Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Archive for January, 2015

BREAKING: Karl Marx Delivers America’s State of the Union Address


January 20, 2015 By

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://www.tpnn.com/2015/01/20/breaking-karl-marx-delivers-americas-state-of-the-union-address/

Obama Marx
Sounding more like Communism’s founder Karl Marx, rather than one of America’s founding fathers, Barack Obama delivered America’s 2015 State of the Union Address on Tuesday evening, stubbornly hammering the American people’s freedom with more proposed confiscatory tax hikes and brutal regulatory schemes, all while Democrat enablers in both Houses of Congress clapped like sycophantic seals before their “Dear Leader.”

Imperial President ObamaSpeaking before the legislative bodies Obama has reduced to nothing more than an overpaid debate society, Obama dressed down the nation with a theme that focused on punishing those who do “spectacularly well” with onerous taxes, while redistributing the American workers’ income to bureaucrats in Washington, DC, and illegal aliens who he unconstitutionally issued amnesty to through royal edict.

Using class warfare rhetoric straight out of Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals,” Obama pandered to the undefined “middle class,” saying, “this country does best when everyone gets their fair shot, everyone does their fair share, and everyone plays by the same rules,” as he fails to mention that his controlist policies have crushed the average Americans from every measurable statistic, Cloward Pevin with explanationincluding the 92 million Americans out of the work force, the most since the second worst president in American history, Jimmy Carter. 

Unlike fellow Democrat Bill Clinton, who after getting crushed by Republicans in 1994, ran to the middle, moderating and negotiating with the GOP to balance the budget and pass welfare reform (which Obama overturned with his “pen”), the scandal-ridden Obama preached his “equality” agenda, the very tyrannical scheme that Founding Father Samuel Adams warned against, prophetically warning about “The Utopian schemes of leveling.” ATT00513 Power over people

“The Utopian schemes of leveling, and a community of goods, are as visionary and impracticable as those which vest as those which vest all property in the Crown. [These ideas] are arbitrary, despotic, and, in our government, unconstitutional,” wrote Samuel Adams.

With the cost of college already inflated to bubble-like levels thanks to taxpayer-funded subsidies, Obama is mashing down the accelerator through the floorboard, with a vote-buying scheme to further inflate the cost of college, as well as hosing taxpayers at the same time, a double-win for Obama, by proposing a plan that would offer “free” community college to certain students who met his arbitrary criteria, a plan that is estimated to cost taxpayers $60 BILLION over 10 years.

The mainstream media will ignore the fact that to pay for the economically illiterate scheme, government would be breaking their own rules of “529″ college savings plans, which parents were promised would be able to be withdrawn tax-free as long as they were used to pay for college costs, another government bait and switch similar to the promise that Social Security was a retirement plan where you would have your own account that you could withdraw from in retirement. As we all know, crooked politicians from both parties spent the Social Security money, all done in for political greed.

Obama said he is magically lowering the price of community college to “zero.” Can he use his “pen and phone” to do that for other expenses in life too? Maybe he could start with taxes. liberals-thanks-saul-alinsky-political-poster-1308396354

Keep in mind that government cost estimates, like Obamacare, which was passed based on a stack of Democrat lies, are almost always drastically underestimated. When Medicare was passed in 1965 under Democrat Lyndon B. Johnson’s “Great Society,” government projected that the cost in 1990 would be $9 billion on Part A hospital costs. The actual cost in 1990 was $67 billion. Today, we have Parts A, B, C, and thanks to Republican George W. Bush, Part D. The total cost for Medicare in 2013 was $585.7 billion, not including other socialist entitlement programs, all of which threaten to bankrupt the nation.

Obama was virtually silent on the mention of the rising threats of Islamic terrorism, as usual, and as would be expected. As was he silent on the over $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities the nation suffers from, and the $18 trillion-dollar debt, $8 million that occurred under his reign.

Samuel Adams also had a quote which should be heeded by the squishy moderate RINOs who make up much of the Republican Party, who were elected in November not to “get along” with Obama, but to stop his dictatorial reign. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, who has become more of a chamber of crony capitalism, rather than a promoter of American free enterprise, should also take note:


“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels of arms. Crouch down and like the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.” 
Most Americans, who participated in drinking games like taking a drink every time Santa Obama said “equality” or “fairness” were soused by the time the speech was over. They didn’t miss much. more evidence

About Matthew Burke

Matthew BurkeMatthew Burke is a former Financial Advisor/Planner for 24 years. He was a 2010 Constitutional Conservative candidate for U.S. Congress in Washington State. View all Posts by Matthew Burke

ALLEN WEST: Obama Releases Convicted Islamic Terrorist From Federal Prison


Posted on January 21, 2015

This is not a ‘Gitmo’ release.

vidRELEASE

Islamapologist

Freedom with Prayer

AMERICAN SNIPERS: Protection From Islam’s Tyrannical Grip


Written by Audrey Russo on January 21, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://clashdaily.com/2015/01/american-snipers-protection-islams-tyrannical-grip/

The film American Sniper…which smashed box office history…covered the life and legacy of US Navy SEAL, Chris Kyle. A man (whose boots his detractors couldn’t shine) that deserves our utmost respect and honor.

But this flick did much more than honor Chris…it focused on the men who have our backs, against an Islamic enemy now run amok over free people…

These are the highly skilled marksmen that are more concerned with how many lives they SAVE, than the few they take. They don’t just target enemies, they also target supplies/equipment our enemies use to murder our troops.

So, how does this concern the average American? They are the wall of protection between freedom and tyrannical ideologies like Islam…

Our current totalitarian enemies, not only on the battlefield but on our very shores, are the followers of Islam. Whether followed completely or not, their system calls for:

  • Inequality in governmental rule over citizens. Former Muslim and friend of my show, Noni Darwish said:
    • This [Islam] is not religion. It has nothing to do with religion. Religion is a relationship with God. … Islam is a relationship with the State. Islam is a one-party, totalitarian system. It’s a one-party State that will not allow you to speak. And it will kill anybody who challenges or questions.

  • No equality for non-Muslims. No equality for women. (Quran 9:29; 18:26)

  • There are 109 verses in the Quran that call for cruel and unusual punishments to non-Muslims.

  • The only freedom in Islam is the freedom to accept Islam. (Quran 4:89)

  • There is no freedom of religion under Sharia Islamic Law. (Quran 9:29)

This is just skimming the surface of what this ideology has in store for free people in the West.

Our champions, who voluntarily guard our freedoms, focus…with pinpoint accuracy…on the destruction of the enemies of freedom. The uncomplicated progression of protection is:

  • Our military snipers target those targeting our troops.

  • Our troops are alive and free to destroy the enemy and strike fear into their hearts of ever again attacking our homeland/people.

  • Hence, millions of innocent lives are saved as a result of the American sniper’s actions.

Simple…yes, to comprehend. But arduously sacrificial on the part of our Military members (and their families). And since the Arab/Muslim mindset is only deterred in their violence by Military strength…the fear of being whacked by our Military is enough to keep us safe for another day.Islam is NOT

So, as we continue to stand as watchmen on the wall of freedom…warning of the peril in political systems (cloaked in religion) like Islam: Let us NEVER lose sight of the Brave in our Armed Forces who daily guard those walls…as a labor of love.

Shalom through strength…

Heart

Freedom with Prayer

Fact check: Obama claims credit for an incomplete recovery


By Associated Press

It’s always problematic when a president takes credit for an improving economy, just as it is when he’s blamed for things going bad. A leader can only do so much, for better or worse, and there are two sides to every economy. But after an election in which Obama largely held off on chest-beating, he claimed credit in bold terms for what is going right.

Also in his speech, Obama skimmed over the cost to taxpayers of free community college tuition and invited closer scrutiny with his claims about US support for Syrian moderates and about his record of public-lands preservation.Imperial President Obama

A look at some of his claims, and the facts and the political climate behind them, as well as a glance at the Republican response:

Obama: “At this moment — with a growing economy, shrinking deficits, bustling industry and booming energy production — we have risen from recession freer to write our own future than any other nation on Earth.”

The facts: By many measures, the economy is still recovering from the deep scars left by the Great Recession.

Job growth has been healthy, but fueled in part by lower-paying jobs in areas such as retail and restaurants, which have replaced many higher-paying positions in manufacturing and construction. Part-time jobs also remain elevated: There are still 1.7 million fewer workers with full-time jobs than when the recession began in December 2007.

And the faster hiring hasn’t pushed up wages much. They have been growing at a tepid pace of about 2 percent a year since the recession ended 5½ years ago. That’s barely ahead of inflation and below the annual pace of about 3.5 to 4 percent that is typical of a fully healthy economy.

That has left the income of the typical household below its pre-recession level. Inflation-adjusted median household income reached $53,880 in November 2014, according to an analysis of government data by Sentier Research. That is about 4 percent higher than when it bottomed out in 2011. But it is still 4.5 percent lower than the $56,447 median income in December 2007, the month the recession began.

Booming energy production is indeed a reality, but that’s a phenomenon many years in the making, with the development of cost-effective extraction from fracking and other means playing into the rise of the US as an energy production giant.


Obama: “I am sending this Congress a bold new plan to lower the cost of community college — to zero.”

The facts: Zero for qualifying students; an estimated $60 billion over 10 years to the Treasury.

Obama confronts a Republican-controlled Congress that can be expected to be wary of a new program costing that much. Moreover, the proposal requires states to contribute about a quarter of the money, and getting them to go along is bound to be tough. Many states refused to expand Medicaid under the health care law, for example, even though Washington is picking up the entire cost in the first years.

On the other hand, community college is an issue close to home for state government, perhaps more appealing than partnering with Washington on the health law, so the idea could have a fighting chance if it can get through Congress. Educators are divided on its merits, with some worrying that aid for a community college education could divert students and scholarships away from four-year schools.


Obama: “We’ve set aside more public lands and waters than any administration in history.”

The facts: Waters is the key word here. Before expanding the Pacific Remote Islands National Monument last year from almost 87,000 square miles to more than 490,000 square miles, Obama had protected far fewer acres than his four predecessors, including President George W. Bush.

Expansion of the massive Pacific islands monument puts Obama on top. It’s nearly all water, however, and the move has limited practical implications. While it bans commercial fishing, deep-sea mining and other extraction of underwater resources, little fishing or drilling occur in the mid-ocean region now.Delusional


Obama: “Thanks to a growing economy, the recovery is touching more and more lives. Wages are finally starting to rise again. We know that more small-business owners plan to raise their employees’ pay than at any time since 2007.”

The facts: A survey of small businesses by the National Federation of Independent Business does show that a rising proportion plans to raise wages. But plans to raise pay aren’t the same as actually raising them.

Average hourly earnings rose just 1.7 percent in December from 12 months earlier, according to the Labor Department. That’s about half the rate that is typical of a healthy economy and actually lower than the previous month. Economists generally expect wage gains to accelerate this year, as unemployment continues to fall and businesses are forced to offer higher pay to attract workers. But there is scant evidence that it is happening yet.


Obama: “In Iraq and Syria, American leadership — including our military power — is stopping ISIL’s advance. Instead of getting dragged into another ground war in the Middle East, we are leading a broad coalition, including Arab nations, to degrade and ultimately destroy this terrorist group. We’re also supporting a moderate opposition in Syria that can help us in this effort.”

The facts: The US also has been slow to set up long-promised training for the moderate Syrian opposition, and has yet to begin the actual vetting of the rebels. Also, despite persistent pleas from the rebels, the US hasn’t sent the more lethal weapons they want. US officials have expressed concerns that the weapons could end up in the hands of insurgents.

Military leaders, however, agree that coalition airstrikes and the military effort in Syria and Iraq have stopped the momentum of the Islamic State group, or ISIL, made it hard for the insurgents to communicate and travel, and hurt their oil revenues.Wake up America


Sen. Joni Ernst: The freshman from Iowa listed Obama’s health care law among his “failed policies” and added, “We see the hurt caused by canceled health care plans and higher monthly insurance bills.”

The facts: The jury is still out on the law Republicans call “ObamaCare.”

The number of uninsured people is down by at least 10 million. A large ongoing Gallup survey documented a steady drop in the nation’s uninsured rate since the law’s big coverage expansion began last year.

The law’s record on affordability is mixed. The share of Americans forgoing needed medical care because of cost is down significantly, according to a Commonwealth Fund survey, and fewer are struggling to pay medical bills. Yet many insured people with modest incomes still have problems with high out-of-pocket costs.

As for harm caused by lost insurance, many in Ernst’s party are intent on repealing the law, which would probably mean even more lost coverage, because many of the estimated 10 million uninsured people who have gained coverage through the Affordable Care Act would no longer be able to afford their premiums.

Complete Message

Freedom with Prayer

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


Cowards

more evidence

DO NOT JACKASS

Freedom with Prayer

Obama’s Budget Would Tax College Savings Plans


Posted on 20 January 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://minutemennews.com/2015/01/obamas-budget-tax-college-savings-plans/Obama MoneyPresident Barack Obama’s budget proposal—which he will outline during his State of the Union address Tuesday night—would tax college savings plans that benefit middle-class families, raising concerns among some policy experts.Cloward Pevin with explanation

Obama’s budget includes $320 billion in tax hikes over the next decade to pay for larger child-care and education tax credits and free tuition for community college students. One of those tax increases involves eliminating some of the tax-free benefits of 529 college savings plans, which the president would replace by broadening eligibility for the American Opportunity Tax Credit (AOTC).

The 529 plans, named after that section of the Internal Revenue Code, allow families to participate in pre-paid tuition plans at some colleges and universities or invest in a savings program managed by a state’s plan or a broker. Earnings from the plans have been tax-exempt since 2001 as long as they are spent on higher education costs, but Obama’s budget would reduce that benefit.Picture5

Taxing earnings from the 529 plans could further depress the savings rate among Americans, which is already at historic lows.DemWarProsperityPIX

Ryan Ellis with Americans for Tax Reform (ATR) said in an email that repealing tax benefits on the plans would primarily hurt middle-class families.Picture6

 Freedom with Prayer

The radicalization of #BlackLivesMatter


URL of the Original Posting Site: http://libertyunyielding.com/2015/01/20/radicalization-blacklivesmatter/

BlackLivesMatter-300x204
Let’s face facts: The Black Lives Matter movement, if it can be called a movement, was a sham from the beginning. Far more blacks die in this country at the hands of other blacks than as a result of run-ins with law enforcement. The decisions of two grand juries not to indict police officers implicated in the deaths of two black men may have seemed like a convenient excuse for a protest, complete with its own Twitter hashtag. But there was never going to be a sustained grassroots movement because the grievance is built on a house of cards.Thug lives matter

Lacking genuine motivation, BLM has had nowhere to go but left, becoming increasingly radicalized and co-opted by liberals — many of them, ironically, rich and white. This trend has manifested itself in recent news stories. Last week, a group of Ferguson protesters made a pilgrimage to the Holy Land, specifically to the “Palestinian Territories” in the West Bank, in a show of solidarity against the “Zionist state.” Ahmad Abuznaid, legal and policy director of the Dream Defenders, organized the trip, whose goals he enumerated thus:

[P]rimarily to allow for the group members to experience and see first hand the occupation, ethnic cleansing and brutality Israel has levied against Palestinians, but also to build real relationships with those on the ground leading the fight for liberation.com03

SEE SECOND ARTILCE BELOW

Showing animosity toward another group that has suffered oppression, Jews, has always been a curious and ironic hallmark of radical black leaders — think Sharpton, Jackson, and Farrakhan. It is utterly unsurprising to see anti-Semitism as a credo of BLM. In a video interview with Noah McKenna, one of the white organizers of a protest cum traffic snarl outside Boston, he is asked about anti-Jewish postings on his group’s Facebook page (beginning around 0:50). His response? “This feels like trolling.”

Yesterday, the new and devalued BLMers crashed an event in St. Louis (aka, “protest central”) honoring Martin Luther King, Jr. The interlopers sought to “reclaim” what they insist is King’s more radical past. Jessica Chasmar of the Washington Times writes:

Despite pleas from march organizers to respect the MLK event, demonstrators blocked Rue de la Place by the Old Courthouse, where the march was to begin Monday morning, protesting what they called a watered-down legacy of King. [Emphasis added]

The problem with claiming that King’s legacy has been “watered down” is that he left behind a body of literature that runs counter philosophically to everything these latter-day protesters claim to stand for — unless they have access to some heretofore undisclosed papers in which the civil rights giant endorsed rioting or looting.

Howard Portnoy

 Howard Portnoy has written for HotAir, NewsBusters, Weasel Zippers, Conservative Firing Line, RedCounty, and New York’s Daily News. He has one published novel, Hot Rain, (G. P. Putnam’s Sons), and has been a guest on Radio Vice Online with Jim Vicevich, The Alana Burke Show, Smart Life with Dr. Gina, and The George Espenlaub Show.

 

Ferguson protesters travel to Palestine in show of solidarity against ‘Zionist state’

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://libertyunyielding.com/2015/01/20/ferguson-protesters-make-pilgrimage-palestine-show-solidarity-zionist-state/

Creeping Sharia

[Ed. – A whole new reason to dislike these morons]

A group of Ferguson protesters has visited Palestine in support of activists aiming to create ties between the two groups and to “see first hand the occupation, ethnic cleansing and brutality Israel has levied against Palestinians.”more evidence

The group consists of members from the Dream Defenders, Black Lives Matter, and other Ferguson protesters.Thug lives matter

The ten day Palestine trip organized by the legal and policy director of the Dream Defenders, Ahmad Abuznaid, offered protesters to visit areas such as the West Bank.

“The goals were primarily to allow for the group members to experience and see first hand the occupation, ethnic cleansing and brutality Israel has levied against Palestinians, but also to build real relationships with those on the ground leading the fight for liberation.”

Activist Cherrell Brown asserted that the police violence carried out on African American is comparable to Palestinians currently living under the “Zionist state.”

Freedom with Prayer

Obama Trolls GOP: Invites Illegal Alien To Be His Guest of Honor At State Of The Union Address…


URL of the Original Posting Site: http://weaselzippers.us/211600-obama-trolls-gop-invites-illegal-alien-to-be-his-guest-of-honor-at-state-of-the-union-address/

obama-smirk

Ughhh…

Via CNS News:

Ana Zamora, who came to the United States illegally, is among the 22 people selected to sit with First Lady Michelle Obama at tonight’s State of the Union address.com01

This is an honor bestowed on people who provide a human face for the liberal agenda that President Obama will lay out. Ana is the face of Obama’s executive amnesty, which conservative Republicans call an affront to the U.S. Constitution.Imperial President Obamakingobamafingerconstitution-300x204obama-border-is-open-378x257

The White House describes Ana as a “letter writer, student, DREAMer.” She was bought here illegally as a child by parents who were themselves illegal aliens, and that’s exactly why she’s being honored by the White House.com02

Freedom with Prayer

 

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


Hands Up, Wallets Out

“Empty your pockets!”

Send-In-The-Clowns

Sharpton Jackson 01

racismjacksonsharptonobamaracebaiterssettingamericaback

Freedom with Prayer

Abortionist Loses Medical License, Botched Abortion Left Baby Stuggling in Toilet Trying to Live


by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com  1/19/15

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://www.lifenews.com/2015/01/19/abortionist-loses-medical-license-botched-abortion-left-baby-stuggling-to-survive-in-toilet-trying-to-live/

New information has surfaced today of a Florida-based abortion practitioner who recently lost his medical license. He is responsible for killing babies in abortions and injuring women — and for one horrible botched abortion case that left a baby born alive in a toilet struggling to survive.Picture14 Picture15

A few years ago, abortion “doctor” Zvi Harry Perper was arrested and charged with enriching himself by illegally writing and selling prescriptions for powerful painkillers. He was eventually jailed for his crimes.

Now, following a lengthy bureaucratic process, a pro-life blogger indicates Perper has finally lost his medical license.

Back in July the Florida Medical Board issued an emergency suspension of abortionist Zvi Harry Perper’s medical license. According to the Florida Medical Board website, the Emergency Suspension Order was filed 7/23/14.

But a Voluntary Relinquishment Pending Board Action was filed September 10, 2014. The order was not on pro-life radars, because, this particular “doctor” was sitting in prison when the emergency suspension was issued.

harryperperPerper is one of 17 people who was snared in a sting operation authorities conducted that netted 17 people on charges of engaging in an illegal drug racket, but his association with abortion was not lost on pro-life blogger Jill Stanek, who wrote about him in connection to an infamous abortion case years ago.

“In 2005 he was the abortionist on call when beautiful Baby Rowan was tragically aborted alive in James Pendergraft’s Orlando late-term abortion mill,” she said. “Finally, [there is] some semblance of justice.”

Perper is the abortion practitioner who began the abortion procedure in a case that result in the suspension of the medical license of another abortion practitioner, James Pendergraft. The latter was fined $10,000 and had his licensed revoked for one year over an illegal late-term abortion he did in 2005.Third of our generation

In 2005, a woman filed a lawsuit against one of Pendergraft’s abortion facilities saying it refused to call emergency personnel to help her or her baby, born on the second day of a two-day abortion procedure. The pro-life law firm Liberty Counsel filed complaints with the Florida Department of Health and the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration and alleged that staff at the abortion facility, including Perper, refused to help Angele or her baby, born on the second day of a two-day abortion procedure.

SIGN THE PETITION! Congress Must Ban Abortions Because Babies Feel Intense Pain

Angele had chosen the “labor and delivery process” for her abortion as opposed to partial-birth abortion or dismemberment. She thought it would be less harmful for her unborn baby. The woman, who is in her 30s, had asked what would happen if the baby were born alive.

“I wanted it to be as humane and painless as possible for my son,” Angele told WorldNetDaily. “They told me they would guide a needle directly into his heart and it would put him to sleep, and he wouldn’t feel anything.”

harryperper2Following her initial visit to the abortion facility, she could feel the baby still moving within her. The next day she took pills meant to induce labor.

I waited outside, cramping and crying, for the clinic to open. My contractions were close. I had been having them for hours. I knocked repeatedly at the door,” Angele told WorldNetDaily.

After she obtained access to the abortion facility, she delivered her son.

“In one agonizing push, I felt and heard something come out. Then immediately another push. I was weak. I just held my head in my hands for a moment. Then I decided to stand up. I looked. There was my baby, the whitish cord and what I thought surely must be the placenta,” Angele said.

Angele added, “I started sobbing and lay down (on) the floor. I stared and stared at my son. I was horrified that I had just had him in a commode.”

Angele then screamed for help for her son, whom she called Rowan. When an abortion facility employee finally arrived, she refused to call 911 for the baby, who was still moving. Angele ended up calling a friend, asking her to call an ambulance. But Rowan died before help arrived.

Let God

Freedom with Prayer

Works for a living, doesn’t block traffic


Posted by    Monday, January 19, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/01/works-for-a-living-doesnt-block-traffic/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LegalInsurrection+%28Le%C2%B7gal+In%C2%B7sur%C2%B7rec%C2%B7tion%29

Comparing Olympia’s gun rights rally to Boston’s #BlackLivesMatter traffic blockage.

LI #12b

I must admit, I had a serious attack of schadenfreude when I learned that the #BlackLivesMatter protesters in Boston were upset by the outrage directed at them after they blocked Route 93. I guess I wasn’t surprised that some protest leaders live at home with their parents in wealthy suburbs.

I guess they were stunned to learn that people trying to get to work felt that their own lives mattered, too.

Let’s contrast this event with another rally by gun rights activists in the blue haven of Washington state. The Washington Firearms Leadership and Activism Group (WAFLAG), Protect Our Gun Rights Washington, and the Gun Rights Coalition hosted Rally for Your Rights against I-594, an “18½-page incoherent, rambling, unconstitutional gun control initiative” that was recently passed by the state legislature.

Given the crowd and the passion, I suspect it will not be the last event.

More than 200 gun-rights activists, most of them carrying firearms, rallied on the steps of Washington’s Capitol Thursday morning to protest the expansive background-check law state voters passed in November.

State legislators and other opponents of Initiative 594′s requirement of background checks on all gun sales and transfers voiced their belief that the new law unfairly infringes on their constitutional rights, and a handful of the protesters carried long guns into the public viewing gallery of the state House of Representatives just as the morning’s brief floor session ended.

A series of speakers urged the crowd outside the Capitol to work to build support to repeal Initiative 594, both by contacting their legislators and by lobbying their friends and relatives. Several I-594 opponents carried signs with messages including “Prosecute criminals not harass us” and “I will not comply” during the chilly morning rally.

….Although the protest was explicitly directed against the new background-check law, a number of speakers and crowd members said their feelings extend to an opposition to gun control efforts in general.cropped-george-washington-regarding-2nd-amandment.jpg

But, like the Boston rally, there was some real drama. This video shows state representatives Graham Hunt and Matt Shea making an appearance to discuss some of their proposals to support the rights of Washington’s gun owners, which seems typical of a political rally.

vid02

Victory Girl contributor Kit Lange takes us behind-the-scenes, where the action was really happening.

So-called “gun rights groups” organized a “Rally for Your Rights” where folks against I-594 could come and listen to them talk about how they weren’t going to actually fight to repeal this unconstitutional law, but instead would try to offer a compromise to the legislature. These groups also, because they didn’t want to scare or offend anyone, asked that people leave their long guns at home and dress in business attire. Perception! they urged. Curb yourselves because otherwise you’ll scare the undecided legislators and make them not like us or vote the way we want.

They apparently never learned Liberty 101: The moment you allow your rights to be curbed because of someone else’s fear or offense you have lost the fight to keep your rights, for you have just shown the way to take them all.

Some of us, however, remember that lesson well…because we know the fates of those who forgot it. We are not subjects and our rights are not open to interpretation or other people’s feelings. If anything, the legislature should be afraid, because their job security depends on the people they have refused to serve.

So we came armed with long guns anyway.Freedom is not free VOTE

It is reported that the State Patrol officers stayed close to the gun-carrying protesters who had entered the Capitol and that no arrests related to the rally were made. It’s legal to openly carry firearms into the Capitol and the public viewing galleries above the chamber floors.

And while the people of Washington are battling to repeal gun control legislation, a Rhode Island lawmaker is trying to prevent road blockages by protesters in his state.

Rhode Island lawmaker said Friday that he’ll introduce a bill making it a felony to block a highway, like protesters did in Boston a day earlier.

State Sen. Leonidas Raptakis said he supports First Amendment rights to free speech and peaceful demonstrations but is concerned some gatherings could threaten public welfare.

Demonstrators alleging racial profiling and violence by police against minorities blocked a busy Boston-area highway used to connect to Providence during the Thursday morning commute and caused lengthy traffic jams, inconveniencing thousands of people and preventing an ambulance from getting through. A similar protest shut down I-95 in Providence for 15 minutes in November.cropped-freedoms-battle-with-heading.jpg

And just because I cannot watch this video too much, here is a replay of Tyree Landrum’s rant against #BlackLivesMatter road blockers in my hometown. Others must have felt the same way: A crowdfunding site wanted to raise $2000 so Landrum could give his kids a great Christmas. The final tally was over $15,000.

vid03

It’s good to see hard-working Americans pushing back on those who would infringe upon their need to get to work and their right to bear arms…and seeing it rewarded.Freedom with Prayer

I’m coining a new term: “Islamapologist”


Written by Allen West on January 19, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://allenbwest.com/2015/01/im-coining-new-term-islamapologist/

Erdogan, Earnest and you-know-who
Erdogan, Earnest and you-know-who

Over the weekend I was chatting with a dear friend and supporter from Lafayette, Louisiana, Greg Mosing. We were talking about our reticence in the West to confront the Islamic jihadist enemy and their militant Islamic ideology. We were amazed at how fast the progressive socialist left turned and blamed the cartoonists of Charlie Hebdo — and Western journalism.

As well, we pondered the declaration from White House spokesperson Josh Earnest that GITMO needed to be closed because it inspiring Islamic terrorism — phooey. We were beside ourselves with the use of the term “Islamophobia” by Turkish President Erdogan. It seems anyone presenting the truth about Islam is met with this pejorative.

Well, Greg and I decided it was time to come up with our own term of endearment to codify those will find any excuse or possess the desire to dismiss Islamo-fascism and jihadism. Our new term is “Islamapologist.” This term will be used to classify those who would shift the blame for Islamic terrorism. Or who want to instill self-censorship in those who define this savage and barbaric enemy.com01

I can’t wait until the first time I can use this new term — and there is no copyright so feel free folks. Something tells me we may be able to use the reference “Islamapologist” Tuesday evening during and after the State of the Union address.

Islamapologist

Freedom with Prayer

Fight Them Over There: Kill the terrorists before they reach the West


BY: , January 16, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://freebeacon.com/columns/fight-them-over-there/

U.S. Marines fight the Taliban in Afghanistan / AP

U.S. Marines fight the Taliban in Afghanistan / AP

And there is really only one way America can respond to this challenge. We need to kill them first. We need to kill them on a field of battle whose contours are determined not by the terrorists but by us. We need to kill them over there—in the Middle East—before they reach the West.

I realize that for at least the next two years what I propose is wishful thinking. American policy has reverted to a defensive condition in which Islamic terrorists set the terms of conflict. We have been here before. Until 2001, the United States treated Islamic terrorism as a matter of law enforcement. When our embassies were raided or bombed, when our barracks were destroyed, when our soldiers and sailors were murdered, when our World Trade Center was attacked, when our destroyer was damaged, we treated the assailants as members of an Arabic-speaking mafia, as criminals to be apprehended, tried, and punished.

Didn’t work. The jihad grew. It even found a base in Afghanistan, where it could equip and train and plot. In 2001, in a single fall morning, the World Trade Center was destroyed, the Pentagon bludgeoned, and more than 3,000 innocent people were killed.

America rethought its approach to terrorism. No longer were the terrorists considered felons. They were now unlawful combatants. Surveillance, interrogation, and detention policies became more aggressive. We invaded Afghanistan, we toppled the Taliban, and we sent al Qaeda leadership into hiding.

When America invaded Iraq in 2003, al Qaeda and its followers—joining forces with Saddam’s former commanders and marginalized Sunni tribes—designated the Tigris-Euphrates plain the main battleground of the global jihad. Aspiring jihadists, enemies of the West, traveled to Iraq where they encountered, and were killed by, heavily armed and expertly trained U.S. pilots, soldiers, and Marines.

The point of the war on terrorism was not merely to “decimate” the “core of al Qaeda.” The objective was also, in the course of a long struggle, to delegitimize the Qaeda movement and deter its fellow travelers by revealing Islamism as an evolutionary dead end. The unstated message of the strategy was this: If you choose jihad against the West, you will spend your life in Guantanamo or you will die.

Look what happened. By May 2008, plagiarist and emcee Fareed Zakaria could report: “If you set aside” the war in Iraq, “terrorism has in fact gone way down over the past five years.” And soon one did not have to “set aside” Iraq. When the change in strategy and surge of troops Bush ordered in 2007 began to take effect, violence in Iraq went “way down” too.

With the election of President Obama, however, the conflict between Islamism and America entered a third phase. Our troops were removed from the battlefield in Iraq and Afghanistan, leaving Special Forces and drone pilots to do most of the fighting. The defense budget was cut. Harsh interrogation was curtailed, and Guantanamo Bay slowly emptied. Surveillance practices were disrupted. The words “Islamic terrorism” would not be uttered, for that somehow legitimized extremists. As for the terrorists themselves, they were once again treated like criminals.more evidence

What has resulted is a dramatic uptick in Islamic radicalism. In January 2014 the RAND Corporation found that “the number of Salafi-jihadist groups and fighters increased after 2010, as well as the number of attacks perpetrated by Al Qaeda and its affiliates.” Attacks including the Ft. Hood massacre; the assault on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi; the Boston Marathon bombing whose victims included an 8-year-old boy; and the public beheading of British Fusilier Lee Rigby.

The absence of American troops in Iraq created an opportunity for ISIS, the Islamic army born of the Syrian civil war. Last summer, from its base in Raqqa, Syria, ISIS invaded Iraq. It captured and imposed sharia law on Mosul, a city of more than a million people, beheaded journalists, and threatened Baghdad, the Kurds, and minority sects with extermination.Airstrikes-600-LI America will NOT be drawn Battle-Plans-590-LI Bombing-ISIS-NRD-600-logo Iraq-buck-590-LA Iraq-sacrifices-NRD-600-w-logo Let me be clear Pulling-the-Pin-NRD-600-w-Logo Stable-Iraq MIssion Accomplished WMD-in-Iraq

ISIS “controls more land and has more weapons than any other jihadist organization in history,” according to experts at the American Enterprise Institute. ISIS is said to possess “more than $2 billion in assets” and command an “estimated 40,000 fighters.” ISIS is expert at “propaganda by the deed”: the spectacular use of public violence to provoke fear in your enemies and loyalty in your friends. There is even an ISIS gift shop. A global movement cowering in fear does not sell tchotchkes.

Nor is ISIS the only jihadist group on the offensive. Yemen has collapsed into a civil war between Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and Iranian-backed Houthi militants. Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb operates freely in Libya and Algeria and Mali. Boko Haram slaughtered thousands while expanding its holdings in Nigeria. Al-Shabaab runs central and southern Somalia. Hamas kills Jews from its Gaza satrapy. The Taliban is ready for its comeback in Afghanistan. This swelling of radical Islam—in territory, in resources, in adherents, in scalps—extends to Muslim communities around the world, and to disturbed and alienated men and women hungry to join a winning fight.

The central front of the war on terror is no longer Iraq. It is not Afghanistan. It is the West, and all lands associated with the West. So the radicals strike Israel, they kill in Sydney, they gun down cartoonists and Jews in Paris, they plan to strike the U.S. Capitol with pipe bombs and rifles.

Such a pattern of destruction ought to force a reevaluation of American strategy. But that has not happened. Instead our response to jihadism has been confusing, contradictory, insipid, self-destructive, and inane.AMEN

The administration not only skips a solidarity march in Paris. It won’t call the Charlie Hebdo and kosher market attacks Islamic terrorism. The favorite newspaper of the White House is more concerned with the “fear and resentment” of European populations tired of being killed than it is with terrorism. The error-ridden blog edited by one of the president’s favorite pundits says discussions of free speech “often seem more about justifying Islamophobia against everyday Muslims, who are just as overwhelmingly peaceful as every other religious group, than they are about protecting rights that are seriously endangered.”Obama Muslim collection

Guantanamo inmates are released to Oman, which borders Yemen, on the same day an American jihadist is arrested for plotting an attack on the nation’s Capitol. The State Department says it’s okay for Iran—a radical theocracy that is the largest sponsor of terrorism in the world, that sows upheaval from Lebanon to Syria to Iraq to Bahrain to Yemen, that originated the idea of assassinating Western authors who blaspheme Mohammed—to build additional nuclear plants.

The means by which the president reluctantly has attempted to take the fight to the terrorists are not succeeding. Micromanagement by White House officials of the air campaign against ISIS has resulted in a stalemate. American advisers to Iraq say it will take a minimum of three years to prepare the Iraqi army to roll back the Caliphate. Meanwhile our soldiers are subjected to mortar rounds launched from ISIS positions. So passive-aggressive is the president’s war on ISIS that Iraqis are beginning to suggest that “ISIS is a U.S. creation.” One Iraqi told the Wall Street Journal: “The international coalition against ISIS is a comedy act. America can destroy ISIS in one day only, but it does not do it.”

What about Yemen, which President Obama has held up as a model of intervention? Michael Crowley of Politico reports, “Since mid-September, the U.S. has conducted just three drone strikes in Yemen, down from 19 last year, according to data compiled by the New America Foundation. And that was a fraction of the 2012 peak of 56 drone and air strikes.” Yemen and Syria are the key nodes of a global network of financing, training, and planning for jihadist operations. The United States has allowed this network to persist, indeed to grow in complexity and reach.

Only by extinguishing ISIS can the United States begin to reassert its authority and put the jihadists on the defensive. But increasing the number and pace of drone and air strikes will not be enough. The number of U.S. ground forces in Iraq must be dramatically increased, and America seriously must work to remove the cause of the Syrian civil war: the mass murderer Bashar al-Assad, who continues to use chemical weapons, has entered into a de facto alliance with our terrorist adversary, and is reconstituting his nuclear weapons program.

Above all, America must cease pretending that Muslim rage is something the United States can ignore and avoid or is powerless against or cannot fight over there. We must fight it over there, or be resigned to terrorist attacks over here. Again and again and again.AMEN Freedom with Prayer

Crowder Video Results in Official Fatwa and Death Threats


Posted By Joe For AmericaJanuary 19, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://joeforamerica.com/2015/01/crowder-video-results-official-fatwa-death-threats/

Today we received a forwarded email regarding a video that Crowder posted back in May, 2013.

While I cannot go into much detail of the contents of the forwarded email, it did provide a link to a recent post from Steven saying:

This is the video that’s literally resulted in an official fatwa and literally thousands of threats on my life and that of my family.

Here is the video that the cause for all the death threats and the fatwa. It really is worth watching…vid01

It seems that with the Charlie Hebdo attack , there is a renewed interest in Crowder and his video. Please keep Steven and his family in your thoughts and prayers as the religion of peace continues to call for the death of those who disagree with them.Freedom with Prayer

 

White House: Obama to restrict media’s reporting of anti-jihad articles


By Michael DorstewitzMichael Dorstewitz on January 14, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://libertyunyielding.com/2015/01/14/white-house-obama-restrict-medias-reporting-anti-jihad-articles/#1AwESo67hIi7ZlSj.99

Josh-Earnest-620x429

Source: Legal Insurrection

At Monday’s White House press briefing, chief spokesman Josh Earnest indicated that in light of the terrorist raid of Charlie Hebdo’s Paris offices by jihadists, President Barack Obama would be taking a serious swipe at the First Amendment freedom of the press as it pertains to future anti-Jihadist articles.

The Daily Caller reported:

President Barack Obama has a moral responsibility to push back on the nation’s journalism community when it is planning to publish anti-jihadi articles that might cause a jihadi attack against the nation’s defenses forces, the White House’s press secretary said Jan. 12.

“The president … will not now be shy about expressing a view or taking the steps that are necessary to try to advocate for the safety and security of our men and women in uniform” whenever journalists’ work may provoke jihadist attacks, spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters at the White House’s daily briefing.

The unprecedented reversal of Americans’ civil-military relations, and of the president’s duty to protect the First Amendment, was pushed by Earnest as he tried to excuse the administration’s opposition in 2012 to the publication of anti-jihadi cartoons by the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo.Imperial President Obama kingobamafingerconstitution-300x204

Back in Sept. 2012, then-White House Press Secretary Jay Carney criticized Charlie Hebdo for its publication of cartoon images lampooning Mohammad. He said, according to White House Dossier:

Well, we are aware that a French magazine published cartoons featuring a figure resembling the Prophet Muhammad, and obviously, we have questions about the judgment of publishing something like this. We know that these images will be deeply offensive to many and have the potential to be inflammatory. But we’ve spoken repeatedly about the importance of upholding the freedom of expression that is enshrined in our Constitution.cropped-freedom-is-not-dictator-friendly.pngObama Muslim collection

It’s obvious that the White House, as of Monday, hasn’t backed off from this position.

The First Amendment, as it pertains to the press’ reporting and analyzing of events, provides, “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom … of the press….”

But over and above those rights that are guaranteed and protected under the Constitution, something else is at play here — something advanced by Ross Douthat in his Jan. 7 New York Times commentary:

“If a large enough group of someone is willing to kill you for saying something, then it’s something that almost certainly needs to be said, because otherwise the violent have veto power over liberal civilization, and when that scenario obtains it isn’t really a liberal civilization any more….”

Stated differently, when journalists back off of a story or sanitize its reporting and commentary of events out of fear of terrorist attacks, the terrorists have already won.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Michael DorstewitzMichael Dorstewitz is a recovering Michigan trial lawyer and former research vessel deck officer. He has written extensively for BizPac Review.

More by Michael Dorstewitz

 

 

 

Freedom with Prayer

HERO Cat Saves Abandoned Baby Left in Street! [VIDEO]


Posted by Rodney Lee ConoverJanuary 18, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://joeforamerica.com/2015/01/hero-cat-saves-abandoned-baby-left-street-video/

In Russia, where apparently babies are left in the street in boxes, a neighborhood cat is being hailed as a hero for saving the life of an abandoned baby. The “communal” cat climbed in next to a little baby boy left in a box outside, keeping the child warm and alerting a neighbor with constant “meows”..

The neighbor said of the cat; “She is very placid and friendly so when I heard her mewing I thought that perhaps she had injured herself because normally she would have come and said hello to me. You can imagine my shock when I saw her lying in a box next to a baby..”

From The Mirror: As well as making sure the three-month-old didn’t freeze to death, the moggy (cat) raised the alarm by crying out to make people aware of the boy’s presence. Irina Lavrova, 68, who lives near to where the tot was dumped in Obinsk, Russia, was throwing out rubbish when she heard Masha the cat meowing near the bins.

Cat saves baby
CENCat saves baby Purr-fect: The baby boy was looked after by Masha the cat

She went over to check Masha – a communal cat – was all right, and could not believe her eyes when she saw the baby boy lying among next to the moggy. “Masha is a communal cat who everyone takes turns in looking after,” she said.

Hero cat
Mothering instincts: Masha, pictured with Irina, used its long hair to keep the tot warm

“Clearly her mothering instincts had taken over and she wanted to protect the child.

“He was well-dressed with a little hat and whoever left him here had even left a few nappies and some baby food.”

The baby boy was taken by ambulance to hospital where he was given a check up and declared fit and healthy.

The abandoned baby
The baby boy is in good health, according to medics

See video report below:

Capture

Of course the kid still has to live in Russia..

A long-haired tabby cat has been hailed a hero after finding an abandoned baby in a street and climbing in the box he had been left in to protect him from the cold. As well as making sure the three-month-old didn’t freeze to death, the cat raised the alarm by crying out to make people aware of the boy’s presence.

A woman, who lives near to where the tot was dumped in Obinsk, Russia, was throwing out trash when she heard Masha the cat meowing near the bins.

She went over to check Masha – a communal cat – was all right, and could not believe her eyes when she saw the baby boy lying among next to the cat. The baby boy was taken by ambulance to hospital where he was given a check up and declared fit and healthy.

Freedom with Prayer

 

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


The Imperial President

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://conservativebyte.com/2015/01/imperial-president/

wall

Dupe and Chains

Freedom with Prayer

Meet a Die-Hard Republican Since the Age of 8-Years-Old: Now He’s 12 & Will Blow You Away!


Posted By Scott OsbornJanuary 16, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://joeforamerica.com/2015/01/meet-die-hard-black-republican-since-age-8-years-old-now-hes-12-will-blow/

CJ Pearson is pro-life, believes in limited government, and is fiscally conservative. He wants to abolish the IRS. He describes the corporate tax rate as “crippling” and “inexcusable” and is for the complete elimination of the state minimum wage. He’s also 12.

CJ Pearson is challenging age barriers that keep his peers out of politics.(Photo: Jon-Michael Sullivan/OZY)

Although his parents are democrats, he has considered himself a die-hard Republican since age 8.

He is 12 years old!

This young man spends around 40 hours weekly concentrating on political items like putting up yard signs and making phone calls for GOP candidates. He tirelessly pushes his local representatives to pay attention to their own legislative ideas. He has been writing his political blog since he was only 8.

Did I mention that he is in Middle school?

CJ also founded Young Geor­gians in Government and serves as executive director. YGG’s cause is to lower the age restriction to be elected to the  House to 18 as well as lower it to  21 in the Senate in his home state of Georgia. CJ is ready to run!

He had to take an unexcused absence from school to attend the press conference where State Sen. Josh McKoon announced his sponsorship of a resolution to enact C.J.’s constitutional amendment.

He has even been “Twitter blocked” by Atlanta’s Mayor Kasim Reed for voicing his opinion of a highly controversial decision the Mayor had made. Now that is a proud achievement!

Listen to this well spoken young man for yourself as he is interviewed by The Takeaway. Impressive!

To get more story about CJ, be sure to see Nick Fouriezos‘ post in USA Today/OZY

 Freedom with Prayer

Selma: The Tea Party of Their Day


Posted by Rodney Lee ConoverJanuary 16, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://joeforamerica.com/2015/01/selma-tea-party-day/

Did you see “Selma” the movie? If you have or when you do, watch Oprah’s character in her opening scene and ask yourself if she’s not in fact, fighting for her Constitutional and Civil Rights? Are the activists and marchers regular folk who feel put-upon by a powerful centralized government, intent on denying them their God-given Rights?

oprah selma
Where’s Al Sharpton when you need him?

They’re sick and tired of taking it and now they’re doing something about it – invoking God as an important part of their quest and movement. Sound familiar?

I’m not saying the film is 100% historically accurate, so put that aside for now (please?) – but to my utter surprise they did depict LBJ as the bigot he was.

The historical fact is that LBJ did everything he could to block Civil Rights until it became advantageous to him politically. He HATED black people.

Yes, your “progressive” hero was a bad, bad, dude who continued down the long path of Democrats enslaving and marginalizing blacks in America with his Great Society. If you’re not sure of his true intentions, listen to his own words…

lbjniggers

Do I have to repeat what he says about him having a certain group voting Democrat for a long while? Look it up – they got this thing called; “Google” now. Or just look at the image above.

In case you live under a pile of leaves, the film “Selma,” tells the story of MLK Jr.’s march in Selma, Alabama, which contributed greatly to passage of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. A majority of Republicans voted for it, a majority of Democrats did not. So you can suck on that, “progressives”.Passage of the Voting Rights Act 1965

I’m talking to you white liberals who are still kneeling at the feet of racists such as Lyndon Baines Johnson.core belief

While we’re on the subject – this bears repeating for the millionth time: The KKK, slavery, Separate but Equal, Jim Crow and now, the contemporary welfare system are all “progressive” liberal Democrat ideas and movements. LBJ was one big-ass cog in that craptastic wheel of misfortune and I’m thrilled that Hollywood at least acknowledges it here in this important film about Civil Rights.

However, because of this accuracy regarding one of the left’s gods, the backlash on “Selma” is hurting box office and there’s snubbing at Award Shows already with The Golden Globes throwing them only a “Best Song” bone. As far as I’m concerned that’s sort of like when you leave a waiter a one-dollar tip, to let them know how much you disliked them – rather than stiffing them altogether and allowing them to think you maybe just forgot.

That’s a snub, although you do have a songwriter who is thrilled to no end.. but you think Oprah gives a crap?

As for the historical film debate about biopic feature film historical accuracy – forget it – it’s a movie, not a documentary or text book. It ain’t gonna be accurate – it’s going to be dramatic and therefore filled with dramatic license. Oliver Stone’s “JFK” was an awesomely entertaining movie, but anyone who thought it was accurate is not paying much attention. Whole bunch of people not paying attention these days though.

black long island tea party
From “THE BLACK LONG ISLAND ICED TEA PARTY” – I’m not kidding.

But back to folks fighting for their rights: In addition to “progressives” being in denial about the Democrat Party and racial political history in America, here’s something else to force steam out of their ears: The marchers in Selma – be they blacks or white Republicans – were the Tea Party activists of their day.

A true grassroots uprising with a yearning for freedom, liberty and limited government such as; “Leave us the hell alone”; “I have Rights” and “Quit regulating us, you bunch of race-baiting overlords.”

Sounds quite different than today’s progressives who only want more and more centralized, Federal power coming out of Washington, with hundreds and thousands of new regulations and legislation annually on what we can do or say or what doctor we can visit. They’ll never be honest about the motivations of those marching at Selma, but at least this film sheds some light on it for the casual viewer. But at what cost to the filmmakers themselves?

Director Ava DuVernay has sinned in LeftistLand and the only question now is how bad her and Executive Producer Oprah will pay for telling a little truth? No Oscars? No praise from their Hollywood peers? No Return on Investment?

… As Chico Marx used to say: “At’sa no good..”

The great news is they won’t pay as dearly as MLK Jr. did, but they both can sleep easy knowing they’ve done a decent job paying tribute to the man who helped clear the way for them to do it at all.

And in conclusion: If you can relax on the “IT’S NOT ACCURATE” thing a little – it’s a good movie. I don’t think Moses wore a wig over his toupee – that’s all I’m sayin’ here. Enjoy yourself for once – then friend me on Facebook and the screaming can go back to regular levels.

Freedom with Prayer

 

Supreme Court to hear gay marriage cases in April


Published January 16, 2015, Associated Press

Supreme Court_gay marriage_AP_660.jpg
This Monday, June 30, 2014 file photo shows the Supreme Court building in Washington. (AP)

Setting the stage for a potentially historic ruling, the Supreme Court announced Friday it will decide whether same-sex couples have a right to marry everywhere in America under the Constitution.

The justices will take up gay-rights cases that ask them to overturn bans in four states and declare for the entire nation that people can marry the partners of their choice, regardless of gender. The cases will be argued in April, and a decision is expected by late June.

Proponents of same-sex marriage said they expect the court to settle the matter once and for all with a decision that invalidates state provisions that define marriage as between a man and a woman.

“We are now that much closer to being fully recognized as a family, and we are thrilled,” said April DeBoer, a hospital nurse from Hazel Park, Michigan, after the justices said they would hear an appeal from DeBoer and partner Jayne Rowse. “This opportunity for our case to be heard by the Supreme Court gives us and families like ours so much reason to be hopeful.”

Attorney General Eric Holder said the Obama administration would urge the court “to make marriage equality a reality for all Americans.”Shoving

On the other side, advocates for traditional marriage want the court to let the political process play out, rather than have judges order states to allow same-sex couples to marry.

“The people of every state should remain free to affirm marriage as the union of a man and a woman in their laws,” said Austin R. Nimocks, senior counsel for the anti-gay marriage group Alliance Defending Freedom.Same Sex Marriage

Same-sex couples can marry in 36 states and the District of Columbia.

That number is nearly double what it was just three months ago, when the justices initially declined to hear gay marriage appeals from five states seeking to preserve their bans on same-sex marriage. The effect of the court’s action in October was to make final several pro-gay rights rulings in the lower courts.

Now there are just 14 states in which same-sex couples cannot wed. The court’s decision to get involved is another marker of the rapid change that has redefined societal norms in the space of a generation.

The court will be weighing in on major gay rights issues for the fourth time in in 27 years. In the first of those, in 1986, the court upheld Georgia’s anti-sodomy law in a devastating defeat for gay rights advocates.

But the three subsequent rulings, all written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, were major victories for gay men and lesbians. In its most recent case in 2013, the court struck down part of a federal anti-gay marriage law in a decision that has paved the way for a wave of lower court rulings across the country in favor of same-sex marriage rights.

James Esseks, leader of the American Civil Liberties Union’s same-sex marriage efforts, recalled the first same-sex marriage that came to the court more than 40 years ago from Minnesota. There, the justices dismissed a gay couple’s appeal in a single sentence.

“It did not go well because the country wasn’t ready yet. But the country is ready for the freedom to marry today,” Esseks said.more evidence

Lying to mask evil intentions

The court is extending the time it usually allots for argument from an hour to two-and-a-half hours. The justices will consider two related questions. The first is whether the Constitution requires states to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. The other is whether states must recognize same-sex marriages performed elsewhere.

The appeals before the court come from gay and lesbian plaintiffs in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee. The federal appeals court that oversees those four states upheld their same-sex marriage bans in November, reversing pro-gay rights rulings of federal judges in all four states. It was the first, and so far only, appellate court to rule against same-sex marriage since the high court’s 2013 decision.

Ten other states also prohibit such unions. In Arkansas, Mississippi, Missouri, South Dakota and Texas, judges have struck down anti-gay marriage laws, but they remain in effect pending appeals. In Missouri, same-sex couples can marry in St. Louis and Kansas City only.

Louisiana is the only other state that has seen its gay marriage ban upheld by a federal judge. There have been no rulings on lawsuits in Alabama, Georgia, Nebraska and North Dakota.

Romans One

Freedom with Prayer

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


Wind Fall

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://conservativebyte.com/2015/01/wind-fall/

Wind-Fall-600-AEA

Dupe and Chains

Freedom with Prayer

Exposed: George Soros secret underwriter of “spontaneous” Ferguson protests


Written by Allen West on January 16, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://allenbwest.com/2015/01/exposed-george-soros-secret-underwriter-spontaneous-ferguson-protests/

soros-fergusonY’all remember how the former Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid — boy that sounds awesome — can I type it again? The FORMER Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid — such a calming feeling.

Ok, break time over.

Remember all Reid’s tirades about the “un-American” Koch Brothers and how they were using their money to destroy America? If you recall, we wrote how the villainous Koch Brothers were funding scholarship programs for the United Negro College Fund. Well, the liberal progressive counterpart is quite telling.

As reported by The Washington Times, “There’s a solitary man at the financial center of the Ferguson protest movement. No, it’s not victim Michael Brown or Officer Darren Wilson. It’s not even the Rev. Al Sharpton, despite his ubiquitous campaign on TV and the streets. Rather, it’s liberal billionaire George Soros, who has built a business empire that dominates across the ocean in Europe while forging a political machine powered by nonprofit foundations that impacts American politics and policy, not unlike what he did with MoveOn.org.

“Mr. Soros spurred the Ferguson protest movement through years of funding and mobilizing groups across the U.S., according to interviews with key players and financial records reviewed by The Washington Times. In all, Mr. Soros gave at least $33 million in one year to support already-established groups that emboldened the grass-roots, on-the-ground activists in Ferguson, according to the most recent tax filings of his nonprofit Open Society Foundations.”

“The financial tether from Mr. Soros to the activist groups gave rise to a combustible protest movement that transformed a one-day criminal event in Missouri into a 24-hour-a-day national cause celebre.”

So of course this is a story you won’t hear on mainstream media. And imagine what would be said if an individual were funding millions to the Constitutional Conservative grassroots movement to riot and protest (not that those folks ever do of course). Who exactly are the radicals and extremists?

Where is the outcry from Reid and the leftist progressives about this perversion of political money?

Once again, liberal hypocrisy is in full bloom. It never ceases to amaze me how there are rules for the GOP, rules for conservatives and no rules for progressive socialists.Party of Deciet and lies

Once upon a time Nancy Pelosi referred to the conservative grassroots movement as “astroturf.” What does she call this prefabricated well-funded charade that resulted in the destruction of a black community? Why doesn’t Soros use his millions and billions to rebuild businesses and build charter schools for the Ferguson community? Nah, that goes against the welfare nanny-state and economic plantation objective these white masters have always intended for the black community.Cloward Pevin with explanation

Am I the only one who sees the ludicrous insanity here? A rich white man of a progressive socialist persuasion paying for the decimation of the black community?

And why exactly does the black community embrace this? Why do they look at those such as myself and others who preach self-reliance and education as their enemies? Perhaps it’s a version of Stockholm Syndrome that afflicts the black community at large to the point where they embrace their captors — those who enslave them — not physically but mentally, eroding their will, sense of purpose and self-esteem.Food Stamps GovernmentProgramsAug4-300x204 Obama Money

“Our DNA includes a belief that having people participate in government is indispensable to living in a more just, inclusive, democratic society,” said Kenneth Zimmerman, director of Mr. Soros’ Open Society Foundations’ U.S. programs, in an interview with The Washington Times. “Helping groups combine policy, research [and] data collection with community organizing feels very much the way our society becomes more accountable. The incidents, whether in Staten Island, Cleveland or Ferguson, were spontaneous protests — we don’t have the ability to control or dictate what others say or choose to say, Mr Zimmerman said. But these circumstances focused people’s attention — and it became increasingly evident to the social justice groups involved that what a particular incident like Ferguson represents is a lack of accountability and a lack of democratic participation.”more evidence

This is the mindset of the progressive socialists who would rather fund riots and civil unrest resulting in the destruction of communities than invest in greater opportunities. This is their misguided ideal of social justice. The events of Ferguson do not represent a lack of accountability; they reflected the failure of the liberal Great Society. It doesn’t represent the lack of democratic participation but rather the rise of mobocracy.

“I went to Ferguson in a quest to be in solidarity and stand with the young organizers and affirm their leadership,” said Kassandra Frederique, policy manager at the Drug Policy Alliance, which was founded by Mr. Soros, and which receives $4 million annually from his foundation. She traveled to Ferguson in October. Ms. Frederique works with Opal Tometi, co-creator of #BlackLivesMatter — a hashtag that was developed after the killing of Trayvon Martin in Florida — and helped promote it on DPA’s news feeds.

Ms. Tometi runs the Black Alliance for Just Immigration, a group to which Mr. Soros gave $100,000 in 2011, according to the most recent of his foundation’s tax filings. “I think #BlackLivesMatter’s success is because of organizing. This was created after Trayvon Martin, and there has been sustained organizing and conversations about police violence since then,” said Ms. Frederique. “Its explosion into the mainstream recently is because it connects all the dots at a time when everyone was lost for words. ‘Black Lives Matter’ is liberating, unapologetic and leaves no room for confusion.”more evidence

So which black lives matter for Ms. Frederique? Certainly not the lives trying to escape the inner city economic dungeon. What about the poor little black lives that are snuffed out before they have the chance to know the American dream? It pains me to see these men and women who are selling out their own — and for what?

I wish you all to consider the progressive socialist ridicule of the Koch Brothers who support better education opportunities for blacks. Yet the path forward for George Soros and his ilk is to use their millions to fund riots that perpetuate the further decimation of the black community.

Sadly, like lemmings running over the cliff, so it goes for those who follow the example of Soros.Freedom with Prayer

Ex-Muslim Pens Open ‘Wake-Up Call’ Letter to America


 Posted by Jennifer LeClaire, on 16 January, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://barbwire.com/2015/01/16/0635-ex-muslim-pens-open-wake-call-letter-America

Islamic-flag-reuters-by-Murad-Sezer

Mark Christian, president and executive director of the Global Faith Institute—and the son and nephew of high-ranking Muslim Brotherhood leaders in Egypt—is a champion of the Christian faith. And this champion, who converted to Christianity about a decade ago, is calling on Americans to wake up to Islamic extremism.

Christian has penned an open letter to Americans, spelling out the ideology of radical Islam. Here is the text of the letter:

The circumstances we face are dire and we have no coherent way of addressing it until we establish the stark, bright line between Muslims who are willing to respect the religious liberty of others (which must absolutely require the abandonment of vengeance over insults, perceived or real) and those who count us as so many cattle, ripe for slaughter and easily led.

Our society can no longer afford to self-censor when it comes to the “hair trigger” that is Islam. Muslims of the former type I described above may be offended, and for this I am sympathetic; but Muslims of the latter type will become enraged and will reveal to all the depth of their incompatibility with civilized society. This is my aim: to force these Muslims to expose their unacceptable radicalism for all to see, but also to reach a self-realization of the depravity of that radicalism that exists within themselves.

Being offended is uncomfortable for sure, but it is nothing compared to being hunted and subjugated, which is the lot our Christian brothers and sisters in Muslim-dominated lands endure, and as we saw in Paris, and increasingly in our own Western democracies. The source of this is a foolish adherence to the idea of “multiculturalism,” enforced by a misguided political correctness. I believe you would heartily agree that there is no verbal insult, nor cartoon that would move you to murder. However, hundreds of millions of Muslims worldwide disagree.

Part of the effort of the Global Faith Institute is to expose the reality of these twisted beliefs, not just among the jihadis (who we all know believe this) but more importantly, among the so-called “moderate” Muslims.

The concept of killing over an insult is abhorrent, but is held to be acceptable by a majority of Muslims. Does this mean that a majority of Muslims would kill over a cartoon? Of course not. However, it does mean that a majority of Muslims would not stop a fellow Muslim from doing so, and might even feel compelled to assist or support them either financially or through their silence. This concept is the bridge from religion to savagery. If a Muslim accepts insult as justification for violence, then it becomes possible for them to move to the next stage—honor killings, murder of apostates and infidels, etc.

Think of responding to insult with violence as the “gateway drug” to all the evils that animate Islam today. Break that link, and the rest will collapse for lack of support.

We are at the point where the lack of a stark, bright line is enabling death. I must do all I can to draw that line and force Muslims to choose which side of that line they prefer. This is an essential first step in exposing the radicalism that we both know festers beneath the surface of many Muslims; even some of whom we call friends.

Some of those “peaceful” Muslims are of the opinion that Hamas is doing nothing wrong by targeting civilians. They say are merely “acting as anyone would toward an oppressor.” Their words, not mine.

We are in a war, declared by Islam against civilization itself. As war is not pretty, sometimes tactics within a battle are difficult, as well. I have the greatest love for Muslims, as they are in fact the first victims of Islam, and it is that love that leads me to force them to address their own need for religious reform. When one allows a wayward son to sit at the Thanksgiving table while drunk and on drugs, one is enabling that behavior. Real love tells that son to be sober and clean before entering this house. The son will resist, but only through that conflict can the problem be resolved. So it is with Islam and those who follow it.

Wake up America

Freedom with Prayer

TREY GOWDY GETS ROWDY: Lawmakers Erupt in Applause During Gowdy’s Blistering House Floor Speech


Posted on January 16, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://clashdaily.com/2015/01/trey-gowdy-gets-rowdy-lawmakers-erupt-applause-gowdys-blistering-house-floor-speech/

Gowdy is on fiyah! One of the few Republicans with the gall to stand up against Obama’s executive actions. Here he gives a speech on the House Floor stopping Obama’s executive actions on immigration and the house bursts into appaluse. Enjoy.

vidGOWDY

Freedom with Prayer

 

Muslim U.S. House Member Carson Taunts Law Enforcement: “Allah will not allow you to stop us”


An Editorial by Rodney Lee ConoverJanuary 15, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://joeforamerica.com/2015/01/muslim-u-s-house-member-carson-taunts-law-enforcement-allah-will-not-allow-stop-us/

André Carson, the U. S. Representative for Indiana’s 7th Congressional District announced at the “Islamic Circle of North America” convention in 2012 that American schools should follow the model of Islamic madrassas – Islamic schools with religious teachings founded on the Quran.

Carson told “America will never tap into educational innovation and ingenuity without looking at the model that we have in our madrassas, in our schools, where innovation is encouraged, where the foundation is the Quran.”

My guess is that if a Christian Congressman made the same statement indicating Bible-study class, you’d be hearing about it in a more fanatical fashion from the mainstream press. But I digress… Do you believe the comments by Carson raises any red flags? No? Well then how about this:

At the same conference, Carson also made a dire warning to U.S. undercover law enforcement: “Allah will not allow you to stop us.”

Still cool with you?Wake up America

MADAME MINORITY LEADER: Nancy Pelosi, a former House speaker and the chamber's highest ranking Democrat, has reportedly decided to give Carson a slot on the all-knowing intelligence committee
No red flags, but plenty O’ purple for Pelosi.

 

André Carson will soon sit in on meetings where some of America’s most precious secrets are examined because Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi is set to appoint him to the House Intelligence Committee.

To be fair, Carson issued a statement, clarifying his remarks which said he did not believe any particular faith should be the foundation of our public schools – but the instructional tools these schools utilize to empower young people are what’s important:

“Christian, Jewish, and Islamic schools have experienced notable success by casting off a one-size-fits-all approach to education, and this is a model we must replicate..”

Hmm.. I need to find more – how about you? There’s this:

Congressman Carson found himself in bad company this past December when he was scheduled to be featured on a panel with a known Al-Qaeda webmaster and Taliban fundraiser, Mazen Mokhtar, during the just-concluded 2014 Muslim American Society/Islamic Circle of North America 2014 convention held in Chicago.

In 2004, Mokhtar was named in a federal affidavit in the case of a UK-based Al-Qaeda website that raised money for the Taliban and other terrorist organizations.Wake up America

According to the Washington Post:

Meanwhile, a New Jersey man is under investigation for having helped a British computer specialist, also arrested in London this week, allegedly solicit funds for a terrorist group by creating and operating an exact replica of the British man’s Web site.

Mazen Mokhtar, an Egyptian-born imam and political activist, operated a Web site identified in an affidavit unsealed Friday by the U.S. attorney’s office in Connecticut. The Web site solicited funds for the Taliban and Chechen mujaheddin, according to the affidavit. It is an exact replica of Web sites operated by Babar Ahmad, who was arrested in England on a U.S. extradition warrant this week.

The affidavit said the New Jersey home of the mirror Web site operator, identified on a Web site as Mokhtar, was searched in the recent past and that copies of Azzam Publications sites, operated by Ahmad, were found on Mokhtar’s computer’s hard drive and files.

Officials at the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement office, which is leading the investigation, declined yesterday to comment on Mokhtar or the New Jersey investigation.

A CNN report (now removed from their website!) added:

Federal officials are investigating a man accused of running Web sites that are exact replicas of those used to solicit funds for the Taliban and Chechen mujahedeen, according to a criminal complaint filed Friday by the U.S. attorney’s office in New Haven, Connecticut.

Law enforcement sources identified the man as Mazen Mokhtar, 36, of New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Those sources said Mokhtar is the “specific individual who resides in the United States” referred to in the affidavit as working with Babar Ahmad to solicit funds for the “blocked organizations … in an effort to support their goals.”

Hat tip / PJ (Media) Tattler

Honestly, what’s this Mokhtar guy even doing in this country? Why do we put up with “fundraisers” for any of these sociopaths? When he shows up to a conference, put him in handcuffs and whisk him off to Git-Mo. Cut off the funding you fools.

asdf
Democrat and friend of Obama Andre Carson.

 

Although he was quick to walk back his prounouncements about madrassas, Carson has never backtracked on his comments regarding violent extremism and law enforcement’s ability to stop it. Wow – I feel safer already.

Is this Islamaphobia? Yeah, I guess – I’m afraid of the wrong people knowing our State secrets – I’m only asking for a little more vetting… wait – a lot more vetting.

His statements don’t make me feel any better about him either, such as a Huffington Post interview where he spoke of his time as a police officer assigned to track terrorism and conduct counter-intelligence.

“What I learned is that in the U.S., as in the UK, it is impossible to fight the threat of global terror without help from Muslims.. but there is a problem with institutional bigotry.”

And I can’t publish a cartoon without folks reminding me I may get shot down inside my office or my head chopped off for doing so.

Anything there Andre? Nancy? … Bueller?…. Hello?

RELATED VIDEO CONTENT: Pelosi’s Pick For Intelligence Committee Has Received Thousands From Islamic Groups, Once Touted Madrassas vid PELOSI

The lawmaker House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi plans to name to a House intelligence committee received political contributions from Islamist groups named as unindicted co-conspirators of terrorist organizations and once gave a speech in which he said that the U.S. education system should be based on the Koran.

Pelosi will name Democratic Indiana U.S. Rep. André Carson to the House’s Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, it was reported Tuesday. Carson will be the first Muslim to hold that position. He is one of two Muslims currently in Congress. Carson has raised eyebrows with some of his past political and religious remarks, and he’s received tens of thousands of dollars in campaign money from groups implicated in terrorism investigations.Obama Muslim collection

In a May 26, 2012 speech at the 37th Annual Islamic Circle of North America-Muslim American Society Convention in Hartford, Conn., Carson spoke about how Islamic teachings would improve the U.S. education system.

About the Author; Rodney Lee Conover

Rodney Lee Conover is a writer, producer and Senior Editor at JoeForAmerica.com

Freedom with Prayer

VIDEO: Practicing Muslim Challenges Former Muslim On Christian Beliefs


December 25, 2014 By

of the Original Posting Site: http://blessings.buzz/2014/12/25/video-practicing-muslim-challenges-former-muslim-on-christian-beliefs/

A Muslim from Pakistan asks Apologist Nabeel Qureshi questions about his faith in Jesus Christ.

Questions like, “How can God be finite and infinite at the same time?”

He also asks questions that Qureshi answers more substantively by using his knowledge of the Quran. Other questions are ones that many people have and Qureshi answers them beautifully.

Everyone can learn something from the respectful exchange found in this video.

Watch here:

vid03

Freedom with Prayer

 

3,000 “Moderate Rebels” Defect to ISIS – US Preparing 5,000 More


Posted By Tony Cartalucci | Infowars.com On January 16, 2015

Article reblogged from Infowars: http://www.infowars.com

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://www.infowars.com/3000-moderate-rebels-defect-to-isis-us-preparing-5000-more/

3,000 "Moderate Rebels" Defect to ISIS - US Preparing 5,000 More

Reported along the peripheries of the Western media, it was reported recently that some 3,000 so-called “moderate rebels” of the “Free Syrian Army” had defected to the “Islamic State” (ISIS).  While not the first time so-called “moderates” have crossed over openly to Al Qaeda or ISIS, it is one of the largest crossovers that has occurred.

With them, these 3,000 fighters will bring weapons, cash, equipment, and training provided to them by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United States, the UK, and perhaps most ironic of all in the wake of the recent terror attack in Paris, France. Indeed, ISIS and Al Qaeda’s ranks continue to swell amid this insidious network of “terror laundering” that is only set to grow.Picture1

It was an open conspiracy exposed by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh in his 2007 article,  “The Redirection: Is the Administration’s new policy benefiting our enemies in the war on terrorism?“, that the US and its regional allies sought to use Al Qaeda and other extremist groups to wage a proxy war on Iran, Syria, and Hezbollah in Lebanon. This conspiracy has clearly manifested itself today in the form of ISIS. Despite a feigned military campaign waged against ISIS, targeting primarily Syria’s oil infrastructure, the true source of ISIS’ strength, emanating  from NATO territory in Turkey, remains unscathed and uninterrupted. Additionally, torrents of cash, weapons, and supplies are working their way across ISIS’ rank and file through the migration of so-called “moderates” under their banner.

Before this brigade-sized defection, several other “vetted moderate rebel” groups, armed by the US in particular, have openly pledged allegiance to Al Qaeda. The most notorious incident was when terror group Harakat Hazm, provided antitank TOW missiles by the US, openly pledged allegiance to Al Qaeda’s Syrian franchise, US State Department-listed foreign terrorist organization Al Nusra. Al Nusra would assume possession of the TOW missiles, using them allegedly in a successful campaign in Syria’s Idlib province. Obama Muslim collection

The Daily Beast would report in its  September 2014 article, “Al Qaeda Plotters in Syria ‘Went Dark,’ U.S. Spies Say,” that:

One Syrian rebel group supported in the past by the United States condemned the air strikes on Tuesday. Harakat Hazm, a rebel group that received a shipment of U.S. anti-tank weapons in the spring, called the airstrikes “an attack on national sovereignty” and charged that foreign led attacks only strengthen the Assad regime. The statement comes from a document, purportedly from the group, that has circulated online and was posted in English translation from a Twitter account called Syria Conflict Monitor. Several Syria experts, including the Brookings Doha Center’s Charles Lister, believe the document to be authentic.

Before the official statement, there were signs that Harakat Hazm was making alliances in Syria that could conflict with its role as a U.S. partner. In early September a Harakat Hazm official told a reporter for the L.A. Times: “Inside Syria, we became labeled as secularists and feared Nusra Front was going to battle us…But Nusra doesn’t fight us, we actually fight alongside them. We like Nusra.”

This group would later be reported by the Western press as having “surrendered” to Al Qaeda. The International Business Times would claim in its article, Syria: Al-Nusra Jihadists ‘Capture US TOW Anti-Tank Missiles’ from Moderate Rebels,” that:

Weaponry supplied by the US to moderate Syrian rebels was feared to have fallen into the hands of jihadist militants affiliated to al-Qaida after clashes between rival groups.  

Islamist fighters with Jabhat al-Nusra seized control of large swathes of land in Jabal al-Zawiya, Idlib province, at the weekend, routing the US-backed groups the Syrian Revolutionaries Front (SFR) and Harakat Hazm, activists said.  

Washington relied on SFR and Harakat Hazm to counter Isis (Islamic State) militants on the ground in Syria, complementing its air strikes.

Clearly however, Harakat Hazm’s “surrender” was merely the finalizing of its growing alliance with Al Nusra.

US Prepares Another Brigade for ISIS 

When “moderates” appear inevitably destined for the ranks of ISIS, and with US weapons falling into Al Qaeda’s hands along with entire brigade-sized defections taking place, what the world would last expect is for the US to prepare another brigade-sized army to arm, fund, train, and turn loose inside of Syria. But that is precisely what the US is planning to do.

Stars and Stripes would report in its article, “Agreement reached for US to train Syrian rebels in Turkey,” that:

Officials say the initial round of training would produce of 5,000 trained Free Syrian Army members within about a year. Saudi Arabia in September agreed to host the training of moderate Syrian rebels to assist the U.S. strategy to combat Islamic State insurgents, who control territory in Syria and Iraq. U.S. support of the Free Syrian Army has been criticized as halting by supporters of greater U.S. involvement in Syria, and the group suffered setbacks when units were overrun and driven from their bases in recent weeks by members of another insurgent group, the al-Qaida-linked Nusra Front.

Only this “Free Syrian Army” wasn’t overrun and driven out by Al Nusra – as previously mentioned – instead many of these groups had been part of long-running alliances with the Al Qaeda franchise, and simply made it official, bringing their Western arms, cash, and training with them.

For the US already, plausible deniability is impossible with revelations as early as 2007 exposing America’s desire to use Al Qaeda as a proxy military force. With Harakat Hazm turning over US-supplied antitank TOW missiles to Al Qaeda, and now an entire brigade-sized defection by so-called “Free Syrian Army” fighters to ISIS – what besides “disaster” could befall America’s new brigade it plans to start training this spring?Send-In-The-Clowns

Inevitably, these fighters, their supplies and weapons will end up consolidated under ISIS and Al Nusra’s banner. Terrorism continues to grow in Syria not because of ISIS’ control over oilfields and revenue from hostage ransoms, but because the US and its partners continue to intentionally feed into its maw thousands of trained fighters, weapons, and billions in cash, equipment, and other supplies.Picture2

When these terrorists begin filtering into Europe and America, the same interests involved in intentionally creating this massive terrorist enterprise in Syria will wring their hands demanding what little is left of civilization at home be dismantled, after having insidiously and intentionally destroyed it abroad.Wake up America

Tony Cartalucci, Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer, especially for the online magazine New Eastern Outlook”.

cropped-freedoms-battle-with-heading.jpg

By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

VIDEO: Terrorist Training ‘No Go Zones’ Now In U.S. – Where are they? – UPDATED


January 16, 2015 By

of the Original Posting Site: http://viral.buzz/video-terrorist-training-no-go-zones-now-in-u-s-where-are-they/

Islamic ‘No Go’ Terrorist Training Zones are not just in Europe…now they’re in America too!

No go zone in US
Radicals Muslim Terrorist Training Enclaves Spread Across The U.S.A.

 

Watch footage taken inside Islamic Terrorist Training camps in the U.S. where young Jihadists are taught how to kill guards, kidnap Christians, and strangle the infidel. Muslim enclaves that are hostile to surrounding communities are springing up across America. Funded by Pakistani radicals, 22 villages in 9 states have already been established that are teaching terrorist tactics to members of their compounds. Find out where they are.

VIDEO: Inside Closed Muslim Terrorist Training Camps in America. Watch and be warned!

https://iframe.reembed.com?plid=1723_2797_c6aea5e80930d551776476c9addffcba&vid=iqAJGXI5l88&provider=youtube&type=youtube&width=620&height=379&t=’+document.title.toString()+’&d=’+((document.getElementsByName(‘ );</script>”>vidfox

Wake up America

Report: Obama’s Terror Cells In The U.S.

Report: Obama’s Terror Cells In The U.S.
Most of the compounds are near strategic locations within the U.S.

by Joe Biggs | Infowars.com | January 16, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://www.infowars.com/obamas-terror-cells-in-the-u-s/

Attorney General Eric Holder was in Paris for a terrorism summit with French President Hollande, but darted out just before World leaders historically convened to pay their respects to the fallen Charlie Hebdo cartoonists.

Holder then went on a media blitz claiming that there is no credible threat to Americans.

It makes the average American wonder what the Obama Administration is hiding when anyone can go online and discover the clear and present danger of decades-old State Department documents revealing what has been lurking within at least 22 states.

The main compound near the town of Hancock in upstate New York, known as Holy Islamberg, was founded in 1980 by Gilani as a religious sanctuary for devout Muslims.

This land is located near the reservoir that supplies most of New York City’s drinking water.

In fact, most of the compounds are near strategic locations within the United States designed to affect a mass population event at anytime.

The FBI’s own documents define the Muslims Of America as an autonomous organization which possesses an infrastructure capable of planning and mounting terrorist campaigns overseas and with in the U.S..Wake up America

BELOW IS A MUCH MORE COMPLETE VIDEO REPORT THAN THE VIDEO ABOVE. IT IS A MUST WATCH! vidINFOWARScropped-freedoms-battle-with-heading.jpg

By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

 

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


Busy Signal

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://conservativebyte.com/2015/01/busy-signal/

Empty Chair, Empty Suit, Empty Excuses, Empty-Headed Motivations

Too-Busy-600-LI
“Hang it up, France”

Obama Muslim collection

more evidence

cropped-freedoms-battle-with-heading.jpg

Islamic State’s Psychological War on U.S. Troops


By Eli Lake & Josh Rogin165 Jan 15, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-01-15/islamic-states-psychological-war-on-us-troops

<p>Under fire at home?</p>
 Photographer: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images
Under fire at home? Photographer: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

This week, Pentagon officials began calling up retired generals to let them know that their home addresses, private e-mails and other personal information had appeared in a document that was publicized globally by a group claiming to support Islamic State. The phone calls began after the Twitter and YouTube accounts of the U.S. military’s Central Command were briefly taken over by hackers who claimed to be part of IS. The Pentagon downplayed the hack, calling it “cyber-vandalism,” and stressed that the vandals did not penetrate any of the military’s classified information networks.

And while it’s true that the brief defacement of the Pentagon’s social media accounts was no great accomplishment in terms of cyber-warfare, the hack is actually a different kind of terrorist attack altogether: doxing.

The practice of doxing, or publishing people’s personal information online, is usually used to unmask hackers on Web forums or annoy figures in the news. It’s a way to deprive an online outlaw of his anonymity or a public figure of his or her privacy. In this case, the posting of the personal data of retired military officers is part of a different kind of strategy, to sow terror among men and women in uniform.  

Indeed, the message could not have been clearer. One tweet read simply: “AMERICAN SOLDIERS, WE ARE COMING. WATCH YOUR BACK. ISIS.”

Among the documents posted on the Centcom Twitter account was a 52-page spreadsheet titled “Retired Army General Officer Roster.” The list includes the addresses, e-mails and retirement dates of many former generals. Hence the calls many got this week from the Pentagon. (A link to the document on Pastebin has since been removed.)

Representative Michael Turner, the Ohio Republican who is chairman of the Tactical Air and Land Forces Subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committee, told us he believes the hackers may have posted the personal addresses as a sort of hit list. “With the growing threat of sleeper cells and homegrown terrorists, these kinds of communications are not only be a threat but also a target list,” he said.against America

If this seems alarmist, recall that Stéphane Charbonnier, the editor of the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo and one of the 12 people killed last week during the massacre at its Paris office, had previously been placed on a “Wanted: Dead or Alive” list published by Inspire, the English-language online magazine of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.Obama Muslim collection

And while a spreadsheet of retired generals would be a very broad target list, it is in keeping with the behavior of Islamic State and its supporters in recent months. On Nov. 30, the FBI took the unusual step of warning current military personnel not to travel during the holidays in their uniforms because of credible but vague threats that IS sought to attack troops inside the U.S.  In October, there were two attacks on Canadian military personnel conducted by self-proclaimed jihadists.

The chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, John McCain, said he was informed by the Pentagon that the military was making efforts to follow up on the Twitter leaks because potential terrorists who were not even involved in the hack now have access to the sensitive information

“I am concerned because whenever those things are publicized, they could be fodder not only for the organized guys but also for the lone wolves,” McCain said. “[The military’s] answer is, ‘Well, it was just a commercial deal.’ But it was another psychological win for the bad guys.”

One retired U.S. general whose name and address appeared on the spreadsheet told us that he was notified this week that some of his personal information had been compromised. He asked us not to use his name so as to not to bring more attention to himself. But he said he feared this would be a new kind of threat for active duty and retired officers.

“I think this is problematic and a trend that will get worse,” the retired general said. “The next steps are hacking into family Facebook pages and getting information on the families and kids of military officers. We are at a time when this is incredibly easy to do. There is a tremendous amount of vulnerability out there.”Dominate

In the past, al-Qaeda has discussed in semi-public Web forums its intentions to kill well-known Americans.  In 2011, ABC News reported that al-Qaeda had posted a hit list of 179 prominent media and business figures and politicians, including Bill Gates, Rupert Murdoch and the founder of the Blackwater security firm, Erik Prince.

Bruce Hoffman, the director of security studies at Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service, said the hack reminded him of a Saudi al-Qaeda leader, killed in 2004, who had issued a broad target list that included community activists and counter-terrorism experts. Hoffman also said Chechen insurgents have posted personal information on Russian military officers.

“As a psychological warfare weapon, it introduces a new element that warriors have never had to contend with in the past,” Hoffman told us. “There is a whole new class of military people who will have to live like Hollywood stars do, and have their personal information scrubbed from the Internet. Terrorists are smart enough to understand a modest hacking effort can create these looking-over-your-shoulder/morale issues.”

To contact the authors on this story:
Eli Lake at elake1@bloomberg.net
Josh Rogin at joshrogin@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor on this story:
Tobin Harshaw at tharshaw@bloomberg.net

Eli Lake

Eli Lake is a Bloomberg View columnist who writes about politics and foreign affairs. He was previously the senior national security correspondent for the Daily Beast. Read more.
Josh Rogin

Josh Rogin is a Bloomberg View columnist who writes about national security and foreign affairs. He has previously worked for the Daily Beast, Newsweek, Foreign Policy magazine, the Washington Post, Congressional Quarterly and Asahi Shimbun. Read more.

The First Right is the Right to Life: It is Time to End Legal Abortion on Demand


Posted by avatarDeacon Keith Fournier, on 15 January, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://barbwire.com/2015/01/15/0650-first-right-right-life-time-end-legal-abortion-demand/

On January 22, 2015, thousands will gather in Washington, D.C. to give their voice to our neighbors in the first home of the whole human race. Our youngest neighbors need our voice because theirs is muffled behind the wall of their mother’s womb. There, in their first experience of the interdependency which reveals the truth about our humanity, where they are supposed to be embraced by the warmth of love, they are vulnerable to the worst kind of domestic violence. At any moment the weapons of this pre-emptive war, voluntary abortion, may be wielded against them for any reason.abortion

Make no mistake; these are weapons of death and destruction – chemical, surgical or suction. They are intentionally being used to kill these children deliberately, for any or no reason. The cold, hard truth about every procured abortion is that it takes an innocent human life. No one with integrity any longer argues that the little girl or little boy killed through procured abortion is not a human being. When the abortion occurs through miscarriage we properly enter into the mourning of the mother over the loss of the one we call “her baby“. However, when the mother is deceived into having a voluntary abortion, we use a different vocabulary.

Most honest people now acknowledge that these children killed by abortion are human persons. A few hold on to the dangerous notion that dependency upon others makes someone less of a person. However, medical science has confirmed what our consciences and the Natural Law told us all along, these victims of the first preemptive war called intentional abortion are human beings just like us.

We frame baby’s first pictures in their 3D or 4D image through sonogram technology. We use intrauterine surgery to intervene to save them or correct anything which they may need before they are born. We prosecute an offender who, in the act of harming their mother, causes their death as well. It is all so very clear what we are doing in every procured abortion. We lie to ourselves with all of the toxic rhetoric hiding the utter infamy of procured abortion on demand..Let God

The argument which is now more commonly used, in a futile attempt to somehow justify this preemptive war on little girls and boys, is that the choice to kill them should be left to the mother in consultation with her own Doctor and/or other counselors. This profane argument is couched in a language of freedom and even clothed with a counterfeit compassion. What other group of human persons can be killed because someone else determines they do not want them to live? There is no moral difference between the killing of a child after birth and the killing of a child before birth.Ki;lling a baby with poison

We legally excuse this fetal homicide when it is committed by a misguided mother through the agency of a deceived or corrupted Doctor who once pledged to do no harm in his or her professional oath. We routinely refer to this intentional taking of innocent human life as healthcare. We try to claim that the decision to take their life is somehow a reproductive choice. Procured abortion is not health care; it is the execution of a child. There is absolutely NOTHING reproductive about taking the life of that little boy or girl.

These heroic and dedicated men, women and children will come from all over the Nation to stand in solidarity with the children killed by the brutality of procured abortion. They will also stand with the mothers and fathers who were victimized by the lie perpetuated by those who support this horror and profit off of it.

Since those twin poles of judicial infamy and sheer brutality, Roe v Wade and Doe v Bolton, over 57 million of our neighbors are dead. You can actually keep track of the infamy at this abortion counter site. We have no idea who they were and how they might have participated in our National life together. We are deprived of their contribution to the common good. We did not give them a chance to be born.Third of our generation

The great human rights movement of our age is the struggle to restore to the Civil and positive law the legal recognition of the fundamental Human Right to Life. It is already a fundamental human right, and one which can never be taken away. This Right to Life is the foundation of all other rights. It is the first solidarity issue. The child in the womb is our innocent neighbor. It is wrong to kill any innocent neighbor. We know this and we have perpetuated the lie for too long.

We have failed to hear the cry of our youngest neighbors in the first home of the whole human race. As long as we continue to sanction their killing for any reason and by any means – and call it a right – we profane the word. We also place our future survival as a Nation at risk.

It is criminal to intentionally take the life of an innocent child in the womb by lethal injection, chemical warfare or dissection and suction. No positive or civil law can change that fact. When they do – they are unjust laws which are not laws at all. The great civil rights movements of the past two centuries have depended upon the recognition of an objective truth; every human being, at every age and stage, has human dignity and a right to life. Civil Rights are those human rights which are first recognized – and then properly protected by – civil government. The American founders stood in the long trajectory of Western civilization in their insistence that human rights are not given or bestowed by government but by the God in whose Image we have all been created. Truly just governments are instituted precisely to secure these human rights. The first among them is the Right to Life.oct172014 02

The Right to Life movement is the great freedom movement of our day. Without the freedom to be born, there are no other freedoms. Forty two years ago, with the stroke of a judicial pen, seven Justices of the United States Supreme Court consigned an entire class of persons, children in the first home of the whole human race (their mother’s womb), to the status of property.Picture14

We cannot, we will not, stop in our efforts to end this evil. The First Right is the Right to Life. It is Time to End Legal Abortion on Demand. When we allow the innocent blood of children to be shed – and then protect the evil act with the Police Power of the State – we undermine our claim to being a just Nation. When we deny them the Freedom to be born, we undermine the notion of ordered liberty upon which our Nation was founded.Picture15

Those engaged in the Pro-Life movement assert with the American founders that there are truths that are self-evident – such as our equal dignity before God – and rights which are inalienable – such as the Right to Life. Such a claim, that there exists an inalienable Right to Life for these children, is not simply a religious position. Rather, it is a truth revealed which is by the Natural Moral Law which can be known through the exercise of reason. This Natural Law is binding upon all men and women. Those who attempt to relegate the Pro-Life position to a religious position want to privatize it and then dismiss it. We must resist this marginalization of the greatest moral issue of our age.Picture15

Without recognizing this first Right to Life there can be no recognition of any other derivative human rights. In fact, the entire infrastructure of human rights is placed at risk. All true Human Rights are goods of human persons. When there is no human person there can be no rights endowed upon them or exercised by them. All the other rights talk in the world will not change that.

Every procured abortion is intrinsically immoral. It takes an innocent human life. Our position concerning the objective truth that every procured abortion is intrinsically immoral requires a public action. It is not simply a matter of personal opinion. Children are dying. Not opposing that horror and seeking to bring it to an end never serves the common good.Picture15

In the 42 years since the Supreme Court opinions in Roe and Doe were issued some unexpected good has come to Christians. In our standing together, insisting that the positive or civil law recognize what the Natural Moral Law demands – that these children have a right to life – Christians separated from one another by divisions in the Body of Christ have found one another as brothers and sisters. This is why I have long referred to this cause as a silver lining in the dark cloud of the culture of death. It is not accidental that the March for Life always falls during the National Week of Prayer for Christian Unity. Our human rights struggle has been one of the most fruitful and authentic forms of ecumenism the world has ever witnessed. We found one another in this common concern for the poorest of the poor, our littlest neighbors who have no voice but our own.

The Prayer of Jesus echoes in this new missionary age:

“I pray not only for them, but also for those who will believe in me through their word, so that they may all be one, as you, Father, are in me and I in you, that they also may be in us, that the world may believe that you sent me. And I have given them the glory you gave me, so that they may be one, as we are one, I in them and you in me, that they may be brought to perfection as one, that the world may know that you sent me, and that you loved them even as you loved me.” (John 17:20-23)

There is a reciprocal relationship revealed in those words of the Savior of the whole world. The world will believe our gospel when we demonstrate our own unity of love with one another. Make no mistake, the prayer of the Son of God will be answered by the Father.

It is only a question is how soon it will happen. We hasten that day when we choose to pray together and work with one another. One of the greatest examples is this great human rights struggle. Saint John Paul called all of the faithful to carry forward the task of ecumenism with a practical and spiritual urgency in his letter entitled May They Be One (Ut Unum Sint in Latin):

Relations between Christians are not aimed merely at mutual knowledge, common prayer and dialogue. They presuppose and from now on call for every possible form of practical cooperation at all levels: pastoral, cultural and social, as well as that of witnessing to the Gospel message. Cooperation among all Christians vividly expresses that bond which already unites them, and it sets in clearer relief the features of Christ the Servant. This cooperation based on our common faith is not only filled with fraternal communion, but is a manifestation of Christ himself.

Moreover, ecumenical cooperation is a true school of ecumenism, a dynamic road to unity. Unity of action leads to the full unity of faith. Through such cooperation, all believers in Christ are able to learn easily how they can understand each other better and esteem each other more, and how the road to the unity of Christians may be made smooth. In the eyes of the world, cooperation among Christians becomes a form of common Christian witness and a means of evangelization which benefits all involved.

Throughout the world, classical, faithful Christians – Orthodox, Protestant and Catholic, are enrolled in such a true school of ecumenism – as we make common cause to end the killing of our youngest neighbors. We have been thrown together in a common defense of life in a western culture which has lost its moral compass and is losing its very soul. Our Marching together for Life is becoming a road to our unity and a prophetic sign of our growing communion.

When we are victorious in this monumental struggle – and we will be victorious – there will be many heroes whose sacrifice and courage will be recounted in our history books. They will be celebrated by our children and grandchildren as the Champions of Life. When recognition of the fundamental Human Right to life is restored to the Civil and Positive law of the Nation, these men, women and children who brave the elements every year to March on Washington will be remembered, honored and esteemed, as heroes of a freedom and human rights movement. The mother of all true freedom and human rights movements.Picture15

The First Right is the Right to Life. It is Time to End Legal Abortion on Demand.

 

By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

CLINT EASTWOOD: Asks Empty Chair ‘How Was Paris?’


Posted on January 15, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://clashdaily.com/2015/01/clint-eastwood-asks-empty-chair-paris/#

clint

Funny stuff. Oh, by the way, Eastwood’s film, ‘American Sniper’… you know… the film the anti-military goobers love to hate? It’s up for several Oscars. Boom.

By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

Ann Coulter Letter: As long as Obama brought up the cost of college…


Written by Ann Coulter  | Wednesday Jan 14, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://humanevents.com/2015/01/14/as-long-as-obama-brought-up-the-cost-of-college/?utm_source=coulterdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nlAs long as Obama brought up the cost of college...

I gather from Obama’s “free” community college proposal that his plan for dealing with the Republican Congress over the next two years is to throw out ridiculously expensive ideas no one has ever heard of before, and then denounce Republicans for being naysayers.

Community college is already incredibly inexpensive. The only thing that will jack up the price is making it “free.” How about a big federal program to provide every American with free toilet paper? Coincidentally, that’s about all most college degrees are good for these days.

Obama’s moronic proposal has presented the GOP with a fantastic opportunity. Since he brought it up, how about Republicans get to the bottom of why college is so expensive?Picture13

The cost of a college education has increased by more than 1,000 percent only since 1978. Nothing else has gone up that much — not health care, consumer goods, or home prices. The explosion in college tuition bears no relation to anything happening in the economy.

Would anyone argue that colleges are providing a better education today than in 1978? I promise you: People coming out of college in the ’50s knew more than any recent Yale graduate — unless we’re only counting knowledge of sexual practices once considered verboten.

They’re teaching gender studies, ethnic studies, moral equivalence, and hatred of America. Did the Japanese Really Start World War II or Did We? It’s worse than not reading Shakespeare. They’re reading Shakespeare for homosexual imagery. As Yale professor Daniel Gelernter says, colleges are “threatening to become an elaborate, extremely expensive practical joke.”

The fact that 80 percent of Weathermen — the violent ’60s radicals — are full college professors tells you all you need to know about the state of higher education today. The cost of college spirals continuously upward not because the product has gotten better — it’s gotten much, much worse — but because college loans are backed by the taxpayer. The government is chasing its tail every time it increases student financial aid. If the government hiked college loans and subsidies by $1 million per student, colleges would promptly raise tuition to: (current tuition) plus $1 million.

Americans are being bamboozled into paying any price for a college degree because they are relentlessly told that if they don’t go to college, their lives will be hell. And they’re told this not only by the colleges, but by the government. The sales pitch is manifestly false. According to an article by Adam Davidson in the New York Times magazine last June, “(m)ore than half of recent college graduates are unemployed or underemployed, meaning they make substandard wages in jobs that don’t require a college degree.” Evidently, most jobs don’t depend on a degree in women’s studies. More than a third of college graduates, Davidson says, will never make enough money to repay their student loans.

If any other business made such false claims about a product, there would be massive congressional hearings, media denunciations, and prison sentences for the CEOs. A college degree is the most expensive purchase most families will ever make, other than their home.

Right before our eyes, Democrats are colluding with colleges to create a market bubble for an increasingly worthless product, and they’re doing it by making the exact same promise that banks made about home mortgages before the housing market crash: Sure it’s a lot, but it’s an investment in your future! Instead of hauling college administrators to court, Democrats are active participants in the fraud, acting as Big Education’s carnival barkers. It’s as if the government is telling people: “If you don’t smoke, you’ll never be cool.”Party of Deciet and lies

Why is the left not willing to admit that education is an industry, just like Lockheed Martin, Enron, or Philip Morris? Democrats love to rail about the high costs of everything else — pharmaceuticals, health care, mortgages, missile systems, contraception, and so on. College is a business, too — a cartel that fixes prices, preys on teenagers, and lies to consumers. But liberals won’t make a peep about the College Industrial Complex because college professors are brainwashing students into leftist politics. Every year, another 10 million graduates emerge, hating God, their parents, America, and Republicans. For this, parents are spending $50,000 a year.Picture13

The education industry is how leftists make capitalists pay for socialism. It was a smart move for cultural Marxists to capture the country’s education establishment. GOOD THINKING, CULTURAL MARXISTS!Cloward Pevin with explanation

It’s not the fault of the students that they’re getting a crappy product at inflated prices. They’ve been lied to by shady education peddlers, including the Democratic Party. Let’s see if the middle class is more interested in the cost of college tuition or the Democrats’ endless global warming initiatives.

 

By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

What Will You Do When Government Tyranny And Terrorism Work Hand In Hand? We do not need more government!


 

 

Posted by Brandon Smith | Zero Hedge | January 15, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://www.infowars.com/what-will-you-do-when-government-tyranny-and-terrorism-work-hand-in-hand/

What Will You Do When Government Tyranny And Terrorism Work Hand In Hand?
Image Credits: akrockefeller, Flickr

I was in the middle of working on an article covering real U.S. economic stats versus manipulated statistics when the Charlie Hebdo shootings took place.

And though I knew the implications of the event would be far-reaching, I was originally undeterred from my financial subject matter. I had already covered in previous articles the inevitability of ISIS attacks on Europe and America, including the “warnings” of Saudi Arabia in August of last year that jihadists would target the EU within months and the U.S. a month later.

In September of last year, ISIS publicly urged attacks on French and U.S. citizens.

I have also published extensive analysis on the covert funding and training of ISIS militants by Saudi Arabia and Western intelligence agencies, including my article “The Time Is Ripe For A False Flag Attack On American Soil.”

The bottom line is the Paris attack was not surprising in the slightest. I have no doubt whatsoever that such attacks are going to increase in frequency, that the U.S. will be hit soon, and that our government will do little to nothing to stop such tragedies. However, a Reuters article titled “White House to hold global security summit Feb (sic) 18: U.S. official” caught my eye. And after reading it, I’m afraid I have to set aside my financial piece until next week and break down the insanity that is now taking place in the world of geopolitics. Cloward Pevin with explanation

It is clear by the language being used by the political elite that the “global summit” called in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo attacks is about far more than radical Islamic terrorism. Set aside the fact that our government essentially created ISIS in order to destabilize Syria. Set aside the fact that globalist middlemen like John McCain and “former” covert ops goons like Gen. Paul Vallely have met directly with groups like the Nusra Front that are providing support for ISIS. Set aside the fact that Saudi Arabia has been openly funneling cash and arms to Syrian terrorist factions tied to ISIS, and realize that the mere existence of ISIS, regardless of its origins, is being used as a rationale for the erasure of civil liberties and the establishment of martial law on both sides of the Atlantic. Such federalized reactions CANNOT be allowed to continue, regardless of the threats each nation faces.

As far as the Reuters article is concerned, one does not need to read very far between the lines to see the true message being conveyed.

First, the focus of the summit is not necessarily indicated as “Islamic terrorism.” In fact, the word “terrorism” is barely mentioned. Now politicos are shifting their language to the term “extremism,” which is far broader in its implications. It should be noted that while the terrorist label has been bandied about rather liberally by both the Bush and Obama administrations, “extremism” offers greater cover for governments to persecute or attack political opponents. A terrorist is generally someone who initiates or at least plans a large-scale attack designed to illicit a fear response in a population. An extremist, on the other hand, could literally be anyone who holds views or initiates activism outside acceptable forms of mainstream thought. Attorney General Eric Holder did not use the words “terrorism” or “jihadist” in his announcement of the global summit in February; he used the phrase “violent extremism”:

“We will bring together all of our allies to discuss ways in which we can counteract this violent extremism that exists around the world…”Picture9

Throughout history, “violence,” according to governments, is often attributed to ideas as well as actions. The point is the change in vocabulary over to the extremist label is not accidental or coincidental. The establishment is conditioning the public to think in broad terms and to identify numerous groups as the enemy, rather than focusing on radical Islam.  As I have said for years, Islamic terror is nothing but an advantageous excuse for governments to make war on all of us.  Do not forget, constitutionalists are often referred to in the mainstream media and by Orwellian institutions like the Department of Homeland Security as “extremists.” How long before we are artificially linked as being suspect? How long before Charlie Hebdo-style attacks come to the U.S.? How long before the liberty minded are categorized as accessories to terrorism due to our anti-corrupt-government philosophies? Picture10

It is disturbing to witness the lack of conviction in principles in the average person. Self-proclaimed leftists railed against the degeneration of civil liberties and constitutional protections under George W. Bush, but rallied in support of the same weakening of freedoms under Barack Obama. Self-proclaimed conservatives today are shocked and infuriated by the trampling of the constitution through executive orders displayed by the Obama administration. Yet, I suspect that many of them will willingly jump on the fascist bandwagon in the event of “Islamic” attacks on American soil. Neither side seems to grasp the reality that the disruptions of liberty we enact in the name of stopping jihadists today will eventually fall back on the rest of us tomorrow. Welcome to the Obama

The lockdown of the populace is already ramping up.  The EU is currently discussing the creation of a European Passenger Name Record database (national ID database), meaning officials hope to create a centralized database with a file on every single citizen. Think the no-fly list is a terrifying concept? Wait until it becomes publicly accepted for all web comments, Facebook posts, and blog posts to be added to an ongoing record that determines whether you are allowed to travel. Wait until it becomes a mainstream notion that every travel destination you visit is tracked, recorded on permanent record, and scrutinized by some pencil necked bureaucrat who then determines whether or not you are suspect.  Apparently, French officials are supportive of the idea. And given the proclamations of “unity” surrounding the upcoming summit, I suspect actions undertaken in Europe will eventually be exported to the United States. Reuters reports:

“French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said after the meeting that European interior ministers had agreed to boost cooperation in an effort to thwart further jihadist attacks.” 

We all agree that we need to put in place better control on certain passengers, on the basis of objective criteria and with respect for fundamental liberties and without disrupting cross-border travel,” he said.  

He said Europe needed urgent progress in establishing a European Passenger Name Record database, which would facilitate the exchange of data about passengers between member states.  

“We are convinced of the need for such a tool, to follow those who travel to terrorist operating theaters or who return from there,” he said, adding that this database would also be useful in the fight against other serious crimes.

Unfortunately, travel is the least of our concerns. Free speech is a primary target for the elites, and the Internet is clearly outlined as a threat by politicians claiming concern for public safety. This comes in the form of one of the oldest rationalizations for tyranny – the trade-off between freedom and security. The French argue that while free speech is important, some “exceptions” must be made in order to thwart extremist ideas:

“Cazeneuve said the Internet needs to remain a space for free expression, but that Europe should fight against abusive use of the web (sic) to spread hate speech, anti-Semitic messages and the recruiting vulnerable young people for violence.” 

“We need to work more closely with Internet companies to guarantee the reporting and if possible removal of all content that amounts to an apology of terrorism or calls for violence and hatred,” he said.

  • Who gets to determine what speech amounts to an “apology of terrorism?”

  • Who is the all-benevolent and wise sage who gets to decide what we can and cannot say?

  • Will he be fair and just?

  • Or will he use the power of censorship to attack any and all websites critical of the establishment?

  • What do you think the most likely outcome of such legal precedence would be?

  • Again, how long before websites like the one you are reading now are vilified by the extremist label?

  • How long before liberty-minded speech is categorized as violent speech or hate speech? Welcome to the Obama

Sen. Dianne Feinstein and the White House are now kindly warning the public that terrorist “sleeper cells” have been activated and that some are present in the United States. On CNN, Feinstein said:

“So I think this calls for vigilance. It calls for seeing that the national security organizations of our country, the intelligence community is funded fully, is directed ably, is cooperating with whether it be British intelligence, French intelligence, German intelligence, as we do.’

“And the French are good at it, and so are the British and the Germans. So, we can even be more active in terms of doing those things which enable us to find terrorists, to see who they’re communicating with in this country, and to track that.”Obama Muslim collection

She means mass Internet and phone surveillance, the same National Security Agency surveillance exposed by Edward Snowden, which now has a convenient justification in the form of an ever-present fear of terrorism. Wake up America

Finally, it is only a matter of time before a militarized response is activated in the U.S., just as it has been in France. One shooting event has led to the fielding of over 10,000 French troops on French soil, as well as an extra 5,000 heavily armed police. Frankly, this is where I — and many people like me — draw the line. Martial law is not acceptable under any circumstances.  I don’t care if we one day see a mushroom cloud over an American city, there is no measure of government security (false security) that is worth the degradation of essential liberties.  I suspect the loss of liberty, usurping of the constitution and the deployment of the military on U.S. soil would trigger revolution — a revolution I’m sure the establishment would attempt to marginalize as mere terrorism. Ultimately, though, there is no other option.

As I have been discussing constantly over the past several months, community preparation and organization comprise the only action plan worth the effort and energy at this time. The French are disarmed and utterly socialized. Millions of them march in Paris in a display of solidarity, but solidarity behind what solution?

  • Even more government; the same government that created the problem in the first place?

  • Even more centralization?

  • The globalization of despotic security policies?

The French have dug their grave, and now they are going to have to lie down in it.

Americans do not have to follow the same path.

We do not need more government. We do not need more surveillance, more police militarization or more troops on the streets. What we need is to take back responsibility for own defense. The French government could not or would not protect the staff of Charlie Hebdo, and the U.S. government will not protect you. That means you must train to protect yourself and those you care about. Whether we face a false flag attack or a legitimate terrorist action, the response is the same: Fight back. It is times like these that separate the courageous from the cowardly; those with principles and conscience versus the treacherous and self-serving. Make no mistake; as I wrote in my last article, many illusions are about to be shattered. You can be caught up in the storm as a helpless spectator and victim or you can become a barrier, a wall of defense against the dangerous riptides. These are your choices. Choose wisely.

By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

 

Stopping jihad in America; The Paris atrocities reveal the risks of leaving the border uncontrolled


Securing the border first is a sound idea: This fence marks the U.S.-Mexico border at El Calaboz, Texas. (Associated press)

Securing the border first is a sound idea: This fence marks the U.S.-Mexico border at El Calaboz, Texas. (Associated press) more >

The terrorist attacks on France are a reminder that the broken U.S. immigration system isn’t just about saving American jobs, but keeping out terrorists who are itching to make similar attacks in America. In the wake of the Paris attacks that killed 17 men and women last week, security officials have warned that the United States is a target for mayhem, too. President Obama’s relentless determination to open the nation’s borders to just about everyone makes it considerably easier for the Islamic jihadis to prepare a strike. We shouldn’t need a violent episode here to remind everyone that a nation that won’t control its border is no nation at all.

Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, a Republican, has taken the explosive immigration issue head on, producing a 25-page pamphlet titled “The Immigration Handbook for the New Republican Majority,” which he distributed to all Capitol Hill Republicans this week. Mr. Sessions’ focus is the economic harm caused by uncontrolled immigration, but his battle plan for controlling immigration would enhance the nation’s security as well.

“President Obama has engaged in a sustained campaign to collapse immigration enforcement,” Mr. Sessions writes. “As long as the president continues to ignore the law, order his officers to free illegal immigrants, and refuse to remove individuals who are here illegally, the problem will only get worse.”obama-border-is-open-378x257

U.S. Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., who calls himself the president’s “wingman” in the campaign to bend the law to fit the White House agenda, conceded in Paris while avoiding the solidarity march that the United States faces similar threats: “It’s something that frankly keeps me up at night, worrying about the lone wolf or a group of people, a very small group of people, who decide to get arms on their own and do what we saw in France.” If the man who left the gate open to terrorists is worried, the rest of Americans should be, too.

The plotters of the Charlie Hebdo atrocity are said to have traveled to Yemen to train for terror. Yemen has become a training ground, preparing fanatics for the export of jihad. Breitbart News reported in August that four Yemenis were caught trying to sneak across the U.S. border in 2014, and another 28 either turned themselves in or were apprehended at official ports of entry. Twenty-eight persons from Pakistan, another breeding ground for radical Islam, were picked up at the border, and 211 others were stopped at ports of entry.Wake up America

With only five-hundredths of 1 percent of the nation’s estimated 12 million illegals removed in 2014, according to Mr. Sessions, it’s not difficult to imagine that radicals looking for targets of opportunity are walking the streets of America, plotting murder and mayhem. It’s further disturbing that Mr. Obama weakened the legal immigration process last year by relaxing restrictions on applicants who show ties to terror organizations.Obama Muslim collection

There are encouraging shafts of hope in an otherwise gloomy prospect that the president’s failure can be overcome. Two-dozen states, led by Texas, have sued the Obama administration for its malfeasance of duty, arguing that the president’s executive action granting amnesty to 5 million illegals is unconstitutional. A federal court in Brownsville, Texas, is scheduled to hear the case Thursday. Republican members of Congress who are meeting in Hershey, Pa., this week should use Mr. Sessions’ immigration pamphlet as a map to design a strategy to regain control of the nation’s border. Resolving to withhold even a dime for the president’s amnesty scheme, which the House endorsed Wednesday by a vote of 236 to 191, is a good place to start.

PLEASE LISTEN BELOW:

vidlaura

Copyright © 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

Muslim Call to Prayer to be Chanted Every Friday at Duke University (UPDATED)


by Ashley Pratte14 Jan 2015Washington, DC

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/01/14/muslim-call-to-prayer-to-be-chanted-every-friday-at-duke-university/

The prayer itself is set to start this Friday at 1:00 p.m. and will be broadcast and amplified from the Chapel bell tower on campus.Christian Persecution

As campuses continue to foster political correctness, they use it as a way to favor religions seemingly at war with Western Civilization and Judeo-Christian beliefs. Frequently, we see students fighting for their religious freedom on campus—especially Christians. We hope that Duke University will also allow equal opportunity for Christian students to gather to pray and respect their religious freedom.Picture6

Duke University has a long history of fostering political correctness and hypersensitivity, from Chick-Fil-A’s removal from campus, to hosting a the national Palestinian Solidarity Movement conference, and to canceling a pro-life event in their Women’s Center on campus.

Young America’s Foundation called and emailed Duke University’s associate dean of religious life, Christy Lohr Sapp, for comment but has yet to hear back. Ashley Pratte, spokeswoman for Young America’s Foundation, spoke with the associate dean’s assistant who confirmed this story.

Ashley Pratte is the spokeswoman for Young America’s Foundation, you can follow her on twitter @ashpratte

~~~UPDATE~~~

Duke Backs Down, Cancels Muslim Call to Prayer from Chapel Tower

Reported by Todd StarnesTodd Starnes | Jan 15, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://townhall.com/columnists/toddstarnes/2015/01/15/duke-backs-down-cancels-muslim-call-to-prayer-from-chapel-tower-n1943785

Duke University has abandoned its plan to transform the bell tower on the Methodist school’s neo-gothic cathedral into a minaret where the Muslim call to prayer was to be publicly broadcast.

“Duke remains committed to fostering an inclusive, tolerant and welcoming campus for all of its students,” university spokesman Michael Schoenfeld said in a statement. “However, it was clear that what was conceived as an effort to unify was not having the intended effect.”

The first adhan, or call to prayer, had been scheduled to be broadcast on Jan. 16. University officials said, the Islamic chant, which includes the words “Allahu Akbar” would have been “moderately amplified” — in both English and Arabic. However, the decision brought a firestorm of national criticism from a number of high profile leaders including Franklin Graham, the son of famed evangelist Billy Graham.

“This is a Methodist school and the money for that chapel was given by Christian people over the years so that the student body would have a place to worship the God of the Bible,” Graham told me in a telephone interview.

He had called for university donors to pull their funding – (and I suspect that had something to do with Duke’s decision.) Instead, the prayers will be moved to outside the chapel.

“Members of the Muslim community will now gather on the quadrangle outside the Chapel, a site of frequent interfaith programs and activities,” Schoenfeld said.

The university did not say whether the Muslim call to prayer would be “moderately amplified” at the new location.

Christy Lohr Sapp, Duke’s associate dean for religious life, heralded the Muslim call to prayer in a column published by the NewsObserver.com.

“The use of it as a minaret allows for the interreligious reimagining of a university icon,” Lohr Sapp wrote.

For the record, the university says the chapel is not exclusively used for Christian worship. It’s used by students of many different religions. She imagined what it would be like for a students to walk through the chapel quad and “catch the sight of the student muezzin facing Mecca in the Chapel tower” and how “they might catch a strain of the Arabic proclamation, ‘Allahu Akbar!’ which means ‘God is great.’”

“This opportunity represents a larger commitment to religious pluralism that is at the heart of Duke’s mission and connects the university national trends in religious accommodation,” Lohr Sapp said.

By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


Uniting With France – Sort Of

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://conservativebyte.com/2015/01/uniting-france-sort/

France-Unite-NRD-600-wlogo

Empty Suit, Empty ChairObama Muslim collection

By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

‘A PETULANT CHILD’: Former Secret Service Agent Blasts Obama For Blaming Service For Skipping Paris March


Posted by Photo of Patrick HowleyPatrick Howley, Political Reporter

&amp;lt;img class=”avatar avatar-96 photo” src=”http://cdn01.dailycaller.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/patrick-howley-2336336962.png&#8221; alt=”Photo of Patrick Howley” pagespeed_url_hash=”418613759″/>

Former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino blasted President Obama’s decision to blame security concerns for his decision not to attend an anti-terrorism rally in Paris. The White House blamed security concerns for Obama’s decision not to attend the “March Of Unity” in Paris after a deadly Islamic terrorist attack on the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in Paris. The Secret Service said that it was never asked to prepare for a presidential visit to Paris. obama-liar4-266x189

Bongino, who served in the Secret Service under presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama before galvanizing conservative voters with recent Maryland Senate and congressional runs, told The Daily Caller that Obama blamed the Service because he knew they couldn’t fight back against him in the press.

“He knows there’s nothing the Secret Service can say. They don’t want to hurt the relationship so as a matter of decorum they can’t say anything,” Bongino said. “I imagine what they’re really thinking is, ‘Is this guy serious?’ It’s not an easy job. After the fence-jumper, morale’s not great over there now, but he still says something that is so obviously not true.”culture of deciet

“Just look at the Mandela funeral which was geometrically worse when it comes to threat and he went to that because he wanted to go. If the president wants to go he goes. The Secret Service doesn’t tell him he can’t go. That’s only in movies.”If his mouth is open he must be lying

“It’s not the first time. We had the White House tours incident. I’m not going to say he’s the first president to blame someone outside of his own executive office, but does he take responsibility for anything? Incorrigible is really the word for him. He acts like a child and no one outside of conservative media holds him to account. These people are forfeiting their lives for you… This guy is just acting like a petulant child.”Imperial President Obama

“My experience with his staff is they are just amateur hour,” Bongino added. “They don’t know what’s going on. There’s really only one channel to him: Valerie Jarrett. This doesn’t function like a regular White House…Instead of just doing what a responsible White House would do and say we blew it, they are completely incapable of acting like adults. It’s infuriating.”kingobamafingerconstitution-300x204

And what do other Secret Service agents think about it, according to Bongino?

“I think they’re so used to it at this point. I don’t think they’re capable anymore of being pissed off with this president. They do their jobs and just keep all this garbage out of it. You start to realize these guys are really getting screwed. They have no voice at all. The president tosses them around like a red-headed stepchild. Most of them know what’s going on but just block it out and put up a wall around it.”

By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

Ted Cruz: You Can’t Defeat Radical Islamic Terrorism If You Can’t Say It


Posted by Tom HincheyTom HincheyJanuary 13, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://www.westernjournalism.com/ted-cruz-cant-defeat-radical-islamic-terrorism-cant-say/#AZzOUudvcdQ7SSKT.99vid05cruz

Texas Senator Ted Cruz (R) said on Tuesday’s Fox & Friends that the world is lacking leadership to effectively fight the terrorist attacks occurring all over the world. He criticized President Obama for failing to attend the Unity Rally in Paris over the weekend.

“It was a very visual manifestation of what’s happened over six years. Over six years, America has receded from leadership in the world. And we saw it just this weekend as forty world leaders walking down the street in Paris and yet where is America, where is the president?”

The White House has not yet released the president’s activities for Sunday that prevented him from going to Paris. Senator Cruz slammed the president for not participating in the event when his presence would have demonstrated America’s support for France.

“He wasn’t standing with our allies, the French, and he wasn’t standing up against radical Islamic terrorism. He wasn’t providing the leadership the world desperately needs and that America has provided for so long.”

Cruz commented that the Obama administration will not be successful in defeating terrorism if they are unable to identify radical Islam as the source of those attacks“You cannot defeat radical Islamic terrorism if you’re unwilling to utter the words ‘radical Islamic terrorism.’” Cruz pointed out that there is a common thread among all the recent attacks around the world; yet we are lacking the leadership to effectively fight against it.com02 Obama Muslim collection

“And just, you know, look in recent months, I mean we’re seeing this all over the world, whether it is these horrific attacks on journalists, on police officers in France. Or whether it is in Sidney, Australia or whether it is in Canada or whether it is in Israel with Hamas terrorists coming in with butcher knives and cleavers murdering Israeli-American rabbis in synagogue as they pray. This is happening all over the world and there is a consistent theme of radical Islamic terrorism and we need clear leadership to combat it.”

h/t: The Blaze

About the Author: Tom Hinchey

Tom HincheyI am the Creative Media Director at Western Center for Journalism
By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

Will Obama declare war on ISIS?


 

Posted by    Tuesday, January 13, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://legalinsurrection.com/2015/01/will-obama-declare-war-on-isis/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LegalInsurrection+%28Le%C2%B7gal+In%C2%B7sur%C2%B7rec%C2%B7tion%29

“An end to the foreign policy messaging disaster?”

Airstrikes On ISIS

The Obama Administration’s foreign policy has from the start been plagued by a near-fatal dose of mixed messaging regarding the actions of our enemies, our mission in the Middle East, and the place the American military should hold in the context of the global economy. Late last year, members of Congress lashed out against the Administration over the Executive’s inability to define exactly what we were doing in the Middle East, and what we should be doing to prepare for future missions.

Now, we may finally receive some answers.

In a meeting with Congressional leadership today, President Obama indicated that he’s ready to propose terms authorizing U.S. military force against Islamic State. He’s been having this conversation with the leadership since November, but this is the first time he’s even come close to showing his hand.

From Bloomberg:

“A good starting place is for him to tell us what he wants,” McConnell of Kentucky told reporters after the meeting.

A debate over efforts to defeat Islamic State would reopen tension over the president’s authority to conduct military operations and uneasiness among some lawmakers — mostly Obama’s fellow Democrats — about being drawn into open-ended conflicts and ground combat.

Republican Senator John Cornyn of Texas, the Senate’s second-ranking Republican, told reporters after today’s meeting at the White House that the president’s statement came as “a little bit of a surprise.”

“I think that’s helpful because we’ve been trying to get him to come up with the plan and show a little bit of what his strategy is going to be,” the senator said.

Representative Steny Hoyer of Maryland, the No. 2 Democrat in the House, said he believes Obama “is going to make some proposal” on an authorization for use of military force.

Much of the White House’s messaging problem when it comes to international terrorism comes down to its insistence on forcing every issue though the politically correct sausage grinder. Republican leadership, however, has taken steps to combat that optic by introducing new legislation that would fund Homeland Security to the tune of $40 billion. They’re also calling out the Administration for its refusal to acknowledge the existence of a “war on terror” that has been raging for over a decade.vid04

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, who is now the Senate Majority Whip, criticized President Obama for focusing on “political correctness” instead of talking tough against terrorism.

“We know that, for example, when Major Nidal Hasan made his attack at Fort Hood, they called that workplace violence,” Cornyn said, referring to the deadly 2009 shooting in Texas. “And they are calling the war on terror ‘overseas contingency operations.’ We need to call it what it is. Because that’s the first step to actually dealing with it on a realistic basis.”Obama Muslim collection

Right now, the priority shouldn’t be to have a perfect policy out of the gate; if it’s coming from Obama, it’s not going to be amazing, and I doubt it will be realistic in the context of actual terrorists wanting to murder people. But once he opens the jar of worms, Republicans in Congress can work with what they’re given—even if that means ripping it up and starting over.

Senator McConnell is right—just tell us what you want, man! This is a non-starter unless Obama, Kerry, and other advisors give the Congress some idea of what it is they actually want the optic for this to be; because right now, the only signal the world is getting is that America is no longer to be taken seriously in the international theater.

By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

Sorry, But YOU Don’t Pay Enough Taxes


Posted by Michael BeckerMichael BeckerJanuary 13, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://joeforamerica.com/2015/01/sorry-but-you-dont-pay-enough-taxes/

Democrats, fresh off a resounding stomping last November, are convinced that the reason they lost is because you don’t pay enough taxes.

Democrats, fresh off a resounding stomping last November, are convinced that the reason they lost is because they’re not giving away enough of your money.

They rectified that Monday with a speech by Rep. Chris Van Hollen proposing tax increases on the wealthy with the money going straight to tax cuts for the poor and middle class.

The plan uses tax laws to encourage employee wage increases, reduce tax breaks for Wall Street and slap another fee on financial transactions. The government would dole out $1,000 tax credits for most workers and increase a slew of other tax credits for poor and middle-class families.more evidence Party of Deciet and lies DO NOT JACKASS

There’s more to it, a laundry list of giveaways to the “poor” and especially the “middle class.”  When reading stuff like this it’s good to recall that the Democrats unwritten rule is “There is no vote too expensive to buy.”  If you really need a mind numbing event in your life, follow the link and just try to follow the “logic” that Rep. Van Hollen is spewing.

Let’s take a quick look at just who is paying taxes now.  Remember, 47% of Americans pay zero income tax.  Actually, that’s not quite true.  The pay no income tax, but they get rebates back from the IRS, so the 47% not only pay no income tax, it’s a profit center for them.  “Earned Income Tax Credits” that require no income to cash in on.  So, the 47% are actually not leaving us with no contribution to the cost of government in the country, they are actually taking money away from tax revenues.

Democrats also love to talk about who makes all the money.  Here’s the truth.

Don’t kid yourself about the Democrats new found love of the “middle-class.”  You probably don’t come anywhere near being middle class, at least according to Democrats, you’re “rich.”  Note that they never talk about income levels when they have these rants, like ObamaCare, you have to pass the tax increase to find you’re rich.DemWarProsperityPIX

About the AuthorMichael Becker

Michael BeckerMichael Becker is a long time activist and a businessman. He’s been involved in the pro-life movement since 1976 and has been counseling addicts and ministering to prison inmates since 1980. Becker is a Curmudgeon. He has decades of experience as an operations executive in turnaround situations and in mortgage banking. He blogs regularly at The Right Curmudgeon, The Minority Report, Wizbang, Unified Patriots and Joe for America. He lives in Phoenix and is almost always armed

Islamic Holy Day Is Celebrated In St. Louis, Missouri With Knives & Blood


URL of the Original Posting Site: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1f4_1421105280

ST.LOUIS, MISSOURI (U.S.A.) Day of Ashura (Arabic: عاشوراء‎ ʻĀshūrā’ , colloquially: /ʕa(ː)ˈʃuːra/; Urdu: عاشورا‎; Persian: عاشورا‎ /ʕɒːʃuːˈɾɒ/; Turkish: Aşure Günü) is on the tenth day of Muharram in the Islamic calendar and marks the climax of theRemembrance of Muharram. This day is commemorated by Sunni Muslims (who refer to it as The Day of Atonement) as the day on which the Israelites were freed from the Pharaoh (called ‘Firaun’ in Arabic) of Egypt. According to Sunni Muslim tradition, Ibn Abbas narrates that Muhammad came to Madina and saw the Jews fasting on the tenth day of Muharram.

vid02

JAckass Whisperer

By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

House votes to overturn Obama immigration actions, bill heads to Senate


Published January 14, 2015, FoxNews.com

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/01/14/house-votes-to-overturn-obama-immigration-actions-bill-now-goes-to-senate/vid01

Imperial President ObamaThe Republican-led House voted Wednesday to overturn President Obama’s immigration actions from last November — and to unravel a directive from 2012 protecting immigrants who came to the U.S. illegally as children — sending the bill to the Senate where it faces an uncertain fate. 

The House voted 236-191 to approve the legislation, which funds the Homeland Security Department through the rest of the budget year to the tune of $40 billion. But as part of that bill, Republicans added provisions to gut the president’s immigration directives. 

Despite deep Democratic opposition, the House voted 237-190 on an amendment to undo the actions Obama announced in November that provide temporary deportation relief, and offer work permits, to some 4 million illegal immigrants. 

Another amendment would cancel Obama’s 2012 policy that’s granted work permits and stays of deportation to more than 600,000 immigrants who arrived in the U.S. illegally as kids. That measure passed more narrowly, 218-209, as more than two dozen Republicans joined Democrats in opposition. 

Republicans say Obama’s moves amounted to an unconstitutional overreach that must be stopped. 

“We do not take this action lightly, but simply there is no alternative,” House Speaker John Boehner said Wednesday. “It’s not a dispute between the parties or even between the branches of our government. This executive overreach is an affront to the rule of law and to the Constitution itself.” 

But as the White House threatened a veto, Democratic leaders claimed the GOP provisions would hurt immigrant families — and ultimately hurt Republicans politically. 

“The amendments … that the Republicans are tacking onto the bill, or at least trying to tack onto the bill, to keep the Department of Homeland Security open are inconsistent with our nation’s values and its history. They would tear families apart,” House Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer, D-Md., said. more evidenceDO NOT JACKASS

Even with Republicans in control of the Senate the bill faces tough chances there, especially because House GOP leaders decided to satisfy demands from conservative members by including a vote to undo the 2012 policy that deals with younger immigrants known as “Dreamers.” The amendment, which is opposed by some of the more moderate Republicans in the House, would ultimately expose those young people to deportation. 

Security-minded lawmakers on both sides of the aisle also are worried about using the DHS funding bill to wage the immigration fight, saying security funding should not be put at risk, particularly in the wake of the Paris terror attacks. Current DHS funding expires at the end of next month. 

In the Senate, Republicans would have to rally a 60-vote majority to advance the legislation, and they have only 54 members.  With even some Republicans voicing reservations, the Senate may have to strip out the immigration provisions and send a straight DHS funding bill back to the House, as the Feb. 27 deadline looms. This, then, could set up another fight between GOP leadership and the conservative reaches of the party. 

One senior House GOP aide told Fox News, “I don’t know how this one ends.” 

Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid, in a written statement, said the bill would not pass the Senate. “Republicans have only been in control for a week and already they are picking an unnecessary political fight that risks shutting down the Department of Homeland Security and endangering our security,” he said, urging Republicans to pass a “clean” funding bill.more evidence DO NOT JACKASS

Some House Republicans acknowledged that the Senate is likely to reject their approach. 

“They’re not going to pass this bill,” Rep. Charlie Dent, R-Pa., said in predicting the Senate outcome. 

Obama has threatened to veto the House bill, and Democrats roundly denounced it, even as immigrant advocates warned Republicans they risked alienating Latino voters who will be crucial to the 2016 presidential election. 

“Just two weeks into this new Congress, Republicans have turned a bipartisan issue, funding our Department of Homeland Security, into a cesspool of despicable amendments that cater to the most extremist anti-immigrant fringe,” Rep. Ted Deutch, D-Fla., said in a House debate. more evidence DO NOT JACKASS

Fox News’ Chad Pergram and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

Radical Imam Anjem Choudary Calls Charlie Hebdo Front Page ‘Act Of War’


by Andre Walker14 Jan 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/01/14/radical-imam-anjem-choudary-calls-charlie-hebdo-front-page-act-of-war/

AFP PHOTO / LEON NEAL
This is the Islamist Thug that Imperial President Obama has invited to the White House. Does that tell you anything?

But Choudary was unimpressed with the offering from the remaining staff at Charlie Hebdo claiming it was “ridiculing” Mohammed. He said the magazine was attacking the Muslim leader’s personality, and that publishing it was “extremely serious”.

This is the second intervention by Choudary since Islamic terrorists launched the devastating machine gun attack on Charlie Hebdo that left 17 dead and many more injured. Soon after the murders, he issued an open letter in which he said: “Contrary to popular misconception, Islam does not mean peace but rather means submission to the commands of Allah alone. Therefore, Muslims do not believe in the concept of freedom of expression, as their speech and actions are determined by divine revelation and not based on people’s desires.”

He claimed the latest front cover was “blatant provocation” and claimed insulting Islam and Muslims is “part of the war that is taking place”. He went on to demand that Western societies be “sensible and sensitive to the emotions and the feelings of the Muslims”, and accused governments of refusing to “nip it in the bud”.

His comments came as Charlie Hebdo announced they had sold out of their first million copies of the post-attack edition. This had been widely expected and the publishers had made provision to print a total of three million copies, using the printing press at Le Monde. The further two million copies are now being printed.

Choudary has been accused of hypocrisy in the past because he had a fondness for drinking cider when he was at Southampton University, something strictly forbidden in Islam. At the time he styled himself “Andy” and only developed an interest in radical Islam when he failed in his ambition to become a lawyer at a top City of London firm.

The 47-year-old, who lectures in Sharia law, was arrested in September as part of an investigation into Islamist terrorism but later bailed. His regular media contributions have made him a hated figure in both the UK and America.

He first became well known when he organised protests against the return of the Anglian Regiment to Luton from Iraq in March 2009. The Muslim group chanted “Anglian Soldiers: Butchers of Basra” and “Anglian Soldiers: cowards, killers, extremists” as the soldiers marched through the town. The English Defence League was founded by Tommy Robinson in Luton as a counterbalance to Choudary’s campaigns.

Extremist cleric to lead White House protest calling for Muslims to ‘rise up and establish Islamic state in America’

Call to arms: Muslim extremist Anjem Choudary will call for Sharia law to be established across the U.S.

Call to arms: Muslim extremist Anjem Choudary will call for Sharia law to be established across the U.S.

A hardline Muslim cleric who sparked anger across the U.S. with his anti-American comments in a television interview this month is to hold a protest outside the White House.

British extremist Anjem Choudary – who once said ‘the flag of Islam will fly over the White House’ – has announced he will lead a demonstration calling on Muslims to establish the Sharia law across America.

The rally, planned for March 3, is to take place just weeks after his on-screen row with Fox News presenter Sean Hannity.

Mr Choudary, 43, called Americans ‘the biggest criminals in the world today.’

The former leader of outlawed group Islam4UK told the Daily Star ‘we expect thousands to come out and support us.’

Mr Choudary said the March rally was organised by the Islamic Thinkers society, an extremist group based in New York.

Two other British extremists,  Abu Izzadeen and Sayful Islam, have also been asked to speak at the demonstration.

Izzadeen is the hate preacher who caused fury last year when he called British soldiers ‘murderers’ the day he was released from jail after a three-and-a-half year sentence for inciting terrorism.

Mr Choudary told the newspaper: ‘The event is a rally, a call for the Sharia, a call for the Muslims to rise up and ­establish the Islamic state in America.’

Furious reaction: Cleric Anjem Choudary made headlines when he was interviewed by Fox News presenter Sean Hannity earlier this month
Furious reaction: Cleric Anjem Choudary made headlines when he was interviewed by Fox News presenter Sean Hannity earlier this month

However, whether the three will be able to enter the U.S., especially Izzadeen, remains to be seen. Even a tourist visa requires applicants to answer questions on whether they have been involved in acts of terrorism or plan to commit crimes in the U.S.

‘This is a unique event taking place in Washington, outside the White House which, Inshallah, (God willing) will garner huge support.’

He hit U.S. headlines just two weeks ago after his furious exchange with Mr Hannity on Fox News. The presenter became so enraged with his anti-American comments he ended the interview by calling him a ‘sick, miserable, evil S.O.B’.

The East London-based cleric’s anti-American stance is well-documented. Last year he led protesters in burning the American flag outside the U.S. embassy in London on September 11.

Sayful Islam: Muslim activist

British extremists: Sayful Islam, left, and Abu Izzadeen, right, have also been invited to speak at the White House rally, which will call for Sharia law in the U.S.

Preacher: Abu Izzadeen

And in October, he told an ABC chat show that ‘one day the flag of Islam will fly over the White House.’

He told the Daily Star: ‘They have seen our activities in the UK and Europe and have decided they want to challenge the vacuum in ­freedom and democracy and the ­people in the front line of the struggle against Islam and Muslims – the ­American ­government and the ­establishment.

‘They have invited and ­myself and Sayful Islam from Luton to come over to address the crowd and rally support.’

Scene of protest: British extremist cleric Anjem Choudary plans to mount a pro-Islam demonstration outside the White House next month

Scene of protest: British extremist cleric Anjem Choudary plans to mount a pro-Islam demonstration outside the White House next month

‘We are going to address ­corruption in the Senate, corrupt foreign ­policy, the mayhem around the ­Muslim world, the drug and ­alcohol culture, ­promiscuity and the pandemic of crime in America.

‘It is only right the call is made in the heart of Western ­civilisation in front of the biggest pharaoh that ­exists today, which is Barack Obama.’

He added: ‘I think the American people’s hearts and minds are open to receive Islam as an alternative way of life. We expect thousands to come out and support us.’JAckass Whisperer

MORE CONFIRMING NEWS REPORTS;

Read more:
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

Two Political Cartoons You Might Have Missed


158570_600 Bear-Loose-600-AEA

 

 

 

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


Here’s Your Sign

URL of the Original Posting Site:  http://conservativebyte.com/2015/01/heres-sign/

Smart power 600 LA

cropped-george-washington-regarding-2nd-amandment.jpg

who want unarmed citizens

By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

Why I have been away from my blog


New WhatDidYouSay Logo

 

Good morning everyone.

To those that knew about my health crisis, thank you for your prayers. For those that didn’t, I got home late yesterday. Here is the explanation;

It really started 6 months ago. Had my quarterly doctor’s appointment,  and all my lab numbers were great. I was feeling great, and both the doctor and I were very happy and encouraged that my diet and exercise were working. My next quarterly appointment in December cause us all a lot of concern. My lab numbers where good, except that they showed I was very anemic, and my Iron was very low. I was not feeling good, constantly feeling weak, and thought that my vertigo was getting worse. A week before my doctor’s appointment, I had passed out going to the front door to respond to someone there. I have no idea how long was out, and when I came too, I was unable to move anything and was very disassociated. The rest of that day I felt weak and dizzy, but the next day I felt great. Christmas came and went with no problems, and my dizziness I just wrote off as vertigo. During this period I was also having a lot of pain across my diaphragm at night, and was very constipated. My waste was very dry and black when I could have a bowl movement.

My doctor was angry that I had not gone to the hospital, and ordered a bunch of test. They included several EKG’s, wearing a heart monitor for 48 hours, having a detailed ultrasound of my stomach, plus other test yet to me performed, one being an upper EG scan. The ultrasound told them my Liver is enlarged and I was having distress in my upper GI tract.

Last Friday I woke up feeling very dizzy and weak as if I were getting the flu. It got worse throughout the day. About 4:15, I went in to take my shower, and passed out in the shower. when I woke up I was very disoriented like the first time, and was shaking badly. Yes, I was not the man of faith I thought I was. I was very afraid. Based on what was on FOX NEWS CHANNEL, I had been out 15 to 20 minutes. I was alone in the apartment. I finished my shower sitting down, dried myself and got dress.

I called Jill (who had gone to the doctor) to see when she was coming home. I told her what happened, and she call out son, who came over to be with me until she got home. He drove us to the VA Hospital in Long Beach. They found I had blood in my stool, and was more anemic than my blood test before my doctor’s appointment. My EKG was normal, so they believed that I was bleeding someone in my stomach, and or, my GI tract. (I had a Colonoscopy November 2013 – 6 polyps). They admitted me.

Later that night, while going to the bathroom, I passed out again. That morning they started giving me fluids, and from Saturday through Sunday, they gave me four units of blood just to get my blood levels in the normal range. They had my fasting 100% because they knew they would have to do a EG scan (the scope down the throat into the stomach and small intestines). I was fasted for over 48 hours. During that time they gave me special medication through the IV designed to coat my stomach and stop the bleeding.

Monday, about noon, they put me out and did the scan of my stomach and upper GI. I indeed did have an ulcer about the size of a quarter in my stomach, but no other place. The medication had stopped the bleeding so they did not need to cauterize the ulcer. After having food, and tracking my blood count, I was giving the news that I could go home. Got home yesterday late afternoon.

PRAISE THE LORD FOR HIS HEALING HANDS UPON ME.

Now for the reason for the ulcer, and they suspected this before the scan. For years I have been taking NSAIDs for pain (NSAIDs are Advil – IBUPROFEN – and related pain relievers, like Naproxen). Not one doctor ever told me that NSAIDs eat away at your stomachs lining causing ulcers and bleeding. None of them ever told me you need to take these with food to lessen the corrosive effects. Some of you know the ongoing battle I have had with my back. Because NSAIDs are great for reducing inflammation, they have been the most effective for my back and arthritis.

I am still very weak. It will take time to build my system back up. As I am typing this I am feeling like I went to lay down and take a nap. That brings me to the next reason for writing this to everyone;

If you are taking NSAIDs and didn’t know the effects on your stomach, please use my experience to save you the same crisis I just had. Please pass this along to those you know about NSAIDs.

Thank you for your patience in reading my long letter. Thank you again for those that have prayed, and thank you for your continued prayers. May God’s richest blessings be yours and you by flooded with God Himself as you continue to walk with Jesus.

In His Service,

Jerry Broussard

How We Enable Radical Islamists


Posted by Karen PetersJanuary 8, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://joeforamerica.com/2015/01/enable-radical-islamists/

obama-and-islamWe enable radical Islamists by our actions and lack of actions.

There are 112 million radical Islamists who are trying to take over the world!  Many people say that only a tiny fraction of Muslims are radical terrorists.  Let’s look at the figures:

Yes, only 7% of Muslims are radicals intent on killing all Infidels.  However, there are 1.6 billion Muslims worldwide.  7% of 1.6 billion equals 112 million!  I would say that is enough of them to force us to take them seriously!

President Obama was forced to call the Paris executions an act of terrorism when the President of France called it terrorism.  Obama has yet to call it Islamic terrorism. Those are the words that will not be spoken.

Police on the scene were unarmed, and useless.  What were they supposed to do – ask sweetly that the terrorists stop?  What good are police officers, or Ft. Hood soldiers, when they are unarmed?  Unarmed police enable radical Islamists.

In another move which enables radical Islamists, the White House was quick to add that America needs to “redouble our efforts to explain the true tenets of Islam”.  http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/wh-america-needs-redouble-effort-explain-true-tenets-islam_823321.html#  We Americans would suggest that America needs to redouble our efforts to rid our country of these radical Muslims who want us all dead.  We need a President who will call it what it is, who will not declare the War on Terror to be over.  Perhaps we need to redouble our efforts of having the moderate and peaceful Muslims  speak out against and condemn those who they say are misusing their so-called peaceful religion. They are afraid of being killed for doing so.

In his book Audacity of Hope Obama wrote, “I will stand with them [Arabs and Pakistani Americans] should the political winds shift in an ugly direction“.  He was speaking against the Japanese interment camps during WWII.  Will he at least condemn the radical Islamists bent on the death of all Infidels?  The winds have certainly shifted in an ugly direction.   http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/coilofrage.asp  As recently as 2012, Obama gave a speech to the UN, saying that “the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam”.  Yes, he also said it should not belong to those who slander Jesus, but he has done little to defend the rights of Christians and Jews.  http://www.truthrevolt.org/news/flashback-obama-2012-future-must-not-belong-those-who-slander-prophet-islamObama Muslim collection

In 2012 the White House actually condemned the judgement of the satire magazine for publishing “deeply offensive, anti-Islamic cartoons”.  Has the White House condemned as deeply offensive any of the affronts to Christianity and Judaism? Christians are being “butchered” in Iraq and Syria by the Islamic State, yet Obama called ISIS a JV team. Has Obama condemned their ongoing slaughter during his Presidency?

When the White House repeatedly and wrongly called the Benghazi murders the result of a homemade video which insulted Mohammed, he was telling Islamists that this would have been an understandable reason to kill.  Constantly warning Americans not to be prejudiced against Muslims in America promotes the idea in the Muslim world that we Americans are attacking Muslims here, which is just not true.

Releasing many radical Islamists from Gitmo, and attempting to close it altogether, will not keep Americans safe. Some of those released go back to their battlefield, but Obama knows that, trading 5 of them in exchange for a probable deserter from our own military. With Obama’s personal Kill List, he chooses which enemies to take out each day by drone.  That keeps us from gaining intelligence which might keep Americans safe from attacks.

Radical Islamists will strike again and again in their desire to have all Infidels in fear or dead!  We can see in Paris and London just what a blind eye and actions engendered by fear produce.

About the Author: Karen Peters

Karen has been writing “Conservative Corner” daily for six years, highlighting news and events the main stream media does not cover. Her work is published daily on Patriotsbillboard.org. as well as many outlets across the web. She’s also been a columnist for the Boyne City Gazette in Michigan, RedState and Examiner and is the author of the book, “Proud to be an American – what I want my grandchildren to know” (self-published). Karen became a Precinct Delegate and Vice Chair of her county Republican Party in response to watching the unprepared, radical Barack Hussein Obama campaign for President in 2008. Her news feed is available to all by sending a note to: conservativecorner@gmail.com 

 

Will we ever learn? Obama White House can’t admit Paris attacks ‘Islamic terrorism’


By , Published January 07, 2015, FoxNews.com

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/01/07/will-ever-learn-obama-white-house-cant-admit-paris-attacks-islamic-terrorism/

vid01

They shouted in Arabic  “Allahu Akbar” (Allah is Greatest) and “We are avenging the Prophet Mohammed” as they sprayed their victims with hundreds of bullets from their semi-automatic weapons. 

Their “victims” were the top editorial cartoonists of the satirical Charlie Hebdo magazine, who had dared to practice their right of free speech.  Their offense?  Publishing cartoons deemed “offensive” by Muslim leaders around the world. The perpetrators? Islamic terrorists.  

Yet in the immediate hours after the murders in Paris, the response from western leaders was scurrilously predictable in their refusal to describe the attack as an “Islamic terrorist attack.”  

Phrasing the problem of “violent extremism,” as the Obama administration has done repeatedly, of being a problem exclusively of only Al Qaeda and now ISIS, is intellectually spurious and truly dangerous to our national security.Obama Muslim collection

Indeed, the responses from our own president, French President Hollande and British Prime Minster David Cameron all spouted the same empty pabulum in asserting that the Paris attack had nothing to do with Islam or any religion for that matter. But the hollow comments coming from our own leaders are steeped in the stench of appeasement and cowardice.com01

The first comments came from Josh Earnest, the White House spokesman, who refused to even call the massacre an act of terrorism, but made sure to add the now typical non-sequitor  which now routinely follows Islamic terrorist attacks,  that “Islam is a religion of peace” and therefore no should associate with the “extremists” in Paris with Islam.cause of deathmore evidence

Then President Obama issued his own statement, but in keeping with his administration’s 6 year old prohibition on using the term “Islamic terrorism,” he simply referred to the attack as “terrorism” — a vanilla term conspicuously devoid of any descriptive term explaining the motivation behind the attack. Thus, to the proverbial Martian it literally could have been eco-terrorism, white supremacist terrorism, or narco-terrorism.  (But admittedly, calling this an act of “terrorism” was a step up from the classification of Major Nidal Hassan’s similar massacre at Fort Hood as “workplace violence.”)  Obama Muslim collection

Then in live comments delivered later, both President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry gave blustery defenses of the U.S. determination to protect the right of free speech and vowed that neither the French nor anyone in the West would be cowed into silence by terrorism.

 Secretary Kerry said as follows:

“Today, tomorrow, in Paris, in France, or across the world, the freedom of expression that this magazine, no matter what your feelings were about it, the freedom of expression that it represented is not able to be killed by this kind of act of terror.” Nice words of bravado.Space Cadet

I hate to disabuse our secretary of state, but indeed  “freedom of expression” has indeed already been killed by acts of Islamic terrorism. Gibberish

Notwithstanding the secretary’s nice words of bravado today, the views in 2012 of the Obama administration on the very same French magazine were markedly differently “We are aware that a French magazine published cartoons featuring a figure resembling the prophet Muhammad, and obviously we have questions about the judgment of publishing something like this,” said Jay Carney, the White House spokesman. “We know these images will be deeply offensive to many and have the potential to be inflammatory.”Gibberish

The president himself, before the United Nations, revealed his own appeasement of Islamic terrorists and hoodlums when he declared in September 2012:

“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”  Obama defending muslims Two

Where was his moral insistence that we would never give into terrorists who would employ violence to intimidate us in suppressing our right to free speech? Just imagine if, amidst the recent North Korean campaign to intimidate Sony into not showing its film that offended North Korea, the president had stated, “The future must not belong to those who slander Kim Jong-un.”

The issue we face is not, as Islamist groups falsely claim in the United States — ironically the very ones invited to the White House, Homeland Security, Department of Justice, and State Department — that using the term Islamic terrorism connotes a generalization that all Muslims are terrorists any more than using the term “Hispanic drug cartels” means that all Hispanics are druggies or that the term “Italian mafia” means that all Italians are mobsters or that the term “German Nazis” mean that all Germans were Nazis.  

The term Islamic terrorism mean just that: terrorist attacks with an Islamic motivation — whether they attempts to silence critics of Islam, impose Sharia, punish Western “crusaders,” commit genocide of non-Muslims, establish Islamic supremacy (or Caliphate), or destroy any non Muslim peoples (e.g. the Jews and Christians) that are “occupying Muslim lands.”

And so in refusing to use the term Islamic terrorism, the administration and their multiculturalist western leaders go along with the patently false charade that Islamic terrorism simply does not exist. more evidence 

This has profound national security implications not only for non-Muslims, but for Muslim victims of Islamic terrorism. If you cannot name your enemy, how can you expect to defeat him? In buying into the notion that uttering the term “radical Islam” is somehow racist, the real scandal here is that our administration and other Western leaders in general are in fact taking a page out of the playbook written by Muslim Brotherhood front groups like the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC).  Muslims in the White House Administration

Those groups, in turn, are ideological derivatives in the West of the Muslim Brotherhood which itself the parent of all Islamic Sunni terrorist groups—from Al Shabab to ISIS to Al Qaeada to Hamas. And in the West, those Muslim Brotherhood front groups have managed to perpetuate one of the biggest and most dangerous national security frauds of the past 30 years: that use of the term Islamic terrorism is tantamount to a racist generalization that all Muslims are terrorist.  And that any criticism of Islam means you are an Islamophobe. Four weeks ago, the United Arab Emirates, a distinctly observant Muslim country, had the courage to designate the Muslim Brotherhood and 83 other Islamist groups including CAIR in the U.S. as Islamic terrorist groups. And our reaction? To our everlasting shame, the Obama administration came to the defense of CAIR, which has been described as a front for Hamas by the FBI and was designated an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorist money laundering trial in U.S. history that resulted in the closure of the Holy Land Foundation and the conviction of its leaders for laundering money to Hamas.cause of death

Phrasing the problem of “violent extremism,” as the Obama administration has done repeatedly, of being a problem exclusively of only Al Qaeda and now ISIS, is intellectually spurious and truly dangerous to our national security. Most recently, in describing ISIS, the Obama administration has categorically defined the group as having “nothing to do with Islam.” It’s time for our leaders to stop this nonsense.  Islamic terrorism and extremism are brutal realities that have killed tens of thousands of people, mostly Muslims.  more evidence

Islamic extremism cannot be confined to groups we don’t like. Islamic extremism is now a movement, just like fascism and communism; it spans a spectrum from Hamas to Al Shabab to the Muslim Brotherhood. And to ignore the common denominator in the motivation behind 75% of the world’s annual terrorist attacks carried out by Islamic terrorists is a sure guarantee that Wednesday’s attacks will be repeated over and over again. 

Will we ever learn?

Steven Emerson is executive director of the Investigative Project on Terrorism and the executive producer of a new documentary about the Muslim Brotherhood in America “Jihad in America: the Grand Deception.” 

New WhatDidYouSay Logo

MY OWN TWO CENTS

Islamist do not expect to take over America from the top down. They’re too smart for that. Instead they know to follow the examples of Adolph Hitler, Saul Alinsky and Cloward-Piven;

  1. Brainwash the children by getting the government run schools to teach how good Islam is and indoctrinate them away from patriotism.
  2. Scare the American people so much with terrorist attacks that they will willingly accept Sharia Law just to feel a false sense of being safe.
  3. Move so many of your own people into the country to stress the Welfare System, destroy the economy through entitlement programs, pay no taxes, and push for the total implementation of Sharia Law as the official law of the land.
  4. Remain patient. This won’t happen overnight.

Taking over America is then accomplished without firing a single shot. They have already expressed the same reluctance to take over America as Germany, Russia and Japan has in the past. They are very afraid of our Red-Neck brothers and sisters knowing how well armed they are. That is why they are pushing the U.N. to disarm America, and now that they have a President and Secretary of State that is enabling them to get further toward their ultimate goal, they have begun moving their people into America by the tens of thousands.

By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

House passes Article V rule change


Posted by on January 09, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://www.conventionofstates.com/house_passes_article_v_rule_change

Rep. Steve Stivers’ (R-OH) amendment to the House Rules passed by a vote on the House Floor this week, according to a press release published by Rep. Stivers’ office. The rule will provide a system with which to track, count, and organize Article V applications to Congress.

“I am pleased my colleagues supported my addition to the House Rules this week,” Stivers said. “I believe a Balanced Budget Amendment is the only way to stop out-of-control government spending.  I hope the passage of this rule will put us one step closer to fiscal responsibility and the inclusion of the BBA in the United States Constitution.”

Rep. Stivers’ press release went on to explain the rule in detail:

“Specifically, the rule creates a process for the intake of the petitions through the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee and gives the Clerk’s Office the responsibility of making the petitions electronically available and organized by the subject, state of origin and year of receipt. This will allow Congress, as well as the American people, to better track the progress of specific Article V efforts.  Prior to Stivers’ rule update, no formal process for cataloging the petitions existed.”

Rep. Stivers’ rule change is an invaluable asset in the Article V process. Where before there was confusion and uncertainty regarding how many applications had been submitted on what topic, now there will be a clear catalog of that information.

We applaud Rep. Stivers’ effort to smooth the road to a Convention of States, and we hope his amendment to the House Rules will bring this country one step closer to the change we so desperately need.

By WhatDidYouSay.org

By WhatDidYouSay.org

Tag Cloud