Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘lies’

Rep. Ratcliffe DEFLATES Democrat Impeachment Hopes! Lists Off Partisan Whistleblower’s Numerous Errors and Lies (VIDEO)


Posted by 

URL of the original posting site: https://steadfastandloyal.com/politics/rep-ratcliffe-deflates-democrat-impeachment-hopes-lists-off-partisan-whistleblowers-numerous-errors-and-lies-video/

Rep John Ratcliffe went into attack mode today as the House Intelligence Committee, headed by a man with no intelligence but loaded for bear with lies, were to holds hearings on the next round of hoaxes Democrats hope will bring the president down.

He took apart the whistleblower, the committee and the Democrats in general. While RINOs who are NeverTrumpers like Mitt Romney and Ben Sasse attacked the president, it’s nice to know some Republicans fight for the American people.

Rep. Ratcliffe pointed out numerous errors, conjecture and lies in the whistleblower report on President Trump’s July conversation with President Zelensky from Ukraine.

Rep. Ratcliffe:  Chairman Schiff wrote a letter on September 13th accusing you of being part of an “unlawful coverup” and then the Speaker of the House took it one step further. She went on national TV and said not once but twice that you broke the law… You were publicly accused of committing a crime and you were also falsely accused of committing a crime. You were required as you noted to follow the opinion of the Justice Department, 11 page report, on whether or not you were required to report the whistleblower complaint. Correct?… So you were publicly accused and you were wrongly accused and yet here today I have not heard an apology. Welcome to the House of Representatives with Democrats in charge… The whistleblower is in fact wrong in numerous respect… The Democrats are intent on impeaching President Trump for lawful conduct… The whistleblower then goes on to say, ‘I was not a direct witness to the events described’ … In other words, all of this is secondhand information. None of it is firsthand information. The sources the whistleblower bases his complaints on include the Washington Post, The New York Times, Politico, The Hill, Bloomberg, ABC News and others. In other words, much like the Steel Dossier the allegations in whistleblower’s complaints are based on third-hand mainstream media sources, rather than first hand information

Rep. Ratcliffe DESTROYED the liberal hack and whistleblower.
It was an incredible drubbing of this latest Democrat clown show.

Nunes Says Downer Lied About Launch of Trump Investigation – Here’s What REALLY Happened



URL of the original posting site: https://steadfastandloyal.com/unreal/nunes-says-downer-lied-about-launch-of-trump-investigation-heres-what-really-happened/

According to the FBI and DOJ as well as Downer, the investigation began July 31st, 2017, but evidence in the public record shows it began no later than April of 2016, meaning that Papadopoulos could not have possibly been the reason for opening the investigation. Seems like the Deep State has a whole lot of lying going on. Their problem is no one tried to cover their tracks because no one believed Trump could win.

Here is a part of that interview:

Rep. Devin Nunes: We know that the counterintelligence investigation was opened in July. Well, that’s fine so if that’s all the information you have then why are there all of these strange activities leading up to late July, particularly in the spring?

Maria Bartiromo: I’m trying to understand this because you broke the news on this program more than a month ago that you’ve looked for reasons and catalysts to understand how an investigation was opened and launched into the Trump campaign. And you said to us, based on the Five Eyes Intelligence of all of our partners across the world, that there was NO intelligence that you could find that launched that investigation… 

Rep. Devin Nunes: … There’s new information this week that the media is ignoring. So The New York Times has reported in the past that the Australian ambassador, the Australian High Commissioner, is the one that brought this to the attention of the United States government. Now typically that would have gone through FBI channels, it would have gone through the embassy in London, it would have come across officially. It would have come across the pond officially. And it didn’t. And that’s what we would like to have seen. Now, this week we now know that Mr. Downer, the former Australian ambassador, high commissioner in London, said that he had given the information to the Australian ambassador in the US. Well, now we know that that’s not true. So, Mr. Downer now has claimed that in an Australian newspaper. But we now know from sources that have now spoken to different media outlets that the Australians are denying that that’s how this happened. The Australian ambassador in the United States had nothing to do with this…

Now that we know everyone is lying about the start of the investigation, we need tp start impeaching every member of the Deep State that is blocking or selectively redacting the information that is reaching congressional investigators. Once we have the truth, we can sic the federal prosecutors on them and get them off the street.

please likeand share and leave a comment

Developing: FBI Report Shows HUGE Discrepancy Between McCabe’s and Comey’s Testimonies


|

An internal FBI document shows that the testimony given by Andrew McCabe about leaking to the Washington Post is diametrically opposed to testimony given by James Comey.

It’s a safe bet that one of them is lying. If it turns out to be McCabe, which is likely, he doesn’t need to worry about his pension as much as he should be worrying about prison. McCabe had testified that he had told Comey about the release but when Comey was questioned, he denied that McCabe ever told him about it.

CNN reported:

Former FBI Director James Comey told internal investigators at the Justice Department that he could not recall McCabe telling him about having authorized FBI officials to talk to a reporter about an ongoing investigation, the sources said. 

Comey’s comments to the Justice Department’s inspector general’s office, which were later included as part of the FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility report on McCabe that prompted his firing earlier this month, put him at odds with the statements McCabe has made about authorizing FBI officials to provide information to the Wall Street Journal in an October 2016 story about FBI and Justice Department tensions over an ongoing investigation into the Clinton Foundation.

McCabe has publicly maintained that he was in a position to authorize the other FBI officials speaking with the reporter and that Comey was aware McCabe had done it.

McCabe and his lawyer both argue that they didn’t lie to Comey and that Comey’s memory just wasn’t that good. But Jim Jordan blasted that by pointing out that McCabe lied four times about not authorizing the leak:

JORDAN: “McCabe didn’t lie just once, he lied four times. He lied to James Comey. He lied to the Office of Professional Responsibility and he lied twice under oath to the Inspector General.” 

“Remember, this is Andrew McCabe, Deputy Director of the FBI. This is Andrew McCabe, the text messages between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page talking about Andy’s office, the meeting where they talk about the insurance policy in case Donald Trump is actually President of the United States… Four times he lied about leaking information to the Wall Street Journal.”

Lock him up!


Today’s Ann Coulter Letter: New Democratic Spin Cycle: Launders Money, Gets Out The Toughest Sleaze!


Commentary by Ann Coulter  | 

The Democrats have two very different profiles. One is their public face of absolute moral purity. They’re just better people than Republicans. That’s what you’re buying when you walk into the Democratic store: pure virtue. They’ve got nothing else on the shelves. No beef jerky, no wiper fluid, no Gatorade. 

The other profile is reality: In the backroom, where the employees eat lunch, the Democrats and their fat-cat donors are committing unspeakably sleazy and immoral acts. Everyone on the left knows this. That’s why, the moment Harvey Weinstein was exposed as a sexual predator, his reflexive response was not to apologize. Accused of the kind of rapes you’d usually need a gang to commit, he put up a virtue shield by attacking the National Rifle Association.

As we recently discovered, first with Weinstein and then with the Hillary campaign paying for the Russian dossier, the left has an all-new trick that exponentially multiplies the Democrats’ sleaze factor. It used to be that Democrats like Bill Clinton would deploy FOBs — Friends of Bill — like James Carville and Sidney Blumenthal to smear his victims. Now, they run their Watergate-style “ratf—ing” through law firms.

Ronan Farrow writes in this week’s New Yorker that Weinstein deployed a raft of spies to befriend and deceive his accusers in order to collect information that could be used against them. A spy with the Israeli private investigations firm Black Cube used a fake name and fake foundation to meet actress Rose McGowan. Then, pretending to be a deeply sympathetic women’s rights advocate, the agent secretly tape-recorded the actress, hoping to get incriminating evidence against her. At a minimum, this is unspeakably repellent and possibly illegal.

And who hired the spies? Not Weinstein! The law firm of David Boies, prominent Democratic attorney.

Using a law firm as a cut-out between the client — an alleged sexual predator — and the people stealthily recording his accusers has one very useful purpose: It places the spy agency’s work behind the protection of attorney-client privilege.

Boies pretends to be steeped in the ethics of his profession, flying to California to argue against the “hate” of Proposition 8 and rushing to Florida after the 2000 election to defend Al Gore’s rightful claim to the presidency.

But now we find out he’s been harassing and intimidating a rape victim on behalf of his client (the rapist) with private eyes who lie about their identity and motives, wasting hours of the victim’s time with false promises of support for her cause — a cause she has taken up precisely because of her alleged rape by the lawyer’s client. Whether or not this violates any bar association ethical canons, it’s certainly despicable.

Two weeks ago, we found out that the law firm cut-out maneuver was the exact same technique used by Hillary’s campaign to obtain damaging information on Donald Trump from the Kremlin — the infamous Russian dossier. The Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee shelled out $12 million seeking incriminating information on Trump from Russian government officials.

Just like Weinstein, the Democrats funneled money for a nefarious purpose through a law firm. To wit: The Democrats paid a law firm (Perkins Coie), which paid a private investigations firm (Fusion GPS), which in turn paid a spy (Christopher Steele), and Steele paid Russian government officials for dirt on Trump.

When the media found out that Donald Trump Jr. had taken a meeting with a friend of a friend, because she claimed to have incriminating information from Russia on Hillary, the word “treason” filled the airwaves.

Hillary’s vice presidential nominee, Sen. Tim Kaine (D- Va.), called Don Jr.’s pointless meeting “potentially treason.”

MSNBC’s favorite former Bush official, lunatic Richard Painter, said anyone who “wanted to help the Russians (disrupt our election process) engaged in treasonous conduct.” Al Sharpton said that the willingness to accept “information to discredit your potential opponent in an American election from Russia — from what is supposed to be an enemy state” — raised the prospect of treason.

If that’streason,” then what is it when the Democrats reach out to the Russians and pass them money for dirt on Hillary’s opponent in a presidential election? Wasn’t that dossier an attempt to discredit her opponent and disrupt the election?

Remember: Don Jr. didn’t seek a meeting with any Russians to get compromising information on Hillary, nor did he receive any. The Russian woman was using the pretense of having dirt on Hillary as a ruse to get a meeting, so that she could lobby Don Jr. on the Magnitsky Act.

Unlike Don Jr., the Democrats didn’t wait to be asked! They paid $12 million, funneled through a law firm, seeking information on Trump from Russian government officials.

But we’re not allowed to mention it because the Clinton campaign and DNC used Weinstein’s money laundering technique.

The attorney-client privilege is intended to ensure that people are completely truthful with their attorneys. It is not supposed to be a shelter for any sordid, and possibly illegal, behavior by liberals. 

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoons


Where’s the Beef

URL of the original posting site: http://comicallyincorrect.com/2017/06/07/hillary-nothing-burger/#LtfoUpZSpfQqgivU.99

In spite of the evidence, Hillary Clinton say’s that all the scandals surrounding her are a big nothing burger.

Political Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2017.

More A.F. Branco cartoons at Constitution.com here.

A.F.Branco Coffee Table Book <—- Order Here!


8 Lies the Media Told This Week about the Comey Story


Reported By Onan Coca |  May 12, 2017

The great John Nolte should be profusely thanked for his constant efforts at unmasking the real progenitors of “fake news” in the mainstream media. This week he has laid bare their lies by focusing his time on one story in particular – the sad saga of former FBI Director James Comey.

Over the last week or so the media has breathlessly reported on every little whisper that has escaped from Washington, D.C. and for the most part – much of what they’ve told us has been wrong. Sadly, this is a common refrain from today’s media who can’t seem to get out of their own way and constantly seem to be tripping over their own failures and falsehoods. It’s almost as if the media has an agenda that they are trying to promote and they are willing to sacrifice their reputation if it means pushing that agenda forward.

In their attempts to use the Comey story to undermine the Trump administration they’ve sacrificed every iota of reputation and been unmasked as the biased hypocrites we’ve always suspected them to be.

But don’t take my word for it – check out the 8 times they got the Comey story wrong in their attempts to hurt Trump this past week.

1. TRUMP FIRED COMEY CUZ COMEY ASKED FOR MORE FUNDS TO EXPAND THE RUSSIAGATE INVESTIGATION!!!!!!!!!

Uh, no. Never happened.

2. DEPUTY ATTORNY GENERAL ROSENSTEIN THREATENED TO QUIT AFTER WHITE HOUSE BLAMED HIM FOR COMEY FIRING!!!!!

Yeah, no. Never happened.

3. THE WHITE HOUSE IS LYING ABOUT BAD MORALE AT THE F.B.I.!!!!

4. TRUMP IS INTERFERING WITH THE F.B.I. INVESTIGATION INTO RUSSIA!!!

Not so much.

5. TRUMP LIED ABOUT COMEY TELLING HIM HE IS NOT UNDER INVESTIGATION!!!!

6. THIS IS THE ‘SATURDAY NIGHT MASSACRE’ ON STEROIDS!!!

7. IT’S A COVER UP!!!

8. THIS IS THE BIGGEST SCANDAL IN YEARS!!!

Nolte does a good job sourcing out the proof that these stories were lies but I’ll add some more background to the last few.

#5 – Nope. We’ve got the word of two leading Senators from opposing parties to back Trump on this one.

#7 – There is nothing to cover up look back at #4, and #5. New acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe explained that the Comey firing will do nothing to slow the Russia investigation.

#8 – Firing a bad FBI Director (that people on both sides of the aisle were saying should have been fired months ago) cannot be more egregious than the Benghazi Scandal, the Fast and Furious scandal, or any of the dozen other major scandals the Obama administration muddled through over the last 8 years. It. Cannot. Be.

The truth of the matter is that there is nothing to see here. There never was, there isn’t now, and there won’t be in the future. President Trump has done nothing wrong when it comes to Russia or Comey and the only reason the Democrats keep harping on this is because they have nothing else to talk about. They have no new ideas. Their old ideas destroyed our economy. Their old leaders are the same as their new leaders and no one in America like them. So, they keep talking about Russia.

And they’ll keep talking about Russia until we force the media to stop talking about Russia.

 

Read the Rest of Nolte’s piece at the Daily Wire.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Onan Coca

Onan is the Editor-in-Chief at Romulus Marketing. He’s also the managing editor at Eaglerising.com, Constitution.com and the managing partner at iPatriot.com. Onan is a graduate of Liberty University (2003) and earned his M.Ed. at Western Governors University in 2012. Onan lives in Atlanta with his wife and their three wonderful children. You can find his writing all over the web.

BREAKING: WIKILEAKS Calls BULLSH*T On Comey’s ‘TESTIMONY’


Posted by CLASHDAILY.COM | Published on March 21, 2017

URL of the original posting site: http://clashdaily.com/2017/03/breaking-wikileaks-calls-bullsht-comeys-testimony/

Hey James, are you ready to put your accuracy record up against Wikileaks?

Comey stood up and said that emails on Republicans were not released during 2016.

rethink-move-son

He’s being called out as a liar. And Wikileaks is offering proof. And whatever you think of Wikileaks’ practices — they’ve not been proven wrong yet.

Comey, on the other hand, has been SPECTACULARLY wrong.

When you follow that link, you’ll see something that looks like this:

screen-shot-2017-03-21-at-11-56-15-am

And if you look WAAAAAY up in the top corner, you’ll see this:

screen-shot-2017-03-21-at-12-01-59-pm

Don’t take our word for it. There’s a lot of fake news out there. Follow the link yourself. Either the one in the tweet, or (if you prefer) this one here. And then decide for yourself which one is fake.

Does anyone know whether someone in Comey’s position is permitted to lie to Congress?

The Question WE would love to get to the bottom of is this: Is Comey that Arrogantly dishonest?  Or is he a superior breed of incompetent?  Or is he actually Corrupt?

DEAR LIBS: While You FAWN Over Hillary’s Abortion BS – Here’s One Big Fact She ‘FORGOT’


waving flagPublished on October 21, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://clashdaily.com/2016/10/dear-libs-fawn-hillarys-abortion-bs-heres-one-big-fact-forgot/

I AM A PERSON with Poem

Hillary is abortion’s biggest cheerleader. She’ll brag about that fact. She did what even most Liberals will shy from doing. She launched into full-throated defense of what we often call ‘partial birth abortion’.

As Christy Lee Parker of Mad World News points out: The logic in the ‘case’ she presented has some … flaws. (Following block quotes are from that original piece.)

“The kinds of cases that fall at the end of pregnancy are often the most heartbreaking, painful decisions for families to make. I have met with women who have, toward the end of their pregnancy, get the worst news one could get that their health is in jeopardy if they continue to carry to term …”

frabz-false-45c2c2

deliver-me

IMAGE ADDED BY WHATDIDYOUSAY.ORG

First, late-term abortions are sometimes referred to as post-viability abortions. That’s important because viability means the fetus is able to live outside the womb. So, at any time after 24 weeks gestation, which is considered the “point of viability,” a baby can be delivered to save the mother while also allowing the child a chance to live. During a late-term abortion, the child is still delivered, only it’s delivered dead rather than alive after the infant has been killed.

As a nurse, I want to be absolutely clear: If a mother’s life is in danger at any time after 24 weeks, let alone in the 9th month, the infant can be delivered via C-section to save the mother. The infant is given a chance at life. It does not need to be killed to save the mother. Never in the 9th month would that ever be a thought for most healthcare professionals. That’s not healthcare. That’s murder. But, there’s more.

absurdities

Image Added by WHATDIDYOUSAY.org

As though that wouldn’t be enough to discount her argument for partial-birth abortion by itself.

In fact, in partial-birth abortions, the baby is delivered breech, which is difficult, painful, and puts the mother’s life at risk. So, when you hear that liberal talking point, where they like to ask, “What if the mother finds out that she could die during childbirth?” it’s important to know that a post-viability abortion isn’t going to prevent birth. In fact, birth is in the name — partial birth abortion. Only a c-section would prevent a vaginal birth, and the child doesn’t have to die for that. The child doesn’t have to die at all, and one look at the steps involved in the late-term abortion procedure clearly indicates this.

Did you catch that? Partial birth abortions are RISKIER than c-sections. Why would anyone choose a riskier procedure that results in a dead fetus rather than a safer one that preserves the lives of both? Isn’t it obvious? The GOAL is not the safety or health of the mother. It’s the ending of a life.

Healthcare

Image added by WHATDIDYOUSAY.org

Besides any of these things, there’s the obvious corollary: You really don’t need special laws allowing abortion if your ‘real’ goal is the SAVING of lives. Do you need special laws governing conjoined twins? If the medical team can save both, they will. If only one life can be preserved, they don’t call it euthanasia, even if one life is forfeit. Because the real goal is MAXIMIZING the number of lives saved. There are no laws preventing the saving of maximum numbers of lives. Nor should there be.

Likewise with abortion. If the real goal is to save the MOST lives possible, you never need a law to protect you. If only one life (the child or the mother) can be saved, you still operate under the principle of doing the Maximum Good. Saving the MOST lives possible. This does not fall under same moral categories as a voluntary cessation of life.

Why isit legal

Image added by WHATDIDYOUSAY.org

If you are voluntarily ending a life (as with partial birth abortion) you are NOT saving the most lives possible. It is, in the truest and darkest sense, executing a choice.

Both choice, and executing are intentionally chosen. They are both present.

If the goal were anything short of deliberate ending of human life, C-section would be the obvious default. But “life” is NOT the goal in view here.

hate God

Image added by WHATDIDYOUSAY.org

So you can stop dressing partial birth abortion up as either ‘hard’ or ‘virtuous’. We see it for what it really is: the deliberate choice of someone’s death.

Today’s BONUS Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


waving flagYes Master!

Friday October 20, 2016

Mainstream Media Propaganda has given it marching orders to the low information voters.

Mainstream Media Propaganda / Political Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2016.

A.F. Branco Coffee Table Book <—- Order Here!

Partyof Deceit Spin and Lies hillary-puppet-master-copy do-not-let-him-copy same-puppet-master-different-puppet-copy emails fire or a liar

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


waving flagDrawn by Michael RamirezMonday, September 12, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://townhall.com/political-cartoons/2016/09/12/144666

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


waving flagDrawn by Michael RamirezTuesday, September 13, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://townhall.com/political-cartoons/michaelramirez

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

or a liar

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


Hillary – Warts and All

Friday September 2, 2016

Warts and all – Hillary keeps on Lying About Lying. Some say she can’t help herself, it’s pathological.

Hillary Lies About Lying / Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2016.

A.F. Branco Coffee Table Book <—- Order Here!

or a liar

More Political INCORRECTNESS from Michael Ramirez


Drawn by Michael RamirezWednesday, August 10, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://townhall.com/political-cartoons/2016/08/10/143770

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

I am NOT a crook Never-Hillary-Egl-sm fight Picture1 true battle In God We Trust freedom combo 2

DEAR CNN: Did YOU Forget Hillary Called A Gold Star Mom A LIAR?


waving flagPublished on August 1, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://clashdaily.com/2016/08/dear-cnn-forget-hillary-called-gold-star-mom-liar/

Ok. I understand now: When a CLINTON does it, it’s perfectly fine.

Trump vs. Khan. The media is abuzz about how (insert nasty adjective here) Donald Trump is for taking issue with the Khan family’s challenge of his character.

The usual talking heads cried foul. How dare anyone answer back to someone after they’ve been presented with a folded flag.

Can anyone tell us where these same talking heads were when Hillary called Gold Star parents liars? Why the double-standard?

Right. Wikileaks showed us why they didn’t? The DNC signs off on their stories before they go to print. Here’s a recap of what they neglected to share:

hillaryfox

lying so longWhen a Gold Star mother stands in public and says “I blame Hillary Clinton personally for the death of my son,” that’s a strong statement.

How did she respond? Hillary is on record in an interview with Chris Wallace. “I don’t hold any ill feeling for someone who in that moment may not fully recall everything that was or wasn’t said.”

Who in that moment may not fully recall?? Really?

Matt Vespa quipped: Oh, so Smith is not only wrong — her grief may have induced some amnesia? Vespa also linked to this handy flashback:

obamahillary

Partyof Deceit Spin and Lies fight Picture1 true battle In God We Trust freedom combo 2

6 Claims Hillary Made About Her Emails are FACT CHECKED–And Guess What…


waving flagPosted on July 6, 2016

Screen Shot 2016-07-06 at 9.47.49 AM

Hillary’s main claims about the email scandal have been proven as lies. Read below and find out just exactly how she lied.

Key assertions by Hillary Clinton in defense of her email practices have collapsed under FBI scrutiny, as Associated Press fact check has found.

A look at Clinton’s claims since questions about her email practices as secretary of state surfaced and how they compare with facts established in the FBI probe:

CLASSIFIED MATERIAL ON EMAIL

CLINTON: ‘I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified material.’ News conference, March 2015.

THE FACTS: Actually, the FBI identified at least 113 emails that passed through Clinton’s server and contained materials that were classified at the time they were sent, including some that were Top Secret and referred to a highly classified special access program, Comey said.

Most of those emails — 110 of them — were included among 30,000 emails that Clinton returned to the State Department around the time her use of a private email server was discovered. The three others were recovered from a forensic analysis of Clinton’s server. ‘Any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position or in the position of those with whom she was corresponding about the matters should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation,’ Comey said. Clinton and her aides ‘were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information,’ he said.

CLASSIFIED MARKINGS 

CLINTON: ‘I never received nor sent any material that was marked classified.’ NBC interview, July 2016.

THE FACTS: Clinton has separately clung to her rationale that there were no classification markings on her emails that would have warned her and others not to transmit the sensitive material. But the private system did, in fact, handle emails that bore markings indicating they contained classified information, Comey said.

He said the marked emails were ‘a very small number.’ But that’s not the only standard for judging how officials handle sensitive material, he added. ‘Even if information is not marked classified in an email, participants who know, or should know, that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.’

‘I PROVIDED ALL MY EMAILS THAT COULD POSSIBLY BE WORK RELATED’ 

CLINTON: ‘I responded right away and provided all my emails that could possibly be work related’ to the State Department. News conference, March 2015.

THE FACTS: Not so, the FBI found.

Comey said that when his forensic team examined Clinton’s server it found there were ‘several thousand work-related emails that were not in the group of 30,000’ that had been returned by Clinton to the State Department.

‘I THOUGHT IT WOULD BE EASIER TO CARRY JUST ONE DEVICE’

CLINTON: ‘I thought it would be easier to carry just one device for my work and for personal emails instead of two.’ News conference, March 2015.

THE FACTS: This reasoning for using private email both for public business and private correspondence didn’t hold up in the investigation. Clinton ‘used numerous mobile devices to view and send email’ using her personal account, Comey said. He also said Clinton had used different servers.

‘THERE WERE NO SECURITY BREACHES’ 

CLINTON: ‘It was on property guarded by the Secret Service, and there were no security breaches. … The use of that server, which started with my husband, certainly proved to be effective and secure.’ News conference, March 2015.

CLINTON campaign website: ‘There is no evidence there was ever a breach.’

THE FACTS: The campaign website claimed ‘no evidence’ of a breach, a less categorical statement than Clinton herself made last year, when she said there was no breach. The FBI did not uncover a breach but made clear that that possibility cannot be ruled out.

‘We assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal email account,’ Comey said.

He said evidence would be hard to find because hackers are sophisticated and can cover their tracks. Comey said his investigators learned that Clinton’s security lapses included using ‘her personal email extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related emails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries.’ Comey also noted that hackers breached the email accounts of several outsiders who messaged with Clinton.

Comey did not mention names, but a Romanian hacker who called himself Guccifer accessed and later leaked emails from Sidney Blumenthal, an outside adviser to Clinton who regularly communicated with her.lying so long

fight Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


waving flagDoggone Truth

cannot remember lying so long Hillary tryant In Review Die true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

From My Email INBOX


 

waving flagDereliction of Duty

Date: March 15, 2016 at 9:28:54 AM PDT

Colonel Phil “Hands” Handley is credited with the highest speed air-to-air gun kill in the history of aerial  combat. He flew operationally for all but 11 months of a 26-year career, in aircraft such as the F-86 Sabre, F-15 Eagle, and the C-130A Hercules.

Additionally, he flew 275 combat missions during two tours in Southeast Asia in the F- 4D and F-4E. His awards include 21 Air Medals, 3 Distinguished Flying Crosses, and the Silver Star.

Here is what Col. Handley wrote in response to Panetta and Dempsey’s claims there was no time to send help to Benghazi.Benghazi Remebrence

——————————

Betrayal in Benghazi    Phil “Hands” Handley Colonel, USAF (Ret.)

The combat code of the US Military is that we don’t abandon our dead or wounded on the battlefield. In US Air Force lingo, fighter pilots don’t run off and leave their wingmen. If one of our own is shot down, still alive and not yet in enemy captivity, we will either come to get him or die trying.

Among America’s fighting forces, the calm, sure knowledge that such an irrevocable bond exists is priceless. Along with individual faith and personal grit, it is a sacred trust that has often sustained hope in the face of terribly long odds.

The disgraceful abandonment of our Ambassador and those brave ex-SEALs who fought to their deaths to save others in that compound is nothing short of dereliction-of-duty.

Additionally, the patently absurd cover-up scenario that was fabricated in the aftermath was an outright lie in an attempt to shield the President and the Secretary of State from responsibility.

It has been over three years since the attack on our compound in Benghazi. The White House strategy, with the aid of a “lap dog” press has been to run out the clock before the truth is forthcoming.

The testimonies of the three “whistle blowers” have reopened the subject and hopefully will lead to exposure and disgrace of those responsible for this embarrassing debacle. It would appear that the most recent firewall which the Administration is counting on is the contention “that there were simply no military assets that could be  brought to bear in time to make a difference” mainly due to the unavailability of tanker support for fighter aircraft.

This is simply BS, regardless how many supposed “experts” the Administration trot out to make such an assertion.

The bottom line is that even if the closest asset capable of response was half-way around the world, you don’t just sit on your penguin ass and do nothing.

The fact is that the closest asset was not half-way around the world, but as near as Aviano Air Base, Italy where two squadrons of F-16Cs are based.

Consider the following scenario (all times Benghazi local): When Hicks in Tripoli receives a call at 9:40 PM from Ambassador Stevens informing him ”Greg, we are under attack!” (his last words), Hicks immediately notifies all agencies and prepares for the immediate initiation of an existing ”Emergency Response Plan.”

At AFRICON, General Carter Ham attempts to mount a rescue effort, but  is told to “stand down”. By 10:30 PM an unarmed drone is overhead the compound and streaming live feed to various “Command and Control Agencies” so everyone watching that feed knew damn well what was going on.

At 11:30 PM Doherty and five others leave Tripoli, arriving in Benghazi at 1:30 AM on Wednesday morning, where they hold off the attacking mob from the roof of the compound until they are killed by a direct mortar hit at 4:00 AM.

So nothing could have been done, eh? Nonsense. If one assumes that tanker support really “was not available” what about this: When at 10:00 PM AFRICON alerts the 31st TFW Command Post in Aviano Air Base, Italy of the attack, the Wing Commander orders preparation for the launch of two F-16s and advises the Command Post at NAS Sigonella to prepare for hot pit refueling and quick turn of the jets.

By 11:30 PM, two F-16Cs with drop tanks and each armed with five hundred 20 MM rounds are airborne. Flying at 0.92 mach they will cover the 522 nautical miles directly to NAS Sigonella in 1.08 hours. While in-route, the flight lead is informed of the tactical situation, rules of engagement, and radio frequencies to use.

The jets depart Sigonella at 1:10 AM with full fuel load and cover the 377 nautical miles directly to Benghazi in 0.8 hours, arriving at 1:50 AM which would be 20 minutes after the arrival of Woods, Doherty and their team.

Providing that the two F-16s initial pass over the mob, in full afterburner at 200 feet and 550 knots did not stop the attack in its tracks, a few well-placed strafing runs on targets of opportunity would assuredly do the trick.

Were the F-16s fuel state insufficient to return to Sigonelli after jettisoning their external drop tanks, they could easily do so at Tripoli International Airport, only one-half hour away.

As for those hand-wringing naysayers who would worry about IFR  clearances, border crossing authority, collateral damage, landing rights, political correctness and dozens of other reasons not to act — screw them. It is time our “leadership” get its priorities straight and put America’s interests first.

The end result would be that Woods and Doherty would be alive. Dozens in the attacking rabble would be rendezvousing with “72 virgins” and a clear message would have been sent to the next worthless POS terrorist contemplating an attack on Americans that it is not really a good idea to “tug” on Superman’s cape.

Of course, all this depends upon a Commander In Chief more concerned with saving the lives of those he put in harm’s way than getting his crew rested for a campaign fund raising event in Las Vegas the next day. It also depends upon a Secretary of State who actually understood “What difference did it make?”, and a Secretary of Defense who was watching the feed from the drone and understood what the attack consisted of instead of making an immediate response that “One of the military tenants is that you don’t commit assets until you fully understand the tactical situation.”

Ultimately it comes down to the question of who gave that order to stand down? Whoever that coward turns out to be should be exposed, removed from office, and face criminal charges for dereliction of duty. The combat forces of the United States of America deserve leadership that really does “have their back” when the chips are down.

Heart Die true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

 

LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Report


waving flagWednesday, February 17, 2016

For pro-life news updated throughout the day, visit LifeNews.com.

Heartbreaking Ultrasound Shows Dying Twin Baby Holding His Sister’s Hand
Kansas family Ian and Brittani McIntire were heartbroken when doctors told them that one of their unborn twins probably will die before he is born. Baby Mason McIntire has a hole in his heart and an abnormal brain.

Clinton Demands GOP OK Obama SCOTUS Nominee: “He’s President Whether They Like It Or Not”
At a Democratic party fundraiser in Colorado, pro-abortion presidential candidate Hillary Clinton demanded that Republicans approve whichever nominee President Barack Obama makes to replace pro-life Justice Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court. She said republicans should stop threatening not to vote on a nominee because Obama is the president, “whether they like it or not.”

Click to Read at LifeNews.com: http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/17/clinton-demands-gop-ok-obama-scotus-nominee-hes-president-whether-they-like-it-or-not/

Ted Cruz Video: As President I Will Do Everything Possible to End Abortion
Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz is one of the pro-life candidates seeking the GOP nod to take on pro-abortion Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders. Cruz has a long pro-life track record in office and it’s one he says in a new video he will continue as president.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com: http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/17/ted-cruz-video-as-president-i-will-do-everything-possible-to-end-abortion/

Donald Trump Responds to Ted Cruz Abortion Ad: “I Am Pro-Life, Cruz is Totally Lying About Me”
 Donald Trump has issued a short response to pro-life Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz. Trump says Cruz’s recent television ad saying Trump “can’t be trusted” on abortion issues is off base. Trump says he is pro-life and has been for a long time.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com: http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/17/donald-trump-responds-to-ted-cruz-abortion-ad-i-am-pro-life-cruz-is-totally-lying-about-me/

Joy Behar: “Racist” Senate Won’t Confirm Scalia Replacement Because of Obama’s “Color”
 President Barack Obama has less than a year left as commander in chief, but that isn’t keeping talk show hosts from making his race an issue – even now. On Tuesday, Whoopi Goldberg slammed her co-host Joy Behar while The View ladies discussed conspiracy theories surrounding Justice Antonin Scalia’s recent death.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com: http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/17/joy-behar-racist-senate-wont-confirm-scalia-replacement-because-of-obamas-color/

Liberal Media Pushes Pro-Abortion Former Justice Sandra Day O’Connor as Consensus Nominee
 With a massive fight brewing over a Supreme Court nomination between pro-abortion President Barack Obama and pro-life Republicans int he Senate, the liberal media is attempting to push a consensus nominee — but one pro-life advocates will find objectionable. Media outlets are suggesting pro-abortion former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com: http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/17/liberal-media-push-pro-abortion-former-justice-sandra-day-oconnor-as-consensus-nominee/

Abortion Activist Has “No Regrets” Aborting Her Baby: I Don’t Give “Much Thought” to It
 Many women report intense guilt years after experiencing an abortion, but administrative law judge Amy Oppenheimer writes in the Huffington Post of being grateful. Oppenheimer became pregnant at 21 years old in 1973, the same year the U.S. Supreme Court legalized abortion.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com: http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/17/abortion-activist-has-no-regrets-aborting-her-baby-i-dont-give-much-thought-to-it/

One of the Biggest Abortion Clinics in Louisiana May Have Closed Its Doors for Good
At LfieNews.com we reported on all sorts of stories that affect the pro-life community, but few provide us with the kind of elation we get when we can report that an abortion business has closed its doors — even if only temporarily. Not only do women and unborn children benefit, but fathers, families and the community do as well.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com: http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/17/one-of-the-biggest-abortion-clinics-in-louisiana-may-have-closed-its-doors-for-good/

West Virginia Senate Bans Dismemberment Abortions Tearing Babies Limb From Limb
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/17/west-virginia-senate-bans-dismemberment-abortions-tearing-babies-limb-from-limb/

This University Was Caught Using Eyeballs of Babies Aborted at 24 Weeks in Research
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/17/this-university-was-caught-using-eyeballs-of-babies-aborted-at-24-weeks-in-research/

How to Kill Your Baby? Web Site Offers “20 Tips for Your First Abortion”
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/17/how-to-kill-your-baby-web-site-offers-20-tips-for-your-first-abortion/

Doctor Told Woman Her Baby Died and Gave Her an Abortion Pill, Later Her Baby is Found Healthy
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/17/doctor-told-woman-her-baby-died-and-gave-her-an-abortion-pill-later-her-baby-is-found-healthy/

Abortion Activists Have Made Women With Zika Virus Scared to Give Birth to a Disabled Baby
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/17/abortion-activists-have-made-women-with-zika-virus-scared-to-give-birth-to-a-disabled-baby/

Why Do Unborn Children Matter? Just Because They Are
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/17/why-do-unborn-children-matter-just-because-they-are/

Chinese Hospital May Have Killed Tens of Thousands to To Sell Their Organs for Profit
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/17/chinese-hospital-may-have-killed-tens-of-thousands-to-to-sell-their-organs-for-profit/

Michigan Abortionist With Violent Criminal History and Addiction Arrested Again
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/17/michigan-abortionist-with-violent-criminal-history-and-addiction-arrested-again/

Ohio Senate Candidate Ted Strickland Will Only Vote for a Pro-Abortion SCOTUS Nominee
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/17/ohio-senate-candidate-ted-strickland-will-only-vote-for-a-pro-abortion-scotus-nominee/

Daily Pro-Life News Report
Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.

Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright 2003-2015 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.

I AM A PERSON with Poem In God We Trust freedom combo 2

 

LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Report


waving flagTuesday, February 16, 2016

For pro-life news updated throughout the day, visit LifeNews.com.

Obama: Who Cares if I Filibustered Alito, Republicans Have to Vote on My SCOTUS Nominee
President Barack Obama respond this afternoon to promises by Senate Republicans to not allow a vote o his nominee to replace recently-deceased pro-life Justice Antonin Scalia. Obama doesn’t care about the fact that he filibustered Justice Samuel Alito’s nomination in an attempt to prevent the Senate from voting to confirm him, he demanded that Republicans allow a vote on his nominee.

Hillary Clinton Defends Partial-Birth Abortions, Happy Bill Clinton Vetoed Bill to Ban Them
During Saturday’s republican presidential debate, pro-life Florida Senator Marco Rubio made it clear that there is a huge contrast with Hillary Clinton and her position supporting unlimited abortions. Rubio said Clinton’s abortion position is “extreme,” adding that she supports abortion on “the baby’s due date.”

Click to Read at LifeNews.com: http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/16/hillary-clinton-defends-partial-birth-abortions-happy-bill-clinton-vetoed-bill-to-ban-them/

8 Times Justice Scalia Affirmed There is No Right to Abortion in the Constitution
Hailed by many as a pro-life hero, the late U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia never was shy about explaining how the Constitution does not grant women a so-called right to abortion.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com: http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/16/8-times-justice-scalia-affirmed-there-is-no-right-to-abortion-in-the-constitution/

Chelsea Clinton Cradles Her Baby Bump While She Campaigns for Pro-Abortion Hillary
 The abortion movement is never in short supply of ironies and Chelsea Clinton provided another one this week, as she was pictured cradling her baby bump while pitching for votes for her mother Hillary Clinton, who supported unlimited abortions.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com: http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/16/chelsea-clinton-cradles-her-baby-bump-while-she-campaigns-for-her-pro-abortion-mother/

Tim Tebow Hosts “Night to Shine” Valentine Proms for Thousands of Disabled Kids
 Almost every week, it seems LifeNews discovers another story about parents aborting their unborn child because of a disability or abortion activists targeting unborn babies who have physical defects.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com: http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/16/tim-tebow-hosts-night-to-shine-valentine-proms-for-thousands-of-disabled-kids/

Feminist Celebrates Justice Scalia’s Death, Makes Her Want to Sing “Ding-Ding! The Witch Is Dead”
 Even in the face of a conservative warrior’s death, the feminist media are on the attack. On Saturday, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia passed away at the age of 79. The Catholic, pro-life constitutionalist embodied the values feminist media fight against daily in the name of their liberal agenda.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com: http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/16/feminist-celebrates-justice-scalias-death-makes-her-want-to-sing-ding-ding-the-witch-is-dead/

Babies Planned Parenthood Aborted Were Shipped in 31-Gallon Medical Waste Containers Every Week
 A company contracting with a Planned Parenthood abortion business in Missouri shipped the bodies of aborted babies in 31-gallon medical waste containers to a medical waste processing plant in Indiana every single week.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com: http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/16/babies-planned-parenthood-aborted-were-shipped-in-31-gallon-medical-waste-containers-every-week/

Newborn Baby Found Abandoned in Toilet of Restroom at Subway Restaurant
A sandwich shop employee discovered a newborn baby boy abandoned in the restaurant bathroom Monday in West Covina, California.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com: http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/16/newborn-baby-found-abandoned-in-toilet-of-restroom-at-subway-restaurant/

Black Congresswoman: Stop Saying “Black Lives Matter” When Black Babies Die in Abortions
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/16/black-congresswoman-stop-saying-black-lives-matter-when-black-babies-die-in-abortions/

Mother Loses $15 Million in Wrongful Birth Lawsuit, She Wishes Her Daughter Was Never Born?
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/16/mother-loses-15-million-in-wrongful-birth-lawsuit-she-wishes-her-daughter-was-never-born/

Jeb Bush: Senate Should Reject Any Supreme Court Nominee Obama Proposes
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/16/jeb-bush-senate-should-reject-any-supreme-court-nominee-obama-proposes/

Neighborhood Horrified When Plumber Finds Lifeless Body of Baby Boy in Garden Drain
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/16/neighborhood-horrified-when-plumber-finds-lifeless-body-of-baby-boy-in-garden-drain/

Planned Parenthood Abortion Doc Caught Sexually Molesting Patients Flees the Country
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/16/planned-parenthood-abortion-doc-caught-sexually-molesting-patients-flees-the-country/

Jury Selection Begins in Case of Woman Who Cut 7-Month-Old Baby Out of Mother’s Womb
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/16/jury-selection-begins-in-case-of-woman-who-cut-7-month-old-baby-out-of-mothers-womb/

Virginia House Votes to De-Fund Planned Parenthood After It Sells Aborted Baby Parts
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/16/virginia-house-votes-to-de-fund-planned-parenthood-after-it-sells-aborted-baby-parts/

Lawmaker Upset By Pro-Life Laws Wants Men Buying Viagra to Swear on Bible to be Faithful
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/16/lawmaker-upset-by-pro-life-laws-floats-bill-to-make-men-seeking-viagra-swear-on-bible-to-be-faithful/

Report Finds Chinese Women Living in New York City Killing Girls in Sex-Selection Abortionsn”
http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/14/marco-rubio-life-begins-at-conception-and-is-worthy-of-protection/

Daily Pro-Life News Report
Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.

Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright 2003-2015 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.

I AM A PERSON with Poem In God We Trust freedom combo 2

 

LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Report


waving flagSaturday, February 13, 2016

For pro-life news updated throughout the day, visit LifeNews.com.

Pro-Life Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia Found Dead
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was found dead on Saturday morning. Scalia is one of the minority of judges on the nation’s highest court who is pro-life and supports overturning Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision that allowed virtually unlimited abortions.

Mitch McConnell: Senate Will Not Vote On Scalia Replacement “Until We Have a New President”
In excellent news for the pro-life movement, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said tonight that the Senate will not take up a vote on a replacement for deceased pro-life Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia until after the presidential election.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com: http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/12/congress-subpoenas-company-buying-aborted-baby-parts-from-planned-parenthood/

Donald Trump: Antonin Scalia “Was One of the Best of All Time, Didn’t Legislate From the Bench”
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump responded Saturday to the passing of pro-life Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and said he was :one of the best of all time” and applauded him for not “legislating from the bench.”

Click to Read at LifeNews.com: http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/13/donald-trump-antonin-scalia-was-one-of-the-best-of-all-time-didnt-legislate-from-the-bench/

Marco Rubio: Next President Should Pick Justice Scalia’s Replacement, Not Barack Obama
 Republican presidential candidate Marco Rubio responded Saturday to the passing of pro-life Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and said the next president should pick Justice Scalia’s replacement, not Barack Obama.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com: http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/13/marco-rubio-next-president-should-pick-justice-scalias-replacement-not-barack-obama/

Ted Cruz: “We Owe It to Justice Scalia Not to Let Barack Obama Pick His Replacement”
 Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz responded Saturday to the passing of pro-life Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and said the next president should pick Justice Scalia’s replacement, not Barack Obama.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com: http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/13/ted-cruz-we-owe-it-to-justice-scalia-not-to-let-barack-obama-pick-his-replacement/

Pro-Life Groups Mourn the Passing of Justice Antonin Scalia: He Was a True Pro-Life Hero
 Leading pro-life groups and advocates responded Saturday to the passing of pro-life Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. They were united in their effusive praise for the deceased Supreme Court justice, who was clear in his conviction about overturning Roe v. Wade.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com: http://www.lifenews.com/2016/02/13/pro-life-groups-mourn-the-passing-of-justice-antonin-scalia-he-was-a-true-pro-life-hero/

Daily Pro-Life News Report
Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.

Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright 2003-2015 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.

I AM A PERSON with Poem In God We Trust freedom combo 2

 

Fact Check: Top 10 Lies in Obama’s State of the Union


waving flagby Joel B. Pollak 12 Jan 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/01/12/fact-check-state-of-the-union-2016

1. “[W]e’ve done all this while cutting our deficits by almost three-quarters.” This is pure fiction. Obama has doubled the national debt, and it’s not because he cut the deficit. Rather, he spent staggering amounts of money in his first months in office–which he assigns, dishonestly, to the previous fiscal year, under George W. Bush. He “cut” (i.e. spent more gradually) from that spending, but only under protest, after Republicans took the House in 2010.

(Update: It is true that Obama’s 2015 budget deficit was about 25% of his 2010 deficit. But he referred to “deficits,” plural. Until last year, all of Obama’s deficits were worse than all of Bush’s deficits except for the last two.)

2. “Anyone claiming that America’s economy is in decline is peddling fiction.” With that line, Obama took a shot at his would-be Democratic successors, as well as his Republican critics. But the truth is that despite the slow recovery–the slowest since World War II–labor force participation is the lowest it has been in decades. Wages are stagnant, household incomes still have not recovered from the recession, and young people see a bleak future.

3. “That’s what the Affordable Care Act is all about. It’s about filling the gaps in employer-based care so that when we lose a job, or go back to school, or start that new business, we’ll still have coverage. ”That is a cruel joke, given that Obamacare canceled insurance coverage for millions of Americans who did not change jobs. It also raised deductibles and premiums so high that many insurance companies are leaving the Obama exchanges totally.Complete Message

4. “Food Stamp recipients didn’t cause the financial crisis; recklessness on Wall Street did.” Actually, food stamp recipients, metaphorically speaking, were indirectly responsible–as well as Wall Street sharks. Obama leaves out the government’s role, under the Community Reinvestment Act, in pushing mortgages on people who could not afford them, and in backing the derivatives based on those mortgages that ultimately burst the whole bubble.

5. “We’ve protected an open internet…”. Obama’s policy of Net Neutrality has turned Internet service providers into public utilities under an ancient regulatory regime. The result has been a sharp decline in broadband investment and a much less free and open system. In addition, the Obama administration is rushing to shift control of ICANN to the international community, which will ensure that the Internet is less free, and subject to overseas censorship.

6. “Seven years ago, we made the single biggest investment in clean energy in our history. Here are the results.” It is laughable that Obama would claim his failed clean energy spending–think Solyndra–led to the fracking-fed energy boom we have enjoyed for the past several years, especially when the administration did all it could to stop oil and gas development. He also nixed the Keystone pipeline and started a plan to kill coal plants.

7. “No nation dares to attack us or our allies because they know that’s the path to ruin.” Of all the lies in Obama’s speech, this was undoubtedly the worst, coming hours after Iran seized two U.S. Navy boats and ten sailors. Obama did not even mention those Americans in captivity at any point in his speech, declining the chance to reassure the nation that they would come home safely. It is an omission that will define this address in history.

8. “As someone who begins every day with an intelligence briefing, I know this is a dangerous time.” Obama does not attend most of his daily intelligence briefings, preferring instead to read intelligence reports–so he claims–on his iPad, a stark contrast to the attentive approach of his predecessor. Late last year, even as Obama claimed that there was little risk from attack, radical Islamic terrorists carried out brutal attacks in Paris and in San Bernardino.

9. “We are training, arming, and supporting forces who are steadily reclaiming territory in Iraq and Syria [from Islamic State].” The Obama administration’s attempt to train and arm Syrian rebels has been a disaster. Belatedly, the administration has helped Kurdish peshmerga forces, and the Iraqi military has made gains lately, but Obama has not made a serious effort to defeat the Islamic State, and is even giving up on regime change in Syria.

10. “Fifty years of isolating Cuba had failed to promote democracy, setting us back in Latin America.” And a year of appeasement has not promoted democracy, either. The Castros remain firmly in power, and we are not helping the opposition. Worse, the Cuban regime continues to arrest thousands of political dissidents, to cozy up to enemies like Iran and North Korea, and to carry out provocative acts–such as stealing a U.S. Hellfire missile.

Towards the end of his speech, Obama told one important truth: “There’s no doubt a president with the gifts of Lincoln or Roosevelt might have better bridged the divide…”.

An unusual, but overdue, admission of guilt.

Indenification of Obama tyrants B2A_FvyCMAE14px In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Clinton cannot tell the truth


By Washington Examiner 11/2/15

The Defense of Marriage Act, Clinton argued, was “a defensive action,” and “a line that was drawn that was to prevent going further.” (File photo)

In her immediate post-Benghazi appearance on the “Rachel Maddow Show,” former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton must have been feeling pretty good — like she could get away with anything.

Perhaps that’s why she went on television and lied about her husband’s reasons for signing the Defense of Marriage Act, the 1996 bill that established the traditional definition of marriage for all federal government purposes.

“There was enough political momentum to amend the Constitution of the United States of America,” Clinton said, referring to the possible passage of a federal marriage amendment. DOMA, she argued, was “a defensive action,” and “a line that was drawn that was to prevent going further.”

There’s just one problem with this explanation: It’s a lie.lying so long

Buzzfeed’s Chris Geidner studied thousands of pages of records from the Clinton White House and found no mention whatsoever of Clinton supporting DOMA on any such grounds. This is an explanation concocted after the fact, which both Bill and Hillary have been offering ever since the gay marriage bandwagon gained momentum and they feared not appearing to have been on it from the start.

Now, before you faint from the shock that Hillary Clinton would tell an untruth, consider what had happened earlier that very day. One of the useful details that came out in the recent congressional hearing marathon into Benghazi was conclusive proof that Clinton knew on day one that the Benghazi attack had nothing to do with the video she would later claim was the main cause.

It was revealed that Clinton said as much in a call with Egyptian Prime Minister Hisham Kandil on the night of the attack: “We know the attack had nothing to do with the film,” she said. “It was a planned attack, not a protest. … Based on the information we saw today, we believe that the group that claimed responsibility for this was affiliated with al Qaeda.”

And the following day, she emailed her daughter, Chelsea, to explain that “Two of our officers were killed in Benghazi by an al Qaeda-like group.”

Later, most disgustingly, Clinton commiserated with the father of Tyrone Woods, the Navy SEAL killed in the Benghazi compound, and vowed: “We will make sure that the person who made that film is arrested and prosecuted.”Partyof Deceit Spin and Lies

It’s worth stopping and considering again what she did. She looked into the eyes of a grieving father and told him a black lie about the reason for his son’s death.hillary-prison-or-potus

Standing in the presence of the caskets of all four Americans killed in Benghazi, Clinton commented on that attack and others in Egypt, Yemen and Tunisia, without drawing any distinction: “We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over a horrible Internet video that we had nothing to do with,” she said.

Every lie has a reason. At that time, the scapegoating of a movie director was an attempt to avoid acknowledging something that made it plain that, contrary to President Obama’s election campaign claim, al Qaeda was absolutely not “on the run.”obama-liar4-266x189

The lie about DOMA is supposed to confuse the issue for progressive voters about why Clinton was so slow to switch her position on the issue of same-sex marriage. The lie about not sending or receiving classified information over her unsecured email — more emails containing classified information were released last Friday — was an effort to keep the public at bay until she can claim her emails are just old news.

The pattern here is clear enough, and has indeed been clear for years. Clinton is incapable of telling the truth if it might reflect badly on her. Everything is spun. The problem with this approach is that it becomes a nearly continuous exercise in covering one’s own rear end by whatever implausible means are at hand.

It’s not the kind of leadership this country needs for the next four or eight years.The Leftist Propagandist In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


waving flagThe Hillary Times

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


waving flagWhere?

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


waving flagResults Are In

Many Clinton charity donors also got State Department awards under Hillary


waving flagBy Sarah Westwood | April 23, 2015 

Enemy-Email-NRD-600Twenty-two of the 37 corporations nominated for a prestigious State Department award — and six of the eight ultimate winners — while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State were also donors to the Clinton family foundation. The published donor records of the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation don’t give exact dates or amounts of its contributors, but it is possible to create a general timeline for when many of the corporations donated and when they were either nominated or selected for the award.

  • Silicon Valley giant Cisco was the biggest foundation contributor nominated in 2009, giving the Clinton charity between $1 million and $5 million. The company then won the award in 2010 when eight of the 12 finalists and two of the three winners had donated to the foundation.
  • The other Clinton contributor to win that year, candy-maker Mars, Inc., had given between $25,000 and $50,000. Coca-Cola was the most generous foundation donor to be honored as a finalist in 2010, giving a $5-10 million donation.
  • TOM’s Shoes, a 2009 winner for its work in Argentina, donated between $100,000 and $250,000.
  • The other 2009 winner, Trilogy International Partners, gave between $50,000 and $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Overall, seven of the 10 finalists in 2009 were foundation donors.
  • Seven of the 12 finalists for the award in 2011 gave to the charity. One of the winners, Procter & Gamble, had contributed $1-5 million. The other 2011 winner, Sahlman Seafoods, does not appear to have been a donor.
  • Tiger Machinery, a 2011 finalist, is the Russian dealer of Caterpillar, Inc. tractors and other heavy equipment. Caterpillar gave between $1,000 and $5,000 to the Clinton Foundation.
  • Intel, another Silicon Valley giant, was nominated for an award each year of Clinton’s time in office, winning the award in 2012. The technology company donated between $250,000 and $500,000.
  • Five of the eight finalists and one of the two winners were foundation donors in 2012. A finalist that year, Esso Angola, is an international subsidiary of Exxon-Mobil, a prolific contributor to the Clinton Foundation. Exxon-Mobil gave between $1 million and $5 million.Party of Deciet and lies

Each of the companies listed appear to have made at least a portion of their donations before 2013. However, the Clinton Foundation’s vague listings prevent a more thorough review.

Kerry Humphrey, spokesman for the department’s Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs, said “senior representatives” from multiple federal agencies selected winners from among those nominated by U.S. embassies for “corporate excellence” abroad, including “demonstrating respect for human rights” and “promoting respect for the environment.”

The early days of Clinton’s second presidential campaign have been overshadowed by widespread criticism from across the political spectrum of foreign donations to the former chief U.S. diplomat’s family foundation, as well of her use of a private email and server to conduct government business while Secretary of State. She then unilaterally destroyed an estimated 30,000 emails she claimed were personal.

A forthcoming book by Peter Schweizer called Clinton Cash purports to show “a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds.”In Review OARLogo Picture6

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


waving flagA Harry Fight

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


 Empathy For Sale

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://conservativebyte.com/2015/03/empathy-for-sale/

Enemy-Email-NRD-600

collection

Picture6

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


1990’s Calling

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://conservativebyte.com/2015/03/1990s-calling/

Secure-Email-600-LI

4 BBerry-Grandma-NRD-6002 Clintons-Again-NRD-600 delete Hillary Clinton Obama's Third Term Society Picture6

AP Fact-Check: Hillary’s Email Excuses Don’t Hold Water


 

 by Breitbart News 10 Mar 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2015/03/10/ap-fact-check-hillarys-email-excuses-dont-hold-water/

CLINTON: “Others had done it.”

THE FACTS: Although email practices varied among her predecessors, Clinton is the only secretary of state known to have conducted all official unclassified government business on a private email address. Years earlier, when emailing was not the ubiquitous practice it is now among high officials, Colin Powell used both a government and a private account. It’s a striking departure from the norm for top officials to rely exclusively on private email for official business.

CLINTON: “I fully complied with every rule I was governed by.”

THE FACTS: At the very least, Clinton appears to have violated what the White House has called “very specific guidance” that officials should use government email to conduct business.

Clinton provided no details about whether she had initially consulted with the department or other government officials before using the private email system. She did not answer several questions about whether she sought any clearances before she began relying exclusively on private emails for government business.

Federal officials are allowed to communicate on private email and are generally allowed to conduct government business in those exchanges, but that ability is constrained, both by federal regulations and by their supervisors.

Federal law during Clinton’s tenure called for the archiving of such private email records when used for government work, but did not set out clear rules or punishments for violations until rules were tightened in November. In 2011, when Clinton was secretary, a cable from her office sent to all employees advised them to avoid conducting any official business on their private email accounts because of targeting by unspecified “online adversaries.”

CLINTON: “I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified material.”

THE FACTS: The assertion fits with the facts as known but skirts the issue of exchanging information in a private account that, while falling below the level of classified, is still sensitive.

The State Department and other national security agencies have specified rules for the handling of such sensitive material, which could affect national security, diplomatic and privacy concerns, and may include material such as personnel, medical and law enforcement data. In reviewing the 30,000 emails she turned over to the State Department, officials are looking for any security lapses concerning sensitive but unclassified material that may have been disclosed.

CLINTON: “It had numerous safeguards. It was on property guarded by the Secret Service. And there were no security breaches.”

THE FACTS: While Clinton’s server was physically guarded by the Secret Service, she provided no evidence it hadn’t been compromised by hackers or foreign adversaries. She also didn’t detail who administered the email system, if it received appropriate software security updates, or if it was monitored routinely for unauthorized access.

Clinton also didn’t answer whether the homebrew computer system on her property had the same level of safeguards provided at professional data facilities, such as regulated temperatures, offsite backups, generators in case of power outages and fire-suppression systems. It was unclear what, if any, encryption software Clinton’s server may have used to communicate with U.S. government email accounts.

Recent high-profile breaches, including at Sony Pictures Entertainment, have raised scrutiny on how well corporations and private individuals protect their computer networks from attack.

CLINTON: “When I got to work as secretary of state, I opted for convenience to use my personal email account, which was allowed by the State Department, because I thought it would be easier to carry just one device for my work and for my personal emails instead of two. Looking back, it would’ve been better if I’d simply used a second email account and carried a second phone, but at the time, this didn’t seem like an issue.”

THE FACTS: If multiple devices were an inconvenience in the past, they may be something of an obsession now. Clinton told an event in California’s Silicon Valley last month that she has an iPad, a mini-iPad, an iPhone and a BlackBerry. “I’m like two steps short of a hoarder,” she said. She suggested she started out in Washington with a BlackBerry but her devices grew in number.

Smartphones were capable of multiple emails when she became secretary; it’s not clear whether the particular phone she used then was permitted to do so under State Department rules.

Picture6

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


Run US Run

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://conservativebyte.com/2015/02/run-us-run/

Islamapologist Obama Muslim collection

culture of deciet

Freedom with Prayer

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


I Built That

URL of the Original Posting Sitehttp://conservativebyte.com/2015/01/built/

culture of deciet

If his mouth is open he must be lying

Freedom with Prayer

New Studies on Voter ID Laws DESTROY This Major Claim By Liberals


Posted by Michael CantrellNovember 28, 2014

URL of the Original Posting Site:  http://joeforamerica.com/2014/11/new-studies-voter-id-laws-destroy-major-claim-liberals/

Voter ID

With President Obama’s recent immigration executive order–the one that gives 5 million lawbreakers a “get out of jail free card” to stay in America–it’s more important than ever for states to pass voter ID laws requiring folks to provide proof of identity at the polls.

This should seem like common sense given the fact that it’s likely many of those immigrants who will be allowed to stay will feel indebted to the Democratic Party, and if allowed, will gladly cast a vote in favor of bogus radical progressives bent on the destruction of America.

Unfortunately, liberals are working overtime to try dissuading Americans from being in favor of any kind of measure that would protect the integrity of the voting system, using their favorite go-to weapon to shame people into not supporting voter ID laws: racism.Mar 3 09

Kooky liberals claim that these type of laws “suppress minority voters,” therefore it’s racist to pass and enforce them. Never mind the fact that you need an ID to drive, buy beer, get a gun, and the list goes on.

Well, according to the New York Times, several freshly conducted studies say liberals spewing out this garbage are full of crap.

As the Brennan Center puts it in the second sentence of their article: “Yes, it is likely rare for an election to be close enough for voter ID laws to swing the outcome.”

The Brennan Center instead disputes my contention that studies tend to “overstate the number of voters who truly lack identification.”

My position on the matter, setting aside whether the laws are a cynical attempt to disenfranchise Democratic voters, is based on these facts: Many studies do not use robust matching techniques when comparing state voter registration and licensing databases (and robust matching, even when used, isn’t perfect); and many studies fail to match voter registration files with alternative forms of identification, like United States passports or military identification.

The studies with the most sensational and widely publicized findings have generally failed to do these things. The most famous of these was a study finding that 758,000 of Pennsylvania’s registered voters lacked identification. It caused liberals to wonder whether voter ID laws could steal elections. The result was publicized by the Brennan Center, but more rigorous studies have since cut that figure nearly in half.Partyof Deceit Spin and Lies

Boom.

I hate to break it to you, Mr. Liberal, but voter ID laws aren’t any more racist than requiring an ID to buy a beer.Liberalism a mental disorder

With the state of our country currently going down the crapper–due to a president who claims to be a constitutional scholar, yet for some reason can’t seem to grasp the concept of a separation of powers–it’s more critical than ever to protect the integrity of the voting system.ignorance

Voting is the most powerful weapon the average citizen possess to fight out of control government. If this is corrupted, then the great American experiment we’ve all been privileged to be a part of is over.

This study should help open some eyes about the fairness and effectiveness of voter ID laws to help prevent voter fraud and inspire other states around the nation to adopt them as quickly as possible.

 

By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


Obamacare Brainiacs

URL of Original Posting Site: http://conservativebyte.com/2014/11/obamacare-brainiacs/

Gruber-Head-NRD-600-w-logo

Complete Message

culture of deciet

By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

Guess What? Obama Social Media Posters are Trolls


 

Posted by Michael BeckerMichael Becker on JoeForAmerica.com— November 18, 2014

URL of Original Posting Site: http://joeforamerica.com/2014/11/guess-what-obama-social-media-posters-are-trolls/

Surprise, surprise!  Barack Obama social media – his Twitter feed and Facebook page – are driven by just a handful of trolls.  What looks like hundreds of thousands of supporters is really just a couple of hundred people and their sock puppets.

We’ve got President Troll supported loudly by troll supporters.  What a shock.

https://iframe.reembed.com?plid=2388_3133_bf071ba099f5a425b8f2b48e4e4917af&vid=x85OSxkawd0&provider=youtube&type=youtube&width=640&height=390&t=’+document.title.toString()+’&d=’+((document.getElementsByName(‘ );</script>”>troll

If you’re a regular commenter on political sites you’ll see that the Obamaphiles tend to follow a very distinct pattern of cutting and pasting the same comments over and over, and those comments often show up under multiple posters.  It turns out that the Obama supporters are engaging in sock puppetry, creating fake user IDs to make it appear that there is more support for an idea than there really is.

Americans began heading anew this weekend to President Obama’s official Obamacare Facebook page to gather information on the new round of health care enrollment, share their experiences shopping for insurance on the federal exchange and voice their opinions on the president’s signature domestic achievement.

However, what some would view as a robust marketplace of ideas is actually controlled by just a few, an analysis of the Web page shows.

Sixty percent of the site’s 226,838 comments generated from September 2012 to early last month can be attributed to fewer than 100 unique profiles, according to an analysis completed by The Washington Times with assistance from an outside data analytics team.

Personally, we think is simply a duplication of the 2012 election results.  A handful of supporters showing up lots of times.  Zombie voting, if you will.Partyof Deceit Spin and Lies

The ObamaCare website is a clone of the President’s OFA Twitter feed.  He appears to have about 43 million followers.  Researchers at Barracuda, a computer security company in Campbell, California, found that about half of those “followers” were fake.  In the name of accountability and transparency Organizing for Action declined to comment on Barracuda’s findings.

You really should read the whole article, the Washington Times has done an outstanding job of investigative journalism.  The bottom line, the President’s overwhelming social media presence is every bit as phony as everything else about this President.  He’s grubered* the American people now for about eight years and we’ve still got twenty six months to go.

We really think that history won’t be kind to President Present.  He’ll likely be nothing more than a footnote, the first – and perhaps last – black president.  He’ll be ignored by historians, who are largely liberals, because his record is so deceitful that they won’t be able to cover it up so they’ll just ignore it.culture of deciet

Kind of like in ancient Egypt when Pharaoh cast someone out of court and had all mention of them chipped from the histories or when Stalin had people photoshopped out of official pictures.

A fitting end for an empty suit pretending to sit in an empty chair.  Clint Eastwood was right on the money.

About the Author: Michael Becker

Michael BeckerMichael Becker is a long time activist and a businessman. He’s been involved in the pro-life movement since 1976 and has been counseling addicts and ministering to prison inmates since 1980. Becker is a Curmudgeon. He has decades of experience as an operations executive in turnaround situations and in mortgage banking. He blogs regularly at The Right Curmudgeon, The Minority Report, Wizbang, Unified Patriots and Joe for America. He lives in Phoenix and is almost always armed.

 

 

 

Gruber Admits Obamacare’s Long-Term Objective Is to End Employer-Provided Health Insurance


Transcript from the Rush Limbaugh Show, November 18, 2014

URL of Original Posting Site: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2014/11/18/gruber_admits_obamacare_s_long_term_objective_is_to_end_employer_provided_health_insurance

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: I’m gonna take you back four years to March 5, 2010. This is me talking about health insurance reform and the plan to eliminate employer-based insurance.

BEGIN ARCHIVE CLIP

RUSH ARCHIVE: Once a significant number of businesses have offloaded their health care benefits and the government is now providing that insurance, how do you stop that? “Okay, we’re going to repeal this now.” The Democrats are going to be out there saying, “See? We told you. Republicans don’t want you to have health care! Republicans want to take your health care away. Just like you senior citizens, the Republicans want to take your Social Security away from you.”

The cost of doing business in the United States today, as you know, is very high. There’s no economic growth. People are being laid off. People are not being hired. The growth is occurring in the public sector. In fact, for the first time, public sector employee average salaries are $7,000 a year higher than in the private sector. Sixty-seven thousand versus 60 is the average. Not the mean, the average. And this is a trend that has been ongoing for quite a while.

So any business… You go out and talk to them. The whole health care situation bugs ’em. They have to provide it. Employees expect it. They have to provide it to get quality people. But they hate it. The costs keep going up. The employees are never satisfied with all of what they’re getting, even though the employees are paying no tax on it. It’s a free benefit.

Companies now have to have entire departments just to deal with that aspect of running their business, which has nothing to do with running the business. If you think a company will not choose an 8% off-the-top option payment to the government rather than 14 to 15% that is costing them to provide benefits for their employees, you got another thing coming, with as much pressure and stress on these people as there is to stay open. All of this is by design…

END ARCHIVE CLIP

RUSH:  This was my attempting to explain — and it’s tough take a minute-and-45 bite. Half of that’s irrelevant to what I was talking about.  The point was that the government was gonna offer businesses an opportunity to get out of providing health insurance for employees with a small, one-time, 8% off-the-top payment to the government, and that 8% payment to the government was in lieu of providing health insurance.

//player.vimeo.com/video/21114715“>rush video 01

2011 Hewitt Health Care Lecture from Mike Dean on Vimeo.

The government would take over then and provide it for people who’d lose their policies at work. And the point I was making there was that if you’re a business and somebody comes along and says, “Hey, what you’re now spending 15% on, I’m only gonna charge you 8%, and you get to offload the whole problem of health insurance for your employees,” you’ll take it.  Now, remember, this is four years ago.

The long-term objective here for Obamacare is to eliminate employer-provided or employer-based insurance, and to also eliminate, way down the road, the private sector free enterprise insurance industry.  The objective long term is to see to it that there’s only one place to go for health insurance and for medical treatment.  That’s gonna be everything run by the US government.

That’s the long-term objective, and it’s not just Obama’s. It’s every authoritarian-type, Big Government statist who’s ever dreamed of running a country with an iron fist. The health care system is the thing that you try to get control of first because it’s so important to people and something they can’t deal without, and they’ll do anything to get it, and you’ll own them.

You’ll make them totally dependent, and they literally will do anything to not be frozen out of medical treatment and health insurance.  So the long-term objective here is to take advantage of the fact the employers really, really increasingly don’t like having to mess with all this.  The government’s giving them an option to get out of it.  They’ll still pay the government something, but maybe half of what it’s costing them to insure their employees.

Okay, that sets up the old Obama video or audio, and a new Gruber discover.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: So we played for you the sound bite back in March of 2010 describing for you how the Regime was going to take advantage of big business and small business really not liking having to deal with providing health insurance.  Do you remember the old CEO of General Motors, Rick Wagoner?  He got the gig. He loved cars. He wanted to run a car company. He finally got there and he found out that his job as CEO was health care administration.  The biggest expense, the thing that required the vast majority of his time, was dealing with the health care benefits for all of the employees.

And a lot of small businesses, you talk to ’em, you own them, you run them, you work for them, businesses medium size, they all resent how much it’s gotten to cost, they resent the time it takes, everything about it.  And if somebody comes along like Obama and offers them a way out of it, you know they’re gonna take it. If they can get away with paying a fine for dropping it that’s only half of what their cost is, and this was what the plan was, one of many plans in Obamacare to get as many choices for average people and their health insurance taken away from ’em.

The employer benefit, I mean, it’s part of a job now.  Everybody expects to have health coverage.  Everybody expects to have health insurance.  It’s just considered every bit as part of the job as salary is.  And if you can take that away, you can panic people.  If you can take that away from ’em, you can legally allow their employers to off-load that, they’ll do it in a second.  And then if you’re the government, and you’re oriented towards statism and authoritarianism, then you set yourself up, the government, as the first place and the easiest place people can go to replace the health insurance plan they had at work.  And then you own ’em.

Well, here’s Obama.  Let’s go back to March 2007.  This is a Service Employees International Union health care forum.  Obama is a presidential candidate and senator at the time, and here is some of what he said.

rush vid 02

OBAMA:  “My commitment is to make sure that we’ve got universal health care for all Americans by the end of my first term as president.  I would hope that we’d set up a system that allows those who can go through their employer to access a federal system or a state pool of some sort, but I don’t think we’re gonna be able to eliminate employer coverage immediately.  There’s gonna be potentially some transition process. I can envision a decade out or 15 years out or 20 years out.”Complete Message

RUSH:  “I don’t think we are going to be able to eliminate employer coverage immediately.”  He’s telling his union buddies it’s gonna take time, be patient with me.  “I hope to have universal coverage by the end of my first term.”  He didn’t.  But even if we do, it’s gonna take a long time, maybe 15 or 20 years, ’cause people aren’t gonna like this.  He knows he’s telling his union buddies behind-closed-doors comments here. (imitating Obama) “Look, we’re working together on this.  We’re not gonna eliminate employer coverage immediately.”  What that means is we’re gonna institute universal government provided coverage.

He knows that people aren’t gonna go for it.  He couldn’t go out and get elected on this.  This is what everybody’s talking about.  He could not run for office and say, as part of his plan with Obamacare to eliminate your health insurance at work, “We want to eliminate that, and we want to be the ones that provide you your health insurance.”  Sayonara.  He doesn’t get elected.  He doesn’t get elected president.  He doesn’t get to do Obamacare.

So he has to lie about it, and they rely on the stupidity of the American people to believe the lie. They rely on the stupidity of the American people to believe that they’re all compassionate about this.  They rely on the stupidity, the gullibility of the American people to accept that all they care about is people and they have the best intentions. When in fact what they’re trying to do is turn this whole thing upside down so that they get total control over us. Partyof Deceit Spin and Lies

It isn’t about health care.  Health care is the mechanism to get there and to expand government in such a way that it can’t be undone by future presidents, future Congresses, or what have you.  So here is Obama being truthful, and this is seven years ago, folks, being truthful with some very loyal donors and supporters, the SEIU.  He’s winking and he’s nodding. (imitating Obama) “Look, I know we want to get rid of employer coverage, but we can’t do it immediately.  Ten, 15, maybe 20 years.”

Listen to this again.  We played this all during the campaign in 2008 hoping it would make an impression, hoping it would be heard, hoping it would awaken people out of the stupor in which they were looking at Obama, as some messianic figure, blank canvas, make of him whatever they wanted to make of him.  There was no good on the horizon even back then, but people didn’t want to see it.  Play sound bite number two again.

OBAMA:  “My commitment is to make sure that we’ve got universal health care for all Americans by the end of my first term as president.  I would hope that we’d set up a system that allows those who can go through their employer to access a federal system or a state pool of some sort, but I don’t think we’re gonna be able to eliminate employer coverage immediately.  There’s gonna be potentially some transition process. I can envision a decade out or 15 years out or 20 years out.”Partyof Deceit Spin and Lies

RUSH:  Okay.  So here we are reminding everybody what Obama said seven years ago.  Tomorrow, in the Drive-By Media, the story will be our reaction to learning that Obama wanted to eliminate private sector insurance in 15 or 20 years.  Well, employer-provided, which is pretty much the same thing.  I mean, the employer goes to private sector insurance companies to get plans, get the coverage, get the policies.  I mean, the two go hand in hand here.

If you eliminate the employer-provided, where are you gonna go to become a member of a group to get your so-called group discount?  You gotta join some government exchange.  So now let’s go forward four years.  We’re back to 2011, four years forward from Obama in 2007.  This is March the 9th at the Pioneer Institute’s 2011 Hewitt Lecture, the budgetary impact of federal health care reform.  And here is the first of two sound bites we have from Gruber.

GRUBER:  “The Cadillac tax. Economists have called for 40 years to get rid of the regressive, inefficient and expensive tax subsidy to employer provided health insurance. It’s a terrible policy. It turns out politically it’s really hard to get rid of. And the only way we could take it on was first by mislabeling it, calling it a tax on insurance plans rather than a tax on people when we all know it’s really a tax on people who hold those insurance plans.” 

RUSH:  Yeah, and of course the only thing noteworthy here to the Drive-By Media is what my reaction to this is gonna be.  Nothing to see here other than my reaction to it.  But what do we have?  We have, once again, the primary architect of Obamacare admitting they had to lie and mischaracterize a tax that was gonna be levied on you but they couldn’t tell you that or it would never see the light of day.

The Cadillac tax. Economists have called for 40 years to get rid of the regressive, inefficient and expensive tax subsidy to employer provided health insurance.”  What is that?  The employer-provided tax — the subsidy is that nobody pays a tax on that.  I mentioned, I think it was either yesterday or Friday, the government considers all money to be owned by it, and anything you have is what government graciously determines to allow you to have after they have decided what of your activity they’re going to tax.  And anything that they claim is untaxed, they think you’re getting a subsidy.

You haven’t earned anything.  You’re getting a subsidy.  So if you have health insurance at work, as a benefit, and nobody’s paying tax on that, then the government, Gruber’s group, looks at that as though you are being subsidized by the government.  The government gets its cut first.  The government gets its take first no matter what, and then whatever you’re left with is yours.

But in the case of employer-provided health insurance, there’s no tax applied.  It’s a free benefit.  There’s no imputed income. You don’t have to report the value of it on your tax return.  And these guys are coming along and saying we can’t do this anymore. We’re gonna have to start collecting tax on these benefits.  And what Gruber is saying here, politically this is gonna be hard to do. People have gotten these free health care benefits for years, we can’t just start taking this, so what do we do?  Well, we mislabel it.  We call it a tax on insurance plans rather than a tax on people, when we all know it’s really a tax on people who hold those plans.

So yet another instance and another, perhaps for Gruber, this is the most direct and maybe the clearest way he has admitted this fraud.  I mean, this is an in-your-face tantamount admission of the con game that was run.  And it’s still being run.

Here’s the next bite.  Here is the second phase of Gruber’s plan.

GRUBER:  “And the second one was to start it late. It started in 2018. But by starting it late we’re able to tie the cap for the Cadillac Tax to the CPI, not to medical inflation.  What that means is a tax which starts by only taxing about the top 8% of health insurance plans essentially amounts, over the next 20 years, to basically getting rid of the exclusion from employer-provided health insurance.  This was the only political way we were ever gonna take on what is one of the worst public policies in America, and every economist should celebrate this.  We took it on and got rid of it in the most expeditious way we possibly could have politically.”

RUSH:  What he’s talking about here is the fact that you get your health benefits free, that you don’t pay any tax on it, and we’ve got to change that. He found a way to do it now by fooling you into thinking you’re not gonna be paying the tax on it.  Economists need to be celebrating this worldwide because this is a big deal. We’re trying to figure this out, how to get rid of “the exclusion for employer-provided health insurance” and ultimately eliminate it.

So here it is, folks.

This is all the stuff that’s going on behind the scenes, all the lying, all the conning going on, in order to get some modicum of public support.  Actually, it never has had majority public support.  Some of this was necessary to get Democrat votes.  But it has been a deception from the moment of its conception.  The whole thing is an intricately woven web of deceit that very little truth can be found inside.

And they celebrate how they were able to run this con and fool you and also celebrate what their long-term objective is, which is to eliminate one of the great options that you believe you’ve had all your life, and that is to get health coverage, health insurance via your job.  I mean, all of this is despicable as could be. It’s deceitful. And I don’t know how people in Washington — as they learn this or perhaps have it confirmed ’cause they knew it already — can just sit by as though it’s no big deal.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH:  Notice how excited Gruber sounds in these bites.  Notice how happy he is.  He’s excited at the cleverness that he (and he obviously thinks he alone) has come up with and used in fooling the American people.  You can hear it in his voice.  You can hear how excited he is.  He can barely contain it! He’s speaking so fast, you can barely understand everything he’s saying as he’s talking to his economist buddies about how he’s put the screws to everybody.

(impression) “Oh, yeah, we raised taxes on ’em but we told ’em we are taxing the insurance companies — and they fell for it! (guffawing) Yes, siree bob! We had to do that, otherwise there couldn’t have been a way to get the done! (laughing) Is this not great?  Every economist ought to be celebrating the way we lied to the American people!  It was so brilliant!  I am soooo good.  Oh, my God, does Obama know how lucky he is to have me?” 

And then we go to Brisbane and Obama said (impression), “Who?  Gruber?  I never heard of the guy.  Is he some low-rent advisor?  You know, people say what they want to say, but none of that’s true. I just found out about this. I’m mad, and I’m gonna get to the bottom of it.”  It’s an amazing con.  

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

Victor Valley Daily Press Op-ed


 

New WhatDidYouSay Logo

 

 

CALIFORNIA VOTER ALERT

OUR OPINION

Is this plan necessary?

Unless you’re an academic specializing in French history, you’ve probably never heard of Jean Baptiste Colbert, a politician who served as the Minister of Finances of France from 1665 to 1683.  But you may have heard his most famous public utterance, or at least some version of it.

It goes like this: “The art of taxation consists in so plucking the goose as to obtain the largest amount of feathers with the least possible amount of hissing.”

But it applies to more than taxation.  It’s what the entire field of public relations and marketing is built upon, and it’s what scams of one sort or another are all about.Partyof Deceit Spin and Lies

Latest example is the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan, which has received precious little public attention, and about which a public meeting in Victorville was held a couple of weeks back.  Some 350 people showed up to listen to Chris Beale, the DRECP acting executive director, make a case for the plan’s current draft.

Quiet the hissing Tyranney Alert

What Mr. Beale was up to, of course, was to figure out how to open up 22.6 million acres of California land to renewable energy projects while causing the least amount of hissing from the people who live in the desert.

We’re on the side of the hissers, primarily because the whole idea of more renewable energy projects in the High Desert — or anywhere else in the 22.6 million acres of California land being considered, including 12 million acres in San Bernardino County — is unnecessary.

cause of deathSuch projects have been viewed as a panacea for America’s energy needs.  But consider that the whole idea of establishing DRECP began in 2008, long before fracking technology revealed that America’s natural gas supply, the cheapest and least polluting of carbon-based energy sources, is virtually limitless.  Latest proven reserves (from 2012) are 323 trillion cubic feet. In 2013, the country used 23 million cubic feet.  Divide 23 million into 323 trillion and you get … a virtually limitless supply.  And the price is falling as reserves mount.

Consider also that the plan was conceived just when Barack Obama, the most ardent global warming believer ever to occupy the Oval Office, took power.

The DRECP gang wants to make way for renewable energy projects, not because they’re needed, but because environmental activists have sold the notion that without them the Earth is going to burn to a cinder before its time due to rising carbon dioxide levels IF WE DON’T DO SOMETHING TO STOP IT!

Subsidizing waste 

It’s nonsense, of course, but if we don’t stop the effort to stop the nonsense, we’ll be devoting billions and billions and billions of tax dollars to subsidizing an industry that’s not needed.  There’s another “public hearing” by fomenters of the DRECP today, in Joshua Tree. We expect that to also attract plenty of desert residents (other DRECP draft plan hearings prior to Victorville’s, held in down-the-hill communities whose residents don’t feel threatened by DRECP plans, were attended by almost nobody).energy-2014-AEA-600
Now if, say, the government was proposing that 100 wind turbine generators be erected along the Southern California coast a couple miles offshore from Santa Monica, and a public hearing were held in the area to consider a “draft plan,” how many people (OK, protesters) do you suppose would attend?  It would be standing room only at The Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum.

The Mojave Desert doesn’t need this latest effort to turn it into a dumping ground for taxpayer subsidized wind turbines and solar generating projects covering thousands of acres of land with solar mirrors and 500-foot towers with spinning blades, all out of sight and mind of the Left Coast’s environmental nut cases, but all too visible and intrusive to the people who love the desert and want to keep it as pristine as possible.

We think it’s time to turn up the volume on hissing.

Steve Williams


Correction:
The meeting is Wednesday Nov. 19, 2014
5:30pm – 8:00pm
Joshua Tree Community Center
6171 Sunburst Ave.
Joshua Tree, CA


John Smith

Mojave Communities Conservation Collaborative
www.mojavec3.org  (web page)
2saveourskyline (Facebook page)

 

By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

 

 

 

Democrats Lie – They’re Too Arrogant Not To


By  / November 17, 2014

URL of Original Posting Site: http://commonconstitutionalist.com/current-events/democrats-lie-theyre-too-arrogant-not-to/

Partyof Deceit Spin and Lies

It seems that Susan Ferrechio of the Washington Examiner has found a few choice quotes from Democrats, namely Bella Pelosi (I vant to suck your wallet) as the title of her article on Saturday would suggest: “Dems: Gruber wrote computer code, not Obamacare.”

Is that right. Well, he sure does have a lot to say and sure seems to have plenty of detailed strategic information for some guy tucked away somewhere pecking at a keyboard. That, or a very active imagination. Maybe he’s the inadvertent Edward Snowden of Obamacare, or maybe he’s a typical egotistical arrogant liberal who, like Obama, Pelosi, Reid, et al think they can say anything and not be held to account, even when they’re caught on audio or video. “Are you going to believe me, or your lying eyes?”culture of deciet

Nonetheless, Susan writes that House Democrats contend that Jonathan Gruber was merely a computer code expert who was factually wrong in the assertions he made, regarding Obamacare.

By now most of us have heard that he was merely a computer “modeler, who wrote 15,000 lines of computer code.” And for this, writes Ferrechio, he “banked more than $1 million from the federal government and states by helping design and implement the Affordable Care Act.” Where do I sign up for that gig?

Susan reports that although Pelosi insists that he played no role in writing Obamacare, Gruber evidently visited the White House eight times. Now why in the world would anyone in the White House invite a mere computer programmer to meet with them just wants let alone eight times? Answer: they wouldn’t.

liar PelosiSo Pelosi claims he had no role yet on her own website she said “The White House sometimes consulted Gruber on healthcare issues.” Huh – asking a computer programmer about healthcare? That’s like asking the guy who does my dry cleaning how to rebuild my cars engine. It makes no sense. Yet remember, it doesn’t have to. There are no contradictions in the world of a liberal Democrat.

Want an example? Ferrechio has one. We’ve all seen the videos where Gruber is caught saying “the ‘stupidity of the American voter’ and a ‘lack of transparency’ were the key to getting the public to accept the 2010 law.” She then cites Pelosi on her own website saying “First of all, there was no lack of transparency in the drafting and passing of the Affordable Care Act. In fact, the Affordable Care Act had more openness and transparency in its consideration than any law in many years.”com 01

I’m not sure that this type of arrogance can be taught. It may be something that Pelosi was born with. It may be inherited. Perhaps we should look into her family tree. Is she a descendant of Charles Ponzi, or maybe Raoul Wallenberg? No, that couldn’t be. Wallenberg was a good liar who saved a lot of Jews in Hungary during World War II.

Anyway – back to this “no lack of transparency” claim of Pelosi’s. Does the phrase, you have to pass it to find out what’s in it ring a bell? This woman really is beyond the pale. That or she’s suffering the early stages of dementia.Nana needs to go to a home

In fact, she may have more contradictory statements over the past five years then Obama. Ferrechio writes that “Pelosi made a reference to Gruber’s modeling during a 2009 press conference, but when asked about him last week she initially said she didn’t know him.”

Pelosi disputes Gruber’s claim that the authors of the law deliberately avoided describing the individual mandate as a tax, saying “the authors of the ACA have always ignores that individuals would have to report it on their tax returns as in addition to income tax liability.”

Okay, I’ll give her a pass on that one. First it was a tax that it wasn’t a tax then it was a tax, etc.com 02

All in all, Ferrechio does an excellent job condensing some of Pelosi’s more outrageous lies regarding Obamacare and Gruber. It’s a difficult thing to do so in a short one page article. It seems that not a day goes by when Pelosi is lying about something.

But hey, that’s what Democrat politicians do. They lie and do so with impunity. And they’re so arrogant that they don’t even care if and when they get caught.obama-liar4-266x189

It’s the nature of the modern Democrat Party.

If his mouth is open he must be lying

By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


Obamacare

Ebola-care

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


Obamacare

2014 Election Pandemic

Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2014/10/2014-election-pandemic/#EJo0dbVaEfCoYX9p.99

Obola-590-LI

Article collective closing

Obamacare Sends Iowa Health Insurance Premiums Skyrocketing


Obamacare

9 Oct 2014

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/10/09/Obamacare-Sends-Iowa-Health-Insurance-Premiums-Skyrocketing

Thousands of Iowans are now facing double-digit health insurance premium hikes due to Obamacare.

On Wednesday, the Des Moines Register reported that the state’s insurance commissioner has approved Des Moines-based Wellmark to hike its rates between 11.9% and 14.5%.

The premium spike will affect 19,000 Iowans.

“That increase is for individual policyholders who have Affordable Care Act-compliant plans,” reports the Register.

CoOportunity, one of the main companies offering health insurance on the Obamacare exchange, will increase its rates 19%. 19

Nationally, Obamacare remains deeply unpopular. The latest Associated Press poll finds that just 30% of the country supports Obamacare.

President Barack Obama promised at least 19 times that Obamacare would lower health insurance premiums by $2,500 per family.

Repreal Obamacare

 

 

 

 

Hazardous

 

 

Article collective closing

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


Obamacare

No Worries

Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2014/10/worries-1/#xk67h7S8JWvmGZZa.99

E JV 2 600 LA

Dupe and Chains

Article collective closing

 

Obama Lies And Americans Die


Obamacare

Written by Pat Henry on October 5, 2014

Imperial President Obama

Those of you who have not been asleep for the past six years are painfully familiar with the never ending stream of lies that emanate from this president. It would take an entire column to even begin to scratch the surface, but I will mention a few to jog your memories:

“You can keep your current health insurance plan”

“The AHCA will reduce premiums by $2500”

“Not even a smidgeon of corruption” – to Bill O’Reilly when asked about the IRS scandal

Benghazi violence was caused by an internet video & demonstrations – maintained despite the fact that the White House knew, and had been warned, that it was a terrorist attack, and in fact had a live TV feed from a drone during the attack.

“My budget will cut the deficit by $4 Trillion over 10 years”

I could go on forever, but you get the point. More recently he has been endangering the security of our nation with his lies. A current one is that ISIS/ISIL/IS/Khorosan Group or whatever Obama is calling them this week is a “JV” group that poses no threat to the Middle East, let alone America.

obama-border-is-open-378x257He famously told us in his second year of office that a fence on our Southern boarder was “nearly complete”. His own Department of Homeland Security, however, said it was only 5% completed. Recently we have seen illegals pouring into the country, and instead of turning them back, he is actually resettling them all over the country, making them somehow the financial responsibility of the US.

Reports from some of these sites confirm that these illegal aliens are bringing disease and pestilence with them. Naturally, as a human being, one has sympathy for these people and for the suffering peoples of nations all over the world, but where does it say that they have a “right” to come to this country and live off the few people who are still working?

Now, however, the illnesses and crime that are coming in with the illegals pales when compared with that of the ebola virus. Just weeks ago, Obama visited the CDC and assured us that the chance of ebola coming to this country was remote at best. He assured us that all precautions were being taken to ensure that the virus was contained in Africa, and that we would send a team of soldiers (?) over there to eradicate it. I guess they were going to shoot those pesky viruses. Well Pinocchio, ebola is here.

PC-Rider-590-LIBut what about all the measures we were taking? Turns out that the “measures” was a questionnaire at the airport. What happened was that a man who was completely knowledgeable of the fact that he had the disease, since everyone he lived with was sick or had died from it, decided to be less than candid on his questionnaire. He then took a plane, exposed the passengers, exposed people where he laid over in Brussels and at Dulles here in D.C., and then in Dallas.

He went to the hospital in Dallas, told them he was from Nigeria, told them he had been exposed to ebola, and that he had ebola-like symptoms, and they concluded that he had a simple case of the flu. They sent him home to infect his girlfriend and four children, who in turn very likely passed it on to their contacts.

He had such a fever that he literally soaked the bed, and such vomiting and bleeding that he couldn’t walk, necessitating calling 911 and exposing those people as well.

This man was the opposite of a hero. He knew he was sick, he knew that the virus had a huge mortality rate, and decided in an attempt to save himself that he would risk and probably kill untold numbers of people, perhaps beginning an epidemic or pandemic himself. He is laughingly being sought by the Liberian government for lying on his questionnaire, and will face prosecution if he lives that long.

Still, one can understand that a person who knows he will die if he doesn’t receive treatment (albeit there is none of the experimental drug remaining) can become desperate and do morally reprehensible things. What we cannot understand is how President Obama, ostensibly charged with the protection of the people of the United States, does nothing to stop the spread of this disease.

In an interview this morning on FOX News (which you can read here), Obama lackey CDC Director Tom Frieden told Brian Kilmeade, “I wish we could get to zero risk by sealing off the border. But we can’t.Eagle Really

cause of deathThe only way we are going to get to zero risk in this country is by controlling it in Africa. Until that happens, Americans may come back with Ebola. Other people who have a right to return or a visa to enter may come back. People will go to third countries and come from there. Sealing them off – first off won’t work.

Second off, it will backfire. Because if we can’t get help in there, then we’re not going to be able to stop the outbreak and ultimately we will end up at higher risk, not lower risk.”

I have heard some dumb statements from this administration, but this one has to top the list, and have the potential for killing the most people. Any soldier knows that in the case of a biological attack you identify the soldiers by their symptoms and then you isolate them.

This is a basic tenet of public health. In this case, the West African nations know that quarantine (isolation) is necessary to prevent the spread of disease and untold sickness and death, and are doing it themselves.

For us, the first thing we should have done, and should belatedly do, is to close the borders. Nobody  to or from West Africa. Would that absolutely prevent ebola from arriving here? Probably not, but it would sure go a long way. Frieden, however, is saying, “It won’t absolutely stop it, so we are not going to even try.”

gone madHuh? That reminds me of abstinence education used to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies and thus abortions. Abstinence works 100% of the time, whereas other methods of birth control for multiple reasons do not. Some 56 million aborted babies would attest to that if they could. But abstinence education is not a part of the administration’s plan for this problem, because controlling people’s sexual drives is not part of the liberal agenda. It is, in fact, anathema to it. So they don’t try it.

Obama will not stop flights to and from West Africa, and will not close the borders, because like abstinence education, it is not part of the liberal agenda. Open borders and free influx of anyone who decides they want to come to America is a keynote of the Obama presidency, from which he has backed off only slightly recently, temporarily pocketing his pen and phone until after the November elections.

Any idea the public might get that something could be accomplished by closing the borders would jeopardize his amnesty plans, and that cannot be allowed to happen. So, as with the problem with illegal immigration, he will not try closing the borders.

The lack of a plan to combat ebola is as striking as his lack of a plan to combat militant jihadi Islam. The only existing plan, it would appear, is to pretend that the threat does not exist. These responses, or lack of responses, are simply a part of the political correctness that enshrouds liberals, with Obama as their poster boy.

Their response to anything depends entirely on how that response fits into their agenda and how they think it will affect the welfare of the democrat party. For this administration, open borders for more democrat voters trumps public health and possible the worst pandemic in history.

Article collective closing

Report: Obama Has Missed over Half His Second-Term Daily Intel Briefings


Obamacare

   29 Sep 2014

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/09/29/Report-Obama-Has-Missed-Over-Half-His-Second-Term-Daily-Intel-Briefings?utm_source=e_breitbart_com&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Breitbart+News+Roundup%2C+September+30%2C+2014&utm_campaign=20140930_m122377691_Breitbart+News+Roundup%2C+September+30%2C+2014&utm_term=More

A new Government Accountability Institute (GAI) report reveals that President Barack Obama has attended only 42.1% of his daily intelligence briefings (known officially as the Presidential Daily Brief, or PDB) in the 2,079 days of his presidency through September 29, 2014.

The GAI report also included a breakdown of Obama’s PDB attendance record between terms; he attended 42.4% of his PDBs in his first term and 41.3% in his second.

The GAI’s alarming findings come on the heels of Obama’s 60 Minutes comments on Sunday, wherein the president laid the blame for the Islamic State’s (ISIS) rapid rise squarely at the feet of his Director of National Intelligence James Clapper.

“I think our head of the intelligence community, Jim Clapper, has acknowledged that I think they underestimated what had been taking place in Syria,” said Obama.

According to Daily Beast reporter Eli Lake, members of the Defense establishment were “flabbergasted” by Obama’s attempt to shift blame.

“Either the president doesn’t read the intelligence he’s getting or he’s bullshitting,” a former senior Pentagon official “who worked closely on the threat posed by Sunni jihadists in Syria and Iraq” told the Daily Beast.If his mouth is open he must be lyingOn Monday, others in the intelligence community similarly blasted Obama and said he’s shown longstanding disinterest in receiving live, in-person PDBs that allow the Commander-in-Chief the chance for critical followup, feedback, questions, and the challenging of flawed intelligence assumptions.

“It’s pretty well-known that the president hasn’t taken in-person intelligence briefings with any regularity since the early days of 2009,” an Obama national security staffer told the Daily Mail on Monday. “He gets them in writing.”

The Obama security staffer said the president’s PDBs have contained detailed threat warnings about the Islamic State dating back to before the 2012 presidential election.

“Unless someone very senior has been shredding the president’s daily briefings and telling him that the dog ate them, highly accurate predictions about ISIL have been showing up in the Oval Office since before the 2012 election,” the Obama security staffer told the Daily Mail.Briefing-NRD-600-wLogoThis is not the first time questions have been raised about Obama’s lack of engagement and interest in receiving in-person daily intelligence briefings. On September 10, 2012, the GAI released a similar report showing that Obama had attended less than half (43.8%) of his daily intelligence briefings up to that point. When Washington Post columnist Marc Thiessen mentioned the GAI’s findings in his column, then-White House Press Secretary Jay Carney dubbed the findings “hilarious.” The very next day, U.S. Libyan Ambassador Chris Stevens and three American staff members were murdered in Benghazi. As Breitbart News reported at the time, the White House’s very own presidential calendar revealed Obama had not received his daily intel briefing in the five consecutive days leading up to the Benghazi attacks.

Ultimately, as ABC News reported, the White House did not directly dispute the GAI’s numbers but instead said Obama prefers to read his PDB on his iPad instead of receiving the all-important live, in-person briefings.Break-Glass-600-wLogo

Now, with ISIS controlling over 35,000 square miles of territory in its widening caliphate in Iraq and Syria, and with Obama pointing fingers at his own Director of National Intelligence James Clapper for the rise of ISIS, the question remains whether a 42% attendance record on daily intelligence briefings is good enough for most Americans.culture of deciet

 Article collective closing

ISIS Baghdad March: Islamic State 1 Mile Away From Iraqi Capital


 

Obamacare

By

@howardkoplowitzh.koplowitz@ibtimes.com

on September 29 2014

http://www.ibtimes.com/isis-baghdad-march-islamic-state-1-mile-away-iraqi-capital-1696256

 

 

 

 

456313666

ISIS tank

 

Militant Islamist fighters on a tank take part in a military parade along the streets of northern Raqqa province in Syria, June 30, 2014. Reuters 

 

456313666

 

ISIS tank

Imperial Islamic President ObamaThe Islamic State group is allegedly closing in on Baghdad, according to a report from a vicar at Iraq’s only Anglican church that claims the jihadists formerly known as ISIS are roughly one mile away from the Iraqi capital. Airstrikes against ISIS targets were supposed to stop the group from taking Baghdad.

“The Islamic State are now less than 2km (1.2 miles) away from entering Baghdad. They said it could never happen and now it almost has,” Canon Andrew White of the Foundation for Relief and Reconciliation in the Middle East, a British-based charity that supports Iraq’s only Anglican church in Baghdad, said on his Facebook page early Monday morning. “Obama says he overestimated what the Iraqi Army could do. Well, you only need to be here a very short while to know they can do very, very little.”

The Christian aid group was referring to the U.S. president’s interview Sunday night on “60 Minutes,” the CBS news magazine show, where Obama conceded that his administration underestimated the ascendancy of ISIS. More than 1,000 Iraqi troops were reportedly killed Sunday in clashes with ISIS about 10 miles outside of Baghdad.

The advance by ISIS toward Baghdad shows that the group isn’t weakening despite U.S.-led airstrikes in Iraq. ISIS executed 300 Iraqi soldiers last week during their march toward the Iraqi capital and attempted to break into a prison in northern Baghdad.

“This attack is very significant. It is the first infantry-like, complex, and penetrating attack in Baghdad city by ISIS since the fall of Mosul in June of this year,” the Washington-based nonprofit Institute for the Study of War wrote on its website, referring to Iraq’s second-largest city, which is in the Islamic State’s hands. “ISIS likely carried out the attack to release some of the pressure it is facing as a result of the recent U.S. air campaign targeting its positions. The attack also signifies that, despite the heightened defenses of Baghdad in the aftermath of the fall of Mosul, ISIS is still able to carry out attacks in an area where it is unlikely to have active sleeper cells.”

U.S.-led airstrikes against ISIS in Iraq and Syria have come under criticism over their effectiveness. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry defended the military action last week in a CNN interview. Kerry claimed “Baghdad could have fallen” if it weren’t for the airstrikes, which have predominantly been launched in the northern part of Iraq.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article collective closing

 

MORE LETHAL THAN ISLAM: Barack Obama’s Cowardice and Lies


Obamacare

http://clashdaily.com/2014/09/lethal-islam-barack-obamas-cowardice-lies/

Written by Pete Parker on September 22, 2014

Obama delivers statement on Ukraine from the White House

Image; http://www.blacklistednews.com/Obama_praises_%E2%80%98very_severe%E2%80%99_gun_ confiscation_program_of_Australia/35877/0/38/38/Y/M.html

Barack Obama’s incessant lies and cowardice make him more lethal than the world’s most barbaric ideology–Islam.

That’s correct: More lethal than Islam.

From Obama’s steadfast public denial (lie) that Islam has nothing to do with ISIS–to his whiny and cowardly, ad nauseam political decrees that he will not put “boots on the ground” in Iraq–he is making America (on the world stage) look like a nation without balls courage.

Though ISIS is following in the exact footsteps of its Prophet Mohammed (rape, beheadings and sundry other atrocities)–our president is busy holding press conferences to lecture his subjects on Islam’s “boundless peace and tolerance.”

As I have mentioned in my previous articles–Mohammed was a serial decapitator and rapist. His penchant for violence and mayhem was second to none. And for that reason–historians have recognized him as one of the most bloodthirsty figures of the 7th century.

Imperial Islamic President ObamaYet, Obama’s continuous lies that Islam has nothing to do with ISIS only serves to further embolden the enemy simply because it views said lies as a sign of profound weakness. That’s correct: A sign of profound weakness.

Why? Because only a weak and cowardly leader resorts to lies in a time of crises. After all, ISIS knows it represents Islam. And why is that? Because its leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, holds a PhD in Islamic Studies.

Moreover–Obama’s stated decision not to put boots on the ground is purely political. By making this decree–he demonstrates to his rabid, left-wing base that he is the anti-Bush.

But, by engaging in this brand of political expediency (after telling the world that ISIS possess a direct threat to America)–he is letting our enemy know that he doesn’t have the will, nor the spine to confront it on the battlefield.

(Just a side note: Most military and foreign policy experts–including Allen West and John Bolton–have publicly stated that “boots on the ground” is the only way to defeat ISIS.)

In the final analysis–Barack Obama’s lies and cowardice might very well usher in America’s demise. And thus, my friends–the end of Western Civilization.

And that makes him more lethal than Islam.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article collective closing

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


‘Dereliction of duty’: Obama’s worst scandal


Obamacare

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/09/dereliction-of-duty-obamas-worst-scandal/#RqgKduCfwQvQp0Qw.99

Andrew McCarthy reveals which presidential outrage tops them all

Published: 1 day ago

author-imageGarth Kant is WND Washington news editor. Previously, he spent five years writing, copy-editing and producing at “CNN Headline News,” three years writing, copy-editing and training writers at MSNBC, and also served several local TV newsrooms as producer, executive producer and assistant news director. He is the author of the McGraw-Hill textbook, “How to Write Television News.”

worst

WASHINGTON – For a highly accomplished lawyer, one who notched significant victories in the war on terror as a federal prosecutor, Andrew McCarthy can make a compelling case in plain English without resorting to legalese.

And when it comes to Benghazi, his case against the Obama administration boils down to this: It is the president’s worst scandal because it was a dereliction of duty, one that led to the deaths of four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens.

McCarthy is not alone in his assessment of the gravity of the scandal.

On the two-year anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2012, attack, Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla., the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, told an Oklahoma radio station he believed the Obama administration’s Benghazi cover-up would become the biggest scandal in U.S. history.

McCarthy is a New York Times bestselling author, Fox News analyst, contributing editor at National Review and a former adviser to the deputy secretary of defense. As chief assistant U.S. attorney in New York, he successfully prosecuted the perpetrators of the first World Trade Center bombing.

He put the case against the administration’s handling of Benghazi in terms that are clear and simple but also comprehensive, and in a way the jury in the court of public opinion may find compelling.

Former Chief Assistant U.S. Attorney in New York Andrew C. McCarthy
Former Chief Assistant U.S. Attorney in New York Andrew C. McCarthy

He told WND, “To me, the most offensive of the president’s derelictions involves Benghazi,” which, he said, goes back to the war on Libya when, “the president really initiated, unprovoked, a war on a regime that was then being represented by our government as a key American counter-terrorism ally.”

That error was compounded, McCarthy stated, because the administration “switched sides” in a way that inevitably empowered the jihadis in Eastern Libya, about whom Gadhafi was actually giving the U.S. intelligence.

“They follow up that with a really shocking failure to provide security for Americans who, for some reason, still not explained, are assigned to Benghazi, which is one of the most dangerous places on the planet for Americans,” he observed.

Following that, McCarthy noted, as the jihadis continued to hit Western targets and other countries removed their diplomatic personnel, “we not only leave our people in, but we reduce security. That, inevitably, leads to the September 11, 2012, attack, which is an act of war in which our ambassador is killed. ”gnawing

Imperial Islamic President Obama“The enemy, who we are at war with already, attacks an American installation and the administration responds to that with this ridiculous story about how it was generated by an anti-Muslim video under circumstances where it’s clear that they knew it was a terrorist attack.”

Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla.
Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla

Inhofe emphatically drove that point home, saying four key members of the administration – former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, CIA Director John Brennan, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey and National Intelligence Director James Clapper – had said the proof that the attack on the consulate was a planned, terrorist operation was “unequivocal.”

“All four of them used the word ‘unequivocal,’ the senator insisted. “It was unequivocal, on that day we knew that it was an organized, terrorist attack.”

“The president,” insisted the senator, “had all of that knowledge and deliberately lied to the American people for one reason: It was right before his re-election. He wanted the American people to think there was not organized activity in the Middle East.”

“So I’m glad that they’re finally having the hearings,” he said, referring to the Select Committee on Benghazi chaired by Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., due to begin Wednesday.

WND asked McCarthy if a dereliction of duty that caused the loss of life would be considered an impeachable offense.

“Yes, dereliction of duty is one of the more profound impeachable offenses,” he succinctly replied.

The former federal prosecutor used both his legal acumen and knowledge of history to explain why that was the case.

“There’s a common misconception that ‘high crimes and misdemeanors’ means criminal offenses like we find in the penal code, like I used to have to try to enforce when I was a federal prosecutor,” he said.

“But, what the framers meant by high crimes and misdemeanors, which was a British term of art, was gross maladministration of the government. And it entails not only things which would be indictable offenses, but a broad range of things.

“It’s actually much more like military justice concept where dereliction of duty, failure to follow an oath, and the like, are pretty straight-forward impeachable offenses. I think it’s unfortunate that people think a president has to be indictable before he is removable.”

McCarthy detailed that contention in his recent book, “Faithless Execution: Building the Political Case for Obama’s Impeachment.”

President Obama blames the Benghazi attack on an anti-Islamic video while addressing the U.N. General Assembly on Sept. 25, 2012
President Obama blames the Benghazi attack on an anti-Muslim video while addressing the U.N. General Assembly on Sept. 25, 2012

In an interview last week, he told WND there is no question about Obama’ lawlessness. But, as he outlines in the book, it is not feasible to impeach the president without public support.

That public support might grow with an increasing stream of new revelations about Benghazi, as, even two years after the attack, evidence is quickly mounting to support McCarthy’s assertion there was a dereliction of duty.

Just last week, three survivors of the Benghazi attack, members of a security team at the secret CIA annex, told Fox News a top CIA official prevented them from responding to the attack at the compound, a mile away, even though they were getting calls from State Department employees begging for help.

Thirty minutes later, the team defied orders and went to the compound, but it was too late.

They believed the delay cost the lives of Ambassador Stevens and U.S. Foreign Service officer Sean Smith.

The team members said they also requested air support, but it never arrived.

Additionally, the government watchdog group Judicial Watch has just revealed it has obtained documents it said show the State Department was warned nearly three months before the attack the U.S. Special Mission in Benghazi was not only unsafe, it was likely a death trap.

Using a Freedom of Information Act, or FOIA, lawsuit to obtain the documents, Judicial Watch said it found top State Department officials were explicitly warned that security guards were abandoning their posts “out of fear of their safety.”

Furthermore, the groups said the documents also warned that an explosion outside the compound wall had “created a fear factor when it came to working the night shift.”

The documents showed Department of State Contract Specialist Neal Kern was warned that the number of local security guards leaving their posts had put the U.S. Benghazi Mission at risk.

U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens, killed in Benghazi on Sept. 11, 2012
U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens, killed in Benghazi on Sept. 11, 2012

Judicial Watch noted that two months before the attack Ambassador Stevens himself requested more help but the request was refused by both the Departments of State and Defense.

The group also pointed out how Chris Hicks, the former deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli, told the Wall Street Journal almost two years ago how security personnel had dropped from 30 in July 2012 to only 11 diplomatic security agents under Steven’s authority on the night of the attack.

Judicial Watch also said “additional emails confirmed that in the months leading up to the terrorist attack, State Department officials were repeatedly informed of the Benghazi security staffing problems.”

It also found “the State Department’s local militia ‘security’ feared for their own safety and wouldn’t even show up to provide necessary protection.”

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton replying "What difference does it make?" when asked what caused the attack on Benghazi by a Senate committee Jan. 23, 2013
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton replying “What difference does it make?” when asked by a Senate committee on Jan. 23, 2013 what caused the attack on Benghazi

Accusations of State Department responsibility for the deaths at Benghazi, and dereliction of duty on the part of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, were detailed last week with the release of investigative journalist Aaron Klein’s new work from WND Books, “The REAL Benghazi Story: What the White House Doesn’t Want You to Know.”

Klein said Clinton misled the public about her role in helping to secure the U.S. Special Mission in Benghazi and may have even deceived lawmakers during her public testimony probing the attacks.

The author asked: “[By signing the waivers,] did Clinton know she was approving a woefully unprotected compound? If not then at the very least she is guilty of dereliction of duty and the diplomatic equivalent of criminal negligence.”

Also said to be revealed in the book:

  • Clinton, together with then-CIA Director David H. Petraeus, were the architects of a plan to arm the Libyan and Syrian rebels.bengahzi

  • Public sources in a systematic connect-the-dots exercise indicate both the U.S. mission and the nearby CIA annex in Benghazi were involved in coordinating U.S. aid transfers to rebels in the Middle East, with particular emphasis on shipping weapons to jihadis fighting the regime of Bashar al-Assad of Syria.Benghazi Remebrence

  • The compound itself was deliberately set up with minimal security so as not to attract attention to what the author reports were secretive activities taking place inside the mission, activities for which Clinton herself was a central player.Clinton Obama

  • Clinton’s claim that the intelligence community believed the attacks were a spontaneous protest in response to a “hateful video” is called into question by numerous revelations.

  • Clinton placed the blame for the controversial talking points squarely with the CIA without mentioning the State Department contributed to the manufacturing of the points.Is Hillary to blame

  • Clinton wrongly wrote that the closest U.S. Special Forces that could have responded to the attacks were “standing by in Fort Bragg, North Carolina, but they would take several hours to muster and were more than five thousand miles away.”

  • Klein notes it has been confirmed Special Forces known as C-110, or the EUCOM CIF, were on a training mission in Croatia the night of the attack. The distance between Croatia’s capital, Zagreb, and Benghazi is about 925 miles. The C-110 is a rapid-response team that exists for emergencies like terrorist attacks against U.S. embassies abroad.Ham

  • Clinton’s assertion “no one in the State Department, the intelligence community, any other agency, ever recommended that we close Benghazi. We were clear-eyed about the threats and the dangers as they were developing in eastern Libya and in Benghazi” was contradicted by her top deputies, including officials known to be close to her who were responsible for some major denials of security at the compound, such as Undersecretary Patrick Kennedy, who cancelled the use in Tripoli of a DC-3 aircraft that could have aided in the evacuation of the Benghazi victims.PI 19

  • Kennedy also denied permission to build guard towers at the Benghazi mission and approved the withdrawal of a security support team, or SST, that special U.S. forces specifically maintained for counter-attacks on U.S. embassies or threats against diplomatic personnel.30 Witnesses disappear

  • Clinton’s contention she was not informed of the general nature of security at the Benghazi facility, even though she was known to have taken a particular interest in the compound.Further from the truth

  • Clinton reportedly called for the compound to be converted into a permanent mission before a scheduled trip to Libya in December 2012 that eventually was canceled. Clinton failed to mention Stevens may have gone to Benghazi for a project that she specifically requested, what Hicks called Clinton’s wish to convert the shanty complex into a permanent mission in a symbol of the new Libya, so she could announce the establishment of a permanent U.S. State Department facility during her planned visit there in December 2012.

Follow Garth Kant @DCgarth

Article collective closing

 

Don’t Call It a War? Administration hit for refusing to use ‘w’ word for ISIS mission


Obamacare

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/09/12/dont-call-it-war-administration-hit-for-refusing-to-use-w-word-for-isis-mission/

Imperial President ObamaThe Obama administration is refusing to describe the expanded military campaign against the Islamic State as a war — despite plans to launch airstrikes across two tumultuous Middle East countries, dispatch hundreds more U.S. military personnel and build a coalition of nations to ultimately “destroy” the growing terror network.

The reluctance to use that label has generated confusion on Capitol Hill, particularly in light of new intelligence estimates that the Islamic State has as many as 31,500 fighters across Iraq and Syria. That’s the size of a small army – and close to the estimated size of the Taliban force in 2001.

Yet in television interviews on Thursday, Secretary of State John Kerry repeatedly avoided the term “war” to describe the mission, instead calling it a “major counterterrorism operation” that could last a long time.lurch

“It’s hard to find a response to that,” Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., told Fox News, when asked about Kerry’s comments. “Then what was the president talking about [Wednesday] night?”

McCain and other lawmaker suggest Kerry’s comments do not square with President Obama’s stated goal of defeating the Islamic State, or ISIS.

“This is John Kerry, vintage,” McCain said.

Other members of the administration besides Kerry appeared to be struggling to both define the conflict and the terms of victory, as the U.S. enters a new and potentially risky phase of its operation against the terror group.

Asked Thursday what would constitute “destroying” ISIS, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said: “I didn’t bring my Webster’s Dictionary with me up here.”Eagle Really

Earnest tried to explain the operation as falling under the umbrella of the 2001 authorization to use military force – the measure that provided the legal basis to go into Afghanistan after the 9/11 attacks. (Kerry also compared the operation to strikes against terrorists in Afghanistan and Pakistan and Yemen.)

The administration is using this argument in order to avoid seeking new congressional authorization for the fight against ISIS.

But the Islamic State was not originally linked to the Sept. 11 attacks and has since split from the perpetrator of those attacks, Al Qaeda.

Some lawmakers say the administration is on shaky legal ground by treating this as a mere continuation of the counterterrorism missions in other countries, and is effectively downplaying the entire challenge ahead.

McCain said that if the president doesn’t understand the difference between the Islamic State and terror networks in places like Yemen, “then … he is oblivious to the size, shape, strength and ability of ISIS. It’s like comparing a little league team to the New York Yankees.”

A CIA spokesperson confirmed to Fox News on Thursday that the ISIS fighting force has sharply increased from the original estimate of at least 10,000 fighters.

“CIA assesses the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) can muster between 20,000 and 31,500 fighters across Iraq and Syria, based on a new review of all-source intelligence reports from May to August,” the spokesperson said. “This new total reflects an increase in members because of stronger recruitment since June following battlefield successes and the declaration of a caliphate, greater battlefield activity, and additional intelligence.”

Asked Thursday whether the government still views these operations as part of the “war on terrorism,” State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said: “It’s certainly not how I would refer to our efforts.”word games

House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Michael McCaul, R-Texas, said the semantics over what to call the operation “weakens the mission.”

“Words matter,” McCaul said Friday.

McCaul praised the president for moving to expand the mission into Syria, where the “head of the snake” of ISIS is located. But he said the administration is being careful with its language because the terror group defies Obama’s “campaign narrative” about ending the war on terrorism and putting Al Qaeda on the run.

“ISIL clearly hasn’t gotten the memo that I think John Kerry did,” McCaul said.

Article collective closing

Obama Claims ISIS Is Not Islamic


Obamacare

Read more at http://lastresistance.com/7235/obama-claims-isis-is-not-islamic/#WUzUejcqgBxKhuYP.99

Posted on September 11, 2014 by

“I believe that political correctness can be a form of linguistic fascism, and it sends shivers down the spine of my generation who went to war against fascism.” – P.D. James

Political correctness is like the toxoplasma gondii parasite; it infects its host and dangerously alters its behavior. In the case of political correctness, a rational—and more importantly, realistic—worldview is changed for the benefit of another’s feelings. Political correctness tells us that the truth is too offensive, or cruel to speak, and that we must be sensitive. But sometimes sensitivity blinds us to the reality of our cultural experience, which directly or indirectly endangers us.

In his speech yesterday regarding the radical Islamic terrorist organization ISIS, president Obama said many things, but one thing in particular left me stunned.

“Now let’s make two things clear: ISIL is not Islamic…No religion condones the killing of innocents, and the vast majority of ISIL’s victims have been Muslim.”

According to the president, ISIS is not Islamic. Doesn’t that sound so warm, culturally sensitive, and nuanced? What an urbane, and prudent man, Obama is. His rationale? The fact that ISIS condones murder, but also the fact that many of ISIS’ victims have been fellow Muslims. You read that correctly. Because ISIS kills Muslims, they cannot possibly be truly Islamic. Let’s talk about that.

  • ISISis made up of Sunni Muslims, and many of the Muslims they are killing are Shiite. To the Sunnis, Shiite Muslims are infidels, and aretherefore a target. According to Alissa J. Rubin of The New York Times:
    • ISIS believes that the Shiites are apostates and must die in order to forge a pure form of Islam…In a chilling video that appeared to have been made more than a year ago in the Anbar Province of Iraq, ISIS fighters stopped three truck drivers in the desert and asked them whether they were Sunnis or Shiites. All three claimed to be Sunni. Then the questions got harder. They were asked how they performed each of the prayers: morning, midday and evening. The truck drivers disagreed on their methods, and all were shot.”
    • Regardless of what you believe about Islam in general, the fact that Muslims are murdering other Muslims does not preclude those doing the killing from being Muslim. And Obama is a moron for saying so and thinking the public will believe him.
  • Next, let’s talk about the whole “no religion condones the killing of innocents” thing. Obama is either deliberately spreading misinformation, or he is bafflingly stupid. The Quran is filled with passages which command the execution of infidels (otherwise known as non-Muslims).
    • Quran 5:33 “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement.”
    • Quran 8:12 “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.”

Imperial Islamic President ObamaThose are just two of dozens, and dozens of versus in the Quran advocating the killing of infidels. There are peaceful Muslims in the world, certainly, but there are those who take the Quran quite literally, and they are the ones fighting this war. Radical Muslims are no less Muslim because they practice violence. In fact, one could argue that they are more devout, because they follow more closely to the Quran.

Additionally, Obama shows his foolishness when he describes the victims of ISIS as “innocents.” To ISIS, non-Sunni Muslims are not innocents, they are infidels, and enemies of Allah. The radicals in ISIS are not killing innocents; they are killing their enemies, whom they believe to be apostates, and evil doers.

Since the beginning of his presidency, when he gave his we’re-all-in-this-together speech in Cairo, Barack Obama has been terrified of labeling radical Islamic terrorism. As his presidency has progressed (I hesitate to use that word), he has evolved, entering into even more treacherous territory. Remember when Obama “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam” during his speech to the UN? Now, with his latest denial of the linkage between Islam, and terror, he has taken political correctness to a frightening level.

The longer Obama denies that radical Islam is the root of modern terrorism, the more power we give to radical Islam. Not only is it a disservice to those who have fought, and died to say that the terror we face isn’t based in radical Islam, it’s a denial that leads us away from fighting the root of the problem. If we don’t recognize the intent of the radical Islamists, which is to wipe us out, and create a modern caliphate, we won’t be able to defeat them. Instead, we will try to negotiate our way out of the problem. But you cannot negotiate with someone who has no intent to cooperate.

Obama’s denial that ISIS is inherently Islamic is not only completely untrue, but If his mouth is open he must be lyinghazardous to our safety as a nation. Given the absolute stupidity of Obama’s statement, it’s safe to say that he is either stunningly incompetent, or just a flat out liar. Either way, he is doing the United States quite a bit of harm.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article collective closing

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: