Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Archive for July, 2014

Amazing Video Shows Life Before Birth: “Everything a Newborn Baby Does, a Fetus Has Already Done”

by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC |

An amazing new video that appeared on the Today show shows life before birth. The pro-life movement already knows unborn babies are capable or truly astonishing things and this report confirms it.

ultrasound4d43Dr. Bill Fifer, a professor of psychiatry at Columbia University and a leading expert on fetal and newborn learning, appears on the program and says “Everything that a newborn baby does, a fetus has pretty much done already.”

“They’re exquisitely able to sense information over all parts of their body, although some are more sensitive than others, like around the mouth, around the feet, around the hands,” he continues.

From the report:

Experts say kicking and other activity can be a reaction to mom eating or changing positions; or it might happen just because the baby feels like moving around.

Mom’s emotions can also cause certain movements. The more stress pregnant women reported, the more frequently their fetuses touched their faces with their left hands, researchers at Durham and Lancaster universities in the UK announced last month. Their study was published in the journal “Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition.”

“This suggests maternal stress could be having on effect on the child’s behavior in the womb and highlights the importance of reducing maternal stress in pregnancy,” Dr. Nadja Reissland, the lead author, said.

The report also discusses how a new study shows even before they are born, babies are learning from experience, especially if it’s directly related to their moms. Babies before birth learn nursery rhymes from their moms while while in the womb. So much for just being blobs of tissue.

Sit back, relax and enjoy this wonderful journey into what it’s like to be an unborn baby in “Hotel Womb.”

fetus film

Click here to sign up for daily pro-life news alerts from


Complete Message

Article collective closing



HOW DO YOU SAY, ‘DISRESPECTFUL PUNK’ IN SPANISH: How Mexican 8th Graders Act In Our Schools


This letter written by a substitute teacher and was read while the state Senate was considering bills on immigration will shock you…

YouTube – The letter by substitute teacher Tony Hill was read aloud Thursday as the state Senate considered one of five bills on illegal immigration. Hill wrote that a majority of eight-grade students who he taught recently at an unnamed Glendale school refused to say the Pledge of Allegiance and declared that “We are Mexicans and Americans stole our land.”

Hill went on to write: “I have found that (in) substitute teaching in these areas most of the Hispanic students do not want to be educated but rather (want to) be gang members and gangsters. They hate America and are determined to “reclaim” this area for Mexico.”


school teacher

la raza








Complete Message
Article collective closing

BREAKING: Court Says Obama Admin MUST Turn Over Fast and Furious Documents

July 31, 2014 By

Brian TerryOn Thursday, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia offered a ruling that will allow Americans greater insight into the Fast and Furious scandal and the Obama Administration that has repeatedly promised to operate as a model of transparent government.
Thanks to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit by the government watchdog group Judicial Watch, the court ruled on Thursday that documents that have previously been withheld from Congress under a flimsy pretense of executive privilege must be turned over to Congress.
“Once again, Judicial Watch has beat Congress to the punch in getting key information about another Obama scandal – this time, the Fast and Furious outrage,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “A federal court has ordered the Obama administration to produce information that could, for the first time, provide specific details who in the administration is responsible for Fast and Furious lies to Congress and the American people.  This is a battle that put Eric Holder in contempt of Congress, saw Nixonian assertions of executive privilege by Barack Obama, and a hapless Congress in face of all this lawlessness.  Finally, we may get some accountability for Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry and the countless others murdered as a result of the insanely reckless Obama administration program.” 
Thank youFor over 16 months, the lawsuit has lingered as Judicial Watch pursued the documents. About a year ago, the court rejected the Justice Department’s request for a hold on the lawsuit that would last indefinitely. The Justice Department had maintained that the documents are protected by executive privilege and that the Fast and Furious scandal was still being investigated.
Attorney General Eric Holder was found in contempt of Congress in 2012 after he refused to cooperate fully with investigations into his involvement in the Justice Department operation that allowed untracked firearms to be funneled to Mexican drug cartels while the Obama Administration condemned violence surrounding the border and attempted to blame law-abiding gun owners and gunshop owners for the violence.
The president saved Holder at the last moment by cloaking his What could go wrongofficial in executive privilege. The Fast and Furious scandal has been obscured by this flimsy pretense ever since.
The DOJ claims, in addition to other Exemption 5 rationales, at least two distinct forms of executive privilege to justify withholding documents: a “deliberative process” privilege of constitutional dimensions and a “congressional response work-product” privilege. 
The Justice Department must now turn over what has been called the “Vaughn Index”- which is an index of “all requested Fast and Furious materials from a June 2012 Judicial Watch FOIA request.”
Judicial Watch’s release clarifies:
SilencerA Vaughn index must:
  • (1) identify each document withheld;
  • (2) state the statutory exemption claimed; and
  • (3) explain how disclosure would damage the interests protected by the claimed exemption.”

In ordering the DOJ to provide Judicial Watch the Vaughn index, the Court ruled, “In this circuit, when an agency is withholding documents under exemption claims, courts require that the agency provide a Vaughn index so that the FOIA requester – at a distinct informational disadvantage – may test the agency’s claims.” 

The court’s ruling is likely not the last hurdle to finding the truth about the scandal that left American border patrol agent Brian Terry dead. However, it is one step closer to forcing the Obama Administration to reveal to the American people the truth about the government’s complicity in the outrage.
Complete Message
Article collective closing

Hamas commits war crime, Obama responds with Hamas talking point


By J.E. Dyer on July 30, 2014

untitled 2
Hamas terrorists prepare to fire mortars in Gaza. (File image via Al Arabiya)

The slavishness with which the Obama administration acted today as a repeater for the Hamas narrative requires calling out here.

On Wednesday morning, Hamas launched mortar fire at IDF assets from the Abu Hussein school in the Jabaliya refugee camp in northern Gaza.  The school was being used by UNRWA, the UN aid agency, to house Gazans who had fled their homes in recent days because of the fighting.What Did You Say Logo


The IDF reported that it responded by firing several tank shells at the Hamas firing position.

Tragically, the damage done by the IDF counterfire appears to have included at least 20 people killed and 90 wounded in the school building.  The New York Times describes the impacts from four rounds on the school site:

One hit the street in front of the entrance, according to several witnesses. Two others hit classrooms where people were sleeping, and a fourth struck a house behind the school.How coward terrorist fight number Two

The war crime here is that Hamas set up a firing position in a facility that was housing civilian refugees. (See Article 8.2 (b) of the Rome Statute.)

The Hamas war crime is only compounded by the fact that UNRWA (United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East; says it notified the IDF 17 times that it was using the school to shelter refugees.

Hamas, which administers Gaza and knows everything that goes on there, and whose guerrilla terrorists were the ones at the school launching mortars, was well aware that Gazan civilians were being sheltered in the school building.  Hamas cannot plead ignorance.  Its operatives knew quite well that they were committing a war crime by turning a refugee shelter into a combat firing position, thus inviting counterfire on it.

There are basically three potential responses to this event.

  • One is to accept and work with the timeline laid out by the IDF. 

  • The second is to dispute the IDF’s narrative; e.g., suggest in some way that the IDF was mistaken about the Hamas mortar fire, or that it is lying, or something along those lines. 

    • If there were information to impugn the IDF statement with, we might expect responsible governments or media to acknowledge that, and refrain from condemning either side until more had been clarified.  (Notably, no such dispute has been offered.)

  • The third response is to simply dismiss the IDF account as though it had not been given, and speak of the event in the terms encouraged by Hamas and Hamas’s sympathizers. 

    • In those terms, the Hamas mortar fire is ignored entirely, and what happened was that Israel shelled a UN shelter, in spite of having been warned that it was a UN shelter.

ConfusedThe Obama administration’s reaction came closest to the third response.  It emphasized not that the school was endangered by Hamas but that the school was shelled:What Did You Say Logo


The White House condemned the shelling Wednesday of a U.N. school in the Gaza Strip that was sheltering Palestinians displaced by the fighting between Israel and Hamas militants in Gaza. …

White House spokeswoman Bernadette Meehan also said the U.S. is “extremely concerned” that thousands of Palestinians aren’t safe in U.N.-designated shelters, despite being told by Israel’s military to leave their homes.

This is the height of irresponsibility.  There is no principle of international law or convention that can enforce itself. When those principles are breached, it is some responsible party breaching them.  The responsible party in breach here is Hamas.

Indeed, Hamas has a long history of committing exactly the same war crime committed this morning: building combat infrastructure in or under protected civilian sites, storing weapons at protected civilian sites, using protected civilian facilities as operational bases, and setting up firing positions at protected civilian sites.  (See, for example, here, here, here, and here.)

Obama defending muslims TwoNo one has a right to protection at a Hamas firing position.  There is no international law or convention that mandates such protection.  None of us could defend ourselves against anything if there were such a mandate.  That’s what makes it a war crime to wage combat from behind protected persons or sites: the necessity it creates for attacking them.

Responsible condemnations of civilian casualties in Gaza should always point back to Hamas’s evil in exploiting this principle to maximize deaths among Gazans, over and over and over again.  No matter what the particulars of the incident, the essential factor for which there is no excuse is that Hamas invites fire down on the heads of the Gazan people, by maneuvering its most dangerous activities into their midst.  That’s the strategic-level “macro” reality of the conflict as well as the tactical-level reality.

The Obama administration not only failed to make that point, but focused on the “shelling” of the school, as if it were a disembodied action to be condemned in its own right.  That’s Hamas’s narrative.  It’s the narrative repeated faithfully by Hamas sympathizers in the West, who themselves heap danger on the people of Gaza by acting as human microphones for Hamas.What Did You Say Logo

“….human microphones for Hamas.”

It appears to me that the Obama administration is trying to find a middle path of some sort by condemning the “shelling” rather than naming a party for condemnation.  There is no justification for this, any more than there would be for trying to find a middle path between condemning al Qaeda and condemning the United States.

Perhaps the Obama administration doesn’t realize that neutrality about this conflict is immoral, and inadmissible as a basis for national policy.  If that’s the case, it has no business being in the Oval Office in the first place.What Did You Say Logo

“…neutrality about this conflict is immoral, and inadmissible as a basis for national policy”

Or perhaps the Obama administration is just going out of its way to avoid condemning Hamas, disguising that purpose under a seemingly neutral concern about “shelling.”  Either way, the implication is damning for Obama.

untitledE. Dyer is a retired Naval Intelligence officer who lives in Southern California, blogging as The Optimistic Conservative for domestic tranquility and world peace. Her articles have appeared at Hot Air, Commentary’s Contentions, Patheos, The Daily Caller, The Jewish Press, and The Weekly Standard.obama-liar4-266x189

More by J.E. Dyer





Complete Message

Article collective closing

House Votes To Sue President For The First Time In History

READ: Boehner Defends Lawsuit Against Obama In Op-edThe resolution authorizes Boehner to challenge Obama in court for exceeding his authority by unilaterally delaying deadlines under Obamacare. Although he has said he’ll target the one-year delay of the health care reform law’s employer mandate penalties, the text of the GOP resolution gives the Speaker room to legally challenge implementation tweaks to other provisions of the law.

“This isn’t about Republicans and Democrats. It’s about defending the Constitution that we swore an oath to uphold,” Boehner said. “Are you willing to let any president choose what laws to execute and what laws to change? Are you willing to let anyone tear apart what our Founders have built?”

Imperial President ObamaThe move comes as Boehner feels elevated pressure to wage new battles against Obama from confrontation-hungry conservatives. It’s a politically awkward one for his party given that Republicans despise the employer mandate, and have voted to eliminate and delay it. Republican aides say they chose the issue for legal reasons as they think it gives them the best chance of victory in court.

VIDEO: Obama Dismisses Boehner’s ‘Stunt’ Lawsuit

“Republicans want to sue the president for not enforcing a law they want to repeal,” said House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-MD). “It is wrong. It is a waste of time. It is a waste of money. It is a distraction from the important issues so important to our people. This lawsuit is nothing more than a partisan bill to rally the Republican base.”

Democrats are aggressively fundraising off the planned lawsuit, portraying it as a precursor to impeachment. They’ve boasted about raising millions of dollars from donors recently over the two issues. Boehner has repeatedly insisted he has no plans to impeach Obama, describing it as a Democratic “scam.” The White House responds that House Republicans were discussing the issue long before Democrats mentioned it, and that GOP leaders also vowed they wouldn’t shut down the government before that happened last fall.

READ: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid: Judge Would Throw Out Boehner’s Lawsuit Against Obamaobama-liar4-266x189Boehner faces an uphill battle in court. The first big question is whether he can achieve “standing” which requires proving a material injury to the House. Legal experts say that’s a very difficult task because no lawsuit emanating from members of Congress against the president has ever achieved standing in court. The next question, if the courts grant standing, is whether the lawsuit has merit to succeed. Republicans may have better luck on this question, experts say, as Obama’s unilateral decision to delay a statutory deadline is arguably problematic from a legal standpoint.

Progressives and some conservative legal minds warn that if the lawsuit succeeds, it would declare open season for the executive and legislative branches to sue each other over any legal disagreement and empower judges to resolve such disputes.

About The Author


Sahil Kapur is TPM’s senior congressional reporter and Supreme Court correspondent. His articles have been published in the Huffington Post, The Guardian and The New Republic. Email him at and follow him on Twitter at @sahilkapur.


Complete Message

Article collective closing

Obama Regime Sides with Hamas

July 30, 2014

By Rush Limbaugh

RUSH:  Okay.  Ladies and gentlemen, I have just been convinced.  I already was.  Let me put it that way.  I have just had the exclamation point attached to my being convinced that the Obama administration has chosen sides, and the side they’ve chosen is Hamas. 

AP reports breaking news “White House Condemns Israel for Latest Attack of UN School in Gaza Strip.”  Now, the White House knows, ladies and gentlemen, that Hamas is using schools and hospitals as military outposts.  Already three schools have been discovered with rockets.  You remember how you found rockets in your school one day, right?  Remember that time your janitor showed you.  They are planting weapons that they intend to use offensively in hospitals.  And they’re advertising the fact. 

They’re letting the Israelis know that this is where the ammunition that they are using is being stored, schools and hospitals.  This is why the Israelis are sending 20-minute warning shots before they attack.  The administration knows all this.  The administration knows what Hamas is doing.  The administration knows where Hamas is putting its armaments.  The administration knows that Hamas is killing its own children with this behavior, and yet they blame Israel. 

And I’ll tell you again, there’s a predisposition to hating Israel, disliking, opposing, whatever, in this administration, there can be no doubt about it now.  But then now to invoke the children again, it’s a repeat of what’s happening here at the border.  The invocation of children anywhere is used to eliminate and silence and nullify any opposition.  So if it is tens of thousands of children crossing our border, shut up, it’s children, for God’s sake, where is your humanity?  And let them in. 

So Hamas puts their own children in known targets.  Israel warns at 20 minute intervals, “Get out, we’re hitting the target.”  Hamas leaves their children there.  “How dare Israel kill children on purpose!  Damn those Israelis.  They hate children.”  It’s clear as a bell what is happening.  This is just awful, folks.  This is just plain and simple awful that this kind of attitude would be engaged in by us toward an ally.  And the Drive-By Media routinely now asks every Israeli guest essentially, “So why are you killing children?  Don’t you have any shame?  Can’t you stop with the killing of children?”  And Hamas applauds.  PR victory after PR victory. 

I watched this morning, does the name Hanan Ashrawi ring a bell?  I’ve been watching her, she’s a Palestinian Imperial President Obamaspokeswoman, and I’ve been watching her since the seventies.  Imagine my shock when I learned that Peter Jennings had an affair with her during his days as a foreign correspondent, by the way, when he was posted over there back in the trench coat days. Back when every foreign correspondent had to wear the — I mean, obviously the mall had a journalism clothing outfit, store, that was only available to journalists.  And in there was the approved journalist trench coat, ’cause they all wore one.  Well, other things now. 

But back in those days Jennings wore his trench coat, and he had an affair with Hanan Ashrawi.  And I learned that ’cause I couldn’t figure out, it seemed like whenever she was on ABC there was never any criticism of the Palestinians.  No matter what it was, there was never any criticism of the Palestinians or of Yasser Arafat or any of this.  At any rate, I saw her on TV today, and she’s still bleeding the same old stuff. She’s out there, “Why are the Israelis killing the children, the children, do you know how many children died this morning because of the Israelis?” 

I’m watching this. It’s just everywhere.  So as far as these people are concerned, “The Israelis are targeting and murdering the children.  How dare they!”  And it’s Hamas that straps bombs to their children.  It’s Hamas that puts their children in these targets.  It’s Hamas that makes targets out of hospitals.  Everybody knows it, and yet they continue to report a lie and then challenge every Israeli guest with the lie. 

Netanyahu is not backing down, but don’t forget now, as I pointed out yesterday, they see Netanyahu as no different than your average Tea Party person.  He’s a vile, hateful conservative right winger.  



Obama defending muslims Two






















Complete Message

Article collective closing

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon

Border Crisis Views




A Service Member















Complete MessageArticle collective closing

Massachusetts Governor Signs Radical Bill Prohibiting Pro-Life Free Speech

by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | | 7/30/14

massachusetts2Despite the fact the nation’s highest court took the state of Massachusetts to task for passing a law curtailing the free speech rights of pro-life advocates, the Bay State is again trying to suppress them.

In a unanimous decision last month, the Supreme Court struck down a Massachusetts buffer zone law prohibiting pro-life free speech outside abortion clinics. The decision was a huge victory for pro-life sidewalk counselors who provide women with abortion alternatives.

In their ruling, the Supreme Court struck down a Massachusetts law that created a 35-foot “buffer zone” restricting pro-life advocates from speaking with people entering abortion facilities.

Saying the abortion buffer zone is “inconsistent with the First Amendment,” the Supreme Court National death rate percentagesruled that that the buffer zone violated the First Amendment because it “restricts access to ‘public way[s]’ and ‘sidewalk[s],’ places that have traditionally been open for speech activities.”

Now, Massachusetts lawmakers have responded with a vengeance — passing a radical bill that prohibits free speech for pro-lifers seeking to help women.

Today, Governor Deval Patrick, who is a staunch abortion proponent and a former board member of Planned Parenthood, signed the bill into law.

The attorney for Eleanor McCullen, the lead plaintiff in the 9-0 decision in McCullen v. Coakley, emailed LifeNews about the bill. Michael DePrimo told

“The new buffer zone law is a backdoor attempt to interfere with the constitutional right of free speech in the service of women seeking abortion whose minds are not made up – women who are looking for the hope, help, love, and concrete aid offered by Eleanor McCullen and other peaceful sidewalk counselors. This new law chills life-saving speech by threatening massive civil fines for non-violent acts such as peacefully offering a leaflet of information to passersby on a public sidewalk.

devalpatrick2The reality is that individuals in the abortion industry have a business incentive to falsely characterize any attempt at pro-life communication on the public ways outside abortion clinics as a form of harassment or intimidation, no matter how peaceful.  It is important for law enforcement to understand that momentary attempts at peaceful communication to offer hope, help and love are constitutionally protected expressive conduct, despite the legislature’s rejection of an amendment offered by Representative Jim Lyons that would have made that expressly clear.

If a citizen is threatening public safety, he or she can be arrested under current state or federal law, and then enjoined by a

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

judge based on evidence and testimony. The new  law signed by the Governor ignores those common resources, and instead invites state censorship by enabling police to order peaceful citizens to stand on a 25-foot line for the remainder of the abortion clinics’ business hours.  The new law is unconstitutional not only because it is vague and overbroad, but also because it purports to grant to law enforcement the power to issue a temporary restraining order—a power that may only be exercised by courts.

The first amendment protection of free speech cannot be placed behind painted lines.    My client Eleanor McCullen and the other peaceful sidewalk counselors will continue to serve the women of Boston who deserve real alternatives to abortion.  We will closely monitor law enforcement’s use of the new law to ensure that our clients’ peaceful exercise of first amendment rights is not infringed.”

Ki;lling a baby with poison

Anne Fox of Massachusetts Citizens for Life told LifeNews that abortion activists told legislators during debate in the legislature false tales of pro-lifers harassing women.

“Planned Parenthood employs a huge number of people in the state who all drone on about their abuse by pro-lifers.  No legislator picked up on the pro-lifers’ demands for pictures or videos of the alleged incidents,” she said.

Fox said pro-abortion lawmakers will rush the bill through the legislature.

“As fast as they can get it through the House and signed, Massachusetts will have a law which is worse than the old Buffer Zone.  It effectively creates a 25-foot zone and the penalties are scary – $50,000 and three years in jail,” she said. “The legislature is in the process of disrespecting the Supreme Court and penalizing law-abiding citizens.  I do think all the other places that have suspended their Buffer Zones will pass laws like this one.  At least Massachusetts will have company in its foolishness.”

During the hearing, when the pro-lifers had a chance to speak, Eleanor McCullen, an elderly woman who has spent years helping women find abortion Third of our generationalternatives, and other pro-life advocates explained that it would be counterproductive to their efforts to save babies from abortion and help women to treat pregnant women badly.

“Phil Moran, the local lawyer for the McCullen win, compared the new zone to the penalty box where the counselors would always be,” Fox told LifeNews about the hearing. “State Representatives Jim Lyons and Marc Lombardo spoke.  Jim pointed out that these same people say “The Supreme court has spoken” about Roe v Wade.  Now they have no use for the Court.  Marc stated that this proposed law is so outrageous that it will definitely be appealed and cited the costs in time and money that will be associated with the appeal – the McCullen case has already cost many millions.”

Pat Stewart, MCFL Executive Director, gave impressive testimony citing 20 actual laws that already cover blockading, harassing, etc.

120-yr-old tombstone in Kansas.

This tombstone is actually in the Attica Cemetery, Harper County, Kansas. 120 yr. old tombstone: 

And this guy died 124 years ago!

Tombstone 01Tombstone 02Tombstone 03

Complete Message

Article collective closing

The loophole is Obama

Ann Coulter Letter

By: Ann Coulter   7/30/2014 03:02 PM

Angry ObamaIt’s been reported everywhere — the New York Times, the Washington Post, Fox News — that the William Wilberforce Sex Trafficking Act requires that any non-Mexican children who show up on our border be admitted and given a hearing. (New York Times, July 7, 2014: “Immigrant Surge Rooted in Law to Curb Child Trafficking.”)

The problem, we’ve been told, is that a loophole in the sex trafficking law mandates these hearings — or “removal proceedings.”

But there is no such loophole.

The fact that people on both sides of the aisle are telling the same lie about this law is worrisome. Are Republicans being tricked into thinking we need an emergency bill, so that, two weeks later, we’ll see them emerging from a conference, saying:

obama-border-is-open-378x257We fixed the loophole! We didn’t get everything we wanted, but you can hear about that later.

No, tell me now.

Well, remember amnesty? It’s kind of in this bill. But the headline is: We closed the loophole! So no more worries about that loophole. But yeah, amnesty passed.

Why else would everyone be carrying on about a non-existent loophole? I know they’re mistaken because I read the law.

The Wilberforce law states, in relevant part:

“Any unaccompanied alien child sought to be removed by the Department of Homeland Security, except for an unaccompanied alien child from a contiguous country (i.e. Mexico — or Canada, so as not to sound discriminatory) … shall be — placed in removal proceedings … eligible for relief … at no cost to the child and provided access to counsel.”

Imperial President ObamaObviously, that’s the whole ball of wax. Once a kid is in, given La Raza attorneys and a hearing date, he’s never going home. No immigration judge is going to listen to a lawyer-manufactured sob story and say, “No, I’m sorry, that didn’t touch my heart. You have to go back to Huehuetenango.”

But the law’s definition of “unaccompanied alien child” limits the hearings to kids who have no relatives in the United States. If your relatives live here, the law assumes you’re not being sex-trafficked — you’re trying to join them.Here’s the definition — note subsection (C):”(g) Definitions

“(2) the term ‘unaccompanied alien child’ means a child who –

(A) has no lawful immigration status in the United States;

(B) has not attained 18 years of age; and

(C) with respect to whom –

(i) there is no parent or legal guardian in the United States; or (ii) no parent or legal guardian in the United States is available to provide care and physical custody.”

The law is not — as George Will suggested on “Fox News Sunday” — a general humanitarian mandate allowing all 2 billion poor children of the world to show

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

up at our border and be told, “Welcome to America!” It’s a law to combat sex trafficking.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein and Vice President Joe Biden wrote the law — and Feinstein isn’t stupid. She’s well aware of illegal immigration. That’s why the law specifically excludes two huge categories of illegal aliens from getting hearings: (1) Mexicans; and (2) children who have relatives in the U.S.

Those cases look more like illegal immigration than sex trafficking. (Didn’t anyone wonder why Mexican kids are excluded?)

Mexicans make up the lion’s share of illegal immigrants in the U.S., and children with relatives already living in the U.S. are probably just trying to rejoin family — not trying to escape a fiendish kidnapper about to sell them into sex slavery.

According to last Friday’s New York Times, almost 90 percent of the 53,000 illegal alien kids given refugee status since October have already been transferred to parents or relatives living in the U.S. By the law’s clear terms, those 47,000 kids should have been summarily turned away at the border — just as Mexican children are.

Immigration-Piper(Democrats wailing about a “humanitarian” crisis — after calculating the precise number of voters they need — evidently don’t care about the Mexican kids.)

No law needs to be fixed. The only thing that needs to be fixed is the president.

Obama has gone mad and is defying the law in order to “fundamentally transform America” — as he pledged to do during the 2008 campaign — into Latin America. (Luckily for George Will, he won’t be around by the time Latin America gets to his neighborhood.)

Any Republicans pushing for an immigration bill to seal an imaginary loophole aren’t fighting Obama; they’re helping him.

Constitutionally, the remedy for a president defying the law so he can assist an alien invasion is impeachment. But the media won’t let us impeach Obama — and Republicans don’t have the votes, anyway. The only way for Americans to fight back is to put large Republican majorities in the House and Senate this November.

Complete MessageArticle collective closing


Christian Mother Sentenced to Death in Sudan Expected in New Hampshire This Week

Some time this week, 27-year-old Meriam Ibrahim is expected to arrive among relatives in Manchester, New Hampshire.

She made international news for being sentenced to death in Sudan for her Christian faith, but she was able to get to Rome on July 24 and will be in Manchester soon.

According to the Washington Examiner, “she and her family fled Sudan following the overturning of her conviction in late June.” However, she was arrested again for allegedly “falsifying travel documents” as she and her family tried to get to the United States.

CNN reports that she and her family were then “confined to a safe house in Sudan” until they were able to flee to Italy.

Once in Italy, Meriam’s husband Daniel called relatives in New Hampshire to say they were coming home.

Meriam was originally detained in mid-January. Upon receiving her death sentence she told the court, “I am a Christian, and I will remain a Christian.”

Follow AWR Hawkins on Twitter @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at

Complete MessageArticle collective closing


Collect More Than $7,000 Per Month for ‘Fostering’ Adult Illegal Aliens

29 Jul 2014


HOUSTON, Texas–The federal government is in dire need of U.S. citizens willing to house the thousands of illegal immigrants who enter the country each week, and they are willing to pay them to do so.

The Texas-based nonprofit Catholic Charities is currently seeking out foster families for the migrants, most of whom come from Central America. A spokeswoman for the organization told Breitbart Texas that foster families can receive monthly payments for housing adult immigrants who are under 23-years-old.migrant

“Most of our children are 15 to 17-years-old,” she said. “But some stay in our program until they are 22-years-old; if they’re still working on getting their high school diploma, they can stay until they’re that age.” 

The revelation that some of the migrants receiving foster care are adults will likely come as a surprise to many; the mainstream media has largely portrayed the border crisis as involving only children and family units.

The spokeswoman mentioned that foster families will be given $40 per day to care for each migrant they take in from Catholic Charities. The assistance is funded by the federal government, as Breitbart Texas previously reported.

Foster parents have the ability to collect more than $7,400 per month, considering that they can house six immigrants at any given time.

The spokeswoman said that the illegal immigrants are provided with taxpayer subsidized education, health care, transportation, and an “allowance.” She was not specific about the amount of such an allowance or how often it is administered.

obama-border-is-open-378x257Many have expressed outrage that instead of being turned away at the border, many illegal aliens are being brought to federal facilities where they receive a slew of taxpayer-subsidized benefits: housing, food, vocational training, English lessons, recreation, and legal counsel. Ultimately, most of the migrants are released onto U.S. soil after promising to show up at an immigration court hearing.

Follow Kristin Tate on Twitter @KristinBTate

The name of the Catholic Charities spokeswoman been removed due to an overwhelming response to this article. 



Complete MessageArticle collective closing


Rep. Van Hollen: Legalizing Illegals Will ‘Reduce the Deficit’

July 18, 2014 – 10:23 AM

Rep. Chris Van Hollen

Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D.-Md.)

obama-border-is-open-378x257(– When asked whether legalizing illegal immigrants would help unemployed Americans, Rep. Chris VanHollen (D.-Md.) responded by pointing to testimony from the director of the Congressional Budget Office that VanHollen said indicated enactment of the Senate immigration bill (which gave illegal aliens a “path to citizenship’) would “reduce the deficit and increase long-term economic growth.” asked: “Do you think that allowing illegal aliens to stay in the United States and putting them on a path to citizenship will help unemployed Americans?”


B.S. MeterVan Hollen responded: “I think what we need to do is pass comprehensive immigration reform, and I just came from a hearing with the non-partisan director of the Congressional Budget Office, who testified that if you passed the Senate bipartisan bill, you will reduce the deficit and increase long-term economic growth in the United States,” Van Hollen replied. asked Van Hollen the question at the “Witness Wednesdays: Voices of the Unemployed” event on Capitol Hill. The same question was also put to Rep. Dan Kildee (D-Mich.), who objected that the question implied “that we want to encourage illegal immigration.”

Kildee responded: “I think we need to have an immigration policy that is welcoming and open. If we’re talking about specifically the children who are fleeing their countries because of the risk that they’re facing, I think it’s a false dichotomy. I think we can be a welcoming nation and also support the people who live here and are struggling.”

mrc two

Never Argue Group

When repeated the question, Kildee replied: “Which illegal aliens are you speaking of? The question implies that we want to encourage illegal immigration, and we should not do that. But what we should have is immigration policy that fits the needs of the current, of the 21st century.”

“So I don’t believe that the question before Congress is whether or not we should allow illegal aliens here, but whether we should deal with the fact that there are 11 million people in this country that are undocumented, and that they are here and should have a pathway to legitimacy,” he told

“They’ve been contributing to the economy, and I think it’s a false choice to say that in order to take care of the people who are unemployed, we can no longer be a nation that is welcoming to immigration.”bs

Kildee is cosponsoring a bill that would extend unemployment benefits. “Since this vital lifeline lapsed, millions of families have struggled to put food on the table, keep a roof over their head and pay their bills,” he said in a statement.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, as of June, there are 9.5 million unemployed Americans.




Complete MessageArticle collective closing


PC POLICE: Geraldo Goes Off On Fox Host for Using The Term, ‘Illegals’

Watch as Geraldo goes off on this Fox Host for using the term ‘illegal’. First rule he should learn: never argue with a woman. And the second the rule, more importantly: especially not four of them.

VIDEO: You’ll Never Believe Why Hillary Said Hamas Plants Its Bombs in Schools

July 29, 2014 By  

HIllary Clinton

Is this the face of, “THE LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD”?

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who many believe will seek to be the Democrat nominee for president in 2016, made a statement about the tactics How coward terrorist fight number Twoof the terrorist group Hamas in their fight against Israel.  

Hamas has been widely criticized for using women and children as shields in their bombings. They have also drawn criticism for storing their rockets and missiles in civilian areas, including schools and hospitals. This practice has led many to attack Israel for their response to Hamas in attacking these areas, though they have no choice since Hamas put their own people in harm’s way.

During a recent interview with Jorge Ramos on Fusion TV, Hillary Clinton addressed the issue of Hamas storing their missiles and rockets in these civilian areas.

The problem is, and this is something — I’m not a military planner, but Hamas puts its missiles, its rockets in civilian areas, part of it is that Gaza’s pretty small and its densely populated. They put their command and control of Hamas military leaders in those civilian areas.

Gaza is pretty small. That is Hillary Clinton’s excuse and rationale for the Hamas terrorists putting civilians in harms way.

hillaryComplete MessageArticle collective closing




Pelosi: Qataris Have Told Me ‘Hamas Is a Humanitarian Organization’

July 28, 2014 – 10:16 AM

Benghazi Attack Pelosi

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., speaks at her weekly news briefing Friday, May 9, 2014, in Washington. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

( – House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) says the United States must look to Qatar, an ally of the terrorist group Hamas, for advice in resolving the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

“And we have to confer with the Qataris, who have told me over and over again that Hamas is a humanitarian organization,” she told CNN’s “State of the Union” with Candy Crowley.

As reported last week, Qatar is a strong supporter and funder of Hamas. Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal operates from Qatar, and has so far rejected ceasefire proposals put forward by Egypt and promoted by Secretary of State John Kerry.pelosi

The U.S government designated Hamas as a “foreign terrorist organization” in 1997. Its founding charter calls for Jews to be killed and says all Muslims are duty-bound to join a jihad to destroy Israel.

In an interview aired on CBS’s “Face the Nation” Sunday, Hamas leader Meshaal said Hamas does not fight the Jews just because they are Jews. “We fight the occupiers,” he said. Asked if he wants to recognize Israel as a Jewish state, Meshaal said “No.”

“War is a deadly thing,” Pelosi said on Sunday, speaking about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

“And I have many Palestinians who live in my district, and I am hearing them regularly about how their families are affected who live in the region. It’s a terrible thing. But let me just say that any missile that comes from someplace has a return address. And if Israel is responding to that address, then that’s a shame that the Palestinians are …rumored to be using children and families as shields for their missiles.”

Nancy-Pelosi-as-Islamic-terrorist-300x204Pelosi said the first thing to do is to “avoid conflict” that “Hamas initiated.”

“[T]his has to be something where we try to have the two-state solution, that we have to support…(Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud) Abbas and his role as a leader there. We have to support Iron Dome to protect the Israelis from the missiles. We have to support the Palestinians and what they need. And we have to confer with the Qataris, who have told me over and over again that Hamas is a humanitarian organization, maybe they could use their influence to–“

Crowley interrupted her to ask: “The U.S. thinks they’re a terrorist organization though, correct? Do you?”

Pelosi responded: “Mmm hmm.”

Crowley said: “Yeah.”

And Pelosi said: “And we’ve had that discussion.”

Pelosie Needs to go to a home‘Obama’s leadership has been strong’; Putin ‘is insecure’

In that same interview with CNN, Pelosi defended President Barack Obama’s “strong” leadership, dismissing a suggestion that Russian President Vladimir Putin considers him to be weak.

Compared with Cold War days, “It’s a much more complicated situation now, and the president’s leadership has been strong,” Pelosi told Crowley, pointing to Obama’s support for Israel’s Iron Dome missile shield; his request for humanitarian assistance for the Palestinian people; and his sanctions on Russia.

“Putin is going to do what Putin is going to do,” she said. “Some of what we see comes from insecurity. Putin, for all of his — is insecure about Russia’s role in the world now.”

Pelosi noted that the Obama administration was early in saying that the rockets used to shoot down a Malaysian airliner over Ukraine “had a provenance in Russia.”

“So nobody is missing in action in all of this.”

“And as far as Putin is concerned, he’s a KGB guy who happens to be the president of Russia and he’s going to do what he’s going to do no matter who else is in charge any other place in the world. So, I would not judge his actions or his motivations by anything other than he is rooted in the KGB, insecure about Russia’s diminished role in the world.”

Never Argue Group
Also See:
Pursing Ceasefire, Kerry Looks to Hamas Supporters Turkey and Qatar for Help
Kerry Accused of Promoting Hamas’ Ceasefire Demands

Complete MessageArticle collective closing


New Emails Show Lois Lerner Called Some Conservatives ‘A**holes’

 Jul. 30, 2014 11:16am Pete Kasperowicz

Hold Lois Lerner in Contempt.New emails uncovered by the House Ways and Means Committee indicate that former IRS employee Lois Lerner has a strong dislike of some conservatives, and at one point called them “assholes” in an email exchange.

The committee released an email Lerner received in November 2012 complaining about the “whacko wing of the GOP.” The person mocked Obamas IRS Gestapoconservatives for believing there are “too many foreigners sucking the teat” and that it is “time to hunker down, buy ammo and food, and prepare for the end.” The person added that the “right wing radio shows are scary to listen to.”

New emails released by House Republicans show former IRS employee Lois Lerner called conservatives “a**holes.” (AP Photo/Lauren Victoria Burke, File)

Lerner replied, “Great. Maybe we are through if there are that many assholes.”

The other person then wrote, “And I’m talking about the hosts of the shows. The callers are rabid.”

Lerner replied, “So we don’t need to worry about alien terrorists. It’s our own crazies that will take us down.”

lerner 01lrner 02lerner 03lerner 05lerner 06

Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.) said this exchange shows the has a “deep animus towards conservatives,” which may have explained her efforts to

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

target conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status.

“This email shows that Ms. Lerner’s mistreatment of conservative groups was driven by her personal hostility toward conservatives,” Camp wrote in a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder. ”This new evidence clearly demonstrates why Ms. Lerner not only targeted conservatives, but denied such groups their rights to due process and equal protection under the law.”

Camp’s letter recounted that his committee has found that Lerner personally directed the IRS to audit Crossroads GPS, the group run by Karl Rove, and hinted at seeking a job with Organizing For Action, the group aimed at helping to re-elect President Barack Obama.

Camp said all of this evidence combined shows that a special counsel is needed to investigate the IRS and Lois Lerner, who has refused to testify before Congress by pleading the Fifth Amendment.

“While the Committee has not seen any evidence of a serious investigation by your department, it is my sincere hope that in light of this new, strong evidence that you immediately begin aggressively investigating this matter or appoint a special counsel,” Camp wrote. “Failure to do so will only further erode public trust in not only the IRS, but the department as well.”

Imperial President ObamaWhile Republicans continue to push for a special counsel, the Department of Justice has not indicated it is willing to take that step.

Earlier Wednesday, the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing in which Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) said that while officials have said they are investigating, there’s little evidence of any action.

“[D]espite the administration’s stated commitment to its ‘investigation,’ the facts and recent events have demonstrated repeatedly that the administration’s real commitment is to slow-walk this investigation, and undermine congressional efforts to uncover the truth,” he said.

“Earlier this year, unnamed Justice Department officials leaked information to the Wall Street Journal suggesting that the department does not plan to file criminal charges over the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups,” he added. “On Super Bowl Sunday, President Obama stated that there was ‘not even a smidgen of corruption’ in connection with the IRS’s admitted targeting of conservative groups based upon their beliefs.”

Read Camp’s letter here:

holder 01holder 02

Complete MessageArticle collective closing


Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon

Los Angeles To Send Homeless To Internment Camps & Implant RFID Chips


Researched and Reported by Mac Slavo 13 hours ago

Homeless beggerAn anonymous source claiming to work inside of the Los Angeles Department of Health Services recently dropped a bombshell that could set a dangerous new precedent in how the government deals with those they find to be a burden or threat to a stable society.

In a report penned by Paul Joseph Watson, the whistleblower says that Los Angeles County is preparing to round up and forcibly house homeless citizens in detention facilities referred to internally by department employees as “FEMA Camps,” though the source says that they have been instructed to refer to the detention areas as “low cost housing” facilities.

According to the source, law enforcement teams will soon be rounding up homeless individuals on the streets, checking them into the facilities, and detaining them indefinitely for “their own health and safety.” What may be even more alarming, however, is that the government is reportedly planning on embedding these individuals with RFID chips presumably to track their whereabouts.

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

The program is focused around removing or relocating homeless people from the streets of downtown L.A., starting with Skid Row.

“We will approach them on the street asking if they need or want help usually offering food to get their direct attention, if they come into the office it makes our jobs twice as efficient,” said the supervisor.

“In most cases the decision is already made for them unless they become combative or belligerent in which case we send them in for a 72 hour psych evaluation and then transfer them while under sedation or heavy medication to the “facility.”

The supervisor stressed that the program would be “humane,” that it would help clean up the streets, and that the citizens being processed into the housing units would receive medical treatment, an RFID chip, room and board, but that “they cannot leave.”

The supervisor elaborated that the facility was not a prison, but that its population would be kept there “for their own health and safety.”

The whistleblower points to a page on the Department of Health Services official website which details how “roving teams” will help “provide short-term housing with health oversight to homeless DHS patients who are recovering from an acute illness or injury or have conditions that would be exacerbated by living on the street or in shelters.”

Full Report at Infowars

Many Americans will no doubt support these facilities because it’ll “clean up” their neighborhoods, making them safer and eliminating an eyesore. They won’t even blink about people being forcibly rounded up, drugged, detained and tracked like animals, so long as it happens out of view of their Utopia.Comming Soon 02

The government will, no doubt, hail the successes of such a program and will likely look to expand it to other cities and perhaps even to larger segments of the population.

One hypothetical scenario that could be imagined is that as more and more dangerous individuals are added to domestic terror watchlists, the government will look to intern suspected terrorists and their associates in such facilities, for their own health and safety of course.

The White House recently approved a substantial expansion of terrorist watchlists, which already boasts a threat list that includes hundreds of thousands of Americans. Under the recently declassified guidelines, being added to a watchlist requires no “concrete facts” or “irrefutable evidence.” The Imperial President Obamaguidelines go so far as to grant broad powers to White House administration officials to unilaterally add not only individuals, but entire “categories of people” to the lists.

One possible future envisions a scenario where specific “categories” of people are identified as dangerous to the public and, like the homeless, are rounded up for internment.

The dangers of such facilities and the means by which they will be populated if this is the actual plan in Los Angeles are a blaring warning sign that should be heeded by all Americans.

To paraphrase the poem by Martin Niemöller about the cowardice of Germans in the face of mass roundups – when they came for the homelesss, I did not speak out because I was not homeless...

obama- Marxist tyrant






30 Witnesses disappear

Complete Message

Article collective closing


The Next ‘Shot Heard ‘Round the World’ May Be Fired In Texas

tx militia patrol

A group of self-organized militiamen patrol in Texas near the Mexican border. Photo from the San Antonio Express-News.

The crisis along our southern border with Mexico is only getting worse.

The Mexican government is allowing tens of thousands of criminal aliens from Central American nations to transit their nation unimpeded to invade the United States. It’s a stunning development for a nation which (ironically) has far stricter immigration laws that the United States does, and which once used to arrest and deport illegals from El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua. For reasons unknown to us—which should perhaps be the focus of a Congressional investigation—Mexico has stopped turning these criminal invaders back, and may even be actively be assisting them in their travels north.

It would be relatively easy for the U.S. government to shut down this flow of criminal immigrants.

The U.. government could simply put economic sanctions on Mexico for failing to stop the invaders at their southern border, and the Mexicans would staunch the flow at two natural checkpoints, one in the state of Oaxaca on Mexico’s west coast, and the other in the state of Veracruz-Llave on the nation’s east coast. The vast wilderness area between these two states in the narrow “foot” of Mexico forces migrants to these coastal routes, where they can be captured and repatriated if the Mexican and United States governments had any interest in stopping the invasion, which the two federal governments quite obviously do not.

obama-border-is-open-378x257It thus appears that American citizens will be left to do the job of stopping the criminal invasion that these governments won’t.

When this nation was founded, the Constitution was written to lay out what the government could do, and the Bill of Rights was created define individual rights and protect the citizenry from governmental tyranny.

The Second Amendment—our primary focus at Bearing Arms—was written to codify a pre-existing human right to self-defense, which includes the right of self-defense from criminals, tyrants, and foreign invaders.

The Founders would take a very dim view of the federal government’s refusal to protect the Republic’s southern border with Mexico.

American presidents from both parties have repeatedly failed to build physical barrier to stop criminal immigration, drug cartels, arms smuggling, and terrorist infiltration. Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California are all but undefended in many stretches as a practical matter, and the Border Patrol has been hamstrung by bureaucrats and politicians who do not wish for them to succeed. At no point in our history, however, has a Presidential Administration so blatantly refused to lift a finger to stop a deluge of foreign invaders.

Is this what Barack Obama meant when he said that he wanted to “fundamentally transform” America?

A group of self-organized militiamen patrolling near the Mexican border talk with a U.S. Border Patrol agent. Photo from the San Antonio Express-News.

A group of self-organized militiamen patrolling near the Mexican border talk with a U.S. Border Patrol agent. Photo from the San Antonio Express-News.

Americans who are sick and tired of the refusal of the Obama Administration to stop importing criminal aliens and distributing them around the nation are beginning to take matters into their own hands. Many are protesting attempts by the federal government to bring these largely illiterate, unskilled, disease-carrying criminal invaders deeper into the heartland, but there are also groups now taking a very active role along the border themselves, seeking to stop the criminal invasion of our nation since the federal government has no apparent interest in enforcing the rule of law.

The militias are turning out.

Photos showing dozens of members of the militia groups on the U.S.-Mexico border carrying semi-automatic rifles and wearing masks, camouflage and tactical gear provide one of the first glimpses into the group’s activities on the border.

Members of the militia groups, who say they have 10 active “teams” along the state’s southern border, are seen at campsites, walking along the Rio Grande River, pointing rifles and pistols out of frame and flipping off the camera in the photos obtained by the San Antonio Express-News.

A spokesperson for the group provided the photos under the condition that members’ faces be blurred because of fear of

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

being identified by “cartel and gang members.”

One of the photos shows a Border Patrol agent leaning through an armed militia member’s vehicle window and pointing on a map. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection earlier this month strongly rebuked the group’s presence on the border but did not return multiple requests for comment regarding the photo.

Gov. Rick Perry, who last week ordered 1,000 Texas National Guard members to the border, declined to comment specifically on the militia groups through a spokesman but said he is “leading to secure the border.”

The groups, including Oathkeepers, Three Percenters and Patriots, began recruiting and organizing more than a month ago, as national media outlets began focusing on an influx of Central American immigrants illegally crossing the border, including more than 50,000 unaccompanied minors.

Immigration-PiperThese patrols of self-organized, self-supporting volunteer militias are armed with semi-automatic rifles. Most wear some form of military camouflage and kit, with multiple magazines for their weapons. Some wear military-grade body armor.  Many appear to be military combat veterans, and have defended the United States before in Afghanistan or Iraq.

This time, their acting with greater urgency, on our own soil.

To date, intercepts of criminal aliens by these militias have been peaceful affairs, with militias calling in the Border Patrol to capture invaders whose intention is to obtain the free food, medical care, and government housing that the Obama Administration seems intent on lavishing on criminal invaders that they seem to want to groom into a new far-left underclass of Democrat voters.

Eventually, however, these patrols are likely to run into armed coyotes, the smugglers who bring humans, weapons, and drug shipments across the border.  In many instances, these coyotes are actively escorted by (or are made entirely up of) members of the Mexican Army.

Eventually, there will be confrontations. There will be firefights. Americans and criminal invaders will both fall, and the vivid cost in blood along the border will inflame an American people who has been quietly simmering with rage against a lawless Administration.

How will Americans respond to civilians dying because federal agencies and the criminal-enabling Obama Administration refuse to fulfill their oaths of office?

If current sentiment is any guide, any of the self-organizing militia who fall will result in the mobilization of more volunteers, and any attempt by this corrupted government to stop the militia patrols or press criminal charges against men and women doing the job that the government intentionally fails to do will result in citizens standing against government agents like they did at Bundy Ranch… and with much less patience.

A group of self-organized militiamen patrol in Texas near the Mexican border. Photo from the San Antonio Express-News.

A group of self-organized militiamen patrol in Texas near the Mexican border. Photo from the San Antonio Express-News.

It is the duty of the federal government to secure the borders and prevent foreign invasion. They have resolutely refused to perform these tasks.

Their actions suggest that they are instead facilitating the invasion by refusing to secure the border, refusing to mobilize and deploy the National Guard, refusing to mobilize and deploy Homeland Security, and refusing to use the many diplomatic tools at their disposal to stop the flow of immigration at Mexico’s southern border, far from our own.

The federal government has abandoned their duty to defend the Republic. American citizens are now beginning to use their natural right to self-defense to form self-organized militias to protect their nation.

When government fails, the people will rise.

If we hope to remain a sovereign nation under a President who has abandoned the rule of law, we seem to have no other choice.



Complete Message

Article collective closing

9/11 Cross Is Safe From Atheist Group’s Lawsuit After Judge Gives Unusual Reason For Protecting It

Reported By Nicole 12 hours ago

Screen Shot 2014-07-28 at 5.46.43 PM

cp 11A meaningful and historic object is safe once more. After an attempt of the American Atheist organization to remove the “9/11 Memorial Cross” on grounds that it violated the separation of church and state, the appeals court affirmed a lower court decision to toss out a lawsuit against the National September 11 Memorial and Museum.

Note: They also would have settled for an Atheist plaque at the memorial to balance things out.

The appellate court stated in a unanimous decision that the cross is historic as much as it is religious:

“As a matter of law, the record compels the conclusion that appellees’ actual purpose in displaying The Cross at Ground Zero has always been secular: to recount the history of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and their aftermath.” —Circuit Judge Reena Raggi

And this:

“Thus, the Establishment Clause is not properly construed to command that government accounts of history be devoid of religious references. Nor is a permissible secular purpose transformed into an impermissible religious one because the government makes an historical point with an artifact whose historical significance derives, in whole or in part, from its religious symbolism.” —General Court Ruling Documentation

American Atheists – time to go back to the drawing board trying to censor people’s religious expression.i know

















Complete Message

Article collective closing

MAD TALENT: A Cover of Johnny Cash’s Hit Song ‘Ring of Fire’ Will Make You Slap Yo’ Mama

Illegal immigrants protest outside White House, with little fear of repercussions

protest1-300x180Illegal immigrant demonstrators were protesting outside the White House on Monday – but don’t expect America’s immigration officers to intervene.

An Immigration and Customs Enforcement official indicated that even if the protesters end up getting arrested by D.C. police, they’d have to be serious criminals for ICE to get involved.

“Unless the individuals meet ICE’s enforcement priorities, it’s unlikely that the agency would get involved in the case,” the official told

Under a policy that’s been in effect for several years, ICE focuses deportation mostly on serious criminals and – in some cases — those caught in the act of crossing the border. The agency prioritizes deportation for felons, repeat offenders, gang members and others with a serious criminal record. But the agency largely gives a pass to other undocumented residents.

obama-border-is-open-378x257This is why illegal immigrant activists can protest outside the White House without worrying too much about ICE.  

They did so at lunchtime on Monday, marching across Lafayette Park to the White House and advocating a reprieve for illegal immigrant parents who brought their children to the U.S. – and whose children have benefited from a separate reprieve issued in 2012 by the Department of Homeland Security.

According to The Washington Times, illegal immigrant protesters also planned to demonstrate outside the White House on Monday afternoon, to call on immigration groups to boycott any administration meetings until illegal immigrants are included in those



























Complete Message

Article collective closing

Obama the Christian Ignores Slaughter of Christians in Iraq


Posted by on Jul 28, 2014

Obama defending muslims TwoIf Barack Obama is such a devout Christian, as he claimed during his run for office in 2008, he has a revolting and disgusting way of showing it, as he stands by while Christians now are being forced to convert, flee or face beheading by ISIS taking over Iraq.

A Christian clergyman shared with reporters his great anxiety over the escalating persecution, and on July 26 the Breitbart report carried this story:

 Andrew White, the vicar of the only Anglican church in Iraq, told BBC Radio 4 that Christianity is coming to an end in the Middle Eastern country. The Islamic State, formerly known as ISIS, is forcing Christians out of towns and into isolation. “Things are so desperate, our people are disappearing,” he said. “We have had people massacred, their heads chopped off. The Christians are in grave Obama defending muslimsdanger. There are literally Christians living in the desert and on the street. They have nowhere to go.”


 “Are we seeing the end of Christianity?” he continued. “We are committed come what may, we will keep going to the end, but it looks as though the end could be very near.”

 ISIS told Christians in Mosul, home to one of the largest Christian communities in the world, to convert to Islam, pay a protection tax, or die. The majority chose to leave, and for the first time in over 2,000 years, there are no Christians in Mosul. ISIS even marked Christian homes with an “N” for Nazarene.

 “There is not a single Christian family left in Mosul,” said Bashar Nasih Behnam, who left with his two children. “The last one was a disabled Christian woman. She stayed because she could not get out. They came to her and said you have to get out and if you don’t we will cut off your head with a sword. That was the last family.”

 Christians spoke out about the treatment they endured from ISIS. They said ISIS destroyed churches and statues of Jesus Christ and Christian Persecutionthe Virgin Mary, and raised the black flag in Mary’s place. Terrorists robbed the Christians at checkpoints, taking the earrings women were wearing.

 White is in London to make sure the United Kingdom does not forget about the Christians in Iraq.

 “We do not want Britain to forget us. We – and I’m saying ‘we’ talking like an Iraqi Christian – have always been with the British because they have already been with us,” he said. “Individual churches, individual Christians in Britain, have been a bigger help than anybody around the world.”

 There were a million Christians in Iraq prior to 2003, but there are now fewer than 500,000. It is unknown if they can ever return. After forcing out the Christians, ISIS blew up Jonah’s tomb and imposed Sharia law in Mosul. The women must now wear full-face veils, perfume is forbidden, and the shops must place veils on all mannequins. According to the U.N., ISIS even ordered female genital mutilation, but ISIS denies the allegation.

This is a crisis that needs immediate and decisive action to prevent the spread of Islamic persecution of Christians. Their goal is to annihilate the followers of Jesus Christ, and claim supremacy for Islam. To the shame of Christian America, President Obama is enabling their efforts! We the People must oppose him in no uncertain terms!

Wake up America

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Complete Message

Article collective closing


Threats to My Child


Posted by on Jul 28, 2014

Kids are going to hurt themselves, and try as any parent may to protect them from all threats – they’re going to experience some bumps and bruises – no matter how vigilant you are. Especially when they’re very young –  they’re going to “fall down, go boom.”

daughterAs I sit here writing this, my 16-month-old daughter is eating an egg and mushroom omelette. She loves mushrooms.

Along with God and my wife, she’s one of the most precious things in my life. I look at her and want to make sure nothing bad ever happens to her but unfortunately, that is an impossibility.

Especially for my daughter who seems to be fearless.

She has not met an obstacle that is too big to climb, but at 16 months old, her balance and agility don’t match her adventurous spirit. Sometimes I’m able to catch her or at least lessen the fall.

Other times she falls, gets hurt and cries. My wife or I pick her up and love the pain away. As soon as my daughter feels better she’s at it again. What I’m describing above is natural though – just “growing pains.” Children will get hurt.

Riding bicycles, climbing slides, running and falling… it is called being a kid. It scares us as parents but of course it’s natural. Sadly, Now, there are also some very real unnatural threats/hurts out there that can guarded against.

For example. Would you send your 7-year-old daughter to a sex offenders house for a sleepover? That’s not a joke or even rhetorical, in fact, a “writer” on is suggesting just that – albeit with an explanation and caveat to at least think about:

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more


In a “Dear Abbey” like column a lady identified as “Stumped” asks if she should allow her daughter to have a sleepover at a friend’s house where the father is a registered sex offender.  His offense occurred some years ago for having sex with his then 14-year-old girlfriend. He was 18 at the time and was turned in by the girls parents (rightly so in my opinion!).

Now Emily Yoffe at writes:

“He has been held accountable for his actions, he is no threat to the community (including your daughter), and what he did when he was a teen should not haunt him the rest of his days..”

So the question at least in Emily Yoffe’s mind becomes one of degree:  Should the actions of an 18-year-old follow him around on a permanent “sex offender” record – or should young people “in love” be treated differently than, say pedophiles, rapists or other types of sexual assault? Most parents of young girls know what this man did when he was 18 is wrong and would agree that a 14-year-old girl doesn’t have the ability to consent as an adult.

But decades later, now with his own daughter and family – is he a danger to society? Perhaps, but is it automatic and a no-brainer? Perhaps not. We’ve all read stories of authoritative overreach where a grade schooler will be charged with a sex offense for kissing the little red-haired girl in their second-grade class during recess.

Permanent record for rambunctious little 7-year-old Billy?

Or what about in States where a 16-year-old boy (notice I didn’t say, ‘man’?) can be charged with the statutory rape of his 15-year-old girlfriend – when both of them have been “hooking up” for  who knows how long?

I’m not excusing or condoning it. If I find out about something like this with my little angel when she grows up – that boy better hope he’s taken into custody before I get to him.

It is your responsibility to keep your children safe, that I know and harmless or not this is a “threat” that can be avoided. Alas, as I said, she’ll fall down and go boom a few times along the way, I’m afraid.

However, as her daddy, I will still try to protect her from all harm. That is what we do as parents. Daddy set a high standard

Complete Message

Article collective closing


Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon

Standing Behind Israel

Posted on July 29, 2014



Complete Message

Article collective closing


Video of the Day


Complete Message

Article collective closing


Obama Thanks Muslims for ‘Building the Very Fabric of Our Nation’

July 28, 2014 By

Obama (1)


Obama defending muslims

ConfusedFrom the White House website, posted on Sunday, July 27 (emphasis added):

As Muslims throughout the United States and around the world celebrate Eid-al-Fitr, Michelle and I extend our warmest wishes to them and their families.  This last month has been a time of fasting, reflection, spiritual renewal, and service to the less fortunate.  While Eid marks the completion of Ramadan, it also celebrates the common values that unite us in our humanity and reinforces the obligations that people of all faiths have to each other, especially those impacted by poverty, conflict, and disease.

In the United States, Eid also reminds us of the many achievements and contributions of Muslim Americans to building the very fabric of our nation and strengthening the core of our democracy.  That is why we stand with people of all faiths, here at home and around the world, to protect and advance their rights to prosper, and we welcome their commitment to giving back to their communities.

On behalf of the Administration, we wish Muslims in the United States and around the world a blessed and joyous celebration.  Eid Mubarak.Islam follower

Earlier this month a Gallup poll indicated that 72% of Muslims approve of the job Obama is doing, even though his support has plummeted among virtually every other group.

Two weeks ago, Obama celebrated the Muslim holiday of Ramadan in the White House.

Imperial President ObamaImperial-President
Complete Message
Article collective closing

‘STAND AND DELIVER’: How Will America Respond This Time?


 Written by Larry Usoff on July 28, 2014

highwaymen-300x180Stand and deliver…those words have struck fear in many a heart, when highwaymen were as common as fleas on a dog.   The vehicle, usually a stagecoach or some other horse-drawn conveyance, would be stopped by a man, or several, standing in the middle of the road. Once the coach stopped, and the robbers were sure that they had the advantage of surprise, they would instruct the drivers and passengers to stand and deliver.  That meant whatever was worthwhile was to be delivered to the robbers.  That was then…this is now.

Our very own band of highwaymen don’t actually say those words…they don’t have to.  Our robbers have a huge government agency, the Infernal Revenue Service(and no, that’s not a typographical error) to order the public to stand and deliver.   The IRS, which can strike fear into the heart of even the most law-abiding among us, simply sends a letter to the subject of their attention.   The letter tells you when, where, and sometimes, how, you will deliver what that bunch of crooks demands.  

Obamas IRS GestapoLong I have remonstrated against the IRS, and their under-handed, Gestapo-like, machinations.  Of all the useless

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

agencies that the government insists on propagating, and which should be eliminated, that’s probably the one that should be at the top of the list…and the list is long, believe me.

For some reason that escapes me at the moment, the American public seems to have been struck dumb.  It appears that, no matter the provocation, the twin devils of ignorance and apathy are alive and well.  Domestic or foreign, enemies of the country are working round-the-clock to achieve the goal of complete dumbing-down.  The school systems, apparently held hostage by foreign governments who provide huge sums of money to have their choice of textbooks used…and that results in altered history, outright subtraction of important events, and a highly slanted view of the world.

Being an old man, and looking back on a life of rather uninspiring events, it struck me that this could be the twilight of my country.  What happened to “morning in America”?Where did the Imperial President Obamaexceptionalism go?  Could it be that we have taken the bait…hook, line and sinker?  Because one person, a man that I personally believe is not an American, says that every country is exceptional in its own way, we swallowed that lie? Correct me if I’m wrong, but didn’t Americans invent a few things that the rest of the world now takes for granted?  Didn’t this country defeat some of the world’s finest militaries, and save the rest of the world while they were doing it?   Why then, would we accept being second-best at anything?  Would we have meekly gotten out of the stagecoach when they said to stand and deliver?  I don’t think so.  We might have gone down, but we would have been fighting.

Americans have always been fighters.  At the Alamo, beyond Pearl Harbor, even the horror of the War Between The States, which some might call the Civil War.  I’ve never understood that name because there was nothing, and never is, anything, civil about war. When war comes, as it does from time to time, Americans have always answered the call to arms, so why now, when we are threatened by several countries with unstable governments and leaders, are we thinning the ranks of the armed forces?   The gall of the government, to issue pink slips to troops while they’re fighting!  What imbecile thought that was a good idea?

Say, here’s a thought: when’s the last time you read a book?   With the advent of television, computers, tablets, pads, and who knows what–nobody is reading books anymore.  The shelves in my office are packed with books, and you could trace the history of America by reading them.  One in particular, How America Saved The World by Eric Hammel is, probably, the best book that explains what mistakes America has made in the past and is repeating those very same mistakes now.    Where liberty dwells

It may come to pass, during my lifetime, that a different sort of highwayman may order the United States to stand and deliver.  What will we do then?  Roll over and play dead?The current administration would prefer that to happen and, if I’m right, is following an agenda that will allow that to happen.  If you think Saul Alinsky, Cloward and Piven, and the Communist Manifesto, you will have the plan right there, and it’s ominous.

“Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of a day; but a series of oppressions, begun at a distinguished period and pursued unalterably through every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematic plan of reducing a people to slavery.” –Thomas Jefferson

Stand and deliver, America!


Complete MessageArticle collective closing


BOO-FRICKIN’-HOO: Liberals Flipping Out Over “Straight White Guy” Festival


I thought liberals loved freedom of expression? Are straight white guys not allowed to have any pride? Check it out…

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

In a culture dominated by political correctness, if a person even politely disagrees with the homosexual lifestyle, liberals in entertainment and politics immediately resort to name calling, bashing, and all manner of activities they accuse and often condemn others for participating in.

Keeping that thought in mind, one can imagine the seething outrage that would fly out in thick waves from liberals if someone where to hold a “heterosexual pride” rally. According to the Washington Times, that is exactly what’s going down in an Ohio park in September, and those on the left are livid, as one angry critic has already voiced his disapproval of the so-called “Straight White Guy Festival.”

“This kind of think implies there’s some kind of struggle going on for being a straight white person in Ohio,” gay marriage activist Michael Premo told the news station. “Straight white people are doing just fine. I think it detracts from the real problems of Ohio that need to be solved, that are being denied their constitutional rights because of who they are, or who they love.”



Liberals seem to think on a different wavelength than the rest of humanity, especially when it comes to the hypocrisy in their “rage” over social issues, gay Shovingmarriage in particular.

“Gay Pride” protests are held on a weekly, possibly daily, basis all around the country, in celebration of someone’s activities that should largely be a private matter behind closed doors.

These rallies encourage homosexuals to be proud of their sexual orientation, to flaunt it out in the open, and otherwise revel in it as the fullness of their identity, which seems demeaning as these individuals are certainly more than just their sexual preferences.

Read more: Conservative Tribune

Complete Message

Article collective closing

Stop Amnesty Bill Introduced by Sen. Ted Cruz


Posted on July 28, 2014 by

obama-border-is-open-378x257The DREAM Act (Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors) was first introduced by Senators Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and Dick Durbin (D-IL) in August 2001. The original bill would apply only to illegals who entered the US when they were minors and have lived here for a minimum of 5 years and have graduated from high school. If these young illegals completed 2 years of college (or college equivalent program) or 2 years of active military service, they would be granted temporary residency in the US for a period of 6 years. If they fulfilled all of the requirements and have remained free of any criminal activity, they could then be eligible to apply for permanent residency.

The DREAM Act of 2001 was never approved, but not forgotten. Versions of it have been introduced in 2007, 2009 and 2011, but again, the measured was never passed. In May of 2012, President Barack Obama announced that he was issuing an executive order to stop the deportation of young illegals who basically met the requirements spelled out in the DREAM Act. He called his program the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program. Technically, Immigration-Piperhe bypassed Congress to establish a new law which in reality is a violation of the Constitution, but no one seems to care to do anything about it.

Under Obama’s provision, these under 30 illegals would be granted permits to work in the U.S. which also entitled them to a number of state and federal benefits. One of those benefits included obtaining a valid state driver’s license. This provision instantly raised alarm flags among many conservatives.

There is no doubt that Obama’s promise of amnesty to the millions of illegal youth in America is responsible for the flood of illegal Central American kids. If that promise of amnesty was removed, the main motive for their coming would be eliminated and America would no longer be as promising to them.

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) has introduced a piece of legislation that is being referred to as the Stop Amnesty bill. Cruz’s bill will defund the Obama administration’s program that allows illegals to remain in the US without fear of deportation. It is tied to the legislation that Obama is trying to push to get Congress to fund him the $3.7 million he wants for his immigration policies.

Cruz’s bill, not yet given a number, states:A Service Member

“A Bill to prevent the expansion of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program unlawfully created by Executive memorandum on August 15, 2012.”

“Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,”

“Section 1. Limitation on Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals; Restrictions on Employment Authorization for Aliens no in Lawful Status.”

“No agency or instrumentality of the Federal Government may use Federal funding or resources—“

“(1) to consider or adjudicate any new or previously denied application of any alien requesting consideration of deferred action for childhood arrivals, as authorized by Executive memorandum on August 15, 2012; or”

“(2) to authorize any alien to work in the United States if such alien—“

“(A) was not lawfully admitted into the United States in compliance with the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.); and”

“(B) is not in lawful status in the United States on the date of the enactment of this Act.”

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

In the released statement, Cruz stated:

“The only way to stop the border crisis is to stop President Obama’s amnesty. If we do not put an end to its expansion — to the promise of amnesty that is the reason so many are coming — then more little boys and girls will be trafficked, abused, and even killed.”

Imperial President ObamaIn addition to his Stop Amnesty Bill, Cruz is expected to introduce several other pieces of legislation designed to increase the speed with which illegal aliens will be deported and to allow governors of the border states to use National Guard troops with the use of federal funds.

In plain language, Cruz wants all of the DREAMers deported and to prevent them and all illegals from being able to legally work and take jobs from American citizens. Cruz is working to protect the American border, protect American jobs and protect American citizens and cities from being ravaged by the flood of illegals. It’s about time someone in Washington is trying to take steps to protect America from the alien invasion.


Complete Message


Article collective closing

The Next Great War

July 28, 2014 By

Al Qaeda on the March
In the July 24 edition of The Wall Street Journal there was a commentary, “Wanted: Converts to Judaism” by the chancellor of the Jewish Theological

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Hate Israel and AmericaSeminary, Arnold M. Eisen. I thought to myself that this was an extraordinary time to be suggesting conversion to a faith that is literally under attack in Israel and being attacked by the reemergence of anti-Semitism in Europe. Here in America we are witnessing the most pro-Islamic and anti-Semitic administration in the history of nation.

In the wake of the Holocaust following World War Two what anti-Semitism existed in the U.S. gave way to an era of good will toward Jews. In Europe open expressions of anti-Semitism were out of favor. Eisen’s concern is the extensive inter-marriage between Christians and Jews in which Judaism is often abandoned in our historically Christian society. The news about Jews in the post-war years was largely about the nation of Israel and the wars it fought to re-establish and maintain the Jewish state.

What those wars should have told us was that Islamic hatred of Judaism extends to Christianity as well.

For Americans that lesson was driven home on September 11, 2001, but even the memory of that event has begun to fade to such an extent that Americans have twice elected a President who has never hidden his admiration for Islam, whose father was a Muslim, and who spent part of his youth in the Islamic nation of Indonesia. In office, his antipathy to Israel has been in stark contrast to the decades of support for Israel that presidents since Harry Truman have demonstrated.

ConfusedA curious trend has emerged in America that runs counter to its entire history. The celebratory elements of Christian holy days, particularly Christmas, came CP 01under attack with demands that holiday scenes of crèches and even crosses be removed from public areas. Being religious was not encouraged and the tradition of starting the school day with a prayer was banned.

It is not too far a reach to say that the West, America and Europe, has been abandoning the depth of faith that distinguished it as church attendance fell off and resistance to attacks on the practice of religion declined. Home to some of the most beautiful churches on Earth, those in Europe are too often virtually empty.

This has not been the case in the Middle East and parts of Africa where Islam has awakened from its passive existence due in part to the colonization that preceded and followed World War One. The riches that oil provided have played a role and today a nation like Qatar is funding the emergence of ISIS, the self-declared caliphate calling itself the Islamic State.

Other oil-rich Middle East nations have supported al Qaeda only to discover that they were among its targets. ISIS has turned on Muslims in the area between Syria and into northern Iraq whom they declare hypocrites and apostates. In Mosul, Christians have been told to convert, pay a tax, or die.

Why Does Obama Hate IsraelWhile the rockets that have rained down on Israel are dramatic, the attacks on Christians throughout the Middle East have received less attention, but Christian Arabs have been driven from their homelands in the same way the establishment of Israel saw Jews forced to abandon homes in which they had lived for generations.

While Americans, joined by European negotiators, attempt to get Iran to abandon its nuclear weapons program, they remain blind to the role Iran has played for decades, using Hezbollah and Hamas, two Palestinian terrorist organizations, to wage war on Israel and, by extension, the U.S. Not a day goes by without the calls, “Death to America” and “Death to Israel.” There is only one way to end Iran’s nuclear program and that is to destroy the facilities that enrich uranium and plutonium. At some point, it will come to that because it must. 

Israel is making it clear to the world that there is only one way to rid itself of Hamas and that is a military operation. Its troops are finding an astounding matrix of tunnels whose only purpose is to attack it.

Utterly devoid of any moral standards, Hamas uses homes, schools and hospitals to hide its arsenal of rockets and Palestinian civilians are forced to act as human shields. The world’s media focuses on the deaths of their men, women, and children, but little notice of the rockets and missiles that continue to be fired at Israel. Meanwhile Hamas has been abandoned by Egypt and most other Middle Eastern nations other than Iran and Turkey.

We Hate JewsThe so-called Palestinians have been led by men like the late Yassir Arafat and currently by Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority, Fatah. Abbas has recently moved his family to a home in Jordan in the face of criticism that he has been too “cooperative” with Israel. On Quds Day last week, an event organized throughout the Middle East by Iran, an estimated 10,000 protesters gathered in the West Bank to protest Israel’s control of Jerusalem, a holy city to Jews and Christians, claimed as well by Islam. It was founded by King David.

Even so, the European business sector was quick to engage with Iran following the news of the negotiations which have been extended and which have granted Iran billions in return for sitting at the table to discuss an end to the nuclear program that it will never abandon.

In 1913, no one in Europe or America would have ever predicted the beginning of World War One in 1914. It began on July 28, 1914. As the historian Charles Emmerson said of the unanticipated war, “Humanity looked into the abyss and peering into the depths, found its own dark, disfigured reflection staring back.”

In 2014, a century later, humanity needs to take a look at the fascistic, utterly immoral objectives and practices of Islam, and understand that it is at war with us, with moderate Muslims, and with all other faiths. It’s not “if” will shall have to deal with it militarily as Israel is doing, but “when.” That day is not far off.

© Alan Caruba, 2014


Obama defending muslims

Who is better off














Article collective closing

New York Times Declares War on Christians and Muslims


That’s right, the so-called “paper of record” is declaring war on people of faith, especially practicing Christians and Muslims.  We never thought we’d find ourselves in the same canoe with followers of Mohammed, may he rot in hell, but here we are.

Here’s New York Times writer Josh Barro.

nyt 01

“…we need to stamp them out, ruthlessly.”  Got that?  “Ruthlessly.”

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more


This comes from the so-called “tolerant left,” the same people who demand that everyone be heard and that everyone be at the table.  Everyone, that is, who agrees with them.  You can bet your bottom dollar that every college campus will be taking up this crusade as well.

ShovingThe gay mafia on the left is already taking Christian bakers to court to force them to bake wedding cakes, and they’re doing it in places with dozens, if not hundreds, of bakers who would be happy to accommodate them.  They’re forcing their agenda on the US military, first it was the demise of “don’t ask, don’t tell” and now the gay mafia is forcing the issue of transsexuals in combat.

We want to be clear.  Today’s left has fully reverted to their fascist roots.  Don’t let anybody tell you that fascism is a “right wing” ideology, it’s not.  It is, and always has been, an ideology of the far left.

nyt 02


Imperial President ObamaSound familiar.  “Ruled by a dictator who controls the lives of the people.”  That’s the perfect definition of today’s Democratic Party and in particular the Obama administration.  They know exactly what kind of health insurance you need and who your doctor should be.  They know best what your diet should be and will go out of their way to impose their idea of a menu on your local school district.  They just know that every employer should buy birth control and abortion for their employees, without regard to the values of the employer.

This fascist administration even knows what and how your children should be taught in their government run reeducation camps schools.

Oh, and never forget these are the same people who want to take your guns away from you.  We wonder why they’d want to do that?We have been torn apart




American Gestapo














Article collective closing


The Battle for Control of Congress In 2014




  • House GOP have 198 safe seats. House Democrats have 162 safe seats. House GOP have a 36 seat advantage over the Democrats in terms of safe seats.
  • There are 75 seats being contested and for the Democrats to become the majority again they need to win in 56 of these 75 seats. This means they need to win all 26 seats they have a small lead, plus all 17 seats they are tied, plus 13 of the 32 seats that the GOP have a small lead.
  • Senate GOP have 41 seats safe or not up for grabs. Senate Democrats have 40 seats safe or not up for grabs.
  • Senate GOP have a 1 seat advantage over the Democrats in terms of safe seats.
  • There are 19 seats being contested and for the GOP to become the majority again they need to win in 10 of these 19 seats. This means they have to win all 5 seats they have a small lead plus 5 of the 8 seats they are tied.
  • For the Democrats to keep a majority they have to win all 6 seats they have a small lead plus 4 of the 8 seats they are tied.

It is obviously a lot closer for the battle to control the US Senate than it is for the battle to control the US House.

vote 01

vote 02vote 03vote 04

We may not know the outcome after the general election on November 4, 2014 if Georgia and Louisiana contests are still in play. There is a Libertarian

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

candidate in Georgia for US Senate who could receive enough votes to keep any candidate from receiving 50% of the votes plus 1. If this happens then a runoff is held for the top 2 vote getters on Tuesday January 6, 2015.

There are no party primaries in Louisiana. All candidates from all parties appear on the open primary ballot. If no candidate receives a majority (50% of the vote plus 1) on November 4, 2014, then a runoff is held between the top two vote getters on Saturday December 6, 2014.

There are 33 states electing 36 US Senators in 2014, and 19 of these states have closely contested elections with 100 days before the general election. The projections with respect to which seats are contested can change between now and then. Please get out and vote for the Republican candidate in these 33 states. Our country is never going to be able to get on the right track again if the majority of voters continue to elect Democrats to the US Senate. If you live in one of the 17 states that is not electing a US Senator in 2014, then consider adopting a Republican candidate to donate money and time to make calls to get out the vote. The future of this republic is on the line


Complete Message

Article collective closing

Traitor To Hamas: Son of Hamas Founder Converts to Christianity and Exposes Hamas [VIDEO]


Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Editor’s Note: Son of Hamas founder Sheikh Hassan Yousef, Mosab Hassan Yousef risks his life to expose Hamas on a public platform.

He says the common preaching in their mosques were ‘…without the shedding of innocent blood for the sake of the ideology, you will not be able to build an Islamic state’; with this indoctrination starting as young as 5-years-old.

Mosab also informs us that Israel is just one piece of land for them to conquer. If they obtain Israel, they will not stop there.   Watch the video to see what else Mosab Yousef has to say. It will open your eyes.


ConfusedObama defending muslims














Article collective closing

KIMBERLY GUILFOYLE: Fox News Host Hammers Obama With Hilarious Tweet


Kimberly Guilfoyle seems to know Obama’s weakness. She hammers him with this one tweet that is both hilarious and somehow eerily true – because it seems like Obama would only act in the case of something preventing him from fundraising.

kimberlyArticle collective closing


Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon















Article collective closing

Fainting Happiness: Dog Reunited with Owner Nearly Passes Out from Overwhelming Joy [VIDEO]


Posted on July 25, 2014

You know your dog loves you when they nearly pass out from being so excited to see you. Rebecca Ehalt was reunited with her four-legged friend after two years of separation. The dog squeals with excitement at the sight of her, but almost passes out because of overwhelming joy. It is so adorable and sweet to see how much this dog loves it’s owner.


Article collective closing


Military bars troops from attending Vacation Bible school honor


A Soldier on flag detail prepares to fold Old Glory. (U.S. Army/Sgt. John Carkeet IV)

Bible Baptist Church in Carthage, Missouri is a small country church bursting with American pride. Old Glory is posted in the sanctuary. And every morning at summer youth camp, the teenagers pledge allegiance and sing the national anthem.

Patriotic holidays are big doings at Bible Baptist. On Memorial Day, the church ladies put out quite a spread – fried chicken, potato salad. Veterans would wear their uniforms and the preacher would salute them during the morning worship service.

Join Todd on Facebook for Conservative Conversation!

“We are a very patriotic church,” Pastor Kent Hogan told me. “We love America. We love this country.”

Imperial President ObamaSo it was not that big of a surprise when the church decided to honor the military during their annual Vacation Bible School. The theme was “God’s Rescue Squad.” And each day of the week, the church invited local “rescue squads” to visit with the boys and girls.

The paramedics came on Monday and on Tuesday, the fire department showed up. The boys and girls were taught how to stop, drop and roll. On Wednesday, the Jasper County Sheriff’s Dept. brought their K-9 unit..

But our story picks up with what happened on Thursday. That was the day when the church was supposed to honor the National Guard. They had invited troops from the nearby armory to drop by with one of their Humvees.

“We were going to thank them for protecting our religious liberty,” said Pastor Hogan. “It was more of a promotion for the military – to show the kids what the military does.”

But the National Guard did not visit Bible Baptist Church on Thursday night, and the reason why has caused great anger and frustration among church members.

“We were told it was against military policy for National Guard troops to participate in Vacation Bible School,” Pastor Hogan said. “They said if the National Guard had assets on church property it would look like the National Guard is sponsoring the Baptist religion.”

Pastor Hogan said he was dumbfounded.

“We are right in the middle of the United States of America,” the pastor said. “We are part of the Bible Belt. You read about We have been torn apartthis stuff going on in big cities. But in Carthage?”

The pastor said the military was concerned about people getting offended by the sight of National Guard troops visiting a church.

“They said they didn’t want to offend anybody. Well, it’s offended our whole church.”

So Pastor Hogan reached out to his state representative – a Republican named Mike Kelley. Kelley then called the adjunct general of the Missouri National Guard.

“They told me that federal policy prohibits them from doing anything with any specific church,” Kelley said. “The guys on the state level did everything they could. I have great respect for our local Missouri National Guard. But we are dealing with an over-burdensome federal regulation.”

The Missouri National Guard did not return my calls for comment – but it doesn’t matter. Kelley sent me a copy of the Army regulation.

It states: “Army participation must not selectively benefit (or appear to benefit) any person, group, or corporation (whether profit or nonprofit); religion, sect, religious or sectarian group, or quasi-religious or ideological movement.”

The policy also states that troops are to avoid any activities that might involve or appear to involve the promotion, endorsement, or sponsorship of any religious or sectarian movement.

Rep. Kelley told me he is incredibly disappointed with the federal policy and feels especially bad for the church.

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

“He (Pastor Hogan) basically got blown off by the federal government,” Kelley said.

Several members of the Missouri National Guard told me they were disgusted by what happened. They only agreed to be quoted provided I not disclose their identities.

“I can tell you I’m ashamed and embarrassed right now,” one Guardsman said. ‘This isn’t the military I signed up for.”

Other soldiers said it was extremely disappointing and embarrassing.

“We had a lot of disappointed kiddos because of the National Guard being unwilling to allow a Humvee and a few soldiers to spend an hour at a Baptist Church,” another Guardsman said. “It makes we wonder what I’m actually fighting for.”

But I believe this soldier’s observations and analysis truly sum up our nation’s current state of affairs.

“I will never understand why it’s okay for the military to march in a gay pride parade but not be allowed to spend an hour CP 01talking to children who look up to them (soldiers),” the Guardsman said. “I honestly never thought I’d see the day that this would happen in my hometown.”

In June, the Department of Defense gave permission for a military color guard to march in Washington, D.C.’s gay pride parade. It marked the first time in history the U.S. Army Military District of Washington participated in the parade.

Pastor Hogan said the entire incident is both appalling and ludicrous.

“I don’t think most Americans realize how much their religious liberty is in jeopardy,” he said. “If they did this to us – how bad is it somewhere else? This is not just a big city issue. This is a small town America issue. Americans need to wake up.”

Welcome to the age of enlightenment, Pastor Hogan – where the military can march in a gay pride parade but they can’t hang out with six-year-olds at Vacation Bible School.

Todd Starnes is host of Fox News & Commentary, heard on hundreds of radio stations. Sign up for his American Dispatch newsletter, be sure to join his Facebook page, and follow him on Twitter. His latest book is “God Less America.”

Article collective closing

Here’s What Happened After an Ohio Sheriff Sent a Bill to the Mexican President for the Illegals in His Jail

Jul. 25, 2014 8:38pm Erica Ritz

obama-border-is-open-378x257Butler County Sheriff Richard Jones said Friday that he sent a letter to Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto, charging him for all the illegals in his jail.

What happened next? The Ohio sheriff told Dana Loesch: “The federal government sends me a letter and said I violated a treaty of like, 1790.”

When Loesch asked for more information, Jones continued: “I sent him a bill for the prisoners that are in my jail. They came here illegally. I’ve not gotten any money from them, but I billed them so much. And I’ll tell you what I got in return: my life was threatened.”

Jones said he got a call from the FBI saying there were three sheriffs in the country that were going to be killed by the drug cartels, and he was one of the three.

Butler County Sheriff Richard Jones appears on TheBlaze TV’s ‘Dana’ with Dana Loesch July 25, 2014. (Photo: TheBlaze TV)


Jones has also written a letter to President Barack Obama, “asking and pleading with him not to bring these people here to the state of Ohio, and to secure our borders.”

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

“We’ve had horrendous crimes here in this community,” Jones said. “We had a senior citizen, an elderly lady, molested by a teenager that came over from Mexico. We had another one molested — an eight year old girl. We’ve had drugs pouring in, more so than before the government said the borders were sealed. And we’re being run over by the drug dealers coming to this community. The violence has increased, and we’re a long way from the borders.”

Jones said his county spends eight to ten million dollars each month on welfare programs, which he called “free stuff,” and said that’s “some of the reason that they come here.”

 “It’s a terrible, terrible tragedy,” Jones said. “People’s lives are being threatened. It’s in the state of Ohio, for crying out loud. We’re not in Arizona; we’re not in California.”

Jones said the administration is making it “too easy” for those wishing to harm America to cross into the United States.

“They’re going to walk in with backpacks. They’re going to put some dirty bombs together, [and] they’re going to do something really terrible. It’s too easy,” Jones said. “We don’t know who they are. They don’t have vaccinations. Our jails are full. They hit and run. It’s totally out of control, and it’s gotten worse just in the past twelve months.”


Imperial President Obama













Article collective closing


‘Christianity as we know it in Iraq is being wiped out’


Rep. Wolf calls out the West, Obama, Congress: ‘The silence is deafening’

Researched and written by Bob Unruh; Joined WND in 2006 after nearly three decades with the Associated Press, as well as several Upper Midwest newspapers, where he covered everything from legislative battles and sports to tornadoes and homicidal survivalists. He is also a photographer whose scenic work has been used commercially.


A member of Congress is calling out Western civilization, President Obama and Congress for their “deafening silence” on the purge by radical Muslims of

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

anything Christian in Iraq, especially Mosul, where Christians had lived for some 2,000 years.

The warning from Rep. Frank Wolf, R-Va., was blunt.

 “Christianity as we know it in Iraq is being wiped out.”

On the House floor, he addressed the fact that Muslims, members of a terror group that has been called Islamic State of Syria and al-Sham, or ISIS, and also Islamic State, have been sweeping across parts of Iraq, killing and destroying.

“I want to read parts of an email I received yesterday from someone in the ground in Iraq: ‘All Mosul churches and monasteries are seized by ISIS. There are around 30. The cross has been removed from all of them. Many of them are burned, destroyed and looted. Many others are being used as ISIS centers. The religious Sunni, Shiite and Christian tombs are destroyed in Mosul. This destruction is endangering very ancient sites, such as prophet Jonah’s tomb, which was broken last week, according to many reporters,’” Wolf said.

“‘It has been widely reported that ISIS soldiers have painted ‘N’ on the doors of Christians to signify that they are ‘Nasara,’ the word for Christian,” he said. “With the exception of Israel, the Bible contains more references to the cities, regions and nations of ancient Iraq than any other country.”Christian Persecution

He called the attacks on Christians “genocide.”

“I also believe it is a crime against humanity,” he said. “Where is the West? Where is the Obama administration? Where is the Congress? The silence is deafening. The West, particularly the church, needs to speak out.”

He said the Obama administration “needs to make protecting this ancient community a priority.’

“President Obama and Secretary of State Kerry need to have the same courage as President Bush and former Secretary of State Colin Powell when they said genocide was taking place in Darfur,” he said. “The Congress needs to hold this administration accountable for its failure to act. The United Nations has a role, too. It should immediately initiate proceedings in the International Criminal Court against ISIS for crimes against humanity.”

Multiple reports have documented the ISIS purge in Mosul. At one point, Muslims gave Christians three alternatives: adopt Islam, pay a jizya tax (a tax for not being Muslim in an area under Muslim control) or “the sword.”

Families chased out of their homes and city with no more than the clothes they were wearing reported they were “robbed.”

Chaldean Patriarch Louis Sako told Agence France-Press: “For the first time in the history of Iraq, Mosul is now empty of Christians.”


ConfusedWolf quoted from an editorial in the Wall Street Journal, under the headline “The Christian Purge From Mosul.”

“Imagine if a fundamentalist Christian sect captured the French city of Lyon and began a systematic purge of Muslims. Their mosques were destroyed, their crescents defaced, the Quran burned and then all Muslims forced to flee or face execution. Such an event would be unthinkable today, and if it did occur Pope Francis and all other Christian leaders would denounce it and support efforts by governments to stop it,” the commentary said.

“Yet that is essentially what is happening in reverse now in Mosul, as the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham drives all signs of Christianity from the ancient city. Christians have lived in Mosul for nearly 2,000 years, but today they are reliving the Muslim religious wars of the Middle Ages.”

That editorial closed, according to Wolf, with: Today’s religious extremism is almost entirely Islamic. While ISIS’s purge may be the most brutal, Islamists in Egypt have driven thousands of Coptic Christians from homes they’ve occupied for centuries. The same is true across the Muslim parts of Africa. This does not mean that all Muslims are extremists, but it does mean that all Muslims have an obligation to denounce and resist the extremists who murder or subjugate in the name of Allah. Too few imams living in the tolerant West will speak up against it. As for the post-Christian West, most elites may now be nonbelievers. But a culture that fails to protect believers may eventually find that it lacks the self-belief to protect itself.”


Obama defending muslimsWolf warned Congress with a quote of William Wilberforce, the great abolitionist and British parliamentarian.

“Having heard all of this, you may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again that you did not know,” Wilberforce said.

Wolf, just a day earlier in Congress, read a statement from Bishop Angaelos, general bishop of the Coptic Orthodox Church in the United Kingdom.

“As the widespread violence and aggression facing Christians and minority groups in Mosul, Iraq, intensifies, it is increasingly evident that the fundamental right and freedom to practice one’s faith and belief is, and continues to be, grossly violated,” the bishop said. “We are currently witnessing an unacceptable widespread implementation of extremist religious ideology that threatens the lives of all Iraqis who do not fit within its ever-narrowing perspective. While this situation stands to eradicate centuries of co-existence and culture in the region it also threatens to significantly and negatively impact these communities for generations to come. If left unchallenged, it is not Iraq alone that is at risk, but the potential is intensified for the replication of this ideology as a viable and legitimate model for others across the Middle East.”

The ISIS reportedly destroyed the grave traditionally considered to be that of Jonah, the Old Testament prophet swallowed by a giant fish when he fled from God’s instructions to evangelize Ninevah.

mosul 2

Who is better offWND has reported over the years on Islamic attempts to rid Iraq and other Middle East areas of Christians.

International Christian Concern reported the murders of four Christians in Baghdad and Kirkuk and speculated whether it was the beginning of a purge.

“Though the perpetrators of the murders are not yet indicated, Islamic fundamentalists, criminal gangs and other armed groups have been behind attacks against Christians in Iraq in the past,” said the organization, which works with members of the persecuted church around the globe.

Sako told the organization that 750 Christians were murdered over a period of several years and tens of thousands fled their homes.

At that time, ICC estimated half of about 1.2 million Iraqi Christians had abandoned their homes in recent years, with many fleeing to Syria, Lebanon and Jordan. Most recently, it’s been estimated that as many as three quarters of that total number of Christians is gone.

After a report of violence, Jonathan Racho, the regional manager for ICC in Africa and the Middle East, said the “suffering of Iraqi Christians has been beyond description and is not yet over.”

“More than ever, the Iraqi Christians need our prayer and support. The latest martyrdom of our brothers should serve to CP 01awaken churches in the Western countries to come to the aid of their Iraqi brothers and sisters. We call upon Iraqi officials and the allied forces in Iraq to avert further attacks against Iraqi Christians. It is simply unacceptable to watch the extinction of the Christian community from Iraq.”

Many of the problems started developing about 2006, after the adoption of an Iraqi constitution that is based on Islam.

That document states: “Article (2): 1st – Islam is the official religion of the state and is a basic source of legislation: (a) No law can be passed that contradicts the undisputed rules of Islam.”

Analysts said the constitution subjugates Iraq’s Christians to the rule of Islamic law.

Wake up America

Article collective closing


Obama Calls For Collectivized New World Order

“People are anxious…. the old order isn’t holding”

by Paul Joseph Watson | July 25, 2014

Imperial President ObamaDuring a fundraiser in Seattle this week, President Barack Obama called for a “new order” based around a collectivized system in order to quell people’s concerns about geopolitical strife and the economy.

“People are anxious. Now, some of that has to do with some big challenges overseas,” said Obama, adding, “But whether people see what’s happening in Ukraine, and Russia’s aggression towards its neighbors in the manner in which it’s financing and arming separatists; to what’s happened in Syria … to the failure in Iraq for Sunni and Shia and Kurd to compromise … to what’s happening in Israel and Gaza….”

“Part of people’s concern is just the sense that around the world the old order isn’t holding and we’re not quite yet to where we need to be in terms of a new order that’s based on a different set of principles, that’s based on a sense of common humanity, that’s based on economies that work for all people. … But here in the United States, what people are also concerned about is the fact that although the economy has done well in the aggregate, for the average person it feels as if incomes, wages just haven’t gone up; that people, no matter how hard they work, they feel stuck.”antichrist

In a geopolitical context, Obama’s call for a “new order” really doesn’t sound any different from the old unipolar world order that the United States has represented since the end of the Cold War, which is now being challenged by the rise of the BRICS countries. (**SEE EXPLANATION BELOW)

Developments over the course of the past year have made it clear that the United States no longer considers Russia to be part of this “new order” as a result of its resistance to NATO encirclement.

In terms of the economy, Obama’s insistence on “economies that work for all people” based on “common humanity” is in direct contradiction to his actual policies, which have almost exclusively served to help Wall Street fat cats while the average American sees their household income decline year after year when adjusted for inflation.

This is by no means the first time that Obama has called for a new world order.

During a 2010 West Point speech, the President encouraged the development of a new “international order” to help secure America’s interests.

Obama also urged Europeans and Americans to embrace the idea of “global citizenship” during a 2012 Berlin speech.

Vice-President Joe Biden has also repeatedly called for a “new world order.”

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Facebook @
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @


Paul Joseph Watson is the editor at large of and Prison

Three Star Line


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Not to be confused with BRICS.
For the Brooklyn arts nonprofit, see BRIC (nonprofit organization).
In economics, BRIC is a grouping acronym that refers to the countries of Brazil, Russia, India and China, which are all deemed to be at a similar stage of newly advanced economic development. It is typically rendered as “the BRICs” or “the BRIC countries” or “the BRIC economies” or alternatively as the “Big Four”. A related acronym is BRICS which includes South Africa.

The acronym was coined by Jim O’Neill in a 2001 paper entitled “Building Better Global Economic BRICs”.[1][2][3] The acronym has come into widespread use as a symbol of the apparent shift in global economic power away from the developed G7 economies towards the developing world.

Projections on the future power of the BRIC economies vary widely. Some sources suggest that they might overtake the G7 economies by 2027.[4] More modestly, Goldman Sachs has argued that, although the four BRIC countries are developing rapidly, it was only by 2050 that their combined economies could eclipse the combined economies of the current richest countries of the world.[5]

In 2010, however, while the four BRIC countries accounted for over a quarter of the world’s land area and more than 40% of the world’s population,[6][7] they accounted for only one quarter of the world gross national income.[8][9]

According to a paper published in 2005, Mexico and South Korea were the only other countries comparable to the BRICs, but their economies were excluded initially because they were considered already more developed, as they were already members of the OECD.[10] The same creator of the term “BRIC” endorsed the term MINT, that includes Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria and Turkey.[11][12]

Several of the more developed of the N-11 countries, in particular Turkey, Mexico, Indonesia and South Korea, were seen as the most likely contenders to the BRICs. Some other developing countries that have not yet reached the N-11 economic level, such as South Africa, aspired to BRIC status.

South Africa was subsequently successful in joining the bloc. This was despite economists at the Reuters 2011 Investment Outlook Summit, held on 6–7 December 2010, dismissing the prospects of South African success .[13] Jim O’Neill, for example, told the summit that South Africa, at a population of under 50 million people, was just too small an economy to join the BRIC ranks.[14] However, after the BRIC countries formed a political organization among themselves, they later expanded to include South Africa, becoming the BRICS.[15]

Goldman Sachs did not argue that the BRICs would organize themselves into an economic bloc, or a formal trading association, as the European Union has done.[5] However, there are some indications that the “four BRIC countries have been seeking to form a ‘political club’ or ‘alliance'”, and thereby converting “their growing economic power into greater geopolitical clout”.[16][17] On June 16, 2009, the leaders of the BRIC countries held their first summit in Yekaterinburg, and issued a declaration calling for the establishment of an equitable, democratic and multipolar world order. Since then they have met in Brasília in 2010, met in Sanya in 2011 and in New Delhi, India in 2012.[18]

In recent years, the BRICs have received increasing scholarly attention. Brazilian political economist Marcos Troyjo and French investment banker Christian Déséglise founded the BRICLab at Columbia University, a Forum examining the strategic, political and economic consequences of the rise of BRIC countries, especially by analyzing their projects for power, prosperity and prestige through graduate courses, special sessions with guest speakers, Executive Education programs, and annual conferences for policymakers, business and academic leaders, and students.[19]

Article collective closing

Can Someone Explain Something to Me?

Israel-defend-ciWhat Did You Say Logo

Today’s Politically INCOORECT Cartoon brought up a question I have had for a long time. “Why do the Liberal Left Press, as well as, the Leftist/Marxist/Socialist/Liberal/Democrats (LMSLD) rush to defend Islam terrorists and their murderous ways?” I do not get it. It makes no sense to me why anyone would defend these haters of all that is not Islam? It is a farce to refer to them as a religion of peace, when every aspect of their history says just the opposite.


  • Israel caves into worldwide pressure and GIVES Palestinian-Hamas (a division of Muslim Brotherhood) How coward terrorist fight number Two
    • the land,
    • hundreds of tons of concrete to build with,
    • new orchards ready for harvesting,
    • food to keep their children alive,
    • medical care they did not have or have to pay for,
    • and a wall to separate the two.
    • GAVE. GAVE. Got it yet? They GAVE it to them in order to have peace.
  • Hamas used the concrete to build reinforced concrete tunnels to give them illegal access into Israel in order to Kill and destroy as much of Israel as possible. Israel restrains themselves.
  • Hamas was the first to fire on Israel.
  • Israel restrains themselves by utilizing their “Iron Dome” defense system as far as long as possible.
  • Hamas deliberately demonstrates their complete lack of humanity and care for their children, women and elderly, by putting them in front of, and all around their military targets in order to be killed when Israel responds to their attacks by targeting ONLY military assets. Then they trot out the dead they care nothing about and lie to the Liberal Press that Israel deliberately targeted their children, women and elderly.

And the Liberal Press buys it, and then makes Israel out to be the bad guy. The only explanation I have is that they hate the Jewish people and Israel, and that Islam is the Liberal Presses executioner of people the LMSLD does not like, and in fact, hates. If anyone has any other explanation I would like to hear it.

The LMSLD Press always defends Islam terrorist organizations. The LMSLD always restrain themselves from saying anything bad about them. WHY? WHY? WHY? WHY? WHY? WHY? When this has happened in the past with situations in the business world the first response is, “Who has picture of someone doing what they should have not been doing?” I don’t see that applying here.

If you have answers, I would like to heart them.

Article collective closing


Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon

Hollywood Threatens Christian Actor

July 25, 2014 By

Luke Grimes
Last season when actor Luke Grimes joined the cast of HBO’s True Blood, he did so under the premise that his actor was heterosexual. After all, the character he played, James Kent, was trying to sweep a female vampire character off her feet and begin a relationship. But, as production of the show continued, Grimes found out something about his character that made him uncomfortable and chose to resign from the hit show because of it.

The writers of the show made a sexual orientation change in Grimes’ character. They were going to have him begin a bisexual relationship with a gay Shovingcharacter, Lafayette, played by Nelsan Ellis.

Grimes, the son of a Pentecostal pastor, was raised a devout Christian. Based upon his beliefs, he did not feel comfortable playing the role of a bisexual character. So, he went to the production company and asked to be let out of his contract.

While the production company agreed to do so, his move has been met with harsh criticism and threats that his career will be ruined. Some argued that Grimes should have known there was a possibility that his character would turn bisexual, even though there was no evidence of that when the role was discussed, because True Blood has homosexual characters and the creator of the show, Alan Ball, is openly gay.

While Grimes had no problem with Nelsan’s character of Lafayette being attracted to his character, he would not submit to any same-sex kissing or same-sex sex scenes. The writers would not alter the direction of his role and were intent on Grime’s character becoming bisexual and entering into a gay relationship with a homosexual character.

These creative differences in the development of his character led Grimes to make the decision to leave the show. That decision has made him a target of critics who believe actors should play whatever role they are given, whether gay or straight. He was replaced by Nathan Parsons.

The associate editor for the homosexual focused OUT Magazine, Stacy Lambe, said, “It’s unfortunate that an actor today would feel uncomfortable play gay, especially on a program that has always put LGBT characters from and center. But Nelsan Ellis and Nathan Parsons are proof that Luke Grimes is not the norm. Grimes is the exception.”

So, because two actors have no problem playing homosexuals, it makes the devout Christian who does have a problem with it an outcast, according to Lambe. It should be noted that a recent government survey found that only 1.6% of the population identify as homosexual.

Nelsan commented, “You quit your job because you don’t want to play a gay part? You make a big statement when you go, ‘I don’t want to play this part

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

because it’s gay. You just made a statement, and it has ripple effects.”

In other words, Christians are not allowed to make choices in which roles they’ll play or which scenes they will do if that choice goes against the progressive homosexual agenda push. Nelsan and Lambe may as well have said to Grimes, “Check your beliefs and principles at the door. Do as you are told, even if it means it goes against your personal beliefs.”

Should Grimes have no choice in the matter of whether he will play a homosexual or bisexual role?  To some, he should not and doing so should have negative consequences. Going against the progressive agenda and refusing to participate in homosexual sex scenes will and should impact his career, according to a professor specializing in LGBT and TV issues at the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism. This professor, Larry Gross, said that the unwillingness to participate in homosexual sex scenes is a bad career move that could negatively impact ones’ career. He added that refusing to play a bisexual role, even if that includes same-sex kissing and same-sex sexual encounters, is not a good career move.

So much for the Left’s support for choice.

Different Free Speech Ideologies

Article collective closing


Mexico Actually Complains About Perry’s Plan to Put National Guard on the Border

July 25, 2014 By

ZPerryobama-border-is-open-378x257If you thought it was outrageous that Mexico refuses to do anything to help stop the flood of illegals pouring into the U.S., wait until you hear this… 
As tens-of-thousands of illegal immigrants pour into the United States in violation of our nation’s laws, we have received precious little cooperation from the Mexican government (and our own) to curb the massive influx.
Now, to help with this problem, Texas Governor Rick Perry has ordered National Guard troops to the border. In an outrageous display of audacity, the Mexican government is now complaining about the troops being placed on the U.S. side of the border.
In response to Texas’ plan, in a statement, Mexico’s Foreign Relations Secretariat said, 
“Attention to the immigration phenomenon must be paid from a long-term regional perspective and based on the principles of good neighborliness and shared responsibility…The strategy for responding in an effective and humane manner to this phenomenon includes the necessary shared responsibility among the countries of origin, transit and destination of migration flows.” complain 2
Governor Perry has declared that he is prepared to act without the federal government’s cooperation on trying to strengthen Texas’ border security, claiming that he would put up to 1,000 Texas National Guard members on the border to help stop illegal immigration.
The move has been met with praise for those wishing to stop the invasion by illegals; however, the Obama Administration has repeatedly declared that border security is the job of the federal government. However, in the absence of any meaningful actions on the part of this administration to secure the border, it seems Gov. Perry’s solution might be the best way for Texas to defend itself.
President Obama has asked for $3.7 billion to better handle the border crisis; however, with the president having repeatedly made clear that amnesty, not border security, is his main priority vis-à-vis immigration reform, the $3.7 billion request has been denied by Republicans who note that they cannot trust this president to actually secure the border and enforce this nation’s laws.
Pro-illegal immigration activists continued to claim that the surges of illegal immigrants are mainly children. However, reports continue to emerge that that is really not the case.
Texas Lt. Governor David Dewhurst sought to debunk this media-created myth and revealed in an interview this week that unaccompanied children only account for 10-12% of the illegals and that a whopping 80-85% have criminal records in their home countries.
View Video Report Below:
Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Article collective closing

IRS to Monitor Sermons as Part of Settlement with Atheists


Researched and Written by Tim Brown

The Internal Revenue Service settled a lawsuit brought by the Freedom from Religion Foundation. The 2012 lawsuit was settled after the IRS agreed to monitor what is said in houses of worship, something that is a clear violation of the First Amendment, since no law can be written by Congress to this effect. Therefore, the “unconstitutional” IRS has gone way beyond what the federal Constitution allows.

Lifesitenews reports:

The Wisconsin group brought the lawsuit because it said the IRS was ignoring complaints about churches violating their tax-exempt statuses. Specifically, FFRF said many churches promote political issues, legislation, and/or candidates from the pulpit in violation of the 1954 Johnson Amendment, which requires that non-profits not endorse candidates.johnson

Obamas IRS GestapoAccording to FFRF, the IRS has not followed a 2009 ruling requiring it to hire someone to keep an eye on church politicking. The IRS says it hasn’t ignored the ruling, but merely failed to follow it.

The government has put a moratorium on the IRS’ investigations of tax-exempt organizations after the scandal that broke in 2013 over its targeting of pro-life, pro-family, and Tea Party groups. FFRF says that even though the IRS will not enforce the agreement because of the moratorium, they can still bring the lawsuit again if needed after the moratorium is lifted.

“This is a victory, and we’re pleased with this development in which the IRS has proved to our satisfaction that it now has in place a protocol to enforce its own anti-electioneering provisions,” said FFRF Co-President Annie Laurie Gaylor in a press release.

“Of course, we have the complication of a moratorium currently in place on any IRS investigations of any tax-exempt entities, church or otherwise, due to the congressional probe of the IRS,” she added. “FFRF could refile the suit if anti-electioneering provisions are not enforced in the future against rogue political churches.” 

police_stateThe press release went on to state:

The IRS has now resolved the signature authority issue necessary to initiate church examinations. The IRS also has adopted procedures for reviewing, evaluating and determining whether to initiate church investigations. While the IRS retains “prosecutorial” discretion with regard to any individual case, the IRS no longer has a blanket policy or practice of non-enforcement of political activity restrictions as to churches. 

In addition to FFRF’s lawsuit, IRS enforcement procedures with respect to political activity by tax-exempt organizations have been the subject of intense scrutiny by Congress. As a result, the IRS is reviewing and implementing safeguards to ensure evenhanded enforcement across the board with respect to all tax-exempt organizations. 

Until that process is completed, the IRS has suspended all examinations of tax-exempt organizations for alleged political activities. The current suspension, however, is not limited to church tax inquiries. 

If you recall there was an outcry for “Pulpit Freedom Suday” back in 2012, as the left didn’t mind being political in Black Churches to advance its agenda, but God forbid that Churches that are truly biblical in their worldview speak out against the evils of political parties and issues of the day, something that would have been foreign to our forefathers.

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

According to FFRF, “Pulpit Freedom Sunday … has become an annual occasion for churches to violate the law with impunity. The IRS, meanwhile, admittedly was not enforcing the restrictions against churches.”

Senior legal counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom Erik Stanley said, “The IRS has no business censoring what a pastor preaches from the pulpit.”

ADF is seeking to “bring the era of IRS censorship and intimidation to an end by challenging the Johnson Amendment, which imposes unconstitutional restrictions on clergy speech.”

The problem is that many pastors are afraid of speaking on political issues from the Bible for a variety of issues. Some love their paycheck and don’t want to rock the boat, while others don’t want to lose “tax exempt status.” The reality is that a church does not have to be a 501c3 organization to be tax exempt. It is tax exempt due to the very nature that it is a Church. Note the IRS’ own publication concerning this issue:

Obama's IRS GestapoAutomatic Exemption for Churches

Churches that meet the requirements of IRC section 501(c)(3) are automatically considered tax exempt and are not required to apply for and obtain recognition of tax-exempt status from the IRS.

Although there is no requirement to do so, many churches seek recognition of tax-exempt status from the IRS because such recognition assures church leaders, members, and contributors that the church is recognized as exempt and qualifies for related tax benefits. For example, contributors to a church that has been recognized as tax exempt would know that their contributions generally are tax-deductible. (page 3)

In other words Churches, you are not required to be 501c3 to be tax exempt, it’s just if you want state recognition for the benefit of others… and I might add so that the government can pull your strings on issues like this one.

However, even though a Church may have received 501c3 status, Congress has already imposed limitations on the IRS as to how and when they may conduct tax inquiries and examinations of churches. They can only do that “if an appropriate high-level Treasury official reasonably believes, on the basis of facts and circumstances recorded in writing, that an organization claiming to be a church or convention or association of churches may not qualify for exemption, may be carrying on an unrelated trade or business (within the meaning of IRC § 513), may otherwise be engaged in taxable activities or may have entered into an IRC § 4958 excess benefit transaction with a disqualified person.”

Even then, it provides nothing for them to be able to stop a Church’s free speech of what the Bible says to a particular issue that is in the sphere of the public.cp 11 In fact, Christians are commanded to not only preach the gospel, but also to teach all that Christ commanded (Matt. 28: 19-20) and to do so when it’s palettable and when it’s not (2 Tim. 2:4), which would include issues like abortion, sodomy, unjust money, lawbreaking, theft, taxes, and a host of instruction God has provided in His Word.

This is the same agency that has been specifically targeting American citizens politically and yet, they are claiming to now be able to investigate pastor’s sermons? I think that is the height of hypocrisy, and so does ADF’s Erik Stanley.

Stanley says there is a trust issue, and he’s right. “Especially given the recent IRS scandal,” he said. “Churches should be allowed to decide for themselves what they want to talk about. The IRS should not be the one making the decision by threatening to revoke a church’s tax-exempt status.” 

“A pastor’s speech from the pulpit should not be subject to the whims of a government official,” concluded Stanley.

I agree, they should not, but I’ll go further: They are not to be subject to the whims of government.

Pastors, it’s time to man up. I suggest ridding yourself of 501c3 status and merely keep good records if there is ever a question, and start preaching the Word of God with boldness.

For more on this subject, I highly recommend Peter Kershaw’s excellent work, “In Caesar’s Grip.”

Article collective closing

Obama ought to speak for our values and forcefully push back against this dark, spreading stain; but he doesn’t.


Mona CharenJuly 25, 2014

Hamas terroristHamas, with perhaps unwitting help from President Barack Obama, is achieving its war aim: to legitimize Islamic supremacism and Jew-hatred, and take it global. Jews are no longer safe in Europe or even in some places in the U.S.

Who now recalls that when Hamas was elected, the world responded with disgust? Hamas was on everyone’s terrorist list. Flailing, the European Union, Russia, the United Nations, and the United States asked Hamas to recognize Israel, renounce terror, and agree to live by previous agreements between Israel and the Palestinian National Authority. Hamas refused. Nevertheless, its image is much improved.

Hamas enjoys killing Israelis and Jews — “By God, we will not leave one Jew in Palestine,” one of its leaders, Abdel Aziz al-Rantisi, told Al Jazeera — but thanks to Israel’s self-defense, opportunities for that pleasure are limited. Hamas has successfully terrorized southern Israel — and more recently, central Israel — with its deliberate missile attacks on civilians; and they take satisfaction in that. But their chief aim and greatest victory is in forcing Israelis to kill Palestinians. It’s almost a matter of indifference to Hamas whether a dead child is an Israeli killed by a Hamas rocket deliberately aimed at a village or a Palestinian child killed because Israel returned fire and the launcher was located in a kindergarten. If it’s the latter, the child’s image becomes part of the psychological war on Israel.

This script has been followed year after year. Elite world opinion seems incapable of seeing the truth — that every dead Palestinian civilian (and, of course, How coward terrorist fight number Twoevery Israeli) is a victim of Hamas. Maybe it’s just too pleasurable to indulge in guilt-free anti-Semitism. Notice that attacks in Europe have targeted synagogues, not Israeli embassies.

Hamas has been successful at libeling Israel and stirring anti-Semitism globally. Obama ought to speak for our values and forcefully push back against this dark, spreading stain; but he doesn’t. He hasn’t spoken up for Christians persecuted throughout the world, either.

Rather than denouncing Hamas’ depravity, he has issued tepid endorsements of Israel’s right to self-defense (undermined by privately delivered warnings). Canada’s Stephen Harper, who has lately seemed, by default, the leader of the free world, was stalwart. “It is evident that Hamas is deliberately using human shields to further terror in the region.” In light of that, “Canada calls on its allies and partners to recognize that these terrorist acts are unacceptable and that solidarity with Israel is the best way of stopping the conflict.”

Obama, by contrast, has slid into the role Hamas practically scripted for him, calling the Israeli prime minister twice in three days to express his “serious concern about the growing number of casualties.”

ConfusedNo country on Earth takes more care to minimize civilian casualties than Israel. It sends text messages, phone calls, and even “taps on the roof” (small firecrackers) to warn residents. And no government on Earth does more to ensure that civilians will be casualties than Hamas. “They have nowhere to go!” reported a U.N. official from Gaza on PBS television. That’s because rather than building bomb shelters, schools, or homes with the 800,000 tons of concrete at its disposal, Hamas has built miles of highly sophisticated, reinforced tunnels to infiltrate Israel. The world’s tallest skyscraper in Dubai, Tablet Magazine notes, used only 110,000 tons of concrete.

Israel has taken precautions about civilians, despite being under ceaseless rocket and terror infiltration attack from Hamas for years.

Obama understands the need to fight terror. He has conducted a drone war against suspected terrorists throughout his term. The Long War Journal estimates that U.S. drones have killed 2,555 leaders and activists in terrorist groups as well as 153 civilians in Pakistan alone. The Bureau of Investigative Journalism estimates that drones have killed between 2,528 and 3,648 individuals, including as many as 948 civilians.

The U.S. has not experienced a large-scale terror attack since 2001. Obama has dispatched drones not in retaliation for attacks but on suspicion that the targets were terrorists plotting future attacks. “Turns out I’m really good at killing people,” Obama boasted to a journalist. “Didn’t know that was gonna be a strong suit of mine.”

In May of 2013, the president defended his actions at the Obama defending muslimsNational Defense University: “Let us remember that the terrorists we are after target civilians, and the death toll from their acts of terrorism against Muslims dwarfs any estimate of civilian casualties from drone strikes.”

Benjamin Netanyahu might quote those words back to him, when he next phones. COPYRIGHT 2014 CREATORS.COM

Photo credit: Zoriah (Flickr)

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more











Article collective closing


This Video Could Shatter EVERYTHING You Thought You Knew About The Gaza Conflict


…seek the truth

 Justin Koski

Bill Whittle outdoes himself again in revealing the truth about Israel, for all those who are buying the lies that the liberal media is spoon-feeding. They are playing right into the hand of Hamas. Know the truth, and then make your own decision.

BILLArticle collective closing


EXPOSED: Israeli Ambassador Rakes A CNN Anchor Across The Coals For Intentionally Misleading Viewers


“It’s kind of an important fact for your reporter to mention…” And they didn’t…

 Justin Koski

Ron Dermer, the Israeli Ambassador to the US, hits hard and doesn’t let up over the course of this interview with CNN host Erin Burnett. He cites CNN for being a “disservice” to their viewers for not once mentioning the fact that the UN Secretary General just issued a statement warning people that Hamas is storing weapons in these UN schools, thus making them a target.

CNN only wants to point out that the children are dead and how tragic it is (and it is), but they are failing to see the greater atrocity. The fact is that Hamas is using these schools to house their weapons, even furthering the statement made by Prime Minister Netanyahu that “Hamas uses its people to protect its weapons.” 



Article collective closing

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: