Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘Dictator’

2014 Political Cartoons, Drawings and Presentations You Might Have Missed

Master MArtinLuther King Jr. oct172014 02 Teaching children to follow Jesus greatest fraud Cold watching gun-control-cartoon-club-knife Let me be clear mission accomplished WMD-in-Iraq gay-marriage-debate-continues Differences Human bomb Islamofascism-300x199 Winston Churchill We Pledge Allegience to Obama Walking Eagle ObamaDictator-300x204 PS_0807W_RECESSION_t ObamaWreckingBall2 strategy Terrorist lives matter The Great Divider yes-we-cannibus Obamacare 02 Obamacare Suppositories Signed Up wheels coming off Dangers I have a steady Job I Never Met Sharpton Jackson 02 The Personal Wealth of Al Sharpton the-only-people-keeping-racism-alive-vik-battaile-politics-1354496075 8 abortion hilary-rosen-vs-ann-romney I sell Women obama isis pays less 2nd term kill isis money worth spending the education of children

New York Times Declares War on Christians and Muslims


That’s right, the so-called “paper of record” is declaring war on people of faith, especially practicing Christians and Muslims.  We never thought we’d find ourselves in the same canoe with followers of Mohammed, may he rot in hell, but here we are.

Here’s New York Times writer Josh Barro.

nyt 01

“…we need to stamp them out, ruthlessly.”  Got that?  “Ruthlessly.”

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more


This comes from the so-called “tolerant left,” the same people who demand that everyone be heard and that everyone be at the table.  Everyone, that is, who agrees with them.  You can bet your bottom dollar that every college campus will be taking up this crusade as well.

ShovingThe gay mafia on the left is already taking Christian bakers to court to force them to bake wedding cakes, and they’re doing it in places with dozens, if not hundreds, of bakers who would be happy to accommodate them.  They’re forcing their agenda on the US military, first it was the demise of “don’t ask, don’t tell” and now the gay mafia is forcing the issue of transsexuals in combat.

We want to be clear.  Today’s left has fully reverted to their fascist roots.  Don’t let anybody tell you that fascism is a “right wing” ideology, it’s not.  It is, and always has been, an ideology of the far left.

nyt 02


Imperial President ObamaSound familiar.  “Ruled by a dictator who controls the lives of the people.”  That’s the perfect definition of today’s Democratic Party and in particular the Obama administration.  They know exactly what kind of health insurance you need and who your doctor should be.  They know best what your diet should be and will go out of their way to impose their idea of a menu on your local school district.  They just know that every employer should buy birth control and abortion for their employees, without regard to the values of the employer.

This fascist administration even knows what and how your children should be taught in their government run reeducation camps schools.

Oh, and never forget these are the same people who want to take your guns away from you.  We wonder why they’d want to do that?We have been torn apart




American Gestapo














Article collective closing



Obama Dictator

“Dictator-in-Chief”, Barack Obama

During his Weekly Address, Barack Obama promised to continue his dictatorial style rule of America, vowing to go around Congress and the system of government that our Founders put in place if Republicans don’t give him exactly what he wants. (watch video below)

Apparently forgetting that America is not a dictatorship and the job of Congress is not to be yes-men to him, Obama chastised Republicans, also forgetting that the failure of his jobs bill was due to bi-partisan opposition.

 “[W]e could do a lot more if Republicans in Congress were less interested in stacking the deck in favor of those at the top, and more interested in growing the economy for everybody. They’ve now voted more than 50 times to take apart the Affordable Care Act – imagine if they voted 50 times on serious jobs bills.”

Obama then went full-fledged dictator boldly proclaiming that he will accomplish his Marxist based agenda to fundamentally transform America using whatever means necessary.

“That’s why I’m going to take action on my own wherever I can. To grow our economy from the middle out, not the top down. To give every American who works hard a chance to get ahead.”

While he didn’t use his “I’ve got a pen and I’ve got a phone” mantra, his vow was definitely reminiscent of previous threats he’s made to act unilaterally and unconstitutionally if he doesn’t get his way.

VOTE 02Community Organizer TwoComplete Message


Is Obama President, King, Dictator, or Tyrant?

Written on Friday, March 21, 2014 by


President Obama is breaking all precedents in steamrolling a complacent Congress as he governs by executive orders. With Obama, we the people has been replaced by me the president.  In recent speeches, the president has been forthright in saying that in every case where he can act without Congress he will do so.  Not only is this an extraordinary statement coming from a man who is supposed to have been a professor of Constitutional law, it shows a dangerous disregard for government of the people, by the people, and for the people.

Ever since the U.S. Constitution was established as the law of the land, there has been tension—some would say power struggles—between the executive and legislative branches of government.  In fact, this tension is a necessary part of the checks and balances our Founders put in place to ensure that each branch of government plays its assigned role without encroaching on the prerogatives of the other branches.  If the president gains too much of the upper hand over Congress, the voice of the people is replaced by the voice of just one person: the president.  If Congress gains too much of the upper hand over the executive branch, we have government by committee, and nothing gets done.  Consequently, it is important to maintain the proper Constitutionally-prescribed balance between the executive and legislative branches of government.

Barack Obama knows this. He probably taught the concept when he was moonlighting as a professor of law.  But knowing about a concept and complying with it are two very different things.  In President Obama’s defense, working with Congress can be a frustrating experience.  Congress can be ponderous, self-protective, parochial, self-serving, and excruciatingly slow to act.  It is governance by committee with all of the shortcomings inherent in that concept.  President Obama is hardly the first person to be elected president only to find that his hands are often tied by an unresponsive Congress.  I am sure that many of his predecessors would have loved to simply by-pass Congress and—like him—govern by executive order.  But most had the good sense to understand that governing by executive order is one of those concepts where the solution is worse than the problem.

When the President of the United States by-passes Congress by issuing executive orders or by using the regulatory process—things Barack Obama does frequently—he undermines the concept of we the people that is the foundation of our form of government and of the freedoms Americans have traditionally enjoyed.  Congress, with all of its warts and blemishes, is still composed of the representatives of the people.  By-passing the elected representatives of the people is the same as by-passing the people.  Rulers who by-pass the people are dictators, kings, and often tyrants, but they are not presidents. Barack Obama was elected president, not dictator nor king, but by governing through executive orders and bureaucratic regulations, he is behaving like one or the other, or both.

One measure of an effective president is that he understands the governing process and is sufficiently adept politically that he can work with Congress to implement his programs and make good on his campaign promises.  Some presidents have had the political skills to accomplish this and some have not.  Barack Obama falls into the latter category, but where he differs from his predecessors is that he has made no effort to learn the way Congress and Washington, D. C. work.  Rather, if he cannot get what he wants when he wants it—regardless of whether the American people want it—he simply by-passes Congress using executive orders or bureaucratic regulations.  What makes this tyrannical situation especially dangerous is that at a time when our country has a president who thinks he is a king, we also have a weak, complacent Congress that lacks the fortitude to stand up to him.  As a result, government of the people, by the people, and for the people has been replaced by government of the president, by the president, and for the president.

Community Organizer Two

Rangel Wants Presidential Executive Orders for ‘Everything’

Now the Liberal Left has come right out and said through Charlie Rangel. They want “Dictator in Chief”. Read on.

Jerry Broussard


By Jill Colvin 11/23 3:32pm

Congressman Charlie Rangel on NY1. (Photo: NY1 screenshot)

Congressman Charlie Rangel on NY1. (Screengrab: NY1)

Congressman Charlie Rangel has a solution for bypassing gridlock in Washington D.C.: executive orders for “everything.”

In an interview last night with NY1, the congressman praised Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s decision to push through the so-called “nuclear option” to end filibusters on most presidential nominees. But he lamented the fact the work-around could not be used for legislation, suggesting the president turn to the executive orders–like the kind used to end the deportation many people who’d entered the country illegally as children.

“You know, the DREAM Act for the kids that came over here and didn’t know their home town, the president did that by executive order. What I did is I’ve taken out the language that he used and I’m gonna see why we can’t use executive orders for everything. What’s he gonna do? Make the Republicans angry? They’re gonna get annoyed? They’re not gonna cooperate?”

He went on to slam the Republican Party for refusing to cooperate–accusing them of acting against the interests of their own constituents.

“A police officer once told me when I was a kid that the worst criminal to deal with is one that doesn’t mind dying,” he said. “And if you take a look at what these Tea Party people have done–recognizing that there’s more sick and poor white folks then there is–but they still are resisting everything that the president wants to do so they can destroy the people in their district in terms of education and jobs, the Congress, the Republican name. And when we had the debt ceiling crisis, they were really prepared to let the United States of America fiscal policy to go in the tubes. How can you talk with people like this?”

He also defended the Affordable Care Act, arguing that far too much attention has been paid to the disastrous roll-out.

“They’re concentrating on the small misjudgments that have been made and nobody’s speaking for the 40 and 50 million people that have dreamed and hoped and prayed for that they could be included and insured. Not having insurance not only destroys your life, it destroys your fiscal life. It breaks up marriages. You cannot functions anywhere unless you have good health,” he argued, agreeing the president never should have apologized.

“I’d forget the apology,” he said. “The president should have said, ‘There’ll be a little quirks here, but we’ll take care of the quirks.’”

Follow Jill Colvin on Twitter or via RSS.

LAWLESS: This Administration is an Acting Dictatorship


  • shreddingThis administration is lawless.
  • This administration is NOT a presidential administration.
  • This administration is a Dictatorship.

Law: A body of rules of conduct of binding legal force and effect, prescribed, recognized, and enforced by controlling authority.

In order for a law to be a law, it has to be applied to everyone: no exceptions, without prejudice, without favor, without exception. If it is not done so, then it is not a law, it is a suggestion. “Thou shalt not murder” (the proper interpretation of the word in the original Hebrew) is a law. You murder someone and you have a price to pay — a price extracted by both man and God. (Well, except maybe O.J. and Casey Anthony.)

I say:

  • This administration is lawless.

I say this administration is lawless because it has a history of ignoring the U.S. Constitution (two links) and any other laws of our land and makes its own decisionsappointments and Executive Orders that are outside of the law. This administration will not obey the law, nor will it even acknowledge the law in some cases.

Without a president who will obey the law — the very Constitution his Oath of Office swore him to “preserve, protect and defend” — we have something besides a presidency as defined in the U.S. Constitution. According to the U.S. Constitution, the president’s powers are delineated in Article II:

Section. 2.

He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.

Section. 3.

He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.

With the exception of signing bills that Congress and the Senate have passed (or not signing them, whichever) that’s it. That’s all the president, constitutionally, has the right to do. (BTW, did you realize that the president, or the “Executive Branch”, is not mentioned at all in the Bill of Rights? Interesting, no?) Therefore,

  • this administration is NOT a presidential administration.

Considering the extra-constitutional actions of this administration and the fact that he allegedly studied and taught the U.S. Constitution at a collegiate level one would think that he would understand the U.S. Constitution and the fact that we are supposed to have checks and balanceslimited powers of each branch and he cannot — by law — do some of the things he has been doing.

One can make an argument that our nation has not been a Constitutional Republic (as it was established to be) for a long time. However, with this administration it has gotten to the point of no return without revolution. Thus, this administration has crossed the line completely and without halt to make this administration the very model of unconstitutional.

Seeing that this administration is unconstitutional, what is it if not constitutional?

  • This administration is a Dictatorship.
Having never been given a democracy (which, simply put, is a room full of men voting that the waitress can be raped and their majority rule makes the waitress’s rights null and void), we are supposed to be ruled by the constitutional laws that were written by the legislative branch of the U.S. government: the House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate and signed by the president. The president has no law-making ability, rights, nor responsibilities (as shown by the excerpt above).

However, this administration doesn’t care about what the Constitution says and he writes his own laws whenever he wants something and he decides to whom those laws are applied and who gets an exemption from them. Deciding to whom the law applies (no matter which law), what laws are enforced, and acting like a dictator equals dictatorial powers and that is extra-constitutional.

Having ignored, denied, sued to prevent the U.S. Constitution – which he swore on oath to “preserve, protect and defend” — from being enforced, he cannot be a constitutional president. He is acting unilaterally: what he says goes. Considering all of this, I say that (and here I will do one exception to ever using his name) Barack Hussein Obama is a DICTATOR and not the President of the United States of America. His own actions prove him thus.

BTW, if he can break the law via giving exemptions to the health care law, that makes the law null and void because it cannot, by definition, be a law so that means we do not have to obey it, either.

About the author: Linda McKinney

Linda McKinney

 I’m an Air Force Brat who married an Air Force Brat who was in the Air Force for twenty-plus years. I bleed Air Force blue. I’ve been married to him for over thirty-five years. I saw him through binoculars when I was fifteen (he was eighteen) and God told me we’d marry. We have two grown sons. I have four passions: God, America, my family and guns (in that order). I’m an amateur photographer (, an artist, a poet and writer (, and I’m determined to help return America to what the Founding Fathers intended her to be!


Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: