Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘blm’

Today’s TWO Politically INCORRECT Cartoons by A.F Branco


Resist The Marxist Cultural Revolution

Resist the Black Lives Matter Organization and Antifa the Marxist Cultural Revolution poster meme. Based on the 2009 painting by A.F. Branco ©2020.

Resist the Marxist BLM and Antifa groups

A.F. Branco Cartoon – The Bush League

A group of G.W. Bush appointees has vowed to vote for Joe Biden proving they were never really conservative.

Bush Appointees for BidenPolitical cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2020.
Donations/Tips accepted and appreciated –  $1.00 –  $25.00 – $50.00 – $100 –  it all helps to fund this website and keep the cartoons coming. Also Venmo @AFBranco – THANK YOU!…

A.F. Branco has taken his two greatest passions, (art and politics) and translated them into the cartoons that have been popular all over the country, in various news outlets including “Fox News”, MSNBC, CBS, ABC and “The Washington Post.” He has been recognized by such personalities as Dinesh D’Souza, James Woods, Sarah Palin, Larry Elder, Lars Larson, Rush Limbaugh, and has had his toons tweeted by President Trump.

My Own Two Cents


ARE CERTAIN MOVIES OF THE PAST ACTUAL PROPHECIES?

July 9, 2020

I was setting here watching Tucker Carlson, and a recurring thought came to mind. A series of movies to be as specific as I dare, because just thinking about these movies might be enough for the “thought police” to have me ______.

Tucker was talking about an article I published today about some “special training” the city of Seattle made mandatory their “WHITE” employees had to participate in. One of the takeaways was the mandatory apology for being born “WHITE”.

See, there goes those thoughts of movies again.

Of all the unrest that has been growing and brewing over the last 30 years, this present craziness appears to be the most dangerous. The drums of civil war have been growing louder for 30 years or more. As Leftist of all kinds press their divisiveness politics, and some of those groups actually forming plans of creating civil war (ANTIFA is the latest), anger, malice and unreasonable expectations have risen in alarming proportions.

Now Black Lives Matter, and their submissive white supporters, are pushing for “re-education” classes, school curriculum for grades 1-12, and adult required seminars put on by their employers and making them a requirement for employment.

Tonight, Tucker made a really great point: I the news came out that such demands were made about black people, the entire world would rip it apart, and rightly so. I would help lead the way. But because the focus is on people born Caucasian, it is perfectly okay to attack, dehumanize, insult, demean, et al. Add to that anyone who opposes BLM’s Marxist agenda is called racist and every effort is made to destroy that person, their employment, family and anyone associated with them. As a result, the drums of civil war grow louder, the heated rhetoric increases exponentially, and all attempts for civil discourse diminishes.

Please explain to me how any of that is fair?

Free Speech is no longer free. As I have said since 1980, Free Speech is defined by the leftist as speech that agrees with them 100% of the time. All other speech is forbidden. THAT’S SOCILAISM/COMMUNISM.

Another thing has to do with all the guns BLM has been carrying, and using, with all the “GUN CONTROL” lefties remaining silent. Two black teens get killed in Seattle’s CHOP, and the leftist said, (crickets). White on Black killing yield unrelenting press coverage. Black on Black killing, (crickets).

Has it gone too far for peace and civil discourse?

Are the hate mongers winning their propaganda war?

How many real Americans are ready to withstand the onslaught of growing discord, hatred, and “re-education camps”?

Given the number of guns owned today, how destructive would an all-out civil war be?

Other than the Lord Jesus Christ, is God raising up leadership that can lead us out of impending destruction? (Don’t count on the spineless Republicans)

I’m certainly not smart enough for the answers. My foundational beliefs are that God can stop this with a genuine revival. I pray He does.

Jerry Broussard

WhatDidYouSay.org

Utah Driver Shot by Antifa Terrorist as He Tries to Flee Swarming Black Lives Matter Mob (Video)


Reported By Kristinn Taylor | Published June 30, 2020 at 1:36pm

A man in Provo, Utah was shot by an Antifa terrorist Monday night as he tried to escape a Black Lives Matter protest mob that had taken over an intersection and swarmed his vehicle. The driver reportedly received a non-life threatening wound.

Video taken of the shooting appears to show a masked white man firing at the driver from the passenger side of a white SUV as the driver is trying to drive thorough a mob that is blocking and surrounding the vehicle. At least two gunshots can be heard on the video.

KLS-TV clip:

Raw video and enhanced close-up taken by KSL-TV and reposted below shows a masked Antifa terrorist raising a handgun and firing into the SUV.

Screen images from the enhanced zoom video by KSL-TV shows the shooter in a green hat and facemask and the muzzle flash as he fired at the driver:

The Salt Lake Tribune reported the driver is in his 60s and that his wound from being shot is not life-threatening.

…The man, whose wounds were not life-threatening, drove himself to Utah Valley Hospital, according to police.

A group protesting police brutality had gathered at the intersection of University Avenue and Center Street on Monday evening, according to Lt. Brian Taylor of the Provo Police Department, and a second group arrived to express their support for police. Protesters were in the street, blocking cars, when a large, white SUV heading south on University Avenue pushed its way through a crowd of protesters, knocking several of them aside.

In a video circulating on social media, the SUV can be seen pushing protesters out of the way as it moves forward, and a loud pop can be heard. According to Taylor, the driver of the SUV — a man in his 60s — was shot…

Police are trying to ID the shooter.

My Own Two Cents


You’d have to have been living in a cave somewhere in Tujunga a to not know about the activities of the Democrats Party, and it’s more radical members. Recent history has found them screaming about the Rebel Battle Flag, while simultaneously, the Clinton’s using that flag in their political campaigns. Remember all the flap that occurred several years ago about taking down that flag?

Since the Dems found out the power they had over black people when using such rhetoric got more votes, they expanded their bile with throwing around lies about “Jim Crow Laws”, the KKK and other related elements of racial bigotry past. All the while inferring that the Republican/Conservatives where the ones behind that past, and desire to reinstate.

Now they have added statuary to their focused riots and demands. Claiming racism, they want everything that represents racism past, even the slightest, they are demanding it all be removed.

Those of you who have followed this site for a while know that I have commented on this movement, identifying it’s culprits. With the inflamed riots several thoughts have come to me, especially knowing that according to PEW Research, about 20% of the rioters are back and Hispanic; the rest WHITE, and predominantly democrat see: https://whatdidyousay.org/2020/06/29/race-stats-for-protesters-finally-come-out-destroy-leftist-narrative/.

So, what is behind all this?

Could it be that the Left is working feverishly to erase their history? All the slave owners of the South were DEMOCRATS. They wanted Lincoln dead. When President Lincoln signed the “Emancipation Proclamation”, these same DEMOCRATS formed the KKK as a rebellious response to the “Emancipation Proclamation”.

Who was Jim Crow? A DEMOCRAT in the South. Who fought all efforts for racial equality and freedom? DEMOCRATS. Who fought for the Black People? THE REPUBLICAN PARTY WHICH WAS FORMED TO SUPPORT PRESIDENT LINCOLN’S DETERMINATION TO FREE THE SLAVES.

By the way, who formed the NAACP? ALL REPUBLICANS TO ASSIST BLACK AMERICANS TO COMPLETE THEIR FREEDOM AND SHARE IN THE AMERICAN DREAM.

I come back to my question. Are the Leftist trying desperately to erase their history and rewrite it in the fiction they have been pushing all these years?

  • Remove the Rebel Battle Flag; Designed by, made by and erected by DEMOCRATS.
  • Sell a fictitious story as history in an attempt to erase the TRUE history of the DEMOCRAT PARTY.
  • Remove all other symbols of the racist DEMOCRATS PAST: Statues of DEMOCRAT SLAVE OWNERS and CIVIL WAR LEADERS. Of course, erected by the SAME DEMOCRATS.
  • Demand everyone in today’s society who never owned slaves nor supported slavery, to pay reparations to those descendants of Black slaves.
  • Cast all blame on anyone who disagrees with their thoughts, demands, rhetoric, hyperbole and spewed hatred.

Is it safe to conclude that any credibility offered such demands and efforts would be to reward their carefully planned deceptions?

Just asking.

A (an actual city in Southern California – many caves)

Black Lives Matter Leader: ‘If This Country Doesn’t Give Us What We Want, Then We Will Burn Down This System’ (VIDEO)


Reported By Cristina Laila | Published June 24, 2020 at 11:26pm

Black Lives Matter greater New York Chair Hawk Newsome issued what many have interpreted as a terroristic threat during his appearance on Fox News Wednesday evening. Mr. Newsome told Fox News host Martha MacCallum that if Black Lives Matter doesn’t get what they want, they will burn the system down.

“If this country doesn’t give us what we want, then we will burn down this system and replace it.. I could be speaking figuratively. I could be speaking literally. It’s a matter of interpretation.” said Newsome.

WATCH:

Senior legal advisor to Trump’s team Jenna Ellis said in response to Newsome’s remarks, “Newsflash: The United States doesn’t negotiate with violent terrorists.”

We already knew Black Lives Matter are radical neo-Marxists and the co-founder confirmed it during an interview last week. Patrisse Cullors, the co-founder of Black Lives Matter proudly admitted she’s a radical, anti-white Marxist. Black Lives Matter is seeking to transform America by;

  • defunding the police,

  • dismantling capitalism, ‘

  • destroying the patriarchy,’

  • breaking down the nuclear family unit,

  • emptying prisons,

  • redistributing wealth in the form of reparations among other far left objectives.

Black Lives Matter and Antifa rioters have destroyed small businesses, targeted churches and razed buildings to the ground. Tonight one of the leaders of BLM openly threatened to burn down the system if his people don’t get what they want.

Where is the FBI and DOJ??

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Left-Wing Cultural Criminals Announce Plans to Destroy Statue of Abraham Lincoln on Thursday


Reported by   | June 24, 2020

The Emancipation Memorial was constructed in 1876 in Washington D.C in Lincoln Park, about a mile east of the United States Capitol. The statue features Abraham Lincoln in the act of freeing a slave from his chains, visualizing the legacy of the President whose legacy consists of abolishing the abhorrent tradition of slavery in America.

Thursday, 7PM… We tearing this m*********** down.” Crowd of fanatic liberal historical ignoramuses cheers with glee.

In a twist attesting to the leftist thug’s monumental ignorance, it’s known that the iconic statue of President Lincoln was constructed with funds raised by freed slaves, many of whom were Black Union Army Civil War veterans.

Although the cultural criminal speaking has a dubious chance of succeeding in the monument destruction, there are elements of Washington D.C’s government that want the statue gone and possess a chance to eliminate it. City Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton has announced her intention to see the Lincoln statue moved to a museum, claiming that its design is offensive and that it has no place in modern-day public society.

When the Left openly flouts its intention to deface a statue memorializing the President thought by many to be even greater in the progress of American society than George Washington, it’s lost any claim to a genuine and authentic American political movement.

Black Lives Matter Co-Founder Confirms That Violent Mob Movement is Run by ‘Trained Marxists’


Reported by    | June 22, 2020

Patrisse Cullors, a woman who is credited as the co-founder of Black Lives Matter (BLM), confirmed during a recent appearance with The Real News that the movement was conceived by “trained Marxists” pushing an agenda of communist revolution.

“We actually do have an ideological frame. Myself and [BLM co-founder Alicia Garza] in particular are trained organizers. We are trained Marxists,” Cullors said.

“We are super versed on all sorts of ideological theories, and I think that what we really try to do is build a movement that could be utilized by many, many black folk,” she added.

The video of Cullors bragging about her Marxist roots can be seen here:

BLM’s own website contains a great deal of Marxist language and is littered with buzzwords commonly used by practitioners of the godless, anti-American ideology. They maintain that their movement is focused “on issues concerning racial injustice, police brutality, criminal justice reform, Black immigration, economic injustice, LGBTQIA+ and human rights, environmental injustice, access to healthcare, access to quality education, and voting rights and suppression.”

The terror group has even received pointers from the Nelson Mandela Foundation, named after the terrorist and communist pawn who seized control over South Africa, on how to commit violence to achieve their revolutionary ends:

The Nelson Mandela Foundation issued an urgent bulletin to Black Lives Matter (BLM) activists, giving the anti-American terror group some pointers on how to achieve their racial supremacist goals through violence.

“Protests in response to the deaths of Black people at the hands of police or military – George Floyd in the United States, Collins Khosa in South Africa, Adama Traore in France – speak to a growing rage across the globe at continued white supremacy and the use of state violence to support it. As the case of South Africa demonstrates, such violence is to be found even in countries where Black people hold the levers of government and of the state more broadly,” the NMF wrote in their plea to BLM.

Of course, in actuality, it is the black majority that is inflicting genocidal levels of violence against the white minority in South Africa. Ever since Mandela “liberated” South Africa, the country has become the rape and murder capital of the world, and is set to become as much of a disaster as Zimbabwe in the years to come.

The NMF did not let reality get in the way of their racial victimhood narrative, and they readily make excuses for the violent nature of the BLM riots.

“As we have seen in South Africa during the democratic era, violent protest is often the result of a careful calculation by communities who have come to see that only such action elicits the desired response from the state,” the NMF wrote.

“The use of violence can be rational and carefully targeted as part of a strategy to counter structural and other forms of violence against Black lives. And, of course, it ought always to be so,” they added.

The NMF is blaming whites for the terror that they are receiving at the hands of black thugs and looters, using the Marxist trope of “structural racism” and the COVID-19 pandemic to justify the racial supremacist violence that they advocate.

“Now is the time for sober assessment of a resilient White supremacy in our country, in the US and globally. We need to reckon with the fact that structural and other forms of violence will provoke violence. And we must face the reality that the ravages of COVID-19 will further entrench structural violence unless we fundamentally restructure our societies. It is time to apply our minds to this challenge. Black lives do matter,” they concluded.

Cullors and other BLM co-founders need to be jailed and charged with treason for their criminal conspiracy to overthrow the Bill of Rights and Constitution.

Ann Coulter OPED: Yale Has to Go!


Commentary by Ann Coulter Ann Coulter | Posted: Jun 17, 2020 6:00 PM

Yale Has to Go!

Source: AP Photo/Beth J. Harpaz

The Democratic Party is being forced into taking ridiculous positions by its insane base. Defund the police! Dishonor the flag! Throw Christopher Columbus in a lake!

What a wonderful gift! All Republicans have to do is take the other side. Make themselves the alternative to madness. Instead, Trump and the Republicans have decided they’re going to be “Democrats Lite.”

I’ll let others berate Republicans for doing nothing about the rioting, the arsons, the beatings, the corporate and social media canceling. This column will address the GOP’s moronitude in response to attacks on the destruction of Confederate monuments. Works of art are being destroyed by Maoist vandals who have no idea what they’re doing.

Literally no idea.

Quick! Who was Fort Bragg named after? What did he do? Do you even know his first name? When you have to Google the guy on a statue to figure out who he is, maybe it’s not really the daily humiliation you claim it is.

At this point, the military bases are famous in their own right. No one hears “Fort Hood” and thinks of Gen. John Bell Hood. Fort Bragg, home of the 82nd Airborne, is many orders of magnitude more famous than Gen. Braxton Bragg. It would be like demanding President John F. Kennedy change his name because his namesake, John Fitzgerald, was a corrupt Boston mayor.

Most obviously, the Democratic Party is going to have to change its name. You want an institution that represents slavery? Confederate politicians were all Democrats, Democrats created Jim Crow, and the founder of the party was a slave holder. (The Republican Party was founded to end slavery.)

Speaking of repellant Democrats, Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., said on the Senate floor this week that the United States “didn’t inherit slavery from anybody. We created it.”

This is the most ignorant statement ever made on the Senate floor. (And that’s saying something!)

Every society has had slavery; it existed long before America did, including by American Indians (though they preferred torturing their captives to death, inasmuch as few of the natives farmed or built things). From 1530 to 1780, at least a million Europeans were kidnapped by African Muslims and forced into slavery. The vast majority were starved or beaten to death.

In fact, unless we’re counting the Democrats’ wearing kente cloth last week, slavery is the only African institution ever adopted by this country. Portuguese — not Americans — brought the first slaves to Jamestown in 1619 (The New York Times’ favorite episode of American history!). We, are, however, the only country that fought a war to end slavery.

Isn’t slavery bad enough? No, Kaine has to make it extra bad by calling slavery an American invention. A U.S. senator committed a blood libel against his own country.

Anything to say, Republicans? Even Obama would have corrected this boob.

The BLM fanboys complain that other countries don’t honor the losing side in their civil wars. Yes, exactly — that’s why their wars never end.

Myanmar has been in a civil war since 1948. Israel’s been fighting Palestinians since 1948. The Kurds and Turks have been fighting for half a century. At last count, there are two civil wars going on in the Philippines, and at least three in India.

America concluded its civil war by dominating and subjugating the losers, but also honoring their bravery.

Even before the war, the South was eons behind the North in industrial development. If the entire country had been the South, America never would have become the richest, most advanced nation on Earth. (And that’s how slaves built America!) After the war, it was like a third world country. On the other hand, Southerners could take justifiable pride in what everyone agrees was a better class of general and soldier.

At Appomattox, Gen. Ulysses S. Grant allowed Gen. Robert E. Lee to keep his sword. As Lee mounted his horse to leave, Grant saluted him. After announcing the South’s surrender at the White House, President Lincoln ordered the band to play “Dixie.” It was an amazing way to end a civil war.

My ancestors were abolitionists who fought for the Union, but you don’t have to be a Southerner to care about Confederate monuments. I can’t help but notice that the people trying to obliterate our history are not part of that history.

Not that long ago, nearly all Americans had pre-Civil War ancestors. Not anymore! Recent immigrants, by which I mean people who arrived after 1865, think the country started with them. They find it hilarious to destroy anything that happened before they got here.

Talk about cultural imperialism!

What about the black Revolutionary heroes, like Crispus Attucks and Phillis Wheatley? Nope, you can forget about foundational black Americans, too. The first two centuries of our nation’s history are canceled. Why would that interest someone from Pune, India, Mogadishu, Somalia, or Bangkok, Thailand? (That would be Kshama Sawant, socialist Seattle city council member, Democrat; Rep. Ilhan Omar, Democrat; U.S. Sen. Tammy Duckworth, Democrat.)

Corporate plunderers, globalists, the wolf of Wall Street, 8 million “diversity” jobs (that go to Indians, not the descendants of American slaves, as intended) — that’s the America they revere.

The new arrivals are fine with Red Guards going into cemeteries, ripping up symbols of our heritage. Just don’t dare lay a finger on their privately owned Rothkos!

What do the Republicans say? No problem! Senate Leader Mitch McConnell says he’s “OK” with changing the names of military bases. Trump tweets narcissistic bluster.

How about a bill withholding all federal funds from Yale University until it changes its name? The school’s namesake, Elihu Yale, was not only a slave owner, but a slave trader. Quite a dilemma for the little snots who attend and teach there! It will be tremendously damaging to their brand. After all, true sublimity for a Social Justice Warrior is virtue signaling and advertising their high SAT scores at the same time.

If you refuse to fight, Republicans, don’t you at least want to have some fun?

Philadelphia’s Police Union President calls BlackLivesMatter Activists “a Pack of Rabid Animals”


Reported By Onan Coca | September 5, 2017

 

Oh. Boy.

Philly’s police union president, John McNesby, may have spoken a little too honestly during a recent rally in support of his police officer brethren. While many local residents may forgive his decision to defend the local police force during a period of time that they are seen as controversial, they’ll likely not forgive any over the top rhetoric that could be seen as tainted with racism or bigotry. McNesby’s most recent remarks during a heated public speech, could be seen as crossing the line.

“(They’re) a pack of rabid animals,” McNesby said on Friday during a pro-police rally at the Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 5 headquarters. “When you go to work each day, you shouldn’t have to worry that a pack of rabid animals will suddenly show up at your home and openly threaten your family. These are not activists, they are racist hate groups determined to instigate violence.” 

“ ”

McNesby’s statement and the rally came in the wake of an ongoing dispute in Philadelphia where a police offcer is under fire after shooting a man as he fled from the officer. While BlackLivesMatter activists want to paint the situation as yet another instance of police brutality, and yet another example of a white officer targeting and shooting a black man… the local P.D. says that’s not at all what happened in this case.

Protests kicked off back in June when Officer Ryan Pownall shot 30-year old Ryan Jones as he fled from the officer. Pownall pulled Jones over for riding an illegal dirt bike on a city street. When the officer patted down the suspect he felt a handgun in the man’s waistband. 

A witness who was in the back of Pownall’s police car said he saw the officer pull his gun and then tell the man not to touch the gun in his waistband. The man then struggled with the officer before pulling his gun from his waistband, but the witness says Jones then dropped the gun, and began to run away. That’s when Pownall fired his gun, hitting the man in the back with two of his shots. Jones later died at a nearby hospital. Police did find a fully-loaded handgun at the scene and have not, as of yet, offered a different version of the story then the witness has described, though the shooting is still under investigation. This is the second time that Officer Pownall has been the center of controversy for shooting a man in the back:

Black Lives Matter, along with others, have been protesting the shooting for weeks. In July, the group marched on the Police Administration Building and City Hall demanding a larger investigation. 

Pownall was called a “racist, bigot pig cop” and Khalif said he has “a murderous spirit” — referring to another shooting that the officer was involved. That 2010 shooting left Carnell Williams-Carney paralyzed when a bullet hit him in the back. The shooting was ruled justified and Williams-Carney lost a federal lawsuit against police.

McNesby’s comments about the protesters being a “pack of rabid animals,” comes less than a week after he called their leader “a punk” who should have been arrested for protesting without a permit. When pressed by the media about calling the BLM leader a “punk,” McNesby said, “I can’t use the words I want. To take it to someone’s house, a police officer’s house, he doesn’t have any respect. He’s a two-bit punk who doesn’t have the respect of decent protesters, if there is any in this city.”

McNesby has gotten riled up by the latest protests because the Black Lives Matter protesters (and their leaders in particular) have been using heated, aggressive, and sometimes violent-sounding rhetoric. For example, last week BLM leaders argued that they knew where Pownall lived before insinuating that they might pay the officer and his family a visit. “We have something in the tank,” the BLM leader said. “There is nothing off the table, including coming back to the police officer’s home.”

Both sides should probably consider modulating their rhetoric, but I don’t expect we’ll see anyone do so.

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: