Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Archive for November, 2014

WND – – ISIS seeks converts among Ferguson rioters

Posted By Leo Hohmann On 11/28/2014

URL of the Original Posting Site:

Article reposted from WND:

An ISIS member uploaded this photo presenting a message to Ferguson rioters.
An ISIS member uploaded this photo presenting a message to Ferguson rioters.

The Islamic State looks at the rioting of black youths in the streets of American cities and sees red-meat – an untapped treasure trove of new recruits.

Within hours of the Ferguson grand jury’s decision not to prosecute Officer Darren Wilson in the fatal shooting of Michael Brown, members of the Islamic State, also called IS, ISIS or ISIL, started Tweeting messages directed at angry protesters. Some promised to send in soldiers to help, for a price:

Abu Hussain Al-Britani tweeted:

“We hear you and we will help you if you accept Islam and reject corrupt man-made laws like democracy and pledge your allegiance to Caliph Abu Bakr and then we will shed our blood for you and send our soldiers that don’t sleep, whose drink is blood, and their play is carnage.”

“To a sane person it sounds ridiculous, but to an insanely angry person it is very tempting,” said the Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, founder of the Brotherhood Organization of New Destiny, a Los Angeles-based ministry that works to strengthen black families by building better fathers. “If they can pledge their allegiance to Louis Farrakhan then they can pledge their allegiance to ISIS.”

While Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam is not as radical as ISIS, it does preach hatred against white America, and ISIS is tapping into that same base of angry blacks, Peterson said.

He’s not sure how effective the Islamic State’s pitch will be, but he expects some blacks will fall prey to the message.

“It’s possible considering their state of anger,” he said. “The only thing the enemy has to do is come along and say ‘I’m you’re friend and I understand that white Americans discriminate against you and I want to help.’”

Al-Britani also uploaded a photo to Twitter of five young black men dressed in terrorist garb, their faces covered with scarves so only their eyes are seen while holding rifles and a message scrawled on paper. A caption under the photo read: “Accept Islam & give bayah [allegiance] to Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi & then we will send u soldiers that don’t sleep! – #IS #Ferguson.”

more isis promises

Another member with the Twitter handle Abu Hamza As Somaal, said: “White pigs oppressed our brothers for a long (sic) it’s a time to claim our right through #jihad through #FergusonDecision.”

Somaal followed with another tweet that said “My fellow black community know that #Jihad is the only thing that will bring justice, respect and honour in #FergusonDecision #Islamic State.”

Another terrorist using the handle “Abu Dujana” taunted the Ferguson rioters, tweeting “how long will you let these govts oppress u. Draw your knife and show them a response!!”

Britani added an appeal to the values of American civil rights leader Malcolm X with the tweet: “From #IS to #Ferguson we heard your call and we are ready to respond! #FergusonDecision #BeLikeMalcolmX #FightBack.”

Abu duwan 'draw your knives and show them a response'

Peterson said the interjection of Malcolm X was a clever attempt to relate to the American black civil rights experience.

“Malcolm X wasn’t this radical but you have to bring up the past history in order to get the people to identify with that,” he said. “What they always leave out was that Malcolm X came to the point where he realized he needed to get over his anger and that all white people were not racists and he had been lied to by (his mentor) Elijah Muhammad while he was in prison.”

Joel Richardson, author of The Islamic Antichrist and director of the new documentary “End Times Eyewitness,” said the Islamic State’s attempts to get into the minds of young American blacks would be laughable if it wasn’t so dangerous.Christian Persecution

“Personally I’m indignant that ISIS is using this moment of deep pain and anger within the African American community to exploit heightened emotions for their own sick purposes,” Richardson said.

Both Peterson and Richardson said Islam has always tried to drive a wedge between American blacks and their Christian heritage by saying that Christianity is the religion of the white oppressors and Islam is the religion of the black man who wishes to throw off his oppressors. But this type of narrative skips over the history of how blacks have been treated in Muslim countries across North Africa.

“Muslims frequently claim that Christianity is a white man’s religion and Islam is a black man’s religion. History laughs at such a suggestion. Not only was the Islamic slave trade far more vast in scope than European and American slavery, but it also lasted much longer,” Richardson said. “The simple fact of the matter is that today the only nation where black slavery is still practiced is in the Muslim nation of Mauritania, where Arab masters still own black slaves.”

Saudi Arabia, the headquarters of Sunni Islam, only outlawed slavery in 1960 and blacks in that country are still relegated to a near apartheid type existence.

In fact, the Arab Muslims have a name for blacks or Africans. It’s called “Abd” or “slave.”

A Muslim-American group in the Detroit area has recently launched a campaign to get Muslims in that area to stop using the word “Abd” for black people, as reported by FrontPage magazine.

Black Americans who have converted to Islam in the greater Detroit area have recognized the frequent use of the term and many feel it is the equivalent to the “N” word in English. Yet, campaigns to end the use of this term have met with stiff resistance from Arab Muslims.

“While American slavery is no doubt a great stain on American history, this country also went to war to end slavery,” Richardson said. “And today this diverse nation is home to millions of the descendants of those who were once slaves. Black culture is part of the very fabric of American culture. The Islamic world cannot say the same thing, simply because Muslim practice was to emasculate their black slaves. So the story of Islamic slavery is really one of a great genocide. A holocaust really, one that is rarely discussed. Islam has always been a form of Arab supremacism.”

Wherever Islam has spread, it has brought the language and culture of seventh century Arabia with it. Why is it, Richardson asks, that American blacks who convert to Islam will immediately change their American name to an Arabic name?

Richardson believes African-Americans are being targeted now by Islam just as blacks in northern Africa have been targeted through history. The only difference is Islam was able to use military force in Africa whereas it uses propaganda to recruit converts in America.Christian Persecution

“African pagans, Jews and Christians were subjugated and forced under the yoke of Islam. But the whole region had long ago accepted Christianity as the one true path to the one true God,” Richardson said. “So when I see Muslim jihadis appealing to young black men to convert to Islam, I ask myself why they would willingly choose to go back to a state of slavery?

Muslims themselves are referred to as slaves to “Allah,” the god of Islam.

“Why would someone desire to become a slave to a desert demon-god when they could be a child of the Most High God?” Richardson asks.

He asks any man targeted by Islamic recruiters to consider the differences between Christianity and Islam.

“The God of the Bible adopts all those who come to Him. He is the One who lays down His life for those He created. He is a Father,” Richardson said. “The demon-god of the Quran is much more akin to the father who never comes home, who is absent and is never present. And yet he demands that Muslims call themselves slaves. That’s a profound insult. My hope is that those in Ferguson and the larger African-American community will return en masse to their true heritage, to become godly men who work toward justice and reconciliation rather than toward cutting off heads, and destroying their own communities.’

“Everywhere that true Islam spreads, slavery follows. Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom.”

Peterson, who works with black families through BOND to help build stronger fathers, said Islam has nothing to offer those who are neither ignorant of history nor consumed by anger.

“Islam is a racist, hateful religion,” Peterson said. “To me it is not even a religion, it appears to be more political, because religion is about forgiveness and redemption. In northern Africa there are blacks over there who are enslaved right now, by Islam, but they will use them. It’s not that they care about black Americans they use them for a higher cause, which is the advancement of Islam. And a lot of black Americans are not aware of the treatment of blacks under Islam. If black Americans heard the truth they might wake up and get over their anger, so this is a crucial message and it concerns me and we need to get it out there and what the danger is that will come upon us if we don’t deal with this anger.”

Peterson said anger will cloud anyone’s judgment.

“Your enemy looks like your friend and your friend looks like your enemy. Anger will make a person look different to you. It changes your perception of them,” he said. “It’s no different in a marriage relationship, if a man gets angry at his wife. It’s the same person but his anger clouds his perception of her. That’s why many in the black community, they can’t see that this is the best country for black folks and they do have opportunities here if they will put their anger away and focus on their opportunities.”

© Copyright 1997-2013. All Rights Reserved.




This Kid’s Amazing Rendition of ‘The Star-Spangled Banner’ Is Going Viral–Watch It And You’ll See Why

Posted by Michael CantrellMichael CantrellNovember 28, 2014

URL of the Original Posting Site:

Nothing stirs up the red, white, and blue coursing through my veins faster than hearing a talented singer completely rock out “The Star-Spangled Banner.”

If it’s done correctly, it brings a tear to my eye and gives me goosebumps as I reflect on how awesome this country really is. It reminds me that despite all of the bad junk going on with our corrupt government, this nation is truly worth fighting for, and in the end, we will be victorious in restoring her to her former glory.

This is exactly how I felt when I heard this young man belt out our National Anthem with the full respect the song demands. It’s simply amazing.

From TheBlaze:

But on Thursday, 12-year-old Quintavious Johnson — a contestant on the 9th season of “America’s Got Talent” — provided a beautiful rendition of the song that earned him quite a bit of praise.

Performing at the Thanksgiving Day game between the Detroit Lions and the Chicago Bears, Johnson inspired the masses with a perfect delivery of the national anthem.


This is so awesome. I think we should all watch it again. Go ahead. Really. I’ll wait.

What makes this version of the song so special is that there have been so many terrible live versions sung at sporting events that each time a video gets posted of the latest one, it’s usually because someone flubbed it, not because they did a stellar job like Johnson did with the tune.

Hopefully this song will brighten your day and remind you how great America is. While things are bad, they could always be worse, so take hope. We’re fighting for freedom, and you know what? It’s a war we can actually win.

 About the Author; Michael Cantrell

Michael CantrellMichael Cantrell is a conservative journalist/blogger with over 8 years of professional writing experience writing for some of the largest publications on the Internet. He has participated in several campaigns to repeal Obamacare, worked with Tea Party candidates running for Congress, and more. Michael is a staunch constitutionalist and lover of American history.


New Studies on Voter ID Laws DESTROY This Major Claim By Liberals

Posted by Michael CantrellNovember 28, 2014

URL of the Original Posting Site:

Voter ID

With President Obama’s recent immigration executive order–the one that gives 5 million lawbreakers a “get out of jail free card” to stay in America–it’s more important than ever for states to pass voter ID laws requiring folks to provide proof of identity at the polls.

This should seem like common sense given the fact that it’s likely many of those immigrants who will be allowed to stay will feel indebted to the Democratic Party, and if allowed, will gladly cast a vote in favor of bogus radical progressives bent on the destruction of America.

Unfortunately, liberals are working overtime to try dissuading Americans from being in favor of any kind of measure that would protect the integrity of the voting system, using their favorite go-to weapon to shame people into not supporting voter ID laws: racism.Mar 3 09

Kooky liberals claim that these type of laws “suppress minority voters,” therefore it’s racist to pass and enforce them. Never mind the fact that you need an ID to drive, buy beer, get a gun, and the list goes on.

Well, according to the New York Times, several freshly conducted studies say liberals spewing out this garbage are full of crap.

As the Brennan Center puts it in the second sentence of their article: “Yes, it is likely rare for an election to be close enough for voter ID laws to swing the outcome.”

The Brennan Center instead disputes my contention that studies tend to “overstate the number of voters who truly lack identification.”

My position on the matter, setting aside whether the laws are a cynical attempt to disenfranchise Democratic voters, is based on these facts: Many studies do not use robust matching techniques when comparing state voter registration and licensing databases (and robust matching, even when used, isn’t perfect); and many studies fail to match voter registration files with alternative forms of identification, like United States passports or military identification.

The studies with the most sensational and widely publicized findings have generally failed to do these things. The most famous of these was a study finding that 758,000 of Pennsylvania’s registered voters lacked identification. It caused liberals to wonder whether voter ID laws could steal elections. The result was publicized by the Brennan Center, but more rigorous studies have since cut that figure nearly in half.Partyof Deceit Spin and Lies


I hate to break it to you, Mr. Liberal, but voter ID laws aren’t any more racist than requiring an ID to buy a beer.Liberalism a mental disorder

With the state of our country currently going down the crapper–due to a president who claims to be a constitutional scholar, yet for some reason can’t seem to grasp the concept of a separation of powers–it’s more critical than ever to protect the integrity of the voting system.ignorance

Voting is the most powerful weapon the average citizen possess to fight out of control government. If this is corrupted, then the great American experiment we’ve all been privileged to be a part of is over.

This study should help open some eyes about the fairness and effectiveness of voter ID laws to help prevent voter fraud and inspire other states around the nation to adopt them as quickly as possible.




How low can it go? Oil, gas prices in freefall as OPEC reels from US fracking, Published November 29, 2014

URL of the Original Posting Site:

Mideast Bahrain Oil Prices-1.jpg

A row of oil pumps work in the desert oil fields of Sakhir, Bahrain. OPEC nations have agreed to keep supply steady, putting new pressure on US producers. (The Associated Press)

Drivers paying less at the pump due to free-falling oil prices can thank the U.S. energy boom for generating shale oil – and weakening OPEC’s ability to keep the cost of a gallon of gas high.

In just a matter of months, the price of a barrel of oil has dropped from more than $100 to about $70, and gas is now cheaper than it has been in years. But a recent report conducted for the American Petroleum Institute claimed oil would cost twice as much as it does now if it weren’t for America’s fracking boom, which wrings oil and natural gas out of shale miles underground.

But the next question could be whether the fracking industry can survive the low prices it brought.

“The shale boom is on a par with the dot-com boom,” Russian oil baron Leonid Fedun of OAO Lukoil told Bloomberg. “The strong players will remain, the weak ones will vanish.”

OPEC, the cartel of oil-producing nations that has historically been able to calibrate the price of oil – and ultimately gasoline – by increasing or decreasing supply, announced Thursday that it won’t fight the price skid by cutting production this time. That likely means prices will continue to fall, and the more costly production technique of fracking could become cost-prohibitive, say experts.

Drivers have benefited in recent months from the falling prices, the API study found.

“This reduction in petroleum product prices have saved U.S. consumers an estimated $63 to $248 billion in 2013 and estimated cumulative savings of between $165 and $624 billion from 2008 to 2013,” stated the report.

OPEC decision to maintain a production target of 30 million barrels a day was seen as a reflection of its members view that the short term pain was necessary to pressure rival producers in the U.S., who need moderate oil prices to break even. Saudi Arabia, the leader of OPEC, appears to be hoping to drive prices below the level at which shale oil production is economical. Experts say shale oil production turns too costly at the $60 a barrel level.

But other OPEC countries may not be able to withstand the steady production and the falling prices it brings. OPEC members like Venezuela and Nigeria need levels close to $100 or above to fund national budgets. Saudi rival Iran is suffering, too, with the price drop adding to huge revenue losses due to sanctions on its crude sales imposed over its nuclear program.

And Russia’s economy is in trouble, making falling oil revenues a problem there, as well.

“I think you’re going to see additional tension between the OPEC ranks,” said Jamie Webster, senior director of crude oil markets at IHS consultants.

In the U.S., gasoline prices are averaging $2.82 per gallon, the lowest price this time of year since 2009, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, which says the average U.S. retail regular-grade gasoline price has fallen 88 cents/gal since the start of July.

But in the U.S., consumers’ joy at pump prices falling toward $2 a gallon will be tempered by fears the burgeoning economy in places like the Dakotas, Texas and Oklahoma could be hurt by the lower cost. The industry is credited with creating nearly 2 million jobs, a number projected to double by 2035.

“If prices don’t recover soon this could be the beginning of the end of the Great American oil fracking boom,” Forbes’ Christopher Helman recently wrote. BIgger energy companies with money of their own to invest might be able to ride out the dip, but smaller, highly-leveraged oil and gas companies will have problems, he said.



Islam Religion Of Peace… What Quran Has Obama Been Reading…

Posted by Mike Shepard of DC Gazette / 11/12/2014

URL of the Original Posting Site:


Imperial Islamic President ObamaIn the “Audacity of Hope” Obama writes “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” In the history of this country when have you ever heard a president say he stands with any religion. Even Bill Clinton convinced us he stood with this country. We have a president who stands with what some call a cult and others call Islam. We can not have a president putting anything before our country especially Islam.

Some Muslims claim the root word of Islam is “al-salaam” which is “peace” in Arabic. An Arabic word only has one root. The root word for Islam is “al-Silm,” which means “submission” or “surrender.” The Quran not only calls Muslims to submit to Allah, it also commands them to subdue people of other religions until they submit to Islāmic rule. If Obama stands with Islam he considers every American who is not Muslim to be an Infidel. Maybe that explains the arrogance and complete disregard for this country and its constitution. Why hasn’t he or the Muslim Brotherhood stood up to the pedophiles of ISIS? Could it be their prophet Muhammad has been accused of being a pedophile?Pedophiles

It’s been reported that Muhammad married his favorite bride when she was the ripe age of six. He then consummated the marriage when she showed first signs of puberty at nine. A little girl who gets her first period at nine is just a little girl with her first period. She is a child and that consummation is nothing more than rape.

Let’s talk about this religion of peace when it comes to women. Quran 4:34 states that you can beat your slaves and beat your wife. I don’t think Obama could handle that one because my bet would be on Michelle. Pay Per View would pay good money to see that ass whooping. One of the many disturbing things about the Quran is 65:4, which states you can rape, marry, and divorce pre-pubescent girls.

If Obama is in love with the Quran does this mean he doesn’t have a problem with the pedophiles of his faith? There is no need in trying to get an honest answer because the Quran 16:106 has instructed him to lie to promote Islam.obama-liar4-266x189

Quran 9:111 instructs him and every Muslim to kill non-Muslims to receive their 72 virgins in Hell. Did the hijackers of 9-11 pick this date because of the numbers to that verse?

You better remove this traitor from office before they settle on another date inspired by the Quran.

No matter where you stand in this world and no matter what your beliefs. We have all been deceived by Satan the greatest deceiver this universe has ever known. His hate has caused war since the beginning of man. This holy war can last another hundred years or it can end tomorrow.

God is love and love conquers all. As I kneel each day talking to the Father I pray for you all. I pray for those who have hate in their hearts to replace it with love. I am able to do this because of the words of Gods perfect Son. Jesus once said “Father please forgive them for they know not what they do.” He wasn’t talking of the men who nailed him on that cross. He was talking about you and me.

You can chop another head off but you shall never kill love. His love has always been here, and has remained in force for over two thousand years.

God bless each and everyone of you, and may He forever bless His World… Semper Fi, Shep

About the Author: Mike Shepard

After graduating high school I served nine years in the Marines. My loyalty is to God, country, family in that order. I am not your typical writer. I am just a Marine with an opinion. What I write is my opinion and not persuaded by anyone else. My love for this country runs deep, and I have sworn an oath to protect it. I don’t care what color of skin, the church You attend, or your lifestyle choices. You are all loved by God, important to God, and we are all important to this country… Semper Fi, Shep…You can follow me on twitter @mshep08_mike



Life Lessons

New WhatDidYouSay Logo

Many of life’s lessons are the hardest to comprehend. The human experience is to ignore them, or try to minimize them. It never works.

The following documentary is one of those tough life lesson. Though it is very hard to look at, and harder still to think about, it is imperative that we accept the lesson so we can have a part in fighting the good fight to see that this life lesson is not repeated.

Jerry Broussard of

Video URL:

YouTube URL:





Imperial President Obama’s Plans for World War III

New WhatDidYouSay Logo

Click on image below to view important video. Please share this:


(in case the link doesn’t work, here is the URL:

obama video



Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon









18-Year-Old’s Short Film on Abortion Will Blow Your Mind

by Nancy Flanders | Washington, DC | | 11/28/14

URL of the Original Posting Site:

(LiveActionNews) — One decision can change everything. Mitosis, a short film from 18-year-old director Hannah Victoria (Worth Saving), aims to prove that. It may seem that the choices we make for ourselves will affect us and us alone, but it simply isn’t true. There is always a ripple effect, whether small or large.

Mitosis tells the story of a young doctor, who after making a promise to a childhood friend, sets out to find a cure for cancer. The film, from Victoria’s company Expressionistic Studios, was released on YouTube this week and promises to shine a light on the magnitude of damage each and every abortion could have on the world.

Victoria explains:

As young people, whether we choose to acknowledge it or not, society’s popular opinion on the sanctity of life is directly affecting our lives in huge ways. Just thinking about how profoundly different our world would be if the millions of lives lost were present is mind boggling!


The film was funded by generous donations through a Kickstarter campaign. When it reached its goal of $5,000, Victoria announced it would be released for free. The total raised through Kickstarter has now reached $5,200.

hannahvictoriaVictoria, who received a Best Young Filmmaker award for her work on Small Talents, says she has always been passionate about the sanctity of human life and wanted to create a film that showcases the potential that each and every life holds. She also wants pregnancy resource centers to be able to use the film in any way they can to support their work. In its first few days on YouTube, Mitosis has been viewed nearly 1,000 times.

“It is amazing to see the impact it is having just in the few days it has been released,” says Victoria, “I’ve gotten e-mails from people who have had multiple abortions, people who want to thank me for making a film about what their baby could have done, and pro-life supporters who are excited to have this tool to show to those who need to see the message!”

As we know, those who support abortion believe that the only person who is affected by a pregnancy or an abortion is the pregnant woman. Her decision should, they say, have no bearing on the rest of us.

Except it does. And Victoria shows us how in Mitosis.

LifeNews Note: Nancy is a work at home mom who writes about parenting, special needs children, and the right to life. She is the lucky mother of two spirited little girls, one who has cystic fibrosis, and she spends any free moment she can find fundraising for a cure for CF. You can read her personal blog at Reprinted from Live Action News.





Ann Coulter Letter: Liberals willing to fight to the last drop of black blood

By: Ann Coulter  11/26/2014 05:36 PM

URL of the Original Posting Site:

Liberals willing to fight to the last drop of black blood

The riot in Ferguson reminds me, I hate criminals, but I hate liberals more. They planned this riot. They stoked the fire, lied about the evidence and produced a made-to-order riot.

Every other riot I’ve ever heard of was touched off by some spontaneous event that exploded into mob violence long before any media trucks arrived. This time, the networks gave us a countdown to the riot, as if it were a Super Bowl kickoff. 

From the beginning, Officer Darren Wilson’s shooting of Michael Brown wasn’t reported like news. It was reported like a cause. The media are in a huff about the prosecutor being “biased” because his father was a cop, who was shot and killed by an African-American. What an assh@le!

Evidently, the sum-total of what every idiot on TV knows about the law is Judge Sol Wachtler’s 20-year-old joke that a prosecutor could “indict a ham sandwich.” We’re supposed to be outraged that this prosecutor didn’t indict the ham sandwich of Darren Wilson.

Liberals seem not to understand that they don’t have a divine right to ruin someone’s life and bankrupt him with a criminal trial, just so they’re satisfied. The reason most grand jury investigations result in an indictment is that most grand juries aren’t convened solely to patronize racial mobs. Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon was basically demanding an indictment of Wilson before Big Mike’s body was cold. It was only because of racial politics that this shooting wasn’t dismissed without a grand jury, at all.

Obama says anger is an “understandable reaction” to the grand jury’s finding. Why? And why — as almost everyone is saying — are we supposed to praise the “peaceful protests”?

There’s nothing to protest! A cop shot a thug who was trying to kill him. The grand jury documents make perfectly clear that Big Mike was entirely responsible for his own death. Can’t the peaceful protesters read?

The night of the riot, Obama said the law “often feels as if it is being applied in discriminatory fashion.” Maybe, but not in this case — except toward Officer Wilson. I know liberals were hoping they had finally found the great white whale of racism, but they’re just going to have to keep plugging away. They might want to come up with a more productive way to spend their time, inasmuch as they’re about 0:100 on white racism sightings.

Anyone following this case has seen the video of Big Mike robbing a store and roughing up an innocent Pakistani clerk about 10 minutes before being shot by Officer Wilson. They’ve seen him flashing Bloods gang signs in photos.

They know Brown’s mother was recently arrested for clubbing grandma with a pipe over T-shirt proceeds. They’ve seen the video of Brown’s ex-con stepfather shouting at a crowd of protesters after the grand jury’s decision: “Burn this bitch down!”

Liberals will say none of that is relevant in court, but apparently they don’t think actual evidence is relevant either. It’s certainly relevant in the court of public opinion that the alleged victims are a cartoonishly lower-class, periodically criminal black family.

TV hosts narrated the riot by saying it showed “the community” feels it’s not being listened to. Only liberals look at blacks looting and say, See what white Americans made them do?

That’s their proof of injustice — look at how blacks are reacting! (While I don’t approve of the looting part, I do approve of the whole throwing-bottles-at-CNN part.)

The looters aren’t the community!

The community doesn’t want black thugs robbing stores and sauntering down the middle of its streets. The community doesn’t want to be assaulted by Big Mike. The community didn’t want its stores burned down.

That community testified in support of Officer Darren Wilson. About a half-dozen black witnesses supported Officer Wilson’s version of what happened. One was a black woman, who saw the shooting from the Canfield Green apartments. Crying on the stand, she said, “I have a child and that could have been my son.”

And yet, she confirmed all crucial parts of Wilson’s account. She said “the child” (292-pound Big Mike) never had his hands up and the cop only fired when “the baby” was coming at him. “Why won’t that boy stop?” she asked her husband.

I always want to know more about the heroic black witnesses. They are put in a position no white person will ever be in and do the right thing by telling the truth — then go into hiding from “the community” being championed by goo-goo liberals.

White people don’t feel any obligation to defend some thug just because he’s white. Only blacks are expected to lie on behalf of criminals of their own race.

But real heroism doesn’t interest liberals. They only ooh-and-ahh over blacks with rap sheets. The only meaningful white racism anymore is the liberal infantilization of black people. 




Black Residents Armed With Assault Rifles Stand Guard Outside White-Owned Business During Ferguson Riots

URL of the Original Posting Site:

Black Ferguson Residents Protect White Owned Store.png<img width=”665″ height=”385″ src=”×385.jpg” data-attID=”1638955″ class=”single-leader wp-post-image” alt=”Black Ferguson Residents Protect White Owned Store.png” />

A group of black Ferguson residents armed with high-powered rifles stood outside a white-owned business in the city during recent riots, protecting it from rioters that looted and burned other businesses.

After a grand jury returned no indictment against Darren Wilson, the Ferguson police officer who shot and killed unarmed black teen Michael Brown, protesters took to the streets and the demonstrations quickly turned into rioting. Several buildings were set ablaze, but a group of heavily armed black men stood outside a Conoco gas station.

One of the residents, a 6-foot-8 man named Derrick Johnson, held an AR-15 assault rifle as he stood in a pickup truck near that store’s entrance. Three other black Ferguson residents joined Johnson in front of the store, each of them armed with pistols.

In a city torn apart by racial tensions, the fact that black residents took up arms to defend a white-owned store made headlines.

The men said they felt indebted to the store’s owner, Doug Merello, who employed them over the course of several years. The men said Merello always treated them with respect.

“He’s a nice dude, he’s helped us a lot,” said a man identified himself as R.J. The 29-year-old R.J. said the group chased away several groups of teenagers who wanted to loot the store, but also nearly got into a brush with soldiers from the Missouri National Guard, who initially mistook them for looters.

The gas station’s owner said the men definitely saved his store.

“We would have been burned to the ground many times over if it weren’t for them,” said Merello, whose father first bought the store in 1984.

While the black Ferguson residents defended the white-owned store, dozens of other businesses were not as lucky. Officials said more than a dozen businesses received “significant” damage as groups of rioters threw bricks, broke windows, and set fires.



GREAT FEEL GOOD REPORT: Vandalized Ferguson Bakery Receives $230K in Donations to Fund Reopening

URL of the Original Posting Site:

Natalie Dubose of Ferguson, Missouri, is a small business owner who was proud to have opened her local cake bakery just over a year ago, but rioters from her own neighborhood destroyed her hard-earned shop this week. Now, thousands of Americans across the country have generously donated over $200,000 to help her rebuild. com 02

Celebrities like actress Patricia Heaton and reality show star Brandi Glanville helped bring awareness to Dubose’s plight, but thousands of regular Americans all across the nation donated Dubose on a website set up to help her reopen her shop, Natalie’s Cakes and More.

“Thank you to actresses Patricia Heaton and Brandi Glanville for supporting me!” Dubose wrote. “I must have missed thousands of other tweets, and I’m so sorry I can’t mention them all. The sweet lady who offered money from her social security check brought me to tears. … Thank you to EVERYONE for the kind words, prayers, and emotional support.”

Thus far, Natalie’s GoFundMe fundraising page has raised nearly $230,000 to help the young woman re-open her shop, far more than she’ll need to do the job.

Dubose has said she is totally floored by the outpouring of support she has received on the fundraising page, as well as on social media. “I would thank everyone for their warm wishes, empathy, and support during this crazy difficult time,” she wrote.

The donor account reached almost $100,000 in the first 20 hours it was posted.

Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston or email the author at




#FERGUSON PROTESTORS: Threaten to Rape and Kill Wives and Children of Police


Posted on November 28, 2014

URL of Original Posting Site:

lootBut it’s OK… they’re black and blacks can get away with saying such things because we’re living in Obamaland now.

Protesters in Ferguson have been threatening to rape the wives of front line police and kill their children during the latest clashes, the wife of one officer has claimed.

The unnamed woman said that her husband has been ‘screamed at’ as he faced off with the angry crowds amid heightened tensions in the suburb of St Louis, Missouri.

She told Fox 2 News that they threatened a home invasion in an apparent attempt to provoke the officers.

The wife claimed the protesters said: ‘We’re going to go to your house. ‘We`re going to rape your wives then we`re going to kill them and we`re going to kill your children’.com 01

The allegations comes after many police officers’ families in Ferguson, Missouri, were reported to be in hiding or running from town amid death and assault threats.

One police wife told KTVI that she’s received threats over the phone and she’s been paranoid for her and her young daughter’s safety ever since.

‘Did they follow me here?’ she told the station. ‘Did I do a good enough job after work today of taking different routes, on my way home?’

Read more: Daily Mail



SHOCK REPORT: St. Louis Bomb Plot Fails Because of Maxed Out EBT Card

by 26 Nov 2014

URL of Original Posting Site:

Only days before a grand jury released its decision on whether there would be a trial for the August shooting in Ferguson, Missouri, the FBI arrested two men who were allegedly looking to buy supplies to make a pipe bomb. 

Sources say the men planned to kill St. Louis County Prosecutor Robert McCulloch, and Ferguson Police Chief Tom Jackson, and also planned to bomb the famed Gateway Arch in downtown St. Louis. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports the men bought what they believed to be a pipe bomb from undercover police but could not afford more bombs “until one suspect’s girlfriend’s Electronic Benefit Transfer card was replenished.”

The two men were arrested on November 21 and accused of attempting to purchase explosives that they planned to use during the Ferguson protests. They were also brought up on gun charges.

But this week, we are learning a bit more about what these men were allegedly planning to do with the explosives.

Sources close to the ongoing investigation have revealed that the men, Brandon Orlando “Muhammad” Baldwin, age unreported, and Olajuwon Ali Davis, 22, were nabbed in an undercover gun sting. The pair were initially arrested after misrepresenting who the firearms were being purchased for, authorities say. Sources also say that the pair intended to kill the St. Louis prosecutor as well as Ferguson’s police chief and also wanted to place their pipe bombs on the upper deck of the St. Louis Gateway Arch. Both pleaded not guilty at their Tuesday hearing. The two also waived their rights to a bail hearing and are being held pending further proceedings.

Olajuwon Ali Davis was a recent speaker at a meeting of the New Black Panther Party held at the Greater St. Mark Family Church in Ferguson in October and has been identified as the Panthers’ “minister of law.”

Authorities would make no further on-the-record statements about the case.



SuperPac Airs New TV Spot —

URL of Original Posting Site:

Washington, DC)—“As families gather to celebrate the American miracle, many are troubled and in disbelief this Thanksgiving because the President of the United States has “gone rogue” and is abetted by a compliant media,” Mike Flynn, spokesman of Conservative War Chest said announcing the new 2-minute television ad. “Just weeks ago, millions of Americans voted for a new direction in this country. Unfortunately, the President has chosen to slip the surly bonds of politics and ignore the voters,” Flynn added. 

 “We are pleased to have time on NFL football on Thanksgiving Day as well as local news over the weekend “ said Flynn, “but this if ever there was a local ad with a national message this is it.”

As Americans join the time-honored tradition of giving thanks, the ad details that they must also today contend with confusing and unsettling developments:

  • A President who discounts the democratic practice of voting,
  • A President who divides the country and weakens the rule of law by governing through  personal orders,  mandates and falsehoods,
  • A President who goes abroad to sign a treaty that imposes recession-level job losses on his own country while giving every advantage to a competing and even hostile foreign power.

“Our ad reminds Americans that the headlines they are reading, unfortunately, are true.” Flynn said. “President Obama says he’s listening not to those who voted but those who didn’t vote. According to former allies, Obama is not only refusing talk to Republicans but even Democrats.”

Based on the two-minute format of the  Paul Harvey “farmer” commercial that drew much comment at this  year’s Superbowl,  the  political commercial that will be shown on holiday football games features the sort of flashing headlines  Americans see on their TV screens

The spot asks “what if ” America had a president who “is listening only to his closest personal advisors and staff – a political party of his own creation that believes in rule through personal order or mandate.”

“Barrack Obama is a creature of the faculty lounge, believing America has a history of being wrong,” Flynn said about about one of the TV spot’s lines. “He believes only he can reshape our nation, ignoring Republicans, Democrats and even voters.”

“Worse though is that this almost messianic belief in himself is now combined with a temper tantrum,” Flynn added. “Obama is willing to upend centuries of the rule of law to show he is politically relevant despite historic low approval ratings.”

“With Obamacare in shambles and “ Grubergate” exposing the president’s own falsehoods about the law and the continuing debacle of the Obama-Clinton-Kerry foreign policy the president is isolated and angry,” Flynn said. “And, despite the best efforts of the press, IRS internal emails about the targeting of political opponents have been made public and Attorney General Eric Holder’s unprecedented extension of “executive privilege” to his own wife has been exposed.”

The spot details how major news organizations have suppressed stories unfavorable to the administration such as allegations of an IRS scandal and Behnghazi cover-up. “ Even the compliant media can’t satisfy Obama’s personal desires,” Flynn noted.       

“Our ad concludes with a picture of  families at the thanksgiving table because Americans still have faith in their country and in themselves,” Flynn said. “They are right in thinking  our current nationals problem are not systemic, but originate with a leader in Washington  who refuses to listen to demands for a new direction and calls for meaningful hope and change.”

“America is still that shining city on the hill,” Flynn noted. “This Thanksgiving, let us all pray that it is ever thus.”


what if
2-Minute Holiday Ad (NFL Game) Warns of Rogue President and Media Suppression VALERIE JARRET FEATURED AS OBAMA WHISPERER Obama Putting at Risk “What’s Best About America”


Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


Civil Disobedience in Ferguson Was Planned and Choreographed Beforehand, Not a Spontaneous Riot

Listen to it ButtonNovember 26, 2014 Windows Icon Windows Media

URL of Original Posting Site:


RUSH: I tried yesterday to make a point about this business in Ferguson, and I did not spend enough time actually thinking about how I wanted to say it in order to be the most clearly communicable and understood.  The artificiality of this, and I do mean artificiality.  These were not riots.  These were planned, staged, predicted, counted on incidents of civil disobedience.

This was not a riot.  This did not happen spontaneously. It did not happen because of something that happened unexpectedly that caused people to lose their mind.  They planned it.  It was a strategic plan, and the media fell right in line, predicting it, and counting down to it and heightening tensions.  And so when it happens, it was expected, and therefore it can’t be a riot. The fact that it was expected and still happened, what does it say about the civility of our culture?  What does it say about the overall civilization that we have?

Something about this has just not seemed right to me and I haven’t been able to put my finger on it.  But it’s the same way I felt in the days leading up to the Obama announcement on amnesty, the executive amnesty for the five million illegals.  Here we were told what was gonna happen and the media, in the pre-days and hours leading up to the event, heightened the tension, the anticipation.  We had a countdown to an event we all knew was coming, and that was the Constitution being violated.

When you get right down to it, that’s what the event was.  And it seemed, even though it happened and we knew it was gonna happen, it just seemed surreal.  Everything seemed to happen on a media schedule, on a media timetable.  Everything seemed to happen because of the media.

In other words, it was real, and what Obama did was real, there’s no question about that. But the same thing here in Ferguson.  We knew the grand jury was gonna have a report at some point and we knew that no matter what that grand jury report was, there was gonna be a riot.  So we all sat down and we expected and waited for it. And the only question was how big was it gonna be, as though now it’s just common.  We sit by, almost idly, and accept the idea that we’re going to have civil unrest, civil disobedience, call it a riot if you want, and that it is justified and we’d better try to understand it. It’s now part of the American fabric, instead of being something spontaneous that is an actual reaction to something.

This riot was planned. It was gonna happen no matter what.  How bad it was gonna be was the only thing unknown.  The actions of the authorities to stop it or not stop it, that was an unknown, but we knew it was gonna happen.  Rodney King was not like this, for example.  The Watts riots in the sixties were not like this. Trayvon Martin was not like this.  This has all been staged.  I’m not saying conspiratorially.  I’m not saying the Wizard of Oz is behind the screen, behind the curtain pulling marionette type strings on puppets and this kind of thing. It’s just that there are now certain destructive aspects of the American culture, civilization, that we have just accepted.  We have resigned ourselves to the fact that they’re gonna happen, in a way, legitimizes them, is the problem here.

And the way the media focuses attention on and counts down, builds the anticipation. And the media leading up to it was not, “Will there or won’t there be a riot?”  There was no question there was going to be a riot.  The only question was, how bad.  And here come the experts predicting the degree of badness of the riot based on whatever the grand jury said.  And while it happened, I’m not saying it didn’t happen, I’m not saying it isn’t real, but at the same time there was nothing spontaneous about this.  It was orchestrated. It was planned. It was going to happen no matter what.

It was going to happen independent of events.  We knew the trigger.  All we had to do was wait for the trigger.  That was the grand jury decision and the report and the announcement, and that was it, and we all knew what was gonna happen.  It’s almost as though we’ve come to expect it, and in a way it’s therefore justified, justifiable.  I don’t know, folks.  I can’t put my finger on this.  And again, I’m not alleging conspiracy.  Don’t misunderstand.  I wish I could find a way to — my problem here is I have feelings about this, and I’m not good at describing the feelings I’ve got.  I’m trying to turn the feelings, convert them into thoughts, which is what I rely on.

There’s something about it that, even though it happened and even though I saw it and even though it was real, there’s something about it that seems illegitimate to me.  (interruption)  Well, it was a stunt.  It was preventable.  But nobody made any effort to stop it.  That’s another thing about this that kind of troubles me in the deep, dark crevices of my mind, is this acceptance, okay, it’s gonna happen, it’s justified, whatever, there was no effort to stop it.  The president didn’t even make an effort.  The president fed the rage when he had his 20-minute little speech, when he was split screened with the riots.

There’s a story out there today, by the way, that that split screen shot is gonna haunt Obama for the rest of his — who in the world believes that?  How in the world is that gonna haunt Obama?  If anybody thinks that that split screen TV shot, here’s Obama on one half of the screen supposedly railing against riots and trying to ask for calm, which is not what he really did.  On the other half of the screen is Ferguson burning and people I guess cannot give up the traditional way of looking at politics and political figures in this country.

If that would have been George W. Bush or George H. W. Bush, maybe even Clinton, it might be something that would haunt.  But what was happening on the screen was not something that troubles Obama.  There’s no way that he could be haunted by this.  Haunted by it means it’s harmful.  Haunted by it means he has no credibility.  Well, there he is out demanding and asking for calm and right next to him on the other side of the screen is Ferguson in flames.  That’s not gonna be a problem for Barack Obama.  A, he’s not responsible for it.  B, he wishes it didn’t happen; but, C, his call for calm was perfunctory.

But even without all of that, that split screen image you could practically do that every day with some sector of life in this country in chaos and say that’s gonna haunt Obama.  I mean, why isn’t Fast and Furious gonna haunt him?  Why isn’t Benghazi?  I mean, those things are not gonna haunt.  Why isn’t using the IRS against the Tea Party, why is that not gonna haunt him?  Why is violating the Constitution not gonna haunt Obama?  None of this is gonna haunt Obama because it’s all working, from his standpoint.  All of these are elements of his “success” story in terms of his ultimate agenda of transforming the country.


RUSH:  Look, let me clarify something.  When I say, “There’s no conspiracy,” of course there is conspiracy between all of the groups that were organizing to protest in Ferguson and all over the country.  Of course that was a conspiracy.  What I’m trying to say was that there was not a conspiracy between all of this and the timing of the grand jury announcement and what the grand jury announcement was gonna be.  I’m trying to make a really, really fine point here and I’m not doing it. I haven’t gotten there yet.

I’m talking about fake versus real, artificial versus substance — and a lot of this is not real.  Politics. People think politics is about the way things are, and it isn’t.  Politics is about the way things appear.  And that’s one of the things that bothers me the most.  What’s happening in our… Look at this Darren Wilson interview, the cop.  Do you realize that to whatever group of people we’re talking about on the other side, it doesn’t matter a hill of beans what the facts are? The truth and what is real doesn’t matter.

There’s no way you can convince them. There’s no way you can convince them to care about the truth and what is real.  It doesn’t matter.  It’s a pointless effort.  And to me — the mayor of Realville and somebody consumed and obsessed by the idea of getting truth out and having people understand it and act on it and believe it and behave according to it — it’s really frustrating to know that, to a large segment of this country, none of that matters.  They don’t care what the truth is.

The agenda is all it is.  The appearance, the fake, whatever it takes in order to advance the agenda.

I’m telling you, it’s destructive.  Liberalism is a poison that is rotting this country, every element of it where it is dominant or growing.


RUSH:  Let me try this another way.  I’m sitting down, Kathryn and I, in front of the TV on whatever the night the grand jury announcement happened. This is Wednesday, so it must have been Monday. The days run together in a short week, I get confused.  Whatever night it was.  And we turned on Fox at nine o’clock, and we’re expecting the announcement at nine o’clock, and by 9:20 there’s no announcement. No, we tuned in at eight o’clock thinking the announcement was — we were off by an hour.

Anyway, the announcement finally came, and I looked at Kathryn, I said, “Listen to all these people on TV.  They’re just vamping and filling time and they’re just trying to flap their gums until the real news is made.”  The whole thing, to me, made me feel like I was watching a scripted event.  Now, one of the allures supposedly of reality TV is that it’s real, that there isn’t a script.  That’s why audiences really like it, like The Real Housewives of whatever, or whatever reality TV show. But let me tell you, there is no such thing as improvisation or reality TV.  It’s all scripted.

The only difference in reality TV and other TV is that the writers in reality TV are not members of unions, and that’s it.  The whole thing feels like a scripted event that I know in advance the outcome.  And, therefore, it isn’t news.  And none of it was spontaneous.  We tuned in all knowing what was gonna happen.  We tuned in expecting what was going to happen.  There was not any thought given by anybody to stopping it.  And what happened?  Sheer barbarism.  People’s businesses were destroyed.  That’s real.  Real live bullets were fired at people.  Real live Molotov cocktails were used.

A woman who saved up everything because her hobby, her passion in life is baking cakes, and she’s black, and she has a place in I think a little strip mall or some street in Ferguson near where all this happened.  It was totally destroyed.  She had nothing to do with any of this.  She was in tears the next day.  From her own neighborhood, people from her own neighborhood and who knows where else, showed up and destroyed her little cake shop.

Now, there’s a great campaign on to refund and donate to her to rebuild, and she’s collected, I think before the program started, over 70 grand and she’s happy as she can be, and thank God for that.  But everybody knew this was gonna happen, maybe not that specific thing, but everybody knew it, the governor knew it.  Where was the National Guard?  The governor knew it. Every law enforcement official knew what was gonna happen. There was no effort to stop it.  The only thing that we speculated about was how bad was this gonna be, how big was it gonna be, and we all tuned in to see that.

We all tuned in to see how bad the destruction, how big the flames, how chaotic.  There wasn’t an effort made to stop it.  We were witnesses to barbarism, scripted barbarism that was designed to tear apart the fabric of an American community, and we sat and watched.  And we had pre-advance knowledge.  They could have put the listings in TV Guide.  Your DVR could have scheduled this because that’s how much in advance we knew it was gonna happen.  Just like any other scheduled television show, which is what this was, except it’s not.

Lives were at risk.  People’s businesses were destroyed. Barbarism was on display.  All-out assaults on the American culture and civilization were taking place.  And there was no effort to stop it.  None, nowhere.  The governor of Missouri, in preparing the state, made it look like it was London in World War II on the eve of the German blitz.  That’s the degree to which he made preparations.

And then for some reason the National Guard was not deployed, and we were told that, well, maybe Obama called on the governor, fellow Democrats, “Keep the Guard out of this. I don’t want militarized pictures during my Regime.  I want to do what I want to do without anybody figuring it out with the pictures, so keep the Guard out of there.”  Who knows.  But we’re left to speculate.

But there wasn’t any effort to stop it.  And then the next day we got questions on television, which should be absurd, but instead they were legitimate:  “Did authorities let Ferguson burn?”  It was a legitimate question, sadly.  “Did authorities let Ferguson burn?”  Why?  There was no effort to stop it.  When the Rodney King riots, the Watts riots of the sixties, when those things started, there were efforts to stop them.  I mean, they played out to a certain point, and I don’t know if you could call ’em great TV or what have you, and they were structured and planned and so forth.  Again, nothing is brand-new in 2014.  Everything has a precedent.  But this is destructive in ways way beyond the riot itself.

This is destructive in ways way beyond the damage to Ferguson, Missouri.  This is destructive because there are a lot of casualties here.  Truth, reality, fact, all casualties.  None of that mattered.  None of it matters today to a significant portion of the population, which is hell-bent on tearing down the modern-day order.  And nobody appears to be willing or knowledgeable enough or whatever to stop it.  Instead, it becomes a television show, a scripted television show.  There was not even a cliffhanger.  We knew who shot J.R. before watching the episode.

The whole thing, I don’t know, folks, it just seems we’re being manipulated in ways that we haven’t been before.  We are really being manipulated by a media complex, in its association with the American left and the Democrat Party, and I think I’m instinctively reacting and objecting to and pushing back against that manipulation and saying, “I’m not gonna fall for it.  You’re not gonna get me.  I am not gonna be manipulated by it.  I’m not gonna get emotionally caught up in this because I know that what I’m seeing on TV is not what this is really all about.”

And that’s the bottom line.  None of this is really, when you get down to brass tacks, you strip all this away, this is not about the grand jury. It’s not about Darren Wilson. It’s not even about the Gentle Giant.  It’s about entirely different things that they don’t show you, that you don’t see.  And it’s the ease with which people are being manipulated and the ease with which people are falling for it, to me, is a problem, and it’s very troublesome.  I look all of this, and I think I understand the purpose of it.  I don’t “think” I know; I know what the ultimate objective to all this is.  You know what it is?

At the end of all this, the real objective is to make you think that it’s ludicrous and ridiculous to oppose any of this or speak out against it ’cause you can’t stop it.  The grievances are too real.  The country is too unjust. The country is illegitimate and immoral, and it’s taken 250 years for this to come to light.  But you’d better learn to accept that, and you’d better learn to accept that if you’ve been on the wrong side, i.e., in the majority in this country since it was founded, your day is coming.  That’s what this is about.  And all of these events are just steps taken in that direction.

I mean, listen to Obama and his speech in Chicago.  Here’s the Breitbart story: “Obama Lectures America About the Justified Anger Towards Law Enforcement in Minority Communities — Tuesday at Copernicus Community Center in Chicago, IL, President Barack Obama addressed the riots and protests going on throughout the country in reaction to the grand jury announcement that Ferguson police officer,” blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.  And that’s just BS.  What he did was he went before a black audience, and this is what he said.  “A grand jury made a decision yesterday that upset a lot of people. And as I said last night, the frustrations that we have seen, are not just about a particular incident.” So, you see, it’s not just about that.

And, by the way, the grand jury decision upset a lot of people, they’re justified being upset. Not because this decision might have been wrong, but because of all the previous ones where people got screwed.  You have to understand. We have to step back and understand what happened, those businesses being destroyed, that barbarism, we had better understand that it is legitimate, because a lot of people were upset.  Maybe this decision, the grand jury got it right, but that doesn’t erase all the wrongs that happened before it which still breed all kinds of frustration.

“As I said last night, the frustrations that we have seen, are not just about a particular incident.” See, it’s about a lot of stuff that came before this. “They have deep roots in many communities of color,” the frustrations do, “who have a sense that our laws are not always being enforced uniformly or fairly.” In other words, even though the facts of the Brown case do not support any claims of an unjust shooting, the anger over all the previous injustices is enough to legitimize the anger this week in Ferguson.

And that’s the problem, folks.  There’s no reason for feeling screwed.  There’s no reason, the facts of this case do not support any claims that the shooting was unjust. “Okay, fine.  Well, what about last year?  What about Trayvon Martin?  What about OJ?” And on and on and on. What about Emmett Till?  And it never ends.  So this incident is used to justify and permit all of this barbarism, not based on what happened this week, but all of the years prior, about which nothing can be done now, see.  The events in the years prior, they’re over and done with, and they have deep roots in many communities of color, who have a sense that our laws are not always being endorsed uniformly or fairly. Even though they might in this case, that doesn’t erase what happened in years past.

Like the Trayvon Martin case, in fact, which ended up not being supported by the facts either.  But that doesn’t matter.  The facts of the Trayvon case have been forgotten just as the facts here will be forgotten.  The news media’s early lies will be remembered.  The Duke lacrosse case is a case is reverse.  If anybody ought to be mad about anything and an injustice and so forth, look at that case.  But were there riots?  Was there barbarism? Was there any kinds of acts of destruction that took place over that injustice?

No, sir, no, ma’am, there were not.  And that was a gross miscarriage of justice.  But, you see, that was also justified because, well, they’re white and they played lacrosse?  Come on.  That means they’re rich.  Come on, even if these guys didn’t do it, you know they wanted to. Even if these guys didn’t, you know it’s happened before.  So these guys pay the price, except they didn’t.

So all of this adds up to this country has a lot to account for, it has a lot of prices to pay, it has a lot of forgiveness, it has a lot to make up for, and you better just get used to it.  And they’re getting so accustomed to it now they’re writing a script of all these events in advance. We know what’s gonna happen. Nobody tries to stop it because everybody, “Yeah, you know, we do kind of suck. Yeah, we were kind of bad back then.  Yeah, I guess we do kind of justify this. We deserve this.”


RUSH: I finally want to get to the point I’m trying to make here about how we’re being manipulated, set up, and staged.  We’re watching scripted events portrayed to us as real and really what I think I’m getting at, I know it will never happen, but if you want to reduce some of the incidents of this stuff, get the cameras out of there. Get the cameras out of there.  Get the media out of there.  In a real protest, in a real riot, the media doesn’t know it’s gonna happen before it starts. They show up afterwards.

Everything that happens is real.  But when you have a riot that everybody knows is coming and you’ve got the cameras and you’ve got the journalists and you’ve got blithering idiots like Don Lemon — do you realize what he did yesterday?  He inadvertently tear gassed himself. Putting on his mask he ended up tear gassing himself.  There’s a piece in the New York Daily News — I hope CNN doesn’t get rid of him because we love Don Lemon. We need him here.  But there’s a really, really critical piece of Don Lemon, a media review in the New York Daily News today, about how out to lunch he is.  They even mention he’s the guy that asked the transportation official could a black hole have swallowed up the Malaysian airliner.

But, at any rate, you get the cameras out of there, you get the script writers out of there, get the media out of there, who knows what would have happened; that’s the point.  But we knew it’s gonna happen, cameras show up, and it just makes what happens after, I’m sorry, unreal.  Even though it was real, this is where it becomes a real challenge to communicate what I’m really talking about here, but if the cameras are not there — now, in this case it probably would have worked the other way. If the cameras weren’t there, the media not being there, the protestors would have torched even more to get ’em to show up.  I understand that.

But when you’ve got an event that everybody knows is gonna happen, you take the cameras out there, it’s not real, folks, when it’s all done for the cameras.  And that’s the point, all this is done for the media. Michael Brown was not shot because he’s black. Trayvon Martin did not die because he’s black.  Now, you can’t convince anybody else of this on the other side.  If they accept that, then everything they’re doing is illegitimate, and they’re not going to agree with that point.

So the whole thing is unreal.  The whole thing is not based on reality.  Everything is a set up.  We’re being manipulated to participate in it and we’re told that what we’re watching is real, but you get the cameras out of there, you get the media out of there and stop all the prepub, same thing might have happened, but I’m telling you it would have felt different, it would have had a whole different set of consequences to it.


RUSH:  Glenn Reynolds runs a website called Instapundit. He’s a law professor at the University of Tennessee and has a theory on why Ferguson happened post-election.  You can understand Trayvon Martin, you can understand all these other things about black turnout, but he thinks that Ferguson, Missouri, has nothing to do with any of that.

“It’s not about swing voters. It’s about the base. And it’s not about the Democratic Party’s base, but about certain leaders’ base within the Democratic Party. This may be best understood as an intra-party struggle. Obama is the champion of the urban-black wing of the party, and because of him that wing has been on top. But his star is fading, black voters are beginning to realize that they haven’t benefited economically, and the next Dem nominee — whether it’s Hillary Clinton, Jim Webb, or Elizabeth Warren — will be from the white gentry-liberal wing of the Democratic Party.”

So he’s talking about the different factions within the Democrat Party.  Obama runs the urban black wing, which would be the Congressional Black Caucus and people that are concerned with the inner city, and that Hillary or Elizabeth Warren, Jim Webb, they’re from the white gentry liberal wing of the Democrat Party.

“The riots, the marches, the traffic-blocking are a way of telling them –” the Hillarys, the Elizabeth Warrens, and the Jim Webbs “– that the Sharpton,” and Jackson, “wing is still a force to be reckoned with,” and that this is all about the Sharpton wing of the Democrat Party demonstrating its power and strength to the Hillary Clintons, the Elizabeth Warrens, as a means of “bargaining power between now and 2016.”

And Reynolds says “that’s the only way this — not at all spontaneous — street theater makes sense.” And folks, this was scripted!  Everybody knew it was coming.  Nobody made an effort to stop it.  It was portrayed as spontaneous, but it wasn’t.  And there’s politics at the end of the rope on it anyway, so there you go.




Thanksgiving Day Politically INCORRECT Cartoon

Thanksgiving Amnesty Day

URL of Original Posting Site:





Today Is Gratitude Day

Thanksgiving Day, Thursday, November 27, 2014, Devotion  by Dr. David Jeremiah of Turning Point Ministries
“I will bless the LORD at all times; His praise shall continually be in my mouth.” (Psalm 34:1; NKJV)
“Through Jesus, therefore, let us continually offer to God a sacrifice of praise-the fruit of lips that confess his name.” (Hebrews 13:15; NIV)
We often say, “God bless you!” to others without thinking about what it actually means. When God blesses us, He speaks a word of care or favor over us (Psalm 29:11). And when we bless God, we do the same—we speak a good word about God’s many attributes that benefit (bless) us (Psalm 26:12). So when the psalmist says, “I will bless the Lord at all times,” he is saying, “I will continually speak of God’s goodness, kindness, generosity, and other traits.” That is, I will continually manifest an attitude of gratitude toward God for who He is and what He has done.
Do you see this background of blessing in Paul’s words, “In everything give thanks” (1 Thessalonians 5:18)? Not just on Thanksgiving Day, but on every day, we should give thanks to God and bless His holy name for His many gifts of grace to us. Even on challenging days, we can be grateful for the fact that God is with us, causing all things to work together for good for those who love Him (Romans 8:28).
Let today be a day of thanksgiving for sure. But let every day be one in which you live with an attitude of gratitude toward Him.
”Christian doctrine is grace, and Christian conduct is gratitude.” ~ J. I. Packer
© 2014 Turning Point with Dr. David Jeremiah


Since Michael Brown Died, 981 Black Babies Have Died in Abortion in Missouri, But There are No Riots

by Steven Ertelt | Jefferson City, MO | | 11/26/14

URL of Original Posting Site:

Riots are taking place across the country in response to a grand jury’s decision not to indict a Ferguson, Missouri police officer for shooting a black teenager. The decision not to bring charges has renewed difficult racial tensions nationwide.

blackbabyYesterday, LifeNews reported how the Planned Parenthood abortion business fanned the flames of racial divide by aggressively opposing the decision in Ferguson.

Though the events in Ferguson have nothing to do with abortion, Planned Parenthood and its pro-abortion CEO Cecile Richards have been very active on Twitter condemning the decision and stoking the racial divide. Ironically, as the abortion giant jumps in the debate, it makes no mention of the fact that it preys on black Americans and aborts black babies at alarming rates.

Today, a pro-life advocate from Missouri put Planned Parenthood’s targeting of black babies in abortion into perspective. She says that while there are riots over the controversial death of a black teen in Missouri, there are no riots over the death of 981 black babies who have died in Missouri since Michael Brown died. She wonders why no one is speaking up for those black victims of violence via abortion.

From Reverend Katherine’s blog:

Today, my native city of St. Louis is under siege; one black man was shot dead by a police National death rate percentagesofficer because he feared for his own life while on duty. The people of Ferguson and surrounding municipalities including St. Louis are looting, setting fires, rolling cars, etc., because of one person.

Since the day that Michael Brown died [Aug 9, 2014], another 981 Black Missourians have died; 9 per day, every day since then. These Black Missourians were unarmed, innocent, and had no ability to defend themselves and died in plain sight. But there is no outrage, no riots, not one protest.

So, while these rioters are trying to destroy my native city of St. Louis because of the death of one Black man, the rioters overlook the fact that just a couple of miles away at Planned Parenthood on Forest Park Avenue, another 109 Black babies have died since Michael Brown.

Why aren’t the rioters at Planned Parenthood defending themselves and their future generations? Why do they allow themselves to be essentially exterminated by abortion but riot over one?

Everyone’s life has value regardless of how many people die or in what circumstances. Michael Brown’s life had value in the same manner as the lives of black babies killed in abortion, yet we’re outraged by the taking of one life and not the other.

What do you think?



Dr. King’s Forgotten Speech at the Berlin Wall and What it Means to be Free in Today’s World

November 24, 2014 By

URL of Original Posting Site:

Recently, the world remembered fondly the anniversary of the demise of the Berlin Wall- the concrete scar that tore a city apart and served as a physical and metaphorical barrier between the West and the East during a time where the world’s survival appeared far from certain.
On November 9th, 1989, I became a Republican. I had conservative leanings prior, but I had the privilege of viewing with my own eyes the struggle and the triumph a people who used hammers and chisels to tear down a wall that had so cruelly divided them. Conservatism, I discovered, was the vehicle for freedom. At that moment, I saw clearly that conservatism and the absence of big government was the surest way to individual freedom- freedom to succeed, freedom to fail, the freedom to make of my life what I could.
I arrived in Berlin that day from Bern, Switzerland, to visit a cousin who was in Berlin and what I saw forever changed me. As I peered onward, I saw the Cold War not as some abstract political feud, but I saw the very-real effects on people. People swung sledgehammers against the wall feverishly as one would do to free a trapped child in a well. On the other side of the wall were thousands of trapped people; they were trapped by a collectivist regime that did not value human dignity.
Years before my arrival in Berlin, Dr. Martin Luther King traveled to the divided city and, somehow, was privileged to not only address the West Berliners, but the East as well- a rarity for any American.
On Sept. 13, 1964, Dr. King addressed a crowd in West Berlin at Waldbühne stadium and offered a message of hope, of reconciliation with their fellow man. Somehow, the American reverend crossed into Soviet-occupied East Berlin via Checkpoint Charlie and offered a very similar speech to a crowd at East Berlin’s Marienkirche.
When we think of speeches in Berlin, we think of only a few. We think of Hitler, we think of Kennedy and most think of Reagan’s famous verbal showdown with the Soviets where he demanded that they “tear down this wall.”
However, Dr. King’s speech has been downplayed over the course of history. His vision for a unifed people- not merely a unified Berlin- is precisely the message for which the reverend was known and the kind of message so desperately needed today.
Paul Kengor recently reported in The Washington Post on the often-forgotten speeches offered in Berlin and noted:
King began his speech by striking a bond with his German audience, noting that his parents had named him after the legendary German reformer. “I am happy to bring you greetings from your Christian brothers and sisters of West Berlin,” he started. “. . . Certainly I bring you greetings from your Christian brothers and sisters of the United States. In a real sense we are all one in Christ Jesus, for in Christ there is no East, no West, no North, no South.”
That introduction set the tone. The reverend had come to this church to give, first and foremost, a Christian message. It was, after all, a sermon. But there would be a political undercurrent to much of what he said.
King made two allusions to the wall, built just three years earlier. “For here on either side of the wall are God’s children, and no man-made barrier can obliterate that fact,” he said at one point. And then later: “Wherever reconciliation is taking place, wherever men are ‘breaking down the dividing walls of hostility’ which separate them from their brothers, there Christ continues to perform his ministry.” Here was affirmation of the inherent, God-given dignity of all human beings, regardless of whether communism denied that dignity, denied that God and denied free passage from East to West.
While King made an effort to distinguish “the struggle” in the United States from “your situation” in Berlin, he shifted back and forth between them in a way that made the parallels obvious. In one passage that must have had particular resonance among East Berliners, who were at a severe economic disadvantage compared with those on the other side of the wall, King acknowledged the fears among African Americans about not being able to hold their own in an integrated society. “Many have not had the opportunity to get an education, which will prepare them for the ‘promised land,’ ” he said. “Many are hungry and physically undernourished as a result of the journey. Many bear on their souls the scars of bitterness and hatred, seared there by the crowded slum conditions, police brutality and . . . exploitation.”
King urged the need to overcome those fears. He talked about the potential power of grass-roots movements to instigate reform, introducing East Germans to names like Rosa Parks and places like Montgomery, Ala. He described how the American civil rights movement married the philosophy of Gandhi with the “Negro’s Christian tradition,” and he promoted “non-violence and love” as the basis for reform movements. This tactic of non-violence was probably the only approach that East Germans had available at the time. 
I was recently reminded of this speech by a friend and colleague. At a time when racial divisions are so ruthlessly widened by race-hustlers for personal gain, profit and egotism, it is an affirmation of the will of a people to be free to remember the triumphant movement led by King and others who stressed a Biblical message that centered on human dignity and a desire of people to be free.
Whether we are talking about slaves, Jim Crow-era blacks or Berliners feverishly tearing down a wall, the will of human beings to be free is awe-inspiring. 25 years after I witnessed the spectacle of people tearing apart a wall with their hands to help topple the evil Soviet empire, I am dismayed to see so many people in all kinds of communities so readily clamoring for the shackles of big government dependency.
Humans are meant to be free; Dr. King knew this; Reagan knew this. Let us not remain silent when others before us so bravely stood up for what was right.

**Media Shock**: New York Times Publishes Darren Wilson’s Address Info

by 25 Nov 2014

Liberal Media BiasUPDATE: The New York Times has posted a correction to the story: “An earlier version of this post included a photograph that contained information that should not have been made public. The image has been removed.”

However, the “information that should not have been made public,” in the Times’ view, is not the name of the street where Officer Wilson’s home is located. The story still contains that information. The Times has merely removed the photo of Wilson’s marriage license from the article.

Breitbart News will not link the story or give out the specific information, but the New York Times had no qualms whatsoever about publishing almost all the information needed for Officer Darren Wilson’s enemies to track him and his wife down at home:

Officer Wilson and [his wife] own a home together on XXXXXXX Lane in XXXXXXXXXX, Mo., a St. Louis suburb about a half-hour drive from Ferguson. Trial of Officer

This malicious move by the New York Times has not gone unnoticed by Ferguson’s protesters:

But printing his street name in the nation’s most influential newspaper on the day the grand jury is expected to hand up a decision on the indictment could reignite interest in — and awareness of — the location, and some critics worry that it could result in protesters descending on his home. Slate even went a step further than the Times, publishing an article featuring a photo of the modest, red-brick house on Monday.

A number of Twitter users — some of whom have identified themselves as planning to protest the grand jury decision — have tweeted the location of Wilson’s home as they gear up for rallies. The house number was not printed in the Times, but the street in the St. Louis suburb of Crestwood where it sits is only about two blocks long, and the house number can be easily located via online sources using only the street name and Wilson’s name.

This type of behavior is nothing new from our elite media. When the media was pulling out the stops to electronically lynch George Zimmerman like they are Wilson, CNN broadcast Zimmerman’s Social Security number to the world.

When the media wants you destroyed they want you destroyed.



Obama: Americans Have No Right To Favor Americans

Posted by Neil Munro, White House Correspondent, 11/25/2014

URL of Original Posting Site:


“The only Americans who can legitimately object to immigration are native Indian-Americans,” President Barack Obama told his Chicago audience Nov. 24, as he made an impassioned ideological plea for endless immigration, cultural diversity and a big government to manage the resulting multicultural society.

“There have been periods where the folks who were already here suddenly say, ‘Well, I don’t want those folks,’ even though the only people who have the right to say that are some Native Americans,” Obama said, rhetorically dismissing the right of 300 million actual Americans to decide who can live in their homeland.Liberalism a mental disorder

Americans should not favor other Americans over foreigners, Obama demanded. “Sometimes we get attached to our particular tribe, our particular race, our particular religion, and then we start treating other folks differently… that, sometimes, has been a bottleneck to how we think about immigration,” he said in the face of many polls showing rising opposition to his immigration agenda.

Obama denied any moral or practical distinction between native-born Americans and future migrants. “Whether we cross the Atlantic, or the Pacific, or the Rio Grande, we all shared one thing, and that’s the hope that America would be the place where we could believe as we choose… and that the law would be enforced equally for everybody, regardless of what you look like or what your last name was,” said the president.Liberalism a mental disorder

“That’s the ideal that binds us all together. That’s what’s at stake when we have conversations about immigration,” he declared.

Obama did indicate his approval for some measures to exclude illegal immigrants, even as he works to amnesty 12 million illegals stage-by-stage.  His current amnesty “doesn’t apply to anyone who has come to this country recently, or might come illegally in the future, because borders do mean something,” he said.obama-liar4-266x189

In Japan, however, where the government allows little immigration, “they don’t have problems with certain folks being discriminated against because mostly everybody is Japanese,” Obama admitted.

Currently, one million immigrants are accepted each year. That inflow brings in roughly one immigrant for every four Americans who turn 18 each year, even though wages and the number of native-born Americans with jobs have both flatlined since 2000 amid increasing competition from migrants, stalled productivity, accelerating technology and changing trade patterns.

Obama’s speech was a defense of his Nov. 21 unilateral effort to roll back enforcement of immigration law.

That action freezes the enforcement of immigration law against 12 million illegals now in the country and also against every new migrant who makes it over the border. The edict also awards work-permits to roughly four million illegal immigrants, and puts them on a fast-track to citizenship. It also sharply increases the annual inflow of 650,000 guest workers for blue-collar and white-collar jobs sought by Americans. Obama’s speech did not mention the unpopular work permits or the fast-track to citizenship.

Numerous polls show Americans want to reduce or stabilize immigration, and also oppose Obama’s immigration policies by a factor of two-to-one, three-to-one or even four-to-one. On Nov. 4, 66 percent of Oregon’s voters —- including many Democratic voters — struck down a law granting drivers’ license to illegals.

In his Nov. 25 speech, Obama downplayed the existence and interests of native-born Americans as he championed the arrival of many non-English speaking students in Chicago schools. “Chicago has always been a city of immigrants, and that’s still true,” he declared, while adding that “you go to the public schools around here and you got 50, 60, 70 different languages being spoken.”com 01

Liberalism a mental disorder

In fact, Chicago and the United States is overwhelmingly populated by native-born Americans who work, live and learn best in stable neighborhoods and classrooms. Nationwide, five out of six people in the U.S are native-born.

More immigration “means more jobs, more growth for everybody,” Obama claimed.Liberalism a mental disorder

But more jobs doesn’t mean more wages for Americans. Since 2000, median wages have stalled and the number of native-born Americans with jobs has remained flat amid the annual arrival of roughly one million legal immigrants, 650,000 guest workers and millions of illegals.

The award of work permits to four million illegals will provide more revenues for government, Obama said. But he ignored the likely $2 trillion cost of providing U.S. welfare and social services to the migrants, who average a 10th grade education.

The migrants “will boost wages for American-born workers,” he said, without mentioning that his aides estimated the increase to be worth only $170 per year for each working American, 10 years after his planned amnesty. That estimate is based on many assumptions, including claims that migrant workers will not usually compete against Americans for better jobs, and that the migrants will earn more money because of government intervention.Liberalism a mental disorder

His forecast of a $170 per year gain claim also ignores evidence that more immigrant workers can swamp the labor market and drive down wages for Americans. That labor-supply reality is accepted by his top economic adviser.

But Obama was far more passionate when making his ideological argument for mass immigration.

Deportations of illegals who have children in the United States “breaks up families… it is heartbreaking, it is not right,” he said. “We’re not a nation that kicks out strivers… we find ways to welcome people, fellow human beings, children of God, into he fold, and harness their talents.”com 02


The Statue of Liberty doesn’t have its back to the world, he said, trying to portray the monument as a colossal invitation to migrants. In fact, the statue was designed as a “Light to the World” that would show foreigners how Americans use their constitution and liberty to govern themselves without kings or imperial obama

The many immigrants who arrive have to be treated equally under the law, Obama said, segueing into his progressive agenda.

“Sometimes that’s hard to do, and it is worthwhile, it is worth doing,” he said.

Obama’s praise for mass immigration reflects his long-standing belief that migrants can join with Africans-Americans, under the guidance of the progressives who run the Democratic Party, to win political power and wealth from 03

“In my mind, at least, the fates of black and brown were to be perpetually intertwined, the cornerstone of a coalition that could help America live up to its promise,” he wrote in his 2006 book, “The Audacity of Hope.”Liberalism a mental disorder

That hope, however, was frustrated by economic competition between Americans and migrants, he wrote.

“The number of immigrants added to the labor force every year is of a magnitude not seen in this country for over a century,” Obama noted. “If this huge influx of mostly low-skill workers provides some benefits to the economy as a whole…. [but] it also threatens to depress further the wages of blue-collar Americans and put strains on an already overburdened safety net.”Cloward Pevin with explanation



Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon

Enemy Of My Enemy

URL of Original Posting Site:

group imperial obama



Written by Allan Erickson on November 25, 2014

URL of the Original Posting Site:

All great civilizations repeat the pattern.   At the start, people come together with common interests, common language, common heredity perhaps, and common enemies.  

They form communities, working in kind to defend themselves and feed themselves. Most importantly they agree upon a code of behavior, the glue of the society, a philosophy of existence, resulting in institutions preserved by ritual to forward and preserve those belief systems.  

Strong civilizations may have tremendous natural resources, inventive genius, abundant farm land and water sources, riches, effective government and substantial military prowess, but, without the “glue”, the stuff of cohesion in the form of agreed upon beliefs, people will not remain loyal to the society, certainly not to one another. All great civilizations repeat the pattern. They form up and prosper. They work out their agreed upon beliefs.  They vow via oaths to sustain themselves, holding fast to their moral code.  Success breeds success, and strength builds upon strength.   

In time however, the “glue” is forgotten, usually through neglect.  This applies to oligarchies of course, and to that most rare and fragile form, republic, the only form of government where the common man and woman have a fighting chance for liberty and prosperity.  

In some cases the “glue” is attacked from within. The essential element most responsible for giving rise to strong civilization in the first place—-the moral code of the society—-becomes a byword, an afterthought, a quaint remembrance, or a target for the anarchist or the tyrant. The essential element providing for success is the first victim of that very success.   

And so, all great civilizations have their beginning, a growth period, the leveling off, and the fall into chaos and destruction, death by systemic demoralization, the failure to preserve the essential “glue”.  Short of a miracle, the American civilization faces death by demoralization.  

European settlers came to the New World bound by certain agreed upon values, most of them derived from Judeo-Christian traditions.  Chief among those values were the fear of the Lord, the matter of justice, the rule of law, the rights of conscience, individual responsibility and the inalienable right to liberty. And so this experiment in self-government was born, based on the understanding of the rights of men, the pursuit of happiness rooted in notions of private property, the obligations of citizenship, representative government, the separation of powers, and elevation of the individual, regardless of station.  For more than 200 years, the “glue” held.  America grew in every way, so much so, she became the envy of the world.  People literally gave their lives to get here, and those already here gave their lives to preserve her.  

Where we were once in agreement about the essential elements of the “glue”, we are now found tearing each other to pieces, the fundamental principles no longer holding us together.  Liberty and justice for all is no longer our creed.  The Two Great Commandments no longer serve as our cultural compass. Instead we promote crony capitalism, other forms of favoritism and the ever-nebulous sense of “fairness”, according to the whims of popular opinion.  

We once agreed our rights come from God.  Now, at least half the people insist our rights come from government.  In the former case, our rights are guaranteed, in the later instance, they are negotiable, and therefore vulnerable.  

One group promotes this grievance, another group another, the Union fractured, separating into tribal units marking out turf, asserting agendas, scrambling for predominance, demanding accommodation.  Revenge, rancor and rage dominate interaction.  Grotesque rhetoric, accusation, slander and condemnation mark our public discourse, and violent atrocities steadily increase in frequency and savagery.    

A congresswoman accuses the opposition of inventing diseases to eradicate a certain race.  A president actively works against the expressed preferences of the majority.  Death threats demand an indictment, the presumption of innocence forgotten.  Moneyed interests bankrupt the nation.  Corruption from top to bottom overwhelms any vestige of integrity.  Massive illegal immigration encouraged by illegal executive action threatens sovereignty like never before.  The weakest are victimized: every scale, dishonest.  No one even remembers the preamble:

“We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Left and right, officials violate the oath they took to protect and defend the Constitution.  Leaders are found breaking every oath, to their country, their spouses, even to those dying on the battlefield.  Children are murdered in the womb.  American rabbis are hacked to death in a Jerusalem synagogue, a woman beheaded in Oklahoma. Slavery is more prevalent than ever.  Demoralization has destroyed trust on every front.  Atrocities are a daily reality to the point people become accustomed, desensitized.  

Without a great revival, this civilization will follow the pattern and collapse from within, just as Lincoln predicted:  

“If destruction be our lot we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen we must live through all time or die by suicide.”  

It is seen clearly President Obama contradicts each phrase in the preamble, and more, he works in direct opposition, ignoring the will of The People, uninterested in forming a more perfect union, lawless to the destruction of justice, an agent of domestic unrest, an enemy of the U.S. military, supportive of selective welfare and an adversary of liberty, in short, a traitor.  

Either The People reassert their God-given right to self-government by overcoming the Usurper and his allies, or this experiment in liberty will fail, fading from memory forever. 

About the author: Allan Erickson 

After college, Allan Erickson enjoyed an 11-year career in journalism. He then turned to sales and marketing for a decade. Fourteen years ago he started his own recruitment company. Allan & wife Jodi have four children and live in Oregon. He is the author ofThe Cross & the Constitution in the Age of Incoherence,” Tate Publishing, 2012. He is available to speak in churches addressing the topics of faith and freedom. To contact him, email:




THANKSGIVING AND GRACE: Politics Aside for One Day, At Least

Written by Pauline Wolak on November 25, 2014

URL of Original Posting Site:

George Washington“…that we may then unite in most humbly offering our prayers and supplications to the great Lord and Ruler of Nations, and beseech Him to pardon our national and other transgressions; to enable us all, whether in public or private stations, to perform our several and relative duties properly and punctually; to render our National Government a blessing to all the people by constantly being a Government of wise, just, and constitutional laws, discreetly and faithfully executed and obeyed; to protect and guide all sovereigns and nations (especially such as have shown kindness to us), and to bless them with good governments, peace, and concord; to promote the knowledge and practice of true religion and virtue, and the increase of science among them and us; and, generally, to grant unto all mankind such a degree of temporal prosperity as He alone knows to be best.” – President Washington

George Washington issued the first Thanksgiving Proclamation on October 3, 1789. 225 years later, Presidents are still thanking God for the blessings we have as Americans. Given the current political climate, it’s hard to remember that we are blessed. But remember we must. Just for one day, I will set aside enmity. I will recognize that for all the headlines blazing with heated rhetoric and vitriol, there is good. Life is, despite angry words in sixty point font, full of joy and wonder and awe.

So this Thanksgiving, I choose to thank God. Not with the words of ghosts, but with my own.

I am thankful.

For the overcooked dinner on my table.

For the sometimes leaking roof over my head.

For the lawn that needs mowing and for the driveway that needs shoveling.

I thank God every single day that I am safe inside these four walls. I have the comfort of good food and of a warm bed. I have clean, running water. A reliable car to put into an overflowing garage. Cringing at the thought of rewiring the house, bemoaning the cost of a bathroom remodel, or grumbling through the third coat of paint in the living room; I am mindful of my fortune.

I am thankful.

For the shooting pain of a Lego against a bare foot at two a.m.

For every exasperated pre-teen eye roll.

For laundry that never ends.

For forgotten homework, diapers, late night feedings, skinned knees, and slammed doors.

I thank God for the gift of motherhood. There are days I thought would never end; where falling into bed is the only thing I want. Days that try my patience, my sobriety, and even my faith. But these are the days I am most grateful for. They are the days that taught me strength comes through tears and grace by counting to ten.

I am thankful.

For being reminded every summer what Red Stag did to me once. (Once!!)

For being called out for acting like a jerk.

For phone calls asking for bail.

For texts that wake me up, favors asked, and money borrowed.

I thank God for the gift of friends. I am grateful to be surrounded by the people that have become family by choice, not birth. We have seen each other through the absolute best and worst times. The joy of a new job and the crushing blows of divorce. We’ve mastered the art of fitting three weeks of gossip into a one hour lunch. We’ve drunk to the memory of friends that have left us behind. Weddings, baptisms, graduations, or just another Friday night; the moments that we’ve truly lived we have lived beside each other.

I am thankful.

For being the only Republican at family dinners.

For sitting at the kids table, even at 37.

For the hysterical, dysfunctional, wonderful, odd, and loud.

I thank God for the gift of my family. I thank God my parents picked me at the ripe old age of eleven to join their family. I am grateful that, for all of the crazy, there remains fierce loyalty. The kind of loyalty that is only felt by the people that have seen you at your worst and love you anyway. They accept your flaws and fill your life with frustration and triumph. And they never ask you to stop bringing up politics at the table.

I am thankful.

I am fortunate to call myself an American daughter. I have the freedom to speak my mind, to live and love in the place I choose, to worship God publicly, to work hard and achieve things others can only dream of.

Tomorrow I will be reminded of lives gone wrong, government gone wild, and people gone off the deep end. But, for today, I am thankful.


About the author: Pauline Wolak

Pauline is a proud wife and mother of three. When she isn’t being the world’s greatest Girl Friday, she is volunteers her time as a school librarian and athletic director. Pauline enjoys football, politics, good beer, and arguing with anyone. She’s a devout pro-life Catholic. Pauline believes in the 1st Amendment and uses it on a daily basis, most notably to ambush unsuspecting family members in political debate! You can find her work here at Clash and at



Mark Levin on Ferguson: ‘What We Are Witnessing Now Is the Left’s War on the Civil Society’

by 25 Nov 2014

 From Mark Levin’s Facebook page:

Ferguson burns and violence has been unleashed thanks to the reckless liberal media, the lawless administration (especially Eric Holder) exploiting the shooting to smear police departments across the nation, phony civil rights demagogues, race-baiting politicians, and radical hate groups.

The lies about why and how Officer Darrin Wilson shot Michael Brown started on day one and never ended. The indisputable facts are that Brown was shot because he assaulted a police officer, attempted to take the officer’s pistol resulting in two close range gun shots in the police cruiser, and then turned around and charged the officer as he was being pursued. The entire event was precipitated by Brown earlier stealing cigars from a local store and assaulting the owner.

What we are witnessing now is the left’s war on the civil society. It’s time to speak out in defense of law enforcement and others trying to protect the community and uphold the rule law.



10 Signs That Russia Is Preparing To Fight (And Win) A Nuclear War With The United States

by Michael Snyder | End Of The American Dream | November 25, 2014

URL of Original Posting Site:

“If the United States and Russia fought a nuclear war, who would win? You might be surprised by the answer”

10 Signs That Russia Is Preparing To Fight (And Win) A Nuclear War With The United States

If the United States and Russia fought a nuclear war, who would win?  You might be surprised by the answer.  Under the Obama administration, the rapidly aging U.S. strategic nuclear arsenal has been shrinking.  Meanwhile, the Russians have been developing an entirely new generation of bombers, submarines and missiles that have the capability of delivering an absolutely crippling first strike.  At this point, most Americans consider a full-scale nuclear war to be inconceivable.  But in Russia attitudes are completely different.  To the Russians, the United States is enemy number one these days and the Russians are feverishly preparing for a potential military showdown.  Of course the Russians don’t actually want to have to resort to nuclear war.  Such an event would be an unspeakable horror for the entire globe.  But if one does happen, the Russians want to make sure that they are the ones that come out on top.

A lot of Americans are still operating under the faulty assumption that the doctrine of “mutually assured destruction” still applies.  The thinking was that both sides had so many nuclear missiles that a launch by one side would guarantee the destruction of both parties.

But since that time, so much has changed.

For one, the U.S. nuclear arsenal is far, far smaller than it was back then.  Back in 1967, the U.S. military possessed more than 31,000 strategic nuclear warheads.  Now, we only have 1,642 deployed, and that number is scheduled to be further reduced to about 1,500.

Sadly, reducing the size of our nuclear arsenal by close to 95 percent is not enough for anti-nuke crusader Barack Obama.  He has spoken of unilaterally reducing the size of our strategic nuclear arsenal down to just 300 warheads.

During this same time period, the Russians have been developing some very impressive stealth delivery systems which have the capability of hitting targets inside the United States within just minutes of an order being issued.  This is particularly true of their submarine-launched missiles.  The newest Russian subs have the ability to approach our coastlines without us even knowing that they are there.  If the Russians came to the conclusion that war with the United States was unavoidable, an overwhelming first strike using submarine-based missiles could potentially take out nearly our entire arsenal before we even knew what hit us.  And if the Russians have an anti-ballistic missile system that can intercept the limited number of rockets that we can launch in return, they may be able to escape relatively unscathed. com 01

In order for “mutually assured destruction” to work, we have to see the Russian missiles coming and have enough time to order a launch of our own.  Thank to emerging technologies, the balance of power has fundamentally shifted.  The old way of thinking simply does not apply anymore and the Russians understand this.

The following are 10 signs that Russia is preparing to fight (and win) a nuclear war with the United States…

#1 Russia is spending an enormous amount of money to develop the PAK DA Strategic Bomber.  Not a lot is known about this stealth bomber at this time.  The following summary of what we do know comes from an Australian news source

Russia’s answer to the B-2 “Spirit”, this next-generation strategic bomber is intended to be almost invisible to radar and capable of carrying a huge array of conventional and nuclear missiles. Little else is known other than its expected service date: 01

#2 Russian nuclear bombers have been regularly buzzing areas in northern Europe and along the coast of Alaska.  The Russians appear to be brazenly testing NATO defenses.  Here is just one recent example

Russian strategic nuclear bombers carried out air defense zone incursions near Alaska and across Northern Europe this week in the latest nuclear saber rattling by Moscow.

Six Russian aircraft, including two Bear H nuclear bombers, two MiG-31 fighter jets and two IL-78 refueling tankers were intercepted by F-22 fighters on Wednesday west and north of Alaska in air defense identification zones, said Navy Capt. Jeff A. Davis, a spokesman for the U.S. Northern Command and North American Aerospace Defense Command. Two other Bears were intercepted by Canadian jets on Thursday.

#3 Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu says that Russian nuclear bombers will now conduct regular patrols “in the western Atlantic and eastern Pacific, as well as the Caribbean and the Gulf of Mexico“.

#4 Russia is constructing an anti-ballistic missile system which will supposedly be superior to anything that the U.S. currently has

Currently under development, the S-500 missile is intended to be capable of intercepting intercontinental ballistic missiles when combined with radar input from the likes of the new A-100 AWACS aircraft. It is supposed to be able to track and shoot at up to 10 supersonic targets at any one time at heights of up to 01

#5 Russia recently successfully test launched a new submarine-based intercontinental ballistic missile

A Russian Northern Fleet nuclear submarine on Wednesday fired a test intercontinental missile from the Barents Sea to the country’s far eastern Kura Range on the Kamchatka Peninsula, the Russian Defense Ministry said in a statement Wednesday.

“Within the frameworks of testing the reliability of marine strategic nuclear forces, the Tula [nuclear submarine] launched a Sineva intercontinental ballistic missile from the Barents Sea to the Kura Range [in Kamchatka],” the statement says.

The RSM-54 intercontinental ballistic missile Sineva (NATO code name SS-N-23 Skiff) is part of the D-9RM launch system.

The D-9RM launch system equipped with RSM-54 missiles was put into service in 1986. The production of the RSM-54 was halted in 1996 but after three years, the Russian government resumed the production of a modernized version of the 01

#6 Russia already possesses super silent nuclear attack submarines that are virtually undetectable when submerged.  In a previous article, I discussed how the U.S. Navy refers to these virtually undetectable subs as “black holes“…

Did you know that Russia is building submarines that are so quiet that the U.S. military cannot detect them? These “black hole” submarines can freely approach the coastlines of the United States without fear of being detected whenever they want. In fact, a “nuclear-powered attack submarine armed with long-range cruise missiles” sailed around in the Gulf of Mexico for several weeks without being detected back in 2012. And now Russia is launching a new class of subs that have “advanced stealth technology”. The U.S. Navy openly acknowledges that they cannot track these subs when they are submerged. That means that the Russians are able to sail right up to our coastlines and launch nukes whenever they 01

#7 Russian media outlets are reporting that 60 percent of all Russian nuclear missiles will have radar-evading capability by 2016

Russia’s Defense Ministry plans to complete the rearmament of Strategic Missile Forces within six years. “By 2016, the share of new missile systems will reach nearly 60%, and by 2021 their share will increase to 98%. At the same time the troop and weapon command systems, combat equipment will be qualitatively improved, first of all — their capabilities for the suppression of antimissile defense will be built up,” Defense Ministry’s RVSN spokesman Colonel Igor Yegorov told ITAR-TASS on 01

#8 For the first time ever, Russia has more strategic nuclear warheads deployed than the United States does

For the first time, Russia, which is in the midst of a major strategic nuclear modernization, has more deployed nuclear warheads than the United States, according to the latest numbers released by the State Department.

Russia now has 1,643 warheads deployed on intercontinental ballistic missiles, submarine-launched ballistic missiles and heavy bombers. The United States has 1,642, said the fact sheet released Wednesday.

The warhead count for the Russians, based the Sept. 1 report required under the 2010 New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START), shows an increase of 131 warheads since the last declaration on March 1. The U.S. reported a warhead increase of 57 during the same period. It is not clear why the warhead numbers 01

#9 Russia has a massive advantage over the United States and NATO when it comes to tactical nuclear weapons

As for tactical nuclear weapons, the superiority of modern-day Russia over NATO is even stronger.

The Americans are well aware of this. They were convinced before that Russia would never rise again. Now it’s too late.

To date, NATO countries have only 260 tactical nuclear weapons in the ETO. The United States has 200 bombs with a total capacity of 18 megatons. They are located on six air bases in Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands and Turkey. France has 60 more atomic bombs. That is pretty much it. Russia, according to conservative estimates, has 5,000 pieces of different classes of TNW – from Iskander warheads to torpedo, aerial and artillery warheads! The US has 300 tactical B-61 bombs on its own territory, but this does not change the situation against the backdrop of such 01

#10 Russian President Vladimir Putin has initiated a huge “weapons modernization program” that is projected to cost the equivalent of 540 billion dollars

Putin said Russia’s weapons modernization program for 2016-2025 should focus on building a new array of offensive weapons to provide a “guaranteed nuclear deterrent;” re-arming strategic and long-range aviation; creating an aerospace defense system and developing high-precision conventional weapons.

He would not elaborate on prospective weapons, but he and other officials have repeatedly boasted about new Russian nuclear missiles’ capability to penetrate any prospective missile shield.

The Kremlin has bolstered defense spending in the past few years under an ambitious weapons modernization program that runs through 2020 and costs the equivalent of $540 01

Meanwhile, the Chinese have been investing heavily in this kind of technology as well.

In fact, just the other day the Chinese successfully tested a new submarine-launched intercontinental ballistic missile

China’s JL-2 second-generation intercontinental-range submarine-launched ballistic missile, which has the ability to reach the continental USA, is already believed to be deployable by the People’s Liberation Army, reports Huanqiu, the Chinese-language website of the nationalistic Global Times tabloid.

The Julang-2 — literally “Giant Wave 2″ — has reached a preliminary level of proficiency, according to the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission in its report to US Congress on Nov. 20.

Most Americans do not believe that any of this is a concern whatsoever.

Most Americans just assume that a full-scale nuclear war is virtually impossible.

But the truth is that a successful first strike against the United States is more possible today than it ever has been before. Hopefully the American people will wake up to this reality before it is too late.

com 01



How Some Islamist Supporters Are Reacting to the Ferguson Unrest

URL of Original Posting Site:

Following the eruption of violence in Ferguson, Missouri, some apparent supporters of Middle East Islamists added their voice to the debate, accusing the U.S. of being a “fake” democracy, likening the U.S. to a terrorist group, and calling for Shariah law to be implemented in the U.S.

It all came as a result of the no indictment of police officer Darren Wilson in the August shooting death of 18-year-old Michael Brown.

Journalist Jenan Moussa with the Dubai-based Al Aan television first reported Tuesday morning that supporters of the Islamic State group and others were actively commenting on the Ferguson developments using Arabic hashtags which translate to “America burning” and “America collapsing.”

01 tweet

The vast majority posted their thoughts in Arabic, but some posted in English.

02 tweet

One Twitter user took the opportunity to criticize the U.S. military’s use of drones in pursuit of terrorism suspects.

03 tweet

The same user also called for the flag of Allah to be raised at the White House:

04 tweet

05 tweet

This photo montage was added to the Twitter conversation accompanied by the Arabic headline “America collapsing.”

06 tweet

Reporter Moussa’s tweet about the existence of the Arabic hashtags on the Ferguson strife also elicited responses, including these:

ferg tweeets last

Christian Persecution



My Own Two Cents About the Results of the Officer Wilson Verdict


New WhatDidYouSay Logo

The news is full of reporting on what happened in Ferguson, Missouri, last night after the Grand Jury issued their results of three months of testimony, questions and carefully considering their decision.

Rather than join the crowd of regurgitating the reports of the riots, including those in many other cities, please allow me to give you some other thoughts about the entire subject;

  1. “Never argue, or try to reason with, nor bother to ask questions of delusional people. You are NOT the DONKEY (Leftist/Marxist/Socialist/Extreme-Liberal/Full-of-Hate/Democrat followers) whisperer.”DO NOT JACKASS
  2. Most of the rioters you saw last night could care less about Michael Brown, or how he died. They just wanted to riot, destroy, pillage and make a fuss. No matter the verdict, they were determined to riot.Angry Black Mob 01
  3. They wanted free stuff. Noticed the businesses they targeted; Cell Phone stores, liquor stores, auto parts stores (McDonalds I really don’t understand).
  4. They wanted to destroy. They hate anyone who actually makes something of their lives. They do not understand, nor do they want to understand, how someone starts and builds a business. This is largely due to the Professional Pot-Stirrer-Thugs of Sharpton/Jackson. As long as these humans remain convinced that the world hates them, owes them, has oppressed them, they will remain victims and never think for themselves. The Sharpton/Jackson’s will continue to get filthy rich off their victims supposed oppression, and laugh all the way to a lifestyle their victims only dream of having. Adding to the wrong is the Sharpton/Jackson’s not paying taxes like good citizens.Stirring Angry People Group Pot
  5. Race relations will never heal as long as these vicious Pot-Stirrer Thugs continue to poke at the bruises they have inflicted on their victims. You can never extinguish the firestorm of hate with more fuel.satisfied people
  6. These victims are so drunk with their hatred, and perceived oppression, that reasoning will never be possible. They will continue to hate, riot. destroy and murder at exponential numbers. Black on black crime will continue to grow in exponential numbers. Black on black hatred will continue as independent-thinking black people seek to escape their perceived bondage and become successful like Dr. Ben Carson, Condoleezza Rice, Allen B. West and other like people. They actually started thinking for themselves. They were raised by parents that encouraged them to get a great education, and do something with that education. They were taught to not follow the crowd, or cave into the stereotypes thrust on them by the Sharpton/Jackson Professional Pot-Stirrer Thugs. Isn’t it odd that they all became conservatives?
  7. More evidence of all this was the riots in other cities. No one can possibly give a righteous reason for their conduct. All they wanted to do was riot, they didn’t care what opportunity they had to do so.
  8. All the pundits that FOX and others interviewed live that are died-in-the-wool Leftist/Marxist/Socialist/White-Hating/America-Hating/Democrat’s that had the same talking points; The prosecutor failed in his job because he took the right steps in going to the Grand Jury first. Their claims that Office Wilson was not cross examined, and that they didn’t have any of the information of the evidence, was all a canard (Definition of CANARD: a false or unfounded report or story; especially : a fabricated report b : a groundless rumor or belief) Their real reason for their complaint was that they didn’t get to have MORE “ammunition” to yell and complaint about, giving them MORE reasons to sharpton america
  9. Another reason they wanted a public trial was so they would have faces of jurors they could intimidate and punish. The Grand Jury is private and unknown.

Unfortunately these acts will not end. More than ever before in history is the United States been in a head-on collision with a Race War. Stoked by the Islamist, and all those profiting from keeping the fires burning and the Pot Stirring, these perceived victims will get bolder, grow in numbers, and anything can flip the switch.

As long as the Evangelical Church in America remains content with playing church, instead of being the Salt and Light Jesus said we are to be, our country will continue its downward spiral into destruction. Waiting at the bottom are the Sharpton/Jacksons, the Islamist and all the other Leftist/Marxist/Socialist/America-Hating/Freedom-Hating/Christian-Hating/Politically-Correct-Worshiping/Democrats. America as designed by God the Father through His instruments of peace, our founding fathers, will completely cease to exists. What rises from the ashes will be the totalitarian, Socialist, Tyrannical, Marxist, Saul Alinsky Designed, Cloward-Piven planned oppressive government these thugs have wanted all along.

I’m still going to fight to the end. How about you?

Jerry Broussard of




Today’s Politicaly INCORRECT Cartoon

Who gives A Loot

URL Of Original Posting Site:

Pants Up LA 600





Does sex ed conference for students go too far?

Published: November 18, 2014, Updated: November 20, 2014

URL of Original Positing Site:

Some question material taught at annual adolescent sex conference in Seaside

SEASIDE, Ore. (KOIN 6) — Students as young as 11 from across the state have been attending a sex conference held in Seaside, Oregon, for the past 20 years.

Taxpayers’ money is used to fund the program, which is meant to promote safe sex and prevent teen pregnancy. However, a KOIN 6 Investigation uncovered that there’s a good chance the parents who signed permission slips in order for their children to attend have no clue what is really being taught behind closed doors.

Part of the lesson plan at a workshop at the Oregon Adolescent Sexuality Conference is an adult website called Virtual Fem. In addition to the content from that website, numerous handouts, such as one that encourages cyber and phone sex, have been passed out to high school and middle school students in attendance.

One of the handouts at the Adolescent Sexuality Conference held in Seaside, April 7-8, 2014 (KOIN 6 News)
One of the handouts at the Adolescent Sexuality Conference held in Seaside, April 7-8, 2014 (KOIN 6 News)

The pamphlets go on to suggest other ways students can engage in intimate activities without going all the way, including bathing together, shaving each other, wearing each other’s underwear, role playing, buying an extra-large pair of pajama bottoms to sleep in together, lap dances and strip teases.

Another workshop at the conference focuses on how to pleasure someone else over the Internet.

“Teledildonics basically refers to the control of sex toys over the Internet; the remote use of sex toys,” said keynote speaker Cory Silverberg in an audiotape obtained by KOIN 6 News after the conference from an attendee.

Conference director

When confronted about the graphic content, the conference’s director, Brad Victor, declined to comment about one session in particular about performing sex acts over Skype and whether those sessions could potentially be recorded and used against a student later.

“Is this interview going down this line the whole time? If it is, I’m walking out. I’m serious about this,” said Victor.Liberalism a mental disorder

The Adolescent Sexuality Conference director Brad Victor, October 2014 (KOIN 6 News)
The Adolescent Sexuality Conference director Brad Victor, October 2014 (KOIN 6 News)

Victor, a spokesperson and director for Teen Pregnancy Task Force, the organizer of the conference, is partially paid with state funds to put on the program in Seaside.

While he refused to answer KOIN 6’s questions, a student, who wanted to remain anonymous, spoke about what she saw during the conference, calling it shocking.

“I felt really just horrified and unsettled by it all,” she said.

While there was a session on learning how to put on a condom and make a dental dam, a workshop where the speaker brought students to a porn website and taught them to program virtual women really upset the student.

“When you press a certain command, it tells her to perform various sexual acts, um, and so that was very disturbing,” she said.Liberalism a mental disorder

Audio of keynote speaker Silverberg giving detailed directions on how to make an avatar for virtual sex.

“You can program her to do whatever you want to say, if you don’t want to say, ‘give me a blow job or something,” said Silverberg.

Teachers and parents

This conference isn’t just for students. Teachers, school district healthcare workers and school board members, including Lisa Maloney, have also attended.

Maloney was not representing the St. Helens School District, but she said she was concerned by what she witnessed.

One of the handouts at the Adolescent Sexuality Conference held in Seaside, April 7-8, 2014 (KOIN 6 News)
One of the handouts at the Adolescent Sexuality Conference held in Seaside, April 7-8, 2014 (KOIN 6 News)

“All kinds of speakers about Internet porn, using Internet sex toys, using meth as is shown in this book for when you’re engaging in sex. It encourages using meth because it helps your sexual drive and what not in here,” said Maloney. “It says in this booklet that was handed out and given out to all young people.”

Indeed, a section of the handout Maloney referred to read: “Meth is widely used for a million reasons to have lots of sex with lots of partners for long periods.”

Lori Porter, a concerned mother, also showed other pamphlets distributed during the conference titled “Dry Humping Saves Lives” and “How to Get Your Groove on Fluid Free.” Another gave tips on masturbation.

“Watch porn, lube, do it in front of a mirror, do it while someone else is watching,” said Porter.Liberalism a mental disorder

Still, Victor defended the material and said it is not censored.

“The material passed out at this conference is dedicated to preventing teen pregnancy, preventing STD’s and also developing healthy relationships,” said Victor.Really with logo

When asked whether he thought the suggestions given in the pamphlets prevent teen sex, Victor refused to comment.

“I’m not going to address that question. That question is inappropriate,” he said.Really with logo

The Adolescent Sexuality Conference was held in Seaside, April 7-8, 2014 (KOIN 6 News)
The Adolescent Sexuality Conference was held in Seaside, April 7-8, 2014 (KOIN 6 News)

State agencies

Victor has two state agencies supporting him and the conference. On the conference website they list the Oregon Health Authority as a sponsor of the conference. A public information request revealed the Oregon Health Authority has spent more than $1000 of taxpayer money for the 2013 and 2014 conferences, according to OHA. That money was spent for staff members to attend the conference.

The Oregon Adolescent Sexuality Conference website also lists the Oregon Department of Education on their steering committee. A public information request revealed ODE has paid Victor more than $800 since 2013. That money is in addition to the more than $4,000 Victor received from the federal government since 2013, the Oregon Department of Education says that money goes to his work supporting districts with aligning instruction to state standards. However, Victor is mostly paid by Wise, a private grant from a private foundation, for working to institutionalize sex education.


KOIN reached out to 16 school district superintendents listed as possibly having students at the conference. Of those contacted by KOIN 6 News, 10 said they were unaware such material was being taught.

Of the 10 superintendents, Newberg School District Superintendent Dr. Kym LeBlanc Esparza was the only one who agreed to speak on the record. When she saw some of the handouts she was clearly discouraged.

“This is garbage, so that’s disappointing,” said LeBlanc Esparza.

Material from the conference shown to her, she said, was a far cry from what she was told would be at the two-day program.

“It’s fascinating because of the documentation that comes out of the Oregon Department of Ed and that comes out of the programs, (that) the organizations put out speak specifically to addressing at-risk kids questions and things to help them make good healthy decisions,” said LeBlanc Esparza.

One of the handouts at the Adolescent Sexuality Conference held in Seaside, April 7-8, 2014 (KOIN 6 News)
One of the handouts at the Adolescent Sexuality Conference held in Seaside, April 7-8, 2014 (KOIN 6 News)

Wise, the grant behind the conference, also provides the sex education curriculum for the same 16 Oregon school districts who attend the annual conference.

“The individuals are able to take this professional development opportunity back to their workplace,” said Victor.

Some are concerned it is working too well.

In the Wise curriculum, sixth grade students are asked, “How do people express their sexual feelings?” The answers they’re given to choose from include anal sex, oral sex and sexual fantasy.

Concerned parents say it’s too much too soon.

“If it was an adult sex conference, we wouldn’t even be having this conversation, but this is directed to adolescents. We want them to be safe,” said concerned mother Lori Porter.

The next conference

To receive the WISE funding, school districts must attend one of three conferences. So far Woodburn, SKSD, Paisley, Pleasant Hill, Cascade, Clatskanie, Warrenton-Hammond school districts have not turned in the paperwork to attend any of the conferences or to take part in the WISE program at all.

Gervais, Sherwood, Sheridan, Willamina, Bethel, Corvallis, St. Helens, and Sisters have sent in their paperwork to attend this upcoming year. However, when KOIN 6 News contacted St. Helens school superintendent Mark Davalos, he said students will not be attending the conference in the future. On Thursday, the Sherwood district told KOIN 6 News they would not attend.

The Newberg superintendent said the school district will not be sending students. If they go their parents will be taking them, not the school.

“If it’s going to take the route of giving kids information that suddenly our families and our communities are uncomfortable with we’ll have a conversation about what that means for us,” said LeBlanc-Esparza.

The Sheridan superintendent told KOIN 6 News Wednesday the investigation raised serious concerns about the conference and the district is re-thinking its involvement.

The superintendent in Woodburn also contacted KOIN 6 News and said their students will not be attending the conference.

A total of 7 of the 16 Oregon school districts will not be participating in the conference next April.



Exclusive: Cornered but unbound by nuclear pact, Israel reconsiders military action against Iran



By MICHAEL WILNER \ 11/22/2014

URL of Original Posting Site:

“Israeli official cites “sunset clause” in proposed comprehensive deal, which guarantees Iran a path into the nuclear club and may corner Israel into war”.

Israel Air Force planes fly over Tel Aviv. . (photo credit:IDF SPOKESPERSON’S UNIT)

WASHINGTON – Historic negotiations with Iran will reach an inflection point on Monday, as world powers seek to clinch a comprehensive deal that will, to their satisfaction, end concerns over the nature of its vast, decade-old nuclear program.

But reflecting on the deal under discussion with The Jerusalem Post on the eve of the deadline, Israel has issued a stark, public warning to its allies with a clear argument: Current proposals guarantee the perpetuation of a crisis, backing Israel into a corner from which military force against Iran provides the only logical exit.

The deal on the table

World powers have presented Iran with an accord that would restrict its nuclear program for roughly ten years and cap its ability to produce fissile material for a weapon during that time to a minimum nine-month additional period, from the current three months.

Should Tehran agree, the deal may rely on Russia to convert Iran’s current uranium stockpile into fuel rods for peaceful use. The proposal would also include an inspection regime that would attempt to follow the program’s entire supply chain, from the mining of raw material to the syphoning of that material to various nuclear facilities across Iran.

Israel’s leaders believe the best of a worst-case scenario, should that deal be reached, is for inspections to go perfectly and for Iran to choose to abide by the deal for the entire decade-long period.

But “our intelligence agencies are not perfect,” an Israeli official said. “We did not know for years about Natanz and Qom. And inspection regimes are certainly not perfect. They weren’t in the case in North Korea, and it isn’t the case now – Iran’s been giving the IAEA the run around for years about its past activities.”

“What’s going to happen with that?” the official continued. “Are they going to sweep that under the rug if there’s a deal?”

On Saturday afternoon, reports from Vienna suggested the P5+1 – the US, United Kingdom, France, Russia, China and Germany – are willing to stop short of demanding full disclosure of any secret weapon work by Tehran.

Speaking to the Post, a senior US official rejected concern over limited surveillance capabilities, during or after a deal.

Imperial Islamic President Obama“If we can conclude a comprehensive agreement, we will have significantly more ability to detect covert facilities – even after its duration is over – than we do today,” the senior US official said. “After the duration of the agreement, the most intrusive inspections will continue: the Additional Protocol – which encompasses very intrusive transparency, and which Iran has already said it will implement – will continue.”

But compounding Israel’s fears, the proposal Jerusalem has seen shows that mass dismantlement of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure – including the destruction, and not the mere warehousing, of its parts – is no longer on the table in Vienna.

“Iran’s not being asked to dismantle the nuclear infrastructure,” the Israeli official said, having seen the proposal before the weekend. “Right now what they’re talking about is something very different. They’re talking about Ayatollah Khamenei allowing the P5+1 to save face.”

Officials in the Netanyahu government are satisfied that their ideas and concerns have been given a fair hearing by their American counterparts. They praise the US for granting Israel unprecedented visibility into the process.

But while those discussions may have affected the talks at the margins, large gaps – on whether to grant Iran the right to enrich uranium, or allow it to keep much of its infrastructure – have remained largely unaddressed.

“It’s like the chemical weapons deal in Syria,” the official said. “They didn’t just say: Here, let’s get rid of the stockpile and the weapons, but we will leave all the plants and assembly lines.”

‘Sunset clause’

Yet, more than any single enforcement standard or cap included in the deal, Israel believes the Achilles’ heel of the proposed agreement is its definitive end date – the sunset clause.

“You’ve not dismantled the infrastructure, you’ve basically tried to put limits that you think are going to be monitored by inspectors and intelligence,” said the official, “and then after this period of time, Iran is basically free to do whatever it wants.”Give peace-chance-590-LI

The Obama administration also rejects this claim. By e-mail, the senior US administration official said that, “‘following successful implementation of the final step of the comprehensive solution for its duration, the Iranian nuclear program will be treated in the same manner as that of any non-nuclear weapon state party to the NPT – with an emphasis on non-nuclear weapon.”

“That has in no way changed,” the American official continued, quoting the interim Joint Plan of Action reached last year.

But the treatment of Iran as any other signatory of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty –189 countries are members, including Iran – would allow Tehran to ultimately acquire “an industrial-sized capability,” the Israelis say. “The breakout times [to a nuclear weapon] will be effectively zero.”  Iran

Israel and world powers seek to maximize the amount of time they would have to identify non-compliance from a nuclear deal, should Iran choose to defy its tenets and build a bomb.

But in the deal under discussion in Vienna, Iran would be able to comply with international standards for a decade and, from Israel’s perspective, then walk, not sneak, into the nuclear club.

“You’ve not only created a deal that leaves Iran as a threshold nuclear power today, because they have the capability to break out quickly if they wanted to,” the Israeli official contended. “But you’ve also legitimized Iran as a military nuclear power in the future.”

From the moment this deal is clinched, Israel fears it will guarantee Iran as a military nuclear power. There will be no off ramp, because Iran’s reentry into the international community will be fixed, a fait accompli, by the very powers trying to contain it.

“The statement that says we’ve prevented them from having a nuclear weapon is not a true statement,” the Israeli official continued. “What you’ve said is, you’re going to put restrictions on Iran for a given number of years, after which there will be no restrictions and no sanctions. That’s the deal that’s on the table.”

Revisiting the use of force

Without an exit ramp, Israel insists its hands will not be tied by an agreement reached this week, this month or next, should it contain a clause that ultimately normalizes Iran’s home-grown enrichment program.

On the surface, its leadership dismisses fears that Israel will be punished or delegitimized if it disrupts an historic, international deal on the nuclear program with unilateral military action against its infrastructure.

By framing the deal as fundamentally flawed, regardless of its enforcement, Israel is telling the world that it will not wait to see whether inspectors do their jobs as ordered.

“Ten, fifteen years in the life of a politician is a long time,” the Israeli said, in a vague swipe against the political directors now scrambling in Vienna. “In the life of a nation, it’s nothing.”

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has threatened the use of force against Iran several times since 2009, even seeking authorization from his cabinet in 2011. Iran’s program has since grown in size and scope.

According to his aides, the prime minister’s preference is not war, but the continuation of a tight sanctions regime on Iran’s economy coupled with a credible threat of military force. Netanyahu believes more time under duress would have led to an acceptable deal. But that opportunity, in his mind, may now be lost.

Whether Israel still has the ability to strike Iran, without American assistance, is an open question. Quoted last month in the Atlantic magazine, US officials suggested that window for Netanyahu closed over two years ago.Israels-Back-590-LI

But responding to claims by that same official, quoted by Jeffrey Goldberg, over Netanyahu’s courage and will, the Israeli official responded sternly: “The prime minister is a very serious man who knows the serious responsibility that rests on his shoulders. He wouldn’t say the statements that he made if he didn’t mean them.”

“People have underestimated Israel many, many times in the past,” he continued, “and they underestimate it now.”





White House Quietly Releases Plans For 3,415 Regulations Ahead Of Thanksgiving Holiday

Posted by Michael Bastasch, Contributor / 11/24/2014

URL of Original Posting Site:

Tyranney Alert

Imperial President ObamaWhile Americans are focused on what delicious foods they’re going to eat for Thanksgiving, the White House is focused on releasing its massive regulatory agenda — marking the fifth time the Obama administration has released its regulatory road map on the eve of a major holiday.

The federal Unified Agenda is the Obama administration’s regulatory road map, and it lays out thousands of regulations being finalized in the coming months. Under President Barack Obama, there has been a tradition of releasing the agenda late on Friday — and right before a major holiday.

“It’s become an unfortunate tradition of this administration and others to drop these regulatory agendas late on a Friday and right before a holiday,” Matt Shudtz, executive director of the Center for Progressive Reform, told The Hill newspaper.

The White House’s regulatory agenda for spring 2014 was released on the eve of the Memorial Day weekend, when millions of people set out on weekend getaways or family vacations.

“It’s unfortunate because it’s an update on protections for Americans of all stripes,” Shudtz told the Hill. “It lays out the administration’s plan and it deserves more attention.”

But the White House may have a good reason to do so because its Unified Agenda for fall 2014 includes some 3,415 regulations– more than the last regulatory agenda, and one that includes 189 rules that cost more than $100 01

One of the most contentious rules is the Environmental Protection Agency rules to limit greenhouse gas emissions from new and existing power plants. According to the agenda, these rules will be finalized in 2015. They have been criticized by Republicans and the coal industry for accelerating the demise of coal-fired power and for setting the stage for increases in electricity prices. Republicans, who are set to take control of the Senate next year, have vowed to fight EPA regulations.

“The president said his policies were on the ballot, and the American people spoke up against them,” said incoming Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican. “It’s time for more listening, and less job-destroying red tape. Easing the burden already created by EPA regulations will continue to be a priority for me in the new Congress.”

But environmental groups and the EPA argue the rule will actually help lower utility bills and help fight global warming.Propaganda Alert BS Alert

“The good news is that we can afford to tackle the growing threat of climate change and, really, we can’t afford not to,” said Starla Yeh, a policy analyst at the Natural Resources Defense Council. “Doing the right thing will save money even as we protect our health, our communities and future generations.”Partyof Deceit Spin and Lies

A more pressing EPA rule set to be finalized is the so-called coal ash rule for coal-fired power plants. A final rule will be issued by Dec. 19, and could be bad news for the power sector, which will bear the brunt of $20.3 billion in compliance costs.

But probably the most fought-over rules to be finalized by the EPA next year will be its redefining of the “Waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act. The EPA will issue its redefinition next year, according to the agenda.

Federal lawmakers from both parties, along with companies from virtually every sector of the economy, have opposed the rule, saying it greatly expands the EPA’s power to regulate even small bodies of water on private property.

“The ‘waters of the U.S.’ rule may be one of the most significant private property grabs in U.S. history,” said Louisiana Republican Sen. David Vitter, adding “they want to take another step toward outright permitting authority over virtually any wet area in the country, while at the same time providing a new tool for environmental groups to sue private property owners.”

But the EPA says the rule is needed to clear up uncertainty over the EPA’s jurisdiction in the wake of two Supreme Court rulings. The EPA says “the decisions established important considerations for how those regulations should be interpreted” and that “[e]xperience implementing the regulations following the two court cases has identified several areas that could benefit from additional clarification through rulemaking.”Liberalism a mental disorder

Follow Michael on Twitter and Facebook

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon

Immigration Fix

URL Of Original Posting Site:

Immigration Fix


group imperial obama



The Crucifixion of Pastor Scott Lively


Written by avatarMatt Barber / 15 November, 2014

URL of Original Posting Site:


“Remember what I told you: ‘A servant is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted me, they will persecute you also. If they obeyed my teaching, they will obey yours also.”

– John 15:20

Christians, pastors, take heed. In case you haven’t noticed, times are a-changin’. Whether at home or abroad, if you follow God’s command to speak biblical truth in all things, most especially, it seems, on matters of sex and sexuality, you will be persecuted.

“A servant is not greater than his master.”

I don’t presume to compare my friend Scott Lively of Abiding Truth Ministries to Jesus Christ. None of us can compare, even remotely, to the one and only God-man – to the Lord of the universe and exclusive path to eternal salvation. That said, Pastor Lively is one of the most “Christ-like” people I’ve had the honor to know.

As did Christ, Scott Lively speaks absolute truth, in absolute love, with absolutely no fear of personal destruction or even death. He loves everyone, cp 11whether friend or foe, Christian or pagan, straight or “gay.”

For example, Scott and his family took into their home and nursed, both physically and spiritually, the late Sonny Weaver, a former homosexual who died, as so many have, from AIDS – a natural consequence of unnatural behavior. Sonny became homosexual after being raped at 7 years old by a “gay” man in a local YMCA. He became a former homosexual after accepting Jesus as Lord of his life.

Lively loves those who seek to defend him just as he loves those who seek to destroy him – and, make no mistake about it, precisely because Pastor Scott Lively has chosen to both obey and emulate Jesus Christ, there are people, very powerful people, who seek to destroy him. These people, unless and until they come to know, accept and surrender to the Lord Jesus, are, and will remain, enemies of God.

And so Scott Lively prays for them.

Remember those pastors in Houston who were told to turn over their sermons to radical lesbian-activist mayor Annise Parker? Remember the national outrage over this blatantly unconstitutional act of governmental abuse?

You ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

Pastor Lively, you see, has, in the spirit of Saul Alinsky, been “Hitlerized” by a left-wing extremist group ironically calling itself the “Center for Constitutional Rights” (CCR). CCR is a George Soros-funded organization with, I kid you not, the beastly street address of 666 Broadway, New York, NY.

Because Lively exercised his God-given First Amendment rights, as well as his free-speech rights afforded by the laws of Uganda, and spoke cp 04biblical truth about homosexual sin after having been invited there by a number of Ugandan pro-family groups, homosexual activists set out to make an example of him.

In March of 2012 CCR sued Lively in a Massachusetts federal court for “crimes against humanity” – the same charge filed against Nazis who stood trial in Nuremberg – on behalf of another moonbat organization called “Sexual Minorities Uganda,” which, and again, you can’t make this stuff up, prefers the moniker “SMUG.”

And so Lively enlisted the pro-bono legal services of Liberty Counsel, one of America’s fastest-growing civil rights organizations.

Lively explains:

“With full knowledge that these are bald-faced lies, SMUG asserts that

1) I masterminded the 2009 Anti-Homosexuality Bill in Uganda, which they call the ‘Kill the Gays Bill’ [in fact, Lively publicly opposed the bill, which has since been struck down by Ugandan courts],

2) inflamed passions against homosexuals in Uganda by characterizing all homosexuals as irredeemable genocidal child molesters, and

3) introduced to Uganda the heretofore unknown strategy of criminalizing public promotion of homosexuality as a means of opposing the rise of a homosexual movement in Uganda. The proof that these are lies is found in the very same documents they misuse against me.”

CCR and SMUG also tried to blame Lively for the murder of Ugandan homosexual David Kato, a murder he also publicly condemned, making it thecp 13 centerpiece of their lawsuit until, and as was noted in Liberty Counsel’s Motion to Dismiss, it was revealed that, as Lively predicted, Kato was actually murdered by his “gay” lover who confessed to the crime, was convicted and is now in prison.

But all of this is incidental. It’s a smokescreen. Keep in mind; we’re talking about protected speech here. Lively is being tried for “crimes against humanity” for merely uttering, publicly, millennia-old biblical orthodoxy relative to sexual morality.

So how could such an Orwellian lawsuit – clearly designed as a weapon to both harass and intimidate Lively and anyone else who might dare challenge the global homosexual activist political agenda – even make its way into a U. S. federal court?

Well, CCR and SMUG’s angle was to circumvent that pesky ol’ First Amendment, as well as Ugandan free speech laws, through a gross misapplication of the Alien Tort Statute. Normally, this would have been laughed out of court and, in fact, just last year, even as this case was ongoing, the U.S. Supreme Court unequivocally ruled this very tactic to be unlawful.

But there’s nothing normal about this case.Shoving

Meet federal Judge Michael Ponsor. Ponsor, who thumbed his nose at the Supreme Court and denied Liberty Counsel’s slam dunk Motion to Dismiss, is the textbook example of a judicial activist. He has admitted as much, once saying in another context that, “At some point I realized that judges are the unappointed legislators of mankind, and what we do is just as creative.”

But for this judicial activist, the case would seem personal. At his inauguration to the federal bench he crowed, for instance, “We have a proud,The Real Gay Mafia vibrant gay and lesbian community.” Presumably he knows this because one of his ex-wives reportedly later “married” another woman, while his daughter once revealed publicly on social media that she, too, was a lesbian.

And so, to keep afloat the demonization of Scott Lively (of all Christians, really) despite the Supreme Court’s torpedo, and to keep alive this judicial abuse, harassment and intimidation – Ponsor, as promised, got “creative.”

Still, the case will eventually be tossed. It’s inevitable. But in the meantime, and as Harry Mihet, Pastor Lively’s lead attorney, points out, “Because the Court denied Mr. Lively’s Motion to Dismiss, we are now forced to go through many months and years of expensive and protracted discovery on two continents. Literally thousands of pages of documents are changing hands, and dozens of depositions will be taken. This makes the subpoenas to Houston pastors look like small potatoes.”

“SMUG’s and CCR’s end game is clear: Make war criminals out of anyone who encourages any legislative body to pass any legislation upholding the traditional family. If Scott Lively is guilty of the Crime Against Humanity of Persecution, then so are the Houston pastors and anyone who has ever tried to influence legislation against the homosexual juggernaut. There is no limiting principle,” concluded Mihet.

Yet, either way, for these anti-Christian extremists, the damage is done. The process is the punishment.

This was never about winning or losing.

It was always about intimidation.






Federal watchdogs uncover thousands of lost Lerner emails, decoding to take weeks  Published November 22, 2014

URL of Original Posting Site:


Obamas IRS GestapoAs many as 30,000 lost emails from Lois Lerner — the ex-IRS official at the center of the agency’s targeting scandal — have been recovered by federal investigators.

The IRS has already turned over thousands of Lerner emails to congressional investigators but has said the remainder are gone forever because Lerner’s hard-drive crashed in 2011. And in June, agency Commissioner John Koskinen told Congress that back-up tapes containing the missing emails have been destroyed.

“The IRS has continually dragged its feet, changed its story, and been less than forthcoming with information related to its egregious violation of Americans’ First Amendment rights,” said Ohio GOP Rep. Jim Jordan, a member of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, which has spearheaded congressional probes on the issue.

“These e-mails are long overdue, and underscore again why we need a special prosecutor to conduct an unhindered investigation. Hopefully these e-mails will help us get to the truth,” he continued.

Lerner led the IRS division that targeted Tea Party and other conservative groups for excessive scrutiny during the 2012 presidential election cycle when they applied for tax-exempt status.

Lerner in March refused to testify before the GOP-led House investigative committee, saying she was protected under the Fifth Amendment, and has since retired.

VIDEO: Did IRS bother to look for emails?

lerner-jail-330x189Some of the recovered emails might be duplicates. And it could take weeks to learn their content because they are encoded, said Frederick Hill, a spokesman for Republicans on the Oversight committee.

In addition, the IRS would also have to delete information about taxpayers that is considered private before it can be released to the committee, which is headed by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif.

The federal investigators are from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, which audits the IRS. A spokeswoman for the inspector general, Karen Kraushaar, declined to comment, saying the investigation was continuing.

Dog-ate-590-LIThe investigators ignited a political firestorm in May 2013 with the initial report about the exceptionally close scrutiny.

The IRS said Saturday that it remains “committed to fully cooperating with all of the pending investigations.”

The agency also said that it learned after the June report that the TIGTA had began an investigation of the hard-drive crash and a search for additional emails.

Senate Finance Committee aides said the investigators will assess if the newly recovered data can be made readable before it can be turned over to the committee.

They said their committee, which has been conducting a bipartisan investigation of the IRS’s treatment of groups, including liberal ones, expects to complete its work early next year.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.



Report: Two New Black Panther Members Arrested with Explosives Near Ferguson

by 21 Nov 2014

URL of Original Posting Site: 01

The FBI arrested two alleged New Black Panther members on Thursday on outstanding warrants, they’re “accused of purchasing explosives they apparently planned to use during protests in Ferguson, Missouri, a law enforcement source told CBS News.”

It’s believed they planned to use the explosives in pipe bombs. The men are said to be from the St. Louis area and were arrested as part of an FBI undercover operation.

Last Updated Nov 22, 2014 7:56 AM EST/

The FBI arrested two men earlier this week on firearms charges as part of increased law enforcement presence in Ferguson, Missouri, ahead of a grand jury decision in the shooting death of Michael Brown.

Court documents show Brandon Orlando Baldwin and Olajuwon Davis face charges of making false written statements in connection with a firearms purchase and aiding and abetting. FBI spokeswoman Rebecca Wu told CBS News the suspects were arrested on outstanding warrants.

A law enforcement source said the two men allegedly purchased explosive material during an FBI undercover operation to possibly use during Ferguson protests.

Court documents show Baldwin and Davis were arrested and charged with the illegal purchase of two Hi-Point .45 ACP pistols.

Within days, a grand jury investigating the Aug. 9 shooting death of unarmed black teenager Michael Brown is expected to decide whether white Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson should face criminal charges.

The FBI said Friday it has deployed about 100 agents to the St. Louis area ahead of the decision, in case demonstrators take to the streets as they did after Brown’s death.

St. Louis County Executive Charlie Dooley said Friday that police, government leaders and protesters have met in recent weeks to discuss so-called “rules of engagement” if protests arise.

Brown’s family, President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder have urged the community to remain calm, no matter what the grand jury decides.



Obama secretly extends US combat operation in Afghanistan


by RT | November 22, 2014

URL of Original Posting Site:

Obama secretly extends US combat operation in Afghanistan

President Barack Obama has secretly signed an order that expands the United States’ direct combat role in Afghanistan throughout 2015, the New York Times reported.

Signed over the last few weeks, the secret order permits American forces to continue to battle the Taliban and other militants that pose a threat to either the Afghan government or US personnel. According to the Times, US jets, bombers, and drones will be able to aid ground troops – be they Afghan or US forces – in whatever mission they undertake.

Under the order, ground troops could join Afghan troops on missions, and airstrikes could be carried out in their support.

If true, this marks a significant expansion of America’s role in Afghanistan in 2015. Previously, President Obama said US forces would not be involved in combat operations once the new year begins. He did say troops would continue training Afghan forces and track down remaining Al-Qaeda members.

culture of decietObama signed the secret order after tense debates within the administration. The military reportedly argued that it would allow the US to keep the pressure on the Taliban and other groups should details emerge that they are planning to attack American troops. Civilian aides, meanwhile, said the role of combat troops should be limited to counter-terror missions against Al-Qaeda.

The Times said an administration official painted the secret order’s authorization as a win for the military, but another said the US would not carry out “offensive missions” against the Taliban in 2015.

“We will no longer target belligerents solely because they are members of the Taliban,” the official said. “To the extent that Taliban members directly threaten the United States and coalition forces in Afghanistan or provide direct support to Al Qaeda, however, we will take appropriate measures to keep Americans safe.”

The change in direction came as the administration faces pointed criticism from those who say the US withdrew from Iraq too quickly, allowing the so-called Islamic State to make rapid gains in a country whose military proved to be easily intimidated and defeated. Heart

Meanwhile, new Afghan President Ashraf Ghani has a much softer position on the US presence in his country compared to his predecessor Hamid Karzai. Ghani reportedly asked the US to keep battling the Taliban into 2015. He also removed restrictions against US airstrikes and joint raids that were implemented by Karzai.

It appears that the number of troops that will be operating in Afghanistan next year will remain unchanged from previous plans. There will be 9,800 soldiers left throughout next year, and that number will be cut in half by the end of the year.

By the end of 2016, the remaining troops are scheduled to leave Afghanistan, ending the US military presence in the country.





Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon

Climate Agreement

URL Of Original Posting Site:


Dupe and Chains



Planned Parenthood Letter: Abortion Won’t Threaten Your Relationship With God

by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | 11/21/14

URL of Original Posting Site:

The Planned Parenthood abortion business has frequently employed a clergy council to attempt to justify abortion to Christians and the religious community.

plannedparenthood84In June, LifeNews exposed how the abortion giant issued a pastoral letter claiming the Bible justifies abortions.

Planned Parenthood issued a “pastoral letter” through one of its political lobbying arms—the Planned Parenthood Clergy Advocacy Board—saying that “many people wrongly assume that all religious leaders disapprove of abortion,” that “abortion is not even mentioned in the Scriptures,” that “there are clergy…from all religions who support women making this complex decision,” and that Planned Parenthood “will refer you to someone who will be supportive of you and your [abortion] decision.”

In May, LifeNews exposed how Planned Parenthood is using God to target paying customers for abortion.

In a Pastoral Letter to Patients, Planned Parenthood tells women and girls in a crisis pregnancy that there is nothing in the scriptures that says abortion is wrong and that many clergy think abortion is okay.

Now, a new letter highlighted by a pro-life blog shows Planned Parenthood telling women their abortion will not threaten their relationship with God. The author writes:

Now I have discovered a 2nd letter called “Pastoral Letter About Your Abortion Decision”.

Planned Parenthood Pastoral Letter 2 Header

The letter features Planned Parenthood’s RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS COMMITTEE

Reverend Debbie Pitney, Reverend Steve Carlson, Reverend Ken Henry, Reverend Ben Dake, Reverend Melanie Oommen, Reverend Gregory Flint, Reverend Danna Drum Hastings, Reverend Dan Bryant, Reverend Zane Wilson, Reverend Jonathan Weldon, Reverend Jan Fairchild, Reverend Bruce Cameron, and Rabbi Yitzhak Husbands-Hankins.

The letter reads:

Planned Parenthood Pastoral Letter 2 Page 1

Dear Friend,
If you are reading this letter you are probably pregnant or close to someone who is. The people who have signed this letter below come from a variety of religious communities. Our purpose in writing this letter is to support you in whatever course you choose. The presence of the “religious right” has been very strong in its refusal to accept abortion as one of the choices before a woman. We represent religious traditions which all have different opinions about abortion, but we do have some basic understandings that we would like to share with you.

We believe, as religious leaders in our faith communities, that abortion is a morally permissible choice for a woman facing a problem pregnancy. No one thinks abortion is an easy choice. If we lived in a perfect world there might be no problem pregnancies and therefore no difficult choices about abortion. We realize that there are many things that can make a pregnancy difficult. Abortion is chosen for medical, physical, emotional, economic and relational reasons. It is a choice made by women, often in consultation with partners, families and friends. We support you and your ability to choose what is best for you.

We believe, as religious leaders in our faith communities, that ultimately no one can make the choice for or against abortion except the woman herself. No one knows your life as you do. We trust that any decision you make will be made after serious thought and contemplation of the alternatives. You will make the best decision you can. We do not believe that it is appropriate for other persons or other faiths to judge you or the correctness of your decision. God gave us all the ability to think and pray and feel and choose. We are called to make the best decisions we can in our personal circumstances. If you have thoughtfully decided to have an abortion then you should be at peace with your decision.

We believe, as religious leaders in our faith communities, that the decision to have an abortion will not threaten your relationship with God. We believe that God is a participant in the struggles of human life. We believe that God is compassionate and does not expect any of us to lead perfect lives. We believe the biblical record shows us a God who loves human beings regardless of our strengths, skills and aptitudes, and loves us equally despite our failings, mistakes and choices. God is not angry with you and will not punish you for any choice you have or might make. In fact, we believe that God loves you and will be with you helping you find strength and understanding and comfort for living through days of doubt and 04

We believe, as religious leaders in our faith communities, that your life needs to go on from here, and that you are deserving of support and assistance. We know that the decision to have an abortion is a difficult one. You may wonder from time to time if you made the right choice. You may be sorrowful, doubtful or depressed because of your choice. These are natural emotions. Experiencing this does not mean your decision was a bad one. It may mean that you are a sensitive person. Nevertheless these feelings may also mean that you could benefit from talking with someone about your decision. It is important for you to find peace. If you have bad moments, we encourage you to seek support from professionals. If you think that it would be helpful for you to talk to a minister, Planned Parenthood keeps a list of clergy who would be supportive of you and the decision you have made. They will see you for no charge and not pressure you to become part of their congregations. We want you to have a peaceful road ahead.
God Bless you!

Thank you for purchasing an abortion and God bless 05



VIDEO: Is This The Best Christmas Commercial Ever?

November 18, 2014 By

URL of Original Posting Site:

Screen Shot 2014-11-18 at 9.36.44 AM
We rarely remember World War I anymore, but this commercial for Sainsbury does an amazing job not only capturing the Christmas spirit, but also capturing the experience of that war.

Here is the full commercial; which has gone viral.



Maryland County To Churches: Preach Environmentalism And Get A Tax Break

Posted by Derek Hunter, Contributor 11/19/2014

Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley made national news last year when he fought to pass and signed a tax bill that levied a tax on Marylanders, businesses and churches for the amount of “impervious surface” they have on their property.

Roofs, driveways, sidewalks, and parking lots qualify for the “rainwater remediation fee” to “protect the Chesapeake Bay.”

Though the O’Malley administration calls it a “fee,” it is commonly called the “rain tax” throughout the state. It is wildly unpopular and the promise to fight to repeal the tax was a large factor in Maryland electing Republican Larry Hogan governor this month.Liberalism a mental disorderNow Prince George’s Country is offering a way for churches to avoid paying the tax, which is estimated to be an average of $744 per year for them — preach “green” to their parishioners.

So far 30 pastors have agreed to begin “‘green’ ministries to maintain the improvements at their churches, and to preach environmentally focused sermons to educate their congregations” to avoid being hit with the tax, The Washington Post 02

Prince George’s County’s Department of Environment director Adam Ortiz told WBAL Radio churches “don’t have to preach, per se,” that they could avoid the tax if they “provide educational programs to teach them (parishioners) about how to be more sustainable. And to help them engage in grant programs and other way that they can control the runoff from their property.” Partyof Deceit Spin and Lies

Asked about the concern of government telling churches what to preach to their members, Ortiz said he had no concern over that. “It’s an opt-in. It’s up to them, if they want to help participate and help clean up the bay, they can opt-in to this program and we can all work together to clean up the bay.”

“All of us are part of the problem,” Ortiz said, “and we can also be part of the solution.”com 03

Between 30 and 40 additional churches have filed applications to avoid the tax and participate in the program, according to Ortiz. “It’s completely voluntary,” he said, “and paying this fee is state law.”

Asked if businesses and private property owners could avail themselves of this program to avoid paying the tax, Ortiz said, “For businesses and private property owners the most important thing is the help control the pollution (rain water), keep it from going into the storm drain, cuz that goes directly into the rivers. So we have a series of grant programs that we’re happy to work with private owners on.”

Ortiz said those programs, particularly for businesses, do not involve talking to employees like churches are required to talk to congregants.

The Unstoppable Emperor of LaRaza

 Posted by Michael Becker

Let me be clear about where I stand on illegal immigration: were I President I would use the US military to immediately shut down the border. I would give them shoot-to-kill orders to respond if attacked in any way, and I would put the Border Patrol to work raiding businesses that are thought to employ illegals and I would set a deportation target of two million in 2015, starting with everybody who holds a DACA card.

That said, the reality of life in 2014, 2015, and 2016 is that we’ve got millions – five is the current guess, but it’s an open ledger – of Mexicans and Central Americans with a smattering of others who are getting social security numbers and work permits and it’s a safe bet the government will disperse them in a way, and not track them, so that it will be practically impossible to remove them.

The President’s actions are absolutely unconstitutional and the idea that he would compare his actions to that of Ronald Reagan and George HW Bush is a lie, and is not the historical record. Both Reagan and Bush I granted amnesty to a small but well define group of illegal aliens in accordance with the law that was passed by Congress in 1986. Reagan certainly, and likely Bush I, acceded to the amnesty portion of the 1986 law based on assurances from Congressional Democrats, led by none other than Harry Reid, that we would secure the border.

For reasons we’re not going to argue here, border security didn’t happen under Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, or Bush II. In fact, Bush II would likely have done something similar to what Obama did last night if he could have found a way to justify it. The difference with our current President is that he doesn’t give a damn about the law or the Constitution nor does the leadership of the Democratic Party, at least as long as their Party is making the rules.

The other group of partisan supporters of across the board amnesty for illegal aliens is the major media outlets. The broadcast news – ABC, NBC, CBS – couldn’t contain their glee last night. The major daily “news” papers – NYT, WaPo, LA Times, etc – will ordering more ink to publish editorials and “news” stories that are little more than press releases from the White House. Cable “news” – MSNBC and CNN – will be setting up altars to the Emperor of LaRaza, and Fox will not be outraged.

The new Republican Congress will do nothing but make weep, gnash their teeth and fill the air with a cloud of ash. The unfortunate reality is that the Leadership of both the House and the Senate don’t want to do anything and the few back-benchers who do want to take real action to stop this outrage will be quickly shut down.

The Senate has already passed the Gang of Eight amnesty bill that goes much farther than Emperor Obama’s order last night. It didn’t pass the House only because of some stalwart conservatives who managed to hold off a floor vote. Had the Gang of Eight bill come to the House floor, it almost certainly would have passed.

The action currently being discussed will not stop this action.

There’s discussion of defunding DHS’ ability to act on the order. Republicans may even pass legislation designed to do it as part of a continuing resolution. Emperor Obama will absolutely veto it and the votes do not exist to override that veto. There are not 12 Democratic Senators who will jump ship to override.

If you think for one second that the Republican Leadership is going to “shut down” the federal government in order to stop the Emperor and his Party you’ve been living in a cave. That will not happen. Bottom line, lots of noise, no action.

There’s discussion of filing a lawsuit against the President by both the Congress and the state of Texas and others would likely join. It’s likely the parties would prevail in the suit at the Supreme Court. It will take three to four years to be heard by SCOTUS and by that time the horse is out of the barn and long gone because no court will stay the Emperor’s order.

Impeachment. Is this an impeachable offense? Yes. It is. Investor’s Business Daily lays out the case.

We live in a constitutional republic, and the president who says he cannot wait for the Congress to act ignores a Constitution that says he has to. Article I, Section 8 gives Congress exclusive authority to “establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization” and Article II, Section 3 says that it’s the president’s duty “to take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”

Professor Turley told the House Judiciary Committee at a Dec. 3 hearing that Obama’s abuse of executive power has grown to the point that “he’s becoming the very danger the Constitution was designed to avoid.”<<<

IBD is not asking for impeachment, they’re demanding that Congress not give the Emperor the money. The point of the above citation though is that the Emperor is in clear violation of the US Constitution, both Article I:8 and Article II:3.

The problem in the real world comes back to 12. There will not be 12 votes on the Democratic side in the US Senate to impeach this President. In fact, there’s every reason to believe that Mr. Obama, Emperor LaRaza, is doing this and daring the Congress to impeach imperial obama

The result will the same as Republicans utterly stupid impeachment of Bill Clinton. They empowered Clinton, lost the American people, and turned the Clintons into folk heroes. The added benefit for Democrats is that their friends and sex partners in the major media will be able to spend the next two plus years reporting on how “racist” the Republican Party is on a daily basis. If you repeat a lie often enough…

In the real world, it’s time for Republicans – or at least the Republicans who still care about the rule of law and the Constitution – to figure out what comes next. The Southwest is already on the verge of being “Northern Mexico.” What can be done to stop that transition, can anything be done to reverse it, and what can be done to limit the Emperor of LaRaza from moving beyond immigration and creating a Progressive Paradise by executive order?Imperial President Obama

We don’t have the answer. The bigger concern is that we don’t think the Republican Leadership has the courage to even look for an answer. Heck, they probably don’t even understand the question.

And you can bet your last peso on the fact that Emperor Barack Obama, Protector of LaRaza and All Things Progressive, knows that.

Michael Becker

About the Author; Michael Becker

Michael Becker is a long time activist and a businessman. He’s been involved in the pro-life movement since 1976 and has been counseling addicts and ministering to prison inmates since 1980. Becker is a Curmudgeon. He has decades of experience as an operations executive in turnaround situations and in mortgage banking. He blogs regularly at The Right Curmudgeon, The Minority Report, Wizbang, Unified Patriots and Joe for America. He lives in Phoenix and is almost always armed.



What You Need to Know About Obama’s Executive Move on Immigration

Josh Siegel / / November 20, 2014

Tyrannical King Obama Photo: Newscom

<!– President Barack Obama makes a statement at the daily briefing in the White House briefing room on August 1, 2014. Photo by Dennis Brack –>

President Obama tonight announced he will begin to fix the nation’s “broken” immigration system by allowing millions here illegally to stay and to get work permits.

Obama did not specify a number, but the White House put it at about 5 million of the estimated 11.5 million illegal immigrants.

Obama said he decided to go around Congress and allow certain unlawful residents with established roots to “come out of the shadows” because mass deportation of illegal immigrants “would be both impossible and contrary to our character.”

“I know some of the critics of the action call it amnesty. Well, it’s not,” Obama said sharply, responding to Republicans and others who use that word to describe a process, including his unilateral actions, under which lawbreakers do not have to face the consequences.’

“Amnesty is the immigration system we have today,” the president said. “That’s the real amnesty, leaving this broken system the way it is.”culture of deciet

The Obama administration intends to begin accepting applications for legal status and work permits this spring. The next president can undo the program.

“I know the politics of this issue are tough,” Obama said in his 12-minute address from the East Room of the White House (transcript here). “Most Americans support the types of reforms I’ve talked about tonight, but I understand the disagreements held by many of you at home.’

“I hear those concerns,” he added in a speech that quoted both Moses and George W. Bush, but “immigrants are a net plus for our economy and our society.”If his mouth is open he must be lying

Here is the skinny on the president’s plan.

So, Mr. President, what’s the deal?

“If you meet the criteria, you can come out of the shadows and get right with the law. If you’re a criminal, you’ll be deported. If you plan to enter the U.S. illegally, your chances of getting caught and sent back just went up,” Obama said.

  • He insisted his actions are about “accountability,” not “amnesty.”obama-liar4-266x189

Who gets deportation relief?

  • Two groups.
  • First, illegal immigrant parents of U.S. citizens who have been in the country more than five years with no criminal record.
  • Obama didn’t specify, but the White House indicates this population could be granted deportation relief for three years “at a time” and be eligible for work permits after background checks and paying fees. They also must pay taxes.
  • Second, Obama intends to expand his existing 2012 program called DACA, or Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, for certain so-called “DREAMers” who were brought into the country illegally as children.
  • He will remove the age cap and expand eligibility to those who arrived in the U.S. as minors before 2010, instead of the current cutoff of 2007. He also will remove the requirement that applicants be under 31.
  • Highly skilled workers will be eligible for visas.Immigration-Piper

Who won’t be eligible for legal status?

  • Illegal immigrant parents of those who qualify under DACA and agricultural workers who are in the country illegally. Both groups had been rumored to be part of Obama’s plan.tear

What won’t these protected illegal immigrants get?

  • Access to Obamacare, food stamps or other federal benefits, the White House has suggested, nor a pathway to citizenship.obama-border-is-open-378x257

What else is involved?

  • Directing “more resources” to the nation’s southern border.
  • Setting deportation priorities to focus on those suspected of terrorism, violent crime, gang members and recent border-crossers.
  • Streamlining the process in immigration courts to more quickly adjudicate cases and clear a massive backlog.
  • Replacing the Department of Homeland Security’s “Secure Communities” program with a “Priority Enforcement Program” to deport those convicted of criminal offenses.sombrero-1-770x395

The Rebuttal

  • Obama challenged Congress to pass a bipartisan immigration bill to replace his actions and “fix the whole system.”

“The actions I’m taking are not only lawful, they’re the kinds of actions taken by every single Republican president and every Democratic president for the past half-century. To those members of Congress who question my authority to make our immigration system work better, or question the wisdom of me acting where Congress has failed, I have one answer: Pass a bill.”com 01

The Republican National Committee posted its own rebuttal video just hours before the speech.


This report has been modified

New WhatDidYouSay LogoMY OWN TWO CENTS

Today I heard all the justifications from the Leftist/Marxist/Socialist/Extreme-Liberal/Freedom-Hating/Culture-of-Lies and Deceit/Democrat’s. Many of then are ObamabotOBAMABOTS spewing the propaganda of the Emperors office. They are touting the same lies that Imperial President Obama peddled last night. They are claiming economical grow numbers, they can never support with facts, and unless you read all the statement you won’t realize that the numbers are supposed to manifest in the 2020’s, long after they’ve escaped scrutiny.

We must constantly remember, and explain to all those that oppose us, that the Obama Administration has established itself as a “culture of deceit and lies.” Typical of all that has been perpratated on America by these Leftist/Marxist/Socialist/Extreme-Liberal/Freedom-Hating/Culture-of-Lies and Deceit/Democrat’s has been unsupportable claims that their media partners will never challenge.
Can these Leftist/Marxist/Socialist/Extreme-Liberal/Freedom-Hating/Culture-of-Lies and Deceit/Democrat’s go away fast enough?


Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon

Poisoning the Well

URL of Original Posting Site:

UN-potable Illegal Immigration Amnesty Policy”


Only Reason


If his mouth is open he must be lying

Partyof Deceit Spin and Lies



My Two Cents on Imperial President Obama’s Speech Tonight


By Jerry Broussard of WhatDidYouSay.orgNew WhatDidYouSay Logo

Everything spoken tonight was anticipated, telling us that Imperial President Obama has become more predictable than anyone has recognized. Here are my reactions to what I heard;

  1. The underlying message of this Leftist/Marxist/Socialist/America-Hating/Extreme-Liberal/Democrat is that every immigrant that came to this country legally, through all the normal channels, are the dumbest people on the planet. All this amnesty talk, no matter how they try to spin it, is a thumb in the eye of every legal immigrant living in America today.
  2. The second underlying message to every legal immigrant, that all their hard work to become naturalized citizens was a waste of time and meaningless. Learning our language (English), learning our history, learning our Constitution and adapting to our culture, was demeaned by Imperial President Obama.
  3. No matter how Imperial President Obama spins his unlawful actions, the fact remains that he has taken the Obama tearing up the constitutionposition as a tyrannical dictator, instead of a Constitutional upholding President.
  4. All his talk about how the Republican House has been uncooperative, has been written abundantly by much smarter people than me. It is important to remember that definition of cooperation for the Leftist/Marxist/Socialist/America-Hating/Extreme-Liberal/Democrat’s is, “Agree with everything we say, everything we mean, and say it the exact way we want it said. Anything less is hateful, racist and you are the party of “NO”.”
  5. I will not apologize for repeating the following; The one and only thing the Leftist/Marxist/Socialist/America-Only ReasonHating/Extreme-Liberal/Democrat’s care about illegal aliens is that they know they are more likely to vote Democrat.
  6. Imperial President Obama’s retching story of the illegal alien was one of the greatest insults to every legal immigrant, and all the rest of us that were born and raised in America. Leftist/Marxist/Socialist/America-Hating/Extreme-Liberal/Democrat’s do not want any of their puppets to have to take personal responsibilities for their illegal decisions, invasion into our country, stealing jobs that make real American’s jobless, take benefits that do not belong to them and sending as much of what they earn back to their home country thus stimulating that countries economy, instead of spending it here to stimulate ours.
  7. Then there is the tax issue. Any economy that puts out more than they take in is destined for collapse, which is the plan for the Leftist/Marxist/Socialist/America-Hating/Extreme-Liberal/Democrat’s following the teaching of Saul Alinsky and Cloward-Piven. The very idea Cloward Pevin with explanationthat the Leftist/Marxist/Socialist/America-Hating/Extreme-Liberal/Democrat’s are going to collect a penny of tax from these cheaters, is beyond laughable, it’s absolutely insulting.
  8. Imperial President Obama’s mocking the Republican Congress is more spin that increases the insult. When counted, his own cohort, Harry Reid, has made the two of them the real “Party of NO”.

I could go on, but I don’t want to risk insulting you with what you heard for yourself. Unfortunately, 30+% of the people who heard the speech are the people who are already drunk the Kool-Aid. After all, Liberalism is a Mental Disorder. The rest of America? Considering the percentage of Americans who don’t bother to vote, the percentage of low-information voters, and the those people claiming to be Christians who refuse to be “Salt and Light” by voting, leaves you and me, and the other political junkies that give a rip about this Country, and want to see us revive our country as designed by the founders.Liberalism a mental disorder

Thank you for reading.





House hearing weighs religious expression in military

WASHINGTON (AP) — Should military officers be free to express their religious beliefs to troops under their PS_0590W_ATHEISM_PROPHET_tcommand?

That issue was discussed at a congressional hearing Wednesday.

Mikey Weinstein (WYN’-steen), president of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, said officers who proselytize or share their faith with subordinates should be disciplined. He told the House Armed Services Committee that troops may feel coerced to endure unwanted religious speech from their 04Men Love Darkness because they know

But the Rev. Ron Crews, who heads the Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty, said Americans don’t lose their free speech and religious rights when they join the military. He said members of the armed forces, regardless of rank, should be free to talk about their faith.

The Family Research Council’s Travis Weber agreed that no one should be coerced into religious practice, “but religious freedom, including the freedom to speak of one’s religion, must be protected.”




Then and Now

then and now

The Big Three Networks Weren’t Asked to Air Obama’s Immigration Speech

URL of Original Posting Site:

[Image via screenshot]

Despite the Obama administration promoting tomorrow’s presidential primetime speech as a game-changing event in the debate surrounding undocumented immigrants, they are curiously not trying to publicize it too hard.

CNN’s Brian Stelter reported Wednesday that the White House did not request primetime space from the major networks — CBS, NBC, and ABC — but that Univision, of all places, will do so. CNN and the other cable networks will air the speech, which will take place in Nevada at 8 p.m. ET.

While President Barack Obama has requested primetime blocks to address the American people before, Stelter noted that those speeches mostly addressed foreign policy initiatives. For Obama not to request network time –especially for something as big as immigration reform — suggested that “he’s not going all the way,” Stelter noted.

“Maybe he’s trying to speak to a more niche audience,” he added.Really with logo

In this speech, Obama is expected to announce a plan to protect undocumented immigrants from deportation, with some speculating that he will grant blanket amnesty.

Watch below via CNN: media

&amp;amp;lt;div&amp;amp;gt;Please enable Javascript to watch.&amp;amp;lt;/div&amp;amp;gt;



Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: