Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Archive for August, 2013

Transgender Student Law Makes Unisex Bathrooms, Teams Norm


by

JerryBrown

The perverts and degenerates have won yet again in California, now that Gov. Jerry “Moonbeam” Brown has signed a trangender students bill into law.

The law covers the state’s more than 6.2 million public school students from kindergarten to grade 12 and allows the “transgender” students to choose which bathrooms to use and whether they’ll participate on boys’ or girls’ sports teams.

Supporters claim this will cut down on bullying. If anything, it will increase it, as well as raise the risk of rapes.

There are very good reasons why boys and girls don’t share restrooms, locker rooms or shower facilities. They are obvious and undeniable by anyone who is not insane,  living in an android body or a Democrat.

“Now, every transgender student in California will be able to get up in the morning knowing that when they go to school as their authentic self they will have the same fair chance at success as their classmates,” said Masen Davis, executive director of Transgender Law Center.

Translation: Now we have a law that will let us sue the capri pants off anyone who stands in the way of the homosexual agenda.

I predict that the sheeple of California will go along with this garbage until the first time the daughter of someone important gets raped in the school shower by some “transgender” boy using the girls locker room.

Fox News reports that opponents are “concerned” that the law might lead to invasions of privacy.

No kidding. About five seconds after aspiring “transgender” boys figure out they can sneak cameras and cellphones into the girls’ locker room, there will be entire new websites devoted to the pictures.

Some people, even in California, realize this bill will create huge problems, but they aren’t getting much attention.

Randy Thomasson of savecalifornia.com said, “This radical bill warps the gender expectations of children by forcing all California public schools to permit biological boys in girls restrooms, showers, clubs and on girls sports teams and biological girls in boys restrooms, showers, clubs and sports teams. This is insanity.”

It is insanity. It seems that the Powers That Be in California aim to break down the last remnants of resistance by creating compounding scenarios meant to drive residents past the mental breaking point. It’s like an episode out of “The Prisoner.”

The current experiment in madness is backed by the usual suspects including the ACLU, the teachers unions and the whole slate of pervert-equality groups.

Obama Will Sign UN Gun Treaty While Congress Is On Vacation


If you have been living in a cave somewhere and just rejoined society, then you have not heard about the United Nations Gun Control Treaty. It is designed to control all gun purchases all over the world. It is also designed to control guns, ammunition and who can possess fire arms. In the treaty is a section for gun registration which always leads to gun confiscation. This treaty’s ultimate goal is the disarming of America, so that their One World Government can be established and all peoples be subjugated to tyrannical reign.
President Obama knows he will never get this treaty approved by Congress, and therefore has decided to ignore our Constitution and sign the treaty in private while Congress is on vacation.
While you are ready this article, please take the time to use their efforts to contact your Senators urging them to stop President Obama. – Jerry Broussard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

CCRKBA.org

CCRKBA.org

BELLEVUE, WA – -(Ammoland.com)- You heard it straight from the horse’s mouth. Jay Carney said Obama will sign the UN Arms Trade Treaty “before the end of August…We believe it’s in the interest of the United States.”

This is very strategic timing considering Congress is on a 5 week vacation lasting thru the month of August!

These back door tactics are nothing new for the Obama Administration, which is why we are using tactics of our own to stop his anti-gun agenda. We have the home fax numbers of every Senator so while they are absent from the Capitol we can demand they must not ratify the UN Gun Treaty once Obama signs it.

We CAN stop this international treaty from reaching American soil by killing it the United States Senate. The U.S Senate must ratify an international treaty for it to be effective. They would need 67 votes to ratify the treaty. Reach every U.S. Senator at their home office; tell them you do not want this treaty in OUR United States!

Select Here To Fax The U.S. Senate At Their Home Offices:

Demand They KEEP THEIR TREATY AWAY FROM OUR GUNS –

DO NOT Ratify The UN ‘Arms Trade Treaty’!

Everything Obama tackles in office is strategically timed and politically motivated. He only looks out for himself, his fellow liberals, and his anti-gun agenda. After mass shootings the Administration would launch all-out attacks on our gun rights since the country would be more susceptible to change after a traumatic event. He made sure the Benghazi cover up was swept under the rug until he got re-elected. He will wait to attack certain issues until the 2014 Congressional elections so he’ll know how many liberals are by his side.

Obama believes now is the best time to sign the UN Gun Treaty since Congress is out of Washington. He will have less scrutiny to worry about if Congress is not nearby. He also thinks the public eye is not paying attention too closely. It is the slow summer months, people are on vacation, Congress is out of Washington so nothing must be happening.

Obama may think he is being sneaky but we will make sure the public knows what he is up to and so will all 100 U.S. Senators. By sending faxes to each Senator’s home office, they will realize how important this issue is to the American people. If we are reaching out to them while they are on vacation they will know they must take action. We must flood the home offices with faxes from Patriots across the country demanding our U.S. Senate does not ratify this international gun grab!

Gun advocates are weary of the language in the treaty including the fact that ‘small arms and light weapons’ are among the included weaponry that could be regulated by the United Nations. The UN Gun Treaty is a lot like ObamaCare; we will not know what it fully entails until it is implemented. It is impossible to trust the UN’s reassurance that this treaty will not affect our current gun laws or our Second Amendment. After all, the UN Arms Trade Treaty had previously been rumored as a replacement of the Second Amendment.

The Obama Administration seems to be thrilled with the thought of global gun control. John Kerry cannot wait for it to be signed:

“As your review of the treaty continues, we strongly encourage your administration to recognize its textual, inherent and procedural flaws, to uphold our country’s constitutional protections of civilian firearms ownership, and to defend the sovereignty of the United States, and thus to decide not to sign this treaty.”

We must make it clear TODAY to the Senate and the White House that the Second Amendment must be protected and that they must reject any and all U.N. Gun Control. Tell them to KEEP THEIR TREATY AWAY FROM OUR GUNS!

All of the evidence suggested Trayvon threw the first punch, Trayvon was on top, Trayvon was unloading significant damage onto Zimmerman, and Zimmerman used deadly force to defend himself. No matter what the facts are, the anti-gunners continue to push their agenda to try to get what they want.

It is our job as Americans and Second Amendment Patriots to meet the anti-gun crowd head on. We will fight any legislation that tries to destroy our self-defense laws or our Second Amendment rights. We need your help in order to launch a significant attack against the anti-gun agenda. They use smoke, mirrors, and lies to push their agenda while we show the facts. So many resources are needed in order to be successful against the anti-gun crowd. Anything you can give us will be substantial in maintaining our goal of protecting America’s Second Amendment!

Select Here To Fax The U.S. Senate At Their Home Offices:

Demand They KEEP THEIR TREATY AWAY FROM OUR GUNS –

DO NOT Ratify The UN ‘Arms Trade Treaty’!

The uncertainty begins in the discussion of small arms. Where will the regulations on our small arms start, and where will they stop? They are even trying to include ammunition regulations in the Arms Trade Treaty! Will the United Nations try to impose international licensing requirements, an international registry, or international?

The last negotiations for an Arms Trade Treaty took place in July 2012, just four months before the Presidential election. Obama did not want to take a big stance for global gun control just months before his re-election but now he has made it clear he is for total gun control. He also told voters he would not be re-visiting negotiations for an Arms Trade treaty but here we are.

Since his re-election it has become clearer than ever what is at the top of his agenda; taking our guns away! The Obama Administration has been exploiting tragedies since the election to push gun control at the city, state, federal, and now GLOBAL level.

Our Senate took a stance before the Presidential election when 51 of them wrote Obama a letter saying they would not support an Arms Trade Treaty. We must let our entire U.S. Senate know we do not support international gun control. They must not ratify this international treaty.

Sincerely Yours,

Alan M. Gottlieb
Chairman
Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms
Ammoland Click to read AmmoLand FTC Marital Disclosures Distributed to you by AmmoLand.com – The Shooting Sports News source.

Barack Obama: Terrorism Enabler, Muslim sympathizer, Traitor


By / http://clashdaily.com/2013/08/barack-obama-terrorism-enabler-muslim-sympathizer-traitor/

Barack_Obama_visits_Sultan_Ahmed_Mosque_4-7-09

At first take it sounds so incredibly ridiculous as to be unworthy of serious consideration, but the more you look into the matter, the more the conclusion becomes inescapable: Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim sympathizer who enables terrorism, aiding our enemies, and thus, he is worthy to be charged with treason.

In the beginning we should have read the signs: from the apology tour to bowing before the Saudi king, to the declarations in Cairo and refusing to directly reference a “war on terror,” this man has demonstrated preference for America’s enemies, denigrating the U.S. and her allies at every turn.   The heart of Obama is measured in the words of his pastor for 20 years, Jeremiah Wright, who proclaimed: “G*d D**n America.”

Obama has orchestrated the leaking of classified information to hurt our country and help our enemies, making himself look good to retain power and forward the agenda: knock down American to build up global government.

US Leak on al-Qaida Threat Could Aid Enemy
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/bolton-qaida-obama-iran/2013/08/06/id/519044?s=al&promo_code=146F7-1

Obama ‘Leaking Info on Israeli Strikes in Syria’
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/170547#.UgKF0cnn_IV

Former Top General Now Reportedly Being Investigated by Obama Admin. for Leaks
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/06/28/former-top-general-now-reportedly-being-investigated-by-obama-admin-for-leaks/

Former CIA Operative on Intel Leaks: Obama Admin’s Claims of Innocence ‘Absurd’
http://www.theblaze.com/blog/2012/06/20/former-cia-operative-on-intel-leaks-obamas-claims-of-innocence-absurd/

Obama left Iraq prematurely and we see the resulting destruction: a country once poised to be a beacon of freedom in the world, now a nexus of terrorism, a vassal of Iran.  Telegraphing the end game, Obama has handed Afghanistan back to the Taliban and al Qaeda. Pouring weapons into Syria, he helps Jihad annihilate Christians, arming thugs who murder women and children with great efficiency.  These are not accidental failures.  They are purposeful, calculated developments designed to shame the U.S., and forward the cause of Sharia in the world.

Obama’s Failure in Iraq
 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/aug/8/al-qaeda-drives-iraq-toward-chaos/

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/joseph-puder/obamas-failure-in-iraq/

How Obama Gets Us to Forget His Failure in Afghanistan
http://townhall.com/columnists/monacharen/2013/06/04/how-obama-gets-us-to-forget-his-failure-in-afghanistan-n1612126/page/full

Obama Ignored Syrian Christians’ Requests for Weapons

http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obama-ignored-syrian-christians-request-for-weapons/

Obama just released $500 million to Hamas, a terrorist organization whose mission statement is the annihilation of Israel, a group thoroughly coordinating with Iran.  That’s on top of $147 million he sent to Hamas last year.
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/072913-665590-obama-giving-hamas-500-million-despite-sequester.htm?ven=benzinga2cp

Obama overthrew Mubarak in Egypt, unleashing violence, death and turmoil in that country for the last two years. Then he armed the Muslim Brotherhood, embraced their members, and appointed them to positions of authority in our own government. (cont’d below)
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/06/21/as-egypt-unravels-team-obama-increases-support-for-muslim-brotherhood/

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/07/01/Flashback-Obama-Administration-Gives-1-5-Billion-To-Egypt-s-Muslim-Brotherhood

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/frank-gaffney/the-muslim-brotherhood-in-the-obama-administration/

Do we even have to mention Benghazi?
http://www.hughhewitt.com/steyn-on-the-latest-benghazi-developments/

SEAL massacre in Afghanistan two years ago: families speak out!
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/10/15/Seal-Team-Six-Family-ROE

http://www.forourson.us/

Releasing Gitmo terrorists and leaving our soldier in the hands of the Taliban:
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2012/05/07/why-release-not-exchange-taliban-prisoners/

Consider his hatred for Israel, and this latest atrocity:
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/07/29/Smart-Power-Obama-Forces-Israel-to-Release-Terrorists-Murderers-for-Nothing

And now the retreat throughout the Arab world, showing cowardice and weakness, once again.
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/gohmert-embassy-closures-cowards/2013/08/05/id/518830

Add all this to the increase in attacks on the homeland, negligence in securing our borders, increases in homegrown terrorism, and efforts to promote Sharia in America, and the unbelievable becomes the unavoidable reality: the President of the United States is the enemy of the United States.

Image: President Barack Obama prepares to visit the Sultan Ahmed I Mosque, April 7, 2009, in Istanbul; source: http:// http://www.whitehouse.gov/photogallery/In-Europe/photo-cat29/;author:Pete Souza Link back to Creator infobox template wikidata:Q2073333; public domain

About the author: Allan Erickson

 Allan Erickson enjoyed an 11-year career in radio, television and print journalism as a reporter, talk show host, and operations manager. He then turned to sales and marketing for a decade. Ten years ago he started his own training and recruitment company in the Pacific Northwest. Allan & wife Jodi have four children and live in California. He is also the author of “The Cross & the Constitution in the Age of Incoherence,” Tate Publishing, 2012. He is available to speak in churches addressing the topics of faith and freedom. To contact him, email: allanlerickson@gmail.com

The Deification Of Hillary Clinton


http://lastresistance.com/3009/the-deification-of-hillary-clinton/

 

John Calvin said: “Every one of us is, even from his mother’s womb, a master craftsman of idols.”

 

There are so many differences between Democrats and Republicans—or should I say Democrats and Conservatives. There are, however, differences for a reason. It is not that Democrats and Conservatives stand on opposing sides just because; we truly have differing world views. A pendulum spends more time on either side than it does in the direct center. With that said, I would argue that many who label themselves Independent are simply uninformed. I have found that once an Independent honestly talks out their beliefs, they end up landing on one side or the other.

 

One of the main differences between Liberals and Conservatives is that Liberals make idols out of their politicians, while Conservatives do not. Conservatives may revere and highly respect their candidates, but they do not make them into gods. Let’s be honest here: Obama has been made into a deity by many. I’ve even heard people say that he is the fulfillment of biblical prophecy. So there’s that.

 

Speaking with George Stephanopoulos regarding a Hillary Clinton candidacy, Donna Brazile said: “So while I do think it’s too early to handicap the race, there is no question, if Hillary Clinton gets into the race, there will be a coronation of her, because there are so many Democrats who last time around supported her, who I think are anxious to see her back out there again.”

 

Making politicians into Kings, Queens, and Deities can have extremely adverse effects. First, it fosters the belief that they can do no wrong, that a politician is infallible. Notice how Liberals will defend their politicians to the teeth? Let’s make a list: Bill Clinton, Al Gore, John Kerry, Barack Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, etc. Second, deifying politicians raises unattainable expectations. Once those politicians are voted in, and proceed to break promises, Liberals are dumbfounded. They cannot believe that their gods would ever fail them.

 

The flip-side of making politicians into gods is making their opponents into devils. The unfortunate result of candidate worship is a demonizing of the opposition. The more people walk in step with their poli-god, the more hate spews forth regarding the opposing side, and its candidates. All of this: the love and the hate, creates a frightening delusion that renders people incapable of rationality.

 

Deifying politicians is dangerous. The simple attitude that a politician is near infallible can bring a country to ruin. We’ve been witnessing the decline since the Chosen One was elected in 2008. Hillary Clinton is the next Chosen One. Between NBC making a “life of Hillary” mini-series, and CNN producing something similar, the deification has already begun to move at full steam. It will only get worse as we near 2016.

 

Liberals are expert idol craftsmen, and they are blinded by the light they give to their politicians. It’s our job to turn off the light and show them reason.

 

Theme Swift by SwiftThemes.Com Copyright ©2013 The Last Resistance | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS) powered by WordPress [Back to top ↑]

byFrank Camp The Deification Of Hillary Clinton Filed under 2016 Election, Email Featured, LIberalism, Politics deification, demonization 22 Share27 Tweet15 0 Share80 John Calvin said: “Every one of us is, even from his mother’s womb, a master craftsman of idols.” There are so many differences between Democrats and Republicans—or should I say Democrats and Conservatives. There are, however, differences for a reason. It is not that Democrats and Conservatives stand on opposing sides just because; we truly have differing world views. A pendulum spends more time on either side than it does in the direct center. With that said, I would argue that many who label themselves Independent are simply uninformed. I have found that once an Independent honestly talks out their beliefs, they end up landing on one side or the other. One of the main differences between Liberals and Conservatives is that Liberals make idols out of their politicians, while Conservatives do not. Conservatives may revere and highly respect their candidates, but they do not make them into gods. Let’s be honest here: Obama has been made into a deity by many. I’ve even heard people say that he is the fulfillment of biblical prophecy. So there’s that. Speaking with George Stephanopoulos regarding a Hillary Clinton candidacy, Donna Brazile said: “So while I do think it’s too early to handicap the race, there is no question, if Hillary Clinton gets into the race, there will be a coronation of her, because there are so many Democrats who last time around supported her, who I think are anxious to see her back out there again.” Making politicians into Kings, Queens, and Deities can have extremely adverse effects. First, it fosters the belief that they can do no wrong, that a politician is infallible. Notice how Liberals will defend their politicians to the teeth? Let’s make a list: Bill Clinton, Al Gore, John Kerry, Barack Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, etc. Second, deifying politicians raises unattainable expectations. Once those politicians are voted in, and proceed to break promises, Liberals are dumbfounded. They cannot believe that their gods would ever fail them. The flip-side of making politicians into gods is making their opponents into devils. The unfortunate result of candidate worship is a demonizing of the opposition. The more people walk in step with their poli-god, the more hate spews forth regarding the opposing side, and its candidates. All of this: the love and the hate, creates a frightening delusion that renders people incapable of rationality. Deifying politicians is dangerous. The simple attitude that a politician is near infallible can bring a country to ruin. We’ve been witnessing the decline since the Chosen One was elected in 2008. Hillary Clinton is the next Chosen One. Between NBC making a “life of Hillary” mini-series, and CNN producing something similar, the deification has already begun to move at full steam. It will only get worse as we near 2016. Liberals are expert idol craftsmen, and they are blinded by the light they give to their politicians. It’s our job to turn off the light and show them reason.
Read more at http://lastresistance.com/3009/the-deification-of-hillary-clinton/#SbF8mSSw0PZ7Eijx.99

State Department Blasts “Enemies of Islam”


By Tim Brown // http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/state-department-blasts-enemies-of-islam/

Following car bombings in Baghdad, which appear to have targeted Shi-ite Muslim festivities that marked the end of Ramadan, State Department spokesperson Jen Psaki issued a press release in which she denounced the “enemies of Islam.”

“The United States condemns in the strongest possible terms the cowardly attacks today in Baghdad. These attacks were aimed at families celebrating the Eid al-Fitr holiday that marks the end of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan. The terrorists who committed these acts are enemies of Islam and a shared enemy of the United States, Iraq, and the international community.”

According to Reuters, there were twelve separate bomb blasts that targeted markets, busy shopping street and parks, which resulted in the deaths of nearly 80 people.

Interestingly, we haven’t seen a condemnation of a jihadist attack this quickly. Even now, the administration does what it can to sweep Benghazi under the rug which was clearly a jihadist attack.

However, the “enemies of Islam” don’t get such a courtesy.

Patrick Poole writes:

As horrific as these bombings are, obviously fueled by sectarian differences, it’s troubling to see that the Obama administration has now put the U.S. government in the business of denouncing “enemies of Islam.”

Mind you, this is the administration that branded the Muslim Brotherhood a “largely secular” organization. It has taken every effort to purge government national-security documents of any reference tying terrorism to Islam while Janet Napolitano’s Department of Homeland Security proscribed training by anyone declaring themselves “Muslim reformers” (while at the same time government contractors tie pro-life, pro-Second Amendment, and Tea Party views to “violent extremism”).

Any government employees that observe that Islamic terrorists themselves wrap themselves in the mantle of doctrinal Islam will quickly find themselves without a job. And when members of Congress have confronted senior administration officials as to whether elements of radical Islam have declared war on the U.S., those officials have angrily protested that Congress merely asking such questions puts them in league with al-Qaeda.

This administration has done everything it can to whitewash Islam. It’s removed references of Islam and jihad from government training manuals, replacing them with emphasis upon Christian extremists as perpetrators of terrorism.

The administration has given preferential treatment to Islamists and continues to fund Islamists. Obama even told the United Nations last year, “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”

Muslims have been demanding and getting prayer openly in public schools. The Obama Justice Department has even had one of its attorneys and FBI special agents threaten citizens that they could face federal prosecution and prison time if they are critical of Islam.

https://i0.wp.com/cdn.freedomoutpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/081213_1714_StateDepart1.pngSo far, no word from the State Department about the final Ramadan Bomb-a-thon body count by Islamic jihadists by this administration. They only want everyone to acknowledge the celebration of the Islamic holiday.

While the press release did address al-Qaeda, offering a $10 million reward for information that helps authorities kill or capture Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, it never ties al-Qaeda to Islam. The hypocrisy of this administration is readily apparent.

Husband to my wife. Father of 10. Jack of All Trades. Christian and lover of liberty. Residing in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina. Follow Tim on Twitter.

Theme Swift by SwiftThemes.Com Copyright ©2013 Freedom Outpost | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS) powered by WordPress [Back to top ↑]

VIDEO: Move over golden calf, children have started praying to Obama


By ROBERT LAURIE – The beatification of Barack Hussein Obama continues…

If you thought that Barack Obama was just a mortal man elected to a temporary position in office, you thought wrong.  According to this video, he’s much, much, more than that.  He is a divine instrument, replete with God-given “special powers.”

According to various sources, the following video was posted to Youtube by the boy’s mother, where it was billed as “A Prayer for Barack Obama.” The problem is that the child here isn’t praying for the President, he’s praying to him. He even goes so far as to thank him for “everything you have done for us” and – unbelievably – for taking “all the responsibility” for his actions.

If you want to be brainwashed follow along at home, we’ve included a transcript of the prayer.

“Thank you for all the stuff that you helped us with.
Thank you for taking the courage and all the responsibility for everything you have done for us.
And God has gave you special powers and you are going to handle it just fine
you are good, Barack Obama. You are great.
And when you get older you will be able to do great things love, Steven.”

With that, he shout’s a gleeful “Barack Obama!”  …This, apparently, is the new word for “Amen.”

SEE VIDEO: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YI4813_v-E&feature=player_embedded

 

Creation verses Evolution


Creation vs. Evolution
The Basics Explained
Why Should Christians believe in Creation?
We believe in creation, first of all, not because of scientific evidence, but because of our faith in Jesus Christ and in His Word the Bible. The Lord Jesus is revealed in the Bible to be the Creator of all things (John 1:3, Hebrews 1:1-3), and He is for Christians the Lord of all and the Head over all things, including science (Acts 10:36, Ephesians 1:22). Our Head has said something about science in John 5:45-47, namely this: If we believe in Jesus Christ, then we must believe Moses’ writings. What did Moses write about first of all? He wrote about the creation of all things by God. So we judge science by the Bible and not the other way around. “We walk by faith, not by sight.” (I Corinthians 5:7)
God has given us Scientific Evidence for Creation
Since the beginning all men have been without excuse if they have not acknowledged the Creator God, for the evidence is all around them in the created world (Romans 1:19-20). And modern science has revealed a vast web of evidence which supports the biblical record of creation. Let us think first about the logic of the scientific argument for creation.
The Logic of the Scientific case for Creation
Creation is by definition a divine miracle, an act of God which is outside of and above the physical laws He has established in the world. Therefore, scientists who believe in creation do not try to devise theories to explain how God created, for human beings cannot understand how God created. On the other hand, evolutionary scientists say that they are devising theories to explain the evolution of all life and that they are discovering natural processes or mechanisms which can evolve new plants and animals. So we say to them, “The burden of proof is on you. Come on, now, give us theories which really explain evolution, and show us the natural mechanisms or processes which can produce new designs and evolve new plants and animals.”
Has evolutionary theory really explained evolution? No. Have they discovered any mechanism or process of genetics which can evolve anything really new. No, they have not. And, as long as this failure of evolutionary science continues, divine special creation continues to be an intellectually and scientifically viable belief for anybody, including scientists, to hold.
A Brief Look at the Evidence
The Fossil Evidence. Evolution is supposed to be a process of change. If some ancient species of worm or other creature without a backbone slowly changed into a vertebrate fish with a backbone, there should be a series of intermediate fossil species which document that actual process of change. These intermediate fossil forms are totally absent from the fossil record. Prof. Alfred Romer at Harvard University wrote that this evolution from invertebrate to vertebrate must have required 100 million years for which we do not have the fossil evidence. Prof. Stephen Stanley of Johns Hopkins University wrote in 1979 that the known fossil record provides not a single example of a series of fossils which prove that a process of evolution really took place to produce a new kind of creature.
These systematic gaps in the fossil record mean that every basic type of plant or animal seems to appear suddenly in the fossil-bearing rocks. The fossils speak of sudden appearance of the kinds, not the slow, gradual change of one kind into another kind. But this fossil evidence appears more in agreement with special creation than with evolution, doesn’t it?
Biological Design. Nature is rich everywhere with biological designs which defy evolutionary explanation. Secular scientists, when pressed, have to admit that they cannot offer testable or even plausible explanations for the origin of biodesigns. For just one example, consider the little intestinal microbe, Escherichia coli. Each tiny single-celled microbe propels itself around with six corkscrew propellers which are connected by universal joints to six constant torque, variable speed, reversible rotary motors!
Evolutionary scientists have not the slightest idea how this complex assembly of complex, interdependent parts could have evolved. Yet, they believe it happened. They have faith in dumb atoms. Faith in the Creator God is far superior.
Genetics: For thousands of years intelligent humans have been selectively breeding plants and animals to develop varieties which are of special value to man. So there are 150 varieties of dogs, scores of varieties of roses, many different varieties of cattle and sheep, of apples and potatoes, etc. But they are still dogs, roses, cattle, sheep, apples and potatoes. There is much variation under artificial selection. Also, there is much variation in nature in the wild. But the changes are always limited. Genetics teaches that there are barriers through which genetic change cannot go. Species of plants and animals exist in groups of species which are separated from all other such groups. And this is just what the Bible teaches in Genesis 1 where Moses tells us that God created the “kinds” of plants and animals to reproduce each one “after its own

Watch ‘Evolution vs. God’ – A new movie from the producers of the Award-winning ‘Genius’!

www.EvolutionVsGod.com

The Great Communicator


Make sure you watch to the end!!!!!!!!!
What a great communicator he was and yep without a teleprompter.  Smile, even tho U may not have liked the guy.
 
Be sure to catch the last portion. You will see why some people need a teleprompter.
 

Schools push ‘Trayvon dialogues’ to vent ‘anger’


WND EXCLUSIVE // http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/schools-push-trayvon-dialogues-to-vent-anger/

Board member: He ‘could have been any one of my 3 sons’

 

author-image Chelsea Schilling About | Email | Archive

Chelsea Schilling is a commentary editor and staff writer for WND, an editor of Jerome Corsi’s Red Alert and a proud U.S. Army veteran. She has also worked as a news producer at USA Radio Network and as a news reporter for the Sacramento Union.
A public school district in San Diego, Calif., has voted unanimously to initiate “Trayvon Martin dialogues” among middle and high-school students so they can “speak honestly about their identification with Trayvon Martin’s story, including feelings of fear, anger and skepticism that they will live in a just society as they prepare for their future.”

On July 30, the San Diego Unified School District board voted 4-0 to “allow students to speak honestly about the worldview that prompted George Zimmerman to confront Trayvon Martin, and help students develop perspectives and strategies to channel their feelings about Trayvon Martin into positive work for themselves and the larger community.”

 School-board member Richard Barrera, who the district describes as having “a background as a community organizer, working to revitalize low-income neighborhoods,” presented the resolution by explaining, “The Trayvon Martin case is something that is having a huge impact across the country and here in the San Diego community. And I know that it’s also an issue that’s particularly having an impact on young people.

“The feelings of young people that I’ve spoken to that have made their voice heard throughout our community are feelings of anger, of frustration, of a sense that is the society that young people grow up in and enter into, is it gonna be fair? And if people kinda play by the rules, do what they’re supposed to do, work hard, study hard with the intention of creating a decent future for themselves, is that future going to be realized in this society?”

In his statement, Barrera didn’t clarify whether he believed Trayvon Martin, too, had chosen to “play by the rules … work hard, study hard.”

As WND has reported, Twitter, Facebook, and toxicology tests established Trayvon’s long and enthusiastic acquaintance with marijuana and codeine. Also, the London Daily Mail ran a story about Trayvon’s suspensions from school three times for fighting, drug abuse and vandalism. The Miami Herald reported that Trayvon was found with women’s jewelry, including silver wedding bands and earrings with diamonds. Trayvon was shot while on suspension from high school.

Barrera added, “[P]articularly young men of color [are] trying to get their heads around what happened in this situation. I think it’s important for us to open up the opportunity for young people to have dialogue with each other, but under the facilitation of professional educators.”

Another school board member, Marne Foster, declared, “Trayvon Martin could have been any one of my three sons as an unarmed, young African-American male traveling home.”

Foster said the resolution presents an “opportunity to have a real and a candid and an honest conversation about the state of America and what the world looks like for our young people and then having a vehicle to drive change.”

She said, “This … gives them a voice and the tools to constructively and safely engage the world around them, and more importantly to become that change agent that we so desperately need them to be,” adding “especially given in 2013, they are still living in a time reminiscent of Emmett Till.”

Till was a 14-year-old boy who was brutally beaten and killed in Mississippi in 1955 after he reportedly whistled at a white woman. Foster’s statement was reminiscent of Oprah Winfrey’s public comparison of Martin and Till. The TV talk host claimed the two cases are “the same thing.”

But TV host Glenn Beck called the comparison “unbelievably wrong.”

“These are two cases that … have nothing in common,” Beck said, explaining that George Zimmerman’s killing of Martin was ruled as self-defense, and Till was viciously murdered by racists.

Concerned individuals may contact the San Diego Unified School District Board of Education.

FROM CIVIL RIGHTS TO PROMOTION OF RACIAL HATRED


 AS IMPLEMENTED BY THE RACE BAITERS INDUSTRY

The so called “Civil Rights” display in the Florida Capital Building is a prime example of the advocacy of hate for non-black Americans.

1cc632248cDream-Defenders-Trayvon-mural

There is absolutely no doubt that such a promotion is for the profitable advancement of the current “leaders” of the black community. If this were not the case there would be an outcry from the black community and the financing for such a hate filled exhibit would not have been possible. However, the increasing rhetoric of the Al Sharptons promoting racial hatred of all non-blacks and the obvious profits of such promotions make it abundantly clear the Civil Rights movement has undergone a fundamental transformation which, incidentally, just happens to coincide with four and one-half years of Obama “leadership”. Damn, I find it difficult to reference the word leadership in conjunction with the name Obama. But be not misled  –  this is a critical element of Obama’s “fundamental transformation” of America, as he promised!

Moving beyond the national issues of such a distasteful and hate based display is the greatly disturbing question of just how did such come to be allowed on public property? By what stretch of anyone’s imagination would this have been allowed had the skin colors of the images been reversed. Further, does anyone believe that such a display would be permitted in ANY public building if the images were of young black men killing other young black men so as to depict the real situation now occurring in Obama’s home town, Chicago, IL? HA!

I hope that every concerned citizen will phone or email every elected state politician in Florida and express their feelings. These numbers and addresses can be found at http://election.dos.state.fl.us/contact-us/contact-elected-officials.shtml

Where is the common sense of our elected and appointed officials???

”We don’t need no stinkin’ private business sector”


BO don't need no stinking constitutionOnce upon a time, two high school buddies, Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak, decided they could build a graphics-friendly home computer. They set up shop in the Wozniak family garage, hand-crafted 50 computers and sold them to a retail computer outlet. When the computers sold quickly, Steve and Steve realized their product had potential. They needed capital (money) to expand production. A successful businessman co-signed a bank loan for a $250,000 cash infusion that enabled Steve and Steve, in 1976, to officially establish Apple Computer. Now, 37 years later, Apple is valued at $651.51 BILLION dollars and has generated hundreds of products and thousands of jobs all over the world.

Could these two entrepreneurs duplicate their business success today in America? HAHAHA! Are you kidding?

Fast forward to 2013. The Wozniak family own their home and property and have the Constitutional right to use it as they wish. The government doesn’t agree. In order to operate a two-person business in a residential garage, Steve and Steve are required to re-zone the hood, obtain multiple permits for this and that, and pay hundreds of dollars in fees.Uncle SCAM and control

Uncle SCAM sends an inspector from OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) to evaluate the workplace, lunchroom/mom’s kitchen, and employee/guest bathroom to be sure government standards are being met. OSHA determines the environment is satisfactory and approves access for all company personnel (meaning Steve and Steve).

The OSHA inspector also determines that the most up-to-date and correct permits,business licenses, safety and grievance procedures are posted at the correct height in the correct space on their correct bulletin board which is correctly attached to the correct wall stud. Not too high, not too low, but just right and in accordance with OSHA rules.

Steve and Steve are mandated to install a double-locked storage cabinet for hazardous garage equipment like rakes and hedge clippers in order to prevent unauthorized access and potentially harmful use by a potential future employee with potential emotional issues and the potential to go postal.

OSHA rules require that resident rodent eradicators  (like the family cat who has unlimited access to the garage/office/workspace), be properly licensed and checked for fleas and other vermin. When Tabby is observed catching and killing an errant mouse, Steve and Steve are required to file a wrongful death report. This generates a visit from PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) who demand the use of humane traps, and require Tabby to attend a “Capture and Release” seminar in Las Vegas, co-sponsored by the GSA (Government Service Agency).

Despite wasting non-productive hours filling out useless OSHA reports and excessive government forms of every type imaginable, Apple’s sales increase until it becomes necessary to hire several employees and occupy a larger production facility.

bank of dadHowever, Steve and Steve hit a snag. When expansion money is unavailable from the usual financial institutions, they turn to old reliable . . .  the bank of Mom and Dad.

However, this bank is closed due to depleted savings and 401(k) retirement accounts. Both mom and dad are restricted to part-time work and must purchase government-approved health insurance that costs 50 to 75% more than before.

So, Steve and Steve, along with Mom and Dad and assorted relatives and friends, locate part-time jobs flippin’ burgers and stocking Walmart shelves to generate expansion capital. Their hard work pays off. They accumulate what they need, move their facility to an industrial park and hire workers.

All goes well until Steve and Steve hire their 51st employee.

“Knock! Knock!” (And no, it’s not Avon calling.) It’s the IRS arriving to exercise the Supreme-Court-granted right to collect health insurance taxes. The agent demands proof of government-approved coverage, then sets about fingerprinting and DNA mouth swabbing all employees. When Steve and Steve object to this un-Constitutional action, the IRS agent quotes the president, “Constitution? We don’t need no stinkin’ Constitution.”

By this time, Steve and Steve realize the extent of ongoing government surveillance by the IRS and OSHA, and the profit-eating nature of having to provide health insurance for all employees. They close up shop.BO benefit card

Their former employees trek down to the government-run unemployment office looking for jobs. A counselor advises them to exercise their Constitutional Rights for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and signs them up for welfare, food stamps, disability, and cell phones.

Meanwhile, back in the Wozniak garage, ever-creative Steve and Steve invent the all-in-one-apple-pie-mixer-and-easy-bake oven. A trip to the Shark Tank TV program introduces Steve and Steve to Laurie who presents their apple-pie-mixer and-easy-bake oven to the Home Shopping Network. Their product launches with $3 MILLION dollars in initial orders which finances construction of production facilities in business-friendly Singapore.

Sound like a winning scenario? Not really. Because of un-Constitutional interference by a government on steroids, hundreds and thousands of jobs are not created, billions of dollars in personal income and tax revenue is never generated. The world eats apple pie instead of computing, phoning, texting, playing games, shooting videos, or reading books on Apple anything.

START THE CONVERSATION: Pass this politically incorrect fable on to a low-information voter, then ask if they believe government has the Constitutional right to control private sector business.

If you’d enjoy a sneak preview of Molli’s upcoming book, “Uncle SCAM Wants Your Money and Your Country,” to be published in August,  CLICK HERE. A former publisher, Time-Life editor, motivational speaker, and author, Molli writes Politically Incorrect Fables to enlighten low-information voters, fire up patriots, and irritate progressives. Additional fables and daily rants are posted at www.grannyguerrillas.com

Put Me In Charge


This was written by a 21 year old female who gets it. It’s her future she’s worried about and this is how she feels about the social welfare big government state that she’s being forced to live in! These solutions are just common sense in her opinion.

This was in the Waco Tribune Herald, Waco, TX 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

PUT ME IN CHARGE . . .

Put me in charge of food stamps. I’d get rid of Lone Star cards; no cash for Ding Dongs or Ho Ho’s, just money for 50-pound bags of rice and beans, blocks of cheese and all the powdered milk you can haul away. If you want steak and frozen pizza, then get a job.

Put me in charge of Medicaid. The first thing I’d do is to get women Norplant birth control implants or tubal ligations. Then, we’ll test recipients for drugs, alcohol, and nicotine. If you want to reproduce or use drugs, alcohol, or smoke, then get a job.

Put me in charge of government housing. Ever live in a military barracks? You will maintain our property in a clean and good state of repair. Your home” will be subject to inspections anytime and possessions will be inventoried. If you want a plasma TV or Xbox 360, then get a job and your own place.

In addition, you will either present a check stub from a job each week or you will report to a “government” job. It may be cleaning the roadways of trash, painting and repairing public housing, whatever we find for you. We will sell your 22 inch rims and low profile tires and your blasting stereo and speakers and put that money toward the “common good..”

Before you write that I’ve violated someone’s rights, realize that all of the above is voluntary. If you want our money, accept our rules. Before you say that this would be “demeaning” and ruin their “self esteem,” consider that it wasn’t that long ago that taking someone else’s money for doing absolutely nothing was demeaning and lowered self esteem.

If we are expected to pay for other people’s mistakes we should at least attempt to make them learn from their bad choices. The current system rewards them for continuing to make bad choices.

AND While you are on Gov’t subsistence, you no longer can VOTE! Yes, that is correct. For you to vote would be a conflict of interest. You will voluntarily remove yourself from voting while you are receiving a Gov’t welfare check. If you want to vote, then get a job.

The Bill of Rights and Sharia Law


About Carolyn Elkins

Florida PolitiChick Carolyn Elkins was born and raised in Canada. Actively seeking citizenship, she loves everything about America, especially the military. She has blogged about politics, religious and… More

 Islam-Takes-Americas-Bill-of-Rights
The US Marine Corps was born in Tun Tavern when in 1775 a committee of the Continental Congress met at the Tavern to draft a resolution calling for two battalions of Marines able to fight for independence at sea and on land. The resolution was approved on November 10, 1775, officially forming the Continental Marines. The Marines’ first challenge was to raid British supplies of gunpowder at Fort Nassau in the Bahamas in 1776. These supplies were being used against the Colonies. Under Captain Samuel Nicholas, 234 Marines made their first amphibious landing and captured the Fort within minutes.

In 1801, Congress passed naval legislation that, among other things, provided for six frigates that ‘shall be officered and manned as the President of the United States may direct.’ In the case the Berber Muslims, the Barbary powers of Tripoli and Algiers declared war on the United States these ships were to “protect our commerce & chastise their insolence by sinking, burning or destroying their ships & Vessels wherever you shall find them.’

It is widely known that Thomas Jefferson owned a copy of the Koran.  An avid reader, always learning, it’s no surprise that he would have had a copy of religious books other than the Bible. The Barbary pirates had been taking ships and tribute for years before Jefferson became President, however he knew about Islam from reading the Koran and from his days as ambassador to France, when he met in London with then Ambassador to Britain, John Adams and Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja, the British Ambassador from Algiers.

In 1805, the US refused to pay “tribute” to Barbary Coast pirates to keep them from raiding American merchant ships.  Jefferson said of the idea of continuing to pay, “Too long, for the honor of nations, have those Barbarians been [permitted] to trample on the sacred faith of treaties, on the rights and laws of human nature!”  As President, negotiations for a treaty failed, so Jefferson called on the Marines.

In the Libya, the US Marines attacked the Tripolitan city of Derna and rescued the kidnapped crew of the USS Philadelphia. The Marines’ victory helped Prince Hamet Bey reclaim his rightful throne as ruler of Tripoli. In gratitude, he presented his Mameluke sword to Lt Presley O’Bannon who had led the Marines. The sword became part of the officer uniform in 1825, and is still in use by the Corps today. It’s from this battle that the words of the Marine Corps Hymn are still sung.

The US Bill of Rights was written by James Madison in response from several states for greater constitutional protection for individual liberties.  Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists believed that a bill of rights was necessary to keep individual liberties safe.  Madison’s changes were given as a list of amendments which made up our Bill of Rights.

Our Bill of Rights includes rights which are inherent and unalienable, meaning you cannot surrender, sell or transfer these rights, as they are a gift from our Creator. All individuals have unalienable rights.  These include those enshrined in our Declaration of Independence, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  The rights of free speech, of religious freedom are also inherent.

Christians know that all people are given a free will, meaning we all have the freedom to choose whether to believe in Christ or some other religious belief or none at all.  Our right to freedom of religion under the 1st Amendment reflects the Christian belief, which is why America has always been a place of refuge for people of any or no religious belief.  The United States being a nation with Constitutional Laws in which our freedom of religion means that our nation’s Law recognizes a person’s  inherent God given right to free will, the freedom to believe whatever one desires when it comes to religious beliefs, and a freedom to speak freely about one’s beliefs.

It was reported recently that a 31-year-old Tennessee native, Muslim convert and Tea Party activist  is trying to spread the message that “Islam is compatible with an anti-big government or libertarian philosophy.”

Will Coley in 2011 persuaded the Tea Party organizations in East Tennessee to take a stand against so called Islamophobia. Talking about his Tea Party outreach and activities, he said, “I was watching the neocon takeover happen… Literally overnight I saw groups devoted to economics and constitutional limits turn into something else… This crazy anti-Islam message was taking over.”

His message is gaining popularity among many libertarians. Many of whom see the US wars as unnecessary.  Libertarian leaders such as Ron Paul have declared that “U.S. intervention in the Middle East is a main motivation behind terrorist hostilities toward America, and that Islam is not a threat to the nation.” Paul remarked about his belief that terrorists attacked on September 11, 2001 because of US involvement in Iraq and spoke of his belief that terrorists react to the United States’ actions in the world also said, “If we ignore that, we ignore that at our risk.”

With words like that, and Paul has made many speeches just like it, is it any wonder why Muslims find in him an ally, one whom they believe to be “Their kind of Republican”?

Might I remind Dr. Paul and other libertarians that Islam has been at war with the world ever since it’s foundation, that Islam has been at war ever since, including with America and other Western nations when they were raiding and attacking merchant ships? Dr. Paul and others, are fully within their rights to disagree on US war policies, but it’s incomprehensible to me that they would choose to believe more in the words of Muslim terrorists from the Middle East.

Muslims desiring a more limited government is what many others who are attracted to groups such as the Tea Party desire, however, Sharia is totally incompatible with US Law which is our Constitution.  Immigrants who desire to change the host country’s laws to suit them never works.  We have seen this happen all across Europe as nations such as Sweden, France, the Netherlands and England have had Muslim dominated, “Sharia Zones” for the past few years which have led to violent clashes between Muslims and non-Muslims who happen to stray into Muslim only areas.   We are seeing more of these areas in the US as well.

Sharia means “path” in Arabic, and it governs every part of Muslim life, including daily routines, personal, familial and religious obligations, financial and in some Muslim countries, government and national law. It comes mainly from the Quran and the Sunna, the sayings, practices, and teachings of Mohammed. It is applied by Muslim scholars who address and advise on new issues.

In sharia, there are categories of offenses: some which receive specific punishment in the Quran, known as hadd punishments, those that fall under a judge’s discretion, and those resolved through an “eye for an eye” type system. There are five hadd crimes: unlawful sex outside of marriage and adultery, false accusation of unlawful sexual intercourse, wine and alcohol drinking, and theft. Punishments for hadd offenses include public caning, flogging, stoning, amputation, exile, or execution, depending on which nation they occur in and the nature of the offense. These punishments remain on the books in most Muslim countries, but lesser penalties are also considered.

Honor killings, murders committed in retaliation for bringing dishonor on one’s family happen worldwide, and have been documented in Canada and the US. The UN estimates thousands of women are murdered annually in the name of “family honor”.  Other sharia practices, such as female genital mutilation, adolescent marriages, polygamy, and gender-biased inheritance rules happen in most Muslim dominant nations, especially in African nations.

In Muslim countries where Islam is the official religion listed in the constitution, sharia is declared as the source of the laws. These include Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Yemen, and the UAE. In Pakistan, Iran, and Iraq, among others, it is also illegal or considered blaspheme to practice or convert to any other religion.  Persecution of Christian and other minority religions in all of these countries are at an all-time high. Even many countries in which Muslims makes up less than 50% of the population, there are cases of persecution, much of it directed against women and children, as in some countries, notably Egypt, have seen Christian girls being kidnapped and forced to convert to Islam.  In Iran, Saeed Abedini, an American pastor who is imprisoned in Iran’s Evian Prison for planting house churches in the country over a decade ago has finally received medical treatment after being denied care for many months. Other Iranian pastors have also been arrested for so called national security issues and propaganda against the state.

One of the champions of the idea of a Bill of Rights was Thomas Jefferson who wrote, “I will now tell you what I do not like. First, the omission of a bill of rights, providing clearly and without the aid of sophism for freedom of religion, freedom of the press…  Let me add that a bill of rights is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth, general or particular; and what no just government should refuse or rest on inference.”

The stark realities and differences between the freedoms which America under the Constitution has held since the Founding Fathers is this; these freedoms are not afforded to anyone other than Muslims in Islamic states.  America must hold on to its Constitution, to its Laws. Sharia may be fine for Muslims, but it is not for non-Muslim America. If Muslims desire to live under their own laws, perhaps they should consider moving to an Islamic Nation.

Military Chaplain’s Assistant Threatened By Superior Over Her Expression Of Christian Beliefs


by Frank Camp // http://lastresistance.com/2981/military-chaplains-assistant-threatened-by-superior-over-her-expression-of-christian-beliefs/#teBAs9yd0hhtWjQk.99

As society progresses, we lose small pieces of what made us human. We replace these little pieces with dangerous facsimiles of what originally filled us. Above all else, we lose our sense of moral integrity. What comes with a loss of moral integrity is an animus toward others who still hold values which many have left behind. We reach a certain point—which I fear we are quickly approaching—when that animus evolves into hostility, and that hostility into tyranny. Once we have reached tyranny, we cannot go back; we are trapped behind a glass wall, only able to see in our minds what once was possible, and who we once were. We are no longer humans, but animals, fighting for territory and scraps of food.

 

As we have progressed, we have lost tolerance. The Left will tell you that they are the most tolerant people the world has ever seen. That is, of course, a lie. The Left is only tolerant of those with whom they agree—which isn’t tolerance at all.

 

According to Town Hall, a Army Chaplain’s Assistant is being targeted for her religious beliefs. After watching a documentary in which a Pastor was condoning homosexuality, telling his gay parishioners to embrace who they are, the Chaplain’s Assistant posted a response on her personal Facebook page. This is the response in full:

 

“A lot ticked off, now to all my gay friends you know I care about you so don’t think otherwise. I’m watching this documentary and this gay guy went to a church and the Pastor was telling him that he needs to embrace his way and know that it is not a sin. Ok umm wow, dude it is. I’m sick of people making Gods word what it’s not. Yes God loves you as a person but He hates the sin. Tired of hearing about Pastors being ok with homosexuality.”

 

In response, her Commander told her to remove the post, or face demotion, and a salary decrease. Her Commander said that she was creating “a hostile and antagonistic environment in the unit.”

 

The Assistant says that she will not remove the post, and that she will not be intimidated into hiding her beliefs. “I haven’t taken it down, and I won’t take it down…

 

I’ve never gotten in trouble for anything. And there’s nothing hostile or antagonistic in the post…Where does it stop? If they are going to silence me on Facebook, where will it stop?”

 

Todd Hudnall, her Colorado Pastor, came to the defense of the Assistant, saying:

 

“I read what she posted and there was absolutely no trace of animus, disrespect or hostility. Instead, she expressed love for her gay friends but insisted that biblical values should not be compromised. Her issue wasn’t with anyone who is gay but with pastors who refuse to acknowledge scriptural teaching about homosexual behavior…I was struck by the fact that the military was denying her right to privately exercise her freedom of expression and freedom of religion.”

 

Where is the tolerance on the part of the Military? I can guarantee that if someone of a faith besides Christianity posted something similar to what the Assistant posted, the response would not be the same. That, right there, is intolerance.

 

Tolerance–in a sense–means dealing with the world around you; it means seeing people for who they are, not what they are. Tolerance means that although you may not agree with someone, you respect them as a human being, and treat them as you would want to be treated. The Military cannot violate freedom of speech. The Assistant has every right to express her beliefs in a way that doesn’t create an uncomfortable environment for her peers. She did that. She respectfully addressed her biblical understanding on her private Facebook page.

 

Finally, what the Chaplain’s Assistant said is correct. If the Military silences her on Facebook, where and when will they act next? If they can reach their arms into the personal lives of soldiers–specifically and deliberately targeting religious beliefs–what is stopping them from going further? The answer is nothing. Nothing is stopping them. Animus will turn into hostility, and hostility into tyranny.

 

I don’t care if you agree with the Chaplain’s Assistant or not. I don’t care if you think her beliefs are wrong. If you care about our country, if you care about the future of our liberties, you will stand with her. With this case, a small, fragile piece of our collective freedom is teetering on the edge of a cliff. If it is allowed to fall, it will shatter into a million tiny pieces which we will never be able to put back together. It will be just one more piece of humanity lost, pushing us further toward tyranny.

Phony Scandals for a Phony President


By / 7 August 2013 / http://clashdaily.com/2013/08/phony-scandals-for-a-phony-president/

Obama
Here we go again. Those big old meanies on the right just won’t let it go! You know, those “phony” scandals. Like a dog with too many bones. Except they aren’t phony. People died and freedoms are at stake.

In an address two weeks ago at Knox College in Galesburg, Illinois, Obama stated: “With an endless parade of distractions, political posturing and phony scandals, Washington has taken its eye off the ball,” and then said that the GOP “needs to stop.” Yesterday, he parroted it again saying that the nation is being distracted by “phony” scandals and isn’t keeping focus on middle class economic issues. Let’s not forget that the White House has, in the past, at least acknowledged, and in some cases feigned, outrage at these scandals.

Merriam Webster online dictionary defines “phony” as: not genuine or real: as a (1) intended to deceive or mislead; (2) intended to defraud or counterfeit, arousing suspicion, probably dishonest, having no basis in fact, fictitious, false, a sham, hypocritical or specious.

The scandals, as we all know, are 1) Benghazi; 2) IRS targeting of conservatives; 3) NSA spying on Americans; and 4) DOJ surveillance of US reporters.

Benghazi is a “phony” scandal that didn’t have to be, and four Americans died on September 11, 2012. They didn’t have to die. First, aid could have been given to those at the Embassy before and during the attack. Instead Hillary Clinton ignored warnings, took away security measures that could have protected them or brought everyone there home During the attacks aid could have gotten there, instead a “stand down” order was issued and the President went to bed. But Obama had an election to win, so he tried to turn it to his advantage by blaming it on an anti-Muslim video instead of calling it the terrorist attack it was. Then he sent Susan Rice to lie for him. Now there are reports of the CIA intimidating and threatening witnesses who were going to testify. Hey, he used the IRS, why not the CIA?

About the IRS … Here’s Obama’s statement from May 15, 2013: “I’ve reviewed the Treasury Department watchdog’s report, and the misconduct that it uncovered is inexcusable. It’s inexcusable, and Americans are right to be angry about it, and I am angry about it. I will not tolerate this kind of behavior in any agency, but especially in the IRS, given the power that it has and the reach that it has into all of our lives.”

Sound like someone who thinks it’s a “phony” scandal? Representative Darrell Issa has been a truth seeker on this issue. He has been holding hearings, one of which has borne out the closest ties to the White House yet. William Wilkins, Chief Counsel for the IRS and appointed by Obama, helped develop the agency’s guidelines for reviewing “tea party” cases. Now that it’s becoming clearer that the orders have come from, most likely, Obama himself, it’s “phony.”

NSA is conducting widespread, untargeted, domestic surveillance on millions of Americans; collecting and keeping records and now working in tandem with the DOJ to do even more record keeping on all of us. When this first broke it was just “collecting phone numbers, nothing more, on people suspected of terrorist ties calling overseas only”, except it wasn’t. Orders from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (or FISC) direct carriers to provide “on an ongoing daily basis” all call records for any call “wholly within the United States, including local telephone calls” and any call made “between the United States and abroad.” What does this actually mean? Carriers must send the NSA a record of every Verizon customer’s call history, including every call made, the time of the call, the duration of the call, and other “identifying information” for the phone and call.

Now there’s even more. The DEA has been doing the same thing in tandem with the NSA. They’ve been collecting information from “intelligence intercepts, wiretaps, informants and a massive database of telephone records” and disseminating the data to authorities across the nation to “help them launch criminal investigations of Americans” — supposedly those who are being investigated as drug dealers, but the information they are collecting spreads a much wider net. The Special Operations Division (“SOD”) is handling this and they are made up of a partnership of numerous government agencies including the NSA, CIA, FBI, IRS and the Department of Homeland Security. They are also instructing Agents to lie about the fact that SOD provided the information (because it is highly unconstitutional) and “recreate” a legal timeline in order to get warrants to arrest or search (i.e. perjure themselves).

Reporters were taught a lesson in how the Obama Administration feels about their 1st Amendment rights earlier this year as well. Why? Because they didn’t kowtow to the polishing of Obama’s election year reputation and hold a story to help do that. The reprisal was a secret and massive raid on the records, a data mining effort of phone and internet records of the AP in general and several reporters. Reporter Sharly Attkisson tweeted that people were afraid to call or email her, personally or professionally. Obama’s message to reporters? Do what I say or I will shut you down. Media heard it loud and clear.

What I find renders me almost speechless about this whole thing is that 100% of Americans aren’t outraged. Why aren’t you angry? People died and our freedoms are being threatened by government abuse of power. At best all we see is a decided “yawn” from most Americans. We deserve better … we should demand better and let Obama know that HE is the phony.

Image: Graffiti streetart Cognac; author: User:Chourmo; Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license

 

20 Cities That May Face Bankruptcy After Detroit


Image: 20 Cities That May Face Bankruptcy After Detroit

By Stephen Moore

 Think Motown is the only major U.S. city in a boatload of financial trouble? Think again.

Detroit’s bankruptcy filing sent shivers down the spine of municipal bondholders, government employees, and big-city urban residents all over the country.

That’s because many of the 61 largest U.S. cities are plagued with the same kinds of retirement legacy costs that sent Detroit into Chapter 9 bankruptcy this summer.

Editor’s Note: ‘This Wasn’t an Accident’ — Experts Testify on Financial Meltdown

These cities have amassed $118 billion in unfunded healthcare liabilities. These are legal promises to pay healthcare benefits to municipal workers beyond the employee contributions to finance those funds. This is a giant fiscal sink hole — and because of defined benefit plans, the hole keeps getting deeper.

Detroit may be the largest city in American history to go bankrupt, but it is not alone. The city raced to the financial insolvency finish line before anyone else in its class.

Keep an eye on “too big to fail” cities like Chicago, Philadelphia, and New York.

According to an analysis by the Manhattan Institute, several Chicago pension funds are in worse financial shape than the worker pensions in Detroit. One is only 25 percent funded, and where the other 75 percent of the money will come from is anyone’s guess. And there are about a dozen major California cities having systemic problems paying their bills.

Here is my worry list, based on bond ratings and other data, of the top 20 cities to watch for financial troubles in the wake of the Detroit story:

1. Compton, Calif.
Compton has teetered on the brink of bankruptcy after it accrued a general-fund deficit of more than $40 million by borrowing from other funds, depleting what had been a $22 million reserve.

2. East Greenbush, N.Y.
A New York state audit concluded that years of fiscal mismanagement — including questionable employment contracts and illegal payments to town officials — left East Greenbush more than $2 million in debt.

3. Fresno, Calif.
Fresno had the ratings of its lease-revenue bonds downgraded to junk-level by Moody’s, which also downgraded its convention center and pension obligation bonds due to the city’s “exceedingly weak financial position.”

4. Gulf County, Fla.
Fitch Ratings warned that Gulf County’s predominately rural economy is “narrowly focused,” with income levels one-quarter below national averages and economic indicators for the county also comparing unfavorably to national averages.

5. Harrisburg, Pa.
Harrisburg is at least $345 million in debt, thanks largely to municipal bonds it guaranteed in order to finance upgrades to its problematic waste-to-energy trash incinerator.

6. Irvington, N.J.
Irvington has a violent crime rate six times higher than New Jersey’s average, with Moody’s citing “wealth indicators below state and national averages and tax-base and population declines due to increased tax appeals and foreclosures.”

7. Jefferson County, Ala.
Jefferson County, home to the city of Birmingham, has been dealing with the collapse of refinancing for a sewer bond. It filed for bankruptcy protection in 2011 over a $3.14 billion sewer bond debt.

8. Menasha, Wis.
Menasha defaulted on bonds in 2007 it had issued to fund a steam plant which has since closed and left the city permanently in the red and, as of 2011, had $16 million in general fund revenue, but had $43.4 million in outstanding debt.

9. Newburgh, N.Y.
Newburgh was cited by Moody’s for “tax base erosion and a weak socioeconomic profile,” with 26 percent of its population below the poverty line and its school district facing a $2 million budget gap.

10. Oakland, Calif.
Oakland is trying to get out of a Goldman Sachs-brokered interest rate swap that is costing it $4 million a year. According to a recent city audit, Oakland has lost $250 million from a 1997 pension obligation bond sale and subsequent investment strategy.

11. Philadelphia School District, Pa.
Philadelphia’s school district, the nation’s eighth-largest, faces a $304 million deficit in its $2.35 billion budget, and is seeking $133 million from labor-contract savings to prevent further cutbacks.

12. Pontiac, Mich.
Pontiac, where the emergency manager has restructured the city’s finances, was downgraded by Moody’s, reflecting the city’s history of fiscal distress and narrow liquidity.

13. Providence, R.I.
Providence, rumored to be filing for bankruptcy for more than a year, experienced consecutive deficits through fiscal 2012, has a high-debt burden and significant unfunded pension liabilities, as well as high unemployment and low income levels.

14. Riverdale, Ill.
The credit rating for Riverdale is under review by Moody’s because the city has not released an audit of interim or unaudited data for the year that ended April 30, 2012.

15. Salem, N.J.
Salem is under close fiscal supervision after it issued bonds to finance the construction of the Finlaw State Office Building, which was delayed by construction issues, and its leasing revenues are not enough to cover the debt payments and the maintenance fees.

16. Strafford County, N.H.
Strafford County regularly borrows money to cover its short-term cash needs after it spent two-fifths of its budget on a nursing home, which lost $36 million from 2004 to 2009.

17. Taylor, Mich.
Taylor has a large deficit and is vulnerable due to significant declines in the tax base, limited financial flexibility, and above-average unfunded pension obligations.

18. Vadnais Heights, Minn.
The St. Paul suburb of Vadnais Heights had its debt rating downgraded to junk last fall by Moody’s after the city council voted to stop payments to a sports center financed by bonds.

19. Wenatchee, Wash.
Wenatchee defaulted on $42 million in debt associated with the Town Toyota Center, a multipurpose arena, and has ongoing financial issues due to the default.

20. Woonsocket, R.I.
Woonsocket faces near-term liquidity shortages necessitating an advance in state aid, a high-debt burden and unfunded pension liabilities, with Moody’s citing the city’s continuing difficulties in making spending cuts because of poor management and imprecise accounting.

The stock market rally in the first half of 2013 has helped many of these cities as they invest pension contributions and get higher returns. But another market downturn could send these teetering cities back into the red.

And the states can’t bail them out because Illinois, California, New York, and Pennsylvania face their own money challenges. Republicans in Congress have been insistent that Washington, D.C., won’t be tossing a life-preserver to troubled cities, either.
The view among conservatives in Washington is that a federal bailout would only reward cities for their own bad behavior. But that won’t stop the unions from trying.

What do most of these ailing cities all have in common? Well, consider that the vast majority are located in states with forced unions, non-right-to-work states.

“Right-to-work laws attract people and businesses,” says labor economist Richard Vedder of Ohio University. “Non-right-to-work states repel them.” His statistics show that cities in states with right-to-work laws have sturdier tax bases and higher employment levels.

Unions control state legislatures and city halls in non-right-to-work states, so it can become politically paralyzing to try to fix the problem of runaway labor costs.

Another common trait of financially troubled cities: years and years of liberal governance.

For at least the last 20 years major U.S. cities have been playgrounds for left-wing experiments — high taxes on the rich; sanctuaries for illegal immigrants; super-minimum wage rules; strict gun-control laws (that actually contribute to high crime rates); regulations and paperwork that make it onerous to open a business or develop on your own property; crony capitalism with contracts going to political donors and friends; and failing schools ruled by teacher unions, with little competition or productivity.

Starting in the 1970s, Detroit became inhospitable if you wanted to raise a family and send your kids to good schools. Criminal predators also made cities like Detroit unlivable for families with children. Businesses that provide jobs often faced citywide income taxes that were layered on top of state income taxes.

“Declining cities are jurisdictions that levy local income taxes,” a Cato Institute report concluded. Detroit levies a 2.5 percent income tax; New York’s is 5 percent.

Another problem has been the decline in family structure that has become acute in so many big cities across the country, from Los Angeles to New York. In many cities, as many as two out of three children are born to a family without a father. As Charles Murray of the American Enterprise Institute has warned, “Single-mother families are a recipe for social chaos.”

They are a major factor in high-poverty levels of many U.S. cities, again with Detroit being exhibit A. Welfare reforms have helped, but much work needs to be done to reinstall a culture of traditional two-parent families in urban areas. This would lead to less crime, fewer school dropouts, more businesses, and more social stabilization.

But for all these problems, cities could see a potential renaissance. More empty-nesters in their 50s and 60s are moving back into central cities like Chicago and Boston, New York and Washington, D.C., because of the cultural amenities — fine restaurants, the theater, sports, fashion, and river or lakeside condominium properties. As baby
boomers retire, cities may see new populations moving in.

But this creates a Catch 22 for American cities trying to recapture their glory days and attract new residents.

Who wants to pay taxes for retired city workers when they don’t provide any services?

These legacy costs are a fiscal millstone. They put cities in a service decline spiral, because current taxes go to retired teachers and other municipal retirees, while city managers and mayors are forced to lay off firefighters, police, and teachers. Detroit has three retired city workers collecting a pension for every two currently working.

The Vallejo, Calif., city manager once told me when that city couldn’t pay its bills several years ago, “You have no idea how bad it is here. We are now paying for three police forces: one that is working and two that are retired.”

Given that payment of the benefits are often legally guaranteed contracts, bankruptcy may  be a salvation for some cities. It is a way to hit the reset button and erase those costs so cities can start over.

A good example is Stockton, Calif., which overdeveloped and took on $1 billion in debt during the Golden State housing boom six years ago. When the economy collapsed and housing values plummeted, Stockton couldn’t pay its supersized debts. It declared bankruptcy, but now is starting to rebuild.

According to The Fresno Bee, “Stockton has negotiated voluntary agreements with current workers to eliminate retiree healthcare entirely and is awaiting court approval of a plan to eliminate healthcare benefits for existing retirees as well. City Manager Bob Deis says those reductions will generate $1.6 billion in savings. Three years after it sought bankruptcy protection, Stockton is beginning to right itself. Employee pay and benefits have been downsized, allowing for necessary investments in public safety.”

So can America’s great and iconic cities make a financial and population comeback? The answer is certainly yes, if they can erase from their books the mistakes of 50 years of labor-union political control.

Bankruptcy, strangely enough, may not be the end for cities, but perhaps the dawning of a new urban revival.

Stephen Moore is senior economics writer and member of the editorial board for The Wall Street Journal.

Editor’s Note: ‘This Wasn’t an Accident’ — Experts Testify on Financial Meltdown

$100 million mega-mosque coming to this state


WND EXCLUSIVE // http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/100-million-mega-mosque-coming-to-this-state/

‘We will show our friends in the U.S. who we actually are’

 

 

author-image Chelsea Schilling About | Email | Archive

Chelsea Schilling is a commentary editor and staff writer for WND, an editor of Jerome Corsi’s Red Alert and a proud U.S. Army veteran. She has also worked as a news producer at USA Radio Network and as a news reporter for the Sacramento Union.
 
Turkey’s Islamist government is constructing a massive $100 million, 15-acre mosque in Lanham, Md., that is expected to “become the largest and most striking example of Islamic architecture in the Western hemisphere” by October 2014.

In May, Turkey Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan placed a ceremonial stone at the construction site. Now the five-building project known as the Turkish American Culture and Civilization Center is well underway in the town just outside Washington, D.C., with a population of about 10,000.

As the Clarion Project explains, mosques have been springing up all over the U.S. in recent years. As many as 80 percent of the mosques in America have been built in the last 12 years – since the 2001 terror attacks.

“A large majority of mosques in the United States are led by Wahhabi clerics,” the Project explains. “Wahhabism is an extreme brand of Islam practiced dominantly in Saudi Arabia. According to Muslim estimates, up to 80 percent of mosques in the U.S. are owned, operated and led by Wahhabis.

“These radical mosques often promote the installation of Sharia law, an extreme ideology that considers ‘non-believers’ to be infidels. According to Wahhabis, jihad or support of jihad is a Muslim duty. They believe that suicide bombers and martyrs are worthy of the highest praise and reward. And radicals are anticipating the day when an Islamic state will one day span the U.S.”

How can you defend America against Islamic supremacist encroachment? In “Stop the Islamization of America,” renowned activist Pamela Geller provides the answer, offering proven, practical guidance on how freedom lovers can stop jihadist initiatives in local communities.

As many as four studies have independently concluded that 80 percent of U.S. mosques “were teaching jihad, Islamic supremacism, and hatred and contempt for Jews and Christians,” Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch has reported.

Spencer noted, “We are increasingly seeing Muslim patrols in the proximity of mosques saying to passers-by that they can’t walk a dog, wear a skirt, drink alcohol.”

But Dr. Yasar Colak, president of the Turkish American Community Center, told the World Bulletin his organization has special plans for the new mega-mosque, which will be designed in accordance with 16th century Ottoman architecture:

“We will show our friends in the U.S. who we actually are and the main principle of our civilization,” he said. “We will present our peaceful culture. We will try to erase the bad reputation of Muslims and Islam created following September 11 attacks.”

In 2009, WND was one of the first to report plans for a new Islamic mosque just steps from Ground Zero where Muslim terrorists murdered 2,751 people in the name of Allah on Sept. 11, 2001. The New York Daily News recently reported the same developer now “controls three adjacent properties on Park Place, leaving neighbors wondering whether the mysterious owner has a mega mosque planned for the block.”

According to the Assembly of Turkish American Associations, the Turkish American Culture and Civilization Center will include facilities for activities relating to:

  • Religious services and education
  • Turkish language education
  • Turkish history lectures
  • Turkish culinary arts classes
  • Cultural exchange
  • Recreation, sports, and health
  • U.S. immigration and citizenship
  • Women’s equality and empowerment education
  • Civic engagement and public advocacy
  • Business, commerce and trade development
  • Spiritual wellness

“There are 19 [Turkish American Community Centers] nationwide,” the Assembly states. ”TACCs represent a board spectrum of Turkish American society, promoting secular democracy and respect towards diverse lifestyles.”

As the Clarion Project reported, the Turkish mosque groundbreaking ceremony was attended by the leaders of two U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entities: Naeem Baig, president of the Islamic Circle of North America, and Mohamed Magid, president of the Islamic Society of North America. A 1991 memo links both organizations to the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood. Page 7 of the memo states that the Brotherhood’s “work in America” is “a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within.”

Also in May, President Obama welcomed Erdogan, who has been a constant advocate for Hamas in Gaza, to the White House. Erdogan brought with him Mavi Marmara, the father of an Islamic jihadist killed in the 2010 raid on a Gaza flotilla. Marmara has indicated he wants the Obama administration to sue Israel over the raid.

Erdogan has said, “The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and the faithful our soldiers.”

At the May ceremony for the new mosque, he warned of groups promoting “Islamophobia,” and just one month earlier, he called Zionism and “Islamophobia” “crime[s] against humanity.”

You need to have the Adobe Flash Player to view this content.

Judicial Watch noted, “During the recent visit to the mosque construction site in Maryland, Erdogan’s deputy prime minister, Bülent Arınç, slipped away from the delegation for a day, according to a newspaper that covers Turkish affairs abroad. Arınç reportedly visited an ‘Islamic scholar’ who lives in self-imposed exile in Pennsylvania.”

Americans overwhelmingly opposed the Ground Zero mosque, but why was it being built in the first place? WND’s Molotov Mitchell explores what’s really going on in his exclusive in-depth, investigative documentary, “The Mosque.”

British planning lawyer Gavin Boby, an expert on zoning permissions who has successfully blocked the construction of more than 16 mosques in the U.K., explained that the significance of mosques extends far beyond religious purposes:

This is the Islamic doctrine, every mosque is instructed to be based upon the original mosque in Medina, where Muhammad originally in the 7th century set up his religious-political doctrine of social control, and the mosque is a place of government, it is a place where treaties are made, death sentences are passed, armies are blessed and dispatched, it is primarily about political control and it is very much used as a tool of advance. Prime Minister Erdogan of Turkey talked about that, the Muslim Brotherhood compared their mosques to battalions and to beehives, where Muslims will gather and then advance, and there’s nothing new about this, it goes back to the 7th century.

In his 2010 exclusive WND column, William Federer, author of “What Every American Needs to Know About the Quran: A History of Islam and the United States,” listed dozens of historical cases in which mosques were erected as signs of Muslim conquest.

In 630 A.D. after he captured Mecca, Muhammad himself converted the Ka’aba, a pagan pantheon, into a mosque.

Boby, who runs the Law and freedom Foundation, also explained that the word “mosque” is strategically omitted during the application process:

“The method is very simple,” he said. “A planning application gets submitted for a mosque in an area, and it will never be called a ‘mosque.’ It will be called a community center; an inter-faith center; a public community, harmony-building outreach center, and then the neighbors contact us, and it’s usually people who have never been involved in politics before, are shy of politics and officialdom and ask us to help them to resist it.”

Dem Senator: Right to Keep and Bear Arms Is ‘Not a God-Given Right’


During a May appearance on Rachel Maddow Lean Forward Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said gun rights are not “God-given” and any claim that the Founding Fathers wanted U.S. citizens armed so they could repel a tyranny “is insane.”

Murphy said, “The Second Amendment is not an absolute right, not a God-given right. It has always had conditions upon it like the First Amendment has.”

This is disturbing language from a sitting Senator, especially when you consider that the First Amendment opens with the phrase “Congress shall make no law” and the Second Amendment states that the right to keep and bear arms “shall not be infringed.”

Moreover, anyone who has studied the two major political philosophies among our Founding Fathers knows that Anti-Federalists persuaded Federalists to add the Bill of Rights to the Constitution as a check on the government rather than the people. The Bill of Rights allowed James Madison to set apart and protect those certain, “unalienable rights” Thomas Jefferson had described in the Declaration of Independence.

These were those rights with which Jefferson said we were “endowed by [our] Creator.” In other words, they were God-given.

Murphy claims that talk of possessing arms as a check on the government is a demonstration of how the NRA has morphed into a “paramilitary group.” But long before the NRA was even thought of, Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story wrote:

The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them.

Lesson Learned


Author Unknown

An unemployed man is desperate to support his family of a wife and three kids.  He applies for a janitor’s job at a large firm and easily passes an aptitude test.

The human resources manager tells him, “You will be hired at minimum wage of $5.35 an hour.  Let me have your e-mail address so that we can get you in the loop.  Our system will automatically e-mail you all the forms and advise you when to start and where to report on your first day.”

Taken back, the man protests that he is poor and has neither a computer nor an e-mail address.

To this the manager replies, “You must understand that to a company like ours that means that you virtually do not exist.  Without an e-mail address you can hardly expect to be employed by a high-tech firm.  Good day.”

Stunned, the man leaves.  Not knowing where to turn and having $10 in his wallet, he walks past a farmers’ market and sees a stand selling 25 lb. crates of beautiful red tomatoes.  He buys a crate, carries it to a busy corner and displays the tomatoes. In less than 2 hours he sells all the tomatoes and makes 100% profit.

Repeating the process several times more that day, he ends up with almost $100 and arrives home that night with several bags of groceries for his family.

During the night he decides to repeat the tomato business the next day.  By the end of the week he is getting up early every day and working into the night. He multiplies his profits quickly.

Early in the second week he acquires a cart to transport several boxes of tomatoes at a time, but before a month is up he sells the cart to buy a broken-down pickup truck.

At the end of a year, he owns three old trucks.  His two sons have left their neighborhood gangs to help him with the tomato business, his wife is buying the tomatoes, and his daughter is taking night courses at the community college so she can keep books for him.

By the end of the second year he has a dozen very nice used trucks and employs fifteen previously unemployed people, all selling tomatoes.  He continues to work hard.

Time passes and at the end of the fifth year he owns a fleet of nice trucks and a warehouse that his wife supervises, plus two tomato farms that the boys manageThe tomato company’s payroll has put hundreds of homeless and jobless people to work.  His daughter reports that the business grossed over one million dollars.

Planning for the future, he decides to buy some life insurance.

Consulting with an insurance adviser, he picks an insurance plan to fit his new circumstances.  Then the adviser asks him for his e-mail address in order to send the final documents electronically.

When the man replies that he doesn’t have time to mess with a computer and has no e-mail address, the insurance man is stunned, “What, you don’t have e-mail?  No computer?  No Internet?  Just think where you would be today if you’d had all of that five years ago!”

“Ha!” snorts the man. “If I’d had e-mail five years ago I would be sweeping floors at Microsoft and making $5.35 an hour.”

Which brings us to the moral of the story: Since you got this story by e-mail, you’re probably closer to being a janitor than a millionaire.

Sadly, I received it also.

“We Have Plenty Of Money If We Just Loot More People”


There has never been a clearer picture of Socialism than the following story. No longer is the Radical Socialist Left Wing spinning their intentions. Now they are outright saying, “We are Socialist and proud of it.”

Now, what are we going to do about it? Mid-Terms anyone? – Jerry Broussard

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The words came from Democratic Representative Keith Ellison of Minnesota:“The bottom line is we’re not broke, there’s plenty of money, it’s just the government doesn’t have it.”

 

You couldn’t ask for a clearer portrayal of the ethics of plunder. “We” are the government and “we” are not broke because all the government needs to do is to take money from other people. Ellison was advocating for his “Inclusive Prosperity Act.” He explained, “The government has a right, the government and the people of the United States have a right to run the programs of the United States. Health, welfare, housing – all these things.”

 

The looting mechanism proposed in the “Inclusive Prosperity Act” is a sales tax on every sale/purchase of a stock, bond, or derivative. This would arguably be destructive to the economy, but I’ll leave that argument to the side. Instead, let me ask, if everything turned out as rosy as Ellison pretends, would we be better off? Ellison claims his new tax would rake in $300 billion a year.

 

I have no idea how realistic his assumptions are. Is he assuming that there would be no reduction in sales of stocks, bonds, or derivatives? Whatever. Pretend he is right and we get $300 billion a year coming into the government. What does he want to do with it? The Bill itself says the money will be used to “fund international sustainable prosperity programs such as health care investments, AIDS treatment, research and prevention programs, climate change adaptation and mitigation efforts by developing countries, and international assistance.”

 

I’m not going to address the value of these goals, or if they are based on hallucinations, in some cases, or not. We don’t need to go into all that. The essential point here is that Ellison is questing for more government spending. The best you can say about him is that he doesn’t admit that he wants to increase the national deficit. But what was that deficit? For 2012 the national deficit was over a Trillion dollars for the fourth year in a row.

 

So the man who is telling us that “we have plenty of money,” even if we assume he really can get all the revue he claims he can get, year after year, is powerless. $300 billion wouldn’t even cover a third of the national deficit if we didn’t spend it on anything else.

 

So, even by these wildly optimistc claims, we are still just a larger version of Detroit heading toward inevitable collapse and bankruptcy. Ellison would loot more people to simply make our financial situation even less safe. He is living in a dream world.

MAN STUFF: 18 Ways to be a Killer Dad


The following is very good and I recommend it’s reading for everyone, especially new dads and Grandpas. The article this was taken from can be found at the end of this piece.

My NUMBER ONE is,  “Raise them in a Christian home.” Not a religious christian home, but a Christian home where mom and dad have a genuine personal relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ and lives that testimony every day.

By / 5 August 2013 / http://clashdaily.com/2013/08/man-stuff-18-ways-to-be-a-killer-dad/

AOM
164 8 0 172 Share

AOM- What follows are the fatherhood tips I wish they’d passed out to me upon the delivery of my first child. It would have helped a ton. I hope they’ll help you become an even more awesome dad than you already are — feel free to refer back to them as a cheat sheet, anytime you need some help.

  1. Cherish your time with them. One thing that will amaze you is how quickly the years will fly.
  2. It gets easier. Others may have different experiences, but I’ve always found the first couple of months the most difficult, when the baby is brand new and wants to feed at all hours of the night and you often have sleepless nights and walk around all day like zombies.
  3. Don’t look at anything as “mom” duties — share responsibilities. While there are a lot of good things from our grandparents’ day that we should bring back, the traditional dad/mom split of parenting duties isn’t one of them.
  4. Love conquers all. This one sounds corny, but it should be at the center of your dad operating philosophy: above all, show your children love.
  5. Kids like making decisions. Teach your child to make decisions, and he’ll grow up much more capable — and happier.
  6. A little patience goes a long way. As a parent, I know as well as anyone how easy it is to lose your patience and temper.
  7. Sense of humor required. There will be times when your child does something that might make you blow your lid — stay cool.  Try to laugh it off.
  8. Read to them, often. Whether you’re a reader or not, reading to your children (from the time they’re babies onward) is crucial.
  9. Don’t be the absent dad. The biggest mistake that dads make are not being there for their children.
  10. Let them play. Kids really develop through playing — and while it might seem obvious, you should allow them as much free play as possible.
  11. Spark their imagination. Free play, mentioned above, is the best way to develop the imagination, but sometimes you can provide a little spark.
  12. Limit TV and video games. I’m not saying you have to be Amish or anything, but too much of this type of entertainment keeps them from doing more imaginative playing, from reading, from getting outside to exercise.
  13. Learn the “firm no”. While I’m all for giving kids the freedom to choose, and for free play, and lots of other freedoms, there should be limits.
  14. Model good behavior. It’s one thing to tell you child what she should do, but to say one thing and do another just ruins the message.
  15. Treat their mother with respect, always. Some fathers can be abusive toward their spouse, and that will lead to a cycle of abuse when the child grows up.
  16. Let them be themselves. Many parents try to mold their child into the person they want their child to be … even if the child’s personality doesn’t fit that mold.
  17. Teach them independence. From an early age, teach your children to do things for themselves, gradually letting them be more independent as they grow older.
  18. Stand together with mom. It’s no good to have one parent say one thing, just to have the other contradict that parent.

For the whole enchilada, click here –

‘Regular’ Muslims and the Muslim Brotherhood — Can Either Be Trusted?


By / 5 August 2013 / http://clashdaily.com/2013/08/regular-muslims-and-the-muslim-brotherhood-can-either-be-trusted/

Muslim_Brotherhood_EmblemPresident Obama has become intertwined with one of the oldest, prominent and influential Islamic political terrorist organizations in today’s modern world.  On a global scale they can be found on every continent and in every corner of the world they infest, they attempt to make national policy change to favor radical Islamists and sharia law.

Recently, one of Egyptian’s leaders of this group called for an attack on the United States Embassy in Egypt for supporting the removal of Egypt’s Islamic president Mohamed Morsi.    This Islamic extremist group has also been protesting the possible appointment of the New York City police commissioner, Ray Kelly, as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security.

I am sure Barry will honor their request and insert Sheila Jackson Lee for Homeland Security Secretary instead of the better choice.  That alone is a scary thought. By now I am sure you have figured out that I am showing a small overview of the Muslim Brotherhood.

“The Society of Muslim Brothers” i.e.. Muslim Brotherhood, was founded in Egypt in 1928 and up until recently, their leader was Mohammed Badie.  Due to the ousting of Morsi there are rumors that Badie has been replaced. Known United States MB terrorist cells can be found in Houston, Texas ~ Detroit, Michigan ~ Tulsa, Oklahoma ~ Plainfield, Indiana ~ Cleveland, Ohio ~ Boston, Massachusetts ~ and of course most of us are aware of the small cell of six that works in Washington D.C. for Obama.  This state location data is from 2007, the most current that I could find.  I am sure the organization numbers and cells have grown since this information was gathered.

What I find most troubling about the MB and most other terrorist groups is the strategical philosophy they are using to infiltrate our nation. During a Federal Investigation in 2007 a document was found that was written by a key MB operative, Mohamed Akram, which uncovered the intent of the organization. This excerpt has been taken from “The Counter Jihad Report” titled, “Muslim Brotherhood Plan for America”.

These “friends” were identified by Akram and the Brotherhood as groups that could help convince Muslims “that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands … so that … God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions.”

Akram was well aware that in the U.S., it would be extremely difficult to promote Islam by means of terror attacks. Thus the “grand jihad” that he and his Brotherhood comrades envisioned was not a violent one involving bombings and shootings, but rather a stealth (or “soft”) jihad aiming to impose Islamic law (Sharia) over every region of the earth by incremental, non-confrontational means, such as working to “expand the observant Muslim base”; to “unif[y] and direc[t] Muslims’ efforts”; and to “present Islam as a civilization alternative.” At its heart, Akram’s document details a plan to conquer and Islamize the United States – not as an ultimate objective, but merely as a stepping stone toward the larger goal of one day creating “the global Islamic state.”

In line with this objective, Akram and the Brotherhood resolved to “settle” Islam and the Islamic movement within the United States, so that the Muslim religion could be “enabled within the souls, minds and the lives of the people of the country.” Akram explained that this could be accomplished “through the establishment of firmly-rooted organizations on whose bases civilization, structure and testimony are built.”

He urged Muslim leaders to make “a shift from the collision mentality to the absorption mentality,” meaning that they should abandon any tactics involving defiance or confrontation, and seek instead to implant into the larger society a host of seemingly benign Islamic groups with ostensibly unobjectionable motives; once those groups had gained a measure of public acceptance, they would be in a position to more effectively promote societal transformation by the old Communist technique of “boring from within.”

I have a very difficult time understanding how we can allow anyone from this organization to be working for our President and having access to sensitive information. CAN ANY MUSLIM BE TRUSTED or is it just the Muslim Brotherhood that can not be?

Image: Source http://www.verfassungsschutz.niedersachsen.de/master/C806292_N808071
_L20_D0_I541.html; author: Muslim Brotherhood; public domain

Achtung! Hitler-and-History Lies We’ve Been Told


By / 5 August 2013 / http://clashdaily.com/2013/08/say-whattt-hitler-and-history-lies-we-have-been-told/

Stalin_HitlerFor decades, even while he was in power, Adolf Hitler was attacked as a right-winger. Of course, his racism provoked that assessment as well as his militarism; however, when put to the test and proper study, what we have been taught and what we have been told by learned scholars is completely wrong. The obviousness of that fact is plain if one sits down and looks at the reality. Hitler was no free thinking, wild eyed individualist — he was a corporatist and a socialist.

First of all, we have him admitting his socialism. He doesn’t call Nazism by anything else other than National Socialism. Professors I know would be flipping their lids at me for daring to say what I am saying, but I knew they were lying when I was studying this. How could Hitler, who controlled Churches, Media, Schools, the Military, Health Care and everything else, be a right-winger? Was it because he was a racist? So, racism apparently makes a Nazi, or member of the National SOCIALIST German WORKER’S Party a right-winger? How convenient.

When I was in school, as in high school, I was always wondering why my teachers called Hitler right-wing. After learning about the rise of National Socialism in Germany, and then Communism, I was struck by similarities. When I asked about this issue, I was told well, they had similarities but really they were far different. That seemed convenient then and it makes zero sense now. Why, you ask? I’ll explain.

Any form of government that controls healthcare, the economy, education and the news media is totalitarian by definition. And if the government controls the economy, either through out-right central control or through large scale corporations, they are socialist. Healthcare control is just a freebie because, if you control the economy, you by virtue of that will control health care. Nazi controlled Germany was all that. For an example, look at the Nazi euthanasia program:
http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005200

So, why would professors, high school teachers and so called learned scholars throw Adolf Hitler and his love of the worker, and controlling people’s lives even to whom they married, be so happy to throw him at us? I have a theory. It is not that complicated. Just follow my line of thinking.

Hitler and his minions wanted to control Germany. They said they were patriotic Germans. This lie helped them establish their credentials with the veterans of the First World War and conservatives who were looking to anyone to give Germany back her place in the world. The Communists were not patriotic.

Here’s the difference: the message. Hitler knew how the rank and file German folk felt about Germany and he used it. His later rantings, as Berlin was being razed to the ground and his empire was reduced to a city block, proves that he was no more a German Patriot than any Communist his brown shirts killed. In other words, Hitler used patriotism to get power. There is a lot more to be said about this subject but there’s no space here to talk about it.

Hitler was able to harness the German’s love of discipline for his efforts. The Germans were very easy to seduce. Now think about this: almost 15 years of staggering, mind-boggling inflation, lawlessness and amorality and here’s this small man with a small mustache going on about law and order and morality. In reality, he was no more law-abiding or worried about morals than the people he wanted to destroy, the Communists. He used the German fear of Communism to shove National Socialism down the Germans’ throats and they didn’t realize it. It was a choice between two versions of Lucifer and they had no idea because they were so brow beaten and done.

So were Adolf Hitler and his minion’s right-wingers? When I think of “right-wing” I think of Libertarians, no centralized government. People governing themselves. I don’t think of an institution of any kind save for a military to protect interests, borders etc. I don’t think of institutionalized racism, forced euthanasia, forced military service, and zero free press. How is any of that “right-wing”?

Is merely calling Hitler a right-winger a sales pitch to sell the same thing he was selling? Did these leftist educators have to make Hitler look like a Republican, a rugged individualist, in order to sell what he sold? Think about it.

I asked that question when I was a sophomore in high school. My Dad agreed with me, of course. HE was the person who taught me to ask questions that began with “yeah”, “but” and “why”. The more I asked, as I grew older, the angrier the response was. When I was a senior in college I realized how much I’d been lied to. Hitler, for all of the garbage I’d been told, was actually one of THEM. And what’s worse they knew it. They know it still.

It is time for some honesty about history. It’s time for the facts. Adolf Hitler was a left-wing socialist. Just because he called himself a National Socialist does not make the facts untrue. He was a corporate fascist socialist.

Now I can hear the leftist scholars freaking out at this fact. He would not have been able to control Germany without the help of large corporate entities. He did not go to the conservatives for money. Outward support and for tea and sympathy, yes, but for real support he ran to Krupp, Thiessen and the rest. Because, unlike other socialists, he knew you can’t go anywhere without money. He followed Mussolini’s lead. A socialist with the veneer of a corporatist. And that, my dears, is a fascist and that is also a kind of leftist socialist.

Facts are what they are. History is an undeniable force. She is strong in her ways and all consuming. She’s about the facts. It is time, when we talk about Germany and its bizarre experiment with National Socialism, to have those facts. Nazism is socialism splashed with corporate support on steroids and that is a fact. That is history.

Image

Remember This? September 29, 1959


Nikita K Saying

Mayor Bloomberg: New York Gun Crimes are Virginia’s Fault


The following article is what prompted my naming this blog; “What Did You Say?”. These extreme, liberal Left wackos are convinced that we are so stupid that we will actually believe them when they make such moronic statements. Please, someone stop the world and let them off. – Jerry Broussard

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 
 
Gun grabbers always blame gun crime on the guns themselves. Or global warming. Anything but the criminals. Like Sheila Jackson Lee said earlier this year: “Don’t blame the gangbangers.” They need rehabilitation, not punishment, and we just need to get rid of all the guns.
 
 
Chicago and Detroit violence isn’t blamed on draconian gun control laws, but the fact that surrounding states have fewer restrictions on guns. And those guns end up being smuggled into the metropolitan areas of Illinois and Michigan. New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is peddling that same excuse for his own city’s gun crimes. New York City is number three in number of gun murders committed between 2009 and 2010, after Los Angeles and Chicago. They had 1,101 murders committed with guns during that time period. And he can’t blame gun control.
 
 
He can’t take any responsibility. He’s got to find someone or something else to blame: “Despite all we do to keep our city safe, we’re increasingly at the mercy of weak national gun laws and weak gun laws in other states. We have been attacking this problem from every angle, but we cannot do it alone.”
 
 
Bloomberg’s chief policy adviser John Feinblatt stated that more guns from Virginia were recovered from New York City crime scenes than from any other state, and it’s been that way for a long time: “Take Virginia. That state requires no background checks for private sales, and the legislature in that state even recently rolled back their state laws by stripping their one-gun-a-month purchase limit.”
 
 
Did it ever occur to Bloomberg or Feinblatt that criminals are attracted to “gun-free zones?” Did it ever occur to them that maybe, just maybe, if New York adopted a more gun-friendly culture (which won’t happen), there would be a lot less desire for criminals to smuggle guns in from other states into New York, and a lot less desire to commit crimes at all? It’s not that other states are too gun-friendly. It’s that New York City, Detroit and Chicago have bought into the idea that gun-free zones are the answers to violence.
 
 
If every state repealed their respective gun control laws, then there would be no safe place for criminals. Violent crime would be rare.

REUTERS EXCLUSIVE: Federal Agents, Under Eric Holder, Caught Using NSA Wiretaps To Prosecute Americans… And Hiding Where Info Came From!


Reports like the following are becoming more and more numerous. This makes next years mid-terms all the more important. We MUST GET OUT THE VOTE AND STOP THIS MADNESS. – Jerry Broussard

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

REUTERS – A secretive U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration unit is funneling information from intelligence intercepts, wiretaps, informants and a massive database of telephone records to authorities across the nation to help them launch criminal investigations of Americans.

Although these cases rarely involve national security issues, documents reviewed by Reuters show that law enforcement agents have been directed to conceal how such investigations truly begin – not only from defense lawyers but also sometimes from prosecutors and judges.

The undated documents show that federal agents are trained to “recreate” the investigative trail to effectively cover up where the information originated, a practice that some experts say violates a defendant’s Constitutional right to a fair trial. If defendants don’t know how an investigation began, they cannot know to ask to review potential sources of exculpatory evidence – information that could reveal entrapment, mistakes or biased witnesses.

“I have never heard of anything like this at all,” said Nancy Gertner, a Harvard Law School professor who served as a federal judge from 1994 to 2011. Gertner and other legal experts said the program sounds more troubling than recent disclosures that the National Security Agency has been collecting domestic phone records. The NSA effort is geared toward stopping terrorists; the DEA program targets common criminals, primarily drug dealers.

“It is one thing to create special rules for national security,” Gertner said. “Ordinary crime is entirely different. It sounds like they are phonying up investigations.”

THE SPECIAL OPERATIONS DIVISION

The unit of the DEA that distributes the information is called the Special Operations Division, or SOD. Two dozen partner agencies comprise the unit, including the FBI, CIA, NSA, Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Homeland Security. It was created in 1994 to combat Latin American drug cartels and has grown from several dozen employees to several hundred.

A QUESTION OF CONSTITUTIONALITY

“That’s outrageous,” said Tampa attorney James Felman, a vice chairman of the criminal justice section of the American Bar Association. “It strikes me as indefensible.”

Lawrence Lustberg, a New Jersey defense lawyer, said any systematic government effort to conceal the circumstances under which cases begin “would not only be alarming but pretty blatantly unconstitutional.”

Lustberg and others said the government’s use of the SOD program skirts established court procedures by which judges privately examine sensitive information, such as an informant’s identity or classified evidence, to determine whether the information is relevant to the defense.

“You can’t game the system,” said former federal prosecutor Henry E. Hockeimer Jr. “You can’t create this subterfuge. These are drug crimes, not national security cases. If you don’t draw the line here, where do you draw it?”

The U.S. Has Already Been Taken Over by Muslims & Communists


By / 4 August 2013 / http://clashdaily.com/2013/08/the-u-s-has-already-been-taken-over-by-muslims-communists/

White_Flag

“Paranoia is just having the right information.”
William S. Burroughs (?)

Muslim operatives learned well from their KGB instructors: infiltrate, demoralize, propagandize, divide, create chaos and fear, destabilize, seize power from within.   The Soviets did not have to work too hard to fan Islamic flames of hatred toward the U.S. and Israel.  That hatred existed long before Soviet involvement. It is important to consider that anti-American and anti-Semitic forces, including Nazi Germany, have long coordinated with Islamic extremists, working  to destroy the U.S. and the Jewish people.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2348191/EXCLUSIVE-KGB-operation-seeded-Muslim-countries-anti-American-anti-Jewish-propaganda-1970s-laying-groundwork-Islamist-terrorism-U-S-Israeli-targets.html

http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/kgb-distributed-protocols-of-the-elders-of-zion-to-the-muslim-world/

Furthermore, it has long been established that the American Left, including people like Bill Ayers, the Clintons, and Barack Obama, have coordinated with enemies of the U.S.— both Muslim operatives and communist subversives.
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2436

http://conservativeamericaonline.blogspot.com/2013/03/wiki-leak-documents-indicate-obama.html

Considering just a few other realities makes the case: Barack Obama is truly an anti-American Muslim operative promoting communism and Sharia via stealth infiltration, destruction of the Constitution, and the collapse of the American economy.

Every move Obama has made in the last few years has favored Muslims, downplayed Americanism, and denigrated Israel.  Bowing and kissing the Saudi king’s hand should have been all the evidence needed to confirm the truth: Obama is a Muslim. As a Muslim, he has no affection for the Constitution, or respect for our way of life.

Obama’s White House is infiltrated by Muslim extremists including members of the Muslim Brotherhood.
http://frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/the-muslim-brotherhood-infiltrates-obama-administration/

He insists on supporting the terrorist Morsi in Egypt, sending him billions in cash and military hardware just before he was overthrown. Even in the wake of his downfall, Obama supports Morsi.

Obama went to bed as terrorists murdered our people in Benghazi.  He ignores Muslim atrocities and points the finger of accusation at our own soldiers and veterans, and Tea Party people.  He recently released $500 million or your tax dollars to Hamas!
http://newsmilitary.com/pages/15864515-barack-obama-sends-500-dollars-million-of-taxpayer-money-to

When a president wages illegal war in Libya, an impeachable offense, and no one does a thing about it, when he engages in many illegal activities without being held accountable, he gets the idea he has permission to operate above the law, a distinctly Muslim attitude.
http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obama-as-a-constitutional-lawyer-i-dont-need-to-follow-the-law/

His Attorney General is a carbon copy:

http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/holder-visits-adl-ignores-anti-semitism-talks-about-helping-muslims/

Like Holder and Obama, the Fort Hood shooter and members of the Council on Islamic-American Relations (a terror front group) agree: they are above U.S. law, serving the higher law of Islam.
http://clashdaily.com/2013/07/muslim-mayhem-dallas-cair-director-says-muslims-are-above-the-law/

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/26/accused-fort-hood-shooter-claims-us-military-at-war-with-his-religion/

Finally, just as in Europe, we are seeing a systematic takeover by Islam right here in the U.S.  From 2000 to 2010, the number of mosques in the U.S. went from 1,209 to 2,106.  In many of these facilities, hate is preached, and homegrown terrorism is supported.
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/religion/story/2012-02-29/islamic-worship-growth-us/53298792/1

What do we hear from Obama, Hillary Clinton, Janet Napolitano and others if you express concern about the obvious Islamic invasion of our country?

“Racist. Islamophobic! Moron!”

Time to face facts Americans: with the help of the mainstream media, an Islamo-Communist has occupied the White House, threated the Supreme Court, and effectively neutralized Congress.

Only a handful of legislators, led by Rand Paul and Ted Cruz, stand in Obama’s way.   If he is not dealt with soon through impeachment, one day, as Ronald Reagan warned, we will have to describe for our children and grandchildren what it was like in America when people were free.

Image: Source: http://www.worldpeace.no/THE-WHITE-FLAG.htm; author: Jan Jacobsen; Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license

Kass: Was police killing of 95-year-old necessary?


Is the following story a sign of things to come? Is this the kind of police state the Liberals want? If this 97 year old man coulod be treated this way, what will stop the police from doing the same to anyone they determine to be a threat? – Jerry Broussard

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Common sense tells me that cops don’t need a Taser or a shotgun to subdue a 95-year-old man.

August 03, 2013|John Kass // Chicago Tribune News; http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-08-03/news/ct-met-kass-0802-20130803_1_butcher-type-kitchen-knife-park-forest-police-taser
  • John Wrana and his wife, Helen in 2005. Helen died in 2005.
John Wrana and his wife, Helen in 2005. Helen died in 2005. ( Family photo from Attorney Nick Grapsas (handout))

When John Wrana was a young man, fit and strong and fighting in World War II with the U.S. Army Air Corps, did he ever think he’d end this way?

Just a few weeks shy of his 96th birthday, in need of a walker to move about, cops coming through the door of his retirement home with a Taser and a shotgun.

The old man, described by a family member as “wobbly” on his feet, had refused medical attention. The paramedics were called. They brought in the Park Forest police.

First they tased him, but that didn’t work. So they fired a shotgun, hitting him in the stomach with a bean-bag round. Wrana was struck with such force that he bled to death internally, according to the Cook County medical examiner.

“The Japanese military couldn’t get him at the age he was touchable, in a uniform in the war. It took 70 years later for the Park Forest police to do the job,” Wrana’s family attorney, Nicholas Grapsas, a former prosecutor, said in an interview with me Thursday.

Wrana’s family wants answers. The Illinois State Police are investigating the horrific incident but won’t comment, and neither will the Park Forest police pending the outcome of the inquiry.

I wasn’t at the scene, and maybe the police have a good explanation. But common sense tells me that cops don’t need a Taser or a shotgun to subdue a 95-year-old man.

And after doing some digging, I found there are two versions of events: The police version, and a new picture that raises questions of whether John Wrana was killed unnecessarily.

The Park Forest police version is that on the night of July 26, John Wrana, a resident of the Victory Centre senior living facility, threatened staff and paramedics with a 2-foot-long metal shoehorn and a metal cane. The police statement neglects to mention that the old man also used a walker, at least according to photographs supplied by Grapsas.

“Attempts were made verbally to have the resident comply with demands to drop the articles, to no avail,” the police statement reads. “The resident then armed himself with a 12-inch butcher type kitchen knife.”

But lawyer Grapsas says that Wrana’s family never saw a knife in his room and that staff also told him Wrana didn’t have such a knife.

“So where did the knife come from?” Grapsas asked.

The police statement leaves the impression that the staff was under threat, leaving police with no choice other than to shoot him.

But according to Maria Oliva, an executive with Pathway Senior Living, the staff was kept out of the room after police arrived. So there was no imminent threat to staff.

“The staff was not inside once the police were on the scene,” Oliva told us. “At different times the staff were in there, but not when they were called. They (the police) were in charge at that point.”

Police said there had been threats made against the staff. But Grapsas said he was told that staff begged to be allowed to try to calm down the old man.

“If there were threats to the staff, why did the staff want to intervene and say, ‘Let us handle this; we’ll get him calmed down’?” he asked.

Grapsas says he was told that police used a riot shield to come through the door before shooting bean-bag rounds at the old man as he sat in his chair.

Riot shields are used to push back mobs of angry young protesters in the streets, or against dangerous convicts in prison cells, not to subdue an old, old man in a chair.

“At some point, I’m told there were between five and seven police officers, they went back to the room with a riot shield in hand, entered the door and shot him with a shotgun that contained bean-bag rounds,” Grapsas said.

If this is true and police had a riot shield, why on earth would they need a shotgun?

Most veteran cops I talked to suspect this is a case of unnecessary force. I’ve never met a police officer who couldn’t handle a 95-year-old man in a walker. And John Wrana wasn’t Jason Bourne. He was an old war veteran who didn’t want to be pushed around.

But one senior police official who has trained police recruits in defensive tactics had a different take.

“When I first heard it, I was like, ‘C’mon,'” he said. “Then I thought it through. We don’t know what occurred. We don’t know what information they had at that time. If you don’t have all of the facts, it’s hard to judge someone. … Anyone can be dangerous.”

Sharon Mangerson, 74, doesn’t see her stepfather as dangerous.

Wrana and Mangerson’s mother, Helen, were married for more than 30 years. Helen died in 2005. So Wrana lived with Mangerson in the south suburbs until his health — and her health — began to fail.

She said he was a fiercely independent member of the greatest generation, honorably discharged as a sergeant after serving in India and Burma during the war.

“He was a very vital 95-year-old, let me tell you. He still played cards. He taught the 70-year-olds how to play gin rummy,” she said in an interview. “I used to admire him so much because he was able to keep doing those type of things. As independent as they come, trust me.”

On the night of the incident, he wound up at Advocate Christ Medical Center. The doctor was on the phone with Mangerson, telling her that even if Wrana survived surgery, he’d likely be on life support. Wrana wanted to talk to her. The doctor held the phone up to his ear, she said.

“He just said, ‘Thank you for everything you’ve done for me. I love you and goodbye,'” Mangerson recalled, her voice cracking. “That was it.”

Will the family ever get an explanation?

“I want answers,” she said. “I want someone held accountable.”

jskass@tribune.com

Twitter @John_Kass

Pentagon Has Awarded Contracts To Al-Qaeda In Afghanistan


Obama is the global head of terrorist network

Steve Watson
Infowars.com

Image: Report suggests al Qaeda militants are being awarded US contracts

A new independent report reveals that lucrative U.S. military contracts have been granted to militant groups in Afghanistan with direct connections to the Taliban and Al-Qaeda.

The report, submitted to Congress by the U.S. Army Suspension and Debarment Office, states that American officials are citing “due process rights” as a reason not to cancel the agreements with the extremists.

A Bloomberg article quotes John Sopko, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, who notes:

“I am deeply troubled that the U.S. military can pursue, attack, and even kill terrorists and their supporters, but that some in the U.S. government believe we cannot prevent these same people from receiving a government contract,”

The report continues:

An audit showed that after 16 months, none of the agency’s essential program objectives have been reached and the money spent has mostly financed workshops and training sessions. The project is aimed at bolstering Afghanistan’s government before troop withdrawals planned for next year.

“It’s troubling that after 16 months, this program has not issued its first community grant,” Sopko said. “Rather, it has spent almost $50 million, about a quarter of the total program budget, on conferences, overhead and workshops.”

Regarding the 43 cases of contractors with militant connections, Sopko said the Army should “enforce the rule of common sense” in its suspension and debarment program.

“They may be enemies of the United States but that is not enough to keep them from getting government contracts,” according to the agency’s report.

So there you have it, while the Obama administration is funding, equipping, and training al Qaeda extremists in Syria to overthrow the Assad government, it is also awarding contracts to al Qaeda after a decade plus long war against “the terrorists” in Afghanistan.

Obama truly is the global head of Al Qaeda – bankrolling, arming and equipping terrorists around the world in order to achieve his administration’s geopolitical objectives – while simultaneously invoking the threat of terrorists domestically to destroy the bill of rights.

—————————————————————-

Steve Watson is the London based writer and editor for Alex Jones’ Infowars.com, and Prisonplanet.com. He has a Masters Degree in International Relations from the School of Politics at The University of Nottingham, and a Bachelor Of Arts Degree in Literature and Creative Writing from Nottingham Trent University.

Black man in hoodie stabs white girl 11 times ‘She came home from work, and her body was full of holes’


http://www.WMD.com

Black man in hoodie stabs white girl 11 times

Police in New York City are trying to find a black man wearing a hoodie who is responsible for a horrific attack on a teenage white girl who was stabbed 11 times just steps from her front door.

The knife-wielding maniac ambushed Natasha Martinez, 17, as she returned home from working her shift at a local McDonald’s restaurant.

Natasha Martinez, 17, was stabbed outside her NYC home/Photo: CBS 2

Hearing her daughter’s screams, Natasha’s mother, Wendy Martinez, came running outside — and the bloodthirsty attacker fled.

“She came home from work, and her body was full of holes,” Wendy Martinez told the New York Daily News.

“I was holding her because she was going to fall. Her face was turning white, and I slapped her. I was telling her, ‘You have to stay alive.’”

Wendy Martinez, 40, ran to her daughter’s aid after hearing her screams

The teen is recovering at Jamaica Hospital, in the borough of Queens, after undergoing surgery for stab wounds to her back, arms, stomach and kidney. Doctors had to remove a vein from her leg and put it in her arm. Her mother describes her condition as “really bad.”

“This is so difficult,” said Natasha’s mom. “You raise your child, take care of them since they were a baby, and then something like this happens.”

Get the book that documents racial violence in America, with hundreds of episodes in more than 80 American cities since 2010, where groups of blacks are assaulting, intimidating, stalking, threatening, shooting, stabbing and killing victims.

Several neighbors said they heard Natasha’s screams the night of the attack.

Blood stains on the sidewalk outside the girl’s home

“I think she was screaming help or something,” witness Christopher Lopez told WCBS-TV.

“Then all of a sudden, I heard the screams get louder and I said, ‘Let me take a look,’” said witness Teddy Betancourt, “and it was the girl’s mother, holding her up, screaming — looked like she passed out.”

Many in the neighborhood were unaware of the attack until police knocked on their doors.

“It’s not a violent environment,” neighbor Edwin Martinez told the TV station. “You know, people don’t get stabbed and shot here. It’s a nice neighborhood.”

You need to have th Adobe Flash Player to viw this content.
Cops are still searching for the assailant and are looking at surveillance video from Monday to see if the suspect may have started following Martinez from McDonald’s or a nearby sandwich shop where she stopped to eat before heading home. A hoodie-wearing man can be seen in the video. Police also recovered a bloody kitchen knife with a 6-inch blade in the building’s vestibule.

“We don’t have an arrest, and we don’t have a motive at this juncture,” Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said.

Kelly told WNBC-TV police are also looking into the possibility the attack is connected to another mysterious stabbing of a woman in front of her home in Queens in June.

A 36-year-old woman on her way to work early in the morning was stabbed seven times.

A man wearing a hooded sweatshirt was seen running from the scene in that attack.

“We’re looking at similarities between this and an event that happened in Queens, Kelly told the TV station. “We’re seeing if it’s a pattern here.”

The victims in both cases suffered critical injuries.

Fired Tennessee newspaper editor: Termination was political and retroactive


Jeff Poor

Media Reporter

On Thursday, the Chattanooga (Tenn.) Times Free Press announced the termination of one of its editors for what was deemed to be an inappropriate headline criticizing President Barack Obama on the day of a visit to Chattanooga to promote his economic policies.Later that day, Johnson gave an interview to The Daily Caller in order explain his termination, claiming it was unmerited on the grounds that it was for a policy that had not yet been put in place. He explained the circumstances of inserting the headline at the minute prior to publication.

“It’s very common practice at our paper and I’m sure it is at a lot of papers to just plug in a space-holder headline or you know, you have a headline you’re not happy with and you change it at the last minute. And I probably did it myself once a week. In this case, I put in a placeholder that wasn’t good. It got time to publish the piece and I thought, ‘What goes with jobs plan?’ and I thought the Johnny Paycheck song, ‘Take this job and shove it.’ So I put that in there — put the title that you saw and the next day, while it was becoming literally the most read, not just editorial but [most read] thing ever on the paper’s website.”

Johnson explained that later that day he got called into his editor’s office and they conveyed their displeasure with the headline. And they informed him that going forward changes to headlines would have to be approved by another editor so that this would not happen again in the future.

And despite the alleged offensive nature of the editorial, Johnson pointed out the Free Press kept the editorial up online in its entirety without any adjustments.

“Keep in mind the entire time since they told me that people were offended by the editorial, they had the editorial online and it’s been read by — it’s got hundreds of thousands of clicks and they’ve made money and they’ve made plenty of money on online advertising,” he added. “And it wasn’t offensive enough for them to pull down and stop getting all the traffic.”

However, two days after the editorial had been published he was called in and fired for the piece.

“So I was brought into human resources today and I was told, ‘You’re being fired for violating the policy that you have to have an editor sign off when you make a change to a headline,’” he said. “Well, I said, ‘That’s funny, because that policy wasn’t in place until after I wrote the piece and you guys told me that was the policy on Tuesday. And I wrote the piece on Monday.’”

Obama – Divider-in-Chief – Says Race Relations May Worsen if He Doesn’t Get What He Wants


http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/barack-obama-the-divider-in-chief-says-race-relations-may-worsen-if-he-doesnt-get-what-he-wants/

 

freedomoutpost.com

 

 

 

 Barack Obama, the great Divider-in-Chief, has been doing whatever he can to convince people that his way is the best way, even though the facts provide an opposite picture. Aside from his usual rhetoric, he is now, once again, emphasizing race relations as a reason to ensure that his agenda becomes the law of the land.

 

In a recent speech (if he isn’t pontificating, he’s vacationing), he essentially said that if Congress doesn’t get in gear and apply his prescriptions to America’s economy, things will get worse. “If we don’t do anything, then growth will be slower than it should be. Unemployment will not go down as fast as it should. Income inequality will continue to rise…Racial tensions won’t get better; they may get worse, because people will feel as if they’ve got to compete with some other group to get scraps from a shrinking pot. If the economy is growing, everybody feels invested.” (emphasis added)

 

Basically, in spite of the undeniable fact that Obama’s programs (like Obamacare) are destroying America’s economy, he has the gall to say that if Congress doesn’t do what he wants done, then not only will unemployment continue to rise, but race relations will worsen.

 

Yet, he and other Democrats are totally behind immigration “reform” that will do nothing but hurt those people already having a tough time getting or keeping jobs because of the economy that Obama has done nothing to help. The sad fact is that people hear his speeches and applaud them, fully believing what he says. There is a huge disconnect between Obama’s reality and the actual reality that is affecting millions of Americans daily. People need to start reading into the plans behind the North American Union. Search it out to find out more.

 

Mr. Obama’s plan appears to be decimating America’s economy. If that’s the case, then he’s doing a perfectly wonderful job.He just took a vacation to Africa that cost taxpayers over $100 million. He’s planning another one to Martha’s Vineyard that will cost millions more. How many vacations does this man need? Meanwhile, we’ve got sequestration that is affecting millions of people and the economy is killing businesses left and right and many jobs with it. People are suffering. Not him. Not his family. He treats himself like a king on the taxpayer’s dime and punishes the average citizen when Congress doesn’t comply with his demands.

 

The most troubling part of what Obama says though is how the worsening of our economy may affect race relations negatively. He is simply planting seeds of discontent. He is giving minorities a reason to go on the warpath if Obama doesn’t get what he wants. He is, in a very real way, telling minorities to take note of what happens and if his agenda is not rolled out, then they should take their frustrations out on whites. That is the implication and this is not what a president –who is supposed to represent all people –do. This type of rhetoric is despicable, yet this is what Obama does. Many blacks have asked things like, “what do you mean, Obama has made race relations worse? He’s telling it like it is!” and that is what they firmly believe.

 

I know plenty of white people who are working two to three jobs just to try to make ends meet. Some have no job at all and have been out of work too long. Where is the help for them? What about all of the things Obama has asked for and received from Congress and yet it’s clear that we are not one step closer to a better economy. In fact, our economy continues to worsen on a weekly, if not daily, basis.

 

Obamacare, if it doesn’t cave in on itself, is going to be the most costly program that our government ever created. We already know that the promises about paying less for insurance and being able to keep your own doctor are promises that will not come to pass. In some states, insurance premiums have risen or are slated to rise by up to %140. How is this creating better situations for the average American?

 

In the end, the truth is that Obama may be fighting a losing battle and knows it. He may realize that he stands a good chance of watching the Democrats lose seats in 2014. If so, he will not get what he wants. It won’t stop him though because he will likely continue to do whatever he wants to do and it appears as though no one in Congress knows how or is willing to take the necessary steps to stop him. It’s all talk, hearings, and more talk. He’s a rogue president. He does what the global elite tells him to do. They are his master(s) and he is their willing slave.

 

He doesn’t work for the American people. We only pay him and pay for his many vacations. He works for the global elite. He routinely sends millions and billions of American taxpayer dollars overseas for “projects” all the while, Americans here at home receive little to nothing. How is it that this administration can ignore Congress and continue to send that type of money overseas while Americans at home are without work and being hemmed in on every side? Meanwhile, Obama says that things may get worse.

 

Yes, things will get worse because he has no interest in doing anything that will help America’s economy. He seems hell bent on destroying it, while blaming others.

 

Tighten your seat belts folks, because the ride ahead appears to be very bumpy. Take stock of yourself and your family. Obama certainly isn’t and neither is Congress. Trouble is coming, encouraged by the man in the Oval Office.

 

 

 

 

About Fred DeRuvo:   Fred DeRuvo is the author of numerous articles and a growing number of books related to conservative theology and politics. Fred received his Bachelor’s degree from Philadelphia College of Bible and his Masters from Tyndale Theological Seminary. Fred received his Th.D from Northwestern Theological Seminary in Florida. Listen to Fred’s program and on MPR 105.3 FM in the Philippines. Fred began Study-Grow-Know Ministries several years ago where he fights the scourge of Leftist politics and policies that seem to be gaining a foothold in America. His blogs include Study, Grow, Know and Politically Correct Morass. View all posts by Fred DeRuvo

Theme Swift by SwiftThemes.Com Copyright ©2013 Freedom Outpost | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS) powered by WordPress [Back to top ↑]

August 1, 2013 by Fred DeRuvo Obama – Divider-in-Chief – Says Race Relations May Worsen if He Doesn’t Get What He Wants 538 Comments Share3.3K Tweet198 30 Share3.7K Barack Obama, the great Divider-in-Chief, has been doing whatever he can to convince people that his way is the best way, even though the facts provide an opposite picture. Aside from his usual rhetoric, he is now, once again, emphasizing race relations as a reason to ensure that his agenda becomes the law of the land. In a recent speech (if he isn’t pontificating, he’s vacationing), he essentially said that if Congress doesn’t get in gear and apply his prescriptions to America’s economy, things will get worse. “If we don’t do anything, then growth will be slower than it should be. Unemployment will not go down as fast as it should. Income inequality will continue to rise…Racial tensions won’t get better; they may get worse, because people will feel as if they’ve got to compete with some other group to get scraps from a shrinking pot. If the economy is growing, everybody feels invested.” (emphasis added) Basically, in spite of the undeniable fact that Obama’s programs (like Obamacare) are destroying America’s economy, he has the gall to say that if Congress doesn’t do what he wants done, then not only will unemployment continue to rise, but race relations will worsen. Yet, he and other Democrats are totally behind immigration “reform” that will do nothing but hurt those people already having a tough time getting or keeping jobs because of the economy that Obama has done nothing to help. The sad fact is that people hear his speeches and applaud them, fully believing what he says. There is a huge disconnect between Obama’s reality and the actual reality that is affecting millions of Americans daily. People need to start reading into the plans behind the North American Union. Search it out to find out more. The man behind the curtain… The man behind the curtain… Mr. Obama’s plan appears to be decimating America’s economy. If that’s the case, then he’s doing a perfectly wonderful job. He just took a vacation to Africa that cost taxpayers over $100 million. He’s planning another one to Martha’s Vineyard that will cost millions more. How many vacations does this man need? Meanwhile, we’ve got sequestration that is affecting millions of people and the economy is killing businesses left and right and many jobs with it. People are suffering. Not him. Not his family. He treats himself like a king on the taxpayer’s dime and punishes the average citizen when Congress doesn’t comply with his demands. The most troubling part of what Obama says though is how the worsening of our economy may affect race relations negatively. He is simply planting seeds of discontent. He is giving minorities a reason to go on the warpath if Obama doesn’t get what he wants. He is, in a very real way, telling minorities to take note of what happens and if his agenda is not rolled out, then they should take their frustrations out on whites. That is the implication and this is not what a president – who is supposed to represent all people – do. This type of rhetoric is despicable, yet this is what Obama does. Many blacks have asked things like, “what do you mean, Obama has made race relations worse? He’s telling it like it is!” and that is what they firmly believe. I know plenty of white people who are working two to three jobs just to try to make ends meet. Some have no job at all and have been out of work too long. Where is the help for them? What about all of the things Obama has asked for and received from Congress and yet it’s clear that we are not one step closer to a better economy. In fact, our economy continues to worsen on a weekly, if not daily, basis. Obamacare, if it doesn’t cave in on itself, is going to be the most costly program that our government ever created. We already know that the promises about paying less for insurance and being able to keep your own doctor are promises that will not come to pass. In some states, insurance premiums have risen or are slated to rise by up to %140. How is this creating better situations for the average American? In the end, the truth is that Obama may be fighting a losing battle and knows it. He may realize that he stands a good chance of watching the Democrats lose seats in 2014. If so, he will not get what he wants. It won’t stop him though because he will likely continue to do whatever he wants to do and it appears as though no one in Congress knows how or is willing to take the necessary steps to stop him. It’s all talk, hearings, and more talk. He’s a rogue president. He does what the global elite tells him to do. They are his master(s) and he is their willing slave. He doesn’t work for the American people. We only pay him and pay for his many vacations. He works for the global elite. He routinely sends millions and billions of American taxpayer dollars overseas for “projects” all the while, Americans here at home receive little to nothing. How is it that this administration can ignore Congress and continue to send that type of money overseas while Americans at home are without work and being hemmed in on every side? Meanwhile, Obama says that things may get worse. Yes, things will get worse because he has no interest in doing anything that will help America’s economy. He seems hell bent on destroying it, while blaming others. Tighten your seat belts folks, because the ride ahead appears to be very bumpy. Take stock of yourself and your family. Obama certainly isn’t and neither is Congress. Trouble is coming, encouraged by the man in the Oval Office. Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/barack-obama-the-divider-in-chief-says-race-relations-may-worsen-if-he-doesnt-get-what-he-wants/#ixzz2axwCzwUd
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/barack-obama-the-divider-in-chief-says-race-relations-may-worsen-if-he-doesnt-get-what-he-wants/#qalhGeihXD3lqvg4.99

The Ten Dumbest Things Said in Defense of Abortion


by Cassy Fiano | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | http://www.lifenews.com/2013/08/01/the-ten-dumbest-things-said-in-defense-of-abortion/


Washington, DC (LiveActionNews) — The past few years haven’t been great for abortion.

More and more people are calling themselves pro-life, including more young Americans than ever before. Pro-life laws are being passed in record numbers each year. While it would be foolish to say that pro-lifers are winning the war on abortion, it wouldn’t be wrong to say that we’re making progress — and that has the pro-aborts panicking.

Some pretty crazy statements are being made in their desperate attempt to keep abortion on demand legal at any time, for any reason. Some are flat-out ridiculous, some are insulting, and others chilling. These are ten of the dumbest things said in defense of abortion.

10. Women shouldn’t have to choose between their cell phones and birth control.

In a stunning display of entitlement, students at the University of New Mexico got upset because the school would no longer be subsidizing birth control. While pro-aborts often try to give sad, sad stories about women who need birth control out of medical necessity, or need abortion because they will DIE without it, the truth is, it’s often merely a matter of convenience. The reason women should get free birth control? Because otherwise, students might be forced to choose between their birth control and… their cell phones! Or their gym memberships! Oh, cruel world! It is just an unthinkable notion that a college student be forced to work out for free at the icky gym on campus, or go with a cheaper cell phone model — or, even worse, pay for the ultra-cheap generic brand birth control at Wal-Mart. Worst of all is the notion that they might be forced to abstain from sex, since they can’t afford birth control and aren’t ready for a baby. Because in the pro-abort world, women are merely animals, incapable of controlling their sexual urges, right?

9. Pro-lifers need a lesson on the birds and the bees.

Nancy Pelosi makes her first appearance on our list, where she responded to laws limiting (but not outlawing) abortions in North Carolina and Texas by saying that pro-life politicians needed “a lesson on the birds and the bees”. Because the only people who understand sex and pregnancy are the pro-aborts, right? Unfortunately, that has turned out to be less and less true over the years. Pro-lifers have embryology on their side, as well as the science of pregnancy and fetal development. Meanwhile, pro-aborts just try to insist that a baby is just a clump of tissues, or that fetal pain laws are dumb because fetal pain doesn’t exist, or that there are no adverse risks that come with abortion. It doesn’t matter that the science isn’t on their side — they’ll still keep claiming, like Nancy Pelosi did, that it’s pro-lifers who are the idiots in need of educating.

3d-ultrasound-fetus-baby38. Women should go into debt to have an abortion.

Abortions are often expensive, costing thousands of dollars when late-term. Ripping babies into pieces is hard work, after all. But this can mean finding the money for the abortion is difficult for some women. Thankfully, pro-aborts like Leela Yellesetty are here to help! What does she do when women are struggling to afford an abortion? Why, help put them into debt, of course! Yellesetty bragged about how she would talk women into taking about payday loans with interest rates over 300%, pawning their valuables, and putting the money for their procedure onto already maxed-out credit cards. Who cares that these women will be breaking their backs to pay off a $3,000 abortion funded by a payday loan with a 322% interest rate? The abortionist got their money, and that’s all that matters.

7. White people are trying to eliminate abortion to “build up the race”.

Pro-lifers have long since spoken out about the overwhelming number of black babies that are aborted. We speak out against the fact that black babies are being aborted at higher rates than other babies, or that many abortion clinics intentionally target minority neighborhoods. And why is this? According to CBS analyst Nancy Giles, this is all because white pro-lifers want to build up the white race. Yep, that’s right. Our dastardly plan is to build up the white race by opposing abortions of black babies, therefore leading to… erm… the births of more black babies. Makes perfect sense.

6. Men don’t deserve to have a voice on abortion.

According to many pro-aborts, men shouldn’t be allowed to talk about abortion, at all (unless they’re for abortion, in which case it’s totally cool). This is because men can’t get pregnant, so as one pro-abortion blogger said, male voices should be silenced in the abortion discussion. Nevermind that the baby is half the father’s. Men need to just shut up about abortion! And meanwhile, anyone who isn’t black can’t speak about slavery, and anyone who isn’t Jewish can’t talk about the Holocaust. Right? It’s the same logic, after all.

5. You’re only a person if you can play tennis.

A few years ago, Choice USA released a video about pregnancy that was just hilarious. To show how ridiculous the idea of a fetus being a person is, a pregnant woman is told that she has to play doubles tennis instead of singles, must pay for two tickets to see a movie instead of one, and must split a bill between two people three ways — because her unborn child is a person. Get it?? Because everyone knows that a person is defined by what they can or cannot do. In a wheelchair and can’t play tennis? Well, clearly this means you aren’t a person worthy of life.

4. As a Catholic, abortion is sacred ground.

Nancy Pelosi makes her second appearance on our list, where she talks about her wackadoodle version of the Catholic faith. Pelosi defended not only abortions, but late-term abortions, by saying that as a practicing Catholic, keeping late-term abortions legal was sacred ground. Abortion may be a sacrament for pro-aborts, but in the actual Catholic church, protecting all human life is what’s actual sacred ground. Pelosi’s fight to keep abortion legal goes against Catholic teachings, and pretending she’s a pro-abortion warrior because she’s a Catholic does nothing more than make a mockery of the Church.

3. Women who don’t support abortion are men with breasts.

It’s not unusual to hear a pro-abortion feminist say that women can’t be feminists unless they support abortion. Unless you fall in lockstep with their abortion worship, you can’t be a part of their club. But they also insist that they’re pro-choice, not pro-abortion. Actually exercise a choice they don’t agree with, though, and they’ll turn on you before you can blink. Case in point: Pennsylvania State Representative Babette Josephs, who smeared pro-life women by calling them men with breasts. Because you can’t be a real woman unless you’re willing to advocate for the brutal murder of your unborn child!

CLICK LIKE IF YOU’RE PRO-LIFE!

 2. Women would be nothing without abortion.

Carly Manes is 19-years-old, and defines herself as an abortion activist. She’s able to do all kinds of cool stuff, and so are other women. Why? Because of abortion! According to Manes, it is only because abortion is legal that women are able to devote their energy to do things like go to school, work as an activist, be an athlete, or decide to be vegetarians (like Manes!). Women owe everything to abortion. Without the ability to kill our unborn children, women would be able to accomplish nothing. Girl power!

1. Abortion takes a life, but it’s a life worth sacrificing.

Salon blogger Mary Elizabeth Williams takes the number one spot on our list, with easily the most chilling statement. According to Williams, abortion is taking a life — but that’s OK because it is a life worth sacrificing. Williams claims that an unborn child is a life, just not one worth as much a mother’s feeling that a pregnancy is inconvenient. For Williams, some lives simply have more worth than others, with the “others” being disposable. It takes a truly depraved mind to argue that it’s acceptable to take a life merely because that person isn’t worthy of life.

LifeNews Note: Cassy Fiano is a twenty-something Florida native now living in Jacksonville, North Carolina who writes at a number of conservative web sites. She got her start in journalism at the Florida Times-Union. She is the mother of two sons, one of whom was diagnosed with Down Syndrome. This originally appeared at Live Action News.

Army bans soldiers from reading about NSA


WND EXCLUSIVE // http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/army-bans-soldiers-from-reading-about-nsa/

Newspaper divulges ‘top secret’ info on access to online data

 

author-image F. Michael Maloof About | Email | Archive

F. Michael Maloof, staff writer for WND and G2Bulletin, is a former senior security policy analyst in the office of the secretary of defense.
Tom Grundy

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Army has ordered its personnel not to go to the latest postings on the website of the British newspaper The Guardian to read revelations of information given to its reporter because it contains a “TOP SECRET slide show.”

The email, which WND received from a Department of Defense source, was addressed to a couple hundred military personnel and civilians working for DOD. The source who provided the email asked for anonymity.

 “Do not go to ‘The Guardian’ news website as they have TOP SECRET slide show on the main page and you will be flagged,” according to the writer from the 304th MIBN, or military intelligence battalion.

“If someone is not included on this email inform them this website is off limits,” the email said. “If anyone has visited this page today and clicked on any ‘NSA program’ slide show please inform me immediately. It is much easier fix (sic) an issue before it becomes a problem then (sic) after it becomes a disaster.”

Following initial leaks of the highly classified slides by The Guardian based on interviews and files given to its reporter by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, the Pentagon had informed all military personnel not to access the website on military office computers, even though the NSA information is in the public domain.

Snowden worked for the defense contractor Booz Allen Hamilton and was assigned for three months to NSA where he had access and acquired the information, apparently by using thumb drives to take the information without detection.

Such access can be ascertained by security personnel who monitor what U.S. military personnel are viewing, whether they are using an unclassified or classified computer.

The latest email referred to The Guardian’s story on XKeyscore, which is an NSA data mining software tool that gives the analyst accesses to “nearly everything a user does on the Internet.”

The latest story on XKeyscore pointed out that this tool gives NSA analysts the “widest-reaching” collection of online data. In addition, NSA analysts don’t need prior authorization to conduct searches.

XKeyscore “sweeps up emails, social media activity and browsing history.”

The story included a series of new XKeyscore slides classified as “TOP SECRET/COMINT/REL TO USA, AUS, CAN, GBR, NZL.”

In effect, the Top Secret slides come from communications intelligence and are released only to the U.S., Australia, Canada, Great Britain and New Zealand.

The program gives NSA access to millions of individuals, based on documents Snowden gave to the Guardian.

All that an NSA analyst needs to do is fill out a simple on-screen form giving only a broad justification to mine NSA’s databases. Such a request is not subject to any court or higher level NSA personnel.

In addition to emails, websites and metadata, XKeyscore also allows the analyst access to an individual’s internet activity in real-time.

The NSA is required by law to get a warrant from the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, court if the target is a U.S. person

However, no such warrant is required if an American is communicating with a foreign target. XKeyscore can bypass the warrant requirement on obtaining information on an American if it has some identifying information such as the email, the Internet Protocol, or IP, address, keywords, name or telephone number.

XKeyscore gives the analyst access to the metadata as well as the content of the emails and other Internet activity, including any browsing and knowledge of the subject matter.

According to The Guardian article, one slide referred to “plug-ins” that describes the various types of information that can be searched. They include “every email address seen in a session by both username and domain, every phone number seen in a session including address book entries or signature block,” and “the webmail and chat activity to include username, buddylist, machine specific cookies etc.”

Another NSA tool called DNI Presenter allows the NSA analyst to read the content of stored emails. With XKeyscore, the analyst can also read the content of Facebook chats or private messages.

The HTTP on a website is important to the NSA analyst since it accesses “nearly everything a typical user does on the Internet.”

The slide asked: “Why are we interested in HTTP?” which then is followed by images of Facebook,Yahoo,Twitter, myspace.com, CNN.com @mailru, Wikipedia, Google and Gmail.

“Because nearly everything a typical user does on the Internet uses HTTP,” the slide added.

XKeyscore also lets the analyst determine the IP addresses of every person visiting any website the analyst looks at.

XKeyscore holds the greatest amount of communications data collected by NSA. The article quotes William Biney, a former NSA mathematician, as saying the agency had “assembled on the order of 20 trillion transactions about U.S. citizens with other U.S. citizens” only from phone calls and emails.

Each day, NSA reportedly intercepts and stores some 1.7 billion emails, phone calls and other communications.

National Intelligence Director James Clapper in a letter to Sen. Ron Wyden conceded that NSA analysts have exceeded their authority in domestic surveillance. He said there were a number of compliance problems which he attributed to “human error” or “highly sophisticated technology issues.”

In a Senate floor response, Wyden said the violations are “more serious than those stated by the intelligence community, and are troubling.”

WND reported more than a month ago when Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., chided the military in response to an Air Force memo banning access to articles about the NSA leak story on the military branch’s unsecured Internet system.

“If it’s in the public domain, it’s hard to make a case that military members – who are still citizens and protected by the Constitution – should not read the news about what government is doing,” Hunter told WND.

WND had reported when the Air Force issued a NOTAM – a Notice to Airmen – that warned users of the military’s unclassified computer network not to look at news stories regarding the NSA-Verizon scandal because it could trigger a Classified Message Incident.

A Classified Message Incident is prompted when classified material or information is transmitted over an unsecure military network.

The story originally reported by The Guardian newspaper of London of the top-secret court order requiring Verizon to hand over all of its call data on an ongoing basis to the National Security Agency included a link to the classified information.

Hunter, a U.S. Marine combat veteran of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, said there’s a “bigger issue with classifications and access, which, if anything, should prompt concerns on the part of officials.”

While members of the Air Force in the U.S. have access to the Internet through other means, some members based overseas who contacted WND said the Air Force’s NIPRNET service is their only access. At a time of increasing distrust toward government, they regarded the order as censorship

How Will You Know When The Balloon Goes Up? Advice From Survival Experts…


I am a preparation person, but not like those you have heard about in recent years. I am moment by moment prepared for my Lord and Savior Jesus the Christ to return and take we away.

When I read the following I was concerned about your response. This is not about being a whacked out loon with multiple conspiracies rummaging around in my head. I do believe that we are on a collision coarse with a race war stirred up by the Professional Pot Stirrers (Jackson, Sharpton, ET. all), and/or a civil war between the perceived “Haves”, and the perceived “Have-nots”. With that in mind I recommend you read the following and get prepared. Unless Jesus comes before, I really believe that these disasters are on the way.

I am now prepared for both. – Jerry Broussard

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

A few weeks ago I had the oddest dream. In this dream, I was at home when my husband walked in the door from work and said, “The balloon’s gone up.” Immediately, my kids and I set about getting ready to leave town. I remember feeling impressed because everyone seemed to know exactly what to do.

Now, talk of balloons going up isn’t part of my everyday vocabulary. I use it about as often as I scamper from bush to bush, hiding from black helicopters. In fact, the first time I heard the phrase, I had to look it up online.

“When the balloon goes up” is a phrase used to imply impending trouble. This relates to the use of observation balloons in the first World War. The sight of such a balloon going up nearly always resulted in a barrage of shells following soon after. The expression was reinforced during WW2 when the hoisting of barrage balloons was part of the preparations for an air raid.

Often in survival type forums and blogs someone will use this phrase along with talk of, “getting out of Dodge.”

Obviously, I’m in favor of educating people to survive during all sorts of crises, but sooner or later one has to wonder, “How will I know when, or if, it’s time to gather my family together and get out of town?”

The answer?

“When the balloon goes up!”

And that gets us right back to where we started. When does one know when that balloon has gone up? How do we know when events have taken an irrevocable turn for the worst and the only way to survive is to get as far away from our current location as possible?

I think that’s the $40,000 question, really. Not, “What do I keep in my bug out bag?”

Rather than try to come up with The Definitive Answer myself, I turned to numerous friends and acquaintances in the survival and preparedness niche and asked them for help.

I received so many outstanding responses from experts such as Claire Wolfe, James Rawles, Rob Hanus, and so many more that it will take more than one blog post to include them all. As you read their thoughtful answers, consider how these events might unfold in your own community.

So, in answer to the question, “How will I know when the balloon has gone up?”, or your own version of that question, here are a few of the responses, with more to follow.

From Brian and Daron Payne of the P2E Emergency Preparedness Expo.

1. Empty shelves in grocery & hardware stores
2. Unexpected bank holidays/Run on ATM’s
3. Large groups of looters
4. Loss of life due to the police and emergency services being overloaded

From Timothy French of Americans Networking to Survive (A.N.T.S.)

A.N.T.S has an emergency plan that members can download. It has a section in it which talks about bugging in and when it is time to bug out.

It lists three threat levels and the signs you should look for. They are the same for all disasters because in the end, breakdowns in society are caused by a loss of utilities and supplies.

The signs are:
Level 1 – No danger – utilities are out – people are getting along

  • OPSEC is low –  neighbors working together.

Level 2- Some danger – utilities are out –  people are getting very worried.

  • OPSEC is medium, should try to band with neighbors to block off your street.

Level 3 – Dangerous – utilities are out – people are desperate and looking for supplies.

  • OPSEC is high – You should bug out or hide in place

So as you can see, your neighbors reactions to an event are your best indicator, and picking up on those little signs before things get bad will give you the advantage. Bugging out before things really get bad will be a judgment call that each of us will have to make.

From Selco of SHTF School

Here are 5 first signs of coming collapse how I experienced it before war started. I’m sure it will be very similar again.

Symptom 1: More violence in your area

Symptom 2: Group behavior changes, survival brings people closer and makes others less human

Symptom 3: Dead streets

Symptom 4: New leaders emerge

Symptom 5: Nobody to trust anymore

From James Rawles of Survival Blog

Five signals of an imminent social collapse:

1.  Failure of any of the three American power grids, with no subsequent restoration of power within 72 hours.

2.  A stock market collapse of 30% of more of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) in less than 10 days.

3.  Simultaneous rioting in three or more major American cities.

4.  News of an easily-transmissible influenza pandemic with a high lethality rate, and an outbreak anywhere in the U.S.

5.  Outbreak of war, with one or more targets hit in the Continental United States by a major nation state, or multiple targets hit by a terrorist group. (This would include use of nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons.

From Randy Augsberger of The Prepared Christian

1)      Warning from the Government or other authority

This one is a no-brainer. As much as I hate to admit it, the government will give us warning in some situations. Think Katrina. It would be a good idea to pay attention to what the talking heads are saying. Just run it through your filter and don’t disengage your brain. These can include natural disasters and health issues like potential pandemics.

2)      GMO crop failure

One of the biggest dangers of a global catastrophe I see is a famine induced by some bug (natural or man-made) attacking GMO crops. This will play out in the future as more and more of our food supply is controlled by Monsanto/ Government.

3)      Talk of making precious metals illegal for private ownership

Don’t think this couldn’t happen? It happen once already in this country. If for some economic reason, real or perceived, the government declares precious metals illegal to own, there will be absolutely no hard currency other than barter (they will probably try to outlaw that also).

4)      Martial law declared anywhere in the U.S.

This one is an alarm bell. Again, be sure to not disengage your brain. If you can see (for yourself) a good reason for it, fine. But if it looks like a government power grab, be ready.

5)      Widespread violent rioting

One or two cities in flame are not enough to get me too worried (unless I lived in those cities). But imagine the occupy movement if it was done with weapons and violence. We would be on the verge if not embroiled in a civil war.

FACT CHECK: Obama understates Keystone XL jobs


 FILE - This March 22, 2012 file photo shows President Barack Obama arriving at the TransCanada Stillwater Pipe Yard in Cushing, Okla. Obama has revived debate about the number of jobs that would be created by the proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada to Texas. The 1,700-mile pipeline would carry oil from tar sands in Alberta to refineries in the Houston area, passing through Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas and Oklahoma. During a jobs speech Tuesday, July 30, 2013, in Tennessee, Obama downplayed the pipeline’s effect on jobs, calling it a "blip" compared to the overall economy. He also made that point during an interview with The New York Times last week.
FILE – This March 22, 2012 file photo shows President Barack Obama arriving at the TransCanada Stillwater Pipe Yard in Cushing, Okla. Obama has revived debate about the number of jobs that would be created by the proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada to Texas. The 1,700-mile pipeline would carry oil from tar sands in Alberta to refineries in the Houston area, passing through Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas and Oklahoma. During a jobs speech Tuesday, July 30, 2013, in Tennessee, Obama downplayed the pipeline’s effect on jobs, calling it a “blip” compared to the overall economy. He also made that point during an interview with The New York Times last week.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File / AP Photo

Associated Press

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama has revived debate about the number of jobs that would be created by the proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline from Canada to Texas. The 1,700-mile pipeline would carry oil from tar sands in Alberta to refineries in the Houston area, passing through Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas and Oklahoma.

During a jobs speech Tuesday in Tennessee, Obama downplayed the pipeline’s effect on jobs, calling it a “blip” compared with the overall economy. He also made that point in an interview with The New York Times last week.

The president correctly characterized the project’s overall effect on U.S. employment but underestimated the number of jobs it would create.

The $7 billion pipeline has become a contentious issue. Project supporters, including unions and lawmakers from both parties, tout the jobs it would create and demand its approval, while environmentalists urge the president to reject it, saying it would carry dirty, carbon-intensive oil.

The State Department expects to issue a final report later this year on whether the project should move forward. The department has authority over the pipeline because it crosses a U.S. border.

Asked Wednesday about the number of jobs that would be created by the pipeline, State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said, “The president was clearly stating the proposed Keystone XL project would have a negligible impact on the overall U.S. job market, which was the finding of the State Department” in a draft report last March.

A look at some of the president’s recent assertions on the pipeline and jobs and how they stack up:

OBAMA: “Republicans have said that this would be a big jobs generator. There is no evidence that that’s true,” he said in The New York Times interview. “And my hope would be that any reporter who is looking at the facts would take the time to confirm that the most realistic estimates are this might create maybe 2,000 jobs during the construction of the pipeline — which might take a year or two — and then after that we’re talking about somewhere between 50 and 100 (chuckles) jobs in an economy of 150 million working people. … That is a blip relative to the need.”

THE FACTS: It’s not clear where Obama came up with the 2,000-jobs figure.

The project’s developer, Calgary-based TransCanada, has said the pipeline could create as many as 13,000 construction jobs — 6,500 a year over two years.

In its March report, the State Department put the number of construction jobs at 3,900 on an annual basis. That figure doesn’t include an estimated 4,000 workers that TransCanada says it has hired for a 485-mile southern segment of the pipeline that already is under construction and nearing completion.

Nor do the figures include the peripheral jobs that would be created as a result of a major infrastructure project.

TransCanada says about 7,000 manufacturing jobs will be needed to support the overall project, which will stretch from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico.

The State Department report goes further. It estimates that the project could help create — directly and indirectly — as many as 42,000 jobs, including jobs for suppliers and subcontractors that provide equipment and materials, as well as lodging, food services and other jobs related to construction. The figure includes part-time jobs.

The report said these jobs would amount to 0.02 percent of total U.S employment, a figure that is consistent with Obama’s characterization that the project would have minimal impact on the overall U.S. jobs picture.

OBAMA: Republicans “keep on talking about this — an oil pipeline coming down from Canada that’s estimated to create about 50 permanent jobs. That’s not a jobs plan,” he said in Tennessee.

THE FACTS: Obama is on more solid ground with this assertion. The State Department report, citing figures provided by TransCanada, said there would be about 50 permanent jobs created along the route of the pipeline once it is completed. The report says the number of permanent jobs in the six affected states would have “negligible impacts” on the economy.

Follow Matthew Daly on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MatthewDalyWDC

EDITOR’S NOTE – An occasional look at political claims that take shortcuts with the facts or don’t tell the full story.

Obama Appeases Taliban – Releases 5 High Profile Gitmo Detainees


by http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/07/obama-appeases-taliban-releases-5-high-profile-gitmo-detainees/#ixzz2agNdXFjI

While the media remains obsessed with Weiner’s sexcapades, there is actually some serious news happening around the world. Though it is not being reported in very many places, the U.S. has apparently released 5 inmates from Guantanamo Bay in order to get those peaceful negotiations with Afghanistan and The Taliban off to a roaring start. Don’t worry though. The U.S. has made all 5 released inmates promise to be good boys.

YNet News Reports:

Without much publicity or official announcements, the United States released five Guantanamo Bay detainees as a nod of willingness to open peace talks in Afghanistan. After officials in Kabul expressed desire for negotiations, the Obama administration released five members of the Taliban who were detained at the US detention center.

A top US official said that the prisoners were released under the condition that they will not engage in any violent activity. While it is clear that they are guilty of crime, the benefit in releasing them—the potential withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan by the summer of 2014—is greater than the risk. The US announced it will attempt to negotiate peace talks with the Taliban and Afghanistan government officials some months ago.

This gesture from the US government was a departure from the Obama administration’s policy of zero tolerance to negotiations with terrorists and releasing prisoners; thus, in preparation for talks with Afghan officials, the US state department redefined the Taliban as an organization that is no longer included in the US enemy list.

Releasing the detainees from Guantanamo Bay serves another purpose for President Obama: The more prisoners released from the camp, the likelier it is for Congress to approve shutting down the facility altogether—a campaign promise which Obama he has been trying to realize since first being elected in 2008.

It appears that we have absolutely no reason to worry. They have been released under the condition that they engage in no violent activity. That’s a relief. I realize that they are former terrorists but they have surely been rehabilitated. They will probably all go to work in the private sector now and be fine upstanding citizens.

And furthermore, Obama does not negotiate with terrorists. He has a zero-tolerance policy for that. Since our government no longer sees The Taliban as a terrorist group then I should not worry about that at all. They are the good guys.

Is anyone else buying this load of crap? Come on YNet, I know you are journalists, but tell it like it is. We can’t get this news in our own country so we are counting on you. I will tell it like it is.

I for one do want to see Guantanamo closed but it’s not for the same reasons as many. The place is basically a country club for alleged Muslim terrorists. Do some research. It is not a corrections facility as much as it is a “political correctness” facility.

Obama can claim that he doesn’t negotiate with terrorists because he doesn’t view any of the radical Islamic groups as terrorists. But let’s look at some facts:

These are just the first several things that popped into my head and I could literally list dozens more. If this story was really anything positive then the mainstream media would be all over it. Obama knows that this story will cause controversy and has purposely tried to keep it out of the media. My guess is that they have been told to ignore it. The Obama administration is trying to hide it and was hoping that no one would notice.

Well we noticed.

But honestly we already know that you negotiate with terrorists.

I am continually embarrassed by our foreign policy. Between Horseface and The Dictator we will be very lucky not to trigger World War III before we get to the 2016 elections.

I realize that this was a gesture of good faith but when talking to terrorists I find that another gesture tends to work much better…

I am not someone that most Americans would want in The White House. I have anger issues. I don’t know why but when terrorists want to bring America to its knees I tend to take offense to that.

But if you want to compare my policy to Obama’s it is pretty simple. If my finger was on the button that he controls…Allah would have long run out of virgins. He’d be passing out sheep by now.

Negotiating with terrorists is a sign of weakness and the world laughs at our president while planning more jihad in America.

I happened to notice a comment on one of my blog posts today. The guy was basically calling me a drama queen and saying that I was overreacting in my article. I can’t help it. I am angry. My opinion is that someone needs to start doing a little overreacting and we need a lot less of this “let’s just see how it plays out” attitude.

This country is in trouble and you have to pick sides now. That “sit back and wait” attitude is exactly why we are at this point and it’s time to show some fight America. There is no more time for apathy. Primetime TV can wait. Your country needs you now.

Like most of my rants, this one is likely destined for internet obscurity but I can’t reach the heart of Americans by coddling them and telling them it’s OK.

Because it’s not OK.

It’s not OK to negotiate with terrorists and it’s OK to be angry about it.

If you don’t think that the Taliban is about terrorism and don’t think they are still very much our enemy you need to talk to one of our young Marines who has been fortunate enough to come home.

Obama spits in the face of everything that this country was built on and everything that this country hopes to someday return to.

We have not yet begun to fight.

UPDATE: Other outlets are carrying the story. Reuters has this piece. Breitbart published this article. The Taliban has previously offered to free U.S. soldier Pfc. Bowe R. Bergdahl, who has been held captive since 2009, in exchange for five Gitmo Prisoners.

Tag Cloud