Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘Racist’

Today’s THREE Politically INCORRECT Cartoons by A.F. Branco


A.F. Branco Cartoon – See BS News

A.F. BRANCO on May 1, 2021 | https://comicallyincorrect.com/a-f-branco-cartoon-see-bs-news/

CBS 60 Minutes caught deceptively editing their story to make Ron DeSantis look guilty of pay-to-play.

Ron De Santis on CBS 60 Minutes

Political cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2021

A.F. Branco Cartoon – Target Practice

A.F. BRANCO on May 2, 2021 | https://comicallyincorrect.com/a-f-branco-cartoon-target-practice/

Target CEO Brian Cornell is putting a target on itself by surrendering to the very groups burning down their stores.

Target Store Promotes More Riots

Political cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2021.

A.F. Branco Cartoon – Cry Uncle

A.F. BRANCO on May 3, 2021 | https://comicallyincorrect.com/a-f-branco-cartoon-cry-uncle/

Tim Scott is ridiculed by the left and the media for his response address to the nation – called Uncle Tim.

Tim Scott Response

Political cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2021.

Donations/Tips accepted and appreciated – $1.00 –  $5.00 –  $25.00 – $50.00 – $100 –  it all helps to fund this website and keep the cartoons coming. Also Venmo @AFBranco – THANK YOU!

A.F. Branco has taken his two greatest passions, (art and politics) and translated them into the cartoons that have been popular all over the country, in various news outlets including “Fox News”, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, and “The Washington Post.” He has been recognized by such personalities as Dinesh D’Souza, James Woods, Sarah Palin, Larry Elder, Lars Larson, Rush Limbaugh, and shared by President Donald Trump.

Today’s TWO Politically INCORRECT Cartoons by A.F. Branco


A.F. Branco Cartoon – Sleep Walz-ing

Governor Tim Walz sleeping while Minneapolis burns out of control out of the George Floyd protest.

Sleep Walz-ingPolitical cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2020.

A.F. Branco Cartoon – Law and Disorder

Democrats claim that Trump’s push for law and order is racist while they continue to fuel the anger.

Trump Law and OrderPolitical cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2020.
Donations/Tips accepted and appreciated –  $1.00 –  $25.00 – $50.00 – $100 –  it all helps to fund this website and keep the cartoons coming. – THANK YOU!

A.F. Branco has taken his two greatest passions, (art and politics) and translated them into the cartoons that have been popular all over the country, in various news outlets including “Fox News”, MSNBC, CBS, ABC and “The Washington Post.” He has been recognized by such personalities as Dinesh D’Souza, James Woods, Sarah Palin, Larry Elder, Lars Larson, Rush Limbaugh, and has had his toons tweeted by President Trump.

Today’s TWO Politically INCORRECT Cartoons by A.F. Branco


A.F. Branco Cartoon – Creeping Up

At the moment Joe Biden is the Democrat presidential frontrunner but Warren is creeping up on him.

Warren Creeping Up on BidenPolitical cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2019.

A.F. Branco Cartoon – The Three R’s

The mainstream media, the propaganda arm of the Democrat party, keep throwing fake news stories like Russia collusion, Trump’s a racist, and now recession as a way hurt Trumps 2020 campaign.

Russia, Racist, and RecessionPolitical cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2019.
More A.F. Branco Cartoons at The Daily Torch.

Branco’s Faux Children’s Book “APOCALI” ORDER  HERE

Donations/Tips accepted and appreciated –  $1.00 – $5.00 – $10 – $100 –  it all helps to fund this website and keep the cartoons coming. – THANK YOU!

take our poll – story continues below
  • Will Joe Biden’s speaking gaffes negatively affect his run for President?

A.F. Branco has taken his two greatest passions, (art and politics) and translated them into the cartoons that have been popular all over the country, in various news outlets including “Fox News”, MSNBC, CBS, ABC and “The Washington Post.” He has been recognized by such personalities as Dinesh D’Souza, James Woods, Sarah Palin, Larry Elder, Lars Larson, the great El Rushbo, and has had his toons tweeted by President Trump.

THREE Politically INCORRECT Cartoons from A.F. Branco


A.F. Branco Cartoon – Movin’ On Up

Some say thing are so bad in Elijah Cummings District most of them would rather live in a detention center at the southern border.

Baltimore 7th Dist CummingsPolitical Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2019.

A.F. Branco Cartoon – Operation Defensive Shield

Democrats call their opponents racist in order to shield their disastrous policies such as Detroit, Baltimore, and other intercity issues they’ve caused across the country from the public.

Democrats Use Racist as CoverPolitical cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2019.

A.F. Branco Cartoon – Ghost of Al’s Past

Joe Scarborough can attest to Al Sharpton’s years of despicable racist comments when back in March 2000 presenting HR 270 condemning him.

Al Sharpton RacistPolitical cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2019.
More A.F. Branco Cartoons at The Daily Torch.

Branco’s Faux Children’s Book “APOCALI” ORDER  HERE

Donations/Tips accepted and appreciated –  $1.00 – $5.00 – $10 – $100 –  it all helps to fund this website and keep the cartoons coming. – THANK YOU!

A.F. Branco has taken his two greatest passions, (art and politics) and translated them into the cartoons that have been popular all over the country, in various news outlets including “Fox News”, MSNBC, CBS, ABC and “The Washington Post.” He has been recognized by such personalities as Dinesh D’Souza, James Woods, Sarah Palin, Larry Elder, Lars Larson, the great El Rushbo, and has had his toons tweeted by President Trump.

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon by A.F. Branco


Black Coffee Matters

Starbucks Coffee, accused of racism, is shutting down 8000 stores for employee bias training. Can you say overreaction?

Starbucks RacismPolitical Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2018.

Black Racist Trump Haters Calling for White Genocide


waving flagAuthored By Dave Jolly February 16, 2017

toronto black lives matter

Imagine what would happen if a conservative organization went public with a cry for black genocide? What if they warned white people that dating or associating with black Americans was wrong and would not be tolerated? What if those declarations were made at a public event in front of hundreds of people?

Every black activist would be screaming racism and hate crime. Every liberal Democrat would be calling for legal action based on racial discrimination, hate language and inciting public violence. The liberal mainstream media would be all over it like flies on a pile of dead fish. Everyone would be in a huge uproar.

Yet when a black American says the same things about white people, it’s not considered wrong. It’s not racist. It’s not a hate crime. The liberal mainstream media would be in full support.war-on-whites

Welcome to today’s America. It’s ironic that the same liberals who would promote the rights of black Americans to call for the genocide of all whites are the same ones who preach ‘social justice’, when in fact they only want preferential treatment and privileges for the far left over normal conservative Americans.

In today’s America, it’s perfectly acceptable to blaspheme against God, Jesus, the Bible and Christianity, but dare say anything against Islam and you’re instantly labeled to be a hater, a racist, a bigot and an Islamophobe. You can say anything you want against traditional marriage and abstinence, but dare anything against homosexuality, including how God says it’s a sin in the Bible, and you’re once again labeled a hater, a racist and a homophobe.free speech def

Teachers can stand up in front of a classroom of kids and trash talk God, Jesus, Christianity, America, patriotism, traditional moral values, parental rights, white history and anything else that helped shape America and made it great and nothing happens to them. Let one teacher even suggest evolution is questionable and they are reassigned or fired. Let a teacher say anything against Islam, black history or gay rights and wow, the proverbial manure hits the fan.

An entire classroom can complain about a teacher speaking out against many of the good things in America and nothing happens to the teacher, but let one student complain about a teacher promoting the good things about America and American history and again, everything hits the fan.

So, what should be done when black activist leaders stand up and threaten other blacks if they date a white person? What should happen if black activist leaders call for the complete genocide of white people?

In a report from the Toronto Sun:

“A co-founder of Black Lives Matter Toronto argued that white people are ‘recessive genetic defects’ and purportedly mused about how the race could be ‘wiped out,’ according to a post on what appears to be her Facebook page…”

“Khogali has a track record of inflammatory, divisive rhetoric.”

“Only last week during a protest in front of the US consulate Khogali shouted into a microphone ‘Justin Trudeau is a white supremacist terrorist’ and urged the crowd to ‘rise up and fight back’.”

“‘Look at us, we have the numbers,’ she said.”

“She also faced controversy in the news for a tweet posted a year ago stating: ‘Plz Allah give me strength to not cuss/kill these men and white folks out here today’.”

“While these remarks alarmed many Canadians, they pale in comparison to a statement numerous sources forwarded to the Sun that Khogali appears to have posted on Facebook in late 2015.”

“‘Whiteness is not humxness (HUMANNESS; she doesn’t have spell check),’ the statement begins. ‘infact, white skin is sub-humxn.’ The post goes on to present a genetics-based argument centered on melanin and enzyme.”

“‘White ppl are recessive genetic defects. this is factual,’ the post reads towards the end. ‘white ppl need white supremacy as a mechanism to protect their survival as a people because all they can do is produce themselves. black ppl simply through their dominant genes can literally wipe out the white race if we had the power to’.”Leftist monster race

Don’t think this is just happening across the border in Canada, but similar sentiments have been expressed by a number of black activists here in America ever since Barack Obama moved into the White House. They feel that having a dark-skinned leader empowers them to come out into the open with their racial hatred toward whites and they have.

Thanks to Obama’s fueling the fires of racial hatred in America over the past eight years, there is a growing tension in America and Canada that could soon erupt into violence and bloodshed. The saddest part of it all is that we are all ONE race. Some have different skin, hair and eye color but we are all ONE race – the HUMAN race. Yet so many are ready to attack and kill each other over these insignificant differences.

After what’s been seen over the past decade, one hates to think what’s around the corner in all of our futures.Civil Race Both

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Dave Jolly

R.L. David Jolly holds a B.S. in Wildlife Biology and an M.S. in Biology – Population Genetics. He has worked in a number of fields, giving him a broad perspective on life, business, economics and politics. He is a very conservative Christian, husband, father and grandfather who cares deeply for his Savior, family and the future of our troubled nation.

More Political INCORRECTNESS from Michael Ramirez


waving flagDrawn by Michael Ramirez – Wednesday, July 20, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://townhall.com/political-cartoons/michaelramirez/

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Instigator in Chief Leftist monster race When tolerance becomes a one way street fight Picture1 true battle In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Ann Coulter Letter: Stunning New Development!!! Media Calls Trump Racist


waving flagCommentary by  Ann Coulter | 

Stunning New Development!!! Media Calls Trump Racist

Annoyed at federal judge Gonzalo P. Curiel’s persistent rulings against him in the Trump University case (brought by a law firm that has paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for speeches by Bill and Hillary), Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump said that maybe it’s because the judge is a second-generation Mexican immigrant.

The entire media — and most of the GOP — have spent 10 months telling us that Mexicans in the United States are going to HATE Trump for saying he’ll build a wall. Now they’re outraged that Trump thinks one Mexican hates him for saying he’ll build a wall.

Curiel has distributed scholarships to illegal aliens.

He belongs to an organization that sends lawyers to the border to ensure that no illegal aliens’ “human rights” are violated.

The name of the organization? The San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association — “La Raza” meaning THE RACE.

Let’s pause to imagine the nomination hearings for a white male who belonged to any organization for white people — much less one with the words “THE RACE” in its title.

The media were going to call Trump a racist whatever he did, and his attack on a Hispanic judge is way better than when they said it was racist for Republicans to talk about Obama’s golfing.

Has anyone ever complained about the ethnicity of white judges or white juries? I’ve done some research and it turns out … THAT’S ALL WE’VE HEARD FOR THE PAST 40 YEARS. The New York Times alone has published hundreds of articles, editorials, op-eds, movie reviews, sports articles and crossword puzzles darkly invoking “white judges” and “all-white” juries, as if that is ipso facto proof of racist justice.

Two weeks ago–that’s not an error; I didn’t mean to type “decades” and it came out “weeks” — the Times published an op-ed by a federal appeals judge stating: “All-white juries risk undermining the perception of justice in minority communities, even if a mixed-race jury would have reached the same verdict or imposed the same sentence.” In other words, even when provably not unfair, white jurors create the “perception” of unfairness solely by virtue of the color of their skin.

Innocence Project co-founder Barry Scheck’s entire career of springing criminals would be gone if it were generally accepted that we can’t question judges or juries based on race or ethnicity. Writing about the release of Glenn Ford, a black man convicted of robbing a jewelry store and murdering the owner, Scheck claimed that one of the most important factors in Ford’s death sentence was the “all-white jury.” On the other hand, the evidence against Ford included: His two black friends telling police he’d shown them jewelry the day of the murder, another Ford acquaintance swearing he’d had a .38 in his waistband — the murder weapon was a .38 — and the gunshot residue on Ford’s hand. His conviction was overturned many years later, on the theory that his black friends had committed the murder, then framed him.

So we know

1) the “real killers” were also black; and

2) any jury would have convicted Ford on that evidence.

Here’s how the Times described Ford’s trial: “A black man convicted of murder by an all-white jury in Louisiana in 1984 and sentenced to die, tapped into an equally old and painful vein of race.”Leftist Propagandist

I have approximately 1 million more examples of the media going mental about a “white judge” or “all-white jury,” and guess what? In none of them were any of the white people involved members of organizations dedicated to promoting white people, called “THE RACE.”

Say, does anyone remember if it ever came up that the Ferguson police force was all white? Someone check that.

I don’t want to upset you New York Times editorial board, but perhaps we should revisit the results of the Nuremberg trials. Those were presided over by – TRIGGER WARNING! – “all white” juries. (How do we really know if Hermann Göring was guilty without hearing women’s and Latino voices?)

The model of a fair jury was the O.J. trial. Nine blacks, one Hispanic and two whites, who had made up their minds before the lawyers’ opening statements. (For my younger readers: O.J. was guilty; the jury acquitted him after 20 seconds of deliberation.) At the end of the trial, one juror gave O.J. the black power salute. Nothing to see here. It was Mark Fuhrman’s fault!

In defiance of everyday experience, known facts and common sense, we are all required to publicly endorse the left’s religious belief that whites are always racist, but women and minorities are incapable of any form of bias. If you say otherwise, well, that’s “textbook racism,” according to Paul Ryan.

At least when we’re talking about American blacks, there’s a history of white racism, so the double standard is not so enraging. What did we ever do to Mexicans? Note to Hispanics, Muslims, women, immigrants and gays: You’re not black.

Other than a few right-wingers, no one denounced now-sitting Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor for her “wise Latina” speech, in which she said “our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging.”

But Trump is a “racist” for saying the same thing.

Six months ago, a Times editorial demanded that the Republican Senate confirm Obama judicial nominee Luis Felipe Restrepo, on the grounds that “[a]s a Hispanic,” Restrepo would bring “ethnic … diversity to the court.” You see how confusing this is. On one hand, it’s vital that we have more women and Latinos on the courts because white men can’t be trusted to be fair. But to suggest that women and Latinos could ever be unfair in the way that white men can, well, that’s “racist.”

The effrontery of this double standard is so blinding, that the only way liberals can bluff their way through it is with indignation. DO I HEAR YOU RIGHT? ARE YOU SAYING A JUDGE’S ETHNICITY COULD INFLUENCE HIS DECISIONS? (Please, please, please don’t bring up everything we’ve said about white judges and juries for the past four decades.)

They’re betting they can intimidate Republicans — and boy, are they right!

The entire Republican Brain Trust has joined the media in their denunciations of Trump for his crazy idea that anyone other than white men can be biased. That’s right, Wolf, I don’t have any common sense. Would it help if the GOP donated to Hillary?

The NeverTrump crowd is going to get a real workout if they plan to do this every week between now and the election.

What do Republicans think they’re getting out of this appeasement? Proving to voters that elected Republicans are pathetic, impotent media suck-ups is, surprisingly, not hurting Trump.

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Detroit Newspaper Puts Pro-Terror Imam On Front Page To Protest Islamophobia


waving flagBy

detroit imam

The liberal media is apoplectic over White America and Donald Trump. Trump’s a racist, Republicans are Islamophobes and the entire country is a wellspring of bigotry and hatred. Right? Right?

So to prove this point, The Detroit Free Press ran a front-page editorial (right above a story about a robot butler, FrontPageMag points out) condemning Donald Trump, his followers and anyone concerned about Radical Islam and terrorism.

detroit free press full cover

One huge problem: Their photo accompanying the article is of a known terrorist sympathizer.

Is there a worse picture to put with this story? Maybe bin Laden?

Imam Husham Al-Husayni tells his fellow Muslims to “get ready for holy jihad.” He has refused to denounce the terrorist group Hezbollah and celebrates the murder of Jews.

Not exactly the kind of person you want as a poster child for tolerance.

Here’s some of the DFP’s bloviating:

Americans who support the real estate magnate turned reality television star turned ersatz politician either bestow approval on the candidate precisely because of his disdain for immigrants, Hispanics and Muslims — or because it just doesn’t bother them that much.

Contrast Trump’s statements to President Barack Obama’s Sunday night address from the Oval Office:

“Muslim Americans are our friends and our neighbors, our coworkers, our sports heroes — and, yes, they are our men and women in uniform who are willing to die in defense of our country. We have to remember that.”

And so: We stand with San Bernardino. We stand with Paris. We stand with Beirut. We stand with Syrian refugees, seeking a safer life in our country, still a beacon of democracy and freedom, despite Trump’s efforts to the contrary. We stand with the Christians, Muslims, Jews, atheists, Hindus, Buddhists and all others who make up our community.

We stand with America.

Mr. Trump, with whom do you stand?

definetly Islam is NOT In God We Trust freedom combo 2

The battle to erase history moves to New Orleans


waving flagPosted at 8:31 am on August 15, 2015 by Jazz Shaw

Did you really think they were going to stop with the Confederate Battle Flag?

Forget flags, kids. Now we’re going to tear down statues. And we’re not talking about statues which popped up during the civil rights movement in the sixties here… these are more than a century old. There are four statues at the St. Charles Avenue circle in New Orleans which are now going to be torn down if activists have their way. (I was stationed there in the early 70s and have been by the circle many times. It’s a beautiful display.) But Bobby Jindal is trying to figure out if there’s a way to stop it.

As a committee of city government called Thursday for taking down four controversial statues that celebrate Confederate officials and a white supremacist group’s violent fight against a biracial state government during Reconstruction, Gov. Bobby Jindal’s office said it is looking into whether he can use the power of his office to keep the monuments in place.

The monuments, including the statue of Gen. Robert E. Lee atop the column at a St. Charles Avenue traffic circle, should be taken down under an ordinance that allows the City Council to remove public statues that celebrate racist ideologies or are likely to be sites of violent protest, the Historic District Landmarks Commission decided after about an hour of sometimes heated testimony.

The HDLC’s recommendation, approved by an 11-1 vote, now heads to the City Council. Later Thursday, the Human Relations Commission held a similar hearing on the fate of the monuments and was expected to issue its own recommendation.Delusional Mental Illness Gibberish

New Orleans apparently has a law on the books which allows the Historic District Landmarks Commission to ban landmarks and displays which, cause of deathcelebrate racist ideologies or are likely to be sites of violent protest.” That’s a pretty convenient way to design a law if you happen to be in the Social Justice business because all you need to do is stage one or two violent protests and pretty much anything you choose can meet the criteria. The removal of the monuments is expected to cost more than a million dollars. Can Jindal step in and stop the process? That seems to be a big question mark since it’s a matter of local jurisdiction. Don’t be terribly surprised if the activists are successful and hand the bill for the deconstruction to the taxpayers, though.Social Justice

Social Justice Definition

CNN was interviewing some folks on both sides of the question this morning and found several who were also calling for the removal of the fleur de lis from flags and public displays as well. This was has been knocking around ever since the Confederate Battle Flag question was raised and the Daily Caller covered it over a month ago.

“As an African I find it painful, and I think people whose ancestors were enslaved here may feel it even harder than I do as an African,” said slave historian Dr. Ibrahima Seck to WWLTV.

He connects the usage of the fleur de lis, to “code noir,” or black code, which was adopted in Louisiana in 1724, and used to govern to state’s slave population.Mob Rule

So now the fleur is racist? (Apparently everything from the 1860s and before is racist, so… yes.) That’s going to be an interesting battle for the SJW to take up, since the fleur was specific to the previously French held territories and had nothing to do with the civil war in any measurable fashion. It also shows up all over the state and would have to be removed from the helmets of the New Orleans Saints, among many, many other places.

People seeking attention and having too much time on their hands can get up to all manner of mischief and that seems to be the case here. But that doesn’t mean it’s not going to work. It’s the Social Justice Warriors’ world now and you’re just living in it.

In God We Trust freedom combo 2

University of Memphis professor: ‘Whiteness is most certainly and inevitably terror’


– The Washington Times – Tuesday, June 30, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/30/zandria-robinson-univ-of-memphis-professor-whitene/#ixzz3egRYy8mw

Zandria Robinson, an assistant professor of sociology at the University of Memphis, is under fire for a number of tweets in which she blasts "whiteness" and even equates it with terrorism. (Twitter/@zfelice)
Zandria Robinson, an assistant professor of sociology at the University of Memphis, is under fire for a number of tweets in which she blasts “whiteness” and even equates it with terrorism. (Twitter/@zfelice) more > Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jun/30/zandria-robinson-univ-of-memphis-professor-whitene/#ixzz3egS0N6Ov Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

Zandria Robinson, an assistant professor of sociology at the University of Memphis, has parted ways with the university after she came under fire for a number of tweets in which she blasts “whiteness” and even equates it with terrorism.

By Tuesday evening, Ms. Robinson’s Twitter account was set to private and her faculty page was deleted from the University of Memphis website.

Zandria Robinson is no longer employed by the University of Memphis,” the university tweeted Tuesday.

The professor first raised ire when she wrote Wednesday to her 2,820 followers that the Confederate flag is “more than a symbol of white racial superiority. It is the ultimate symbol of white heteropatriarchal capitalism.”

“The flag thus is a direct symbol of race, class, gender, & sexuality oppression. We need a more nuanced intersectional reading of the thing,” Ms. Robinsonadded. “This isn’t to say that the American flag does not represent such things, but the confederate flag only represents those things for whites.

“I’ve been working w teens this summer & it has been a surreal experience talking to them (& the 12-yr-old at home) about being under attack,” she tweeted Friday. “Like, this is a daily part of our lives. We don’t accept it. We *don’t*. But we alive now. We push back. We write. We laugh. We twerk. Hard.

“Whiteness is most certainly and inevitably terror,” she added.More Evidence

Ms. Robinson also retweeted a message that stated: “[W]hite supremacy lives with or without the confederate flag. [Expletive] the USA flag stands for the same thing as the confederate flag.”

“White folks think that if they are nice to you they are above a critique of whiteness, white supremacy, or structural racism. #cueviolins,” Ms. Robinsonwrote Monday.

“I’m not racist. I have a white friend,” she joked after Twitter users accused her of racism.hell

Ms. Robinson describes herself on her Twitter profile as a “Dirty South black feminist sociologist,” “Some babies’ mama,” and “Negressdamus.”

Campus Reform reports that the assistant professor threatened in a Facebook post earlier this year that she would “come for” any white student who believed black students were given preferential treatment when applying to graduate schools. She has since removed public access to her Facebook account.

The professor said earlier this month that she expects “death and rape threats” because, “those are the ultimate expressions of love from conservative whites these day.”

More Evidence freedom combo 2

AL SHARPTON WANTS TO BAN THIS MEME: So Let’s Share the Hell Out of It


waving flagPosted on July 1, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://clashdaily.com/2015/07/al-sharpton-wants-to-ban-this-meme-so-lets-share-the-hell-out-of-it

sharptonflag

Al Sharpton will never own up to this one fact – but nothing has ever been truer.

freedom combo 2

Liberal Colleges Persecuting Conservatives AGAIN


Eagel Rising Banner

http://eaglerising.com/5033/liberal-colleges-persecuting-conservatives/#GFy4BLCKa5oVof1f.99

By / 8 March 2014

 It is becoming commonplace for colleges and universities to persecute and marginalize conservatives – but the most recent example shows how outrageous the behavior of leftist colleges is becoming.

Rutgers University in New Jersey had invited former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to be their commencement speaker for the 2014 graduation ceremonies. Apparently, for the faculty at Rutgers, this is reason for protest.

Seriously.

The faculty at Rutgers has decided that Ms. Rice is not “qualified” to speak at the commencement of their students. They said she, “lacks “moral authority.” She fails to meet the standards of “exemplary citizenship” and she does not have what it takes to “inspire” graduating college seniors.”

Ridiculous.

This is what our liberal colleges have come to–where no one with conservative beliefs and values has a place among the halls of higher education.

Juan Williams from Fox News is noticing a trend out there –

“There is an added element at play here. There is a disgraceful double standard amongst liberals, particularly those in academia, in the hatred they direct at black conservatives.

We saw this last April when the conservative neurosurgeon Dr. Ben Carson was forced to step down as a Commencement Speaker for Johns Hopkins University (where he ably served as the head of pediatric neurosurgery).

Liberals on the Hopkins campus mobilized against Carson because he criticized President Obama’s health care reform law and said that he opposed gay marriage.

I am not a conservative but I have spoken out for years against the staggering amount blind hatred directed at black conservatives by liberals.

Liberals are shockingly quick to demean and dismiss brilliant black people like Rice, Carson, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, U.S. Senator Tim Scott (R-SC), Professor Walter E. Williams and economist Thomas Sowell because they don’t fit into the role they have carved out for a black person in America.

Black Americans must be obedient liberals on all things or risk being called a race traitor or an Uncle Tom.”

It’s good to see Juan Williams defending conservatives – but its meaningless until more liberals begin speaking out against the injustice that is bred by leftist intolerance.

About the author: Onan Coca

Onan is a graduate of Liberty University (2003) and earned his M.Ed. at Western Governors University in 2012. Onan lives in the Atlanta area with his wife, Leah. They have three children and enjoy the hectic pace of life in a young family. Onan and Leah are members of the Journey Church in Hiram, GA.

Website: http://www.eaglerising.com

The Democratic Party’s Dirty Secret


INFOWARS

INFOWARS.COM

March 8, 2014
Updated with a new video below.

030814democrat

Jon Bowne investigates the mass amnesia associated with the indisputable connection between the Ku Klux Klan and the Democratic Party as well as its long history of murder, torture and voting coercion (MUST SEE and SHARE):

KKK

And Alex explains how the Democrats’ history ties into their current race-based, divide and conquer platform:

Dems

Yet the mainstream media is always trying to bury these obvious connections.

For example, shortly after the death of Democratic Senator Robert Byrd in 2010, Daily Caller contributor Mike Riggs pointed out the mainstream media’s whitewash of Byrd’s former ties to the Ku Klux Klan:

Deceased U.S. Sen. Robert Byrd will be remembered by lots of things: His love for dogs and hyperbole, his ability to funnel federal dollars into make-work jobs in his native West Virginia, his loathing of balanced budgets and the fact that he skillfully conned several generations of Appalachian woodhicks into voting for him, over and over again, for almost six decades.

In passing, Sen. Byrd will also be remembered for having joined the Ku Klux Klan as a “young man.”

A quick check of this morning’s obituaries reveal that in the eyes of the traditional media, Byrd the Progressive Porker is much more important than Bob the Exalted Cyclops.

Byrd joined the Klan at the ripe young age of 24 — hardly a young’un by today’s standards, much less those of 1944, when Byrd refused to join the military because he might have to serve alongside “race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds,” according to a letter Byrd wrote to Sen. Theodore Bilbo at the height of World War II.

Today’s obituaries, however, made little mention of Byrd’s once-deeply held hatred for African Americans.

For your reading pleasure, a collection of obituary snow jobs:

From the 11th paragraph of the LA Times’ Byrd obituary: “Byrd was not always a champion of liberal causes. He had come of age as a member of the Ku Klux Klan and cast a “no” vote on the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 that prohibited discrimination against African Americans and others. He later renounced his actions in both cases and called his membership in the KKK ‘the worst mistake of my life.’”

ABC News noted that “despite his successful political track record, the Senate’s senior Democrat was no stranger to controversy and was once a member of the Ku Klux Klan,” as if calling for the extermination of dark-skinned peoples (as well as Jews, Catholics, and gays) was no more stirring a gaffe than Gary Hart’s monkey business.

MSNBC.com reported that “Byrd’s success on the national stage came despite a complicated history on racial matters. As a young man, we was a member of the Ku Klux Klan for a brief period, and he joined Southern Democrats in an unsuccessful filibuster against the landmark 1964 Civil Rights.” (The Ku Klux Klan no doubt objects to being called complicated, and has held since Day 1 one that there is nothing wishy-washy about castrations, lynchings or burning folks alive.)

CNN also gave Byrd a pass on his association with the early 20th-century homegrown terrorist movement, writing in the 20th paragraph of Byrd’s obituary that “He blamed ‘that Southern atmosphere in which I grew up, with all of its prejudices and its feelings,’ for his opposition to equal rights, which included joining the [domestic terrorist outfit] Ku Klux Klan in the 1940s.”

This article was posted: Saturday, March 8, 2014 at 8:58 am

Common Core Curriculum, Written by Two Islamic Extremeist, Being Taught to Your Fourth Grade Child


THIS IS BEING TAUGHT TO FOURTH GRADE CHILDREN BY SCHOOLS USING Common Core Curriculum.

ONE MORE TIME.

THIS IS BEING TAUGHT TO FOURTH GRADE CHILDREN BY SCHOOLS USING Common Core Curriculum.

If you are not shocked into investigating your local schools to see if they are teaching this mess, than shame on you.

Jerry Broussard

<><><><><><><><><><><><>

Sex and Lies in Current TN School Textbooks

http://victoriajackson.com/10406/list-lies-current-tn-school-textbooks#HZmDjECa8kF8Bsm8.99

Posted by on  February 19, 2014 at 1:17 am

Go to TextbookAdvocates.com for this information.

The current textbooks being used in public schools today, that your children are reading, memorizing and being tested on, are inaccurate, revisionist, anti-American, racist, climate change propaganda based on fake science, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, pro-Islam, Marxist, globalist, pro-Socialism/Communism, pro-homosexuality, pro-abortion, and sexually explicit. Below is a list of examples and… who wrote the Pearson Publishing textbooks, that TN schools are now using. (Related story, as of Dec. 2013, Pearson Foundation fined millions for violating laws. Story here.)

During August of 2013, scores of TN volunteers reviewed the 72 books on the State textbook list – 39% were declared acceptable for TN classrooms, 12% need major revisions to meet acceptable standards, many more need minor fixes.

Conclusion: “There is a mind-numbing degree of indoctrination (def: teach a person or group to accept a set of beliefs uncritically) and (inappropriate sexual references/diagrams) found in the proposed textbooks.”

Here is a book called “It’s Perfectly Normal” on the 4th grade reading list. Below are photos I took from the book that a teacher of 30 years shared with me. Parents are not aware that this book is on the approved reading list for 4th grade classrooms.

This page teaches how to use a condom.

Book Cover

Cartoon Pictures of Different Types of Naked Bodies

Homosexuality is Normal propaganda

No discussion of adoption in lieu of abortion

What male sex organs look like

How to Masturbate

Pornographic excerpt from book "Dreaming in Cuban"

Back of book

EXAMPLE OF TEXTBOOK LIES and PROPAGANDA:

1. According to McGraw Hill, 9-12 AP, “American Democracy Now”) America is a Democracy not a Constitutional Republic.

Truth: Mrs. Eliza Powell asked Ben Franklin in 1787, as he left the Constitutional Convention, “What have you given us?” He replied, ”A Republic if you can keep it.” From federal to local governments, every decision made by lawmakers must comply with our Constitution. Not so with a democracy. (A lynch mob is a democracy). In a democracy, whatever the majority decides the minority must endure. Our constitution is designed to protect the minority and the individual. There is not a full explanation of the Constitution in this textbook, but a lot of art work saying we are a Democracy.

2. According to Pearson Education 9-12,”What Should Governments Do?” The Purpose of Government is:

  • “Maintain a national defense,”
    • Truth: yes, that’s in the Constitution,
  • “Provide public goods and services”
    • Truth: uh, that’s limited in the Constitution,
  • “Preserve order…when people protest in large numbers government may resort to extreme measures to restore order.”
    • Truth: Not constitutional until laws are broken
  • “Socialize the Young.”
    • Truth: ??!!!! This is the beginning of State Controlled Children i.e. Castro, Hitler – it’s completely unconstitutional. Who do you want “socializing” your child?
  • “Collect Taxes.”
    • Truth: They do that too well!

3. According to MacGruder’s American Government and Civics, Pearson Ed. 9-12, “What is Government?” The Government is not “by the people, of the people, and for the people,” but “the institution through which a society makes and enforces its public policies. Government is made up of those people who exercise it’s powers, all those who have authority and control over people.” (What?! The textbook continues,) “The public policies of a government are, inshore, all of those things a government decides to do….the list of public policy issues handled by government is nearly endless.”

(That’s an oligarchy, not America!)

4. According to MacGruder’s American Government and Civics, Pearson Ed. 9-12, “the Soviet Union controlled Eastern Europe for four decades. But by the late 1980s the Soviet Union had severe economic problems and a new leader, Mikhail Gorbachev, was making reforms…By 1989 Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland and Romania ended Communist control of their governments and held free elections…”

The truth that was omitted is that there were 56 to 62 million “unnatural deaths” for the USSR overall, with 34 to 49 million under Stalin, Dyadkin, I.G. (Demograficheskaya statistic neyestestvennoy smertnosti v SSSR 1918-1956). Also omitted is that at the war’s end, the Soviet Union adopted a “plunder policy” of physically transporting and relocating east European industrial assets to the Soviet Union. Also omitted is the fact that no experiments in communism/socialism have ever succeeded. China is offered up as an example of success but Mao was responsible for over 70 million deaths. (Historians Jung Chang and Jon Halliday)

5. According to “American Government and Politics Today” Houghton, Miffli, Harcourt, 9-12, “…African Americans…feel a sense of injustice…and this feeling is often not apparent to, or appreciated by, the majority of white America.” What?! Uh, that sounds racist against white people…

According to the above textbook, “The president addressed racial profiling in ways no previous president could when one of the nation’s pre-eminent scholars was arrested…in his own home…

Truth: Police were doing their job protecting a home that appeared to be in the process of a burglary. President Obama said on National TV, “the police acted stupidly.”

6. According to “Psychology in Everday Life” Bedford, Freeman and Worth, “Under the guise of preventing voter fraud, a number of states have adopted laws likely to suppress the vote. Nine states now require government issued photo identification.”

Truth: That first sentence reveals the author’s bias. Fact: An illegal vote cancels your vote. That equals the disenfranchisement of the legal voter. A photo ID is required to board a plane, cash checks, rent anything, obtain a library card, join the YMCA, etc.

7. According to “American Government and Civics” Macgruders Page 758 says, “The number of families on welfare has plunged since the mid-1900s”

Truth: There was a 32% increase in welfare spending from 2009 to 2012 alone! Congressional Research Service

8. According to above textbook, page 10, “But what is justice?” The term is difficult to define for justice is a concept, an idea, an invention of the human mind. Like other concepts such as truth, liberty, fairness and justice means what people want it to mean.”

Truth: (that last ‘and’ is grammatically incorrect but in the quote) Moral virtues are natural law. The natural law our founding fathers spoke of. In a civilized world, … “It is the doctrine of objective value, the belief that certain attitudes are really true, others really false…” C.S. Lewis from The Abolition of Man.

Moral virtues must be learned, therefore they must be taught. With no 10 Commandments, and the teaching of secular humanism, there are no absolutes, therefore, any behavior is permissible.

9. According to Ancient World History, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, “JESUS’ DEATH Jesus’ growing popularity concerned Roman leaders…The Roman governor Pontius Pilate accused Jesus of defying the Authority of Rome. Pilate arrested Jesus and sentenced him to be crucified.”

Truth: John 19:4 Pilate said, “I find no basis for a charge against him – You take him and crucify him, as for me I find no basis for a charge against him…From then on, Pilate tried to set Jesus free…”

10. According to “My World History and Geography, Early Civilization thru Renaissance” Houghton Mifflin Harcourt:

  • The number of units on Islam 1

  • The number of units on Christianity 0

  • The number of units on Judaism 0

  • The number of chapters on Islam 5

  • The number of chapters on Christianity 0

  • The number of references to Muslims 219

  • The number of references to Christians 42

  • The number of references to Jews 26

  • The number of references to Muhammad 180

  • The number of references to Jesus 102

You can see the rest of the examples at the Textbook Tattler at the website TextbookAdvocates.com.

Guess who wrote these biased Pearson textbooks? “Pearson hired Shabbir Mansuri, and Susan Douglass (a convert to Islam) to review and consult on the material being written for textbooks. One problem is that both of these individuals are associated with the Council for Islamic Education, a front for the Muslim Brotherhood in America.” Story here.

Talk about bias! Check this out. From a textbook, authored by Karen K. Kirst-Ashman, that was allegedly assigned reading for a University of South Carolina three-credit course titled, “Introduction to Social Work Profession and Social Welfare.”

C’mon, Admit It: This Column Is Racist


http://clashdaily.com/2013/12/cmon-admit-column-racist/#GXkvzDV5tjACwZMz.99

By / 7 December  2013

new-black-panthers

“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a  nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the  content of their character.” — Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

An NFL player says team owners treat players like slaves. The player,  a Black man, will make $10 million this year. He could not be reached for  clarification. He is touring Africa on a goodwill trip. A little good will goes  a long way.

According to Obama, the Cambridge Police “acted  stupidly” trying to protect a homeowner’s property. When the homeowner showed  up, a Black professor, he turned on the police, refused to obey orders, then  insulted them. Acting strictly according to procedure, they arrested the guy,  but the President said they acted stupidly. Once Obama finally obtained the  facts, he seemed to back down, but never apologized.

According to  the President and his friends, Jeremiah Wright and Louis Farrakhan are heroes,  but George Bush and his kind are criminals. Just ask Percy Sutton, attorney for  Malcolm X, and big Obama cheerleader. Just ask Khalid al-Mansour, mentor to  Black Panthers, Jew hater, Christian hater, so-called professor who encourages  Muslims to attack and maim white people, and big Obama cheerleader, one who  helped Obama get into Harvard, a real boy scout. (Jihadwatch.org, “The  Obama-Mansour Connection.”)

Jesse Jackson calls for war in Madison,  Wisconsin, after fomenting racial tensions in Portland, Oregon last year, but  it’s all about the colors of the rainbow. A black “professor” out  of North Carolina actually says the only solution is killing all white people.  No kidding. (WND.com, “Professor: exterminate the white people,” Oct. 22, 2005)

Al Sharpton says school choice is racist.  Of course. You can’t be allowing people the freedom to use their own tax money  to educate their own children as they see fit. How blatantly un-American can you  be to suggest such a thing? Obviously racist. (The latest in Sharpton shooting  blanks.)

Speaking of Sharpton and Jackson, who could forget a few  years back the Duke University lacrosse players accused of rape and racism and  raked over the coals by the mainstream media for at least a year, only to be  exonerated by DNA evidence in the end? (AmericanThinker.com, “Racism 101 at Duke,” April 12, 2006)

Remember  this gem: Black Panthers standing outside a polling place during  the 2008 presidential election in Philadelphia. One has a truncheon.  Its only purpose is cracking skulls. The Panthers taunt voters. One says: “That’s why you’re gonna be ruled by a black man, Cracka!” (BigGovernment.com, “New Black Panther Party President admits to  Philadelphia voter intimidation,” July 9, 2010).

The Panthers were convicted. Obama’s AG Eric Holder declined to follow  through with the penalty phase. Holder says enforcing the law without regard to  race, his sworn duty, would demean “his people,” in this case, and, he says,  it’s a lie his Justice Department is racially motivated. Really? A  civil rights lawyer weighs in decrying the incident and criticizing Holder and  the Obama administration. He must be a racist. Anyone who highlights the  incident is a racist, a mere political opportunist. (Fox video on YouTube, “Eric Holder Drops Charges on Black Panthers for Voter  Intimidation.”)

  • Notice, the civil rights attorney identifies the  Black Panther Party as a hate organization, so designated by the Anti-Defamation  League and the Southern Poverty Law Center. The Black Panther Party, dating from  the 1960s, has always been a Marxist group promoting violent overthrow of  the U.S. government. Saying so makes you a racist.
  • In the wake of  Katrina a Black singer said, “Bush doesn’t care about black people,” accusing  Bush of being a racist.
  • If you opposed the power of public employee  unions and their unholy alliance with radical leftists using tax revenue to  finance political activism, well, you are obviously a racist according to  Charles Rangel. (TheHill.com, “Rangle Abolishing collective bargaining  akin to slavery,” March 1, 2011)
  • If you want to hold  hearings to determine the threat level posed by radical Islam domestically,  you’re a racist, according to Black legislators weighing in at the hearings  recently.
  • If you suggest government affirmative action housing  programs interfering with the private mortgage industry led to the financial  meltdown, you are a racist.
  • If you suggest universal healthcare is  not a constitutional right: racist.
  • If you think turning a blind  eye toward illegal immigration is not such a great idea: racist.
  • If  you suggest we must reform welfare and entitlement spending if the nation is to  survive: racist.
  • If you don’t swing with the green agenda promoted  by Van Jones: racist.
  • If you suggest affirmative action actually  works against the best interests of Black Americans: racist.
  • Anyone  who levels legitimate criticism of President Obama is a racist.
  • Anyone who hits the streets to protest government spending, waste, fraud and  mismanagement is a racist.
  • Write a column like this: racist.

You know, it is difficult to  extend the hand of friendship when it keeps getting chopped off. Haven’t we learned by now that playing the race card indiscriminately only stirs  up violence and resentment, the exact opposite of what Dr. King would have us do? So then, who is the real racist?

Bonus material: a  real solution from a black man who experienced real slavery, Frederick  Douglass: “I have one great political idea … the best expression of  it I have found in the Bible. It is in substance, ‘Righteousness exalteth a  nation; sin is a reproach to any people’ [Proverbs 14.34]. This constitutes  my politics, the negative and positive of my politics, and the whole of my  politics.”

Parting shot: So-called “progressives” attending a  recent Common Cause event said Justice Clarence Thomas should be “sent back to  the fields”, or should be “strung up.”

Now, now. These were not  racist comments. They weren’t even reported in the MSM. No. These were merely  the statements of frustration uttered by enlightened citizens concerned about  social justice and the plight of all oppressed people. (Christian Hartsock, ‘“Progressive Ralliers Call for Lynching of Clarence Thomas,” YouTube  video, Feb. 2, 2011)

Ask these people about the vicious,  insulting treatment they’ve received, not so much for being black as for being  black and Conservative:

  • Larry Elder
  • Janice Rogers Brown
  • Walter Williams
  • Alphonso Rachel
  • Condoleezza Rice
  • Thomas Sowell
  • Anne  Wortham
  • Ken Blackwell
  • Lt. Col. Allen West
  • Michael Steele
  • Herman  Cain
  • Shelby Steele
  • J.C. Watts
  • Armstrong Williams
  • Star Parker

[From the book, The Cross & the Constitution in the Age of  Incoherence, 2012, Tate Publishing]

Image: Courtesy of:  http://theworstnamesinnews.blogspot.com.br/

About the author: Allan Erickson

 Allan Erickson enjoyed an 11-year career in radio, television and print  journalism as a reporter, talk show host, and operations manager. He then turned  to sales and marketing for a decade. Ten years ago he started his own training  and recruitment company in the Pacific Northwest.  Allan & wife Jodi have  four children and live in California. He is also the author of “The  Cross & the Constitution in the Age of Incoherence,” Tate Publishing,  2012. He is available to speak in churches addressing the topics of faith and  freedom.  To contact him, email:  allanlerickson@gmail.com

Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2013/12/cmon-admit-column-racist/#GXkvzDV5tjACwZMz.99

The Radical Racist Background of Michelle Obama


http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/the-radical-racist-background-of-michelle-obama-were-not-talking-about-barack/

 

I did some background checking into Michelle Obama and her links with socialists, communists and other high ranking radicals that wish nothing more than to destroy the United States as it is, and create a brand new United States! This may sound absurd and demeaning, but it is true. Some of the words spoken by Michelle Obama and her husband Barack Obama have come directly from a radical book titled Rules for Radicals by Saul D. Alinsky.

I’ll expose Alinsky’s background in future articles, but before we go too far, let us just start with Michelle Obama’s college days, since to find her high school history seems to be quite difficult.

Michelle Obama’s maiden name was Michelle LaVaughn Robinson, and she was born on January 17, 1964. She married Barack Hussein Obama in 1992.

According to FrontPageMagazine reporter Jacob Laksin, “In a [February 2008] interview with Newsweek, [Michelle] Obama reveals that she got into Princeton …not on the strength of her grades, which she admits were unexceptional, but thanks to her brother Craig, a star athlete and gifted student who preceded her to the school. As a ‘legacy’ candidate and a beneficiary of affirmative action, Michelle Obama was granted an opportunity that others more accomplished were denied.”

The First lady got her college education due to her brother and her ethnicity, not her excellence in academics. So why is she such a radical racist woman? It must come from somewhere in her background. Perhaps her parents were the ones who led her to this road of turmoil about racial prejudice. Let us take a brief look to see just what she was doing at Princeton while she was there and what types of people she had as her close friends. Some of Michelle Obama’s contacts in College were of the Marxist/socialist types.

Princeton, 1984

Charles C. Johnson wrote on October 30, 2012, “Michelle Obama attends and promotes a ‘Black Solidarity’ event for guest lecturer Manning Marable, who was, according to Cornel West, probably ‘the best known black Marxist in the country.’ The event is the work of the Third World Center (TWC), a campus group whose board membership is exclusively reserved for minorities.”

With this documented article, we see that Michelle Obama, much like her husband is closely associated with the teachings of Marxism and had attended meetings with Marxist-type people. We must now wonder, why did the people elect a man with a wife that has such a marked background, mixed with Marxism and communism by association with such types of people?

Michelle Robinson’s racial animosity of Caucasian people is exposed through her articles and statements from the time she was at Princeton. One can see this in her ideas that the white population at Princeton were a bunch of “racist” individuals. Johnson quotes an article Michelle Robinson (Obama) wrote while at Princeton University, following an introduction to the quotation.

 If ever there was an example of the TWC governing board’s obsession with race, an editorial from October 21, 1981 is it. The members took great offense to an op-ed titled “Rebuilding Race Relations,” calling the article “racist, offensive, and inaccurate” for daring to question the group’s true commitment and to present a thesis on race relations counter to its own.

“The word RE-building implies that race relations once existed and, for some mysterious reasons, fell apart …,” the board wrote in a scathing letter to the editor. “We, on the other hand, believe that race relations have never​been and still are not at a satisfactory level. We are not RE-building. We cannot RE-build something that never existed in the first place.”

“Don’t hide behind excuses such as a lack of effort [to integrate with the Princeton campus] on our part,” the revealing letter added. “The bottom line is that white students on this campus are racist, but they may not realize it.” [Emphasis added]

Princeton itself, however, was concerned about the self-segregation by black students and proposed reforms to counter it, including no longer permitting black students to all room together in one dorm and integrating black freshmen into the general student body. The TWC strenuously opposed all of these reforms, arguing that integration of nonwhite students would harm the “support system” available to them, especially blacks. (Julie Newton, “TWC criticizes CURL plan: Minority strife would worsen,” The Daily Princetonian, October 21, 1981).”

The TWC is an organization of whose membership was exclusively reserved to Minorities only and the initials represent the words, “Third World Center”. Here we have to note that Michelle Robinson was an activist that had the intention to change the very ideology of the Princeton school she got into through the use of her brother! Here, she makes the statement, “The bottom line is that white students on this campus are racist, but they may not realize it” [Emphasis added]. This clearly shows an animosity towards white people while she was attending Princeton, and it also shows just what she thought of the college that allowed her to enter based upon her brother’s position and not her grades. Michelle Robinson was actually biting the hand that fed her!

Princeton took a look at the problems and came up with a plan that would integrate the different people and bring them into a more associative bonding. However, this was not strong enough for Michelle Robinson or the TWC since that would solve the problem that they shine a spotlight on, but it was not what they wanted and they countered that idea as shown below.

“Princeton itself, however, was concerned about the self-segregation by black students and proposed reforms to counter it, including no longer permitting black students to all room together in one dorm and integrating black freshmen into the general student body. The TWC strenuously opposed all of these reforms, arguing that integration of nonwhite students would harm the “support system” available to them, especially blacks. (Julie Newton, “TWC criticizes CURL plan: Minority strife would worsen,” The Daily Princetonian, October 21, 1981).”

Michelle Robinson was part of the group, but not a full board member at that time, but when she did become a board member she found yet another racially-charged way to make a statement. Michelle Obama was an individual that found fault with anything that dealt with ethnicity. Johnson documents her actions and statements in 1983 as follows:

“While Michelle was not a part of the board in 1981, as a board member of the Third World Center starting on April 7, 1983 she joined in a different racially-charged statement reproaching the college for not doing enough to hire “Latino administrators.” In a letter a few weeks later, the TWC attacked Princeton’s administration for not replacing Hector Delgado, a minority dean of students.

 “This search needs to produce another experienced individual who is of minority background, preferably Latino, and who will be responsive to the concerns of Third World Center as well as the student body at large,” the TWC’s governing board wrote.

 Others on campus took notice of the group’s calls and expressed concern.

 For example, Fred Foote —the editor of Prospect magazine, a conservative monthly publication —criticized the TWC and Delgado for their obsessive focus on race.

 “[Delgado’s] penchant for drawing campus issues along racial lines—a penchant shared by the TWC and The Daily Princetonian—is the chief cause of racial strife on campus,” he wrote.”

Now this seems to show without a doubt that others on campus were looking at this action by the TWC of which Michelle Robinson,(Obama), was a part of. It seems to show that had she and the others just allowed actions to drift by, the so-called problems would have been much less in the front of the students than their curriculum was. Now one has to wonder why take such actions if the college was getting along just fine before?

Michelle Robinson (Obama) did more than make meetings and express her seemingly hate for whites, she went on with the TWC and made demands for minority only meetings. She would have been up in arms to stop such meetings if they were to the exclusion of minorities. Yet it was fine, and even better, when she stood alongside a segregation policy that banned whites from any meetings held by the TWC! This is well noted in statements below.

“In November 1984, TWC’s board demanded that nonwhite students should have the right to bar whites from their meetings on campus. They also demanded minorities-only meetings with the deans. (John Hurley, “Black students, university debate closed meeting policy,” The Daily Princetonian, November 29, 1984). The ban was frankly unnecessary, since whites were made to feel unwelcome at the meetings if they were invited at all, but the TWC continued to press for it, arguing, too, that blacks ought to be able to bar whites from attending events aimed at discussion of “sensitive” racial issues.

 “The administration, by denying us these [blacks-only] meetings, is saying that we don’t have specific needs that have to be addressed this way,” David Jackson, ’87, a fellow TWC member, told the Daily Princetonian after the university officials finally rejected its proposal to hold racially limited meetings.

But despite the radical and racialist character of the TWC, Michelle Robinson was an active participant and may have been attracted by that very radicalism.

 “The Third World Center was our life,” Angela Acree, her best friend at Princeton, told The Boston Globe in June 2008. “We hung out there, we partied there, we studied there [in Liberation Hall].”

 “Not a day went by that I did not see Michelle at the Center,” Czerni Brasuelle, TWC’s director at the time, told the Daily Princetonian in its November 5, 2008 issue.”

This would seem to indicate that Michelle Robinson (Obama) did not like the idea of all ethnicities working together, and would rather have them separate from each other. However, this is not what our nation had been working towards. It had been working towards having ethnic groups working together and not apart. This was so we all could be together as one nation, as Americans. Michelle Robinson in 1983-84 did not like that idea and helped call for separate and different meetings just for minorities. No whites could be there at all. Yet it was Michelle Robinson (Obama) that had stated that race relations at Princeton were deficient. However, it seems that she was part of the problem. She sat on the board of TWC to force Princeton to have separate meetings for minorities without any whites allowed! This does not bring ethnicities together nor does it resolve problems. It would make them worse due to the distancing of the minorities from the white population and causing the white population to wonder what the monitories are planning. However, this was just the beginning for Michelle Robinson.

This is the first of a 2 part article on Michelle Robinson Obama. The next article will show her use of Saul Alinsky’s works, a man she admired along with her husband Barack Obama.

New Black Panthers: Zimmerman verdict means ‘war’


WND EXCLUSIVE

Urge followers to ‘take to the streets’ and ‘stay there’

Published: 1 day ago// http://www.wnd.com/2013/07/new-black-panthers-zimmerman-verdict-means-war/

author-image Aaron Klein

Aaron Klein is WND’s senior staff reporter and Jerusalem bureau chief. He also hosts “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio” on New York’s WABC Radio. Follow Aaron on Twitter and Facebook.
King_Samir_Shabazz

The George Zimmerman verdict is a declaration of war that only the devil can applaud, according to the Twitter feed for the New Black Panther Party.

The Twitter account, managed by the group’s national chairman, Malik Zulu Shabazz, further urged followers to “take to the streets [and] stay there.”

“Were at war,” Shabbazz Tweeted. “Its (sic) silly and immoral to call for peace when war has been declared.”

The NBPP slammed what it called the “white mans (sic) justice system,” claiming the courts base their law on “the white is right theory.”

“Only a devil would applaud that verdict. Only natural born devil. By applauding that verdict you in fact admit that you are a devil,” wrote Shabbazz.

“The major problem with whites is they see white as exalted over others,” the Twitter feed added.

Shabbazz Tweeted that “As a lawyer, I am deeply dissapointed & embarassed (sic) at a judicial system that can’t deliver jail time for clear killer.”

Of whites, Shabbazz charged, “You all are born to kill and murder the darker peoples as Jesus says in John 8th chapter 44 verse. ‘A liar and a murderer from beginning.’”

Continued Shabbazz: “Everywhere the white man has gone since released from the caves and hills of europe the white man has killed & murdered the dark peoples :(”

See the NBPP tweet stream for yourself below:

The NBPP is a controversial black extremist party whose leaders are notorious for their racist statements and for leading anti-white activism.

The NBPP’s official platform states, “White man has kept us deaf, dumb and blind,” refers to the “white racist government of America,” demands black people be exempt from military service and uses the word “Jew” repeatedly in quotation marks.

Shabazz has led racially divisive protests and conferences, such as the 1998 Million Youth March, in which a few thousand Harlem youths reportedly were called upon to scuffle with police officers and speakers demanded the extermination of whites in South Africa.

The NBPP chairman was quoted at a May 2007 protest against the 400-year celebration of the settlement of Jamestown, Va., stating, “When the white man came here, you should have left him to die.”

He claimed Jews engaged in an “African holocaust,” and he has promoted the anti-Semitic urban legend that 4,000 Israelis fled the World Trade Center just prior to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

When Shabazz was denied entry to Canada in May 2008 while trying to speak at a black action event, he blamed Jewish groups and claimed Canada “is run from Israel.”

Canadian officials justified the action stating he has an “anti-Semitic” and “anti-police” record, but some reports blamed what was termed a minor criminal history for the decision to deny him entry.

Carefully Crafted Broadcast


During a review of some news cast, I was reminded of the carefully crafted fabrications issued by the Media Left, especially MSNBC. It was a supposed report on the Zimmerman-Trayvon story. The male news reader, complete with facial expressions, looked in the camera and said that Zimmerman “STALKED TRAYVON”, “HUNTED HIM DOWN” and “EXECUTED HIM”. Those were his exact words and phases. There is only one explanation possible for such irresponsible behavior. This was carefully crafted to “stir the pot” of their core constituents; hard-core leftist looking for an excuse to release their pent-up anger on those they perceive as enemies.

When you listen to any Left Wing person talk, you hear like words that are deliberately used to keep the pot of hatred stirred. There can’t be any other explanation. A stirred pot keeps boiling all the contents of the pot and what was past, perceived as an attack on them or their “rights”, or any disagreement they have with any group that disagrees with them. Think about every time Sharpton, Jackson, or any other like “self-appointed” official for the perceived “oppressed”, takes the microphone before a willing media outfit. They will use words of hate, as well as words designed to “stir the pot.”

I live in Southern California. I was watching as the jury came back with the acquittal in the Rodney King case. Immediately “Black Leaders” rushed to the cameras and microphones. One such woman, who later became a Congresswoman, started shouting, “NO JUSTICE NO PEACE”. That so stirred those around her that the riots began right at her feet. No, she was never charged.

Those that have great talent at “stirring the pot” are the ones who always escape any consequences. Like the New Black Panther Party putting out a murder contract on Zimmerman, with no arrest or prosecution. Are they exempt? As the pot continues to get stirred, the hatred continues to grow. Destruction, death and great loss is the only outcome.

Why are we allowing this to continue? Black Christian Church Leaders; why are you not speaking up? Where are the peacemakers?

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: