Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Archive for May, 2014

Muslim Leader Says “Jihad stays until America is No More”

By / 27 May 2014

khameneiThe Supreme leader of Iran, the Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, recently announced that talks with America over ending their nuclear program are basically dead. But that’s not the big news.

He also said Jihad will continue until America is no more.

Sounds hopeful, right?

This is the leader of a major world nation. We’re not talking about some warlord in the jungles of Africa, or some little despot in a Latin American Banana Republic. This is the leader of one of the most powerful Islamic nations in the world. This is a guy who holds religious and political sway over MILLIONS of Muslims in Iran and beyond. This is trouble.

“Those [Iranians] who want to promote negotiation and surrender to the oppressors and blame the Islamic Republic as a warmonger in reality commit treason,” Khamenei told a meeting of members of parliament, according to the regime’s Fars News Agency.

Khamenei emphasized that without a combative mindset, the regime cannot reach its higher Islamic role against the “oppressors’ front.”

“The reason for continuation of this battle is not the warmongering of the Islamic Republic. Logic and reason command that for Iran, in order to pass through a region full of pirates, needs to arm itself and must have the capability to defend itself,” he said.

“Today’s world is full of thieves and plunderers of human honor, dignity and morality who are equipped with knowledge, wealth and power, and under the pretense of humanity easily commit crimes and betray human ideals and start wars in different parts of the world.”

In response to a question by a parliamentarian on how long this battle will continue, Khamenei said,“Battle and jihad are endless because evil and its front continue to exist. … This battle will only end when the society can get rid of the oppressors’ front with America at the head of it, which has expanded its claws on human mind, body and thought. … This requires a difficult and lengthy struggle and need for great strides.”

Khamenei cited the scientific advancement of the country. “The accelerated scientific advancement of the last 12 years cannot stop under any circumstances,” he said, referring to the strides the regime has made toward becoming a nuclear power.


Wake up, fellow Americans. We aren’t just fighting “extremist” terrorists in caves and on dessert battlefields. We are also fighting politicians and governments of supposedly respected nations. Iran is an enemy… but they’re not the only one. Don’t get caught up in a mindset that says only Islamic terrorists our out to get us because many of these Islamic nations are the ones funding the terrorists efforts against us.

Wake up America


38 Muslim Men Gang Rape 15 Year Old Girl for Several Hours

Reported by

A young 15 year old girl in Malaysia was gang raped by 38 Muslim men, with each man taking turns for several hours. Police have arrested 15 men and are looking for the remaining ones as the investigation is going under way.

According to several media outlets, police chief Azham Otham said 38 men were involved. The same chief said:

It is very disturbing to me that no one in the village was even suspicious when the closest neighbour was a mere 20 metres away

Another activist said:

We are seeing a prevalence in rape cases because boys are raised in an environment where they think it is okay to use violence

One report said:

The men took turns to rape her for hours. Police were also investigating whether her 17-year-old friend was also raped. … Almost 3,000 rapes were reported to the police in 2012, of which 52 percent involved girls aged 16 and below, according to police statistics.

I could never imagine that someone could be raped by 38 men, but once you realize that we are dealing with a spiritual darkness, then the truth remains: there is no limit to evil. Satan has no limits, and the mind, under his control, plunges itself ceaselessly through the never ending ocean of sinister depravity.

Here is an interview we did with one of our Pakistani contacts explaining how two Christian girls were mass raped by Muslim men

mase rapeSource


Wake up America

War on Christians




Stacey Dash viciously attacked by black community for Fox gig

Photo: via BizPac Review

Photo: via BizPac Review

It never ceases, and it never ceases to amaze: the duplicitous hypocrisy of the so-called “tolerant Left” and worse, the nastiness of the black community. Hat tip to our local friends at BizPac Review for bringing it to our attention yet again.

BizPac reports: “Fox News announced Wednesday that actress Stacey Dash has been hired as a contributor to provide cultural analysis and commentary across the network’s daytime and prime time programming. The news is not going over too well on the Left, particularly in the black community — Dash is of African-American and Mexican descent.”

Why, why does it matter to these hate-filled individuals? Did any black conservative come out and spew hatred about Toure, Al Sharpton, Melissa Harris-Perry, Joy Reid, or Tamron Hall being hired as show hosts? No, the argument is always about views and perspectives on the issues.

Once again, the closed-minded drones in the black community who associate character with skin color and refute the right of an FreeSpeech1-300x204individual to independent thought have reared their ugly heads. But Ms. Dash has withstood the fiery darts of these hate-mongers before when she tweeted out her support for Mitt Romney in the 2012 presidential election.

“Perhaps I publicly endorsed Romney from a slightly naïve place, thinking that I could speak my voice without being criticized in such racially charged and hateful tones,” Dash wrote in an editorial for TMZ.

Why is it that the liberal progressive Left — and their black henchmen — hate black conservatives to so passionately? If you have an ideological disagreement based upon debate of the issues, let’s have at it.

“The ONLY FREE SPEECH the Leftist/Socialist/Marxist/ followers of Saul Alinsky are interested in is REPEATING WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO SAY, THIS AGREEING WITH THEM. Anything else is grounds for hatred.” JB

However, the route taken of crying Oreo, sellout, Uncle Tom, house Negro, white man’s porch monkey and other invectives achieves nothing.Mar 3 05 Name-calling has no effect in any way. As a matter of fact, it only emboldens us more. I know its intent is instilling fear, coercion, and intimidation, but all it does is point a blinding spotlight on a lack of intelligence and inability to make a coherent presentation.

Wednesday’s announcement brought out more of the “racially charged hateful tones” Dash spoke of, as seen on Twitter. While many of the tweets are being deleted by users once they realize their hatred is on full display, captured a few. Here are the cleaner ones:








Am I right about this? Just watch and see the comments that will emanate from the usual suspects on these pages — so predictable.

I’ve never met Stacey Dash, but applaud her courage, conviction, and character. The fascists, whether black or white, shall not shut us down.

We have the right to free speech. You have the right to spew hatred, but I would recommend you all refer to Proverbs 17:28, (NIV):

“Even fools are thought wise if they keep silent, and discerning if they hold their tongues.”

Obama Follow Me
Sorry Yet
Rejecting SocialismVOTE 02



Arizona Tea Party Holding First State Convention


 Amidst yet another round of media conjectures regarding the demise of their movement, Tea Party groups across Arizona will gather together for a State Convention on May 31st in Phoenix, Arizona, the Valley of the Sun. This event has the political class a little nervous. Apparently, these groups didn’t get the memo that the movement is dead. In fact, they are proving quite the contrary.  

The “Organizing to Represent Americans” Convention represents the first time Tea Parties in Arizona will assemble as a whole at one venue to discuss creating a system of strategies designed to go on the offense against the left and restore the American Republic.

“In my four years of Tea Party participation in Arizona, I have never seen so much enthusiasm for one of our events, “said Chris Rossiter, President of the Greater Phoenix Tea Party. “Each time we would put out a new batch of tickets, they were snatched up. The Tea Party is a very instinctive and resilient movement and I think everyone senses that a big change is necessary and it is here, starting this Saturday in Arizona.”

The organizers of the event had one thing in mind when they were planning the event—strategy. They immediately sought participation from the national groups and secured sponsorship from the Tea Party Patriots and, as well as Americans for Prosperity and Heritage Action. This move of getting the backing of national Tea Party groups was a strategic one. Organizers of the Arizona Tea Party Conference want to see Tea Party Conventions in all 50 States by 2016. Accomplishing that task will require the assistance of groups at the national level.

By calling their event a State Convention, Rossiter said they have made several ears in the Republican Party perk up. “My phone and email are going crazy with messages from politicians who want in. The funny thing is that this isn’t a political event and we are posting ‘no campaigning’ signs at the entrance to the venue,” he said.  Rossiter continued, “Perhaps they are worried we are going to leave them high and dry and strike out on our own. Even though we have no intention at this time of forming a third party–if the Republicans were to drop a hand grenade in the middle of their ranks by doing something like passing Amnesty, the GOP could fall apart and we would be wise to have a contingency plan. But, that is not the main purpose of our Convention by any means.” 

In a press release, the organizers stated what drove them to organize the Tea Party state convention in Arizona. 

“At a time when the liberal media and the establishment political parties are proclaiming the death of the movement, the Tea Party has gathered steam, is further organizing, and is meeting to establish long-term goals and the strategies to achieve them. The Constitution and the very moral fabric of our society are under attack.   Ordinary Americans are eager for their rights and their values to be represented and defended in the public arena and that is exactly what the Tea Party intends to do.” 

There has been so much interest in the 2014 Arizona Tea Party State Convention that the event is now sold out.


Complete MessageVOTE 02




Abortion Clinic Nurse Who Claims She “Serves God” Assaults Pro-Lifer

by Carole Novielli | Tuscaloosa, AL | | 5/30/14 10:03 AM

A video posted on Youtube shows an abortion clinic nurse appearing to attack attack a pro-lifer.

The abortion nurse is upset because the pro-lifer accused her of telling patients that their abortion won’t hurt….

tuscaloosaThe pro-lifer who posted the vid identified as Paul Lake explains, “I learned that the # 1 question women ask in abortion clinics when considering abortion is; Does it hurt? Some clinics have certain people who do certain jobs and answer certain questions women ask. When the nurse at our local abortion clinic arrived to work Tuesday morning I asked her, “Are you the nurse that tells the women that it don’t hurt?” She didn’t answer. So I said to her that “whoever is telling them that it doesn’t hurt is lying to them”. She went into the clinic. 10 minutes later the same nurse walked up to me and this is what happened..”

“I don’t need you out here telling me nothing bout I’m a nurse and I’m telling these people it don’t hurt. I don’t tell them that, so I’m not a liar…and I’m not a liar and your not going to stand there and tell me that I’m a liar…because I’m not a liar. I serve a God that sees everything and know everything and if you was any kind of big Christian you wouldn’t be sit’n your tail out here doing what your doing.”

At that point the pro-lifer says, ” I want to help you.”Worker 2

And the abortion nurse replies, “You aren’t helping me and you’re right there your wearing that cross – you don’t need to be wearing it…”

The pro-lifers says, ” I’ll get you another job…”

As the conversation continues a second abortion worker joins in threatening the pro-lifer, “You need to watch what you’re doing because we know every single thing that you do. If you wipe your f***ing a** we know. So, you need to quit stalking me – you need to quit stalking Dr. Payne…we know everything about you just like you’re trying to find out about me that you’ll never know.“

She then asks the pro-lifer, “Can you tell me where I go to church, that’s what I want to know?”

They then get into a debate on whether abortion kills a baby and both nurses who claimed to go to church say abortion is a women’s choice.


The outside of the clinic and looks like West Alabama Women’s Center.











According to a Dr. Louis Thomas Payne works there and the nurses mentioned a doctor Payne.












A state inspection conducted in January of 2013 at the WEST ALABAMA WOMEN’S CENTER, INC revealed that:













Based on review of the center’s policies, observations and interview, it was determined the center did not follow their own standards of practice for:

1. Hand Washing

2. Glove usage

3. Cleaning of supplies

4. Safe use of sharps containers

During the tour on 1/10/13 at 10:30 AM in Exam Room # 2 the surveyor noted a sharps container more than 2/3 full with needles on the floor beside the sharps container. The soap dispenser by the sink in Exam Room 2 did not work so the surveyor was unable wash her hands with soap and water.

An interview was conducted with Employee Identifier # 1, Director on 1/10/13 at 10:45 AM who verified the sharps container was more than 2/3 full and the needles were on the floor.

A tour was conducted in Medication Storage Closet on 1/10/13 at 11:00 AM. The surveyor observed the following unlabeled:

1 – 10 cc (cubic centimeter) syringe with liquid and a needle

2- 3 cc syringes with liquid and a needle

3- 1 unit syringes with liquid and a needle

An interview with EI # 1 and EI # 2, Medical Director was conducted on 1/10/13 at 11:05 AM and both stated it was used for Lidocaine.On 1/10/13 at 2:40 PM the surveyor observed EI # 2 perform a procedure in Exam Room # 2. EI #2 was observed giving an injection intravenously in the right antecubital without the use of gloves.

EI # 2 was also observed by the surveyor during the above procedure use non sterile gloves to examine Patient Identifier (PI) # 1 and then change to sterile gloves without hand hygiene.

EI # 3, the nurse assisting with the procedure also changed gloves during the above procedure without hand hygiene.

PI # 1 was transferred to the Recovery Room on 1/10/13 at 2:51 PM. PI # 1 was seated in a recliner and feet propped up. EI # 4, Registered Nurse, then administered Rhogam to PI # 1 right shoulder without the use of gloves.

PI # 1 was discharged on 1/10/13 at 3:21 PM. EI # 4 did not clean the back and feet area of the recliner.

A tour was conducted on 1/11/13 at 9:10 AM, to exam Room # 2. The surveyor was unable to obtain soap from the soap dispenser. EI # 1 tried to obtain soap and was unable.

But this was not the only time…. the Alabama Department of Health which regulates abortion clinics in the state, shows that the West Alabama Women’s Center abortion clinic has been written up on several occasions:












So to recap – abortion does hurt and if you point that out as a pro-lifer you could be attacked by a nurse who claims she serves God and slices while working at an abortion clinic with several health deficiencies…..just who is on the side of woman again?

LifeNews Note: Carole Novielli is the author of the blog Saynsumthn, where this article originally appeared.

19This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. 20Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed. 21But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what they have done has been done in the sight of God.” John 3:19-21; NIV

“The foundation for why people think, and act the way they do is answered by Jesus in John 3:19-21. People who chose to give their lives to Jesus have come into the light. All others have chosen to stay in darkness. In darkness they feel secure and untouchable. They feel they are hidden and their ideologies, theologies and sociologies are covered by the darkness. When light shows up, everything they are, everything they believe, everything they stand for, everything they defend, all their “ologies” and all their stances are exposed for what they really are. Thses women used God’s Name in Vain by claiming to be followers of our Lord and Risen Savior, Jesus the Christ. Their stance, based on what they really believe and who they are really associated with is exposed. That is why they were so angry.’

“As Christians we are taught not to judge (meaning to condemn someone to eternal death). We are called to be fruit inspectors (Matt 12:33-37; NIV). Love is the key and according to Jesus, as recorded in John 13, we prove we are His followers by how we love one another. So, keep in mind why they act the way they do, refuse to be offended, refuse to contend with them and love them. Take their verbal abuse. Pray for them to come to the light, and don’t stain yourself by being drawn into their desire for confrontation.” JB


Obama SNAPS when Reporter Dares to Ask a Question

By / 31 May 2014

President Obama is often referred to by his fawning media as one “cool customer.” At a recent press event, he must have forgotten how “cool” he was supposed to be – because he snapped when asked a simple (but important) question by a reporter covering the event.

“I’m sorry, we’re doing a science fair- c’mon, c’mon!”  

President Obama lost his cool with Alexis Simendinger, a reporter with Real Clear Politics, when she asked him about reports of the US sending people in to help train the rebels in Syria. He responded to her question with a glare and then saying “I’m sorry, we’re doing a science fair- c’mon, c’mon,” before he stomped off like some kind of petulant child.

The Obama administration continues to be the least transparent administration EVER. The President answers questions from the press about as often as we see Halley’s Comet. When he does choose to grace the press with his presence – the questions are choreographed and the president has had time to prepare a politically acceptable response.

Sadly, our watchdog media does nothing to fix the problem. They simply continue to bow to the White House as if responding to the very call of God Himself. The media have become idol worshippers.

Community Organizer TwoVOTE 02

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon

Community Organizer TwoComplete MessageVOTE 02

NBC Reporter Can’t Name ONE Country Obama Has Improved Relations With; Blames Bush Anyway

May 29, 2014 By

Ken Engel

Thursday morning, NBC Chief Foreign Correspondent Richard Engel was grilled by CNBC panelist and Home Depot co-founder Ken Langone, to name just one country where relations with the United States have improved under Obama (SEE VIDEO BELOW).

“Name one country with whom we have better relationships with today, than we did when he [Obama] became president almost six years ago,” Langone challenged the NBC reporter.

You would naturally want to say Europe, answered NBC’s Engel, “But generally, the relations with a lot of European countries have gotten worse because of these relationships…” 

Langone interrupted Engel saying, “I can name all the countries where the relationships have gotten worse. I’m asking to give me one country  where they’ve gotten better.” 

While Engel appeared clearly taken aback, and wasn’t able to name one country the Obama foreign policy had improved U.S. relations with, he didn’t hesitate to come to the defense of the Obama regime, using the old-standby, the worn-out “blame Bush” meme.

Engel answered Langone:

“Yeah, I think you’d be hard-pressed to find that, and I think this is the reason…I think the reason is our allies have become confused. For eight years, you had the Bush administration with a very interventionist policy, driving into world affairs, driving primarily into the Islamic world, army first or fist first, and that was very unpopular with most of our allies.”



Community Organizer TwoComplete MessageVOTE 02

Military Members Died Defending Our Rights, Will You Allow Their Sacrifice To Be Mocked

I wrote my “open letter”  on the eve of Memorial day – a day we honor the fallen heroes that defend and protect our rights.

These men and women that served and paid the ultimate price for our way of life were someone’s dad, mom, brother, sister, or daughter. They made that sacrifice, which guarantees our freedoms because they believe in America. So I’m asking the question:

Why are the lives of these brave Americans less important than the victims of Elliot Rodger?

Because if the solution to this horrific incident is surrendering to the devious schemes of oppression; it nullifies the sacrifice of all Veterans. To infringe on our rights to bear arms would make a mockery of our fallen heroes who died defending our way of life.

police_stateLeft-leaning politicians and their lapdogs in the mainstream media want to use this “crisis” to further chip away our rights. They want to use Gun Control Supportersthese deaths to gain more power and more control. They only care about the victims so long as they serve a purpose:

The killings are useful, the grieving an opportunity, the survivors are props in a staged circus of phony outrage, but with real people now damaged by the very policies the Marxists hope to arrange more of.

Don’t believe me? Look how the country has taken care of our veterans:

The horror story is right in front of our faces. This President swore five years ago to do something about it and billions of dollars later, all we have to show are dead Veterans in Arizona and no one accountable.

Because once these heroes return from the battlefield, they are no longer useful to the left. They’re thrown aside and ignored in a VA bureaucracy which should have been an obvious warning to all against the horrors of socialized medicine.

Even when 90-year-old men in wheelchairs wish to visit the WWII Memorial in Washington D.C. – a monument they built by trudging across Europe in their bare feet to kill Nazis, cramming into submarines in the South Pacific to hold off the invading Japanese, and staring down Rommel’s tanks in Africa – they’re confronted with steel barricades, compliments of the Administration.

George Washington regarding 2nd AmandmentBack to guns:

-Whistles don’t protect women from rape – a Glock does!

-When armed men come into your house to steal, a baseball bat doesn’t cut it. Unless you have an automatic-baseball bat. I want one of those – email me.

-When a nut-job decides to go on a killing spree and the cops are 5 to 15 minutes away, you are screwed unless you are carrying a Colt.

-And – this is the most important one: Guns are mostly for hunting down politicians who would actively seek to take your freedoms and liberty away from you. Google “Hitler, Mao, Kim Jung Il, Castro, Stalin” just for starters.

As far as me being nice, cordial, respectful – don’t hurt people’s feelings… bla bla? We tried that and look where it got us?

Comming Soon 02VOTE 02


Gay Agenda Being Pushed into Public Schools

Posted By on May 30, 2014


I know you’ve heard of library books in the public schools that promote the homosexual lifestyle for kids as young as kindergarten, but are you aware of the agenda to force more homosexual and perverse lifestyles on your kids?

Have you ever heard of a group called GLSEN? It stands for ‘Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network.’ However, don’t let the word ‘straight’ fool you, they are anything but straight. They are the largest LGBT activist organization in America that is working to push their agenda into the public schools and government.

According to the group’s website:

“Improving Education, Creating a Better World”

“In 1990, a small, but dedicated group of teachers in Massachusetts came together to improve an education system that frequently allowed its lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) students to be bullied, discriminated against and/or fall through the cracks.

“Almost 25 years later, that small group has grown into the leading national education organization focused on ensuring safe schools for all students. Today, we’re known as GLSEN, the Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network.



“We face a pervasive problem with a set of new challenges. 8 out of 10 LGBT students are still harassed at school each year because of who they are.

“We are working to change that.

“At GLSEN, we want every student, in every school, to be valued and treated with respect, regardless of their sexual orientation, gender identity or gender expression. We believe that all students deserve a safe and affirming school environment where they can learn and grow.

“We accomplish our goals by working in hallways across the country — from Congress and the Department of Education to schools and district offices in your community — to improve school climate and champion LGBT issues in K-12 education.

  • We conduct extensive and original research to inform our evidence-based solutions for K-12 education.
  • We author developmentally appropriate resources for educators to use throughout their school community.
  • We partner with decision makers to ensure that comprehensive and inclusive safe schools policies are considered, passed and implemented.
  • We partner with dozens of national education organizations to leverage our shared expertise into creating great schools and better opportunities for every student.”

The Real Gay MafiaLast month, GLSEN Massachusetts held their annual conference in Boston where they hoped to introduce teachers, students and other homosexual activists to their liberal and perverted agenda. On their website, they state the purpose of the conference as:

“The conference is an opportunity for more than 250 students, educators, parents, and school staff to spend a day building community and sharing resources for creating safer, more affirming schools for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and Questioning (LGBTQ) youth, educators, and allies.”

In all of this, where does it say anything about the ‘straight’ agenda? The only place it appears is in their name, not in their actions.

Brian Camenker, Founder and President of MassResistance has been working for nearly 20 years trying to stop the gay agenda of working its way into the Massachusetts public schools. He commented about the Boston conference, saying:

“They want kids to feel comfortable around homosexuality and those issues, feel comfortable coming out, feel comfortable taking on those behaviors, feeling comfortable with everything about it.”

“You wouldn’t think you could integrate homosexuality into much, but they do by saying something like “a woman does this and her wife does this. They will bring in homosexual themed books. One of their favorites is to claim that historical figures – Eleanor Roosevelt, for example – were actually homosexual.”

We have been torn apartIf you want to get an idea of just what GLSEN’s agenda is, I strongly urge you to visit the MassResistance website which describes what took place at the Boston conference, who the speakers were and what workshops they held to push their abominable agenda.

This isn’t just happening in Massachusetts, but in every state of the country. GLSEN is working with state and federal legislatures, the Department of Education and school districts everywhere pushing to get their agenda into your kids’ education and they are succeeding. This is another reason why parents should do whatever they can to keep their kids away from the public school system which currently is teaching nothing Christian, wholesome, moral or virtuous. A nation can be lost in one generation and we are losing America now. The future depends upon what your kids are being taught now.

‘This is more of their determination to shove homosexuality so far down the throats of America that we gag, and struggle to breath. They are insistent in the  brainwashing of children just like Hitler advocated in Germany. They don’t care about adults or parents. They want to train up children in their perverted sodomite ideologies so that the stigma of their wrong life choices is wiped away in the minds of future American citizens who have been programmed to believe that homosexuality is the norm, and all other sexual relations are abnormal. Please do not give up the fight. They MUST be stopped.” JB


Inside the Ring: Memo outlines Obama’s plan to use the military against citizens

President Barack Obama salutes military service members while watching the inaugural parade from the reviewing stand on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, D.C., Jan. 21, 2013. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

President Barack Obama salutes military service members while watching the inaugural parade from the reviewing stand on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, D.C., Jan. 21, 2013. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

 By Bill Gertz

A 2010 Pentagon directive on military support to civilian authorities details what critics say is a troubling policy that envisions the Obama administration’s potential use of military force against Americans.

The directive contains noncontroversial provisions on support to civilian fire and emergency services, special events and the domestic use of the Army Corps of Engineers.

The troubling aspect of the directive outlines presidential authority for the use of military arms and forces, including unarmed drones, in operations against domestic unrest.

“This appears to be the latest step in the administration’s decision to use force within the United States against its citizens,” said a defense official opposed to the directive.

Directive No. 3025.18, “Defense Support of Civil Authorities,” was issued Dec. 29, 2010, and states that U.S. commanders “are provided emergency authority under this directive.”

“Federal military forces shall not be used to quell civil disturbances unless specifically authorized by the president in accordance with applicable law or permitted under emergency authority,” the directive states.

“In these circumstances, those federal military commanders have the authority, in extraordinary emergency circumstances where prior authorization by the president is impossible and duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation, to engage temporarily in activities that are necessary to quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances” under two conditions.

“Who owns the definitions of what “unexpected civil disturbances” are? How big is “large scale”, and who owns that definition?” JB

The conditions include military support needed “to prevent significant loss of life or wanton destruction of property and are necessary to restore governmental function and public order.” A second use is when federal, state and local authorities “are unable or decline to provide adequate protection for federal property or federal governmental functions.”

“Federal action, including the use of federal military forces, is authorized when necessary to protect the federal property or functions,” the directive states.

“Who owns the definition of “protect the federal property or functions”? What are those definitions?” JB

Military assistance can include loans of arms, ammunition, vessels and aircraft. The directive states clearly that it is for engaging civilians during times of unrest.

A U.S. official said the Obama administration considered but rejected deploying military force under the directive during the recent standoff with Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and his armed supporters.

Mr. Bundy is engaged in a legal battle with the federal Bureau of Land Management over unpaid grazing fees. Along with a group of protesters, Mr. Bundy in April confronted federal and local authorities in a standoff that ended when the authorities backed down.

The Pentagon directive authorizes the secretary of defense to approve the use of unarmed drones in domestic unrest. But it bans the use of missile-firing unmanned aircraft.

“Use of armed [unmanned aircraft systems] is not authorized,” the directive says.

The directive was signed by then-Deputy Defense Secretary William J. Lynn. A copy can be found on the Pentagon website:

Defense analysts say there has been a buildup of military units within non-security-related federal agencies, notably the creation of Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams. The buildup has raised questions about whether the Obama administration is undermining civil liberties under the guise of counterterrorism and counternarcotics efforts.

“….undermining civil liberties under the guise of counterterrorism and counternarcotics efforts…”


Other agencies with SWAT teams reportedly include the Department of Agriculture (WHY?), the Railroad Retirement Board (WHY?),, the Tennessee Valley Authority (WHY?),, the Office of Personnel Management (WHY?),, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (WHY?),, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (WHY?), and the Education Department (WHY?),.

“What does any of the above organizations have to do with National Security or keeping the peace? Sound a little like Nazi Germany?” JB

Comming Soon 02

The militarization of federal agencies, under little-known statues that permit deputization of security officials, comes as the White House has launched verbal attacks on private citizens’ ownership of firearms despite the fact that most gun owners are law-abiding citizens.

A White House National Security Council spokeswoman declined to comment. (WHY?),

President Obama stated at the National Defense University a year ago: “I do not believe it would be constitutional for the government to target and kill any U.S. citizen — with a drone or with a shotgun — without due process, nor should any president deploy armed drones over U.S. soil.”


The House defense authorization bill passed last week calls for adding $10 million to the Pentagon’s future warfare think tank and for codifying the Office of Net Assessment (ONA) as a semi-independent unit.

The provision is being called the Andrew Marshall amendment after the ONA’s longtime director and reflects congressional support for the 92-year-old manager and his staying power through numerous administrations, Republican and Democratic.

Mr. Marshall’s opponents within the Pentagon and the Obama administration persuaded Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel this year to downgrade the ONA by cutting its budget and placing it under the control of the undersecretary of defense for policy. The ONA currently is a separate entity within the Office of the Secretary of Defense.

“Is that because they then can be easily manipulated without notice of the media or government watchdog groups? Does this give President Obama more tyrannical, unconstitutional control?” JB

Members of the House Committee on Armed Services objected and added the $10 million to the administration’s $8.9 million request, along with a legal provision that would codify ONA’s current status as separate from the policy undersecretary shop.


The committee was concerned Mr. Hagel’s downgrade would “limit the ability and flexibility of ONA to conduct long-range comparative assessments,” the report on the authorization bill states.

“The office has a long history of providing alternative analyses and strategies that challenge the ‘group think’ that can often pervade the Department of Defense,” the report says, noting an increasing demand for unconventional thinking about space warfare capabilities by China and Russia.

“Or Americans that vehemently disagree with President Obama’s policies? Does this make all the definitions we’ve been asking for, about to be made up as we go along?” JB

In addition to adding funds, the bill language requires the ONA to study alternative U.S. defense and deterrence strategies related to the space warfare programs of both countries. (WHY?)

China is developing advanced missiles capable of shooting down satellites in low and high earth orbits. It also is building lasers and electronic jammers to disrupt satellites, a key U.S. strategic military advantage. Russia is said to be working on anti-satellite missiles and other space weapons.

“The committee believes the office must remain an independent organization within the department, reporting directly to the secretary,” the report said.

Mr. Marshall, sometimes referred to as the Pentagon’s “Yoda,” after the Star Wars character, has come under fire from opponents in the Really 01administration, who say he is too independent and not aligned with the administration’s soft-line defense policies.

The ONA is known for its extensive use of contractors and lack of producing specific overall net assessments of future warfare challenges, as required by the office’s charter.

One example of the ONA’s unconventional thinking was the recent contractor report “China: The Three Warfares,” which revealed Beijing’s extensive use of political warfare against the United States, including psychological warfare, media warfare and legal warfare.

“‘The Three Warfares’ is a dynamic, three-dimensional, war-fighting process that constitutes war by other means,” the report says.

A Pentagon spokesman had no immediate comment.


Navy Adm. James A. “Sandy” Winnefeld, Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Wednesday that the Pentagon is deploying more and higher-quality missile defenses to counter potential nuclear attacks from North Korea and Iran.

“This is about ensuring we can deny the objectives of any insecure authoritarian state that believes acquisition of deliverable weapons of mass destruction is key to the preservation of its regime,” Adm. Winnefeld said in a speech to the Atlantic Council. “The number of states trying to achieve that capability is growing, not shrinking, with our principal current concern being North Korea, because they are closest in terms of capability, followed by Iran.”

He added that missile defenses are needed “because we’re not betting on Dennis Rodman as our deterrent against a future North Korean ICBM threat.”

He was referring to the heavily tattooed and pierced former NBA star, who has traveled to North Korea as a guest of leader Kim Jong-un. Mr. Rodman calls the dictator his “friend.”

“A robust and capable missile defense is our best bet to defend the United States from such an attack and is, in my view, our No. 1 missile defense priority,” Adm. Winnefeld said.

North Korea is continuing to develop long-range missiles and nuclear weapons. It recently threatened to conduct a fourth nuclear test, and analysts say signs from the closed communist state suggest the North Koreans may test a missile warhead.

Contact Bill Gertz at @BillGertz


Examples Of The Tolerant Left **Graphic**

090309_joe_plumber_297Regardless of what you may think, I care about the victims and their families. That is why I fight for the 2nd Amendment. The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. Such was the case with Elliot Rodger.

If you think for one second that guns are the problem then you are being misled and are now part of the problem. This was my objection to the father of one of the victim’s blaming gun owners for his son’s death.

There is absolute right and wrong, there is good and evil, unfortunately society tries to redefine right and wrong as it gets in their way.

What happened this past weekend was a tragedy, and the powers that be will USE this tragedy to try and control us a little more.  What about the American soldier that died defending our rights? Is there death any less tragic? Let me say this again – they died defending our rights. Why would we allow the politicians to make a mockery of their sacrifice to a take away our rights?

Think about it…

For you on the left, your tolerance is overwhelming.

What follows are just a very tiny portion of comments at my website, Tweets directed at my account, received emails and entries posted on my Facebook page. Although these are *Not Safe For Work* – I cannot print half of the ones I receive due to their extreme nature, in sexual content, profanity and outright violence.

I’m used to the revulsion and racist, vile, almost inhuman hatred which liberal’s spew forth on a daily basis – but I thought you might be interested in just a taste of what we’re really dealing with here. People who stand up in public and say conservatives are bad people? I’d like you to know they are not dealing straight with you. Ever.


Steven Weeks

May 27th, 5:01pm

Fuck you asshole . I hope your daughter gets raped by a dick so big it splits her in two the shot. As for your boy kill him slowly one shot at a time limb by limb Fuck you and your chicken ass rights only pussies need guns so that means you are a pussy. In fact I’ll pay to fly you to California so I can fuck you up. I bet you won’t even answer this if you do you will hide behind your guns. You see asshole I’m no pussy I don’t need a gun to fuck you up got it. Again I can only hope that one day I read about your kids being fucked up and beg to die but only slowly. Oh by the way motherfucker I am a plumber too. You don’t know how to use a set of irons . I would enjoy destroying your credibility concerning the plumbing trade what’s a figure 5 fitting, what’s a durum system probably have to look it up so you do look as stupid as you really are go fuck yourself and fuck your family . If your mom is still alive maybe she will get shot Dad, Grandparents, sisters, brothers, anyone of your low life family. Hey, there your rights; right motherfucker. you piece of shit . In retrospect may be you are a plumber because are a piece of shit. And I am also a vet what about you. Do you have your DD214 I sure do want to se it.


Steven Weeks

May 28th, 5:08pm

I hope you get heckled and heckled along with the kids, wifie yo mama, which by the way should have aborted your ass it old her to. She has some nasty pussy but an inbred like you probably already knows that


Jason Thomas

May 29th, 9:58am

May you drown in your own excrement.


Patti Mullin

May 28th, 7:59pm

Next time you are sucking out someone’s septic system why don’t you stick your head down the hose. Because you really are a piece of shit!!!!!!!!!!


Matt Simmons

May 28th, 5:29pm

You’re a repellent fuck. Just thought you should know! You should kill yourself!


Jerry Gregory

May 28th, 4:08pm

I hope someday you are on on the bad end of a mass shooting. If our paths ever cross I am going to stick my 45 up your penis whole and pull the trigger. You complete piece of horse crap.


Bria Fey

May 28th, 8:07am

You dumb piece of shit. How DARE you pretend to know what it’s like to lose a child? After your idiotic and ignorant comments about “your dead kids don’t blah blah blah my constitutional rights” (seriously, you don’t even deserve to be quoted, so I won’t), people are honestly questioning your sanity, you sanctimonious prick. You aren’t morally superior though – you are morally vacant. You are a liar and a fraud and a sad excuse for a human being. You spread hate and you are pro-violence and you are what is wrong with humanity. Fuck. You.


John Seitz

May 28th, 2:00am

I will pray every night that the day comes when you have to go to the morgue to identify your murdered child or grandchild. I would never harm another human being, except in self defense, but I will donate to the defense fund of anyone who makes you suffer.


Bill Jonke

May 27th, 9:45pm

May one of your own children, if your limp dick was capable of helping to conceive, receive the same fate as those “dead children” who don’t trump your rights, you BASTARD! And get your balls shot at too while you’re at it. You deserve it and without a 911 call.

Bill Jonke

May 28th, 12:28am

Fucking prick, if you can even find one without a microscope or apply a 2″ strap-on!


Steve Small

May 29th, 10:50am

I hope someone knocks you right the fuck out, you miserable asshole!


Misch JinxJoe the Plumber

22 hrs ·

I said it once and i’ll say it again .. i hope you have eyes in the back of your head cause by the time you hear the sound it will be to late


Joanne McIntyreJoe the Plumber

May 27 at 5:56pm ·

Joe hope somebody comes along and shoots your dumb ass.


Harry BallzackJoe the Plumber

May 27 at 5:07pm ·

Livestock humping, inbred southern trash


Bill JonkeJoe the Plumber

May 27 at 4:28pm ·

You, a poor excuse for a plumber, need to be shot in the balls and left to live!


So there you go – the tolerant left and their love for humanity. There are literally thousands more everyday… sad to think these people are even out there. Now do you think you should have the right to protect your family? I sure do.

Keep in mind that these are the same folks criticizing me for insensitive remarks! – JTP


Bloomberg: Universities becoming bastions of intolerance

By Ray Sanchez, CNN

updated 12:51 PM EDT, Fri May 30, 2014

Bloomberg blasts liberal censorship


  • Former Mayor Michael Bloomberg blasts what he calls silencing of ideas
  • Bloomberg says liberals often silence voices “deemed politically objectionable”
  • At Harvard commencement, he also blasts impasse between Republicans and Democrats

(CNN) — Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, delivering Thursday’s commencement speech at Harvard University, criticized what he described as a disturbing trend of liberals silencing voices “deemed politically objectionable.”

“This spring, it has been disturbing to see a number of college commencement speakers withdraw — or have their invitations rescinded — after protests from students and — to me, shockingly — from senior faculty and administrators who should know better,” Bloomberg said.

The billionaire former mayor cited an October speech during which his ex-police commissioner, Ray Kelly, was shouted down by students at Brown University. The university canceled Kelly’s speech when protesters opposed to the police department’s stop-and-frisk policy shouted down and interrupted Kelly.

Bloomberg noted other universities have had speakers back out. He pointed to Rutgers, where former U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice withdrew amid protests, and Smith College, where International Monetary Fund chief Christine Lagarde withdrew after a student petition.

“In each case, liberals silenced a voice — and denied an honorary degree — to individuals they deemed politically objectionable. This is an outrage,” Bloomberg said to applause.

An even more glaring example of failing to listen to the opposing side, Bloomberg said, was the longstanding impasse between Republicans and Democrats in Washington, where every major question facing the nation is decided “not by engaging with one another but by trying to shout each other down.”

Bloomberg, who in April pledged $50 million to gun control groups he helped organize, spoke about Washington politicians’ handling of gun issues, noting Congress has barred the national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from conducting studies of gun violence, a prohibition that was recently extended to the National Institute of Health.

“What are they afraid of?” he asked.

“Do you really want an answer Mr. Bloomberg, or is all this a prelude to your campaigning for President? If in fact you really want an answer, I’ll give you my perspective; Unless you’re a “die-hard” Liberal Leftist, the very idea of the national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducting research about gun violence screams bias. The Leftist/Marxist/Socialist tyrannical force has already determined the outcome of that study. All they want is to get their deceptive hands on the money to do the research. You see, Mr. Bloomberg, most of America is smarter than you and your Leftist comrades think we are. Any more questions?” JB

The Senate this year delayed a vote on President Obama’s nominee for surgeon general, Dr. Vivek Murthy, because the Harvard physician “had the audacity to say gun violence is a public health crisis that should be tackled,” Bloomberg said to applause.Propaganda Alert

“Let’s get serious: When 85 Americans are killed with guns every single day, and shootings regularly occur at our schools and universities, including last week’s tragedy at Santa Barbara, it would be almost medical malpractice to say anything else,” Bloomberg said.

“Mr. Bloomberg sir? Please show us the FACTS that back up your quote of 85 Americans being killed with guns everyday?” JB

The former mayor, who received honorary degrees from Harvard along with seven others — including former President George H.W. Bush and music icon Aretha Franklin — spoke of the role of universities as places where people of all backgrounds and beliefs can freely debate ideas without that “sacred trust” being threatened by the “tyrannical tendencies of monarchs, mobs and majorities.”

He recalled when protesters came out several years ago against the development of a mosque a few blocks from ground zero in lower Manhattan.

“We protected their right to protest,” Bloomberg said. “But they could not have been more wrong. And we refused to cave in to their demands. The idea that government would single out a particular religion, and block its believers — and only its believers — from building a house of worship in a particular area is diametrically opposed to the moral principles that gave rise to our great nation, and the constitutional protections that have sustained it.”


He added, “If you want the freedom to worship as you wish, to speak as you wish, and to marry whom you wish, you must tolerate my freedom to do so — or not do so — too. What I do may offend you. You may find my actions immoral or unjust. But attempting to restrict my freedoms in ways that you would not restrict your own leads only to injustice.”

“There is hope for you yet, or is that the last smoldering vestiges of your one time conservative beliefs?” JB

Bloomberg compared the intolerance of ideas prevalent in the country today to “McCarthy’s Red Scare” in the 1950s and its destruction of thousands of lives. In the 2012 presidential race, he said, the overwhelming majority of campaign contributions from Ivy League faculty went to Barack Obama.

“Today, on many college campuses, it is liberals trying to repress conservative ideas, even as conservative faculty members are at risk of becoming an endangered species,” he said. (“AGREED!” JB)

After the speech, Sarah Surrain, who completed her master’s degree in education, said Bloomberg was bold to criticize universities as too liberal.

“I thought it was really thoughtful,” she said of the speech. “It was nice that it wasn’t just platitudes.”

Harvard Law School graduate Jared Nicholson said the speech was “a great message … about tolerance of different ideas and diversity of opinions.”

Greg Silverberg, an engineering school graduate, said he welcomed the former mayor’s viewpoint.

“He gave some interesting perspectives on conservative views in universities that I hadn’t heard before coming from a liberal undergraduate institution myself,” he said. “It was eye-opening for a lot of people.”

Before the speech, Cary Williams, president of the Association of Black Harvard Women, questioned why Bloomberg was selected as speaker, because, she said, the NYPD’s stop-and-frisk program “disproportionately has targeted people of color in New York.”

“It’s basically racial profiling,” junior Keyanna Wigglesworth said of the New York policing policy under Bloomberg. “And so it’s unsettling to me, (for) someone to speak who advocates a racist policy when you want students of color on campus to feel comfortable. It’s confusing and I don’t think its what Harvard stands for.”



CNN’s Laura Dolan and Dana Garrett contributed to this report

Complete MessageFreeSpeech1-300x204VOTE 02

Boehner Camp’s Threats Could Spark Battle

Speaker John Boehner’s friends are trying to design new, more effective punishments for the conservative members that might vote against him on the House floor come January, but the message from the right is, “don’t even try it.”

“Look, intimidation tactics and threats do not take the place of leadership,” Rep. Jeff Dunacn (R-SC) told Breitbart News.

“I feel like the embers are gathered on the fire pit, and there just needs to be a spark for the flames to go up,” a senior GOP aide said, predicting the move could backfire.

Boehner’s allies, as first reported by Politico, have been quietly plotting how to prevent a small group of conservatives from denying Boehner a victory in the speakership election next January, something that members on the right have been actively discussing.

Under House rules, an absolute majority of members voting for a person is required to be elected Speaker, making it possible for a small group to cause a deadlocked vote.

Top Boehner allies have considered releasing a letter – it doesn’t exist yet, but the idea was discussed – with a few dozen signatures vowing to only vote on the floor for the person elected by the GOP conference in a closed-door, secret ballot leadership election that precedes the floor vote, according to several GOP sources familiar with the talks.

They’re also talking about altering GOP conference rules to punish members who don’t vote on the floor in accordance with the secret ballot results, such as stripping committee assignments.

Republicans said Boehner didn’t initiate the talks, and a senior lawmaker said Boehner had since signaled to his friends he didn’t want them to pursue the plan.

But the issue is already prompting pushback on the right.

In a radio interview with Laura Ingraham, Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R-KS), a key member among the Boehner dissidents on the right who recently participated in a bull session with a group of conservatives in Sen. Ted Cruz’s Capitol Hill office, said the threats are pervasive.

“There are [conservative House members] who think, ‘My God, should I speak up? Should I speak up in a Republican Conference meeting because they might cut off my money? They might kick me out of committee,’” Huelskamp said.

But Huelskamp, who was thrown off of the House Agriculture and Budget Committees in 2013, said he was undeterred. “I think we need new leadership,” he said. “Cantor, McCarthy and Boehner all come from blue states….We need some folks from red states that understand what most Americans are thinking, especially grassroots conservatives.”

“Don’t make threats of committee assignments or removals – convince me of how you will lead going forward, especially in the pivotal times of the last two years of an Obama Administration when we need clear action,” Duncan added.

Huelskamp, in particular, has long drawn the ire of Boehner’s circle. Republicans close to Boehner said their latest plans to demonstrate strength and raise the cost of opposing him in a high-stakes floor vote are intended to offset members like Huelskamp who will go to extraordinary lengths to exert their will.



The logic of the move, a former leadership aide with knowledge of the situation said, is to make the point that “I’m going to be as f***ing idiotic as Tim Huelskamp” and do whatever it takes, including a series of deadlocked speaker votes, to get him and others in his camp to back down.

The timing of the Politico story drew speculation, since it came as Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA), who has been working to consolidate internal support of late, is locked in a high-profile primary battle with a long-shot opponent. However, Jake Sherman, the reporter who wrote the story, had been working on it for several weeks, sources said, putting its origin before Cantor’s primary race really got on the national media’s radar screen.

Interestingly, the criticism Cantor is facing from the right has prompted key conservative lawmakers to seriously consider whether Boehner might be preferable to Cantor, his heir apparent, Republicans said.

Their rationale: Boehner would be a lame-duck with a clear time horizon, while Cantor could consolidate support and serve for any number of years before the right got a chance to put one of their own in the speakership. During the end of Boehner’s reign in the next Congress, potential leaders on the right – Reps. Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) and Jim Jordan (R-OH) are the names most often mentioned – could continue to gain strength to take on Cantor when Boehner departed.





Today’s Politically INCORRECT, Yet True, Cartoon

Just the Tip



Complete MessageVOTE 02



Report: Directive Details Obama’s Plan to Use Military Force Against Americans within the U.S.

May 29, 2014 By

On July 2, 2008, then candidate Barack Obama made a shocking statement that caused alarms of concern to go off for many Americans around the country.

“We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded.”

Reports of government agencies, from the Postal Service to the EPA and BLM, buying large amounts of high-powered ammunition fed fuel to the fire of wondering how Obama would use such a force. The BLM invasion of the Cliven Bundy Ranch gave some insight into that question. Now, according to a report by the Washington Times, Obama not only has government agencies developing their own police forces, but he has a directive issued on December 29, 2010 that gives him the power to use military force against American civilians in the United States.

“One more time; “…..he has a directive issued on December 29, 2010 that gives him the power to use military force against American civilians in the United States.” JB

Comming Soon 02

This directive, No. 3025.18, is called the “Defense Support of Civil Authorities.” It not only gives Obama the power to use the force of Are You Considered a terroristthe military against Americans, but also says that federal military commanders have such authority if prior authorization by the president is not possible. Such action can be taken during times deemed to be ‘civil unrest.’

“Federal action, including the use of federal military forces, is authorized when necessary to protect the federal property or functions,” the directive states.

Military assistance can include loans of arms, ammunition, vessels and aircraft. The directive states clearly that it is for engaging civilians during times of unrest.

police_stateThis directive also gives the secretary of defense the authorization to use unarmed drones, but bans drones that can fire missiles.

The Washington Times continues their report by addressing the militarization of government agencies under the Obama regime and the impact of that on civil liberties. 

Defense analysts say there has been a buildup of military units within non-security-related federal agencies, notably the creation of Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams. The buildup has raised questions about whether the Obama administration is undermining civil liberties under the guise of counterterrorism and counter narcotics efforts. 

Other agencies with SWAT teams reportedly include;

  • the Department of Agriculture,
  • the Railroad Retirement Board,
  • the Tennessee Valley Authority,
  • the Office of Personnel Management,
  • the Consumer Product Safety Commission,
  • the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
  • and the Education Department.

The militarization of federal agencies, under little-known statues that permit deputization of security officials, comes as the White House has launched verbal attacks on private citizens’ ownership of firearms despite the fact that most gun owners are law-abiding citizens.

The detailing of this directive that was put into effect in 2010 will bring into question the validity of two claims that were made last year that were written off by many as ‘conspiracy theories.’ The first was the allegation, as reported by The Blaze;

  • that Obama was purging the military of commanders who didn’t agree with his ideology.
  • The second, which actually ties into the first, was the claim that the litmus test for which military leaders would be allowed to stay was whether or not they would fire on citizens.
  • According to Dr. Jim Garrow, an author and humanitarian, those who would not agree to fire on American citizens were let go.

Comming Soon 02

While those reports and allegations were written off as untrue, this directive giving Obama the power to use military force against Americans certainly gives them more credibility.

“Follow this link No. 3025.18, and you can read the directive for yourself.” JB

Do you believe that the current administration would use military force against American citizens? Take the Official Tea Party Poll. Click HERE!30 Witnesses disappearGathering Storm

2VOTE 02




Benghazi mom Pat Smith: Hillary Clinton is a “terrible person”

By , Communities Digital News

Benghazi mom Pat Smith: Hillary Clinton is a “terrible person”

Benghazi mom Pat Smith: Hillary Clinton is a “terrible person”


Is Hillary to blameLOS ANGELES, May 27, 2014 — On Memorial Day, many Americans paid tribute to fallen soldiers. As painful as it is for families to visit the graves of loved ones lost in war, the cemetery allows for some closure. The survivors know where their loved ones are, how they died, and why they are gone. Clear answers eventually help lead many survivors to places of solace and peace.

Conversely, not having those answers can be a constant source of torment. Pat Smith is a tormented woman. Her son Sean Smith was one of the four Americans murdered in Benghazi, Libya on the eleventh anniversary of the original September 11th attacks. The day after the 2012 attacks, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told Pat Smith that her son died due to Muslim anger over an anti-Islamic internet video. The truth was that the video played no role in the attacks, and the administration knew this. A recently released email confirmed that blaming the video was a deliberate strategy to bolster the president’s reelection chances.

Pat Smith was promised answers. She has never received a single phone call. When Cindy Sheehan embraced Hugo Chavez and cursed President George W. Bush, New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd glibly declared that a grieving mother’s viewpoint was “absolute.” Since Smith is critical of a liberal administration, the word absolute means nothing.

READ ALSO: Obama’s opposite day: When bad is good and liberals make sense

On Memorial Day, Pat Smith was asked by Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace what she thought of Hillary Clinton. Smith twice said, “Don’t ask me that.” Yet Smith could no longer hold her tongue, saying about Clinton that “she is a terrible person.” Smith also added that Hillary wants to run an entire country, but she cannot run anything.

Hillary defenders will claim that conservatives are using Smith to score political points. They will deflect to Bush and the Iraq War. They will even claim that critics of Hillary are sexist in the same way critics of Obama are supposedly racist.

Even if all of that toxic bile were true, the ultimate truth remains the same. Smith is a legitimate victim. Hillary has played a major role in violating Smith. Hillary has a history of such violations. Hillary Clinton is a terrible person.

READ ALSO: Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi betrayal and the other shoe


  • Only a terrible person would be part of an administration that left people to die to protect a false narrative about defeating al Qaeda.

  • Only a terrible person would take part in blaming an innocent film-maker and staying silent while he went to jail to protect the administration.

  • Only a terrible person, when asked how Sean Smith died, would respond, “What difference at this point does it make?”

  • Only a terrible person would deliberately lie to a grieving mother about how her son died.

  • Only a terrible person would refuse to answer questions that would give the grieving mother a sense of peace.

  • Why was Sean Smith left to die?

  • Why did the Obama-Hillary government refuse to try and save Smith’s life?

  • Who gave the order for those planning a rescue mission to stand down?

  • Why was the American government unprepared for the attacks in the first place?

Further from the truth


Hillary ClintonHillary Clinton knows that the truth coming out could damage her chances of being President. A good human being would put doing what is right above an obsessive quest for power. A terrible human being who has often been compared to Lady MacBeth would trample over people and show an utter disregard for their humanity. Can any Hillary defender claim that she cares about people like Pat Smith? Can anybody claim that Pat Smith is a partisan gunslinger?

Smith is an ordinary American woman who wants to know what happened to her son. Every day for her will be Memorial Day until she gets some answers.

Hillary Clinton has not given Pat Smith or anybody else in America answers about what happened in Benghazi in the 20 months since the attacks happened. There is no reason to expect that Hillary will voluntarily ever give those answers. Winning at all costs requires shrouding the truth and wrecking the lives of innocent people.

Inflicting that carnage is the very essence of Hillary Clinton.

That is what makes her a terrible person

Benghazi Remebrence

Clinton Obama

Complete MessageVOTE 02






Obama’s Labor Secretary Tweets Advice to Grads: Don’t be an Individual, Join the Collective!

Facebook Twitter EmailBy Soopermexican


Yes, it’s the season for American college students to graduate from the care-free days of college and head into crushing debt and unemployment, thanks to Obama’s failed economic policies. But don’t worry, kids; Tom Perez, Obama’s Secretary to the Labor Department, has some great advice for you as you hang out in your parents’ basement:

tweet Com 01

Fox News commentator Jonathan Hoenig accurately deciphered Perez’s message:

tweet Com 02

It’s little surprise that Secretary Perez wants young Americans to devalue individualism.

After all, individualism leads to hard work, hard work leads to personal responsibility, and personal responsibility leads to the dark side – voting Republican!

Community Organizer TwoVOTE 02


Video: New Ads Slam Vulnerable Democrats for ‘Parroting’ Obamacare Falsehoods

Guy Benson | May 28, 2014

Guy Benson


ad 01The Alaska version is here. Millions of Americans have been unable to keep their existing plans, withaccess shocksevering years-long patient/doctor relationships. And the broken promises are expected to continue to impact vast groups of consumers for years. Obamacare isn’t the only subject on which Senators like Pryor and Begich have done Obama’s bidding. Last year’s Congressional Quarterly analysis revealed that they’ve voted with the White House 90 percent and 97 percent of the time, respectively. Meanwhile, Americans for Prosperity has released an ad critical of Democratic Senate hopeful Rep. Gary Peters in Michigan. You likely remember Peters as the man whose campaign attempted to silence single mother and cancer patient Julie Boonstra, whose plan was canceled under Obamacare. The new spot, conspicuously aimed at female voters, hits Peters for his unrepentant support for a law that is raising many Michiganders’ healthcare costs:

aD 02
In an interesting twist, an NBA player is now claiming that Michigan Democrats “recently” approached him about running for Senate this fall, which Republican Terri Lynn Land’s campaign is touting as a private vote of no confidence against Peters. AFP is also running a positive spot praising Rep. Tom Cotton, Pryor’s opponent in Arkansas. In New Hampshire, Scott Brown’s campaign is up on air with a new radio ad critical of Obamacare’s deleterious impact on jobs and the economy:

ad 03
Earlier in the month, Democrats on Capitol Hill giddily quoted a piece from The Hill positing that Republicans had “gone quiet” on Obamacare, flummoxed by the law’ssuccesses.” In that case, why are GOP ad-makers consistently coming out guns blazing against Obamacare? Perhaps it’s because the law remains deep underwater in the court public opinion, as a new AP poll again confirmed just yesterday. It’s also no mystery why so many of these ads ruthlessly Democrats to President Obama: He’s unpopular, and he’s a significant drag on his party. More results from yesterday’s national survey:

josh tweet

His overall approval rating in the poll is (43/56)…among adults, not likely or even registered voters. By the way, if you’re unacquainted with the significance of the #LikeABoss hashtag, read this to get up to speed.

Complete Message





Democrats changing tune on ObamaCare?


Keep it up Democrats.

With all the problems ObamaCare is causing you must have to search forever to find something good.

Voters will show you what they think of it.

Check it out:

Some candidates aren’t running away from the Affordable Care

See news report from FOX NEWS CHANNEL (Click on the image below and it will take you to the web site that has the video):

running away


Complete MessageVOTE 02


dogVOTE 02



Don’t stigmatize murderers!

Ann Coulter Letter

Don't stigmatize murderers!

Mass murder at a sunny college campus in a beach town would normally be considered “newsy,” but Elliot Rodger’s massacre at the University of California-Santa Barbara last Friday is getting surprisingly little press.

This is not a good case for liberals: The killer was an immigrant, a person of color, and the majority of his casualties resulted from attacks with a car or knife. It makes as much sense to rant about the NRA as to blame the Auto Club of America or the National Knife Collectors Association.

Rather, what we have is yet another mass murder committed by a schizophrenic — just like those of Seung-Hui Cho, Jared Loughner, James Holmes, and Adam Lanza.

Yes, they all used guns. Also, they were all males. They were all college-aged. They all had hair. Those are not distinctive characteristics.

When the last five mass murderers share something that only 1 percent of the population has, I think we’ve found the relevant common denominator.

Rodger had been seeing therapists since he was 8 years old. Just last year, his psychiatrist, Dr. Charles Sophy, prescribed him Risperidone, an anti-psychotic. But after looking up what Risperidone was for — schizophrenia — Rodger decided “it was the absolute wrong thing for me to take” and never did.

See, that’s the thing about schizophrenics — they don’t think they’re sick. They think the lava lamp that’s talking to them is sick.

Rodger’s “manifesto” reads like Nikolai Gogol’s “Diary of a Madman” — generally recognized as the first description of schizophrenia, except it’s a little repetitive and not well-written, no matter what that “tech guru” says.

I’m one of the few who have read all 141 pages. It is a tale of increasing delusions, paranoia, hallucinations, and wild, grandiose self-assessments. In other words, it is a slightly less whiny version of Obama’s first inaugural address. (How many pages does your manifesto have to be before we can force you to take your medication?)

Rodger says of himself:

– “I saw myself as a highly intelligent and magnificent person who is meant for great things.”

– “Becoming a multimillionaire at a young age is what I am meant for.”

– “I am like a god.”

– “This was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and the planet began to heal.”

(No — wait … Last one was Obama.)

Rodger saw every female as a “tall, hot blonde” — and, this being California, that’s at a campus that’s only 50 percent white. He viewed all couples as his sworn enemies causing his suffering.

Although Rodger loved driving his car, he “soon learned the hard way” not to drive on Friday and Saturday nights, where he “frequently saw bands of teenagers roaming the streets.” They “had pretty girls beside them,” probably on their way to “get drunk and have sex and do all sorts of fun pleasurable things that I’ve never had the chance to do. Damn them all!”

At Santa Barbara City College, he dropped his sociology class on the first day of school “because there was this extremely hot blonde girl in the class with her brute of a boyfriend.” Rodger couldn’t even sit through the whole first class with them, merely for being a couple.

Santa Monica Pier was out for him, too: “I saw young couples everywhere. … Life was too unfair to me.” On a trip to England, he refused to leave his hotel room so he wouldn’t have to see men walking with their girlfriends.

The “cruelty” of women apparently consisted of the failure of any “tall, hot blondes” to approach Rodger and ask for sex. He would walk around for hours “in the desperate hope that I might possibly cross paths with some pretty girl who would be attracted to me.”

But only once, in the entire 141-page manifesto, does Rodger attempt to speak to a girl himself. She’s a total stranger walking past him on a bridge, and he musters up the courage to say “hi.” He claims she “kept on walking” and said nothing. She probably didn’t hear him. But he called her a “foul bitch” and went to a bathroom to cry for an hour.

Although Rodger repeatedly denounces the world and everyone in it for “cruelty and injustice,” he was the bully more often than the bullied, especially as time went on, and his rage increased.

He sees an Asian guy talking to a white girl at a party, decides he’d been “insulted enough,” and roughly bumped the Asian aside. “How could an ugly Asian attract the attention of a white girl, while a beautiful Eurasian like myself never had any attention from them? I thought with rage.”

Even after this unprovoked assault, the couple was nice to him, telling him he was drunk and should have some water. He stormed out of the party, but returned to “spitefully insult” the Asian.

Then he climbed up on a balcony at the party, and when some college kids joined him, he began insulting them and tried to push the girls off a 10-foot ledge.

He hectors his mother to marry “any wealthy man” because it would “be a way out of my miserable and insignificant life.” He tells her “she should sacrifice her well-being for the sake of my happiness.”

When flying first class, he says, “I took great satisfaction as I passed by all of the other people who flew economy, giving all of the younger passengers a cocky little smirk whenever they looked at me.”

Meanwhile, in 141 pages, the worst thing anyone ever did to him was not say “hi” back.

His claim that couples all over were “making out” or “passionately kissing” are probably hallucinatory. In the Starbucks line? At family dinners? They were probably holding hands and Rodger hallucinated something resembling a live sex act.

Thus, he claims a couple in a Starbucks line were “kissing passionately … rubbing their bodies together and tongue kissing in front of everyone.” Livid, Rodger followed them to their car and threw his hot coffee on them. Utterly self-pitying, he says: “I cursed the world for condemning me to such suffering.” Then he spent five days alone in his room.

Another couple Rodger claims were kissing “passionately” in the food court outside Domino’s pizza enraged him so much he followed them in his car and “splashed my iced tea all over them” — to fight “against the injustice.”

But the story that sounds the most like Gogol’s Poprishchin hearing two dogs talking in Russian is Rodger’s claim that his stepmother bragged to him that his stepbrother, Jazz — her own 6-year-old son! — “would be a success with girls and probably lose his virginity early.”

I know Moroccan cultural mores are different, but I’m calling “auditory hallucination” on that one.

A family friend, Simon Astaire, described Rodger’s flat affect, common to schizophrenics, saying he “couldn’t look at you straight in the eye and looked at your feet. It was unbearable.”

It’s hard to feel sorry for a mass murderer, but it was cruel to Elliot Rodger to allow him to refuse medication and turn himself into a monster. It was beyond cruel to his innocent victims — as well as the other victims of psychopathic killers. But liberals are more worried about “stigmatizing” the mentally ill, than the occasional mass murder

Pro-Life Group Excluded From Peace Parade for Being Pro-Life

by Lauren Enriquez | Rochester, NY | | 5/28/14 4:56 PM

Rochester, NY (LiveActionNews) —Every year in Rochester, NY, an organization called Metro Justice holds a Peace Parade on Memorial Day . The organization claims to fight for “economic, social, and racial justice,” but their efforts have been compromised in the past where the pre-born are involved.
The pro-life organization Feminists for Nonviolent Choices (FFNVC) became a victim of Metro Justice’s dichotomous view of peace when they were excluded from the organization’s peace parade earlier this week. After attending planning meetings where the organization was told by Metro Justice that they would be allowed to participate as long as their message focused on peace, FFNVC received a letter six days later uninviting them from participating in the parade due to their stance against abortion, even though they consistently oppose all violence (including war, euthanasia, etc.).

Tfeminists3he news came as a blow to the organization, whose founding member, Carol Crossed, had helped to found the Peace Parade in 1984 as a member of the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom. Crossed also marched in the original peace parade, making FFNVC’s rejection from the parade thirty years later even more troubling.

After their rejection from the event, FFNVC turned to the Ghandi Institute, a local organization that works to promote “harmony in the community” and whose executive director has mediated dialogue between pro- and anti-life factions in the community in the past. However, despite the Gandhi Institute’s offer of a mediator, Metro Justice refused to dialogue before the parade event. FFNVC was left with no alternative but to apply for their own parade permit with the city one week prior to the event. FFNVC members felt that it was important for their own message of nonviolence to be heard in spite of the discrimination they faced.

FFNVC banners read, “Feminists for Nonviolent Choices: A consistent voice for all human life,” and many participants from other area pro-life organization wore white and displayed symbols of peace, trying to connect for observers the relationship between peace and life.

Kelly Vincent Brunacini, the Executive Director of FFNVC, gave Live Action News an exclusive interview after the parade. She said,

FFNVC was disappointed and hurt by the exclusion from Rochester’s Peace Parade by Metro Justice. Rather than focus on the common ground of our pro-peace/anti-war positions, they instead chose to focus on the differences in our abortion position. This unfortunate decision created division where there should have been unity and ultimately hindered the process of peace at a very basic level.

Despite hostility from a few Metro Justice people — Brunacini cheerfully refers to the obscene gesture they received from one woman as a “half peace sign.” — Brunacini said that the pro-life parade received overwhelming support from observers.

The experience ultimately left Brunacini saddened. “How are ‘peace’ people going to bring about peace if power and control and domination are used in achieving it ?,” she asked. “That is not the way of nonviolence.”

LifeNews Note: Lauren is a former Legislative Associate for Texas Right to Life and a graduate of Ave Maria University. This post originally appeared at Live Action News and is reprinted with permission.

Heartbreaking Must-Read Story: “My Father Beat Me for Two Days Because I Didn’t Want an Abortion”

by Nancy Flanders | Washington, DC | | 5/28/14 11:40 AM

Washington DC (LiveActionNews) — We hear a lot about choice and how every woman should be able to choose for herself if and when she has a child. But the truth is, many women are denied the choice to let their child live. Whether it’s because of family, friends, boyfriends, or societal pressures, so many women are made to feel that their only choice is abortion. And they spend the rest of their lives suffering because of it.

Paula Veit Fetter sent a letter to the women at Chicks on the Right asking them to share her story. She wants the world to see what abortion is really like to a seventeen year old girl who has no one to turn to for help. Paula wants to you to open your eyes and realize that even those who say they will help, don’t. And that when you need them the most, sometimes your own family betrays you.

sadwoman16Paula was raised in a seemingly average family. But inside their home, her mother was depressed and distant, and her father, often a caring, charming and fun man, would turn on Paula, beating her for the smallest of reasons. These circumstances created a rebellious, promiscuous teenager and at the age of 16, Paula found out she was pregnant. She and her boyfriend decided they would get married and have their baby, but it was 1976 and abortion was now legal. When her father discovered that Paula was pregnant, he beat her up and insisted she have an abortion, driving her to an abortion clinic.

She was examined by the doctor and told him that she didn’t want an abortion. But instead of finding a way to help her, he told her that because she was 16, abortion was her only choice. Paula didn’t give up, reaching out the social worker at the clinic, telling her about the abuse and that she was afraid to go home. She revealed her bruises, but the social worker left the room to speak to Paula’s father. When she returned to the room, Paula’s father was with her. The social worker told Paula that her father promised not to hurt her again. She told her to go home with him and she would find help for Paula. That help never came.

From the moment Paula got back into the car with her father he began beating her. He didn’t stop for two days. She writes:

At home, he dragged me upstairs by my hair, threw me against a wall and said if I didn’t get an abortion, he would give me one himself, then hit me in the stomach. He started choking me and I felt myself passing out. At that point, my mother, who had just been watching while all this happened, told him he had to stop choking me or I would die, He stopped choking me but continue to hit and kick me.

A few days later, while her father was working, Paula asked her boyfriend to take her to the agency who was supposed to help her. She told them what was happening and showed them her bruises. They advised her to abort and told her there were no resources to help her. Paula refused to abort her baby and was sent to a group home. Once there she was sent to a local doctor who also dismissed her desire to have her baby and told her to terminate. Terrified that her father would find her and kill her, and let down by every other adult she turned to, Paula only had her boyfriend for support. But then she lost him too. She says:

My boyfriend and I continued to see each other during this time and still talked of marriage. After I had been in the group home about three months, my boyfriend and a friend of his stole a car and were arrested. My case worker contacted me and told me my boyfriend told his lawyer he did not want to get married. I was hopeless at that point, and that night I took all my morning sickness pills in an effort to kill myself. This was not a cry for help, it was a real attempt-I thought the pills would kill me and I did not expect to wake up. I threw up all night and survived the attempt. The next day I called my case worker and told her I was ready to have an abortion, I didn’t feel like I had any other options.

Two weeks after her birthday and four and a half months pregnant, Paula had a saline abortion in which a saline solution is used to burn the unborn baby both inside and out. Paula delivered a dead, burnt baby. And the she carried the pain and guilt of that for years. Once she became Christian and felt God’s forgiveness, she was able to forgive herself.

But today, married with two grown children and a granddaughter, Paula wonders how many young girls and woman are suffering because of an abortion they never wanted. She wonders how many of them were abandoned by their families and friends. She wonders how many social workers who promise to help, never come through. Paula fears that so many girls are being told that abortion is their only choice and that those girl then have to live in pain and guilt. She doesn’t want anyone else to ever go through what she did.

Her request to you is that you understand that some girls don’t get to choose. It doesn’t matter what the law or the media says. Forced abortion happens right here, right now in the United States. Girls need real help and real solutions. Don’t turn a blind eye, help them. 

LifeNews Note: Nancy is a work at home mom who writes about parenting, special needs children, and the right to life. She is the lucky mother of two spirited little girls, one who has cystic fibrosis, and she spends any free moment she can find fundraising for a cure for CF. You can read her personal blog at Reprinted from Live Action News.

Girls on the Right:


Finally. Answers To Quiet Your Friends Who Scream About Aborted Baby Stem Cell Research in Order to Support Abortion

Please go to and read the testimonials of people who have had success because they were treated with ADULT STEM CELLS. Here is what the front page looks like;


Science has acknowledged that success is already being realized through Adult Stem Cell Treatments, not just research, as is the case with aborted baby stem cells. Now you have a source of evidence, not speculation, of success using ADULT STEM CELLS. Babies do NOT have to be murdered in order for this life saving/changing science to work.

Continue to pray and work for LIFE and the overturn of Roe v Wade.



She Was Totally “Pro-Choice” on Abortion, Then This Happened

by Josh Brahm | Fresno, CA | | 5/28/14 9:11 AM

Roni Cairns is a good friend of mine whom I’ve known for at least four years. She’s the reason I began exploring the use of relational apologetics to persuade pro-choice people to the pro-life position. After four years of friendship and debate, Roni is now pro-life.

Roni and I met each other in an abortion debate group on Facebook. I spent about a year participating in that group, ultimately becoming one of the admins, even though most of the participants were pro-choice. I learned a lot that year about how to (and how not to) debate online. (I’m sure I will be publishing some of what I learned in the future.)

lifenotabortionRoni was extremely pro-choice, but we genuinely liked each other from the beginning. Of all the people in that group, Roni was one of the three pro-choice people whom I was closest to, and believed most likely to one day become pro-life. Roni is an amazing reader, a good thinker and her ultimate fantasy is being a Supreme Court justice.

Roni just finished writing a series of blog posts about her conversion. There are links to all of them at the bottom of this article, but my favorite is part four, which Roni gave me permission to post in its entirety here. It’s about the night my friend Clinton Wilcox and I took Roni to dinner.

Becoming Pro-Life: Iceberg, Straight Ahead!

As I sit here and am about to share perhaps the most significant part of my shift to Pro-Life, a very special book sits next to me. It’s in nearly the same condition as I got it. The pages are still white and crisp. But the upper right corner of this softcover book is a little bent. This is because I have a terrible habit of flicking pages between my fingers as I read. Opening the book to the title page, I find myself smiling and tearing up at the five hand-written messages crammed onto the page. I can tell you the exact date I got this book and these notes were made: September 12, 2012.

Let’s back up a wee bit, though. By this point, I’d been talking to some of the greatest Pro-Life people in the history of ever, even if I didn’t realize it. I don’t even think I could list all of the great Pro-Lifers I’d talked to by this point… Josh Brahm, Clinton Wilcox, CB, JBH, FA, AL, GT, AR, LR, LHB, KDT, CDD, CD, AF, Destiny ReNae Gonzalez, IT, RMN, SMU/P, Aryn Bedrick… So many names. Now let me say here that some of these were not my friends by the aforementioned date–some I had merely spoken to. Some I severely disliked (at this time, though I considered myself “on the fence”, as far as abortion legality went, I still supported it, and was still judging many of these Pro-Lifers from what my Pro-Choice friends (typically, but not always, extremists) had told me about them).

I had started to call myself “on the fence” because I came to realize, slowly but surely, that there were many great Pro-Life points out there (and great Pro-Life people, even if I didn’t realize that my “enemies” were some of them). There were bad Pro-Choice arguments, and I’m really glad that the ones who first started pointing these out to me were not the stereotypical hateful Pro-Lifers/extremists. I don’t know what I would have done if they had been. No doubt, I would have been even more resistant to change than I already was.

I actually paid attention to the logic behind arguments. And I think that is what made a world of difference. There was still that day though, and that book. It’s not a large book, but it’s significant. For some time, by this point, I called myself “Pro-Solution” and had a page about trying to find common ground between the Pro-Life and Pro-Choice sides of abortion. I was certain it existed, and still am. However, due to the nature of the terrible people I still associated myself with, I had countless times gotten discouraged (and I will address this in the next post). I will share with you the title of the book and maybe you’ll see why just that alone is significant. But I am not going to share that with you yet. First, I want to share with you the date. September 12, 2012: The day I met Josh Brahm, Clinton Wilcox, and a few other important people.

“God loves you, Roni. Seek him all your days.”
(one of the messages on the title page)

I cannot possibly express to you how excited I was as my mother drove me, my sisters, Piper, and my husband (at the time) to Wichita. I was going to meet Josh and Clinton! I’d been talking to them online for a good year (more than that!) now and here they were in my state! AAAAH!!! I could not contain my excitement, either. I would catch myself smiling when I thought about it on my ride there. I cannot, for the life of me, remember what my family was going to go do while I hung out with Josh and Clinton (and some guy named Steve). I didn’t care then, and I don’t care today. The point of the day was to meet two really, really awesome people.

Here was the plan: I was going to be dropped off at Steve’s place where Josh and Clinton were staying, and we would hang out there for a while. Then we’d go to Olive Garden and eat. Then I’d go back home.

As we pulled into the driveway I saw Josh outside. I waited (barely) for the car to stop before I got out, jogged, and had to jump up in order to hug him–he was tall, okay? Clinton is quite a bit taller than me, too. Pretty sure I had to jump to hug him too. And I’m only 4’11”. I then introduced Josh and Clinton to my family and to my husband. I introduced them to my precious baby girl, who was a whole year and two months old at the time).

“Dear Roni,
It was a pleasure to meet you. I admire your desire to think critically and enjoyed tonight’s discussion.
Peace and joy,”
~JW (Steve’s sister)
(Another message on the title page)

I’d brought a bag of books with me, to show the books I’d been reading. I had also brought one of my favorite books, a legal text, regarding bioethics, personal autonomy, and social regulation. It was this big, bulky, brown book–one that you would see in a lawyer’s office, or one you’d have to read from in law school. I still treasure it. I think that they may have been shocked, but in retrospect, they’ve both read so many books on the abortion issue, if they did seem shocked, I wonder if it was simply to compliment me?

We talked for some time about how awesome it was to be meeting, and not just Skyping or chatting behind a screen in a debate forum. I genuinely think they were happy to see me, which is really weird because I was (and still am) a nothing. I’m not some kind of big philosopher. I’m not that smart. I’m not famous. I’m not, nor have I ever been, big in the Pro-Choice or Pro-Life movements. I’m this woman who lives in Kansas who sometimes Skypes with people and talks on the phone with others. People don’t listen to my views and think that I’m some big thinker. I don’t think I’ve influenced many with my views at all. I’m just now making more friends and just now really desiring to do something with my views (blog, talk, listen, go out there and do something).

I appreciate knowing you and enjoy our discussions. I know you’ll enjoy this book.”
~Clinton Wilcox

I’m pretty sure Steve wasn’t there in the beginning, because if I am remembering correctly, he and his sister came home after I arrived and had been talking to Josh and Clinton. Steve introduced himself, as did his sister. There was someone else with them (JM), who also introduced himself.

We all sat in the kitchen/dining area (they were in the same room), and there the real talking began. It was wonderful to be able to be heard. In most online debates, you speak all you want but your arguments are seldom heard from the opposite side, and if they are, it is mostly so that the opposing side can misconstrue them. For a long time, by that day, I had been mostly asking questions and lurking. Of course I’d debate too, but it was mostly on the pages where, again, you weren’t really heard. But here these people were, (all Pro-Life, mind you) talking to me, asking me questions, and–here’s the kicker–actually listening to me. They didn’t tell me I was wrong. They didn’t call me a murderer. They addressed what I said, asked for clarification, and they let me ask questions–answering every single one I asked. Now THIS was a discussion! Their questions were sometimes difficult to answer though.

I remember one stuck out: Someone asked me what the difference between a child immediately after birth and the fetus immediately before birth. Not just what the difference was, but what the MORAL difference was. There aren’t really that many differences anyway, physically, and I couldn’t think of a moral difference. It moved back from there. What was the moral difference between a fetus at 39 weeks to 38? 38 to 37? 37 to 36? And down and down and down.

I noticed that my knowledge of facts really didn’t have nearly as big of a part in the discussion as I would have liked then. I understand it now, but I still felt like all facts were 100% relevant and you could derive an “ought” from an “is.”

The discussion really didn’t last long, though. But it was fantastic. I wish I could see more of these, be a part of more of them. Some might say it was unfair; four Pro-Lifers to one “non-traditional Pro-Lifer” (as Josh had once called me). Four individuals to one who had been so extreme at one point. But each question opened my mind further.


If you’ve seen Titanic (and if you know me, you know Titanic references are 150% predictable and valid), perhaps you remember that the iceberg it struck seemed to come out of nowhere (despite The approximate locations of the six openings in Titanic's hull (indicated in green).the warnings), and when it struck the hull of the ship, instead of ripping straight through, it left a series of holes. That was pretty much what my conversion was like.

My Pro-Choice ship was sinking. There weren’t enough lifeboats to save everything. But it was going to take a good while for it to sink, considering its size and the small breaks in the hull. I had a ton of Pro-Choice friends, many of them hateful, and I knew that no matter how many flares I shot, many of them wouldn’t understand. The ones that managed to rescue the pieces of my Pro-Choice self (which I came to desperately cling to) were too late when they arrived. The ship was already gone.

I had mentioned that I wanted to find common ground between the two sides of abortion. Someone mentioned that Steve had written a book. He even had a copy. Better yet, he was going to give it to me. Best detail: He was going to give it to me FOR FREE. BOOYAH!

He handed the book to me. It was small (especially compared to other books I owned), but I didn’t care. I knew before I looked at it that I would treasure it. But then, I read the title and the value of the book to me rose to infinite heights:

Have you read this book yet? And why not? Order it at

And then they wanted to write in the book. I’m not sure what prompted that, but they did. The fourth message in the book read:

“To Roni–
It was a joy to meet you [and] have you in our home. You’re welcome anytime. Enjoyed seeking truth together with you!”
~Steven Wagner

I’m actually crying now as I type this. I will never be able to thank the people I met that day enough. Don’t judge me.

Clinton, Josh, and I went to eat at Olive Garden. I’d never been to one before, but I knew I liked chicken alfredo. I can’t remember what the other two ordered, but I do remember that when we got our salad, the server asked if we wanted any cheese on it, and was prepared to pour some on the salad. I refused. Clinton said yes. He got cheese. When asked if that was enough, Clinton wanted more. I respect Clinton more for loving cheese. It’s delicious.

And I swear to you that some deity made my chicken alfredo, because I was in heaven. It was so delicious.


I was dropped off at a Barnes & Noble bookstore, where my family was, after dinner. I was sad to see the day end, but I knew I would never forget it. I cherish the memories. I cherish the book. I cherish the friends i had and the friends I made. I wish I could tell Steve about this change. I wish I could thank him again–him, his sister, Clinton, Josh, and JM. I will never stop being thankful for the real discussion, the real dialogue, the listening, the understanding.

I love you, my friends. You have made me a better person, even if I didn’t realize it then.

Oh, but before I end this, I recall telling you that there were five messages on the title page. I’ve only shared four. Let me share that last one.

“To my closest pro-choice, soon to be pro-life friend Roni.”
~Josh Brahm


Read Roni’s entire conversion story here:

Meet Baby Angel, Saved From Abortion After Being Conceived in Rape

by Juda Myers | Washington, DC | | 5/28/14 10:47 AM

A mother could barely breathe finding out that she was pregnant after being raped by a family member. Conceived in rape is hard enough but conceived in incest has even more trauma. Having the rapist constantly near is a huge fear. First thoughts were abortion. Her head was spinning and couldn’t seem to find any solutions.

A sonographer from a pregnancy center called me asking if I could talk to this young woman. This mother was wanting to go to Planned Parenthood. I knew this was a matter of life and death. After listening to literally hundreds of women telling me the best thing that could have ever happened was their baby after rape and listening to 9 women tell me aborting a rape conceived baby was the worst thing to ever happen to them, I knew abortion wouldn’t be good for this young mother either. She had other children but many times women don’t realize they are mothers when they are pregnant and this baby was hers also.

babyangelThis woman would never think of hurting her other children but not holding this one in her arms made it easy to detach herself. We talked but she kept saying she wanted to abort. I begged. I cried. I gave her logical reasons not to abort but when a person is panicked logic isn’t much help. Then I offered her money not to abort.

I knew she was financially hurting and wanted to let her know that part of her worries was taken care of. SaveUnbornLife is really putting their money where their heart is and they have helped CHOICES4LIFE save babies before. More than once I’ve heard pregnant women and those who promote abortion talk about the financial aspect. But what is a human life worth? Today another young mother knows that answer. It is worth her life. Her child is her life and she now has no doubts about it.

Each time I’ve offered to help financially both during and after birth it has changed the minds of mothers carrying unplanned babies. So this mom also changed her mind. And after she no longer had that financial fear she said she was ashamed to have even considered abortion. That’s how strong the pressure is on women to abort. One thing I just cannot understand is why mothers are not considering adoption in such financial stress. There is no shame in adoption. It is heroic!

Well this young mother would never think of harming her precious Angel in anyway. She is so in love she named the baby Angel. Joy unspeakable is hers now because she chose life. CHOICES4LIFE honored her with a baby shower and even gave her a complete baby bed with sheets and bumper pads too. Mom has no regrets and is feeling great.

The other children are thrilled to have a new member of the family. This baby is loved beyond words. CHOICES4LIFE will continue to support this mom and family with love, counseling, financial help and other resources when needed as this child grows to be a wonderful part of society. We save babies but we also save moms  from the pain of abortion. She is so very grateful someone cared enough to stop her from making a horrible choice that would hurt for the rest of her life.

If you need help carrying a child to term or raising a child conceived in rape please contact us. If you’ve aborted or miscarried a baby conceived in rape we are here to help you also. We understand the value of your baby.

LifeNews Note: Juda Myers has made it her life’s mission to reach out to women victimized by rape, and to protect unborn babies conceived by rape and incest from the injustice of abortion




60 Dead Veterans left to rot in LA County Morgue for 18 months while Obama Gets Photo Op in Afghanistan

Nothing our president does comes as a surprise anymore, but when he uses our troops, still stationed in Afghanistan, for nothing more than a photo-op to deflect from his abysmal neglect of veterans here at home, it’s beyond shameful! I wonder, did he really think that we’d swallow that little bit of theater? Does he really think the American people are that stupid? Answer – Well of course he does!

There is more shocking news regarding the VA scandal coming out every single day now. But boy, howdy….didn’t he look great putting that wreath on the tomb of the Unknowns on Memorial Day? If I was one of those “low information voters,” I would almost swear that he really does care about our nation’s finest. Thank God I’m not that stupid! For the president to tell America he knew nothing about the problems within the VA is also insulting.

More disturbing news has surfaced about the neglect by the VA. This time it comes from Los Angeles County, where the dead bodies of at least 60 veterans have been left in the LA county morgue for almost a year and a half without being processed and given a burial with honors that they deserve.

This past Thursday, the LA County Coroner’s Office was asked why the bodies had not yet received a proper burial after a source indicated there may have been as many as 60 veterans at the morgue for the past year and a half. The morgue says the bodies were unclaimed and they don’t know how long the veterans were there.

The law states veterans are supposed to receive a proper burial.

The Veterans Administration says they were never notified the bodies were processed and ready to be buried. The LA County Morgue and the Veteran’s Administration were blaming each other for the mistake. I would have given almost anything to have listened to that conversation. 


dead vets 
The Obama administration’s neglect of my fellow veterans is beyond insulting. But what the heck folks, what’s one more scandal to these people? How many more times will our president act “outraged” and promise to get to the bottom of things and not do a darn thing? The White House and the DOJ have done everything they can to impede any investigations ranging from Operation Fast And Furious up to and including this latest scandal involving the Veterans Administration.

I’ll tell you what I’m grateful for; I thank God that I have a family that cares about me. I’m also grateful that my wife and I have already paid for our cemetery plot. I shudder to think what would happen to my remains if I didn’t have a family, or if I had to depend on the VA to provide me with a timely burial. Would my body be left to rot in a county morgue like those men?

If this story doesn’t make you mad as hell, then nothing will. 

I wonder, what those dead veterans in the L.A. county morgue would say to our president if they could speak? 

HeartVOTE 02

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon

State Dept. tweets link to radical Muslim cleric. When does this become treasonous?

Written by Allen West on May 27, 2014

 Last week, we reported on the Clarion Project’s detail of the Obama administration’s lies regarding their involvement with the Muslim Brotherhood.

Now, the Washington Free Beacon reveals that the State Department’s Counter Terrorism (CT) Bureau promoted on Friday a radical Muslim cleric whose organization has reportedly backed Hamas and endorsed a fatwa authorizing the murder of U.S. soldiers in Iraq.

The CT bureau on Friday tweeted out a link to the official website of Sheikh Abdallah Bin Bayyah, the vice president of the International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS), a controversial organization founded by a Muslim Brotherhood leader “who has called for the death of Jews and Americans and himself is banned from visiting the U.S.” The tweet has since been removed, but here’s how it appeared:


“…Muslim Brotherhood leader “who has called for the death of Jews and Americans ….. is banned from visiting the U.S.”

Folks, I’m sorry to keep saying this, but you just cannot make this stuff up. And I have to ask, when does it become treasonous, this aiding and abetting the enemy?

Of course it was the same Muslim cleric bin Bayyah who was granted a meeting in June 2013 in the Obama White House with top-level national security council members. He was confirmed to have met with members of Obama’s National Security Council at the White House to discuss poverty and global health efforts.

“…Muslim Brotherhood leader “who has called for the death of Jews and Americans ….. is banned from visiting the U.S.”

Bin Bayyah is reported to have been one of several clerics who endorsed a 2004 fatwa that endorsed resistance against Americans fighting in Iraq.

The CT Bureau tweet linked to a press release on Bin Bayyah’s site condemning the kidnapping of hundreds of Nigerian girls by the Boko Haram group. However, Bin Bayyah himself has been known to back controversial causes. Bin Bayyah has ‘urged the U.N. to criminalize blasphemy,’ according to reports, and spoke ‘out in favor of Hamas,’ the terror group that rules over the West Bank. The cleric also issued a fatwa in 2009 ‘barring ‘all forms of normalization’ with Israel,’ according to Fox news.

“…Muslim Brotherhood leader “who has called for the death of Jews and Americans ….. is banned from visiting the U.S.”

My question is simple, is the Obama administration so lacking in character that it will join arms with anyone? I can see no reason for the US State Department to retweet anything from a radical Islamic cleric or invite him into the White House. Am I missing something?

The Free Beacon reports that terrorism analyst Patrick Poole said the State Department must more carefully choose the Muslim leaders it promotes. Gee, ya think?

“This administration is continuing to push extremist clerics like Bin Bayyah as part of a fantasy foreign policy that somehow they are somehow a counter to al Qaeda,” Poole said. “But in Bin Bayyah’s case, it was his organization that issued the fatwa allowing for the killing of U.S. soldiers in Iraq and said it was a duty for Muslims all over the world to support the Iraqi ‘resistance’ against the United States that gave religious justification for al Qaeda’s terrorism. “And [Bin Bayyah] said nothing as his pal Qaradawi issued fatwas authorizing the use of suicide bombings and publicly defended terrorist groups like Hamas, Hezbollah and Palestinian Islamic Jihad,” Poole added. “If anything, clerics like Bin Bayyah and [Yusuf] Qaradawi have actively aided al Qaeda.”

Yusuf Qaradawi, the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood leader who founded the IUMS—where Bin Bayyah served as vice president—has been called a “theologian of terror” by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). And what percentage of the Jewish community voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012?

Oh well, if you’re Barack Hussein Obama, you can do no wrong and you’re never held accountable or responsible — and he knows that. So when does it become treason? Or it is just acceptable behavior?

Wake up AmericaTree of Liberty 03VOTE 02


The College Board’s Attack on American History

Imagine having your teenager emerge from a U.S. history course with only a vague recognition of the name “George Washington.” Suppose that course mentioned the father of our country with reference to only one speech – no discussion of his military leadership and triumphs, his personal sacrifice to accept the call to become the first President, or his wise and steady leadership during the tumultuous first years of our nation. 

To put this into perspective, imagine how South Africans would respond if an unelected agency issued a history of their country that contained just one reference to Nelson Mandela.

Beginning in August, such a course will be offered to 500,000 of America’s most talented high-school sophomores and juniors – the College Board’s new AP U.S. History Framework. The new College Board Framework will replace the traditional 5-page topical outline with a 98-page document that dictates how teachers should cover the required topics. George Washington gets one brief mention; other founders, such as Benjamin Franklin and James Madison, none. The Declaration of Independence is referred to in passing in one clause of one sentence.

Leftist Revisionist


If the Framework virtually ignores the most important men and documents in American history, what does it find worthy of attention? The answer is, pretty much anything that casts a negative light on our country. The redesigned Framework inculcates a consistently negative view of American history by highlighting oppressors and exploiters while ignoring the dreamers and innovators who built our country.

Propaganda Alert


The Framework asserts that the British-American colonies were characterized by the development of “a rigid racial hierarchy” (page 27) that was in turn derived from “a strong belief in British racial and cultural superiority” (page 29) – and teaches that much of the rest of American history was shaped by those beliefs. There is much emphasis on mistreatment of slaves and native people, but none on truly revolutionary founding principles that laid the groundwork for the freest nation on earth (consent of the governed, development of democratic institutions, religious liberty). World War II was a time of racial discrimination and other inequities, not of massive sacrifice and achievement by soldiers and civilians alike.

These omissions reflect not only a leftist slant on our history but also a general view that academic historical knowledge is unnecessary. At a conference recently held in Atlanta, Lawrence Charap, head of the College Board’s History and Social Sciences Content Development Group, told high school teachers that the new AP U.S. History course and exam will eliminate the unnecessary memorization of irrelevant facts and replace actual knowledge with “historical thinking skills.” Mr. Charap then cited America’s Lend-Lease program — which provided over $50 billion in military equipment to help our allies defeat Hitler — as an example of an irrelevant fact that should no longer be taught. Unlike the myopic Mr. Charap, Stalin recognized the Lend-Lease program’s vital contribution to the war effort when he offered this toast: “To American production, without which this war would have been lost.”

Leftist Revisionist


The College Board has a responsibility to provide a balanced curriculum that acknowledges both America’s founding principles and its continuing struggles to be faithful to these principles. Instead, the new College Board Framework seems determined to create a cynical generation of what it calls “apprentice historians” – students who “know” everything bad about their country but very little that is good.

“…students who “know” everything bad about their country but very little that is good.” JB

The redesigned Framework is best described as a curricular coup that sets a number of dangerous precedents. By providing a detailed course of study that defines, discusses, and interprets “the required knowledge of each period,” the College Board has in effect supplanted local and state curriculum by unilaterally assuming the authority to prioritize historic topics. The Framework establishes the priorities, and anything that doesn’t fit with its leftist, revisionist view of American history is either minimized or omitted.

“….. that doesn’t fit with its leftist, revisionist view of American history is either minimized or omitted.” JB

Leftist Revisionist


College Board spokespeople insist that the new Framework will allow teachers the flexibility to teach the Lend-Lease Act or any other state-mandated topic or person they wish. But the College Board’s own website confirms that the AP exam will focus exclusively on content specified in the Framework. In short, what isn’t tested won’t be taught.

“…..the AP exam will focus exclusively on content specified in the Framework. In short, what isn’t tested won’t be taught.” JB

The redesigned Framework is thoroughly biased, poorly written, ineptly outlined, and consistently negative in tone. These egregious flaws must be corrected. Teachers, parents, and school officials have a responsibility to demand that the College Board address these issues before the new school year begins. And legislatures and governors should eliminate this course from the schools.

Jane Robbins is the senior fellow of APP Education of the American Principles Project, a conservative advocacy organization based in Washington, D.C.

Larry Krieger is a retired AP U.S. History teacher from Pennsylvania.

Leftist RevisionistTree of Liberty 03VOTE 02




Future Cumulus Host Mike Rogers to Keynote Event Honoring ‘Ground Zero Imam’

Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI) has committed another blunder that may threaten his talk radio career before he even starts.

According to a Breitbart News column by Center for Security Policy President Frank Gaffney, Rogers will be the keynote speaker at an event held by The International Center for Religion and Diplomacy (ICRD), an organization with extensive ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. The dinner’s guests of honor will be Feisal Abdul Rauf—the infamous “Ground Zero Imam” who refused to describe Hamas as a terrorist organization when scrutinized over his plan to build a mosque near the remains of the World Trade Center—and his wife Daisy Khan.

Gaffney sent a letter on May 21st “laying out the ties between the ICRD and various American Muslim Brotherhood fronts and leaders,” then urging Rogers not to attend:

While there is certainly no objection to qualified Americans, of any religion, serving in U.S. policy-making positions, it appears that members of the Muslim Brotherhood, a subversive terrorist organization with intimate ties to terrorism, are using the ICRD as a venue for an ongoing influence operation to manipulate U.S. policy. Your attendance at this event would risk further legitimizing this event to the detriment of U.S. national security.

Author and leader of the American Freedom Defense Initiative Pamela Geller wrote in 2010 of the Ground Zero mosque:

There is ample support for the idea that this Islamic Center is an insult to the victims of the 9/11 attacks. Throughout Islamic history, wherever they have conquered, Muslims have converted non-Muslim houses of worship into mosques and built mosques on the holy sites of other religions. The Dome of the Rock, built on the site of the Temple in Jerusalem, the Umayyad Mosque in Damascus built over the Church of St. John the Baptist, and the Aya Sofya mosque in Istanbul, formerly the grandest church in Christendom, are three notable examples among a great many. While at Ground Zero the mosque is not being built over the site of a synagogue or church, the same pattern of conquest and supremacism is in evidence: the World Trade Center site was a symbol of American economic power; the 9/11 Mosque is a symbol of the conquest of that power.

As House Intelligence Committee Chairman, Rogers has touted his national security expertise as a selling point for his upcoming three-hour talk show with Cumulus, set to begin in January 2015 after he retires from Congress. The appearance of “legitimizing” an event linked to Islamic extremists will not sit well with conservatives in Rogers’ potential audience members.

And the ICRD speech is not the first troubling incident for Rogers. Mere weeks ago, he wrote in the pages of the New York Times that his program would be a “more productive, you-might-actually-learn-something kind of talk radio,” an obvious dig at firebrand hosts such as Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity. Less than a week later, the Associated Press profiled Rogers, saying he has “contempt for right-wing ideologues.”



Wake up AmericaVOTE 02

Obama Calls for Creating Separate, Race-Based Legal Systems in Hawaii

May 27, 2014 By

Though the election of the first biracial president could have served as a unifying force in America, the result has, seemingly, been the exact opposite. Playing one race against another, President Obama has often stepped into the middle of controversies to weigh in on racial tensions, helping widen the divide amongst races in America and has presided over a period of deepening racial divides in America.

Now, it seems, President Obama is hoping to codify into law legal segregation in Hawaii.Community Organizer Two

On Friday, a day often used by the White House to release information quietly, the Obama Administration released a proposal to change the federal rules.
The policy proposal, an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, states:
“The Secretary of the Interior is considering whether to propose an administrative rule that would facilitate the reestablishment of a government-to-government relationship with the Native Hawaiian community.”
The document claims that the goal is “to more effectively implement the special political and trust relationship that Congress has established between that [Hawaiian] community and the United States.”

“Is  President Obama saying they are Hawaiian and not Americans?” JB

 What this does is essentially create a two-tier legal system based on race in Hawaii.  

Hawaii remains a divided state with a continuation of acrimony between native Hawaiians and non-native Hawaiians. This policy would, essentially, create a codified, legal policy of segregation- a policy that would, no doubt, be defended as being a policy dedicated to “separate but equal” treatment between the races.
Critics were aghast at the proposal that seeks to implement racial separatism within the legal system.
Gail Heriot, a commissioner on the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and a law professor at the University of San Diego questioned,
“What’s to prevent creating similar groups out of say, Cajuns, or Orthodox Jews or Amish?”
“If you can do that with groups that are already part of the mainstream, you can balkanize the country,” heriot continued.
Carissa Mulder, a spokeswoman for members of the federal Commission on Civil Rights claims that the move by the Obama Administration is yet another example of the president overstepping legal boundaries in order to advance his policy agenda.
“There is no constitutional basis for conferring such status, and Congress has repeatedly refused to confer this status,” Mulder stated. “This seems to be yet another case of the Obama administration ignoring the law to achieve its policy objectives.” 
“If the reports are accurate, the Obama Administration is taking Plessy vs. Ferguson, which codified segregation, back from the brink. It would be wrong for any president in the 21st century to initiate such policy, but for the first president of color to do it is even more a moral outrage,” stated Niger Innis, a Congressional candidate in Nevada and the former national spokesman for the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE). 
The proposed policy is likely meant as a remedy to address financial allocations for native Hawaiians via the Office of Hawaiian Affairs who distribute money generated from land entrusted to native Hawaiians.
In recent years, Hawaiian groups have pushed for legislation that would create a tribal government for Hawaiians, an effort that has failed.
Though the issue is nuanced, the fact remains that our president, a man who was elected with a unifying message, has turned to racial separatism as a remedy to issues that exist between native and non-native populations. 

Has the Obama Administration made race relations worse in America? Take the Official Tea Party Poll. Click HERE!


Va. Dem. suggests killing Ted Cruz, Nikki Haley, Ann Coulter on Twitter

by Mike Dickinson Getty

May 28, 2014

tweet 01


The tweet didn’t sit too well with some, who took Dickinson to task for appearing to threaten elected officials.

“[D]ude, did you just threaten the life of a sitting US Senator?” one person asked.

“Mikey thinks he is above the law since he is ‘progressive,'” another person added.

This is the second time Dickinson has engaged in the Twitter game where players are given a list of well-known people and then asked to state whether they would have sex, marry or kill the person. In mid-May, Dickinson issued a similar tweet listing former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, conservative columnist Michelle Malkin and Elisabeth Hasselbeck.

“Picking between @GOPLeader Eric cantor & tea @DaveBratVA7th is like a (expletive deleted), Marry, Kill between @michellemalkin @ehasselbeck & @SarahPalinUSA,” he tweeted.

According to Urban Dictionary, the game “is not intended for literal thoughts,” but it’s beginning to appear that Dickinson really has fantasies of murdering conservatives, given the nature of his tweets. On Monday, for example, he issued tweets fantasizing about being part of the Civil War while calling members of the Tea Party “traitors” and “terrorists.”

In other tweets, he expressed a desire to “eradicate” the Tea Party and those who watch Fox News, while soliciting support from those who want to see him “decimate” Christians. Dickinson, however, claims his offensive tweets are simply intended to “tweak” conservatives.

“In sports it’s called you punk someone. I punk all my haters everyday. I play you for fools. You actually take time and reply lol,” he tweeted.

So says the man who once threatened an elected GOP state delegate, suggested supporters violate the law by calling police to harass members of the Tea Party and posted pictures of license plates of Tea Party members for identification and harassment. Now, he appears to be suggesting that certain elected officials be murdered.

One Twitter user summed up Dickinson’s short, hate-filled messages: “You just need attention, you’re like a dog that chews shoes, only people love dogs.”

NEVER ARGUE WITH CHILDREN: This Little Girl Zinged Her Teacher Like a Sardonic Ninja

By / 28 May 2014

Screen Shot 2014-05-28 at 8.11.27 AM

Check out how this little girl replies to her teacher’s objections in one swift move:




Krauthammer: Obama’s Afghanistan plan is ‘an act of personal narcissism’

Charles Krauthammer said Tuesday on “Special Report with Bret Baier” that President Obama’s announcement that he will send half of the United States’ residual force in Afghanistan home in 2015, and the rest of the troops by the time he leaves office, was “worse than a political act.”

“It’s kind of an act of personal narcissism,” Krauthammer, a syndicated columnist and Fox News contributor, said. “Is that how we’re now setting the strategy of the United States in a war zone, where so many have died and so much treasure and blood has been spent, so a president can leave office looking good?”

Krauthammer added that he believed Obama’s remarks were designed to play to the president’s political supporters and help Democrats in the 2016 election. But while the move might help Democrats at the polls, Krauthammer said it may not be the best thing for the country.

“The greatest success we had in the post war era, the post wars era were in Japan and Korea and Germany, where we still have troops 60, 70 years after the war,” he said.



Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


Exposed-590-LACommunity Organizer TwoComplete MessageVOTE 02



Please consider Passing this on to Everyone You Know Who Gives a Damn

Please take a few minutes to read and absorb just what this woman had to say, and then hopefully everyone will pass it to their entire mailing list, and theirs to theirs until it circles the nation!  Time is short and arrogance, stupidity and ignorance abound….

The following letter read on Glenn Beck’s show, is rapidly circulating around the country. Americans everywhere identify with this 53-year-old woman. She has given us a voice. Once you read this, you will want to forward it to all of your friends…

GLENN BECK: I got a letter from a woman in Arizona . She writes an open letter to our nation’s leadership: “I am a home grown American citizen, 53, registered Democrat all my life. Before the last presidential election I registered as a Republican because I no longer felt the Democratic Party represents my views or works to pursue issues important to me. Now I no longer feel the Republican Party represents my views or works to pursue issues important to me. The fact is I no longer feel any political party or representative in  Washington  represents my views or works to pursue the issues important to me.   Instead, we are burdened with Congressional Dukes and Duchesses who think they know better than the citizens they are supposed to represent.

There must be someone. Please tell me who you are. Please stand up and tell me that you are there and that you’re willing to fight for our Constitution as it was written. Please stand up now. You might ask yourself what my views and issues are that I would feel so horribly disenfranchised by both major political parties. What kind of nut-job am I? Well, these briefly are the views and issues for which I seek   representation: One, illegal immigration. I want you to stop coddling illegal immigrants and secure our borders. Close the underground tunnels.. Stop the violence and the trafficking in drugs and people. No amnesty, not again. Been there, done that, no resolution. P.S., I’m not a racist. This is not to be confused with legal immigration. Two, the STIMULUS bill. I want it repealed and I want no further funding supplied to it. We told you No, but you did it anyway… I want the remaining unfunded 95% repealed. Freeze, repeal. Three: Czars. I want the circumvention of our constitutional checks and balances stopped immediately. Fire the czars. No more czars. Government officials answer to the process, not to the president. Stop trampling on our Constitution, and honor it. Four, cap and trade. The debate on global warming is not over. There are many conflicting opinions and it is too soon for this radical legislation. Quit throwing our nation into politically-correct quicksand. Five, universal healthcare. I will not be rushed into another expensive decision that will burden me, my children, and grandchildren. Don’t you dare try to pass this in the middle of the night without even reading it. Slow down!  Fix only what is broken — we have the best health care system in the world — and test any new program in one or two states first. Six, growing government control. I want states rights and sovereignty  fully restored. I want less government in my life, not more. More is not better! Shrink it down. Mind your own business.  You have enough to take care of with your real [Constitutional] obligations. Why don’t you start there. Seven, ACORN. I do not want ACORN and its affiliates in charge of our 2010 census. I want them investigated. I also do not want mandatory escrow fees contributed to them every time on every real estate deal that closes — how did they pull that one off?  Stop the funding to ACORN and its affiliates pending impartial audits and investigations. I do not trust them with taking the census with our taxpayer money. I don’t trust them with any of our taxpayer money. Face up to the allegations against them and get it resolved before taxpayers get any more involved with them. If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, hello. Stop protecting your political buddies. You work for us, the people. Investigate. Eight, redistribution of wealth. No, no, no. I work for my money. It is mine. I have always worked for people with more money than I have because they gave me jobs — and that is the only redistribution of wealth that I will support. I never got a job from a poor person! Why do you want me to hate my employers? And what do you have against shareholders making a profit? Nine, charitable contributions. Although I never got a job from a poor person, I have helped many in need. Charity belongs in our local communities, where we know our needs best and can use our local talent and our local resources. Butt out, please. We want to do it ourselves. Ten, corporate bailouts. Knock it off. Every company must sink or swim like the rest of us. If there are hard times ahead, we’ll be better off just getting into it and letting the strong survive. Quick and painful. (Have you ever ripped off a Band-Aid?) We will pull together. Great things happen in America under great hardship. Give us the chance to innovate. We cannot disappoint you more than you have disappointed us. Eleven, transparency and accountability. How about it? No, really, how about it? Let’s have it. Let’s say we give the buzzwords a rest and have some straight honest talk.. Please stop trying to manipulate and appease me with clever wording.. I am not the idiot you obviously take me for. Stop sneaking around and meeting in back rooms making deals with your friends. It will only be a prelude to your criminal investigation. Stop hiding things from me. Twelve, unprecedented quick spending. Stop it now. Take a breath. Listen to the people. Slow down and get some input from nonpoliticians and experts on the subject. Stop making everything an emergency. Stop speed-reading our bills into law. I am not an activist.. I am not a community organizer. Nor am I a terrorist, a militant or a violent person. I am a parent and a grandparent.. I work. I’m busy.  I am busy, and I am tired. I thought we elected competent people to take care of the business of government so that we could work, raise our families, pay our bills, have a little recreation, complain about taxes, endure our hardships, pursue our personal goals, cut our lawn, wash our cars on the weekends and be responsible contributing members of society and teach our children to be the same all while living in the home of the free and land of the brave. I entrusted you with upholding the Constitution. I believed in the checks and balances to keep from getting far off course. What happened? You are very far off course. Do you really think I find humor in the hiring of a speed reader to unintelligently ramble all through a bill that you signed into law without knowing what it contained? I do not.

It is a mockery of the responsibility I have entrusted to you. It is a slap in the face. I am not laughing at your arrogance. Why is it that I feel as if you would not trust me to make a single decision about my own life and how I would live it but you should expect that I should trust you with the debt that you have laid on all of us and our children. We did not want the TARP bill. We said no. We would repeal it if we could. I am sure that we still cannot. There is needless urgency and recklessness in all of your recent spending of our tax dollars. From my perspective, it seems that all of you have gone insane. I also know that I am far from alone in these feelings. Do you honestly feel that your current pursuits have merit to patriotic Americans? We want it to stop. We want to put the brakes on everything that is being rushed by us and forced upon us. We want our voice back. You have forced us to put our lives on hold to straighten out the mess that you are making. We will have to give up our vacations, our time spent with our children, any relaxation time we may have had and money we cannot afford to spend on bringing our concerns to Washington .. Our president often knows all the right buzzwords like unsustainable. Well, no kidding. How many tens of thousands of dollars did the focus group cost to come up with that word? We don’t want your overpriced words. Stop treating us like we’re morons. We want all of you to stop focusing on your reelection and do the job we want done, not the job you want done or the job your party wants done. You work for us and at this rate I guarantee you not for long because we are coming. We will be heard and we will be represented.. You think we’re so busy with our lives that we will never come for you? We are the formerly silent majority, all of us who quietly work, pay taxes, obey the law, vote, save money, keep our noses to the grindstone… and we are now looking at you. You have awakened us, the patriotic freedom spirit so strong and so powerful that it had been sleeping too long. You have pushed us too far. Our numbers are great. They may surprise you. For every one of us who will be there, there will be hundreds more that could not come. Unlike you, we have their trust. We will represent them honestly, rest assured. They will be at the polls on voting day to usher you out of office.

We have cancelled vacations. We will use our last few dollars saved. We will find the representation among us and a grassroots campaign will flourish. We didn’t ask for this fight. But the gloves are coming off. We do not come in violence, but we are angry. You will represent us or you will be replaced with someone who will. There are candidates among us who will rise like a Phoenix from the ashes that you have made of our constitution. Democrat, Republican, independent, libertarian. Understand this.. We don’t care. Political parties are meaningless to us Patriotic Americans are willing to do right by us and our Constitution, and that is all that matters to us now. We are going to fire all of you who abuse power and seek more. It is not your power. It is ours and we want it back. We entrusted you with it and you abused it. You are dishonorable. You are dishonest. As Americans we are ashamed of you. You have brought shame to us. If you are not representing the wants and needs of your constituency loudly and consistently, in spite of the objections of your party, you will be fired. Did you hear? We no longer care about your political parties. You need to be loyal to us, not to them.. Because we will get you fired and they will not save you. If you do or can represent me, my issues, my views, please stand up. Make your identity known. You need to make some noise about it. Speak up. I need to know who you are. If you do not speak up, you will be herded out with the rest of the sheep and we will replace the whole damn congress if need be one by one.

We are coming. Are we coming for you? Who do you represent? What do you represent?  Listen. Because we are coming. We the people are coming.”


DHS Labels Veterans “Violent” “Extremists” Who Are “‘Disgruntled’ About the Takeover of the US.”

Posted by

As we observed Memorial Day yesterday, Barack Obama was playing his 165th round of golf. However, he did take time out of his schedule to offer lip service from Arlington National Cemetary to the veterans he despises so much. However, while he spoke eleoquently of veterans, his administration is embroiled in a scandal where the lack of care for our veterans has led to countless deaths and his continued warmongering continues to put current military personnel in harm’s way, but not for national defense. Even more sinister, if the Obama Department of Homeland Security’s claim that our veterans, “who have fought in foreign wars and are ‘disgruntled’ about the takeover of the US” are classified as “extremists” and “violent.”


US veterans of war, this is what the current Commander-in-chief and his administration, an administration heavily made up and influenced by those you have been told were your enemy (the Muslim Brotherhood), thinks of you.

You may recall the military indoctrination manual that came out, which specified evangelical Christians at the top of the list, ahead of the Muslim Brotherhood as “religious extremists.” Of course, we recall that when that was exposed, the Obama administration shuffled that off as some lone person who constructed the manual and they knew nothing about it. Now, under the direction of the Obama administration, the Defense Department, FBI, DHS and other federal agencies are scrubbing references to Islam and jihad in their counter-terrorist indoctrination. Even the terrorist linked Hamas-CAIR is flexing its Islamic supremacist muscles on the local level and intimidating local sheriffs who were intending on hosting counter terrorism training by those that believe Islam is terrorism.

What I find even more concerning in the text is what the veterans are disgruntled about: “The takeover of the US.” Veterans have seen firsthand what Islam, Communism and Socialism do. Of course, they are concerned, and for good reason.

Our veterans have fought against those who truly believe in Islam, as taught in the Qur’an and the hadiths. They have fought against the National Socialists in Germany and the Communists in Vietnam. They know about the goals of the Communist Party, which were entered into the Congressional Record years ago, and we see developing before our eyes. Now, they have to endure all of these ideologies in their House, the White House. They endure the ridicule, the embarrassment and the mockery of their service to our country by having to listen to men and women espouse the very ideology that they fought against, that took their friends’ lives, that took their limbs, and that forever haunts their memories.

Now, consider the fact that Islam is almost endorsed by the current administration as the religion of the West. In fact, Obama’s own DHS advisor Mohammed Elibiary, an Islamic imam, said,America is an Islamic Country,” and that the best antidote to terrorism is Islam! The reality is that Islam is terrorism. Elibiary believes America is an Islamic Country because Islamists believe that when an Islamist is in charge of any country, that it is Islamic, regardless of the country’s history or culture.

Our veterans have paid with life, limb, and blood in their service to the United States and yet, Muslims in foreign lands and here at home are treated with greater respect than they are. It is treasonous.

Our veterans deserve better than this. I, for one, will not stand by and let them be called “violent extremists” by those Islamic, Socialist and Communist ideologues, who are the real terrorists, without raising my voice in opposition. Will you do the same

About Tim Brown

Husband to my wife. Father of 10. Jack of All Trades. Christian and lover of liberty. Residing in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina.
HeartWar on Christians
Wake up AmericaVOTE 02

SHOCK! Obama White House Blows Cover of Top CIA Officer in Afghanistan

May 26, 2014 By 
When the Obama White House released the list of names to news organizations of senior U.S. officials participating in Obama’s visit to Afghanistan, it “mistakenly” included the name of the highest ranking CIA spy in the country, effectively putting the agent and his family potentially in extreme danger.

The Washington Post  reported the story, agreeing not to publish the name of the CIA chief at the request of the Obama regime officials who “warned that the officer and his family could be at risk if the name were published.” Both the CIA and the Obama White House refused to comment on the matter to the paper.

However, the damage is likely already done as the cat is already out of the proverbial bag, as this reporter with Roll Call  announced on Twitter Sunday evening:

According to the WAPO report, the list was “distributed to a list of more than 6,000 recipients,” making the likelihood of protecting the agent’s name very slim:

The list was circulated by e-mail to reporters who traveled to Afghanistan with Obama, and disseminated further when it was included in a “pool report,” or summary of the event meant to be shared with other news organizations, including foreign media, not taking part in the trip.

In this case, the pool report was filed by Washington Post White House bureau chief Scott Wilson. Wilson said he had copied the list from the e-mail provided by White House press officials. He sent his pool report to the press officials, who then distributed it to a list of more than 6,000 recipients.

During the George W. Bush administration, the mainstream media was in a crazed state of obsession over the so-called “outing” of Valerie Plame, who many argue (including her own supervisor) was outed by her own husband, Joe Wilson.

It will be interesting to see whether the mainstream media will hold the same level of outrage towards Obama for a much clearer case of the outright, indefensible outing of a CIA agent. 

Community Organizer TwoComplete MessageVOTE 02

“I am No Longer Shocked That A Court Report Like This is Happening in America.” JB

Christian cop loses appeal – must attend mosque

Event included discussion of Islamic beliefs, Muhammad, Mecca, prayer, Quran

Published: 4 days ago

author-image Bob Unruh

Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after nearly three decades with the Associated Press, as well as several Upper Midwest newspapers, where he covered everything from legislative battles and sports to tornadoes and homicidal survivalists. He is also a photographer whose scenic work has been used commercially.

DENVER – A panel of federal judges in Denver, in an opinion written by Judge Harris Hartz, found that it is perfectly appropriate for a police chief to order subordinates to attend an Islamic mosque where Muslims “discussed Islamic beliefs, Muhammad, Mecca, and why and how Muslims pray” in addition to encouraging officers “to buy” Islamic books and pamphlets that were for sale.

“Yes you read that correctly. ‘ORDERED’ to attend a Mosque. Why has this story NOT been all over the news?” JB

The ruling came on Thursday from the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a case brought by Capt. Paul Fields, who had been ordered by Tulsa police officials to either go to a special event at the local mosque himself, or order others to do that.

Fields refused based on religious freedom objections and was punished for that.

The judges on the 10th Circuit panel said that was perfectly appropriate.

“This ruling is troubling on so many levels,” said Robert Muise, of the American Freedom Law Center, which has pursued the case since it developed several years ago.

“We have argued throughout this case that Capt. Fields was summarily punished for simply raising and asserting a religious objection to the order mandating attendance at the Islamic event, and that such discriminatory treatment violates the First and 14th Amendments,” he said. “Yet, inexplicably, the 10th Circuit refused to address this main issue on appeal, claiming that it was not raised below.

“The court is wrong, and we intend to seek full court review of this patently erroneous decision,” he said.

The case was brought by the AFLC on behalf of Fields against Tulsa, Police Chief Chuck Jordan and Deputy Chief Daryl Webster.

The court ruling “noted that Capt. Fields’ briefs asserted that the city’s ‘reason for imposing punishment, or at least the reason for the severity of the punishment, was the religious nature of Fields’ objection to the order.’ The appellate court further noted that ‘there is evidence in the record that would support this assertion. Some statements by TPD officials suggest that at least part of the motive for punishing Fields was that he posed a religious objection to the order and refused to attend the mosque event on religious grounds.’ Yet, the court refused to address the issue on appeal, claiming ‘that it was not preserved in the district court.’ Instead, the court avoided this central issue and simply held, as did the district court, that the order ‘did not burden Fields’ religious rights because it did not require him to violate his personal religious beliefs by attending the event…,’” the AFLC said.

Find out what other plans there are for the U.S., in “Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring to Islamize America”

“It is impossible to square the court’s opinion with the briefs and the record presented on appeal. Indeed, even a cursory review of our briefing before the district court and in the appellate court makes clear the basis for Capt. Fields’ constitutional claims: he was singled out for discriminatory treatment and thus punished because he raised a religious objection to the order. That is religious discrimination, pure and simple,” the AFLC said.

The police department executives had promised they would send officers to the mosque for Muslims to talk to them about the Quran, Muhammad and their other beliefs, but were unable to find volunteers. So they issued an order making attendance mandatory.

Fields objected, telling officials, “Please consider this email my official notification to the Tulsa Police Department and the City of Tulsa that I intend not to follow this directive, nor require any of my subordinates to do so if they share similar religious convictions.”

Police officials immediately launched an internal affairs investigation which resulted in a two-week suspension for Fields, and a permanent demotion.

“When Chief Jordan was asked directly during his sworn deposition whether it was his ‘understanding that [he] could have accommodated Captain Fields’ religious objections to this event if [he] had made it voluntary for him,’ the chief responded, ‘Yeah. According to his e-mail, yes, I could have,’” the AFLC said.

Capt. Paul Fields

Even the formal disciplinary statement said, “Capt. Fields was disciplined during this rating period for refusing to attend and refusing to direct that officers attend a law enforcement appreciation day at a local mosque.”

“Which is a deliberate LIE.” JB

“The evidence is overwhelming that the city and its senior police officials wanted to make an example of Capt. Fields by harshly punishing him, a Christian, for objecting on religious grounds to an order compelling attendance at an Islamic event,” said David Yerushalmi, co-founder for the AFLC.

“Consequently, when judges can rewrite the case and the case history to fit the conclusion they seek, as the 10th Circuit has done here, due process is robbed of any meaning,” he said.

“Had a Muslim officer objected to attending a Jewish event to be held at a synagogue on a Saturday and the officer was treated like Capt. Fields, there is little doubt that the entire Tulsa Police Department chain of command would have been fired,” Yerushalmi said.

“As the 10th Circuit acknowledged in its opinion, the undisputed record evidence demonstrated that during the Islamic event, which was held on a Friday – the ‘Sabbath’ for Muslims – the Muslim hosts discussed Islamic religious beliefs; they discussed Muhammad, Mecca, why Muslims pray, how they pray, and what they say when they are praying; they showed the officers a Quran; and they showed the officers Islamic religious books and pamphlets that were for sale and encouraged the officers to purchase them. Moreover, after the event, the Islamic Society posted on its website a photograph of the police officers sitting at a table with members of the mosque with the caption, ‘Discover Islam Classes for Non-Muslims,”‘ AFLC reported.

“Obviously, Islam used these AMERICAN Police Officers as fodder for their recruiting efforts. They USED the COMMAND against American police officers. Does that anger you?” JB

The AFLC noted that Fields just prior to the religious event, “was one of the primary officers involved with helping to protect this mosque from a criminal suspect intent on doing harm.”

“His thanks for protecting Islam was disciplinary action and a demotion. ‘Thanks again Captain Fields for your exemplary service.'” JB

The Tulsa Islamic organization has featured speakers such as Imam Siraj Wahhaj, “a Shariah-adherent Muslim who promotes the destruction of Western civilization and the creation of an Islamic caliphate,” according to the lawsuit.

“Once again for emphasis; “…..who promotes the destruction of Western civilization and the creation of an Islamic caliphate,” Yes, that makes all the difference in the world. Feeling better now Captain Fields?” JB

War on ChristiansWake up AmericaVOTE 02

I Looked Up the Definition of “Coward” and Found this Article – JB

Nigerian defense chief claims abducted schoolgirls located


May 26, 2014: Nigeria’s chief of defense staff Air Marshal Alex S. Badeh, center, speaks during a demonstration calling on the government to rescue the kidnapped girls of the government secondary school in Chibok, in Abuja, Nigeria, Monday.AP


Nigeria’s defense chief is claiming that the country’s military has located nearly 300 schoolgirls abducted by Islamic extremists but cannot go in with force to free them.

Air Marshal Alex Badeh told demonstrators supporting the country’s much criticized military on Monday that Nigerian troops can save the girls, according to The Associated Press. But he added, “we can’t go and kill our girls in the name of trying to get them back.”

He spoke to thousands of demonstrators who marched to Defense Ministry headquarters in Abuja, the capital. Many were brought in on buses, indicating it was an organized event.

Asked by reporters where they had found the girls, Badeh refused to elaborate.

A senior U.S. defense official who spoke to Fox News also said that the reports cannot be independently confirmed.

“We want our girls back. I can tell you we can do it. Our military can do it. But where they are held, can we go with force?” Badeh asked the crowd.

People roared back, “No!”

“If we go with force what will happen?” he asked.

“They will die,” the demonstrators said.Really 01

Badeh said no one should criticize the military.

“Nobody should come and say the Nigerian military does not know what it is doing. We know what we are doing,” he insisted.Really 01

Nigeria’s military and government have faced national and international outrage over their failure to rescue the girls seized by Boko Haram militants from a remote northeastern school six weeks ago.

President Goodluck Jonathan was forced this month to accept international help. American planes have been searching for the girls and Britain, France, Israel and other countries have sent experts in surveillance and hostage negotiation.

Jonathan’s reluctance to accept offered help for weeks is seen as unwillingness to have outsiders looking in on what is considered a very corrupt force.Really 01

Soldiers have told The Associated Press that they are not properly paid, are dumped in dangerous bush with no supplies and that the Boko Haram extremists holding the girls are better equipped than they are.

Some soldiers have said officers enriching themselves off the defense budget have no interest in halting the five-year-old uprising that has killed thousands.

Soldiers near mutiny earlier this month fired on the car of a commanding officer come to pay his respects to the bodies of 12 soldiers who their colleagues said were unnecessarily killed by the insurgents in a night-time ambush.

The military also is accused of killing thousands of detainees held illegally in their barracks, some by shooting, some by torture and many starved to death or asphyxiated in overcrowded cells.

More than 300 teenagers were abducted from their school in the town Chibok on April 15. Police say 53 escaped on their own and 276 remain captive.

A Boko Haram video has shown some of the girls reciting Koranic verses in Arabic and two of them explaining why they had converted from Christianity to Islam in captivity. Unverified reports have indicated two may have died of snake bites, that some have been forced to marry their abductors and that some may have been carried across borders into Chad and Cameroon.

Boko Haram — the nickname means “Western education is sinful” — believes Western influences have corrupted Nigerian society and want to install an Islamic state under strict Shariah law, though the population 170 million people is divided almost equally between Christians and Muslims.

“Did that sink into your consciousness? “The population of 170 million people are EQUALLY divided between Christian and Muslims”. That is staggering. Where did the church ever get the idea that Christians are not suppose to defend themselves against war type attacks? As Jesus was facing His last hours on this earth he warned His disciples that they would need swords. That has not changed. The sixth Commandment deals with murder, not defense. David wrote how God gave him arms for war. If they are not armed, they should be. By the way, it is the MUSLIMS that have started and fueled their 10 year Civil War. Surprised?” JB

Fox News’ Jennifer Griffin and The Associated Press contributed to this report

Wake up AmericaVOTE 02




Iran demands U.S. ‘disarmament’

Official wants ‘annihilation of U.S. weapons of mass destruction’

A prominent Iranian official is demanding future discussions over international security and stability that would involve his nation also should address the disarmament of the United States and Israel.

“We urge our country’s nuclear negotiators that in addition to the talks with G5-1, to focus their efforts on full nuclear, chemical and microbial disarmament of the Zionist regime, the biggest threat to the region and world’s security, as well as the disarmament of the United States.”

“Sadly enough, I can see the Obama Administration going along with this. The audacity of that little bug Iran being so full of themselves that they believe that they can make such a demand of Israel and America tells me they actually believe that their demands are possible. That’s scary folks.” JB

The comment comes from Maj. Gen. Hossein Dehqan, the minister of defense and logistics of the armed forces, according to a report from the state-run Islamic Republic News Agency.

The defense ministry’s media department issued the statement Sunday from Dehqan in “reaction to the U.S. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel’s call for a probe on Iran’s missile program … .”

“Dehgan said that Iran’s missile capacity is defensive, conventional, deterrent and not negotiable,” the report said.Really 01

“If an issue is due to be dealt with following the nuclear deal, it is total elimination of the Zionist regime’s nuclear, chemical and microbial weapons in a bid to create a nuclear-free Middle East as well as annihilation of the U.S.’ weapons of mass destruction,” he said in the report.

That, he said, “Should be placed on agenda.”

IRNA said, “The Zionist regime should always be worried about the deterrence power of the Islamic Republic of Iran, otherwise, the occupying regime would have brought the Middle East under its control through war and bloodshed.”

Hagel recently was on a four-day visit to the Middle East where he met with defense leaders from nations with long security connections to the United States.

Voice of America reported during that trip, Hagel discussed Iran’s nuclear program, and told Israeli leaders, “I want to assure you of the United States’ commitment to ensuring Iran does not get a nuclear weapon, and that America will do what we must to live up to that commitment.”Really 01

Iranian officials long have contended their pursuit of nuclear capabilities strictly is for peaceful power production and research purposes. The suggestion was that once the issue of nuclear production is resolved, the missiles Iran has should also be discussed.

According to a report from the Pakistan Daily Times, Iran’s Fars news agency also released a related statement, calling the U.S. military’s capabilities “dreadful.”

The statement said Dehqan focused on “paragraph 6 of the Non-Proliferation Treaty alongside their negotiations with the Group 5+1 (the U.S., Russia, China, Britain and France plus Germany).”

Dehqan said he was pleased Israel – the “Zionist regime” – in concerned about Iran’s weaponry.

“Dehqan underlined that it is a shame for the U.S. which claims to be a superpower that its defense secretary announces, ‘Israelis have allowed us to find a way to exit from (the deadlock over) Iran’s nuclear issue,’” the report said.

The Daily Times said Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyed Ali Khamenei said the Western states’ demand for restricting Iran’s missile capability is foolish.

“They expect Iran to limit its missile program while they continue posing military threats against Iran, and hence, such an expectation is foolish and silly,” Khamenei said. “The IRGC Aerospace Force should precisely advance its works and plans and should not be satisfied with its status quo.”

According to a translation of another Fars agency report, Khamenei also suggested that destroying America is on the to-do list.

“DESTROYING AMERICA IS ON IRAN’S TO-DO LIST! Oh yes, we really want to negotiate with people like that.” JB

The report said his statement included, “The reason for continuation of this battle is not the warmongering of the Islamic Republic. Logic and reason command that for Iran, in order to pass through a region full of pirates, needs to arm itself and must have the capability to defend itself.

“Today’s world is full of thieves and plunderers of human honor, dignity and morality who are equipped with knowledge, wealth and power, and under the pretense of humanity easily commit crimes and betray human ideals and start wars in different parts of the world.”

The statement continued, “Battle and jihad are endless because evil and its front continue to exist. … This battle will only end when the society can get rid of the oppressors’ front with America at the head of it, which has expanded its claws on human mind, body and thought. … This requires a difficult and lengthy struggle and need for great strides.”Really 01

Recent negotiations over Iran’s nuclear pursuit have ended without results.Really 01

Barack Obama had hoped for progress on an interim agreement dated last year that allowed Iran some enrichment activity in return for relief of billions of dollars in sanctions and penalties.

Instead, the Iranian representatives recently have proposed new boundaries for the discussions, including a ban on discussion about its ballistic missile program.Really 01

Wake up AmericaVOTE 02


Video: Watch What Happens when People Goof-Off at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier

May 26, 2014 By

On this day, Americans are so often consumed with the changing season, barbeques and the luxury of a three-day weekend. We shuffle from Friday to Monday and rejoice at the freedom afforded to us from work, from school.
It’s natural to get caught up in the activities of Memorial Day weekend, but I urge every reader to please take a moment away from enjoying the changing season and offer a solemn remembrance of our fallen heroes. Ponder what it is to be an American and rejoice not only in the freedom of an extended weekend, but in the blanket of freedom in which we are all cloaked thanks to the sacrifices of America’s heroes.
On this Memorial Day, TPNN would like to wish all Americans a happy holiday and offer all who have served this country a hearty and well-deserved “Thank you!”
Please enjoy this video of a soldier who has dedicated his life to preserving the memory of those who fought and died for our freedoms. In the video, people are laughing off-screen, something that prompts the guard to set them straight.

A Bonus for your information and Patriotism;

HeartVOTE 02

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon

Defender-BenderHeartComplete MessageVOTE 02

Why America’s Military Must Be Strong

Why America’s Military Must Be Strong

Over the past century there have been periods when the American military has been dominant and periods when it has not. Renowned British historian Andrew Roberts examines the consequences of a weak America versus a strong America and what each means to the peace and prosperity of the world.

See Andrew Roberts making an introduction to the coarse here;


More at


Tree of Liberty 03Comming Soon 02VOTE 02



Wait Until You See the ‘Abortion Barbie’ Posters that Greeted Democrat Wendy Davis in Hollywood

May 25, 2014 By

Wendy Davis, the State Senator from Texas who is also the Democrat gubernatorial candidate, was partying it up with the Hollywood elite on Thursday in L.A. Those radical progressives from California who would like to help turn Texas blue paid upwards of $25,000 to the campaign of Davis for the privilege of attending a ‘soiree’ in her honor. Davis was catapulted to national fame and earned the name Abortion Barbie when she filibustered a proposed bill in Texas that would end late-term abortions. The bill would have also required doctors performing abortions to have hospital admitting privileges. Her antics proved unsuccessful and the bill became law.

Davis’s visit to L.A. was met with more than just the bright lights of the big city of glitzy Hollywood.  Twenty life-sized posters depicting Wendy Davis as “Abortion Barbie” was placed throughout Los Angeles just ahead of her fundraiser.

The posters say “Hollywood Welcomes Abortion Barbie, Wendy Davis”. The life-sized Barbie pic has Wendy Davis’ face as Barbie, a plastic baby in her belly, and a pair of scissors next to her near a baby’s head.

Since Davis stood up and fought against making abortions more safe for women and advocated strongly for the killing of the baby during even a late pregnancy stage, one would think she would proudly embrace her depiction. After all, it is simply a pictorial representation of her advocacy in support of abortion, even during the late –term. 

Of course, the Davis campaign is attempting to use the posters as a way to attack her GOP opponent Greg Abbott, despite the fact that he had nothing to do with the posters. According to Newsbusters, Kathryn Stuard, a conservative woman from Midland, Texas, paid the conservative artist “Sabo” to design and hang the posters. reports that Stuard, a 53-year old woman who made her money in the oil business, said of the posters, “It hits people with the truth. The artist is very edgy…I do support (Greg) Abbott but the campaign had nothing to do with these (posters).”

Complete MessageVOTE 02


Sedgwick County Sheriff Jeff Easter Buckles to Islamic Supremacists Hamas-CAIR

Reported by

There’s an old saying that people will only change when the pain of staying the same becomes greater than the pain of changing. When applied to cowardice in the face of Muslim Brotherhood front groups in the U.S., far too many institutions choose fear over courage. The latest example comes courtesy of a KAKE news report out of Wichita, KS. If this keeps up, the pain of staying the same will only exceed the pain of changing when there’s blood in the streets.

Sheriffs with badges are required – REQUIRED – to eschew cowardice. Yet, far too few do.

cair As has reported in the past, Guandolo made an explosive claim that CIA Director John Brennan converted to Islam while stationed in Saudi Arabia in the 1990′s. The news report above identifies this claim – as well as one about Barack Obama’s “allegiances” to Islam as being the reason why Guandolo’s training was canceled.

This begs a simple question: Why would groups like CAIR object to claims that Obama and Brennan have allegiances to Islam? Wouldn’t they be proud of such claims? Wouldn’t they like to promote such things? Wouldn’t it make their religion look good and give it more prominence?

Shame on the Sheriff. It’s obvious he’s not fit for the job he holds. As a protector of his county, courage and toughness is a requirement. Instead, he more closely resembles Barney Fife. Here is a scene from the Andy Griffith show do demonstrate what just happened in Kansas using a metaphor. Here, Fife represents the Sedgwick County Sheriff and Opie represents CAIR. Griffith represents Guandolo, who can do little more than shake his head:

pointers h/t BNI

Here is video from last year of Guandolo claiming that Brennan converted to Islam:

cia director 


Wake up AmericaVOTE 02

Triple Amputee Veteran Brian Kolfage Blasts Obama in Powerful Memorial Day Letter: You were Raised to Hate America

Reported by

Senior Airman and veteran Brian Kolfage, Jr. is the epitome of what a man who has taken his oath seriously is about. After becoming the most severely wounded Airman in US history, Kolfage fought back against the odds to regain his life, marry his bride and continue to be a voice among veterans against the tyranny we see taking place under the Obama administration. In a powerful Memorial Day letter, Kolfage took time to blast Obama writing, “Your disdain for America and her greatness has never been a secret. You were raised to hate the ‘American Empire’ and were taught that the American military is the enemy.”

Here’s Kolfage’s letter in its entirety, via his Facebook page.

President Obama,

On this Memorial Day I can’t help but think of the many veterans who have given their lives to protect the freedoms that we all enjoy today, and quite frankly one that so many Americans take for granted. As you’re playing your 165th round of golf this weekend you can count on our warriors to protect you and to protect this great nation.

From the Civil War to the wars in the deserts of the Middle East, our brave men and women have given their lives for freedoms that can only be found in America. Generations of selfless Americans have stepped up to fight for a cause greater than themselves. Freedom is never free, and the price of our freedom has been paid with the blood of our finest Americans. Your daughters have been fortunate enough to reap the freedoms that so many have sacrificed their lives for. Without these heroes you would have never have had the opportunity to become the President of this great nation.

Sadly, the men and women who have volunteered to fight the in the most extreme conditions in the world are coming back only to find themselves engaged in a new war at home. They have now found themselves in a war with your incompetent administration, who’s scandal ridden legacy has finally hit an all-time low. I can’t help but feel the deepest disgust for the pain you and your administration have caused the families who have lost their heroes battling your war against our veterans back home. I can’t think of more shameless way to for this country to dishonor its veterans. And sadly, it’s the lack of your leadership and accountability that lead to these failures.

These men and women who bravely fought in WWII, Korea, Vietnam, and the Gulf Wars have been forced to rely on your useless bureaucratic employees for their health care. These federal employees disrespected these men and women and the sacrifices they have made in the worst imaginable way. They ignored their pleas for help and in many cases left them to die in favor of hefty government bonuses for exceptional performance. We all know you and your regime doesn’t give a damn about these heroes. Your disdain for America and her greatness has never been a secret. You were raised to hate the “American Empire” and were taught that the American military is the enemy. It was easier for you to just ignore the Veteran Affairs crisis as you crisscrossed America fundraising for your fellow Democrats.

I remember candidate Obama promising to overhaul the VA and reduce the backlog. You claimed that America’s support for its veterans is obvious by the way we treat our vets. You really nailed that one didn’t you? Just like you were going to fix Detroit or fix foreign policy. Your high school like approach to solving complex issues can’t be fixed by tweeting hashtags with propaganda to people who want to kill us. Anyone with an ounce of common sense can see you’re unfit to lead our nation, let alone act as our Commander In Chief. What our country needs now, more than ever is real leadership, someone who doesn’t wait for a crisis, but is able to foresee an issue and deal with it before it happens. Unfortunately for America, you’ve been too busy campaigning and don’t have time to deal with the health care crisis of our veterans. The only thing you seem to care about is your own radical agenda, and now our vets are paying for your negligence with their lives.

On this Memorial Day, as I battle your incompetent bureaucrats my family would like to thank you for once again failing our veterans. We can’t help but wonder about the disastrous socialized medicine program that we will surely be dealing with if ObamaCare is allowed to be fully implemented. If our incompetent VA cannot handle government healthcare for a fraction of our population, who would be foolish enough to believe a massive health care system designed to provide health care for all American’s would be any different? You can’t even find someone to build a competent website to work for your socialized medicine program when you had your name attached to it, so why would you care about our veterans when you could so easily push the blame off on someone else?

You have not only failed our veterans, you have failed America in every way imaginable. You have purposely divided us by race, political parties, and socioeconomic status in order to push a radical agenda on America that can only be passed when you have successfully divided all Americans. Your entire administration is incompetent and you have set America on a path for certain failure.

So, on this Memorial Day, as we honor those who have made the ultimate sacrifice for our nation, I’d like to thank you, our Commander In Chief for not even caring enough to provide us with quality health care.

Brian Kolfage, Sra, USAF Ret

About Tim Brown

Husband to my wife. Father of 10. Jack of All Trades. Christian and lover of liberty. Residing in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina.
HeartComming Soon 02Tree of Liberty 03VOTE 02

New Jersey Attorney General: Voters Don’t Have a Right to Vote in Primaries, But They are Obligated to Pay for them

Reported by



The New Jersey Secretary of State and the New Jersey Attorney General claim that New Jersey voters do not have a right to vote in primaries, but they do have an obligation to pay for them.

A few months ago, we told you about the End Partisanship lawsuit. Here’s one of the main points we expressed then:

Across the nation, both Republicans and Democrats have closed primaries meaning that you must be a registered voter within their party to be allowed to vote in a primary.

So remember what I told you about 40% of voters being Independents and still others are registered Green Party, Libertarian party, Constitution party, Justice party, etc. That means, at least half of all voters are locked out of participating in the primary vote that ultimately decides their representatives. And yet according to Chad Peace with the Independent Voter Project, that is exactly what is happening.

My right to participate in our democracy should not be conditioned. I should not have to join a party,” Peace said.

Now you might say… tough. If you want to change that, then don’t be an Independent. Don’t be a Libertarian or Green Party member. Join the republican and democratic party and make your vote count in the primary. Glad you brought that up…

Remember the video we started with, the video that demonstrates what happened in 2012. That is exactly the problem. Over 2 million Republican primary voters attempted to do that in 2012. But state after state, the rules were changed, sometimes in the middle of a convention. And remember why? Because the Republican Party insisted it could do so, claiming that it is a private club.

That brings us to the third principle of the End Partisanship coalition. Public funds should not be used to subsidize activities of political parties that abridge a voter’s right to meaningful participation in the election process.

“They say we have the right to tell people they can’t vote in our primaries because we are private organizations,” said Peace. “So the second cause of action is very simple. If you are a private organization, start acting like one, meaning you shouldn’t be accepting taxpayer dollars and tax payers shouldn’t have to fund primaries if you aren’t going to let everybody vote in them.”

Now a motion has been filed by New Jersey Attorney General John J. Hoffman, on behalf of the Secretary of State’s office, claiming that US citizens in New Jersey do not have a right to vote in primary elections, but political parties do have a right to use taxpayer dollars to fund them.Really 01

The motion to dismiss, which was filed on May 16, 2014, claims:

  1. The End Partisanship claims of equal protection fails because the plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to participate in a primary;
  2. A closed primary system is related to the state’s legitimate interests in protecting the associational rights of political parties,

So, making the argument for the closed primary system is one thing, but what about the fact that while only half the state’s voters can participate in that system, the primaries are paid for with taxpayer subsidies.

“Whatever happened to one person one vote? The Left is always up in arms about voter oppression. A law that excludes 40% of the populace in primary elections is more like a tyrannical democracy than a Representative Republic. “Hey, Governor Christie. What do you have to say about all this? As President, would you restrict my vote? Would you nullify the vote of those that decided they don’t want to be associated with Democrats or Republicans? Hey Tea Party? What do you have to say about all this? We’re waiting!” JB

The motion continues, “The plaintiffs do not have standing to bring this claim because they only allege a generally available grievance about government, and have not suffered a concrete and particularized injury.”Really 01

So, at the end of the day, the claim is simple. The State of New Jersey says they are taking money from so many New Jersey residents that they aren’t injuring any one really, so there’s no damage to any one person. If anything, it’s just a general claim.

It remains to be seen how the judge will rule in this case, but fingers crossed, he doesn’t buy the argument that as long as a little money is taken from everyone, no one is really hurt by a system that is locking voters out of the process while forcing them to pay for it.

*transcript by Tim Brown of

Complete Messagepolice_stateVOTE 02


Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: