Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Archive for June, 2016

ACLU Lawyers Blame Christians For Orlando Terror Attack


waving flagWritten by Kevin Daley, 06/12/2016

URL of the original posting site: http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/12/aclu-lawyers-blames-christians-for-orlando-terror-attack/

delusional file

Several American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) attorneys took to Twitter to blame the “Christian Right” for Sunday’s deadly terrorist attack at a nightclub in Orlando, Fla., which left 50 dead and 53 injured.

Chase Strangio, a staff attorney with the ACLU’s LGBT and AIDS Project, claimed the social and political environment cultivated by Christian conservatives in recent months was to blame for the shooting at Pulse, a nightclub popular with Orlando’s LGBT community.

Which Religion Is To Blame For The Orlando Terrorist Attacks?

Strangio also called for solidarity between American Muslims and LGBT communities, arguing both are maligned and oppressed by the religious right.

Federal law enforcement officials have identified ?????????, of Port St. Lucie, Fla., as the alleged shooter. ///// father told NBC news his son harbored anti-gay sentiments, and said his son gave voice to those feelings recently during a trip to Miami, where he saw two men kissing.

Another ACLU attorney, Eunice Hyon Min Rho, who specializes in election and religious liberty law, impugned the motives of Republican lawmakers who expressed sympathy for the victims, by pointing out many were sponsors of the First Amendment Defense Act, legislation the ACLU considers anti-LGBT.

She further characterized expressions of solidarity as “useless,” as many of the victims could be people of color, who she contends are regularly stigmatized by Republican legislators. Little demographic data is currently available about the victims, as many have not yet been identified.

She went on to retweet a user who claimed many public officials would use the auspices of an LGBT tragedy to pursue an “anti-Muslim agenda.”

The ACLU did not respond to The Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

Update: Rho appears to have deleted her Twitter account. Multiple attempts to locate her account on the social media platform were unsuccessful.

culture of deceit and lies Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

We Need to Stop Blaming ‘Guns,’ and Start Blaming Radical Islam


waving flagBy Rob Knowles June 13, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://constitution.com/need-stop-blaming-guns-start-blaming-radical-islam/

Early Sunday morning, a gunman opened fire in a gay night club called “Pulse” in Orlando, Florida. At this point, the death toll stands at approximately 49, making this horrifying tragedy the deadliest mass-shooting in U.S. history, as well as the most devastating terror attack on American soil since 9/11.

As expected, the Left has immediately jumped to gun control:

or01 or02

The reason liberals are rushing to blame guns is because they don’t have anything else to blame. The shooter, Omar Saddiqui Mateen, was a radical Islamist.democrat problem

According to CNN:

“[Mateen] called 911 around the time of the attack to pledge allegiance to ISIS and mentioned the Boston bombers, according to a U.S. official.”

This was an act of radical Islamic terrorism. However, the Left cannot acknowledge such a thing because they refuse to identify the enemy. We’re dealing with an ideology that isn’t simply religious, but political and cultural. Radical Islamists in the Middle East routinely execute homosexuals by various means, including tossing them off buildings.

Mateen’s target wasn’t random. He sought out a club full of individuals whom he believed should be put to death, and systematically slaughtered them. This was not a random act of violence. This was not a “mass-shooting” in the way of Sandy Hook. This was not a “hate crime.” Like San Bernardino before it, this was an act of war against western culture by radical Islam.AMEN

I keep seeing posts on social media repeating the same idiotic notion: This wasn’t because of Islam, it was an act of hate. I would follow that up with this: An act of hate because…his radical Islamic ideology teaches him to hate gays.

As Ted Cruz rather brilliantly said yesterday:

“For all the Democrats who are loud champions of the gay and lesbian community whenever there is a culture battle waging, now is the opportunity to speak out against an ideology that calls for the murder of gays and lesbians. ISIS and the theocracy in Iran (supported with American taxpayer dollars) regularly murder homosexuals, throwing them from buildings and burying them under rocks. This is wrong, it is evil, and we must all stand against it…

If you’re a Democratic politician and you really want to stand for LGBT, show real courage and stand up against the vicious ideology that has targeted our fellow Americans for murder.”

If the Left refuses to fight for the people they claim to champion, even when they know in their hearts who the enemy is, they are truly and utterly repugnant.

They can cry for days about how “sensible gun control” would have prevented this massacre, but we don’t know that. Most likely, it wouldn’t have. Other than complete confiscation, there is very little that can be done to “control” guns. Moreover, the sad reality is that in our disturbed world, bad guys will always–let me repeat that–always have access to the weapons they want. The only thing gun control will accomplish is leaving law-abiding Americans unarmed in the face of terror.Disarmed Citizenry

So let’s place the blame where it belongs–on radical Islamic ideology. If we keep our eyes firmly shut, the blood will never stop running, and eventually, we won’t have any left.

culture of deceit and lies Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

DEAR AMERICA: Do You Believe CAIR Is ‘Sickened and Heartbroken’ Over Orlando Terrorist Attack?


waving flagPublished on June 13, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://clashdaily.com/2016/06/dear-america-believe-cair-sickened-heartbroken-orlando-terrorist-attack/

CAIR has released a statement about the Orlando attack during a press conference — do you believe that their message is genuine and true?

American Muslim leaders are condemning the attack on a gay nightclub in Orlando that killed 49 people and wounded more than 50 others.

Nihad Awad, the executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, called the killings a hate crime and said the group has no tolerance for extremism of any kind.

A law enforcement official has said the gunman, Omar Mateen, called 911 from the nightclub and expressed allegiance to an Islamic State leader.

The suspect’s father, Mir Seddique, told NBC News that his son got upset when he saw two men kissing and that the attack ‘had nothing to do with religion.’

 

A former Afghan official says the father of the Orlando nightclub gunman is a native of Afghanistan who appears on a television program known for ‘its anti-US tirades’ and ‘pro-Taliban’ remarks.

Awad says members of the LGBT community have stood with Muslims in the past and today they stand that community.

‘We are sickened and heartbroken by this appalling attack. Our hearts and prayers are with the families and loved ones of the victims. There can never be any justification for such cowardly and criminal acts, period,’ Awad said in a statement.America are you really paying attention

Read the rest of the story at: Daily Mail

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Armed Citizens May Be the Solution to Terrorism, Says Interpol Secretary General


waving flagWritten by |Oct. 22, 2013

qmeme_1465834933674_675

Open Carry / formatted_dad / photo on flickr

What do you do when terrorists turn from attacking well-protected government buildings and transportation centers in favor of anyplace that people may congregate? Specifically, how do you address bloody scenarios like the assault on the Westgate mall in Nairobi, Kenya by the Islamist group al-Shabaab, which killed at least 61 civilians? Well, the Secretary General of Interpol, the international police-coordination organization, says you either start providing “extraordinary security” perimeters around anything that might be a target, or else let people carry the means to defend themselves. Surprisingly, he seems to lean toward empowering individuals to take responsibility for their own defense.

In an interview with ABC News, Interpol Secretary General Ronald K. Noble said:

“Societies have to think about how they’re going to approach the problem,” Noble said. “One is to say we want an armed citizenry; you can see the reason for that. Another is to say the enclaves are so secure that in order to get into the soft target you’re going to have to pass through extraordinary security.”

“Enclaves” translates as “any place people gather,” which could be a mall, a theater, a supermarket, a town square… That’s an awful lot of secure perimeters to set up. No doubt, plenty of police unions and politically well-connected private security companies would love to see that effort made, but are you really going to throw a cordon up every time a few people gather to chat about the weather or have a barbecue? Unusually for a government official (he was the Undersecretary for Enforcement of the United States Department of the Treasury, in charge of the Secret Service as well as the ATF), Noble obviously sees that as a bit of a daunting challenge. He adds:

“Ask yourself: If that was Denver, Col., if that was Texas, would those guys have been able to spend hours, days, shooting people randomly?” Noble said, referring to states with pro-gun traditions. “What I’m saying is it makes police around the world question their views on gun control. It makes citizens question their views on gun control. You have to ask yourself, ‘Is an armed citizenry more necessary now than it was in the past with an evolving threat of terrorism?’ This is something that has to be discussed.”

“For me it’s a profound question,” he continued. “People are quick to say ‘gun control, people shouldn’t be armed,’ etc., etc. I think they have to ask themselves: ‘Where would you have wanted to be? In a city where there was gun control and no citizens armed if you’re in a Westgate mall, or in a place like Denver or Texas?'” 

Ronald. K. NobleInterpolI’d answer that allowing people to proactively respond to threats has always been a better idea that trying to anticipate what assailants might consider to be an easy target. You can’t fortify every gathering on the planet, and each security perimeter will still have potential victims within it for the enterprising terrorist who can penetrate “extraordinary security.”

The Secretary General, by the way, also called for tighter passport controls, so his comments weren’t a totally unmixed bag for those of us favoring personal liberty and autonomy. Travel has become an increasingly bureaucratic ordeal over the past century, and that doesn’t look likely to let up soon.

Noble (pictured at right) was first appointed to oversee Interpol’s day-to-day work in 2000, and his third five-year term is up in 2015. After voicing even measured support for armed citizens in a world where governments have never much liked the idea, let’s see if he makes it to through the full gig.Disarmed Citizenry

Update: Minneapolis police officers may agree, even by accident, with Secretary General Noble. They’re objecting to an NFL policy banning off-duty cops from taking their guns into stadiums. Without their guns, they point out, they won’t be able to respond to attacks.

J.D. Tuccille is a former managing editor of Reason.com and current contributing editor.

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Political INCORRECTNESS from the Perspective of Michael Ramirez


waving flagDrawn by Michael Ramirez – Saturday, June 11, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://townhall.com/political-cartoons/michaelramirez/

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Direction Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


Stupid POTUS Tricks

Obama’s terrorism Policy will never eliminate tragedies like what happened in Orlando Florida, but it sure makes liberals feel good.

Terrorism Policy Tricks / Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2016.

To see more Legal Insurrection Branco cartoons, click here.

A.F. Branco Coffee Table Book <—- Order Here!

Armed Criminals and Dictators Disarmed Citizenry Hey Leftist Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

The Heritage Foundation


waving flagBusiness Owners ‘Nervous and Unhappy’ After San Diego Raises Minimum Wage to $11.50

Majority of ANTI-GUN Politicians are CRIMINALS–Here is the List


waving flagBy Rob Morse  Posted on June 10, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://girlsjustwannahaveguns.com/majority-of-anti-gun-politicians-are-criminals-here-is-the-list/

democrat problem

Not all of the anti-gun politicians are corrupt, but many of them certainly are.  Here are a few dozen examples to prove my point.

California Senator Leland Yee authored many anti-rights bills that heavily burdened gun owners.  Yee was named to the Gun Violence Prevention Honor Roll by the anti-rights Brady Campaign.  Yee was charged with gun trafficking and public corruption.  Yee is now serving time in federal prison.Armed

Dean Skelos was Majority Leader of the New York State Senate.  Skelos helped pass the infamous anti-rights New York SAFE Act.  This legislation required gun registration and was so burdensome that even the New York police ignored it.  Skelos was convicted of federal corruption charges.

Speaker of the New York State Assembly Sheldon Silver also helped pass the New York SAFE Act.  The Brady campaign thanked Silver by name for his anti-gun legislation.  Silver was arrested, tried and convicted on seven counts of corruption.

President of the California Senate, Kevin De Leon is an active anti-rights legislator.  DeLeon is the current author of at least four anti-rights bills this year that limit honest gun owners.  Senator De Leon is also named 47 times in a current FBI probe of corruption and bribery.

Former California Democratic Assemblyman Tom Calderon plead guilty to one count of money laundering in a corruption case involving him and his brother.  His brother is former state Senator Ron Calderon.  The Calderon brothers were consistent anti-rights voters.

Missouri State Senator Jamilah Nasheen was arrested at a protest in Ferguson, Missouri.  Senator Nasheen has a very strong anti-rights voting record against honest gun owners.  Senator Nasheen was arrested for carrying a gun while intoxicated.

Let me paint with a broader brush for a minute. Some 25 anti-rights mayors in Michael Bloomberg’s group Mayors Against Illegal Guns have been charged with crimes.  The majority of those charged were convicted, though some convictions remain open on appeal.  In contrast, Barack Obama was never charged for selling two thousand illegal guns to Mexican drug gangs.  Hillary Clinton took millions of dollars in foreign bribes.  Clinton also called the NRA the political enemy of which she is most proud.  Clinton is currently under investigation by the FBI for security violations while Secretary of State.

Not all of the anti-gun politicians are corrupt, but that is the way to bet.  No wonder these politicians want to disarm honest civilians.

Hey Leftist Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Trump U. Judge Linked to RACIST Leader, ‘Whites Need to go…’


waving flagPosted on June 11, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://girlsjustwannahaveguns.com/trump-u-judge-linked-to-racist-leader-whites-need-to-go/

Screen Shot 2016-06-11 at 10.31.30 AMYikes! This looks way bad for the judge. So much for tolerance and acceptance of all cultures. Check it out.

By Brandon Darby

The lawyers’ association to which Judge Gonzalo Curiel belongs was co-founded by a man who publicly bragged about Hispanics taking over California and all of the state’s governmental institutions–and insisted that whites should go back to Europe. The group, the California La Raza Lawyers Association, has been widely defended as “not pro-Mexican” by mainstream media outlets, though the outlets failed to report the inflammatory statements of the man listed first as a founder, Mario Obledo.

A 2010 Snopes report asserts that the first-listed co-founder of Judge Curiel’s group, Obledo, made the statements. They reported:

Mario Obledo was a co-founder of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF) and the La Raza Lawyers of California bar association, and he formerly served as California’s Secretary of Health and Welfare. We don’t know exactly when and where he first made his controversial statement about California’s becoming a “Hispanic state,” but he has confirmed he said it at least twice: during an appearance on Ray Briem’s talk radio show in May or June of 1998, and again on Tom Leykis’ talk radio show:

Obledo: “We’re going to take over all the political institutions of California. In five years the Hispanics are going to be the majority population of this state.”

Caller: “You also made the statement that California is going to become a Hispanic state, and if anyone doesn’t like it, they should leave. Did you say that?”

Obledo: “I did. They ought to go back to Europe.”

The statements were also reported by the New York Times in their 2010 obituary for Obledo. They wrote:

When someone put up a sign at the California border saying, “Illegal Immigration State,” he threatened to burn it down personally.

He ignited an explosive response in 1998 when he said in a radio interview that Hispanics were on the way to taking over all of California’s political institutions. He suggested that people who did not like it go back to Europe.

When tolerance becomes a one way street Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Collection of Politically INCORRECT Cartoons Found This Week


waving flag

bg060816dAPC20160608034521 ca062713dBP20130625084540 kn061016dAPC20160608084643 sit roll over

 

Direction Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

 

LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Report


waving flagFriday, June 10, 2016

I knew you

For pro-life news updated throughout the day, visit LifeNews.com.

 

Hillary Clinton Tells Planned Parenthood: “As President I Will Always Have Your Back”
Abortion activist Hillary Clinton made her first speech as the Democratic presidential nominee to the nation’s largest abortion corporation, Planned Parenthood.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Hillary Clinton Says Donald Trump is “Frightening” Because He Opposes Abortion
Hillary Clinton will be addressing a rally for the Planned Parenthood abortion business today and, according to news report about her planned speech, she will aggressively attack Donald Trump for campaigning on a pro-life position on abortion.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Donald Trump Tells Pro-Life Voters: “I’m With You 100%,” “We Must Protect the Sanctity of Life”
Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, gave a speech today before thousands of pro-life voters at the Faith and Freedom Coalition’s “Road to Majority Conference” in Washington.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Hillary Clinton Praises Planned Parenthood Doc Caught Selling Aborted Babies’ Heads
During her speech to the Planned Parenthood abortion business today, Hillary Clinton singled out for praise a Planned Parenthood abortion practitioner. .

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

 

Pro-Life Women Leaders: “We Can’t Celebrate Pro-Abortion Hillary Clinton as First Woman President”
Hillary Clinton will be addressing a rally for the Planned Parenthood abortion business today — with her first speech as the first female presidential nominee coming to the nation’s largest abortion corporation.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

God’s Blessing: Meeting the People Who Prayed Outside the Hospital Where I Survived an Abortion
Everyone has a story. Everyone. But every story is different, and how we are called to use our story is also different.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Looking for an inspiring and motivating speaker for your pro-life event? Don’t have much to spend on a high-priced speaker costing several thousand dollars? Contact LifeNews at news@lifenews.com about having LifeNews Editor Steven Ertelt speak at your event.
Daily Pro-Life News Report
Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.

Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright 2003-2016 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.

Prayer for revival Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

I Wish I Had Been Told About These Risks Before I Had Gender Surgery


waving flagWritten by Walt Heyer / June 09, 2016

True compassion is acknowledging the mental disorders and providing effective, sound treatment in an effort to slow the staggering number of suicides, before rushing to perform irreversible surgeries. (Photo: iStock Photos)

<!– True compassion is acknowledging the mental disorders and providing effective, sound treatment in an effort to slow the staggering number of suicides, before rushing to perform irreversible surgeries. (Photo: iStock Photos) –>

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Walt Heyer

Many Americans are unaware of the serious problems that face transgender persons. More than 50 percent had active suicidal thoughts and 45 percent had had a major depressive episode.

For instance, a 2016 study comparing 20 Lebanese transgender participants to 20 control subjects reported that transgender individuals suffer from more psychiatric pathologies compared to the general population. More than 50 percent had active suicidal thoughts and 45 percent had had a major depressive episode.

While it may not be politically correct to link psychological disorders with the transgender population, the researchers see the evidence that a link exists. As a former transgender person, I wish the guy who approved me for gender surgery would have told me about the risks.

Quick to Diagnose

The experience of many gender-confused individuals is that medical professionals are quick to reach a diagnosis of gender dysphoria and recommend immediate cross-gender hormone therapy and irreversible reassignment surgery without investigating and treating the coexisting issues. Research has found that powerful psychological issues, such as anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, or alcohol or drug dependence often accompany gender dysphoria.

study published in JAMA Pediatrics in March 2016 shows a high prevalence of psychiatric diagnoses in a sample of 298 young transgender women aged 16 through 29 years old.

More than 40 percent had coexisting mental health or substance dependence diagnoses. One in five had two or more psychiatric diagnoses. The most commonly occurring disorders were major depressive episodes and non-alcohol psychoactive substance use dependence.

Yet, transgender individuals are never required to undergo any objective test to prove their gender dysphoria—because no diagnostic objective test exists.

The cause of this condition can’t be verified through lab results, a brain scan, or review of the DNA make-up.

Research studies from 2013 and 2009 looking for a “transgender gene” showed not a smidgeon of abnormality in the genetic make-up that causes someone to be transgender.

No alterations in the main sex-determining genes in male-to-female transsexual individuals were found, suggesting strongly that male-born transgender persons are normal males biologically.get over it

Psychological Care Urgently Needed

The study concluded that improved access to medical and psychological care “are urgently needed to address mental health and substance dependence disorders in this population.” On the contrary, it did not conclude that improved access to bathrooms, hormones, or surgery are urgently needed.

A 2015 study of 118 individuals diagnosed with gender dysphoria found that 29.6 percent were also found to have dissociative disorders and a high prevalence of lifetime major depressive episodes (45.8 percent), suicide attempts (21.2 percent), and childhood trauma (45.8 percent).

It also remarked that differentiating between a diagnosis of dissociative disorder and gender dysphoria is difficult because the two can closely resemble each other.

Another study found a “surprisingly high prevalence of emotional maltreatment” in the 41 transsexuals studied. It called for further investigation to clarify the effects of traumatic childhood experiences and the correlation between transsexualism and dissociative identity.

That finding tracks with what I experienced in my transgender life. In my life and in the lives of those whose families contact me, traumatic childhood experiences are present 100 percent of the time.

Childhood Gender Dysphoria

One area where medical professionals should tread lightly is in the diagnosis and treatment of children who have gender identity issues.

A 2015 study aimed to gather input from pediatric endocrinologists, psychologists, psychiatrists, and ethicists—both those in favor and those opposed to early treatment—to further the ethical debate. The results showed no consensus on many basic topics of childhood gender dysphoria and insufficient research to support any recommendations for childhood treatments, including the currently published guidelines that recommend suppressing puberty with drugs until age 16, after which cross-sex hormones may be given.

An analysis of the 38 youth referrals for gender dysphoria to the Pediatric Endocrinology Clinic at the University School of Medicine in Indianapolis showed that more than half had psychiatric and/or developmental comorbidities.

Without sufficient research and consensus on treatment of children diagnosed with gender dysphoria, and knowing over half have coexisting disorders, any invasive treatment, even if recommended by the current guidelines, is simply an experiment. It’s time to stop using children as experiments.

Transgender Persons Are Struggling Psychologically

Transgender individuals need psychotherapy not access to cross-sex restrooms, showers, and dressing areas. Blaming society for the ills of transgender persons will not improve their diagnosis and treatment.

Reckless disregard for the mental disorders in favor of enforcing preferred pronouns is madness. It’s time to show compassion by telling the truth and stop pretending they are born that way. True compassion is acknowledging the mental disorders and providing effective, sound treatment in an effort to slow the staggering number of suicides, before rushing to perform irreversible surgeries.AMENPrayer for revival

 

QUESTION: Would You Be SHOCKED If The Obamas Started Attending MOSQUE After Leaving Office?


waving flagPublished on June 10, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://clashdaily.com/2016/06/question-shocked-obamas-started-attending-mosque-leaving-office/

muslim-obamaWould it be surprising to you if the Obamas started attending a Mosque after they left the White House?

Or do you think that they have always sided with Islam?

Watch the video below and then vote!

is bho muslim

Direction Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Lisa Benson’s Contribution to Political INCORRECTNESS


waving flagFrom the Pen of Lisa Benson – Friday, June 10, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://townhall.com/political-cartoons/lisabenson

Political Cartoons by Lisa Benson

Direction Prayer for revival Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


waving flagArt of the Crooked Deal

Many feel that the Hillary Uranium deal with Russia put her in the same category as Benedict Arnold, the American revolutionary war traitor.

Hillary Uranium Deal / Political Cartoon by A.F. Branco.

A.F. Branco Coffee Table Book <—- Order Here!

Direction Prayer for revival Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

What Christians are now being FORCED to do for Muslims makes my blood boil


waving flagWritten by Allen West on June 8, 2016

Italian-Catholic-Praying-640x480

I often say, “when tolerance becomes a one way street, it leads to cultural suicide,” and it appears we have a very appalling example to share. It just never ceases to amaze me how we are so bent on political correctness when it comes to acquiescing our Judeo-Christian faith heritage before Islam. We have these “coexist” bumper stickers that should read “submit”…or even better, “Dhimmi.”

As reported by Breitbart.com, “Parishioners visiting a church in Italy were told they must “pray in silence” so as not to disturb African migrants being housed there. Some of the faithful hoping to practice their Christianity at the church of St. Anthony in Ventimiglia were surprised when they were told by Caritas volunteers they couldn’t recite the rosary and would instead have to pray in silence out of respect to migrants who are living there. Do you want

Caritas is ostensibly a Catholic charity, although much of its resources are spent on facilitating mass migration to Europe; the organization even boasts that it contributes to and seeks to influence European Union (EU) “asylum” policies. Caritas reports that they have been distributing 600 meals a day to migrants in Ventimiglia.

After one of the female parishioners requested that the migrants be taken to another church so that she could recite the rosary, the parish priest, Don Rito, appeared and accompanied her and the other visitors to another church.

The Northern Italian town of 55,000 people has recently been overwhelmed with hundreds of migrants. More than 50 Africans have been crossing into Ventimiglia every day, hoping that from there they will be able to enter France. The town’s mayor, Enrico Ioculano, has said that this is “an untenable situation”. Mr. Ioculano has admitted that Ventimiglia is struggling to meet the costs of the migrant influx.”

I just have to ask, where is Saudi Arabia in all of this? Apparently someone in the Saudi kingdom, perhaps the royal House of Saud family, had enough money to finance the 9-11 terrorists. So why don’t they have enough money to house and feed their Muslim brethren?AMEN

But here’s the real kicker: why are the parishioners of the church told to be silent and suppress their Christian worship? Why did it seem more accommodating to remove the parishioner and take her to another church? Not only are we watching a blatant invasion but also a complete surrender to those who should be so appreciative and seeking out the Lord God of those granting them food and shelter. What misguided sense of political correctness are we witnessing here?Islamanipulation

Let me make a simple parallel. Do any of you think if Christian migrants ended up in an Islamic country that imams, clerics, and mullahs would demand that the public call to worship over the muezzin be halted, silenced? Heck, just imagine what would happen here in the United States if some people demanded that the muezzins be silenced. There would be complete and total outrage and calls of Islamophobia and bigotry.

Who are these Caritas volunteers who are facilitating the violation of national sovereignty? And are they aware of the threats of Islamic jihadist groups, namely ISIS, to infiltrate the migrant masses?

There is nothing noble about this. It is instead highly disturbing. Surrendering one’s principles and values all for what, some inane sense of multiculturalism?

“Breitbart London has previously reported on churches across Europe where welcoming migrants has taken precedence over Christian worship. In Germany, an evangelical church stripped out pews, the altar, and pulpit as well as all symbols of Christianity when offering it as a new home for migrants — so as to make them feel “more welcome in their new home.”America are you paying attention

This is not about just stripping out pews and symbols of our Christian faith or silencing our prayer. This is about the abject subjugation and admittance of inferiority. When you invite someone into your home, you don’t remove your furniture and items near to your heart. However, as with the visit of the Iranian delegation to Italy and the Vatican, art pieces were covered so as not to offend. Have we become so ashamed of our culture and civilization?

Remember: when tolerance becomes a one-way street, it leads to cultural suicide — and just look for the comments of the slack-jawed surrender monkeys who will accuse me of promoting hate. It reflects a deranged mind that embraces cowardice and would rather exist on its knees, than stand on its feet.When tolerance becomes a one way street

And that, ladies and gents, is why Secretary of State John Kerry could thank the Iranians for taking care of our ten US Sailors who they put on their knees at gun point…sadly, the progressive socialist left prefers that position.

Not. Me.

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Report


waving flagThursday, June 9, 2016

For pro-life news updated throughout the day, visit LifeNews.com.

 

Hillary Clinton to Give Keynote Address to Her Best Friends at Planned Parenthood
Hillary Clinton will give a keynote address tomorrow to her best friends at the Planned Parenthood abortion business. But two pro-life groups will be on hand to protest the event.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Obama Endorses Abortion Activist Hilary Clinton for President: “I’m With Her”
President Barack Obama has been the most pro-abortion president in the nation’s history and today he endorsed another abortion activist to take his place when he leaves the White House.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

UN Slams Ireland for Protecting Unborn Children, Says Abortion Ban is “Cruel and Inhuman”
The United Nations Human Rights Committee wants fewer humans to worry about in Ireland.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Doctors Told Pregnant Mom With Cancer “You’re Gonna Have to Terminate Your Child”
Lately, more doctors appear to be steering women toward abortion when something goes wrong during pregnancy.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

 

Polls Shows Americans are Still Pro-Life as People Say Abortion is Morally Wrong
A Gallup poll conducted May 4-8 finds that more Americans still find abortion “morally wrong” (47%) than “morally acceptable” (43%).

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Democrats Lose Bid to Force Americans to Pay for Abortions in the Nation’s Capital
Americans who don’t want to be force to pay for aborting babies with their taxpayer dollars won a hard-fought victory in the halls of Congress.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

South Carolina Governor Joins With Kids to Sign Bill Banning Abortions After 20 Weeks
Yesterday was a special day for the people of South Carolina and unborn children as the state’s governor participate in a special ceremony to sign legislation that would ban abortions int he state after 20 weeks.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Pro-Life Group Files Lawsuit to Overturn New California Law Legalizing Assisted Suicide
A pro-life legal group filed a lawsuit against California’s dangerous new assisted suicide law on Wednesday, saying it could lead to abuses of the state’s most vulnerable citizens.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Looking for an inspiring and motivating speaker for your pro-life event? Don’t have much to spend on a high-priced speaker costing several thousand dollars? Contact LifeNews at news@lifenews.com about having LifeNews Editor Steven Ertelt speak at your event.
Daily Pro-Life News Report
Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.

Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright 2003-2016 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.

I AM A PERSON with Poem Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Newt Just Hit The Nail On The Head…Says This Is Exactly What The Anti-Trump Protesters Are Doing


waving flagAuthored by Colleen Conley June 6, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://www.tpnn.com/2016/06/06/newt-just-hit-nail-head-says-exactly-anti-trump-protesters/

“This is 1968 all over again.”

So said Newt Gingrich in a wide ranging interview with Chris Wallace on Fox News, during which they discussed increasing violence seen at Trump rallies in which hard-core leftists and — in the case of an event held in San Jose — angry immigrants have been causing mayhem.Liberal reality

The host of “Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace” referred to the brutal assaults on Trump supporters and asked the former speaker, “If these violent anti-Trump rallies continue into the convention, into the fall, how do you see it factoring into the campaign?”

“The country will become enraged,” responded Gingrich emphatically. His “1968” comment referred to the Democratic National Convention in Chicago where rage turned into street violence that became widespread.

Gingrich also recalled events in Madison, Wisconsin, when union members protested en masse against Gov. Scott Walker for doing what the people elected the Republican chief executive to do — rein in the burgeoning costs being forced upon the taxpayers by public sector unions.

“If Donald Trump is serious about changing Washington, every federal employee union will be in the streets, because the first thing you have to do to be serious is make it possible to fire corrupt, dishonest workers.”Mob Rule

When Wallace asked if there might be a backlash, Gingrich stated, “When people see the American flag being burned, they don’t side with the people burning the American flag.”

“I think it drives Hillary and Sanders into a very narrow box,” Newt said, adding:

“This is 1968 all over again. This is the hard left saying “If you don’t do what we want, we’re going to be physically violent and we’re going to pick on some woman who can’t defend herself,”” said Gingrich. “I don’t think that is sustainable and I think the American people will be repulsed by the idea that the hard left gets to dictate to the rest of us.”

Only a few days ago, longtime conservative stalwart Pat Buchanan said much the same thing as the former speaker — that the mayhem outside rallies could build credibility for Trump and help give credence to the businessman’s campaign, as most believe that the protestors themselves are more to blame for the violence than the candidate or his supporters are.

On the Fox News show on Sunday, Gingrich also spoke about the uptick in criticisms made by Hillary Clinton against the likely Republican nominee on the campaign trail.

Gingrich slammed Clinton’s attacks on the billionaire businessman’s ethics, saying, “You have to love the degree to which Hillary lives in an alternative universe in which nothing she has done counts against whatever she says.”Direction

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

From My Email Inbox


waving flagThis is from a Democrat, but first an American, when men were men and said what was on their mind.  Today, they can’t even acknowledge their gender without being attacked by the PCers. This is priceless!

Political Correctness per Harry Truman
What is meant by the modern term referred to as ‘POLITICAL CORRECTNESS’.. 

The definition is found in 4 telegrams at the Truman Library and Museum in Independence, Missouri. The following are copies of four telegrams between President Harry Truman and Gen Douglas MacArthur on the day before the actual signing of the WWII Surrender Agreement in September 1945..  The contents of those four telegrams below are exactly as received at the end of the war – not a word has been added or deleted!

(1) Tokyo,Japan  0800-September 1,1945  To: President Harry S Truman   From: General D A MacArthur      

Tomorrow we meet with those yellow-bellied bastards and sign the Surrender  Documents, any last minute instructions? 

(2) Washington, D C  1300-September 1, 1945  To: D A MacArthur  From: H S Truman       

Congratulations, job well done, but you must tone down your obvious dislike  of the Japanese when discussing the terms of the surrender with the press, because  some of your remarks are fundamentally not politically correct! 

(3) Tokyo, Japan   1630-September 1, 1945  To: H S Truman  From: D A MacArthur and C H Nimitz      

Wilco Sir, but both Chester and I are somewhat confused, exactly what does  the term politically correct mean? 

(4) Washington, D C  2120-September 1, 1945  To: D A MacArthur/C H Nimitz From: H S Truman      

Political Correctness is a doctrine, recently fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and promoted by a sick mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a piece of shit by the clean end!

Now, with special thanks to the Truman Museum and Harry himself, you and I finally have a full understanding of what ‘POLITICAL CORRECTNESS’ really means…..

cause of death Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

At least 12 released Guantanamo detainees implicated in attacks on Americans


 Authored by Adam Goldman and Missy Ryan of The Washington Post

An American flag flies behind the barbed and razor wire at the Camp Delta detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

© Brennan Linsley/AP An American flag flies behind the barbed and razor wire at the Camp Delta detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

 

The Obama administration believes that at least 12 detainees released from the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, have launched attacks against U.S. or allied forces in Afghanistan, killing about a half-dozen Americans, according to current and former U.S. officials.

In March, a senior Pentagon official made a startling admission to lawmakers when he acknowledged that former Guantanamo inmates were responsible for the deaths of Americans overseas. The official, Paul Lewis, who oversees Guantanamo issues at the Defense Department, provided no details, and the Obama administration has since declined to elaborate publicly on his statement because the intelligence behind it is classified.Bull

But The Washington Post has learned additional details about the suspected attacks, including the approximate number of detainees and victims involved and the fact that, while most of the incidents were directed at military personnel, the dead also included one American civilian: a female aid worker who died in Afghanistan in 2008. The officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive matter, declined to give an exact number for Americans killed or wounded in the attacks, saying the figure is classified.

Lewis’s statement had drawn scrutiny on Capitol Hill, where some lawmakers see the violence against Americans as further evidence that the president’s plans for closing the prison are misguided and dangerous. They also describe the administration’s unwillingness to release information about the attacks as another instance of its use of high levels of classification to avoid discussion of a politically charged issue that could heighten political opposition to its plans.you think

One U.S. official familiar with the intelligence said that nine of the detainees suspected in the attacks are now dead or in foreign government custody. The official would not specify the exact number of detainees involved but said it was fewer than 15. All of them were released from Guantanamo Bay under the administration of George W. BushPicture4

The official added: “Because many of these incidents were large-scale firefights in a war zone, we cannot always distinguish whether Americans were killed by the former detainees or by others in the same fight.”Leftist Propagandist

Military and intelligence officials, responding to lawmakers’ requests for greater details, have provided lawmakers with a series of classified documents about the suspected attacks. One recent memo from the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), which was sent to the House Foreign Affairs Committee after Lewis’s testimony, described the attacks, named the detainees involved and provided information about the victims without giving their names.Picture5

But lawmakers are prohibited from discussing the contents of that memo because of its high classification level. A similar document provided last month to the office of Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.), a vocal opponent of Obama’s Guantanamo policy, was so highly classified that even her staff members with a top-secret clearance level were unable to read it.

“There appears to be a consistent and concerted effort by the Administration to prevent Americans from knowing the truth regarding the terrorist activities and affiliations of past and present Guantanamo detainees,” Ayotte wrote in a letter to Obama this week, urging him to declassify information about how many U.S. and NATO personnel have been killed by former detainees.

Rep. Edward R. Royce (R-Calif.), who chairs the House Foreign Affairs Committee, has also written legislation that would require greater transparency surrounding the transfer of Guantanamo detainees. Royce and Ayotte are among the lawmakers who opposed a road map for closing the prison that the White House submitted to Congress earlier this year. That plan would require moving some detainees to U.S. prisons and resettling the rest overseas.

“The administration is releasing dangerous terrorists to countries that can’t control them, and misleading Congress in the process,” Royce said in a statement. “The president should halt detainee transfers immediately and be honest with the American people.”AMEN

Just under 700 detainees have been released from Guantanamo since the prison opened in 2002; 80 inmates remain.

Secrecy about the top-security prison, perched on an inaccessible corner of Cuba, is nothing new. The Bush administration for years refused provide a roster of detainees until it was forced to do so in a Freedom of Information Act case in 2006. To this day, reporters have never been able to visit Camp 7, a classified facility that holds 14 high-value detainees, including the five men on trial for organizing the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

Both the Bush and Obama administrations have provided only limited information on current and former detainees; most of what the public knows about them comes from defense lawyers or from documents released by WikiLeaks.

According to a 2012 report from the House Armed Services Committee, the Defense Intelligence Agency ended the practice of naming some suspected recidivists in 2009 when officials became concerned that it would endanger sources and methods.

National Security Council spokesman Myles Caggins said it was difficult to discuss specific cases in detail because the information was classified.

“But, again, we are committed to being forthcoming with the American people about our safe and responsible approach to Guantanamo detainee transfers, including about possible detainee re-engagement in terrorist activities,” he said.Picture6

One Republican aide who has reviewed the classified material about the attacks on Americans said the information has been “grossly overclassified.”REALLY

Administration officials say that recidivism rates for released Guantanamo inmates remain far lower than those for federal offenders. According to a recent study, almost half of all federal offenders released in 2005 were “rearrested for a new crime or rearrested for a violation of supervision conditions.” Among former Guantanamo detainees, the total number of released detainees who are suspected or confirmed of reengaging is about 30 percent, according to U.S. intelligence.

Nearly 21 percent of those released prior to 2009 have reengaged in militancy, officials say, compared with about 4.5 percent of the 158 released by Obama.

Human rights activists say the statistics are suspect and cannot be verified because the administration provides almost no information about whom it is counting and why.

Most of those suspected of re-engagement are Afghan, reflecting the large numbers of Afghans detained after the Sept. 11 attacks and the ongoing war there. More than 200 Afghan prisoners have been repatriated from the prison.

Officials declined to identify the woman killed in Afghanistan in 2008. But there are two female aid workers killed that year who might fit the description. Cydney Mizell, a 50-year-old employee of the Asian Rural Life Development Foundation, was abducted in Kandahar as she drove to work. Her body was never recovered, according to a former colleague who said he was told about a month later that she had died.

Another woman, Nicole Dial, 30, a Trinidadian American who worked for the International Rescue Committee, was shot and killed the same year south of Kabul, along with two colleagues. Relatives of Mizell and Dial said they have not been in touch with the FBI for years. Dial’s brother said he was unaware of a former Guantanamo detainee being involved in his sister’s killing. Mizell’s stepmother said she was never told the exact circumstances of her daughter’s death or who abducted her.

“She was definitely killed,” Peggy Mizell said. “I figured she was shot.”

Julie Tate contributed to this report.

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Liberal BS Regarding ‘Love & Tolerance’ BRUTALLY Destroyed In EPIC Meme


waving flag

Published on June 9, 2016

This meme completely destroys the liberal BS that wants you to believe they are ‘loving and tolerant.’

Do you know any libs who are like this? Some will even promote violence against someone who disagrees with them.

Make sure you share this everywhere!

qmeme_1465487668825_251

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

More Political INCORRECTNESS From Michael Ramirez


waving flagFrom the Perspective of Michael Ramirez – Wednesday, June 8, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://townhall.com/political-cartoons/michaelramirez/

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

  Direction true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon by A.F. Branco


waving flagIn Your Face Lawlessness

In your face Lawlessness and disrespect toward our immigration laws is an insult to our country and it’s “legal” Immigrants.AMEN

Lawless Immigration / Cartoon by A.F. Branco.

To see more Legal Insurrection Branco cartoons, click here.

A.F.Branco Coffee Table Book <—- Order Here!

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

From My Email Inbox


waving flagTo all the Bernie Sanders supporters who want Free everything.  This message describes life in Denmark.

In Europe, Denmark is cited as a benchmark for the Utopian Society that the USA should emulate.  Free everything…..just as Bernie Sanders proposes.  Here’s an assessment from one who lives there!

denmark socialism

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Report


waving flagWednesday, June 8, 2016

ROE

For pro-life news updated throughout the day, visit LifeNews.com.

Planned Parenthood Bashes Donald Trump: “He’s a Dangerous Bully” Who Would “Ban Abortions”
The Planned Parenthood abortion business has sent out a fundraising email to its supporters trashing presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump. The email slams Trump as supposedly “racist and sexist.”

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Abortion Survivor on Meeting Her Mom: “I Don’t Think I Was Prepared for That Look In Her Eyes”
If there’s any question about whether an unborn child is a human being worthy of legal protection, abortion survivors erase any doubt. When a baby survives an abortion, the survival is further proof of the humanity of the unborn child who is the subject of the “medical procedure” done specifically to terminate their life.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Pro-Life Groups Defeat “Pro-Life Traitor” Renee Ellmers, Who Almost Sabotaged Abortion Ban
For a short time last year, Congresswoman Renee Ellmers was public enemy number one of the pro-life movement.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Head of Pro-Abortion Group: Americans are Sexist Bigots if They Don’t Vote for Hillary Clinton
It’s hard to come up with anyone who receives better press (aside from pro-lifers) than Cecile Richards, Planned Parenthood’s head honcho. But new heights (or depths) a recent interview conducted by CafeMom’s “The Stir.”

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

 

Hospital Trying to Remove 2-Year-Old Girl’s Life Support Despite Her Parents’ Objections
A Virginia family is fighting for the life of their 2-year-old daughter this week after a hospital said she probably is brain dead.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Assisted Suicide Will be Legal in California Tomorrow, Targeting the Elderly and Disabled
California’s new assisted suicide law takes effect on Thursday, opening the doors to potential abuses of the vulnerable, elderly and disabled.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Planned Parenthood Loses Attempt to Deny Pro-Lifer’s Free Speech Rights Outside Its Clinic
The Thomas More Society-Omaha announced today that charges against pro-life advocate Steve Beller have been dismissed.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Looking for an inspiring and motivating speaker for your pro-life event? Don’t have much to spend on a high-priced speaker costing several thousand dollars? Contact LifeNews at news@lifenews.com about having LifeNews Editor Steven Ertelt speak at your event.
Daily Pro-Life News Report
Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.

Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright 2003-2016 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Iran Denies Entry to U.S. Congressmen Seeking to Inspect Nuke Sites


waving flagBY: June 7, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://freebeacon.com/national-security/iran-denies-entry-u-s-congressman-seeking-inspect-nuke-sites/

Nuclear power plant near  Bushehr, Iran / AP

Nuclear power plant near Bushehr, Iran / AP

Iran informed three leading members of Congress in a letter sent to the State Department last week that their request for travel visas into Iran will be denied on the grounds that no U.S. citizen or official has the right to inspect Iran’s contested nuclear sites, according to a copy of Iran’s response letter obtained by the Free Beacon.

Reps. Mike Pompeo (R., Kan.), Lee Zelden (R., N.Y.), and Frank LoBiondo (R., N.J.) have been trying for months to obtain travel visas to Iran so they can meet with American hostages and inspect Iran’s nuclear sites to ensure compliance with the nuclear accord.

Iranian officials stalled the effort for months and missed their own self-imposed deadline by which they vowed to respond to the request. On June 2, Iranian officials officially informed the State Department they are denying the travel request, according to the letter.

“Despite what you seem to presume, members of the U.S. Congress do not get to dictate the policies of other countries,” the Iranian Foreign Ministry wrote in a letter. “This clearly applies to Iranian visa policies. Bear in mind that as members of the U.S. Congress you are not a global authority.”Bull

Iran is not permitting any participant in last summer’s nuclear agreement to inspect the country’s nuclear sites to ensure compliance with the deal.

“No [deal] participant, including the United States, and certainly no citizen or official of these countries, can arrogate any such right to monitor the implementation of [Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action] to itself, nor are they authorized by the JCPOA or other provisions of international law to encroach upon Iranian sovereignty by claiming such monitoring authority,” Iran maintained.Bull

“In sum,” the letter continues, “we consider your visa request to have been a publicity stunt and not an appropriate request to visit a sovereign country; and it has, and will continue to be, treated in that spirit.”

Pompeo, a member of the House’s intelligence committee, told the Free Beacon on Tuesday that he will continue to pursue his efforts to travel to Iran.

“This letter from Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Zarif is entirely divorced from reality,” Pompeo said. “My two congressional colleagues and I followed all the necessary procedures—filling out applications, writing letters, meeting with staff, following up on the status, and even hand delivering our materials to the Iranian Interests Section—and still the Iranians refuse to reply in a civilized or respectful manner.”

“After being designated by the U.S. Department of State as an official state sponsor of terrorism since 1984, the Islamic Republic of Iran continues to act as a rogue and hostile nation. I ask the Iranian government again—grant me a visa,” the lawmaker said.

The letter sent by Iran was forwarded by the State Department to three Congressmen.

A State Department spokesman told the Free Beacon on Tuesday that it does not take a position on Iran’s rejection of the visa applications.

“We’re aware of the Iranian response to visa applications by some Members of Congress,” the officials said. “The response came to us and we passed it along to the Congress members.  We have no specific comment on the Iranian response to the members of Congress.”

“As we’ve said in the past, given that we have no ability on the ground in Iran to support a congressional delegation, and given the recently updated Travel Warning, we had and continue to have no plans to intervene in the request by these Members for a visa to Iran,” according to the State Department official.Leftist Propagandist

Iran emphasized in its letter that the United States and Iran still do not have friendly relations.

“It bears reminding that Iran and the United States do not have diplomatic relations, and as such, there are no reciprocal monitoring arrangements between the two countries,” Iran writes.

One senior congressional aide informed about Iran’s denial told the Free Beacon that the Islamic Republic’s behavior “does not bode well for the future of this nuclear deal.”

“As a state sponsor of terrorism, Iran’s undated, unsigned, and unserious letter is proof of its obviously hostile attitude,” the official said. “One would hope that the Iranians would act as a civilized nation when dealing with elected officials of the country that is providing billions of dollars in sanction relief.”

“But that is not the case, as this letter, and Iran’s actions demonstrate,” the source continued. “If the visa applications of Congressmen Mike Pompeo, Lee Zeldin, and Frank LoBiondo are so offensive to the Iranian regime, the regime should just reject them. To play games with these elected officials, two of whom are veterans, does not bode well for the future of this nuclear deal and U.S.-Iran relations.”Pitiful-Deal-NRD-600

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Obama Appoints Transgender Woman to Advise on Faith Issues


waving flagAuthored by Fred Lucas / / June 07, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://dailysignal.com/2016/06/07/obama-appoints-transgender-woman-to-advise-on-faith-issues/

“It makes sense the president would appoint a transgender activist as a faith adviser,” Travis Weber, director of the Center for Religious Liberty at the Family Research Council, says. (Photo: Joe Sohm Visions of America/Newscom)

<!– “It makes sense the president would appoint a transgender activist as a faith adviser,” Travis Weber, director of the Center for Religious Liberty at the Family Research Council, says. (Photo: Joe Sohm Visions of America/Newscom) –>

President Barack Obama’s appointment of a Christian transgender activist as an adviser on faith issues represents part of a larger agenda, some social conservatives fear.

Last month, Obama named Barbara Satin, a man who identifies as a woman, to the President’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships.

Satin is the assistant faith works director for the LGBTQ Task Force and a member of the United Church of Christ, serving on the church’s national executive council. The denomination is among the nation’s most open to the LGBT community. Satin has been the chair of LGBT Generations—an advocacy group for gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people—since 1999.More forced

“It makes sense the president would appoint a transgender activist as a faith adviser,” said Travis Weber, director of the Center for Religious Liberty at the Family Research Council, a social conservative advocacy group. “It would be a bigger surprise if he appointed someone with traditional values.”

Obama has been a strong advocate for LGBT issues. The appointment comes amid a major controversy over freedom of religion laws at the state level and as the administration has threatened to withhold federal funds from schools if transgender people can’t use their restroom of choice.More

“The fact that he would appoint someone to the faith-based partnerships council who has been an activist, as she has, fits the Obama administration agenda,” Weber added. “The LGBT agenda has been part of the State Department’s programs overseas, and with Department of Education’s threat to withhold Title IX funding to schools.”Leftist Giant called Tyranny

Satin recently worked on the development of Spirit on the Lake, which the White House describes as an “LGBTQ senior housing project in Minneapolis.” Since 2013, Satin has also served on the board of directors of PFund Foundation, a regional LGBT advocacy group covering Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin, according to the White House.

In a statement on the task force website, Satin said:

Given the current political climate, I believe it’s important that a voice of faith representing the transgender and gender non-conforming community—as well as a person of my years, nearly 82—be present and heard in these vital conversations.Leftist Propagandist

The council is charged with identifying the best practices for delivering social services, “evaluating the need for improvements in the implementation and coordination of public policies relating to faith-based and neighborhood organizations,” and making policy recommendations to the president and other administration officials.More forced

The bigger problem is that the council is not representative of America’s faith community, said John Stemberger, president of the Florida Family Policy Council.

“This is more evidence that Obama is attempting a moral revolution pretending the percentages of America is as diverse as his faith council,” Stemberger said. “It’s not a proportional representation of America.”

He added this appointment ties in with the larger debate.

“This is directly related to the bathroom debate,” Stemberger said. “It’s an attempt to push conservative traditional people of faith on this issue. No world religion embraces this moral agenda, at least not in its orthodox form.”More forced

The council is made up of people from different faiths. On the same day Obama named Satin, he also appointed Naseem Kourosh to the council, the human rights officer at the U.S. Bahá’í Office of Public Affairs, and Manjit Singh, co-founder and chairman of the Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request to comment on this story. However, after Obama made the appointments to the faith council and other panels, he said in a statement: “These fine public servants bring a depth of experience and tremendous dedication to their important roles. I look forward to working with them.” Neither the LGBTQ Task Force nor the United Church of Christ responded to inquiries for this story.engineering

Satin grew up as a Catholic, but left the church later in life, according to her biography on the LGBTQ Religious Archives Network website, which said Satin was “raised as a boy.” Satin later served as a pilot in the U.S. Air Force. Satin married and was the father of three children. The bio says Satin did not begin to explore a different gender identity until the age of 54.

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Ann Coulter Letter: Stunning New Development!!! Media Calls Trump Racist


waving flagCommentary by  Ann Coulter | 

Stunning New Development!!! Media Calls Trump Racist

Annoyed at federal judge Gonzalo P. Curiel’s persistent rulings against him in the Trump University case (brought by a law firm that has paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for speeches by Bill and Hillary), Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump said that maybe it’s because the judge is a second-generation Mexican immigrant.

The entire media — and most of the GOP — have spent 10 months telling us that Mexicans in the United States are going to HATE Trump for saying he’ll build a wall. Now they’re outraged that Trump thinks one Mexican hates him for saying he’ll build a wall.

Curiel has distributed scholarships to illegal aliens.

He belongs to an organization that sends lawyers to the border to ensure that no illegal aliens’ “human rights” are violated.

The name of the organization? The San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association — “La Raza” meaning THE RACE.

Let’s pause to imagine the nomination hearings for a white male who belonged to any organization for white people — much less one with the words “THE RACE” in its title.

The media were going to call Trump a racist whatever he did, and his attack on a Hispanic judge is way better than when they said it was racist for Republicans to talk about Obama’s golfing.

Has anyone ever complained about the ethnicity of white judges or white juries? I’ve done some research and it turns out … THAT’S ALL WE’VE HEARD FOR THE PAST 40 YEARS. The New York Times alone has published hundreds of articles, editorials, op-eds, movie reviews, sports articles and crossword puzzles darkly invoking “white judges” and “all-white” juries, as if that is ipso facto proof of racist justice.

Two weeks ago–that’s not an error; I didn’t mean to type “decades” and it came out “weeks” — the Times published an op-ed by a federal appeals judge stating: “All-white juries risk undermining the perception of justice in minority communities, even if a mixed-race jury would have reached the same verdict or imposed the same sentence.” In other words, even when provably not unfair, white jurors create the “perception” of unfairness solely by virtue of the color of their skin.

Innocence Project co-founder Barry Scheck’s entire career of springing criminals would be gone if it were generally accepted that we can’t question judges or juries based on race or ethnicity. Writing about the release of Glenn Ford, a black man convicted of robbing a jewelry store and murdering the owner, Scheck claimed that one of the most important factors in Ford’s death sentence was the “all-white jury.” On the other hand, the evidence against Ford included: His two black friends telling police he’d shown them jewelry the day of the murder, another Ford acquaintance swearing he’d had a .38 in his waistband — the murder weapon was a .38 — and the gunshot residue on Ford’s hand. His conviction was overturned many years later, on the theory that his black friends had committed the murder, then framed him.

So we know

1) the “real killers” were also black; and

2) any jury would have convicted Ford on that evidence.

Here’s how the Times described Ford’s trial: “A black man convicted of murder by an all-white jury in Louisiana in 1984 and sentenced to die, tapped into an equally old and painful vein of race.”Leftist Propagandist

I have approximately 1 million more examples of the media going mental about a “white judge” or “all-white jury,” and guess what? In none of them were any of the white people involved members of organizations dedicated to promoting white people, called “THE RACE.”

Say, does anyone remember if it ever came up that the Ferguson police force was all white? Someone check that.

I don’t want to upset you New York Times editorial board, but perhaps we should revisit the results of the Nuremberg trials. Those were presided over by – TRIGGER WARNING! – “all white” juries. (How do we really know if Hermann Göring was guilty without hearing women’s and Latino voices?)

The model of a fair jury was the O.J. trial. Nine blacks, one Hispanic and two whites, who had made up their minds before the lawyers’ opening statements. (For my younger readers: O.J. was guilty; the jury acquitted him after 20 seconds of deliberation.) At the end of the trial, one juror gave O.J. the black power salute. Nothing to see here. It was Mark Fuhrman’s fault!

In defiance of everyday experience, known facts and common sense, we are all required to publicly endorse the left’s religious belief that whites are always racist, but women and minorities are incapable of any form of bias. If you say otherwise, well, that’s “textbook racism,” according to Paul Ryan.

At least when we’re talking about American blacks, there’s a history of white racism, so the double standard is not so enraging. What did we ever do to Mexicans? Note to Hispanics, Muslims, women, immigrants and gays: You’re not black.

Other than a few right-wingers, no one denounced now-sitting Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor for her “wise Latina” speech, in which she said “our gender and national origins may and will make a difference in our judging.”

But Trump is a “racist” for saying the same thing.

Six months ago, a Times editorial demanded that the Republican Senate confirm Obama judicial nominee Luis Felipe Restrepo, on the grounds that “[a]s a Hispanic,” Restrepo would bring “ethnic … diversity to the court.” You see how confusing this is. On one hand, it’s vital that we have more women and Latinos on the courts because white men can’t be trusted to be fair. But to suggest that women and Latinos could ever be unfair in the way that white men can, well, that’s “racist.”

The effrontery of this double standard is so blinding, that the only way liberals can bluff their way through it is with indignation. DO I HEAR YOU RIGHT? ARE YOU SAYING A JUDGE’S ETHNICITY COULD INFLUENCE HIS DECISIONS? (Please, please, please don’t bring up everything we’ve said about white judges and juries for the past four decades.)

They’re betting they can intimidate Republicans — and boy, are they right!

The entire Republican Brain Trust has joined the media in their denunciations of Trump for his crazy idea that anyone other than white men can be biased. That’s right, Wolf, I don’t have any common sense. Would it help if the GOP donated to Hillary?

The NeverTrump crowd is going to get a real workout if they plan to do this every week between now and the election.

What do Republicans think they’re getting out of this appeasement? Proving to voters that elected Republicans are pathetic, impotent media suck-ups is, surprisingly, not hurting Trump.

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Through Our Natural Rights, God Has Empowered Us to Protect Life and Liberty


waving flagBy David Boarman June 8, 2016

I had often wondered, when I read the Declaration of Independence, how to interpret the language. The vernacular is a couple hundred years old and can prove challenging. Even in the 1st and 2nd Amendments to the Constitution, the wording has been argued, interpreted and reinterpreted many times over the past decades. So, I sought to understand exactly what Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion and the right to keep and bear arms really meant.

In a previous article, I reviewed the 2nd paragraph of the Declaration of Independence wherein our inalienable rights are referenced. It had occurred to me that, regardless of vernacular, the Founding Fathers had at least one ideology upon which they agreed: that we are equally created beings. It followed then that they agreed on the fact that a Sovereign Creator had done the work and our design wasn’t simply left to the whims of Mother Nature, rather to Nature’s Creator.

Even Benjamin Franklin, a notorious womanizer and alleged Atheist, was well aware of, and respected, the believer’s need for God (though he did not see the purpose). I may even argue that, given Mr. Franklin’s analysis of God’s characteristics, he had an Agnostic-leaning view. Regardless, Benjamin Franklin agreed with the Declaration of Independence at least on the principles of its existence and certainly with the indictments laid against King George III.

What became obvious to me as I studied the Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights is that if any one of the documents were taken away, the others would lose a great deal of substance.

All three documents were and are necessary to: 1) give hope and purpose, 2) give structure to our nation and form of governance, and 3) ensure life and liberty would be safely guarded within these borders. But, I was still seeking the answer to, “what are our inalienable rights?” Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is simply too vague and I had yet to understand the purpose having rights in the first place.

I began to reconcile the Founding Documents with biblical principal. This was not an easy task either since I was looking for more than surface value. What is found in the Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights is not taken verbatim from the Bible. Nowhere in the Bible are we told, “You are granted these rights…”

It is a foregone conclusion that God would not have endowed different rights to certain individuals. I believe it would not be in His nature to create mankind with varying degrees of inequality. Since mankind is made in His image, I concluded there must be an inherent, created equality. The goal of my journey then was twofold:

  1. Enumerate a list of Natural Rights
  2. Discover the framework of equality

Back in January, 2015, I attended a Tea Party meeting. The agenda that night was a teaching on the Founding Documents with topics covering Separation of Church and State, Freedom of Religion, etc. Specifically, I recall the speaker mention that we could use the Ten Commandments to derive a list of rights. That made sense to some extent but left me with more questions than answers. And if I simply use “Thou shalt not steal” to derive the right to own property, then it becomes too easy for Atheists to call foul.

That said, and by now, the Ten Commandments are all but etched into my psyche. While all of the Commandments don’t directly equate to specific rights, they do provide clues. I went through a series of prayer, reading and research with each of the commandments. Whenever I had questions, the answers were scarce. It was almost as if I had questions that had never been asked, or those who answered tried to fake it. This mission was far too important to me to accept just any answer. Consequently, I often had only one source I could trust. Every time I sought God’s answer He would lead me onto another path of learning and discovery. Through every step, new knowledge built on top of previous knowledge.

In March, 2016, everything seemed to come together. All of the study, all of the research, it all came into focus. I had begun this journey knowing very little about rights, incapable of a definition or explaining what truly makes us equal, to understanding exactly what these Natural Rights are, why we have them and how we are equal. I remember asking in prayer, “What are our rights?” As usual, I was answered with a question, “Why do you have rights?” It was almost as if to say, “You need to know this first.”

So I asked. But before I could even finish uttering the words the answer was given, this time, straightforward and emphatic: “to protect and preserve life.” That’s it? So simple yet profound: We have been equally empowered by God with Natural Rights for the primary function of protecting and preserving life.

As it slowly sunk in, I saw the element of restraint God placed on Himself not to interfere with free will. In all honesty, I began to marvel at the elegance of simplicity as well as the ability to navigate very complex scenarios. There are 7 Natural Rights endowed to us. Within these rights we find the framework of equality and we find Life, Liberty and the ability to pursue Happiness. The Natural Rights empower every individual equally with the right to:

  1. Pursue the worship of God.
  2. A life unharmed by another.
  3. A livelihood.
  4. Own property.
  5. Convey thoughts, beliefs, ideals and motivations.
  6. Know truth.
  7. Choose not to assert any of the above.

After writing the Natural Rights down, it occurred to me that this list is agnostic to those differences that cannot be chosen at birth. This list works for everyone regardless of family, nationality, wealth or status. Instinctively, the biggest hurdle for non-Christians is the first, the right to pursue the worship of God. However, the Natural Rights insist that individuals who choose not to pursue the worship of God can do so without affecting any of the other rights or altering the inherent equality afforded by the framework.

The all important right is the last one. Essentially it is the Right of Free Will. If you choose to assert the 7th to choose not to pursue the worship of God, you are not outside this framework of equality. It is only when individuals take it upon themselves to lay claim to a ‘right’ where none exists that inequality begins creeping in. Equality insists that an equal and identical set of Natural Rights exist for all people.

Because we have been empowered by the Natural Rights to protect and preserve life, it then becomes our duty to do so. And, through the power of the 2nd Amendment, we have equal footing against tyrants, both foreign and domestic, to defend these Rights equally, righteously and justly, for all individuals regardless of religious affiliation. Only one so-called religion exists that, nearly point-for-point, denies the Natural Rights. Because of its doctrine, Islam is at complete odds with the Natural Rights. Fundamentally, this explains why Islamic doctrine is completely incompatible with the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: David Boarman

David Boarman

I am Christian, a husband and a father. Currently, we live in Oceanside, California (which is ironic in so many ways). We moved to San Diego in November, 2011 for a software engineering job. Beginning in November, 2014, I began a journey that has culminated in vast understanding of our natural, inalienable rights. I have converted a Facebook page (formerly for a bid as a presidential candidate). The FB page, Old Guard Federalists, is now about our rights – educate, learn and defend.

 

 

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

U.S. Imam Says “Muslims Have The RIGHT To Take Property from FILTHY Christians And Jews” [VIDEO]


waving flagBy Bethany Blankley June 8, 2016

U.S. Imam Abu Ammaar Yasir Kazi is a college professor at Rhodes College in Memphis, Tenn., who The New York Times Magazine describes is “one of the most influential conservative clerics in American Islam.” He instructs followers of Muhammad to commit rape, theft, and murder in the United States. And he has not been arrested for inciting violence or hate crimes.

In his lectures to college students at an American college on American soil, Kazi compares Christians to feces and urine, saying they are the “most evil of evils.” He instructs his students to engage in jihad and fight all unbelievers until they convert to Islam. Those who refuse to convert to Islam, he says, should have their lives and property taken.

“Property,” according to the Qur’an, includes women and children, which also includes taking women and children as sex slaves.

Kazi is not an extremist. He’s actually teaching exactly what Muhammad said about jihad, conversion, Christians and Jews, as recorded in the Qur’an. At least Kazi is being honest. He’s teaching what Muhammad taught.

There’s no way around the false claim that Islam is peaceful after reading what Muhammad commanded. Islam remains one of the greatest national security threats to the freedoms protected by the Constitution since America’s founding.

imam video

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:  Bethany Blankley

Bethany Blankley is the Senior Editor for Constitution.com. Her syndicated show, “America’s Betrayal,” can be heard on Conservative Review Radio, WAAR Radio, and other talk radio stations. Her columns have been published by The Washington Times, Newsday, Western Journalism, Townhall, The Christian Post, Charisma News, and others. She was a former communications strategist to four Senators, one Congressman, one New York governor, and several nonprofits. She holds graduate and undergraduate degrees in Theology and Political Science. Follow her: @bethanyblankley & http://www.bethanyblankley.com.

 

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

“Christian” Rock Star Accuses Pastors of False Teaching on Homosexuality


waving flagBy Michael Ware June 8, 2016

These people fight every day with the desire to do that which the Scripture teaches is sin and an abomination. So, when some of these people publicly declare that they have this struggle, we should not be shocked. We should not even be shocked if that person is in the public eye.

Christian News reports

During an appearance on ABC’s “The View” on Friday, Everyday Sunday’s Trey Pearson, who released a letter last week to fans in which he came out as a homosexual, outlined that he has left his wife after deciding to no fight against having feelings for men.

Pearson has tried hard to present himself as a responsible person, who is trying to fulfill his obligation to his wife and kids. He meets with them and eats dinner with them. And he is doing this because he wishes to present his sexual desires as legitimate. Trey even goes as far as blaming the Church and more specifically pastors for the situation he and others are in today.

Christian New continues

The musician, who is scheduled to perform at a homosexual pride event next week, said that he finds it “damaging” when ministers call homosexuality a choice.

“There are still people that are teaching these hurtful things and they are the ones that get scared when millions of people connect with it,” he stated. “And they want to say that you’re the false teacher, but they never start to think that it’s their false teaching that causes things like this to happen in the first place.”

WOE

The problem is that even if we concede that Trey and the rest of the sodomite community were born with these sexual desires; this does not make the act of sodomy acceptable. We can look at several places that point out God’s feelings toward sodomy.

Trey’s argument is one that is used over and over but is a logical fallacy. The assumption is that the way things are is the way things ought to be. This is the “Is-Ought” fallacy. But we can point to several things that prove this to be a false reasoning. 

Those born with homicidal desires are the most glaring. People claiming that they never remember a time that they did not desire to kill. We would never say that these desires are legitimate and should be fostered or celebrated.

I hope that Trey will see the error in his thinking and repent.

Picture1true battlePicture1In God We Trustfreedom combo 2

NBA Sells Rainbow Shirts to Raise Money for Gay Organization That Instructed HS Students in ‘Fisting’


by Breitbart Sports8 Jun 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://www.breitbart.com/sports/2016/06/08/nba-raises-money-for-gay-organization-that-instructed-hs-students-on-fisting/

“In celebration of LGBT Pride Month, we’re excited to announce a new collaboration between the NBA, GLSEN, and Teespring,” the three groups proclaimed. “Beginning on June 7, fans can purchase an exclusive line of Teespring NBA Pride T-shirts featuring the logos of all 30 NBA teams, with all proceeds benefiting GLSEN.”

nba01 nba02

GLSEN, the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network, pushes discussions of homosexuality in K-12 schools. At one infamous conference sponsored by the group, speakers explained the practice of “fisting” to high school students and at another a retired gym teacher detailed how she told students in kindergarten that she kisses her girlfriend.

(For a detailed explanation of “FISTING” see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisting– JB)

In 2009, 53 Republican congressmen wrote a letter objecting to President Barack Obama appointing GLSEN’s founder, Kevin Jennings, to lead the Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools. They wrote the president:

Mr. Jennings’ self-described history of ignoring the sexual abuse of a child. In his book, One Teacher in Ten, Mr. Jennings recounts a 15-year old student confiding in him that he had a sexual relationship with a much older man. Mr. Jennings’ only response was to ask if the underage boy used a condom. As a mandatory reporter, Mr. Jennings was required by law to report child abuse, including sex crimes. Mr. Jennings cannot serve as the “safe schools” czar when his record demonstrates a willingness to overlook the sexual abuse of a child.

Despite the group’s creepy history, the NBA raises money for it. The peculiar mixing of politics and basketball follows the NBA threatening to pull the 2017 All-Star Game from Charlotte because of North Carolina’s law restricting multiple-use public bathrooms in government buildings to people of the sex indicted by the insignia on the door and the league selling shirts infusing environmentalist imagery onto team  logos as part of its “green” NBA program that funnels money to activist groups.

Under Commissioner Adam Silver, the league increasingly involves itself in politicized campaigns atop traditional community outreach under its “NBA Cares” banner. The league explains, “NBA Cares is the league’s global social responsibility program that builds on the NBA’s mission of addressing important social issues in the United States and around the world.”delusional file

Among organizations supporting sick kids and after-school programs for children, GLSEN receives inclusion by the NBA in non sequitur fashion in its list of charitable endeavors. The league, in boasting gifts of $270 million since 2005, notes: “NBA Cares works with internationally-recognized youth-serving programs that support education, youth and family development, and health-related causes, including: Special Olympics, YMCA of the USA, Boys and Girls Clubs of America, UNICEF, the Make-A-Wish Foundation, Share Our Strength and GLSEN.”Not okay

Political INCORRECTNESS from the Perspective of Gary Varvel


waving flagMon, Jun 6, 2016  |  by Gary Varvel

URL of the original posting site: http://www.srnnews.com/cartoon/gary-varvel-for-jun-06-2016/?type=archive

1465241439949137MZaS0cRzV7

14648958197131551nZWCpI53B

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

U.S. official: North Korea restarts plutonium production for nuclear bombs


waving flagBy SRN News Wed, Jun 8, 2016

1465383995401057VDvmtDIh5D

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – North Korea has restarted production of plutonium fuel, a senior U.S. State Department official said on Tuesday, showing that it plans to pursue its nuclear weapons program in defiance of international sanctions.

The U.S. assessment came a day after the U.N. nuclear watchdog said it had “indications” that Pyongyang has reactivated a plant to recover plutonium from spent reactor fuel at Yongbyon, its main nuclear complex.

The latest developments suggest North Korea’s reclusive regime is working to ensure a steady supply of materials for its drive to build warheads, despite tightened international sanctions after its fourth nuclear test in January. The U.S. official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that Washington is worried by the new plutonium reprocessing effort, but he offered no explicit word on any U.S. response.

“Everything in North Korea is a cause for concern,” the official told Reuters.

“They take the spent fuel from the 5 megawatt reactor at Yongbyon and let it cool and then take it to the reprocessing facility, and that’s where they’ve obtained the plutonium for their previous nuclear tests. So they are repeating that process,” the official said. “That’s what they’re doing.”

North Korea, which conducted its fourth nuclear test in January, vowed in 2013 to restart all nuclear facilities, including the main reactor and the smaller plant at Yongbyon, which was shut down in 2007 as part of an international disarmament-for-aid deal that later collapsed.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which has no access to North Korea and mainly monitors its activities by satellite, said last year it had seen signs of a resumption of activity at Yongbyon. IAEA chief Yukiya Amano told a news conference in Vienna on Monday that there have been indications of renewed plutonium reprocessing activities at Yongbyon. Reprocessing involves extracting plutonium from spent reactor fuel, one route to obtaining bomb fuel other than uranium enrichment.

“I would agree that there are indications,” the U.S. official said.

The official declined to confirm whether this determination was made from satellite imagery or intelligence sources, or to say how much plutonium North Korea could produce by this method. South Korea’s Unification Ministry spokesman Cheong Joon-hee said Seoul was closely watching movements related to the North’s nuclear facility “with grave concern” but declined to comment directly on plutonium production.

A spokesman for China’s Foreign Ministry said China, North Korea’s lone major ally, has always promoted the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula and a resolution of the issue via talks.

“We hope all parties can work hard together to put the nuclear issue back on the track of dialogue and negotiations,” spokesman Hong Lei told reporters.

SHROUDED IN SECRECY

North Korea announced at a rare congress of its ruling Workers’ Party last month that it would strengthen its defensive nuclear weapons capability. It had already declared itself “a responsible nuclear weapons state” and disavowed the use of nuclear weapons unless its sovereignty is first infringed by others with nuclear arms. While North Korea in the past has often obtained key components for its nuclear program from other countries despite international sanctions, there was no sign of any recent outside procurement involved in reactivating its plutonium reprocessing, the U.S. official said.

There is little proven knowledge about the quantities of weapons-grade uranium or plutonium that North Korea possesses, or its ability to produce either, though plutonium from spent fuel at Yongbyon is widely believed to have been used in its nuclear bombs.

South Korean Defense Minister Han Min-koo said last month the North probably had about 40 kg (88 lb) of plutonium. That would be enough to make eight to 10 bombs, according to experts.

Operating the 5 megawatt reactor could yield about 5-6 kg of plutonium a year, they said.

Experts at the U.S.-Korea Institute at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies in Washington predicted last year that North Korea’s nuclear weapons stockpile could grow to 20, 50 or 100 bombs within five years, from an estimated 10 to 16 weapons at that time.

North Korea has come under tightening international pressure over its nuclear weapons program, including tougher U.N. sanctions adopted in March backed by China, following its most recent nuclear blast and ballistic missile tests.

The website 38 North reported last week, based on commercial satellite imagery, that exhaust plumes had been detected twice in May from the thermal plant at Yongbyon’s Radiochemical Laboratory, the site’s main reprocessing installation. The Institute for Science and International Security also reported exhaust emissions from a chimney at the plant, which it said was often associated with reprocessing activities there.

(Additional reporting by Jack Kim in Seoul and Ben Blanchard in Beijing; Editing by James Dalgleish and Nick Macfie)

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


waving flagFor Everyone’s Eyes Only

Hillary feels the Nuclear Codes are safer in her hands than in Trumps. Maybe she should hide them in her ultra-secure personal server.

Hillary Nuclear Codes / Political cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2016.

More A.F. Branco cartoons at Patriot Update here.

A.F. Branco Coffee Table Book <—- Order Here!

Hillary Clinton 2.0 Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Report


waving flagTuesday, June 7, 2016

I knew you

For pro-life news updated throughout the day, visit LifeNews.com.

Hillary Clinton Clinches Democratic Nomination, Thinks Child Should Have No Rights Before Birth
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has clinched the Democratic nomination, thanks to the support of superdeegates, and will become the party’s nominee to face Donald Trump — who is campaigning as a pro-life candidate. Clinton is not just pro-abortion but support abortion up to birth and thinks children should have no rights before birth.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Oklahoma Governor Signs Bill to Teach People “Abortion Kills a Living Human Being”
The governor of Oklahoma has signed a pro-life bill into that that will teach the public, and students, that “abortion kills a living human being.” The notion is easily provable given the inordinate amount of scientific evidence, ultrasound imaging and comments from top scientists about the humanity of unborn children.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Minister Claims: “My Faith Calls Me to Support Planned Parenthood,” It Does “Sacred” Work
One can’t help but wonder if Pastor Darcy Baxter has made her own version of a Jefferson Bible.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards on Her $600,000 Salary: I Could Make More Elsewhere
It’s hard to come up with anyone who receives better press (aside from pro-lifers) than Cecile Richards, Planned Parenthood’s head honcho. But new heights (or depths) a recent interview conducted by CafeMom’s “The Stir.”

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

 

Mom, Baby With Down Syndrome Tell Doc Who Suggested Abortion: “You Were So Very Wrong”
When Courtney Baker found out that her unborn daughter had Down syndrome, she felt anxious and afraid, but she also knew that her daughter was a valuable human being.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

South Carolina Governor Will Hold Special Event to Sign Bill Banning Abortions After 20 Weeks
On Wednesday, June 8, South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley is scheduled to hold a ceremonial signing of the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act at a special education school in Taylors, South Carolina.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

WATCH: Little Girl Receives a Doll With a Prosthetic Leg Like Hers and Cries Tears of Joy
Ten-year-old Emma was overjoyed when she was surprised with a doll just like her. The company A Step Ahead Prosthetics gave the American Girls look-alike doll a prosthetic leg, just like Emma’s.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Scientists Creating Human-Pig Hybrids for Organ Transplants That Could Develop Into “Monsters”
Researchers in the U.S. are tinkering with a disturbing new experiment that mixes human and pig cells to produce a hybrid embryo, The Express reports.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Looking for an inspiring and motivating speaker for your pro-life event? Don’t have much to spend on a high-priced speaker costing several thousand dollars? Contact LifeNews at news@lifenews.com about having LifeNews Editor Steven Ertelt speak at your event.
Daily Pro-Life News Report
Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.

Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright 2003-2016 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

What the IRS just revealed should start a wave of OUTRAGE


waving flagWritten by Allen West on June 7, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://www.allenbwest.com/allen/what-the-irs-just-revealed-should-start-a-wave-of-outrage

Slide1

Just imagine if this had been a Republican presidential administration these past seven years. The media would have been all over it like white on rice. However, for some very apparent reason, the liberal progressive media has dismissed or ignored scandals, faults, issues of deception, lies, abandonment of Americans to die, and tyrannical unconstitutional actions. Now the IRS has finally revealed its nefarious actions to us all – and it’s far worse than we thought. 

As reported by the Washington Times, “More than three years after it admitted to targeting tea party groups for intrusive scrutiny, the IRS has finally released a near-complete list of the organizations it snagged in a political dragnet.”

The tax agency filed the list last month as part of a court case after a series of federal judges, fed up with what they said was the agency’s stonewalling, ordered it to get a move on. The case is a class-action lawsuit, so the list of names is critical to knowing the scope of those who would have a claim against the IRS. But even as it answers some questions, the list raises others, including exactly when the targeting stopped, and how broadly the tax agency drew its net when it went after nonprofits for unusual scrutiny.

The government released names of 426 organizations. Another 40 were not released as part of the list because they had already opted out of being part of the class-action suit. That total is much higher than the 298 groups the IRS‘ inspector general identified back in May 2013, when investigators first revealed the agency had been subjecting applications to long — potentially illegal — delays, and forcing them to answer intrusive questions about their activities. 

Tea party and conservative groups said they were the target of unusually heavy investigations and longer delays, Edward D. Greim, the lawyer who’s pursuing the case on behalf of NorCal Tea Party Patriots and other members of the class, said the list also could have ballooned toward the end of the targeting as the IRS, once it knew it was being investigated, snagged more liberal groups in its operations to try to soften perceptions of political bias.

Sixty of the groups on the list released last month have the word “tea” in their name, 33 have “patriot,” eight refer to the Constitution, and 13 have “912” in their name — which is the moniker of a movement started by conservatives.

Another 26 group names refer to “liberty,” though that list does include some groups that are not discernibly conservative in orientation. Among the groups that appear to trend liberal are three with the word “occupy” in their name. And then there are some surprising names, including three state or local chapters of the League of Women Voters — a group with a long history of nonprofit work.”

There should be a wave of incredible outrage all across the nation knowing this has occurred. Lois Lerner should not be sitting back enjoying a nice six-figure tax payer-funded pension. Now, imagine if this were a Republican administration and the preponderance of these groups were liberal progressive? There’s no doubt t the manner of stories would be incessant and rampant — much like Abu Ghraib. It must be accepted that the liberal progressive left will leverage the power of the federal government against the common American citizen.

Obamas IRS GestapoAfter the 2010 midterm election cycle President Obama and the left knew there was no way they could allow for a constitutional conservative grassroots movement to go forward. So they came up with the treacherous scheme of using the tax collection agency to undermine the effort. In other words, the president of the United States turned the government on his own people — well, I suppose we’re not his own people. We still have to hear about the breaking and entering of Watergate, but mum’s the word on something as horrific as this.

obama-liar4-266x189And if President Obama wasn’t aware of this, then someone needs to explain to us who is in charge of the federal government — namely, this episode. Yes, I would concur that much lies at the feet of the modern-day Rasputin, Valerie Jarrett. But, Obama can’t come up with some “plausible deniability” excuse. I suppose he also had no idea Ben Rhodes was lying about the Iranian nuclear deal or creating a false narrative about the Benghazi incident. And yes, I will continue to address Benghazi since four Americans no longer walk this earth — while those who abandoned them still do.

We may not know the full extent of the tyranny of the Obama administration until years afterwards. However, we should be careful about turning this country over to another tyrant.

I have to admit, I just don’t hear much discussion, reference, and quotes by the remaining three presidential candidates regarding the Constitution and individual rights. I’m not talking about populist messaging. I want to know how we shall restore this Constitutional Republic to its standing and regard for individuals and their right to petition the government for redress of grievances.AMEN

This is a very serious issue and it needs to be addressed — this should be a critical item to bring to the awareness of the American people. We truly do not need to be talking about someone’s individual court case. The fact that the Internal Revenue Service has released a list of groups that they targeted should not go unnoticed. This is a critical message point. And the liberal progressive left must be forced to admit if they do or do not consent to this type of abhorrent behavior.AMEN

It can no longer be dismissed as having never happened. What America do we live in that an agency can produce a target list? And it would be interesting to see the exact dates for each group when they were first targeted — I bet that would be rather revealing.

Here we thought we lived in a free country. Sadly it seems the last seven years have been anything but.

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Nearly Half of D.C. Employers Said They Have Laid Off Workers, Reduced Hours Due to Minimum Wage Hikes


waving flagBY: June 7, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://freebeacon.com/issues/nearly-half-d-c-employers-said-lay-off-employees-due-minimum-wage-hike/

Minimum Wage

AP

The minimum wage in the District of Columbia has increased from a $8.25 hourly rate in 2014 to the current rate ofreplacement $11.50 per hour. Mayor Muriel Bowser advocated a $15 minimum wage in her State of the District address earlier this year.

“In recent months, the City Council in D.C. has considered enacting a number of new labor mandates, including a higher minimum wage, a bill that would fine employers for schedule changes, and a family leave policy funded by a tax on employers,” the report says.

The institute surveyed 100 employers in Washington, D.C. to understand how they would react to a further minimum wage hike.

“Employers affected by the proposed increase to a $15 minimum wage were asked if they had either reduced the number of employees on their staff, or reduced the hours of current employees, to adapt to recently enacted minimum wage increases,” the report says. “Nearly half of employers surveyed had already taken one of these steps—suggesting that 2014-16 minimum wage increases haven’t been absorbed through higher prices alone.”not worth it

According to the report, just over half of the businesses surveyed said they planned to raise prices in order to offset the cost of a minimum wage hike. Thirty-five percent said they would likely reduce staffing levels and 37 percent said they would reduce employees’ hours or reduce the number of hours they were open for business. Thirty-one percent of businesses said they were very likely to hire more skilled workers in the future to offset the higher wage.

One in five businesses said they would move out of the District of Columbia and into Arlington, Virginia where the minimum wage is $7.25 per hour. Sixteen percent of businesses surveyed said they were somewhat likely to close their business if the minimum wage hike were implemented and 6 percent of businesses said they would likely close.

“These results are consistent with the best and most recent published research on the minimum wage, which finds that past increases (at lower proposed wage levels) have reduced employment for younger and less-educated employees,” the report states.

“These proposed laws have encouraged a perception that D.C. is becoming less friendly for businesses,” the report says. “Two-thirds of surveyed businesses agreed with this sentiment, with half strongly agreeing that D.C. is becoming a business-unfriendly city.”Minimum-Wage-AspirantSG

While Bowser did not comment on this specific report she said that there was consensus that a $15 minimum wage was the right thing to do for the District of Columbia.

“We are glad there is consensus around a $15 minimum wage and welcome the ongoing conversation on how best to support our workers, while creating an environment where businesses can start, grow, and thrive in all 8 wards,” Bowser said.More Words of a Hateful Leftist Socialist Propagandist

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Ali Meyer is a staff writer with the Washington Free Beacon covering economic issues that expose government waste, fraud, and abuse. Prior to the Free Beacon, she was a multimedia reporter with CNSNews.com where her work appeared on outlets such as Drudge Report and Fox News. She also interned with the Heritage Foundation and Pacific Research Institute. Her Twitter handle is @DJAliMeyer, and her email address is meyer@freebeacon.com.

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

FBI Delivers Second BLOW in Hillary E-mail Server Scandal


waving flagPosted on June 7, 2016

The dark cloud of Hillary’s past will always overshadow her. She is not the person anyone wants in the White House.11880359_10153570076618588_822147005175424235_n

The FBI is offering a federal judge a second secret glimpse into the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server.

The Justice Department asked a federal judge Monday to accept “additional details” under seal about how the FBI conducted its search for records a Vice News journalist requested under the Freedom of Information Act from the law enforcement agency about the probe it is conducting into Clinton’s email set-up and how classified information came to reside in the Democratic presidential candidate’s account.

“These details supplement defendant’s showing that it conducted a reasonable search, but cannot be disclosed on the public record without compromising information that the FBI seeks to protect,” Justice Department lawyers wrote, citing FOIA exemption for ongoing !cid_image010_jpg@01D18A66government investigations and enforcement actions.

It’s the second time the Justice Department has sought to give U.S. District Court Judge Randolph Moss a secret update on the high-profile, Clinton-related inquiry.

 

 

 

 

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Seven Times Democrats Were Overtly Racist On Judges Before Trump


waving flag Authored by Casey Harper / 06/06/2016

Donald Trump has taken heavy fire for saying the judge presiding over his Trump University lawsuit is biased because of his Mexican heritage, but Democrats have a long history of invoking race on judicial issues.

Trump said U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel had “an absolute conflict” in the case because of his Mexican heritage, calling him “a hater of Donald Trump.” In the case, former students of Trump University are suing Trump alleging the school, which was supposed to teach real estate, was a ripoff. Trump has firmly denied their allegations.

In an interview, CNN’s Jake Tapper repeatedly questioned Trump about invoking the judge’s race saying “is that not the definition of racism?”

“But I don’t care if you criticize him,” Tapper told Trump in the interview. “That’s fine.  You can criticize every decision.  What I’m saying is if you invoke his race as a reason why he can’t do his job …” The problem is, a judge’s race is often a major factor and is acknowledged as such by the media, especially in Supreme Court appointments.

The Daily Caller News Foundation has compiled a list of seven times liberals invoked a judge’s race.

  1. Justice Sonia Sotomayor famously invoked her identity as a “wise Latina” who could outdo a white man. “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life,” she said in an October, 2001 speech that became a point of criticism for Republicans.
  2. When Donald Trump released his list of potential Supreme Court nominees, the left was quick to point out they were all white. Think Progress published an article titled “Your Ultimate Guide To The 11 White People Donald Trump Will Consider For The Supreme Court,” which pointed out that “Only three are women. All are white.”
  3. George Takei, Star Trek actor and gay rights activist, called Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas a “clown in black face” after his vote against the recognition of same-sex marriage. “I mean, doesn’t he know that slaves were in chains?” Takei said. “That they were whipped on the back. If he saw the movie 12 Years a Slave, you know, they were raped.”
  4. Liberal Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson blasted Thomas for his stance against affirmative action. “I believe in affirmative action, but I have to acknowledge there are arguments against it,” Robinson wrote. “One of the more cogent is the presence of Justice Clarence Thomas on the U.S. Supreme Court.”
  5. Anna Quindlen, a liberal writer for Newsweek, clearly invoked Thomas’ race in her criticism of him, saying “His judicial resume was mediocre; he was chosen because he was conservative and black, an affirmative-action hire by an administration that eschewed affirmative action.”
  6. Liberal writers and activists Jeff Cohen and Norman Solomon wrote an article in the Seattle Times saying Thomas was unseemly as a “beneficiary of affirmative-action programs who climbs the ladder of success by attacking affirmative action.”
  7. To defend itself from criticism over nominating a white Supreme Court Justice, the White House was quick to invoke race. In a post titled, “White House Defends Diversity Record In Judicial Appointments,” the New York Times points out that Josh Earnest was eager to tell reporters that Obama had appointed a Hispanic justice to the Supreme Court and therefore, had previously embraced diversity. The defense came after attacks from the left over nominee Merrick Garland, who is white.

Partyof Deceit Spin and Lies Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Michael Ramirez’ Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


waving flagFrom the Pen of Michael Ramirez – Monday, June 6, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://townhall.com/political-cartoons/michaelramirez/

 Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


waving flagPick Your Poison

Pick Your Poison, the new flavors of liberal kool-aid 2016 are out via Bernie and Hillary.

Liberal Kool-aid 2016 / Political Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2016.

More A.F.Branco Cartoons at Net Right Daily.

A.F.Branco Coffee Table Book <—- Order Here!

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Report


waving flagMonday, June 6, 2016

I AM A PERSON with Poem

For pro-life news updated throughout the day, visit LifeNews.com.

Dr. Martin Luther King’s Niece Opposes Abortion: “Civil Rights and Human Rights Go Together”
Martin Luther King Jr.’s niece Alveda King is spreading the pro-life message to students across North America. Last week, the pro-life activist spoke to Canadian students at Bishop Macdonell Catholic High School on human rights, including rights of the unborn child.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

ISIS Burns 19 Girls Alive After They Refuse to Have Sex With Their Terrorist Captors
Nineteen girls who are members of the Yazidi religious minority group in Mosul were burned alive for their refusal to have sex with their ISIS terrorist captors. The news is the latest persecution by ISIS against women — which also includes forcing them into sexual slavery and forcing them to have abortions if they become pregnant.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Amazing Photos Show Thousands of Pro-Lifers Flooding Streets of Dublin to Celebrate Life
Thousands of pro-life people flooded the streets of Dublin, Ireland over the weekend to celebrate the 8th Amendment providing legal protection for unborn children.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Hillary Clinton on Campaign to Defund Planned Parenthood Abortion Biz: “It’s Just Cruel”
A majority of Americans arr pro-life and appear to believe that abortions taking the lives of unborn children is “cruel.” But pro-abortion presidential candidate Hilary Clinton thinks just the opposite.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

 

Supreme Court May Decide Thursday on Texas Law Saving Tens of Thousands of Babies From Abortion
It appears possible that the Supreme Court will decide on Thursday on the next major decision related to abortion. The high court — one member short — is expected to rule in the potential landmark case Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt that concerns a Texas pro-life law.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

United Methodist Church Praised for Finally Leaving Coalition of Pro-Abortion Religious Groups
Finally. After all those years. After all those General Conferences. After all those many attempts.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Pro-Life Leaders Call for JAMA to Retract Study Falsely Claiming Unborn Babies Don’t Feel Pain
The Journal of the American Medical Association is facing calls to retract a 2005 study that pro-lifers have labeled a “propaganda tool” for abortion activists.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Student Newspaper Defends Using Aborted Baby Parts in Research: “America is Not a Christian Nation”
An Illinois couple’s love story almost came to a tragic end 16 months ago when Ethan Menges contracted a deadly illness.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Looking for an inspiring and motivating speaker for your pro-life event? Don’t have much to spend on a high-priced speaker costing several thousand dollars? Contact LifeNews at news@lifenews.com about having LifeNews Editor Steven Ertelt speak at your event.
Daily Pro-Life News Report
Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.

Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright 2003-2016 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Our Rights Come From God, Not the Government


waving flagBy David Boarman June 6, 2016

This is the first part in a series of articles where I take you, the reader, with me to reflect on a journey of discovery. I believe it will be just as enlightening for you as it was for me. This adventure became very personal as I dealt with opposition from neighbors, friends and family alike. But I also gained new friends in the process that believed the same as me, thus confirming as truth the foundation that was being laid. The resounding result is this: the truth I now hold is self-evident; that no Civil Right, Liberty or label ever supersedes my Natural Rights.

“What are Natural Rights?”

Natural rights are those rights endowed by our Sovereign Creator. ‘Natural’ meaning that these rights, unmodified, represent the natural equality we are born into – unaffected, unmodified by wealth, status or power – and agnostic of physiological differences which cannot be chosen at birth: gender, skin color or disability.

For all intents and purposes, I use the term Natural Rights synonymously with inalienable, or unalienable, rights. So, without further ado, let’s start with our Declaration of Independence…

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

As Americans we have heard these words on numerous occasions. If one were to ask, “what are your rights?” the answer may often be some form of “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” Some may answer, “the right to vote, to protest, to keep and bear arms.” But when we ask about rights, there are two contexts from which we can draw answers. But there is only one context from which the Declaration of Independence draws from to conclude that we are endowed with rights by our Creator.

Enumerating such things as voting and protest are civil in nature and are not part of the context. No, the Declaration of Independence is referring to our Natural Rights in a divine context. To understand the context, we must find answers to several questions. But if we really want to wrap our heads around the idea of separate contexts and the providence or domain of each – Natural and Civil – then we have to start at the beginning of the statement.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident,”

Truth, in and of itself is not always self evident. It is up to the receiver of information to make the distinction between fact and fiction, truth and deception. What the Founders believed to be self-evident is that truth does exist and, given a foundation in truth, one can find evidence and bring to bear all manner of knowledge and wisdom to reason against falsehoods.

As a matter for consideration, one must understand that the Founders recognized that truth does not change. Albert Einstein once commented on the fact that mathematics enjoys a particular place in the sciences because it is based purely on truth. No other science – biology, astronomy, chemistry, etc. – enjoys such a foundation in truth that math does. The sciences, as we know them, are only as accurate and as good as the knowledge we have today. With some breakthrough tomorrow, everything we know about any given science could change overnight. Mathematics simply does not change. 

“that all men are created equal,”

First, I hope that no one is taking offense to the fact that the masculine is used. Given the vernacular of the day (and throughout biblical writings), this was common and did not necessarily refer only to men. The point of the statement is two-fold: 1) all persons are created beings, and 2) all persons are equal. “Okay,” you say, “I know we are equal. What’s your point?”

The point is, given that we are ‘created equal’, there must be some form or framework by which we can measure that equality. This is where it starts to get interesting, though. If I ask, “what is equality?”, most actually have a difficult time explaining in a few words what it means that ‘all persons are created equal’. We can look at a math equation – e.g. 3 + 4 = 2 + 5 – and see that the ‘=’ is there to state a factual balance between the left and right. In effect the equation states a truth: 3 plus 4 was, is and always will be equal to 2 plus 5.

When it comes to people, though, answers get a lot fuzzier. Ideology of gender, skin color, disability, religion and other characteristics are undoubtedly discussed. In reality, we need to be able to discover a framework that is completely agnostic and independent of those features. This ‘equality framework’ must be able to supply all persons with exactly the same tools regardless of physiological differences – those characteristics that a person cannot choose at birth.

“that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,”

This phrase could be broken up even further to drive home certain points. But we have discussed enough to understand that if people are created, then there is a Creator – One who is above all and exists outside of time, space and matter; a Sovereign source of Wisdom and intelligent design. Aside from that, the truly complex part of the phrase is regarding unalienable rights. What does that mean?

Because these ‘certain rights’ are endowed by a Power higher than man, no man has the power to remove, restrict or modify them. We cannot be separated from these rights. No Civil Right, Liberty or label has the power to restrict or override any of our Natural Rights. And because these rights are endowed by a never-changing Creator, the Natural Rights are never changing.

“that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

When I began studying to find out what our Natural Rights actually are, this phrase gave little help. We say, “of course, I have the right to live.” But then what does it mean to have the right of liberty? And exactly how does this mean I have the right to pursue happiness? Seems somewhat open and ambiguous, especially given the context of what many consider to be ‘happiness’ today.

The Founders hit the nail on the head in one regard with the word ‘Life’. This is what being human is all about – having an abundant, free and happy life. While we are challenged at times with financial issues, physical ailments, difficulty finding work or other hurdles, we can still find happiness through the assertion of our Natural Rights, or liberties. But an ‘equality framework’ could not exist just to provide for happiness and it certainly isn’t there so we can compare ourselves to others.

Our Natural Rights exist for two purposes:

1) to provide a framework within which all persons are equally empowered, and

2) to protect and preserve life.

When any right is claimed, it must measure up to these two principles. For any equality framework to exist, it must do so in such a way that it is unchangeable regardless of physiological differences.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

David Boarman

David Boarman

I am Christian, a husband and a father. Currently, we live in Oceanside, California (which is ironic in so many ways). We moved to San Diego in November, 2011 for a software engineering job. Beginning in November, 2014, I began a journey that has culminated in vast understanding of our natural, inalienable rights. I have converted a Facebook page (formerly for a bid as a presidential candidate). The FB page, Old Guard Federalists, is now about our rights – educate, learn and defend.

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

15 Memes That Describe The 2016 Democratic Presidential Race


waving flagBy Jeff Dunetz June 6, 2016

June 7th is the big Kahuna for the Democratic Party, the California Primary, 475 delegates will be awarded. Hillary Clinton only needs to win 82 of those delegates to wrap up the nomination. And if California doesn’t do it, chances are between New Jersey which awards 126 delegates on June 7th, and California on the same day, Hillary Clinton will pass the magic Democratic number of 2,382 next Tuesday.

Before we pivot to the general election it might be fun to look back at the Democratic Party primary campaign, the below is a really quick review of the race. As they say, pictures are worth 1,000 words, so these 15 memes are worth 15,000 words. Some of these were created for posts or others were created just because a sick idea crossed my mind.

Before we start, please remember to be nice to Democrats, they can’t help themselves:

1909750_1055004411227563_6811442463984799217_n

I’m not saying Ms. Clinton is a witch but….

surrenderbernie

 

Sometimes the answer to Hillary’s email issues is in the classics

152j3z

Democrats then and now:

13071867_1081711365223534_2954636023608249909_o (1)

Nuff said?:

12920446_1071601796234491_8056863976044856871_n (1)

Well did they?:

12439337_1017025025025502_1433076572110972051_n

Bernie’s slogan reminds me of college:

1909889_1056247381103266_8248275966334236836_n

You know you’re a redneck when:

12140790_1058731710854833_7465727220509696574_n

They said the GOP debates were crazy, but the Democratic ones upset many people:

12669708_1030245080370163_2587267889807289663_n

Did you know that Hillary did a GEICO commercial?

lies-1

This is #1 on my bucket list:

12644891_1026637830730888_6984565977811130789_n

Nothing like cutting the red tape:

y25xp

Gotta give her credit, even after she left the state department Hillary tried to help the country:

12549116_1017570471637624_5072660446367763000_n

Bernie keeps talking about those rich donors controlling politics but…

12800254_1042658802462124_967580711340208993_n

Let’s be honest, in the end, neither Hillary or Bernie have winning ideas:

165973_1041561855905152_6480871303298128034_n

Please let me know if you enjoyed this post, as there are plenty more memes where these came from, and we can run more posts like the one above.

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


waving flagThe Pitfalls

Babies In Danger of falling into the Planned Parenthood exhibit, right next to the gorilla display of selective compassion.

Babies In Danger / Political Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2016.

To see more Legal Insurrection Branco cartoons, click here.

A.F. Branco Coffee Table Book <—- Order Here!

how many body parts PP Body Parts Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Parents OUTRAGED After 8th-Graders Get This Shockingly Racist, Violent Math Quiz


waving flagBy: John Falkenberg on June 2, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://conservativetribune.com/parents-outraged-8th-graders/

An Alabama middle school teacher has been suspended for forcing her students to take a wildly racist 10-question quiz. The assessment referred to drive-by shootings, drugs, prostitutes and pimps — to eighth-graders at Burns Middle School in Mobile, according to WPMI in Mobile.

Fortunately, one of her students had the presence of mind to report the incident to his mother, the station reported.

This is the quiz Joanne Bolser distributed to her eighth-graders:

The LA Math Proficiency Test has been circulating - and getting teachers into trouble - since the early 1990s

What did you say 04.jpgThey make a list of basic math questions known as the LA Math Proficiency Test.”

One of which goes as follows.

“Tyrone knocked up four girls in a gang. There are 20 girls in the gang. What is the exact percentage of girls Tyrone knocked up?”

Another one: “Desmond gets $200 for a BMW, $150 for a Corvette, $100 for a 4×4. If he steals one BMW, 2 Corvettes, and 3 4x4s, how many more Corvettes does he need to get to $900?”

Which doesn’t even make sense — the answer would be 2/3 of a Corvette.

The teacher was set to retire this year. If she’s lucky, she will see her retirement, instead of the severe repercussions she deserves.

According to WALA, the students were happy to laugh it off until Bolser told them that they had to finish it and turn it in.

The district was appalled.

“We regret this happened. We have 7,500 employees at Mobile Public Schools and we overwhelmingly have excellent teachers,” said the spokesman. “This is a shame that it’s taking away from their work.”

Middle schools are fertile ground for controversies, whether from the left or from the right, but this is one area where just about everyone should agree the questions were inappropriate. Bolser isn’t the first to give this test. Teachers in California, Texas, New Mexico, and Illinois have all handed out versions of the test, and they were all suspended.

H/T U.K. Daily Mail

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Calif. school calls sheriff to stop 7-year-old from handing out Bible verses


waving flagBy Joe Newby – June 4, 2016

BibleIt seems the First Amendment right to free speech and freedom of religion is officially dead, at least in one California school district.

On Thursday, Liberty Counsel said that officials with the Desert Rose Elementary School were so upset over notes containing Bible verses they called the local sheriff to make it stop.

According to Liberty Counsel:

The situation started with an encouraging note and Bible verse from mom Christina Zavala, tucked into a packed lunch for her little boy (“C”). The seven-year-old boy read the note and verse, and showed them to his friends during lunch time at school.

Mrs. Zavala’s daily note for her son soon turned into an expectation by the other children during lunch, who excitedly begged C for copies of the notes, which grew to include short stories from the Bible to provide context for the verses.

However, when one little girl said “teacher – this is the most beautiful story I’ve ever seen,” “separation of church and state” was the response, and the notes were banned from lunchtime distribution. C was told that the school gate was the only location at which he could give the Bible verses to his friends, and only after the bell rang.Combined

In April, Liberty Counsel said, Mrs. Zavala wrote to say the situation was corrected, but the school informed her that her son was reprimanded in front of the class and ordered to stop talking about his religion or sharing her notes.

The story continues:

The Zavalas and C complied with the school gate directive, and soon, as many as 15 fellow students looked forward to the after-school Bible notes. However, on May 9, 2016, Principal Melanie Pagliaro approached Mr. Zavala at that location, and demanded that C only hand out the notes on a public sidewalk, far from the exit, off school property. The family immediately complied.Gaged by the Left

But it got a whole lot worse (Emphasis added):

Later that day, however, a Los Angeles Deputy Sheriff knocked at the door of C’s home, demanding that C’s note sharing cease altogether because someone might be offended.” C’s family then asked Liberty Counsel to help protect their child’s constitutional freedoms.

“This is a clear, gross violation of the rights of a child,” Liberty Counsel said.  “That the CP 01school district enlisted a police officer to intimidate C and his family makes this case even more outrageous.”

“I would expect something like this to happen in Communist Romania, where I went to elementary school, but cops don’t bully 7-year-olds who want to talk about Jesus in the Land of the Free,” said Horatio “Harry” Mihet, Esq., Vice President of Legal Affairs & Chief Litigation Counsel of Liberty Counsel.

Liberty Counsel has sent the Palmdale school board a letter demanding they correct this breach of the boy’s Constitutional rights.

Freedom is never free Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

More Signs of Our Times


waving flag New WhatDidYouSay Logo

I had an appointment yesterday at the VA Hospital Medical Center for the results of a skin biopsy (Like 14 other times, it is cancer. Thanks Democrats for bathing me in Agent Orange in Vietnam and sending me out for 15 months without sun block in one of the hottest places on earth).

As I entered the main building, I was greeted with the following sign:

IMG_1134

That’s right. The Homosexual Mafia has struck the VA.

Today, I can across the following article:

VA moves to allow sex-reassignment surgeries for transgender veterans

By Douglas Ernst – The Washington Times – Friday, June 3, 2016 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/3/va-seeks-rule-change-to-allow-sex-reassignment-sur/

Veterans Affairs Secretary Robert McDonald talks about the state of the department while speaking at a luncheon at the National Press Club in Washington on Nov. 6, 2015. (Associated Press) **FILE**

Veterans Affairs Secretary Robert McDonald talks about the state of the department while speaking at a luncheon at the National Press Club in Washington on Nov. 6, 2015. (Associated Press) **FILE** more >

Transgender veterans may soon be eligible for sex-reassignment surgeries if a proposed rule change at the Department of Veterans Affairs is approved. The Executive Office of the President recently announced the possible rule change on its website.

“Surgical procedures are now widely accepted in the medical community as medically necessary treatment for gender dysphoria,” the announcement stated. “Additionally, recent medical research shows that gender dysphoria is a serious condition that has had severe medical consequences for certain patients if transition-related surgeries and procedures are not provided.

“In light of these medical advances and recent research, VA would revise its regulation to remove the prohibition on medical services that are considered gender alterations,” the website said. “In this way, medical decisions would be made on a case-by-case basis about what procedures are medically necessary to treat gender dysphoria.”

VA officials declined to say precisely when the rule was first proposed, but said it has been mulled since at least 2014, Time magazine reported Thursday.

“At that time some of these surgical procedures were not as well-developed as they are now,” Jillian Shipherd, a co-director of the VA’s LGBT health care program, told the magazine. “The science about what the international standards of care are was very different from where we are today.”More forced

Gene Silvestri, VA coordinator with the American Military Partner Association, which advocates for LGBT veterans, cheered the move.

“This sets a tone. The VA is part of the government,” Mr. Silvestri told The Wall Street Journal Friday. “We’ll see a change in treatment and culture and acceptance.”

The moderator of Doctrine Man, a popular news aggregator for the military community, said the decision could be seen as the agency not properly prioritizing its most urgent problems.

“I do take issue with this change, but more so because I think the VA has bigger issues on its plate than this, and the decision to perform such surgeries isn’t as simple as it seems on the surface,” the website reported. “There’s also the issue of service connection, but I don’t think that plays a role here since the VA treats pretty much any condition for qualified veterans. And I don’t think there’s a long line of ‘suffering veterans’ standing outside the VA today waiting for this surgery, but there are a lot of others waiting for other procedures. So, I guess we’ll just have to wait and see where this goes.”engineering2

The proposed rule change is open for public comment, The Journal reported. No date has been issued for a final decision.

Picture1 Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

 

 

Katie Couric’s Anti-Gun Producers Repeatedly Violated Federal Gun Laws


waving flagBy   3, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://thefederalist.com/2016/06/03/katie-courics-anti-gun-producers-repeatedly-violated-federal-gun-laws/

Katie Couric’s Anti-Gun Producers Repeatedly Violated Federal Gun Laws

Katie, get your gun lawyer.

By now you’ve probably heard about Katie Couric’s new anti-gun documentary “Under The Gun,” and how her producer doctored video of interviews with gun owners in order to make them look stupid and heartless. Couric’s producer and director, Stephanie Soechtig, admitted to doctoring the video, and Couric herself kinda sorta apologized for it.

But that’s not the worst thing that happened with the making of this documentary. It turns out that Couric’s production team deliberately conspired to violate federal gun laws. According to video obtained by Ammoland, a shooting sports news website, one of Couric’s producers deliberately committed at least four separate felonies by purchasing four separate firearms across state lines without a background check.

In the video, Soechtig openly admits that she directed one of her employees to purchase guns across state lines, and that he absolutely followed her orders:

gun

SOECHTIG: We sent a producer out and he was from Colorado. He went to Arizona, and he was able to buy a Bushmaster and then three other pistols without a background check in a matter of four hours. And that’s perfectly legal. He wasn’t doing some sort of underground market. [..] And he just met someone in the parking lot of Wendy’s and bought a Bushmaster. Legally. Like, this is legal.

Except it’s not legal. Like, it’s illegal. Super duper illegal. Quadruple illegal in the case of the Soechtig employee who purchased four firearms across state lines without processing the sale through a federal firearms licensee (FFL) in his home state of Colorado.

Federal law is abundantly clear on what types of transactions require federal background checks. Gun owners tend to understand these laws incredibly well. Gun controllers like Soechtig do not. Under federal law, all gun purchases from an FFL must be accompanied by a federal background check. It doesn’t matter if the FFL sells a gun at a retail location, at a gun show, or out of the back of a car in a Wendy’s parking lot. All FFL transactions require a federal background check. It doesn’t matter who you are or where you’re from: if you buy a gun from an FFL, the FFL must confirm that you have passed a federal background check.

Next we have interstate purchases, all of which must be conducted through an FFL in the buyer’s home state. It is illegal to purchase a gun across state lines unless the transaction is processed through an FFL in the buyer’s home state. And what did we just learn about all FFL purchases? That they require federal background checks. Ergo, all interstate purchases must be accompanied by federal background checks.

What does that mean? It means that a producer who resides in Colorado cannot legally buy a gun in Arizona unless that gun is shipped to an FFL in Colorado, whereby that FFL confirms that the Colorado resident can legally own that firearm. The Colorado resident who bought the gun from someone in Arizona cannot take possession of that gun until the Colorado FFL receives the gun from Arizona and confirms that the Colorado buyer can legally own that weapon. Once that happens, the Colorado FFL would transfer possession of the gun to the Colorado buyer.

The federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives even has a handy FAQ on its website which directly answers the question of whether you can buy a gun across state lines:

How may an unlicensed person receive a firearm in his or her State that he or she purchased from an out–of–State source? An unlicensed person who is not prohibited from receiving or possessing firearms may purchase a firearm from an out–of–State source, provided the transfer takes place through a Federal firearms licensee in his or her State of residence. [18 U.S.C 922(a)(3) and 922(b)(3); 27 CFR 478.29]

But that’s not what happened according to Soechtig’s very own testimony. According to Soechtig, she gave direct orders to an employee of hers who lives in Colorado to buy some guns in Arizona without undergoing a federal background check. He then acted on those orders, and, according to Soechtig’s own admission, proceeded to illegally purchase four separate firearms from a seller in Arizona. And if he was purchasing the guns for Soechtig rather than himself, you can add illegal straw purchases to the list of federal crimes.

Soechtig’s employee, acting on her orders, repeatedly violated federal gun laws. And he did so not just because of his own monumental ignorance, but because of the aggressive ignorance of Stephanie Soechtig, Katie Couric’s hand-picked producer, director, and writer of the anti-gun documentary.

Soechtig’s chest-thumping ignorance and arrogance on display in that interview–“Legally. Like, this is legal.”–are a perfect example of why so many gun owners care so little about the opinions of sanctimonious gun controllers. Because they have absolutely no clue what they’re talking about. They don’t understand how guns work. They don’t understand crime statistics. They don’t know the difference between semi-automatic and automatic. And they can’t even deign to spend 5 minutes researching actual gun laws before declaring that those laws just aren’t sufficient.More Evidence

The one thing gun controllers all agree on, however, is that strong enforcement of commonsense gun laws is key to preventing senseless gun violence. Katie Couric, Stephanie Soechtig, and their entire anti-gun documentary team now have a chance to put their money where their mouths are. If enforcement of federal gun laws is essential to preventing gun violence, then Soechtig and her team must pay the price for their willful and admitted violations of federal gun laws.

When Soechtig and her team plea to federal charges for violating the nation’s commonsense gun laws, we’ll know they’re serious about cutting down on gun crime. Until then, we’ll know they’re just a bunch of ignorant, gun-trafficking profiteers who want to take away our rights while they violate with absolute impunity the very laws they demand.

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Tag Cloud