Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Archive for December, 2013

Distinc.tt: Apple’s New LGBT “Social Networking” App Targets Kids 12 and Up


http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/12/apple-perverts-targeting-kids-age-12-new-lgbt-social-app-distinc-tt/#UxzTxP7BftKSyczV.99

Posted By on Dec 17, 2013

App 

imagesApple is at it again. Having sold its soul to the  homosexual agenda, as most every other major corporation has, it is now trying  to outdo itself. In creating an app called Distinc.tt,  the company is marketing homosexuality and sodomy to persons 12-and-up. Selling  sex to any teen is disgusting regardless or the circumstance. Though the makers  of the app swear it is purely for “networking,” this is a lie. This is a  homosexual sex app aimed at teens, who have barely hit puberty. It doesn’t get  more repulsive than this.

Do  you feel that the gay community is all too often symbolized by shiny torsos  with a body fat percentage below 3?

Do  you sense that when you think of gay apps, the first that comes to mind is Grindr?

But  what about gay taste? What about the gay sense of style?

Grindr is just one of the nasty, disgusting apps that comes to mind targeting  homosexuals. There are numerous apps to prove that Apple is completely behind  this sinister agenda of indoctrination. On the iTunes  site, Grindr is described as “Gay, same sex, bi, social network to chat and meet  guys.”

This is on iTunes available for purchase, just like other apps like the “homosexual history” app Quist.  The Huff  Post describes The Quist  app as one that “provides daily updates that summarize major landmarks  and milestones for the queer community in a “this day in LGBTQ history” framework.

screen568x568Every “homosexual app” is a hookup app. It’s  ridiculous to assert that Apple would create one like Distinc.tt  that is for “social networking.” This is about selling illicit sex to teenagers.  Also, the likelihood a young person will encounter a sexual predator is  extremely high, one that would prey upon their naivete. Marketers like Apple are  pushing the homosexual agenda onto younger and younger kids, trying to convince  all that they are “born  this way.” Any assertion that this is incorrect is met with resistance and  threats.

Some  very clever Harvard types (are there any other kind?) believe that, when it  comes to apps, the gay community hasn’t offered the full bloom of its most  tasteful side.

So they’ve created Distinc.tt.  This, they claim, is “the  only gay social app approved by the   iTunes store for 12-year-olds and older.”

Before  you mount your high, sweaty horse and exert a moral gallop over the idea,  might I say that this app doesn’t have sex at its core?

Instead,  and I’m quoting the company now, Distinc.tt “uses real-time collective  knowledge to connect trendsetting crowds and travelers to the places and people  that best reflect their distinct interests.”

Apple  is selling cultural rot. It is also responsible for ruining many lives in the  process. In marketing a homosexual app for persons age 12-and-up, the company  has blood on its hands. This is life and death. Apple is in the process of  bartering for the souls of America, starting at a most impressionable age. Not  that they’re alone, but marketing and selling apps for the purpose of sodomy is  morally reprehensible.

Here’s  an extract: “With an emphasis on good taste, Distinc.tt is sleekly designed  to easily lead users to the right event, restaurant, party, or vacation spot for  the moment or upcoming calendar, where their friends are or plan to go  soon.”

In  the iTunes store, Distinc.tt has a charming way of describing itself: “Finally, an LGBT app that you can bring home to Mom!”

Indeed,  Distinc.tt describes itself as “clean, social, and fun.”

CEO  Michael Belkin says he’s launching Distinc.tt because he became “disgusted  by the tasteless torsos and imagery on gay social sites and  apps.”

They’re marketing this as an “LGBT” app a 12-year old can bring home to mom  and buy without her permission? This is insane, but this is what Apple is doing.  They’re selling the homosexual lifestyle to children, making it look appealing  and desirable. Now the whole experience can be sold to a prepubescent teen for a  little over a dollar. Is a soul worth that much? To Apple it is. Apple removed  it’s Exodus  International app, a ministry dedicated to helping those experience freedom  from homosexuality through the power of Jesus Christ.” Through pressure  from change.org  and other progressives, the ministry’s app was quickly removed from iTunes in  2011.

Homosexuals do not want anyone to believe they can escape the bondage of the  lifestyle. They want to suck a young person in, without any chance of getting  out. There is one way out, but marketers and the general culture are trying to  block all who seek salvation and deliverance through the blood of Christ.  Satan’s assault on the world is made plain through the homosexual agenda. Good  is called evil, and evil good, and the lie is working.

Author: Janna Brock

I am a Christian and a staunch conservative. I am very interested in civil  liberties and also arts and entertainment from a conservative point of view. I  am interested in a wide variety of topics that have to do with the liberal war  against conservatives. Christians are being attacked on all fronts, be it the  homosexual agenda, abortion issues, and other forms of persecution. It is time  to stand for Christ in a sin sick world.  Janna Brock also contributes to The BrennerBrief.com.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/12/apple-perverts-targeting-kids-age-12-new-lgbt-social-app-distinc-tt/#wvZjMgiwvy5XgYwC.99

More Evidence of “Dictator” Obama is Marching Us Toward Socialism


Obama Administration Violates another Court Order and  More Veterans will Die

Posted By on Dec 17, 2013

 http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/12/obama-administration-violates-another-court-order-veterans-will-die/#qPJLSAGtb98QoELU.99

obamas-finger

The Obama Administration controlled Department of Veteran Affairs has just  told disabled veterans to “Embrace the Suck. ” This slang phrase, often used in  times of desperation, is recognized by all US military personnel as meaning, “Face it soldier. I have been there. This ain’t easy. Now let’s deal with it.”

In contempt of a 2013 Circuit Court order (in Harris v. Secretary of Veterans  Affairs et al Eric Shinseki), the Obama Veterans Administration recently filed a  potentially illegal VA policy guideline change with the federal registry. If  approved, the VA will begin stripping veteran’s legal rights, increase veterans  disability claims denials and make it more difficult for veterans to challenge  unfair VA disability ratings determinations.

In Harris v. Shinseki, a Circuit Court ruled the VA must follow established  Veterans Administration policy and cannot unfairly deny or terminate a veteran’s  right to due process in disability claims adjudication or appeal by claiming a  veteran did not fill out the proper claims form.

Hidden, yet recently discovered in the federal registry is a new Department  of Veterans Affairs policy directive dated October 31, 2013 (38 CFR Parts 3, 19  and 20 Standards Claims and Appeals Forms). Although the policies stated  objective claims “to improve the quality and timeliness of processing of  veteran’s claims”, nothing could be further from the truth.

The Obama Administration—finally fed up with being blamed for its failure to  reduce record veteran disability claims backlogs and obscene rates of veteran  homelessness and suicides—is arrogantly pursuing the violation of a 2013 court  order protecting veterans and once again violating rights to due process.

The VA directive above will cause needless delays in existing disability  claims processing, open the door for low balling of disability ratings, increase  the volume of denied claims and see many veterans reluctant to endure the stress  of a VA claim process abandon their claim altogether.

This new Veterans Administration policy will require all new VA disability  claims to be filed on a newly designed form or filed electronically. To the  average American, this seems to make sense, but to our disabled veterans—many  who do not have access to computers and the internet, and some, without an  address—this will mean further complications and delays in applying for and  receiving the benefits, they deserve.

Moreover, this new VA policy change will effectively eliminate established  grounds for disability claims appeal by eliminating “requests for  reconsideration” which includes Congressional inquiries. This would all but  purge any Congressional power to challenge an incorrect VA disability  determination on behalf of a veteran constituent. Often times, this is the court  of last resort for veterans denied VA benefits.

Once again, another Obama cabinet appointee, Eric Shinseki, Secretary of the  Department of Veterans Affairs, has ordered an extraordinary cabinet level  policy change (a potentially illegal policy change) that undermines existing  Circuit Court precedent. All to cover the Obama Administrations careless  incompetence and loyalties to the American Federation of Government Employees,  the union representing inept Veterans Administration staff. All in the dead of  night, while Congress is on its current break.

This is how the White House plans to sweep the VA deficiencies and our  veterans under the rug.

Where is the Justice Department? Where is Attorney General Eric Holder? If a  private insurer had changed their process for claims filing midstream in order  to avoid paying out, delaying or discouraging valid claims submissions the  federal government would have them in front of a Grand Jury in a heartbeat.

In the dead of night, while Congress was on break, our transparent Obama  Administration slid a new VA directive into the federal registry effectively  stripping existing veteran’s rights without so much as a hearing; all to  artificially reduce the number of outstanding or backlogged veteran’s disability  claims under current Congressional scrutiny. This is how the Obama  administration cooks their books.

Author: John DeMayo

Raised in New York, now an adopted son of Texas, John DeMayo is an advocate  for the restoration of conservative America. He has been called a “stone  thrower” by some and a “sheep dog” by others. DeMayo’s America puts the  Constitution and Conservatism first. Everything else is just colored bubbles.  Visit me at lazarusoverwatch.com, Facebook or on Twitter.  All are welcome.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/12/obama-administration-violates-another-court-order-veterans-will-die/#qPJLSAGtb98QoELU.99

16 Signs That Global Warming Was A Lie And That We Have Now Entered A Period Of Global Cooling


http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/12/16-signs-global-warming-lie-now-entered-period-global-cooling/#KWZpaU9UBtmRP8CV.99

Posted By on Dec 17, 2013

Record-Events

Back in 2009, Al Gore boldly  declared that “the entire north polar ice cap during some of the summer  months could be completely ice-free within the next five to seven years.”  Well,  it turns out that was a lie along with almost everything else that Al Gore has  been peddling.  The truth is that the polar ice cap is actually growing.  It is  about 50 percent larger than it was at this time last year.  And as you will  read about below, a shocking UN report that was recently leaked shows that the  planet has actually not been warming for the past 15 years.  So if you are  breathlessly anticipating that “global warming” will soon bring on the  apocalypse, you can stop waiting.  On the other hand, there is rising concern  about what “global cooling” will soon do to the planet as we suffer through the  beginning of the coldest winter in decades.  Thanks to an unusually  quiet solar cycle and an unusually  high number of volcano eruptions, global temperatures have been falling.   And if this cold weather persists, that could lead to massive global problems.   Periods of very low temperatures throughout history have resulted in mass crop  failures and widespread famines.  Could that soon happen to us?  The following  are 16 signs that “global warming” was a lie and that we have now entered a  period of global cooling…

1. According to a leaked UN report that absolutely rocked  the “global warming” believers, the earth has not gotten any warmer for  the past 15 years.

2. The amount of ice covering the Arctic is up by  50 percent compared to this time in 2012.

3. In just one week in late November, a combined total of more  than 1000 new cold temperature and snowfall records were set in the United  States.

4. In just one week in December, a combined total of more  than 2000 new cold temperature and snowfall records were set in the United  States.

5. On December 15th, 53  percent of the United States was covered in snow.  That was the highest  level on this date in 11 years.

6. A snowstorm that spanned more  than 1,000 miles slammed into New England on Sunday.

7. Some areas of upstate New York were hit with about  six feet of snow a few days ago.

8. Chicago just experienced that coldest temperatures that  it has seen in December in  nearly 20 years.

9. On December 7th, Eugene, Oregon recorded the lowest  temperature that it has seen since  December 11th, 1972.

10. A few days ago, three  feet of snow closed roads in Jerusalem.  It was the worst snow storm in  Israel since 1953.

11. Heavy snow also fell on  parts of Saudi Arabia.  That was considered to be extremely unusual.

12. The recent snowfall in Turkey was so bad that it closed 900  roads.

13. Temperatures have dropped so low that some Syrian war  refugees are actually dying  from the cold.

14. Cairo, Egypt just had the first snowfall that it has  experienced in  100 years.

15. It was so cold in Canada recently that the Arctic Winter  Games biathlon trials were  forced indoors.

16. According to NASA satellite data, a temperature of minus  135 degrees Fahrenheit was recorded in Antarctica back in July.

So why is all of this happening?

Well, the number one factor affecting our climate is the giant ball of fire  called the Sun that our planet revolves around.  As I detailed in a previous  article, solar activity has dropped to a 100 year low.  The following is how  a Space.com  article recently described what we are currently experiencing…

The sun’s current space-weather cycle is the most anemic in 100 years,  scientists say.

Our star is now at “solar  maximum,” the peak phase of its 11-year activity cycle. But this solar max  is weak, and the overall current cycle, known as Solar Cycle 24, conjures up  comparisons to the famously feeble Solar Cycle 14 in the early 1900s,  researchers said.

“None of us alive have ever seen such a weak cycle. So we will learn  something,” Leif Svalgaard of Stanford University told reporters here today  (Dec. 11) at the annual meeting of the American Geophysical  Union.

Another factor that is causing all of this cold weather is a dramatic  rise in volcanic activity.  Throughout human history, volcanic eruptions  have produced some of the coldest winters ever recorded, and in 2013 we have  witnessed a record number of volcanic eruptions.  Something appears to be  happening to the crust of the earth, and that is one of the reasons why I  included the future eruption of Mt. Rainier in  my new novel.  The mainstream media does not talk about this much, but right  now we are seeing a stunning rise in volcanic activity all over the planet.

The truth is that volcanoes can influence our climate far more than normal  human activity ever possibly could.  When a tremendous amount of volcanic debris  gets ejected into the atmosphere, it can have a huge impact on global  temperatures and the consequences can be quite dramatic.  The following historic  examples come from Wikipedia

The effects of volcanic eruptions on recent winters are modest in scale, but  historically have been significant.

Most recently, the 1991 explosion of Mount  Pinatubo, a stratovolcano in the Philippines,  cooled global temperatures for about 2–3 years.

In 1883, the explosion of Krakatoa  (Krakatau) created volcanic winter-like conditions. The four years following the  explosion were unusually cold, and the winter of 1887-1888 included powerful  blizzards.  Record snowfalls were recorded worldwide.

The 1815 eruption of Mount  Tambora, a stratovolcano in Indonesia,  occasioned mid-summer frosts in New York  State and June snowfalls in New England  and Newfoundland and Labrador in what came to be known as the “Year  Without a Summer” of 1816.

A paper written by Benjamin  Franklin in 1783 blamed the unusually cool summer of 1783 on volcanic dust  coming from Iceland, where  the eruption of Laki  volcano had released enormous amounts of sulfur  dioxide, resulting in the death of much of the island’s livestock and  a catastrophic famine which  killed a quarter of the Icelandic population. Northern  hemisphere temperatures dropped by about 1 °C in the year following the Laki  eruption.

In 1600, the Huaynaputina in Peru erupted. Tree ring  studies show that 1601 was cold. Russia had its worst  famine in 1601-1603. From 1600 to 1602, Switzerland, Latvia and Estonia had  exceptionally cold winters. The wine harvest was late in 1601 in France, and in  Peru and Germany, wine  production collapsed. Peach trees bloomed late in China, and Lake Suwa in Japan froze  early.

So are we now heading for a similar period of time?

Will lower temperatures lead to mass crop failures and widespread global  famine

Author: Michael Snyder

Michael T. Snyder is a graduate of the University of Florida law school and he worked as an attorney in the heart of Washington D.C. for a number of years. Today, Michael is best known for his work as the publisher of The Economic Collapse Blog (End of the American Dream. Michael and his wife, Meranda, believe that a great awakening is coming and are working hard to help bring renewal to America.

‘Climate change expert bilks EPA out of $1 million


HUMAN EVENTS

POWERFUL CONSERVATIVE VOICES

http://www.humanevents.com/2013/12/17/derp-government-climate-change-expert-bilks-epa-out-of-1-million-over-a-decade/

'Climate change expert bilks EPA out of $1 million

By: John Hayward

We have truly entered the age of “Derp”(1) Government, in which the colossus in Washington has grown institutionally fat, drunk, and stupid on trillions of dollars in madcap spending.  The bigger government gets, and the more power it claims, the more unaccountable it becomes, and the less anyone gives a damn about their jobs.

Exhibit A, of course, is HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and the historic disaster of the ObamaCare rollout, whose aftermath has given us so many wonderful congressional hearings filled with mighty six-figure bureaucrats claiming that nobody had any idea what was going on, during the three and a half years they were blowing a billion dollars on web infrastructure, training, and marketing.  There was no oversight… so the overseers cannot be held responsible for the ensuing disaster.  There was no management… so the managers must be allowed to keep their jobs, every single one of them.  It really is like watching a gang of drunken frat boys claim nobody was at the wheel when their party van slammed into a tree.

ObamaCare is the paramount example of Derp Government, but it’s far from the only one.   Last week, we had the spectacle of the Obama Administration’s top Afghanistan specialists rolling into a congressional hearing without the foggiest notion of how many casualties there have been this year, or how much the war effort cost.  Hey, man, nobody told us there was going to be a test, or we would have done some homework instead of partying all night.

No better prepared was the hapless clown currently serving as Secretary of State, onetime Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, who apparently didn’t know that North Korea already has nuclear weapons when he moaned, “To have a nuclear weapon, potentially, in the hands of somebody like Kim Jong In… Jun… just becomes even more unacceptable.”  That’s Kim Jong Un, Mr. Secretary.  And he does indeed have nuclear weapons in his pudgy hands, as did his father.  But in the crazy who-gives-a-damn degeneracy of the Obama Administration, where trillion-dollar industry takeovers are made up on the fly, no one expects the Secretary of State to have the geopolitical knowledge of the average college freshman.  He says he’s real smart, and that’s good enough for the media.

Then there’s the bizarre spectacle of Fake Sign Language Guy, a paranoid schizophrenic with a history of crime and violent behavior, coupled with a blissful lack of knowledge about sign language, who somehow managed to get on stage with the President of the United States at the Mandela memorial in South Africa.  It turns out that Fake Sign Language Guy, Thamsanqa Jantjie, participated in a mob action that killed two men by “necklacing” them with tires full of burning gasoline.

“Questions have been raised over the screening of the man who has been the subject of complaints from the deaf community before, and who said he had hallucinations and saw angels while interpreting at the stadium in Soweto,” writes the UK Independent.  Why, yes, I think there are a few questions to be asked about that, especially since the President is pleased to bill taxpayers for a titanic entourage of security personnel and aides, every time he travels.  But nobody in this vast royal procession bothered to apply even the most elementary scrutiny to the interpreter that would wind up standing next to the President?  It’s not the first time the vaunted Secret Service has been caught metaphorically flat on its back during the Obama years, either.  Wait, make that literally flat on its back.

The combination of unlimited money, total power, and absolutely zero accountability is intoxicating.  It’s hardly a new feature of this Administration – it’s been building for decades in the depths of imperial agencies, completely insulated from both fiscal reality and the voting public.   No degree of failure means extinction for any big government program.  The good times will never stop rolling.  Careless disregard for taxpayer money has given us infuriating carnivals of excess, from the lavish conference parties of the General Services Administration, to the goofy training videos of the Internal Revenue Service.  A common thread running through these scandals is how silly they are.  Nobody with a shred of common sense or responsibility would approve them.  But Uncle Sam is living like the Great Gatsby these days, and few of his bureaucratic nephews see themselves as the careful stewards of scarce and sacred taxpayer dollars.

Which brings us to the Environmental Protection Agency’s latest scandal, and this one’s a doozy.  NBC News tells the tale of John C. Beale, a “climate change” expert who cheated the government out of a few million dollars in outrageously lavish salary and benefits over the course of a decade… by never showing up for work… because he claimed he was working as a CIA spy in Pakistan.

John C. Beale, who pled guilty in September to bilking the government out of nearly $1 million in salary and other benefits  over a decade, will be sentenced in a Washington, D.C., federal court on Wednesday. In a newly filed sentencing memo, prosecutors said that his lies were a “crime of massive proportion” that were “offensive” to those who actually do dangerous work for the CIA.

Beale’s lawyer, while acknowledging his guilt, has asked for leniency and offered a psychological explanation for the climate expert’s bizarre tales.

“With the help of his therapist,” wrote attorney John Kern, “Mr. Beale has come to recognize that, beyond the motive of greed, his theft and deception were animated by a highly self-destructive and dysfunctional need to engage in excessively reckless, risky behavior.” Kern also said Beale was driven “to manipulate those around him through the fabrication of grandiose narratives … that are fueled by his insecurities.”

Well, that actually sounds plausible, given that “climate change” is the biggest, most delusional fraud ever perpetrated.  A lot of the people who marinate in that atmosphere of self-righteous quackery lose touch with reality.

It’s long past time for the Church of Global Warming to start paying for its own clergy, because they’re not cheap dates:

Beyond Beale’s individual fate, his case raises larger questions about how he was able to get away with his admitted fraud for so long, according to federal and congressional investigators. Two new reports by the EPA inspector general’s office conclude that top officials at the agency “enabled” Beale by failing to verify any of his phony cover stories about CIA work, and failing to check on hundreds of thousands of dollars paid him in undeserved bonuses and travel expenses — including first-class trips to London where he stayed at five-star hotels and racked up thousands in bills for limos and taxis.

Until he retired in April after learning he was under federal investigation, Beale, an NYU grad with a masters from Princeton, was earning a salary and bonuses of $206,000 a year, making him the highest paid official at the EPA. He earned more money than Gina McCarthy, the agency’s administrator and, for years, his immediate boss, according to agency documents.

In September, Beale, who served as a “senior policy adviser” in the agency’s Office of Air and Radiation, pled guilty to defrauding the U.S. government out of nearly $900,000 since 2000. Beale perpetrated his fraud largely by failing to show up at the EPA for months at a time, including one 18-month stretch starting in June 2011 when he did “absolutely no work,” as Kern, Beale’s lawyer, acknowledged in his court filing.

And who would miss him?  Dogs don’t notice when their ticks take the day off.  At this point, the machinery of the “climate change” fraud runs itself.  Billions of dollars are flogged out of the private sector with automated whips.  Sign a couple of reports, write a few op-eds inveighing against “deniers,” announce that every hurricane and typhoon is the wrath of the Angry Sky Gods, declare that cold winters are proof of global warming, declare that hot winters are proof of global warming, work with radical greens to target the next bit of the Industrial Revolution you can bully the populace into renouncing… most of it can be done by underlings, and one imagines the highest-paid official at the EPA has a lot of those.

Quite a bit of Derp Government is running on autopilot.  It’s filled with redundant and obsolete agencies, whose primary objective is demonstrating they are too under-funded to accomplish anything.  The most outrageous, and yet comically awesome, example is a scam artist who gets away with bilking the government out of a $200k salary, limo service, first-class air fare, and five-star hotels for a decade while telling anyone who asks what he actually does that he’s too busy to answer, because he, Jack Ryan, James Bond, and Jason Bourne are getting ready to take out a terror cell in Pakistan.  At least Beale had a sense of humor about it:

To explain his long absences, Beale told agency officials — including McCarthy — that he was engaged in intelligence work for the CIA, either at agency headquarters or in Pakistan. At one point he claimed to be urgently needed in Pakistan because the Taliban was torturing his CIA replacement, according to Sullivan.

“Due to recent events that you have probably read about, I am in Pakistan,” he wrote McCarthy in a Dec. 18, 2010 email. “Got the call Thurs and left Fri. Hope to be back for Christmas ….Ho, ho, ho.”

But he didn’t work for the CIA, ever, and didn’t even have a security clearance.  He spent the decade living large at his Northern Virginia house and Cape Cod vacation home, when he wasn’t jet-setting at taxpayer expense.  He was constantly zipping off to conferences and violating the official per diem expense limit by 100 percent, and his expense vouchers were routinely approved by his colleagues.  For ten damn years.

Nor was that Beale’s only deception, according to court documents. In 2008, Beale didn’t show up at the EPA for six months, telling his boss that he was part of a special multi-agency election-year project relating to “candidate security.” He billed the government $57,000 for five trips to California that were made purely “for personal reasons,” his lawyer acknowledged. (His parents lived there.) He also claimed to be suffering from malaria that he got while serving in Vietnam. According to his lawyer’s filing, he didn’t have malaria and never served in Vietnam. He told the story to EPA officials so he could get special handicap parking at a garage near EPA headquarters.

I wonder if he got a magic hat while he was non-serving in Vietnam.  No doubt the experience is seared into his memory.  And he used that story to scam a handicapped parking space!

How did Derp Government finally catch this legendary grifter?  Well, he had a big, splashy retirement aboard a yacht, attended by top EPA officials… and then he kept collecting paychecks.  For another year and a half.  And then someone at the EPA finally decided something was amiss.

This blood-boiling outrage is casually written off by EPA Assistant Inspector General Patrick Sullivan as a product of agency culture.  He doesn’t seem to realize he’s describing a culture of mind-blowing, reform-proof arrogance and irresponsibility:

Sullivan said he doubted Beale’s fraud could occur at any federal agency other than the EPA. “There’s a certain culture here at the EPA where the mission is the most important thing,” he said. “They don’t think like criminal investigators. They tend to be very trusting and accepting.”

In a statement to NBC News, Alisha Johnson, McCarthy’s press secretary, said that Beale’s fraud was “uncovered” by McCarthy while she was head of the Office of Air and Radiation. “[Beale] is a convicted felon who went to great lengths to deceive and defraud the U.S. government over the span of more than a decade,” said Johnson. “EPA has worked in coordination with its inspector general and the U.S. Attorney’s office. The Agency has [put] in place additional safeguards to help protect against fraud and abuse related to employee time and attendance, including strengthening supervisory controls of time and attendance, improved review of employee travel and a tightened retention incentive processes.”

But he didn’t go to “great lengths.”  This was easy.  He gamed a system that was institutionally incapable of seeing through the flimsiest story ever concocted, a story that could have been shredded with a couple of phone calls.  And he did it from the very pinnacle of privilege and power, not the dark and faceless recesses of a cubicle farm.  Our titanic super-government, staffed with the best and brightest, claims it can run every industry in America better than its owners… but nobody noticed that the highest-paid “expert” at one of the most powerful Washington agencies spent ten years goofing off at home.  There’s really nothing all that surprising about the failure of ObamaCare, is there?  This entire system has passed the point of caring what happens after it wins the latest political victory and expands further.  It thinks always about its frontiers, never about the careless rot at its core.

(1)

Q: What is derping?

A:’Derp’ is a term popularized by South Park. It’s sort of a random utterance, such as “blargh”. It was used in South Park during a fictional Rob Schneider traile… Read More »

Source:wiki.answers.com

Q: What is a derp?

A:Derp is a word used at the end of almost every sentence by anyone with a song in their h…   Read More »
Source:www.chacha.com

Q: What is derps?

A:Derps is Australian abbreviation of underpants. Thanks for asking ChaCha! Have a great day! Read More »
Source:www.chacha.com

This Went Unnoticed: President Obama Added “Living Wages” to the Bill of Rights


independentsentinel.com

http://www.independentsentinel.com/this-went-unnoticed-obama-added-living-wages-to-the-bill-of-rights/

December 16, 2013

By

The White House issued a presidential proclamation declaring December 15th Bill of Rights Day. That’s very nice except that he added Karl Marx’ living wages to his interpretation of the Bill of Rights. He can never simply talk about the US Bill of Rights without adding propaganda.

By doing that, Mr. Obama is attempting to change the meaning our Founding Fathers ascribed to the document.

The proclamation is fine until it the third paragraph (emphasis mine):

We learned that our Nation, built on the principles of freedom and equality, could not survive half-slave and half-free. We resolved that our daughters must have the same rights, the same chances, and the same freedom to pursue their dreams as our sons, and that if we are truly created equal, then the love we commit to one another must be equal as well. Americans with disabilities tore down legal and social barriers; disenfranchised farmworkers united to claim their rights to dignity, fairness, and a living wage; civil rights activists marched, bled, and gave their lives to bring the era of segregation to an end. As we celebrate the anniversary of the Bill of Rights, let us reach for a day when we all may enjoy the basic truths of liberty and equality.

Since when did Thomas Jefferson include a living wage in the Bill of Rights? When Mr. Obama mentions farmworkers, Mr. Obama is referring to people primarily here illegally, also not what the Founders had in mind.

There is nothing in here about entitlements which is what a living wage is:

bill of rights

It might do Mr. Obama some good if he thought about what the Founders actually did say. For instance, they said taxation without representation is tyranny.

Obama is propagandizing the Bill of Rights to convince the American people that a guarantee of living wages is part of our Constitution.

The right to work hard and have equal opportunity is guaranteed, not entitlements.

Pastor Rick Warren Makes Piers Morgan Look Foolish


http://eaglerising.com/3619/pastor-rick-warren-makes-piers-morgan-look-foolish/#jruZqbzb0gOW1e0y.99

By / 17 December  2013

Pastor Rick Warren of Saddleback Church in California is a frequent guest on  the Piers Morgan show. While some conservative evangelicals may fear being  cornered on a shoe like Piers Morgan Live, Pastor Warren seems to relish the  opportunities, as the conversation often turns to Spiritual things. In their  most recent conversation, the liberal Brit tries to corner Pastor Warren on gay  marriage, only to hear Pastor Warren patiently  refute his every argument.

Bravo, Pastor Warren! Continue to speak the truth in love and you’ll  definitely reap the rewards.

Warren

MORGAN: You and I, we’ve debated this before about gay rights, gay  marriage. Clearly, it’s a movement in America as it is around the  world…

WARREN: Right.

MORGAN: … towards to a much more tolerant attitude to this. Have you in  the last two years since I last I think debated this particular point with you — have you moved at all now? Are you recognizing that there is this seemingly  unstoppable movement?

WARREN: Well, I don’t get to change what God says is right and what  God says is wrong. And I think God is real clear that all sex outside of  marriage is wrong. But the issue here is the issue of respect. While I may  disagree with you on your views on sexuality, it does not give me a right to  demean you, to demoralize you, to defame you, to turn you into a  demon.

See tolerance, Piers, it used to mean we treat each other with mutual  respect even if we have major disagreements. Today, tolerance has been changed  to mean, all ideas are equally valid. Well, that’s none sense. OK? All ideas are  not equally valid.

 I mean, you could say the moon is made of cheese or I could say the moon  is made of beans and so many ask me it mean wrong.

RickandPiersMORGAN: But do you believe in equality for all as  your heart right? This is where I think I took issue with you before and I will  again — how can you really as a Christian man…

WARREN: Yes.

MORGAN: … a great man — how can you espouse genuine  equality…

WARREN: Yes.

MORGAN: … if you don’t allow gay people the same rights to get  married…

WARREN: Yes.

MORGAN: … as straight people? That’s a question that many I think would  love to hear the answer.

WARREN: I’d like to reposition it this way. I’m more against the  redefinition of the term marriage than anything else. I don’t think other groups  get an opportunity to redefine a term. For instance, if a Muslim says this is a  term we use and also I’ll take that term and mean it for me. What? That’s not  right.

And I think, historically around the world, the vast majority of people  would say, “Marriage means one man and one woman in a commitment.” Don’t take a  term and make it something different.

Well, we’ll talk about double speak where words mean the exact opposite  of what they use to mean. I’m going — OK. In first place, it’s not against the  law for you to love anybody, a man or a woman OK? It’s not criminal — at least  shouldn’t be but when you start taking a term, then why are taking that  term?

MORGAN: Do you think you’ll change? I mean, can you see — you’re a man  on a — he has this incredible library, Rick Warren — literally, one of the  great libraries I’ve ever seen in my life, kept beautifully. You have all these  books by all these great scholars. Many, many of them would have  evolved their thought processes over things depending on how they see if the —  can you see a time, when not just you but other Christian preachers… … and indeed the Catholic church and others say, “You know, what actually  real equality means everyone has the same right to get married — gay or  right.”

WARREN: I cannot see that happening in my life. I fear the disapproval  of God more than I fear your disapproval or the disapproval of society. And so,  I can’t change what I think God has said. Now, I believe in the infallibility of  Scripture. I do not believe in the infallibility of my interpretations. So,  interpretations can be wrong — we know that that as true but I believe that  what Scripture says is that sex is for a man and a woman in  marriage.

Grumpy Cat Perspective


GC 01 GP 02 GP 03 GP 04 GP 05 GP 06 GP 07 GP 08 GP 09 GP 10

Gingrich: “Every major city which is a poverty center is run by Democrats.”


http://www.humanevents.com/2013/12/16/gingrich-every-major-city-which-is-a-poverty-center-is-run-by-democrats/

Gingrich: "Every major city which is a poverty center is run by Democrats."By: John Hayward

Courtesy of NewsBusters, here’s one of those heated exchanges that partisans of both Left and Right are bound to view as a slam-dunk in-your-face win for their side, as former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich and Clinton-era Labor Secretary Robert Reich spar over poverty and policy on ABC’s “This Week.”

Newt

In the exchange, Reich argues that the War on Poverty was going great until tight-fisted Republicans started interfering with Democrat plans to redistribute even more wealth, and claims “income inequality” has gotten worse under Obama because of Republican resistance to his agenda.  This is, quite possibly, the dumbest thing anyone has ever said.  Just for starters, it projects staggering ignorance about the War on Poverty.  To agree with Reich, you have to be just about completely ignorant of actual history, not only from decades past but from the explosion of wealth redistribution and social welfare spending under the past few Presidents, particularly Obama.

But of course, it’s tedious leftist cant to insist that the only reason their policies fail is that they weren’t given another couple trillion dollars to pursue them more vigorously.  Every failure of State control is caused by insufficient State control.  The Daily Caller offers a look at how the War on Poverty was going when Reich was on the front lines under Clinton, and his history of deliberately misrepresenting that history:

One thing Reich isn’t taking responsibility for is his own contribution to inequality during his widely regretted  stint in the White House. Working as the Clinton Administration’s Labor Secretary from 1993 to 1997, Reich oversaw a substantial hike in the federal minimum wage and implementation of the Family Leave Act. Despite these apparent War-On-Poverty victories, according to inequality.org‘s chart of after-tax income by income group, U.S. inequality during his tenure grew at the fastest rate ever seen up until that time.

Reich left office prior to the late-Clinton-era boom that lifted all wage groups and saw the last balanced budgets in American history. He later slammed his former colleagues in the memoir “Locked In the Cabinet,” which was universally criticized and had to be substantially re-edited in later editions due to Reich’s multiple distortions and outright falsehoods.

Reich is a hardcore socialist, and socialists lie.  It’s what they do.  It’s baked into the very essence of their being, because their philosophy assumes the absolute primacy of a wise Ruling Class elite that knows how best to arrange society in a “fair” and “just” manner.  This involves the use of compulsive force to seize assets and income from their rightful owners, plus a good deal of forcing average citizens to live as the Ruling Class desires.

Unfortunately, the Western socialist lives with the unpleasant reality of popular elections, where the people have a distressing ability to reject the vision of the Ruling Class and insist on their liberties.  Therefore, it is inescapably necessary for the great and wise to lie to voters, because they can’t handle the truth.  It’s for their own good, so it’s all totally justified.  By definition, the common man lacks the vision of the elite, so he cannot be allowed to thwart that vision by voting against it.  You will never be granted complete candor by people who believe that you must be forced to do certain things for the greater benefit of society, as they envision it, because such candor would inevitably lead to greater resistance.  The path to utopia will require many sacrifices, so the ignorant people must be led down it blindfolded.

Gingrich hits back hard against Reich’s assertion that Republican stonewalling of the Obama agenda is the only reason we haven’t drawn closer to utopia over the past five years, calling it “baloney.”  Gingrich shot back: “Every major city which is a center of poverty is run by Democrats.  Every major city.  Their policies have failed, they’re not willing to admit it, and the fact is, it’s the poor who suffer from bad government.”

Reich stammered something about how outgoing New York mayor Michael Bloomberg wasn’t a Democrat, but aside from Bloomberg’s decidedly government-centered philosophy, the rest of New York’s political machinery has been safely in Democrat hands forever.  No one is going to “solve” the poverty debate in an exchange of sound bites, but Gingrich’s point about how badly-run government causes the greatest suffering among the poor is far more solid than anything Reich says, and it’s worth exploring further.

Perhaps the point begins as something of a tautology, because the poor are, by definition, “suffering” worst from a policy standpoint under any system of government.  But what Gingrich means is that bad government policies are particularly destructive to the opportunities for employment and stability essential to the climb out of poverty.  Reich is an utter fool to believe that these opportunities can be replaced by titanic government spending programs; the Obama years are definitive proof that doesn’t work.  As a left-wing propagandist, he might deserve a little applause for having the chutzpah to make his “just give us more money to spend and we’ll get it right” argument in favor of managerial liberalism at the exact moment ObamaCare is crashing down in flames, the most devastating failure of Reich’s ideals since the fall of the Soviet Union.

Over a trillion dollars in “stimulus” spending gave us permanent double-digit real unemployment.  Even the heavily cooked unemployment rate popularized by the news media has been stuck over 7 percent for years, and it’s a lot worse in the demographics Gingrich and Reich are discussing.  When Obama imposed his stimulus spending agenda, all the “smart people” in his elite team assured us their plans would bring unemployment under 5 percent by the end of the President’s first term.  Instead, the job market tracked consistently and significantly worse than the worst-case scare-tactic conditions they warned would occur without their redistribution scheme.

The social pathologies incubated by the Great Society turned cities into blighted war zones, not only because of the corrosive effect cradle-to-grave welfare has on the people it’s ostensibly trying to “help,” but because the cities ruled by Democrats have become the hardest places in America to launch a business venture or hire someone.  Their stale political cultures have been very lucrative for the ruling party’s cronies, but smokestacks of despair for everyone else.  Knowing that things will never change makes small entrepreneurs – the people who don’t get front-page headline coverage for throwing political fundraisers – depart the dying cities to seek opportunity elsewhere.  We’re not talking about a few people bailing out and skedaddling for the burbs just because a couple of elections don’t go their way.  We’re discussing cities with generational histories of one-party rule and machine politics.  To this day, their ruling political machines have absolutely no idea how to reverse the decline, because everything that might work is completely antithetical to their statist ideology, not to mention their hunger for government revenue.

The day Margaret Thatcher warned about has arrived – the Left has run out of other peoples’ money to spend.  Even the vast ocean of federal spending and debt is not bottomless.  We’ve arguably passed the point where the geese of industry can be squeezed by the State for more golden eggs, without choking them to death.  A great deal of Obama malaise is caused by government overtaxing and over-regulating the private sector far beyond the point where the net result is counter-productive.  This economy is begging for pro-growth tax reforms and the privatization of moribund government programs, beginning with ObamaCare, which managed the neat trick of being born moribund.  The situation is even more pronounced in the cities Newt Gingrich mentioned, which offer a glimpse into our national future for anyone with the intellectual honesty to look clearly.  The private sector needs to get bigger, and fast.  It is no longer strong enough to carry the flabby Ruling Class riding on its back.

First major victim of Harry Reid’s tyrannous Senate majority could be separation of church and state


http://washingtonexaminer.com/first-major-victim-of-harry-reids-tyrannous-senate-majority-could-be-separation-of-church-and-state/article/2540765

    By MARK TAPSCOTT

Whereas before 60 votes were required to end debate on a nominee, now only a simply majority of 51 senators can silence opponents and force a final vote for or against confirmation.

The 60-vote threshold forced supporters and opponents of a nomination to temper their views, thus encouraging reasonable compromise rather than straight-up all-or-nothing votes that can enable a majority to tyrannize a minority. That’s the theory anyway.

Here’s the first example

Late last week, Senate Democrats confirmed Cornelia Pillard to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. “That makes two additional Obama nominees on the court with the lightest workload, and it gives leftists a 6-4 advantage on the court that hears most challenges to executive actions,” according to the Patriot Post.

Pillard, a tenured Georgetown University law professor, is a former Clinton administration Department of Justice political appointee. She is, according to National Review Online’s Patrick Brennan, “probably the most extreme of President Obama’s” many federal judicial nominees.

How extreme is she?

In 2011, Pillard said of a case then before the Supreme Court that the idea that “the Constitution requires deference to Church decisions about who qualifies as a minister … seems like a real stretch.”

The Supremes unanimously disagreed with Pillard and affirmed that the government has no power to tell churches who they can and cannot hire as ministers.

If Pillard’s view prevailed, there would be no such thing as separation of church and state, nor would the First Amendment’s guarantee of religious freedom be anything other than mere words.

Pillard now has power

Pillard is now part of a liberal majority of the appeals court with the most influence on what is commonly referred to as the second most important court in the country.

This comes at a time when, as today’s Washington Examiner editorial points out, liberals are assaulting the traditional understanding of religious freedom on many fronts.

Sooner or later, Pillard’s panel will have to decide a case whose outcome could determine which side wins the liberal war on the First Amendment.

Veterans must not embrace the suck in budget deal


http://allenbwest.com/2013/12/veterans-must-embrace-suck-budget-deal/#WrGiqSIBFKbxvLdZ.99

Written by Allen  West on December 16, 2013

ptsd_soldier_640As you probably know by now, I’m a combat veteran who gave 22 years of my  life in service to our great Republic and deployed to two combat zones:  Operation Desert Shield/Storm and Operation Iraqi Freedom.

I followed the example of my dad, who served in World War II, and my older  brother in Vietnam, and now my nephew has heeded that call to service, already  earning trips into the combat zone of Afghanistan. He will be promoted to Major  in January.

I’m also a “veteran” of Congress and I was absolutely appalled at the House  of Representatives’ passage of the Budget Act of 2013 legislation last Thursday.  Here is why.

As we reported last  week and the Washington Times Josh Hicks reports today,

“The budget agreement crafted by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and Sen. Patty  Murray (D-Wash.) would reduce cost-of-living adjustments for working-age  military retirees by 1 percent starting in December 2015. The existing rate  would apply again when former service members reach age 62.”

I sure hope to stay healthy and get to 62. But once trust is broken I doubt  it can be restored. As Hicks writes,

“The provision is projected to save $6 billion, but the Veterans of Foreign  Wars estimated it would mean $80,000 less by age 62 for a typical enlisted  person who retires at age 40.”

Saving $6 billion on the backs of those who have been willing to make the  last full measure of devotion to their country seems minuscule and imbecilic in  concept. Six billion dollars represents  .017 percent of the current budget – now divide that by ten years. It is idiotic.

Although this has passed the House, it is running into problems in the US  Senate, with Sens. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Roger  Wicker (R-Miss.) saying they cannot support it.

The Washington Times reports:

Armed forces advocates spoke out against the reduction last week, saying it  could affect retention for the military. “Currently serving members look at how  they, their families, retirees and survivors have been treated when making  career choices,” said Vice Adm. Norb Ryan, president of the Military Officers  Association of America. VFW National Commander William Thien added: ”The last  thing our nation can afford is a mass exodus of mid-career enlisted and officers  because they no longer feel welcome or in control of their military careers.”

Every veteran and anyone who feels this is a miscarriage of justice should  send this quote from George Washington to every Member of the House of  Representatives who voted “Yea” on this budget legislation and to every Senator,  –especially those on Armed Services Committee:

“The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war,  no matter how justified, shall be directly proportional to how they perceive  veterans of early wars were treated and appreciated by our nation.”

I find it unconscionable that this was buried in the “deal” created by  Senator Murray and Representative Paul Ryan. I am almost certain most of those  who voted “Yea” in the House did not even read the legislation.

I certainly shall not, and I pray you will not, “embrace the suck” as so  aptly put by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi. I for one am sick of the “pass  the bill in order to find out what is in it” mentality.

Police Chief Calls Out Kanye West for Comparing Rapping to War or Police Work


http://eaglerising.com/3599/police-chief-calls-kanye-west-comparing-rapping-war-police-work/#uUWo3vyS1U5oav7O.99

By / 16 December  2013

A popular police chief from Ohio penned a scathing online note to famous  rapper Kanye West. Police Chief David Oliver, head of the Brimfield, Ohio police  department has become an internet phenomenon. In fact, Brimfield Police  Department has the 2nd most followers on Facebook of any of America’s police  departments (they trail only the NYPD). His latest Facebook post has brought him  his most notoriety yet…

Here it is:

Dear Kanye West,

 I am honored to be writing such an important star. I am a mere  Internet sensation. I’m not sure I am worthy to address you, although the  Huffington Post did say I was “Humorous and Insanely Popular.” I don’t pay much  attention to those things. Anyway, please excuse my interference in your life  for a quick second.

I read your interview and also watched it on video. You said: “I’m just  giving of my body on the stage and putting my life at risk, literally.….and I  think about it. I think about my family and I’m like, wow, this is like being a  police officer or something, in war or something.”

I want to thank you for putting your life on the line for all of us every  day. I know that being a rapper is tough work. I have tried to rap, and it is  very difficult to keep up with the pulse of the rhyme flow…although when Ice Ice  Baby comes on the radio, I can usually keep up with ol’ Vanilla. Anywho, your  job is just some very dangerous work. Most people don’t consider… if you rap  really fast, without a chance to inhale, you could pass out and hit your  head.

nomopesThat last paragraph was covered in sarcasm. I’m  letting you know, just so you do not think I agree with your very ignorant  assessment of your career (or any other performer)as it relates to a person in  the military or a police officer’s service. You sir, are as misguided as they  come. I do have a suggestion for you. Since you are accustomed to danger, from  your life as an international rapper, I am strongly encouraging you immediately  abandon you career as a super star and join the military. After joining, I would  like you to volunteer to be deployed in Afghanistan or one of the numerous other  forward locations where our men an women are currently serving. When the Taliban  starts shooting at you, perhaps you could stand up and let the words flow. It  could be something like “I’m Kanye West, wearing a flak vest.” I’m sure they  would just drop weapons and surrender. You could quite possibly end all wars,  just from the enemy being star-struck.

Your line of thinking is part of the problem in the world today….which  include entertainers thinking they are something more than just entertainers. I  know it is supply and demand and the demand for your services is high. I get  economics. What I do not get is you EVER comparing what you do for a living to  our heroic military members, who are always in harm’s way… and my brother and  sister police officers who have to go to work carrying weapons and wearing a  bullet-proof vest to protect themselves.

Check yourself, before you wreck yourself….Chief Oliver.

 Bam!

Way to go, Chief Oliver. I think everyone can agree that we’re tired of  people in popular culture whether they be rappers, musicians, actors or athletes  comparing their work with war or other violence. Your job may be hard, but it’s  not battle. You aren’t risking your life. You aren’t sacrificing your youth to  bring safety and peace to your nation. You aren’t ever in any danger – so stop  pretending what you do is life and death, because it isn’t.

Thanks, Chief Oliver, for putting this all into perspective for us.

About the author: Onan Coca

 Onan is a graduate of Liberty University (2003) and earned his M.Ed. at  Western Governors University in 2012. Onan lives in the Atlanta area with his  wife, Leah. They have three children and enjoy the hectic pace of life in a  young family. Onan and Leah are members of the Journey Church in Hiram, GA.

Website: http://www.eaglerising.com

Read more at http://eaglerising.com/3599/police-chief-calls-kanye-west-comparing-rapping-war-police-work/#uUWo3vyS1U5oav7O.99

Is the New Glock Commercial the Best Ever? I Say, “YES IT IS AND WE NEED MORE OF THEM”.


http://eaglerising.com/3592/new-glock-commercial-best-ever/#ZzRVOc4B8smgziOo.99

By / 16 December  2013

In a new commercial that’s sure to get some liberal panties in a bunch, Glock  has held nothing back. It’s amazing how conservative companies that liberals  consider so controversial (like Glock or Daniel  Defense) make such “safe” advertisements and are still called out as  controversial. There are no partially clad women, no violent altercations, no  edgy language… but somehow because these gun manufacturers make guns, they are  inherently controversial. Newsflash, folks! If we didn’t have gun manufacturers  we wouldn’t have guns, and if we didn’t have guns what would be the point of our  RIGHT to bear arms?

Saying that gun manufacturers are controversial simply because they make guns  is like saying that our rights are controversial. It’s preposterous.

Anyway, it’s nice to see gun companies like Glock and Daniel Defense working  so hard to make good advertising. This Glock commercial may be the best  commercial going right now, and it will likely get little to no air time on  local stations. Creative nonetheless!

Glock

 

 

Beck and Levin Team up on Support for Convention of States


    http://conservativebyte.com/2013/12/beck-levin-team-support-convention-states/#Di1wSgEDBcK0tChi.99

Posted  on December 16, 2013 by Conservative  Byte

Huge news. When giants  like this team up you can know that this is real. Now you need to do  something. Check it out:

In this 4-minute audio clip, you’ll hear that Mark Levin and Glenn Beck  have buried old hatchets from past feuds and united around Article V initiatives  like Compact for America (CFA) and Convention of States (COS).

While there are other worthy Article V initiatives, COS and CFA in particular  form a long game (COS) and a short game (CFA) for We the People to take back our  country from an out-of-control federal government that is condemning our  children and grandchildren to modern-day debt bondage.

 Levine Beck

 

Continue Reading on www.westernfreepress.com

FIVE YEARS AGO TODAY… Al Gore Predicted the North Pole Will Be Ice Free in 5 Years


http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/12/five-years-ago-today-al-gore-predicted-the-north-pole-will-be-ice-free-in-5-years/#!

Posted by Jim Hoft on Friday, December 13, 2013, 5:09 PM

FIVE YEARS AGO TODAY— Al Gore predicted the North Polar Ice Cap would be completely ice free in five years. Gore made the prediction to a German audience in 2008. He told them that “the entire North ‘polarized’ cap will disappear in 5 years.” “Five Years”

This wasn’t the only time Gore made his ice-free prediction. Gore’s been predicting this since 2007. That means that this year the North Pole should be completely melted by now.

Junk scientist Al Gore also made the same prediction in 2009.
From the video:

Former Vice President Al Gore references computer modeling to suggest that the north polar ice cap may lose virtually all of its ice within the next seven years. “Some of the models suggest that there is a 75 percent chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during some of the summer months, could be completely ice-free within the next five to seven years,” says Gore.

Gore

Today Cairo had its first snowfall in 100 years.

UPDATE: Ed Driscoll found the original Gore video from 2008.

More From the “Thousand Words” File


This would be funny if he wasn’t so destructive.

 

The-Selfie

You Must See This Video


This is a serious warning about E15 Gas. Use it and you could void your new vehicles warrenty. Please share this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ceW9Nc1hVHU

Gas

ALERT! ALERT! Reports of erroneous WA health exchange debits


kgw.com

Posted on December 10, 2013 at 8:28 AM

For the second week in a row, the Washington Healthplanfinder website is down, and it’s causing problems for people who are dealing with billing issues. Some of them say the website is mistakenly debiting their accounts.

Shannon Bruner of Indianola logged on to her checking account Monday morning, and found she was almost 800 dollars in the negative.

“The first thing I thought was, ‘I got screwed,’” she said.

The Bruners enrolled for insurance on the Washington Healthplanfinder website, last October. They say they selected the bill pay date to be December 24th. Instead the Washington Healthplanfinder drafted the 835 dollar premium Monday.

Josh Bruner started his own business this year as an engineering recruiter. They said it’s forced them to pay a lot of attention to their bills and their bank accounts.

“Big knot in my gut because we’re trying to keep it together,” said Shannon Bruner. “It’s important to me that this kind of stuff doesn’t happen.”

They’re not alone.

One viewer emailed KING 5 saying, “They drafted my account this morning for a second time.”

Another woman on Facebook with a similar problem commented, “We are all in the same boat.”

“We’ve got to figure out how to get money to pay the bills for the next week or two until we have another check come through,” said Josh Bruner. “It’s just crazy.”

Washington Healthplanfinder emailed the Bruners a few days ago telling them to log in to view their invoice, something they couldn’t do because the website has been down. The Bruners haven’t been able to get through on the helpline either. They finally contacted Healthplanfinder administrators by posting a message on their Facebook page.

Washington Healthplanfinder tells KING 5 their staff is looking into the problem.

Until it’s resolved, the couple is putting their best face forward.

“We haven’t bought anyone’s Christmas gifts yet,” said Shannon Bruner. “We’re just kind of waiting.”

“We wrote a check to our nanny last week, it isn’t going to work,” said Josh Bruner. “So she can’t get paid.”

Where Are The PATRIOTS?


Where are the PATRIOTS who are willing to die for their country, if necessary, to gain freedom? Where are they in Iraq as well?

Jerry Broussard

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Iraq is still bleeding 10 years after Saddam Hussein’s capture

Friday’s anniversary of the dictator’s arrest sees the country struggling with   a resurgent al-Qaeda and a death rate double that of a decade ago

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iraq/10514145/Iraq-is-still-bleeding-10-years-after-Saddam-Husseins-capture.html

Ten years after the capture of Saddam Hussein, Iraq is at risk of becoming a failed state again as al-Qaeda reclaims vast swathes of the country.

Al-Qaeda has mounted repeated strikes across the country with an average of 68 car bombs a month this year Photo: Reuters
Colin Freeman

By , Baghdad

6:00PM GMT 12 Dec 2013

Ten years after the capture of Saddam Hussein, Iraq is at risk of becoming a   failed state again as al-Qaeda reclaims vast swathes of the country.

Friday’s anniversary of the Iraqi   dictator’s arrest sees the country still struggling with his   legacy, with al-Qaeda launching a fresh campaign of terrorist atrocities   from new territory carved out in western and northern Iraq.

Backed by jihadists fighting the civil war in neighbouring Syria, the group is   trying to create an “emirate” straddling the two countries, taking advantage   of the collapse in security across the border.

Bridges linking four key border towns on the Iraqi side have been dynamited,   making it difficult for security forces to operate in the area.

Road signs have even been put up proclaiming it to be the turf of the Islamic   State of Iraq and the Levant, the name for the joint Syrian-Iraqi al-Qaeda   franchise.

Using their new safe haven as an operating base, al-Qaeda has mounted repeated   strikes across the country, with an average of 68 car bombs a month this   year.

After a period between 2009 and 2011 in which violence was on the wane,   al-Qaeda’s resurgence in the past year has led to a fresh sense of despair   on the streets of Baghdad, where many young Iraqis think now only of leaving   the country.

The scene of a car bomb in Baghdad last year (AFP)

“It is not as bad as during the civil war, but whenever you leave your house,   you can’t be sure that you will be coming back,” said Shadi Karaqzi, 23, an   accountancy student smoking a shisha pipe in a central Baghdad cafe, itself   the target of a devastating car bomb attack in 2007. “We are living in   terror.”

“The wish of most young men now is just to live abroad so that they can have a   normal life,” added his friend Ghaith Hamed, 22.

In recent months, al-Qaeda’s so-called “reload rate” – the time between one   series of mass attacks and another – has dropped to as little as a week,   down from four to six weeks.

The death toll for 2013 has already topped 7,000, with the United Nations   saying that 979 died in October alone, the latest month for which figures   are available.

That is roughly twice the Iraqi death rate when US forces plucked Saddam from   his “spider hole” in Tikrit in December 2003, an arrest hailed at the time   as spelling the end of Iraq’s insurgency problems.

The brunt of al-Qaeda’s new onslaught is borne by Iraq’s majority Shia Muslim   community, who are classed as apostates in the terror group’s extremist   Sunni Muslim vision.

So far, senior Shia clerics have forbidden retaliation. But in interviews with   The Telegraph, both Iraqi politicians and foreign diplomats have expressed   fears that the sheer scale of the current onslaught is putting a strain on   Shias’ willingness to turn to the other cheek.

They fear a return to the sectarian warfare of 2006-2007, when up to 3,000   people a month were killed in tit-for-tat violence waged   by Sunni and Shia death squads.

Only last month, police found the bodies of 19 people – including a family of   five – shot dead and dumped in two districts of Baghdad, one mainly Sunni,   the other Shia.

Shi’ite women mourn during the funeral of the victim of a bomb attack in   Baghdad last month (Reuters)“Al-Qaeda is trying to return the country to the civil war era by killing   Shias,” said Sami al-Askary, an Iraqi MP and adviser to Nouri al-Maliki, the   prime minister. “So far they have not succeeded, but nobody knows how long   for. When the rage comes, you cannot expect how people will react.”

The current wave of violence has its roots in Iraq’s own belated version of   the Arab Spring a year ago, when the country’s Sunni minority – who enjoyed   privileged status under Saddam – began their   own mass demonstrations.

They complained of being treated as second class citizens by Iraq’s new   Shia-dominated government, alleging that they were subject to mass arrests   by the security forces and barred from government jobs because of pasts in   Saddam’s Baath party.

While foreign diplomats say their claims were not without foundation, they got   little sympathy from Mr Maliki’s government, whose followers point out that   Sunnis treated Shias in exactly the same way when they were in power.

Mr Maliki also feared that al-Qaeda would infiltrate the movement, a prophecy   that his security forces then helped fulfil when they violently broke up a   Sunni protest in the northern town of Hawija last April.

While the troops claimed they were fired on first, the deaths of some 40   Sunnis in the military’s heavy-handed response proved a major new recruiting   sergeant for al-Qaeda.

The group then scored a second major coup in July, when it staged a   mass jailbreak at Baghdad’s Abu Ghraib prison, freeing several   hundred hardcore followers held on terrorism charges.

The break-in at what was supposed to be the country’s most impregnable jail   underlined both al-Qaeda’s operational sophistication and the Iraqi security   forces’ continued incompetence.

Some 933,000 people are now enlisted in various military and paramilitary   police units. Yet despite having ballooned to the same size as it was in   Saddam’s time, much of the million-man army remains poorly equipped,   badly-trained and indisciplined.

Often they lack the equipment, logistics and training to dominate the ground   in hostile areas, and since the US troop withdrawal, there has been little   in the way of intelligence sharing.

Al-Qaeda’s current hold on Iraq is still weaker than it was at its peak of   2004-2007, when it controlled entire cities such as Ramadi and Fallujah.

With elections due next April, Mr Maliki’s government is now making a   concerted push against al-Qaeda on several fronts. At a meeting in   Washington last month, he is believed to have reinstated intelligence   sharing agreements, which withered amid the increasing acrimony between the   two governments ahead of the US pull-out in 2011.

The Iraqi government is also awaiting consignments of Russian helicopter   gunships, the only way in which they can currently mount surprise attacks on   al-Qaeda hideouts in remote desert areas.

The Telegraph understands that a plan is also under way to adopt a more   “hearts and minds” security strategy, moving away from the mass arrests that   have helped alienate Iraq’s Sunnis.

“Ahead of the elections, I understand that we will be moving to a new, more   refined, intelligence-led approach,” said Mouffak al-Rubaie, Iraq’s former   national security adviser, who still maintains close links with Mr Maliki.   “Hopefully, the time for mass arrests is over.

Related Articles

Jane Fonda has a charitable foundation


You remember Hanoi Jane, right?

HanoiJane2Well, since her halcyon days as a Communist rally  organizer and America Hater First Class, she’s apparently mellowed with age.  She’s now 75 and hasn’t made a movie in forever, and doesn’t show up at any  Democratic events anymore either. My guess is that since today’s Democratic  Party is a tad to the left of where she was in 1968 she’d feel out of place  being the most conservative one in the room.

Hanoi Jane is now Charity Jane. She has her own foundation, the Jane Fonda  Foundation, and she spends her time – when she’s not elbowing John Kerry out  of the way for Botox – running her foundation.

Though Jane Fonda’s private foundation has nearly $800,000 in assets, the  group has not made a charitable contribution during the last five years for  which it has filed federal tax returns, an apparent violation of Internal  Revenue Service rules.

According to the Jane Fonda Foundation’s most recent tax return–filed last  year and covering calendar year 2011–the organization’s cash, stock, and bond  portfolio was valued at $798,133. The filing lists the 75-year-old actress as  the foundation’s president and chairman of the board, and reports that she  devotes 10 hours a week to the charitable group.

The foundation hasn’t made a charitable contribution since 2006, according to  IRS public records, when they donated $1,000 to the Atlanta Obstetric and  Gynecology Society.

The interesting part of this is that while the IRS has plenty of time to  harass conservative 501-c4 groups, and audit critics of ObamaCare, they are  ignoring Hanoi Jane’s compliance problems with her foundation.

IRS regulations require private foundations to make  annual distributions totaling at least five percent of its assets. The rule is  intended to prevent foundations from stockpiling and investing funds (while  never making contributions, gifts, or grants). If applicable, the so-called Five  Percent Rule could have forced Fonda to distribute a minimum of about $40,000 in  2011.

If a private foundation fails to make required minimum distributions, it  faces stiff IRS penalties.

I can’t wait to find out when they’re planning on auditing her. After all,  the IRS are non-partisan public servants, right?

Related articles

Famous Presidential Lies


LBJ: “We were attacked.”


Nixon: “I am not a crook.”


Clinton: “I did not have sex with that woman,,,,,, Ms. Lewinski.”


Bush – 41: “Read my lips – No new taxes.”


Obama:   Does he ever tell the truth?????

  • “I will have the most transparent administration in history.”

  • “TARP is to fund Shovel-ready jobs.”

  • “I am focused like a laser on creating jobs.”

  • “The IRS is not targeting anyone.”

  • “It was a spontaneous riot about a movie.”

  • “I will put an end to the type of politics that “breeds division, conflict and cynicism”.

  • “You didn’t build that!”

  • “I will restore trust in Government.”

  • “The Cambridge cops acted stupidly,”

  • “The Public Will Have 5 Days To Look At Every Bill That Lands On My Desk.”

  • “It’s not my red line – it is the world’s red line.”

  • “Whistle blowers will be protected in my administration.”

  • “We got back Every Dime we Used to Rescue the Banks, with interest.   Same for the Auto Companies.”

  • “I will close Gitmo.”

  • “I am not spying on American citizens.”

  • “ObamaCare will be good for America .. “

    • “You can keep your family doctor, period.”

    • “Premiums will be lowered by $2500.”

    • “If you like it, you can keep your current healthcare plan, Period.”

    • “It’s just like shopping at Amazon.”

    • And the biggest one of all:

      • “I, Barrack Hussein Obama, pledge to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America”.

Obama Scandal Commemorative Plate Set: An Hysterical Parody Ad


Plates

 

Just in time for the holidays! The perfect present for the Obama supporter in your life. It’s  the “Obama Scandals Collectable Paper Plate Series.” Each paper plate is  lovingly crafted to commemorate a classic scandal from the Obama administration.
Read more at http://conservativevideos.com/2013/12/obama-scandal-commemorative-plate-set-hysterical-parody-ad/#OCRwtE5UT6WuxuMs.99

Congressmen Want to Bring Obama to Court for Not Faithfully Executing Laws


http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/congressmen-want-bring-obama-court-not-faithfully-executing-laws_770812.html#

30 members support the House Resolution calling for civil action.

Dec 12, 2013• By DANIEL HALPER

Congressman Tom Rice of South Carolina, a Republican, is sponsoring a resolution in the House of Representatives that would, if adopted, direct the legislative body “to bring a civil action for declaratory or injunctive relief to challenge certain policies and actions taken by the executive branch.” In other words, Rep. Rice wants to take President Obama to court for not faithfully executing the laws.

“President Obama has adopted a practice of picking and choosing which laws he wants to enforce. In most cases, his laws of choice conveniently coincide with his Administration’s political agenda. Our Founding Fathers created the Executive Branch to implement and enforce the laws written by Congress and vested this power in the President.  However, President Obama has chosen to ignore some of the laws written by Congress and implemented by preceding Presidents,” Rice wrote in a letter to fellow House members to ask them to co-sponsor this resolution.

“This resolution allows the House of Representatives to bring legal action against the Executive Branch and challenge recent actions, inactions, and policies.”

The “legal action against the President” would be, according to an aide for Rep. Rice, “for ignoring Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution.” Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution states,

He shall from time to time give to the Congress information of the state of the union, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in case of disagreement between them, with respect to the time of adjournment, he may adjourn them to such time as he shall think proper; he shall receive ambassadors and other public ministers; he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed, and shall commission all the officers of the United States.

AdvertisementAdvertisement<The resolution alleges that President Obama and his administration have abused executive power and failed to execute the laws of the United States faithfully.

Thus, the resolution calls for “CIVIL ACTION.—The House of Representatives shall bring a civil action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for declaratory or injunctive relief to challenge any of the following policies or actions:

(1) The policy of the Department of Health and Human Services that, with respect to health insurance coverage that is renewed for a policy year during the period beginning January 1, 2014, and ending October 1, 2014, health insurance issuers may continue to offer coverage that would otherwise be terminated or cancelled for being out of compliance with various requirements of title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act and corresponding portions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as announced by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services on November 14, 2013.

(2) The 1-year delay in the application of the reporting requirements of sections 6055 and 6056 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (and related requirements of section 4980H of such Code), as provided under Department of the Treasury Notice 2013–45, as announced by the Department of the Treasury on July 2, 2013.

(3) The policy of the Department of Homeland Security to exercise prosecutorial discretion with respect to individuals who came to the United States as children, as announced by the Department of Homeland Security on June 15, 2012.

(4) The authorization, approval, renewal, modification, or extension of any experimental, pilot, or demonstration project under section 1115 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1315) that waives compliance with a requirement of section 407 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 607) through a waiver of section 402 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 602).

In plain English, and in the words Rice used to ask fellow members to sign onto the resolution, the complaints are:

1.       President Obama recently announced an “administrative fix” in regard to cancelled healthcare plans due to Obamacare.  Of course he plans to provide a “fix” which will substantially alter his signature legislation without involving Congress.

2.       Over the summer, President Obama’s Administration announced a one-year delay in Obamacare’s employer mandate without involving Congress.

3.       Last year, President Obama’s Administration granted temporary status to illegal immigrants who entered the United States as children without involving Congress

4.       In June 2012, President Obama’s Administrative provided a waiver initiative for the welfare work requirement under TANF without involving Congress.

So far, 29 members of Congress are co-sponsoring Rice’s Resolution: Bachmann (MN-06), Bridenstine (OK-01), Chaffetz (UT-03), J. Duncan (SC-03), DeSantis (FL-06), Franks (AZ-08), Gowdy (SC-04), Harris (MD-01), Lamborn (CO-05), LaMalfa (CA-01), Marino (PA-10), McClintock (CA-04), Meadows (NC-11), Nunnelee (MS-01), Pittenger (NC-09), Posey (FL-08), Tom Price (GA-06), Ribble (WI-08), Salmon (AZ-05), Sanford (SC-01), Schweikert (AZ-06), Stewart (UT-02), Stockman (TX-36), Walberg (MI-07), Weber (TX-14), Wenstrup (OH-02), Williams (TX-25), Joe Wilson (SC-02), and Yoho FL-03.

Here’s full resolution, which is expected to be filed with the House clerk’s office very soon:

RESOLUTION

Directing the House of Representatives to bring a civil action for declaratory or injunctive relief to challenge certain policies and actions taken by the executive branch.

Whereas President Obama and officials in his administration have frequently overstepped the limits placed on executive branch power by the Constitution;

Whereas because of President Obama’s continuing failure to faithfully execute the laws, his administration’s actions cannot be addressed by the enactment of new laws, be- cause Congress cannot assume that the President will execute the new laws any more faithfully than the laws he has already ignored, leaving Congress with no legislative remedy to prevent the establishment of what is in effect an imperial presidency; and

Whereas it is therefore necessary and appropriate for Congress to turn to the courts to ensure the faithful execution of the laws as required by the Constitution: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved,

 SECTION 1. DIRECTING CIVIL ACTION BY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES IN RESPONSE TO CERTAIN EXECUTIVE BRANCH ACTIONS.

(a) CIVIL ACTION.—The House of Representatives shall bring a civil action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for declaratory or injunctive relief to challenge any of the following policies or actions:

(1) The policy of the Department of Health and Human Services that, with respect to health insurance coverage that is renewed for a policy year during the period beginning January 1, 2014, and ending October 1, 2014, health insurance issuers may continue to offer coverage that would otherwise be terminated or cancelled for being out of compliance with various requirements of title XXVII of the Public Health Service Act and corresponding portions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as announced by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services on November 14, 2013.

(2) The 1-year delay in the application of the reporting requirements of sections 6055 and 6056 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (and related requirements of section 4980H of such Code), as provided under Department of the Treasury Notice 2013–45, as announced by the Department of the Treasury on July 2, 2013.

(3) The policy of the Department of Homeland Security to exercise prosecutorial discretion with respect to individuals who came to the United States as children, as announced by the Department of Homeland Security on June 15, 2012.

(4) The authorization, approval, renewal, modification, or extension of any experimental, pilot, or  demonstration project under section 1115 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1315) that waives compliance with a requirement of section 407 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 607) through a waiver of section 402 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 602).

(b) NO ADDITIONAL FUNDS PROVIDED TO BRING ACTIONS.—Any amounts obligated or expended by the House of Representatives to carry out this resolution during a fiscal year shall be derived from existing appropriations for salaries and expenses of the House for that fiscal year, and nothing in this resolution may be construed as authorizing an increase in the amount of budget authority available to the House for that fiscal year.

Did Obama imply U.S. Founders were communist?


     http://conservativebyte.com/2013/12/obama-imply-u-s-founders-communist/#52CSEb5O2XQlZmcu.99

Such delusions are why liberals never seem to get it. Check it out:

When it came to covering the Nelson Mandela memorial, most commentators  focused on President Obama’s  tacky “selfie” or his handshake with Castro. Dr. Savage, however, was more  concerned about Obama’s speech, in which he compared Mandela to America’s  Founding Fathers.

“That’s like saying our Founding Fathers were communists,” said Savage. After  all, “Mandela was a member of the Communist Party who supported the murderous  dictatorship in Cuba” and other far left regimes.

Dr. Savage is an expert on natural healing who doesn’t hesitate to criticize  modern medicine when he feels it’s appropriate. In the case of the flu shot,  he’s against it, telling his audience that we can reduce our chances of coming  down with such illness by practicing simple common sense hygiene, like regular  hand washing with soap and water.

 Dr Savage

Continue Reading on www.wnd.com  …

Obamacare Shocker


http://conservativevideos.com/2013/12/obamacare-shocker-richest-1-get-best-health-care-99-get-shaft/

Trifeca

Anti-Obamacare Parody Song: ‘You Picked a Fine Time to Leave Me, Blue Shield’


Anti-Obamacare Parody Song: ‘You Picked a Fine Time to Leave Me, Blue Shield’ Anti-Obamacare Parody Song: ‘You Picked a Fine Time to Leave Me, Blue Shield’

Congresswoman’s Miracle Baby Home for Christmas After Doctors Said She’d Die


http://www.lifenews.com/2013/12/11/congresswomans-miracle-baby-home-for-christmas-after-doctors-said-shed-die/

by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com

When she was pregnant with her daughter Abigail Rose Beutler, doctors told Congresswoman Jaime Herrera Beutler, a pro-life Republican from Washington state, that her baby had a potentially fatal diagnosis that would claim her life shortly after birth.

Beutler posted a message on Facebook in June saying her unborn child had been diagnosed with Potter’s Syndrome, a condition which prevents the child’s kidneys from developing properly and is typically fatal for the baby.

In Potter’s syndrome, the unborn baby has an atypical physical appearance as the result of oligohydramnios, a decrease in amniotic fluid volume that causes developmental problems and babies with Potter’s Syndrome typically die within a couple days of being born.

Then, in July, Beutler said Abigail was doing well two weeks following her birth and she continued to progress in September.

Now, little Abby is heading home for Christmas!

After spending months under the supervision of doctors in California, U.S. Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler’s infant daughter got to come home to Camas this week.

Herrera Beutler shared the good news in an statement Wednesday. She also announced she would travel to Washington, D.C., this week to vote on a federal budget deal.

“We are so grateful to the medical team at Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital in California for their care of Abigail during her first months of life,” Herrera Beutler said. She also asked for “continued patience and prayers in the coming weeks as our family adjusts to life back home.”

Surprising the medical field, Abigail was born prematurely in July with fully developed lungs. Her kidneys weren’t functioning, though, and she was whisked off to the California hospital for dialysis treatments. She will eventually need a kidney transplant.

 The Republican congresswoman has been on leave since her daughter’s birth. She has traveled to Washington, D.C., to take a few crucial votes, including one in October to end the partial government shutdown. She also relies more heavily on her staff to communicate with 3rd District constituents.

“My staff and I will continue serving the residents of Southwest Washington just as we have throughout this challenging time,” Herrera Beutler said. “Like the millions of working mothers in this country, I will balance the responsibilities of my job with the needs of my family.”

 

Student Escapes Abortion to Become University Homecoming Queen


http://www.lifenews.com/2013/12/11/student-escapes-abortion-to-become-university-homecoming-queen/

by John Stonestreet | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com

An unborn girl escapes abortion, is adopted, and becomes a homecoming queen? This is not a fairytale.     

True stories are always full of both ugliness and beauty, and this one is no different. A married woman is sexually assaulted in California and becomes pregnant. Compounding her pain, her husband gives her an ultimatum: Abort this baby, or I’ll divorce you. That’s the ugly part. The woman, however, courageously decides that the child growing inside her is not the ugly part of her story, and gives birth. That and what follows is beautiful!

She moves to Alabama, is put in touch with a Christian adoption agency called Lifeline Children’s Services. Peggy Dutton and her husband are on the board of Lifeline. They get to know this courageous woman and agree to give her child a loving home. Two days after Molly’s birth, they adopt her.

Molly grows up and lives a gloriously average suburban life and now attends Auburn University as a horticulture student.

Almost no one there knew her story—until friends urged her to run for homecoming queen. For her platform issue, Molly chose alternatives for women facing crisis pregnancies. She told her story which spread like wildfire. Soon, Molly was all over TV and the Web winsomely sharing her positive message about life.

“It’s already been a huge response,” she said. “It shows how much the public wants to receive life. It has been viral.” And not only that—Molly Anne Dutton was named Auburn’s homecoming queen!

Amazing—from what some people would call a disposable “blob of tissue” to homecoming queen. All because of the selflessness of a mother.

And you thought fairytales at Auburn only came true on the football field!

Folks, Molly Anne Dutton’s story reminds us that we don’t have to choose between biblical truth and compelling stories. It’s not all about facts and figures. We must touch people’s hearts as well as their heads. And true truth always does that, because the ultimate Truth of the world was embodied personally in Jesus Christ.

Here’s another true fairytale, told by Jerry Root and our own Stan Guthrie in their outstanding book, “The Sacrament of Evangelism”:

“A woman named Virginia and her husband,” they write, “were expecting their first child. Doctors, however, said the kidneys of the unborn baby were pocked with cysts. They said the child could not possibly live more than a few hours and advised them to abort.”

Virginia was heartbroken, but she had no intention of ending the baby’s life. She told the doctor, “I do not know why God chose me to be the mother of this child, but since He did I will give birth to this child and I will love it with mother-love the best I can for as long as it lives.”

When the baby was born, Virginia rocked, nursed, and sang to her baby until the child died. Jerry and Stan note, “There are no scales to measure such love and courage.”

Years later, another woman told Jerry about her pregnant daughter: Doctors told her that the baby inside her would also die within hours after birth and advised an abortion.

So Jerry put her in touch with Virginia, who spoke with the daughter by phone every week. “Taking courage from Virginia’s example,” Jerry and Stan write, “the daughter chose to give mother-love to her child for as long as that child should live.” Beautiful, right? But here’s the kicker: “After the baby was born, the doctors discovered that they had made a misdiagnosis. The baby was fine.”

It’s in these stories of people like Molly and Virginia, and the gracious God they serve, that our neighbors will not only learn about the goodness of God; they’ll be able to see it.

And please, if you’re on Facebook or Twitter, share this broadcast with your friends. You’ll find a transcript and the audio at BreakPoint.org. What better time to share these kinds of stories than at Christmas, when the Truth became flesh and dwelt in our midst.

LifeNews Note: John Stonestreet writes for BreakPoint.org

South Carolina to Nullify Obamacare


http://eaglerising.com/3528/south-carolina-nullify-obamacare/#ZMBUrsMq0CfbmTo1.99

By / 12 December  2013

The “South Carolina Freedom of Health Care Protection Act,” or South  Carolina’s House Bill 3101, will likely pass through the South Carolina  Senate chamber and could effectively eliminate Obamacare in South Carolina. It  could also serve as a model that other conservative states could look to when  trying to formulate their own plans for eliminating Obamacare in their  states.

In all likelihood South  Carolina will soon be the first state to exempt their populace from any  participation in the Obamacare scheme.

NullifyOcareState Senator Tom Davis, who sponsored the bill,  says, “It will essentially have five components to it, all of which in my  judgment are legal, effective, and within the state’s power to do. What the  Supreme Court said in Printz v. United States is that states are not merely  political subdivisions of the federal government to carry out what the federal  government does; they are sovereign entities. Congress can pass laws, but it  cannot compel the states to utilize either their treasury or personnel to  implement those federal laws.”

South Carolina’s Senate is dominated by Republicans, but even some of the  Democrat members are likely to agree to the bill. Governor Nikki Haley (R-SC)  has been an outspoken opponent of Obamacare and will also very likely jump at  the chance to be the first Governor in the United States to stand up to the  Obama administration by outlawing Obamacare in South Carolina.

Of course, the federal government could enact and handle Obamacare in South  Carolina without the state’s help, but given how badly the Obamacare rollout has  gone thus far, it’s unlikely they’ll be able to do this effectively. Things will  only get worse as other Republican dominated states move forward with similar  plans. There is just no way that the federal government can make Obamacare work  if some states simply refuse to comply with the law.

Nullification

The talking heads and political wonks may not believe that nullification  still exists… but it does. There can be no real balance of power between the  states and the federal government without it. So let’s stand and cheer South  Carolina on as they prove a state still has the right to nullify federal law.  Way to go, Palmetto State!

About the author: Onan Coca

Onan is a graduate of Liberty University (2003) and earned his M.Ed. at  Western Governors University in 2012. Onan lives in the Atlanta area with his  wife, Leah. They have three children and enjoy the hectic pace of life in a  young family. Onan and Leah are members of the Journey Church in Hiram, GA.

Website: http://www.eaglerising.com

Read more at http://eaglerising.com/3528/south-carolina-nullify-obamacare/#ZMBUrsMq0CfbmTo1.99

Report: ESPN Rejects Catholic Hospital Ad Because ‘Jesus,’ ‘God’ ‘Problematic’


http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-Sports/2013/12/11/ESPN-Rejects-Catholic-Hospital-AD-Because-Jesus-Problematic

by Breitbart Sports 11 Dec 2013

**UPDATE** The new ad that will run on ESPN on December 14th does not mention “God” or “Jesus” like the commercial that had been rejected. The ad also focuses on the hospital’s pediatric heart department instead of asking viewers to send messages of hope to children at the hospital to “help us reveal God’s healing presence this Christmas,” which was in the rejected ad.

**UPDATE** ESPN reached out to Breitbart News and provided the following statement:

As originally submitted, the spot did not meet our commercial advocacy standards. We have since been supplied with a different commercial which will air on the 14th.

Here is the ad as it will air:

ESPN

**UPDATE** A source also confirmed to Breitbart Sports on Thursday that the original Cardinal Glennon Children’s Foundation ad was rejected by ESPN for broadcast over its nationwide network.

The Foundation has a partnership with the Missouri Valley Conference, and had asked ESPN to run its ad in the Virginia Commonwealth vs. Northern Iowa NCAA Basketball game that will be aired this Saturday.

The ad was submitted to an ad executive for the network who rejected it because it did not comply with the ESPN broadcast rules. Breitbart Sports has learned that the Foundation asked the exec to submit their appeal to his rejection to his superiors at ESPN. He did, and the ad was rejected again.

**UPDATE** Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin said ESPN’s rejection of the ad was “so disappointing” and told Breitbart Sports:

“I used to be obsessed with ESPN. In how many interviews have I admitted that was my goal – my dream job – as I earned my Journalism degree and creds in the 80’s? My repeated quote is: ‘But I didn’t want to move to Bristol, Connecticut (home of ESPN), so I named my first daughter Bristol, instead!'”

***

ESPN has reportedly rejected a Christmas commercial from a St. Louis area Catholic hospital because the network found the mention of “Jesus” in the ad to be “problematic.”

Bill O’Reilly, the host of Fox News’ O’Reilly Factor, said on Wednesday that an ad from the Cardinal Glennon Children’s Foundation was turned down by ESPN even though it is run on other networks in the area.

The commercial mentions that thousands of people in the community send “messages of hope to sick and injured children who may not be able to come home for the holidays.”

“At… Cardinal Glennon Children’s Medical Center, we celebrate the birth of Jesus and the season of giving, bringing hope to the many children, parents, and families that we serve,” an announcer says in the ad before mentioning that the hospital’s patients are “filled with hope” because they receive daily messages from the “treasure chest” beneath its “tree of hope.”

The ad concludes by asking viewers to “help us reveal God’s healing presence this Christmas. Send your message of hope at Glennon.org.”

ESPN reportedly found “we celebrate the birth of Jesus” and “help us reveal God’s healing presence this Christmas” to be “problematic.”

Appearing on O’Reilly’s show, Doug Napier of the Alliance Defending Freedom said to say that “there is too much Jesus in this Christmas message of hope is like saying there is too much sports in ESPN.”

Napier wondered why ESPN would want to “marginalize” a holiday a majority of Americans celebrate with family–and probably with ESPN on in their homes. O’Reilly said ESPN’s decision was “insane,” and even more so because the ad was for a Catholic hospital trying to help sick children.

Napier said he has not spoken to ESPN and O’Reilly mentioned that representatives from ESPN and the hospital declined to appear on the program. O’Reilly said he felt the Catholic hospital was intimidated to take on a big outlet like ESPN.

This is yet another example of the “War on Christmas” that former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, in her book, Good Tidings and Great Joy: Protecting the Heart of Christmas, said was the “tip of the spear” in a larger battle to fundamentally transform American and erode the country of its exceptionalism.

Obama taskforce studying how to “nudge” – er, control your behavior


http://allenbwest.com/2013/12/obama-taskforce-studying-nudge-er-control-behavior/#U0OL7AEbsfXc4IFD.99

Written by Allen  West on December 10, 2013
Obama1984
 “In a universe of deceit, truth becomes a revolutionary act.” Often  attributed to George Orwell, this statement is eerily appropriate in light of  this latest revelation about the Obama administration.

In Politico, Richard Williams reports:

Earlier this year, the White House revealed that it is establishing a task  force dedicated to studying how to motivate you—just as parents do—to do what  the government thinks is best for you.

Just another example of how well this administration is spending your  taxpayer dollars. Not.

Per Williams:

To be clear, Congress did not pass legislation authorizing such activity;  this is something dreamt up by bureaucracies to force their own preferences on  citizens, whether by combating obesity or discouraging procrastination when it  comes to saving for retirement.

The report goes on to explain the genesis of this very disconcerting  endeavor, called “behavioral economics”—the study of how psychology affects  people’s decisions. It most recently became a buzzword when former White House  official Cass Sunstein co-authored the book Nudge while Sunstein was  still a law professor at Harvard.

Williams reports:

In 2009, Obama appointed him as administrator of the Office of Information  and Regulatory Affairs, where Sunstein championed cost-benefit analysis of  regulation, as well as “nudges.” Sunstein left government in 2012 to return to  academia, but the “nudge” school of thought has clearly lingered in the Oval  Office: The newly created behavioral economics task force is the most prominent  example yet.

Just so you know, Sunstein is married to US Ambassador to the UN Samantha Power and when he testified before our House Small  Business Committee actually said “increased regulation is a means to create  jobs.” He believed that government must hire more people to enforce the new  regulations – yes, these are the types of people Obama has close to him.

President Obama and his progressive socialist disciples seek to turn the  United States into a “1984″-type totalitarian government-controlled society  where history is rewritten (see Common Core). Thanks to the Supreme Court ruling on the  Individual Mandate, government has the authority to modify individual behavior  by way of taxation, forcing you to purchase private sector industry products.

All of you who (still want to) think Barack Obama is a “likable cheeky” fella — you are wrong. He is a deceptive charlatan and manipulative despot. Right now,  the Democrats are crafting poll-tested messages and slogans to mentally enslave  America. Obey or rebel, the choice is yours — I have made mine.

“Obama Coalition” no longer so hot on “cool” president


http://allenbwest.com/2013/12/obama-coalition-longer-hot-cool-president/#DefrshGm7BTelYp2.99

Written by Allen  West on December 11, 2013
Photo: Bob OwensAs Byron York writes in the Washington Examiner:

President Obama won re-election with the rock-solid support of what has  become known as the “Obama Coalition” — young people, minorities, women, and  low-income voters. Without a firm foundation — and high turnout — among those  groups, Obama would not be in the White House today.

Yesterday I spoke at an event supporting the London Center for Policy  Research for whom I have the distinct honor of being a Senior Fellow. After my  remarks, a woman said to me, “You are so cool,” to which I replied, “my  daughters would never characterize me that way!”

This woman (who works for NBC, but not the news bureau) told me her daughter  had supported Barack Obama because he was so cool, but now despises him because  she doesn’t like a “celebrity president.” While she wholeheartedly admitted she  isn’t overly “political,” this lady thought I was “cool” because I  articulated the issues and solutions in a manner that made her interested.

And so it seems that trite, poll-tested and marketed soundbites of hope  and change, forward, war on women, tax the rich, fair share and one percent vs 99 percent mean nothing when  people are losing jobs and their healthcare coverage.

York writes,

Obama’s job approval rating among Hispanic Americans has plunged from 75  percent in December 2012 to 52 percent today — a drop of 23 percentage points,  the sharpest decline among any voter group. Among Americans who make less than  $24,000 a year, the president’s approval rating has fallen from 64 percent last  December to 46 percent today. Among Americans 18 to 29 years of age, it has  fallen from 61 percent to 46 percent. Among women, it has fallen from 57 percent  to 43 percent.

However, there is still one group that hasn’t awakened from its stupor, even  while suffering the most under the failures of Obama: the black community.  Still, support is down nonetheless, from 92 percent to 83 percent today.

Imagine if in the next presidential election, Democrats received only 80% of  the black vote — still high — but that would put two torpedoes broadside in the  USS Progressive Socialist.

All the soaring rhetoric means nothing when you’re struggling and just got a  cancellation notice from your insurance company and doctor.

The hip-hop bounce down the stairs of Air Force One seems more arrogant when  you can’t afford to fill your grocery cart or gasoline tank. Singing Al Green at  rallies is embarrassing when our kids are trapped in failing schools.

Maybe we’re finally witnessing the day when cool became uncool, and being  able to lead and speak from the heart without a teleprompter became cool. Our  nation depends on it.

Now Obama gets ‘executive power’ czar


http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/now-obama-gets-executive-power-czar/#cvWJGReqaAI4RHPx.99

Specializes in bypassing Congress to enact ‘progressive  change’

By Aaron Klein

About Aaron  Klein

Aaron Klein is WND’s senior staff reporter  and Jerusalem bureau chief. He also hosts “Aaron  Klein Investigative Radio” on New York’s WABC Radio. Follow Aaron on Twitter and Facebook.
A senior progressive strategist and former chief of staff for President Bill  Clinton who specializes in the use of executive authority to bypass Congress is  reportedly joining the White House.

Podesta last month announced the establishment of a new group, the Washington  Center for Equitable Growth, that will work within his Center for American  Progress. The new center bills itself as a research and grant-making  organization founded to accelerate the closing of what it calls the income gap  in the U.S. by fighting so-called income inequality.

The Times reported Podesta will help the White House on “matters related to  the health care law, administration organization and executive actions,” with  particular focus on so-called climate change issues, according to a person  familiar with the plans.

Podesta is a long-time champion of the use of executive powers, including  bypassing the legislative branch to enact progressive change.

In November 2010, he co-authored a 48-page Center for American Progress paper  titled “The  Power of the President: Recommendations to Advance Progressive Change.”

“The U.S. Constitution and the laws of our nation grant the president  significant authority to make and implement policy,” wrote Podesta in the  paper’s introduction.

“These authorities can be used to ensure positive progress on many of the key  issues facing the country through executive orders, rulemaking, agency  management, convening and creating public-private partnerships, commanding the  armed forces … diplomacy.”

Podesta stressed: “The ability of President Obama to accomplish important  change through these powers should not be underestimated.”

In a conference call to reporters after the release of the paper on executive  authority, Podesta recalled that after Democrats lost control of Congress in  1994, President  Clinton utilized his executive privileges to enact progressive change without  the help of Congress.

Podesta’s paper details how Obama can push executive change on a host of  issues.

The paper states that on energy and environmental arena, the president  can:

  • Reduce oil imports and make progress toward energy independence.
  • Progress toward reducing greenhouse gas pollution by 17 percent by  2020.
  • Conserve federal lands for future generations.
  • Manage public lands to support a balanced energy strategy.
  • Convene and engage hunters and anglers in the development of a fish and  wildlife climate adaptation plan.
  • Generate solar energy on U.S. Air Force hangar roofs.On the domestic  economic policy front, Podesta usges Obama to:
  • Direct an assessment, strategy, and new policy development to promote U.S.  competitiveness.
  • Launch the new consumer financial protection bureau with an aggressive  agenda to protect and empower consumers.
  • Increase the capacity of small businesses to expand hiring and purchases by  accelerating the implementation of the Small Business Jobs Act.
  • Promote automatic mediation to avoid foreclosure where possible and speed  resolution.
  • Create a Web portal to empower housing counselors, reduce burdens on lenders  and speed up home mortgage modifications.
  • Help stabilize home values and communities by turning “shadow REO” housing  inventory into “scattered site” rental housing.
  • Promote practices that support working families.

On the domestic policy front, Podesta’s paper recommends that Obama:

  • Partner with the private sector in health care payment reform.
  • Focus on health care prevention in implementing the Affordable Care  Act.
  • Streamline and simplify access to federal antipoverty programs.
  • Replace costly, inhumane immigration detention policies with equally  effective measures.

Regarding education policy, the paper states the president can:

  • Launch an “educational productivity” initiative to help school districts  spend every dollar wisely to best prepare our children for the 21st  century.
  • Ensure students can compare financial aid offers from different  postsecondary institutions.
  • Improve the quality, standards and productivity of postsecondary  education.

With regard to “improving the performance of the federal government,” the  president can:

  • Scrutinize federal spending programs and tax expenditures to achieve greater  returns on public investment.
  • Build the next-generation Recovery.gov website to track all public  expenditures and performance in real time.
  • Use new information technology for faster, more transparent freedom of  information.
  • Create a virtual U.S. statistical agency.
  • Collect data on lesbian ,gay, bisexual and transgender Americans in federal  data surveys.

And in the foreign policy and national security arena, the president and his  administration can:

  • Rebalance Afghanistan strategy with greater emphasis on political and  diplomatic progress.
  • Promote domestic revenue generation in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
  • Appoint a special envoy for the Horn of Africa and the southwest Arabian  Peninsula region.
  • Appoint a special commission to assess contracting practices in national  security and foreign affairs.
  • Redouble support for Palestinian state- and institution-building  efforts.
  • Pursue dual-track policy on Iran while sharpening focus on Iranian human  rights issues.
  • Reinvigorate the U.S.-Turkey strategic alliance. Develop a comprehensive  policy on the Russia-Georgia conflict.

In 2008, Podesta served as co-director of Obama’s transition into the White  House.

A Time magazine article profiled the influence of Podesta’s Center for  American Progress in the formation of the Obama administration, stating that “not since the Heritage Foundation helped guide Ronald Reagan’s transition in  1981 has a single outside group held so much sway.”

The center is funded by billionaire George Soros. Its board includes Van  Jones, Obama’s former “green jobs” czar, who resigned in September 2009 after it  was exposed he founded a communist revolutionary organization.

With additional research by Brenda J. Elliott.

Obama’s Back Dated & Forged Selective Service Form Hits Washington Times in Full Page Ad


http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/12/obamas-back-dated-forged-selective-service-form-hits-washington-times-full-page-ad/#ctclKVfMEbUw4PWK.99

Posted By on Dec 10, 2013

m05-wtnw12092013-obamadraftcardforged-withhdr

Someone has finally decided to put out Barack Obama’s forged documents in  some mainstream papers.  On Monday, CDR  Charles Kerchner (Retired) took out a full page ad in the Washington Time to  make people aware of the fraudulent documents of Barack Hussein Obama,  specifically his back dated and forged selective service form.

Kerchner’s ad appeared on page 5 of the Washington Times National Weekly and  included a large copy of Barack Obama’s Selective Service form, along with  various URLs to other pertinent information on the various forgeries of Obama’s  documents.

m05-wtnw12092013-obamadraftcardforged-withhdr

If you thought Kerchner was done with only one ad dealing with Obama’s  Selective Service form, you would be mistaken.  He also dealt with John Boehner.

Kerchner blasted  House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH), who apparently has taken a similar stand to  that of Markwayne Mullins, who said he believes  that Obama’s birth certificate is a fraud, but doesn’t “give a sh*t.”

Mr. Kerchner wrote:

He then included another full page ad in which he wrote a “Dear John” letter  that he believed Lady Liberty would pen if she was able, calling him on the very  things he wrote above.

WT-NW-12092013-TEARSHEET-Pg36

Herchner included links to Arizona Chief Investigator Michael  Zullo’s sworn affidavit attesting to the fact that Obama’s documents have  been forged, as well as documentation  provided by Debbie Schlussel that Obama’s Selective Service registration is a fraud.

The pressure continues to build, however, don’t expect establishment  Republicans to get on board.  After all, they this is really no big deal and  they are ready to roll over in bed with the Democrats as they have already  shown.  However, there is hope that some Tea Party representatives, like Steve Stockman, who do believe there is validity to the  information and want to see a serious inquiry for the public’s best interest.   Stockman even passed out copies of Articles of Impeachment to every House member earlier  this year.

Contact your  representative or senator today and let them know you want this issue  investigated and resolved, including impeachment and removal from office of  Barack Hussein Obama if necessary.

Don’t forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook and Google  Plus

Author: Tim Brown

Husband to my wife. Father of 10. Jack of All Trades. Christian and lover of  liberty.  Residing in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina. Follow  Tim on Twitter.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/12/obamas-back-dated-forged-selective-service-form-hits-washington-times-full-page-ad/#ctclKVfMEbUw4PWK.99

Would Americans Actually Dare Revolt Against This Abusive Government?


http://clashdaily.com/2013/12/americans-actually-dare-revolt-abusive-government/#szlIEYJJDR2m6k4C.99

By / 9 December  2013

revolution

America’s Founding Fathers spelled it out pretty clearly:  The  purpose of government is to secure the God-given, inalienable rights of  men.  They put that exact language into The Declaration of  Independence.

They also spelled out, exactly, that when government becomes abusive, and “destructive of these ends,” it is mankind’s right and duty to alter,  abolish, or overthrow it.

You may have seen the recent news about prominent and well-spoken experts  testifying before Congress regarding the Obama administration’s shocking  usurpations and out-of-control excesses, especially the utter lack of regard for  Constitutional limits on the powers of the executive branch.  The testimony  was remarkable in that the prospect of possible citizen uprising and  revolt was brought up repeatedly.  I can’t recall in my lifetime this  ever having happened before, in such an official, high-level on-the-record  context before the cameras and klieg lights.

The question that comes to my mind foremost is not whether such outright  revolt is justified or warranted.  The question is whether enough  of us have the will and the wherewithal to carry it out.

Given what millions of us see as plainly egregious high crimes and  misdemeanors by Obama and his agents, without adequate redress of our grievances  by those who we believe are also largely corrupt–our representatives  in Congress–a large chunk of the American population easily pays lip service to  the idea of actual revolution, as opposed to more of the same-old, same-old  election cycle shenanigans.

But talking and doing are, of course, two very different things.

I realize that by typing these words and sending them out over the  cyber-clothesline, I’m somewhat risking a visit from the gestapo.  So  what.  Let them throw me in jail.  My wife and son would suffer, but  if I’ve learned anything about that woman in the eight years we’ve been  married, it’s that she can catch fish just as well or even better than I can on  any given day, and probably live off the land if she has to.  She was  pretty much raised that way.

Have we as a society become so soft and accustomed to the comforts  of technology and of various government checks &  subsidies that too few of us would ever forcefully resist the tyranny  that is growing from the power-mad panderers of the Left?

Life certainly is much different today than in the days of the American  Revolution.  Not only are people generally much more dependent on vast,  highly-advanced, complex, specialized, and bureaucratic systems and technology  which have removed them so much from the concept and practice of  self-reliance in nature of those more primitive times, but anyone contemplating  some kind of active defiance of the status quo has to consider also the  comparatively extremely lopsided scenario such a prospect involves where it  comes to actual weapons systems, intelligence networks, command and control  operations, and logistics.

George Washington’s regulars, guerrillas, mercenaries, and Minutemen were  long-shot underdogs against a formidable foe, of course, in the vastly  better equipped, funded, and armed redcoats of King George.  However,  the muskets, horses, and cannon of our Revolutionary fighters were somewhat  comparable, in technological sophistication and array, to the similarly  primitive (by modern standards) hardware deployed by the crown.   Furthermore, having “home field advantage,” all the colonists really had to do  was make things so horrible for the king’s forces, much of  which had come all the way from across the ocean, that the King eventually  just relented rather than continue to try to keep control from all those  thousands of miles away.

Nowadays, however, we’re talking about guys (and gals) with handguns, hunting  rifles, carbines, and really not much more than that at all, up against the  most space-age, entrenched, home-grown federal leviathan of lasers and  satellites, nuclear missiles and bomber planes, tanks, aircraft carrier ships,  helicopters, jet fighters and cargo planes, AWACS and close-air support planes,  refueling tanker planes, smart bombs, infrared and laser-guided weird weapons  that can zap and vaporize entire city blocks (I’ve been out of the military too  long to even know what the hell these new weapons are), not to mention truly  spooky, virtually omniscient surveillance and communications  technology along with the government’s presumed ability to shut down any  kind of tech networks we might employ.

Real encouraging, isn’t it?

Y’all think we should just stick to trying to vote the bastards  out?  Or am I missing something?

About the author: Donald Joy

 Following his service in the  United State Air Force, Donald Joy earned a  bachelor of science in business administration from SUNY while serving in the  army national guard.  As a special deputy U.S. marshal, Don was on the  protection detail for Attorney General John Ashcroft following the attacks of  9/11.  He lives in the D.C. suburbs of Northern Virginia with his wife and  son.

Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2013/12/americans-actually-dare-revolt-abusive-government/#szlIEYJJDR2m6k4C.99

President Obama accused of LYING about intelligence which he said proved Assad was behind sarin gas attacks in Syria


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2520555/President-Obama-accused-lying-Syrian-intelligence-sarin-gas-attack-award-winning-journalist-Seymour-Hersh.html#ixzz2n742WjZl

  • The Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist  claims the Obama Administration ‘cherry-picked intelligence’ on Syria
  • Hersh, 76, cited  conversations with military officials who spoke of their ‘immense frustration’  with the President
  • Previously he had claimed that the official account of the 2011 raid which  killed Osama Bin Laden as ‘one big lie’
  • He says the US media is too ‘afraid’ to  pick on Obama

By Marie-louise Olson and David Mccormack

PUBLISHED:22:14 EST, 8  December 2013| UPDATED:01:59 EST, 9 December 2013

Seymour Hersh, 76, who had previously  described the official account of the 2011 raid which killed Osama Bin Laden as ‘one big lie,’ claims the current administration ‘cherry-picked intelligence’ on  Syria.

Hersh first gained worldwide recognition in  1969 for exposing the My Lai Massacre and its cover-up during the  Vietnam War,  for which he received the 1970 Pulitzer Prize for  International  Reporting.

cPulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh has  accused President Obama of lying to the American people earlier this year when  he blamed President Bashar al-Assad for a sarin-gas attack that killed hundreds  of Syrian civilians in August

 

'We are not going to lose this vote': Obama has asked Congress to vote to authorize a strike against Syria and Kerry now says the case for an attack has only gotten strongerHersh, 76, cited conversations with military officials  who spoke of their ‘immense frustration’ with the President

 In early September, Secretary of State John  Kerry said the United States had proof that the nerve-gas attack in Syria was  made on Assad’s orders.

‘We know the Assad regime was responsible,’ President Obama told the nation in an address days after this revelation, when  he said he had been pushed over the ‘red line’ to consider military  intervention.

In Sunday’s London Review of Book, Hersh accused the administration of ‘cherry-picked intelligence,’ citing conversations with intelligence and  military officials.

‘A former senior intelligence official told  me that the Obama administration had altered the available information – in  terms of its timing and sequence – to enable the president and his advisers to  make intelligence retrieved days after the attack look as if it had been picked  up and analyzed in real time, as the attack was happening,’ he wrote.

Some 355 people showing 'neurotoxic symptoms' died August 21 after an attack with what the U.S. now says was likely deadly sarin gasSome 355 people showing ‘neurotoxic symptoms’ died  August 21 after the deadly sarin gas attack which U.S. authorities accused  forces loyal to President Assad of carrying out

On an account dubbed 'the official Twitter account for the Presidency of the Syrian,' a picture was posted early Sunday of Assad meeting with the Iranian national security committeePresident Bashar al-Assad repeatedly denied that his  soldiers carried out the sarin-gas attack that killed hundreds of Syrian  civilians in August

According to Hersh, the situation reminded  him of the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident, when President Johnson’s administration  had reversed the sequence of National Security Agency intercepts to justify one  of their early bombings of North Vietnam.

Hersh also said that his contacts spoke of ‘immense frustration inside the military and intelligence bureaucracy’ regarding  the current President.

‘The guys are throwing their hands in the air  and saying, “How can we help this guy [Obama] when he and his cronies in the  White House make up the intelligence as they go along?”’

Hersh also claims that the administration  buried intelligence on the fundamentalist group/rebel group al-Nusra related to  the sarin attacks, plus he repeated his accusation that the U.S. media fails to  properly question what information is given to them by the  government.

A United Nations resolution ultimately  prevented American military intervention, but Hersh believes that the  information he has unveiled is similar to when President George W. Bush  justified his invasion of Iraq with evidence concerning nuclear weapons which  later turned out not to be true.

Deadly nerve agent: John Kerry announced Sunday morning that the U.S. now has evidence that Syria's government used the deadly nerve agent sarin in the August 21 chemical weapon attach outside DamascusIn early September, Secretary of State John Kerry said  the United States had proof that the nerve-gas attack in Syria was made on  Assad’s orders

Journalist Seymour Hersh attends Al Jazeera Forum
Dead or alive? The Saudi-born militant, Osama Bin Laden, was allegedly killed in a raid on his compound in Pakistan

‘Lying’: Hersh says ‘not one word’ of the Obama  administration’s account of the raid that supposedly killed Osama Bin Laden is  true. The government has never released pictures of Bin Laden’s dead body to the  public

‘The cherry-picking was similar to the  process used to justify the Iraq war,’ wrote Hersh.

This isn’t the first time he has  accused  President Obama of lying. In September he said that ‘not one  word’ of the  administration’s narrative on the killing of Osama Binladen was true.

At that time  Hersh also savaged the U.S.  media for failing to challenge the White  House on a whole host of issues, from  NSA spying, to drone attacks, to  aggression against Syria.

He said the Navy Seal raid that supposedly  resulted in the death of the Al-Qaeda terror leader, Hersh said, ‘not one word  of it is true’.

According to Hersh the problem is that the  U.S. media is allowing the Obama administration to get away with  lying.

President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and members of the national security team watch the raid live from the White House's Situation Room on May 1, 2011President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, former  Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and members of the national security team  watch the raid live from the White House’s Situation Room on May 1, 2011

 The compound: The Pakistan home of the al Qaeda leader was in flames after it was attacked by Navy Seals

The compound: The Pakistan home of the al Qaeda leader  was in flames after it was attacked by Navy Seals

 ‘It’s pathetic. They are more than  obsequious, they are afraid to pick on this guy [Obama].’

Hersh said the American press spends ‘so much  more time carrying water for Obama than I ever thought they  would’.

In his opinion, the solution would be to shut  down news networks like NBC and ABC and fire 90 per cent of mainstream editors  and replace them with ‘real’ journalists who are not afraid to speak truth to  power.

‘The republic’s in trouble, we lie about  everything, lying has become the staple,’ he said.

LRB · Seymour M. Hersh · Whose sarin?

Florida Becomes Third State to Pre-File


http://conventionofstates.com/news/florida-becomes-third-state-pre-file

Good news from the Sunshine State!  Florida State Senator Alan Hays (R-Umatilla) filed SM 476 on Friday petitioning Congress to call an Article V Convention of States.

Senator Hays stated, “Everywhere I go, people ask me what can be done to reform Washington, D.C.  This petition to Congress to convene the Article V convention is the first step toward that reform.  This ‘runaway’ Federal government is of great concern to Americans of all political parties and of all the states.”

In filing the legislation, Senator Hays continued, “In their wisdom, our Founders knew the Federal Government might one day become too large and too powerful, so they specifically inserted a mechanism that gives states a lawful and orderly instrument to restrain a runaway federal government;  it’s Article V, Section 2 of the Constitution.”

So far, Florida, Virginia, and South Carolina have officially pre-filed our application in their state legislature.  We have many more representatives interested in sponsoring our application, so be looking for your state as we announce more pre-filings in the next few weeks!

These are huge steps towards calling a Convention of States, and we’re taking them right on schedule!

Want to be a part of the fight? Sign up in our Action Center today!

Please Take Time To Read This and Warn Others


Because this has gone viral, it is safe to assume that others will want their names published as well. If you are going to buy anything of Craig’s List, or any service like it, please be very carefull. Keep in mind what happened here and be wise about who you approach.

Jerry

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

HOOD RATS: Thug brothers kill Dad who tried to buy iPad from  them through Craigslist

By / 10 December  2013

pos1

Brothers Tryon, 19, and Tyshaune Kincade, 18, were formally charged  Monday in the shooting death of Sergent First Class Jim Vester, 32, after  arranging to sell the 12-year military veteran an iPad on Wednesday.

According to phone records released by the police, the Indianapolis  father wanted to buy an iPad from the brothers as a Christmas present for his  parents based off of their Craigslist ad.

At 3:05pm, Vester texted: ‘Can I get your address’. At  3:14pm, the suspects texted him to meet at 920 Wyckford Dr.

Vester arrived at the address at 3:49pm  and texted: ‘are you  here?’ and the suspect quickly replied ‘yes’. Five minutes later Vester was  killed.

Police were able to catch the brothers that evening after tracing phone  records and interviewing witnesses. They arrested 18-year-old Tyshaune Kincade  after pulling him over in a traffic stop.

After searching Tyshaune’s mother’s house ,they were able to figure out  that the text messages sent to Vester’s phone came from 19-year-old Tryon  Kincade’s phone.

Tryon’s number was also the same one used in other robberies in the  area.

The brothers’ next hearing is set for Tuesday.

One of their Facebook pages boasts of going to the school of ‘da thug  life’.

Vester left behind his one-year-old son Gavin and wife Jamie.

In the wake of the senseless murder, nearly 1,500 people have donated  $58,000 to a YouCaring.com fundraiser set up by Vester’s  family for the man described as a ‘great cook, loving father and faithful  man.’

‘He would drop everything and cross town to help you and your family,’ friend Master Sgt. Jerry Wurm said.

Vester was a career military man, with 12 years of service in the  Indiana National Guard, including a year-long tour of duty in Iraq in  2006. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2521168/Teen-brothers-killed-veteran-Jim-Vester-fake-Craigslist-iPad-deal.html#ixzz2n5JUPXcU Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2013/12/hood-rats-thug-brothers-kill-dad-tried-buy-ipad-craigslist/#z6SzXTWLQf73CYqv.99

Christian cleansing continues in Mideast with murder/kidnapping in Syria


http://allenbwest.com/2013/12/christian-cleansing-continues-mideast-murderkidnapping-syria/#xOmU2hvj0FxLHPzW.99

Written by Allen  West on December 8, 2013
syria
 This is a time when those of us who share the Judeo-Christian faith sing  songs of peace and goodwill towards all men. This is also the time — as it seems  it is all the time — when those who follow the theocratic-political totalitarian  intolerant belief of Islam — which means submission — kill those who will not  submit to their form of proselytization, forced conversion.

According to a reports from World  Net Daily,

A Syrian city overrun by the Muslim Brotherhood was the scene of the  execution of three Christian men who refused to convert to Islam. The Catholic  young men were killed by rebels fighting the regime of Bashar al-Assad after  they had taken control of the village of Maaloula.Todd Daniels, a spokesman for  the American human rights group International Christian Concern, said based on  the statement from the Melkite patriarch, these men were martyred because they  refused to recant their faith,” Also, 12 nuns were kidnapped at about the same  time. They were identified as Mother Superior Pelagia Sayyaf and 11 nuns with  her.

International Christian Union President Joseph Hakim said the rebels forced  their way into a monastery to take the nuns hostage. Dutch human rights activist  Martin Janssen said that when fighting broke out in Maaloula, the nuns remained  behind to care for the children in the monastery. The jihadists forced their way  into the monastery and demanded that the 12 nuns had to go if they wanted to  save the lives of the children with them,” Janssen said, and blames the Muslim  Brotherhood.

“The Free Syrian Army is powerless,” he said, noting the Muslim Brotherhood  is starting to take a leading role. “They’ve used the honest Syrian people who  really want democratic rule and used them to open the door,” Hakim said. “The  entire terrorist movement is financed by the Saudi government and the Turkish  government,” Hakim said. “Let’s be honest, how can the rebels have that much  money?”

The violence comes amid U.S. support for the Islamic rebels in Syria, an ill- advised endeavor. Many have alerted the Obama administration that these “rebels” are tied to al-Qaida and have declared their intent to establish Islamic law the  country. It also rekindles the questions about a potential gun-running scheme  out of Libya from the Islamist rebels President Obama supported through Turkey  to the Islamist rebels in Syria.

We know the Obama administration wholeheartedly supported the Muslim  Brotherhood government of Mohammed Morsi in Egypt. Thank God the Egyptian people  and military rose up in defiance to Obama’s Islamist leanings.

However, this episode reminds us again there is no aspect of “coexistence” with Islam and that “when tolerance becomes a one way street it leads to  cultural suicide” along with ritual executions  and beheadings.

Now the chuckleheads at the Council for America Islamic Relations (CAIR) will  see this post and declare that Islam does not believe in any compulsion of  religion. What they will not explain to you is the concept of “nakeesh,” Arabic  for abrogation. That means latter verses in the Koran supersede previous verses.  So later in the Koran and Hadiths, when Mohammed sent a letter to Heraclius,  Emperor of the Byzantine Empire, offering him conversion, subjugation (jizya  tax), or death, that became the modus operandi for all subsequent Islamic  conquests.

We can pretend to live in some type of politically correct fairy tale land or  face the truth. These barbarians follow the standard of someone who is nothing  more than a murderous warlord, psychopath/sociopath, liar, and by modern day  standards, a pedophile. Saying this, the truth, does not make me an Islamophobe,  it makes me someone as Sun Tzu would say, “knows my enemy.”

There is a cleansing occurring of Christians in the Middle East, a region  where Christians have resided for some 2000 years, certainly before Islam was  ever conceived. God welcome the souls of those who refused to surrender their  faith. God protect those nuns. And God help these murderous jihadists because  the day of reckoning is coming — and your progressive socialist apologist  allies, to include President Obama, will not save you from warrior Christians  such as myself.

David Gergen: Report on Obamacare Prep Shows ‘No One in Charge’ of White House


http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/12/08/David-Gergen-GAI-Report-Indictment-of-Obama-White-House-Operation-Bordering-on-Malfeasance

 A veteran Washington adviser who has worked for four Presidents on both sides of the political aisle said that the stunning Government Accountability Report report that found President Barack Obama has not had a one-on-one meeting with Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius since the passage of Obamacare over three years ago is an indictment of the entire White House operation and shows that the Obama administration has bordered on “malfeasance.”

“I have no doubt the White House is right, that Secretary Sebelius was in several group meetings with the president about health care,” Gergen caveated, “but the whole point is, there was nobody in charge in the administration.”

CNN

Appearing on CNN’s Newsroom program Saturday night, David Gergen, a known Washington “fixer” some veteran Washington observers have even suggested that Obama should bring in to help manage the Obamacare rollout crisis, was asked by CNN Anchor Deborah Feyerick about the GAI report.

Feyerick cited a report from “an outfit called the Government Accountability Institute [that] finds the president and HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius held just a single one-on-one meeting after Obamacare was signed into law over three years ago.”

“I don’t think this is simply sloppiness on the part of the White House,” Gergen said. “What seems to me is there’s a case of near malfeasance here.”

Gergen, who has served as Director of Speechwriting for the Nixon White House, Director of Communications for both Presidents Ford and Reagan, and then as a senior advisor to President Bill Clinton, is intimately familiar with how the White House operates. In addition, he normally takes a “neutral” position on most matters and often gives those in power the benefit of doubt.

But Gergen emphasized that the GAI report concerning the lack of meetings between Sebelius and Obama raises troubling issues about about the conduct of affairs in the Obama White House.

Breitbart News Senior Editor-at-Large and Government Accountability Institute President Peter Schweizer unveiled the report on Wednesday on Fox News’s Hannity and Breitbart News.

As Breitbart News has reported, Schweizer said there was no evidence on the White House schedule that showed Obama cared about Obamacare

“In the case of President Obama, if you look at his calendar, there is no evidence whatsoever that he is focused or has much interest in health care at all,” Schweizer said on Hannity on Wednesday.

Feyerick, the CNN host, added that the White House had attacked the report, “Jay Carney [is] saying that the report’s misleading and based on a ridiculously false premise, those are his words david Gergen, what do you think about this?”

Gergen responded by saying the GAI report was a big deal and should not be dismissed. On Friday, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said Obama and Sebelius meet “regularly” but their meetings were not recored on the visitors logs. Schweizer had previously noted that GAI also looked at White House visitor logs and found that whenever Sebelius went to the White House, it was for social functions with “dozens or hundreds of people.” And he noted on Hannity that if Obama met with Sebelius and left the meeting off the books, Sebelius would be the only cabinet secretary whose meetings with the White House were concealed.

 

Gergen faulted the White House for this lack of contact and condemned the whole White House operation.

“The fact that he was not meeting with her one-on-one, I think, frankly, is not so much an indictment of her but of the White House operation,” he said.

Gergen said that “at the same time three years pass with no one-on-one meetings according to this Politico article.  The president had 277 one-on-one meetings with other members of his cabinet.” Gergen referenced Schweizer’s Politico article in which he mentioned that “perhaps the insular White House team wanted to distance the president from the bureaucratic process in the hopes of granting him a halo of deniability if the launch failed.” Schweizer also noted “the lack of meetings reinforces the severity of what the New York Times describes as the ‘deeply dysfunctional relationship between the Department of Health and Human Services and its technology contractors, and tensions between the White House chief of staff and senior health department officials.'”

Feyerick, the CNN host, added, that if health care reform “was so important to the president, you would think that there was a lot more one-on-one interaction especially on something that’s so critical to him and his policy.” Princeton Professor Julian Zelizer, who was also on the panel, did not respond directly to the details of the GAI report, only to say that “we have to be careful because as the White House said, that [report] does come from a conservative organization.”

The Government Accountability Institute, though, is a nonpartisan organization and its mission is to “investigate and expose crony capitalism, misuse of taxpayer monies and other governmental corruption or malfeasance.” GAI, headed by Schweizer, has written several reports in recent years and has been criticized by both the Obama White House and House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH).

I Told You So! I Told You So! I Told You So! I Told You So! I Told You So! I Told You So!


It is happening. Doctors refuse to do business at a loss, and are in fact offended that the State thinks they are worth so little. As I have said many times before; Doctor’s all over California, as well as across America, will start displaying signs that state that they no longer take any form of insurance. BEFORE treatment, you must agree to pay them CASH, and they you can bill your insurance carrier. That will mean you will pay MORE than the ALREADY outrageous deductibles to get treatment.

As was published last week; All of this is NOT a mistake. All of this mess was, and remains, a deliberate hoax by President Obama (I will never show disrespect for anyone holding the sacred title of President of the United States).  He, along with his carefully selected minions, designed this monster of a law to get the American People to rise up in anger about healthcare cost so they can get their original goal of “Single Payer” National Socialized medicine. (See http://www.freemarketcure.com/singlepayermyths.php)

The goal all along has been to destroy the American economy by destroying capitalism. Then the Left can throw out the Constitution and install a Marxist/Socialist/Collectivist government. Please read the following.

Jerry Broussard

Line 3

Doctors Revolting Against Obamacare in California

By / 9 December  2013

California’s largest medical association found in a recent survey that  some 7 out of 10 doctors in California had decided not to participate in the  state’s Obamacare exchange.

Those numbers could play havoc with the state’s attempt at socializing  healthcare. If Californians sign up for Obamacare’s coverage in any great  number, there will be nowhere near enough doctors to cover all of the  patients.

The President of the California Medical Association says that he is “not  surprised” at the amount of doctors revolting against the Obamacare system.

“It doesn’t surprise me that there’s a high rate of  nonparticipation,” “We need some recognition that we’re doing a service to  the community. But we can’t do it for free. And we can’t do it at a loss. No  other business would do that.”

Of course no other business would do that. No businessman in their right mind  would do all of the work entailed in starting a business if they didn’t think  they might make a very good profit.

It’s just not worth it!

doctors are scarceIt’s worth even less for a doctor. Doctors not only  have to run a business, they have to go through years of education and hundreds  of thousands of dollars in debt to start their businesses. Why would they put  themselves through all of that pain and effort if they weren’t assured a nice  profit and the luxuries of financial prosperity?

They wouldn’t.

And other medical professionals are starting to speak out about the problem  as well.

Alex Briscoe, health director for Alameda County Health Care Services Agency  says,

“Enrollment doesn’t mean access, because there aren’t enough doctors to  take the low rates of Medicaid. There aren’t enough primary care physicians,  period.”

Briscoe hopes his eight community health centers can handle the 200,000  uninsured individuals he said reside in his county, but he warned that “there is  a doctor shortage. It is going to get worse as more people enter the  market.”

Briscoe professed not to be surprised by the refusal of doctors to  participate in Covered California. “It rings true. I’ve been kind of wondering  in my head, ‘How are they offering such low premiums?’ ”

Due to its population size and liberal bent, California will probably become  the first state with lines as long as the ones you’d find in Canada or the UK  for healthcare. Good luck getting medical care in California as Obamacare  progresses – it’s going to be tough.

Read more at http://eaglerising.com/3454/doctors-revolting-obamacare-california/#iPhBTgBmYuBcsDVu.99

Supporters Push Obama to Bypass Congress Even More


Congressional Democrats and activists, frustrated with the  gridlock in Washington, are pressing President Barack Obama to bypass Congress  and use his executive authority to achieve progress on a number of top liberal  issues.
According to The  Washington Times, the president has already invoked his powers to change  laws on issues ranging from immigration and healthcare to welfare and education  laws, and supporters want him to go further.
“In light of Republican  obstructionism, it should be no surprise to anyone that the administration is  moving more and more toward executive action,” Jim Manley, a Democratic  strategist, told the Times.
“The problem, however, is you can do a lot  more via the legislative process than you can do through executive orders.”
On healthcare reform, the president has taken a number of unilateral  decisions on the application of the law to meet his political objectives.
For example, he  single-handedly suspended the employer mandate, made a decision that  people could receive subsidies even if they’re not participating in Obamacare’s  state-run health exchanges. He also  decided that states  have the authority to approve existing insurance plans even if they are  not in keeping with the new requirements in the Affordable Care Act.
Obama also made waves when he decided to halt  the deportation of “Dreamers,” or immigrants who were illegally brought  to the U.S. as minors, even though Congress voted against the policy.
Republicans and legal experts have argued that Obama has far overstepped his  authority and run roughshod over the constitutional system.
But  supporters say he should go further.  More than two  dozen House Democrats wrote a letter to Obama saying he should exercise  his authority to give amnesty to all illegal immigrants.
And liberal  lawmakers also are pressing him to use executive authority for measures to  achieve greater income equality.
“The problem with what the president is  doing is that he is not simply posing a danger to the constitutional system; he  is becoming the very danger the Constitution was designed to avoid:  that is,  the concentration of power in any single branch,” Jonathan Turley, law professor  at George Washington University, told the House Judiciary Committee this week,  according to the Times.
“We’ve had the radical expansion of presidential  powers under by President Bush and President Obama,” Turley added.  “We have  what many once called an imperial presidency model of largely unchecked  authority.  And with that trend we also have the continued rise of this fourth  branch.  We have agencies that are now quite large that issue regulations.”
Related Stories:

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com

Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!

C’mon, Admit It: This Column Is Racist


http://clashdaily.com/2013/12/cmon-admit-column-racist/#GXkvzDV5tjACwZMz.99

By / 7 December  2013

new-black-panthers

“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a  nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the  content of their character.” — Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

An NFL player says team owners treat players like slaves. The player,  a Black man, will make $10 million this year. He could not be reached for  clarification. He is touring Africa on a goodwill trip. A little good will goes  a long way.

According to Obama, the Cambridge Police “acted  stupidly” trying to protect a homeowner’s property. When the homeowner showed  up, a Black professor, he turned on the police, refused to obey orders, then  insulted them. Acting strictly according to procedure, they arrested the guy,  but the President said they acted stupidly. Once Obama finally obtained the  facts, he seemed to back down, but never apologized.

According to  the President and his friends, Jeremiah Wright and Louis Farrakhan are heroes,  but George Bush and his kind are criminals. Just ask Percy Sutton, attorney for  Malcolm X, and big Obama cheerleader. Just ask Khalid al-Mansour, mentor to  Black Panthers, Jew hater, Christian hater, so-called professor who encourages  Muslims to attack and maim white people, and big Obama cheerleader, one who  helped Obama get into Harvard, a real boy scout. (Jihadwatch.org, “The  Obama-Mansour Connection.”)

Jesse Jackson calls for war in Madison,  Wisconsin, after fomenting racial tensions in Portland, Oregon last year, but  it’s all about the colors of the rainbow. A black “professor” out  of North Carolina actually says the only solution is killing all white people.  No kidding. (WND.com, “Professor: exterminate the white people,” Oct. 22, 2005)

Al Sharpton says school choice is racist.  Of course. You can’t be allowing people the freedom to use their own tax money  to educate their own children as they see fit. How blatantly un-American can you  be to suggest such a thing? Obviously racist. (The latest in Sharpton shooting  blanks.)

Speaking of Sharpton and Jackson, who could forget a few  years back the Duke University lacrosse players accused of rape and racism and  raked over the coals by the mainstream media for at least a year, only to be  exonerated by DNA evidence in the end? (AmericanThinker.com, “Racism 101 at Duke,” April 12, 2006)

Remember  this gem: Black Panthers standing outside a polling place during  the 2008 presidential election in Philadelphia. One has a truncheon.  Its only purpose is cracking skulls. The Panthers taunt voters. One says: “That’s why you’re gonna be ruled by a black man, Cracka!” (BigGovernment.com, “New Black Panther Party President admits to  Philadelphia voter intimidation,” July 9, 2010).

The Panthers were convicted. Obama’s AG Eric Holder declined to follow  through with the penalty phase. Holder says enforcing the law without regard to  race, his sworn duty, would demean “his people,” in this case, and, he says,  it’s a lie his Justice Department is racially motivated. Really? A  civil rights lawyer weighs in decrying the incident and criticizing Holder and  the Obama administration. He must be a racist. Anyone who highlights the  incident is a racist, a mere political opportunist. (Fox video on YouTube, “Eric Holder Drops Charges on Black Panthers for Voter  Intimidation.”)

  • Notice, the civil rights attorney identifies the  Black Panther Party as a hate organization, so designated by the Anti-Defamation  League and the Southern Poverty Law Center. The Black Panther Party, dating from  the 1960s, has always been a Marxist group promoting violent overthrow of  the U.S. government. Saying so makes you a racist.
  • In the wake of  Katrina a Black singer said, “Bush doesn’t care about black people,” accusing  Bush of being a racist.
  • If you opposed the power of public employee  unions and their unholy alliance with radical leftists using tax revenue to  finance political activism, well, you are obviously a racist according to  Charles Rangel. (TheHill.com, “Rangle Abolishing collective bargaining  akin to slavery,” March 1, 2011)
  • If you want to hold  hearings to determine the threat level posed by radical Islam domestically,  you’re a racist, according to Black legislators weighing in at the hearings  recently.
  • If you suggest government affirmative action housing  programs interfering with the private mortgage industry led to the financial  meltdown, you are a racist.
  • If you suggest universal healthcare is  not a constitutional right: racist.
  • If you think turning a blind  eye toward illegal immigration is not such a great idea: racist.
  • If  you suggest we must reform welfare and entitlement spending if the nation is to  survive: racist.
  • If you don’t swing with the green agenda promoted  by Van Jones: racist.
  • If you suggest affirmative action actually  works against the best interests of Black Americans: racist.
  • Anyone  who levels legitimate criticism of President Obama is a racist.
  • Anyone who hits the streets to protest government spending, waste, fraud and  mismanagement is a racist.
  • Write a column like this: racist.

You know, it is difficult to  extend the hand of friendship when it keeps getting chopped off. Haven’t we learned by now that playing the race card indiscriminately only stirs  up violence and resentment, the exact opposite of what Dr. King would have us do? So then, who is the real racist?

Bonus material: a  real solution from a black man who experienced real slavery, Frederick  Douglass: “I have one great political idea … the best expression of  it I have found in the Bible. It is in substance, ‘Righteousness exalteth a  nation; sin is a reproach to any people’ [Proverbs 14.34]. This constitutes  my politics, the negative and positive of my politics, and the whole of my  politics.”

Parting shot: So-called “progressives” attending a  recent Common Cause event said Justice Clarence Thomas should be “sent back to  the fields”, or should be “strung up.”

Now, now. These were not  racist comments. They weren’t even reported in the MSM. No. These were merely  the statements of frustration uttered by enlightened citizens concerned about  social justice and the plight of all oppressed people. (Christian Hartsock, ‘“Progressive Ralliers Call for Lynching of Clarence Thomas,” YouTube  video, Feb. 2, 2011)

Ask these people about the vicious,  insulting treatment they’ve received, not so much for being black as for being  black and Conservative:

  • Larry Elder
  • Janice Rogers Brown
  • Walter Williams
  • Alphonso Rachel
  • Condoleezza Rice
  • Thomas Sowell
  • Anne  Wortham
  • Ken Blackwell
  • Lt. Col. Allen West
  • Michael Steele
  • Herman  Cain
  • Shelby Steele
  • J.C. Watts
  • Armstrong Williams
  • Star Parker

[From the book, The Cross & the Constitution in the Age of  Incoherence, 2012, Tate Publishing]

Image: Courtesy of:  http://theworstnamesinnews.blogspot.com.br/

About the author: Allan Erickson

 Allan Erickson enjoyed an 11-year career in radio, television and print  journalism as a reporter, talk show host, and operations manager. He then turned  to sales and marketing for a decade. Ten years ago he started his own training  and recruitment company in the Pacific Northwest.  Allan & wife Jodi have  four children and live in California. He is also the author of “The  Cross & the Constitution in the Age of Incoherence,” Tate Publishing,  2012. He is available to speak in churches addressing the topics of faith and  freedom.  To contact him, email:  allanlerickson@gmail.com

Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2013/12/cmon-admit-column-racist/#GXkvzDV5tjACwZMz.99

Congress Fears Out of Control Obama Could Suspend Election Laws


INFOWARS

Anthony Gucciardi Infowars.com December 6, 2013

Video: Congress Fears Out of Control Obama Could Suspend Election Laws

Ignor law

From DHS enacting ‘Constitution-free zones‘, to executive orders taking over all forms of communication authority within the United States — the Obama Administration has already gone far beyond corruption and deception and into an entirely new level of dictatorial control. And now, even leading congressional officials are openly questioning how truly tyrannical Obama’s next move may be.

Always operating with a straight face while trampling all over the Constitution, it seems Obama has no remorse when it comes to going against the people of the United States and its legal system as a whole. We all remember when Obama began issuing calls to attack Syria following a very sketchy chemical attack scenario, only to be met with fierce opposition. Ultimately, we did force Obama to back off amid complete and utter disapproval, but now even high level congressional officials are concerned as to what Obama’s next move will be.

Specifically, Rep. Trey Gowdy from South Carolina has now publicly raised fears that Obama could go ahead and suspend election laws in order to maintain control of the presidency. Gowdy says that since Obama has already decided to overturn the standing law on illegal immigrants, effectively declaring that the law no longer applies to them without any congressional backing, then what is to stop him from failing to enforce election laws? During  a recorded a House Judiciary Committee hearing, Gowdy asked:

“If the president can fail to enforce immigration laws, can the president likewise fail to enforce election laws?”

And he is asking a valid question, though it’s essential to understand that Obama and his administration have already gone above and beyond the already unprecedented levels of tyranny set by the Bush administration with legislation like the Patriot Act. Now, we must understand that Obama is getting away with completely stepping over the Constitution and the overall foundation of the United States — and it’s time we raise that message loud and clear.

This article was posted: Friday, December 6, 2013  at  5:53 am

Why Obamacare is a Fantastic Success


Posted by Wayne Root on October 21, 2013

 

As published at FoxNews.com on 10/21/13

 

By Wayne Allyn Root

 

There are 2 major political parties in America. I’m a member of the naïve, stupid, and cowardly one. I’m a Republican. How stupid is the GOP? They still don’t get it. I told them 5 years ago, 2 books ago, a national bestseller ago (“The Ultimate Obama Survival Guide”), and in hundreds of articles and commentaries, that Obamacare was never meant to help America, or heal the sick, or lower healthcare costs, or lower the debt, or expand the economy.

 

The GOP needs to stop calling Obamacare a “train wreck.” That means it’s a mistake, or accident. That means it’s a gigantic flop, or failure. It’s NOT. This is a brilliant, cynical, and purposeful attempt to damage the U.S. economy, kill jobs, and bring down capitalism. It’s not a failure, it’s Obama’s grand success. It’s not a “train wreck,” Obamacare is a suicide attack. He wants to hurt us, to bring us to our knees, to capitulate- so we agree under duress to accept big government.

 

Obama’s hero and mentor was Saul Alinsky – a radical Marxist intent on destroying capitalism. Alinksky’s stated advice was to call the other guy “a terrorist” to hide your own intensions. To scream that the other guy is “ruining America,” while you are the one actually plotting the destruction of America. To claim again and again…in every sentence of every speech…that you are “saving the middle class,” while you are busy wiping out the middle class.

 

The GOP is so stupid they can’t see it. There are no mistakes here. This is a planned purposeful attack. The tell-tale sign isn’t the disastrous start to Obamacare. Or the devastating effect the new taxes are having on the economy. Or the death of full-time jobs. Or the overwhelming debt. Or the dramatic increases in health insurance rates. Or the 70% of doctors now thinking of retiring- bringing on a healthcare crisis of unimaginable proportions.Forget all that.

 

The real sign that this is a purposeful attack upon capitalism is how many Obama administration members and Democratic Congressmen are openly calling Tea Party Republicans and anyone who wants to stop Obamacare “terrorists.” There’s the clue. Even the clueless GOP should be able to see that. They are calling the reasonable people…the patriots…the people who believe in the Constitution…the people who believe exactly what the Founding Fathers believed…the people who want to take power away from corrupt politicians who have put America $17 trillion in debt…terrorists?

 

That’s because they are Saul Alinsky-ing the GOP. The people trying to purposely hurt America, capitalism and the middle class…are calling the patriots by a terrible name to fool, confuse and distract the public.

 

Obamacare is a raving, rollicking, fantastic success. Stop calling it a failure. Here is what it was created to do. It is succeeding on all counts.

 

#1) Obamacare was intended to bring about the Marxist dream- redistribution of wealth:

 

Rich people, small business owners, and the middle class are being robbed, so that the money can be redistributed to poor people (who vote Democrat). Think about it. If you’re rich or middle class, you now have to pay for your own healthcare costs (at much higher rates) AND 40 million other people’s costs too (through massive tax increases). So you’re stuck paying for both bills. You are left broke. Brilliant.

 

#2) Obamacare was intended to wipe out the middle class and make them dependent on government:

 

Think about it. Even Obama’s IRS predicts that health insurance for a typical American family by 2016 will be $20,000 per year. But how would middle class Americans pay that bill and have anything left for food or housing or living? People that make $40K, or $50K, or $60K can’t possibly hope to spend $20K on health insurance without becoming homeless. Bingo. That’s how you make middle class people dependent on government. That’s how you make everyone addicted to government checks. Brilliant.

 

#3) As a bonus, Obamacare is intended to kill every decent paying job in the economy, creating only crummy, crappy part-time jobs:

 

Why? Just to make sure the middle class is trapped, with no way out. Just to make sure no one has the $20,000 per year to pay for health insurance, thereby guaranteeing they become wards of the state. Brilliant.

 

#4) Obamacare is intended to bankrupt small business, and therefore starve donations to the GOP:

 

Think about it. Do you know a small business owner? I know hundreds of them. Their rates are being doubled, tripled and quadrupled by Obamacare. Guess who writes 75% of the checks to Republican candidates and conservative causes? Small business. Even if a small business owner manages to survive, he or she certainly can’t write a big check to the GOP anymore. Money is the “mother’s milk” of politics. Without donations, a political party ceases to exist. Bingo. That’s the point of Obamacare. Obama is bankrupting his political opposition and drying up donations to the GOP. Brilliant.

 

#5) Obamacare is intended to make the IRS all-powerful:

 

It adds thousands of new IRS agents. It puts the IRS in charge of overseeing 15% of the U.S. economy. The IRS has the right because of Obamacare to snoop into every aspect of your life, to go into your bank accounts, to fine you, to frighten you, to intimidate you. And Obama and his socialist cabal have access to your deepest medical secrets. By law your doctor has to ask your sexual history. That information is now in the hands of Obama and the IRS to blackmail GOP candidates into either not running, or supporting bigger government, or leaking the info and ruining your campaign. Or have you forgotten the IRS harassed, intimidated and persecuted critics of Obama and conservative groups? Now Obama hands the IRS even more power. Big Brother rules our lives. Brilliant.

 

#6) Obamacare is intended to unionize 15 million healthcare workers:

 

That produces $15 billion in new union dues. That money goes to fund Democratic candidates and socialist causes- thereby guaranteeing Obama’s friends never lose another election, and Obama’s policies keep ruining capitalism and bankrupting business owners long after he’s out of office.

 

Message to the GOP: This isn’t a game. This isn’t tidily-winks. This is a serious, purposeful attempt to highjack America and destroy capitalism. This isn’t a train wreck. It’s purposeful suicide. It’s not failing, it’s working exactly according to plan. Obama knows what he’s doing. Stop apologizing and start fighting.

 

Oh and one more thing…Conservatives aren’t “terrorists.” We are patriots and saviors. We represent the Constitution and the Founding Fathers. We are the heroes and good guys. Unless you get all this through your thick skulls, America is lost…forever.

 

 

IT’S THE JEW’S FAULT: Councilwoman-Elect Blames ‘Knockout Game’ on Fear of Jews


http://clashdaily.com/2013/12/jews-fault-councilwoman-elect-blames-knockout-game-fear-jews/#RAjsWFB0uG42GUOb.99

By Sonja Sharp / 5 December  2013

knockoutjewsCROWN HEIGHTS — The alleged “knockout” attacks on Jewish residents of  Crown Heights may stem from ongoing racial tension between the  neighborhood’s black and Jewish communities, a newly-elected Brooklyn politician  said.

Councilwoman-elect Laurie Cumbo, who was elected to represent Crown Heights  starting in January, released an open letter Tuesday saying that many of her  black constituents told her they feel threatened by the growth of the  neighborhood’s Jewish community — and she fears the tension could be spiking the recent  violence.

“Many African American/Caribbean residents expressed a genuine concern that  as the Jewish community continues to grow, they would be pushed out by their  Jewish landlords or by Jewish families looking to purchase homes,” Cumbo  wrote in the 1,200-word letter, which was emailed to supporters and posted on  her Facebook  page.

“I respect and appreciate the Jewish community’s family values and unity that  has led to strong political, economic and cultural gains. While I personally  regard this level of tenacity, I also recognize that for others, the  accomplishments of the Jewish community triggers feelings of resentment, and a  sense that Jewish success is not also their success.”

Read more: dnainfo.com

House Judiciary versus the imperial President


http://www.humanevents.com/2013/12/05/house-judiciary-versus-the-imperial-president/

House Judiciary versus the imperial President

By: John Hayward  12/5/2013 09:42 AM

Fox News relates some stern criticism of our imperial President from this week’s House Judiciary Committee hearings:

Committee Chairman Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., says the president, “doesn’t have a debate in the Oval Office about what he wants to do,” adding, “he does what he wants to do, and then you no longer have representative democracy.”

George Washington University law professor and Obama supporter Jonathan Turley says he’s troubled by the expansion of executive power under both President George W. Bush and now President Obama.

“The problem of what the president is doing is that he is not simply posing a danger to the constitutional system; he is becoming the very danger the Constitution was designed to avoid: that is, the concentration of power in any single branch,” he said.

Rep. Goodlatte, who called the hearings, appeared on Fox News with Megyn Kelly to discuss them afterward:

Meygan

The unitary executive had his defenders, too:

Article II of the U.S. Constitution calls on the president to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed.” Simon Lazarus, Senior Counsel for the Constitutional Accountability Center, says that’s exactly what President Obama is doing by modifying the ACA so that the law can be successfully implemented.

Lazarus also testified before the committee.

“I have to say that hyperventilating about how extraordinary and unprecedented and unconstitutional these delays are is just that, it’s hyperventilation and it’s contrary to obvious historical fact,” Lazarus said.

That’s an absurd rationalization, if not downright creepy.  Presidents have unlimited power to violate the law in order make sure it’s “faithfully executed?”  We had to break the law in order to preserve it. We had to burn the village in order to save it.

What Lazarus presumably means is that the President can do whatever it takes to ensure the “spirit” of a law succeeds, or that it meets its true “goals”… as defined unilaterally by him.  Goodbye, separation of powers, checks and balances, Constitutional order, and all the rest of those antique notions from the pre-totalitarian era.  The way it works now is, Congress agrees that something wonderful should happen, and the dictator-President makes sure it does.  If you don’t like it, you can vote him out of office in four years.  Or take it out on his designated successor, in the case of a lame duck like Barack Obama.

Though experts testifying before the committee mentioned impeachment as the ultimate check on executive power, Republicans on the committee gave the idea no real consideration – given that the Senate is controlled by Democrats. They also expressed frustration that under current legal precedent it is virtually impossible for members to sue the executive branch.

The experts seemed unified in expressing to the committee that the one viable solution “comes down to elections.”

What elections?  The whole point of the imperial Presidency, and the dissolution of the Republic, is that congressional elections don’t really matter all that much.  The lesson of the recent government shutdown is that the House of Representatives is almost entirely symbolic – it has little real power now.  Control of the House means you get to hold hearings where experts say it’s a pity the House doesn’t have its enumerated powers any more.

The Senate still  has some real power, but you might have noticed that the current Democrat majority has been busy stripping the minority of influence, using the very same maneuvers Democrats denounced as unspeakable offenses to the Constitution and the spirit of 1776 when they were the minority, in opposition to a Republican president.  At this point, in all but a few respects, a President whose party commands 51 Senate seats holds virtually unlimited power, except for a few instances – certain to be far more common if Republicans hold the White House and Senate – where strong bipartisan opposition to the President takes shape.

It cannot be said enough that Americans would be absolutely foolish to accept a single presidential vote every four years as an adequate check on power.  Obviously the framers of the Constitution didn’t think that was good enough.  Too many modern voters have squandered their legacy of limited government because they view the President as the one official “everybody” votes for, so the unitary executive who can supersede or disregard Congress seems reasonable to them… when it’s a Democrat, of course.  It seems quaintly amusing today, but liberals were very upset by George Bush’s allegedly unitary powers, back in the day.  Their arguments make for hilarious comedy reading in light of the dizzying imperial powers asserted by Barack Obama, with virtually no objections from the people who thought Bush was pushing the boundaries of his office.

We hear a lot of talk about “consensus” and the “will of the people” these days.  Not to be overly alarmist, but you will search history in vain for the record of a single tyrant who did not claim to be exercising the will of the people.  In the modern American context, it’s foolish to accept the assertion by Obama defenders that a single presidential election expresses “the will of the people” for four years, with opposition becoming tantamount to “sabotage” or “treason.”  There isn’t much that a huge, diverse country full of independent people reaches a true “consensus” on.  The rough and tumble of congressional debate, complete with all its “stalemate” and “gridlock,” is a more accurate reflection of our national debate about important issues.  If we have a Congress that doesn’t get things done, maybe that’s because there aren’t a lot of things we agree, on a national scale, that we want the federal government to do.  Elections are not supposed to be punitive exercises against benevolent dictators who didn’t satisfy 51 percent of the electorate.

What Obama has done, particularly with respect to ObamaCare, goes far beyond exercising executive discretion to hammer out a few dents in an otherwise sound, faithfully executed law.  He keeps doing things he has absolutely no statutory authority to do, and rarely even bothers to argue to the contrary.  His “argument” always boils down to “I think it’s the right thing to do, and I don’t want to argue with Congress about it.”

But “arguing with Congress” is a vital component of the American system.  To put it bluntly, if the President’s big brainstorm only works when he can rewrite the law on the fly, his program is garbage that is utterly incompatible with the American system of government.  No representative of any party, in either chamber, should vote for a “law” that only “works” if the President can violate it at will.  (Or, in the case of Obama’s largely forgotten insurance cancellation “fix” from a few weeks ago, invite other people to violate it, and promise not to prosecute them for a year.)

That’s not a law.  It’s an assertion of raw power.  There is a difference.  American government is supposed to be about law, not power.  Laws bind those who pass them.  Laws bind the government, as well as the people.  There are plenty of reasonable mechanisms for modifying or repealing laws that don’t work as planned.  Even the Constitution has an amendment process, which has been used many times.

But following those processes dilutes the power of a dictatorial President and power-hungry party, because it means the opposition party gets to weigh in and extract concessions.  Obviously the petulant Obama doesn’t want that.  He wasn’t about to submit his proposed delay of the ObamaCare mandate to Congress for proper debate and ratification, so he did what the American system expressly forbids, and made unilateral, arbitrary changes to the law for nakedly political reasons.  If the Affordable Care Act actually was “faithfully executed” as written, with the employer mandate kicking in on schedule, the ACA would most likely have been repealed by now, with a veto-overriding bipartisan majority driven by public outrage.

And that’s the way it should be.  Presidents and congressional representatives should be afraid to pass laws that could blow up in their faces.  They should be afraid of suffering from their hubris and arrogance.  If there’s one thing America desperately needs right now, it’s humble government.

But we’re not going to get humble government any time soon, because as the House Judiciary hearings illustrate, there’s really nothing anyone can do about the imperial presidency at the moment.  The ugly political genius of Barack Obama involved calling every bluff in the American system, which long ago degenerated past the point where any serious penalties awaited the aspiring dictator.  In a real sense, that business about “elections” being the remedy for abuse of power means the media is the only real remaining check against presidential power.  If the media doesn’t repeatedly tell people to get angry about something, and keep them good and riled all the way through an election, there’s no price to pay.  Obama correctly judged he would never have to face that kind of press coverage.

The polite understandings and gentlemen’s agreements from previous years were swept aside like so many cobwebs by Obama, to replaced by a simple implied challenge: What are you gonna do about it, impeach me?  He knows the answer is “no,” so he does as he pleases, with just enough restraint to keep his media allies from growing queasy.  That’s not how America is supposed to work, and it’s no surprise that the results have been dismaying.

Update: Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) made some of these points during an interview with Fusion TV:

Cruz

(Hat tip: Washington Examiner.)   Cruz makes an interesting point about dictatorship: it can exist without Castro-style imprisonment of dissidents.  Dictators are always interested in suppressing dissent, but there are many less brutal ways of achieving that goal.  The dangers of centralized power are not eliminated because it wears velvet gloves.  It increasingly seems that Obama apologists make the argument that he’s not a dictator almost entirely based on the absence of gulags, as though any seizure of power that doesn’t involve tossing dissidents into concentration camps is acceptable.  And it’s not as if this President has been shy about using the power of government to punish dissident Americans, and their political organizations,  in a variety of interesting ways…

Obamacare Debate on FOX NEWS Sunday with Chris Wallace


Chris Wallace

Liberals talk race and crime – and hilarity ensues!


Ann Coulter Letter

http://www.humanevents.com/2013/12/04/liberals-talk-race-and-crime-and-hilarity-ensues/

Liberals talk race and crime - and hilarity ensues!

By: Ann Coulter  12/4/2013 06:32 PM

On a break from pretending to believe they live in a country bristling with violent white racists, the Non-Fox Media have been trying to debunk stories about the “Knockout Game,” in which young black males approach random strangers and try to knock them out with one punch.

 

The left’s leading line of defense against the Knockout Game is to argue that young black males have always been violent, so, hey, this is nothing new.

You’re welcome, black America!

In Slate, Emma Roller wearily recounted other episodes of black-on-white violence in order to announce: “The ‘Knockout Game’ is a myth.”

Reminiscing about the flash mobs that shook many parts of the country a few years ago, Roller wrote: “I remember the summer of 2011, a story about a crowd of (black) teenagers at the Wisconsin State Fair randomly attacking fairgoers went viral as a sign of a burgeoning race war.”

So you see, stupid right-wingers, young black males have always been violent, so what’s the big deal about the Knockout Game? Your honor, my client’s not a killer; he’s a serial killer.

MSNBC’s Chris Hayes reached for a different example of monstrous black-on-white violence in order to dispute that the Knockout Game is anything new.

Looking like a translator for the deaf with all the air quotes he had to make for “supposed” “trend” and “Knockout Game,” Hayes compared it to what he called the fake trend of “wilding” after a mob of black youths violently attacked and raped a white woman jogging in New York’s Central Park in 1989. According to Hayes, “there never was such a thing” as wilding.

Whether the boys who were convicted of the crime did it or, as liberals now claim, a man already sentenced to life in prison did it, the Central Park jogger was brutally raped and nearly murdered by either one or several young black men. (They all did it — see Chapter 13 of my book “Demonic.”)

The following year, 1990, blacks committed 57 percent of all the violent crime against whites, while whites committed only 2 percent of the violent crime against blacks, according to the Department of Justice’s annual Victimization Report.Thanks for the memories, Chris!Oh, and contrary to Hayes’ proclamation, black men raping white women is something of a “trend” — at least according to FBI crime statistics. At least since 1997 (I got bored and stopped looking any farther back) blacks have raped several thousand white women every year, while white-on-black rapes have numbered between “0.0″ and “Sample based on 10 or fewer.” (See Chapter 11 of “Mugged.”) 

In a particularly incomprehensible defense of black America in Mediaite, Tommy Christopher denounced the “sketchy” news reports of “the so-called ‘Knockout Game’” by citing the video of a group of black teenagers walking past teacher Jim Addlespurger, when one of the black teens steps from the group and knocks the teacher out cold, and then they all laugh about the assault as they continue walking.

But Christopher helpfully notes that a cop said this “was just a random act of violence.” So don’t worry about the Knockout Game, white people — this is mostly just ordinary, everyday black-on-white violence.

Flash mobs, wilding, day-to-day black violence — talk about damning with faint praise!

Liberals have to work so hard to avoid noticing the astronomical crime rate among young black males that their brains freeze.

Roller attributed public interest in a story about mobs of young black males attacking families at a state fair to white people’s need to validate their “fear” that black people are dangerous. (Milwaukeeans hardly even notice when mobs of whites surround their families at a state fair, punch them, kick them and smash their cars, while shouting racial slurs.)

But Roller implied that blacks engaging in violence is wildly unusual: “When a few YouTube videos are able to convince terrified white folks that young black people are dangerous, they may as well assume that all cats can play the keyboard.”

Is a disproportionate amount of keyboard playing in the country being done by cats?

According to the FBI, between 1976 and 2005, blacks, who are about 12 percent of the population, committed 53 percent of all felony murders and 56 percent of non-felony murders. The Centers for Disease Control recently reported that young black men are 14 times more likely to commit murder than young white men.

White liberals know this. Blacks certainly know it. Despite the hoo-ha over George Zimmerman shooting Trayvon Martin, most black people’s experience is not that white vigilantes are shooting them. For every one of those, there are 1,000 black teens killing other black people.

But if liberals took the first step toward sanity and admitted that young black men commit an awful lot of violent crime, they might have to ask why that is.

That’s a dangerous question for people who refuse to acknowledge the devastation of fatherless boys caused by liberal welfare policies. (See Chapter 6 of “Never Trust a Liberal Over 3″ to see how the British welfare system has created the same social disaster among hordes of white people.)

Unable to consider the obvious explanation — single-motherhood — liberals are left with nothing but genetic determinism.

So liberals defend young black males from the charge of playing a Knockout Game by telling us young black men are always violent.

Don’t worry, black America. White liberals have your back.

Image

A Hearing You Have Heard Nothing About


Executive Powers

Harvard: Students turn on Obama, want him recalled, reject Obamacare


http://washingtonexaminer.com/article/2540139

By PAUL BEDARD | DECEMBER 4, 2013 AT 1:12 PM

 The Obama thrill is gone among America’s millennials aged 18-29 just a year after they helped the president win a second term.

A new and shocking poll from Harvard University’s Institute of Politics released Wednesday found that younger Americans are so disgusted with President Obama, Congress and the troubled Obamacare system that 47 percent support recalling the president and just 29 percent are planning to sign up for health insurance.

“A critical factor in the election and reelection of Barack Obama, America’s 18- to 29- year-olds now rate the president’s job performance closer to that of Congress — and at the lowest level since he took office in 2009,” said Harvard Institute of Politics Director Trey Grayson.

How bad is it? Obama’s approval rating among millennials, many with big college loans and no job, is just 41 percent. Even young blacks are tiring of the president, with his approval rating among African-Americans dropping from 84 percent seven months ago to 75 percent today.

Harvard’s poll is especially troubling for Obamacare, which needs millions of younger Americans involved for it to succeed financially. The poll found that 57 disapprove of Obamacare and that there is little interest in signing up.

Worse, by a margin of more than two-to-one, 44 percent of millennials believe that the quality of their care will get worse under the Affordable Care Act and 50 percent believe their cost of care will increase.

“Young Americans aren’t daft, they know a bad deal when they see one and that is why they are abandoning the president and no amount of spin can change the facts that just like MySpace, Millennials are over Obama,” said Raffi Williams, deputy press secretary at the Republican National Committee.

On the issue of recalling the president and Congress, 52 would recall all members of Congress and 47 percent would junk the president, though a nearly-equal 46 percent would not recall him.

Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner’s “Washington Secrets” columnist, can be contacted at pbedard@washingtonexaminer.com.

Author: Paul Bedard

Tag Cloud