Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘President Trump’

Bombshell Study: Trump was Right, Noncitizens Kept Him from Winning the Popular Vote

Reported By Onan Coca | June 26, 2017

A bombshell new study seems to lend credence to President Trump’s assertion that but for noncitizens voting illegally, he would have won the popular vote as well as the Electoral College vote.

If you remember, after winning in November, President Trump was immediately attacked for having “lost” the popular vote. In response, the President pointed out that millions of non-citizens likely voted against him and swung the popular vote to Hillary Clinton. The media laughed off the suggestion and painted the President as someone who couldn’t accept the reality that he had lost the popular vote…

Except, it seems that the President has more evidence to support his opinion than the media does to support theirs.

Back in 2014, the Electoral Studies Journal conducted a study that showed that millions of non-citizen voters had cast ballots in 2008 and 2010.

From Investor’s Business Daily (IBD):

The only problem is, a study in 2014 in the online Electoral Studies Journal made a quite similar claim: In the 2008 and 2010 elections, they said, as many as 2.8 million illegal noncitizen votes were cast, “enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes and congressional elections,” said the study, authored by Jesse T. Richman and Gushan A. Chattha, both of Old Dominion University, and David C. Earnest of George Mason University.

The bombshell was this: “Noncitizen votes likely gave Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress.”

While the media ignored this study and refused to give any credence to President Trump’s assertions that non-voters had swung the popular vote away from him, they’ll find it harder to ignore the latest study, which has even more convincing evidence that Trump was right.

Libertarian leaning think tank, Just Facts, has just released their new study that relied on data from a Harvard study sampling tens of thousands of voters and the conclusions may shock you.

Again from IBD:

The findings are eye-opening. In 2008, as many as 5.7 million noncitizens voted in the election. In 2012, as many as 3.6 million voted, the study said.

In 2016, the U.S. Census Bureau estimates that there were 21.0 million adult noncitizens in the U.S., up from 19.4 million in 2008. It is therefore highly likely that millions of noncitizens cast votes in 2016.

And it was no accident. Democrats had extensive get-out-the-vote campaigns in areas heavily populated by illegal aliens.

While the data does not “prove” that President Trump would have won the popular vote had we stopped non-citizens from voting, it does provide evidence that he could be right. It also lends more weight to the debate on voter fraud, as it provides a large pool of evidence that the Democrats are wrong and that wide-spread voter fraud is occurring in our elections. We cannot protect our democratic system if we refuse to protect the sanctity of our ballot boxes. It’s time for stringent voter-ID laws to go in effect around the country.


Onan is the Editor-in-Chief at Romulus Marketing. He’s also the managing editor at, and the managing partner at Onan is a graduate of Liberty University (2003) and earned his M.Ed. at Western Governors University in 2012. Onan lives in Atlanta with his wife and their three wonderful children. You can find his writing all over the web.

Trump’s Travel Ban Reinstated by Supreme Court

Today, the Trump administration reached a partial victory.  The United States Supreme Court announced there will be a review of the lower court injunctions which are blocking the enforcement of President Trump’s executive order to temporarily stop travel from six Islamic countries.

This means the Court is allowing the ban to go into effect.

Any foreign nationals who lack any “bona fide relationship with any person or entity in the United States,” will be denied entry if they are from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.

The court, in a per curiam opinion, left the travel ban against citizens of these six Islamic countries on hold as applied to non-citizens with relationships with persons or entities in the United States:

We now turn to the preliminary injunctions barring enforcement of the §2(c) entry suspension. We grant the Government’s applications to stay the injunctions, to the extent the injunctions prevent enforcement of §2(c) with respect to foreign nationals who lack any bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States. We leave the injunctions entered by the lower courts in place with respect to respondents and those similarly situated, as specified in this opinion.

Such formal relationships include: students accepted to US universities and an employee who has accepted a job with a company in the US.

According to Breitbart: The Court wrote that the lower court injunctions, even accepting the First Amendment arguments against the order as likely to succeed, went too far

[T]he injunctions reach much further than that: They also bar enforcement of §2(c) against foreign nationals abroad who have no connection to the United States at all. The equities relied on by the lower courts do not balance the same way in that context. Denying entry to such a foreign national does not burden any American party by reason of that party’s relationship with the foreign national.

The opinion also announced the Court will consolidate the cases from the U.S. Courts of Appeal for the Ninth and Fourth circuit, Trump v. Hawaii and Trump v. International Refugee Assistance Project, respectively. Both cases found the executive unenforceable as a likely violation of the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment Establishment Clause because the lower courts held it was motivated by an attempt to disfavor Islam.

The Court had requested additional briefing from the parties in both cases earlier this month, signalling they would hear arguments on the case despite the Court going out of its regular term this week. Arguments are expected to be heard when the Court reconvenes in October. Attorney from the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Immigration Law Center are expected to face off against a government team now led by acting Solicitor General Jeffery Wall.

The government had argued in the new briefing that the injunctions had delayed the start date for the 90-day order. This would allow the ban… to remain valid despite having been issued in March.

A dissent from the per curiam decision, written by Justice Clarence Thomas and joined by Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, would have gone further and stayed the injunctions in their entirety, allowing the travel ban to go fully into effect immediately.

Will the Trump admin see a full victory in October? Time will tell, but for now we need to be thankful for this small victory.

America just took one step towards the safety of its citizens.

Dear Media: Here’s Trump’s Epic Economic Records Set In A Mere 4 Months – Is That ‘News?’

Published by | June 23, 2017

URL of the original posting site:

The Media (D) is constantly reporting on Trump’s alleged collusion with Russia — but somehow fails to mention this. It’s probably just an oversight.

Did you know…

– The Dow Jones hit a new record high on Monday? Yep. The Dow peaked at 21,535 and closed at 21,467. That was the first time it broke the 21,500 mark in its more than 100 year history.

The Dow daily closing average has risen 17% since Election Day 2016

– Since Inauguration Day, the Dow has risen by 9%

– The records continue to be broken, and it is taking very little time to do so. The first record was November 22 when it hit 19,000 for the first time, but 66 days later it moved 2,000 points above to 21,000. That’s the fastest 2,000 point run in history.

– On February 28, President Trump tied President Reagan’s record of daily growth in 1987 of most closing high days of 12 days in a row.

The US stock market gained $2 trillion in wealth since the election of President Trump

– The S&P 500 broke $20 trillion for the first time in its history

President Donald J. Trump is Making America’s Markets Great Again! So, why isn’t the Media (D) reporting on this? Because it would detract from their non-story of big, bad Russian collusion. 

The Media (D) won’t touch this ever. Why would they ruin a good, unconfirmed narrative of ‘hacking’ an election with actual, hard facts about growth and stability in the markets?

The Media (D) is made up of a bunch of wussies with a Leftist agenda. Do not be like the Media (D).

Trump Considers High Tech Border Wall, Complete With Solar Panels

Reported By Andrew West | June 22, 2017

Donald Trump may have been stymied a bit on the start date for construction of his all-too important border wall, but that hasn’t stopped the President from pushing innovation for the project.

The so-called “resistance” to President Trump has caused a bit of a traffic jam in Washington D.C., as leftists and their protégés continue to oppose and deny The Donald in every possible scenario for no other reason than his republican status.  It’s petty and childish, sure, but that has been the way that democrats have operated for years.  The only difference now is the unacceptable ferocity with which these leftist lunatics are opposing him.  Death threats, mock assassinations, shooting at congressmen…It’s enough to slow down any administration for a few months.

Trump, for what it’s worth, has not given up on his campaign promises to the American people in the face of this asinine adversity.  Instead, the President has now revealed a possible solution to finding support for his promised border wall, and, while he’s at it, a little slice of energy independence from foreign sources.

“President Trump is considering building the wall between the U.S.-Mexico border out of solar panels, according to remarks he made in Iowa Wednesday evening.

“‘We are thinking of something that’s unique. The southern border — lots of sun, lots of heat. We are thinking about building a wall as a solar wall. So it creates energy. And pays for itself,’ Trump said to cheers from the crowd at Kirkwood Community College in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.

“‘I think we can make it look beautiful too. It would really look beautiful. That would be nice,’ said Trump.

“Trump quipped that the solar installation would cost Mexico ‘much less money.’”

Trump’s proposal will certainly irk the left, as it calls into question their own opposition to the wall.

Democrats have constantly fought against the idea of large corporate anything, including the global companies that control the world’s oil supplies.  This has turned energy independence and renewable resources into a pet project of the American leftist.  In this case, however, Donald Trump is bridging a gap, across the aisle, in order to compromise.  Trump will get his border wall, protecting Americans from the peril of unchecked human traffic between the U.S. and Mexico and create a bit of energy independence for Americans.  It’s “America First” at its finest, yet it will be difficult mental gymnastics for the left to oppose the idea.

Try as they may, democrats can no longer thoughtfully oppose the border wall should the President incorporate this sort of energy-creating circumstance.  Well played, Prez.

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoons

Where’s the Beef

URL of the original posting site:

In spite of the evidence, Hillary Clinton say’s that all the scandals surrounding her are a big nothing burger.

Political Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2017.

More A.F. Branco cartoons at here.

A.F.Branco Coffee Table Book <—- Order Here!

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoons

A Beast Of Burden

URL of the original posting site:

Trump puts an end to America pulling most of the weight when it comes to Al Gore and the Paris Climate Accord.

Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2017.

More A.F. Branco Cartoons at Net Right Daily.

A.F.Branco Coffee Table Book <—- Order Here!

London’s Mayor To Trump: ‘Let Muslims In Or Risk Attacks!’ – What Do YOU Say To THAT?

Reported by | 

URL of the original posting site:

London’s Mayor — is he the ‘Voice of Reason’, or is he complicit in the UK’s slow descent to cultural suicide? The same guy who told us…

…that living with terror attacks – like the one that hit New York at the weekend – is ‘part and parcel of living in a big city’.
[…] ‘It is a reality I’m afraid that London, New York, other major cities around the world have got to be prepared for these sorts of things.
‘That means being vigilant, having a police force that is in touch with communities, it means the security services being ready, but also it means exchanging ideas and best practice.’ (Source)


… denounced [Trump’s] views on Islam as “ignorant,” suggesting Trump’s policies would increase the terrorist threat in both the U.S. and U.K.

Trump’s response?

Trump is the American President. Kahn is the mayor of London. Remind me, which has faced more attacks that involving words that rhyme with Aloha snack bar since, say, January 20th? Was it the UK, or the USA?

(Maybe this graphic will help answer that question.)

What does Kahn think accounts for that difference?

Kahn is hiding behind the fact that London is a large city.

Fact check says?


Maybe there’s a different explanation. Hey Poland, what’s accounting for YOUR lack of attacks? (‘Welcome Refugee’ types won’t want you to ask that question. Or worse yet, get the answer.)

Some ‘hard’ conversations are long overdue. Here’s one of them.

Are they ready to start facing facts? Or will MORE bodies have to hit the floor first?

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: