Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘climate change’

Meteorologist Takes AOC To TruthCity Over Her ‘Climate Crisis’ Blather


Written by Wes Walker on July 9, 2019

It rained in DC. So, naturally, the left’s little darling freaked out over it. And (naturally) pushed her agenda.

Gotta give her credit. As bad as her ideas are, she’s really REALLY committed to seeing them take hold in America. (If only we could say the same thing about some RINOs we could mention…)

But like so many people who speak beyond the limits of their knowledge and experience, it’s easy for someone who knows what the hell they’re talking about to take them to the woodshed for a good whoopin’.

Which is exactly what happened here.

Then again, what would some guy with a Ph.D. know compared to the much-touted AOC?

As it turns out, the answer is ‘A Lot’.

You should resist the emotional temptation to blame EVERY weather event on climate change.

But AOC has already put her cards on the table. She belonged to the radical group Democratic Socialists of America — whose Aggressively Anti-American and Anti-freedom policies we’ve covered elsewhere.

She’s not you’re typical America-loving politician with ideas that tilt to the Left. She’s a radical zealot willing to use any trick or tactic to achieve her political ends. Why would we expect anyone who came out of DSA to be anything BUT a radical zealot.

Fortunately for her, there are still enough patriotic Americans who are willing to kick her Marxist ideologies to the curb where they belong.

Hopefully, not to be recycled, but to be incinerated altogether.

Glacier National Park Removing Signs of Global Climate Farce


Written By Kevin Jackson | 

Al Gore told one too many fish tales #KevinJackson

When the Left gets something wrong, they act in one of two ways.

They double down or they try to quietly pretend they never acted.

In the case of global climate change, they’ve chosen to do both. For example, Ocasio-Cortez doubled down on the global climate farce. She predicted on record that Earth has but twelve more years, at least its human inhabitants. Then she quietly walked her statement back.

Glacier National Park chose the latter of the cover-ups. Currently, Glacier National Park pretends that its cries of glaciers disappearing never occurred. But here is the propaganda video produced by National Geographic in 2012 that won’t allow them to live down the lie.

National Geographic’s claim in this fakeumentary is as follows:

Glacier National Park is losing its iconic glaciers to a changing climate. In the mid-1800s, this Montana landscape was covered by 150 glaciers—today only 25 remain. To show the decrease in glacier size, scientists from the USGS Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center photograph the same areas where glaciers were photographed in the early 1900s. Dan Fagre, a USGS research ecologist, has been studying climate change in the park for more than 20 years. Fagre and his colleagues discuss what melting glaciers and climate change mean for the future of the park, which is expected to be nearly glacier free by 2030, based on present warming trends.

National Geographic acts more like an Obama-funded government agitprop than the “world’s premium destination for science, exploration, and adventure” as their website suggests.

As we now know, Glacier National Park’s glaciers have grown by as much as 25% since the National Geographic’s propaganda aired.

Dr. Roger Roots documented the quiet disappearance of global climate alarmist propaganda from Glacier National Park:

Then he wrote about this video recently.

May 30, 2019. St. Mary, Montana. Officials at Glacier National Park (GNP) have begun quietly removing and altering signs and government literature which told visitors that the Park’s glaciers were all expected to disappear by either 2020 or 2030.

In recent years the National Park Service prominently featured brochures, signs and films which boldly proclaimed that all glaciers at GNP were melting away rapidly. But now officials at GNP seem to be scrambling to hide or replace their previous hysterical claims while avoiding any notice to the public that the claims were inaccurate. Teams from Lysander Spooner University visiting the Park each September have noted that GNP’s most famous glaciers such as the Grinnell Glacier and the Jackson Glacier appear to have been growingnot shrinking—since about 2010. (The Jackson Glacier—easily seen from the Going-To-The-Sun Highway—may have grown as much as 25% or more over the past decade.)

The centerpiece of the visitor center at St. Mary near the east boundary is a large three-dimensional diorama showing lights going out as the glaciers disappear. Visitors press a button to see the diorama lit up like a Christmas tree in 1850, then showing fewer and fewer lights until the diorama goes completely dark. As recently as September 2018 the diorama displayed a sign saying GNP’s glaciers were expected to disappear completely by 2020.

But at some point during this past winter (as the visitor center was closed to the public), workers replaced the diorama’s ‘gone by 2020’ engraving with a new sign indicating the glaciers will disappear in “future generations.”

Almost everywhere, the Park’s specific claims of impending glacier disappearance have been replaced with more nuanced messaging indicating that everyone agrees that the glaciers are melting. Some signs indicate that glacial melt is “accelerating.”

A common trick used by the National Park Service at GNP is to display old black-and-white photos of glaciers from bygone years (say, “1922”) next to photos of the same glaciers taken in more recent years showing the glaciers much diminished (say, “2006”). Anyone familiar with glaciers in the northern Rockies knows that glaciers tend to grow for nine months each winter and melt for three months each summer. Thus, such photo displays without precise calendar dates may be highly deceptive.

But deception is all the climate alarmists have. When they aren’t fudging the photos, they’re fudging the statistics.

How many climate scientists have been caught lying about their data? Roughly the 95% the Left all claim support the global climate farce. And now that the money has dried up, few promote the nonsense any more.

As for the park service, recently it quietly removed its two large steel trash cans at the Many Glacier hotel. The reason behind the removal is the messaging on the cans. Engraved on the cans were “before and after” likenesses of the Grinnell Glacier in 1910 and 2009. The steel carvings indicated that the Glacier had shrunk significantly between the two dates. But a viral video published on Wattsupwiththat.com showed that the Grinnell Glacier appears to be slightly larger than in 2009.

The article continues:

The ‘gone by 2020’ claims were repeated in the New York Times, National Geographic, and other international news sources. But no mainstream news outlet has done any meaningful reporting regarding the apparent stabilization and recovery of the glaciers in GNP over the past decade. Even local Montana news sources such as The Missoulian, Billings Gazette and Bozeman Daily Chronicle have remained utterly silent regarding this story.

Essentially, these climate LIARS now want to cover their tracks and pretend they were never a part of the money grab.

We will never let them forget.

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon by A.F. Branco


A.F. Branco Cartoon – Inconvenient Glaciers

Glaciers at Glacier National Park in Montana have grown 25% over the past few years, an inconvenient truth for Leftists Climate Change pushers.

Glaciers Grow 25% at Glacier National ParkPolitical Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2019.
More A.F. Branco Cartoons at The Daily Torch.

Branco’s Faux Children’s Book “APOCALI” ORDER  HERE

Donations/Tips accepted and appreciated –  $1.00 – $5.00 – $10 – $100 –  it all helps to fund this website and keep the cartoons coming. – THANK YOU!

A.F. Branco has taken his two greatest passions, (art and politics) and translated them into the cartoons that have been popular all over the country, in various news outlets including “Fox News”, MSNBC, CBS, ABC and “The Washington Post.” He has been recognized by such personalities as Dinesh D’Souza, James Woods, Sarah Palin, Larry Elder, Lars Larson, the great El Rushbo, and has had his toons tweeted by President Trump

Liberals Pledge Not To Have Babies Because Of CLIMATE Change


Written by K. Walker on June 10, 2019

Imagine that your fear of climate catastrophe is so crippling that you decide not to reproduce.

Some people will say, “Good! Don’t reproduce and self-select your crazy @$$ out of the gene pool!”
AOC mentioned in one of her livestream cooking videos that it’s a growing phenomenon amongst climate activists that are considering not having children because of their fear for the future.

But, let’s examine what exactly these folks are doing.

Blythe Pepino is a British woman who started the #BirthStrike movement. She makes it clear that she’s not like the climate change activists that are advocating that other people should not have children or should have fewer children, but rather, this movement is made up of people that are choosing to not bring children into a world that is heading towards a climate apocalypse. It’s similar to the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement in that way.

Some, however, argue the exact opposite saying that having children may be the way to solve the problem. That theory is that the more people there are, the more ideas to combat the problem there are.

Members of Pepino’s BirthStrike movement aren’t that hopeful, however. Some seem downright depressed about the coming climate apocalypse. Although the movement appears to be small right now — about 330 people, about 80% of which are women — it is growing. Once they go down this road, it’s very difficult to turn back.

Pepino, a 33-year old musician, said that she founded the movement out of her concern for the coming “ecological Armageddon” that would result in food insecurity, wildfires, droughts, and extreme weather. Although she does want to have children, and she loves her partner, but she doesn’t think that this is a time that she can do that.

“You are gambling with someone else’s life,” said Cody Harrison, a 29-year-old who recently joined the group. “If things don’t go well, that human is not going to have a very good life.”

“When climate change gets worse, it multiplies other things. It’s like dominoes that are falling,”said Lori Day, another member of BirthStrike. “It goes beyond sea level rise and storms. It affects food production, migration, resources and war.”
Source: CNN

These BirthStrikers believe that human extinction is possible as a result of climate change, so they have decided to be proactive on the extinction front.

The TL;DR is this: THEY BELIEVE IN POPULATION CONTROL. Only self-selective population control. It’s like the idea of “Democraticsocialism.

The thing that they’re not getting is that their ideology may very well die with them.

But according to experts who spoke to CNN, BirthStrike and its fellow anti-child organizations may not be doing as much for the environment as they believe they are, because it’s not necessarily how many people the Earth holds that makes the difference in whether climate activists will make — it’s how much those people consume. Those who do not reproduce also run the risk of their ideology dying with them.

In other words, voluntary extinction is its own form of social Darwinism, and the leftists who embrace it are actually doing themselves a disservice by ending their own lines.

Source: Daily Wire

As an interesting aside, take note of this woman’s name — her first name, Blythe, literally means “carefree” and her last name, Pepino, is Spanish for cucumber. (Thank you, VeggieTales.) She could be “cool as a cucumber” and “carefree,” but instead, she’s so terrified of an “Ecopocalypse” that she’s decided to end her family line voluntarily.

A more accurate name for this chick would be “Blythe Ring Idiot,” amirite?

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

ClashDaily’s Associate Editor since August 2016. Self-described political junkie, anti-Third Wave Feminist, and a nightmare to the ‘intersectional’ crowd. Mrs. Walker has taken a stand against ‘white privilege’ education in public schools. She’s also an amateur Playwright, occasional Drama teacher, and staunch defender of the Oxford comma. Follow her humble musings on Twitter: @TheMrsKnowItAll

A.F. Branco On America’s Voice News


Posted by A.F. Branco | on

URL of the original posting site: https://comicallyincorrect.com/a-f-branco-on-ameicas-voice-news/

A.F. Branco on America’s Voice News

Watch video here >>> LINK

A.F. Branco talks about his new collaboration with Evan Sayet – A children’s book titled APOCALI NOW! , and some other things regarding his political cartooning career.

APOCALI NOW! Fun For Adults, ideological vaccination for kids against liberal propaganda.

Apocali Now! is nothing short of a public service.” — Dennis Prager.

“Evan wields humor as the devastating weapon it was intended to be. — Steve Deace, The Blaze

“Get it for your kids — or your Progressive friends who have never grown up” – Dinesh D’Souza.

“The endlessly clever Evan Sayet strikes again with a children’s book for both adults and kids that is part wisdom and all wit. A must have for every thinking family.” — Tom Del Beccaro,  Fox News

take our poll – story continues below
  • Who are the happiest people?

“Brilliant, entertaining, hilarious!  It’s not just for your family’s children and grandchildren, but for all the adults in your family, too.” — Movieguide

“My email exploded with requests for a book that hadn’t then yet been put to paper.”  — Lars Larson, nationally syndicated radio talk show host.

Evan takes a crayon to a knife fight….and wins!” — Howard Hyde, bestselling author, Escape from Berkeley.

“Worried your kids will succumb to new-age fears?  Read them this laugh-a-minute book by Evan Sayet and you’ll both sleep well at night” — Glenn Reynolds, Instapundit.

Watch Video … HERE

 

ORDER “APOCALI NOW!”… HERE

AFL-CIO Union Turns on AOC as Blue Collar Workers Realize She’s Targeting Them


Reported By Ben Marquis | Published March 13, 2019 at 2:10pm

When Democratic New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez first introduced the costly socialist power grab known as the Green New Deal — with a matching resolution in the Senate by Democratic Massachusetts Sen. Ed Markey — it was widely criticized and mocked as absurd and unconstitutional by the right.

Even some on the left expressed misgivings about the proposal to fundamentally transform the entirety of the United States’ energy sector, economy and much of society in general, ostensibly to combat climate change but in reality to centralize more power and control with the federal government.

Now the Democrats who support the measure put forward by Ocasio-Cortez are facing an incredible predicament as a major force for fundraising and voter support on the left — organized labor unions, especially the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, or AFL-CIO — have come out firmly against the Green New Deal.

That will force some Democrats to choose between placating their typically moderate liberal union worker voters or appeasing the increasingly rabid and radical far-left base of the party that demands significant action on environmental concerns.

Republican Wyoming Sen. John Barrasso tweeted out a copy of a letter sent from leaders of the AFL-CIO labor union conglomerate to Markey and Ocasio-Cortez,. It expressed how the labor unions simply couldn’t support the Green New Deal proposal that would “cause immediate harm to millions of our members and their families,” a message with which the Republican senator agreed.

The letter, dated March 8, began by noting that union workers weren’t consulted on the ideas put forward in the proposal, even as those workers stood most at risk of facing severe economic disruptions and potential job loss because of the proposed policies. The unions agreed that some action was required to address the eventual impact of man-made climate change, and even expressed support for investment in new technologies to produce clean and carbon-free energy. However, they seemed to balk at some of the proposals — such aiming to do away with the current national dependence on fossil fuels like oil and natural gas within 10 years — as being non-specific and threatening toward the survival of their jobs and various sectors of the industrial economy.

The AFL-CIO letter stated that the Green New Deal is “not rooted in an engineering-based approach and makes promises that are not achievable or realistic.”

“We will not accept proposals that could cause immediate harm to millions of our members and their families,” the letter proclaimed. “We will not stand by and allow threats to our members’ jobs and their families’ standard of living go unanswered.”

The letter closed by reiterating that something needed to be done, but suggested that discussions be held about “responsible” solutions that would not utterly destroy the energy and industrial sectors of the economy and the livelihoods of those who work in those and related areas.

The letter was signed by Cecil Roberts, international president of the United Mine Workers of America, and Lonnie Stephenson, international president of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, as well as eight other major labor unions under the AFL-CIO banner.

The Washington Post reported that the criticisms in the letter seemed to echo comments made to the media just days prior by AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka while he was on Capitol Hill to speak with lawmakers.

Trumka said, “Look, we need to address the environment. We need to do it quickly. But we need to do it in a way that doesn’t put these communities behind, and leave segments of the economy behind.

“So we’ll be working to make sure that we do two things: that by fixing one thing we don’t create a problem somewhere else,” he added.

Labor unions have long been relied upon by the Democratic Party for considerable support in elections, but that support has been wavering in recent years, given the increasingly leftward lurch of the party’s base and elected officials who stand fundamentally at odds with the more moderate and conservative-leaning rank-and-file workers who make up private-sector unions.

President Donald Trump siphoned off quite a few of those typically Democrat-voting union workers in the 2016 election.

If Democrats continue to press forward with their proposal to wreck the economy and energy/industrial sectors as we currently know them, that problematic trend for Democrats will likely continue and grow devastatingly larger in the 2020 election.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: 

Summary

More Info Recent Posts Contact

Ben Marquis is a writer who identifies as a constitutional conservative/libertarian. His focus is on protecting the First and Second Amendments. He has covered current events and politics for Conservative Tribune since 2014.

Today’s TWO Politically INCORRECT Cartoons by A.F. Branco


A.F. Branco Cartoon – Background Check

Elizabeth Warren says she has zero sympathy for the parents involved in the admissions scandal but wait, how did she get into Harvard?

E Warren on Admissions ScamPolitical Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2019.
More A.F. Branco Cartoons at The Daily Torch.

Donations/Tips accepted and appreciated –  $1.00 – $5.00 – $10 – $100 –  it all helps to fund this website and keep the cartoons coming. – THANK YOU!

A.F. Branco has taken his two greatest passions, (art and politics) and translated them into the cartoons that have been popular all over the country, in various news outlets including “Fox News”, MSNBC, CBS, ABC and “The Washington Post.” He has been recognized by such personalities as Dinesh D’Souza, James Woods, Sarah Palin, Larry Elder, Lars Larson, the great El Rushbo, and has had his toons tweeted by President Trump.

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: