Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘birth control’

If You Let Government Parent, Don’t Be Surprised When It Claims Your Kids

Reported By Julie GunlockNOVEMBER 16, 2021


Glenn Youngkin’s gubernatorial win in Virginia sent a clear message to government bureaucrats: treat parents with more respect. Parents are paramount to their kids’ welfare and education, and they have a right to be angry when treated otherwise. Yet parents should also reflect on how we got here and consider how they share at least some of the blame.

For decades, public schools have encroached on some basic parental responsibilities — from feeding kids to health care to helping with homework. Is it any wonder school officials view themselves as the leading authorities on your children?

Consider that, today, a huge number of kids are dropped off at schools before the classes even begin, as early as 6:30 a.m. Kids are watched and fed a simple breakfast. This program, known as “before care,” allows parents to head to work early, which may be necessary for parents who work an early shift. Yet it’s also used by parents who want an early start to the day and a hassle- and kid-free morning.

Many parents also seem happy to let schools feed their kids. The school lunch program, originally designed to help low-income families, is now feeding any child, regardless of need. In fact, according to the School Lunch Association, 7.7 million students paid full price for a school lunch in 2019, meaning the child’s family did not qualify for a reduced or free school lunch.

The full price for a school lunch varies but it averages at about $2.48 for elementary school and $2.74 for high school. Even with rising inflation, that’s enough to make a simple meal for a child. Yet so many parents who could easily do this themselves instead opt to let the school feed their kids because it’s convenient.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture also funds weekend, holiday, and summer meal programs. This is on top of the generous food assistance that’s already provided to needy families through various programs. During the COVID shutdown of schools, even wealthy moms partook of these free food giveaways, since the USDA waived all requirements to show enrollment in the school meal program.

Working late? No sweat! Like the “before care” program, most schools now offer “after care” programs so that parents can work late. Participating students are typically assisted with their homework and fed. Not having to do homework with your kid sounds nice, but it also robs parents of knowing what is being taught and how their kid is doing with his or her schoolwork.

Students are even able to seek medical treatment without their parents’ consent. In Alexandria, Virginia, the high school’s “Teen Wellness Center” will alert parents if a child is seen for a cold, acne, or a few other minor illnesses. But parents are not informed if their child is there for a pregnancy test, diagnosis, and treatment of a sexually transmitted disease (including HIV), a prescription for birth control, “behavior change counseling,” mental health counseling, or substance abuse counseling. These services are all offered free of charge, so at no point would a student need to inform a parent.

Those who advocate for keeping children’s medical care private from parents often cite concerns about abuse arising from a parent finding out about their child’s sexual activity or its consequences. Yet school officials seem less concerned about the harms that could result from letting a child navigate these traumatic and potentially life-altering health conditions without assistance from their parents.

As for discipline, parents rarely have a place at the table. While schools used to be willing to contact parents, share information, and work as partners in setting kids on a better path, today, restorative justice programs cut out parents (and law enforcement), and reduce discipline to a performative joke.

If parents want to be respected by school officials, they need to stop ceding parenting basics to others. By placing these duties in the hands of teachers and school officials, parents have weakened their case that they are the primary caregivers for their children. I’m glad parents are fighting for their rights, but they should never have given up so much authority over their children’s upbringing in the first place.

Julie Gunlock directs the Independent Women’s Network and its Center for Progress and Innovation. She is the author of “From Cupcakes to Chemicals: How the Culture of Alarmism Makes Us Afraid of Everything and How to Fight Back.”

In Historic 7-2 Decision On Obamacare – Supreme Court Says Trump’s Birth Control Exemption Is Lawful

Reported By Adam Casalino | July 8, 2020

In Historic 7-2 Decision On Obamacare – Supreme Court Says Trump’s Birth Control Exemption Is Lawful

What’s Happening:

President Trump has been an outspoken critic of Obamacare since before he entered office. Once president, he began rolling out reforms that weakened Obamacare’s stranglehold on the medical industry.

One of his reforms was to expand birth control exemptions for any employer who expressed concerns based on religious or moral grounds.

The fight was taken to the Supreme Court. And in a historic 7-2 decision, the court says Trump’s birth control exemption is lawful:

The Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld the Trump administration’s expansion of ObamaCare birth control exemptions for employers…

Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the majority on Wednesday, said the move by federal agencies under President Trump to expand the carve-outs was lawful.

During the Obama administration, religious nonprofits were the only groups that could claim and exemption from paying for contraceptive coverage. Any other business, regardless of the employers’ religious or moral leanings, was forced to pay for birth control.

According to the Trump administration, this violated the employer’s religious rights. Additionally, he expanded the exemptions so that businesses of all kinds can refuse to pay for employee’s birth control if it conflicted with their beliefs.

Naturally, progressive activists challenged the order, taking it all the way to the Supreme Court. Justice Thomas wrote that employers with “religious and conscientious objections” to birth control should be exempt from this rule.

In a surprise ruling, two of the court’s liberal justices, Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer sided with the conservative wing, giving them the 7-2 decision.

Critics of Obamacare frequently questioned the need for employers to pay for a person’s birth control. If it’s “their body, their choice” they argued, why was it someone else’s responsibility to provide contraceptive?

Such concerns were overlooked by the Obama administration, which conservatives accused of trying to push birth control against religious people’s objections.

This ruling strikes a huge blow against Obamacare and moves the U.S. closer to a possible revoke.

Key Takeaways:

  • The Supreme Court ruled to uphold Trump’s expansion of birth control exemptions under Obamacare.
  • The court decided employers don’t have to pay for contraceptive, if it conflicts with moral or religious beliefs.
  • The ruling was a historic 7-2 decision.

Source: The Hill


Adam Casalino is a freelance writer, cartoonist, and graphic designer. He is a regular contributor for the Patriot Journal. Find his other work: Pro-Life News Report Monday, February 11, 2019

Top Stories

He Stabbed His Girlfriend’s Stomach to Kill Her Baby, Won’t be Charged Because of New York’s Abortion Law
Andrew Cuomo’s Approval Rating Hits a New Low After Signing Law for Abortions Up to Birth
President Trump’s Approval Rating Soars to 52% After Pro-Life State of the Union Address
Nick Sandmann’s Attorney Says Nathan Phillips “Will be Sued for His Defamatory Lies”

More Pro-Life News
WATCH: These Abortion Survivors are Horrified About Bills to Legalize Abortions Up to Birth
Amy Klobuchar Supports Abortion Up to Birth, Voted Pro-Abortion 36 Out of 36 Times
Accused Murderer Not Charged With Killing Woman’s Unborn Baby Thanks to New York’s Abortion Law
33 TV Shows in January Slam “Terrorist” Trump, But Praise Abortion
Scroll Down for Several More Pro-Life News Stories

SIGN THE PETITION: Excommunicate Andrew Cuomo for Legalizing Abortions Up to Birth


44% of “Pro-Choice” Voters in New York Oppose New Law for Abortions Up to Birth

New Mexico Bill Legalizing Abortions Up to Birth Would Force Doctors and Nurses to Do Abortions

Notre Dame Professors: Pro-Life People are Just White Supremacists in Disguise

1,500 Physicians Protest British Doctors’ Group’s Plan to Support Assisted Suicide

Looking for an inspiring and motivating speaker for your pro-life event? Don’t have much to spend on a high-priced speaker costing several thousand dollars? Contact about having LifeNews Editor Steven Ertelt speak at your event.

Abortion Clinic That Does Abortions Up to Birth Calls 911 After Abortion Causes Seizure

Man Admits Giving Girlfriends Abortion Pills Without Their Knowledge, Killing Six Babies

House Democrats Block Request to Vote on Bill to Stop Infanticide For a Third Time

Massachusetts Bill Would Legalize Abortions Up to Birth, Repeal Parental Consent Law

Comments or questions? Email us at
Copyright 2003-2019 All rights reserved.

More Politically INCORRECT Cartoons and More for Monday October 9, 2017

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: