Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Written by Allen  West on December 16, 2013

ptsd_soldier_640As you probably know by now, I’m a combat veteran who gave 22 years of my  life in service to our great Republic and deployed to two combat zones:  Operation Desert Shield/Storm and Operation Iraqi Freedom.

I followed the example of my dad, who served in World War II, and my older  brother in Vietnam, and now my nephew has heeded that call to service, already  earning trips into the combat zone of Afghanistan. He will be promoted to Major  in January.

I’m also a “veteran” of Congress and I was absolutely appalled at the House  of Representatives’ passage of the Budget Act of 2013 legislation last Thursday.  Here is why.

As we reported last  week and the Washington Times Josh Hicks reports today,

“The budget agreement crafted by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and Sen. Patty  Murray (D-Wash.) would reduce cost-of-living adjustments for working-age  military retirees by 1 percent starting in December 2015. The existing rate  would apply again when former service members reach age 62.”

I sure hope to stay healthy and get to 62. But once trust is broken I doubt  it can be restored. As Hicks writes,

“The provision is projected to save $6 billion, but the Veterans of Foreign  Wars estimated it would mean $80,000 less by age 62 for a typical enlisted  person who retires at age 40.”

Saving $6 billion on the backs of those who have been willing to make the  last full measure of devotion to their country seems minuscule and imbecilic in  concept. Six billion dollars represents  .017 percent of the current budget – now divide that by ten years. It is idiotic.

Although this has passed the House, it is running into problems in the US  Senate, with Sens. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Roger  Wicker (R-Miss.) saying they cannot support it.

The Washington Times reports:

Armed forces advocates spoke out against the reduction last week, saying it  could affect retention for the military. “Currently serving members look at how  they, their families, retirees and survivors have been treated when making  career choices,” said Vice Adm. Norb Ryan, president of the Military Officers  Association of America. VFW National Commander William Thien added: ”The last  thing our nation can afford is a mass exodus of mid-career enlisted and officers  because they no longer feel welcome or in control of their military careers.”

Every veteran and anyone who feels this is a miscarriage of justice should  send this quote from George Washington to every Member of the House of  Representatives who voted “Yea” on this budget legislation and to every Senator,  –especially those on Armed Services Committee:

“The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war,  no matter how justified, shall be directly proportional to how they perceive  veterans of early wars were treated and appreciated by our nation.”

I find it unconscionable that this was buried in the “deal” created by  Senator Murray and Representative Paul Ryan. I am almost certain most of those  who voted “Yea” in the House did not even read the legislation.

I certainly shall not, and I pray you will not, “embrace the suck” as so  aptly put by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi. I for one am sick of the “pass  the bill in order to find out what is in it” mentality.

"Thank You" for taking the time to comment. I appreciate your time and input.

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: