Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘Saul Alinsky’

Saul Alinsky’s 8 LEVELS OF CONTROL


waving flagOriginal Author UnknownNew WhatDidYouSay Logo

You may have seen this before, but every time I have re-read it, it concerns me more.  Therefore, we should read and reread it and constantly remind ourselves that unless we want to completely give up ALL OF OUR RIGHTS, those rights that we have fought wars to prevent from loosing, those rights that we have honored and protected, we must do something about it NOW.  We must get rid of those politicians who openly support change in the negative way and vote in those politicians who have the guts to stand up for our rights, our principles, our freedom, our American ideals

Saul Alinsky died about 43 years ago, but his writings influenced those in political control of our nation today. Recall that Hillary did her college thesis on his writings and Obama writes about him in his books.

He Died: June 12, 1972, Carmel-by-the-Sea, CA   Education: University of Chicago

Spouse: Irene Alinsky

Books: Rules for Radicals, Reveille for Radicals

Alinsky dedicated his book to Lucifer, the ultimate rebel. All eight rules are currently in play:   

How to create a social state.

There are eight levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a social state. The first is the most important.

1)   Healthcare – Control healthcare and you control the people.
2)   Poverty – Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
3)   Debt – Increase the debt to an unsustainable level.  That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4)   Gun Control – Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.
5)   Welfare – Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Water, Electrical power, Housing and neighborhood demographics, and Income).
6)   Education – Take control of what people read and listen to – take control of what children learn in school.  (Common Core?)
7)   Religion – Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.
8)   Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor.  This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take Tax from the wealthy with the support of the poor.

Sound familiar? These rules have been applied in our society over several Democrat administrations.

Alinsky merely simplified Vladimir Lenin’s original scheme for world conquest by communism, under Russian rule.

Stalin described his converts as “Useful Idiots.” The Useful Idiots have destroyed every nation in which they have seized power and control. It is presently happening at an alarming rate in the United States.

If people can read this and still believe, everything is just fine, they ARE “useful idiots”.

“It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere.”

freedom combo 2

3 simple steps to a conservative in the White House


waving flagPosted By author-image Gina Loudon On 06/07/2015

Article printed from WND: http://www.wnd.com

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://www.wnd.com/2015/06/3-simple-steps-to-a-conservative-in-the-white-house

B2A_FvyCMAE14px

As we look ahead to the 2016 elections, we need to be ready to fight back against those who do not want a right-sided victory. Many will talk about attracting certain voting groups. They will spout the rhetoric we have heard so many times in elections:

  • “We must attract the independents.”
  • “We must attract the women’s vote.”
  • “We must attract the black vote.”
  • “We must attract the youth vote.”
  • “We must attract the Hispanic vote.”

The list goes on, and it serves one purpose: to confuse.

The statists plan to win, and it isn’t because they have a better candidate or even more money. They plan to win by confusing their enemy. (That’s you.) The elections in 2016 can be won by the right using three simple tactics:

1) The Christian vote: Only 50 percent of those who warm the church pews actually even vote in the general elections. The numbers for women who attend church and vote are even more abysmal. If every churchgoer who does vote brought one churchgoer who doesn’t vote, the election would be wrapped up for the right. This tactic would have even more impact in a primary.

2) Conservatives rally behind one candidate: Before Iowa, conservatives need to have a coordinated strategy to decide on one candidate, or they will get whomever the D.C. elite decides to hand them.

3) Eliminate voter fraud: After deciding on the candidate, and committing to get churches to vote, conservatives should dedicate the rest of their efforts to eliminating voter fraud and opposing motor voter, same-day registration and voting (California has this), and voting without ID laws in their state.

For good measure, I would remind conservatives watch for Saul Alinsky’s rules to be used against them over, and over, and over. The more quickly conservatives can recognize the attacks on them, the better:

Alinsky’s rules:SAUL-ALINSKY-OBAMA2

1) “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from two main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood.

2) “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone.

3) “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.

4) “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.

5) “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.

6) “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.

7) “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news.

8) “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.

9) “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist.

10) “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.

11) “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem.

12) “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.

The left has very effectively divided conservatives using Alinsky tactics this week with regard to the Duggar family. If conservatives are smart, they will recognize that attack and move on from it. This will happen again and again and again throughout this election cycle. You won’t see the internal circular fire in the statist camp. They are too pragmatic for that.Culture

If you look closely, the entire Duggar story was a not-so-subtle message to conservatives, especially those who are seeking office: Only those who have no standards should be allowed to judge those who do. This will undoubtedly cause sleepless nights for many a conservative running for office and remembering a joint shared at a college party, or a Playboy magazine shared in a Boy Scout tent in elementary school. That is the intent of the Duggar story, which used tactics No. 4, No. 5 and No. 12 and threatens to sweep away a family that had captured the American imagination while showing large Christian families in a positive light. Remember, Nazism is short for national socialism, particularly atheistic centralized government partnering with powerful preferred corporations.

Let’s take a look at the people behind the assault on the Duggars and American-style individual liberty and protections for children.

Bauer Holdings, the German conglomerate that owns In Touch Magazine, trades in all kinds of societal derogating trash and probably enjoys little readership among Duggar family loyalists. Christian converts are bad for business. Attacking the Duggars is a three-fer: Sell magazines, defend your market, and help make sure no conservative is elected to the White House in 2016. So they would dedicate a lot of time and money to investigate and paint the Duggar family as exhibit A of why we can never give spotlight or power to a conservative.

According to an investigation in the The Wrap, one of Bauer’s subsidiaries is Der Landser, a Nazi-sympathizing, skinhead magazine in Germany. Germany’s equivalent of Time Magazine, Der Spiegel, described the Bauer publication as “a specialist journal for whitewashing the Wehrmacht,” Hitler’s war machine.

Bauer also published the magazine Zuerst! Dieter Munier, the publisher of that magazine is a known German neo-Nazi leader for more than 40 years. Bauer sold that magazine in 2012 after public outrage became overwhelming.

Bauer’s holdings don’t stop at Nazi sympathizing or Holocaust denial.Buying votes

Bauer owned multiple distributorships of pornography, including (you can’t make this up) many Nazi-themed porn movies. These movies detail punishing via rape and torture those who do not sympathize with Nazis. One movie cited in The Wrap article was “Inglorious B–ches.” Bauer showcased this movie via Internet service provider, and shows a scene where a pair of Nazi soldiers torture resistance fighters. By shredding the American principle that we protect the identity of abuse victims, the owners of In Touch magazine have done more damage to women and children around the world than any one molester could do. They clearly aren’t looking for answers to the cancerous problem of child molestation. The reality is, that even those who are looking for answers don’t have many. But one thing is certain: In Touch magazine has an agenda far bigger than the Duggars.War on Christians

If conservatives want to win in 2016, they will need to keep their eye on the prize and keep from getting mired in the distractions of the day. They will have to speak truth boldly and swiftly, and not to get dragged into the narrative of the left (example: “The Duggars should have…”).

The game is on. To the winner go the spoils.muslim-obama

Order Gina Loudon’s book “Ladies and Gentlemen: Why the Survival of Our Republic Depends on the Revival of Honor” – how atheism, liberalism and radical feminism have harmed the nation.


freedom combo 2

Just a Reminder from the “Thousand Words” File


New WhatDidYouSay Logo

Occasionally we need to be reminded of some facts. Pictures are still a powerful tool to bring arguments to focus. Here are just a few.

Jerry Broussard of WhatDidYouSay.org

 

wraped up in themselves You might be a liberal Transformation-Day the education of children SAUL-ALINSKY-OBAMA2 liberals-thanks-saul-alinsky-political-poster-1308396354 River-denial-NRD-600 Socialism verses Communism dem primary Leftist determonation to destroy freedom of religion Liberalism a mental disorder 2 AFA MAP with LEGAND squeeze into mold muslim-obama Islamapologist Welcome to the Obama Party of Deciet and lies who want unarmed citizens Only Reason cropped-freedoms-battle-with-heading.jpg cropped-security_freedom_tn.jpg cropped-jefferson.jpg cropped-tree-of-liberty-03.jpg cropped-benefits.jpg cropped-admit-they-were-wrong.png cropped-different-free-speech-ideologies.jpg cropped-we-must-never-forget.jpg cropped-we-have-been-torn-apart.jpg cropped-the-conservative.jpg cropped-george-washington-regarding-2nd-amandment.jpg culture of deciet Offical Seal Dupe and Chains obama-border-is-open-378x257 Imperial President Obama Cloward Pevin with explanation Tyrant Obama Truth The New Hate Speech 2 Resist Amnesty OARLogo Picture6

 

They can only win by lying!


By Joe Messina – Apr 5, 2015

It seems like the party of “the people” can only win by lying to “the people”.
Senator Harry Reid admitted this week that he lied to help Mr. Obama win. He, at this point, is the most honorable man in the Democrat party.

 You see he is the ONLY Democrat to really come out after being caught and basically say… yup, I did it and I got what I wanted, so sue me. He knew the information on Obama’s opponent, Mitt Romney was false. There was no “insider” at Romney’s company. But he, and the rest of the Dems, were OK with lying about it.

The Democrats should change the name of the party to the “Whatever it takes to win” party. Tell the people whatever it takes to get them “in bed” with you and then you can say “I didn’t mean it that way.”

Party of Deciet and liesThe now ever-famous and haunting words, “if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor” was clearly a LIE! “If you like your plan, you can keep your plan,” also a LIE. Then he tried to “clarify” with “What I meant was, if it fit our parameters,” yet another LIE!If his mouth is open he must be lying

I think when the NEW edition of “The Book of Lies” gets published the first group of pages will be all Democrats, and mostly Mr. Oblamo! It will be followed closely behind by Billy “where’s the free sex island” Clinton, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman” and “it depends of what the meaning of is, is.” Not far behind is the oh-so-loving spouse, Hillary “what difference does it make” Clinton.

If a Republican did one-tenth of what the Clintons have done to the public there would be rioting in the streets, courtesy of the Reverends Sharpton and Jackson.

Recently, Representative Gutierrez from Illinois said, “If the Republicans got in the way of the amnesty order there would be militant action from the immigrants.” WHAT?! Hey, Mr. Gutierrez;

  • did you just threaten American representatives and citizens with militant action from NON-American citizens?
  • Did you just sanction an act of violence to perpetuate the breaking of laws?
  • Aren’t you a lawmaker, sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution?
  • Isn’t this a form of treason?War Drums

A bunch of Democrats screamed “discrimination” about Indiana’s new law protecting peoples’ religious beliefs and the practice thereof. Interestingly enough, it’s the same reason the original settlers came here… to get away from religious persecution. This group of Dems said no one should patronize, support, or take part in any event or action to support Indiana. Curious! Some of these same Dems made a trip to Cuba to support the illegal actions of President Obama. In case you haven’t figured it out, Mr. Obama and clan believe the Constitution and the laws of this country don’t apply to them. They let the Castro Crew know they are in support of Cuba normalizing relations with America. Well, if the Dems hold true to their belief system then will that would only occur AFTER the Castro regime changes its laws and treatment of homosexuals, right? And after they change their laws on treatment of political prisoners. But the Democrats are telling us that our sanctions aren’t working and simply normalizing relations with Cuba will fix all that (just like it’s worked in the Middle East?)Picture1

And then there’s Iran. The president wants us to believe that the deal (non-deal) he made with Iran was good for everyone involved. It was so good that even the French walked away stating what a bad deal it was. Israeli Prime Minister, Mr. Netanyahu says it the beginning of the end. The Russians and Chinese left because there was no movement. But our ever-loving, “alternate universe reality,” President Obama said we were staying at the table because we were making progress. Usually when one person in the room sees a situation one way and the rest see it another, odd man out under the influence of narcotics (or some other delusion!)more evidence

The president televised his usual rah-rah speech about how happy and proud he was of his team and this non-deal. Sure, the Iranians got sanctions lifted and all they really had to agree to do is come back to the table with a real plan by June! They also agreed to have open weapons inspections, you know, the kind they’ve agreed to many times in the past and ignored many times in the past with little (or no) consequences. But, President Obama says, it’s a good deal for ALL if Iran does what they say.culture of deciet

I’m taking bets, anyone else?

I often wonder why Mr. Obama chooses the most communist, hate-filled, anti-human rights countries to build alliances with, all the while shunning and getting In the way of progress with our allies all across the world. Any thoughts? Keep it clean!
We have been blatantly lied to and threatened by, President Obama, Mr. and Mrs. Clinton, Attorney General Eric Holder, Al Gore, and Representative Gutierrez just to name a few. In the time of our Founding Fathers every one of these individuals would have been brought up on treason charges and disposed of accordingly.cropped-freedom-is-not-dictator-friendly.png

My real issue is that the America-loving Democrats don’t come out against their own. It takes an act of God to get them to move. And don’t us Senator Menendez as the ONE example. He is just a casualty after daring to question the President. Are there no others? Or are they just too afraid after seeing what happened to Menendez. DOJ says they will not prosecute Lois Learner. They know they are required to under the law but are choosing to ignore it. Menendez, an enemy of their party is a YES, and Lois

Learner, an enemy of the people but a good “party” soldier is a NO!squeeze into mold

Republicans go after themselves to a fault. The Dems never spend money on opposition research because they know they can get all of that from Republicans during primaries! Most of the time we take our own people to the woodshed and perform public floggings. Just look at what is being said from within the party about current candidates for the upcoming presidential race.
Obama, Holder, Clintons(s), and many others at the top have lied and cheated on the American people. Is that because they know their message is old and can’t win? Is it really the only way they CAN win? Have they solidified themselves as the party of the untruth?Party of Deciet and lies

By their actions, the Dems appear to be “over it” with our laws, our rules, and our protocols. And we really do absolutely nothing to stop them. Democrat leadership is 100% sure they are smarter than us and know what’s better for us, so they just repeatedly sidestep the laws. Be honest with yourselves people, even those of you on the Left!

They care more for non-American, lawbreakers than they do for the people who were born here, have paid taxes (their salaries!) and voted them in! Sadly, it seems the Dems are willing to do anything they can to prove they are right, even if it brings this country to its knees. The question is, are you going to sit idly by and just let it happen, or are YOU going to do something about it?

cropped-tree-of-liberty-03.jpg Picture6

What Will You Do When Government Tyranny And Terrorism Work Hand In Hand? We do not need more government!


 

 

Posted by Brandon Smith | Zero Hedge | January 15, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://www.infowars.com/what-will-you-do-when-government-tyranny-and-terrorism-work-hand-in-hand/

What Will You Do When Government Tyranny And Terrorism Work Hand In Hand?
Image Credits: akrockefeller, Flickr

I was in the middle of working on an article covering real U.S. economic stats versus manipulated statistics when the Charlie Hebdo shootings took place.

And though I knew the implications of the event would be far-reaching, I was originally undeterred from my financial subject matter. I had already covered in previous articles the inevitability of ISIS attacks on Europe and America, including the “warnings” of Saudi Arabia in August of last year that jihadists would target the EU within months and the U.S. a month later.

In September of last year, ISIS publicly urged attacks on French and U.S. citizens.

I have also published extensive analysis on the covert funding and training of ISIS militants by Saudi Arabia and Western intelligence agencies, including my article “The Time Is Ripe For A False Flag Attack On American Soil.”

The bottom line is the Paris attack was not surprising in the slightest. I have no doubt whatsoever that such attacks are going to increase in frequency, that the U.S. will be hit soon, and that our government will do little to nothing to stop such tragedies. However, a Reuters article titled “White House to hold global security summit Feb (sic) 18: U.S. official” caught my eye. And after reading it, I’m afraid I have to set aside my financial piece until next week and break down the insanity that is now taking place in the world of geopolitics. Cloward Pevin with explanation

It is clear by the language being used by the political elite that the “global summit” called in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo attacks is about far more than radical Islamic terrorism. Set aside the fact that our government essentially created ISIS in order to destabilize Syria. Set aside the fact that globalist middlemen like John McCain and “former” covert ops goons like Gen. Paul Vallely have met directly with groups like the Nusra Front that are providing support for ISIS. Set aside the fact that Saudi Arabia has been openly funneling cash and arms to Syrian terrorist factions tied to ISIS, and realize that the mere existence of ISIS, regardless of its origins, is being used as a rationale for the erasure of civil liberties and the establishment of martial law on both sides of the Atlantic. Such federalized reactions CANNOT be allowed to continue, regardless of the threats each nation faces.

As far as the Reuters article is concerned, one does not need to read very far between the lines to see the true message being conveyed.

First, the focus of the summit is not necessarily indicated as “Islamic terrorism.” In fact, the word “terrorism” is barely mentioned. Now politicos are shifting their language to the term “extremism,” which is far broader in its implications. It should be noted that while the terrorist label has been bandied about rather liberally by both the Bush and Obama administrations, “extremism” offers greater cover for governments to persecute or attack political opponents. A terrorist is generally someone who initiates or at least plans a large-scale attack designed to illicit a fear response in a population. An extremist, on the other hand, could literally be anyone who holds views or initiates activism outside acceptable forms of mainstream thought. Attorney General Eric Holder did not use the words “terrorism” or “jihadist” in his announcement of the global summit in February; he used the phrase “violent extremism”:

“We will bring together all of our allies to discuss ways in which we can counteract this violent extremism that exists around the world…”Picture9

Throughout history, “violence,” according to governments, is often attributed to ideas as well as actions. The point is the change in vocabulary over to the extremist label is not accidental or coincidental. The establishment is conditioning the public to think in broad terms and to identify numerous groups as the enemy, rather than focusing on radical Islam.  As I have said for years, Islamic terror is nothing but an advantageous excuse for governments to make war on all of us.  Do not forget, constitutionalists are often referred to in the mainstream media and by Orwellian institutions like the Department of Homeland Security as “extremists.” How long before we are artificially linked as being suspect? How long before Charlie Hebdo-style attacks come to the U.S.? How long before the liberty minded are categorized as accessories to terrorism due to our anti-corrupt-government philosophies? Picture10

It is disturbing to witness the lack of conviction in principles in the average person. Self-proclaimed leftists railed against the degeneration of civil liberties and constitutional protections under George W. Bush, but rallied in support of the same weakening of freedoms under Barack Obama. Self-proclaimed conservatives today are shocked and infuriated by the trampling of the constitution through executive orders displayed by the Obama administration. Yet, I suspect that many of them will willingly jump on the fascist bandwagon in the event of “Islamic” attacks on American soil. Neither side seems to grasp the reality that the disruptions of liberty we enact in the name of stopping jihadists today will eventually fall back on the rest of us tomorrow. Welcome to the Obama

The lockdown of the populace is already ramping up.  The EU is currently discussing the creation of a European Passenger Name Record database (national ID database), meaning officials hope to create a centralized database with a file on every single citizen. Think the no-fly list is a terrifying concept? Wait until it becomes publicly accepted for all web comments, Facebook posts, and blog posts to be added to an ongoing record that determines whether you are allowed to travel. Wait until it becomes a mainstream notion that every travel destination you visit is tracked, recorded on permanent record, and scrutinized by some pencil necked bureaucrat who then determines whether or not you are suspect.  Apparently, French officials are supportive of the idea. And given the proclamations of “unity” surrounding the upcoming summit, I suspect actions undertaken in Europe will eventually be exported to the United States. Reuters reports:

“French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said after the meeting that European interior ministers had agreed to boost cooperation in an effort to thwart further jihadist attacks.” 

We all agree that we need to put in place better control on certain passengers, on the basis of objective criteria and with respect for fundamental liberties and without disrupting cross-border travel,” he said.  

He said Europe needed urgent progress in establishing a European Passenger Name Record database, which would facilitate the exchange of data about passengers between member states.  

“We are convinced of the need for such a tool, to follow those who travel to terrorist operating theaters or who return from there,” he said, adding that this database would also be useful in the fight against other serious crimes.

Unfortunately, travel is the least of our concerns. Free speech is a primary target for the elites, and the Internet is clearly outlined as a threat by politicians claiming concern for public safety. This comes in the form of one of the oldest rationalizations for tyranny – the trade-off between freedom and security. The French argue that while free speech is important, some “exceptions” must be made in order to thwart extremist ideas:

“Cazeneuve said the Internet needs to remain a space for free expression, but that Europe should fight against abusive use of the web (sic) to spread hate speech, anti-Semitic messages and the recruiting vulnerable young people for violence.” 

“We need to work more closely with Internet companies to guarantee the reporting and if possible removal of all content that amounts to an apology of terrorism or calls for violence and hatred,” he said.

  • Who gets to determine what speech amounts to an “apology of terrorism?”

  • Who is the all-benevolent and wise sage who gets to decide what we can and cannot say?

  • Will he be fair and just?

  • Or will he use the power of censorship to attack any and all websites critical of the establishment?

  • What do you think the most likely outcome of such legal precedence would be?

  • Again, how long before websites like the one you are reading now are vilified by the extremist label?

  • How long before liberty-minded speech is categorized as violent speech or hate speech? Welcome to the Obama

Sen. Dianne Feinstein and the White House are now kindly warning the public that terrorist “sleeper cells” have been activated and that some are present in the United States. On CNN, Feinstein said:

“So I think this calls for vigilance. It calls for seeing that the national security organizations of our country, the intelligence community is funded fully, is directed ably, is cooperating with whether it be British intelligence, French intelligence, German intelligence, as we do.’

“And the French are good at it, and so are the British and the Germans. So, we can even be more active in terms of doing those things which enable us to find terrorists, to see who they’re communicating with in this country, and to track that.”Obama Muslim collection

She means mass Internet and phone surveillance, the same National Security Agency surveillance exposed by Edward Snowden, which now has a convenient justification in the form of an ever-present fear of terrorism. Wake up America

Finally, it is only a matter of time before a militarized response is activated in the U.S., just as it has been in France. One shooting event has led to the fielding of over 10,000 French troops on French soil, as well as an extra 5,000 heavily armed police. Frankly, this is where I — and many people like me — draw the line. Martial law is not acceptable under any circumstances.  I don’t care if we one day see a mushroom cloud over an American city, there is no measure of government security (false security) that is worth the degradation of essential liberties.  I suspect the loss of liberty, usurping of the constitution and the deployment of the military on U.S. soil would trigger revolution — a revolution I’m sure the establishment would attempt to marginalize as mere terrorism. Ultimately, though, there is no other option.

As I have been discussing constantly over the past several months, community preparation and organization comprise the only action plan worth the effort and energy at this time. The French are disarmed and utterly socialized. Millions of them march in Paris in a display of solidarity, but solidarity behind what solution?

  • Even more government; the same government that created the problem in the first place?

  • Even more centralization?

  • The globalization of despotic security policies?

The French have dug their grave, and now they are going to have to lie down in it.

Americans do not have to follow the same path.

We do not need more government. We do not need more surveillance, more police militarization or more troops on the streets. What we need is to take back responsibility for own defense. The French government could not or would not protect the staff of Charlie Hebdo, and the U.S. government will not protect you. That means you must train to protect yourself and those you care about. Whether we face a false flag attack or a legitimate terrorist action, the response is the same: Fight back. It is times like these that separate the courageous from the cowardly; those with principles and conscience versus the treacherous and self-serving. Make no mistake; as I wrote in my last article, many illusions are about to be shattered. You can be caught up in the storm as a helpless spectator and victim or you can become a barrier, a wall of defense against the dangerous riptides. These are your choices. Choose wisely.

By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

 

Today’s Multiple Politically INCORRECT Drawings, Cartoons and Pictures


 

Saturday, December 13, 2014

sworn enemies 05-01-08

Unplugged-600-LA

Alinsky on ridicule

SAUL-ALINSKY-OBAMA2

Nakita Saying

obama cartoon 7

Voting Intellegence Test

Obama Shirt 3

UNion Worker Gun

No mom should fear

war on black males

Being sick of Obama

the education of children

Nancy Pelosi takes the ice bucket challenge

money worth spending

LASTBlog wishes

Labor Force Participation Remains at 36-Year Low


By Ali Meyer, December 5, 2014

Economy Jobs
In this Thursday March 13, 2014, file photo, job seekers line up to attend a marijuana industry job far in Downtown Denver. (AP Photo/Brennan Linsley, File)

(CNSNews.com) – The labor force participation rate remained at a 36-year low of 62.8 percent in November, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 

 
The participation rate, which is the percentage of the civilian noninstitutional population who participated in the labor force by either having a job during the month or actively seeking one, was 62.8 percent in November which matches the percentage since March 1978.
 
In November, according to BLS, the nation’s civilian noninstitutional population, consisting of all people 16 or older who were not in the military or an institution, reached 248,844,000. Of those, 156,397,000 participated in the labor force by either holding a job or actively seeking one.
 
The 156,397,000 who participated in the labor force was 62.8 percent of the 248,844,000 civilian noninsttutional population, which matches the 62.8 percent rate in April, May, June, August and October of 2014 as well as the participation rate in March of 1978. The participation rate hit its lowest level of 62.7 percent in September 2014.
 
Another 92,447,000 people did not participate in the labor force. These Americans did not have a job and were not actively trying to find one. When President Obama took office in January 2009, there were 80,529,000 Americans who were not participating in the office, which means that since then, 11,918,000 Americans have left the workforce.

participation rate
Cloward Pevin with explanationOf the 156,397,000 who did participate in the labor force, 147,287,000 had a job, and 9,110,000 did not have a job but were actively seeking one -– making them the nation’s unemployed.
 
The 9,110,000 job seekers were 5.8 percent of the 156,397,000 Americans actively participating in the labor force during the month of November. Thus, the unemployment rate was 5.8 percent, the same as it was in October.
 
 
The business and economic reporting of CNSNews.com is funded in part with a gift made in memory of Dr. Keith C. Wold.
Blog wishes

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: