Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions


waving flagReported by Micaiah Bilger   Nov 5, 2015   |   Washington, DC

In total, the six pro-abortion appointees received $43,362 from Planned Parenthood during the 2012 and 2014 election cycles alone, according to data from the Center for Responsive Politics.

SIGN THE PETITION! Congress Must De-Fund Planned Parenthood Immediately

Here is the breakdown for each appointee:

  • Congressman Jerrold Nadler of New York – $1,000 in 2014 and $2,000 in 2012

  • Congresswoman Diana DeGette of Colorado – $4,000 in 2014 and $7,000 in 2012

  • Congresswoman Jackie Speier of California – $1,000 in 2014 and $3,800 in 2012

  • Congresswoman Suzan DelBene of Washington – $9,732 in 2014 and $5,000 in 2012

  • Congresswoman Bonnie Watson Coleman of New Jersey – $3,500 in 2014

  • Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky of Illinois – $3,830 in 2014 and $2,500 in 2012

Rep. Degette recently was exposed as one of the biggest Congressional recipients of Planned Parenthood donations.burke She was No. 5 on the list, having received a total of $41,485 from Planned Parenthood for her elections, LifeNews.com previously reported.

Every one of the pro-abortion appointees also has a 0% pro-life voting record from the National Right to Life Committee for the current session.

The Select Panel also will include eight pro-life Republicans. The work of this panel will be in addition to the ongoing Planned Parenthood investigations at the Judiciary Committee and Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Pro-life Rep. Marsha Blackburn, a Tennessee Republican who will chair the panel, outlined the topics the panel will investigate:

  1. Medical procedures and business practices used by entities involved in fetal tissue procurement;
  2. Any other matters with respect to fetal tissue procurement;
  3. Federal funding and support for abortion providers;
  4. The practices of providers of second and third trimester abortions, including partial birth abortion procedures that may lead to a child born alive as a result of an attempted abortion;
  5. Medical procedures for the care of a child born alive as a result of an attempted abortion;
  6. Any changes in law or regulation necessary as a result of any other findings made.

SIGN THE PETITION! Congress Must Investigate Planned Parenthood for Selling Aborted Baby Parts

The expose’ videos catching Planned Parenthood officials selling the body parts of aborted babies have shocked the nation. Here is a list of the eleven videos:

  • In the first video: Dr. Deborah Nucatola of Planned Parenthood commented on baby-crushing: “We’ve been very good at getting heart, lung, liver, because we know that, so I’m not gonna crush that part, I’m gonna basically crush below, I’m gonna crush above, and I’m gonna see if I can get it all intact.”
  • In the second video: Planned Parenthood’s Dr. Mary Gatter joked, “I want a Lamborghini” as she negotiated the best price for baby parts.
  • In the third video: Holly O’Donnell, a former Stem Express employee who worked inside a Planned Parenthood clinic, detailed first-hand the unspeakable atrocities and how she fainted in horror over handling baby legs.
  • In the fourth video: Planned Parenthood’s Dr. Savita Ginde stated, “We don’t want to do just a flat-fee (per baby) of like, $200. A per-item thing works a little better, just because we can see how much we can get out of it.” She also laughed while looking at a plate of fetal kidneys that were “good to go.”
  • In the fifth video: Melissa Farrell of Planned Parenthood-Gulf Coast in Houston boasted of Planned Parenthood’s skill in obtaining “intact fetal cadavers” and how her “research” department “contributes so much to the bottom line of our organization here, you know we’re one of the largest affiliates, our Research Department is the largest in the United States.”
  • In the sixth video: Holly O’Donnell described technicians taking fetal parts without patient consent: “There were times when they would just take what they wanted. And these mothers don’t know. And there’s no way they would know.”
  • In the seventh and perhaps most disturbing video: Holly O’Donnell described the harvesting, or “procurement,” of organs from a nearly intact late-term fetus aborted at Planned Parenthood Mar Monte’s Alameda clinic in San Jose, CA. “‘You want to see something kind of cool,’” O’Donnell says her supervisor asked her. “And she just taps the heart, and it starts beating. And I’m sitting here and I’m looking at this fetus, and its heart is beating, and I don’t know what to think.”
  • In the eighth video: StemExpress CEO Cate Dyer admits Planned Parenthood sells “a lot of” fully intact aborted babies.
  • The ninth video: catches a Planned Parenthood medical director discussing how the abortion company sells fully intact aborted babies — including one who “just fell out” of the womb.
  • The 10th video: catches the nation’s biggest abortion business selling specific body parts — including the heart, eyes and “gonads” of unborn babies.The video also shows the shocking ways in which Planned Parenthood officials admit that they are breaking federal law by selling aborted baby body parts for profit.
  • The 11th video: shows the abortion doctor for Planned Parenthood in Austin, Texas, Amna Dermish, describing a partial-birth abortion procedure to terminate living, late-term unborn babies which she hopes will yield intact fetal heads for brain harvesting.
  • Unreleased Videos: Unreleased videos from CMP show Deb Vanderhei of Planned Parenthood caught on tape talking about how Planned Parenthood abortion business affiliates may “want to increase revenue [from selling baby parts] but we can’t stop them…” Another video has a woman talking about the “financial incentives” of selling aborted baby body parts.

I AM A PERSON with Poem In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagReported by Micaiah Bilger   Nov 5, 2015   |   Washington, DC

The Free Beacon report continues:

Between 2012 and the present the project spent $10,161.73 on fetal brain tissue, according to records maintained by the university and additional invoices obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.

Funds were used for two fetal brains and over a dozen tissue samples totaling $7,130 from StemExpress, the California-based tissue company that had to cut ties with Planned Parenthood following the Center for Medical Progress videos.

[Researcher Dr. Nada] Zecevic also spent federal funding on two second trimester brains from Advanced Bioscience Resources Inc. costing over $300, and an intact calvarium for $645.

SIGN THE PETITION! Congress Must De-Fund Planned Parenthood Immediately

how many body partsFee lists obtained by the news outlet show that StemExpress also charged $45 for “tissue cleaning,” $80 for storage, and delivery fees, the news agency reports.

In total, Zecevic received almost $3.8 million in taxpayer-funded grants for her research, according to the report. The neurologist’s study involves comparing brain tissue between humans and mice to find a cure for schizophrenia and autism, the report states.

Internal emails obtained by the news outlet show that the university researcher corresponded with Planned Parenthood and StemExpress about obtaining the aborted babies’ brains. Zecevic also worked with a New York brain bank to buy aborted babies’ brains, according to the report.

Ironically, the researchers seemed to regard their animal subjects with more respect than their human ones. The report continues:

The grant application, which was approved, explains how the researchers took care to reduce the amount of pain for the mice that were used as test subjects.

“Procedures for ensuring that discomfort, distress, pain, and injury will be limited: There is no pain or discomfort associated with anesthesia and immediate subsequent decapitation,” the document states.What did you say 05.jpg

This isn’t the first time the Obama administration has supported using tax dollars to pay for aborted babies’ body parts in research. In 2012, the Obama administration also faced criticism after it approve an experiment using brain stem cells of unborn children victimized by abortion, LifeNews.com previously reported.

SIGN THE PETITION! Congress Must Investigate Planned Parenthood for Selling Aborted Baby Parts

In recent months, the Obama administration has widely ignored Americans’ outrage over the undercover videos showing Planned Parenthood officials harvesting aborted babies’ body parts for research.

President Barack Obama and his administration staunchly continue to support the abortion giant, and Obama has promised to veto any legislation that would de-fund Planned Parenthood or hold it criminally liable for harvesting aborted babies’ body parts if they are still alive.

I AM A PERSON with Poem In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagWritten by Thomas Holmes on November 5, 2015

URL of the original posting site: http://clashdaily.com/2015/11/this-u-s-city-moves-to-start-a-muslim-government-and-the-media-is-silent/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=subscriber_id:9760859&utm_campaign=This%20U.S.%20City%20Moves%20To%20Start%20A%20Muslim%20Government%20%E2%80%93%20And%20The%20Media%20Is%20SILENT

America Never Forget

And so it begins. I guess America was feeling a little left out of all the Muslim influence in western democracies like Britain and Australia. We want our fair share of Islamic indoctrination too. And now, a suburb of Detroit has stepped up and elected the first Muslim majority city council in American history. The Polish settled town of Hamtramck, Michigan voted Muslim in four of the six council elections in what is generally considered a reflection of the town’s changing demographics. It wasn’t even that close. Muslims were the top three vote getters.

city

Got-Quran_thumb1-300x228To be fair, two of the Muslims were actually re-elected. And while we’re not talking about the Islamists who boycotted the police in Australia, this is the same city that saw no problem voting unanimously in 2004 to allow the mosques to broadcast the Muslim call to prayer. Look, I’d love nothing more than to report this as a great step for new believers in America and immigrants who reflect constitutional ideals. Unfortunately, last I checked, this is still the same religion whose highest leadership defines its faith on Sharia Law and destroying America.

Beside the questions about empowering people of a dangerous and violent faith, despite their individual integrity, there’s the issue of diversity. Of course, don’t tell this reporter that there’s a diversity problem. As he rambles on about Hamtramck’s new reflection he seems happy to ignore the fact that the city council’s “diversity” is 67% one faith and ethnic background. Don’t even get into the question of political diversity.

Apparently, ethnic majorities are only a problem when were dealing with Caucasian males.Islam is NOT In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagAuthored by Joe Wurzelbacher — November 5, 2015

The Muslim Brotherhood arm, CAIR will have a float in the Veterans Day Parade in Tulsa and it is stirring up a storm! The parade committee actually tried to keep this information from reaching the public and not all parade participants are happy about it. Namely, U.S. military veterans. Let’s be clear: We’re not questioning their Rights, we’re questioning their intentions – by Joe Wurzelbacher

cair-FL-parade

Tulsa Muslims have full right to be there under the Constitution. But why does a terrorist organization want to have a float in a Veteran’s Day Parade?

It isn’t about Muslims. Muslims have been participating in Veteran’s Day Celebrations all along.  It’s about the terrorist organization the Muslim Brotherhood and their fight against our troops on the world stage – so I ask you again- “What is the Enemy Doing in Our Victory Parade?”

The FBI identifies CAIR as an arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in America. CAIR consistently states that it is not connected.

The connections have been well documented. So why CAIR involvement?

As BILL SHERMAN Faith and Values Writer for the TulsaWorld writes:

Several veterans wrote or called unhappy about CAIR in the parade – one of them who served in special ops in Iraq said he is working with other veterans to plan some kind of legal and peaceful protest.

He said he is fine with Muslims in the parade, but not CAIR, which he says, once again, has ties to terrorist organizations.

Many U.S. Muslims have served in the armed forces. There are many Muslim Veterans. No one has a problem with Muslims, especially those who are Veterans, to continue to participate as has happened in the past.

Again, why does a terrorist organization like the Muslim Brotherhood and their arm CAIR want to have a float in a Veteran’s Day Parade?America Never Forget

We all know the answer to that – but we need to go to Tulsa, everyone who can get there – and let them know how we feel. There’s a very good chance that I’m showing up myself and I have a great idea: When the CAIR float comes by and throws out candy as is tradition – I’m going to throw pork rinds back.

That’s right I said it – they’re the enemy and every damn one of you knows it. When are we going to stop putting up with our adversaries hiding in plain site? Tulsa is the new ground zero as far as I’m concerned and we need to make enough noise so it can be heard all the way to the White House.AMEN

Don’t misunderstand me – they’ve got every Right to Free Speech. But buddy, so do I – and I’m not alone:

The Veterans Day parade in Tulsa is one of the largest in the country each year, but this year – having a float representing CAIR doesn’t sit well with most locals:

Larry Williamson, a member of the Tulsa 912 Project, a conservative organization, told the World it is “atrocious” to ask veterans to “march alongside people who represent our enemies in a current war.”

“I believe all American entrants who the parade is intended to honor should be made aware as soon as possible that they are being asked to share their honor with the Muslim Brotherhood, sworn enemy of the United States and our ally Israel and an enemy in our current war on the Islamic jihad in which American soldiers are fighting and dying,” he said in a letter to the Tulsa World.

Making matters worse for Williamson, he told the World his Tulsa 912 Project float is scheduled to be in line right next to the CAIR float in the parade. “I’m not a spokesman for Tulsa 912, but I won’t march alongside the Muslim Brotherhood,” he told the newspaper.

Williams refers to CAIR as the “Muslim Brotherhood” because of documents filed in court records from the Holy Land Foundation trial naming CAIR as a Brotherhood front group.

Folks, I’ve read the Koran and  it’s perfectly fine to lie and deceive if you’re in the act of defeating the Infidels. Listen to the lies from the local Oklahoma Chapter:

Adam Soltani, Executive Director of CAIR Oklahoma, says claims that CAIR supports terrorism are simply false.

“Any claim that CAIR is associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, or any other terrorist organization is absolutely preposterous, he told KRMG. “CAIR was founded in 1994 in Washington D.C. as a national organization to be a civil rights advocate for American Muslims, to stand up for constitutional rights, for religious freedom, for pluralism, and for every right that we value as American citizens.”

You’re supposed to believe that, despite the national CAIR organization being named as an unindicted co-conspirator in a 2001-11 investigation into a group called the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development. Several members of that group were eventually convicted; one of them was also a founding member of CAIR.

Believe me, I could list a hundred connections – going all the way to the White House, Hillary Clinton and Anthony Weiner’s in-laws, but just for instance – In 2008, the FBI cut all its ties with the Council on American-Islamic Relations after it came to light that Nihad Awad had participated in meetings with the Holy Land Foundation.Muslims in the White House Administration

FBI Special Agent, Lara Burns testified at the trial that CAIR was a Hamas front, and the Obama administration has continued with this refusal to work with CAIR. Hamas itself was established by the Muslim Brotherhood in 1988 after the First Intifada or uprising in Palestine.

Pamela Geller noted earlier this year, San Francisco Bay Area CAIR Executive Director Zahra Billoo “struggles with Memorial Day each year. How does one balance being pretty staunchly anti-war while honoring those who died in the military?”muslims-pray

Billoo also tweeted a quote by CAIR head Dawud Walid, saying, “If one dies in an unjust war in which we illegally invaded and occupied a sovereign nation, should that person be honored?”

What did you say 07.jpg In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagPublished November 05, 2015, FoxNews.com

As authorities worked to establish a motive for the 18-year-old college freshman who stabbed four people on a California campus Wednesday, more disturbing details emerged about the attacker. Faisal Mohammad, who was killed by University of California Merced police, was described by at least one witness as smiling as he slashed at victims, called a loner by a fellow dorm resident and drew praise Thursday from a Twitter account associated with ISIS, which just last week released a series of videos calling for lone wolf stabbing attacks.

“May Allah accept him,” read a tweet in Arabic from a Twitter account that terrorism experts say has carried previous ISIS propaganda, just minutes after Mohammad’s name was divulged by campus authorities.against America

UC Merced Chancellor Dorothy Leland said that personal animosities, not a political agenda, motivated the 18-year-old. LeLand said Mohammad was a student in the class he attacked Wednesday, but authorities didn’t know if he targeted someone in particular.

Merced County Sheriff Vern Warnke added that a bomb squad recovered Mohammad’s backpack, which contained items including petroleum jelly. He described the substance as a “poor man’s C-4,” a military-grade explosive.

Warnke said there was also a handwritten list of items to put in the backpack, and officials recovered them all except for scissors.

Warnke added that there was nothing to indicate Mohammad would lash out violently.

“He had a smile on his face, he was having fun,” a construction worker who helped stop the attacker told CBS 47.

A suitemate said Mohammad “didn’t talk much.” Speaking to KFSN, Andrew Velasquez said he never saw the stabber walking to class with anyone, adding, “Every time I would try and say something he would just ignore it.”

Campus police shot and killed Mohammad, a computer science & engineering major who graduated from Wilcox High School in Santa Clara last June. Police detonated his backpack and are testing a substance inside, KGO reports.

The four victims are expected to survive. Authorities say Mohammad was armed with a hunting knife, and that its blade was 8 to 10 inches long.

The construction worker ran into the classroom to stop the attack, saying he’d initially thought it was a fight. Byron Price, 31, was working on remodeling a waiting room when he heard a commotion and rushed to check on it.

Price told CBS 47, “It was a really big knife and he was swinging it down so I figured if I was on the ground and my feet were at him, he could get my legs and not my body.”

“I really believe he’s a hero here. I think he prevented this first student from dying,” Merced County Sheriff Vern Warnke said. “The cops on campus, oh my gosh, praise them because they stopped a threat, but this first guy, he stopped a death.”

Two of the injured had to be airlifted to nearby hospitals, and the other two were treated on campus. The incident began when the assailant used the knife to stab two people in a second-floor room around the start of an 8 a.m. class.

Warnke said the suspect fled the room after attacking the construction worker and ran down two flights of stairs to the outside where he stabbed a school employee sitting on a bench. The suspect fled the building. He was shot and killed by pursuing campus police on a nearby foot bridge.

All the victims were conscious when paramedics reached them, Assistant Vice Chancellor Patti Waid said.

Lensy Maravilla, 19, a first-year student, said she was in a biology class on the second floor of the same building, when a female student ran in. Maravilla said the student “was crying hysterically and came in and said that she had seen somebody get stabbed, or slashed, in the throat and she ran.”

The main road to enter the campus remained closed to outside traffic Wednesday night and classes were canceled until Friday at the university, which is about 120 miles south of Sacramento in the farm-rich San Joaquin Valley. Police were allowing students who live on campus to come and go, but anxious parents waited in their vehicles at the end of the dark roadway about a half mile from the campus entrance.

The Twitter account on which the attack was praised appears to be one of thousands that regularly reference ISIS, according to Terrorism Research & Analysis Consortium (TRAC), which translated the message. Veryan Khan, of TRAC, which monitors ISIS and other groups on social media, said ISIS mounted a call for stabbings on Oct. 18, with the release 19 videos, but could not say what motivated Wednesday’s attack.

“Over the past three days, the Islamic State has released nineteen videos encouraging Palestinians stabbing attacks on Israel,” Khan said. “The media campaign coincides with a wave of renewed violence between Israel and Palestine, after a wave of seemingly lone wolf attacks by Palestinians targeting Israelis.”culture of deceit and lies

Fox News’ Mike Lundin, Malia Zimmerman and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

In God We Trust freedom combo 2


Authored by  Ann Coulter  | 

URL of the original posting site: http://humanevents.com/2015/11/04/ok-who-ordered-the-mexican-heroin/?utm_source=coulterdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

OK, Who Ordered the Mexican Heroin?

Heroin use in the United States increased by nearly 80 percent between 2007 and 2012 alone, and The New York Times’ main reaction to this depressing fact is to be overjoyed that the new addicts are mostly white.

The important point is not that ragingly addictive drugs are sweeping small-town America, young lives are being cut short, or that we lost one of the most talented actors of his generation to a heroin overdose. What matters is that that the drug epidemic is not having a disparate impact. 

Excitedly reporting that “nearly 90 percent of those who tried heroin for the first time in the last decade were white” — yay! — the Times claimed that, with white kids dying from heroin overdoses, their parents are taking a “more forgiving approach” to heroin addiction.

Assuming that’s even true, are grieving parents the best source of public policy recommendations? If we’re basing our drug policies on the feelings of parents whose kids overdosed on drugs, how about having the parents of kids who have been raped and murdered write our death penalty laws?

Columbia professor Kimberle Williams Crenshaw lamented that if only whites had been dying of heroin overdoses sooner, “the devastating impact of mass incarceration upon entire communities would never have happened.”

The implication that black people have always had a more “forgiving” approach to drugs — and whites are finally catching up — is insane. Black leaders have been begging for more aggressive drug laws forever.

In the ’90s, members of the Congressional Black Caucus repeatedly held hearings on the crack epidemic, crime and drugs. Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., called drug traffickers “a greater threat to our national security than communists.” Jesse Jackson demanded “a comprehensive war on drugs.” Lee Brown, Clinton’s African-American director of national drug control policy, said that “that the legalization of illegal drugs would be the moral equivalent to genocide.”

Nor did black citizens take a particularly “forgiving” approach to their children’s drug addictions. In March 1987, The Miami Herald told the story of an African-American woman who called the police on her own son, telling them to arrest him, when his drug habit led him to burglarize homes in their neighborhood.

By contrast, the Times’ big ideas for reducing heroin addiction in America are: (1) stop stigmatizing drug use; (2) stop imprisoning drug offenders; and (3) make a heroin antidote, naloxone, widely available, so Americans are prepared when their friends and relatives overdose.

The Times objects to stigmatizing behavior only when it doesn’t really mind the behavior. It never advocates a “forgiving approach” toward things the Times dislikes. There will be no “forgiving approach” to abortion-doctor killers, Catholic priests who molest children or corporate polluters — though those behaviors may also result from a “disease.”

Instead of trying to prevent abortionists from being shot, why not give them bulletproof vests?

Rather than stigmatize priests who molest kids, shouldn’t we put them in “diversion” programs, and have STD antidotes available for the molested children? And do we have to use such loaded term as “molest”?

How about “compassionate counseling” for socially irresponsible corporate conglomerates? Lets try recasting them in a less stigmatizing light — avoiding words like “polluter” or “contaminate,” and instead using terms that convey a chronic condition, like “rent seekers”?

If the Times had any genuine interest in reducing drug addiction, I suspect the paper would prefer the “stigmatizing” approach. It might even advocate policies to stop drug addiction, rather than policies to treat it.

As Rangel said in a 1992 speech to the National Press Club: “We all know that the availability of heroin and cocaine on our streets is because our borders are a sieve. I would like to believe that if the communists were still alive and well, and they were pushing bombs into communities that could cause the havoc, the pain and the cost that drugs are, that somehow the secretary of state … would be involved.”

Rangel is right. The drug problem exploded in the U.S. after we opened our southern border to one of the world’s major drug-supplying countries: Mexico. The vast majority of all drugs in America — heroin, cocaine, marijuana and, increasingly, methamphetamine — are brought in by the people of Mexico, who make our country a more diverse tapestry of cultural richness.

In 2010, 38,329 people died from drug overdoses, twice the number a decade earlier. More people died of drug overdoses than from automobile accidents (30,196), murders (13,000) or gun accidents (700).

About 90 percent of heroin in the U.S. is brought in by Mexicans. In 2013, U.S. authorities seized 2,162 kilograms of heroin coming across our southern border — compared to 367 kilos in 2007. The government has estimated that 660,000 Americans are using heroin and more than 3,000 are dying of it every year — because Mexico is boosting the supply.

And yet in a major front-page article about America’s “heroin crisis” last weekend, the Times never mentioned Mexico.

Even when Mexicans dump illegal drugs on our country, it’s America’s fault. As the Times explained in an Aug. 30, 2015, article, Mexico increased opium production by 50 percent in 2014, “the result of a voracious American appetite.”

In what other circumstances do we absolve the seller of a dangerous product because a buyer exists? It’s not the hit-man’s fault — that lady wanted her husband dead.

In any event, the “appetite” argument may work for pot, but America did not place an order for black tar heroin. According to a DEA agent quoted in The Washington Post, Mexican drug pushers stand outside American methadone clinics, selling their wares. Hey, senor, have you heard of this?

Despite the Times’ neurotic obsession with the racial breakdown of heroin users, it seems sublimely uninterested in the ethnic composition of heroin pushers. This is more than the left’s usual affection for criminals.

Contrary to the cliches, most drug dealers aren’t black: They’re Hispanic. In 2013, 48 percent of drug offenders in federal prison were Hispanic. Only 27 percent were black and 22 percent white.

All the left’s blather about drug laws being used to lock up “black bodies” is a lie. Once again, the left is using African-Americans as a false flag to push policies that help Democrats, but hurt black people.

The Times doesn’t mind black neighborhoods being seized by Mexican drug cartels. It doesn’t mind if more white people die from heroin overdoses. The Times just wants to increase the number of Hispanics out of prison, on their way to citizenship, so they can start voting for the Democrats.

illegalalienvoters-300x300 In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagWho’s The Whiner?


BY: November 3, 2015

URL of the original posting site: http://freebeacon.com/national-security/congress-moves-to-label-muslim-brotherhood-a-terrorist-group

Muslim Brotherhood

Muslim Brotherhood supporters in Egypt / AP

The legislation outlines the Brotherhood’s long history of sponsoring terrorism and outlines congressional support for it to be designated a global terrorist outfit. The bill also would force Secretary of State John Kerry to explain why the Obama administration has been hesitant to label the Brotherhood a terrorist group.

 

The Brotherhood’s political wing has been banned in Egypt, where affiliates of the organization overthrew the government and then violently cracked down on its opposition, the United States has avoided labeling the organization a sponsor of terrorism.Muslims in the White House Administration

Should the State Department refuse to move forward with the designation, the bill would require it to provide a justification for this policy, according to the bill.

Multiple House lawmakers spearheaded a similar effort last year, but the bill failed to become law.

This time around, Sen. Ted Cruz (R., Texas) is heading the legislation in the Senate, while Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R., Fla.) is handling the House version of the bill, sources said.

“We have to stop pretending that the Brotherhood are not responsible for the terrorism they advocate and finance,” Cruz told the Free Beacon. “We have to see it for what it is: a key international organization dedicated to waging violent jihad.  Since the Obama administration refuses to utter the words’”radical Islamic terrorism,’ and Congress owes it to the American people to tell them the truth about this threat.”

The bill also helps combat the notion that Brotherhood is a peaceful political group, Cruz said.

“This bill puts the lie to the notion that the Muslim Brotherhood is a peaceful political organization that can be a legitimate partner for America,” the lawmaker said. “In 2008 the Justice Department successfully prosecuted the largest terrorism-financing trial in American history arguing that the Muslim Brotherhood directed U.S. affiliates such as the Holy Land Foundation to provide ‘media, money and men’ to Hamas. That support was used for terrorist attacks against Americans and our allies in the Middle East.  When they are capable they will try to do the same thing here.”

The bill, which includes a lengthy history of the Brotherhood’s links to radical terrorist leaders and violent incidents, concludes that “the Muslim Brotherhood meets the criteria for designation as a foreign terrorist organization.”

It would require the State Department and other agencies to determine whether the Brotherhood officially meets the requirements to be designated under U.S. law as a terrorist organization.

However, “if the Secretary of State determines that the Muslim Brotherhood does not meet the criteria,” it must submit to Congress “a detailed justification as to which criteria have not been met,” according to the bill.

Muslim Brotherhood affiliates as well as the group’s members have been listed as sponsors of terrorism in the past by the U.S. government. The terrorist group Hamas, a longtime Brotherhood affiliate, has been sanctioned for some time.Muslims in the White House Administration

The organization garnered international headlines after its rise to power following a coup in Egypt that took down its longtime former leader. While in power, the Brotherhood cracked down on opponents and waged violent campaigns against Christians and others who opposed the group’s radical ideology.

Five countries—Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Russia—already consider the Brotherhood a terrorist organization. Israel, Canada, and the United Kingdom are examining the possibility of designating it a terrorist organization as well.

Lawmakers such as Cruz maintain that the Brotherhood poses a direct threat to U.S. national security, though the Obama administration has held meetings with the organization’s representatives.

A senior member of the Brotherhood was hosted at the White House last year, while other representatives of the group have been granted entrance to the United States. Senior U.S. officials have warned in the past that the Brotherhood both in the United States and overseas have backed terrorist acts. “I can say at the outset that elements of the Muslim Brotherhood both here and overseas have supported terrorism,” said Robert Mueller, the former director of the FBI, during testimony in 2011.

muslim-obamaIntelligence officials have established that elements of the Brotherhood run terrorist financing operations in the United States. Much of this information, however, remains classified.

Other officials have explained that terror groups such as Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and al Qaeda can all trace their roots back to the Muslim Brotherhood and its leaders.

Cruz has also led congressional efforts to designate Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps an official state sponsor of terrorism.

That bill, submitted at the end of September, would likely mitigate the impact of sanctions relief provided to Iran under the recently inked nuclear deal.

“Branches of the [Revolutionary Guard Corps] have murdered hundreds of Americans,” Cruz said in a statement at the time. “They have attacked our allies, notably Israel. They have provided material support for other designated terrorist groups, such as Hezbollah and Hamas. Yet for years the United States has sanctioned [Revolutionary Guard Corps] entities while leaving the organization itself untouched.”

Obama Muslim collection Islamapologist against America In God We Trust freedom combo 2


Reported by F. Peter Brown November 3, 2015

URL of the original posting site: http://www.westernjournalism.com/supreme-court-about-to-make-massive-decision-some-say-could-lead-to-2nd-civil-war/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=ConservativeHeadlinesEmail&utm_campaign=PM1&utm_content=2015-11-04

Image credit: Steve Petteway/Wikipedia
The court is considering whether to hear an appeal from Highland Park pediatrician Arie S. Friedman, who claims that…Image credit: Steve Petteway/Wikipedia

The Second Amendment to the Constitution has long been one of the most cherished amendments of the Bill of Rights. The amendment reads: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”Hey Leftist

Many liberals, though, questioned whether individual citizens owning firearms amounted to a “well regulated militia.”

The question was put to rest by the Supreme Court in the 2008 decision District of Columbia v. Heller. The court, in an opinion authored by Justice Antonin Scalia, ruled that there was in fact a personal right to gun ownership for “traditionally lawful purposes” such as self-defense in the home.

Now, there is another critical case dealing with gun rights which the Supreme Court is considering taking up. The case concerns a semiautomatic gun ban in a Chicago suburb. The court is considering whether to hear an appeal from Highland Park pediatrician Arie S. Friedman, who claims that the gun ban denies him the ability to use semiautomatic weapons to defend his family and home, which Friedman claims is a right protected by the Second Amendment. Friedman has already lost his case in two courts, a US District Court and then 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals.SCOTUS GIANT

The National Rifle Association has filed a brief with the Supreme Court in support of the court taking up Friedman’s case. The court’s decision on whether they hear the case or not could come as early as today.

Semiautomatic weapons are distinguished from automatic weapons in that semiautomatic weapons require the user to press the trigger each time one fires as opposed to automatic weapons which allow the user to fire many rounds while simply holding down the trigger.

The NRA states that semiautomatics now count for about 50 percent of all new firearms bought annually.

Criminals and Dictators In God We Trust freedom combo 2


– The Washington Times – Tuesday, November 3, 2015

URL of the original posting site: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/nov/3/election-night-conservatives-win-as-voters-elect-g

Kentucky Republican gubernatorial candidate Matt Bevin hugs a supporter at the Republican Party celebration Tuesday Louisville, Ky. Mr. Bevin defeated Democrat Jack Conway to become only the second Republican governor in the state in four decades. (Associated Press)

Kentucky Republican gubernatorial candidate Matt Bevin hugs a supporter at the Republican Party celebration Tuesday Louisville, Ky. Mr. Bevin defeated Democrat Jack Conway to become only the second Republican governor in the state in four decades. (Associated Press) more >

In the election races across the country Tuesday, Houston voters rejected a transgender “bathroom bill,” Ohioans torched legal marijuana, and Republicans captured both gubernatorial contest races at stake.

With 30 percent of precincts counted, The Associated Press declared that Houston’s Proposition 1 had gone down to defeat. The measure was taking a beating with 62 percent of voters against the measure and 38 percent in favor.

The vote capped a pitched 18-month battle between Houston pastors and Mayor Annise Parker, the first openly lesbian mayor of a major city, who had championed the ordinance allowing people to use restrooms, showers and other public accommodations based on their gender identity, not their biological sex.What did you say 07.jpg

In Kentucky, Republican businessman Matt Bevin defeated Democratic Attorney General Jack Conway by 53 to 44 percent, with independent Drew Curtis taking 4 percent in the race to succeed term-limited Democratic Gov. Steve Beshear.

Meanwhile, Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant easily won a second term over Robert Gray, a Democrat who spent just $3,000 in a token campaign in the overwhelmingly Republican state.

Ohio voters overwhelmingly rejected Issue 3, which would have legalized recreational marijuana for adults 21 and over, handing the pro-pot movement its first defeat since Colorado and Washington approved legalization measures in 2012.

“When it comes to the broader debate about legalizing marijuana, the defeat of Issue 3 won’t be a case of ‘as Ohio goes, so goes the nation,’” said Tom Angell, chairman of Marijuana Majority, in a statement.

Unlike Ohio, the four states — Colorado, Washington, Oregon and Alaska — that have approved recreational pot for adults began with medical marijuana. “This was about a flawed measure and a campaign that didn’t represent what voters want,” Mr. Angell said.

Mr. Bevin, a Kentucky business owner who had challenged Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell in the 2014 GOP primary, ran as a political outsider with strong tea party support. He won the GOP gubernatorial primary in a crowded Republican field by just 83 votes.

In his victory speech, Mr. Bevin issued a clarion call for unity, praising Mr. Conway and saying “this is our opportunity to come together as one. We have much work ahead of us.” It is time “to get the overalls on, get the boots on and get out of bed,” he said.

His running mate — Lt. Gov.-elect Jenean Hampton, who introduced him Tuesday night — became the first black person to win a statewide race in Kentucky.

Mr. Conway made a concession and congratulations call before 9 p.m., telling supporters at the Frankfort Convention Center that he had told his rival that he “remained positive about moving this state forward, and that if he ever needed any assistance, that this Democrat was at his disposal.”

In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagBy Ben Bowles on November 4, 2015

URL of the original posting site: http://libertyunyielding.com/2015/11/04/obama-administration-transgender-boys-must-be-allowed-to-shower-with-girls-at-school

Obama girls locker roomWhen it rains it pours. This morning Howard Portnoy wrote about a landmark referendum vote in Houston to repeal that city’s LGBT-friendly Houston Equal Rights Ordinance, or HERO.

Now comes word that the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights has ordered a taxpayer-funded school district in Palatine, Ill., to allow a male transgender student who dresses like a girl and otherwise identifies as female to use the girls locker room and shower on school premises.

Eric Owens of the Daily Caller writes:

The Department of Education has given the school district one month to let the student use the girls locker room. If the district does not capitulate, it risks losing federal funding.

President Barack Obama’s Department of Education — which manifestly is not vested with judicial powers — has taken to applying Title IX, a comprehensive 1972 federal law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex, to transgender cases.

Megyn Kelly of Fox News Channel did an illuminating segment on this ruling, a video clip of which follows:

transgender

The school attempted to accommodate the student, setting up a separate dressing area for him that would allow girls the privacy they deserve, but the teen, backed by the ACLU, refused to accept “halfway measures.”Picture1

The Chicago Tribune.quotes John Knight, director of the LGBT and AIDS Project at ACLU of Illinois, as saying, “Showering in a different place is ‘blatant discrimination,’” adding:

It’s one thing to say to all the girls, ‘You can choose if you want some extra privacy,’ but it’s another thing to say, ‘You, and you alone, must use them.’ That sends a pretty strong signal to her that she’s not accepted and the district does not see her as girl.More Evidence

On Monday, the Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights said it agreed with Knight’s assessment, writing in a letter:

Student A has not only received an unequal opportunity to benefit from the District’s educational program, but has also experienced an ongoing sense of isolation and ostracism throughout her high school enrollment at the school.squeeze into mold

I can imagine that people who find this decision intrusive and appalling will raise hypothetical questions like “Would Obama be OK with his daughters showering next to biologically male teens?” Something tells me his answer would be yes. That doesn’t mean, of course, he should have the final say on whether it’s OK for other parents or their daughters.

AMEN In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagWritten by Bethany Blankley

URL of the original posting site: http://constitution.com/constitutional-requirement-to-shut-down-mosques-as-hate-groups

Obama’s former White House Homeland Security advisor, Mohamed Elibiary (a Muslim Brotherhood member), asserted:

“America is an Islamic country” with an “Islamic Compliant Constitution.” Elbiary, like most Islamists, believes America will soon be part of a Muslim majority world.Islam is NOT

To understand him, Obama, and many other Islamists, it’s important to first understand that Islam is not a religion. “Religious worship” is only one aspect of an expansive Islamic political ideology.

Islam regulates financial transactions and contracts, morality, philosophical beliefs, and criminal and civil law. Islamic Shari’a Councils exist in societies worldwide, which institutionalize and regulate violence against women, honor killings, child marriage, and domestic violence.

Islamic rules are outlined in the Qur’an by Muhammad, a self-proclaimed prophet and political leader, about which he explicitly stated no follower of his could alter or ignore. While Islam, literally translated, means “submission” [to Allah—or death], Islam and Shari’a law are one and the same.

Islam’s totalitarian political ideology specifies a mandatory legal system to oversee all areas of society—and rejects every aspect of western law.

  • Drinkers of alcohol, gamblers, and unmarried sexual partners must be whipped;
  • All gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and transgender people are to be executed if sever punishment does not result in repentance and halting of perverted behavior.
  • Free speech, freedom of the press, and freedom to worship or not worship do not exist under Islamic law.

In fact, the Qur’an, the Hadith, and the Sunnah all clearly articulate Islam’s ultimate goal: to implement worldwide totalitarian rule under Shari’a Law. Several efforts are underway in America towards this end.

The Muslim Brotherhood recently announced its intention to create a political party to engage Muslims in U.S. politics in addition to the numerous organizations and agencies it has infiltrated over the last several decades. CAIR (the Council on American Islamic Relations) and other organizations and Islamists are actively trying to make every state constitution Shari’a compliant.

Obama’s close friend, Omar Ahmed, Chairman of the Board of CAIR claimed:

“Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Qur’an should be the highest authority in America.” America Never Forget

Belgian leader Abu Imran helps clarify the Islamic perspective:

“Democracy is the opposite of Islam. A Muslim who supports democracy is equivalent to a Jewish Muslim. It’s impossible to be both Jewish and Muslim and impossible to be a Muslim against Shari’a.”

It is an Islamist’s duty to transform all governments to Shari’a Law– which is why mosques act primarily as political centers, not “religious” institutions.

According to the Center for Security Policy, 81 percent of all mosques in America distribute imam-promoted literature that encourages violence as part of advancing Islam. According to the Center’s survey results, data, and calculations, the majority of men who attend mosques on a weekly basis attend mosques that promote jihad. Because the imam-distributed material classifies as hate speech, many Islamic organizations affiliated with and/or funding/managing mosques can be classified as “hate groups.” More importantly, they can also be shut down.culture of deceit and lies

The Qur’an is the only “religious book” that requires its followers to target and kill certain people— solely based on their ethnicity and religious belief and/or affiliation.

muslim-obamaEven if considered “religious,” no rational assertion can claim Islam does not incite violence. Because violence is integral to Islam, Islam itself violates the U.S. Constitution.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled more than once that “hate speech,” which incites violence, falls outside of constitutional protection.

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. argued, “The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic.” (Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47, 39 S. Ct. 247, 63 L. Ed. 470 [1919]).

In 1969 the Supreme Court added three conditions to the Holmes argument for restricting speech; the speech in question must have

1) the intent and

2) the likelihood of causing

3) imminent violence.

Inciting the intent to kill any non-Muslim, anyone who rejects the Qur’an, Shari’a law and Islam, involving direct encouragements for others to commit crimes and to commit them “now,” all meet the three-prong criteria. Yet, few if any legal actions have been taken against imams, mosques, or any other groups continuing to incite violence.

Every American citizen must demand that legal action be taken to curtail and halt incitement to violence being directed towards any and everyone who rejects Islam. The first place to start is by first classifying mosques as “hate groups.” Next, shut down mosques. Finally, identify, arrest, and try imams and everyone who poses a direct threat to the Constitution, as instructed in Article III.

AMEN In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagEye opening Statistics

Chicago,
IL
Houston, 
 
—– Original 
TX
Population
2.7 
million
2.15 
million
 
 
 
Median HH Income
$38,600
$37,000
 
 
 
% of African-American
38.9%
24%
 
 
 
% Hispanic
29.9%
44%
 
 
 
 
% Asian
5.5%
6%
 
 
 
% Non-Hispanic White
28.7%
26%

Somewhat similar until you compare the following:

Chicago,
IL
Houston,
TX
Concealed Carry gun law
NO
YES
 
 
 
# of Gun Stores
0
184- Dedicated gun 
stores plus1500 legalplaces to buy
guns, e.g. Wal-Mart, K-mart, sporting goods,
etc.
 
 
 
Gun Related Homicides, 2013
1,806
207
 
 
 
Homicides per 100K
38.4
9.6
 
 
 
Avg. January high temperature (F)
31
63

Democrat Conclusion: Cold weather from global warming causes murder.

More Evidence     Hate Merchants          stupid Alinsky affect In God We Trust                                  freedom combo 2


waving flagThe Fix Is In


waving flagBy / 2 November 2015

Often, when there is a confrontation of free speech in the public square and one side becomes violent, police want to step in and instead of dealing with the violent party, they will remove the law-abiding citizens “for their own safety.” It is clearly a violation of the right of the people to assemble, as well as a free speech violation. Now, a US Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled constitutionally when it comes to police attempting to remove Christians from public areas just because Muslims threaten them with violence.

Bob Unruh reports:

The case was brought by Bible Believers, Ruben Israel, Arthur Fisher and Joshua DeLosSantos against Wayne County, Michigan, Sheriff Benny Napoleon and deputies Dennis Richardson and Mike Jaafar.

It cited the plaintiffs’ messages on signs and T-shirts that included “Islam Is A Religion of Blood and Murder,” “Turn or Burn,” “Fear God,” “Jesus Is the Way, the Truth and the Life. All Others are Thieves and Robbers” and “Prepare to Meet Thy God – Amos 4:12.”

The Christians also began their walk carrying a pole with a pig’s head attached to the top, further angering the Muslim crowd.

The opinion noted that two types of speech are unprotected, incitement to riot and fighting words.

The judges found any advocacy for the use of force or lawless behavior is “absent from the record in this case.” And the judges found regarding fighting words, “the average individual attending the festival did not react with violence, and of the group made up of mostly adolescents, only a certain percentage engaged in bottle throwing.”

The opinion cited the “heckler’s veto” concept of one person or group silencing others by threatening violence.

Cops Remove ChristiansWhile lower courts ruled that police could issue unlawful commands to Christians to remove themselves from the public square because of lawless threats against them by Muslims at the International Arab Festival in Dearborn, Michigan, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned those rulings by stating, “We find that defendants violated the Bible Believers’ First Amendment rights because there can be no legitimate dispute based on this record that the [county and officers] effectuated a heckler’s veto by cutting off the Bible Believers’ protected speech in response to a hostile crowd’s reaction.”

“The First Amendment offers sweeping protection that allows all manner of speech to enter the marketplace of ideas,” the ruling added. “This protection applies to loathsome and unpopular speech with the same force as it does to speech that is celebrated and widely accepted. The protection would be unnecessary if it only served to safeguard the majority views. In fact, it is the minority view, including expressive behavior that is deemed distasteful and highly offensive to the vast majority of people, that most often needs protection under the First Amendment.”

The incident in question occurred in 2012. Many Christian apologists attend the festival to share the Gospel with Muslims who are willing to listen. However, often the confrontations are not exactly positive, but do become violent. Take a look at this video from 2012 at the festival in which Muslims assaulted Christians with milk crates, glass bottles, eggs and whatever else they could get their hands on.

The American Freedom Law Center co-founder and Senior Counsel Robert J. Muise, who worked on the case said, “This was a complete victory for the Constitution and for all freedom-loving Americans who enjoy the protections of the First Amendment. This decision makes clear that the First Amendment protects speech critical of Islam and that when the government seeks to suppress such speech by enforcing a heckler’s veto that favors the violent Muslim mob over the free speech rights of Christians, the government will pay dearly for this egregious violation of the Constitution.”Different Free Speech Ideologies

“Kudos to Judge Clay and the majority. Judge Rogers’s dissenting opinion, on the other hand, speaks volumes about how progressives (be they Republicans or Democrats) view the Bill of Rights,” added AFLC co-founder and Senior Counsel David Yerushalmi.  “For Judge Rogers, there is one constitution for minorities and quite a lesser document for those perceived to be in the majority. The former’s speech is protected; the latter’s is protected only up to the point that some minority – especially Muslims – protests or, as in this case, engages in violence by attacking the speaker. In this case, the Christians and the Constitution did not lie down and roll over. This is an example where lawfare, fought on behalf of liberty, has moved the proverbial mountain and buried the jihadi’s heckler’s veto six feet under.”Free Speech Definition

In 2013, the City of Dearborn actually had to apologize to Christians for arresting them “for their own safety” at the Arab festival.

This is a huge win for Christians in the public square. Now, if we can just get those who are entrusted to keep the peace to actually do that by arresting those who act unlawfully and protecting those who are doing good, then all will be well.

from Freedom Outpost

In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagPosted On 02 Nov 2015 By :

In another one of those signs that we’re standing at the edge of the final collapse, People.com is celebrating a 6-year-old transgender girl with a new web series. The girl – Devina Keswani – used to be a boy named Dev. But since she had the misfortune of being born to parents with the combined intellect of a fruit fly, she has since “transitioned” into her female form. At the age of six.What did you say 05.jpg

The series follows her family as they usher their child into one of the worst lives imaginable. Seriously. The Keswanis have been watching the news, right? They’ve seen the studies that say transgenders are at extraordinarily high risk of being bullied? That they lead sad lives. That they commit suicide at high rates? What kind of parents would want that life for their child? This is just sick. We take children away from parents who let them play at the park without adult supervision, but we let this family breed mental illness.

“The day Dev could walk, the walk was feminine. The day Dev could talk, it was really feminine,” said Devina’s mom, Vaishali in one episode of the series.Keys taken

So what do you do when confronted with this peculiar behavior? Do you try to discourage it? No, of course not. You let them become a girl. And if your kid shows signs of being into killing helpless animals, you should definitely encourage that as well. The point of life is to live as your authentic self, right? Sure. There’s no right or wrong. Just do whatever you want. What a great philosophy. It will surely help this country achieve great things well into the future.

“Family support is the number one way to ensure that your child will have a happy and healthy transition,” says Devina’s 15-year-old transgender friend, Lily Rubenstein. “The Keswanis are setting the example here. Because of their support, Devina has been able to live a happy and authentic life. There is nothing better than being able to do that.”More Evidence

What kind of a fantasy world do these people live in where they think this poor child is going to live a happy life? Because unless something shifts dramatically over the next ten years, it’s not going to be easy for her. She’s going to be at the fringe of society. This is a fact. For every Caitlyn Jenner, there are hundreds of transgender boys and girls who are thoroughly miserable.

Because these people are living lives of absolute absurdity. There’s no happiness there. And look, you should be free to do whatever you like as long as it’s not harming anyone. If the kid on this show grew up and decided he wanted to live his life as a woman, go for it. No one’s going to stop you. But for a family to push this on a child who doesn’t have a concept of what they’re buying into. It’s sickening.AMEN

But what’s more sickening is this attempt to make it mainstream. To encourage other parents to follow in the Keswanis footsteps, and to make it seem like it’s somehow inhumane to do otherwise. That’s really sick, and it’s going to cause so many people to live lives of unending misery.

In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagReported by avatar  on 3 November, 2015

Judge Day

On the surface, my native state of Oregon remains the setting of rugged and breathtaking panoramas, the sought-after subject of legendary photographers and painters.

But beneath that physical surface that baptizes the artist’s imagination wages a fierce culture war, the spoils being the character and morés of Oregon’s people. Oregon’s soul as it were. The battle repercussions could shake the nation.

And smack dab in the middle of the battle is Marion County Circuit Court Judge Vance Day, “the subject of an investigation by the state judicial fitness commission in part because of his decision not to officiate weddings for gay couples.”

Perusing the headlines across the nation for September, those stories concerning Judge Day are so patently skewed as to be almost comical.

In that last article, Oregonian Metro Columnist Steve Duin wrote:

Marion County Circuit Judge Vance Day needs to retire with his “deeply-held religious beliefs,” now that the evolving complexity of justice has overwhelmed him.

In the last year, Day has, instead, raised questions about his impartiality, imposed on his colleagues, and laid the groundwork for a fundraising campaign to defend himself against a judicial fitness complaint.

Those choices were set in motion 16 months ago when U.S. District Judge Michael McShane struck down Oregon’s ban on same-sex marriage. Day immediately ordered his staff to funnel gay and lesbian couples seeking a more perfect union to other judges in the Marion County court system. Several months later, Day recalculated and decided to quit officiating marriages altogether.

Day – who attends Morning Star Community Church in Salem – is welcome to such exercise when he’s off the bench. But that faith-based stamp-of-approval is precisely what many couples seek to avoid when they head to the courthouse, rather than the local chapel, to finalize this civil transaction.

Just how many Marion County judges would need to follow Day’s lead, I wonder, before gays and lesbians reached the conclusion that the circuit court is in revolt against the rulings of McShane and the Supreme Court of the United States?More Evidence

SCOTUS GIANTWhat I would posit of Duin? First, you do realize that SCOTUS is not vested with the power to make law?

And second, a judge is only “…welcome to such exercise [First Amendment rights] when he’s off the bench”? Meaning a sitting judge has no First Amendment rights?

Duin continues:

When former Gov. John Kitzhaber appointed Day to the bench in 2011, Day’s religious views on marriage equality didn’t bring him into conflict with state and federal law.

But the law has changed, and Day, the former head of the Oregon Republican Party, has not evolved with it.Alinsky affect

Ahhh. There’s the rub. That, my friends is the “Living Document” school of thought that twists the U.S. Constitution and state constitutions to suit the current whim or degeneracy of society. It would seem that a law that is ever-changing and morphing to the pleasure of those who would otherwise be law-breakers is no law at all.squeeze into mold

Those headlines stand as examples of what poses as journalism in America today. Nothing like the old standards established by Walter Williams, founder of the world’s first school of journalism at University of Missouri in 1908. Williams taught would-be-columnists to get out the who, what, why where and how and hold everyone’s feet to the fire.

The dozen or so stories on Judge Day are mostly re-hashing of the Oregonian and Statesman stories, with little or no investigation. So who is Judge Vance Day? What are the allegations? And who or what is the Commission on Judicial Fitness and Disability?

Let’s start at the beginning and navigate the muddied waters of the case.

Vance Day’s mother, Janet Day Brelje

Vance Day is a native Oregonian, born at Good Samaritan Hospital in Portland. Raised in the Portland metro area, Vance was a beloved son and brother (with an older and younger sister). Vance’s mother, Janet, is a lovely woman whose ready smile and quick intellect belie her octogenarian status.

Janet recounted her son’s facile mind and great humor from the youngest age. She particularly remembered that, at age 13, Vance made a heartfelt decision to follow Jesus and give Him his whole life. The stories she told made perfect sense in light of Vance’s will to honor his Savior, whether overtly or in subtle ways. After all…what does it mean to follow Jesus? Jesus himself told a religious leader:

“And thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength: this is the first commandment.’

“And the second is like, namely this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these.” Mark 12:30 & 31

The stories of Vance Day’s life paint a picture of a man who habitually lives out , who loves God and people, ALL people.

Vance was a soccer player, Boy Scout (eventually an Eagle Scout, as are his sons), active in Young Life, loved to sail, attended Sunday School and church.

Vance met his bride-to-be Mattie when they were both attending Regent University. He earned his law degree at Willamette University Law School. Willamette was originally established in 1834 by missionary Jason Lee who came to the Oregon Territory to establish a Methodist mission for Native Americans living in the Willamette Valley.

Randy, fellow Willamette law student, friend, and later colleague in the same law firm, related his first meeting with Vance:

“When I first met him I was in the student lounge watching Perry Mason. Vance walked into the room, looked at me and said hello and the first substantive thing he said was “What is your worldview?”’

“I asked him, “What do you mean by that?”’

“He explained to me and that’s how he found out that I was a Christian and that’s how I found out that he was a Christian.’

“He wasn’t afraid to speak out.”

Another anecdote Randy shared which illustrates Vance’s willingness to take charge and make a difference:

“Willamette was founded as a Christian university and the Dean at the time was Catholic. We were graduating and there was no baccalaureate for the law students. Vance said, “Let’s do a baccalaureate!”’

“The Chaplain said, as a religious school we could do that. So they arranged to do a chapel and Judge Otto Skopil delivered the message (Judge Skopil was a Christian).’

V”ance was and is a networker and knows a lot of people…he pulled it together. Vance sang and led the hymn singing — he has a good voice.””

In other ways Vance’s faith affected his law practice. Randy remembers:

“He’s always been a patriot, always conservative, always a Christian and solidly so.’

“The other thing is he did do a lot of pro bono work as a lawyer. He did personal injury and he saw it as a matter of stewardship.’

“He would bring matters of faith into client meetings. For personal injury he would take even small cases, even if he would not make money doing it.”

What I learned from those around Judge Day is not what you will see in most of the Mainstream Media Press.

Vance founded the Marion County Veterans Treatment Court whose mission statement states:

The mission of the Marion County Veterans Treatment Court is to identify veterans within the criminal justice system and honor their sacrifice and service by providing a collaborative, judicially supervised, mentor-oriented treatment regime with the goal of enhancing public safety by stabilizing, habilitating and reintegrating dependence-free veterans back into our community by utilizing federal and community resources.

Day has also been closely associated with and supportive of Veterans, and especially the Band of Brothers veterans, at least one of whom was from Oregon and became Vance’s great friend.

Vance’s son Justin and wife, Mattie

The headlines stress the fact that Vance will not marry same sex couples. There are several charges being brought against Judge Day: from hanging a “picture of Hitler” in the courthouse, to seeing a felon handle a handgun, to collecting monies from other colleagues for artwork in the courthouse. But none of these charges spurred the Oregon Commission of Judicial Fitness to action until they were made aware that the judge would not marry same sex couples.cp 11

Each charge has a simple and innocuous explanation, none of which have been detailed in the press.

Also not detailed in the press is the critically important fact that marriage is not a compulsory judicial duty in Oregon, but entirely optional.It HasNever Been About Marriage

In Part 2 of this series I will get into the details of the charges, what ACTUALLY occurred, the truth about the “Hitler picture,” the nature and lack of accountability of the Commission on Judicial Fitness, and what lies ahead on Vance’s (and Mattie’s) legal journey.

The Commission on Judicial Fitness and Disability receives perhaps 150 – 250 complaints per year, and maybe 1 or 2 complaints are escalated to an ethics complaint. And those 1 or 2 complaints might warrant a day-long hearing.

But for Judge Day? The CJFD is allotting 2 weeks beginning Monday, November 9 (excepting Wednesday the 11th, which is the Veterans Day holiday). The hearings commence at 9AM each day at the Capitol Hearing Room 50 November 9 – 13, and at the Department of Transportation Ackerman Conference Room November 16 – 20. These are public hearings, and many friends and supporters of Judge Day will be in attendance, listening and praying.

Also of note, these legal procedures are costly. Vance and Mattie having secured a home equity loan to pay some of the legal fees (which may exceed $250K), but any who would like to support the Judge may do so at DefendJudgeDay.com.

A last thought. When asked if he intends to fight these charges, most of which are baseless or overblown, Vance answered yes. When asked what the core issue is, Vance immediately responded, “This has to do with my not marrying same sex couples.”Leftist Giant called Tyranny

Again, remember that performing marriage ceremonies is entirely optional for judges in the state of Oregon, and Judge Day no longer marries ANY couples.

When hinted that he should just quietly resign from his job Vance answered:

“That’s not going to happen. I didn’t take this job because it’s a job, but because it’s a calling. I believe in justice. This is about judicial independence and threatening other judges or people of faith. If that’s where we’re going as a nation, I fear for our future.”cp 11

Everyone, every Christian, may have their Esther moment, that point in their life where they know they were put in the position they’re in for “such a time as this.” For this native son, who began life at Good Samaritan Hospital, and has lived his life according to biblical precepts, a real life good samaritan, this is Vance Day’s moment to stand. He does not intend to shirk it.

I, for one, am honored to tell his story, to follow the case of a brother in the faith under fire.

And I will be petitioning heaven on Judge Day’s behalf.

In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagBy Andrea Noble – The Washington Times – Monday, November 2, 2015

URL of the original posting site: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/nov/2/ayman-al-zawahri-hints-at-al-qaeda-unity-with-isla

In a recent recording attributed to al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahri, he calls for greater cooperation with the Islamic State. (Associated Press)

In a recent recording attributed to al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahri, he calls for greater cooperation with the Islamic State. (Associated Press) more >

muslim-obamaU.S. intelligence officials say al Qaeda has seen its standing as the leader of the global jihad movement “dented,” and regard an audio recording reportedly released over the weekend by the group’s leader as an attempt to reclaim its prominence. Al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahri called for “unity” among jihadis in taking on the West, encouraged strikes at the “heartland” of the U.S. and praised recent attacks on Jews in Israel in an audio recording released Sunday.

“Reports of a new Zawahri statement calling for unity in light of developments in Syria are his latest attempts to avoid being further sidelined” by the Islamic State, said a U.S. intelligence official speaking on background.

Al Qaeda and the Islamic State, also known as ISIL and ISIS, have feuded over territory in Syria and prominence over the last year, with Zawahri previously lashing out at Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and calling him unworthy of leading the jihadi movement. The al Qaeda leader does not endorse the Islamic State in his latest message, but instead suggests the potential for greater cooperations between the two groups.

“The Americans, Russians, Iranians, Alawites, and Hezbollah are coordinating their war against us — are we not capable of stopping the fighting among ourselves so we can direct all our efforts against them?” Zawahri said in Sunday’s message, as translated by Reuters.Islam is NOT

Another U.S. intelligence source said Monday that officials are still working to authenticate the recording.

In the recording, Zawahri also goes on to praise recent stabbing attacks carried out against Jews at the Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem — asking God “to bless these martyrdom-seekers who dare to stab the Jews even as they are almost certain that they will be killed at the Jews’ hands,” according to a report in The Long War Journal. He also says that in order to “liberate” Jerusalem, jihadis must attack “the West, and especially America, in its heartland,” according to the report.

In September, CIA Director John O. Brennan warned that despite the reach of the Islamic State, it would only take one grand operation to put al Qaeda back into the global spotlight.

culture of deceit and lies In God We Trust freedom combo 2


By Penny Young Nance ; Published November 03, 2015; FoxNews.com

Remember when “The View” hosts lambasted Donald Trump, just two months ago, for making comments about Carly Fiorina’s appearance in Rolling Stone magazine?

I do. They were right to stand up for Carly.

So what happened last Thursday, when “The View’s” hosts – Whoopi Goldberg, Joy Behar, Michelle Collins, Paula Faris and Raven-Symone – went even further than Trump, saying Carly’s smile “looked demented” during the last Republican presidential debate? Co-host Joy Behar stooped so low as to say she wished “it was a Halloween mask. I’d love that.”

Their hypocrisy is astounding. The episode could have been a clip from “Mean Girls.” But instead of a high school cafeteria, the setting was a live, nationally televised panel discussion on ABC.

If women can’t civilly disagree on issues and, instead, descend to schoolyard name-calling, if they can’t show simple respect to other women, how can we expect men to do the same?

2016 presidential hopeful opens up on 'Fox News Sunday'

 How does Carly Fiorina respond? She declares she’ll sits down with them anyway. This is why she has staying power as a presidential candidate.  She has courage and class.

Carly is slated to appear on “The View” this Friday to face the five co-hosts in person. She called them out over the weekend on “Fox News Sunday” telling host Chris Wallace, “Conservative women from Sarah Palin to Michele Bachmann to Carly Fiorina are long used to this. It will not stop me. It will not scare me. Let’s see if the ladies of ‘The View,’ if I come back on again, have the guts to say that to my face.”

She doesn’t want an apology, she wants an honest discussion of issues on which women take a wide variety of positions.  She wants a meaningful dialogue based on mutual respect.

You would think the women of “The View,” so forthright with their opinions, would be able to muster some respect for the first female CEO of a Fortune 20 company, a breast cancer survivor, a mother who’s lost her daughter to addiction, and a serious candidate for president who has impressively held her own in shoulder-to-shoulder debates with the GOP’s male candidates.

It would be far more productive if the women of “The View” would discuss Fiorina’s proposals for zero-based budgeting to downsize government, cutting regulations so more companies can hire more people, reducing the tax code to three pages, securing the border first before doing anything else on illegal immigration, or her four-point specific strategy for dealing with ISIS.  Whether they agree or disagree with her, the end result would be informative.

This will only happen if the women of “The View” want to have an edifying discussion when Carly joins the show on Friday.

Can they handle a successful, poised, thoughtful conservative woman who differs with them on key issues?  Or will we just see another spin-off of “Mean Girls”?

My hope is that “The View” audience will get the substantive discussion they deserve.

SEE FOX NEWS BROADCAST FROM “THE FIVE”;

http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=4592569777001&w=466&h=263<noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href="http://video.foxnews.com">video.foxnews.com</a></noscript>&#8221; href=”http://http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=4592569777001&w=466&h=263<noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href="http://video.foxnews.com">video.foxnews.com</a></noscript>”&gt;http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=4592569777001&w=466&h=263<noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href="http://video.foxnews.com">video.foxnews.com</a></noscript&gt; aligncenter wp-image-20670″ src=”https://whatdidyousay.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/view.jpg&#8221; alt=”view” width=”814″ height=”594″ />

Penny Young Nance is president and CEO of Concerned Women for America, the nation’s largest women’s public policy organization. She is the author of the forthcoming book “Feisty and Feminine: A Rallying Cry for Conservative Women” (Zondervan 2016).

In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flag

By Ian M. Smith;

URL of the original posting site: http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/the-administration/258689-leaked-dhs-memo-shows-obama-might-circumvent-dapa

tyrants

Imperial President ObamaA newly leaked internal DHS memorandum produced for an off-the-record agency conclave reveals that the Obama administration is actively planning to circumvent a federal court injunction that suspended part of last November’s deferral-based amnesty initiative. The document, apparently prepared as follow-up from a DHS “Regulations Retreat” last summer, appears sure to re-ignite concerns in Congress as well as federal judges in the Fifth Circuit. The Administration has already been criticized from the bench for handing out work permits to hundreds of thousands of deferred action beneficiaries, in direct violation of a district court’s order. With the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals deciding any day now whether to deny the Administration’s request to reverse that injunction, this public leak has come at a critical juncture for U.S. enforcement policy. 

kingobamafingerconstitution-300x204Last June, four months after Texas federal judge Andrew Hanen’s order to freeze President’s DAPA and Expanded DACA programs—disclosure: the Immigration Reform Law Institute has filed briefs in these cases—DHS’s immigration policy makers apparently held a “Regulations Retreat” to discuss “different options” for “open market Employment Authorization Document (EAD) regulatory changes.” EAD is the statutory term for work permits. From a memo recording these discussions, we now know that the Obama DHS has, rather than pausing to allow the courts to assess the constitutionality of its enforcement nullification initiatives, been gearing up to roll out one or more of four plans drawn up at the meeting, each one designed to provide EADs to millions of nonimmigrants, including those lawfully present and visa over-stayers, crippling the actual employment-based visa system on the federal statute-book.

 

illegalalienvoters-300x300The internal memo reveals four options of varying expansiveness, with option 1 providing EADs to “all individuals living in the United States”, including illegal aliens, visa-over-stayers, and H-1B guest-workers, while option 4 provides EADs only to those on certain unexpired non-immigrant visas. Giving EADs to any of the covered individuals, however, is in direct violation of Congress’s Immigration & Nationality Act and works to dramatically subvert our carefully wrought visa system. As mentioned, the first plan the memo discusses basically entails giving EADs to anyone physically present in the country who until now has been prohibited from getting one. A major positive to this option, the memo reads, is that it would “address the needs of some of the intended deferred action population.” Although DHS doesn’t say it expressly, included here would be those 4.3 million people covered by the president’s DAPA and Expanded DACA programs whose benefits were supposed to have been halted in the Hanen decision. On top of working around the Hanen injunction, this DHS plan would also dole out unrestricted EADs to those on temporary non-immigrant visas, such as H-1B-holders (their work authorizations being tied to their employers) and another 5 to 6 million illegal aliens thus far not covered by any of the President’s deferred action amnesty programs. By claiming absolute authority to grant work authorization to any alien, regardless of status, DHS is in effect claiming it can unilaterally de-couple the 1986 IRCA work authorization statutes from the main body of U.S. visa law. While DHS must still observe the statutory requirements for issuing visas, the emerging doctrine concedes, the administration now claims unprecedented discretionary power to permit anyone inside our borders to work. Picture2

The anonymous DHS policymakers state that a positive for this option is that it “could cover a greater number of individuals.” In a strikingly conclusory bit of bureaucratese, they state that because illegal aliens working in the country “have already had the US labor market tested” it has been “demonstrat[ed] that their future employment won’t adversely affect US workers.” The labor market, in other words, has already been stress-tested through decades of foreign-labor dumping and the American working-class, which disproportionately includes minorities, working mothers, the elderly, and students, is doing just fine. Apparently, the fact that 66 million Americans and legal aliens are currently unemployed or out of the job-market was not a discussion point at the DHS “Retreat.” Delusional Mental Illness Gibberish

Bottom line: The memo foreshadows more tactical offensives in a giant administrative amnesty for all 12 million burkeillegal aliens who’ve broken our immigration laws (and many other laws) that will emerge before the next inaugural in January 2016. According to the authors, one negative factor for granting EADs to illegal aliens, visa-overstayers, etc., is that they’ll still “face difficulties in pursuing permanent residence due to ineligibility or being subject to unlawful presence inadmissibility for which a waiver is required.” This is in reference to the reality that an EAD isn’t a green card and that eventually the EAD-beneficiaries are supposed to apply to ‘adjust their status,’ which cannot be done without showing evidence of lawful status. But this might change, they write. The DHS “macro-level policy goal”, we’re told, is to assist individuals to stay “until they are ready and able to become immigrants.” This would seem to say that DHS, the largest federal law enforcement agency in the nation, is banking on awarding those who’ve broken our laws and violated our national sovereignty.

Will the 26 plaintiff states that have challenged the President’s DAPA program bring this memo to the Fifth Circuit’s attention, before they issue their closely-awaited decision?  If this document is indeed the cutting edge of Obama’s strategy for DHS to circumvent Judge Hanen’s injunction order, it would confirm the Administration’s bad faith and contempt both for the court and the law.obama- Marxist tyrant

Smith is an investigative associate with the Immigration Reform Law Institute

In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagJackass Media


waving flagby Michelle Moons1 Nov 2015

IMG_2159

Michelle Moons

YORBA LINDA, CALIFORNIA — “I’ve been called a traitor” for speaking out against illegal immigration, grieved mother and latina woman Angie Morfin, as she enlightened those gathered at one of many events across the country for the National Remembrance Day for those killed by illegal aliens.

Sabine Durden can be seen in the photo above clutching a small jar containing the ashes of her son Dominic. A twice convicted drunk driver and foreign national illegally present in the United States struck and killed the young 9-1-1 operator on July 12, 2012.

Breitbart News was on scene at the Yorba Linda, California gathering commemorating the National Remembrance Day. Other events occurred in cities across the country including Phoenix, Arizona, Houston, Texas and in New York State.

IMG_2178

Morfin, mother of murdered 13-year-old Ruben Morfin told the crowd, “I’m serving a life sentence.” She shared how her son was shot in the back of the head by an illegal alien. Doctor’s at the hospital told her half of her little boy’s brain was missing. Young Ruben was in the hospital a short time before passing away. Morfin recalled how her son’s murderer fled the country, but after being featured on America’s Most Wanted, was caught in Jalisco, Mexico in 1994 and was finally sentenced.

“I’ve been called a traitor,” Morfin told the crowd gathered. She continued, “I think the best thing that’s happened to us was Donald Trump.”

Brenda Sparks shared the story of her son Eric Zepeda who was killed by an illegal alien. She explained that the individual who hit and killed Zepeda had previously pled guilty to drunk driving three times, but remained in the country and was driving to deliver papers when he hit her son. Zepeda was in a coma for four long weeks before he was taken off of life support. Sparks expressed the shock being told that the offender who was illegally in the country, illegally driving and illegally working delivering papers could only be charged with misdemeanor vehicular homicide without negligence.Illegal Immigration Giant

Sabine Durden recalled her experience legally immigrating to the United States from Germany to those gathered Sunday. She gladly went through the process and was proud to become a citizen. Years later her only son Dominic, also a legal immigrant, was killed by an illegal alien at just 30 years old. She lovingly told the crowd Dominic’s nickname, “German chocolate.” As a half black young man there was no outcry from activists like those that now herald, “black lives matter.” No big headlines appeared for Durden’s son in the mainstream media.

A statement was read from Kathy Woods, mother of murdered teen Steven Woods. Young Steve was murdered at the beach after a high school football game in San Clemente, California. The statement recalled three cars of gang members, one of which shattered the passenger window of the car the young man was in and plunged a sharpened paint roller into his temple. The statement from Kathy Woods noted that for over three weeks her son lived in the hospital before he died. The media neglected to report that the gang members who attacked him were illegal aliens.

IMG_2199

Many of those families who have lost loved ones to illegal alien crime expressed great thanks for 2016 Presidential candidate Donald Trump for helping spark national conversation over their plight following the death of Kate Steinle in San Francisco last July.

Breitbart News reported from the 2014 National Day of Remembrance event in Temecula California where Moreno, Sparks and Durden spoke alongside the family of murdered young man Jamiel Shaw and Don Rosenberg, father of Drew Rosenberg, killed by an illegal alien.illegalalienvoters-300x300

Mary Ann Mendoza recounted the story of her murdered son Sgt. Brandon Mendoza on the Sunday evening edition of Breitbart News radio with guest host Dan Fluette on SiriusXM 125. Mendoza explained that she lost her son when a three times drunk driver illegal alien, who was on meth, slammed head on into Sgt. Mendoza. She told the listening audience that many elected officials are not listening to the families that have lost family members to illegal alien crime, but that Rep. Steve King (R-IA) and Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) are among the few who have listened and taken action.

Again and again families relayed — if the killer(s) of their loved ones had been deported, as many of them passed through the hands of the justice system, these Americans would be alive today.

In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagPosted on November 2, 2015Philip Hodges

 Hey Leftist

CNN political commentator Sally Kohn threw out a statistic about guns and children that was a little farfetched, to say the least. She said that 10,000 kids are killed every year by guns. The title of her piece was “We regulate toys, so why not guns?” Her main argument was that since it doesn’t take much for the government to outlaw toys or appliances when they’re found to cause injury or death, gun manufacturers should be treated the same. For example, she said:

Recently, my CNN colleague Mel Robbins made a startling point. Robbins was on “Legal View” to discuss the case of an 11-year-old who shot and killed an 8-year-old neighbor when host Ashleigh Banfield noted that 10,000 children are killed by guns every year. Robbins was taken aback by the statistic. Then Robbins pointed out that when the government found out that a certain type of crib resulted in 32 children dying over 10 years, what did the government do about the cribs? “Outlawed them,” she said. But 10,000 kids die because of guns every single year and we can’t pass even the most measly common sense safety laws?Lies Lies and More Lies

If you go to that link now, you’ll see that she corrected her claim about 10,000 kids being killed by guns every year. But not before radio host John Cardillo called her out on it. He pointed to FBI statistics that found that there were a total of 11,961 gun homicides last year. Of those, 1,085 were victims under the age of 18. And when you think of places like Chicago and Detroit, that’s not all that surprising, since those places are hotbeds of gang violence, often involving teen minors.Criminals and Dictators

In the context of her article, she’s probably talking about little kids, not merely those under the age of 18. The number of little kids who are killed each year by someone with a gun is sure to be a good bit smaller than 1,085.

When Cardillo pointed out the error on social media, Sally Kohn corrected her piece. Now it says, “10,000 kids die or get injured every year because of guns.”Partyof Deceit Spin and Lies

I know, I know…10,000, 1,000…what difference at this point does it make? Well, since you’re asking, about 9,000. Liberals have to inflate these numbers to make things seem way worse than they really are.

Gun Control Supporters cropped In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagPosted by Richard Pollock, Reporter;  11/01/2015

U.S. President Barack Obama listens as he is introduced to speak at the White House Summit on Worker Voice in Washington October 7, 2015. (REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque)

Complete MessageObamacare premium costs will soar 20.3 percent on average in 2016 instead of the 7.5 percent increase claimed by federal officials, according to an analysis by The Daily Caller News Foundation. The discrepancy is because the government excluded price data for three of the four Obamacare health insurance plans when the officials issued their recent forecast claiming enrollees would face only a 7.5 percent average rate increase in 2016.

When data for all four plans are included, premium costs will actually rise on average 20.3 percent next year. The 2015 Obamacare price hike was 20.3 percent.

The Obamacare program’s federal exchange operates in 37 states where officials declined to set up state-run exchanges. Officials in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Center for Medicare Services, which manages Obamacare, only calculated price changes for the health insurance program’s Silver plan, thus ignoring data for the Bronze, Gold and Platinum plans.Partyof Deceit Spin and Lies

The CMS officials said they did so because the IRS uses the Silver plan as a “benchmark” for tax purposes. That approach, however, gave consumers an incomplete picture of what is happening in the health insurance marketplace through the Obamacare program.

The DCNF analysis reviewed price data for all four plans obtained from CMS, insurance companies, state insurance regulators and the nonpartisan National Conference of State Legislatures.

The 20.3 percent figure is the average for all plans. Premium increases in some states will be much higher. In Utah, for example, some enrollees in an individual plan will face a 45 percent price jump. In Illinois, the highest price hikes for individuals in the federal exchange will be 42.4 percent. Some insurers in Tennessee will experience a 36.3 percent price rise.

Wayne Winegarden, a senior fellow in business and economics at the Pacific Research Institute, told The DCNF that CMS 7.5 percent forecast number is “misleading and a meaningless statistic” that “isn’t actually relevant to any individual in any state. If you go across the four different metals, what happened in the Gold plan, what happened in the Platinum plan, what happened to the Bronze plan?” obama-liar4-266x189

Charles Gaba, a data analyst who tracks Obamacare trends and is an Obamacare supporter, reported earlier this year that Obamacare consumers in all 50 states will experience an average 14.4 percent increase. His analysis can be found on his web site, acasignups.net. “I was hoping they would include all of the rates,” Gaba told The DCNF. “I would love it ideally if they had all the medal levels.”

Gaba called the CMS price analysis, “fairly representative, but there’s the Gold, the Platinum, the Bronze, the catastrophic plan even, and there’s also a variety of Silver plans. So there are a bunch of different ones in addition to the benchmarks which they did not include.”

The difference between premium cost projections based only on the Silver plan and those that result from using all four plans can be dramatic. Silver enrollees in Pennsylvania, for example, will experience a 10.6 percent increase. Using all four plans, the average price hike for Obamacare enrollees is 20.3. Time Insurance Co. pulled out of Obamacare after state officials rejected its 61 percent increase request.

South Dakotans using Silver will pay 24.7 percent more this year. But among all exchange users in the state, the average increase will be 39 percent. Dakota Care hiked its Obamacare exchange prices 63 percent for 2016, while Blue Cross Blue Shield raised its rates by 43 percent.If his mouth is open he must be lying

In South Carolina, the Silver increase will be 10.8 percent, compared to 23.4 percent when all four plans are considering.

Some worrisome trends appear when specific Silver plan offerings are measured against other medal levels. The National Conference of State Legislators has begun tracking Obamacare price hikes by levels.

  • In Colorado, for example, Silver customers will see a 12.94 percent price hike. But Gold users will face a 20.33 rate increase and Platinum enrollees will see a 29.80 percent price rise, according to NCSL data.
  • Idaho Silver customers will have an 8.69 percent increase. But Bronze customers will face 11.03 percent rise and Gold will face 15.9 percent, according to NCSL. Idaho did not offer Platinum coverage for 2016.

The mainstream media was quick to embrace the 7.5 percent number, claiming it reflected the real- world experience of most Obamacare customers. The Washington Post’s Amy Goldstein reported in a story filed last Saturday  that “the [CMS] analysis includes all plans being sold in the 37 states that will continue to rely on the federal exchange next year.”

In fact, Platinum, Gold and Bronze price changes were excluded from the federal analysis.

Thomas Miller a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, told The DCNF that CMS is “always trying to put the best face on things going forward.” But, he said, “you got your initial press release. Only a few people catch up with what might be the final results.”Lies Lies and More Lies

Emma Colton contributed to this story.

In God We Trust freedom combo 2


By Washington Examiner 11/2/15

The Defense of Marriage Act, Clinton argued, was “a defensive action,” and “a line that was drawn that was to prevent going further.” (File photo)

In her immediate post-Benghazi appearance on the “Rachel Maddow Show,” former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton must have been feeling pretty good — like she could get away with anything.

Perhaps that’s why she went on television and lied about her husband’s reasons for signing the Defense of Marriage Act, the 1996 bill that established the traditional definition of marriage for all federal government purposes.

“There was enough political momentum to amend the Constitution of the United States of America,” Clinton said, referring to the possible passage of a federal marriage amendment. DOMA, she argued, was “a defensive action,” and “a line that was drawn that was to prevent going further.”

There’s just one problem with this explanation: It’s a lie.lying so long

Buzzfeed’s Chris Geidner studied thousands of pages of records from the Clinton White House and found no mention whatsoever of Clinton supporting DOMA on any such grounds. This is an explanation concocted after the fact, which both Bill and Hillary have been offering ever since the gay marriage bandwagon gained momentum and they feared not appearing to have been on it from the start.

Now, before you faint from the shock that Hillary Clinton would tell an untruth, consider what had happened earlier that very day. One of the useful details that came out in the recent congressional hearing marathon into Benghazi was conclusive proof that Clinton knew on day one that the Benghazi attack had nothing to do with the video she would later claim was the main cause.

It was revealed that Clinton said as much in a call with Egyptian Prime Minister Hisham Kandil on the night of the attack: “We know the attack had nothing to do with the film,” she said. “It was a planned attack, not a protest. … Based on the information we saw today, we believe that the group that claimed responsibility for this was affiliated with al Qaeda.”

And the following day, she emailed her daughter, Chelsea, to explain that “Two of our officers were killed in Benghazi by an al Qaeda-like group.”

Later, most disgustingly, Clinton commiserated with the father of Tyrone Woods, the Navy SEAL killed in the Benghazi compound, and vowed: “We will make sure that the person who made that film is arrested and prosecuted.”Partyof Deceit Spin and Lies

It’s worth stopping and considering again what she did. She looked into the eyes of a grieving father and told him a black lie about the reason for his son’s death.hillary-prison-or-potus

Standing in the presence of the caskets of all four Americans killed in Benghazi, Clinton commented on that attack and others in Egypt, Yemen and Tunisia, without drawing any distinction: “We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over a horrible Internet video that we had nothing to do with,” she said.

Every lie has a reason. At that time, the scapegoating of a movie director was an attempt to avoid acknowledging something that made it plain that, contrary to President Obama’s election campaign claim, al Qaeda was absolutely not “on the run.”obama-liar4-266x189

The lie about DOMA is supposed to confuse the issue for progressive voters about why Clinton was so slow to switch her position on the issue of same-sex marriage. The lie about not sending or receiving classified information over her unsecured email — more emails containing classified information were released last Friday — was an effort to keep the public at bay until she can claim her emails are just old news.

The pattern here is clear enough, and has indeed been clear for years. Clinton is incapable of telling the truth if it might reflect badly on her. Everything is spun. The problem with this approach is that it becomes a nearly continuous exercise in covering one’s own rear end by whatever implausible means are at hand.

It’s not the kind of leadership this country needs for the next four or eight years.The Leftist Propagandist In God We Trust freedom combo 2


Posted on October 31, 2015 by

ISIS addresses U.S. president, beheads more hostages

U.S. Delta Force and the Kurdish Peshmurga Special Forces conducted raids at a prison near Hawija, Iraq, where hostages were held and faced a mass execution by ISIS, the Islamic radical devils who have taken large areas of Iraq and Syria.  Now, an ISIS radical who speaks perfect English, beheaded four hostages and has threatened U.S. President Barack Obama.

The U.S.-led raid killed 20 terrorists, arrested six ISIS terrorists, rescued 70 Iraqi hostages, and that upset the radical Muslim murderers, who in turn, addressed President Obama and said the beheadings were what they called ‘revenge’ as the murderers stood over four hostages who were executed shortly after the murderer’s speech.

In the graphic video, the ISIS murderer stated, “Obama, you have learned a new lesson… six of the soldiers of the caliphate faced 400 of your children; they killed and injured them by Allah’s grace.”

ISIS Threat to Obama Video

Back in May 2015, Vocative reported that ISIS threatened Obama, Christians, and the U.S., due to a military strike deep in ISIS territory that killed senior leader Abu Sayyaf.  One ISIS supporter responded by saying, “If they took Abu Sayyaf, we will take Obama.”   The message was posted in the hours after the raid, which took place near the eastern Syrian city of al-Amr.  “If your goal is killing Abu Sayyaf then our goal is killing Obama and the worshipers of the cross… we have attacks coming against you.”Christian Persecution

Defense Secretary Ash Carter was pleased that the mission to kill Abu Sayyaf was a success and stated, “No U.S. forces were killed or injured during the operation, which represented “another significant blow”. “And it is a reminder that the United States will never waver in denying safe haven to terrorists who threaten our citizens, and those of our friends and allies.”

Related:

In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagGood Question


waving flag

next gen

In God We Trust freedom combo 2

 


Posted on October 29, 2015 by

Tyranney Alert

The Los Angeles City Council — no collection of constitutional scholars cropped-george-washington-regarding-2nd-amandment.jpgthey — on Tuesday unanimously adopted an ordinance that requires any privately owned handgun to be kept at home, either locked or dismantled so that it does not function. Councilman  Paul Krekorian was behind the vote. Krekorian also recently pushed through an ordinance requiring all clips of more than 10-round capacity to be destroyed.

The Los Angeles Times quoted Krekorian as saying, “It’s unacceptable to live in a country where it’s more dangerous to be a preschooler than to be a police officer — and we can do something about that today.”

Gun Control Supporters croppedThe Times neglected to mention what country Krekorian thinks he’s living in.

Cuz that’s definitely a country you wanna stay away from.

Perhaps I’m just not enlightened, but I’m a bit confused what exactly Krekorian imagines is going on in Los Angeles homes.

I’m getting flashes of scenes involving toddlers out strolling the neighborhood, caps on askew, gold chains hanging from their necks, the theme from “The Sopranos” playing over their iPhones, when some punk from a rival block rolls up on his trike, hauls out a nine and goes to town.

It’s like a scene out of the comic strip “Boondocks.” 

Does Krekorian think that toddlers just spend all their time looking for Dad’s gun, then shooting their friends with it? Or is it that Krekorian foresees a day when the U.N. has banned meat animals and roving burger gangs hunt down the last meat available — little Timmy?Armed

That Krekorian is afraid of guns is assumed, but you would probably be correct to suspect that what he’s really afraid of is the people who elected him to office being able to defend themselves not against criminals but the government.Disarmed CitizenryHey Leftist

And the L.A. City Council might have reason to fear that, having invited illegal aliens of all stripes to rest their weary heads within their sanctuary city limits. So, people who are by definition criminals, who often bring crime with them or engage in crime once they get here, are OK. But people wanting to defend themselves against crime, that’s bad.Criminals and Dictators

Councilman Mitch Englander pitched in with Krekorian, saying, “This is less about gun control and simply more about controlling your gun. It’s really that simple.”

And then, to paraphrase the film “Idiocracy,” government will un-Nazi the world, forever.

In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagBy Jonah Goldberg, October 30, 2015

Here’s something you may not know: Dr. Ben Carson is black.

Of course, I’m being a little cute here. The only way you wouldn’t know he’s black is if you were blind and only listened to the news.

For instance, on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” — a program that often serves as a kind of artisanal boutique of inside-the-Beltway conventional wisdom — host Joe Scarborough expressed consternation over Carson’s popularity. “I just don’t get it,” Scarborough said more than once. Remarking on some Carson ad he didn’t like, Scarborough said, “This guy is up 20 points in Iowa? . . . It’s baffling.”

Co-host Mika Brzezinski kept saying, “I just don’t get the Ben Carson . . .” before trailing off into in articulate exasperation.

Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson took a plausible stab at why Carson is popular. “They like him, they like him,” he repeated, referring to conservatives in Iowa and elsewhere who admire Carson’s dignified and soft-spoken demeanor.

True enough; Carson has the highest favorables of any candidate in the GOP field.

But what’s remarkable is that at no point in this conversation did anyone call attention to the fact that Carson is an African-American. Indeed, most analysis of Carson’s popularity from pundits focuses on his likable personality and his sincere Christian faith. But it’s intriguingly rare to hear people talk about the fact that he’s black.

One could argue he’s even more authentically African-American than Barack Obama, given that Obama’s mother was white, and he was raised in part by his white grandparents. In his autobiography, Obama writes at length about how he grew up outside the traditional African-American experience — in Hawaii and Indonesia — and how he consciously chose to adopt a black identity when he was in college.

Meanwhile, Carson grew up in Detroit, the son of a very poor, very hardworking single mother. His tale of rising from poverty to become the head of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital is one of the most inspiring rags-to-riches stories of the last half-century. (Cuba Gooding Jr. played Carson in the movie about his life.) He was a towering figure in the black community in Baltimore and nationally — at least until he became a Republican politician.

And that probably explains why his race seems to be such a non-issue for the media. The New York Times is even reluctant to refer to him as a doctor. The Federalist reports that Jill Biden, who has a doctorate in education, is three times more likely to be referred to as “Dr.” in the Times as brain surgeon Carson. If the Times did that to a black Democrat, charges of racism would be thick in the air.

Or consider the aforementioned Eugene Robinson, who routinely sees racial bias in Republicans. “I can’t say that the people holding ‘Take Back Our Country’ signs were racists,” he wrote in 2014, recalling a tea party rally four years earlier, “but I know this rallying cry arose after the first African-American family moved into the White House.”

Wrong. Howard Dean, Hillary Clinton and John Kerry all used the slogan incessantly when George W. Bush was in office.

How strange it must be for people who comfort themselves with the slander that the GOP is a cult of organized racial hatred that the most popular politician among conservatives is a black man. Better to ignore the elephant in the room than account for such an inconvenient fact. The race card is just too valuable politically and psychologically for liberals who need to believe that their political opponents are evil.

Carson’s popularity isn’t solely derived from his race, but it is a factor. The vast majority of conservatives resent the fact that Democrats glibly and shamelessly accuse Republicans of bigotry — against blacks, Hispanics and women — simply because they disagree with liberal policies (which most conservatives believe hurt minorities).

Yet conservatives also refuse to adopt those liberal policies just to prove they aren’t bigots. Carson — not to mention Carly Fiorina and Hispanics Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio — demonstrates that there’s no inherent contradiction between being a minority (or a woman) and supporting conservative principles. And that fact is just too terrible for some liberals to contemplate.


Cleaning put the Budget BarnCannot fix RINOSGOPNoSpineCartoonReality 2no more rinosIn God We Trustfreedom combo 2


waving flagFeel the Burn


waving flagBy Julian Hattem10/30/15

ObamaIranian-Flag-WORD-ART

Getty

The Iranian government has arrested an Iranian-American businessman living in Dubai, according to multiple reports on Friday, in what is likely to be interpreted as a signal of a crackdown following the international nuclear deal.

The man, Siamak Namazi, is the head of strategic planning at an energy company and was arrested by an arm of the Revolutionary Guards Corps two weeks ago while visiting family in Tehran, multiple news outlets reported. He is believed to be in his late 40s.

Namazi is the fourth American known to be Death to Americaimprisoned in Iran; his arrest signals new discord in the relationship between Tehran and the western world on the heels of the nuclear pact. A fifth American went missing in 2007, and Iran is believed to have knowledge of his whereabouts.The arrest of Namazi is also being seen as a sign of the ongoing friction between Iran’s hard-liners and President Hassan Rouhani, who has pushed for reforms.

It is likely to send a chill through any in the business community looking to exploit new opportunities in the country as international sanctions dissipate in coming months, under Perspectivethe terms of the nuclear accord. The deal lifts international sanctions on Iran’s oil and financial sectors in exchange for limits on its nuclear program.

The Washington Post reported that Namazi’s family came to the U.S. when he was a boy in 1983. He returned to Iran after college, to serve in the military, and has had business in the country for more than a decade, the newspaper added. Namazi was a proponent of greater engagement between the U.S. and Iran. In 2013, he wrote an op-ed in The New York Times urging countries to relax their restrictions so that life-saving medical supplies can be sent into Iran. “The West must relax and rationalize the terms of its sanctions regime against Iran to allow more Bright-Future-NRD-600medical goods into the country,” he wrote. “If it doesn’t, more Iranian men, women and children will suffer needlessly.”

According to The Wall Street Journal, Iranian intelligence agents ransacked Namazi’s family home in Tehran and took his computer. His email contacts have become the target of cyberattacks, the newspaper added.

Critics of the Obama administration’s stance toward Iran have chided the president for signing the nuclear pact without assuring commitments about the imprisoned Americans.

The Iranian government has suggested a willingness to trade the prisoners for an undefined group of Iranians in U.S. jails.

Secretary of State John Kerry met with Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif on Thursday in Vienna to discuss the nuclear deal. The two are among a group of international diplomats gathered in Austria to talk options for ending the civil war in Syria.


waving flag

By Ben Kamisar and Jonathan Easley

The Republican National Committee on Friday pulled out of a planned Feb. 26 debate with NBC News amidst a revolt by candidates after Wednesday’s CNBC debate.  “While debates are meant to include tough questions and contrast candidates’ visions and policies for the future of America, CNBC’s moderators engaged in a series of ‘gotcha’ questions, petty and mean-spirited in tone, and designed to embarrass our candidates,” RNC Chairman Reince Priebus wrote in a letter to NBC News Chairman Andrew Lack. Since CNBC is an NBC Universal property, “We are suspending the partnership with NBC News” for its Feb. 26 debate.

Priebus’s email panned CNBC for “inaccurate or downright offensive” questions, specifically singling out a question to Donald Trump, who was asked whether he was running a “comic book” version of a presidential campaign.

“What took place Wednesday night was not an attempt to give the American people a greater understanding of our candidates’ policies and ideas.

Debates can mean big money for networks, which charge premium prices to advertise for the event. CNBC reportedly charged about $250,000 for a 30-second ad during Wednesday night’s debate — similar to reported prices for the previous CNN debate.

The decision is the RNC’s response to the rumbling of complaints that bubbled over during the debate, when Sen. Ted Cruz (Texas) and other bashed the moderators for political bias and unfair questions. Immediately after the debate, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush’s campaign manager confronted the network backstage over how little time his candidate received.

GOP front-runner Donald Trump came out in support of the RNC’s decision Friday afternoon. “The campaign supports the RNC’s decision to suspend the debate on February 26th due to the total lack of substance and respect exhibited during Wednesday’s night’s debate,” Trump’s campaign said in a statement. “We look forward to pursuing alternatives along with the RNC to ensure candidates are given ample opportunity to outline their vision for the future of our country.”

A spokesperson for Ben Carson said the campaign has “no objections to the decision,” but still wants to see changes to the process to ensure the debates are “about informing the public and not about network ratings.”

Some campaigns are still set to meet this weekend to air their grievances and determine what other steps might be taken to avoid issues in future debates.

The RNC has tried to take more of a leading role in debates after 2012, slicing the number of debates to about one-third of the contests from that cycle.  While the editorial decisions, specifically debate questions, are up to the media organizations, it has control over the logistics and ultimately whether the debate gets its blessing.

But that hasn’t stopped complaints about the criteria in each of the three debates—Fox News chose to lower the qualifications for its undercard debate and CNN expanded the criteria to include Carly Fiorina, both decisions amid criticism. And the pushback from the campaigns on CNBC’s debate hasn’t relented since late Wednesday night.

In his letter to NBC, Priebus wrote, “I have tremendous respect for the First Amendment and freedom of the press. However, I also expect the media to host a substantive debate on consequential issues important to Americans. CNBC did not.” 

NBC responded to the RNC’s decision in an email statement Friday afternoon saying, “This is a disappointing development. However, along with our debate broadcast partners at Telemundo we will work in good faith to resolve this matter with the Republican Party.” A source with NBC pointed out that NBC News had no editorial control over the debate. Lack’s corporate bio says that he only oversees NBC News and MSNBC. CNBC is a separate property under the NBC Universal umbrella.

The RNC still plans to hold a debate on that date that includes National Reviewa conservative publication that partnered with NBC for the upcoming debate.  The decision to pull out of the NBC debate was met with mixed reviews from RNC veterans.

Jim Nicholson, a former RNC chairman during the 2000 election, applauded Priebus’ decision and told The Hill that the “RNC ought to continue to use their megaphone to try to get these networks and moderators to have the same set of standards.” 

“That’s a pretty big stick because those debates have been very well watched, so the advertising time is very valuable to the networks,” Nicholson said of the threat of pulling out of another debate.

As far as the candidates, he added, their leverage lies in uniting together if they want to push for substantive changes to future debate criteria. “They are the strongest when they act collectively,” he said, adding that Donald Trump and Ben Carson won their demands to have opening and closing statements, as well as a two-hour time limit on the debate, after threatening to pull out of CNBC’s debate.

That win was short-lived, however, as Priebus’ letter notes that the network eschewed the opening statement to instead ask candidates about their weaknesses.

But former RNC chairman Michael Steele, who has clashed with Priebus in the past, said the move to suspend the partnership with NBC would do nothing ameliorate the frustration candidates have with the debate process as a whole.

“This doesn’t solve the problem,” Steele said. “The original idea was for the RNC to have more control over the process but now the candidates are already making their move and it’s too late.” 

“I don’t think it’s a bold move,” he added. “They’re trying to appease the candidates who are already pissed off at the process they created. What they’ve got to do is look forward and determine the style of debate they want and who is going to be up there for it, rather than just reacting to what happened with CNBC, which was abhorrent.”

In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagBy  Susan Ferrechio (@susanferrechio) 10/29/2015

Sen. Ted Cruz, the Texas Republican presidential candidate, conducted a 90-minute takedown late Thursday of his own Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell, who he characterized by name as a weak leader unwilling to fight for conservative causes. Cruz, a Tea Party conservative, frequently bucks Senate GOP leaders and has on at least one other occasion criticized McConnell in a Senate floor speech.

But late Thursday, he took on McConnell with renewed antipathy, using pie charts to demonstrate that the Kentucky no more rinosRepublican has bolstered the Democratic agenda rather than conservative goals during his ten-month tenure. “Why is a Republican majority leader fighting to accomplish the priorities of the Democratic minority?” Cruz asked.

Cruz criticized a broad budget and debt limit deal the Senate is scheduled to vote on early Friday, arguing that the accord gave President Obama and Democrats all that they wanted, with nothing in return for Republicans seeking to rein in spending and shrink the debt.

Many conservatives have waved off as insignificant a provision in the bill that aims to cut the cost of the nearly insolvent Social Security Disability Insurance program with heightened fraud scrutiny.

The legislation increases spending by $80 billion over two years, breaking budget caps. It also suspends the nation’s $18.1 trillion borrowing limit until March 2017.

“This means that Republican majorities in both parties will be extracting nothing significant from President Obama,” Cruz said in opposition to the bill. “This deal means that Republican leadership will have fully surrendered.”AMEN

Cruz’s drubbing didn’t stop with the budget.

Using pie charts, Cruz made the case that McConnell has helped to pass legislation opposed by the majority of Senate Republicans but supported by the majority of Democrats.

Climate change legislation and an amendment to revive the Export-Import were among the measures brought to the floor despite opposition from a majority of Republicans, Cruz noted. The provisions passed with mostly Democratic support.

Cruz said McConnell should employ an old GOP House rule to bring to the floor only legislation that has a majority of Republican Senators backing it. He said the established congressional leaders aren’t looking out for ordinary Americans but rather big corporations, who cut them checks for them at D.C. cocktail parties and reward them later with million-dollar jobs.

Cruz also targeted now former Speaker John Boehner, who retires Friday. Boehner wrote much of the budget deal Cruz opposes. “The lame duck speaker, on his way out, will no doubt land in a plush easy chair, in the Washington D.C. cartel, and will soon be making millions of dollars, living off the cartel,” Cruz said. GOPNoSpineCartoon

Cruz said Americans are onto the scheme and are tired of Republicans making promises on the campaign trail, only to shy away from big fights once elected. “That frustration is driving every day, the growing rage from the American people,” Cruz said.AMEN

McConnell has traditionally chosen to avoid responding to Cruz’s attacks and has discouraged other GOP lawmakers from defending him on the Senate floor. Most Senate Republicans support McConnell and have privately and publicly accused Cruz of using floor diatribes to raise campaign cash from the conservative base and support for his presidential bid. 

Jim Manley, a former top aide to Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Cruz had taken an unprecedented step in attacking McConnell Thursday night. “I have never, EVER, seen anything like it,” Manley said on Twitter. “McConnell should not dignify with a response, but wow.”

Delusional Mental Illness Gibberish In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagDNCNBC Debate


waving flagPosted by

URL of the original posting site:  http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/10/33-of-americans-believe-its-time-for-states-to-openly-defy-the-feds-and-that-number-is-growing/#ecLkFE5EXopqZ3rh.99

SCOTUS GIANT

A recent Rasmussen poll, which was conducted in July of 2015 discovered that 33% of Americans support the States openly defying the federal judiciary because of bad behavior, ie. Acting lawlessly. The poll was taken following the Supreme Court’s illegal and unconstitutional ruling on redefining marriage to include those who practice sodomy and their previous ruling regarding the unconstitutional healthcare mandate nicknamed Obamacare.

Thirty-three percent of likely voters believe the States should exercise their Tenth Amendment rights and ignore the federal rulings because they are in violation of the enumerated powers granted to the judiciary under the Constitution. According to Rasmussen, these numbers are now up nine points since February, at which time just 24% supported such a measure. Those who disagree fell from 58% in February to 52%. Apparently, a whopping 15% aren’t intelligent enough to know the difference to make a decision.

“Perhaps even more disturbing is that the voters who feel strongest about overriding the federal courts – Republicans and conservatives – are those who traditionally have been the most supportive of the Constitution and separation of powers,” reports Rasmussen. “During the Obama years, however, these voters have become increasingly suspicious and even hostile toward the federal government.”

The polling firm also pointed out that when it comes to those in political parties, fifty percent of Republicans side with the states, while just twenty-two percent of Democrats and thirty percent of independents also side with State’s rights on the issue.

The survey consisted of 1,000 likely voters and was conducted between June 30 and July 1, 2015.

Pastor Matthew Trewhella, author of The Doctrine of the Lesser Magistrates: A Proper Resistance to Tyranny and a Repudiation of Unlimited Obedience to Civil Government, commented on the judiciary and Supremacy Clause:

The federal judiciary has long built this fiction that they are the sole and final arbiter of what is constitutional or unconstitutional. They base this upon the Supremacy Clause which is Article 6, paragraph 2 of the U. S. Constitution. They claim that Article 6, paragraph 2 grants the Supreme Court supremacy to determine whether laws are constitutional or unconstitutional.

Funny thing is – when one actually takes time to read Article 6, paragraph 2, they realize that the Supreme Court isn’t even mentioned. In fact, federal courts aren’t even mentioned. What is mentioned – and is declared to have supremacy – is the U. S. Constitution itself and all laws made in accordance therewith.

In other words, America’s founders did not establish judicial supremacy as the Supreme Court is wont to assert (and thereby usurp all other branches of government) – rather they established constitutional supremacy.

All magistrates in America – whether federal, state, county, or local – did not take an oath of subservience to the federal government nor the federal judiciary. Rather, they took an oath to uphold the U. S. Constitution.

True federalism understands that all magistrates – whatever their level or sphere of jurisdiction – possess lawful authority. And that whenever one branch of government begins to play the tyrant – all other branches (whether federal, state, county, or local) have the duty then more than ever to uphold the Constitution and oppose that branch acting tyrannically – even if that branch is the Supreme Court.

Trewhella also pointed out that founding father Thomas Jefferson tried to warn the people about the friction of the Supreme Court being understood as authoritative in all matters.

In writing to William Jarvis, Jefferson said,

“You seem . . . to consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.”

Jefferson had previously warned Charles Hammond in 1821, “The germ of dissolution of our federal government is in the constitution of the federal Judiciary; an irresponsible body (for impeachment is scarcely a scare-crow) working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief, over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped.”

Just two years later, he would write to A. Coray,

“At the establishment of our constitutions, the judiciary bodies were supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the government. Experience, however, soon showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous; that the insufficiency of the means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and irresponsibility in office; that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only, pass silent and unheeded by the public at large; that these decisions, nevertheless, become law by precedent, sapping, by little and little, the foundations of the constitution, and working its change by construction, before any one has perceived that that invisible and helpless worm has been busily employed in consuming its substance.”

If you are one that believes the Supreme Court is the final arbiter of what is lawful and constitutional, then you have believed a lie and a myth that Jefferson warned about. The States still retain their rights to this day to defy the federal judiciary, which has become an oligarchy. We just need strong statesmen as governors and legislatures to make that stand! The people will get behind those that will take the stand, but we must first seek out those willing to put all they are on the line for the sake of freedom, not necessarily a political future.

In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagPosted on October 29, 2015Philip Hodges

Ryan McMaken over at Mises.org brought to light a Pew Research Center report that found that the murder rate in the U.S. has been cut in half over the past 20 years or so from 7 per 100,000 to 3.6 per 100,000, in spite of widespread proliferation of guns. The gun death rate has already dropped over the same time period, though not as drastically. In 1993, it was about 15.2 per 100,000. Twenty years later in 2013, it was down to 10.6. Despite these numbers, a majority of poll respondents thought that the crime rate had gone up:

Despite the attention to gun violence in recent months, most Americans are unaware that gun Gunscrime is markedly lower than it was two decades ago. A new Pew Research Center survey (March 14-17) found that 56% of Americans believe the number of crimes involving a gun is higher than it was 20 years ago; only 12% say it is lower and 26% say it stayed the same. (An additional 6% did not know or did not answer.)

Men (46%) are less likely than women (65%) to say long-term gun crime is up. Young adults, ages 18 to 29, are markedly less likely than other adults to say long-term crime is up—44% do, compared with more than half of other adults. Minority adults are more likely than non-Hispanic whites to say that long-term gun crime is up, 62% compared with 53%. 

Gun Control Supporters croppedThese people must watch too much TV. You can blame shows that either glorify and romanticize violence, or make it look like it’s more prevalent than it really is, such as in crime dramas.

But even more than that, the news media love to fixate on violent crimes, particularly mass murders, simply because they’re shocking. They know that their viewers will be hooked to the tube if they sensationalize a mass murder. They do it for the ratings, which translate into more ad revenue.

People are so hoodwinked by the media that they don’t realize that the truth is that violent crime is down drastically, and gun ownership is up drastically. People’s perceptions are at stark odds with reality.

 

Hey Leftist Makes sitting ducks In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagby | Oct 29, 2015 | Media, Politics

GOP Debate On CNBC: Horrible For CNBC, Horrible For Jeb Bush

I wouldn’t be surprised if the debate shook things up a bit, Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio were the huge winners, Carly Fiorina and Chris Christie also had a great night but to a lesser extent than the first two.  Frontrunners Trump and Carson did not hurt themselves, even though at one point the good doctor seemed not to know his own tax plan.

CNBC had set the debate to begin at 8 p.m. But instead of introducing the ten candidates as they filed onto the platform, the CNBC anchors continued babbling about politics in a manner that demonstrated a lack of understanding of the issues. As CNBC team continued to ramble the candidate were on the stage waiting as if they were extras in a movie waiting for their chance to do a crowd scene while the stars were finishing their lines.

Sadly for those looking for a substantive debate, the CNBC moderators Becky Quick, Carl Quintanilla, and John Harwood, went downhill from their opening shunning of the candidates. It wasn’t just that the moderators asked snotty questions filled with personal attacks against the candidates, but they were unprepared asking questions without the backup to prove the attacks drilled into the queries.

Initially the candidates fell for the CNBC trick by attacking each other but the tide began to turn when Ted Cruz had the moment of the night. Asked a question (that he didn’t want to answer) by Carl Quintanilla about the debt limit agreement that was to be voted on by the senate the next day, Cruz attacked the moderators.  The brilliance of Cruz’s attack was that he used specifics and spoke in a way that united all ten candidates (and most of the audience) against the moderators.

Quintanilla: Senator Cruz. Congressional Republicans, Democrats and the White House are about to strike a compromise that would raise the debt limit, prevent a government shutdown and calm financial markets that fear of — another Washington-created crisis is on the way. Does your opposition to it show that you’re not the kind of problem-solver American voters want?

Cruz: You know, let me say something at the outset. The questions that have been asked so far in this debate illustrate why the American people don’t trust the media. This is not a cage match. And, you look at the questions — “Donald Trump, are you a comic-book villain?” “Ben Carson, can you do math?” “John Kasich, will you insult two people over here?” “Marco Rubio, why don’t you resign?” “Jeb Bush, why have your numbers fallen?” How about talking about the substantive issues the people care about?

Cruz outburst seemed legitimate, unscripted, and right on. Heck the very first question asked in the debate sounded like an attack, it came from John Harwood who throughout the night seemed to be the most arrogant of the CNBC crew:

This series of debates is essentially a job interview with the American people. And in any job interview, you know this: you get asked, “what’s your biggest weakness?” So in 30 seconds, without telling us that you try too hard or that you’re a perfectionist what is your biggest weakness and what are you doing to address it? We’ll go left to right. More Evidence

Yes its true what is your biggest weakness is a common interview question (by a lazy interviewer). What job candidate is going to answer “I embezzle money from the companies I work for,” or “I like to have sex with little children.” Come on! Its an idiotic question and a waste of time! I always answered that my weakness was an inability to grow hair.Alinsky affect

This debate was a make or break night for Jeb Bush, he was broken.  Jeb started off seemingly with his swagger in gear, but when he attacked Marco Rubio the younger Floridian’s response made Bush’s mojo run away and hide in a corner.

Quintanilla asked Rubio about the Sun-Sentinel editorial published earlier that day calling for Rubio to resign because he missed so many senate votes because he was out campaigning.  Rubio explained that he missed fewer votes than other candidates many of whom the Sun-Sentinel endorsed. That’s when Jeb Bush made the mistake that put a nail in his campaign coffin; he asked to respond to Rubio:

Bush: Could I — could I bring something up here, because I’m a constituent of the senator and I helped him and I expected that he would do constituent service, which means that he shows up to work. He got endorsed by the Sun-Sentinel because he was the most talented guy in the field. He’s a gifted politician. But Marco, when you signed up for this, this was a six-year term, and you should be showing up to work. I mean, literally, the Senate — what is it, like a French work week? You get, like, three days where you have to show up? You can campaign, or just resign and let someone else take the job. There are a lot of people living paycheck to paycheck in Florida as well, they’re looking for a senator that will fight for them each and every day.no more rinos

Rubio:  Well, it’s interesting. Over the last few weeks, I’ve listened to Jeb as he walked around the country and said that you’re modeling your campaign after John McCain, that you’re going to launch a furious comeback the way he did, by fighting hard in New Hampshire and places like that, carrying your own bag at the airport. You know how many votes John McCain missed when he was carrying out that furious comeback that you’re now modeling after?

No Jeb, I don’t remember — well, let me tell you. I don’t remember you ever complaining about John McCain’s vote record. The only reason why you’re doing it now is because we’re running for the same position, and someone has convinced you that attacking me is going to help you. I’m not — my campaign is going to be about the future of America, it’s not going to be about attacking anyone else on this stage. I will continue to have tremendous admiration and respect for Governor Bush. I’m not running against Governor Bush, I’m not running against anyone on this stage. I’m running for president because there is no way we can elect Hillary Clinton to continue the policies of Barack Obama.ATTA BOY

When pundits write their post mortems about the 2016 campaign, that particular exchange will be known as the moment Bush’s campaign died.  Bush seemed demoralized the rest of the night, and while he may stay in the race for a while it’s only because he is too demoralized to know he should fall over. Look for Bush to make a major move firing a senior member of his team.

John Kasich didn’t do himself any favors last night either. He tried to play the “big boy” in the room attacking the Carson and Trump economic plans as fantasy but it didn’t work, not because of what he said but because how he said it.  Kasich seemed to be channeling Bernie Sanders, screaming each and every answer.

Rand Paul didn’t get a big chance to talk and didn’t really stand out when he did.

Trump dodged a bullet when Becky Quick asked him about his criticism of Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook about immigration. When Trump said he never criticized Zuckerberg:

Quick: Where did I read this and come up with this that you were…

Trump: Probably, I don’t know — you people write the stuff. I don’t know where you…

In truth Trump did say that, it was on his website something that Quick reminded him about a half-hour later, but because Quick didn’t have her backup sourcing her questions, her correction later in the debate went unnoticed.

Perhaps Trump deserved to get away with that answer; arguably CNBC’s Trump questions were the worst. Harwood asked him if his was “a comic book version of a presidential campaign?” Harwood also asked Trump “I talked to economic advisers who have served presidents of both parties. They said that you have as chance of cutting taxes that much without increasing the deficit as you would of flying away from that podium by flapping your arms.” At one point Harwood practically begged Mike Huckabee to attack Trump by asking him, “The leading Republican candidate, when you look at the average of national polls right now, is Donald Trump. When you look at him, do you see someone with the moral authority to unite the country?” Huckabee refused to attack Trump and instead hit at Hillary Clinton, “Let me tell you, Donald Trump would be a president every day of the week and twice on Sunday, rather than Hillary.”ATTA BOY

Overall Trump had a good night but was not as dominating as earlier debates because he saw few attacks from the other candidates for him to answer with counter-punches.

The other leader, Ben Carson was well…Ben Carson.  He was the kind soft-spoken Doctor whose style (rather than substance) made him popular.  His best moment was when he was asked about his positions on homosexuality and he explained that despite the liberal propaganda, being anti-gay marriage does not mean he hates gay people.

Quintanilla: Dr. Carson, we know you as a physician, but we wanted to ask you about your involvement on some corporate boards, including Costco’s. Last year, a marketing study called the warehouse retailer the number one gay-friendly brand in America, partly because of its domestic partner benefits. Why would you serve on a company whose policies seem to run counter to your views on homosexuality?Hate Merchants

Carson: Well, obviously, you don’t understand my views on homosexuality. I believe that our Constitution protects everybody, regardless of their sexual orientation or any other aspect. I also believe that marriage is between one man and one woman. And there is no reason that you can’t be perfectly fair to the gay community. They shouldn’t automatically assume that because you believe that marriage is between one man and one woman that you are a homophobe. And this is one of the myths that the left perpetrates on our society, and this is how they frighten people and get people to shut up. You know, that’s what the PC culture is all about, and it’s destroying this nation. The fact of the matter is we the American people are not each other’s enemies, it’s those people who are trying to divide us who are the enemies. And we need to make that very clear to everybody.ATTA BOY

Chris Christie had his best night. His style of turning to the camera and addressing each answer to the TV audience was unique among the candidates and very effective.  His best moment however, was near the end of the night after Jeb Bush answered a Quintanilla question about fantasy football and the NJ Governor was indignant as he Quintanilla’s head off.More Liberal Gibberish

Christie: Carl, are we really talking about getting government involved in fantasy football? We have — wait a second, we have $19 trillion in debt. We have people out of work. We have ISIS and al Qaeda attacking us. And we’re talking about fantasy football? Can we stop? How about this? How about we get the government to do what they’re supposed to be doing, secure our borders, protect our people, and support American values and American families. Enough on fantasy football. Let people play, who cares?ATTA BOY

A close second best moment for Christie was when Harwood kept interrupting an answer he was giving,

John, do you want me to answer or do you want to answer? Because, I’ve got to tell you the truth, even in New Jersey what you’re doing is called rude. So…ATTA BOY

Marco Rubio had the most great moments of the night. When Donald Trump spoke of SuperPACs used by the other candidates Rubio answered with an great attack on the Hillary Clinton and the Media:

Rubio: I know the Democrats have the ultimate SuperPAC. It’s called the mainstream media who every single day…and I’ll tell you why. Last week, Hillary Clinton went before a committee. She admitted she had sent e-mails to her family saying, “Hey, this attack at Benghazi was caused by Al Qaida-like elements.” She spent over a week telling the families of those victims and the American people that it was because of a video. And yet the mainstream media is going around saying it was the greatest week in Hillary Clinton’s campaign. It was the week she got exposed as a liar. It was the week that she got exposed as a liar… But she has her super PAC helping her out, the American mainstream media.ATTA BOY

And when John Harwood incorrectly attacked Rubio’s tax plan, Rubio reminded the CNBC moderator that he had made the same mistake once before and apologized for being wrong. Harwood denied Rubio’s claim but here’s the proof:

Screen Shot 2015-10-29 at 10.15.58 AM

Harwood’s worst moment was near the end of the debate, when Donald Trump bragged talking to Ben Carson and going in united to get CNBC to cut the debate from three hours to two. Harwood out and out lied saying the debate was always supposed to be two hours. Perhaps he didn’t read any newspapers, or his management didn’t tell him but Trump was 100% correct.

As for Carl Fiorina her best moment was she addressed a Becky Quick question about women she proved once again why the party needs her as a spokesperson for their policies about women

Fiorina: Becky, it is the height of hypocrisy for Mrs. Clinton to talk about being the first woman President, when every single policy she espouses, and every single policy of President Obama has been demonstrably bad for women. 92 percent — 92 percent of the jobs lost during Barack Obama’s first term belonged to women. Senator Cruz is precisely right. Three million women have fallen into poverty under this administration. The number of women —living in extreme poverty is the highest level on record. I am a conservative because I know our values, our principles and our policies —work better to lift everyone up, men and women.ATTA GIRL

Perhaps the biggest surprise of last night happened after the debate. Reince Priebus the chair of the National Republican Committee went into the “spin room” and bashed CNBC.

“I think it was one gotcha question, one personal low blow after the other. It’s almost like they tried to design a Rubik’s cube for every question. I’m proud of our candidates for pretty much sticking together. I’m very disappointed in the moderators and I’m very disappointed in CNBC.”AMEN

Priebus immediately left the spin room without taking questions.

There have been other lousy performances by debate moderators, although in my experience none worse than CNBC’s last night, but never in my experience as a political geek has any party chairman walked into a spin room just to trash the debate hosts and stormed out.  Parties are built bottom up and by necessity the chairman are by necessity the ultimate diplomats as they have to keep everyone happy, their negative comments are usually reserved solely for the other party. But Priebus’ scolding was entirely appropriate.

The next debate will be on Fox Business network in two weeks. Any polls between now and then will probably show big increases for Rubio and Cruz, a smaller one for Christie, a major drop for Bush and minor ones for Paul, Kasich and possibly Huckabee.  I also wouldn’t be surprised if Trump dropped a few points, not because of anything he did but because the success of others peeling off some of his supporters.

This debate was so awful, I wouldn’t be surprised if CNBC’s overall viewership falls not to recover for a very long time. In fact thinking what I would write about the debate this morning one thing that popping into my head was that this scene from the movie Billy Madison  could very well be used to describe the CNBC questioners.

Allow me to suggest that you read other opinions to get a full picture of the debate. For example my Liberty Alliance colleague Joe Newby wrote on his site, Conservative Firing Line, “Tonight’s Debate…Ted Cruz Won Going Away” and if you go there to read his post, make sure you go and vote on the debate poll he put up on his site. Another LA colleague Howard Portnoy also wrote a good analysis on his blog Liberty Unyielding, “The loser of last night’s GOP presidential debate? The envelope, please.” and Steve “Deace grades the debate,” on his site, SteveDeace.com.

I will be a guest on today’s Ed Morrissey show and we will be discussing his take on the debate  “Priebus: Say, there were a lot of gotcha questions last night, huh?” as well as mine.

In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagCommentary by  Ann Coulter  | 

URL of the original posting site: http://humanevents.com/2015/10/28/the-meek-shall-inherit-the-earth-but-they-shouldnt-be-president/?utm_source=coulterdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl

The Meek Shall Inherit the Earth, But They Shouldn't Be President

It took a billionaire living the glamorous New York City life to exhibit real Christian courage by going against every elite group in the nation, every media outlet, every well-heeled donor, to defend America from destruction by immigration.

Baptist leader Russell Moore, desperate for liberal approval, claims that Christian conservatives “must repudiate everything they believe” in order to support Donald Trump, who “incites division, with slurs against Hispanic immigrants and with protectionist jargon that preys on turning economic insecurity into ugly ‘us versus them’ identity politics.” (Please like me, New York Times!) 

Moore is especially offended by Trump’s “boisterous confidence” and “waving arms” — as he put it in the Times, journal of respectable liberal opinion. (Do Baptist preachers ever wave their arms? Somebody Google that.)

How would Gen. Douglas MacArthur fare with today’s evangelical leaders? Ronald Reagan was a visibly devout Christian, but Richard Nixon wasn’t. Joe McCarthy wasn’t. MacArthur wasn’t.

Sometimes the country needs a man.

The idea that Christians are supposed to be milquetoasts is liberal propaganda. Ask the money-changers how meek Jesus was. (Not the Clintons; I mean the other money-changers.) God commanded the Israelites to go to certain cities and kill “every living thing.” As I recall, the Crusaders were a little rough around the edges.

When Trump attacks, he targets the rich and powerful. When the elites attack, they target the average American and everything he cares about.

When Trump boasts — about his wealth, his family, his intelligence — it’s funny, not mean-spirited. No one feels inferior. In fact, legions of political commentators who’ve never accomplished anything in their entire lives feel immensely superior to Trump.

No doubt, wisdom shall die with them. (Job 12:1 — one of many examples of sarcasm in the Bible, a rhetorical device bossy Christians tell us is un-Christian.)

By contrast, Trump’s personal style is denounced by the Piety Police with smug certitude, to showcase their superior moral understanding.  I’m almost sure the Bible says nothing about arm-waving, but it says quite a bit about the sort of pride that allows a person to presume to speak for God on acceptable speaking styles. God does not mandate personality types and, if He did, I doubt it would be “lisping sycophant.”

It’s not Trump who’s displaying the sin of pride here.

Christians obsessed with ostentatious shows of religiosity in public life have basically the same disease as liberals who go around being offended all the time. It’s all posturing. Trump’s a Christian. This is a Christian country. How about helping keep it that way?

Although Trump has been winning the largest percentage of evangelical voters, evangelical “insiders” like Moore hate him. A poll of “insiders” hand-picked by anti-Trump Warren Cole Smith found only 1.1 percent of evangelical leaders supporting Trump, with 37.4 percent supporting Marco Rubio — as their betters had hoped.

Smith sent the results of his survey to media outlets under the headline: “Evangelicals do NOT support Trump.”

The problem is, they do. Evidently, the flock is not as dumb or “easily led” — in the words of The Washington Post — as evangelical leaders think.

While the Russell Moores and Warren Cole Smiths urgently warn conservative Christians that Trump is a model-marrying libertine, actual evangelicals understand that this is entirely beside the point.

This is not an election about who can check off the most boxes on an evangelical lifestyle list. This is an election about saving the concept of America, the last hope for Christianity on the planet.

A country in which partial birth abortions are freely available, but children can’t hold hands and pray in school, is not a country where Christians are winning.

What difference does it make where a candidate stands on abortion or gay marriage, when a few more years of our current immigration flow will mean no Republican can ever be elected president again and nine Ruth Bader Ginsburgs will sit on the Supreme Court?

Unless Americans stop being outvoted by foreigners, Christians — as well as libertarians, neoconservatives, fiscal conservatives and moderate Democrats — have no hope of winning anything, anywhere, anytime. The last Christian country on Earth will be no more.

Evangelicals don’t need candidates to have religious ecstasies on stage. They need a man with the courage to stand up to the infectious madness pushing Third World immigration on our country.

Marco Rubio devoted his entire Senate career to pushing amnesty — but he made a point of letting the press know that he went to church on Wednesday this week, the day of the debate.

Meanwhile, Trump’s pitch to the religious right is: Yeah, I don’t go to church that much. (At least we know he’s not lying!) But he promises to build a wall, deport illegals and end anchor babies.

Evangelicals know Trump will not go on a witch hunt against some county clerk over gay marriage or sue a high school football coach for allowing his players to pray. It’s the left that has the maniacal bloodlust of totalitarians. Only Trump will oppose them — and with gusto!

What other candidate would toss out un-PC phrases like “illegal immigrant” and “anchor babies” without breaking into a sweat? No other candidate of either party agrees with Trump on immigration — and if they say they do, they’re lying.

Even after Trump rocketed to the lead with his immigration policies, the media still refuse to discuss the issue. The demand for ever-more poverty-stricken immigrants from primitive cultures has gone beyond cheap labor and has become a mass hysteria.

Half the evangelical “leadership” in America can’t comprehend anyone who is not consumed with worldly approval. Russell Moore is afraid to disagree with The New York Times from his religious community in Tennessee. Donald Trump actually is an elite, but he doesn’t care what his friends on Fifth Avenue think of him.

Some Christians want proof that a candidate has memorized Bible verses. I want a candidate who lives by this verse: “So do not be afraid of them.”

In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagWitch Hunt


waving flagBy Thomas Holmes

URL of the original posting site: http://clashdaily.com/2015/10/u-s-schools-are-now-appeasing-muslims-by-canceling-this-popular-holiday/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=subscriber_id:9760859&utm_campaign=U.S.%20Schools%20Are%20Now%20Appeasing%20Muslims%20By%20Canceling%20This%20Popular%20Holiday

Remember the good old days when people just put razor blades in Halloween candy – at least according to the urban legend? Or how about the harmless religious evangelicals that produced Hell-themed Halloween shows? At least that faith-based fad put some effort into relating Halloween with their message. Evidentially, Muslims just want to destroy everything that isn’t them, according to what’s going on in Milford, Connecticut.   As previously reported, the Milford public schools officially cancelled all Halloween events to avoid “excluding people due to religion, cultural beliefs etc.” Apparently, the school leaders decided it was just easier to exclude everybody. In fact, Milford isn’t even the first Connecticut County to try this. Newington schools banned Halloween costumes by actually using “exclude everybody” as a justification.Islamitization of America

We can thank Islam and its banning children from wearing costumes as the reason for this nonsense. I guess it’s not enough for Islamic law to include murdering anyone who isn’t Muslim, or enjoy the benefit of a President who literally ignores reality in order to defend Islam. Muslim’s gotta crush the fun stuff too. Remember how some Christians reject Halloween and everybody else just laughs at their beliefs and go trick-o-treating anyway? Funny how school leaders don’t worry much about exclusion then.bully

The good news is Milford parents were not taking this sitting down, according to “I don’t think we’re excluding anybody” stated Victoria Johannsen to local reporters. “I think they’re excluding themselves.” True that. The good news is after getting the spit kicked out of them in the backlash, the school system reversed their decision to resume Halloween festivities.

Obviously, it just proves that even Islam shouldn’t mess with suburban Soccer Moms.

America Never Forget In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagPosted By Curtis Ellis On 10/27/2015

Article printed from WND: http://www.wnd.com

URL to article: http://www.wnd.com/2015/10/obama-in-secret-pact-with-worlds-largest-muslim-country

President Widodo of Indonesia and Obama of the United States.

muslim-obamaPresident Obama says the U.S. and the world’s largest Muslim country will merge their economies under an agreement whose terms have not been disclosed to Congress or the public. After Obama met with Indonesian President Joko Widodo at the White House Monday, Widodo said, “Indonesia intends to join the TPP,” referring to the TransPacific Partnership.

Indonesia is the most populous Muslim nation in the world with 250 million people. Obama attended elementary school in the country. “I have a very personal interest in Indonesia given the fact that I spent time there as a child and have relatives who are Indonesian,” Obama said.

The TPP is a sweeping global regulatory pact. It establishes an international authority that will write rules for merging the U.S. economy with other countries in the partnership. The administration reached an agreement on the TPP with 11 countries on four continents after negotiations that lasted more than five years. Indonesia was not involved in the negotiations.

But neither Congress nor the public have been allowed to see the final agreement the administration has negotiated. The president has not released the text of the agreement or the numerous side agreements attached to the TPP.Picture2

The administration describes the TPP as a “living agreement” that will be updated and which other countries can join in the future. China, South Korea, the Philippines and Taiwan also have expressed interest in joining the TPP economic union. But it appears the U.S. Congress will not have any say in the matter.Picture2

Earlier this year, Congress granted the president “fast track” trade promotion authority to negotiate the TPP and surrendered its ability to change whatever agreement the president proposes. An amendment to the fast track bill would have required congressional approval before China could join the TPP. But the amendment, opposed by GOP leadership and the president, was defeated.

The unilateral move by the president to bring Indonesia into the TPP confirms charges by Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., that Congress will have no role in approving changes as the partnership grows. Sessions read the draft of the TPP agreement earlier this year and described it as “a nascent European Union.”Picture3

Like the European Union, the Transpacific Partnership calls for the free flow of people, goods and capital among member countries. “It’s going to put us in an international commission that allows the sultan of Brunei to have the same vote as the president of the United States,” Sessions said.

Sessions is referring to the TransPacific Partnership Commission, a governing authority created under the agreement, similar to the European Commission that oversees the European Union. This shadowy trans-Pacific body would have vast regulatory powers the details of which the president has refused to disclose to either Congress or the public. But it appears the president has revealed details to Indonesia and other countries it hopes to enlist in the pact. While Obama refuses to show the public the TPP agreement, the president and his surrogates are out selling the pact with a series of speeches and op-eds.

Poll after poll shows the majority of Americans across the political spectrum oppose the TPP. All the leading presidential candidates, including Donald Trump, Ben Carson, Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, oppose the agreement. Politico reports Republican leaders in the House and Senate want to vote on the TransPacific Partnership in a lame-duck session of Congress after the November 2016 general election. “If it’s such a good deal, then why do they want to keep the American people from having an influence on it?” Sessions asked. “Why don’t they bring it up during the election [campaign] so people can vote and evaluate their representatives on how they vote?”

Workers in Indonesia earn as little $2.50 a day.

    &amp;amp;lt;a style=”color: #336699; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;” href=”http://license.icopyright.net/3.16633?icx_id=2576725&#8243; target=”_blank” title=”Main menu of all reuse options”&gt; &lt;img height=”25″ width=”27″ border=”0″ align=”bottom” alt=”[Reuse options]” src=”//d2uzdrx7k4koxz.cloudfront.net/images/icopy-w.png”/>Click here for reuse options!</a>


In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagPosted by Eric W. Dolan , 28 Oct 2015

Joe Kennedy leading players in prayer (Screenshot/King5)

Joe Kennedy leading players in prayer (Screenshot/King5)

A student at Bremerton High School in Washington has asked the local Satanic Temple to deliver an invocation — and the semi-satirical devil worshippers told KIRO Radio’s Dori Monson they would show up. “We will be at Thursday’s game doing a postgame Satanic invocation on the field if Coach (Joe) Kennedy continues to pray,” said Lilith Starr, head of The Satanic Temple of Seattle. “We won’t step on the field if he is stopped or doesn’t pray.”CP 01

Bremerton High School coach Joe Kennedy has defied orders from school district officials to stop his tradition of leading team prayers. The school says the prayers violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits public officials like Kennedy from promoting religion.Bull

“School staff exercising their right to silently pray in private on their own is fine,” Washington state Superintendent of Public Instruction Randy Dorn said in the statement. “But leading a prayer isn’t. School officials are role models; leading a prayer might put a student in an awkward position, even if the prayer is voluntary. For students who don’t share the official’s faith, prayers the official’s public expression of faith can seem exclusionary or even distressing.”Delusional Mental Illness Gibberish

But Kennedy insists he has the right to lead team prayers. Lawyers from the Texas-based Liberty Institute have threatened to sue the school district if they block Kennedy’s prayers.

Starr said that by failing to stop the prayers, the school has turned the football field into an open forum and cannot discriminate against Satanists. “In permitting school-sponsored prayer, the district has created a de facto open forum for religious expression in accordance to the Establishment Clause of the federal constitution which prohibits the government from preferring one religion over another,” the Satanic Temple of Seattle said in a press release. “Therefore, the Satanic Temple wishes to ensure their belief system has equal access to the football field.”What did you say 07.jpg

Starr said the student who requested the invocation is atheist who “felt their views weren’t being represented,” according to the Kitsap Sun. The student wishes to remain anonymous to avoid facing a backlash.

Starr said the invocation would consist of a seven-minute-long proclamation — punctuated by the banging of a gong — that would address “justice and equal religious liberty for all.”

Really with logo In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagHospitable Takeover


waving flagby | Oct 27, 2015 | Faith/Morality

URL of the original posting site: http://lidblog.com/palestinian-incitement-and-muslim-absurdity-at-the-temple-mount

Palestinian Incitement And Muslim Absurdity At The Temple Mount

Over and over Abbas and other high ranking Muslims have claimed the Jews want to take over the mount and/or (God Forbid!) pray, precisely because it is an easy way to incite violence.  And it has been a card Abbas has been playing often.

In 2014 after weeks of incitement about the Temple Mount by the leadership of the Palestinian Authority, there was a wave of violence in Jerusalem cumulating in a terror attack where five rabbis were slaughtered in a Jerusalem Synagogue as they met for morning prayers.

terror-har-nof

Immediately after the attack Chairman Abbas toned it down for a bit, but soon returned to his insightful ways claiming that the Jews wanted to Judaicize  the Temple Mount. The truth is his claims have little to do with faith.

A major strategy of the Palestinians in their goal of ultimately taking over all of Israel is to deny Jewish and Christian ties to the land. They do this by de-legitimizing the Jewish connection to a holy site and/or destroying Jewish holy sites. That’s why they hold on to the Temple Mount, destroying artifacts. That is why they burned down Joseph’s Tomb and it is why they claim the Cave of the Patriarchs and Rachel’s Tomb. But it’s not only Jewish sites, the Palestinians have laid claim to the Church of the Holy Sepulcher and in 2002 invaded and trashed Jesus’ birthplace in Bethlehem.

In a recent televised speech Abbas claimed, “The Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Church of the Holy Sepulcher are ours. They are all ours, and they have no right to defile them with their filthy feet.” He added, “We salute every drop of blood spilled for the sake of Jerusalem.

Despite the incitement by the Palestinian leaders there is a constant drawing of moral equivalence, “both sides need to calm the violence” type of nonsense.  The truth is only the Palestinian side is inciting violence, Netanyahu has been calling for calm (and for Abbas to stop inciting the violence).

Now it looks as if there is a solution for now. The Jordanians had proposed to Israel that cameras be installed on the Temple ;Mount to ensure that no damage was being done to the mosques, and no violations of the status quo; a proposal which Netanyahu accepted.

Think about that for a second.  In most places in the world closed circuit cameras are installed to insure no crimes get committed, but at Judaism’s holiest site, closed circuit cameras will be installed to insure no Jews pray to God.

Which brings to mind a story that demonstrates the absurdity of this situation.

An American couple was honeymooning in Jerusalem and has a chance encounter with Gilad Erdan Israel’s public security minister.  Erdan. asks them if they are enjoying their trip. They respond that it is wonderful, that the only thing missing was they had always wanted to visit the Temple Mount. Being a nice guy Erdan says he could arrange it for them.

The groom tells Gilad that he understands there are things the couple are not allowed to do on top of the temple mount. But he also  reminds Erdan that they are newlyweds and asks if it would be okay if they snuck in a quick kiss while no one was looking. “Of course” said Gilad . “What if it was a long kiss?” “Well you are newlyweds said the public security minister.” “But what if it was an embrace? ” asked the bride.  “That shouldn’t be a problem,’ said the Israeli. The groom continued, ” What if we no longer could control our passion, ripped off each others cloths and made mad passionate love..right there in front of everyone?” “I supposed that would be okay said the Israeli official, “you are married.”  The groom spoke again, “What if we were overwhelmed with ecstasy and while we were naked and making love in front of everybody in the middle of the Temple we screamed out at the top of our lungs Oh God, Oh God, OH GOD !

“Are you guys nuts?”   Asked Gilad Erdan, “The Muslims will think you are praying!”

America are you paying attention Islam is NOT America Never Forget In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagPosted By Leo Hohmann On 10/26/2015

Article printed from WND: http://www.wnd.com

URL to article: http://www.wnd.com/2015/10/islamic-invasion-pulls-trigger-europeans-scramble-for-guns

rifles_shotgunsAmerica are you paying attention

Austrians are arming themselves at record rates in an effort to defend their households against feared attacks from Muslim invaders. Tens of thousands of Muslim “refugees” have poured into Austria from Hungary and Slovenia in recent months on their way to Germany and Sweden, two wealthy European countries that have laid out the welcome mat for migrants. More than a million will end up in Germany alone by the end of this year, according to estimates from the German government.

Smart-power-600-LAObtaining a working firearm and ammunition in Germany, Britain, Denmark and the Netherlands is practically impossible for the average citizen. Germany, for instance, requires a psychological evaluation, the purchase of liability insurance and verifiable compliance with strict firearms storage and safety rules. And self-defense is not even a valid reason to purchase a gun in these countries.

The laws in Austria, while still strict, are a bit less overbearing.

A Czech TV report confirms that long guns – shotguns and rifles – have been flying off the shelves in Austria, and Austrians who haven’t already purchased a gun may not have a chance to get one for some time. They’re all sold out.

And those arming themselves are primarily women. “If anyone wants to buy a long gun in Austria right now, too bad for them,” the Czech newscaster says. “All of them are currently sold out.”gun free zone

He cites the Austrian news outlet Trioler Tageszeitung as the source of his report.

“We cannot complain about lack of demand,” Stephen Mayer, a gun merchant, told Trioler Tageszeitung.

He claims the stock has been sold out for the last three weeks and that demand is being fueled by fears generated by social changes. “People want to protect themselves,” Mayer said. “Nonetheless, the most common purchasers of arms are primarily Austrian women.”

muslim-obamaThey are also buying pepper sprays, which Mayer said are in big demand among those who can’t get a gun.

Alan Gottlieb, executive vice president of the Second Amendment Foundation, said he recently returned from a gun rights event in Europe, where he sensed a change in attitude toward firearms. “I just returned from a gun rights meeting in Belgium, and I can attest that all over Europe people now want the means to defend themselves,” Gottlieb told WND. “Self-defense is no longer a dirty word. In countries like Austria, where it is still legal to own a firearm, gun sales are at record levels. I can tell you first-hand that people in Europe now wish they had a Second Amendment.”

More potential new customers are entering the market than ever before, according to the Czech report.Disarmed Citizenry

&amp;amp;lt;div&amp;amp;gt;Please enable Javascript to watch this video&amp;amp;lt;/div&amp;amp;gt;

Until the refugees started flooding Europe, it was mostly hunters and sport shooters who purchased firearms. Now, people are seeking weapons for self-defense because they are worried about their personal safety. Most have never used a gun before.

So-called “projectile weapons” are available in Austria under two classifications, C and D, which are rifles and shotguns. Every adult Austrian is legally able to apply for a weapons permit but must disclose to the government their reason for wanting to own a gun.

The Czech station cited an interview with a sociologist and an Austrian journalist, both of whom said the weapons purchases were based on unfounded fears about foreign migrants.Lies Lies and More Lies

‘Something is very wrong here’

The Viennese sociologist, identified only as Mr. Gertler, said no such fears about migrants should ever be published by any Austrian news outlet.

A journalist named Wittinger said “something is very wrong here” if Austrians are buying guns to protect themselves against migrants. Shotguns will not, after all, solve any immediate problems, quite the contrary,” he said.Delusional Mental Illness Gibberish

The Czech TV station then reported that Islamists are promising: “We will cut the heads off unbelieving dogs even in Europe.” “Look forward to it, it’s coming soon!” the Czech newscaster said.culture of deceit and lies

ISIS-trained jihadists are now returning as European citizens or they are trying to infiltrate as migrants. In one propaganda video an ISIS operative informs his comrades back home in Germany to slit the throats of unbelievers in Germany, Czech TV reports. “Overall, the ministry of interior stated that Germany is in the cross-hairs of Islamic terrorists but that he does not have any indications of specific threats,” he said.

Bracing for another Islamic invasion

The Czech site reflects awareness of a major event in Western history, said Larry Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America. “Polish King John Sobieski defeated the Muslim invaders at the gates of Vienna in 1683. Another Muslim invasion is underway and Austrians are alarmed, hence their run on gun stores,” Pratt told WND. “Women are right to be concerned in view of the Muslim view of women that they are good for raping and little else.”America are you paying attention

The Czech TV report cited the Arab Spring as the root cause for the flood of Muslim migrants into Europe.

“More and more, the whole thing is turning into the situation that we will experience the much-touted Arab spring from very close up – right here at home,” the reporter said. “What’s more, many European are alienating large part of their own populace with unfortunate social and multicultural politics, merciless removal of children, unfair seizures and trading on traditional European values and with policies which are usually less friendly toward conservative and traditional native inhabitants and leans toward that portion of inhabitants who have little trouble with globalization and nonchalant liberalization, removal of traditions and Islamization. Yet we will not be able to rely on it, that portion of (population) once the Arab Spring comes here. And that will probably be, as they say, closing the barn after the cows are gone.”


 In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagPublished October 27, 2015, FoxNews.com

America will NOT be drawn

ISIS-Logo-600-LIThe Obama administration is weighing moving U.S. troops closer to the front lines in Iraq and Syria while preparing to “intensify” the air campaign against the Islamic State, officials said Tuesday. Defense Secretary Ash Carter testified on Capitol Hill Tuesday that the military plans a “higher and heavier rate of strikes” against ISIS targets.

Separately, a senior U.S. official confirmed to Fox News that President Obama is considering proposals to move U.S. troops ISIS1closer to the front lines in the fight. The Washington Post first reported that national security advisers are proposing putting a limited number of Special Operations forces in Syria, and U.S. advisers closer to the fight in Iraq.

The changes would need approval from Obama, but the plans reflect an effort to recharge the campaign against ISIS — particularly after a U.S. train-and-equip program to help Syrian rebels was effectively ended. “The end state is to defeat ISIL,” Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Joseph Dunford, Jr., testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Tuesday, acknowledging: “No one is satisfied with our progress to date.” you think

At the same hearing, Carter described a changing approach to the fight against the Islamic State, focusing largely on Raqqa, the Islamic State-declared capital in Syria, and Ramadi, the capital of Anbar province in western Iraq.

Carter said the U.S. would intensify the air campaign against the Islamic State with additional U.S. and coalition aircraft and heavier airstrikes. His testimony came as Russia is conducting its own airstrikes in Syria, saying it aims to help the Syrian government defeat the Islamic State and other terrorists.

The U.S.-led effort “will include more strikes against IS high-value targets as our intelligence improves, and also its oil enterprise, which is a critical pillar of IS’s financial infrastructure,” he said. Bombing-ISIS-NRD-600-logo

Carter said to keep up the pressure on Raqqa, the U.S. will support moderate Syrian forces, who have made territorial gains against the Islamic State near that city. “Some of them are within 30 miles of Raqqa today,” he said.

He said the U.S. also hopes to better equip Arab forces battling the Islamic State and to further bolster Jordan, a neighbor of Iraq and Syria which is flying missions as part of the anti-IS coalition.

Carter said he was disappointed that the U.S. effort to form new moderate Syrian rebel forces to fight ISIS had failed. He said the new approach is to work with vetted leaders of groups that are already fighting the militants and also give them equipment and training and help support them with U.S. air power.

Better IdeasThe military leaders faced tough criticism Tuesday from committee Chairman Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who said “killing” the earlier training program is “destroying what little trust our Syrian partners have left in us to say nothing of allies like Turkey and Jordan that invested their own money and prestige in the program.”

He added, “We’re still not providing sufficient support to Sunni tribes which are the center of gravity in this fight.”

The new strategy would include helping the Iraqi government’s effort to assemble Iraqi forces, including Sunni fighters, to fight Islamic State militants in Anbar province. Carter said that as the U.S. sees more progress in assembling motivated Iraqi forces, it will be willing to continue providing more equipment and fire support to help them succeed. Battle-Plans-590-LI

Fox News’ Jennifer Griffin and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagOperation CYA


waving flagPosted by B. Christopher Agee October 22, 2015

URL of the original posting site: http://www.westernjournalism.com/muslim-starts-stabbing-elderly-women-then-she-utters-four-words-and-he-stops-immediately/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=ConservativeHeadlinesEmail&utm_campaign=BestOfAM2&utm_content=2015-10-24

dutch

She said she immediately turned to her faith as she was being stabbed.

muslim-obamaA 78-year-old woman in Jerusalem is crediting God and a Good Samaritan for her ability to escape a recent terror attack. One of numerous violent incidents across the region in recent weeks, Marike Veldman recalled spotting two suspicious men on the bus she was riding last week. “I thought to myself, ‘What were they doing on a bus at this hour? They should be at work,” she explained.

Within moments, Veldman said the men began praising Allah as one fired shots and the other began stabbing her.stab01

“People screamed very loudly,” she said, describing the ordeal as “awful.”

Though two individuals died in the attack, Veldman survived – as did 15 other injured passengers – and was taken to a nearby hospital for treatment. She said she immediately turned to her faith as she was being stabbed. “I cried constantly in Dutch,” she said, “‘Lord Jesus! Lord Jesus! Help me! Help me!’”stab02

As she called out to Jesus, Veldman said the man backed away, allowing her to escape through the bus’s open door.

“I started walking up the hill there and I was bleeding terribly and I was alone,” she said, noting that a Jewish passerby picked her up and drove her to the hospital. Reports indicate she was admitted with several injuries, including punctured lungs.

In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Tag Cloud