Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘Iran nuke deal’

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon by A.F. Branco


A.F. Branco Cartoon – In the Shadows

John Kerry appears to be undermining U.S. foreign policy by going behind Trump’s back and secretly negotiating with Iran. Is he breaking the Logan Act?

John Kerry in IranPolitical cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2018.
See more Legal Insurrection Branco cartoons, click here.

A.F.Branco’s New Coffee Table Book <—- Order Here!

take our poll – story continues below
  • Are you done with Nike after announcing Colin Kaepernick will be featured in their 30th anniversary “Just Do It” marketing campaign?

Donations/Tips accepted and appreciated –  $1.00 – $5.00 – $10 – $100 –  it all helps to fund this website and keep the cartoons coming. – THANK YOU!

A.F. Branco has taken his two greatest passions, (art and politics) and translated them into the cartoons that have been seen all over the country, in various news outlets including “Fox News”, MSNBC, CBS, ABC and “The Washington Post.” He has been recognized by such personalities as James Woods, Sarah Palin, Larry Elder, Lars Larson, and even the great El Rushbo.

Obama Admin Officials Urge European Leaders To Take Action Against US For Nixing Iran Deal


disclaimerReported by 

URL of the original posting site: http://www.americanjournalreview.com/obama-admin-officials-urge-european-leaders-to-take-action-against-us-for-nixing-iran-deal/

President Obama with Secretary of State, John Kerry

 
The efforts of former Obama administration members are becoming more and more beyond the pale as they desperately try to undermine the efforts and present policy of the United States and the Trump administration.what do you mean he canceled the deal

Former Secretary of State John Kerry’s spokesperson admitted that he had secret meetings with the Iranians to try to save the Iran Deal. People screamed ‘Logan Act’ but media barely covered it and no one seems to be taking any action against Kerry.

Now two more Obama administration officials are actually advising European leaders who are upset about the U.S. pulling out of the Iran Deal to boot our ambassadors from their country.

How is this not arguing against the United States? Answer: that’s exactly what it is. It’s arguing and advocating on behalf of Iran and the stated policy of the United States. 

The officials argued in an NY Times op-ed that the countries could expel American diplomats to punish Trump.

From Free Beacon:

“Europe Doesn’t Have to Be Trump’s Doormat,” wrote Steven Simon and Jonathan Stevenson. Simon served as the National Security Council’s senior director for the Middle East and North Africa, while Stevenson served as the regional director for political-military affairs.

“After months of swaggering hesitation, President Trump finally announced the United States’ withdrawal from the nuclear deal with Iran, to which Britain, France, Russia, China, Germany, and the European Union are also parties,” they wrote. “This action tramples on European leaders, who urged Mr. Trump to exercise restraint in the interest of international security and multilateralism.”words-of-a-leftist-propagandist

The two officials urged the European governments to take concrete actions against the United States.

“The European Union could, for instance, announce the withdrawal of member-states’ ambassadors from the United States,” they suggested. “Isn’t this what states do when diplomatic partners breach solemn agreements, expose them to security risks and threaten to wreak havoc on their economies?”

Simon and Stevenson went on to suggest that, depending on how the United States reacted, “European capitals might even follow up with expulsion of American ambassadors.”

Has there been any prior administration in history who has done so much to undermine their successors?

This is unconscionable.

It isn’t just an attempt to undermine the Trump administration but it is undermining the United States and hurting our position with our allies.

And they don’t even make any attempt to hide it, putting it in the NY Times and the media gives them the platform to attack our own policy. And this is in addition to Democrats paying for the fake dossier and spreading the Russia collusion story to harm the administration.

Time to connect all the dots and for everyone to condemn this coordinated Obama team effort.

please likeand share and leave a comment

 

MORE Politically INCORRECT Cartoons for Tuesday May 15, 2018


dems blinders to trumps accomplishmentsdont trust the deallefts war on women hypocrisynever thought I see the dayno longer the door matnothing to live forreturn the medalshredding obamas legacysummit tensionswhat do you mean he canceled the dealwinning in israelplease likeand share and leave a comment

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon by A.F. Branco


His Legacy’s End

Obama has built almost his entire legacy on executive orders (pen and phone) rather than to go through Congress, only to have them rescinded by the next president.
End of Obama’s Legacy CartoonPolitical Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2018.
A.F.Branco Coffee Table Book <—- Order Here!

Donations/Tips accepted and appreciated –  $1.00 – $5.00 – $10 – $100 –  it all helps to fund this website and keep the cartoons coming. – THANK YOU!

A.F. Branco has taken his two greatest passions, (art and politics) and translated them into the cartoons that have been seen all over the country, in various news outlets including “Fox News”, MSNBC, CBS, ABC and “The Washington Post.” He has been recognized by such personalities as James Woods, Sarah Palin, Larry Elder, Lars Larson, and even the great El Rushbo.

 


Trump Dumps Iran Nuke Deal: “The United States Does Not Make Empty Threats”

 

Q: How is Trump different from other Politicians? A: He keeps his promises. Here is yet another example.

Trump hated the Iran Deal.

Why? Because it was all around, a bad deal.

Bad for us.
Bad for the region.
Bad for the world.

Just plain bad. 

Can we all at least agree that a nuclear arms race would be ‘a bad thing’ in the Middle East? Because that’s where the deal as it existed would eventually lead us. Even if Iran could be trusted to comply with every detail of the Obama-era deal, nothing would prevent them from being nearly nuclear-ready on the other end of that 10-year window.

They already have missiles that are capable of being outfitted with and delivering a nuclear payload. For that ‘world’s largest state sponsor of Terror’ that’s not a good development. All of their neighbors would be highly — HIGHLY — motivated to join a nuclear arms race. And who could blame them?

But maybe Kerry and Obama didn’t ‘care too much about that non-proliferation treaty.

A huge opportunity was missed in giving up the enormous leverage America held over Iran during the sanctions. Handing them billions took that pressure off. A much more favorable deal — including better enforcement, and Iran giving up its proxy wars in Yemen and Syria, and funding of terror groups could have been part of the negotiations.

Some other things the treaty didn’t do?

It didn’t allow adequate inspections — including Iran’s military sites. 

It didn’t require Iran to stop funding terror activities by any of its proxies.

It didn’t stop them from building intercontinental ballistic missiles.

Bolton explained that the sanctions, as they existed before the deal, will be signed back into place.

Not surprisingly, Bibi praised this development. 

What does this mean for the other signers? The other member countries — including Iran, France and some others, will remain in the deal. Iran will try to negotiate with remaining members and is claiming it will enrich uranium ‘more than before’ in ‘coming weeks’ if that fails. That flies in the face of their claims that they never ever wanted to develop nukes in the first place.

Roundup of This Weeks Politically INCORRECT Cartoons


Full Investigation into Obama Admin Launched by Congress After Hezbollah Report


Posted by GirlsJustWannaHaveGuns.com | on December 22, 2017

Earlier this week a scandalous report, published by Politico, alleged the Obama administration interfered with a DEA investigation into Hezbollah — called “Project Cassandra” — and ultimately sabotaged the whole project so Obama could pass his Iran Nuclear Deal.

Due to this report congressional leaders are launching an investigation into the Obama administration and their intrusion into Project Cassandra. Several congressional officials confirmed in a report to The Washington Free Beacon that an investigation has started into these allegations.

“Lawmakers will be paying particular attention to whether [National Security Council official Ben Rhodes] or other senior officials accused of misleading Congress and the American public about the Iran deal played a role in thwarting the Hezbollah investigation,” the Free Beacon reports.

The report continued that congressional investigators “are already preparing letters to various U.S. government agencies in order to obtain greater information about the alleged interference.”

House Oversight Committee member and chairman of its National Security Subcommittee, Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-FL), said top Obama administration officials could be implicated: “I’ve long believed that the Obama administration could not have done any more to bend over backwards to appease the Iranian regime, yet news that the Obama administration killed the investigation into a billion-dollar drug ring that lined the terrorist group Hezbollah’s pockets in order to save its coveted Iran deal may very well take the cake. Hezbollah is a brutal terrorist group with American blood on its hands and it would be unconscionable for American policy to deliberately empower such a nefarious group. Congress will be investigating this thoroughly and my National Security subcommittee will be particularly interested in how such a decision came about and whether it was driven by key Iran deal architects such as Ben Rhodes.”

Rep. Peter Roskam (R-IL) isn’t surprised by the report and thought an investigation is necessary to determine what happened: “The report alleging the Obama Administration turned a blind eye and allowed Hezbollah to pump drugs into the United States to fund its terror campaigns in the Middle East is not surprising. Hampering the DEA’s investigation of Hezbollah would be emblematic of the previous administration’s fixation to strike a nuclear accord with Iran at any costs. This blind eye imperiled our efforts to combat Iran and its proxies’ malign behavior and left us with a cash-flush Iran on the warpath across the Middle East with a nuclear program legitimized by the [Iran deal]. Congress needs to investigate this report and do what the Obama Administration refused to do, severely increase pressure on Hezbollah and hold the terrorist group, and its benefactor Iran, accountable for their crimes.”

Should this investigation blow open to the public, it will give direct insight into exactly how the Obama administration placed U.S. national security at risk to pass a bad deal.

Dr. Peter Vincent Pry — executive director of the Task Force on National and Homeland Security and director of the U.S. Nuclear Strategy Forum and served as the chief of staff on the Congressional EMP Commission, the Congressional Strategic Posture Commission, the House Armed Services Committee, and the CIA — gave a statement to the Daily Wire on how the Iran deal is a direct threat to America:

“Project Cassandra” wittingly or not, in ancient Greek is named for “an unheeded prophet of disaster” — an apt description of the anti-drug program against Hezbollah sabotaged by the Obama Administration to protect their Iran nuclear deal, and an even more apt description of the Iran nuclear deal itself. The extraordinary sacrifices made by the Obama Administration for the Iran nuclear deal endangered U.S. homeland security by facilitating Hezbollah’s criminal and terrorist activities against the American people and against U.S. allies. For the Iran nuclear deal, the Obama Administration sacrificed U.S. national security interests by alienating our closest Middle Eastern allies, including Israel and the moderate Middle Eastern states. The Iran nuclear deal itself is among the greatest threats to U.S. national security, promoting the fiction that Iran’s advance toward nuclear weapons has been halted, albeit temporarily. In fact, we know nothing of the kind. The inspection regime for the Iran nuclear deal leaves uninspected Iranian military bases and suspected clandestine facilities — where Iran almost certainly continues building nuclear weapons. Indeed, there is substantial and compelling evidence Iran achieved nuclear weapons capability years before the Iran nuclear deal. Was the Iran nuclear deal really appeasement, a surrender to Iran’s geostrategic and economic interests, so Iran would not disclose the politically humiliating and terrifying fact that, on Obama’s watch, Iran built their Islamic Bomb?

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: