Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘President Trump’

Black Voters Ghosting the Democrats


By: Kevin Jackson | October 19, 2025

Read more at https://theblacksphere.net/2025/10/black-voters-ghosting-the-democrats/

Black, vote, Trump, TeamKJ, KevinJackson

Imagine somewhere in a dimly lit D.C. basement, a cadre of pollster’s huddles over flickering screens, sweat beading like forbidden truths on their foreheads.

They’ve just crunched the latest data from AtlasIntel, and the verdict hits like a rogue wave at a beachside barbecue—54% of Black voters approving of Donald Trump’s job performance, while a mere 46% disapprove. That’s not just a blip; that’s Black support for Trump outshining the national average, where 47% approve and 52% tsk-tsk from their ivory towers.

In a nation where racial fault lines are usually drawn with the precision of a drunk cartographer, this poll whispers a seismic shift: Black voters, long the unyielding backbone of the Democratic machine, are eyeing the exit sign lit up in MAGA red.

But hold onto your yarmulke, because the comedy of errors doesn’t stop there.

This same AtlasIntel survey, drawn from 1,066 Americans with a margin of error tighter than a miser’s fist (±3%), clocked Black respondents at about 10.6% of the sample—hardly a rounding error. Still, rewind the tape to earlier in the year, and the numbers play like a bad acid trip: May’s poll had 28% Black approval, July plunged to a cryptic 14%. Why the nosedive? Did a summer heatwave melt the resolve of respondents too polite to hang up? Then, bam—October’s quantum leap to 54%.

It’s as if the Black electorate collectively binge-watched Trump’s rallies on fast-forward, pausing only to nod at the parts where he promises to bulldoze the border banditos and criminals turning Black neighborhoods into no-man’s-lands.

Of course, the chattering class—those self-appointed oracles who treat polls like sacred scrolls—scoffs at this outlier.

A late-September YouGov survey clocked Black approval at a dismal 12%, with 86% channeling their inner Ebenezer Scrooge in disapproval. Echoing the gloom, a New York Times/Siena College poll from the same fever-dream period pegged it at 10%.

These aren’t polls; they’re prophecies scripted by the same folks who swore Hillary’s emails were a nothingburger and Biden’s Afghanistan withdrawal was “an orderly success.” Meanwhile, Trump’s 2020 haul of 14% Black votes—modest, sure, but a Republican high-water mark since the days when Ronald Reagan charmed with supply-side sonnets—now feels like ancient history. What sorcery turned that trickle into a potential torrent?

Ah, but let’s not kid ourselves: this isn’t sorcery; it’s sobriety. Black Americans, like any group weary of being pawns in a partisan chess game, are waking up to the raw arithmetic of Trump’s agenda. Start with the streets, those concrete veins pulsing with the real pulse of Black life—neighborhood safety.

Under the Obama-Biden carousel, urban crime didn’t just tick up; it erupted like a long-simmering grudge match finally spilling into the alleyways. Homicide rates in major cities spiked 30% from 2019 to 2020, per FBI data, with Black communities bearing the brunt—young men gunned down in broad daylight while politicians preached “mostly peaceful” protests from their gated enclaves.

Trump flipped the script with Operation Legend.

He flooding cities with federal agents to claw back control from the chaos merchants who thought “defund the police” was a haiku, not a homicide invitation. Approval ratings among Black voters for his law-and-order push? They didn’t just climb; they vaulted, as folks traded abstract slogans for the tangible thrill of walking home without glancing over their shoulder.

And here’s where the humor sharpens to a stiletto: the Left, those high priests of performative piety, spent decades peddling the myth that Black progress hinged on their benevolent oversight—like feudal lords doling out scraps from the castle feast.

Historical context? Let’s dust off the archives. From the Dixiecrats who filibustered civil rights in the 1960s to the welfare traps of the Great Society that ensnared generations in dependency, Democrats have mastered the art of the gilded cage. LBJ’s infamous quip about owning “the n***** vote for 200 years” wasn’t hyperbole; it was blueprint.

Fast-forward to today, and the hypocrisy gleams like fool’s gold: the same party that greenlit mass incarceration under Clinton now weeps crocodile tears over “systemic racism” while ignoring how their sanctuary-city experiments have flooded Black neighborhoods with fentanyl-fueled phantoms. Trump’s retort? Meritocracy unapologetic, borders sealed like a vault, and his first-term Opportunity Zones that funneled billions into Black-owned businesses—$75 billion in investments by 2023, per Treasury reports. Estimates have Trump creating 500,000 jobs in underserved areas.

No wonder the polls are glitching; reality’s a tough pill when your brand is built on pity porn.

Now, devil’s advocate time, because we can’t ignore the funhouse mirrors.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI)—that corporate kabuki theater the Left touts as salvation—has its cheerleaders arguing it pads the numbers for Black advancement. Sure, on paper, quotas might juice short-term hires, like sprinkling glitter on a mud pie and calling it cake.

A 2023 McKinsey report claimed companies with diverse exec teams outperform peers by 25% in profitability, a stat the DEI evangelists wave like a magic wand. But peel back the foil, and the emperor’s strutting in his skivvies: studies from Harvard Business Review show DEI initiatives often breed resentment, not results, with 40% of employees viewing them as “reverse discrimination.” And among Black voters?

A Rasmussen poll from August 2024 found 62% prioritizing “equal opportunity based on merit” over mandated diversity hires, underscoring a deep-seated belief in climbing ladders you build yourself, not elevators rigged by bureaucrats. Trump’s pitch resonates here—no handouts, just highways paved with hard-won hustle. It’s why Black entrepreneurs, from barbershop philosophers to tech trailblazers, are ditching the Democratic dole for the Republican roar.

Zoom out, and the X ecosystem—once Twitter, now the wild west of unfiltered truth—pulses with this awakening.

Scroll through and you’ll find Black voices belting Trump’s praises like an impromptu gospel choir. Take Judge Joe Brown, dropping an unreported gem about Trump quietly bankrolling young Black entrepreneurs, the kind of off-the-books benevolence the media buries deeper than Jimmy Hoffa. Or N.O.R.E., the hip-hop heavyweight, crowing, “I love Trump! He let n***as out of jail!” in a clip that’s racked up millions of views, crediting the First Step Act for slashing sentences on nonviolent offenses—over 3,000 Black inmates freed by 2021, per DOJ stats.

Then there’s the Black MAGA Preacher, Jordan Wells, fielding fire for rocking a red hat in the pulpit, asking, “How can I preach salvation while backing the man the devil’s disciples demonize?” His viral takedown? Democrats peddle victimhood; Trump peddles victory.

This isn’t blind fealty; it’s forensic accounting.

Black unemployment cratered to 5.4% under Trump pre-COVID—the lowest in 50 years, per BLS data—fueled by tax cuts that let small businesses breathe without Big Brother’s boot on their neck. Contrast that with Biden’s “Build Back Broke” blueprint, where inflation gnawed at grocery carts like termites at a dream deferred, hitting Black households hardest with a 20% food price surge by 2023. Trump’s not whispering sweet nothings; he’s yelling blueprints for border walls that stem the tide of wage-wrecking illegals, school choice vouchers that liberate kids from failing public pens, and energy independence that slashes utility bills without apology.

The irony? The Left’s propaganda press, ever the loyal lapdog, spins these surges as “anomalies” while internal Trump polls—those elusive El Dorado of electoral intel—paint a rosier portrait. Why the veil? Because admitting Black voters are bolt-clipping their chains threatens the whole plantation paradigm. Trump’s team doesn’t poll-chase; they policy-charge, consequences be damned. Common sense over consensus, action over alibis. As one X sage quipped, “Democrats promised hope and change; Trump delivered jobs and jails emptied. Guess which sticks?”

In the end, this polling pandemonium isn’t about numbers; it’s about narratives cracking like eggshells under combat boots. Black America, forged in the fires of real struggle—from Selma’s bridges to Baltimore’s blocks—isn’t buying the bill of goods anymore. They’re bartering for the merit-based muscle Trump offers, the kind that fortifies neighborhoods, fuels family tables, and flips the bird to paternalistic pity.

White House faith director responds to Trump’s Heaven comments: ‘It was humility’


By Ryan Foley, Christian Post Reporter | Thursday, October 16, 2025

Read more at https://www.christianpost.com/news/white-house-faith-director-responds-to-trumps-heaven-comments.html?utm_source=Daily&utm_campaign=Daily&utm_medium=newsletter

President Donald Trump bows his head in prayer after delivering remarks during an Easter Prayer Service and Dinner in the Blue Room of the White House on April 16, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Christians across the globe will celebrate Easter on Sunday, April 20. | Win McNamee/Getty Images

WASHINGTON — A White House official who deals directly with faith issues says President Donald Trump’s recent statements suggesting he may not make it to Heaven are an example of his humility. 

Jenny Korn, the director of the White House Faith Office, addressed the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference at the Museum of the Bible on Tuesday. Korn, who also served in the first Trump administration and the George W. Bush administration, used her remarks to vouch for Trump’s character as a man of faith. 

“I have the honor of knowing him now for almost 10 years,” she said. “I’ve been in the Oval Office with the cameras and without the cameras. And I want to let you know that those pictures that you see of the president praying in the Oval Office with many pastors around him, it’s real.”

Korn insisted that “On camera or off camera, the president welcomes hands-on and welcomes prayer.” She added, “It’s in his heart, and this is who he is.”

“There’s been prayer in the Oval Office, in the Roosevelt Room, in the East Room, in the Residence, on the grounds, in every part of the White House inside and out,” she said.

Speaking with reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday, the president suggested that he’s “maybe not Heaven-bound.”

“I’m not sure I’m going to be able to make Heaven,” Trump said. 

Korn said that Trump’s comments are not a cause for concern.

“The president has his own language, and I look at it, and I know his language, it was humility,” she said. 

In August, Trump made public comments that questioned whether ending the Russia-Ukraine war could help him get to Heaven, prompting debate among Christian leaders about the path to salvation.  Korn assured that Trump has accepted Jesus Christ as his “Lord and Savior.” While Trump “uses some colorful language” and “might not speak like a Sunday School teacher,” Korn stressed that the president “sure likes to hire them.”

Korn has worked under Trump during both his terms in office and on his 2016 election campaign. She was the deputy director of the White House Office of Public Liaison all four years of his first term. During Trump’s initial campaign, Korn led coalition engagement efforts with several minority and faith communities.

“I never really understood what spiritual warfare was until I worked for President Trump,” she said. “I would walk into the White House, and I could feel this very dark cloud above me, but there was this space in between my head and that dark cloud, and it was your prayers. It was God. It was Jesus.”

“I was able to do my job because of you and all of the millions of people that were praying for us to do our jobs that first term,” she added.

She contends that the faith advisors in the president’s inner circle continued their efforts during the four-year hiatus between Trump’s first and second terms. Korn said she went to Mar-a-Lago with Pentecostal televangelist Paula White-Cain, Trump’s longtime pastor and spiritual advisor, to present him with the idea of establishing the White House Faith Office, which he established in February with her and White-Cain at the helm. 

“He opened it, he read it and he’s like ‘I love this.’ He started writing notes of things that he would add to the plan. He didn’t have to call an advisor; he didn’t have to ask anyone else. He just said yes.”

“[This is] the very first time that there has ever been a White House Faith Office in the West Wing as a direct report to the president of the United States,” she stressed.

“Inside the White House, we have six employees for a brand-new office, but we also have a faith director in every department and agency who are looking out for people of faith in those departments and those issues.”

Ryan Foley is a reporter for The Christian Post. He can be reached at: ryan.foley@christianpost.com

Operation Arctic Fraud: Jack Smith’s Cold War Against Trump


By: Kevin Jackson | October 7, 2025

 Read more at https://theblacksphere.net/2025/10/operation-arctic-fraud-jack-smiths-cold-war-against-trump/

Is anybody surprised to learn that Jack Smith is a criminal?

That’s like being shocked to find out a Kardashian staged a photo op. The only real mystery here is how this guy keeps getting taxpayer-funded badges to break laws he’s supposed to enforce.

According to a Newsbreak report, former Special Counsel Jack Smith allegedly authorized surveillance on nearly a dozen Republican senators during his “investigation” into January 6. The DOJ document—discovered by FBI Director Kash Patel—details a scheme dubbed “Operation Arctic Frost.” Cute name. Sounds like a limited-edition Slurpee flavor, except this one’s spiked with espionage and arrogance.

Smith allegedly tracked private communications and phone calls from Senators Lindsey Graham, Marsha Blackburn, Ron Johnson, Josh Hawley, Cynthia Lummis, Bill Hagerty, Dan Sullivan, Tommy Tuberville, and Congressman Mike Kelly. That’s not an investigation — that’s political reconnaissance. It’s like the DOJ decided to become the Democrat National Committee’s spy agency.

Now, let’s play along with their delusion.

Let’s assume, for argument’s sake, that there was a legitimate reason to track Republicans’ phones. Fine. What did they find? A fantasy football league and a bunch of text messages about border security? Meanwhile, the Democrats’ phones from the J6 Committee days — poof — gone. Wiped cleaner than Hunter Biden’s laptop after a visit from the Secret Service.

And speaking of cover-ups, every key J6 Committee member got their preemptive Biden-issued “autopen pardon.” Nothing screams innocence like a co-conspirator providing “just in case” legal protection before the evidence shows up.

 Now let’s zoom out a bit. Jack Smith didn’t stumble into corruption.

He’s not a rogue operator — he’s part of the treasonous cabal that turned the DOJ into the enforcement arm of the Democratic Party. His history with Trump goes back years, and every move he’s made since has had the same goal: destroy the man who refuses to bow to their Deep State altar.

Remember when Democrats called January 6 an “insurrection”? Notice how not one person has been charged with actual insurrection. It’s almost as if the government knows the word doesn’t apply when nobody’s armed, no government was overthrown, and the only thing actually destroyed was Americans’ faith in election integrity.

By now, even the most hopeless Leftist barista in a Che Guevara T-shirt knows J6 was a cover-up.

The Democrats needed a spectacle — a smoke bomb to distract from their 2020 election heist. They had to convince America that the guy who drew 60,000 people to rallies somehow lost to the guy who couldn’t draw 60 to a Zoom call. The math only works if you ignore arithmetic.

President Trump, of course, has been vindicated by time. He knows he was cheated out of a second term, but in true Trumpian fashion, he’s weaponized the waiting game. The delay allowed every corrupt actor to leave a trail of digital breadcrumbs, and now, one by one, those crumbs lead straight to Democrat doorsteps. These aren’t geniuses, folks — these are bureaucrats who think “delete” is the same as “destroy.”

The walls are closing in — but this time, on them.

Take James Comey. His indictment sent shockwaves through D.C., mostly because the Left suddenly realized their “untouchables” aren’t. The Comey domino is the first in a long line. Once he flips — and he will — the floodgates will open. Bureaucrats, aides, media operatives — the entire swamp ecosystem will start squealing like Fauci at a gain-of-function hearing.

And then there’s General Mark Milley — Mr. “I secretly called China to undermine my commander-in-chief.” Recently, even he admitted he could face court-martial for his actions. Translation: “I did it, I know I did it, and I’m praying for a plea deal.” Don’t think Milley suddenly realized this, as he’s known this for years. But like other Leftists who targeted Trump, he never thought he would get found out. After all, they had destroyed Trump, right?

The Left is cracking under its own hypocrisy.

These people spent years calling Trump a dictator while literally using intelligence agencies to spy on elected officials. And all their chest-pounding over “rule of law” and so on provided cover for their treason. Temporarily.

Jack Smith’s “Operation Arctic Frost” wasn’t just about surveillance. It was about control — about keeping tabs on anyone who might expose the truth. When the DOJ spies on sitting senators, it’s not democracy. It’s tyranny with better branding.

Ironically, every Democrat who’s ever screamed about “threats to democracy” is now defending a man who illegally tapped political opponents. These are the same people who fainted over Trump’s tweets but shrug when federal agencies behave like the Stasi. If irony were currency, Democrats would have paid off the national debt by now.

So where does this go?

My bet — the thread unravels fast. Because when corruption this deep is exposed, it never stops at the first name. Jack Smith’s downfall will trigger a cascade — DOJ officials, FBI players, even sitting politicians who thought “Arctic Frost” would stay buried. Spoiler alert: there’s no permafrost thick enough to preserve this kind of rot.

And that brings us to the political weather forecast: a deep freeze for the Left. The Uniparty’s about to get frostbite in some sensitive places. Trump isn’t just exposing the swamp — he’s forcing it to melt itself. Every time Democrats act to “save democracy,” they end up proving why it needs saving from them.

Operation Arctic Frost won’t be remembered as an investigation. It’ll be remembered as the moment the Left’s paranoia became its undoing — the day the hunters realized they’d been wiretapping their own graves.

Because when all’s said and done, you can only keep secrets so long before they start keeping you.

The Left’s biggest lie is that Biden won the 2020 election. And their next biggest lie is how they created the J6 narrative to protect the lie. Now those lies are front and center.

Comey will have lots of company soon, as new indictments come. And the names on the list will be shocking for only one reason: we finally got them.

Today’s Politically INCORECT Cartoon by A.F. Branco


Branco Cartoon – He Came, He Saw…

A.F. Branco | on October 1, 2025 | https://comicallyincorrect.com/branco-cartoon-he-came-he-saw/

The Above the Law Bunch
A Political Cartoon by A.F. Branco 2025

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Flipboard

A.F. Branco Cartoon – The “no one is above the law bunch”, who tried to destroy Trump, may find out just who’s not above the law.

BRANCO TOON STORE – New products – 2026 Calendar – T-shirts – Mugs

Andrew McCabe Is Running from Comey Unfortunately It’s Too Late

By Jim Hoft – JoeHoft.com – Sept 29,2025

It’s too late for Andrew McCabe, he’s in deep trouble. No sense trying to separate yourself from Comey now, Andy.
Andrew McCabe was recently on CNN and he appeared to be trying to separate himself from Jim Comey.
Andrew McCabe must be scared after Comey was arrested. Unfortunately for him, there was a report put together of his wrongdoings while he was conspiring with Comey to remove President Trump from office.
(See the entire report below.)
Below is a list of the most significant points in the report – … READ MORE

DONATE to A.F. Branco Cartoons – Tips accepted and appreciated – $1.00 – $5.00 – $25.00 – $50.00 – it all helps to fund this website and keep the cartoons coming. Also, Venmo @AFBranco – THANK YOU!

A.F. Branco has taken his two greatest passions (art and politics) and translated them into cartoons that have been popular all over the country in various news outlets, including NewsMax, Fox News, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, and “The Washington Post.” He has been recognized by such personalities as Rep. Devin Nunes, Dinesh D’Souza, James Woods, Chris Salcedo, Sarah Palin, Larry Elder, Lars Larson, Rush Limbaugh, Elon Musk, and President Trump.

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon by A.F. Branco


Branco Cartoon – Do No Harm

A.F. Branco | on September 24, 2025 | https://comicallyincorrect.com/branco-cartoon-do-no-harm/

Trump On Big Pharma
A Political Cartoon by A.F. Branco 2025

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Flipboard

A.F. Branco Cartoon – Prest. Trump, with the help of RFK Jr, is coming after Big Pharma for the reported ill effects of their products.

BRANCO TOON STORE – NEW PRODUCTS!

President Trump Makes Major Announcement on Autism and Vaccines

By Cristina Laila – The Gateway Pundit – Sept 22, 2025

President Trump on Monday announced that the use of acetaminophen, the active ingredient in Tylenol, can increase the risk of autism when used by pregnant women.
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said Tylenol is tied to autism, ADHD and liver toxicity in children.
“Today, the FDA will issue a physician’s notice about the risk of acetaminophen during pregnancy and begin the process to initiate a safety label change,” Secretary Kennedy said. “There is a potential association between acetaminophen use during pregnancy and adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes, including later diagnosis for ADHD and autism.”
President Trump also pleaded with mothers not to pump their babies with too many vaccines at once… READ MORE

DONATE to A.F. Branco Cartoons – Tips accepted and appreciated – $1.00 – $5.00 – $25.00 – $50.00 – it all helps to fund this website and keep the cartoons coming. Also, Venmo @AFBranco – THANK YOU!

A.F. Branco has taken his two greatest passions (art and politics) and translated them into cartoons that have been popular all over the country in various news outlets, including NewsMax, Fox News, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, and “The Washington Post.” He has been recognized by such personalities as Rep. Devin Nunes, Dinesh D’Souza, James Woods, Chris Salcedo, Sarah Palin, Larry Elder, Lars Larson, Rush Limbaugh, Elon Musk, and President Trump.

Karma Forecloses on This Corrupt Democrat


By: Kevin Jackson | September 18, 2025

 Read more at https://theblacksphere.net/2025/09/karma-forecloses-on-this-corrupt-democrat/

Trump’s nemesis Letitia James

Bad news for Big Tish.

Trump’s nemesis Letitia James built her career accusing him of fraud. Now she’s staring down mortgage fraud allegations of her own—and suddenly the “fraud fighter” looks more like the fraudster. Graphic: Courtroom gavel with a foreclosure sign.

Karma doesn’t knock. It kicks down the door. For years, New York Attorney General Letitia James strutted around as the self-appointed dragon slayer of Donald Trump, waving around lawsuits like trophies and branding herself the one who would finally end Trump’s career. But in a twist so ironic it belongs in a satire novel; James now finds herself on the wrong side of a fraud investigation. Yes, the same “fraud-buster” who dragged Trump through court for allegedly lying on valuations is now facing heat for her own false documents: mortgage fraud tied to her Virginia residence.

According to NewsbreakTrump officials are pushing for charges against her.

Investigators found that when James purchased her Virginia home in 2023, paperwork fraudulently listed the property as her “primary residence” when it wasn’t. That little box isn’t just paperwork fluff; lying about primary residency can drastically change mortgage terms and constitutes mortgage fraud. This wasn’t some clerical oops. This was lying for financial benefit—exactly the kind of dishonesty James used to try to bludgeon an innocent Trump.

And it wasn’t some random stranger filling out forms wrong. The documents came through under James’ name, via power of attorney signed through her own niece. Whether you stamp the pen yourself or hand the pen to family, the responsibility lies with you. That’s law 101. And the fact is, many people don’t believe the “niece” story.

Trump Retribution? No—Accountability

Her defenders scream this is political revenge. But let’s cut the nonsense. If an ordinary citizen lied on mortgage paperwork, they wouldn’t get an ABC News puff piece or cries of “weaponization”—they’d get indicted. Period.

ABC confirms that DOJ subpoenas have already been issued to James. When her defenders say “no clear evidence,” what they really mean is “we haven’t spun it enough yet.” Because at the end of the day, James got a financial benefit through fraudulent documentation—the definition of mortgage fraud. The fact that investigators are hesitating to indict tells you more about the rot in the justice system than about her innocence. The irony bites even harder when you recall James’ civil fraud case against Trump, where she paraded herself as crusader for truth. Laughable that any Democrat can get the word truth to roll off their tongue without having a seizure.

She built her political brand on promising to “get Trump.” She used her office as a political club, weaponizing the justice system against her enemies. Now the spotlight exposes her own corrupt dealings, and suddenly the system looks far less interested in speedy convictions. Funny how that works.

Hypocrisy on Display

James’ career is one long string of accusations, mugshot press conferences, and partisan grandstanding. She made “fraud” her middle name when she targeted Trump, painting him as the epitome of corruption. Yet now that she’s caught up in her own fraud scandal, her allies claim she’s the victim. The hypocrisy is so thick, you need a bulldozer to plow through it.

She wanted to make Trump the face of corruption. Now she’s turned herself into the poster child for the very fraud she claimed to oppose. The joke writes itself: Letitia “Fraud Fighter” James caught in (checks notes)… fraud.

Political Weaponization: Her Own Creation

The establishment whining about Trump’s “weaponization of justice” is laughable. Who was the pioneer of turning courtrooms into political battlegrounds? James. Her entire platform was about bringing down a political rival through lawfare. She normalized it, she celebrated it—until it cut the other way. Now she wants to cry foul? Too late. She set the precedent. Trump’s officials don’t even need to innovate here; they’re just flipping the playbook James invented back on her.

Bigger Picture

This entire saga reminds Americans that political witch hunts have a way of backfiring. When prosecutors become the prosecuted, it’s usually because they overplayed their hand, drank too much of their own propaganda, and thought they were untouchable.

Letitia James is not untouchable. She’s just another two-faced politician who abused her power to attack her enemies while thinking no one would notice her own sins. Well, people noticed. And subpoenas don’t just vanish.

The woman who tried to end Trump’s legacy may end up remembered not as the one who toppled Trump—but as the AG who blew up her own career with lies scribbled onto mortgage forms.

Trump Delivers Ultimatum to Foreign Companies After ICE Raid


By Jimmy Parker | September 8, 2025

Read more at https://pagetraveler.com/

In a decisive response to last week’s significant immigration enforcement operation, President Donald J. Trump has issued a powerful call to action for all foreign corporations investing on American soil. The operation, which targeted a Hyundai battery construction plant in Georgia, resulted in the arrest of 475 individuals who were found to be in the United States illegally or in violation of their visa terms. President Trump’s statement serves as a stark warning that the era of exploiting loopholes and disregarding federal immigration law has come to an abrupt and final end under his strong leadership.

Contrary to the narrative undoubtedly being spun by the liberal media, this enforcement is not about hostility toward foreign investment or global talent. In fact, President Trump explicitly encourages it, but he demands it be conducted within the clear boundaries of the law. As the President firmly stated, “Your Investments are welcome, and we encourage you to LEGALLY bring your very smart people, with great technical talent, to build World Class products, and we will make it quickly and legally possible for you to do so.” This position underscores a fundamental commitment to fairness and legality, principles that the previous administration, which openly celebrated this very plant, seemingly ignored in its pursuit of hollow economic victories.

The core of the President’s message is a simple and fair bargain for any company wishing to benefit from the world’s greatest consumer market and most powerful economy. The United States will facilitate the legal entry of essential technical expertise, but in return, corporations have a solemn duty to prioritize the American worker. President Trump’s declaration leaves no room for misinterpretation: “What we ask in return is that you hire and train American Workers. Together, we will all work hard to make our Nation not only productive, but closer in unity than ever before.” This stand for the American citizen is a refreshing change from the globalist policies that have for decades left hardworking citizens competing unfairly for jobs in their own country.

The sheer scale of the raid, where a majority of the nearly 500 arrested were reportedly South Korean nationals, exposes a blatant disregard for U.S. Code § 1324, which explicitly makes it unlawful to hire unauthorized aliens. While the predictable hand-wringing from the left will focus on the individuals detained, President Trump’s unwavering focus remains on the rule of law and protecting American jobs.

His administration’s actions prove that no company, no matter how large or foreign, is above the law. This enforcement, coupled with the successful negotiation for the repatriation of over 300 individuals, demonstrates a level of operational competence and diplomatic strength that was utterly absent just a few years ago.

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/115165715028507857/embed

This event is a direct result of the America First policies that have secured over $5 trillion in private and foreign investments for U.S. manufacturing and infrastructure. President Trump has proven that a nation can be both open for business and fiercely protective of its sovereignty and its citizens’ prosperity. His leadership ensures that economic growth will no longer be built on the back of illegal labor, but on the innovation of legal immigration and the unmatched talent of the American workforce.

Today’s TWO Politically INCORRECT Cartoons by A.F. Branco


Branco Cartoon – Woke Is No Joke

A.F. Branco | on August 26, 2025 | https://comicallyincorrect.com/branco-cartoon-woke-is-no-joke/

Craker Barrel Gose Woke
A Political Cartoon by A.F. Branco 2025

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Flipboard

A.F. Branco Cartoon – Cracker Barrel is realizing that where there’s woke, there’s Smoke as they have Bud lit themselves on fire.

BRANCO TOON STORE  (New Products)

Cracker Barrel Releases Desperate Damage Control Statement Addressing Outrage Over Branding Changes as Stock Continues to Free Fall

By Cassandra MacDonald – The Gateway Pundit – Aug 25, 2025

The statement, titled, “A Promise to Our Guests,” was posted to Facebook on Monday morning.
The restaurant chain, long beloved for its traditional American charm, faced a storm of criticism after unveiling a modernized logo that ditched iconic elements like the barrel and the “Old Country Store” tagline.
Fans, including President Donald Trump, slammed the change as a “woke” erasure of heritage, leading to a $94 million drop in stock value in just one day.
The statement, issued on Monday, attempts to convince customers that the core of Cracker Barrel remains unchanged despite the…. READ MORE

Branco Cartoon – Pro-Crime Democrats

A.F. Branco | on August 27, 2025 | https://comicallyincorrect.com/branco-cartoon-pro-crime-democrats/

Trump Fights Crime
A Political Cartoon by A.F. Branco 2025

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Flipboard

A.F. Branco Cartoon – Democrats are outraged at Trump for cleaning up dangerous crime in our cities, with Black communities benefiting most.

BRANCO TOON STORE (NEW PRODUCTS)

The Cavalry is Coming: 1700 National Guardsmen from 19 States Mobilizing to Help President Trump Stop Illegal Migration and Crime – Here Is the Full List

By Cullen Linebarger – The Gateway Pundit – Aug 23, 2025

President Trump is about to get a boost from some friendly states as he doubles down on his efforts to halt illegal immigration and crime across America.
Fox News reported on Friday that as many as 1700 national guardmen from 19 states are being mobilized to assist the Department of Homeland Security as part of the crackdown. This move will allow the U.S. military to provide a more direct role in supporting federal immigration enforcement.
News of this comes as Trump has suggested he will seek to replicate his successful takeover of DC with other crime-ridden cities such as Chicago and… READ MORE

DONATE to A.F. Branco Cartoons – Tips accepted and appreciated – $1.00 – $5.00 – $25.00 – $50.00 – it all helps to fund this website and keep the cartoons coming. Also, Venmo @AFBranco – THANK YOU!

A.F. Branco has taken his two greatest passions (art and politics) and translated them into cartoons that have been popular all over the country in various news outlets, including NewsMax, Fox News, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, and “The Washington Post.” He has been recognized by such personalities as Rep. Devin Nunes, Dinesh D’Souza, James Woods, Chris Salcedo, Sarah Palin, Larry Elder, Lars Larson, Rush Limbaugh, Elon Musk, and President Trump.

House Intel Chair: Declassified Docs Show Obama-Directed Psyop


By: M.D. Kittle | July 30, 2025

Read more at https://thefederalist.com/2025/07/30/house-intel-chair-says-declassified-docs-show-obama-directed-psyop/

Rep. Rick Crawford, R-Ark., on Fox News to talk about the Russian collusion hoax.
Rep. Rick Crawford says the report his committee put together in 2020 exposes the people behind the Russia collusion hoax.

Author M.D. Kittle profile

M.D. Kittle

More Articles

Rep. Rick Crawford joined the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) in early 2017, just as the Obama administration was putting the Russia collusion hoax into motion. The Arkansas Republican and his fellow committee members would soon be up to their necks in one of the darkest chapters in U.S. intelligence history. 

On Jan. 6, 2017, documents suggest, the deep state was setting up its own brand of insurrection, pushing an Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) filled with dubious information and sourcing that Crawford believes was designed to topple President-elect Donald Trump’s first term in office. 

“Forgive me for being coarse, but these [intelligence] analysts, for lack of a better term, crapped all over ICD [Intelligence Community Directive] 203. They did not follow it in the slightest,” Crawford said on the latest episode of The Federalist Radio Hour. He was referring to the analytic standards that CIA agents and analysts must follow. They didn’t.

“It was ignored and they went forward with their own narrative that was done simply to discredit President Trump and to spin a narrative that was false: That he was involved with [Russian President] Vladimir Putin in helping to change the outcome of the election,” he added. 

‘It Didn’t Matter If It Was True’

Crawford, who in January took over as chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, has, like his Republican colleagues, been waiting a long time for the public to know what he has known for years. The recent declassification and release of the committee’s 2020 majority staff report lays to waste the lie that the Trump campaign colluded with the Kremlin to steal the 2016 election and exposes the likes of then-CIA Director John Brennan for driving a deeply flawed intelligence assessment. The report, released last week by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, found that one “scant, unclear, and unverifiable fragment of a sentence from one of the substandard reports constitutes the only classified information cited to suggest Putin ‘aspired’ to help Trump win.” 

The ICA “ignored strong indicators supporting the alternative hypothesis that, at a minimum, Putin didn’t care who won and even had reasons to prefer a Clinton victory,” and that by “adopting a single-track explanation for Putin’s actions — that he ‘preferred’ candidate Trump and ‘aspired’ to help him win — the ICA authors had little choice but to ignore contrary evidence and attempt to force-fit weak evidence to make their case.”

And there was a plethora of contrary evidence. Career intelligence officials warned Brennan and then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper that they were barking up the wrong tree. The Trump-hating deep staters didn’t listen. Forcing their collusion narrative, Brennan and crew relied on the Steele dossier to the disgust of intelligence analysts who saw it for the garbage political opposition research that it was. According to the committee report, a CIA analyst told investigators that Brennan “refused to remove it, and when confronted with the dossier’s main flaws, [Brennan] responded, ‘Yes, but doesn’t it ring true?’” 

Crawford found the old CIA director’s comment particularly troubling. 

“It didn’t matter if it was true, as far as he was concerned. It rang true so it was going to be central to their assessment,” the committee chairman said. “The analytic integrity was completely lacking.” 

Never mind that Hillary Clinton’s campaign paid for the Steele dossier, littered with salacious and unverifiable opposition research. 

‘Willing Accomplices’

Crawford said there’s a reason why the damning documents have been sealed for so long. Former Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., who chaired the Intelligence Committee in the thick of the Russia collusion hoax and who was viciously attacked by Democrats and the media for combatting the lies, tried unsuccessfully to get the 2020 report released. Rep. Mike Turner, an Ohio Republican who served as chairman of the Intelligence Committee in the previous session of Congress, tried as well but ran into a brick wall, Crawford said. That changed with Trump’s return to the White House in January. The administration returned the documents to the House Intelligence Committee, and they are now open to public inspection. 

“So, what we see here is a fraud, a hoax perpetrated on the American people at the expense of President Trump,” the congressman said. “And this was nothing more than a Psyop, a psychological operation against the American people, really under the direction of President Obama and conducted by the IC leadership team.”

And the hoax was greatly assisted by a Trump-hating corporate media that gladly gobbled up all of the false “tips” the Intelligence Community and like-minded political operatives fed them, Crawford said. 

“It’s not as though the media were just reporting facts that were being put out there in the public sphere. They were willing accomplices,” the chairman said. So much so, he added, that the Steele dossier was leaked to Yahoo News, and the leak was used as a predicate to go after Trump and launch the FBI’s politically-driven Crossfire Hurricane sham probe. Ex-FBI agent Peter Strzok, the partisan player behind the investigation, suggested as much in a Sept. 23, 2016 text, boasting that the Steele dossier was able to “influence” media.

“Looking at the Yahoo article, I would definitely say at a minimum Steele’s reports should be viewed as intended to influence as well as to inform,” the disgraced former agent, fired from the FBI in August 2018, wrote in the declassified communications. 

Now that same accomplice media is ignoring or dismissing the bombshell documents. 

“So, the media essentially becomes not an unwitting player in this whole thing but a witting accomplice, like, ‘Yes, give us this information. We’ll help spin this. We’ll help sell it to the American people, we’ll help take down President Trump,’Crawford said. “And they’re not about to admit that they made that mistake or that they were involved in that because that would be a huge revelation. It would discredit them all.” 

‘An Absolute Travesty’

Like corporate media, the Intelligence Community has had plenty of struggles with the truth over the years. Crawford and the Subcommittee on Central Intelligence Agency have investigated more recent suspect ICAs

“The Intelligence Community (IC) has attempted to thwart the Subcommittee’s investigative efforts to uncover the truth at every turn. Despite this, the Subcommittee has uncovered information illustrative of problems with the ICA’s creation, review, and release,” Crawford wrote in the subcommittee’s interim report in December on “the Intelligence Community’s Conclusions on Anomalous Health Incidents.” The report asked, “Is the Intelligence Community Hiding the Real Reason for This Phenomenon?”

Crawford said he wants to believe that the perpetrators of the Russia collusion hoax will ultimately be held accountable, but he worries about legal “loopholes.” The major players have gone on to very lucrative post-IC careers, serving as “credible experts” to the same news outlets that ran with their twisted intelligence. 

“That’s an absolute travesty because what they have done, they really, in my opinion, perpetrated the largest, deepest, widest hoax we’ve ever seen in American history, and they seem to be proud of it. And that’s the thing that bothers me the most.” 

Listen to The Federalist Radio Hour podcast interview with Rep. Rick Crawford here.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Matt Kittle is a senior elections correspondent for The Federalist. An award-winning investigative reporter and 30-year veteran of print, broadcast, and online journalism, Kittle previously served as the executive director of Empower Wisconsin.

The World’s Most Dysfunctional Body? Cory Booker Captures the Decline the United States Senate


By: Jonathan Turley | July 30, 2025

Read more at https://jonathanturley.org/2025/07/30/the-worlds-most-dysfunctional-body-cory-booker-captures-the-decline-the-united-states-senate/

When President James Buchanan declared that the United States Senate is the “world’s greatest deliberative body,” he clearly had not envisioned Sen. Cory Booker (D., N.J.). In yet another tirade on the floor, Sen. Booker attacked not just President Donald Trump but his Democratic colleagues for voting for a bipartisan bill on law enforcement. Behind the “I am Spartacus” theatrics is a more troubling trend in the United States Senate as it devolves into a more populist, impulsive institution.

In 1872, Moncure Daniel Conway published an account of a meeting between Thomas Jefferson and George Washington. Jefferson questioned Washington’s support for the creation of a second or upper house in the form of the Senate. Washington asked:

“Why…did you just now pour that coffee into your saucer, before drinking?”

“To cool it,” answered Jefferson, “my throat is not made of brass.”

“Even so,” rejoined Washington, “we pour our legislation into the senatorial saucer to cool it.”

These days, it seems like legislation goes to the Senate to heat up. The Senate is losing its constitutional and cultural moorings as the cooling saucer for our heated politics. Instead, it is becoming more like . . . well . . . the house.

The role of the Senate is key to the Madisonian design in forcing compromise and deliberation. Senators were given longer, six-year terms to insulate them from the immediate political demands that often motivate the House.

That has changed with the 24-hour media-saturated political environment. It has changed in this age of rage. Cue Corey Booker:

Putting the claims of “secret police” and, once again, the imminent collapse of democracy, Booker was immediately set upon by his colleagues after he moved to block the bipartisan bill by fellow Democratic Sens. Catherine Cortez Masto (Nev.) and Amy Klobuchar (Minn.). Klobuchar effectively accused Booker of grandstanding and hypocrisy:

“I will note that Sen. Booker objected to my police reauthorization bill, the cops funding, the Clinton cops funding, long before Donald Trump came into office. So, this is not just about this. This is a long dispute over this type of funding.”

She also snapped back at Booker saying that he could not make a key hearing on the drafting of the bill because of a conflict, noting “I can’t help it if someone couldn’t change their schedule to be there.”

Cortez Masto struck back at the notion that Democrats should simply refuse to cooperate with the Administration or that working with Republicans is what Booker calls “complicity.”

Booker is clearly maneuvering for a possible presidential run and seeking to tap into the rage growing on the far left. He is also the inevitable result of the rising rhetoric of figures like Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer in pandering to the far left of his party. Democratic senators are now being denounced as “establishment” as Booker and others tack to the left to lead “the resistance.”

Booker just raised the anger ante for Democrats. They must either join the resistance and the rage or face the ire of their party. In the interim, the constitutional system will suffer. We need the House of Representatives as the “people’s house.” We do not need two Houses of Representatives. The Senate ideally moderates, not magnifies, the pressures and passions in the political system.

Booker’s tirades clearly resonate with some on the far left, but it is likely to come at a cost for the institution itself. As tensions build on the Democratic side, Teddy Roosevelt’s quip seems to be coming true in voting for bipartisan legislation: “When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer ‘Present’ or ‘Not guilty.””

Trump Gets the Government Out of the Propaganda Business


By: Kevin Jackson | July 29, 2025

Read more at https://theblacksphere.net/2025/07/trump-gets-the-government-out-of-the-propaganda-business/

The Public Broadcast: From Educator to Echo Chamber

NPR started as your mom’s cultured whisper in the morning—classical music, educational fare. Fast forward to 2025, and it’s more like a 24/7 campus rally, with woke mantras peppered throughout its programming. PBS, once a wholesome window into Mr. Rogers, now co-hosts drag story hours for your kids. We can’t even get through “Masterpiece Theater” these days without an ideological subplot.

But then came Trump, stepping in like a turnaround CEO sans the boardroom jargon. He wielded Executive Order 14290 (May 1, 2025) like an axe: “Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Biased Media” With a flick of the pen, he defunded NPR and PBS—finally freeing Uncle Sam from being the PR manager for progressive talking points. And Congress finally codified this.

NPR’s Leftward Migration: From Neutral to Narrative

During the George Floyd riots, NPR promoted a book called ‘In Defense of Looting.’ Here is one line from the article.

“The very basis of property in the U.S. is derived through whiteness and through Black oppression…”

Let’s pause on that anchor quote: NPR, taxpayer-funded, giving airtime to a book celebrating looting as moral justice. It’s not editorializing—it’s activism, on your dime. Scholar Samantha Bradshaw documented how private platforms shape propaganda—but here, public media is doubling down, funding incitement instead of impartial reporting.

When your “news” platform starts sounding like a university campus radical, you’ve gone rogue. But NPR doubled down—because why be a news service when you can be political?

Trump Cuts the Red Tape—and the Funds

Realizing nobody else would do it, Trump played his CEO card. On May 1, 2025, he issued EO 14290 to eliminate funding to NPR and PBS. Congress followed suit via the Rescissions Act of 2025stripping $1.1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting—effectively zeroing out federal support. Stations panicked—PBS’s CEO warned of devastation in rural America. Sen. Lisa Murkowski.

Sen Lisa Murkowski called PBS and NPR, “a lifeline for many of my small, rural communities.”

Seriously? I grew up in a small community, and not once did I hear of anybody relying on NPR for anything. Sure, you might listen occasionally, generally when you’re in “flyover” country and you can’t get a clear radio signal. But rely on NPR?

If your lifeline is faking neutrality while preaching leftism, then it was a leash more than it was a lifeline.

The Red Ink Tsunami Hits Legacy Media

PBS and NPR are icing on the cake for President Trump. He can be credited for permanently crippling the fake-news narrative. He coined the term nearly a decade ago—“fake news,” and it bit. It’s survived every administration’s spin cycle.

TV isn’t immune. The cancellation of The Late Show hit late-night with a sledge hammer. Networks and podcasts bloodied. Even the Washington Post CEO held a town hall asking “Real journalism, or pink slips?”—because the left’s game plan isn’t editing copy, it’s bleeding the business. The private outlets are hemorrhaging red ink—and in their last throes, they scream “We need protection!” But Trump, armed with budgeting knives rather than bluster, said “Nah.”

Government Joins the Exit Strategy

Public media was the last unabashed government-funded narrative peddler. But not anymore. Trump’s bold move compelled taxpayer escapes from ideological echo chambers. PBS may fight in court (they did), but fact is: government propaganda is over. Not through cancel culture—but through budget cuts. Welcome to free market—where propaganda meets zero-dollar ads.

If PBS and NPR stoically go down, I’m all to happy to add them to the existing media carcasses.


Trump’s Media Trophy Room: And He’s Still Adding Heads

Consider:

  • He debuted “fake news.”
  • He defunded federal media’s baton of bias.
  • He triggered TV cancellations (The Late Show, Trevor Noah, Joy Reid, Rachel Maddow, et al).
  • He forced WaPo to issue existential memos.

All from the CEO perspective. You cut waste. You dump the PR spin. You claw back cash to run the important things. Check. Check. And check. 


Reactions, Backlashes, and Irony

Progressives wailed. Rural station heads claimed doom. But recall Fred Rogers: in 1969, he moved Congress to fund PBS as an educational beacon. They cried foul. Now they’re elite tentacles of the Left. Hilarious arc.

Exclusive PBS drag shows? NPR-sponsored looting pamphlets? This isn’t Fred Rogers pushing wheels in Peacefulville; it’s Leftist insurgent political theater paraded as journalism.


Why Defunding Was More Than Just Budget Cuts

  1. No neutral public sector narrative. If government-funded media hops Left, taxpayers get hemmed into funding echo chambers.
  2. Red ink is real. Legacy news is dying. Public media was the last subsidized fortress—now it’s falling.
  3. Marketplace wins. Podcasts, private news, streaming—if you create it, someone will pay for it.

Final Score: A Win for Citizens, Not Cultures

Trump didn’t just sculpt policy—he curated the information buffet. Cutting public media funding wasn’t removal—it was refusal to fund Leftist PR from Washington.

What’s next? A civilian media renaissance—undirected, decentralized, and driven by demand—not by capital-D Doublespeak.


NPR and PBS weren’t the neutral stewards they advertised. In fact, they became state-funded billboards for the Left. CEO Trump cut them from the budget, liberating taxpayers and creating a media meltdown, and pulling the plug on propaganda.

4 highlights from the White House Summit of Faith and Business Leaders


By Ryan Foley, Christian Post Reporter | Wednesday, July 16, 2025

Read more at https://www.christianpost.com/news/4-highlights-from-trumps-summit-of-faith-and-business-leader.html

U.S. President Donald Trump and Pastor Paula White-Cain, the head of the White House Faith Office, bow their heads in prayer during a White House Faith Office luncheon in the State Dining Room at the White House on July 14, 2025 in Washington, DC. White-Cain hosted the luncheon with members of government and faith-based and community organizations.
U.S. President Donald Trump and Pastor Paula White-Cain, the head of the White House Faith Office, bow their heads in prayer during a White House Faith Office luncheon in the State Dining Room at the White House on July 14, 2025 in Washington, DC. White-Cain hosted the luncheon with members of government and faith-based and community organizations. | Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

President Donald Trump and the White House Faith Office hosted the inaugural Summit of Faith and Business Leaders on Monday to celebrate what he calls “core values that built this country,” which include “freedom, hard work, risk-taking, and above all, trust in Almighty God.” 

Held in the State Dining Room, the event was attended by dozens of CEOs and business leaders, honoring those who have donated to faith-based charities. 

In addition to remarks from Trump, Paula White-Cain, senior advisor to the White House Faith Office and a Charismatic televangelist, also addressed the gathering.

While Trump touched upon multiple topics during the discussion, encompassing both foreign and domestic policy, the importance of the Christian faith loomed large.

Here are four highlights from the meeting. 

1. Trump highlights faith of notable entrepreneurs

U.S. President Donald Trump attends inauguration ceremonies in the Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 20, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Donald Trump takes office for his second term as the 47th president of the United States.
U.S. President Donald Trump attends inauguration ceremonies in the Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 20, 2025, in Washington, D.C. Donald Trump takes office for his second term as the 47th president of the United States. | Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

The president began his remarks by naming notable entrepreneurs throughout American history who strongly embraced the Christian faith. He repeatedly asserted that Christianity has had a positive influence on American society. 

“From the earliest days of our republic, the steady compass of faith has guided the strong hands of American workers, builders and entrepreneurs like really no other,” he said. “Our country was founded by pilgrims and believers. And every generation since, Americans of faith have built our communities and forged new industries and enriched our country by millions and millions of people and ways.” 

Trump listed John D. Rockefeller of Standard Oil, clothing entrepreneur J.C. Penney, inventor Charles Goodyear, and Chick-fil-A founder Truett Cathy as examples of business leaders “inspired by their love of God.” He insisted that there were people he could name in the room whose “names are every bit as big as that,” adding that “the proud tradition continues with all of you.” 

“This group reminds us [that] a nation that prays is a nation that prospers,” he added. “I think one of the reasons we went so bad is they really wanted to take God and religion out of your lives, and there was nobody to … look up to.” 

“We have to bring religion back into the country, and we’re starting to do that, I think, at a very high level.”

WASHINGTON, DC – APRIL 05: People use IRS Direct File at the Internal Revenue Service Building on April 05, 2024 in Washington, D.C. | Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images for Economic Security Project

2. Trump touts new policy allowing pastors to endorse political candidates 

Much of Trump’s remarks at the event consisted of highlighting what he viewed as the major accomplishments of his administration so far.

“As president, I’ve ended the radical left war on faith, and we’re once again protecting religious freedom like never before in our country,” he said. 

Trump touted “getting rid of the Johnson Amendment that didn’t let the pastors and ministers and everybody speak about politics.” He contended that in the absence of the Johnson Amendment, which was passed in 1954 to prevent nonprofits from endorsing political candidates, pastors now have the ability to say, “I don’t like that guy.”

In a legal filing last week, the IRS confirmed that religious leaders who endorse political candidates from the pulpit or through their church communications will not lose their tax-exempt status, drawing praise from conservative and progressive Christian leaders and criticism from secular legal groups. 

The president recalled how many religious leaders supported him in his first presidential bid in 2016. But he claims they declined to endorse him because of concerns of losing their tax-exempt status under the Johnson Amendment. He described how, during “a meeting with 50 faith leaders” in 2015, then-candidate Trump informed them that “I’d love to have your endorsement.”

Trump expressed concern that the religious leaders “didn’t say anything” due to their concerns about the Johnson Amendment, maintaining that he was unaware of the longstanding provision because he was new to politics.

In a subsequent meeting with religious leaders ahead of the 2016 presidential election, Trump vowed to get rid of the Johnson Amendment. In 2017, Trump instructed the IRS to relax enforcement of the Johnson Amendment on churches.  

Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump is rushed offstage after an assassination attempt on his life during a rally on July 13, 2024, in Butler, Pennsylvania. Butler County district attorney Richard Goldinger said the shooter is dead after injuring former U.S. President Donald Trump, killing one audience member and injuring another in the shooting. | Anna Moneymaker/Getty Image

3. Trump says his life was ‘saved by God to make America great again’ 

As Trump continued to talk about what has transpired during his administration, he noted that the White House gathering took place one day after the first anniversary of the Butler, Pennsylvania, campaign rally, where an assassin’s bullet nearly ended his life.

“It’s remarkable to think that it was only one year ago this week that my time on earth nearly ended,” Trump asserted. “And if you look at that, God was with me because that’s something,” he added. “In theory, I should not be with you today.”

After the attendees erupted into applause, Trump insisted that “my life was saved by God to really make America great again.” The president echoed what he has articulated in previous remarks about his assassination attempt, noting how his sons, who are avid shooters, informed him that “at that distance with that gun, you didn’t have a chance.”

“Some people say it was lucky, and some people say something else. I say something else. I think God helped us,” he concluded. 

Paula White-Cain, senior advisor of the White House Faith Office, delivers remarks at a White House Faith Office luncheon, July 14, 2025. | Screenshot: Paula White Ministries

4. Paula White calls America’s business leaders ‘stewards on divine assignment’

The Rev. Paula White-Cain, a Florida-based pastor who has served as Trump’s spiritual advisor, called Trump “the greatest champion of faith of any president that the United States of America has ever had.” 

She told the attendees that the Trump administration “understands that people who are of faith who are entrusted with wealth and influence, as you are, are essential to building a stronger, freer, and more compassionate nation.”

“You’re more than just CEOs and business leaders and entrepreneurs,” she said. “You’re stewards on divine assignment, builders of legacy and vessels of impact. You’ve been called by God to His kingdom for such a time as this.”

White-Cain claimed that “America’s spiritual and moral foundations have been restored.”

“And it’s only the beginning,” she continued. “Today’s not just a luncheon. It is a moment of divine alignment, a commissioning. And we believe that God is raising up business leaders who don’t separate faith from enterprise but who see their platforms and their pulpits as their businesses and instruments for eternal impact.” 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Ryan Foley is a reporter for The Christian Post. He can be reached at: ryan.foley@christianpost.com

Watch: Trump’s Historic Action Against Fentanyl Crisis, Stands with Grieving Families


By: Daphne Moon | July 17, 2025

Read more at https://thepatriotchronicles.com/news-for-you/watch-trumps-historic-action-against-fentanyl-crisis-stands-with-grieving-families/

In a powerful and emotional ceremony in the White House East Room, President Donald Trump signed the HALT Fentanyl Act into law, permanently classifying fentanyl-related substances as Schedule I drugs under the Controlled Substances Act. Surrounded by nearly 200 Americans who have lost loved ones to the fentanyl epidemic, President Trump delivered a resounding message of justice, strength, and relentless action against the cartels and traffickers flooding the nation with poison.

“Today, we strike a righteous blow to the drug dealers, narcotic traffickers, and criminal cartels that we’ve all been hearing so much about for so many years… and we take a historic step toward justice for every family touched by the fentanyl scourge,” Trump declared to thunderous applause. His words stood in stark contrast to the inaction and neglect of the previous administration, which allowed the border crisis to spiral out of control, unleashing a wave of fentanyl deaths across America.

While the liberal media continues to downplay the devastation of the fentanyl crisis—often ignoring its ties to open-border policies—President Trump has taken decisive action. Since returning to office, his administration has seized over 4,500 pounds of fentanyl, a record-breaking effort to protect American lives. “On day one of the Trump administration, we declared an all-out war on the dealers, smugglers, traffickers, and cartels,” Trump stated, reaffirming his unwavering commitment to securing the border and stopping the flow of deadly drugs.

The heartbreaking stories shared by grieving parents at the signing ceremony exposed the true cost of fentanyl. Gregory Swan, who lost his son Drew, held up his child’s photo and declared, “It’s the honor of my life to be here… His passing ruined, I thought, my life.” He praised Trump’s efforts to secure the border, emphasizing the importance of educating children on the dangers of fentanyl.

Anne Fundner, whose 15-year-old son Weston died after unknowingly taking fentanyl, delivered an emotional address, thanking Trump for finally giving victims a voice. “President Trump, for four years, we felt ignored, but you’ve changed that. We appreciate that so much,” she said, as Trump proudly held up Weston’s photo for the nation to see. Fundner highlighted Trump’s aggressive measures, including sanctioning cartels, closing shipping loopholes, and mobilizing federal agencies—actions the liberal media refuses to credit.

Jacqueline Siegel, who lost both her daughter and sister to fentanyl, shared her devastating story, vowing to turn her pain into purpose. “It’s turned me into more of a fighter to carry on my husband’s legacy and the other family’s legacies of saving lives,” she said.

While the left-wing press remains fixated on divisive narratives, President Trump is delivering real results—standing with victims, crushing cartels, and ensuring no more families suffer the agony of fentanyl poisoning.

Trump Wins Multi-Million Dollar Defamation Lawsuit Against CBS


By: Mandy Matthews | July 2, 2025

Read more at https://libertyonenews.com/trump-wins-multi-million-dollar-defamation-lawsuit-against-cbs/#google_vignette

Paramount Global, parent company of CBS, confirmed on Wednesday it will pay $16 million to settle President Donald Trump’s lawsuit over the handling of a “60 Minutes” interview – funds that will go to Trump’s future presidential library rather than to him directly.

Trump originally sued in October, demanding $10 billion over claims that CBS deceptively edited an October 2024 interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris to favor the Democratic Party. He later amended the claim to $20 billion in February.

Paramount’s $16 million settlement, disclosed Wednesday, stems from mediation initiated in April. It explicitly excludes any apology or expression of regret from the network.

In a separate move to increase transparency, Paramount agreed that future “60 Minutes” interviews with U.S. presidential candidates will be accompanied by released transcripts, redacted only for legal or security reasons.

CBS has repeatedly maintained that the editing in question was routine and lawful. The lawsuit centered on CBS airing two versions of Harris’s response on Israel and the Israel–Hamas war—one brief and another more forceful—before and after the presidential race.

Paramount, which previously sought dismissal of the lawsuit as “completely without merit,” opted for settlement to avoid a protracted court battle and to clear regulatory hurdles linked to its pending $8.4 billion merger with Skydance Media.

The Trump lawsuit was filed in a Texas federal court under the state’s Deceptive Trade Practices–Consumer Protection Act, asserting that CBS’s editing constituted false and misleading commercial conduct.

Paramount’s decision is part of a growing pattern: Disney-owned ABC News paid $15 million and issued a public apology in December, while Meta agreed to pay about $25 million in January—both in agreements to address Trump’s claims.

The “60 Minutes” controversy triggered internal upheaval: Executive producer Bill Owens resigned in April, followed by CBS News President Wendy McMahon in May, amid staff concerns over editorial independence and corporate intervention.

Analysts warn that such settlements may threaten journalistic integrity by emboldening political figures to deploy litigation as leverage—rolling back hard‑won press freedoms.

Paramount’s board, including controlling shareholder Shari Redstone, reportedly weighed settling for up to $20 million internally, mindful of both merger risks and potential regulatory scrutiny.

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, who must sign off on the Skydance transaction, has initiated a probe into whether CBS’s edits met the threshold for “news-distortion,” signaling deeper scrutiny of broadcast standards.

With this settlement, Reuters notes, Paramount aims to sanitize its legal slate ahead of merger approval—while Trump continues to pursue additional legal claims against media outlets

Trump Scores Another Trade Win—Canada Caves Instantly


By Jimmy Parker | June 30, 2025

Read more at https://pagetraveler.com/trump-scores-another-trade-win-canada-caves-instantly/

It took exactly one Truth Social post to bring the Canadian government to heel. President Trump saw Canada’s digital tax for what it was—a direct hit job on U.S. tech companies—and fired off a warning that trade talks were off unless the tax was scrapped. Just like that, the mighty maple leaf folded like a dollar-store lawn chair in a thunderstorm.

Carney’s Crash Course in Trump Economics

Mark Carney, the new Canadian prime minister and professional globalist, just got his first lesson in Trump-style negotiation. Hours before his big shiny Trudeau-era tax was set to take effect, he quietly waved the white flag. Instead of taxing U.S. companies billions for the crime of doing business in Canada, he announced a complete reversal and pledged to start real trade talks. Welcome to the real world, Mark.

Trudeau’s Legacy: Broken and Deleted

Let’s not forget this tax was a leftover from Trudeau’s progressive fever dreams—a policy that had been festering since 2021. Carney’s sudden about-face is more than just economic—it’s political. He’s signaling that Trudeau’s globalist agenda is officially up for fire sale. In fact, Sunday’s announcement used the phrase “Canada’s new government” several times, which is Canadian for “please stop treating us like Trudeau still lives here.”

A Retroactive Heist Masquerading as Policy

The digital services tax was pure robbery dressed up as policy. It targeted companies like Meta, Amazon, and Google, demanding a retroactive 3% tax on digital revenue from Canadian users dating back to 2022. The first payment alone would’ve cost American firms about $2.7 billion CAD. That’s not tax policy—it’s ransomware.

Trump Called the Bluff—and Then Some

Trump didn’t even need to threaten tariffs this time. He simply said he was done talking unless the tax vanished. That wasn’t just a negotiation tactic—it was a power move. And it worked. Carney didn’t just pause the tax—he’s now introducing legislation to kill it entirely. That’s a political KO, and Trump didn’t even get off the golf course.

Big Tech, Big Target, Big Backfire

This wasn’t just about Canada needing money—it was about scoring points with the anti-Big Tech crowd. But Carney miscalculated. Instead of sticking it to Silicon Valley, he ended up igniting a trade war with the U.S. and learned the hard way that Trump doesn’t play these games. Especially not when American companies are being used as ATMs for foreign governments.

USMCA Still Stands—But So Does Trump’s Red Line

Yes, we still have the USMCA, but Trump made it clear that the agreement isn’t worth the paper it’s printed on if countries start cheating. Canada thought they could sneak one past the goalie. Trump promptly reminded them that he’s still in the arena—and he still keeps score.

What’s Next: A Deal or Another Showdown?

Carney and Trump now have until July 21 to hammer out a new trade agreement. And while Canada is clearly coming to the table with hat in hand, don’t expect Trump to make it easy. He just won the first round without breaking a sweat—and Carney knows full well what happens if he tries another Trudeau-style stunt.

Final Verdict: Tactical Retreat, Strategic Win

Let’s call this what it is—a decisive, humiliating retreat for Canada and a clear, commanding win for Trump. He protected American businesses, reasserted his dominance on the global stage, and forced a foreign government to reverse course with nothing more than a social media post. Not bad for a weekend.

WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY

Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com

Victor Davis Hanson Analyzes How Trump’s Strategy Led to Iran’s Downfall: ‘You’re Going to Stew in Your Own Juices’


By: David Gregoire | June 24, 2025

Read more at https://libertyonenews.com/victor-davis-hanson-analyzes-how-trumps-strategy-led-to-irans-downfall-youre-going-to-stew-in-your-own-juices/

Victor Davis Hanson shared insights on Newsmax about President Donald Trump’s bold strategy that he claims has significantly weakened Tehran’s influence. Trump’s strategic strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites and his stern warning to Iran about targeting U.S. forces have reportedly cornered the regime. These developments signal a notable shift in the Middle East’s balance of power that once seemed unshakeable.

During his appearance on “Rob Schmitt Tonight,” Hanson remarked on Iran’s muted response, contrasting it with its former reputation as a formidable “terrorist colossus.” He likened Trump’s approach to placing Iran in a pot, turning up the heat, and sealing it with a lid, forcing the regime to confront its failures. Hanson emphasized that Iran now faces the daunting task of justifying its squandering of resources on groups like Hezbollah and Hamas.

Trump’s peace efforts have boxed Iran into a corner, Hanson argued, leaving the regime to stew in its own missteps. He highlighted how Iran’s diminished military and strategic options are a direct result of Trump’s policies. The regime’s previous investments in defense and nuclear projects now seem futile, according to Hanson.

Hanson believes the peace deal has severely restricted Iran’s maneuverability. He described the regime as being left with no choice but to accept its current predicament. The only leverage Iran has left, he stated, is its existence, which is precariously balanced against pressures from the U.S. and Israel.

Israel’s recent strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities have further complicated the situation for Tehran. In response, Iran launched a retaliatory attack, targeting the Al Udeid U.S. Air Base in Qatar. However, this move prompted a swift and decisive reaction from the United States.

Victor Davis Hanson Breaks Down How Trump’s Strategy Made Iran Collapse

President Trump made it clear that any aggression from Iran would be met with additional military action. His administration’s firm stance has served as a deterrent to further escalation. Meanwhile, the announcement of a ceasefire between Israel and Iran offers a temporary pause in hostilities.

The ceasefire, announced shortly after the U.S. strikes, is scheduled to take effect imminently. This development underscores the delicate balance of power in the region. Trump’s administration remains vigilant, ready to act if Iran breaches the agreement.

Hanson’s commentary reflects a broader conservative perspective on the situation, celebrating the perceived successes of Trump’s foreign policy. His views align with those of other conservative commentators who attribute the weakening of Iran’s influence to Trump’s leadership. This narrative is echoed by right-leaning media outlets, which highlight the strategic gains made under Trump’s presidency.

For many conservatives, Trump’s approach is seen as a necessary counterbalance to previous administrations’ perceived leniency towards Iran. The focus is on maintaining a strong U.S. presence in the Middle East to deter threats. This stance is supported by the belief that peace through strength is the most effective strategy.

The current state of affairs presents a complex picture of geopolitical dynamics. With Trump’s policies in place, the hope among conservatives is that stability can be achieved. The ongoing situation will require careful monitoring and strategic foresight.

As the ceasefire takes hold, the world watches to see how Iran will navigate its new reality. The regime’s future actions will be closely scrutinized by both allies and adversaries. For now, the focus remains on maintaining the fragile peace that has been brokered.

The broader implications of these events on global politics are yet to be fully realized. However, the immediate outcome is a testament to the power of decisive leadership. The Trump administration’s handling of the situation continues to be a topic of discussion and analysis.

Observers will continue to assess the impact of these developments on regional stability. The coming weeks and months will be critical in determining the long-term success of the current strategies. The international community remains attentive to the evolving dynamics.

The situation remains fluid, with potential for further changes on the horizon. Experts and policymakers alike are tasked with navigating the complexities of Middle Eastern geopolitics. As always, the goal is to ensure a peaceful and secure future for all involved.

David Gregoire

About the Author David Gregoire

Darnell Thompkins is a Canadian-born American and conservative opinion writer who brings a unique perspective to political and cultural discussions. Passionate about traditional values and individual freedoms, Darnell’s commentary reflects his commitment to fostering meaningful dialogue. When he’s not writing, he enjoys watching hockey and celebrating the sport that connects his Canadian roots with his American journey.

The Claude Rains School of Constitutional Law: Democrats Denounce Iranian Attack as Unconstitutional


By: Jonathan Turley | June 28, 2025

Read more at https://jonathanturley.org/2025/06/22/the-claude-rains-school-of-constitutional-law-democrats-denounce-iranian-attack-as-unconstitutional/

Yesterday, I wrote a column in the Hill discussing how Trump is unlikely to go to Congress in launching an attack on Iran and how he has history on his side in acting unilaterally. The column noted that many Democratic politicians and pundits who were supportive of such unilateral actions by Democratic presidents such as Bill Clinton and Barack Obama are suddenly opposed to Trump using the same power. It is the Claude Rains School of Constitutional Law where politicians are “shocked, shocked” that Trump is using the authority that they accepted in Democratic predecessors.

Democratic members are calling for impeachment, while others are declaring the attacks unconstitutional. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is particularly shocked that Trump took the action and is calling for a vote under the War Powers Act.

Schumer insisted that “no president should be allowed to unilaterally march this nation into something as consequential as war with erratic threats and no strategy.” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries has issued a similar statement.

Schumer is the same politician who was silent or supportive in earlier unilateral attacks by Democratic presidents. In 2011, Obama approved a massive military campaign against Libya.  I represented a bipartisan group of members of Congress challenging that action. We were unsuccessful, as were such prior challenges.

I have long criticized the abandonment of the clear language of the Constitution on the declaration of wars. Only eleven such declarations have been made in our history. That has not happened since World War II in 1942. Over 125 military campaigns have spanned from Korea to Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq. It is not a rule honored solely in the breach.

Democrats were supportive when Clinton launched cruise missile attacks under Operation Infinite Reach on two continents on August 20, 1998. He ordered attacks in locations in Khartoum, Sudan, and Khost Province, Afghanistan.

The War Powers Act has always been controversial and largely ineffectual. Presidents have long asserted the inherent powers to conduct such attacks under their Article II authority as the designated Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces. The WPA requires the President to inform Congress within 48 hours in a written notice to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate of the action.

The WPA further bars the use of armed forces in such a conflict for more than 60 days without congressional authorization for use of military force (AUMF) or a declaration of war by the United States. There is a further 30-day withdrawal period.

President Trump reportedly did immediately notify Congress after the attack under the WPA .

Presidents have routinely ignored the WPA when it limited their ability to conduct foreign military operations. In 1999, Clinton ignored the 60-day deadline and continued to bomb forces in Kosovo. His actions were also challenged, but the court in Campbell v. Clinton just shrugged off the violation and said it was a non-justiciable political question.

In responding to the current demands, Trump could look to a curious ally: Hillary Clinton.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton pushed for unilateral attacks during the Obama Administration. She dismissed the need to consult, let alone secure authorization, from Congress. In March 2011, Clinton testified that there was no need for such consultation and declared that the Administration would ignore a 60-day limit on unauthorized military actions.

Obama also defied the War Powers resolution on Syria. He actually did ask for congressional authorization to take military action in that country in 2013, but Congress refused to approve it. He did it anyway.  Despite Congress expressly denying, ” authorization for the introduction of United States Armed Forces,” both Obama and Trump did precisely that.

Trump was wise to notify Congress. However, what occurs after that is anyone’s guess. The WPA and the AUMF have been paper tigers for decades and most in Congress wanted it that way. Politicians long ago abandoned their responsibilities to declare war. What remains has been little more than political theater.

Even under the WPA, Trump would have 60 days to prosecute this war and another 30 days to draw down forces without congressional approval. The court, in Campbell v. Clinton, noted that even if Clinton violated the WPA by continuing operations after the 60-day period, he was technically in compliance by withdrawing forces before the end of the 90-day period.

Trump could likely prosecute this campaign in 90 days. Indeed, if it goes beyond 90 days, we will likely be facing a potential global war with retaliatory strikes on both sides. In such an environment, it is very unlikely that Congress would withhold support for our ongoing operations.

In the meantime, the calls for impeachment are absurd given the prior actions of presidents in using this very authority. Once again, some Democrats appear intent on applying a different set of rules for impeaching Trump than any of his predecessors. Trump can cite both history and case law in allowing presidents to take such actions. At most, the line over war powers is murky. The Framers wanted impeachments to be based on bright-line rules in establishing high crimes and misdemeanors.

This is all part of the Claude Rains School of Constitutional Law. Members will once again express their shock and disgust in the use of the same authority that they once accepted in prior presidents. Trump has a great number of risks in this action from global military and economic consequences. The War Powers Act is not one of them if history is any measure.

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University and has both testified and litigated in the area of war powers, including the prior representation of members of Congress. He also testified in both the Clinton and Trump impeachment hearings.

N.B.: A slightly different version of this column ran on Fox.com

Ninth Circuit Rules for Trump on National Guard Deployment


By: Jonathan Turley | June 20, 2025

Read more at https://jonathanturley.org/2025/06/20/ninth-circuit-rules-for-trump-on-national-guard-deployment/

California Gov. Gavin Newsom just lost a major ruling in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which ruled that President Donald Trump is likely to prevail in his deployment of National Guard troops. Newsom and various Democratic politicians have insisted that Trump’s order is unlawful and that Newsom has to agree to any request for deployment. The Ninth Circuit ruled on Thursday that Newsom does not have such a veto over deployments.

The Ninth Circuit blocked the injunction of District Court Judge Charles Breyer who suggested in open court that Trump was acting like another “King George.” He then wrote an opinion that included many Democratic talking points — suggesting, for example, that Trump was creating disorder by calling out the National Guard to deal with disorder. Breyer further indicated that the violence in Los Angeles was relatively minor, despite potentially deadly attacks on law enforcement, arson, and looting.

Breyer gave the Administration little time to appeal his ruling, but it was enough for the Ninth Circuit.

Title 10 provides:

Whenever—

(1) the United States, or any of the Commonwealths or

possessions, is invaded or is in danger of invasion by a

foreign nation;

(2) there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the

authority of the Government of the United States; or

(3) the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States;

the President may call into Federal service members and units of the National Guard of any State in such numbers as he considers necessary to repel the invasion, suppress the rebellion, or execute those laws. Orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States or, in the case of the District of Columbia, through the commanding general of the National Guard of the District of Columbia.

10 U.S.C. § 12406.

In his decision, Judge Breyer took the extreme position that Trump could not use subsection 3 if there was any possibility of executing federal laws absent the use of the National Guard troops:

[T]he statute does not allow for the federalizing of the National Guard when the President faces obstacles that cause him to underperform in executing the laws. Nor does the statute allow for the federalizing of the National Guard when the President faces some risk in executing the laws. . . . The statute requires that the President be “unable” to execute the laws of the United States. That did not happen here.

In its decision, the court rejected this premise and held that “Section 12406 does not have as a prerequisite that the President be completely precluded from executing the relevant laws of the United States in order to call members of the National Guard into federal service, nor does it suggest that activation is inappropriate so long as any continued execution of the laws is feasible.”

It concluded that “it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority” in federalizing control of the guard. It also rejected Newsom’s claim of a veto on deployment.

Here is the opinion: 25-3727_order-for-pub

JUST IN: Trump’s Iran Decision Coming as Missiles Hit Israeli Hospital


By Jimmy Parker | June 19, 2025

Read more at https://pagetraveler.com/just-in-trumps-iran-decision-coming-as-missiles-hit-israeli-hospital/

President Donald Trump is expected to make a final decision within the next two weeks on whether the United States will enter the Israel-Iran conflict, following a devastating Iranian missile strike Thursday on Soroka Hospital in southern Israel. The attack, which injured more than 70 civilians, marks a turning point in the escalating conflict and raises urgent questions about Iran’s nuclear capabilities and intentions.

Iranian Missile Hits Civilian Hospital in Israel

Early Thursday morning, a barrage of Iranian missiles struck Soroka Medical Center in Beersheba, one of Israel’s largest trauma hospitals. According to Israeli officials, over 70 people were injured. Photos from the scene show thick plumes of smoke rising from the hospital complex.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned the attack, calling it a direct strike on civilians and a war crime. Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar echoed the sentiment, stating, “Iran has intentionally targeted a civilian medical facility—this is a violation of international law and an act of terror.”

The Iranian regime has not formally acknowledged targeting the hospital, but the strike comes amid intensifying missile exchanges between Tehran and Jerusalem following Israel’s recent strikes on Iranian military sites, including facilities allegedly tied to Iran’s nuclear program.

Trump to Decide Within Two Weeks on U.S. Involvement

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt addressed reporters Thursday afternoon, delivering a direct quote from President Trump:

“Based on the fact that there’s a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.”

Leavitt reiterated that President Trump remains open to diplomacy but emphasized his commitment to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. “Iran went for 60 days without responding to our outreach,” she said. “On day 61, Israel took action. The president will now determine if the U.S. should follow suit.”

Leavitt also confirmed there have been six rounds of direct and indirect negotiations with Iran since the conflict reignited, but she declined to disclose details of the discussions.

U.S. Intelligence: Iran Weeks Away From Nuclear Weapon

Leavitt warned that Iran is closer than ever to acquiring a nuclear weapon. “Iran has all that it needs to achieve a nuclear weapon. All they need is a decision from the Supreme Leader. It would take just weeks to complete production.”

This estimate is consistent with recent reports from U.S. and Israeli intelligence, which suggest Iran has enriched uranium to near-weapons-grade levels and has the necessary delivery systems in place.

Trump has consistently stated he would not allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon, and his current deliberations include potential military action against Iranian enrichment and missile facilities. Reports indicate that bunker-buster bomb options are being reviewed among possible strike packages.

U.S. Evacuates Personnel, Israel Launches Counterstrikes

In response to the hospital attack and other Iranian strikes, the U.S. Embassy in Israel began evacuating nonessential personnel from high-risk zones, according to sources familiar with the operation.

Meanwhile, Israeli Defense Forces launched new airstrikes overnight, targeting Iranian surface-to-surface missile platforms and anti-aircraft units within Iranian territory. Israeli officials say these strikes are defensive and focused on degrading Iran’s offensive capabilities.

Internet Blackout Inside Iran

Amid growing unrest, Iran’s government has shut down internet access nationwide, cutting off millions of citizens from the outside world. While Elon Musk’s Starlink has been previously activated in Iran, satellite internet access still requires specialized dish hardware. Without this, most Iranians remain effectively cut off.

This blackout limits internal dissent and makes it harder for the international community to verify claims or assess civilian casualties following Israeli counterstrikes.

Trump Administration Reviews Military Options

According to senior defense officials, President Trump has approved U.S. military attack plans as part of contingency discussions but has not yet given a final order to proceed. These plans reportedly include limited precision strikes on nuclear and missile sites, designed to halt Iran’s nuclear progress without triggering a full-scale regional war.

Trump’s national security team has briefed both the House and Senate intelligence committees, and a classified Senate briefing is scheduled later this week to discuss the evolving situation.

The Bigger Picture

While the world waits, Trump’s decision could reshape the balance of power in the Middle East. The contrast between Israel’s military precision and Iran’s civilian-targeted attacks is already drawing renewed international scrutiny. And with Iran now only weeks from building a nuclear bomb, the margin for error is dangerously thin.

The next two weeks may determine whether this conflict remains regional—or becomes global.

WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY

Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com

Terry Moran Suspended After Trump Hate Post Backfires


By Jimmy Parker | June 9, 2025

Read more at https://pagetraveler.com/terry-moran-suspended-after-trump-hate-post-backfires/

Well, well, well—another day, another mask ripped clean off the smug face of “objective journalism.” ABC News has officially suspended senior correspondent Terry Moran after he let loose on X (formerly Twitter), calling Stephen Miller and Donald Trump “world-class haters” in a post so drenched in bile it made Keith Olbermann look subtle. The tweet got deleted—of course—but not before screenshots lit up conservative circles like a Fourth of July sparkler. Now ABC is scrambling to pretend it has standards. Spoiler alert: it doesn’t.

Moran’s Meltdown in His Own Words

Let’s recap the meltdown. Moran wrote that Stephen Miller wasn’t known for brains but for “bile,” describing him as “richly endowed with the capacity for hatred” and someone who “eats his hate.” He went on to say Trump was also a world-class hater, but only because it fuels his “own glorification.” This wasn’t analysis—it was a tantrum. And it came just hours after the third straight night of violent riots in Los Angeles, where Trump had just deployed the National Guard to restore order. The timing? Not subtle.

ABC Plays Damage Control—Too Little, Too Late

After backlash from all sides, including the White House and a furious online conservative base, ABC News issued a very corporate statement saying Moran had “violated our standards” and was being suspended pending further evaluation. Now they want you to believe they care about “objectivity.” Please. ABC calling itself neutral is like Hunter Biden calling himself sober—technically possible, but hard to swallow. This isn’t the first time ABC has had to clean up after its own, either. Just last year they paid $15 million to settle a defamation suit with Trump over a George Stephanopoulos interview. At this point, “We stand for impartiality” is the most laughable line in their brand guide.

The White House Fires Back—And Rightly So

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt jumped into the fray, calling the post “unhinged and unacceptable,” and demanded ABC explain how they’d hold Moran accountable. Vice President J.D. Vance called Moran’s rant “a vile smear dripping with hatred,” and said it proves why Americans can’t trust ABC’s Trump coverage. And Stephen Miller himself? He summed it up best: “Terry pulled off his mask.” That’s the point. This wasn’t just a reporter having a moment. It was a veteran journalist admitting what so many of us already knew—these people don’t report on Trump. They despise him. And they despise you, too.

Journalists or Activists? Pick One

Let’s be honest: Terry Moran didn’t get caught in a gotcha moment. He gave a confession. He said the quiet part out loud. For years, people like him have lectured the rest of us from their media ivory towers, pretending they’re just telling the truth while pushing narratives straight from the DNC playbook. The only thing more dangerous than dishonest journalism is dishonest journalism wrapped in fake neutrality. And Moran wrapped his hatred in both. His post didn’t just attack two public figures—it confirmed decades of conservative skepticism about the press.

The Real “Hate” Is Coming from Inside the Newsroom

The irony here is almost too perfect. While cities burn from “peaceful protests,” and while the Left defends lawlessness in the name of equity, the same media talking heads accuse Trump and his team of being the real threat to democracy. This is what projection looks like. Moran accused others of feeding on hate—but the bile in his tweet says otherwise. If you want to know what fuels the corporate press, just read Moran’s late-night poetry slam. He wasn’t giving policy commentary. He was lashing out because he’s losing control of the narrative—and he knows it.

What Happens Next?

Will ABC quietly reinstate Moran after a week of “reflection”? Probably. Will the rest of the media rally around him, pretending this is a free speech issue? Almost certainly. But make no mistake—this moment matters. Every time a media figure exposes their disdain for half the country, it pushes more Americans out of the mainstream media bubble and into platforms like ours. The more they rant, the more they reveal. And that’s why we’ll keep watching. Keep calling it out. And keep fighting back.

WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.

Trump’s Global Reset: Economic Might, Cultural Renewal, and the End of Intervention


By: Kevin Jackson | May 21, 2025

Read more at https://theblacksphere.net/2025/05/trumps-global-reset-economic-might-cultural-renewal-and-the-end-of-intervention/

While President Trump visited Saudi Arabia, the Left predicted America would fall into the ocean. Headlines were prepped to paint him as escaping the doom he supposedly created stateside. Yet, while the President was abroad, some rather unexpected things happened.

​https://video.spreely.com/embed/6AutdtCkJUm255I?color=04abf2

For instance, 17 Mexican cartel members surrendered to the FBI in San Diego.

You remember that war the President declared on narco-traffickers, branding them as terrorist organizations? Well, it turns out when you call a spade a spade, things start to happen. Cartels are starting to realize that this administration means business. Trump doesn’t just make noise; he sets traps, and those traps are catching monsters.​

Meanwhile, ICE continued its crackdown on illegal immigration, plucking dangerous criminals off American streets. Funny, isn’t it? The Democrats’ old trope that “illegals commit fewer crimes than citizens” hasn’t been heard much lately. You’d think a few hardened criminals getting cuffed would be newsworthy. But alas, it’s crickets from the mainstream media.​

On the subject of immigration, Democrats showed their true colors when they resoundingly rejected Trump’s offer to bring South African farmers to America.

These farmers face racially driven violence in their homeland, with the South African government practically endorsing the extermination of white landowners. The silence from Leftists was deafening—not a word about DEI when it comes to protecting white South Africans. Makes you wonder if their moral compass only points one direction.​


The Market Surge No One Saw Coming

And then there’s the economy. Trump’s visit to Saudi Arabia wasn’t the catastrophe the media predicted. In fact, the stock market rebounded, erasing all losses for the year and surging ahead. Bloomberg even called it “a rally no one is comfortable with.”​

Comfortable? I’m downright cozy. In fact, I predicted it. Trump’s tariff strategy worked exactly as intended—forcing renegotiation of trade deals, revitalizing American manufacturing, and giving our economy a much-needed boost. Yet Leftists insist on cheering against prosperity. It’s like hoping the pilot crashes the plane because you don’t like his haircut.

Remember when Eric “I sleep with Chinese spies” Swalwell’s tweet? 

“Your 401K just became a 201K. And the f’g moron who did that to you is golfing for the weekend in Miami. Let that sink in”

I chuckle when I see these tweets that Democrats wish they could forget ever happened. It’s like they can’t take a strategy to the end, or perhaps they like the public sodomy Trump eventually levels on them.​


Global Diplomacy Through Economic Strength

Trump’s tariff policies not only bolstered American markets but sent a message globally: the U.S. is back in the driver’s seat. And it’s not just rhetoric—Trump’s economic strategy is pulling entire regions out of turmoil.

Just last week, he opened up markets in Congo and Rwanda, committing billions in American investments while negotiating ceasefires in those regions. No more USAID checks funding coups and communist enclaves. Trump’s plan is straight-up capitalism, planting the seeds of economic growth instead of war.​

And it’s working. These emerging markets are diversifying global GDP. Instead of China using American money to build outposts of communism, Trump’s deals are spreading capitalism. It’s like exporting freedom disguised as commerce. American influence, backed by real economic growth, not just military might.​


Black America and the Left’s Legacy of Intervention

This shift in strategy isn’t just global—it’s deeply personal for Black America. Trump understands the damage of intervention because he’s seen it firsthand. While Blacks of the past lived through Democrat hell—oppressed in every walk of life—we built strong, thriving communities. Segregation that Democrats meant for punishment backfired. We built businesses, banks, schools, and entire communities. We didn’t just survive; we thrived.​

But then the interventionists hit. They decided to make Blacks their project, not to improve Black culture but to manage it. Programs like The Negro Project weren’t about uplift; they were about control. Under the guise of “help,” Black communities were funneled into government dependency, erasing decades of self-made progress.​

Trump’s policies flip that narrative. He’s not interested in making Black America dependent—he wants it empowered. By bringing jobs back to the U.S. and cutting bureaucratic red tape, Trump is fueling Black entrepreneurship and dismantling the dependency state the Left has cultivated for decades. The model isn’t government handouts; it’s government getting out of the way.​


Diplomacy Redefined: Trump in Saudi Arabia

When Trump landed in Saudi Arabia, it wasn’t just a diplomatic visit—it was a paradigm shift. The Saudis didn’t just roll out the red carpet; they rolled out the kingdom. Trump’s speech there wasn’t just another political moment—it was historic. For the first time in modern history, Muslims felt genuinely heard. Trump essentially said, “We may not agree with all you do, but we’ll find ways to work together.“​

And it worked. Middle Eastern leaders are starting to rethink their strategies, not because of pressure or military threat, but because Trump is offering something more enticing—commerce over conflict. The ripple effect of this can’t be overstated. Even Dubai, one of the wealthiest cities in the Muslim world, has adopted Western sensibilities. Capitalism and cultural respect are thriving side by side.​


The Bigger Picture: Peace Through Strength

What did you notice most about Trump’s visit to Saudi Arabia?

For me, it was the profound respect he commanded. It wasn’t just diplomatic courtesy; it was genuine admiration. The Saudis recognize strength when they see it. And in President Trump, they saw a leader unafraid to shake the status quo—not just for America, but for the world.​

Trump’s philosophy is simple: Strength through commerce, peace through economic leverage. Instead of blowing nations to pieces, he’s introducing them to prosperity. It’s a radical shift from the endless wars and nation-building that marked past administrations.​


A New World Order, Built on Capitalism and Respect

We are witnessing the redefinition of American influence—not through war, but through economic sovereignty. And the world is taking notice. Trump’s model is forcing countries to compete, innovate, and trade, not war. And in doing so, he’s bringing back something America hasn’t truly felt in decades: global respect.

Trump’s Tariffs Are Only the Start. Congress Must Now Cut Taxes and Regulations.


Reported by Kevin Roberts | Richard Stern | April 11, 2025

Read more at https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/04/11/trumps-tariffs-are-only-start-congress-must-now-cut-taxes-regulations/

Donald Trump, in a darl blue suit, shakes hands with Mike Johnson, dressed in a dark grey suit.
(Chip Somodevilla via Getty Images)

President Donald Trump announced historic tariffs on April 2—“Liberation Day”—to ensure that America is no longer “looted, pillaged, raped, and plundered” by other nations.

On Wednesday, the president announced a 90-day pause on the tariffs and lowered the tariff rate on most nations to 10%. He also raised tariffs on China to 125%.

His bold leadership, which quickly brought 75 countries to the negotiating table, he said, should be applauded. Clearly, his strategy is working: America is gaining leverage, and China is becoming more and more isolated.

While conservatives have been divided and disorganized about how to respond to the president’s policy, with almost all Republicans in Washington still watching from the sidelines, we’re calling on Americans to unify around a “yes, and” agenda.

That means saying yes to strategic, reciprocal tariffs that target China and other trade abusers—based on their barriers, not simply the balance of trade—as we work toward true free and fair trade.

And it means insisting that tariffs are most effective when paired with a broad array of conservative policies that alleviate economic pain on the American people. While Trump works to liberate us from foreign abuses, congressional Republicans must fight to liberate Americans from the burdens of federal regulations, mandates, and taxes.

Republicans Must Make Tax Cuts Permanent

First, we must not settle for extending the status quo on tax relief. Thanks to the majorities Trump delivered in November, Republicans must pursue deeper tax reform through reconciliation. Every penny raised from tariffs should be offset with pro-growth tax cuts.

Making the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act permanent is a good start, but we also must remove every remaining tax penalty on expanding hiring and business operations in America by adopting full and immediate expensing for all investments. Pairing this with a simplified flat tax for all is even better. Congress should collapse the personal income and corporate tax rates to 15%.

Second, Congress should work alongside the Trump administration, using the reconciliation process, to transform the current 10% universal tariff into a true border-adjusted tariff. That means applying a universal 10% tariff on all imports, while granting a matching 10% credit to all American exports.

That isn’t just smart policy—it’s a long-overdue correction to a global tax system that has punished American industry for decades.

We’ve let foreign goods pour into our markets tax-free, while our manufacturers are taxed at home and slapped again abroad. That’s not free trade—it’s economic surrender. And no country has abused this broken system more brazenly than China, which has cheated on trade, exploited our openness, and gutted the U.S. industry while Washington looked the other way.

If we want to rebuild our economy, secure our supply chains, and end our dependence on adversarial regimes, then a border adjustment tariff must be part of the conservative economic playbook.

As a bonus, these revenues can be used to offset lost revenue from the lower tax rates we are calling for.

Congress Must Cut Federal Spending

Third, Republicans must finally get serious about cutting spending—not with half measures or messaging bills, but with real, structural reform. Through reconciliation, Congress should significantly cut mandatory spending riddled with waste, fraud, and abuse.

Now is not the time to settle for the lowest common denominator, which is always a temptation in politics. If we are to undo the fiscal and inflationary damage done by the previous administration and decades of fiscal irresponsibility, we must go big and take advantage of this historic electoral mandate.

Then, through the appropriations process, we must slash the bloated discretionary budget that fuels the unchecked growth of the federal bureaucracy.

In the meantime, the Department of Government Efficiency must be fully unleashed to do its job—scrutinizing every dollar, rooting out inefficiency, and holding agencies accountable. This is how we restore fiscal integrity and prove to the American people that their government works for them, not the other way around.

Businesses Need Deregulation

Fourth, American enterprise must be unleashed through sweeping deregulation. For too long, unelected bureaucrats have imposed crushing rules that stifle innovation, punish small businesses, and expand government control far beyond its proper bounds.

It’s time for Congress to reassert its constitutional authority, starting by empowering lawmakers to roll back legacy regulations that have accumulated over decades of executive overreach by passing the REINS Act and the Sunset Act.

At the same time, the administration should lead a coordinated effort—through executive orders and agency rulemaking—to dismantle the regulatory state piece by piece.

Fifth, permitting reform is long overdue, and it’s time we treat it like the national priority it is. For decades, radical environmentalists and bloated bureaucracies have used red tape to delay, derail, and destroy American energy and infrastructure projects. The result? Higher costs, energy dependence, and missed opportunities for American workers.

We need to streamline the permitting process from top to bottom—cut timelines, eliminate duplicative reviews, and ensure projects get approved on merit, not political ideology. If we’re serious about unleashing American energy, rebuilding our industrial base, and securing true energy independence, then Congress must act—the administration must lead—with bold, unapologetic reform.

In Washington, conservatives talk a lot about policies, but policies are not ends in themselves. They’re tools to achieve a certain end—the flourishing of the American people. Americans care about policy only insofar as it influences how they can purchase a home, build strong families, raise their children in safe communities, and live lives rooted in faith, purpose, and freedom.

For too long, America’s strength has been undermined by a bipartisan failure to defend our own economic foundation. Congress and previous presidents ran up our debt, piled up regulations, outsourced our manufacturing base, surrendered our supply chains, and signed trade deals that ignored Chinese cheating.

All of this served government bureaucrats, but not the American family. The result? Hollowed-out towns, lost jobs, and a working class forced to pay the price for decisions made in Washington and on Wall Street.

This result wasn’t inevitable—it was a choice. And it’s time we choose differently. It’s time to put American industry, families, and sovereignty back at the center of our national agenda.

As conservatives, we’re not just fighting for policies—we’re fighting for the American way of life. A way of life rooted in personal responsibility, bound by opportunity, and defined by human dignity. Every policy we advance—whether it’s tax reform, deregulation, tariffs, or border security—must serve that higher purpose: to strengthen families, empower communities, and preserve the blessings of liberty for the next generation.

Originally published by USA Today

Related posts:

  1. Trump and Our Return to the ‘American System’
  2. As Tariffs Tank Markets, Economy Craves Tax Cuts
  3. Capitol Hill Reacts to Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’ on Tariffs

Why Trump’s Right to Axe the Department of Education [Video]


By: Jimmy Parker | April 1, 2025

Read more at https://pagetraveler.com/why-trumps-right-to-axe-the-department-of-education-video/

You ever wonder what would happen if the Department of Education had to compete in the free market? Yeah, it’d be toast before lunch. No bailouts, no excuses, just a long-overdue tombstone that reads: “Here lies a bloated bureaucracy that did nothing but burn your money and babysit mediocrity.”

But because this mess is taxpayer-funded, it’s still limping along, hemorrhaging billions while test scores plummet and administrators polish their nameplates.

Billions Spent, Nothing to Show

The Department of Education was created in 1979 — right around the time disco mercifully died. Unfortunately, only one of those two stayed dead. Fast forward to 2023: the Department’s budget was a whopping $79.6 billion — and that’s not even counting the $120 billion they tossed on top in pandemic relief. That’s nearly $200 billion in a couple years. For that kind of cash, you’d expect students to be splitting atoms or at least knowing how to spell “government.”

But no — math and reading scores are in free fall, American students are getting curb-stomped in international rankings, and colleges are forced to teach freshmen how to read at a 9th-grade level. We’re not investing in education — we’re investing in excuses.

Imagine If This Was a Business

Picture this: Ford spends $200 billion and then sells fewer cars with worse safety records and no innovation. Shareholders would riot. The CEO would be kicked out so fast they’d leave skid marks.

Now look at the Department of Education: same level of failure, but instead of firings, we get raises and more budget requests. Why? Because they don’t answer to you. They answer to no one. There’s no competition, no consequences, and no customer service hotline. Just taxpayer dollars flowing like a busted fire hydrant.

The Nation’s Report Card: F

In 2022, the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) showed that math and reading scores for 9-year-olds hit their lowest point in decades. Not just bad — historic failure.

U.S. students ranked 28th out of 37 countries in math. Japan’s at the top. We’re chilling with the bottom third, clutching our participation trophies and blaming “equity gaps.”

And the kicker? From 2018 to 2022, our average math score dropped 13 points. That’s not a dip — that’s a nosedive with no parachute.

But don’t worry, the Department of Education is on it. They’re forming a task force. Translation: they’re going to schedule a lot of Zoom calls, spend $50 million on “equity consultants,” and absolutely nothing will change.

Bureaucracy: The Real Curriculum

Let’s talk about where your money really goes. Hint: it’s not teachers, students, or even books.

A massive chunk of the Department’s budget disappears into a labyrinth of administrative costs. Money filters through federal programs, state agencies, and school districts, shrinking like a bar of soap at every stop — until what’s left for actual classrooms is about enough to buy a handful of glue sticks and a couple packs of dry-erase markers.

Meanwhile, your local superintendent just got a new leather chair and a raise for… well, existing.

No Incentive, No Progress

In business, if your product sucks, you fix it. Or you die. Simple.

But in government? If your product sucks, you blame society, lobby for more money, and slap a rainbow sticker on the failure so nobody questions it.

Remember Blockbuster? They had the money, the brand, and the reach. But they didn’t adapt. Netflix ate their lunch, dinner, and midnight snack. Now Blockbuster’s a meme — and the Department of Education is headed down the same path if we let it.

Only difference? Netflix didn’t use your money.

What Needs to Happen?

Trump’s move to abolish the Department of Education isn’t radical — it’s common sense. If it were a company, it’d be delisted by now. We don’t need more bureaucracy. We need bold, state-led reforms that put parents and students first — not union bosses and overpaid administrators.

So what should we do?

  • Decentralize it: Let states handle education. California wants drag queen story hour and pronoun worksheets. Fine. Florida wants phonics and discipline. Also, fine. Let the states compete.
  • School choice: Give parents the ability to walk away from failure. That’s how the free market fixes things — it lets bad products die.
  • Outcome-based funding: No more blank checks. If your district can’t improve test scores, you don’t get a raise — you get a restructure.
  • Cut the fat: Fire the bureaucrats pushing paper and give that money to teachers who actually move the needle.

Final Thoughts

The Department of Education isn’t just failing — it’s making failure look like a strategy. We’ve built a system that protects mediocrity, punishes excellence, and gaslights the public into thinking more money is the answer. It’s not. The answer is accountability, competition, and local control.

If this agency were a business, it’d have been gone yesterday. But because it’s a government program, it lingers — burning cash, lowering standards, and calling itself “progress.” It’s time we call it what it is: a sinking ship that never should’ve set sail.

And if that makes me “anti-education,” then fine. I’ll wear it like a badge — right next to my “I prefer competent adults teaching kids” sticker.

WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY

Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com

Trump Preparing Republicans for Next Landslide


Commentary by Kevin Jackson | March 31, 2025

Read more at https://theblacksphere.net/2025/03/trump-preparing-republicans-next-landslide/

Trump, victorious, Kevin Jackson

Donald Trump has positioned Republicans for a political landslide in the midterms and beyond. And the Democrats will be powerless to stop him.

Yes, Trump orchestrated a power-grab but he didn’t do it alone. As Carrie Underwood sang, “Jesus take the wheel”, and Jesus snatched it from the Democrats and gave it to President Trump. And now a much more knowledgeable Trump has Democrats flailing like fish on a dock, desperately trying to find a way to stop the inevitable.

All their tricks have been revealed, and their infrastructure that allowed them to believe they were relevant is gone. Worse for them, the Conservative base is energized, and with good reason.

First, we will never forget the election cheating, the real version of J6, and lockdowns, for starters. And after 4 years of Biden’s punishing economy, we are determined to never return. And thanks to President Trump, things are working out as planned.

The economy is humming again, as inflation is lowering, good jobs are returning, and the president is exposing the game. But we are just getting started.

The Democrats’ Desperation Playbook: A Comedy of Errors

Democrats are orchestrating a collective effort to disrupt the stock market. Remember how well stocks did under Trump in his first term, setting records almost weekly. If Democrats allowed the stock market to react to version two of Trump, the Dow would be at 50,000. So they manipulate it. And they hope it will panic Americans and the world into distrust of Trump. Democrats are about to get the vegan at a barbecue.

The truth is, there’s nothing the Democrats can do to derail the economic momentum Trump has built except God. And we know who’s side He’s on. So for those who are taking hits in the market, don’t sweat it. Your 401(k) accounts will be restored and profitable by summer.

And let’s not forget the recent Friday boycott. What was that about? Democrats fought a forest fire with a squirt gun. Meanwhile, Trump’s tariffs are working, the stock market is responding positively, and interest rates are dropping. People’s incomes are rising, and their taxes are falling. It’s almost as if conservative policies… work. Who knew?

Every politician knows. And that’s why conservatives are about to get the biggest win of our lifetime.

Trump’s Revenge: Justice Served Cold

Remember when Trump said his success would be his revenge? Well, that’s not the case anymore.

During the joint session of Congress, where Democrats sat on their hands like petulant children, Trump realized that the only true revenge is pure, unadulterated justice. And justice is what he’s delivering.

The so-called “buyer’s remorse” among Trump voters? Please. If anything, Trump’s base is more energized than ever. The man has a knack for turning his critics into his biggest cheerleaders. And that’s why for the first time in a long time Republicans are firmly in the driver’s seat.

A Historic Opportunity for Republicans

Republicans haven’t seen an opportunity like this in decades. The last time the GOP controlled both the House and Senate for more than two terms was during the Clinton years. And let’s be honest, Bill Clinton’s presidency was only “tremendous” because Republicans held Congress in check.

With Trump at the helm, Republicans have a chance to return to the glory days of the Wilson, Harding, Coolidge, and Hoover presidencies, when the GOP held both houses of Congress for six cycles. This isn’t just a political opportunity; it’s a historical one. And we have Barack Obama to thank for it.

In Obama’s first term, Democrats dominated the House and Senate. But in the midterms, Republicans decimated them, gaining 64 seats in the House and five in the Senate. The next election saw Democrats cheat their way back into power, but it was short-lived. Enter Donald Trump, and Republicans added gains in both the House and Senate.

Over the next four years, Democrats pulled every dirty trick in the book to defeat Trump, even working with complicit Republicans. But despite their best efforts, Trump’s resurgence and the rise of DOGE (Digital Online Grassroots Engagement) have put Republicans back in the driver’s seat.

The Senate Shakeup: Democrats on the Ropes

Let’s talk numbers. Currently, the Senate has 53 Republicans, 45 Democrats, and two independents. But that’s about to change. Three Democratic senators—Gary Peters (D-MI), Tina Smith (D-MN), and Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH)—are up for grabs. Two of these seats are considered toss-ups. Add North Carolina and Georgia to the mix, and you’ve got a recipe for a potential Republican supermajority.

The House isn’t looking much better for Democrats. Currently, there are 218 Republicans, 214 Democrats, and three vacancies. Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) and Rep. Michael Waltz (R-FL) resigned, but those seats will go to Republicans. Rep. Sylvester Turner (D-TX) passed away, as did an Arizona Congressman, and these two seats may return to the Democrats. However, regardless of the outcome of these races, you can bet that Republicans will make massive gains in the House in the midterms.

The Bottom Line: A Conservative Renaissance

In short, Trump’s recovery from Obama’s recession will pale in comparison to his recovery from Biden’s. When the economy fully rebounds, Trump will be untouchable. This will give him three unfettered years to dismantle the deep state and continue to deliver on his promises.

The Democrats’ only hope is that RINOs will work with them to torpedo Trump’s agenda. But even that’s a long shot. The Conservative base is too strong, too energized, and too fed up with the status quo.

Worse for Democrats is how DOGE dried up their gravy train. Imagine Democrats having to win with no taxpayer money, no significant media support, and no message. They haven’t faced anything like this in decades, so this is new ground for them. Shaky ground. I predict that more Democrats defect from their party.

So, buckle up, folks. The next few years are going to be wild. Trump has positioned Republicans for a historic power grab, and there’s almost nothing the Democrats can do about it. It’s a great time to be a Conservative.

President Trump has set the stage for a Republican renaissance in the midterms and beyond. With the economy on the upswing and Democrats out of options, Conservatives are poised for historic gains in both the House and Senate. The Democrats’ desperation is palpable, but their efforts are futile. Trump’s policies are working, and the Conservative base is more energized than ever. This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity for Republicans to solidify their power and deliver on their promises.

9th Circuit Court Reverses Biden Judge Ruling on Trump Administration’s Refugee Policy


By: Doug Goldsmith | March 26, 2025

Read more at https://libertyonenews.com/9th-circuit-court-reverses-biden-judge-ruling-on-trump-administrations-refugee-policy/


The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, often regarded as the most liberal in the United States, delivered an unexpected triumph for the Trump Administration. In a recent decision, a three-judge panel blocked a Seattle district court’s order that aimed to force the Trump Administration to restart refugee admissions. This decision allows President Trump to maintain his pause on new refugee entries, a move that aligns with conservative values of prioritizing national security.

According to Politico, the Trump Administration is still obligated to process refugees who were approved prior to January 20. The ruling clarifies that these individuals are not affected by Trump’s executive order, which sought to pause the influx of new refugees. Notably, two judges on the panel, Barry Silverman and Ana De Alba, were appointed by Bill Clinton and Joe Biden, while the third, Bridget Bade, was a Trump appointee.

Gateway Pundit highlighted that District Judge Jamal Whitehead, appointed by Biden, had previously blocked Trump’s efforts to halt the refugee resettlement program. This program has seen years of misuse under Democratic administrations, often compromising national interests. Trump’s Executive Order 14155, titled “Realigning the United States Refugee Admissions Program,” was signed two months ago and effectively halted the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program as of January 27, 2025.

The executive order not only stopped new refugees from entering the U.S. but also cut federal funding to organizations aiding refugees, even those already residing in the country. This suspension is intended to stay in place until it is determined that resuming the program aligns with American interests. Judge Whitehead’s ruling criticized Trump’s actions, calling them an “effective nullification of congressional will” regarding refugee admissions.

Despite Whitehead’s claims, the President’s authority to control refugee admissions is substantial, though not without limits. Whitehead’s desire to admit potentially dangerous refugees was a step too far, even for the Ninth Circuit Court. The court’s decision underscores the importance of maintaining a firm stance on immigration and national security.

Fox News reported that the ruling is seen as a significant win for those advocating for stricter immigration controls. Conservatives argue that the refugee program has been manipulated for years, posing risks to national security. The decision by the Ninth Circuit suggests a growing recognition of these concerns, even among traditionally liberal judges.

The New York Post emphasized that Trump’s executive order is a necessary measure to protect American citizens. By pausing refugee admissions, the administration aims to reassess and realign the program with the nation’s priorities. This approach reflects a commitment to putting America’s interests first, a core tenet of conservative ideology.

The decision by the Ninth Circuit Court is a testament to the enduring influence of policies that prioritize national safety. It highlights a shift in judicial perspectives, validating the Trump Administration’s efforts to strengthen border security. Newsmax noted that this ruling could set a precedent for future cases involving immigration and national security.

Conservatives view this victory as a reinforcement of their stance on immigration. By ensuring that refugee admissions align with U.S. interests, the administration is safeguarding the nation’s sovereignty. This decision is a reminder that America must remain vigilant in its immigration policies to protect its citizens.

The ruling also calls into question the motivations behind Democratic efforts to expand refugee admissions. Critics argue that such policies often disregard potential threats to national security. The Ninth Circuit’s decision is a clear message that the safety of American citizens should be the foremost concern.

While Democrats may continue to push for relaxed immigration policies, this ruling serves as a significant check on those ambitions. It reaffirms the President’s authority to regulate immigration in a manner that is consistent with national interests. This is a win for those who believe in a strong, secure America.

For years, the refugee resettlement program has been a contentious issue, often dividing political lines. Conservatives argue that unchecked admissions can lead to vulnerabilities in national security. This ruling is a step towards addressing those concerns and ensuring a balanced approach to immigration.

As the debate over immigration continues, this decision by the Ninth Circuit Court will likely resonate across the political spectrum. It underscores the importance of maintaining a robust immigration policy that prioritizes the safety and well-being of American citizens. The ruling is a significant development in the ongoing discussion about the role of refugees in the United States.

This outcome is a reminder that the courts can play a crucial role in shaping immigration policy. It reflects a growing awareness of the challenges posed by the current refugee system. By upholding the Trump Administration’s pause on refugee admissions, the Ninth Circuit has set a precedent for future legal battles.

Ultimately, this decision is a victory for those who believe in strong leadership and decisive action on immigration. It affirms the need for policies that are in line with American values and priorities. As the nation grapples with complex immigration issues, this ruling provides clarity and direction for the future.

GOP Lawmakers Aim to Codify Trump’s Executive Orders


By: George Caldwell | March 11, 2025

Read more at https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/03/11/gop-lawmaker-vows-codify-trumps-executive-orders/

Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, is seen here in front of the U.S. Capitol on March 21, 2024.
Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, is seen here in front of the U.S. Capitol on March 21, 2024. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

GOP members of Congress on the Republican Study Committee promised Tuesday to fight to turn President Donald Trump’s executive orders into law. Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, chairman of the RSC, was joined at a news conference by a dozen other Republican lawmakers, each of them touting their legislation.

Pfluger began the press conference by praising Trump’s work to “eliminate government waste, to secure our borders, and to push back against radical gender and DEI policies.

The Texas lawmaker then promised that he and his fellow Republicans would codify the president’s executive orders involved into law.

“Now, our Republican-controlled Congress has a responsibility to reinforce and etch these victories into permanent law,” he said.

One by one, Republicans with the RSC took the microphone to pitch his or her legislation. 

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., spoke of her legislation to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America. Rep. Pat Harrigan, R-N.C., advocated making it more difficult for the executive branch to impose vaccine mandates on the nation’s military troops. 

Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, proposed repealing the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, which was weaponized by the Justice Department under Trump’s predecessor, President Joe Biden, to prosecute and imprison pro-life activists, who Trump pardoned soon after taking office on Jan. 20.

Despite being confident of the support of fellow Republicans, the lawmakers face a likely partisan obstacle; namely, getting enough Democratic votes in the Senate to invoke cloture 0n filibusters to allow for their bills to go to the Senate floor for a vote.

Asked by a reporter how he would overcome that hurdle, Pfluger said he hoped colleagues such as Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., who joined him at the event, would be able to iron out differences in the Senate.

But persuading Democrats to allow ambitious Republican legislation to become law may prove to be a tall order.

Just last week, Senate Democrats unanimously blocked a bill that would have barred transgender athletes—biological males—from female sports, despite polling showing nearly 80% public support in polls for such measures.

After the press conference, Pfluger told The Daily Signal that swing-district Democrats must allow Republicans to pass legislation, or they will face electoral consequences.

“Look, there are 13 House of Representative districts that President Trump won,” Pfluger said. 

“So, President Trump won these, even though there’s a Democrat in those [House] seats. So, those representatives have to go back and explain to their constituency why they voted against President Trump’s executive order legislation,” he said.

The Educational Cartel: How Randi Weingarten Finally Said the Quiet Part Out Loud


Commentary by Jonathan Turley | March 11, 2025

Read more at https://jonathanturley.org/2025/03/11/the-educational-cartel-how-weingarten-finally-said-the-quiet-part-out-loud/

American Federation of Teachers president Randi Weingarten is known primarily for two things: screaming into microphones at political rallies and making the teacher’s union an extension of the Democratic Party. However, Weingarten had an unintended substantive moment when she changed her earlier position on the elimination of the Education Department. Weingarten previously shrugged off the elimination of the department as not a big deal for education. Recently, she returned to her irate default in denouncing the elimination. The reason, however, was telling.

After Trump was reelected in November, Weingarten said that the elimination was not a big deal and that teachers had originally opposed the creation of the department: “I mean, my members don’t really care about whether they have a bureaucracy of the Department of Education or not. In fact, Al Shanker and the [American Federation of Teachers] in the 1970s were opposed to its creation.”

Now, however, Weingarten has resumed her natural state of being “really angry.” In an interview with MSNBC, Weingarten explained:

“That is why so many people are so mad about it. Because they’re just taking opportunity away from kids that don’t have it. So, billionaires – kids of billionaires, they have it, they go to private schools. Everyone else, 90% go to public schools. Don’t take away their opportunity. Sorry, I’m really angry about this … I’m really angry,”

However, it is the reason that is most interesting.

In a podcast, Weingarten explained that they have to avoid such “block grants” going to families. Host Molly Jong-Fast readily agreed, raising the danger that it might even support Catholic and religious schools.  Weingarten stressed that “We know, for example, what Texas would do. They’ll use it for vouchers. So, they won’t give [federal funding] to the kids who have it now, they’ll just give it for vouchers.”

There is reason for Weingarten and the teacher’s union being so concerned. Florida allows for school choice and has demanded greater performance from public schools. Despite attacks by Weingarten and other Democrats, Florida has been ranked as the number one state for both education and the economy.

We have previously discussed how schools have been dropping the use of standardized tests to achieve diversity goals in admissions. That trend continued this month with Cal State dropping standardized testing “to level the playing field” for minority students. I have long been a critic of this movement given the overwhelming evidence that these tests allow an objective measure of academic merit and have great predictive value on the performance of students.

Many colleges and universities are returning to standardized testing after the much-acclaimed abandonment of the tests for a more “holistic approach” to selection.

However, public educators have continued to lower proficiency requirements and cancel gifted programs to “even the playing field.” The result has been to further hide the dismal scores and educational standards of many public-school districts.

I previously wrote about how public educators and teacher unions are killing public education in America. Many of us have advocated for public education for decades. I sent my children to public schools, and I still hope we can turn this around without wholesale voucher systems.

Teachers and boards are killing the institution of public education by treating children and parents more like captives than consumers. They are force-feeding social and political priorities, including passes for engaging in approved protests.

As public schools continue to produce abysmal scores, particularly for minority students, board and union officials have called for lowering or suspending proficiency standards or declared meritocracy to be a form of “white supremacy.” Gifted and talented programs are being eliminated in the name of “equity.”

Once parents have a choice, these teachers lose a virtual monopoly over many families. They are no longer a captive audience. If public unions want to maintain funding, they will have to actually improve educational results for these families.

You see, Weingarten knows that, like her, they are “really angry,” but not about the future of a union that increasingly sounds like an educational cartel.

Made in America: Trump Racks Up $3 Trillion of Investments in US Economy


By: Bradley Devlin | March 04, 2025

Read more at https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/03/04/trump-3-trillion-investment-american-economy/

President Donald Trump greets Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. CEO C.C. Wei at the White House on Monday.
President Donald Trump greets Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. CEO C.C. Wei at the White House on Monday. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

For President Donald Trump, the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co.’s $100 billion investment in U.S. chip manufacturing represented “a tremendous leap—like, a leap that nobody would have really said was possible.” But TSMC’s $100 billion is just a small part of the at least $3 trillion in investments and trade commitments the Trump administration has racked up in just six weeks since Inauguration Day.

The $3 trillion of investment and trade commitments with the United States involve key allies, such as India and Japan, and major players in the private sector—Apple and Oracle, to name just two. These arrangements also cover critical industries beyond chip manufacturing, from pharmaceuticals to automobiles to artificial intelligence.

With the announcement of TSMC’s $100 billion investment—which Trump celebrated with TSMC CEO C.C. Wei, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and AI czar David Sacks on Monday—the Taiwanese company is nearly tripling its previous investment in additional chip manufacturing investment in the United States. Before the announcement, TSMC had invested $65 billion in U.S.-based manufacturing. Its first American manufacturing plant in Arizona, which began with a $12 billion investment in 2020, opened for business late last year. TSMC plans to use the $100 billion in new investment to set up three new chipmaking plants, two chip-packing plants, as well as a research and development center.

TSMC dominates the global semiconductor industry. In terms of revenue, its foundries account for more than 60% of global market share. But that was not always the case. Just over 30 years ago, the U.S. accounted for 37% of global semiconductor production, while Taiwan was just a few measly percent.

U.S. policymakers engrossed in the doctrines of free trade saw the semiconductor industry flee to subsidized and protected Asian markets. For decades, free-trade dogmatism dragged America into a ditch.

Now, the Trump administration is offering a way out. Trump’s policies have spurred investments that diminish China’s leverage over the American economy. These investments are a foundational pillar for any attempt to make the U.S. economy more resilient to a China shock and revitalize American manufacturing.

During his first full day of his second term, Trump unveiled “Stargate,” a $500 billion investment into artificial intelligence over the next four years. Trump called Stargate—a collaboration between Softbank, OpenAI, and Oracle—“the largest AI infrastructure project, by far, in history.” 

Just a month prior, Softbank announced a $100 billion investment that aimed to create 100,000 American jobs. Additionally, Trump secured a $20 billion initial investment by DAMAC Properties in early January for new data centers based in the U.S. 

As Vice President JD Vance outlined in his speech at the Paris AI summit last month, the Trump administration is committed to competing with China in the AI space while also challenging European notions of how to regulate AI and chart the future of the AI economy.

After Trump said his administration was considering placing tariffs on pharmaceutical imports, the pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly announced it planned to invest $27 billion in four new manufacturing facilities in America. The company claimed that, once complete, the plants will create more than 3,000 jobs. Building the facilities themselves will require 10,000 construction workers, the company added.

Since China’s accession to the World Trade Organization, production of generic drugs and the chemical compounds used as inputs for those drugs, increased at a rapid pace. That was not the “invisible hand” at work; rather, it was the result of conscious policy choices on the part of the Chinese Communist Party to subsidize those industries, thereby undercutting drug producers and jobs in the U.S. and across the West, nations which were at the time drinking deeply from free-trade dogmatism.

Tariffs also may have been a factor in Apple’s decision to invest in the American economy. After Trump announced an additional 10% tariff on China, Apple announced it would be investing $500 billion in the United States and hire approximately 20,000 workers. Apple plans to open a new factory in Texas and a manufacturing academy in Detroit, Michigan, as well as expansions in Arizona, Nevada, California, North Carolina, and other states.

Apple will double its investment in its U.S. Advanced Manufacturing Fund, which includes working alongside TSMC in the Taiwanese company’s Arizona facility to produce advanced silicon. Apple plans to hire the 20,000 workers over the next four years, the vast majority of whom will be focused on silicon engineering, AI and machine learning, and the like.

Trump has also worked with foreign leaders to court more investment in the American economy and bolster American exports. Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman pledged the kingdom would invest $600 billion in America. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi agreed with Trump on increasing the trade between U.S. and India to $500 billion.

Japan, meanwhile, has promised to open more auto plants in the U.S. and import American liquified natural gas at “historic” levels, thereby reducing America’s trade deficit with its Asian ally. One Japanese automaker, Honda, is reportedly moving production of the Honda Civic hybrid from Mexico to Indiana in response to Trump’s tariffs on Mexico and Canada.

For Trump and his administration, “Make America Great Again” starts with actually making things in America again.

BREAKING: Secretary of State Marco Rubio Ends U.S. Support for Ukraine’s Power Grid


By: Erica Carlin | March 3, 2025

Read more at https://libertyonenews.com/breaking-secretary-of-state-marco-rubio-ends-u-s-support-for-ukraines-power-grid/

Vice President J.D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio

Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice President J.D. Vance, recently joined President Donald Trump in a critical Oval Office meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The discussions were tense and unapologetically direct, with President Trump making it abundantly clear that America’s foreign policy is shifting away from the reckless, endless spending that defined the Biden administration’s approach to Ukraine.

The meeting, originally intended to focus on Ukraine’s failing power grid and Washington’s role in its restoration, ended with Trump decisively canceling a planned joint press conference with Zelensky, signaling a major shift in U.S.-Ukraine relations.

In a bold and necessary move, Secretary of State Marco Rubio has announced an end to U.S. support for Ukraine’s power grid, cutting off taxpayer-funded aid that has funneled billions into a foreign war with little accountability.

The decision effectively halts a USAID initiative that had been pouring American resources into rebuilding Ukraine’s energy infrastructure, even as millions of Americans struggle with rising costs at home. For years, Ukraine’s energy grid has been a target of Russian attacks, but rather than finding long-term solutions, Zelensky’s government has relied on endless American handouts, expecting the U.S. to foot the bill for Ukraine’s survival.

According to NBC News, USAID is dramatically reducing its presence in Ukraine, with the State Department officially ending a multi-million-dollar program that has propped up Ukraine’s crumbling energy grid. The decision has sent shockwaves through the D.C. establishment, particularly among those who have grown comfortable using Ukraine as a slush fund for special interests.

The reality on the ground in Ukraine remains dire, with widespread power outages plunging regions into darkness as Russia continues to target its energy infrastructure. Yet rather than seeking diplomatic resolutions, Zelensky arrived in Washington demanding more financial aid, falsely claiming that without further U.S. funding, Ukraine’s ability to defend itself would collapse.

Trump wasn’t having it. The meeting quickly turned heated as Zelensky pushed for an agreement that would give Ukraine access to lucrative rare earth mineral rights, a move that raised serious red flags within the administration. President Trump, a master negotiator, saw right through the ploy and firmly rejected Zelensky’s demands.

“You don’t have the cards right now,” Trump bluntly told Zelensky, emphasizing that Ukraine is in no position to make demands. The President made it clear that American lives, resources, and priorities come first, warning that Zelensky’s refusal to consider a negotiated settlement was gambling with the lives of millions.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, an outspoken advocate for America First foreign policy, echoed Trump’s frustrations, calling out Zelensky’s arrogance and unwillingness to accept political reality. Vice President J.D. Vance also took Zelensky to task, questioning his audacity to come to the White House and lecture the administration. The meeting ended abruptly, with Zelensky escorted out of the White House after failing to secure any new commitments from the Trump administration.

The implications of this meeting are enormous. The era of blank checks to Ukraine is officially over. For years, Washington’s corrupt foreign policy elites have funneled tens of billions of taxpayer dollars into Ukraine, enriching defense contractors and globalist interests while ignoring America’s own pressing needs. Trump’s decisive action signals a long-overdue course correction, prioritizing the American people over foreign wars and geopolitical quagmires.

While critics of the move lament the withdrawal of U.S. support, arguing that it could embolden Russia, Trump’s stance is based on realism, not fantasy. Unlike the weak Biden administration, which recklessly escalated tensions with Russia while neglecting U.S. borders and energy independence, Trump is seeking a path forward that prioritizes peace and stability over endless conflict.

This shift in U.S.-Ukraine relations is already shaking up the global power structure. European leaders, who for years have relied on American taxpayers to fund their geopolitical ambitions, are now being forced to reassess their own commitments. The message from Washington is clear: the United States will no longer be the world’s ATM.

Trump’s decisive rejection of Zelensky’s demands and his America First foreign policy represent a seismic shift from the corrupt globalist status quo.

The Ukraine war, once used as an excuse to funnel billions into the military-industrial complex, is now under scrutiny, and Washington elites are panicking as Trump restores sanity to foreign policy.

As the world watches, one thing is certain: Trump is back, and he’s putting America first—exactly as he promised.

Watch The New Austin TX local channel on OBBM Network TV!

Erica Carlin

Erica Carlin is an independent journalist, opinion writer and contributor to several news and opinion sources. She is based in Georgia.

Trump’s ‘gold card’ visa could invite fraud, national security risks: expert


By Michael Lee Fox News | Published February 27, 2025 4:00am EST | Updated February 27, 2025 6:54am EST

Read more at https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trumps-gold-card-visa-could-invite-fraud-national-security-risks-expert

President Donald Trump’s plan to offer a “gold card” visa to those willing to shell out $5 million could raise new fraud and national security risks, according to one expert.

“Any immigration benefit draws fraud … people are willing to do anything and say just about anything to come to the U.S.,” Lora Ries, director of the Heritage Foundation’s Border Security and Immigration Center, told Fox News Digital.

The comments come after Trump announced Tuesday a plan that would give those willing to pay $5 million for a “gold card” lawful permanent U.S. residency status and a pathway to citizenship, which the president argued would lead to several economic benefits.

“They’ll be wealthy, and they’ll be successful,” Trump told reporters from the Oval Office on Tuesday. “They’ll be spending a lot of money and paying a lot of taxes and employing a lot of people, and we think it’s going to be extremely successful.”

TRUMP TO INTRODUCE ‘GOLD CARD’ VISA FOR WEALTHY INVESTORS WITH $5 MILLION PRICE TAG: ‘ROUTE TO CITIZENSHIP’

President Donald Trump holds a Cabinet meeting at the White House on Feb. 26, 2025.
President Donald Trump holds a Cabinet meeting at the White House on Feb. 26, 2025. (JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images)

Trump doubled down on those comments Wednesday while also telling reporters that the program would be a way to pay down some of the national debt.

“Companies can go and buy a gold card, and they can use it as a matter of recruitment,” Trump said. “At the same time, the company is using that money to pay down debt. We’re going to pay down a lot of debt with that.”

But while Ries acknowledged that she understands the goals behind the program, she expressed skepticism that applicants could be vetted well enough to prevent the kind of fraud currently seen in the similar EB-5 visa program, which Trump’s gold card would replace.

“Fraud is rarely detected, let alone enforced … so it’s low risk, high reward to commit immigration benefit fraud,” Ries said, adding that even Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick admitted to the widespread fraud plaguing the EB-5 program.

President Donald Trump speaks as Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick looks on after Trump signed executive orders in the Oval Office on Feb. 25, 2025.
President Donald Trump speaks as Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick looks on after Trump signed executive orders in the Oval Office on Feb. 25, 2025. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

TRUMP’S LATEST MOVES SIGNALS MOST ‘HAWKISH’ APPROACH ON CHINA YET: EXPERT

“So, the question is: How is this going to be different,” Ries said. “It raised the price from a million to 5 million, but how are we going to prevent the fraud? Are you just inviting wealthier fraudsters and corrupt people to exploit this?”

Ries also raised concerns about the potential national security implications of the program, arguing that many of the applications are likely to originate from countries that are not exactly friendly to the United States.

“Who can afford this? What countries have many people who can afford this,” Ries said. “Russia, China … you’re going to get Gulf countries, but China is not exactly our ally – some Russians, the same boat.”

U.S. passport in person's hand
Trump’s gold card plan would extend a path to citizenship for qualified foreign nationals who pay the $5 million fee. (Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images)

Ries said the key will be the system used to vet potential applicants, details of which have yet to be revealed by the Trump administration.

“It’s going to need thorough vetting for national security concerns, espionage and corruption,” Ries said. “That’s going to be very, very important.”

The White House did not immediately respond to a Fox News Digital request for comment.

Michael Lee is a writer for Fox News. Prior to joining Fox News, Michael worked for the Washington ExaminerBongino.com, and Unbiased America. He has covered politics for more than eight years.

Explosive Video: EPA Rushed Billions Before Trump Took Office!


By Jimmy Parker | February 12, 2025

Read more at https://pagetraveler.com/explosive-video-epa-rushed-billions-before-trump-took-office/

Caught on Camera: EPA Official Confesses to Rushed Fund Allocation in Climate Push.

A shocking revelation has emerged from an undercover investigation by Project Veritas. An EPA advisor was caught on tape admitting that the agency hastily allocated billions of taxpayer dollars to climate change initiatives just before President Donald Trump took office. Brent Efron, a special advisor at the EPA who played a crucial role in implementing Biden’s climate agenda, was filmed discussing the frantic effort to disburse funds mere months before Trump’s inauguration.

Efron candidly told a Project Veritas operative, “Now it’s how to get the money out as fast as possible before they [Trump Administration] come in … It truly feels like we’re on the Titanic or throwing gold bars off the top edge.” This statement sheds light on the chaotic and reckless manner in which the EPA managed taxpayer money. Under the Biden administration’s so-called Inflation Reduction Act, dubbed by Efron as “Biden’s climate law,” over $100 billion was designated for environmental projects, an amount that Efron admitted the agency is racing to allocate.

WATCH

In a brazen illustration of bureaucratic insolence, Efron divulged that the EPA is vigorously ensuring these funds are committed to projects, some of which were initially set aside for a Kamala Harris presidency that never materialized. He remarked, “The thing that we haven’t funded yet are [sic] the local nonprofit program that was going to be an inter-Kamala Harris administration program… so now we’re getting it [funding] out as quick as possible. It’s like two billion at this point, we’ve got most of it out – like 90%.”

Furthermore, Efron openly acknowledged the EPA’s strategy to continue this funding rush up until the last possible moment on Inauguration Day. His statement reveals a clear strategy to channel funds through nonprofits, which Efron viewed as an “insurance policy” against a Trump-led administration that might seek to overturn these initiatives. According to Efron, “We gave them [nonprofits, states, tribes] the money because… it was an insurance policy against Trump winning. Because they aren’t [a government agency], they’re safer from Republicans taking the money away.”

This revelation is emblematic of the underhanded tactics used by liberal bureaucrats to advance their agendas while circumventing Republican oversight. Efron’s comments also suggest that these actions were motivated by potential personal gains, hinting at “personal benefits” awaiting him after his tenure with the EPA. He boastfully declared, “Over the last year we’ve given out $50 billion dollars for climate things…so to go work for one of these places would be really cool.”

WATCH

In response to the scandal, EPA chief Lee Zeldin, a dedicated Trump ally and former Congressman from New York, released a statement highlighting the outrageous misuse of funds. “Huge news! Our awesome team EPA just located BILLIONS of dollars worth of “gold bars” that the Biden Admin threw “off the Titanic”. Big update coming tomorrow…” Zeldin wrote.

Conservative voices are rallying against what they see as blatant incompetence and manipulation by the liberal-led EPA. Utah Senator Mike Lee took to X to express his disdain, saying, “The U.S. government is actively working to undermine the American people. We’ve empowered Washington to the point that it’s become dangerous and destructive. It’s too big, too expensive, and too powerful. We must return to constitutional government.”

Last one:
WATCH

This episode is a stark reminder of the lengths to which Democrat operatives will go to further their objectives at the expense of transparency and integrity. As the smoke clears, conservatives are calling for accountability and a rigorous investigation into these egregious acts.

BUSTED! Mystery Millions: Government Workers’ Wealth Under Elon’s Radar! [Videos]


By: Daphne Moon | February 12, 2025

Read more at https://thepatriotchronicles.com/news-for-you/busted-mystery-millions-government-workers-wealth-under-elons-radar-video/

It seems we have a new chapter featuring tech magnate Elon Musk as the lead, aimed squarely at the secrets of government financial dealings. Musk is reportedly teaming up with President Donald Trump, who he visited in the Oval Office. Alongside his son X, Musk seemed to be on more than just a casual visit, with high stakes surrounding their discussions. President Trump signed a new executive order, instructing federal agencies to work with DOGE, a move causing quite a stir.

Musk didn’t hold back as he questioned the growing net worth of federal government employees who are on a basic salary structure. “We do find it sort of rather odd that there are quite a few people in the bureaucracy who have essentially a salary of a few hundred thousand dollars, but somehow manage to accrue tens of millions of dollars in net worth while they are in that position,” he noted.

Conservative voices have long expressed skepticism about how certain individuals in the public eye seem to gain significant wealth without any plausible explanation. Musk’s plan to delve deeper using DOGE comes as a welcomed initiative by many supporters of transparency. “We’re just curious as to where it came from. Whether they have very good investing in which that case we should take their investment advice perhaps,” Musk added with a hint of sarcasm, “They seem to be mysteriously getting wealthy and we don’t know why – where did it come from?”

This issue of financial discrepancies in public office is not exclusively a bureaucratic problem, as Musk hints at significant wealth seen in certain political realms, often leaning towards the Democrat side. Robert Kiyosaki’s eyebrow-raising predictions about gold and silver prices also add layers of financial intrigue to the political plotline.

There’s more than meets the eye when it comes to Senator Elizabeth Warren. Musk recently pondered over her hefty, amassed wealth, given her salary figures. The eye-opening question, “Has anyone tracked how she got $12M from a $200k salary?” throws the senator under the microscope. It’s a question resonating with many Americans who demand accountability and financial transparency. Musk, never one to mince words, declares, “This is a real question.”

The ongoing investigation powered by Musk’s tech influence threatens to unravel hidden truths about government wealth accumulation and holds the potential to shift the tide of political accountability. Both Trump and Musk’s tally of financial truths challenge liberal agendas, seeking to shed light on opaque practices cloaked in governmental operations.

The Left Unwittingly Proves Trump’s Point on the Need to Root Out Anti-Christian Bias


By: Tyler O’Neil | February 10, 2025

Read more at https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/02/10/left-unwittingly-proves-trumps-point-need-root-anti-christian-bias/

Donald Trump prays between Reps. Ben Cline and Jonathan Jackson
Rep. Ben Cline, R-Va., and President Donald Trump bow their heads in prayer as Rep. Jonathan Jackson, D-Ill., speaks at the National Prayer Breakfast on Thursday in Washington. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

President Donald Trump last week announced a new task force dedicated to eradicating anti-Christian bias in the federal government. Trump noted that the federal government under President Joe Biden “engaged in an egregious pattern of targeting peaceful Christians while ignoring violent, anti-Christian offenses.” The new president pledged not to “tolerate this abuse of government” and announced what he called the Task Force to Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias.

On cue, the Left condemned the new task force, ignoring the many instances of anti-Christian bias Trump cited in a fact sheet.

The Guardian’s Joseph Gedeon condemned the move as an effort to boost Christian nationalism.” USA Today columnist Chris Brennan said the task force aimed to increase division. The secularist group Americans United for Separation of Church and State insisted that the task force “will misuse religious freedom to justify bigotry, discrimination.” These responses only serve to underscore the reason such a task force is necessary in the first place.

Trump cited numerous examples of anti-Christian bias, which these critics largely ignored. He noted that pro-life Christians received multiyear prison sentences for peacefully protesting at abortion centers, while the Biden Justice Department largely ignored hundreds of attacks on Catholic churches and pro-life pregnancy resource centers. He noted the notorious FBI Richmond, Virginia, memo that suggested traditional Catholics represented a domestic terrorism threat. He also cited the Health and Human Services Department’s move to force transgender orthodoxy in foster care.

Finally, the president noted that the Biden administration declared Easter Sunday “Transgender Day of Visibility.”

These actions may seem irrelevant to secularists who balk at the idea of saying “Merry Christmas,” but they represent a federal government demonizing Christians while at the same time favoring their ideological opponents.

Yes, Anti-Christian Bias Is Real

Critics often dismiss the idea of anti-Christian bias. After all, about 63% of Americans self-identify as Christian, according to the Pew Research Center. How could the government be biased against the majority of Americans?

Such criticisms obscure the real phenomenon. Most Americans may identify as Christian, but far fewer actually attend church, read the Bible regularly, and follow what Scripture teaches even when it is unpopular. Until quite recently, the Left’s approach to social issues has been in the driver’s seat in the culture—and in many mainline Protestant and even some Catholic churches.

“Although Christianity is the largest religion in the United States, a small, but growing, body of work indicates that in certain social areas Christians face real discrimination,” sociology professors George Yancey and David Williamson write in their book So Many Christians, So Few Lions: Is There Christianophobia in the United States?”

The professors found that “Christian fundamentalists experience more relative animosity than most other social groups.” Their research finds that many Americans are biased against conservative Christianity or “fundamentalism,” and those who have high levels of social power trend toward Christianophobia.

“Anti-fundamentalists are more likely to be white, well-educated, and wealthy,” but the factor that most connected to Christianity in their study is politics. “Nearly half of the anti-fundamentalists in our sample were political progressives.”

The top determining factor for anti-Christian bias in their study is support for same-sex marriage.

“Even among those who do not particularly like sexual minorities, people are more likely to support LGBT rights if they do not like conservative Christians,” Yancey, one of the sociologists, explained in a separate article. “In other words, my data seem to indicate that there are people who support sexual minorities’ rights because they dislike—or even hate—conservative Christians.”

This study does not prove or even suggest that most Americans who support LGBTQ causes harbor animus toward Christians, but it helps illustrate the real nature of anti-Christian bias: It’s a hatred of conservative Christians who believe what the Bible says about homosexual activity and biological sex, not a hatred of everyone who claims to follow Jesus.

This study also helps explain the hatred some transgender activists harbor against Christian schools and churches. A female who identified as male targeted a Christian school in Nashville for a mass shooting in 2023. Another transgender activist in Illinois, this time a male who identified as female, threatened to rape the daughters of Christians in girls restrooms.

It seems likely the transgender movement has hypercharged anti-Christian bias, and that’s exactly what the Biden record suggests.

The True Biden Record

Many of those who claim the Biden administration didn’t target Christians focus on Biden’s self-identification as a Roman Catholic and the fact that Biden regularly attends Mass. Yet Biden and the bureaucrats in his administration firmly supported abortion and gender ideology. Their policies alienated and even demonized conservative Christians who disagree with their positions on those issues.

My new book, “The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government,” recounts some of Trump’s examples. The book focuses on the left-wing activist groups that infiltrated and advised the Biden administration.

As the book explains, the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division prosecuted more than 50 pro-life protesters who attempted to dissuade women from having their unborn babies killed in the womb. Meanwhile, the division largely ignored the vandalism and violent attacks against 96 pro-life pregnancy resource centers and pro-life groups in the wake of the leak of the Supreme Court’s June 2022 opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade.

The law DOJ used to prosecute the pro-lifers, the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, is supposed to apply equally to abortion facilities and pro-life pregnancy help centers. This egregious double standard echoed the mentality of pro-abortion groups that helped staff the Biden administration.

Yet the FBI’s notorious memo about “radical traditional Catholics” revealed an even worse bias against conservative Christians. The FBI’s Richmond office wrote a memo suggesting connections between racially motivated violent extremists and “radical traditional Catholics.” While the FBI’s national office rescinded the memo as soon as a whistleblower published it, the memo had cited the Southern Poverty Law Center, a far-left activist group that compares mainstream conservative Christians to the Ku Klux Klan.

As I recount in my first book,Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center,” the SPLC gained its reputation by suing KKK groups into bankruptcy, but when it ran out of grand dragons to slay, it started identifying conservative groups as “hateful,” placing them on a “hate map” alongside Klan chapters. The SPLC has condemned conservative Christian groups such as the Family Research Council and Alliance Defending Freedom as “anti-LGBTQ hate groups,” but last year it even applied the label to a group of homosexuals who reject transgender orthodoxy—Gays Against Groomers.

A former employee called this a “highly profitable scam,” and the “hate map” inspired a terrorist attack in 2012. The SPLC is currently facing a powerful defamation lawsuit regarding the map.

Yet when Biden entered office, federal agencies asked the SPLC for advice on combating the “domestic terrorism threat.” As “The Woketopus” recounts, the SPLC had close ties with the Biden administration, with leaders and staff going to the White House at least 18 times and Biden nominating an SPLC lawyer to a top federal judgeship.

When the SPLC listed the Ruth Institute as an “anti-LGBTQ hate group,” it presented as evidence a quote from the institute’s founder. That quote came directly from the Catechism of the Catholic Church, suggesting that if the SPLC were to be consistent, it would have to brand the entire Catholic Church a “hate group.”

The fact that Biden’s administration welcomed a far-left group that compares Christians to the Klan because of their conservative views arguably speaks the most clearly to the anti-Christian bias in the past administration.

Yet Trump also mentioned a few other examples. He noted a Biden administration rule requiring that potential foster parents embrace transgender orthodoxy in order to provide a home for kids in the foster system. The rule determined that if potential foster parents refused to “affirm” a child’s stated transgender identity, that constitutes child abuse. This logic denies conservative Christians the ability to care for the less fortunate just because they disagree with gender ideology.

Finally, Trump mentioned the celebration of “Transgender Day of Visibility” on Easter Sunday. Biden had commemorated the transgender day in previous years, but he made no effort to separate it from Easter in 2024 when the transgender event overlapped with Easter (the date of which varies based on a lunar calendar). The Biden administration dedicated far more fanfare to the transgender celebration, making Christians feel like second-class citizens in their own country.

The Human Rights Campaign, a prominent LGBTQ activist group that has pushed corporations to adopt its rhetoric through its “Corporate Equality Index,” released a “Blueprint for Positive Change” as a roadmap for Biden policy in 2020. The Biden administration carried out at least 75% of its recommendations, according to my analysis.

Anti-Christian Bias Is Still A Problem

Biden is no longer president, of course, but that doesn’t mean the animus against conservative Christians will suddenly disappear from the federal government. Many of the elite institutions that push transgender orthodoxy remain very active in civil society. The SPLC and Human Rights Campaign—two of the groups I describe as arms of the “Woketopus”—have pledged to sue the Trump administration to block its policies opposing gender ideology.

Despite the SPLC’s many scandals, The Washington Post and USA Today cited SPLC as an authority when countering Trump’s attacks on the “diversity, equity, and inclusion” movement. While Trump opposes DEI because it encourages Americans to judge one another based on their skin color, rather than on merit, the Post quoted SPLC President Margaret Huang in calling the DEI attacks “a new twist on an old, racist and misogynistic idea—that women, black and brown people, and other marginalized groups are inherently less capable.”

Similarly, The New York Times editorial board savaged what it called Trump’s “Shameful Campaign Against Transgender Americans.” The editors condemned Trump’s declaration that the U.S. will reject gender ideology and embrace the truth that there are only two biological sexes.

While Americans oppose men competing in women’s sports and experimental transgender medical procedures for minors, the editors condemned Trump’s efforts to follow the public on these issues. Even though more than half of the men who identify as women in Wisconsin’s women’s prisons have been convicted of at least one sexual assault, the editors lamented Trump’s rule that “transgender women in custody … be housed with men.”

If these outlets portray transgender activists as victims, who are the villains? That’s easy: It’s those mean conservative Christians who refuse to kowtow to gender ideology.

Trump Drops the Tariff Hammer, and Canada’s Economy is Screaming ‘Uncle!’


By: Kevin Jackson | February 6, 2025

Read more at https://theblacksphere.net/2025/02/trump-drops-the-tariff-hammer-and-canadas-economy-is-screaming-uncle/

Trump Don’t Play: Tariffs and the Little Trains That Couldn’t

Eva Vlaardingerbroek of The Netherlands summed up the Trump Effect in a single tweet:

“Trump is making America great again a little too fast. He hasn’t even been back in office for a month, and every single day he does something even more badass than the day before. It’s so cool, and as a European, it’s getting painful knowing we don’t have a single leader like him.”

Painful, indeed. While European leaders struggle to remember what a spine looks like, Trump is over here flexing economic muscle with the precision of a Mr. Universe. And the Left? They’re scrambling like roaches when the kitchen light flips on. The desperation is so real that the bot farms have gone global. Tony Seruga tweeted:

“We just blocked over 5,000 botfarm accounts. Interesting they all pivoted from their passion for Ukraine to Canada at the exact same moment. Most originated from Chinese Communist Party PLA efforts using Canadian, US, and UK IP addresses.”

Translation: The globalists are running out of fake outrages, so they’re swapping Ukraine flags for Canadian tears. And for good reason—Trump just put Canada and Mexico on notice, and their economies flinched like a Chihuahua in a room full of exploding firecrackers.


When Trump Speaks, Markets Listen

If you thought Trump’s tariff threats were just political theater, tell that to the foreign exchange markets.

  • The Canadian dollar nosedived to its lowest level since 2003 after Trump’s tariff announcement.
  • The Mexican peso crashed to its weakest point since 2020.

It’s almost poetic. Canada is wailing about a 25% tariff while quietly accepting a 20% carbon tax hike on April 1st of last year. You can’t make this stuff up. Trudeau taxes his own citizens into submission, but when Trump asks them to pay their fair share, it’s suddenly a national crisis.

As for America? I think we can handle saying goodbye to maple syrup, and “Canadian bacon”.


Canada’s Free Ride Is Over

For decades, Canada has played the wide-eyed innocent neighbor while quietly stacking tariffs on American goods like a compulsive hoarder. Here’s a quick reality check on how “fair trade” has worked so far. These are some of the historical tariffs from Canada on the U.S.

  • Milk: 270%
  • Cheese: 245%
  • Butter: 298%
  • Chicken: 238%
  • Bovine/Meat: 26.5%
  • Steel: 25%
  • Aluminum: 45%
  • TVs: 45%
  • HVAC Systems: 45%

Meanwhile, the U.S. provides Canada’s military defense while they spend next to nothing on their own protection. Talk about the ultimate free ride.

Now, the hard math:

  • 77% of Canada’s exports go to the U.S.
  • 84% of Mexico’s exports go to the U.S.
  • Mexico exports to U.S. as a percentage of GDP: 35%
  • Canada exports to U.S. as a percentage of GDP: 22%
  • U.S. exports to Canada as a percentage of GDP: 1.5%
  • U.S. exports to Mexico as a percentage of GDP: 1.2%
  • Canada GDP $2.14 trillion
  • US GDP $27.36 Trillion

If Canada were a U.S. state, it would rank fourth in GDP.


When Reality Hits Like a Trump Tariff

The pain is already setting in. Two of Canada’s fastest-growing food companies—Mid-Day Squares and Flourish Pancakes—are making a run for it, eyeing U.S. expansion instead of sticking around to suffer Trudeau’s economic mismanagement. Mid-Day Squares, which initially planned to expand in Montreal, is now considering Ohio, Wisconsin, or Missouri. Why? In the words of co-founder Jake Karls:

“We need the U.S. as a business. It’s critical.”

No Borders, No Trade Deals

Trump’s tariffs aren’t just about trade; they’re about national security. Fentanyl is now the #1 killer of Americans aged 18-45—with its ingredients sourced from China and funneled through Mexico and Canada. Neither country is doing enough to stop it. Trump’s message? Either help stop the flow of poison, or pay the price.


The Bottom Line

Trump isn’t here to play “international feelings counselor.” He’s here to win—and for the first time in a long time, America isn’t rolling over to appease weaker economies.

Canada and Mexico can huff and puff all they want, but the numbers don’t lie. They need us far more than we need them. And with Trump at the helm, the days of America getting played are officially over.

Brace yourself, globalists. The tariff hammer has dropped.

Trump’s Gaza Plan: A Bold Move That Could Change the World


By Jimmy Parker | February 5, 2025

Read more at https://pagetraveler.com/trumps-gaza-plan-a-bold-move-that-could-change-the-world/

President Donald Trump has done it again. While the political elite squabble over the same tired talking points, Trump has dropped a geopolitical bombshell that could reshape the Middle East—and no, it’s not just another round of diplomatic niceties. We’re talking about a masterstroke that might actually work. Imagine that: real leadership, not the limp-wristed handwringing we’ve grown accustomed to from the D.C. establishment.

A Vision Beyond the Rubble

Trump’s plan to take over the Gaza Strip, level the destruction, and rebuild it as a beacon of economic prosperity is nothing short of revolutionary. Forget the endless cycles of ceasefires and re-escalations; Trump is thinking bigger, bolder, and with the kind of clarity that only he seems capable of. He’s not just offering another Band-Aid solution. This is about transformation—turning a war-torn region into the “Riviera of the Middle East.”

For decades, Gaza has been a symbol of despair, a playground for terror organizations, and a tragic headline generator. Trump’s proposal flips the script. Instead of perpetuating the misery, he’s envisioning a future where Gaza becomes a hub of economic growth, job creation, and stability. And honestly, it’s about time someone did.

The Details: Level, Rebuild, Prosper

Here’s the brilliance: Trump proposes the U.S. take long-term ownership of Gaza, dismantling unexploded bombs and dangerous debris, then leveling the area to start fresh. No more patchwork repairs. No more rebuilding just to see it destroyed again. This is a clean slate, a blank canvas to create something extraordinary.

Economic development will be at the heart of this transformation. Thousands of jobs, modern housing, and infrastructure that doesn’t double as a target for the next rocket attack. Trump isn’t just talking about peace through strength; he’s talking about peace through prosperity.

Netanyahu: A Partner in Vision

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was right there, nodding in agreement, praising Trump’s “outside-the-box” thinking. Let’s face it: Netanyahu knows a thing or two about Middle Eastern politics, and if he’s on board, it’s worth paying attention.

Netanyahu’s goal is clear: make sure Gaza never threatens Israel again. Trump’s plan doesn’t just align with that goal; it supercharges it. By removing the environment that breeds extremism—poverty, hopelessness, and perpetual conflict—Trump’s strategy addresses the root causes, not just the symptoms.

The Naysayers and Their Predictable Outrage

Of course, the usual suspects are up in arms. Saudi Arabia, France, China, and a chorus of left-wing critics are crying foul. “International law!” they wail. “Destabilization!” they warn. Please. These are the same geniuses who have been wringing their hands while the Middle East burned for decades.

Saudi Arabia insists they won’t normalize ties with Israel without a Palestinian state. Sure. But when Gaza transforms into a booming economic success story, let’s see how long they hold that line. Money talks louder than outdated rhetoric.

Hamas, predictably, called Trump’s plan “ridiculous and absurd.” Coming from a group that specializes in launching rockets at civilians, that’s almost a compliment. If Hamas hates it, it’s probably a good idea.

A New Middle East?

Here’s the thing: Trump’s plan isn’t just about Gaza. It’s a blueprint for a new Middle East. By replacing chaos with commerce, terror with trade, and despair with development, this strategy could trigger a domino effect across the region.

Imagine a Middle East where economic cooperation replaces ideological warfare. Where young people aspire to careers in tech, business, and innovation instead of martyrdom. That’s the world Trump is envisioning—and it’s one worth fighting for.

Final Thoughts

Trump’s Gaza plan is bold, ambitious, and exactly the kind of disruptive thinking the world needs. While his critics cling to their outdated playbooks, Trump is rewriting the rules. This isn’t just diplomacy; it’s leadership with vision.

Love him or hate him, Trump has once again proven that he’s not afraid to challenge the status quo. And who knows? This time, he might just change the world.

Trump’s Wrath: How Illegal Immigration Became a National Emergency


By: Kevin Jackson | January 28, 2025

Read more at https://theblacksphere.net/2025/01/trumps-wrath-how-illegal-immigration-became-a-national-emergency/

California Governor Gavin Newsom (D-CA)

New fires have broken out in the San Diego area of California, and these blazes feel symbolic of what’s happening to the Democratic Party.

We already witnessed the aftermath of fires in Los Angeles, which exposed the core nature of Leftism: incompetence. And what does incompetence cost? California homeowners are still on the hook for their mortgages, trapped in a cruel twist of irony—many of them uninsured due to, yes, the incompetence of California’s leaders.

Before outrage takes hold, consider this: they still own the land. Typically, the land is the most valuable part of a property, at least monetarily speaking. But no amount of land value can replace the memories those people lost in the flames. Who needs memories, though, when you can bask in the glow of virtue-signaling? And speaking of glowing embers of mismanagement, let’s turn to the issue of illegal immigration.

The landscape of illegal immigration has shifted dramatically, and the message from President Trump is unmistakable: America’s borders are no longer open for exploitation.

This shift carries lessons not only for those attempting to break U.S. immigration laws but also for the Leftists who have spent years undermining border security. Having cheated Trump out of his rightful second term, Democrats now face the consequences: a Trump unrestrained, with a clear mandate and the wind at his back.

Democrats pushed too far, allowing an invasion that has devastated communities across the country. Even stalwart Democrats like New York City Mayor Eric Adams have been forced to confront the consequences. Adams’ admission—that he was told to “be a good Democrat” and allow illegals to overrun New York—reveals the cynicism of the Left’s policies. His pushback nearly cost him his political career in what appeared to be a coordinated coup. Meanwhile, Trump stands ready to act decisively, knowing that the American people, fed up with the chaos, are now firmly behind him.

Trump’s Plan: Swift and Purposeful Action

When it comes to illegal immigration, Trump doesn’t make threats—he makes plans. His administration has already taken decisive steps to tackle the crisis head-on:

  • Military Deployment to the Border: Skeptics once mocked Trump for suggesting the military would be involved in border security. Now, 10,000 troops, including 500 Marines, are being deployed to reinforce the southern border. This is no symbolic gesture; it’s a national emergency, and Trump has declared it as such. As one official put it, “Don’t be surprised if you see Marines being dropped off by helicopters.”
  • Deportation on Demand: The policy is simple: “Deported Same Day.” The Biden administration spent billions facilitating illegal immigration. In stark contrast, Trump is redirecting those resources to expedite deportations. U.S. Transportation Command is preparing military aircraft to assist in migrant deportation flights, underscoring the seriousness of the effort.
  • Investigating Obstruction: The Trump Justice Department is launching investigations into state and local officials obstructing deportations and preparing to challenge sanctuary laws in court. For Trump, lawlessness—whether at the border or in sanctuary cities—is not an option. Any official standing in the way of lawful deportation orders will face scrutiny and accountability.
  • Rebranding Border Policy: Under Trump’s leadership, illegal entry has been rebranded. Those who attempt to cross the border illegally can expect to be sent home immediately. Trump Airlines, as the joke goes, is now offering one-way tickets back to reality.

Exposing Leftist Hypocrisy

One of the most startling revelations in Trump’s crackdown is the Biden administration’s use of taxpayer dollars to fly illegals into the country. This brazen misuse of resources has been exposed and halted. Trump’s Department of Homeland Security has fired its entire advisory committee, citing the need to refocus on protecting American interests.

Lessons for the Left

The humanitarian argument for open borders has worn thin. While some illegals genuinely seek to escape poverty and violence, the same issues plague America’s minority communities, particularly Black neighborhoods. As Trump understands, we don’t need to go to other countries looking for problems to solve when we have enough of our own.

The Left’s policies have disproportionately harmed the very people they claim to champion. Minority communities have borne the brunt of unchecked illegal immigration, facing increased competition for jobs, strained public services, and rising crime. The message is clear: America’s resources must first be directed to solving its own problems.

The Bigger Picture

Trump’s return to power represents more than just a change in immigration policy; it’s a reckoning. The Democrats’ attempt to undermine Trump has backfired spectacularly, leaving them exposed as architects of chaos. Trump’s decisive actions on immigration signal a return to order, accountability, and national sovereignty.

For those willing to break U.S. laws to enter the country, the lesson is simple: America will no longer tolerate lawlessness. For the Left, the lesson cuts deeper. By pushing their radical agenda to the breaking point, they’ve unleashed the Wrath of Trump—a leader determined to restore America’s greatness by any means necessary.

Toay’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon by A.F. Branco


A.F. Branco Cartoon – Bunker Buster

A.F. Branco | on January 28, 2025 | https://comicallyincorrect.com/a-f-branco-cartoon-bunker-buster/

Mother Of All Presidencies
A Political Cartoon by A.F. Branco 2025

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Flipboard

A.F. Branco Cartoon – The Deep State is feeling the heat from the Mother Of All Presidencies (MOAP). Trump is resending the security clearances of many for lying about the Hunter Laptop and the Russia collusion hoax and is weeding out others who have leftist political motives.

Deep Stater John Brennan Upset About Losing His Security Clearance, Claims He Only Used it to Advise Government (VIDEO)

By Mike Lachance – The Gateway Pundit – Jan 23,  2025

Former CIA chief John Brennan is among the many ‘spies who lied’ that had their security clearances revoked by Trump this week.
Brennan ran to MSNBC to complain, because what else is he going to do?
He used his appearance in an attempt to rewrite history, claiming that his security clearance was only ever used to advise the government on certain affairs. He also completely misrepresents the famous letter about Hunter Biden’s laptop.
“The only reason why I still had a security clearance, as I have for the past number of years since I left government service, was for the benefit of the government, so that if the CIA or another government agency wanted to call me in to discuss the classified matter, they could do that,” Brennan said.
READ MORE

DONATE to A.F. Branco Cartoons – Tips accepted and appreciated – $1.00 – $5.00 – $25.00 – $50.00 – it all helps to fund this website and keep the cartoons coming. Also Venmo @AFBranco – THANK YOU!

A.F. Branco has taken his two greatest passions (art and politics) and translated them into cartoons that have been popular all over the country in various news outlets, including NewsMax, Fox News, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, and “The Washington Post.” He has been recognized by such personalities as Rep. Devin Nunes, Dinesh D’Souza, James Woods, Chris Salcedo, Sarah Palin, Larry Elder, Lars Larson, Rush Limbaugh, and President Trump.

President Trump urged to pardon 76-year-old grandmother, others in prison for pro-life activism


By Peter Pinedo Fox News | Published January 21, 2025, 2:52pm EST

Read more at https://www.foxnews.com/politics/president-trump-urged-pardon-76-year-old-grandmother-others-prison-pro-life-activism

Conservative law firm calls on Trump to pardon 21 pro-life activists prosecuted by Biden DOJ

Amid newly inaugurated President Donald Trump’s pardon of nearly 1,500 January 6 protesters, anti-abortion groups are calling on the president to pardon a 76-year-old grandmother and 20 others who were imprisoned and prosecuted for pro-life protests under the Biden Department of Justice.

One group, the Thomas More Society, a law firm specializing in pro-life cases, filed a petition to the new president in which it laid out the legal grounds for him to issue pardons and pointed out how President Joe Biden abused the justice system to target these pro-life activists.

Steve Crampton, a senior counsel at the Thomas More Society, told Fox News Digital that it is “absolutely vital” these activists be pardoned to restore equality under the law.  

“We hope by President Trump’s actions here that he will restore some sanity and rule of law to the approach of the Department of Justice and the FBI, but also help move this culture back toward a culture of life rather than one of death,” said Crampton. “This small act on his part would, in fact, serve to kind of ignite a momentous movement toward restoring a respect for life in this nation that’s so desperately needed.”

WHITE HOUSE HINTS AT ‘MASSIVE’ ANNOUNCEMENT FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP ON FIRST FULL DAY IN OFFICE

Donald Trump signs pardons for January 6 defendants in the Oval Office
President Trump signs pardons for Jan. 6 defendants in the Oval Office at the White House on Inauguration Day, Jan. 20, 2025. (Reuters/Carlos Barria)

Trump indicated several times during his campaign that he is open to issuing pardons for some of these pro-lifers who were prosecuted under a federal law called the Freedom of Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act. The activists were convicted of FACE Act violations for participating in various “sit-in” protests inside abortion clinics in Washington, D.C., Nashville, Detroit, Long Island and Manhattan.

According to the Thomas More Society, Biden’s Department of Justice used the FACE Act to increase sentences for crimes that would otherwise have been simple trespassing charges. The group says Biden sought to make examples of these pro-lifers, prosecuting them to the fullest extent of the law, despite their sit-in protests inside abortion clinics being entirely peaceful and with no threat of violence or intimidation.

Now that Trump is back in the White House, the Thomas More Society believes he can restore justice for these 21 activists and, in so doing, help restore confidence and trust in the justice system among the American people.

“In my lifetime, I’ve never seen a president honor his campaign promises the way this president has,” said Crampton. “So, we’re very hopeful that he will do so again in this case. And for these people who are really just salt of the earth, the best kind of folks that ought to be in their communities doing good rather than behind bars.” 

TRUMP PARDONS NEARLY EVERY JAN 6 DEFENDANT BUT SAYS HE’S JUST GETTING STARTED

Abortion activist sentenced
Lauren Handy, director of activism for Progressive Anti-Abortion Uprising, in Washington, D.C. on April 2, 2022. (Eric Lee for The Washington Post via Getty Images)

Of the 21 activists prosecuted under the Biden administration’s use of the FACE Act, nine are currently in prison. Several of those in prison are elderly, with three, Jean Marshall, Paullette Harlow and Joan Andrews Bell, in their 70s. The eldest is Bell, who, at 76, has seven adult children and seven grandchildren. She was sentenced to over two years in prison. One activist, Heather Idoni, 59, who was sentenced to two years, has undergone serious health difficulties and suffered a minor stroke while in prison.

The longest prison sentence went to 31-year-old Lauren Handy, who is currently serving a nearly five-year sentence for her role in organizing a 2020 sit-in protest at the Washington, D.C., Surgi-Clinic run by Dr. Cesare Santangelo.

Also facing prison time is 89-year-old Eva Edl, a survivor of a communist concentration camp, who has been active in the pro-life movement for decades.

LEADERS FROM AROUND THE WORLD REACT TO PRESIDENT TRUMP’S WHITE HOUSE RETURN

SUPREME-COURT-ABORTION-PROTESTERS
Anti-abortion demonstrators in front of the Supreme Court building, on the day justices heard arguments in the Mississippi abortion rights case, in Washington, Dec. 1, 2021. (Reuters/Jonathan Ernst)

“Down is up and up is down in this case,” said Crampton. “These people are folks who, some of them, have adopted several special-needs children from places like Ukraine. Some are missionaries to China and Ukraine and the worst places on the planet, going out of their way to do good to people that are in desperate need. These are folks that ought to be receiving those citizenship medals that President Biden is handing out to the likes of George Soros, who is trying to destroy our nation.”  

“We must restore the rule of law,” he went on. “The questioning of Mr. Trump’s Cabinet appointees this past week, ironically enough, from the left, points again and again, back to the need not to single out political opponents for prosecution and so forth.”

“We have recently undertaken a disrespect for the rule of law that has undermined any respect for authority in general, let alone the law in particular,” he said. “So, I really think that this also is a small step back to restoring that absolutely essential respect for the rule of law that we must have if America is to survive.”

Peter Pinedo is a politics writer for Fox News Digital.

The End of Shock and Awe: How the Justice Department Made the Case for the J6 Pardons


By: Jonathan Turley | January 21, 2025

Read more at https://jonathanturley.org/2025/01/21/the-end-of-shock-and-awe-how-the-justice-department-against-the-case-for-the-j6-pardons/

Below is my column in the New York Post on the pardoning of the January 6th defendants by President Donald Trump. The scope of the pardon appears broader than some had hoped. What is clear is that any such relief should not extend to violent actors, particularly those who attacked police officers.  However, the Justice Department itself may have made the strongest case for presidential pardons.

Here is the column:

On January 20, 2025, the “shock and awe” campaign of the Justice Department came to an end as President Donald Trump pardoned 1,500 January 6th defendants.

Four years ago, the Justice Department set out to send a chilling message to the nation. In an interview with CBS News a year later, Justice Department official Michael Sherwin indicated that they wanted to send a message with the harsh treatment of defendants. Sherwin explained that “our office wanted to ensure that there was shock and awe … it worked because we saw through media posts that people were afraid to come back to D.C. because they’re, like, ‘If we go there, we’re gonna get charged.’ … We wanted to take out those individuals that essentially were thumbing their noses at the public for what they did.”

The awe is gone but the shock remains at the Justice Department. If Sherwin and his colleagues hoped to “Trump proof” the nation, they failed in spectacular fashion. While there was ample basis for criminal charges, the excessive treatment of some of the January 6th defendants undermined the credibility of their prosecutions for many.

That is no easy feat.

Most of us denounced the January 6th riot as a desecration of our constitutional process. Those who engaged in the rioting, and most importantly the violence, needed to be punished. However, what followed left many increasingly uneasy. The Justice Department rounded up hundreds and, even though most were charged with relatively minor crimes of unlawful entry or trespass, the Justice Department opposed the release of many from jail and sought absurdly long sentences in some cases. It also sought restrictions on defendants that raised troubling first amendment concerns.

In my recent book, “Indispensable Right,” I discuss these cases and their troubling elements.

A good example is the handling of the most well-known case of the so-called QAnon Shaman. Bare-chested, wearing an animal headdress, horns, and red-white-and-blue face paint, Jake Angeli Chansley became the iconic image of the riot.

Seeking to make examples of these defendants, the Justice Department took special measures in hammering Chansley. He was held in solitary confinement and denied bail.

Chansley was treated more harshly because of his visibility. It was his costume, not his conduct, that seemed to drive the sentencing. In the hearing, Judge Royce Lamberth noted, “He made himself the image of the riot, didn’t he? For good or bad, he made himself the very image of this whole event.”

Lamberth hit Chansley with a heavy 41-month sentence for “obstructing a federal proceeding.”

However, long withheld footage, showed recently that Chansley (like hundreds of people that day) simply walked into the Capitol past police officers and was then escorted by officers through the Capitol. At one point, two officers not only appear to guide him to the floor but actually try to open locked doors for him. Chansley is shown walking unimpeded through a large number of armed officers with his four-foot flag-draped spear and horned Viking helmet on his way to the Senate floor.

Does that make Chansley’s actions acceptable, let alone commendable? Of course not. He deserved to be arrested and punished. However, what many saw was a troubled individual being made an example for others.

In my book, I discuss how, in history, “rage rhetoric” was allowed to become “state rage.” This is one such case.

Trump ran on the promise to pardon these defendants and secured not just the White House but the popular vote. It was not just the public that rejected the narrative of January 6th as an “insurrection.”

In the recent Supreme Court decision in Fischer v. U.S. to reject hundreds of charges in January 6th cases for the obstruction of legal proceedings, the Court left most cases as simply a mass trespass and unlawful entry.

The shock may be gone for these defendants, but it may only be beginning for the Justice Department and the FBI.

  • When the campaign of Hillary Clinton secretly funded the infamous Steele Dossier to launch the Russian conspiracy investigation, it was the Justice Department that was not just the willing but eager partner.
  • The “insurance policy” described by former FBI official Peter Strzok was redeemed in investigations that derailed much of Trump’s first term.
  • Later, it was the Justice Department again that pursued a no-holds-barred effort to convict Trump before the election.

The Justice Department is the hardest of silos in Washington to reform. Unlike most departments, it is largely homogenous, with thousands of lawyers who share professional and cultural ties. It is a department composed of people who are by their very definition, litigious.

Trump insisted on selecting an Attorney General, nominee Pam Bondi, who has no past ties or identification with the department. For the Justice Department, it must feel like the Visigoths arriving at the gates of Rome . . . only to be let in by the citizens.

According to polling, the public ultimately found the “barbarians” less threatening than those who have insisted that Rome would fall. That must certainly be shocking for many in Washington, but the record of the Justice Department showed how the awe can become awful when officials feel the license of state rage.

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro professor of public interest law at George Washington University and the author of “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.”

With the Trump Sentencing, the Verdict is in . . . for the New York Legal System


By: Jonathan Turley | January 10, 2025

Read more at https://jonathanturley.org/2025/01/10/with-the-trump-sentencing-the-verdict-is-in-for-the-new-york-legal-system/

Below is my column at Fox.com on the sentencing of President-Elect Donald Trump. The conviction should be overturned on appeal. However, the most lasting judgment will be against the New York court system itself in allowing this travesty of justice to occur.

Here is the column:

With the sentencing of Donald Trump Friday, the final verdict on the New York criminal trial of the president-elect is in. The verdict is not the one that led to no jail or probation for the incoming president. Acting Justice Juan Merchan has brought down the gavel on the New York legal system as a whole.

Once considered the premier legal system in the country, figures like New York Attorney General Letitia James, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, Justices Arthur F. Engoron and Juan Merchan have caused the system to be weaponized for political purposes. Trump will walk away from this trial and into the White House in less than two weeks, but the New York system will walk into infamy after this day.

The case has long been denounced by objective legal observers, including intense Trump critics, as a legal absurdity. Even CNN’s senior legal analyst Elie Honig denounced the case as legally flawed and unprecedented while Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., simply called it total “b—s–t.”

It is a case based on a non-crime. Bragg took a long-dead misdemeanor and zapped it back into life with a novel and unfounded theory. By using federal violations that were never charged, let alone tried, Bragg turned a misdemeanor into dozens of felonies and essentially tried Trump for federal offenses.

Merchan not only allowed those charges to be brought to trial but then added layers of reversible errors in the effort to bag Trump at any cost.  For that, he was lionized by the liberal media and many New Yorkers. However, Trump still managed to pull in 3.6 million New York votes, or 42.7%, in the 2024 election. After all of the lawfare and every advantage (including a heavily biased media and a larger war chest), Vice President Kamala Harris lost hundreds of thousands of votes in 2024 in comparison to Joe Biden just four years earlier.

Many polls showed that the public saw the Manhattan criminal case for what it was: raw lawfare targeting a leading political opponent. The election itself felt like the largest verdict in history as citizens rejected the political, legal, and media establishments in one of our nation’s most historic elections.

The New York court system will now have a chance to redeem itself, but few are holding their breath. The appellate court has still not ruled on an appeal of Attorney General Lettia James’s equally absurd civil lawsuit against Trump. Despite judges expressing skepticism over Engoron’s use of a law to impose a grotesque $455 million in fines and interest, we are still waiting for a decision.

Most are waiting for this criminal case to escape the vortex of the New York court system. With this appeal, this peddler’s wagon of reversible errors will finally pull up in front of the Supreme Court itself.

With its ruling on Thursday night, the setting for a decision could not be better for Trump. The Supreme Court has again demonstrated that it has shown restraint and independence in these cases. In response to the ruling, Trump struck the perfect note Thursday night and declined to criticize the Court, stating that “This is a long way from finished and I respect the court’s opinion.”

The ultimate penalty on Friday morning from Judge Merchan reflects the lack of seriousness in the case. It was more inflated than the Goodyear blimp, pumped up by hot rage and rhetoric. The sentence was the pinprick that showed the massive void within this case.

The verdict is in. The New York legal system has rendered it against itself.

Jonathan Turley is a Fox News Media contributor and the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. He is the author of “The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage” (Simon & Schuster, June 18, 2024).

Trumped-Up Christmas: A Playlist for Taunting Leftists


By: Kevin Jackson | December 18, 2024

Read more at https://theblacksphere.net/2024/12/trumped-up-christmas-a-playlist-for-taunting-leftists/

Trump, Santa, Merry Christmas

‘Tis the season to be MAGA!

What better way to spread holiday cheer than by remixing Christmas classics to remind Leftists they’ve been “YUGE” losers lately? Below is a list of Trump-themed carols inspired by the controversies and catastrophes of the Left. Each title comes with a clever backstory to deliver laughs like stockings stuffed with coal.


1. “All I Want for Christmas Is the Popular Vote”

Mariah Carey’s classic gets a twist.
This hit is a nod to Democrats’ obsession with the popular vote, as they cling to their moral victories like a kid who didn’t make the nice list clutches coal. Spoiler alert: It’s the Electoral College, not your feelings, that decides the winner.


2. “It’s Beginning to Look a Lot Like Fraud”

Inspired by: “It’s Beginning to Look a Lot Like Christmas”
In honor of their cries about “election interference,” this parody croons about imaginary ballots, Dominion conspiracies (on both sides), and their inability to accept Trump’s comeback.


3. “Grandma Got Run Over by Pelosi”

Inspired by Pelosi’s recent Luxembourg tumble.
Grandma might’ve survived her reindeer incident, but Pelosi didn’t quite stick the landing on her latest European escapade. This slapstick rewrite mocks how she’s literally falling for socialism.


4. “Do You Fear What I Fear?”

Inspired by the Leftist media meltdown.
This reimagining of the holiday hymn focuses on CNN’s ratings nosedive and their fear of being surpassed by podcasters. Who knew Joe Rogan would be their Silent Night-mare?


5. “Trump the Halls”

Inspired by: “Deck the Halls”
This version celebrates MAGA wins by telling Leftists to deck their halls… with tears and old Biden campaign signs.


6. “Hark! The Climate Activists Sing”

For Greta and Co., who think Christmas lights are destroying the planet.
This anthem mocks the eco-warriors’ refusal to let people enjoy Christmas without a lecture about polar bears.


7. “Silent Joe, Holy Gaffe”

Inspired by Biden’s whispering speeches and constant flubs.
This one’s a solemn ode to Biden’s best “silent” moments—like forgetting what century we’re in during his last press conference.


8. “Kwanzaa Nights”

Inspired by Kamala Harris’s hilarious holiday videos.
This parody pokes fun at Kamala’s attempts to connect with her authentic Black identity by reciting Kwanzaa tales that sound about as believable as her debate performance.


9. “Oh Vax of Death”

Inspired by: “O Holy Night”
This somber tune reflects the fallout from Covid misinformation, vaccine debates, and Fauci’s conflicting advice. Perfect for anyone who still has their booster appointment… in 2025.


10. “Frosty the Plumber”

Inspired by: “Frosty the Snowman”
A nod to working-class Americans who saw through Leftist rhetoric. The tune celebrates real jobs, not soy latte activism.


11. “Baby, It’s Cold in Luxembourg”

Dedicated to Pelosi’s literal and metaphorical fall.
This jazzy number jokes about Pelosi looking for taxpayer-funded wine while forgetting her footing—symbolic of her political career.


12. “Biden Got Run Over by His Teleprompter”

Inspired by Biden’s many battles with basic sentences.
This is about Biden’s public speeches, where commas are the real enemy, and every teleprompter is a banana peel.


13. “Kamala’s Laughing All the Way”

Inspired by: “Jingle Bells”
A parody poking fun at Kamala’s tendency to laugh at her own confusion during interviews.


14. “Jail the Halls with Hunter’s Deals”

Inspired by: Hunter Biden’s laptop saga.
This jingle recounts the eyebrow-raising business deals, “art sales,” and laptop drama that made Hunter a household meme.


15. “O Little Town of San Francisco”

Inspired by the city’s descent under Leftist policies.
This hymn describes the streets of San Francisco: a place where carolers need hazmat suits and reindeer avoid stepping in “human presents.”


16. “I’m Dreaming of a Non-Woke Christmas”

For anyone tired of cancel culture.
This jazzy tune imagines a world where Rudolph isn’t labeled problematic for his “toxic red nose.”


17. “You’re a Mean One, Mister Fauci”

Inspired by: “You’re a Mean One, Mr. Grinch”
This song skewers Dr. Fauci’s ever-changing advice, likening him to the Grinch who stole Christmas cheer.


18. “Last Christmas, I Got My Fourth Booster”

Inspired by: Wham!’s “Last Christmas”
A hilarious take on those still following CDC guidelines like it’s a new religion.


19. “Rockin’ Around the Leftist Meltdown”

Inspired by their reaction to every conservative win.
This upbeat tune celebrates watching Leftists freak out over Supreme Court decisions and electoral surprises.


20. “We Three Grifts”

Dedicated to the Bidens’ holiday corruption tour.
This reimagining pokes fun at the Biden family’s shady dealings, showing they’re the gift that keeps on giving… to themselves.


The Backstory

Legend has it these songs were born during a MAGA Christmas party where someone spiked the eggnog with winning. The titles practically wrote themselves as attendees reflected on 2023: a year where America got a stocking full of Leftist tears and Trump got another political miracle.

Merry MAGA Christmas, and don’t forget to keep triggering Leftists one carol at a time!

Democrat Fixer Marc Elias’ Firm Steps In To Stop ‘Disastrous Election System’ Fix


BY: M.D. KITTLE | JUNE 19, 2024

Read more at https://thefederalist.com/2024/06/19/democrat-fixer-marc-elias-firm-steps-in-to-stop-disastrous-election-system-fix/

Democrat attorney Marc Elias appearing on MSNBC.

Author M.D. Kittle profile

M.D. KITTLE

MORE ARTICLES

Bogus Russian dossier peddler and Democrat Party problem fixer Marc Elias has again injected himself into a key election integrity case to “defend the broken status quo.” Swing-state Nevada’s dirty voter rolls include hundreds of suspect addresses, at bars, strip clubs, empty parking lots, and other commercial addresses, according to an investigation by the Public Interest Legal Foundation. Doing so is clearly against the law. 

“In Nevada, by the state law, you are required to be registered where you actually live, where you sleep. Not where you work, not at a P.O. Box. So we’re trying to get elections officials to enforce the law,” Lauren Bis, PILF’s director of communication and engagement, says in a video tracking bad addresses in the Las Vegas area. 

To that end, the foundation has filed a petition in Washoe County, Nevada’s second-most populous county, to force elections officials to investigate and fix commercial addresses on the voter roll. PILF investigators found addresses on the rolls reported as liquor stores, empty lots, and even the Nevada Gaming Control Board, among others. 

Baseless Attacks?

Elias Law Group and a band of leftists have sought to intervene in PILF’s petition for a writ of mandamus, arguing that forcing Washoe election administrators to follow the law and clean up the county’s dirty voter rolls will “threaten” voting rights. 

The would-be intervenors claim that their members and constituents would be forced to “expend substantial resources to educate voters and protect them from baseless attacks on their eligibility.” 

Baseless attacks? 

As The Federalist recently reported, Bis was greeted with a lot of quizzical looks from employees at the casinos, fast-food restaurants, retailers, post offices, funeral homes, strip clubs, tattoo parlors, and jails where registered voters — at least according to Nevada’s dirty voter rolls — “resided.” What PILF found was equal parts sad and hilarious, foundation President J. Christian Adams told me on “The Federalist Radio Hour.”

The election integrity public interest law firm tracked data from the Nevada secretary of state’s office, which in the 2022 midterm elections reported 95,556 ballots sent to undeliverable, or “bad,” addresses. PILF investigators documented commercial addresses purported to be the residences of registered voters, confirming on video that the individuals did not live where they reported residing. 

“We’ve been to all of the locations. It’s not some data exercise we see sitting at a computer in Chicago. We’ve actually got boots on the ground looking for the voters, and they don’t exist,” Adams said.

‘Disastrous Elections System’

Making matters worse, Nevada automatically mails a ballot to every active registrant on the voter rolls. 

“I’m looking for Ronald or William Phelps,” Bis says in the video to a bartender wearing a “Tacos por favor” T-shirt at a local watering hole on North Nellis Boulevard in Vegas. “I don’t know who that is,” the barkeep replies. 

“So, they don’t live here?” Bis asks. “Uh, at the bar? No,” the bartender says, chuckling. She’s clearly amused by the question. 

It’s almost as amusing as Elias and friends’ apparent efforts to stop election officials from following the law under the absurd premise of voter rights. Their court filing offers a dire warning about what will happen if Washoe County is required to do what PILF has done: Washoe County’s job. 

“If the Court grants such relief, Respondent Burgess — and other clerks and registrars across the state — will be flooded with third-party demands to investigate all manner of alleged peculiarities in the voter rolls, based on unsourced, unverified, and unsworn information,” the court filing admonishes. “Petitioners are not the only ones making such demands. Nevada is in the midst of a storm of baseless efforts by third parties to force election officials to undertake a rushed purge of registered voters before the November election.”

Adams called Elias’ latest lawfare stunt a “cry wolf exercise.” 

“He does this all over the country. He spools up these progressive astroturf organizations and they file a legal brief, which they have done in our case, which we have to respond to, that says, ‘Oh, if you listen to these evil conservatives, there will be eligible people improperly removed from the rolls.’ Nonsense,” said Adams, who formerly served in the Voting Section at the U.S. Department of Justice and was appointed to President Trump’s Advisory Commission on Election Integrity. 

“Marc Elias is in the business of defending the riches of a disastrous elections system with universal vote-by-mail that are sending ballots automatically to thousands of bogus addresses,” Adams added.  


Matt Kittle is a senior elections correspondent for The Federalist. An award-winning investigative reporter and 30-year veteran of print, broadcast, and online journalism, Kittle previously served as the executive director of Empower Wisconsin.

Exclusive: Liz Cheney, January 6 Committee Suppressed Exonerating Evidence Of Trump’s Push For National Guard


BY: MOLLIE HEMINGWAY | MARCH 08, 2024

Read more at https://thefederalist.com/2024/03/08/exclusive-liz-cheney-january-6-committee-suppressed-exonerating-evidence-of-trumps-push-for-national-guard/

Liz cheney

Author Mollie Hemingway profile

MOLLIE HEMINGWAY

VISIT ON TWITTER@MZHEMINGWAY

MORE ARTICLES

Former Rep. Liz Cheney’s January 6 Committee suppressed evidence that President Donald Trump pushed for 10,000 National Guard troops to protect the nation’s capital, a previously hidden transcript obtained by The Federalist shows.

Cheney and her committee falsely claimed they had “no evidence” to support Trump officials’ claims the White House had communicated its desire for 10,000 National Guard troops. In fact, an early transcribed interview conducted by the committee included precisely that evidence from a key source. The interview, which Cheney attended and personally participated in, was suppressed from public release until now.

Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato’s first transcribed interview with the committee was conducted on January 28, 2022. In it, he told Cheney and her investigators that he overheard White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows push Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser to request as many National Guard troops as she needed to protect the city.

He also testified President Trump had suggested 10,000 would be needed to keep the peace at the public rallies and protests scheduled for January 6, 2021. Ornato also described White House frustration with Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller’s slow deployment of assistance on the afternoon of January 6, 2021.

Not only did the committee not accurately characterize the interview, they suppressed the transcript from public review. On top of that, committee allies began publishing critical stories and even conspiracy theories about Ornato ahead of follow-up interviews with him. Ornato was a career Secret Service official who had been detailed to the security position in the White House.

Cheney frequently points skeptics of her investigation to the Government Publishing Office website that posted, she said, “transcripts, documents, exhibits & our meticulously sourced 800+ page final report.” That website provides “supporting documents” to the claims made by Cheney and fellow anti-Trump enthusiasts.

However, transcripts of fewer than half of the 1,000 interviews the committee claims it conducted are posted on that site. It is unclear how many of the hidden transcripts include exonerating information suppressed by the committee.

Those documents support the committee’s narrative rather than the truth of the events leading up to January 6, 2021, said Rep. Barry Loudermilk, chairman of the House Administration’s Subcommittee on Oversight.

“The former J6 Select Committee apparently withheld Mr. Ornato’s critical witness testimony from the American people because it contradicted their pre-determined narrative. Mr. Ornato’s testimony proves what Mr. Meadows has said all along: President Trump did in fact offer 10,000 National Guard troops to secure the U.S. Capitol, which was turned down,” said the Georgia Republican.

His subcommittee is reviewing the work of the January 6 committee, which has been accused of other unethical behavior at the expense of accuracy, as well as collusion with other Democrat efforts to prosecute political opponents.

“This is just one example of important information the former Select Committee hid from the public because it contradicted what they wanted the American people to believe,” Loudermilk said. “And this is exactly why my investigation is committed to uncovering all the facts, no matter the outcome.”

Early Corroboration For Contested Claim

A January 6 committee staffer asked Ornato, “When it comes to the National Guard statement about having 10,000 troops or any other number of troops, do you recall any discussion prior to the 6th about whether and how many National Guard troops to deploy on January 6th?” Ornato surprised the committee by noting he did recall a conversation between Meadows and Bowser: “He was on the phone with her and wanted to make sure she had everything that she needed,” Ornato told investigators.

Ornato said White House concerns about January 6 were related to fears that left-wing groups would clash with Trump protesters and that no one in the White House anticipated a riot at the Capitol. Antifa and other left-wing groups were planning protests for the same day. Left-wing groups had been involved in violent assaults on Trump supporters following public protests.

Meadows “wanted to know if she need any more guardsmen,” Ornato testified. “And I remember the number 10,000 coming up of, you know, ‘The president wants to make sure that you have enough.’ You know, ‘He is willing to ask for 10,000.’ I remember that number. Now that you said it, it reminded me of it. And that she was all set. She had, I think it was like 350 or so for intersection control, and those types of things not in the law enforcement capacity at the time.”

Ornato was correct. Bowser declined the offer, asking only for a few hundred National Guard and requiring them to serve in a very limited capacity.

“No DCNG personnel shall be armed during this mission, and at no time, will DCNG personnel or assets be engaged in domestic surveillance, searches, or seizures of US persons,” Bowser wrote in her letter requesting the D.C. National Guard. Bowser had been a strenuous critic of Republican efforts to limit rioting from leftwing political activists in U.S. cities during 2020’s summer of violence.

Bowser’s decision to decline help from the White House did not end the Trump team’s efforts to secure troops ahead of the protest. When the D.C. mayor declined Trump’s offer of 10,000 troops, Ornato said the White House requested a “quick reaction force” out of the Defense Department in case it was needed.

“The only thing I remember with DOD and the National Guard was even though the mayor didn’t want any more National Guard in D.C., that a request was made to have kind of a, lack of better term, a quick reaction force out at Joint Base Andrews being that it was a military installation,” Ornato told investigators in the previously concealed interview. “I remember Chief Meadows talking to DOD about that, I believe. I remember Chief Meadows letting me know that, ‘Hey, there was going to be National Guard that’s going to be at Joint Base Andrews in case they’re going to need some more, we’re going to — the Mayor would need any, we’re going to make sure they’re out there.’”

Meadows was concerned that D.C. would be unprepared for the size of the crowd coming to protest the controversial 2020 election in which hundreds of laws and processes were changed to enable tens of millions of unsupervised mail-in ballots to flood the country. The January 6 Committee prevented an investigation into Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi’s preparation — or lack thereof — for Capitol security ahead of the event, so it is unclear if she was as concerned about keeping the peace as Meadows and the Trump White House were.

“And, again, the crowd sizes were, you know, the organizers were saying, you know, there may be 50,000 here. So that’s where it started, I think, to scare the chief a little bit of how many people were coming in for this event, and wanted to make sure that they would be able to bring in National Guard if needed for this size of this many people inside D.C.,” Ornato said.

Once the Capitol was breached, the Trump White House pushed for immediate help from Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller and grew frustrated at the slow deployment of that help, according to the testimony.

“So, then I remember the chief saying, ‘Hey, I’m calling secretary of defense to get that [quick reaction force] in here,” Ornato said. Later he said, “And then I remember the chief telling Miller, ‘Get them in here, get them in here to secure the Capitol now.’”

Still later, he said, “[T]he constant was, you know, where is the National Guard? Why isn’t — you know, we’ve got to get control of this.” And again, “But, you know, [Meadows] understood the urgency, that’s for sure. And he kept, you know, getting Miller on the phone, wanting to know where they were, why aren’t they there yet.”

Days prior, Cheney had “secretly orchestrated” a pressure campaign to prevent the Defense Department from deploying resources on January 6, 2021. She organized an op-ed for the Washington Post from her father and other former secretaries of defense specifically to discourage Miller from taking action.

Ornato described Meadows’ strenuous efforts to quicken the Defense Department’s deployment of the National Guard: “Every time [Meadows] would ask, ‘What’s taking so long?’ It would be, like, you know, ‘This isn’t just start the car and we’re there. We have to muster them up, we have to’ — so it was constant excuses coming of — not excuses, but what they were actually doing to get them there. So, you know, ‘We only have so many here right now. They’re given an hour to get ready.’ So, there’s, like, all these timelines that was being explained to the chief. And he relayed that, like, you know — he’s like, ‘I don’t care, just get them here,’ you know, and ‘Get them to the Capitol, not to the White House.’”

Cheney hid this testimony and instead asserted in her report that President Trump “never gave any order to deploy the National Guard on January 6th or on any other day. Nor did he instruct any Federal law enforcement agency to assist.”

Her report noted that the secretary of defense “ultimately did deploy the Guard. Although evidence identifies a likely miscommunication between members of the civilian leadership in the Department of Defense impacting the timing of deployment, the Committee has found no evidence that the Department of Defense intentionally delayed deployment of the National Guard. The Select Committee recognizes that some at the Department had genuine concerns, counseling caution, that President Trump might give an illegal order to use the military in support of his efforts to overturn the election.”

Cheney has never addressed the effects of her secretly orchestrated campaign to prevent Miller from acting ahead of the January 6, 2021 protest. A new book confirms prior reporting that Cheney secretly conspired with District Attorney Fani Willis in Fulton County’s prosecution of Republicans and that she viewed it as a “platform for her to resuscitate her political career” and would “provide a springboard for a Cheney presidential run.”

Ornato’s description of events also matched testimony offered by Kash Patel, the former chief of staff to the acting secretary of defense, in the Colorado Supreme Court hearing about Democrat efforts to limit the ability of Americans to vote for the candidate of their choice. The Colorado court, whose efforts to remove Trump from the ballot were so extreme they were overturned this week by a unanimous Supreme Court, claimed Patel’s “testimony regarding Trump authorizing” at least 10,000 National Guardsmen was “illogical” and “completely devoid of any evidence in the record.” Because Ornato’s corroborating information had been suppressed from the public record by the January 6 committee, the Colorado Supreme Court improperly dismissed evidence.

‘I Never Heard Anything Like That’

Cheney and her committee did devote 2,000 words in their final report to an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory that President Trump had physically overcome a Secret Service agent in his zeal to join protesters at the Capitol. That story had been told by Cassidy Hutchinson, Cheney’s friend and star witness, along with other stories that eyewitnesses disputed. (Disclosure: Hutchinson falsely claimed this reporter received classified information from a Secret Service handler in a clandestine Georgetown meeting. She has thus far refused formal requests to correct her theatrical claim.) While the story of Trump overcoming a Secret Service agent would not be told for months, Ornato pre-rebutted it in his testimony.

Asked if he ever heard anything about Trump deciding to go to the Capitol that day, Ornato said he hadn’t. Ornato said Trump had driven by a previous rally, had flown over another, and that handlers had previously decided against him joining the day’s events.

“No. I did not know that. I mean, I don’t think — that couldn’t have happened. Nobody had — nobody would be prepared for that. There would be no security to do that. There would be no — I mean, that was like I said, talked about a couple of days, whenever it was prior, and it was scoffed at and moved on, and I never heard about it again,” Ornato said, adding that he never heard anything about Trump wanting to go to the Capitol that day. “Usually somebody would, you know, report it up or report over, like, ‘Hey, this is what I overheard’ or something, but I never heard anything like that.”

Later, Hutchinson would claim Ornato had been the source of her dramatic tale that Trump had commandeered the presidential vehicle and demanded to be taken to the Capitol. Other Secret Service sources also strongly repudiated the outlandish claim.


Mollie Ziegler Hemingway is the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist. She is Senior Journalism Fellow at Hillsdale College and a Fox News contributor. She is the co-author of Justice on Trial: The Kavanaugh Confirmation and the Future of the Supreme Court. She is the author of “Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our Elections.” Reach her at mzhemingway@thefederalist.com

Trump-Endorsed Karoline Leavitt Runs Away with Primary Win Despite $5 Million in Smear Ads by Kevin McCarthy and GOP Elites! – Trump Congratulates!


By Jim Hoft | Published September 14, 2022

Read more at https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/trump-endorsed-karoline-leavitt-runs-away-primary-win-despite-5-million-smear-ads-kevin-mccarthy-gop-elites-trump-congratulates/

Kevin McCarthy, Congressional Leadership Fund, and Defending Main Street spent $5 million to prevent Karoline Leavitt from winning her primary election for New Hampshire’s District 1 that was held on Tuesday.

McCarthy, GOP Elites and Super PACs dumped $5 million to stop Karoline Leavitt.

It is the same tactics the GOP elites use in every state. They can’t win on the issues so they spend MILLIONS to slander and smear MAGA Republican candidates.

MILLIONS!

#NH01 GOP primary getting expensive as Defending Main Street kicks its spending up to $1.27M to oppose Karoline Leavitt. The GOP’s Congressional Leadership Fund SuperPAC has spent $1.4M, largely on boosting Matt Mowers. Anti-Leavitt spending is now the largest single component. https://t.co/WMpGLdae1b pic.twitter.com/FeUSqBSksv

— Rob Pyers (@rpyers) September 7, 2022

** You can support Karoline Leavitt here.

Leavitt once tweeted that Dr. Deborah Birx was a “DEEP STATE DOCTOR” — We agree.

On Tuesday Karoline Leavitt won her primary by 10 points!

President Trump cheered Karoline’s big win!

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/108997006470192139/embed

Last Thursday night Karoline Leavitt joined Tucker Carlson to discuss the $5 million in attack ads and smears by the GOP elites.

Here is Karoline’s campaign ad.

Jim Hoft

Jim Hoft is the founder and editor of The Gateway Pundit, one of the top conservative news outlets in America. Jim was awarded the Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media Award in 2013 and is the proud recipient of the Breitbart Award for Excellence in Online Journalism from the Americans for Prosperity Foundation in May 2016.

Senior DOJ officials blast FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago as ‘spectacular failure’: ‘The worst of the bureaucracy in action’


By CHRIS ENLOE | August 11, 2022

Read more at https://www.theblaze.com/news/doj-officials-raid-spectacular-failure/

A senior Justice Department official condemned the FBI’s raid on Mar-a-Lago as a “spectacular backfire” for triggering a tsunami of backlash against the Justice Department. Two senior DOJ officials spoke with Newsweek and disclosed new details about what led up to the raid. According to one official, the FBI specifically planned to conduct the raid when former President Donald Trump was not present at Mar-a-Lago. Trump was in New York at the time of the raid, Fox News reported.

“What a spectacular backfire,” the senior DOJ official said of the FBI’s attempt to keep the raid “low-key.”

“I know that there is much speculation out there that this is political persecution, but it is really the best and the worst of the bureaucracy in action,” the official explained. “They wanted to punctuate the fact that this was a routine law enforcement action, stripped of any political overtones, and yet [they] got exactly the opposite.”

The second DOJ official told Newsweek the FBI “were seeking to avoid any media circus” but “they also created the very firestorm they sought to avoid, in ignoring the fallout.”

The officials explained the FBI had been planning the raid for weeks after receiving information from a confidential source about allegedly classified documents being stored at Mar-a-Lago. Newsweek reported the informant both identified the documents and told investigators where they were located. Importantly, the sources told Newsweek that Attorney General Merrick Garland did not have advance knowledge about the specifics of the raid. Instead, FBI Director Christopher Wray approved the raid.

“I know it’s hard for people to believe,” one of the DOJ officials said, “but this was a matter for the U.S. attorney and the FBI.”

Despite claims that Garland was not involved in the planning of the raid, Republican lawmakers are demanding that Garland and Wray face repercussions for the unprecedented raid.

“I’ve never been a fan of overusing impeachment, but I think there has to be an investigation. And if it warrants it, there’s going to have to be a look at whether or not the attorney general has misused his office for political purposes. Have they gone after a political opponent? I mean, this is beyond the pale,” Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said on Fox News.

“At a minimum, Garland must resign or be impeached. The search warrant must be published. Christoper Wray must be removed. And the FBI reformed top to bottom,” Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) said.

Sources, Trump lawyer make eyebrow-raising accusations against FBI agents who conducted Mar-a-Lago raid: ‘Trying to shield what they’re doing’


By CHRIS ENLOE | August 10, 2022

Read more at https://www.theblaze.com/news/sources-trump-attorney-accusations-fbi-mar-a-lago-raid/

Law enforcement sources and an attorney for former President Donald Trump are making eyebrow-raising accusations as more details about the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago are sifted through the media. The New York Post reported Tuesday the purpose of the raid was to retrieve “presidential records and evidence of classified information being stored there.”

Sources further alleged that FBI agents barred Trump’s attorneys — who arrived at Mar-a-Lago shortly after the raid began — from witnessing the search, which is unusual. Once a judge approves a search warrant, authorities have the ability to execute the warrant without consent from the person whose property is being searched, thus attorneys or the person being searched are typically allowed to witness the search. Shockingly, sources even alleged FBI agents demanded surveillance cameras be switched off, but Trump’s employees did not comply with the request.

After searching Trump’s property for nearly 10 hours, the FBI removed boxes of documents and personal mementos that Trump collected during his presidency. It is not clear what other items the FBI confiscated, the Post reported. However, sources told the Post that FBI agents searched every room — including Melania Trump’s wardrobe — and repeatedly boasted to Trump’s lawyers, “We have full access to everything. We can go everywhere.”

Secret Services agents who are stationed at Mar-a-Lago reportedly granted the FBI access to the property after likely receiving instructions from U.S. Secret Service attorneys.

The Washington Post reported Tuesday that a Trump lawyer confirmed the FBI confiscated about 12 boxes of documents from a basement room. The documents were reportedly taken from the same room that FBI investigators, according to CNN, had already inspected in June.

Trump attorney Christina Bobb — one of the attorneys who responded to Mar-a-Lago after the FBI arrived — confirmed that agents were looking for documents in compliance with the Presidential Records Act and allegedly classified documents. She also described the warrant as “thin” and explained that she does not yet know the probable cause for the warrant because the affidavit remains sealed.

In another interview, Bobb suggested the search is related to other matters and the DOJ’s purported attempts to prosecute Trump.

“I think this is clearly a situation where they’re looking for a way that they can easily prosecute President Trump,” Bobb claimed. “They want to do it under a national security-type guise because they can hide things from the public and they can say, ‘Oh, we can’t tell you. We can’t give you the details because it’s confidential information, subject to national security concerns, so we can’t tell you, but we’re just going to prosecute [Trump].

“They’re trying to shield what they’re doing,” she charged.

Former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, who was fired under the Trump administration, agrees the aggressive nature of the raid suggests it was about something more than documents.

“This is such a bold, such a disruptive, such an aggressive move,” McCabe said on CNN. “The idea they would do this simply because they weren’t getting the sort of compliance they were looking for out of securing the room with the documents, things like that, seems really unimaginable to me. It seems like they must have — I hope they have more than just that.”

President Trump Posts Apocalyptic Ad Mourning America Hours After FBI Raids His Home – And He Makes One Inspirational Promise


By Alicia Powe | Published August 9, 2022

Read more at https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/08/president-trump-posts-apocalyptic-ad-mourning-america-hours-fbi-raids-home-makes-one-inspirational-promise/

Just hours after Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida was raided by the FBI, the former president posted his eerie new ad on his social media platform late Monday night warning America is in decline and “a failing nation.” Despite the unprecedented tyranny that’s taken hold of the U.S. over the past two years, the legitimate president assures, “The best is yet to come.”

A harrowing clap of thunder is heard as Trump mournfully details the litany of dangers Americans face as tyranny takes hold in the somber ad, which opens in black and white.

TRENDING: Judge Bruce Reinhart Who Signed Warrant to Raid Trump’s Home at Mar-a-Lago Previously Worked for Jeffrey Epstein — Please Help TGP In Our Legal Quest to Get Epstein Client List

“We are a nation in decline. We are a failing nation,” Trump cautions:

We are a nation that has the highest inflation in over 40 years; where the stock market just finished the worst first half of a year in more than five decades. We are a nation that has the highest energy cost in its history and we are no longer energy independent or energy dominant, which we were just two short years ago. We are a nation that is begging Venezuela and Saudi Arabia for oil.

“We are a nation that surrendered in Afghanistan, leaving behind dead soldiers, American citizens and $85 billion worth of the finest military equipment in the world. We are a nation that allowed Russia to devastate a country, Ukraine, killing hundreds of thousands of people and it will only get worse.

We are a nation that has weaponized its law enforcement against the opposing political party, like never before — we’ve never seen anything like this.

We are a nation that no longer has a free and fair press. Fake news is about all you get.

We are a nation where free speech is no longer allowed; where crime is rampant like never before; where the economy has been collapsing; where more people died of COVID in 2021 than in 2020.

We are a nation that is allowing Iran to build a massive nuclear weapon and China to use the trillions and trillions of dollars that’s taken from the United States to build a military to rival our own, that over the past two years is no longer respected or listened to all around the world. And we are a nation that is hostile to liberty and freedom and faith. We are a nation whose economy is floundering, whose stores are not stocked, whose deliveries are not coming and whose education system is ranked at the bottom of every list.

We are a nation that in many ways has become a joke.

The adversity may seem insurmountable, “But soon we will have greatness again,” Trump continues, as color is restored in the video.

Trump's eerie ad ended with: 'We are a nation that in many ways has become a joke. But soon we will have greatness again'

“It was hard working Patriots like you who built this country and it is hardworking patriots like you who are willing to save our country,” Trump affirms. “There is no mountain we cannot climb. There is no summit we cannot reach. There is no challenge we cannot meet. There is no victory we cannot have.

“We will not bend. We will not break. We will not yield, ever, ever, ever. We will never give in, we will never give up. We will never, ever back down. We will never let you down as long as we are confident and united, the tyrants we are fighting do not stand even a little chance because we are Americans and Americans yield to God and God alone and it is time to start talking about greatness for our country again.”

WATCH:

Hours before the ad was published, Lara Trump argued the FBI’s raid of the former president’s home is an attempt to derail his 2024 bid for the presidency which “he’s going to announce any day.”

“This is about weaponizing the justice system, as it has been so many times in the past against somebody who you politically do not like,” she admonished in an appearance on the Fox News Channel. “They detest Donald Trump, not just on the Democrat side, but the general establishment, because he’s not one of them, because he doesn’t play their game. They are terrified. He’s going to announce any day that he’s running for president in 2024. And this is a very convenient way to just throw a little more mud on Donald Trump as though they haven’t already done enough.

“Think about this. If this is what they’re able to do to the former president of the United States, think about what they could do to you, to anybody in America. The bottom line here is that these documents that have been in question have been, everybody’s been cooperating,” she continued. “Everybody from my father-in-law’s team has been cooperating with the FBI with any authority that asks for anything up until now and there was no need to make such a big scene, to do something this insane, quite frankly, to a former president. But I think everybody clearly knows, Will, what is going on here. This is about weaponizing the justice system, as it has been so many times in the past against somebody who you politically do not like.”

WATCH:

Trump trounced potential 2024 contenders in CPAC’s presidential nomination straw poll presidential nomination straw poll at the Conservative Political Action Conference three-day gathering in Texas last week, capturing 69 percent of ballots cast in the anonymous survey.

“The support for the former president, who remains the most popular and influential politician in the Republican Party and continues to play a kingmaker’s role in GOP primaries, is up from his 59% showing in the anonymous online straw poll at the CPAC gathering in Orlando, Florida in February,” Fox News reports. “Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis came in second on the 2024 presidential nomination question, at 24%, down from his 28% showing at CPAC in Orlando five months ago.”

Alicia Powe

Alicia is an investigative journalist and multimedia reporter. Alicia’s work is featured on numerous outlets including the Gateway Pundit, Project Veritas, World Net Daily, Townhall and Media Research Center, where she exposes fraud and abuse in government, media, Big Tech, and Big Pharma and public corruption. She has a Bachelor of Science in Political Science from John Jay College of Criminal Justice. She served in the Correspondence Department of the George W. Bush administration and as a War Room analyst for the Rudy Giuliani Presidential Committee. Alicia is originally from New York City and currently resides in Washington D.C.

New details leak about FBI’s shock raid on Mar-a-Lago — and GOP leader fires back at AG Garland: ‘Preserve your documents and clear your calendar’


By CHRIS ENLOE | August 09, 2022

Read more at https://www.theblaze.com/news/new-details-fbi-raid-mar-a-lago/

The FBI’s raid on Mar-a-Lago was reportedly part of an investigation into former President Donald Trump removing classified documents from the White House and storing them in his south Florida resort. FBI agents began the raid early Monday morning around 9 a.m. and searched the property until 6:30 p.m., according to News Nation reporter Brian Entin, who cited his sources. The agents arrived in plain clothes — thus appearing to be Secret Service agents — and only notified the Secret Service about the raid right before it began. “That is why it didn’t leak earlier,” Entin explained.

Three of Trump’s lawyers arrived at Mar-a-Lago after the raid began, and the FBI agents did, as Trump claimed, open a safe in his office.

The purpose of the raid was to retrieve classified documents that Trump allegedly removed from the White House, the New York Times confirmed.

From the Times:

Mr. Trump delayed returning 15 boxes of material requested by officials with the National Archives for many months, only doing so when there became a threat of action to retrieve them. The case was referred to the Justice Department by the archives early this year.

Eric Trump confirmed about 30 FBI agents raided Mar-a-Lago, that nothing was found in Trump’s safe, and the purpose of the raid was to retrieve documents.

The raid does not confirm that Trump has committed a crime. It does, however, signal that investigators convinced a federal judge they had sufficient probable cause that a crime had been committed and that raiding Mar-a-Lago was necessary to retrieve evidence. Legal experts believe the raid must have been approved by the most senior levels of the Justice Department, perhaps even by Attorney General Merrick Garland, because Trump is a former president and raiding his residence would require approval at the highest levels of government.

The White House allegedly did not know about the raid beforehand.

But Republicans say the raid is more evidence the Justice Department has become politicized under President Joe Biden. After the raid, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy promised an investigation into the DOJ should Republicans retake control of the House after the 2022 midterm elections.

“I’ve seen enough,” McCarthy said in a statement. “The Department of Justice has reached an intolerable state of weaponized politicization. When Republicans take back the House, we will conduct immediate oversight of this department, follow the facts, and leave no stone unturned.”

“Attorney General Garland, preserve your documents and clear your calendar,” he added.

‘Banana Republic’: DeSantis and other conservatives sound off after Trump says the FBI raided his Mar-A-Lago home


By ALEX NITZBERG | August 08, 2022

Read more at https://www.conservativereview.com/banana-republic-desantis-and-other-conservatives-sound-off-after-trump-says-the-fbi-raided-his-mar-a-lago-home-2657831229.html/

Republican politicians and conservative commentators sounded off on Monday after former President Donald Trump released a statement saying that the FBI had raided Mar-A-Lago.

“The raid of MAL is another escalation in the weaponization of federal agencies against the Regime’s political opponents, while people like Hunter Biden get treated with kid gloves. Now the Regime is getting another 87k IRS agents to wield against its adversaries? Banana Republic,” Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis declared in a tweet.

“This is the act of a dictator of a Banana Republic. Republicans NEVER did this to Clinton, although perhaps we should have. With Joe & Hunter Biden paying zero consequence for his actions. This is shameful and MUST STOP. We don’t do this in America. Way over the line,” Glenn Beck tweeted.

“In third world countries and banana republics they prosecute the former presidents/leaders and their staff. Right now, we look beneath them. We are in a race to the bottom,” GOP Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky tweeted.

“Using government power to persecute political opponents is something we have seen many times from 3rd world Marxist dictatorships,” Republican Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida tweeted. “But never before in America.”

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy declared that when Republicans regain the majority in the chamber, they will carry out “immediate oversight” of the Justice Department. “Attorney General Garland, preserve your documents and clear your calendar,” McCarthy said in the statement.

Trump, who is widely expected to run for president again, issued a statement on Monday in which he said that, “my beautiful home, Mar-A-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, is currently under siege, raided, and occupied by a large group of FBI agents.”

“It is prosecutorial misconduct, the weaponization of the Justice System, and an attack by Radical Left Democrats who desperately don’t want me to run for President in 2024 … and who will likewise do anything to stop Republicans and Conservatives in the incoming Midterm Elections. Such an assault could only take place in broken, Third-World Countries. Sadly, America has now become one of those Countries, corrupt at a level not seen before.”

Mark Levin unloads on Trump raid: ‘No justification for sending 30 freaking FBI agents’


By CHRIS PANDOLFO | August 09, 2022

Read more at https://www.theblaze.com/news/mark-levin-trump-fbi-raid/

BlazeTV host Mark Levin unloaded on the FBI Monday night, calling the raid on Donald Trump’s home in Palm Beach, Florida, “outrageous” and the “worst attack on this republic in modern history.”

Levin, a former chief of staff to U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese, called in to “Hannity” on Fox News Monday to give his reaction to the then-breaking news that FBI agents executed a search warrant at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence. Federal agents were reportedly searching for evidence that Trump violated federal records-keeping law by allegedly taking classified documents from the White House with him to Mar-a-Lago when he left office.

“First of all, I’m a former chief of staff to a United States attorney general. We would never ever have done this. Ever,” Levin told Sean Hannity. “Number two, it’s 90 days before midterm election. That’s outrageous.”

“Number three,” he continued, “everybody pretty much knows that Donald Trump is going to run in the Republican primary for president of the United States. And so you have a sitting president who wants to run against him and his attorney general acting like this.”

Drawing on his experience with the Department of Justice, Levin said that the U.S. attorney in the District of Columbia, Matthew Graves, had jurisdiction over the Trump presidential records case because the National Archives is located in D.C. Graves is also the U.S. attorney overseeing the Jan. 6 investigations.

Levin said Graves’ office likely coordinated with the U.S. attorney’s office in Florida and that FBI agents in South Florida would have been the ones who conducted the raid, “if they are playing it by the book.”

“[The U.S. attorney] wouldn’t have done anything without the sign-off of the attorney general of the United States. Period,” Levin emphasized. He also explained that the precision of the FBI raid suggests it had been planned for some period of time, possibly weeks.

For months, watchdog groups have accused former President Trump of violating the Presidential Records Act by improperly handling classified documents. The National Archives has said Trump tore up some documents he was supposed to preserve while in office and took other materials with him to Mar-a-Lago after leaving office.

Earlier this year, the National Archives and Records Administration recovered 15 boxes of presidential records from Trump’s residence in Florida, which allegedly included “classified national security information.” Trump said the records were given to the Archives upon request in accordance with federal law. But the agency referred the matter to the Justice Department.

New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman has written a forthcoming book that accuses Trump of attempting to flush some records down the toilet, an act that would potentially be illegal.

Levin said the accusations in Haberman’s book and other reports of Trump’s alleged misconduct served as a “pretext” for the raid on Mar-a-Lago.

“There is no justification for sending 30 freaking FBI agents to the former president’s compound in Mar-a-Lago in early morning and conducting themselves this way or in any other cases in which they’ve done exactly the same thing,” Levin said.

“The FBI is corrupt. This guy [Attorney General Merrick Garland] goes after parents. He goes after Republican state legislatures, he goes after states he disagrees with their abortion positions, he doesn’t do a damn thing to protect the border, which is compelled by the Constitution. Nothing.”

“This is the worst attack on this republic in modern history. Period,” Levin continued. “And it’s not just an attack on Donald Trump. It’s an attack on everybody who supports him, it’s an attack on anybody who dares to raise serious questions about Washington, D.C., and the establishment in both parties.”

THE GREAT ONE GOES OFF: ‘The Worst Attack on This Republic in Modern History, Period.’

posted by Hannity Staff – 8.09.22

0:11 / 4:20

Fox News host Mark Levin went off on the FBI and the DOJ for the raid on former President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence; Levin says it’s “the worst attack on this republic in modern history, period.”

https://hannity.com/media-room/the-great-one-goes-off-the-worst-attack-on-this-republic-in-modern-history-period/

Watch the clip above. Excerpts from the interview below.

LEVINEverybody pretty much knows that Donald Trump is going to run in the Republican primary for president of the United States. And so you have a sitting president who wants to run against him and his attorney general acting like this.

Now, here’s how this worked. Everybody’s guessing. I’ll tell you what happened. This is in the jurisdiction of the US attorney in District of Columbia, who’s also overseeing the January 6 prosecution. Why? Because that’s where the National Archives is, in the District of Columbia. They didn’t send FBI agents from the Washington office down there. They would have used FBI agents in South Florida and they would have coordinated with the U.S. attorney’s office down there if the plaintiff had a book.

This was well orchestrated, so this has been going on for weeks. Now, you keep asking your guests, what’s the justification? There is no justification. What’s he going to say tomorrow? The attorney general. Here’s my guest. We’ve been negotiating with Trump and his lawyers since February when we found out they had this information, we were getting nowhere. And then we know or we heard that some documents were being destroyed. Maggie Haberman, The New York Slimes was on CNN. They’ve been running pictures of hers that she’s going to have in the book of documents being flushed down a toilet. That doesn’t mean a damn thing. It could be anything. 

There is no justification for sending 30 friggin’ FBI agents to the former president’s compound in Mar-a-Lago in early morning and conducting themselves this way or in any other cases in which they’ve done exactly the same thing.

The FBI is corrupt. This guy, Garland, goes after parents. He goes after Republican state legislatures. He goes after states because he disagrees with her abortion positions. He doesn’t do a damn thing to protect the border, which is compelled by the Constitution. Nothing.

Tag Cloud