Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Archive for May, 2012


Have you reached the point of being tired of political types treating you like you’re stupid? I am hoping you are, and ready to get up off our apathy and start speaking up (but NOT like the ‘Occupiers’).

In the last couple of weeks I find myself screaming at the pundits, their spokesmen, and the professional pot stirrers, “Hey, I only look this way.” (For those of you needing an explanation, “I only look that stupid”, or, “I am not as stupid as I look.”). For example, there is a man running for District Attorney for the City of Los Angeles claiming that electing him will enable the children to have a fair chance. Sound familiar?

Another one is part of a campaign to raise tax dollars to fight cancer. One of the supposed doctors claim that this bill will keep 200,000 children from smoking cigarettes. And on they go making promises that sound very vague, without any detail, after the pattern of candidate Obama in 2008. Make a lot of promises, keep the promises extremely vague letting the electorate to decide in their own minds what you stand for and will carry out. That way when you fail, you just remind them that you did not make those exact promises, change the mantra, and continue campaigning.

Now you understand the primary reason for the title of this blog. I find myself constantly asking, “What did you say?” These politicians have learned that most of the electorate will NOT hold their feet to the fire about their promises. As a result, they have become so bold as to make statements and promises knowing that you won’t be challenged unless you go on O’Reilly.

Will you join me in putting these politicians’ feet to the fire by challenging them when we can? Attend the rallies. Write the letters. Share blogs like this and let us do all we can to educate the electorate around us making this November the most active in history.



I have never heard this said as simply or as well. Class war at its best.

The folks who are getting the free stuff don’t like the folks who are paying for the free stuff, because the folks who are paying for the free stuff can no longer afford to pay for both the free stuff and their own stuff.

And, the folks who are paying for the free stuff want the free stuff to stop.

And the folks who are getting the free stuff want even more free stuff on top of the free stuff they are already getting!

Now… the people who are forcing the people who pay for the free stuff have told the people who are RECEIVING the free stuff that the people who are PAYING for the free stuff are being mean, prejudiced, and racist.

So… the people who are GETTING the free stuff have been convinced they need to hate the people who are paying for the free stuff by the people who are forcing some people to pay for their free stuff and giving them the free stuff in the first place.

We have let the free stuff giving go on for so long that there are now more people getting free stuff than paying for the free stuff.

Now understand this. All great democracies have committed financial suicide somewhere between 200 and 250 years after being founded. The reason?

The voters figured out they could vote themselves money from the treasury by electing people who promised to give them money from the treasury in exchange for electing them.

The United States officially became a Republic in 1776, 236 years ago. The number of people now getting free stuff outnumbers the people paying for the free stuff. We have one chance to change that in 2012. Failure to change that spells the end of the United States as we know it.

A Nation of Sheep Breeds a Government of Wolves!


Obama: Gone!

Borders: Closed!

Language: English only

Culture: Constitution, and the Bill of Rights!

Drug Free: Mandatory Drug Screening before Welfare!

NO freebies to: Non-Citizens!


Because the President Obama Administration, along with the Democratic Party and their willing media partners, have labeled all of you as “VULTURE” Capitalist, and because they have demonized what you do, lied about how you function and dehumanized the profession as being thieves taking from the poor and giving it to the rich, I propose the following:

  • Immediately stop all work with companies you are trying to save who are in States Governed by Democrats, especially those that have joined the bandwagon to bad-mouth all of you.
  • Go immediately into States governed by conservatives who appreciate all the companies you save, and therefore, all the jobs that are associated with those companies.
  • Look into Canada. They will welcome you with open arms.
  • Look into other countries who are going bankrupt. They will appreciate all the taxes you generate when you save companies and make the prosper.
  • As you leave each Democrat State, let the government know that they can be expecting more unemployment because you are taking your own money to States that are governed by those that understand what you do, and what you have to do in certain cases to save a company the their employees. Also let them know that because you are leaving, their tax revenues will drop dramatically.
  • Let the employees of those companies you are leaving to the Democratic Government that President Obama and the entire Democratic party feels their pain as they stand in line for unemployment.

That should make everyone happy because the Democratic governance can be free of you and your “vulture capitalism”. It will give them an opportunity to lie about something else.

United States Constitution; The Presidency 101

Printed from:

Article. II.

Section. 1.

The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the same State with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like Manner chuse the President. But in chusing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; A quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse from them by Ballot the Vice President.

The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the Same shall devolve on the VicePresident, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.

The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation, which shall neither be encreased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.

Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:–“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Section. 2.

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.

Section. 3.

He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.

Section. 4.

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.


In any of what you read, did you see any part that says the President of the United States has the responsibility, or the authority, to:

  • Create jobs in America?
  • Make sure every citizen has an equal opportunity to succeed?
  • Ensure every citizen has the same success?
  • Define what success is ion America?
  • To execute judgment on free market companies that they are making too much money?
  • To declare that profit is bad?
  • To declare who is a good business person versus a bad business person?
  • To make sure all wealth is evenly distributed?

Did you read anything in the Constitution that lines up with anything President Obama has said about how he perceived the position of Presidency? This is the same man, and his vast media team, that has painted a picture of Mitt Romney;

  • As a vicious Venture Capitalist who goes about taking from the poor and giving it to his rich buddies.
  • According to Vice President Bidden Mitt Romney is “unqualified” to be President. “Mr. Vice President. How qualified was Mr. Obama before he was elected?”
  • Because he put his dog (in a kennel)on the roof of their car while on a trip.
  • Because he MIGHT have bullied someone in high school.Because their interpretation of Governor Romney’s tenure in Massachusetts was different from what the Romney Campaign is saying.

This is becoming the most ridiculous Presidential campaign in history. Let’s end the madness.


Profit is good. Loss is bad. Profit enables profitable companies to hire more employees. Profitable companies pay many taxes. The more employees on the payroll, they more Federal and States Taxes, the more Sales taxes and the more other taxes the government has hung around our necks. Profit means more other companies can hire more people and pay more taxes.

Loss means layoffs and unemployment. No taxes paid because there is no income generated. Loss makes people grumpy and some to break the law just to be able to eat. Loss does not make momma happy, and if momma is not happy, ain’t nobody happy.

Venture Capital companies take their own money, and sometimes the money of investors, and take a big risk by investing in companies that are doing good, but could do better, and struggling companies that could be profitable. They know by experience that the bigger the risk, the possibility of a greater return on that investment exists. They lose THEIR money because the risk was too great, oh well. They took the chance and it didn’t pay off. That is why more people are NOT in the Venture Capital business.

They succeed in their risk; they get a return on that investment. That is fair. They risked their own money; they should be able to enjoy the benefits of that investment. They also pay State income taxes on that profit AS WELL AS Capital Gains Taxes. Profit good. Loss is bad.

The Venture Capital Company sometimes makes changes in the company they invest in, and that can mean staff is laid off, or let go. That happens every time any company has to do to become more profitable. It’s never a person thing, but a business decision to keep the company going and most of the employees keeping their employment. It is never pleasant, and yes, it can make for some bad feelings. I have been laid off more than once. It is not fun.

When government thinks it knows how to run business better than the business people, regulators are created to make business very difficult. That can also cause people to lose their jobs.

President Obama claims he has a better way than all business people. He is so smart, and has so much experience in running multimillion-dollar business, that he says he will make everything fair. Of course, no one bothers to ask him to define “fair”, just like no one asked him to define “change you can believe in” from the last election. President Obama says he wants to make sure that everyone has a “fair shot.” Again, no one has asked him to define what he means.

President Obama says that Mitt Romney is a bad man because he closed down a steel company and took all the profits of the company for himself. The past president of that steel company says that is not true. Bain Capital, the Venture Capital Company that Mitt Romney once run, actually closed the doors of one of the five companies in that steel company in order for the other four plants could stay open and thrive (that means they made profit and those employees kept their jobs, income and benefits). Why is that bad Mr. Obama?

Let us summarize. Profit is good because it enables the business owner to hire, train and develop employees who earn an income and benefits. When companies prosper, taxes are paid. When Americans are working taxes are paid. When businesses have to shut down because they can’t afford to stay in business because the government has made it too difficult to stay in business and make a profit, employees lose their jobs, have no income and no one is paying any taxes to keep the government running.

Telling lies about your political opponent is really ugly. President Obama does not like Mitt Romney’s experience, but it is far more leadership experience than he had going into office.

Another Cultural War Alert

They are at it again. Now it is Vice President Biden saying that his parents could dream great things for their children just like a rich man. According to the Vice President and other Left Wing spokes people;

  • Conservatives hate poor people.
  • Conservatives want to make the poor, poorer and the rich, richer.
  • Conservatives want to take from what the poor have and give it to the rich.
  • Conservatives do not care about the poor and only care about the rich.

These statements are ridiculous, unless you are a “cool-aid” drinker from the Left. No person who can actually think for themselves would put any value to such crazy claims. Understanding that they are saying such things to further gin up their voting base, and “stir the pot” so that more hatred is produced, and more envy.

I am very upset that those in the media who claim to be fair and balanced would ask a couple of very important follow-up questions:

  • “Mr. Biden. When you talk about the rich, what rich people are you talking about?
    • How about the Wall Street tycoons who gave you money in 2008 helping get you and President Obama elected?
    • How about professional athletes?
    • How about Hollywood?
    • How about all the Democrat Senators and Congress People who are millionaires and constantly vote themselves exclusions from the tax laws the rest of America is supposed to abide by?
    • How about all the foreign investors that give to the Super Packs?”

Who are the rich people the Left is demonizing? I would like to see one interviewer have the courage to actually ask that question and not let them go until they answer.

Have you also noticed that President Obama has done a great job NOT creating new wealthy people, except of course those contractors The President’s head of the GSA have awarded.

Do they really want riots in the street? Do they really want to create such hatred for 30% of our population who are actually employing those the Left are ginning up to hate? The Left has been very successful at creating their primary voting base; the 50% of Americans and illegals, who never pay any Federal Income Tax. According to the Left, the rest of us want to take away what they have and give it to ourselves.

No, I do not want anything they have. Instead, I support the following ideas;

  • All those that are on any form of Welfare immediate become employees of the State they live in. Take what they get in benefits divide by Minimum Wage. They owe those hours to the State.
  • Put them to work cleaning up the graffiti, clearing sewage lines, cutting firebreaks in the hills and mountains, keeping skid row clean, clean along the rail road tracks and all the other jobs that are not getting done now.
  • Treat them like any State employee. Screw up, and you are fired. No more freebies.

Let me know what you think.


Professional Pot Stirrers (those people they claim to be a spokesperson for) succeed because they keep their “victims” focused on the wrongs of the past. Any psychologist will tell you that mental and emotional health is derived from not focusing on the past but looking toward to the future. Letting go of the past is the primary way of going forward in life.

These Professional Pot Stirrers keep their assumed followers focused on the wrongs done to them in the past. The natural anger associated with such memories get stronger and stronger which makes these people less productive and more dependent on the assumed leader (The Professional Pot Stirrer). The final result is the original goal of the Professional Pot Stirrer; Create so much anger and hatred that the people get violent. Death, disaster and chaos are the only result.

The Political Left is a master at creating Bills that are aimed at “Hate Crimes”, “Hate Speech”, and “Special Rights for Minorities”. These bills are designed to stir the pot, separate the citizenry more and more, while pitting them against each other. Their Bills are written in such a way that any disagreement with the Bill labels you as a person of hate and out of touch with suffering people. Your disagreement is also labeled as hate speech, and you are castigated as a bigot.

If we do not stop this now, we will have laws like Canada that will imprison you if you so much as speak in public your disagreement with a group (like several Pastors have learned in Canada for speaking out against homosexuality. Just using that word in Canada will land you in jail under hate speech).

We cannot wait any longer. Every election in all levels of government across America is more critical than ever before. We must encourage conservatives to get out and vote, while spending time with the Independents helping them to see the truth. Prayer works, however, God also want us to put “legs” to our prayers and go out in His strength, love and righteousness.



The Left is adding more fuel to the fire of the Class War they created. Once again they are going after wealthy people, describing them as oppressors and evil people who do not want anyone else to succeed and want to keep the poverty-stricken in poverty.

Of course, they are concentrating on Conservative wealthy people, not those of the Left. They are focusing on Mitt Romney and those wealthy people who are contributing to his campaign. Of course, there is no mention of the super wealthy on the Left; George Soros, John Kerry (married into wealth), John Edwards (made his wealth off of bilking millions of dollars out of insurance companies using junk science) and most of the politicians in Congress and The Senate.

According to the latest attack on Mitt Romney regards a steel company that went bankrupt. The facts are that Mitt was not with Bain Capital when that happened. Even so, no one is discussing the difference between a “business decision” and decision all people make every day.

Business executives of all kinds make “Business decisions” every day across America that has a negative effect on their employees. That is the nature of “business decisions”. They have to be made without the emotions of people relationships to save the business and make sure employment for those unaffected by the “business decisions”. I have known some executives to have breakdowns after making such decision because they know how it has affected the employees. However, in order for the business to remain solvent, and the bulk of the employees have a job; those “business decisions still have to be made.

I agree with the notion that the business playing field is not level. Some in business are there because they were born into the business. Others have learned how to play the “office politics game” so well that they get what they really do not deserve. That still is no excuse to work hard and smart, gather as much knowledge as possible, learn from every one’s mistakes, and then use that to move yourself up the ladder, either in that company, someone else’s, or your own. It can be done because it has been done multiple, multiple times.

You can stay the baby bird with its mouth opened saying, “gimme, gimme, gimme.” Don’t blame anyone else because you made that decision.

President Obama and the “View”

I have waited several hours after watching President Obama on the View this morning to see if anyone else picked up on President Obama’s choice of words in a direct answer to one of Barbara Walters questions. Evidently I am to only one who thinks his answer and choice of words was important.

Many have defined President Obama as a Socialist. Naturally the Political Left won’t stand for that and they fire back various responses in an attempt to disqualify who ever made the observation. Typical of the Left is their dehumanizing vocabulary hat is designed to demean, belittle and marginalize anyone who disagrees with them.

This morning Barbara Walters asked President Obama what he would like to accomplish in the next five years assuming he wins reelection. His answer, and choice of words (highlighted) are worth discussing. He said, “Whether I win or not, what I want to accomplish in the next five years to RECREATE America where everyone has the same opportunity to work hard and enjoy success.” In other interviews he said the same thing using terms like, “same opportunity to succeed”, or if you work hard you can succeed.”

If any conservative used the word, “RECREATE”, that person would be castigated for being highly arrogant with a huge ego and a false sense of reality. The Ladies on the View swooned over the President and no one asked him to explain his statement. However, any study of Socialist and Socialism will inform you that their philosophy is just that; recreate the nation into what they want it to be and ignore the founding father’s intentions. This statement is a revelation of what President Obama is thinking and is determined to do.

Notice he said he is determined to do this even if he is not reelected. What kind of power structure would he have to have in order to accomplish that task? Has our country become so transformed from its original design that an individual could have around him an organization so large and powerful, that it could do what it wanted without much of a fight from the populace? That is a scary question.

Someone once said that absolute power corrupts absolutely. Is that where we are at in America today?

America has always been a place where people can work hard and enjoy the fruits of their labor. The Left has this idea that every worker should have the same outcome financially. Once again, that is Socialism.

Testimonies abound of people accomplishing great and wonderful things during times of hardship. Those opportunities have always been there provided government does not stand in the way of allowing people to use their imaginations and ingenuity to create ways to earn income and prosper. Where the Left goes wrong is their perspective that all efforts should have the same results. Life itself tells you that is not reasonable.

Over fifty years ago, someone wrote that the graveyards were full of people who worked hard all their lives, yet died broke. Hard work in and of itself is no guarantee of financial independence. When I was in the corporate world I would constantly remind salespeople that hard work was not the answer; smart work is what generally produces success. A sales person that runs all over the area with no plan is one that gets very little done. Their tired, yet accomplished little or nothing. That same sales person who develops a smart plan that takes the most advantage of time and space is the one who consistently produces wealth.

I have read several studies of economist who teach at the college level. The claim is this: Take all the wealth of the United States and evenly distribute that to every person 18 years of age and older. It is estimated that within 10 years this would be the results;

  • The people, who had earned the wealth, including those who built the businesses that employed the people, will have earned it again, and rebuilt the businesses.
  • The people who were the employees would be broke, and seeking employment.
  • Those that were on welfare would also be broke and back on welfare and still claiming that those that had the money were bad people who wanted them poor and oppressed.
  • Equal opportunity is no guarantee of equal outcomes.
  • Those that learn how to build wealth, develop the disciplines necessary to build a business, will work hard, and smart are the ones that will ultimately find success.

Failure happened to all of us. Testimonies abound of people failing multiple times before they finally developed the success that set out to achieve. They refused to give up, and they ultimately succeeded. Yes, some were helped along the way. YES, others who got the same help did not succeed and ended up bankrupt. That is just the way it works. No one is guaranteed success at anything, except poverty.

Life guarantees success to no one. Those that discipline themselves to learn, work and maintain patience as they work hard are the ones who enjoy the wealth THEY WORKED HARD TO EARN. The Occupiers have said in interviews that they want the success without having to earn it. John Stossel of FOX was talking with a young man (Occupier) who claimed to be a college graduate, who looked for work and could not find any. John Stossel promised to find him a job, if he would accept it. The young man said no, unless it paid $85,000 or more a year. Enough said?

If you have been silent so far, get of your collected buts and get busy helping others to see past the camouflage of the political Left.


I graduated high school in 1965. I was in the Marine Corps Oct 1, 1966. Viet Nam March of ’67 to April ’68. I missed much of the demonstrations going on as we were being shot at. Yet I still heard much of the rhetoric of the time and one phrase stands out from all the rest, “I’m tired of Christians shoving their religion down my throat”. Sometimes they would use the word “morals”. Have you ever heard anyone use a phrase like that?

Apparently those times have been lost on a certain group of people. Over the years they have grown bolder and bolder with their demonstrations, political activism and parades. They are a people who chose and lifestyle that all cultures have rejected as unwholesome and wrong. Some cultures have gone so far as to execute anyone who chooses this lifestyle and practices the same. As a result they have used every platform imaginable to “shove” their message, and lifestyle down all our throats, and shamed governments into giving them special rights, even those that will label this writing as “hate speech.” According to them, anything you say against them is “hate speech.”

In more recent years this group of people (about 1% of the population) have cried, screamed and hollered to force everyone else to accept their relationships as the same as one man and one woman marriage. Now the political Left is using this as another divisive weapon to further set citizens against each other. They are promoting discord, not peace.

Lets strip away the façade and have an honest discussion. First of all the chosen lifestyle is homosexual not “gay”. It is still a term in dictionaries, encyclopedias and medical books. It is unacceptable to allow any group of people to hijack acceptable English words and transforming them into a definition of their own just because they hate the word that describes them. “Gay” means happy; light-hearted. That describes most people I know. Non of the have chosen the homosexual lifestyle. Misusing the English language is one of the reasons our nations literacy is declining in record forces. If you have to change the English language in order to get others to accept you, then you have a serious problem with that chosen lifestyle. There are too many groups of people who have worked so hard at rewriting our language in an attempt to make people accept them, or to create their own version of the English language (i.e., “Street Language”).

Second, forcing their chosen lifestyle down the throats of the rest of the people is the exact act they have always complained about. Someone will label this article as hate speech, only because I have used the word homosexual. This word is in every dictionary, encyclopedias and medical books. This small group of people has used multiple forces to eradicate this word from society. As a result, other groups have started using this same “playbook” to get their group of people the same acceptance. Have you ever heard of Muslims and their Sharia Law?

I am one citizen who is tired and being forced to be tolerant. Throughout my business experience, as well as many other venues of my life, I worked with many people who I knew to be homosexual. I fact, one of those people was one of my best friends. He never made it an issue, and neither did I. When he was very sick and dying, he asked me to pray for him and I was honored to oblige. To this day I miss him.

I don’t hate people. I learned a long time ago to separate people from what they do. I can love any person while hating what they do. Anyone can change what they do without changing who they are. I learned this primarily through God’s Word, the Bible and my relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ. I have many times loved addicts of all description, while hating their addictions. People are to be loved and respected. Just because I hate their life choices does not mean I hate them.

If you’re honest enough, you will agree that you practice the same conduct. Your children can do things you do not like, or might even hate, but you still love them. Love doesn’t change (or shouldn’t), conduct can, and does. This myopic view of judging people by their conduct is not of God, but has its roots in cultural origins. It has to be taught, because no one is born with such attitudes.

Stop forcing me to accept something I know to be wrong. You chose a lifestyle, and then you have chosen the results of that lifestyle. I agree that any form of prejudice is wrong. So, stop your prejudice toward me because I do not choose to accept your choices. Stop labeling me with your pseudo political correctness. Stop making me accept your relationships as equal to what I know to be God’s perfect will for marriage. One man, one woman.

The Subject is Rich

You don’t have to be a news junkie to have heard the constant banter of the Political Left about how Mitt Romney is rich. They talk about it as if his wealth is equal to a plague. They are careful to use words that make you think that Mitt Romney’s wealth is dirty, and oppressive. Odd, it seems that the Left bring this up every time the subject of President Obama’s record is discussed. It also seems to come up every time the economy is discussed. Listening to the Left, you get the idea that Mitt Romney’s wealth, and how he accumulated it, was somehow from dubious means or illegal.

Looking back a few years, is there anyone who can remember such comments about John Kerry and his Vice President choice, John Edwards. Kerry’s billions came with his wife as he married into wealth. John Edwards accumulated his wealth using junk science to bilk millions out of insurance companies. Their wealth was certainly questionable. Mitt Romney’s was earned.

Once again we have the double talk of the political Left. Once again they tried the magician’s trick of misdirection and mirrors to get the populace looking away from the real subjects. Hopefully this time there will be enough of us to help strip the camouflage off the Left so the American People can see them for what they are.

The Tail is Wagging the Dog Again

 Remember during the Monica Lewinsky sagas, President Clinton decided to start a war to distract the populace. This has been a typical ploy by the Left to distract from the real topics and get the world talking about something else. Repeatedly the Left does this so they can control the national conversation. 

Now we have Vice President Bidden and other White House people going on the talk shows talking about same-sex marriage. All of a sudden, the topic of conversation has shifted from the economy and joblessness to same-sex marriage. Do you really care what President Obama has to say about the subject? 

This morning on the Meygn Kelly’s broadcast on FOX was a Left Wing strategist who made a very interesting comment as the segment ended. According to her, The Political Left intends to overturn the will of the people (30 States now have a law stating that marriage is between one man and one woman). Typical of the Left, when they do not get their way, they go to their partners in the courts to overturn the will of the people under the guise of protecting the minority from the majority. 

I am one voter who is fed up with exercising my voting rights to have them overturned by a Socialist System of élite Left Wing Politicians and their willing Judicial Partners. That is the reason you are hearing so many people express their frustration with voting saying they are not going to bother to vote again when the Left can get their way no matter what. Based on that (at least in California) we are no longer a Country governed by a Representative Republic, but instead we are a pseudo Socialist state. 

I am not giving up. As God as my witness I will keep up the fight for freedom and defend the constitution. How about you?

More Nanny State???????

Once again the Nanny State wants more control. Surprise, surprise. Nanny thinks we are all too fat and they need to step in and do something like taking over control of the fast food industry. Really? That’s all it takes. Nanny spanking a free market industry will make us all lose the weight. Really?

Let’s make sure we understand what Nanny has done so far for our well-being;

  • Attacked and nearly wiped out the tobacco industry.
  • Took over Wall Street Banks to “save” them.
  • Took over the banking industry so they “wouldn’t go under”.
  • Pick and choose what industries need billions of dollars of tax payer money to help them succeed.
  • Took over the American automobile manufacturing industry and gave them to their political hit squad, the unions.
  • Took over health care, 1/6th of the American economy.
  • Other areas we have not found out about.

I am morbidly fat. For 16 years I was an active soccer referee. For 12 of those years I got paid for my services. I had to take time off because I dislocated my right hip. During that time arthritis built up rapidly, and I was not able to go back. As an active referee, I was in very good shape. Without the exercise, I packed on the wait, speared on by a very deep depression.

I know what to eat. I know how much. I know the amount of exercise I need, yet an arthritic body makes that difficult. I certainly do not need Nanny doing anything to respectable businesses because Jerry Broussard has a morbid weight problem. Nanny needs to go away and leave freedom loving people alone.

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: