Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘Iran Nuclear AGREEMENT’

Obama’s 6 biggest lies about Iran nuke deal


waving flagPosted By Chuck Norris On 08/30/2015

Article printed from WND: http://www.wnd.com

URL to article: http://www.wnd.com/2015/08/obamas-6-biggest-lies-about-iran-nuke-deal

nuclear-fusion_researchPresident Obama has been campaigning for the Iran nuclear deal like he’s running for a third term. But, unfortunately, because of his naivety and lack of experience on foreign policy, he is completely wrong.

Let me highlight six Obama statements about the Iran nuclear agreement that are complete exaggerations.

ObamaIranian-Flag-WORD-ART1) President Obama said, “I’ve had to make a lot of tough calls as president, but whether or not this deal is good for American security is not one of those calls. It’s not even close.”

“Not even close”?

He just said Friday, “the vast majority of experts on nuclear proliferation have endorsed this deal. The world is more or less united …”

But 200 retired generals and admirals completely disagreed as they sent a letter to Congress last week urging lawmakers to reject the Iran nuclear agreement, which they said “would threaten the national security and vital interests of the United States.”

Are we to assume that most of them are not in any respect “experts on nuclear proliferation”? And are we gullible enough to believe that the commander in chief knows more about military strategy and American security than 200 retired generals and admirals?

And what about other notable experts who disagree? As one editorial piece noted: “Michael Hayden, former CIA director; Dennis Ross, longtime Mideast negotiator; Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; David Albright, former nuclear weapons inspector and president of the Institute for Science and International Security; and Olli Heinonen, the International Atomic Energy Agency’s former deputy director general for safeguards, have all expressed reservations about the deal.”

Chuck Norris provides real solutions to our county’s problems and a way to reawaken the American dream in his best-seller, “Black Belt Patriotism.”

2) President Obama said, “Because this is such a strong deal, every nation in the world that has commented publicly – with the exception of the Israeli government – has expressed support.”

But the Wall Street Journal reported that “Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates – are just as distraught” as Israel about the Iran nuclear deal.

Mishaal al-Gergawi, managing director of the Delma Institute in Abu Dhabi and a prominent Emirati political commentator, explained: “A lot of the Gulf countries feel they are being thrown under the bus. The Gulf thought it was in a monogamous relationship with the West, and now it realizes it’s being cheated on because the U.S. was in an open relationship with it.”

Obama’s “with the exception of the Israeli government” comment is not only a ginormous snub to our greatest ally in the Middle East but an affront to the fact that Israel has been threatened repeatedly with genocide by Iranian leaders.

Jerusalem is 970 miles from Tehran, which is roughly the distance between Washington, D.C., and the islands of the Bahamas – just 50 miles off the Florida coast. If the Bahamas were a hostile state to Washington with a long history of threatening to eradicate the U.S. capital from the planet, do you think anyone in Washington would concede to give the Bahamas nuclear power?

Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is absolutely right when he calls the Iran deal a grave travesty and threat for not only Israel but also a “historic mistake for the world.” He said, “The desire to sign an agreement was stronger than everything else. … Wide-ranging concessions were made in all of the areas which should have prevented Iran from getting the ability to arm itself with a nuclear weapon.”

3) The president initially said International Atomic Energy Agency, or IAEA, inspectors would be allowed to “access any suspicious location” in Iran. He then backpedaled and limited it, saying, “Inspectors will be allowed daily access to Iran’s key nuclear sites. If there is a reason for inspecting a suspicious, undeclared site anywhere in Iran, inspectors will get that access, even if Iran objects. This access can be with as little as 24 hours’ notice.”Bull

But the truth is, Obama’s “anytime, anywhere” inspections is a bunch of smoke-and-mirror sales pitches to get the American public and legislators to buy the agreement.

First, even the president confessed: “And while the process for resolving a dispute about access can take up to 24 days, once we’ve identified a site that raises suspicion, we will be watching it continuously until inspectors get in.”

However, the Wall Street Journal did an investigation into the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action released by the Obama administration and it “reveals that its terms permit Iran to hold inspectors at bay for months, likely three or more.”What did you say 04.jpg

Now, imagine what a drug dealer could do with a warning 90 days before a law-enforcement raid.

The White House noted: “Right now, Iran has nearly 20,000 centrifuges between their Natanz and Fordow facilities. But under this deal, Iran must reduce its centrifuges to 6,104 for the next ten years.”

Ten years?! That’s two-and-a-half presidential terms or cycles. And we expect the No. 1 terrorist-recruiting Islamic nation in the world to comply and not play a shell game with centrifuges over that 10-year period?

The White House again was wrong when it stated, “International inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) will not only be continuously monitoring every element of Iran’s declared nuclear program, but they will also be verifying that no fissile material is covertly carted off to a secret location to build a bomb. … Basically, from the minute materials that could be used for a weapon comes out of the ground to the minute it is shipped out of the country, the IAEA will have eyes on it and anywhere Iran could try and take it.”What did you say 06.jpg

So, we are supposed to believe that, despite not being on the ground full-time, the IAEA, will be omniscient and omnipresent so as to detect any movement of any materials at any time outside the country, even though it will fight to get into the country to inspect anything in less than three months? Can you say, pipe dream?!

And if you think the preceding sounds bogus, consider that the Associated Press just discovered a “secret agreement” between the IAEA and the United Nations and reported this about the discovery: “Iran will be allowed to use its own inspectors to investigate a site it has been accused of using to develop nuclear arms, operating under a secret agreement with the U.N. agency that normally carries out such work.”

And, to add injury to insult, guess who will pay for those Iran inspectors to investigate their own nuclear facilities? You guessed: the American taxpayers have to pay more than $10 million a year.Picture2

Reuters reported, after the IAEA said it has a severe funding shortfall and would need extra monies, the U.S. mission in Vienna said in a statement: “The United States is committed to working with all (IAEA) member states to ensure the agency has the resources it needs to verify Iran’s nuclear-related commitments under the (July 14 agreement).”

The State Department echoed similar sentiment back in April: “The United States is committed to working with other IAEA member states to provide the agency the resources it needs to continue carrying out this [Joint Plan of Action]-related work.”Picture3

Imagine: Washington agreeing to force American taxpayers to pay for a rogue and terrorist-funding Islamic republic to inspect its own nuclear facilities while ignorantly hoping it doesn’t develop a nuclear bomb behind our backs.What did you say 07.jpg

We really have forgotten Sept. 11.

Write your representatives today and demand they reject the Iran nuclear agreement.

(Next week in Part 2, I will give three more examples of Obama’s misguidance and more evidence that the Iran nuclear agreement is bad news for the U.S. and world, how Iran will continue to build a nuclear bomb despite a signed agreement, and, grievous among all the fallout, even if Congress does not sign an agreement, Iran will still be rewarded with at least $50 billion and up to $150 billion additional revenue to continue to fund terrorism against Israel, the West and the U.S. And Obama agrees it is best. Yes, you read that right!)

In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


Prize Fighters

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://conservativebyte.com/2015/04/prize-fighters/

Eye-Prize-600-LI
iran deal Iran Collection Why Picture6

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


Trust But No” Verify

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://conservativebyte.com/2015/04/trust-but-no-verify/

Iran Cheat 600 LA
muslim-obama iran deal against America Iran Collection Why Picture6

Nuclear ‘deal’ critics worried about ‘dueling’ fact sheets from US, Iran


Published April 07, 2015, FoxNews.com

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/04/07/nuclear-deal-critics-worried-about-dueling-fact-sheets-from-us-iran/

iran deal Iran Collection Why

Congressional critics of the Iran nuclear “deal” are worried Washington and Tehran can’t even agree on what was in the accord struck last week, pointing to “dueling” fact sheets put out by each government. “The bottom line is Iran has not agreed to a political framework that addresses all parameters of a comprehensive agreement, but rather has put out a dueling framework that contradicts the one put out by the United States,” Sen. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., said in a written statement. 

muslim-obamaKirk and other lawmakers are citing the stark differences between what Iranian and U.S. officials each say is in the deal, in questioning the Obama administration’s sales pitch — and demanding a say on any final agreementSenate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker, R-Tenn., told “Fox News Sunday” that Iran is touting “sort of the mirror image opposite of what’s being reported here.” 

Harvard University’s Belfer Center put out a translated version of Iran’s fact sheet, which Kirk cited. Key differences include: 

Sanctions

U.S.: The U.S. fact sheet says Iran will “receive sanctions relief, if it verifiably abides by its commitments” — asserting sanctions relief would kick in only once conditions are met. 

OBAMALAND FARSE Fact Sheet says:U.S. and E.U. nuclear-related sanctions will be suspended after the IAEA has verified that Iran has taken all of its key nuclear-related steps. If at any time Iran fails to fulfill its commitments, these sanctions will snap back into place.” 

Further, it says: “All past UN Security Council resolutions on the Iran nuclear issue will be lifted simultaneous with the completion, by Iran, of nuclear-related actions addressing all key concerns.” If his mouth is open he must be lying

Iran: The Iran fact sheet, by contrast, says “all of the sanctions will be immediately removed after reaching a comprehensive agreement.” 

The translated fact sheet says: “According to the reached solutions, after the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan of Joint Action, all of the UN resolutions will be revoked and all of the multilateral economic and financial sanctions by the EU and the unilateral ones by the US will be annulled.” 

Centrifuges

If his mouth is open he must be lyingOBAMALAND FARSE Fact Sheet says:  The U.S. statement says Iran won’t use its advanced centrifuges for 10 years and can do “limited” research before that. It says: “Iran will not use its IR-2, IR-4, IR-5, IR-6, or IR-8 models to produce enriched uranium for at least ten years. Iran will engage in limited research and development with its advanced centrifuges, according to a schedule and parameters which have been agreed to by the P5+1.” 

 

Iran: The Iran statement does not describe this research and development as “limited,” but instead says: “Iran will continue its research and development on advanced machines and will continue the initiation and completion phases of the research and development process of IR-4, IR-5, IR-6, and IR-8 centrifuges during the 10 year period of the Comprehensive Plan for Joint Action.” 

Uranium stockpile 

If his mouth is open he must be lyingOBAMALAND FARSE Fact Sheet says: The U.S. statement says “Iran has agreed to not enrich uranium over 3.67 percent for at least 15 years,” and to “reduce its current stockpile of about 10,000 kg of low-enriched uranium (LEU) to 300 kg of 3.67 percent LEU for 15 years.” It also says Iran will only enrich uranium, using first-generation centrifuges, at its Natanz facility for 10 years. 

 

Iran: Iran’s statement does not appear to make the distinction between 10 and 15 years, saying: “The timeframe of the Comprehensive Plan of Joint Action regarding Iran’s enrichment program will be 10 years.” It then refers to the enrichment at Natanz occurring during this period. 

Heavy water reactor 

If his mouth is open he must be lyingOBAMALAND FARSE Fact Sheet says: The U.S. statement says the Arak heavy water reactor will be redesigned and rebuilt, and will not produce weapons grade plutonium. The statement says, “The original core of the reactor, which would have enabled the production of significant quantities of weapons-grade plutonium, will be destroyed or removed from the country.” 

 

Iran: The Iran statement says the Arak reactor “will remain” and will be enhanced and updated, including so it produces less plutonium. It does not mention the core being destroyed.

Corker, in questioning the discrepancies on Sunday, underscored the need for legislation he has co-sponsored that would demand congressional review of any nuclear deal. 

kingobamafingerconstitution-300x204President Obama opposes the bill, but in a troubling sign for the administration, even some in his own party support it. Most recently, Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. — who is Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid’s choice to succeed him after his retirement — told Politico he supports the Corker bill. 

Administration officials, meanwhile, have downplayed the discrepancies between how the U.S. and Iranian governments are portraying the framework — which would be the basis for a final deal all sides are trying to reach by June 30. An administration official said on a conference call last week that Iran’s foreign minister will have to sell the deal just like the U.S. will. Party of Deciet and lies

Asked Monday about the discrepancy over the timing of sanctions relief, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest acknowledged that the issue “still needs to be negotiated.” … There are still details about the phase-out, if you will, of the sanctions that have not yet been agreed to. And it is the strong view of the administration that it would not be wise, and it would not be in the interest of the international community, to simply take away sanctions … on day one,” Earnest said.more evidence Picture6

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


It’s Suicide!

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://conservativebyte.com/2015/04/its-suicide/

Suicide-USA-NRD-600

iran deal Why Iran Collection Picture6

They can only win by lying!


By Joe Messina – Apr 5, 2015

It seems like the party of “the people” can only win by lying to “the people”.
Senator Harry Reid admitted this week that he lied to help Mr. Obama win. He, at this point, is the most honorable man in the Democrat party.

 You see he is the ONLY Democrat to really come out after being caught and basically say… yup, I did it and I got what I wanted, so sue me. He knew the information on Obama’s opponent, Mitt Romney was false. There was no “insider” at Romney’s company. But he, and the rest of the Dems, were OK with lying about it.

The Democrats should change the name of the party to the “Whatever it takes to win” party. Tell the people whatever it takes to get them “in bed” with you and then you can say “I didn’t mean it that way.”

Party of Deciet and liesThe now ever-famous and haunting words, “if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor” was clearly a LIE! “If you like your plan, you can keep your plan,” also a LIE. Then he tried to “clarify” with “What I meant was, if it fit our parameters,” yet another LIE!If his mouth is open he must be lying

I think when the NEW edition of “The Book of Lies” gets published the first group of pages will be all Democrats, and mostly Mr. Oblamo! It will be followed closely behind by Billy “where’s the free sex island” Clinton, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman” and “it depends of what the meaning of is, is.” Not far behind is the oh-so-loving spouse, Hillary “what difference does it make” Clinton.

If a Republican did one-tenth of what the Clintons have done to the public there would be rioting in the streets, courtesy of the Reverends Sharpton and Jackson.

Recently, Representative Gutierrez from Illinois said, “If the Republicans got in the way of the amnesty order there would be militant action from the immigrants.” WHAT?! Hey, Mr. Gutierrez;

  • did you just threaten American representatives and citizens with militant action from NON-American citizens?
  • Did you just sanction an act of violence to perpetuate the breaking of laws?
  • Aren’t you a lawmaker, sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution?
  • Isn’t this a form of treason?War Drums

A bunch of Democrats screamed “discrimination” about Indiana’s new law protecting peoples’ religious beliefs and the practice thereof. Interestingly enough, it’s the same reason the original settlers came here… to get away from religious persecution. This group of Dems said no one should patronize, support, or take part in any event or action to support Indiana. Curious! Some of these same Dems made a trip to Cuba to support the illegal actions of President Obama. In case you haven’t figured it out, Mr. Obama and clan believe the Constitution and the laws of this country don’t apply to them. They let the Castro Crew know they are in support of Cuba normalizing relations with America. Well, if the Dems hold true to their belief system then will that would only occur AFTER the Castro regime changes its laws and treatment of homosexuals, right? And after they change their laws on treatment of political prisoners. But the Democrats are telling us that our sanctions aren’t working and simply normalizing relations with Cuba will fix all that (just like it’s worked in the Middle East?)Picture1

And then there’s Iran. The president wants us to believe that the deal (non-deal) he made with Iran was good for everyone involved. It was so good that even the French walked away stating what a bad deal it was. Israeli Prime Minister, Mr. Netanyahu says it the beginning of the end. The Russians and Chinese left because there was no movement. But our ever-loving, “alternate universe reality,” President Obama said we were staying at the table because we were making progress. Usually when one person in the room sees a situation one way and the rest see it another, odd man out under the influence of narcotics (or some other delusion!)more evidence

The president televised his usual rah-rah speech about how happy and proud he was of his team and this non-deal. Sure, the Iranians got sanctions lifted and all they really had to agree to do is come back to the table with a real plan by June! They also agreed to have open weapons inspections, you know, the kind they’ve agreed to many times in the past and ignored many times in the past with little (or no) consequences. But, President Obama says, it’s a good deal for ALL if Iran does what they say.culture of deciet

I’m taking bets, anyone else?

I often wonder why Mr. Obama chooses the most communist, hate-filled, anti-human rights countries to build alliances with, all the while shunning and getting In the way of progress with our allies all across the world. Any thoughts? Keep it clean!
We have been blatantly lied to and threatened by, President Obama, Mr. and Mrs. Clinton, Attorney General Eric Holder, Al Gore, and Representative Gutierrez just to name a few. In the time of our Founding Fathers every one of these individuals would have been brought up on treason charges and disposed of accordingly.cropped-freedom-is-not-dictator-friendly.png

My real issue is that the America-loving Democrats don’t come out against their own. It takes an act of God to get them to move. And don’t us Senator Menendez as the ONE example. He is just a casualty after daring to question the President. Are there no others? Or are they just too afraid after seeing what happened to Menendez. DOJ says they will not prosecute Lois Learner. They know they are required to under the law but are choosing to ignore it. Menendez, an enemy of their party is a YES, and Lois

Learner, an enemy of the people but a good “party” soldier is a NO!squeeze into mold

Republicans go after themselves to a fault. The Dems never spend money on opposition research because they know they can get all of that from Republicans during primaries! Most of the time we take our own people to the woodshed and perform public floggings. Just look at what is being said from within the party about current candidates for the upcoming presidential race.
Obama, Holder, Clintons(s), and many others at the top have lied and cheated on the American people. Is that because they know their message is old and can’t win? Is it really the only way they CAN win? Have they solidified themselves as the party of the untruth?Party of Deciet and lies

By their actions, the Dems appear to be “over it” with our laws, our rules, and our protocols. And we really do absolutely nothing to stop them. Democrat leadership is 100% sure they are smarter than us and know what’s better for us, so they just repeatedly sidestep the laws. Be honest with yourselves people, even those of you on the Left!

They care more for non-American, lawbreakers than they do for the people who were born here, have paid taxes (their salaries!) and voted them in! Sadly, it seems the Dems are willing to do anything they can to prove they are right, even if it brings this country to its knees. The question is, are you going to sit idly by and just let it happen, or are YOU going to do something about it?

cropped-tree-of-liberty-03.jpg Picture6

Iran: U.S. Lying About Nuclear Deal, ‘Fact Sheets’ on Negotiations Are ‘Spin’


by Jordan Schachtel, 2 Apr 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/04/02/iran-u-s-lying-about-nuclear-deal-fact-sheets-on-negotiations-are-spin/

In two following Tweets, Zarif insisted that the U.S. and EU will remove all economic and financial sanctions on Iran immediately, contrary to what the U.S.-produced fact sheet states.t02

Iran’s state-run Press TV reported that the agreement allowed for Iran to continue enriching uranium, and none of its facilities would be shut down. “In the framework of the agreement, none of Iran’s nuclear facilities as well as the previous activities will be stopped, shut down or suspended and Iran’s nuclear activities in all its nuclear facilities including Natanz, Fordow, Isfahan and Arak will continue,” said the Iranian media report.If his mouth is open he must be lying culture of deciet Party of Deciet and lies

Iranian media also reported that all of the UN Security Council, United States, and European Union sanctions against the regime will be lifted immediately, once the Joint Plan of Action has been implemented.Iran Collection

Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has not commented on the agreement that required his authorization for Iran’s negotiating team to sign off on the accord. As dictator of Iran, Khamenei doesn’t answer to anybody, and has no checks on his power, so it remains unclear whether he will weigh in on the nuclear framework.Picture6

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: