Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘lies’

Today’s Ann Coulter Letter: New Democratic Spin Cycle: Launders Money, Gets Out The Toughest Sleaze!


Commentary by Ann Coulter  | 

The Democrats have two very different profiles. One is their public face of absolute moral purity. They’re just better people than Republicans. That’s what you’re buying when you walk into the Democratic store: pure virtue. They’ve got nothing else on the shelves. No beef jerky, no wiper fluid, no Gatorade. 

The other profile is reality: In the backroom, where the employees eat lunch, the Democrats and their fat-cat donors are committing unspeakably sleazy and immoral acts. Everyone on the left knows this. That’s why, the moment Harvey Weinstein was exposed as a sexual predator, his reflexive response was not to apologize. Accused of the kind of rapes you’d usually need a gang to commit, he put up a virtue shield by attacking the National Rifle Association.

As we recently discovered, first with Weinstein and then with the Hillary campaign paying for the Russian dossier, the left has an all-new trick that exponentially multiplies the Democrats’ sleaze factor. It used to be that Democrats like Bill Clinton would deploy FOBs — Friends of Bill — like James Carville and Sidney Blumenthal to smear his victims. Now, they run their Watergate-style “ratf—ing” through law firms.

Ronan Farrow writes in this week’s New Yorker that Weinstein deployed a raft of spies to befriend and deceive his accusers in order to collect information that could be used against them. A spy with the Israeli private investigations firm Black Cube used a fake name and fake foundation to meet actress Rose McGowan. Then, pretending to be a deeply sympathetic women’s rights advocate, the agent secretly tape-recorded the actress, hoping to get incriminating evidence against her. At a minimum, this is unspeakably repellent and possibly illegal.

And who hired the spies? Not Weinstein! The law firm of David Boies, prominent Democratic attorney.

Using a law firm as a cut-out between the client — an alleged sexual predator — and the people stealthily recording his accusers has one very useful purpose: It places the spy agency’s work behind the protection of attorney-client privilege.

Boies pretends to be steeped in the ethics of his profession, flying to California to argue against the “hate” of Proposition 8 and rushing to Florida after the 2000 election to defend Al Gore’s rightful claim to the presidency.

But now we find out he’s been harassing and intimidating a rape victim on behalf of his client (the rapist) with private eyes who lie about their identity and motives, wasting hours of the victim’s time with false promises of support for her cause — a cause she has taken up precisely because of her alleged rape by the lawyer’s client. Whether or not this violates any bar association ethical canons, it’s certainly despicable.

Two weeks ago, we found out that the law firm cut-out maneuver was the exact same technique used by Hillary’s campaign to obtain damaging information on Donald Trump from the Kremlin — the infamous Russian dossier. The Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee shelled out $12 million seeking incriminating information on Trump from Russian government officials.

Just like Weinstein, the Democrats funneled money for a nefarious purpose through a law firm. To wit: The Democrats paid a law firm (Perkins Coie), which paid a private investigations firm (Fusion GPS), which in turn paid a spy (Christopher Steele), and Steele paid Russian government officials for dirt on Trump.

When the media found out that Donald Trump Jr. had taken a meeting with a friend of a friend, because she claimed to have incriminating information from Russia on Hillary, the word “treason” filled the airwaves.

Hillary’s vice presidential nominee, Sen. Tim Kaine (D- Va.), called Don Jr.’s pointless meeting “potentially treason.”

MSNBC’s favorite former Bush official, lunatic Richard Painter, said anyone who “wanted to help the Russians (disrupt our election process) engaged in treasonous conduct.” Al Sharpton said that the willingness to accept “information to discredit your potential opponent in an American election from Russia — from what is supposed to be an enemy state” — raised the prospect of treason.

If that’streason,” then what is it when the Democrats reach out to the Russians and pass them money for dirt on Hillary’s opponent in a presidential election? Wasn’t that dossier an attempt to discredit her opponent and disrupt the election?

Remember: Don Jr. didn’t seek a meeting with any Russians to get compromising information on Hillary, nor did he receive any. The Russian woman was using the pretense of having dirt on Hillary as a ruse to get a meeting, so that she could lobby Don Jr. on the Magnitsky Act.

Unlike Don Jr., the Democrats didn’t wait to be asked! They paid $12 million, funneled through a law firm, seeking information on Trump from Russian government officials.

But we’re not allowed to mention it because the Clinton campaign and DNC used Weinstein’s money laundering technique.

The attorney-client privilege is intended to ensure that people are completely truthful with their attorneys. It is not supposed to be a shelter for any sordid, and possibly illegal, behavior by liberals. 

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoons


Where’s the Beef

URL of the original posting site: http://comicallyincorrect.com/2017/06/07/hillary-nothing-burger/#LtfoUpZSpfQqgivU.99

In spite of the evidence, Hillary Clinton say’s that all the scandals surrounding her are a big nothing burger.

Political Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2017.

More A.F. Branco cartoons at Constitution.com here.

A.F.Branco Coffee Table Book <—- Order Here!


8 Lies the Media Told This Week about the Comey Story


Reported By Onan Coca |  May 12, 2017

The great John Nolte should be profusely thanked for his constant efforts at unmasking the real progenitors of “fake news” in the mainstream media. This week he has laid bare their lies by focusing his time on one story in particular – the sad saga of former FBI Director James Comey.

Over the last week or so the media has breathlessly reported on every little whisper that has escaped from Washington, D.C. and for the most part – much of what they’ve told us has been wrong. Sadly, this is a common refrain from today’s media who can’t seem to get out of their own way and constantly seem to be tripping over their own failures and falsehoods. It’s almost as if the media has an agenda that they are trying to promote and they are willing to sacrifice their reputation if it means pushing that agenda forward.

In their attempts to use the Comey story to undermine the Trump administration they’ve sacrificed every iota of reputation and been unmasked as the biased hypocrites we’ve always suspected them to be.

But don’t take my word for it – check out the 8 times they got the Comey story wrong in their attempts to hurt Trump this past week.

1. TRUMP FIRED COMEY CUZ COMEY ASKED FOR MORE FUNDS TO EXPAND THE RUSSIAGATE INVESTIGATION!!!!!!!!!

Uh, no. Never happened.

2. DEPUTY ATTORNY GENERAL ROSENSTEIN THREATENED TO QUIT AFTER WHITE HOUSE BLAMED HIM FOR COMEY FIRING!!!!!

Yeah, no. Never happened.

3. THE WHITE HOUSE IS LYING ABOUT BAD MORALE AT THE F.B.I.!!!!

4. TRUMP IS INTERFERING WITH THE F.B.I. INVESTIGATION INTO RUSSIA!!!

Not so much.

5. TRUMP LIED ABOUT COMEY TELLING HIM HE IS NOT UNDER INVESTIGATION!!!!

6. THIS IS THE ‘SATURDAY NIGHT MASSACRE’ ON STEROIDS!!!

7. IT’S A COVER UP!!!

8. THIS IS THE BIGGEST SCANDAL IN YEARS!!!

Nolte does a good job sourcing out the proof that these stories were lies but I’ll add some more background to the last few.

#5 – Nope. We’ve got the word of two leading Senators from opposing parties to back Trump on this one.

#7 – There is nothing to cover up look back at #4, and #5. New acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe explained that the Comey firing will do nothing to slow the Russia investigation.

#8 – Firing a bad FBI Director (that people on both sides of the aisle were saying should have been fired months ago) cannot be more egregious than the Benghazi Scandal, the Fast and Furious scandal, or any of the dozen other major scandals the Obama administration muddled through over the last 8 years. It. Cannot. Be.

The truth of the matter is that there is nothing to see here. There never was, there isn’t now, and there won’t be in the future. President Trump has done nothing wrong when it comes to Russia or Comey and the only reason the Democrats keep harping on this is because they have nothing else to talk about. They have no new ideas. Their old ideas destroyed our economy. Their old leaders are the same as their new leaders and no one in America like them. So, they keep talking about Russia.

And they’ll keep talking about Russia until we force the media to stop talking about Russia.

 

Read the Rest of Nolte’s piece at the Daily Wire.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Onan Coca

Onan is the Editor-in-Chief at Romulus Marketing. He’s also the managing editor at Eaglerising.com, Constitution.com and the managing partner at iPatriot.com. Onan is a graduate of Liberty University (2003) and earned his M.Ed. at Western Governors University in 2012. Onan lives in Atlanta with his wife and their three wonderful children. You can find his writing all over the web.

BREAKING: WIKILEAKS Calls BULLSH*T On Comey’s ‘TESTIMONY’


Posted by CLASHDAILY.COM | Published on March 21, 2017

URL of the original posting site: http://clashdaily.com/2017/03/breaking-wikileaks-calls-bullsht-comeys-testimony/

Hey James, are you ready to put your accuracy record up against Wikileaks?

Comey stood up and said that emails on Republicans were not released during 2016.

rethink-move-son

He’s being called out as a liar. And Wikileaks is offering proof. And whatever you think of Wikileaks’ practices — they’ve not been proven wrong yet.

Comey, on the other hand, has been SPECTACULARLY wrong.

When you follow that link, you’ll see something that looks like this:

screen-shot-2017-03-21-at-11-56-15-am

And if you look WAAAAAY up in the top corner, you’ll see this:

screen-shot-2017-03-21-at-12-01-59-pm

Don’t take our word for it. There’s a lot of fake news out there. Follow the link yourself. Either the one in the tweet, or (if you prefer) this one here. And then decide for yourself which one is fake.

Does anyone know whether someone in Comey’s position is permitted to lie to Congress?

The Question WE would love to get to the bottom of is this: Is Comey that Arrogantly dishonest?  Or is he a superior breed of incompetent?  Or is he actually Corrupt?

DEAR LIBS: While You FAWN Over Hillary’s Abortion BS – Here’s One Big Fact She ‘FORGOT’


waving flagPublished on October 21, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://clashdaily.com/2016/10/dear-libs-fawn-hillarys-abortion-bs-heres-one-big-fact-forgot/

I AM A PERSON with Poem

Hillary is abortion’s biggest cheerleader. She’ll brag about that fact. She did what even most Liberals will shy from doing. She launched into full-throated defense of what we often call ‘partial birth abortion’.

As Christy Lee Parker of Mad World News points out: The logic in the ‘case’ she presented has some … flaws. (Following block quotes are from that original piece.)

“The kinds of cases that fall at the end of pregnancy are often the most heartbreaking, painful decisions for families to make. I have met with women who have, toward the end of their pregnancy, get the worst news one could get that their health is in jeopardy if they continue to carry to term …”

frabz-false-45c2c2

deliver-me

IMAGE ADDED BY WHATDIDYOUSAY.ORG

First, late-term abortions are sometimes referred to as post-viability abortions. That’s important because viability means the fetus is able to live outside the womb. So, at any time after 24 weeks gestation, which is considered the “point of viability,” a baby can be delivered to save the mother while also allowing the child a chance to live. During a late-term abortion, the child is still delivered, only it’s delivered dead rather than alive after the infant has been killed.

As a nurse, I want to be absolutely clear: If a mother’s life is in danger at any time after 24 weeks, let alone in the 9th month, the infant can be delivered via C-section to save the mother. The infant is given a chance at life. It does not need to be killed to save the mother. Never in the 9th month would that ever be a thought for most healthcare professionals. That’s not healthcare. That’s murder. But, there’s more.

absurdities

Image Added by WHATDIDYOUSAY.org

As though that wouldn’t be enough to discount her argument for partial-birth abortion by itself.

In fact, in partial-birth abortions, the baby is delivered breech, which is difficult, painful, and puts the mother’s life at risk. So, when you hear that liberal talking point, where they like to ask, “What if the mother finds out that she could die during childbirth?” it’s important to know that a post-viability abortion isn’t going to prevent birth. In fact, birth is in the name — partial birth abortion. Only a c-section would prevent a vaginal birth, and the child doesn’t have to die for that. The child doesn’t have to die at all, and one look at the steps involved in the late-term abortion procedure clearly indicates this.

Did you catch that? Partial birth abortions are RISKIER than c-sections. Why would anyone choose a riskier procedure that results in a dead fetus rather than a safer one that preserves the lives of both? Isn’t it obvious? The GOAL is not the safety or health of the mother. It’s the ending of a life.

Healthcare

Image added by WHATDIDYOUSAY.org

Besides any of these things, there’s the obvious corollary: You really don’t need special laws allowing abortion if your ‘real’ goal is the SAVING of lives. Do you need special laws governing conjoined twins? If the medical team can save both, they will. If only one life can be preserved, they don’t call it euthanasia, even if one life is forfeit. Because the real goal is MAXIMIZING the number of lives saved. There are no laws preventing the saving of maximum numbers of lives. Nor should there be.

Likewise with abortion. If the real goal is to save the MOST lives possible, you never need a law to protect you. If only one life (the child or the mother) can be saved, you still operate under the principle of doing the Maximum Good. Saving the MOST lives possible. This does not fall under same moral categories as a voluntary cessation of life.

Why isit legal

Image added by WHATDIDYOUSAY.org

If you are voluntarily ending a life (as with partial birth abortion) you are NOT saving the most lives possible. It is, in the truest and darkest sense, executing a choice.

Both choice, and executing are intentionally chosen. They are both present.

If the goal were anything short of deliberate ending of human life, C-section would be the obvious default. But “life” is NOT the goal in view here.

hate God

Image added by WHATDIDYOUSAY.org

So you can stop dressing partial birth abortion up as either ‘hard’ or ‘virtuous’. We see it for what it really is: the deliberate choice of someone’s death.

Today’s BONUS Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


waving flagYes Master!

Friday October 20, 2016

Mainstream Media Propaganda has given it marching orders to the low information voters.

Mainstream Media Propaganda / Political Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2016.

A.F. Branco Coffee Table Book <—- Order Here!

Partyof Deceit Spin and Lies hillary-puppet-master-copy do-not-let-him-copy same-puppet-master-different-puppet-copy emails fire or a liar

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


waving flagDrawn by Michael RamirezMonday, September 12, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://townhall.com/political-cartoons/2016/09/12/144666

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: