Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘Gun Confiscation’

Town BANS Semi-Automatic Guns from Homes — Owners Must Pay $1,000 Daily Fine if They do not Comply

Posted by | April 4, 2018

An unanimous vote amongst rule-makers for the town of Deerfield, IL, to ban semi-auto rifles, pistols and shotguns “with certain features,” as well as with magazines carrying over 10 rounds of ammunition has been enforced. 

Passing Monday night, it outlaws any weapon the community leaders believe to be “assault weapons,” especially AR-15s. But they don’t stop there, they’re grabbing all “semi-automatic rifles, pistols and shotguns with certain features.”

“This is our fight. This is our generation’s fight, and we’re going to keep fighting,” said student Ariella Kharasch at a public hearing, who attends Deerfield High School. “Thank you for being part of that.”

Starting on June 13th, the new rule will be implemented and residents who decide to not comply by that date can face up to $1,ooo daily fines. Deerfield town’s rule-makers got the idea for the ban from one enforced in Highland Park, IL. The case went all the way to the United States Supreme Court; to which the high court let a lower court ruling allowing the ban stand.

“If Highland Park, if Deerfield, if more towns say no to this type of weapon, maybe the state of Illinois says no,” said town manager Kent Street. “Maybe the federal government says no.”

This new rule faces fierce opposition, though. “You are the bureaucrats that Thomas Jefferson warned us about,” said Deerfield resident Dan Cox. 

“There were a lot of emotional arguments and not a lot based on fact,” said local Daniel Easterday. “Deerfield is a very crime free community, and I don’t see how this is going to make it any more crime free.”

Larry Nordal of Deerfield cited their rights under the Second Amendment and expressed fear that more restrictive laws would be passed in the future,” the Chicago Tribune stated. 

“The ordinance to store firearms was only passed for one reason,” Nordal said. “That was to have an amendatory vehicle that could be used in the future for just this purpose so you could banish assorted firearms in the future. First it’s going to be assault rifles. [There will be] new bans in the future. It’s just a matter of time.”

BUY “Your Approval Not Required” T-shirt Now!


5 Reasons We Know They Are Coming For Our Guns

Reported by Tim Brown

There are at least five reasons we know that the push is not for “common sense” gun laws, as anti-Constitutionalists and emotionally controlled high school student proclaim, but is for total gun confiscation.

In a recent article by Rachel Blevins at The Free Thought Project in which she pointed out many of the students marching for gun rights apparently didn’t have much of a problem with an increased police state.  Yes, that’s not a typo.  These were student marching FOR the rights of gun owners, but also promoting the increase of police officers, which is a growth of government.

For more on that topic, I’d refer you to the articles by Rutherford Institute attorney John Whitehead of an excellent article by Daniel Greenfield titled Our State of Police.

At the end of Blevins’ article, she also posted a brief video on five reasons we should consider that the current anti-Second Amendment activists are not seeking more gun control laws, but are, in fact, promoting gun confiscation and a total ban on arms in the united States.

Here’s the video.

The video is mixed with the rhetoric of David Hogg’s cult group of useful idiots at the DC March for Our Lives and various interviews in which they are telling America exactly what their handlers want them to say, as well as movie clips that mock their stupid statements and lies.  Remember, these are kids that have been given scripts to present to the media and cannot actually engage in debate with someone who holds a pro-Constitution, pro-Second Amendment position, which is opposite of their own.

However, the words they are presenting are those of the Communists in our country along with the media’s own efforts to disarm the American public while ignoring the law and history.

The 5 reason we know they are coming for our guns are:

  1. The March for Our Lives’ kids really do want to ban guns.

  2. The media has one unified message: The repeal of the 2nd Amendment

  3. The media’s propaganda seems to be working.

  4. The March for Our Lives is not a grassroots movement.  It is funded with dark money.

  5. Draconian gun control legislation is sweeping the nation.

While the leaders of the movement claim that the “don’t want to ban guns” and just want sensible gun laws, that has all changed to calling for Nazi-style gun confiscation and bans.  Many, even professed Constitutionalists and conservatives, were just fine with raising the age to purchase rifles and banning bump stocks, the kids are telling you when you give in to that, they’re going to take a lot more because you allowed them to set a precedence, an unconstitutional precedence at that.

The answers these kids give to what should be done concerning gun owner rights is the typical anti-American, Communist lines of “ban assault rifles,” “citizens don’t need ‘weapons of war'” and other common phrases by the same handlers that are feeding them the scripted lines.  I mean seriously, does anyone think these kids even know what a semi-automatic rifle is?  Probably not.  do they even know that AR-15s are not used in actual combat in the military when engaged in war?  Probably not.

Whether or not you believe the kids want to ban guns or not, despite them coming right out and saying it, is irrelevant because this is the narrative that the corporate CIA-controlled media is peddling to the dumbed down American population.

In fact, it’s so clear that the media is both pushing for a repeal of the Second Amendment by presenting former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens’ call for a repeal and both by trying to soften the blow by allowing Communists like Chris Cuomo, a man who doesn’t believe rights come from our Creator but from government, to openly say no one is calling for a repeal of the Second Amendment.  Cuomo’s own network reported on Justice Stevens’ calls for such a repeal.

And while you listen to some of the useful idiot airheads spewing this garbage in the video above and in the daily news cycle, the reality is that should that time ever come, they will be the first to have their rights stripped and not be able to speak out against anything and if they do, they’ll be summarily shot dead.  Oh, the irony, and it’s simply because they have not learned from history.  Primarily, they haven’t learned from their forefathers nor the last century in which governments disarmed their people only to come in later and murder them by the hundreds of millions.

If you are one that doesn’t believe the media’s propaganda is working in conjunction with an illegal and corrupt public school system that has dumbed down the up and coming generation to the point that they have no idea what the founding fathers of our country even meant when they wrote the Second Amendment, where rights come from as described in the Declaration of Indpendence or anything else in the Constitution, then you should consider that people actually applaud when a Democrat candidate for sheriff in North Carolina actually uttered that it was OK to pry the guns from the cold dead hands of gun owners, and by that, the implication was to kill them to confiscate their arms.

But it’s not just people running for office. A new Quinnipiac poll released Tuesday found that two-thirds of American voters support stricter gun laws, reaching the highest level in the poll’s history.  Take a look at that polling and see how things have changed drastically in the past 20 years.  Fortunately, we are not a democracy that is ruled by the emotions of a childish mob, but a republic under the rule of law.

The March for Our Lives is a sideshow of WWE.  Like its counterpart of politicians in DC, March for Our Lives is not born of genuine concern, but rather an agenda, and as with every anti-gun cry, it’s funded by the usual suspects.  People like Michael Bloomberg and George Soros are behind the money that supports the movement.  Ironically, baby murderers Planned Parenthood, an organization that actually murders children unlike the National Rifle Association, also throws in some of Americans’ tax dollars that it is unconstitutionally given by your corrupt representatives, including President Donald Trump.

As an “astroturfed” movement, March for Our Lives is meant to appear as a grassroots movement, but it’s all funded and orchestrated by outsiders.  The march in DC really was going nowhere.  It garnered just over 200,000 people and that included media and the whining children.

Additionally, Nazi-style gun laws are being promoted, even here in the deep South where I live by such people as Democrat Georgia Rep. Erica Thomas, who supported legislation to seize and take possession of semi-automatic guns, high capacity magazines and ammunition and yet, she says she doesn’t want to do it by force.  Talk about Orwellian doublespeak!

And that’s just the tip of the iceberg.  We’re seeing another assault weapons ban being formed in DC, and around the country cities and states (New Jersey, Delaware, Vermont, Oregon and Florida) are banning bump stocks even though people can bump fire without a bump stock and pushing for more unconstitutional gun laws!  It’s going to get worse too.  And you believed President Trump when he told you that your Second Amendment rights were no longer under attack.  He’s been aiding in the attack!

There were some good comments in the final 40 seconds.  Kyle Kushuv, who is a Florida student and has been reasoned and rational voice in the  conversation, pointed out the irony of the failures of government, even in the Parkland shooting, and yet, says it is utterly ironic that people want to trust that same government, even more, when it comes to the rights of gun owners.  He’s right on!

We must continue to expose their lies and hypocrisy in order to win the day, and we must be very vocal about it!

Democratic Rep Details Her Gun Confiscation Law

Reported by |

Rep Debbie Dingell, the wife of former Rep John Dingell, has announced that she is busy writing a gun confiscation bill. She claims that the bill would include due process, but that’s impossible.

The only way you satisfy both would be to have a court appearance before the guns are confiscated. That’s not what this bill does. This bill confiscates the guns first. Since she says she’s modeling it after the Indiana law, that means you have fourteen days to go to court and show that there was a reason to confiscate the guns in the first place. 

I could be wrong but get the wrong cop or judge and you can lose a constitutional right.

Also, in my humble opinion, you would be reversing due process. If they took you to court first, then the burden of proof is on them but if you have to go to court to get your guns back, the burden of proof then shifts to you. It also makes you vulnerable to vengeful relatives and neighbors. Your brother or your sister could call the police and falsely claim you threatened them with your gun. How could you possibly prove you didn’t. It’s their word against yours and you have the burden of proof.

From Breitbart

The Salt Lake Tribune summed up the Indiana law, “In Indiana, law enforcement can confiscate weapons without a judge’s order. The gun owner must ask the court to get the weapons returned.”

Extreme Risk Protection Orders have proved a popular gun control response to the February 14 Parkland school shooting. However, it is difficult to believe such orders would have prevented that attack.

On February 23, 2018, Breitbart News reported, “The family with which [Cruz] was staying repeatedly called the police on him in November 2017 but refused to file charges when sheriff’s deputies arrived.

member of the family with which Cruz was staying explained away Cruz’s erratic behavior by saying he ‘had been suffering significantly from the loss of his mother’ earlier in the month.” 

I think we can all agree that crazy and extremely violent people do not need to have guns, but on the other hand, I don’t want someone innocent to have to face accusations that he or she can’t win. Maybe they could amend the bill to mete out mandatory jail sentences for making a knowingly false claim?

History Lesson: Hitler Used Kids As Propaganda, Too

Reported by

Back in the 1930s started confiscation of weapons and they used children to do it, just as other tyrannical regimes have done. They have found it most effective to play on emotions and to keep the people from relying on common sense. Fortunately for Hitler, they had gun registration and when the Nazis took over Germany they were able to identify gun owners who were given 24 hours to turn over their guns and those who didn’t comply were shot down on the spot.

But Hitler saw the value in indoctrinating the children.

Hitler said –

“These boys and girls enter our organizations [at] ten years of age, and often for the first time get a little fresh air; after four years of the Young Folk they go on to the Hitler Youth, where we have them for another four years . . . And even if they are still not complete National Socialists, they go to Labor Service and are smoothed out there for another six, seven months . . . And whatever class consciousness or social status might still be left . . . the Wehrmacht [German armed forces] will take care of that.”
Adolf Hitler (1938)

According to the National Review :

The perennial gun-control debate in America did not begin here. The same arguments for and against were made in the 1920s in the chaos of Germany’s Weimar Republic, which opted for gun registration. Law-abiding persons complied with the law, but the Communists and Nazis committing acts of political violence did not.

In 1931, Weimar authorities discovered plans for a Nazi takeover in which Jews would be denied food and persons refusing to surrender their guns within 24 hours would be executed.

They were written by Werner Best, a future Gestapo official. In reaction to such threats, the government authorized the registration of all firearms and the confiscation thereof, if required for “public safety.” The interior minister warned that the records must not fall into the hands of any extremist group.

In 1933, the ultimate extremist group, led by Adolf Hitler, seized power and used the records to identify, disarm, and attack political opponents and Jews. Constitutional rights were suspended, and mass searches for and seizures of guns and dissident publications ensued.

Police revoked gun licenses of Social Democrats and others who were not “politically reliable.”


When Obama signed Executive Orders on guns, look who he surrounded himself with.

Children make great props and are quick to memorize Democratic talking points on guns.

Seattle Police Begin NAZI STYLE Gun Confiscation: No Laws Broken, No Warrant, No Charges

Reported by Mac Slavo

A man in Seattle has had his gun confiscated by police after breaking no laws. The police took his gun without a warrant and without pressing any charges.  Tyranny has officially taken hold on American soil. This sets a precedent that government can now forcefully take guns away from an individual without a crime being committed or an arrest being made and without a warrant.

In the name of fear and political exploitation of anti-gun rhetoric, a citizen’s Second Amendment rights have been ripped away from him by the government.

The new “red flag” law, which has taken hold in other states already, allows the courts and law enforcement to take away guns from individuals they deem are dangerous and they’ve just begun the confiscation.

A man living in the Belltown neighborhood of Seattle, Washington became the first individual in the state to have his firearm confiscated without any formal arrest or charges.  The man was not identified by authorities.

Neighbors complained that the man had been “staring” at people through storefront windows while wearing a holstered firearm. He was not brandishing his weapon by any account, and open carrying is legal in the area, so he was abiding by the law.

Other residents also complained that the man’s open carrying made them feel “uncomfortable” and “unsafe.” “He was roaming the hallways with a .25 caliber automatic,” said Tony Montana, a man who lives in the same apartment complex as the gun owner and a person without any reasonable gun knowledge.

Handguns are semi-automatic. 

These lousy complaints from neighbors allowed police to use the newly passed state law to confiscate the man’s firearm because the man apparently stared at others.  Maybe there’s a ban on staring at others in Washington we are unaware of.

Under the extreme risk protection orders — also referred to as “erpos” or “red flag laws” —  police (government officials) are now allowed to violate a person’s Second and Fourth Amendment rights (which are basic fundamental human rights) and take their legally acquired personal property if they are tattled on by offended liberals.

Tyranny has now taken hold on American soil.

Article posted with permission from SHTFPlan

PATRIOTS: Who’d WIN If Civil WAR Breaks Out In America?

waving flagPublished on June 27, 2016

URL of the original posting site:

If Obama or Hillary were to go through with gun confiscation and a civil war was to break out, who do you think would win? And which side would you be on?

There are a whole lot of gun owners in our country who will not sit down quietly and take that kind of abuse from the government.


Share if you think it’s clear who would win

Hey Leftist cropped-george-washington-regarding-2nd-amandment.jpg Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon

waving flagDisarming America

Hillary’s plan against terror is Disarming America so the only the criminals and terrorists among us will have access to assault weapons.

Hillary Disarming America / Political cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2016.

More A.F. Branco Cartoons at Net Right Daily.

A.F. Branco Coffee Table Book <—- Order Here!

Criminals and Dictators Armed Hey Leftist Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flag

Australian Gun Law Update!cid_MshfaDCLxNksOfGcxATl

Here’s a thought to warm some of your hearts …
From: Ed Chenel, a police officer in Australia
Hi Yanks, I thought you all would like to see the real figures from Down Under. It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by a new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by our own government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars. 
The first year results are now in:

Australia-wide, homicides are up 6.2 percent

Australia-wide, assaults are up 9.6 percent

Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)! 

In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent. (Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not and criminals still possess their guns!) 
While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease Disarmed Citizenryin armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since the criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed. There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the elderly, while the resident is at home. 
Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was expended in ‘successfully ridding Australian society of guns….’ You won’t see this on the American evening news or hear your governor or members of the State Assembly disseminating this information. 
The Australian experience speaks for itself. Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws affect only the law-abiding citizens. 
Take note Americans, before it’s too late! Will you be one of the sheep to turn yours in? 
WHY? You will need it. 
 Makes sitting ducks Down-by-Lib-600-CI Armed Guns In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Feeling good about your 2nd Amendment rights? Don’t!



Posted by on Sep 17, 2014

We’ve seen some significant victories in the battles over the right to bear arms, our 2nd Amendment right that is clearly spelled out in the George Washington regarding 2nd AmandmentConstitution.  Until very recently, in areas controlled by anti-gun Democrats it’s virtually impossible buy, own, or legally carry a firearm.  The Heller decision by the Supreme Court got the ball rolling when they declared the restrictive ownership laws in Washington DC to be unconstitutional.  That was followed by decisions that overturned the gun ban in Chicago and the right to carry a concealed weapon in Illinois.  Even California has gotten on the bandwagon, with decisions loosening their restrictive purchase and ownership rights.  The latest victory in the battle happened this week when the New York Times declared that they’d lost the war on “assault weapons” and all that skirmish ever was was a quibble over style.

A word of Curmudgeonly advice.  Don’t get cocky.

We’ve always found one thing about the far left to be very admirable.  They never give up.  They have a level of commitment to their long term agenda that is not just unmatched on the right, it’s unknown.

The left hates guns.  They really hate the fact that we can own guns.  They are committed to not just eliminating your right to own and carry a gun, and they won’t quit until, like in England and Australia, private ownership of a firearm is outlawed and weapons are confiscated and destroyed.

Something popped up today, and you can bet it’ll be under-reported, and it reinforces the fact that war on the 2nd Amendment isn’t anywhere close to over for the left.

There is nothing [in ATF or OMB’s website links addressing the change in policy] that supports the requirement that ATF collect race-based information.” … Laura Murphy, the American Civil Liberties Union director for legislative affairs in Washington, said in an emailed statement.

race on gun purchase

Imperial President ObamaPlease note that the ATF, a bureaucracy that is part of the “most transparent administration in history,” declined to comment on the reason they are collecting the information.  They don’t have to, they’re “the gummit.”  And just where is the NAACP?  They should be filing lawsuits over racial profiling by the Obama administration.  Where are they?

Both the NAACP and the National Council of La Raza — the nation’s largest national Hispanic civil rights group — declined comment.

You’re probably saying, “Hey Curmudgeon, you’re paranoid!”  Well maybe, but just because we’re paranoid doesn’t mean that somebody is not out to get us.

The 4473 form is supposed to be kept in a gun retailer’s possession at all times — allowing ATF agents to inspect the form only during the course of a criminal investigation or during a random audit of the dealer. The form is to be kept out of the hands of the government, hence the distinction between “sales/transaction form” and “registration form.” But that isn’t The Great Divideralways the case, gun rights advocates say.

“We’ve been contacted by several dealers saying ATF is or has been making wholesale copies of their 4473 forms, and it’s just not legal,” said Erich Pratt, spokesman for Gun Owners of America, a gun advocacy group. “If this is what they’re doing somewhat out in the open, what’s going on behind closed doors? Are these names and demographic information getting phoned [in and] punched into a government computer? Do they ever come out?”

Are you willing to believe what ATF and any administration tells you about information they have?  We’re not.  We don’t trust Republicans any more than we trust Democrats when it comes the overreach of government.

Article collective closing


A Perspective

George Washington regarding 2nd AmandmentToday I swung my front door wide open and placed my Remington 30.06 right in my doorway. I left 6 shells beside it, then left it alone and went about my business.

While I was gone, the mailman delivered my mail, the neighbor boy across the street mowed the yard, a girl walked her dog down the street, and quite a few cars stopped at the stop sign near the front of our house. After about an hour, I checked on the gun. It was still sitting there, right where I had left it. It hadn’t moved itself outside. It certainly hadn’t killed anyone, even with the numerous opportunities it had been presented to do so. In fact, it hadn’t even loaded itself. Well you can imagine my surprise, with all the media hype about how dangerous guns are and how they kill people. Either the media is wrong or I’m in possession of the laziest gun in the world.

The United States is 3rd in Murders throughout the World. But if you take out Chicago , Detroit , Washington DC and New Orleans , the United States is 4th from the bottom for Murders. These 4 Cities also have the toughest Gun Control Laws in the United States. All 4 are controlled by Democrats.   It would be absurd to draw any conclusions from this data – right?   Well, I’m off to check on my spoons – I hear they’re making people fat.

7 (2)










America the movie with hyperlink

Click on image to see movie trailer and more

Click on image to see movie trailer and more













Article collective closing


Obama comes Out in the Open – Pushes for Gun Confiscation Agenda like Australia

Reported by

As has been predicted by those in the citizen media, Obama is set to use his “authority” as president to unilaterally issue some form of pseudo-law executive order to further the agenda of gun control in light of the recent shooting at an Oregon school. White House spokesperson Josh Earnest stated the president was always looking for opportunities to increase community safety, but that he would rather work with Congress on “robust” legislative action. Earnest revealed the president’s latest gun control campaign push at a White House press briefing on Tuesday.


gunCloward Piven

According to Earnest, “The president’s goal is to look for opportunities to act administratively, unilaterally using his executive authority to try to  make our communities safer. We’re always looking for those opportunities. But none of those opportunities when they present themselves are going to be an acceptable substitute for robust legislative action.”

Earnest contended that Congress needed to work to prevent future shootings going on to say there has been an “alarming frequency of tragic incidents of gun violence” that concern people throughout the country as well as both parties in Washington.

B.S. MeterEarnest stated, “The question I think really facing lawmakers right now is what common sense steps can Democrats and Republicans take to reduce the likelihood of gun violence? And there are some, and they have unfortunately been bottled up in Congress and that is a disappointment to the president. But that’s not going to stop the president from continuing to push for administrative steps that we can take to help reduce gun violence.”

Searching the internet finds many individuals discussing this “alarming frequency of gun violence” with some pointing to an orchestration of these incidents by the Obama administration to push gun control.Tyranney Alert

Of course, Obama couldn’t resist the temptation to push his gun control leading to confiscation agenda on Tumblr. In one statement, Obama suggested that America should follow Australia’s example and institute strict bans on automatic and semi-automatic weapons. After being briefed on the recent incidents in California and Oregon, Obama stated, “Australia had a mass shooting [in 1996] similar to Columbine and Newtown, and just said, ‘That’s it, we’re not seeing this again,’ and basically imposed very severe, tough gun laws and they haven’t had a mass shooting since.”

Obama is referring to the Port Arthur massacre that occurred at the historic prison colony there.

Since Obama has referred to Australia as a shining example of gun control and confiscation that eliminated mass shootings, what has happened to crime in Australia since?

According to a 2009 report by the National Center for Policy Analysis, the Australian Bureau of Criminology, five years after Australia enacted its gun ban, acknowledged there was no correlation between gun control and the use of firearms in violent crimes. “In fact, the percent of murders committed with a firearm was the highest it had ever been in 2006.”

According to the NCPA:

Even Australia’s Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research acknowledges that the gun ban had no significant impact on the amount of gun-involved crime:

  • In 2006, assault rose 49.2 percent and robbery 6.2 percent.
  • Sexual assault – Australia’s equivalent term for rape – increased 29.9 percent.
  • Overall, Australia’s violent crime rate rose 42.2 percent.

Moreover, Australia and the United States – where no gun ban exists – both experienced similar decreases in murder rates.

  • Between 1995 and 2007, Australia saw a 31.9 percent decrease; without a gun ban, America’s rate dropped 31.7 percent.
  • During the same period, all other violent crime indices increased in Australia: assault rose 49.2 percent and robbery 6.2 percent.
  • Sexual assault – Australia’s equivalent term for rape – increased 29.9 percent.
  • Overall, Australia’s violent crime rate rose 42.2 percent.
  • At the same time, U.S. violent crime decreased 31.8 percent: rape dropped 19.2 percent; robbery decreased 33.2 percent; aggravated assault dropped 32.2 percent.
  • Australian women are now raped over three times as often as American women.

While this does not prove that more guns would impact crime rates, it does prove that gun control is a flawed policy.Gun Control SupportersWhile Australia may not have had a mass shooting since, the crime rate in Australia has risen and the gun ban had no significant impact on the amount of gun-involved crime. Obama, as usual, doesn’t relay all the information but chooses to use information selectively to promote an agenda. There has been no definitive proof that any gun control laws prevent gun-related crimes as criminals do not follow the law.

So making guns illegalIn his Tumblr broadcast, Obama claimed that respect for the Second Amendment can still occur and “responsible sportsmen and hunters” can still possess weapons. He declared the country needed “common sense rules” to deter these incidents of mass shootings.

The questions one must ask regarding these statements is who is to determine if a person is responsible and how is that to be determined? The next is who is to determine what is common sense rules for any gun control and how is common sense defined in relation to establishing those rules? While many may not see the wisdom in the single phrase “shall not be infringed” contained in the Second Amendment, it is there to inhibit these “common sense rules,” where common sense would be defined by government, and to inhibit government from establishing the definition of “responsible” concerning who can and cannot possess firearms. The framers intent was for individuals to be able to defend themselves from tyrannical government by possessing the same fire power as the government, as the framers recognized the individual’s God-given right to protect person and property. To hear Obama talk, the Second Amendment only pertains to hunters and sportsmen.

In one statement, Obama let slip the definitive problem. He said, “My greatest frustration so far is that this society has not been willing to take steps to keep guns out of the hands of people you know who can just do unbelievable damage.”

The problem is not the guns; the problem is people who will do unbelievable, illegal, criminal activity. Those types of people will use any means necessary to perpetrate their crimes. And, Obama should be reminded that he, through the DOJ and EricFast and FuriousHolder, put guns into the hands of people who did “unbelievable damage.” The problem is the people, not the inanimate object. Criminals will be criminals so no laws, gun control or otherwise, will affect them whatsoever as they will not follow the law. Obama is evidence of that – criminal is as criminal does.


Obama continued his basic rant on guns saying, “We’re the only developed country on Earth where this happens. … Our level of gun violence is off the charts. There’s no advanced country on Earth that would put up with this.”

Well, Obama, if you take Washington, DC, Chicago, Detroit and New York out of the equation, the US has the lowest incidences of gun violence in the world. And, in case you missed it, Mr. Master of Skewing the Facts, these cities have gun control laws.


Of course, Obama could not let the opportunity pass to mention Newtown, Connecticut’s Sandy Hook Elementary School incident, which some Leftist Revisionisthave argued was a false flag psy-op event to promote a gun-control agenda, to drum up emotions.

Speaking of the Newtown shooting, Obama stated, “I’ve been in Washington, and most things don’t surprise me, [but] the fact that 20 six-year-olds were gunned down in the most violent fashion possible and this town could not do anything about it, was stunning to me.”

Why did not Obama mention the adults that supposedly were killed at Sandy Hook? Simple. Adult victims do not produce as much emotion in people as when the victims are innocent, defenseless children. He also forgot to mention that the state did do something about it in violation of the rights of gun owners.

As long as the emperor wannabe occupies the Oval Office, Americans can expect gun control to continue to surface with even more fervor than the last with each incident of gun related violence. Isn’t interesting that reports on shootings are increasing in the media?

Comming Soon 02

Article collective closing




Governor Jerry Brown’s Official Police State


California: APPS: Protect Yourself if the Government Comes for Your Guns

Posted on January 27, 2014 //

Attention residents of the City of Los Angeles and Orange County:

We recently learned that local law enforcement entities are conducting firearm confiscation raids in your area on behalf of the California Department of Justice, as part of its Armed Prohibited Persons System (“APPS”) program.  These raids are typically conducted without search warrants.  

Be prepared!  While these raids are promoted by politicians as intended to disarm dangerous criminals, they actually more often target unsuspecting citizens who present no danger and have no idea that they are prohibited from possessing firearms and ammunition.

Watch this video for background on APPS’s shortcomings and injustices, and this revealing video in review of a former DOJ Special Agent who formerly conducted APPS raids.

For an overview of how these confiscations are conducted, and information about your rights when subjected to one, read this memorandum.

If you are uncertain if you are prohibited from possessing a firearm or ammunition, check your eligibility by submitting a Personal Firearms Eligibility Check application to the California Department of Justice.

If you are prohibited from possessing firearms, contact an attorney to discuss how best to restore your rights and comply with the law.

If law enforcement shows up at your home asking about firearms:

  • Don’t talk!  Officers are trained to get people to make statements that provide “probable cause” to search and seize.  Try not to even open the door.

  • Instead, provide the officers with this flyer, or tell the officers that you assert your right to remain silent and want to have an attorney present (actually say those words).

  • Do NOT “consent” to a search of your person, possessions, or home.  Insist on a search warrant.  If they don’t have a warrant, refuse the search entirely and close the door.

  • Consult a lawyer immediately.

  • Confirm whether you may legally possess firearms and learn your rights!  Don’t take the rap for APPS!

Stay connected with the NRA through these additional connections:

Websites: NRA-ILA, NRA-ILA California, NRA – ILA Legal Update,,,

Facebook Pages: NRA’s Facebook page, Facebook page, NRA Members’ Councils’ Facebook page, Hunt for Truth Facebook page

LinkedIn: NRA’s LinkedIn page

YouTube: NRA YouTube

Twitter: NRA Twitter, NRA-ILA Twitter, CalNRATwitter, CalGunLaws Twitter


The Institute for Legislative Action (ILA) is the lobbying arm of the NRA. Established in 1975, ILA is committed to preserving the right of all law-abiding individuals to purchase, possess and use firearms for legitimate purposes as guaranteed by the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
ILA’s ability to fight successfully for the rights of America’s law-abiding gun owners directly reflects the support of NRA’s nearly 5 million members—a number that has more than tripled since 1978. When restrictive “gun control” legislation is proposed at the local, state or federal level, NRA members and supporters are alerted and respond with individual letters, faxes, e-mails and calls to their elected representatives to make their views known.

In 1986, the NRA and millions of gun owners nationwide applauded as the Firearms Owners’ Protection Act was signed into law by President Ronald Reagan. ILA worked for more than a decade to secure passage of that historic legislation to reform the Gun Control Act of 1968.
Combined with the strong grassroots efforts of NRA members and NRA-affiliated state associations and local gun clubs, the Institute has worked vigorously to pass pro-gun reform legislation at the state level.
These efforts include enacting laws that recognize the right of honest citizens to carry firearms for self-protection; preemption bills to prevent attacks on gun owner rights by local anti-gun politicians, and fighting for legislation to prevent the bankrupting of America’s firearms industry through reckless lawsuits.
The Institute is also involved in educating the public about the facts concerning the many facets of firearms ownership in America. Through the distribution of millions of printed fact sheets, brochures and articles annually and the posting information and the latest news daily on its Internet site (, the Institute provides facts about responsible firearms ownership, the Second Amendment and other topics.
In NRA Headquarters in Fairfax, Va., and in offices in Washington, D.C., and in Sacramento, Calif., the Institute employs a staff of more than 80, with a team of full-time lobbyists defending Second Amendment issues on Capitol Hill, in state legislatures and in local government bodies.
While NRA is a single-issue organization, the Institute is involved in any issue that directly or indirectly affects firearms ownership and use. These involve such topics as hunting and access to hunting lands, wilderness and wildlife conservation, civilian marksmanship training and ranges for public use, law enforcement-related issues, product liability, trapping, crime victim rights and criminal justice reform.

Download the NRA-ILA Mission Brochure.

New York Gun-Owners Getting Letters Instructing Them To Turn In Their Weapons

For most of the press it is believed, “As goes New York, so goes America”. While I do not believe that is a fact, I do believe that as goes New York, so goes it’s influence on other Liberal cities and states.

This report need to be a warning to the rest of America that we WILL see this law spreading like cancer.

Jerry Broussard


Posted By on Dec 2, 2013

pointed handgun

Thanks to New York’s gun registry, officials know exactly what kinds of guns  residents have and where these people live. Due to changes in New York’s gun  laws with the passage of the misnamed SAFE Act, many residents are now in  possession of certain “unlawful” firearms which were previously legal.

Kit Daniels of Infowars writes:

The notice provides gun owners, who possess  firearms now prohibited under New York’s unconstitutional SAFE Act, the “options” to either surrender their firearms to the police, remove them from the  city limits or otherwise render them inoperable…

The SAFE Act, which was passed by the state  legislature and signed by the governor on the same day in January, has numerous,  draconian provisions including, but not limited to:

  • Outright ban of magazines holding over 10  rounds

  • Restriction on more than seven rounds being  loaded into a magazine; the limited exceptions do not include home  defense

  • The creation of a firearms registry for what  the state considers “assault weapons”

  • A requirement for firearm permit holders to  fill out a form to keep the state from publicly identifying them

We always warned that gun registration would lead to confiscation. But the  registration part was always touted as a safety measure. They just wanted to  make sure that no guns ended up in the wrong hands. So, government officials had  to know who had what guns and to whom they were transferred. They needed to be  able to track them. If you were a law-abiding gun-owner, then there was no  reason for you to worry. They were only looking out for criminals. “No one’s  coming for your guns,” they’d say with a wry smile.

Well, yes, they are. Albeit incrementally. They’re coming for them, one law  at a time.

Civil War And The Litmus Test: Will You Shoot Americans?

By / 30 November  2013

 Click on picture to see video:

Civil WarDr. Jim Garrow is a renowned author and whistleblower who has been nominated  for a Nobel peace prize for his humanitarian work. He is the author of The  Pink Pagoda: One Man’s Quest to End Gendercide in China.

He has spent over $25 million over the past sixteen years rescuing an  estimated 40,000 baby Chinese girls from near-certain death under China’s  one-child-per-couple policy by facilitating international adoptions. He is the  founder and executive director of the Bethune Institute’s Pink Pagoda schools,  private English-immersion schools for Chinese children. Today he runs 168  schools with nearly 6,300 employees.

Dr Garrow was recently contacted by a high ranking military official who  implored him to reveal the truth about a “litmus test” that is being proposed by  the Obama administration to the military asking the question “will you shoot  Americans if they won’t give you their guns?”

Gun Confiscation Taking Place In Several Democrat Controlled States


by Richard Anthony

“Gun Confiscation” is a term that should strike fear into the hearts of criminals, not law abiding citizens. But that is exactly what certain states like New York, Colorado and California are attempting to do with “tough new gun control legislation laws.” It is no secret that the Obama Administration really, really wants to do the same thing on a national level. Imagine what could happen if that were to take place? That means only “government” would have any guns. Australia did exactly that, and crime actually rose.

The research institute known as the Australian Institute of Criminology presents these statistics:

Between 1995 and 2007, Australia saw a 31.9 percent decrease; without a gun ban, America’s rate dropped 31.7 percent.

During the same time period, all other violent crime indices increased in Australia: assault rose 49.2 percent and robbery 6.2 percent.

Sexual assault — Australia’s equivalent term for rape — increased 29.9 percent.

Overall, Australia’s violent crime rate rose 42.2 percent.

At the same time, U.S. violent crime decreased 31.8 percent: rape dropped 19.2 percent; robbery decreased 33.2 percent; aggravated assault dropped 32.2 percent.

Australian women are now raped over three times as often as American women.

In England, they have extremely strict gun laws, and they seem to be experiencing a rise in violent crime, as well.

California is already starting to confiscate legally purchased firearms. SEE VIDEO:

Simply put, this is how it starts. This is how a government becomes tyrannical, and the sad part about this is that you won’t be any safer because only the criminals and police will be the only people that are “armed.” This is just another example of how Democrats think the Constitution is just to wipe your backside with. in 2010 my mother was dying of cancer. I had to sell all of my guns to be able to travel from Washington State where I live to Southern California, so I could be with her before she died. It wasn’t even a concern because I had to be with her. Now here it is 3 years later, and I can’t afford to purchase any more firearms because unlike our politicians in Washington D.C., my wife and I live on a tight budget. For the first time in my adult life, I am un-armed, and this is the one time in history where I wish I wasn’t.

In Seattle, Mayor Mike McGinn is trying to do something similar but is restrained by the courts, we have open carry laws in Washington State. So what he is doing is, he is trying to convince business owners in Seattle to join his “Gun Free Zone” campaign. Thereby prohibiting patrons of businesses to carry firearms in stores where “Gun Free Zone” stickers are in the windows. Well, what can one expect from this idiot? He’s a Democrat from New York.

It is really quite frightening to me to see all these end-runs around the Constitution, but when only “Government” has the guns…that is tyranny.

Richard Anthony is a US Army veteran who served from 1975 to 1980. He was stationed in Frankfurt West Germany from 1976 to 1978 with the 3rd Armored Divisions 143rd Signal Battalion as a Tactical Telecommunications Center Specialist and was also with the 1st Cavalry Division 1st/12th Cav as a Combat Medic until discharge in 1980. He has been married for 20 years and has 3 sons. He’s also a very involved Tea Party activist.

Obama Will Sign UN Gun Treaty While Congress Is On Vacation

If you have been living in a cave somewhere and just rejoined society, then you have not heard about the United Nations Gun Control Treaty. It is designed to control all gun purchases all over the world. It is also designed to control guns, ammunition and who can possess fire arms. In the treaty is a section for gun registration which always leads to gun confiscation. This treaty’s ultimate goal is the disarming of America, so that their One World Government can be established and all peoples be subjugated to tyrannical reign.
President Obama knows he will never get this treaty approved by Congress, and therefore has decided to ignore our Constitution and sign the treaty in private while Congress is on vacation.
While you are ready this article, please take the time to use their efforts to contact your Senators urging them to stop President Obama. – Jerry Broussard

BELLEVUE, WA – -( You heard it straight from the horse’s mouth. Jay Carney said Obama will sign the UN Arms Trade Treaty “before the end of August…We believe it’s in the interest of the United States.”

This is very strategic timing considering Congress is on a 5 week vacation lasting thru the month of August!

These back door tactics are nothing new for the Obama Administration, which is why we are using tactics of our own to stop his anti-gun agenda. We have the home fax numbers of every Senator so while they are absent from the Capitol we can demand they must not ratify the UN Gun Treaty once Obama signs it.

We CAN stop this international treaty from reaching American soil by killing it the United States Senate. The U.S Senate must ratify an international treaty for it to be effective. They would need 67 votes to ratify the treaty. Reach every U.S. Senator at their home office; tell them you do not want this treaty in OUR United States!

Select Here To Fax The U.S. Senate At Their Home Offices:


DO NOT Ratify The UN ‘Arms Trade Treaty’!

Everything Obama tackles in office is strategically timed and politically motivated. He only looks out for himself, his fellow liberals, and his anti-gun agenda. After mass shootings the Administration would launch all-out attacks on our gun rights since the country would be more susceptible to change after a traumatic event. He made sure the Benghazi cover up was swept under the rug until he got re-elected. He will wait to attack certain issues until the 2014 Congressional elections so he’ll know how many liberals are by his side.

Obama believes now is the best time to sign the UN Gun Treaty since Congress is out of Washington. He will have less scrutiny to worry about if Congress is not nearby. He also thinks the public eye is not paying attention too closely. It is the slow summer months, people are on vacation, Congress is out of Washington so nothing must be happening.

Obama may think he is being sneaky but we will make sure the public knows what he is up to and so will all 100 U.S. Senators. By sending faxes to each Senator’s home office, they will realize how important this issue is to the American people. If we are reaching out to them while they are on vacation they will know they must take action. We must flood the home offices with faxes from Patriots across the country demanding our U.S. Senate does not ratify this international gun grab!

Gun advocates are weary of the language in the treaty including the fact that ‘small arms and light weapons’ are among the included weaponry that could be regulated by the United Nations. The UN Gun Treaty is a lot like ObamaCare; we will not know what it fully entails until it is implemented. It is impossible to trust the UN’s reassurance that this treaty will not affect our current gun laws or our Second Amendment. After all, the UN Arms Trade Treaty had previously been rumored as a replacement of the Second Amendment.

The Obama Administration seems to be thrilled with the thought of global gun control. John Kerry cannot wait for it to be signed:

“As your review of the treaty continues, we strongly encourage your administration to recognize its textual, inherent and procedural flaws, to uphold our country’s constitutional protections of civilian firearms ownership, and to defend the sovereignty of the United States, and thus to decide not to sign this treaty.”

We must make it clear TODAY to the Senate and the White House that the Second Amendment must be protected and that they must reject any and all U.N. Gun Control. Tell them to KEEP THEIR TREATY AWAY FROM OUR GUNS!

All of the evidence suggested Trayvon threw the first punch, Trayvon was on top, Trayvon was unloading significant damage onto Zimmerman, and Zimmerman used deadly force to defend himself. No matter what the facts are, the anti-gunners continue to push their agenda to try to get what they want.

It is our job as Americans and Second Amendment Patriots to meet the anti-gun crowd head on. We will fight any legislation that tries to destroy our self-defense laws or our Second Amendment rights. We need your help in order to launch a significant attack against the anti-gun agenda. They use smoke, mirrors, and lies to push their agenda while we show the facts. So many resources are needed in order to be successful against the anti-gun crowd. Anything you can give us will be substantial in maintaining our goal of protecting America’s Second Amendment!

Select Here To Fax The U.S. Senate At Their Home Offices:


DO NOT Ratify The UN ‘Arms Trade Treaty’!

The uncertainty begins in the discussion of small arms. Where will the regulations on our small arms start, and where will they stop? They are even trying to include ammunition regulations in the Arms Trade Treaty! Will the United Nations try to impose international licensing requirements, an international registry, or international?

The last negotiations for an Arms Trade Treaty took place in July 2012, just four months before the Presidential election. Obama did not want to take a big stance for global gun control just months before his re-election but now he has made it clear he is for total gun control. He also told voters he would not be re-visiting negotiations for an Arms Trade treaty but here we are.

Since his re-election it has become clearer than ever what is at the top of his agenda; taking our guns away! The Obama Administration has been exploiting tragedies since the election to push gun control at the city, state, federal, and now GLOBAL level.

Our Senate took a stance before the Presidential election when 51 of them wrote Obama a letter saying they would not support an Arms Trade Treaty. We must let our entire U.S. Senate know we do not support international gun control. They must not ratify this international treaty.

Sincerely Yours,

Alan M. Gottlieb
Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms
Ammoland Click to read AmmoLand FTC Marital Disclosures Distributed to you by – The Shooting Sports News source.

Tyranny Continues to Grow

CA Governor Signs Law Allowing Confiscation of Firearms

On May 1, California Governor Jerry Brown signed legislation that allows law enforcement to confiscate handguns and assault rifles from Californians who bought the weapons legally but have since had a disqualifying “criminal conviction or serious mental illness.”

Legislators believe up to 20,000 Californians will fall under this law, which could mean up to 40,000 weapons need to be confiscated. The legislation “allocates $24 million in surplus funds” to hire “dozens of special agents” to help recover the weapons.

Since California keeps a database of gun owners, they know where every gun is–or where it’s supposed to be–and they’ll use that database to locate them.

Sen. Mark Leno (D-San Francisco) said the money California has spent to maintain a “tracking program” on firearms has paid off and is now giving the lawmakers “the opportunity to confiscate [these guns].”

No word on when the confiscation will begin.

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: