Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘ObamaCare’

Obamacare blocks patients paying for treatment


WWW.WND.COM

WWW.WND.COM

Care can be denied ‘even if patient is willing,’ able to cover costs

http://www.wnd.com/2014/03/feds-to-cap-what-citizens-can-spend-on-own-healthcare/#KlmeHKi3ASHBuPj2.99

author-image Bob Unruh About | Email | Archive

Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after nearly three decades with the Associated Press, as well as several Upper Midwest newspapers, where he covered everything from legislative battles and sports to tornadoes and homicidal survivalists. He is also a photographer whose scenic work has been used commercially.

(This report includes my emphases)

A new report by the Robert Powell Center for Medical Ethics at National Right to Life warns that one of the Obamacare provisions that ex-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Americans would discover if Congress passed the bill is that some seniors will not be allowed to spend as much as they wish on their health care.

The extreme position was revealed in a special report by the NRLC titled “The Affordable Care Act and Health Care Access in the United States,” which analyzes four fundamental policy areas of Obamacare.

It finds several ways that the federal health care law “will drastically limit access to life-saving medical treatment under the law.”

“These four areas include: the ‘excess benefit’ tax coming into effect in 2018, the current exclusion of adequate health insurance plans from the exchanges, present limits on senior citizens’ ability to use their own money for health insurance, and federal limits on the care doctors give their patients to be implemented as soon as 2016.”

Only DemocratsCarol Tobias, president of National Right to Life, said that “for pro-life Americans concerned about the impact on innocent life – both born and unborn – the policies of Obamacare couldn’t be worse.”

“Americans are just as concerned with the law’s impact on our ability to access life-saving medical treatment for ourselves, our family members, and our loved ones as with Obamacare’s funding of abortions. Obamacare is bad medicine for America,” she said.

Pelosi famously said Congress should pass the law so Americans could find out what was in it, and its unpleasant surprises have been shocking citizens ever since.

Only DemocratsThe study finds, for example, that the “Independent Payment Advisory Board,” which starting next January is supposed to make “recommendations to slow the growth in national health expenditures,” will set “quality and efficiency” standards for hospitals and demand that doctors meet government minimums in order to contract with any qualified health insurance plan.

“Essentially, doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers can be told by Washington just what diagnostic tests and medical care are considered to meet ‘quality and efficiency’ standards. These standards will be enforced not just for health care paid for by federally funded programs like Medicare, but also for health care paid for by private citizens and by the health insurance they or their employers purchase,” the study explains.

“These standards are specifically designed to limit the funds that Americans may choose to spend on health care so that they cannot keep up with the rate of medical inflation. Treatment that a doctor and patient deem needed or advisable to save the patient’s life or preserve or improve the patient’s health, but which runs afoul of the imposed standards, can be denied, even if the patient is willing and able to pay for it,” the study warns.

Only DemocratsThe study says that means that Washington “bureaucrats” will set a national standard for care “that is designed to limit what private citizens are allowed to spend to save their own lives.”

“On its face, the law maintains that this limitation does not amount to ‘rationing.’ Indeed, the [law] states, ‘The proposal [by the IPAB] shall not include any recommendations to ration health care.’ … However, the law never actually defines what it means by the word ‘ration.’

“Obamacare authorizes federal bureaucrats to impose limits on what life-saving medical treatments Americans are allowed to get. It may not call this ‘rationing.’ But that doesn’t mean that it isn’t,” the report says.

The report addresses several other limits on life-saving care in Obamacare, including the 40 percent excise tax on some employer-paid premiums.

“Consequently, insurance companies will be forced to impose increasingly severe restraints on policy-holders’ access to medical diagnosis and treatment – limits that will make it hard to get often-expensive treatments essential to combating life-threatening illnesses.”

Only DemocratsThird, “Under Obamacare, consumers using the exchanges may only choose plans offered by insurers who do not allow their customers to spend what government bureaucrats deem an ‘excessive or unjustified’ amount for their health insurance – regardless of whether the insurers offer such plans.”

And fourth, there are provisions “allowing Washington bureaucrats to prevent [senior citizens] from making up the Medicare shortfall with their own funds by limiting their right to spend their own money to obtain insurance less likely to limit treatments that could save their lives.”

Burke Balch, director of the Powell Center, said Obamacare “authorizes Washington bureaucrats to create one uniform, national standard of care that is designed to limit what private citizens are allowed to spend to save their own lives.”

“We are convinced most Americans do not believe that the government should limit the right of Americans to use their own money for health care necessary to save their lives. Yet, that is exactly what Obamacare does,” he said.

Only DemocratsIn the study, Dr. Marc Siegel warns that Obamacare is threatening the future of health care and, consequently, the lives of Americans.

“The kind of insurance that is growing under Obamacare’s fertilizer is the exact kind that was jeopardizing the quality of health care in the first place: the kind that pays for seeing a doctor when you are well, but where guidelines and regulations predominate and choice is restricted when you are seriously ill,” he said.

“How can quality of care not be affected if the antibiotic or statin drug or MRI scan I feel you need isn’t covered under your plan?”

Only DemocratsObamacare’s limits on Americans’ health care often is done through trickery, the report says.

The law says Health and Human Services can “negotiate” premiums to be charged by private Medicare plans, but the government had no power to impose a premium price control on private fee-for-service plans.

“Thus, under the law before Obamacare, senior citizens could choose, if they wished, to add extra money of their own on top of the government payment in order to get health insurance less likely to ration, and Washington bureaucrats could not limit their right to do this,” the report says.

Only DemocratsBut that’s changed. Obamacare has a new provision that says: “Nothing in this section shall be construed as requiring the secretary to accept any or every bid submitted by an MA organization under this subsection.”

“This means,” says the report, “that the pre-existing law that effectively forbade the secretary to exclude a private fee-for-service plan on the basis that CMS considers its premiums to be too high has been trumped by the new ability of the secretary to reject ‘any or every’ premium bid submitted by a private fee-for-service plan.

“Thus, under Obamacare, Washington bureaucrats are given the authority to limit or even eliminate – senior citizens’ ability, if they choose, to spend their own money on health insurance less likely to ration.”

About that $2,500 savings we were supposed to get on our health insurance


Joe the Plumber Banner

Remember when candidate Barack Obama told us that if we liked our health insurance plan we could keep it? At the same time he was also telling us that our astronomical insurance bills – surely a legacy of Bush administration policies – would be going down by $2,500 per year.

Everybody has made a big deal out of the “keep it” part of the promises but for some reason, nobody has broached the $2,500 savings that’s mystically turned into a premium increase of up to $5,000. Well, nobody asked until last week.

Last week, at a town hall in Mankato, Minn., lawmakers, Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and Rep. Tim Walz (D-MN), laughed at that very question.

You’ll note that after laughing at the question, neither one of the Democrats in question actually answered it.

What we want to know is why hasn’t the Republican leadership been hammering this ObamaPromise? Where is John Boehner or Mitch Daniels? Maybe they’re busy trying to hustle the Chamber of Commerce for another $50 million to fight off the Tea Party or trying to find a way to pass an immigration amnesty bill.

What we do know is that Republicans should, at EVERY opportunity, pound any and every Democrat with the Democrats repeated lies about ObamaCare. That should be the first topic, the last topic, and the topic in the middle of every conversation.

Come on Republicans, get with the program. Let’s see you force some transparency on the President and his party. After all, you’ve all had time to read the bill now so you know what’s in it.

Do something about it. Now. And every day until November 5th.

ALWAYS REMEMBER, NEVER FORGET, DON’T LET ANYONE ELSE FORGET, ESPECCIALLY THE LEFT

Only Democrats

Death and Taxes

 

Texas Takes Stand: 9 out of 10 Voters Want Obamacare Repealed and Welfare Recipients Drug Tested


FreedomOutpost_Masthead

http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/03/texas-takes-stand-9-10-voters-want-obamacare-repealed-welfare-recipients-drug-tested/#IHyw1WWQQLUQ5XO5.99

Posted by

Just because one part of the country has seemingly lost its mind and is willing to give up their freedom for the promise of more security doesn’t mean everyone is on board.

In Texas, where voters took to the polls Tuesday night, a completely different set of ideas is at play. And if nationwide sentiment is any indication, other conservative and libertarian leaning states will soon follow.

Though only about half of the votes have been tallied so far, the people of Texas have spoken. It’s a roar, in fact. Voters are standing in unison and have overwhelmingly approved a variety of propositions that may well send shivers down the spines of supporters of things like universal health care, rampant welfare dependency, special privileges and gun rights.

The following results speak for themselves.

First on the chopping block is the Patient Affordable Care Act, more commonly known as Obamacare.  Apparently, 93% of Texans don’t take well to having the federal government mandate what they should or shouldn’t buy with the penalty for non-compliance being IRS harassment and prison time:

The Affordable Care Act, also known as “Obamacare”, should be repealed.

texas-votes-obamacare

REMEMBER, AND NEVER FORGET, AND NEVER LET EVERYONE ELSE FORGET

Only Democrats

Death and Taxes

This one might be a little scary for those folks who spend their lives on their couches smoking weed or mainlining heroin while hard working Americans pay for their dope:

Texas recipients of taxpayer-funded public assistance should be subject to random drug testing as a condition of receiving benefits.

texas-votes-welfare

You’ll never see the U.S. Congress vote for this, because they’re way too special:

All elected officials and their staff should be subject to the same laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances as their constituents.

texas-votes-official

If you’re an anti-gunner this is where you should stop reading:

Texas should support Second Amendment liberties by expanding locations where concealed handgun license-holders may legally carry.

texas-votes-chl

It’s a sad state of affairs when the public has to actually vote on their right to pray in public places. Isn’t that covered by the First Amendment? Just in case it isn’t Texas will make sure you can worship and pray as you see fit:

Texans should be free to express their religious beliefs, including prayer, in public places.

texas-votes-religion

Silly Texans. Didn’t anyone tell you that it’s government, not businesses, that creates jobs and grows the economy?

Texas should abolish the state franchise tax, also known as the margins tax, to encourage business growth.

texas-votes-taxes2

Common sense laws and regulations. What a novel concept.

There’s a reason why Americans all over the country are flocking to Texas in the hopes of finding the American Dream that has been lost in so many other parts of the Union.

About Mac Slavo

<br data-mce-bogus=”1″><br data-mce-bogus=”1″><br data-mce-bogus=”1″><br data-mce-bogus=”1″><br data-mce-bogus=”1″><br data-mce-bogus=”1″><br data-mce-bogus=”1″><br data-mce-bogus=”1″><br data-mce-bogus=”1″><img alt=” src=’http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2e2df882a285019ef335e01b2d56d467?s=68&d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D68&r=G’ class=’avatar avatar-68 photo’ height=’68’ width=’68’ />Mac Slavo is the Editor of SHTFPlan.com

Georgia House Votes to Nullify Obamacare


FreedomOutpost_Masthead

http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/03/georgia-house-votes-nullify-obamacare/#eLXiD56fw8OpMUVj.99

 Posted by

ALWAYS REMEMBER, AND REMIND EVERYONE ELSE

Only Democrats

Late Monday evening, the Georgia State House of Representatives passed HB707, which bans the state participating in significant portions of the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare.  The vote was 115-59.

Representative Jason Spencer introduced HB707, The Georgia Health Care Freedom and ACA Noncompliance Act.  Spencer also had five co-sponsors to the bill.

According to Tenth Amendment Center executive director Michael Boldin, “While Georgia can’t fully stop Obamacare on its own, it can serve as a pretty major roadblock to implementation,” he said. “And as more states get on board with this strategy, it will pull the rug out from under it. Bills like this will end Obamacare from the bottom up.”

HB707 specifically provides the following bans:

  1. Prohibits any state agencies, departments or political subdivisions from using resources or spending funds to advocate for the expansion of Medicaid. This provision works hand-in-hand with HB990 to make it more difficult to expand Medicaid. HB990 would require legislative approval for expansion of the program, barring the governor from doing it by executive order.
  2. Prohibits the state of Georgia from running an insurance exchange.
  3. Refuses and federal grant money for the purpose of creating or running a state insurance exchange.
  4. Ends the University of Georgia Health Navigator Program.
  5. Prohibits the Commissioner of Insurance from investigating or enforcing any alleged violation of federal health insurance requirements mandated by Obamacare.

Tenth Amendment Center executive director Michael Boldin said, “While Georgia can’t fully stop Obamacare on its own, it can serve as a pretty major roadblock to implementation.  And as more states get on board with this strategy, it will pull the rug out from under it. Bills like this will end Obamacare from the bottom up.”

Judge Andrew Napolitano agrees.  Regarding South Carolina’s push to remove Obamacare from being implemented in the Palmetto state, Napolitano said, “If Enough States do this, It will Gut Obamacare.”

The Tenth Amendment center also points out:

The provision prohibiting the Georgia insurance commissioner from investigating or enforcing violations of federally mandated health insurance requirements will prove particularly problematic for the feds. Insurance commissioners serve as the enforcement arm for insurance regulation in the states. The federal government has no enforcement arm. It assumed the state insurance commissioners would enforce all of the provisions of the ACA. So, when people have issues with their mandated coverage, they will have to call the feds. At this point, it remains unclear who they will even call. Issues the Georgia insurance commissioner will not address include prohibiting a denial of insurance for preexisting conditions, requiring dependent coverage for children up to age 26, and proscribing lifetime or yearly dollar limits on coverage of essential health benefits.

Rep. Spencer said, “Disputes over these mandates arise under federal, not state law.  The federal Department of Health and Human Services can be expected to seek to commandeer the machinery of Georgia’s commissioner of insurance to enforce them or to investigate alleged violations because at present there is no federal health insurance agency and Congress is not likely to create one given the substantial opposition to Obamacare. Under HB707, the feds won’t be able to do that. They’ll have to figure out how to do it themselves.”

The legislation rests on a little known ruling by the Supreme Court referred to as the anti-commandeering doctrine.

Georgia is one of eleven states engaged in some form of nullification of Obamacare.

As I have pointed out before, nullification is a good thing, but it requires more, should the federal government seek to show a use of force and make an example of one state.  That would require interposition, or the state stepping in and making it a crime to enforce federal laws that are deemed unconstitutional by the state.  For nullification with teeth, I suggest taking a look at Albany, New York’s nullification of NDAA.

The bill will now move to the Senate.

Death and Taxes

About Tim Brown

Husband to my wife. Father of 10. Jack of All Trades. Christian and lover of liberty.  Residing in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina. Follow Tim on Twitter.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/03/georgia-house-votes-nullify-obamacare/#eLXiD56fw8OpMUVj.99

Obamacare Architect: “Insurance Companies As We Know Them Are About to Die”


FreedomOutpost_Masthead

http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/03/obamacare-architect-insurance-companies-know-die/#pkFBw3D9GGG2BzGW.99

When Obamacare was passed, many individuals in the conservative circles made predictions about the effect this legislation would have regarding the health care insurance industry, health care providers and acquisition of health care itself.  At the time, those pointing out the failures of Obamacare were ostracized, called “doomsayers,” and outright liars.  But, as time has gone by, these predictions have been seen and continue to be exposed and felt across the country.  Stories of drastically increased health care insurance premiums, policy cancellations and pure unaffordability of premiums along with services that were previously covered now not covered have made headline news.   These stories were so frequent and horrid that Harry Reid (D-NV) called everyone who had an Obamacare horror story a liar in an attempt to “cover” the Democratic bumble in its passage.

“ALWAYS REMEMBER”

Only Democrats

As it turns out, one of the architects of Obamacare, Ezekiel Emanuel, has just disclosed that “insurance companies as we know them are about to die.”  In fact, Emanuel predicts the end of health care insurance companies by 2020.  I wonder if Harry Reid would like to take to the stage and call anyone who said this years ago a liar now.

In an op-ed featured on New Republic, Emanuel stated, “The good news is you won’t have insurance companies to kick around much longer.  The system is changing.  As a result, insurance companies as they are now will be going away.  Indeed, they are already evolving.  For the next few years, insurance companies will both continue to provide services to employers, and, increasingly, compete against each other in the health insurance exchanges.”

Emanuel, in his op-ed, stated that individuals blame the insurance companies for increased premiums, denial of insurance, or denial of high-priced drugs because they are the easy target.  He stated that individuals do not place the blame accordingly:  underlying hospitals or physicians who charge high prices and pharmaceutical companies who set the prices for drugs.  Seeing this “misplacement” of blame, politicians seize on this position and gain support when they attack the health care insurance companies.  But, Emanuel claimed the actions of the insurance companies are the result of the way our health care system is structured:  “how it incentivizes and forces certain behaviors.”

According to Emanuel, new groups called “accountable care organizations” or ACOs “must start competing directly in the health care exchanges for exclusive contracts with employers.”  Because of Obamacare, new participants will “force insurance companies to evolve or become extinct.”

According to Emanuel in New Republic:

The accountable care organizations (ACOs) and hospital systems will begin competing directly in the exchanges and for exclusive contracts with employers.  These new organizations are delivery systems with networks of physicians and hospitals that provide comprehensive care.  This health delivery structure is in its infancy.  Today there are hundreds of these organizations being created and gaining experience within government sponsored programs or getting contracts from private insurers.  They are developing and testing ways to coordinate, standardize, and provide care more efficiently and at consistent higher quality standards.  Over the next decade, many of these ACOs and hospital systems will succeed at integrating all the components of care and provide efficient, coordinated care.  They will have the physician and hospital networks.  They will have standardized, guideline driven care plans for most major conditions and procedures to increase efficiency.  They will have figured out how to harness their electronic medical records to better identify patients who will become sick and how to intervene early as well as how to care for the well-identified chronically ill so as to reduce costs.

The key skill these ACOs and hospital systems lack – the skill insurance companies specialize in – is the actuarial capacity to predict and manage financial risk.  But over the next decade this is something they will develop – or purchase.

Emanuel claimed with the actuarial science skill, ACOs and hospital system will become integrated health delivery systems, such as Kaiser or Group Health of Puget Sound, cutting out the middle man insurance company and keeping the insurance company profits for themselves.

Another path the insurance companies may take would be to transform themselves into integrated health delivery systems.  Since insurance companies start out with the actuarial skills, they would only need to add providers of services in order to become an integrated delivery system.  According to Emanuel, the easiest way for the insurance companies to do this would be to purchase or enter into exclusive agreements with “efficient hospital systems, ACOs or physician groups.”

Personally, I don’t find any of this good news especially in reading the rest of the article and some of Emanuel’s statements.  Emanuel stated, “The worried well might wonder what happens if they contract a serious illness, such as cancer or some rare disease, will they be restricted only to physicians in the delivery system?”  His answer to his own question should raise the alarm;  “We should note that many people pick Kaiser or Group Health and get all of their care from those integrated systems, and they don’t  seem to worry that they are not getting the highest quality care.”

Out of the mouth of the architect comes the stark hard fact that these integrated systems may not provide the highest quality care nor provide a choice in health care provision.  Many saw this coming when the atrocity that is Obamacare was passed.  The states and congressional representatives have failed the American public and subjected us to the realization of health care delivery reminiscent of the communist USSR.

Everyone wants high quality health care at a reasonable price.  There is not one person in America who wants low or average quality health care nor is there any one person in America who doesn’t worry about getting high quality care.  With the health care structure and the insurance companies before Obamacare, individuals were able to receive high quality care at a reasonable price.   Specialty care was covered either through the chosen carrier or an additional policy, such as for cancer.  Individuals had a choice of providers and could see a provider outside of the network with approval at a higher rate, if the individual chose that option.  Many insurance companies provided for out of state coverage when treatments for certain conditions and diseases were more advanced than what was provided in the individual’s service area.  Granted, the out of pocket expense was greater but what is important to remember is the choice to receive or not receive those services.   There was always the choice to pay for services without going through the insurance company when the service was denied or out of network.

All of this boils down to the removal of the freedom of choice in health care, ranging from service providers to treatment.  Americans will be at the mercy of those “ACOs” or integrated health care delivery systems.  When an individual has a choice in providers for health care services, those providers know that individuals will seek treatment elsewhere when their services are below that of another provider; those services would include customer service, specialty services, preventive services and screenings, bedside treatment, etc. along with access to high quality care providers.  Without this competition, the need to strive to improve quality and expand services becomes nil.

Then, one must think about research.  Where does the cutting edge medical research take place in these new ACOs or integrated health care systems?

Emanuel went on to say that these integrated delivery systems would compete with their “objectively validated high-quality networks.”  To provide services for rare and serious conditions, Emanuel stated the integrated delivery systems will do one of two things.  First, they could identify “recognized centers of excellence – the absolute best places in the country – and contract special arrangements for the referral and treatment of their patients.”  Second, more expensive benefit plans would have a provision for second opinions.  He cited a market for supplemental insurance to cover second opinions for serious conditions that would appeal to the “well-heeled and worried.”

It has been my experience with insurance companies that a second opinion is covered when facing a serious condition or treatment such as surgery.  Now, according to Emanuel, only certain “plans” will include a second opinion while others will need to have additional insurance to cover a second opinion.  Most everyone should know that a second opinion is considered one of the rights of medical care.  Every individual is entitled to a second opinion concerning diagnosis and treatment when it comes to serious illness, diseases or surgical intervention.  It looks as though with Obamacare, a second opinion is a privilege afforded to those who pay the price for it, which means higher premiums for a plan that includes it or pay an additional insurance price to cover those second opinions.

Either way you look at it, Obamacare is destroying health care in America and doing nothing but nickel and diming an already financially strained citizenry.  At one time, America could boast the best health care system in the world.  It wasn’t perfect but it was better than any other country.  So what happened with the tried and true, “if it isn’t broke, don’t fix it?”  That has all changed with Obamacare.  What America can look forward to is what has been described by Emanuel.  Whether the care will be high quality at this point could be a toss up depending on the plan you choose and can afford.  At this point, the affordability of any plan is questionable.

So much for the promise, “if you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan, period.”  It looks as though America can kiss the insurance companies and their health care plans good-bye.  So, who was actually doing the lying, Harry?

Death and Taxes

About Suzanne Hamner

Suzanne Hamner (pen name) is a registered nurse, grandmother of 4, and a political independent residing in the state of Georgia, who is trying to mobilize the Christian community in her area to stand up and speak out against tyrannical government, invasion by totalitarian political systems masquerading as religion and get back to the basics of education.

Obama: Democrats Must Reclaim the Word ‘Freedom’ from Republicans


Tea Party News Network Banner

http://www.tpnn.com/2014/03/03/obama-democrats-must-reclaim-the-word-freedom-from-republicans/

March 3, 2014 By

Obama

Because nothing says “freedom” like forcing people to purchase a product or otherwise be punished…

The Democrat Party has trouble with the concept of freedom. While so many praise the concept of liberty, so often, the Democrats in power focus attention on more regulation, more taxes, more laws- overall, more constraints. They justify this mantra as a function of the modern world and pretend that more government is the answer. They seldom reference freedom because the Democrat agenda is so-often at-odds with it.

President Obama is looking to change that. Speaking to Democrats on Friday night, Obama attempted to rally the audience by suggesting that they should try to reclaim the word “freedom” from Republicans.

Speaking to fellow Democrats, Obama announced,

“As Democrats, we’ve let the other side define the word ‘freedom’ for too long.”

Freedom, Obama claimed, is about having health insurance.

“Freedom is the peace of mind of knowing that if you got sick, you won’t lose everything,” he stated. “Freedom is the ability to change jobs and start a new business, chase a new idea without fear of losing your health insurance.”

President Obama and his band of Democrats have continually hailed the disastrous CBO report as good news. The CBO reported that Obamacare would cost 2 million jobs within ten years and force 6 to 7 million people to lose health insurance options that otherwise would have been present if the law had never passed.

Only Democrats

Obama and Democrats have worked feverishly to spin the news, claiming that Obamacare allows people to move freely within the job market, unafraid of changing (or losing) jobs that were tied to employer-provided healthcare insurance.

Of course, the position falls apart with even mild scrutiny as it is not a blessing that millions more will be out of work thanks to Obamacare.Death and Taxes

Obama touted economic reforms that have had a disastrous effect on the banking industry.

“Freedom is signing for that new home and knowing it can’t be taken from you because you actually understand what you’re signing,” he said. “Freedom is getting that new credit card and knowing the stakes and understanding how you’re going to manage it; enrolling in college and knowing what you’ll owe once you graduate.”

Obama mentioned immigration, saying,

“Freedom is the knowledge that your future in this country is secure; you’re not going to be treated like a second-class person once we fix our broken immigration system. That’s freedom.”

“So we’re not ceding that word… That’s the choice we face right now — opportunity for a few, or opportunity for all,” he explained.

Obama’s assertion that Democrats are pro-freedom is as absurd as Ted Nugent saying he’s pro-gun control.

Democrats have firmly committed to crusading for big government, the antithesis of freedom. They have committed to this line of thinking and the choice for Americans has become, “Do you want more freedom, but more responsibility, too? Or do you want government to control our lives, but mitigate your commitment to personal responsibility?”

Freedom is not a gimmick, a word to just say because it sounds nice. Either Democrats are committed to freedom, or they are not.

Political Thoughts for March 3, 2014


Mar 3 01 Mar 3 02 Mar 3 03 Mar 3 04 Mar 3 05 Mar 3 06 Mar 3 07 Mar 3 08 Mar 3 09 Mar 3 10 Mar 3 11 Mar 3 12 Mar 3 13 Mar 3 14

Today’s Political Cartoon


CONSERVATIVE-BYTE-BANNER

ObamaCare Victims Fight Back: We Are Not Liars and Phonies


FOXNATION Banner

http://nation.foxnews.com/2014/02/28/obamacare-victims-fight-back-we-are-not-liars-and-phonies

Doctor to Reid

Watch the latest video at <a href=”http://video.foxnews.com/”>FoxNews.com</a&ampGRETA VAN SUSTEREN, FOX HOST: Tonight, the Tea Party is celebrating. What are they celebrating? Well, you are going to go to the party a little later.

But right now, the Obamacare horror show goes on.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

SEN. HARRY REID, (D-NV), SENATE MAJORITY LEADER: There’s plenty of horror stories being told.

UNIDENTIFIED DOCTOR: I’m going to have to be dealing with patients who could get taken off the drug that is now stabilized them and kept them from being disabled.

REID: All of them are untrue.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Our family, our premiums increased from $440 a month to $920 a month.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I can’t afford that. I think I’m going to let it go and hope I can stay healthy.

REID: All of them are untrue.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: My wife was diagnosed with stage-4 brain and bone cancer. We received this letter of cancellation.

REID: All of them are untrue.

UNIDENTIFIED DOCTOR: I’m going to stop being a doctor when I know I could take care of somebody but I’m not allowed to use the medications that could provide that.

REID: All of them are untrue.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

VAN SUSTEREN: Well, our first guest says Senator Harry Reid is wrong, Obamacare is a horror for real. And to her patients and her employees, it is a horror. Ophthalmologist, Dr. Patricia McLaughlin, joins us.

Good evening, Doctor.

PATRICIA MCLAUGHLIN, OPHTHALMOLOGIST: Good evening.

VAN SUSTEREN: When you hear Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid say these horror stories are wrong and untrue, what do you think? What do you say to him?

MCLAUGHLIN: I would just certainly hope that he said that in haste and that perhaps the information that was given to him came from a source that wasn’t correct. This is not the case that we are seeing in our practices and with stories patients are telling us.

VAN SUSTEREN: All right. Well, let’s go specific. Let me go first to your patients. You have patients who have insurance and they go to you. But now you have been knocked off one of the insurance networks. Is that correct?

MCLAUGHLIN: Well, I have been not dismissed but have nothing offered participation status in some of the subsections of one of the insurance companies. And that was insurance that would be covering individuals taking out insurance through the Affordable Care Act or through small business plans outside the Affordable Care Act. It also included them.

VAN SUSTEREN: All right, does that mean that these patients that some patients of yours can no longer go to you unless they pay out-of-pocket?

MCLAUGHLIN: That’s correct.

VAN SUSTEREN: Have any of your patients said anything to you? Are they distressed by this or are they happy to sort of move on to look for another doctor?

MCLAUGHLIN: You know, most patients are attached to their doctor. We have had long-standing relationships. We don’t just take care of an illness. We take care of the human spirit as well. So we know things about their spouse, their children, their parents. We have gone through their trials and tribulations. There’s a relationship. Of course, they are distressed. And they don’t enjoy the fact that they don’t have freedom of choice any longer. It’s very, very confusing to them. It’s very distressful. They don’t know where to turn. They still will call us and ask for help. And, of course, we are willing it do that.

VAN SUSTEREN: All right. Now you have also gotten squeezed because of what’s happened with your own insurance for your employees. What’s happened with them?

MCLAUGHLIN: Well, I had a small business plan and my employees were under my plan as well. So when my plan was cancelled, which was a very complex, very complete plan, but it was cancelled. And the reason given in the letter was that it had to do with not meeting the regulations of the Affordable Care Act. I mean, this completely confused me and came as a complete surprise. Well, you know, I had to then obtain a broker and start looking at other options because the subsequent plan that was offered by the same insurance company turned out to have a network that was so incredibly narrow, so restrictive, where my original plan had a robust network with many, many doctors, including myself on it, and the subsequent plan, didn’t have me or any of my colleagues or any of the doctors that myself, my husband, and my employees used. We didn’t lose just one doctor, we lost a lot of doctors. It was horrendous.

VAN SUSTEREN: Doctor, thank you. Good luck to you.

MCLAUGHLIN: Thank you so much.

=====================================================================

Watch the latest video at <a href=”http://video.foxnews.com/”>FoxNews.com</a>Mother

Mother with sickly daughter outraged by Reid’s comments

Senate majority leader claimed ObamaCare ‘horror stories’ are untrue – and this mother fired back on ‘Fox & Friends’

Networks Refuse to Report Latest ObamaCare Fail: Two-Thirds of Small Business Employees to See Premiums Spike


http://newsbusters.org/blogs/geoffrey-dickens/2014/02/25/nets-refuse-report-latest-obamacare-fail-two-thirds-small-business#ixzz2uTTnQ3dQ

Geoffrey Dickens's picturePosted by Geoffrey Dickens

Thanks to ObamaCare, about two-thirds of Americans who work at small businesses will see a spike in their health insurance premiums. Reaction at ABC, CBS and NBC to this devastating news for employees across the nation? A big fat yawn.

 No one at the Big Three networks have reported on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Death and Taxesreport, issued on Friday, that anticipates 65 percent of small businesses will see their health insurance premiums rise. This isn’t what the President promised on the 2012 campaign trail:

“The other thing we’ve done is to say, what are the critical needs of small business? A lot of time, one of the biggest challenges is to make sure that you, as a sole proprietor, that you can get health insurance for you and your family.  So when you hear about the Affordable Care Act — ObamaCare — and I don’t mind the name because I really do care.  That’s why we passed it. You should know that once we have fully implemented, you’re going to be able to buy insurance through a pool so that you can get the same good rates as a group that if you’re an employee at a big company you can get right now — which means your premiums will go down.” — President Barack Obama, campaign speech in Cincinnati, July 16, 2012

On Tuesday, the Wall Street Journal’s Jennifer Corbett Dooren broke down the CMS findings: “The report concluded that about 65% of small businesses, or plans covering 11 million people, would see an increase in insurance premiums under these so-called community-rating provisions of the health law. About 35% of employers would see a decrease for plans covering six million people. These employers aren’t required to pay a penalty under the federal health law if they don’t insure workers.” 

The CMS report is just the latest in a string of bad news for ObamaCare that the Big Three networks have either ignored or downplayed. ABC, CBS and NBC ignored a February 22 New York Times story that reported government jobs were also being hurt by ObamaCare. And the news of yet another delay in the employer mandate, and a devastating CBO report that claimed the Affordable Care Act would cost the equivalent of two million jobs were barely mentioned on the Big Three evening and morning shows.

About the Author

Geoffrey Dickens is the Deputy Research Director at the Media Research Center. Click here to follow Geoffrey Dickens on Twitter.

Only Democrats

 

Today’s Political Cartoon


CONSERVATIVE-BYTE-BANNER

“LANDSIDE”

Posted on February 26, 2014

http://conservativebyte.com/2014/02/landslide/

Slide-590-LA

 

Death and Taxes

Only Democrats

Today’s Political Cartoon


‘Working 9 to 5′ Parody: Obamacare Remix


Greta: Laughing at ObamaCare fears is disgraceful


Gretta

Published February 20, 2014  | On the Record | Greta Van Susteren

http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/on-the-record/2014/02/21/greta-laughing-obamacare-fears-disgraceful

By Greta Van Susteren

Let’s all go “Off The Record” for just a minute. Do you know what I find absolutely disgraceful? People laughing at other people’s fears and misfortunes, or even potential misfortunes.

But there’s something even worse than that — something more disgraceful. That’s when the ones laughing are also the very ones who caused the fears and misfortune. Case-in-point: Three politicians from Minnesota, all Democrats – two congressmen, Collin Peterson and Tim Walz, and U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar. Congressman Walz and Senator Klobuchar voted yes for ObamaCare. And now, well, they are laughing at what it’s doing to so many Americans. Listen to this exchange at a recent forum. (CLICK HERE to watch)

You heard right. That was laughing. Laughing at the nightmare ObamaCare is for many. And I bet if you live in Minnesota and if you have cancer or diabetes or a child with a serious disease, you aren’t laughing. In fact, you’re probably scared.

While Congressman Collin Peterson did not vote for ObamaCare, he did vote against its repeal, and now, he’s joining his two colleagues laughing. Listen.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

CONGRESSMAN COLLIN PETERSON: I voted no. So I’ll let these guys –

(APPLAUSE)

(END VIDEO CLIP)

Would you laugh if you played a role in creating this mess? That’s my “Off The Record” comment tonight. If you have an important story, issue think I should take “Off The Record,” go to GretaWire.com and tell us about it.

Only Democrats

Death and Taxes

New Obama promise: If you like your life, you can keep it


Ann Coulter Letter

http://www.humanevents.com/2014/02/19/new-obama-promise-if-you-like-your-life-you-can-keep-it/

New Obama promise: If you like your life, you can keep it

Ann CoulterBy: Ann Coulter   2/19/2014 04:50 PM

Liberals are winning wild praise for their candor in admitting problems with Obamacare. It shows you the level of honesty people have come to expect of our liberal friends. Now, liberals are applauded for not lying through their teeth about something.

What are they supposed to say? This Obamacare website is fantastic! And really, haven’t you already read all the magazines in your current doctor’s office anyway?

The New York Times has described Obama’s repeated claim that you could keep your insurance plan and keep your doctor under Obamacare as a mere slip of the tongue: “Mr. Obama clearly misspoke when he said that.”

Misspoke? How exactly does one misspeak, word for word, dozens of times, over and over again?

That wasn’t misspeaking — it was a deliberate, necessary lie. Even Democrats couldn’t have voted for Obamacare if Americans had known the truth. It was absolutely vital for Obama to lie about people being able to keep their insurance and their doctors.

Of course, it was difficult for voters to know the truth because every time Republicans would try to tell them, the White House and the media would rush in and call the critics liars.

The White House posted a specific refutation of the “disinformation” about not being able to keep your doctor or insurance plan that was being disseminated by Republicans “to scare people.” Their proof consisted of a video of Obama clearly stating, “If you have insurance that you like, then you will be able to keep that insurance. If you’ve got a doctor that you like, you will be able to keep your doctor.”

A video of someone asserting the very fact in dispute does not rise to the level of “evidence,” but it was more than enough for MSNBC.

Death and TaxesEven when pretending to be critical of Obamacare, liberals lie about the real problems. They tell us they’re worried about the percentage of young people signing up for Obamacare. The mix of young and old people in Obamacare is completely irrelevant. It won’t help if a lot of young people sign up because their premiums are negligible.

To keep the system afloat, what Obamacare really needs is lots of healthy people, preferably healthy older people. Their premiums are astronomical — and they won’t need much medical treatment.

Premiums are set by your age, not your health. It doesn’t matter if you never go to the doctor. Obamacare punishes you for having a healthy lifestyle. The Obamacare tax is a massively regressive poll tax on the middle-aged and the middle class.

Apart from those who are subsidized, everyone pays the exact same amount in penalties or insurance premiums for his age group. It doesn’t matter if you don’t make as much money as Bill Gates. Any 58-year-old male who doesn’t qualify for a subsidy will pay the same Obamacare tax as Gates.

When Margaret Thatcher tried to impose the same tax per person, as a “community charge,” there were riots in the street.

Our extremely progressive tax system, where nearly half the country pays no income tax at all, and the other half pays about 40 percent of their income, may not be fair. But most people also don’t think it’s fair to tax a guy making $80,000 a year the identical amount as one making $80 million a year. That’s exactly what Obamacare does.

With Obamacare, the Democratic Party has foisted the most regressive tax possible on America. This ruthless assault on the middle class is all so we can have a health care system more like every other country has.

Until now, the United States has had the highest survival rates in the world for heart disease, cancer and diabetes. Cancer comparisons are the most useful because all Western countries keep careful records for this disease.

For all types of cancers, European men have only a 47.3 percent five-year survival rate, compared to a 66.3 percent survival rate for American men.

European women have only a 55.8 percent chance of being alive five years after being diagnosed with any type of cancer, compared to 62.9 percent of American women.

American survival rates for breast, prostate, thyroid and skin cancer are higher than 90 percent. Europeans do not have a 90 percent survival rate for one of those cancers.

The European rates are even worse than they sound because many cancers are not discovered until the victim’s death — twice as many as in the U.S. All those cancers were excluded from the study.

Canadian cancer survival rates aren’t much better than the European rates — and they’ve been able to sneak into to the U.S. for treatment! Women in the U.S. have a 61 percent survival rate for all cancers, compared to a 58 percent survival rate in Canada. Men in the U.S. have a 57 percent survival rate compared to 53 percent in Canada.

That’s why your insurance premiums have to go through the roof and your Obamacare tax is the same as Bill Gates’. So across the world, we’ll all be equal, dying of cancer, heart disease and diabetes as often as everyone else.

It’s not that Obama doesn’t believe in American exceptionalism; it’s that he wants to end it.

Only Democrats

Super Funny – Nancy Pelosi PAC Attacks Obamacare


http://eaglerising.com/4669/super-funny-nancy-pelosi-pac-attacks-obamacare/#CXwgv0ZgumAXw3J5.99

By / 14 February 2014

How worried are Democrats about what Obamacare is going to cost them in 2014?

So worried that even Nancy Pelosi pet Political Action Committee (PAC) is taking pot shots at the “disastrous” healthcare law. In an ad they’ve developed for Joe Garcia (D-FL) who is running for Congress from Florida’s 26th District, they highlight how Mr. Garcia “fought to let you keep your insurance” and that he is “working to fix” the law. The ad also takes the Obama administration to task for the “disastrous” Obamacare website.

Here’s the ad.

Webb

It’s very telling that the House Majority PAC, which is so closely tied to Nancy Pelosi, would be willing to try to win points by attacking Obamacare when it was Pelosi herself who said, “I don’t think you can tell what will happen next year, but I will tell you this: Democrats stand tall in support of the Affordable Care Act.”

Keep standing tall, Nancy… that way it will be easier to knock you down in November.

REMEMBER AND NEVER FORGET

Only Democrats

Doc discovers Obamacare’s shocking, dirty secret


http://www.wnd.com/2014/02/doc-discovers-obamacares-shocking-dirty-secret/#FwtUAms0Gm1sKivu.99

Exclusive: Dr. Lee Hieb’s phone call changes everything

author-image Lee Hieb, M.D.

Dr. Lee Hieb is an orthopaedic surgeon specializing in spinal surgery. She is past president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, a free market medical organization.
140210doctorsurprised

I am being impacted in many ways by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, or, to give credit where credit is due, “Obamacare.” But the most stunning attack on my person came this month in the form of insurance rate hikes.

My older son is 24 years old, a student and in perfect health. He has never smoked, is thin, has totally normal labs, is on no meds and comes from a long line of hearty, healthy stock. It seemed appropriate to pay $47 a month for health insurance.

Then, I just received notice from Coventry Insurance that due to the new health-care law we had to make a choice from three options: 1) We could keep his insurance policy and pay nearly four times as much – $167/month; 2) We could explore a different “ACA compatible” policy; or 3) We could try our luck at the Iowa “marketplace” – i. e. Obamacare state exchange. Each option had its own phone number.

Now I’d rather sell my kid into indentured labor than put him on Obamacare, so I called the number for the new policy. I did the appropriate button pushing but ended up at the state exchange anyway. And I confess after a short conversation with a probable navigator, I hung up the phone, saying there was no way I wanted Obamacare. I also confess that I may have been a bit abrupt, thinking I would never talk to him again. So I dialed the number for option No. 1 – updating the original policy.

To my horror I again landed in the proverbial lap of the same phone navigator – is there only one of these guys for the whole state? So now, I asked more questions and discovered the dirty little secret about those three options: There are not three options of insurance. There is really only one option and only one possible policy. The issue is whether I or the great state of Iowa will be paying the premium!

So let’s be clear. A policy once costing $47 per month – a price many young people or their parents could afford – is now made vastly more expensive ($167 per month), but the price tag is being picked up for the “poor” by the State of Iowa.

Am I the only one who sees a basic flaw in this scenario?

I, one of the few remaining taxpayers, will be paying four times as much for my own insurance and paying taxes for state-subsidized insurance. And this “insurance” for the poor is also four times the actual market value. So, unless I choose to be an under-working deadbeat and go on the government dole myself, I lose financially on every front.

And remember that ACA is an acronym standing for – my fingers are cramping typing this – the “Affordable Care Act.”

Don’t think these increased premiums are increasing any payment to the hospitals and doctors who care for you. We are all taking big cuts. Small hospitals all over the country are teetering on the brink of financial ruin.

Remember when they said you could “keep your doctor”? What they really meant was, you may have to actually keep him – like in your basement. And you may need to bring in a few unemployed hospital administrators and nurses as well.

Anyone with a spare room? Will do surgery for food.

Only Democrats

Today’s Political Cartoon


CONSERVATIVE-BYTE-BANNER

Thursday, February 13, 2014

“Heartfelt Job Loss”

Heartfelt-Job-Loss

Today’s Political Cartoon


CONSERVATIVE-BYTE-BANNER

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

“Liberated”

Liberated

Today’s Political Cartoons


CONSERVATIVE-BYTE-BANNER

“JOBS”

Jobs

Today’s Political Cartoon


CONSERVATIVE-BYTE-BANNER

“Job Killer”

Job-Killer

Texas Doctor Rebels against Obamacare – Calls it Socialism


http://lastresistance.com/4649/texas-doctor-rebels-obamacare-calls-socialism/#KX74U16XZBhy7loW.99

Posted By on Feb 6, 2014

kristin_story_held

Held is an ophthalmologist who has taught at the University of Texas Health Science Center and served as the director of the Ophthalmology Clinic at the Brady Green Community Health Center.  Currently she works in private practice at the Stone Oak Ophthalmology Center in San Antonio.

Like every doctor in private practice, Held contracts with a number of insurance companies to provide covered services to her patients. The contracts specify the extent of covered healthcare the doctor provides and it is a signed contract.  Signed contracts cannot be altered without the agreement of both parties or so Dr. Held thought.  She and her office manager discovered by chance that Aetna had changed the terms of her contract without her knowledge or approval.  When she found out, she was irate and contacted Aetna to terminate her contract with them.  In her letter to Aetna, Held wrote:

“Obamacare, the ‘law of the land,’ contains ever-changing-at-the-whim-of-HHS, politically expedient mandates, rewards, penalties, rules and regulations with which I cannot rationally or morally treat my patients and run a practice, much-less interpret, implement, or comply.”

“Millions of Americans have lost coverage because of the healthcare law and must now shop on a defective, insecure government website and sign up for more expensive policies through Federal and State exchanges.”

“Only by logging in as a prospective patient did my office manager and I discover that Aetna was selling plans for which I am a provider — effectively selling my services without even asking, much less informing me that my services would be sold on such a site, under the auspices of new terms with which I will not comply.”

“It saddens me to think of the decreased access to care from actual physicians and the shockingly increased costs Aetna patients will now experience because of your choice to collude with big government rather than collaborate with patients and physicians.”

Last December, Dr. Held posted the following statement on her blog:

“Obamacare empowers a few political elites, their operatives, and cronies to do whatever they want to the American people on the false promise of access to ‘free’, ‘quality’ ‘medical care’, AKA tyranny-through-medicine. They write and rewrite the deceitfully-passed law for political expediency, power, and money; patients are an afterthought, an annoying impediment to their ultimate goal — socialized medicine, the keystone in the arch of Socialism. … Our current Federal government is the antithesis of all that composes American medicine and the sacred patient-doctor relationship.”

WOW!  Dr. Kristin Held hit the nail on the head with that blog.  I’ve been saying all along that Obamacare has nothing to do with providing healthcare to the American people.  Its sole purpose was to establish a socialist program that commanded the people to bow to tyranny.  Obamacare forces Americans to purchase a product whether or not they want to.  It forces employers to comply with the government dictates and it forces Christians to violate their faith.  All of these add up to one thing – socialism.

Then to top it off, Obama defiantly ignores the US Constitution and makes changes to the congressionally passed law at his slightest whim.  These are the actions of a socialist dictator that has no regard for the nation’s laws or the people.  Obamacare is a major step in gaining control over the American people and Obama is abusing that power as much as he can.

My hat goes off to Dr. Held for her boldness and standing up for American ethics.  Just think what would happen if a million other doctors terminated their contracts with various insurance companies over Obamacare; they could bring the entire Obamacare system crashing down upon itself, and hopefully take Obama and his fellow socialist Democrats with it.

Told You So


NY Hospital Turns Down Cancer Patient With Obamacare

http://freebeacon.com/ny-hospital-turns-down-cancer-patient-with-obamacare/

BY: February 6, 2014 8:37 am

Stage-four cancer patient Bruce Johnston seems to be the latest victim of Obamacare’s terrible rollout, as his insurance under Obamacare was recently denied at Stony Brook University Hospital.

NY Hospital

When told the hospital did not take his insurance, Johnston was shocked. “It leaves me high and dry,” Johnston said. “I mean, this is nothing to fool around with. This is my life.”

The hospital said it currently does not accept any of the 8 plans offered by the New York state exchange, citing low reimbursement fees that “wouldn’t come close” to the cost of providing treatment. The hospital has had to negotiate on a case by case basis with the insurance companies to cover patients in predicaments like Johnston’s.

Top Liberal Reveals Massive Democrat Secret!


 

The Marxist/Socialist/Collectivist/Extreme Liberal Left has been building their dependent underclass since President Johnson passed his, “War on Poverty” bill. They DO NOT care about the poor or illegal immigrants. All they care about is getting their votes, because they know that without them, they will not be able to win elections. With their votes they can steal elections so they can destroy our Liberty replacing it with their Marxist/Socialist/Collectivist/Extreme Liberal Left Doctrine, installing a tyrannical European style faux democracy. Then anyone who disagrees with them can silence by whatever means necessary. – Jerry Broussard (MrB)

<><><><><><><><><><><><>

http://lastresistance.com/4627/top-liberal-reveals-massive-democrat-secret/#yM1St8VuH1QcPgfA.99

Posted By on Feb 4, 2014

donna brazile

The Left has a long track record of lying about their intentions. Recently, they have lied about Obamacare, claiming it was meant to give the poor an opportunity at healthcare. We all know there are numerous ways by which the healthcare industry can be fixed without a massive government takeover, but that’s the point. The Left doesn’t care about the poor, they want bigger government. They think it is for the betterment of man that we be under the loving care of a monstrous matriarchal government.

Every effort made by the Left at legislation is designed to push our country toward their ultimate goal: a Marxist paradise. Most of the country doesn’t want to live in soviet Russia, so the Left must disguise their policy as something good and lovely.

Resist AmnestyThe issue at the top of the liberal agenda is immigration. They know that if they can grant amnesty to the millions of illegal immigrants in the United States, those immigrants will eventually be allowed to vote. Guess who they’ll vote for? Yeah, Democrats. Republicans will never again win an election. Liberals have denied on many occasions that their ultimate intention is voting rights. They have claimed many times that the notion that they want illegal aliens to vote is preposterous. They just want “equality.” Finally, someone has said it.

Donna Brazile let the cat out of the bag. This is how they’re going to play the game. They’re going to first ask for legal residency. After that, the Left will rise up, and pretend to feel bad for the apartheid nation we have created, in which some can vote, and others are left in the cold. Then the faux sympathies being projected by the Left will get picked up by the media, and run around the clock, until it somehow seems like a good idea to grant them full citizenship. Then the Left—who once claimed to never ever want illegal immigrants to have voting rights—will have won the game.

The Left will win in part because the Republicans will go along with whatever the Democrats do, thinking it will benefit them. Republicans will follow the Democrats into a hell of the Democrats’ making. There were several ways the voting rights for illegals situation could have gone, but Donna Brazile just revealed the course being taken by the Left. Just wait and see.

Nakita Saying

CBO: O-Care will cost 2.5M workers


http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/budget/197365-cbo-o-care-slowing-growth#ixzz2sOSeq7ci

February 04, 2014, 10:15 am By Erik Wasson

Tyranny-careThe new healthcare law will cost the nation the equivalent of 2.5 million workers in the next decade, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated in a report released Tuesday.

The nonpartisan agency found the reform law’s negative effects on the economy would be “substantially larger” than what it had previously anticipated.

It said the equivalent of 2.3 million workers would be lost by 2021, compared to its previous estimate of 800,000, and that 2.5 million workers would be lost by 2024. It also projected that labor force compensation would be reduced by 1 percent from 2017 to 2024 — twice its previous estimate — and that declining economic growth would add $1 trillion more to deficits.

The findings immediately roiled the debate over the healthcare law on Capitol Hill ahead of this year’s midterm elections.

The White House swiftly pushed back against the findings, seeking to dismiss suggestions from Republicans that the Affordable Care Act has contributed to a slower economic recovery or would “kill” jobs.

It pointed out that the CBO concluded the reduction in worker hours was almost entirely because of workers Death and Taxeschoosing to work less.

“The estimated reduction stems almost entirely from a net decline in the amount of labor that workers choose to supply, rather than from a net drop in business’ demand for labor,” the CBO report said.

Republicans seized on the analysis, arguing it is proof that the healthcare law will hold back the economy.

“This latest diagnosis from the nonpartisan CBO confirms what we have been saying all along — that the president’s health law is bad medicine for jobs and the economy,” said House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-Mich.).

“Washington can’t continue to ignore the problem: trillions of dollars in empty promises. And ObamaCare is only making things worse,” said Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), the chairman of the House Budget Committee.

The CBO is not saying employers will fire millions of workers because of the law.

It instead found that the healthcare law will create disincentives for people to work and that this in turn will cut into the labor supply, hurt the economy, lower tax collection and cause higher deficits.

Some people will leave the workforce or reduce their hours in response to lower wages because of the healthcare law, while others will leave or reduce their hours because they have insurance coverage and do not need to work full time to keep it, the CBO said.

“All our analysis led us to conclude the effects of the [healthcare law] on labor force participation would be a good deal larger than we had thought originally,” CBO Director Doug Elmendorf said. “Fundamentally, the Affordable Care Act provides subsidies to lower income people and those subsidies phase out … that will have some effects on discouraging labor supply.”

Overall, the CBO is sticking by its earlier analysis that the ObamaCare law, which contained tax increases and Medicare cuts, reduced deficits, however.

In a lengthy statement, White House press secretary Jay Carney rebutted arguments that the healthcare law is slowing the economy.

He criticized the CBO report as incomplete, arguing it fails to take into account the law’s slowing of healthcare costs, which the administration argues will lead to the creation of as many as 400,000 new jobs per year by the end of the decade.

He also focused on the CBO’s finding that people will choose to leave the workforce.

“At the beginning of this year, we noted that as part of this new day in healthcare, Americans would no longer be trapped in a job just to provide coverage for their families, and would have the opportunity to pursue their dreams,” he said, adding “the Republican plan to repeal the ACA would strip those hard-working Americans of that opportunity.”

A senior administration official joked that repealing Social Security would increase employment, because people on the system would no longer be able to retire and 95-year-olds would be back in the workforce.

PAy for MedicalCarney also argued the economy had added 8.1 million jobs since the law was signed — the strongest job growth since the late 1990s.

The CBO now thinks the economy will grow at 3.1 percent in this fiscal year, which ends in October, rather than the 3.4 percent growth it predicted last year.

The unemployment rate is projected to fall to 6.7 percent by the end of the year, much lower than the 7.6 percent the CBO saw for 2014 previously. The budget office does not see unemployment falling below 6 percent for the rest of President Obama’s term, however.

The CBO’s annual update contained rosier near-term deficit projections, but projected that $1 trillion more than previously thought would be added to deficits over the next decade because of slower economic growth.

Instead of adding $6.3 trillion in deficits from 2014 to 2023, the government will add $7.3 trillion, the CBO now projects.

By 2023, the gross debt of the United States will be $26 trillion, up from a projected $25 trillion. A year later, the debt will rise to $27 trillion as the $1.074 trillion deficit for fiscal 2024 is added in.

Most of the change is due to lower economic growth. Congress has actually improved the picture slightly, adopting $20 billion in deficit reduction through the December budget agreement.

In the near term, the CBO is projecting smaller deficits.

For 2014, the deficit is slated to be $514 billion, an improvement of $46 billion from last year’s projection.

In 2015, the deficit estimate falls to $478 billion. That is still higher than the last full year of the Bush administration, when the deficit was $458 billion, but it is a steep drop from the $1 trillion deficits of most of the Obama years.

The CBO also said the botched ObamaCare rollout will result in 6 million people signing up for coverage through the insurance exchanges this year — 1 million fewer than projected last year.

One million fewer people will enroll in Medicaid and children’s health insurance through the healthcare law, and 1 million more people will be uninsured in 2014.

This story was updated at 4:19 p.m.

Only Democrats

Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook

Women’s Cancer Center Closes Thanks to Obamacare


Life News Banner

http://www.lifenews.com/2014/01/31/womens-cancer-center-closes-thanks-to-obamacare/

by Steven Ertelt | Fort Collins, CO | LifeNews.com | 1/31/14 5:54 PM

The War on Women is supposedly waged by pro-life advocates opposing abortion and the Obama administrations HHS mandate forcing religious groups to pay for abortions and birth control. But it looks like it’s the Obama administration that’s engage in a war on women.

A women’s cancer center in Fort Collins, Colorado is closing down because of the ramifications of Obamacare:

pichealth31Women’s Resource Center closed its doors suddenly Friday, stating that Obamacare has changed donor perceptions of the need for reduced women’s healthcare services.

The nonprofit, which has provided a wide array of bilingual health and human services primarily for un/underinsured women, has operated in Larimer County since 1975. WRC programs focused specifically included breast, cervical, ovarian and reproductive cancers; dental health; diabetes prevention and education.

“The perception among many of our previous grantors seemed to be that Obamacare would now be able to provide for all women’s health needs,” said a statement released by the WRC board Friday. “We started to develop a program to provide short term crisis management for women who needed assistance with prioritizing and finding solutions to many of life’s difficulties, especially mental health issues.”

The statement continued to say that many other county agencies were “fully supportive” of the nonprofit’s attempts to remain relevant in the changing face of healthcare, but the decision was not backed up by the needed funding to remain open.

The WRC website had events, including monthly mammogram vans at local retailers, scheduled through April 10, 2014. The organization’s Facebook, Twitter and website had no mention of the closure, which was confirmed by staff and board members, Friday morning.

Watch as Employees Experience Obamacare Sticker Shock for the First Time


http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/01/watch-employees-experience-obamacare-sticker-shock-first-time/#vIHIKjYTppCIYGBS.99

Posted by Joshua Cook

A news station visited a local Pennsylvania small business which showed the devastating impact of Obamacare. One employee said, following his Obamacare sticker shock, “they call it the affordable health plan? There is nothing affordable about it … wake up America. This is not acceptable.”

Watch below:

Sticker Shock

About Joshua Cook

Joshua Cook lives in Travelers Rest SC. He received his BA from Southeastern University and MBA from North Greenville University.  Follow Joshua Cook on Facebook and on Twitter: @RealJoshuaCook

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/01/watch-employees-experience-obamacare-sticker-shock-first-time/#vIHIKjYTppCIYGBS.99

Five Ironic and Hypocritical Statements From Obama’s SOTU


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2014/01/28/three-ironic-and-hypocritcal-statements-from-obamas-sotu-n1786289

Katie PavlichKatie Pavlich | Jan 28, 2014

       1. President Obama touted the pre-existing condition requirement in Obamacare saying, “Because of this law, no American can ever again be dropped or denied coverage for a preexisting condition.” As a result of Obamacare and since the federal exchanges were launched on October 1, 2013, millions of people have been dropped from their health insurance plans.

      2. President Obama said it was an “embarrassment” that in today’s American society women get paid less than men, ignoring the fact that his White House pays women less than men.

      Female employees in the Obama White House make considerably less than their male colleagues, records show.
According to the 2011 annual report on White House staff, female employees earned a median annual salary of $60,000, which was about 18 percent less than the median salary for male employees ($71,000).

      3. President Obama said, “I will act on my own to slash bureaucracy and streamline the permitting process for key projects, so we can get more construction workers on the job as fast as possible,” and urged Congress to send him legislation to make it happen while ignoring the Keystone Pipeline, a project that would create thousands of jobs and one that has been sitting on his desk for years waiting for approval.

    4. On foreign policy President Obama said, “America must move off a permanent war footing,” while refusing to acknowledge his administration’s meddling in places like Egypt, Libya, Syria and Honduras.

      5. When discussing veterans and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, President Obama said, “As this time of war draws to a close, a new generation of heroes returns to civilian life.  We’ll keep slashing that backlog so our veterans receive the benefits they’ve earned, and our wounded warriors receive the health care – including the mental health care – that they need,” while failing to acknowledge Obamacare has destroyed those healthcare benefits in Tricare.

     The Obama administration’s proposed defense budget calls for military families and retirees to pay sharply more for their healthcare, while leaving unionized civilian defense workers’ benefits untouched. The proposal is causing a major rift within the Pentagon, according to U.S. officials. Several congressional aides suggested the move is designed to increase the enrollment in Obamacare’s state-run insurance exchanges.

      The disparity in treatment between civilian and uniformed personnel is causing a backlash within the military that could undermine recruitment and retention.

      The proposed increases in health care payments by service members, which must be approved by Congress, are part of the Pentagon’s $487 billion cut in spending. It seeks to save $1.8 billion from the Tricare medical system in the fiscal 2013 budget, and $12.9 billion by 2017.

      Many in Congress are opposing the proposed changes, which would require the passage of new legislation before being put in place.

       “We shouldn’t ask our military to pay our bills when we aren’t willing to impose a similar hardship on the rest of the population,” Rep. Howard “Buck” McKeon, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee and a Republican from California, said in a statement to the Washington Free Beacon. “We can’t keep asking those who have given so much to give that much more.”

        Administration officials told Congress that one goal of the increased fees is to force military retirees to reduce their involvement in Tricare and eventually opt out of the program in favor of alternatives established by the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare.

Watch for this Phrase in Tonights State of the Union Address: “Income Inequality”


Income Inequality claims: Wrong-Headed Liberalism

Written on Monday, January 27, 2014 by

http://patriotupdate.com/articles/income-inequality-claims-wrong-headed-liberalism/#k1uORuFeMOBzxdfh.99

Hurting from the implosion of Obamacare and the revelation that its namesake lied to the American people about his misnamed Affordable Care Act, liberals running for office have been forced to find another song to sing.  Not surprisingly, they have found one: income inequality.  Income inequality has become mantra for progressive politicians who are concerned about the effect Obamacare will have on their re-elections.  Ask a progressive politician about President Obama’s you-can-keep-your-doctor promise, and you will get an earful about income inequality.  Show a progressive politician your cancelled health insurance policy, and you will hear a lecture on income inequality.  Give a progressive politician a copy of the notice of increased premiums you just received from your insurance company, and you will be treated to a dissertation on income inequality.  Liberals have decided to confront their Obamacare problem by changing the subject.  The new subject they plan to focus on is income inequality.

The problem with all of this talk about income inequality—aside from the fact that it’s a smokescreen thrown up to divert attention from the failings of Obamacare—is that it’s founded on invalid assumptions.  With income inequality, we are not talking primarily about inherited wealth.  Rather, we are talking about the amount of the world’s wealth that is controlled by the top one percent of wealthy people.  The invalid assumptions that progressives base their income-inequality diatribes on are these: 1) That all work is equally valuable in the marketplace,  2) That those who earn less are somehow being discriminated against, which is why they earn less, and 3) That it is unfair for one individual to earn a lot of money while another earns comparatively little.  All of these assumptions are demonstrably false, and liberals know it.  Of course since stoking the fires of class envy is their goal, it matters not a whit that their assumptions are false, at least not to liberals.

In a free society with a market economy, the people who have the most money will always be those who are able to provide a product or service people want and are willing to pay for.  Consequently, the level of income one earns and the amount of wealth one generates is based primarily on supply and demand.  If an individual enters a profession for which demand is strong and supply is limited, he will earn more than someone who enters a field for which demand is weak and supply is plentiful.  Hence, individuals who work as high-level computer engineers—the kind of professionals employed by Microsoft for example—earn more than individuals who work the counter at a fast-food restaurant.  Is this wrong?  Hardly.  Why is it not wrong?  Because people want computers and the associated devices and software that go with them and they are willing to pay to get them.  Further, to become a computer engineer one must have the innate mental capacity to do the work, the perseverance to complete a rigorous course of college study, and the persistence to keep one skills constantly updated and on the cutting edge of computer technology. These things are not true of people who work the counter at fast-food restaurants.

To work the counter at a fast food restaurant requires little more than the mental capacity, education, and persistence associated with a sixth grader, if that.  Because of the supply-and-demand equation, it is difficult for employers such as Microsoft to find and keep qualified computer engineers.  Hence the market demands that they pay a competitive salary that is enhanced by good benefits and attractive perquisites.  On the other hand, almost any person can quickly learn everything necessary to work at a fast-food restaurant.  Consequently, there is seldom a shortage of individuals seeking employment at fast food restaurants.  In this case, the supply is typically high and demand is typically low.  Consequently, the pay is correspondingly low.  This is not unfair, as progressives try to portray it.  In fact, it is inherently fair.  The market usually is.  What is unfair is when progressive politicians with a hidden agenda try to manipulate public opinion by encouraging class envy.  And, of course, this is precisely what the left is doing with its new campaign for income equality.

While it is true that the hand of God is certainly a factor in determining who is born with the innate ability to become a computer engineer as opposed to a fast-food worker, it is also true that success in the workplace is based on much more than innate ability.  It would be hard to count the number of people with innate ability whose earning potential is limited by such factors as laziness, bad educational choices, sloppy career planning, and a poor work ethic.  Perhaps one might argue that it is inherently unfair that one individual would have the innate ability to become a computer programmer, but that is a conservation to have with God not your local Congressman.

Political Ignorance and Big Government


http://patriotupdate.com/articles/political-ignorance-big-government/#ZA8GZYYa8GRVE814.99

Written on Friday, January 24, 2014 by

image001There are many good and sound reasons for limiting the size of government—efficiency, effectiveness, responsiveness, cost, too many layers between officials elected to serve and those who are supposed to be served, and the burgeoning-bureaucracy syndrome. The burgeoning-bureaucracy syndrome is the tendency of a bureaucracy, once in place, to focus more on growing and staying in business than on doing the business it was established to do.  Big government bureaucrats may be slow, inefficient, and uncaring in doing their jobs but they are experts at keeping their jobs.  These are all good reasons for limiting the size of government, but there is another reason that gets little attention: the concept of political ignorance.

This is one of the themes of a new book by Ilya Somin: Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government is Smarter.  Somin makes the point that the American public suffers from a bad case of political ignorance.  There are several reasons for the lack of political knowledge exhibited over and over again by the voting public.  There is the sad fact that public education at all levels in America either fails to teach American government in a competent manner or purposely distorts what it teaches as part of its leftwing indoctrination effort. There is the additional fact that schools and colleges in America fail to develop critical-thinking skills in students because the liberals who control public education do not want graduates to think—they want them to blindly follow where the left leads.  But one reason that had not surfaced until Ilya Somin raised it in his new book is big government.

Big government, because it is so inaccessible, has created a situation in which everyday Americans purposefully ObamaFedoraavoid political engagement.  Said another way, they choose to be politically ignorant.  According to Somin, purposeful political ignorance is a rationale response for an individual who thinks his involvement will do no good and that his voice will not be heard no matter what he does. A substantial number of Americans believe—and with good reason—that the president, Congress, and the courts will do what they want irrespective of what individual Americans want.  An example of why so many Americans feel this way about their government is Obamacare.  Obamacare was muscled through Congress without the support of the majority of Americans and over the strong opposition of Republicans in Congress.  Those Democrats who voted for it had no idea what was in the bill.  They simply believed what the president told them and voted for it.

To illustrate how Obamacare and other legislative initiatives that ignore the desires of the voting public contribute to political ignorance, consider the findings of a recent Kaiser survey.  A startling 44 percent of respondents did not even realize that Obamacare had passed and is the law.  Even more discouraging is that 80 percent of respondents knew little or nothing about the insurance exchanges that are a fundamental part of the law. Citizens can certainly be forgiven for being unable to understand Obamacare.  The few people who do Tyranny-careunderstand the ACA are making a fortune as consultants explaining it to insurance companies and employers.  But political ignorance is not limited to specific acts of legislation.  According to Somin, a 2006 survey revealed that only 42 percent of respondents could name the three branches of government: executive, legislative, and judicial.

Throwing up their hands and saying “I give up” is a common response for people who are overwhelmed, and a substantial number of Americans are overwhelmed by the size of their government.  Hence they have stopped trying to understand political issues.  Add to this the substandard teaching most of the them got in public school and their lack of critical thinking skills and the level of political ignorance in America becomes understandable, although still unacceptable.  If political ignorance is a rational response to a government that has become too big, too inefficient, and too unresponsive, it follows that limiting the size of government and decentralizing it so that government is closer to the people is a good idea.  This alone will not solve the problem of political ignorance, but it is a necessary first step.

Only Democrats

This IS the best 90 seconds you can ever watch


Wonderful, it should be played every day till the American public wake up.

If you are not a regular watcher of Fox News (especially during the daytime hours) Then you may have missed this RETORT by Neil Cavuto. This is an excellent response (September 26, 2013) to the contradictory occupant of the White House. Takes only a moment to watch. ll want to send it on to others who have meaningful things going on in the daytime.

Cavuto

CNN Calls the Obama Administration LIARS


You know we’re in trouble as a nation when catching a politician in lies produces no shock. MrB

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

 

http://eaglerising.com/4136/cnn-calls-obama-administration-liars/#MssWwAbpJfDdb6ET.99

By / 15 January 2014

Only Democrats
In an article titled “The Truth Behind Obamacare 6 Million Figure,” CNN takes the administration to task for touting information that is, at the very least “misleading.”

The Obama administration been advertising that 6 Million people have healthcare because of Obamacare.

 “Now more than 6 million Americans have been enrolled in Marketplace or Medicaid coverage and are getting peace of mind, knowing that they can get the care they need without losing everything they’ve worked and saved for,” wrote Phil Schiliro, who returned to the White House last month to oversee health care policy initiatives.

Gene Sperling, the director of the National Economic Council, went on “Meet the Press” recently, he simply cited the 6 million figure without further explanation.

Sadly, while both Mr. Sperling and Mr. Schiliro would like everyone to believe that through the magic of Obamacare some 6 million people who were previously uninsured now have health insurance… the number is simply a mirage.

obama-lied— 2.1 million Americans signed up for private health insurance through the federal and state exchanges through the end of December.

— 3.9 million people learned they’re eligible for Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) in October and November.

The squishiness lies in the Medicaid number. The 3.9 million figure includes people who were already on Medicaid and are just renewing…

While CNN sees “squishiness” in the Medicaid number, I think there is worse here.

Let’s start with the 2.1 million Americans who signed up for private insurance through the exchanges.

Since October 1, 2013 almost 5 million people have lost their coverage due to Obamacare. Doesn’t it stand to reason that many of these people are the ones who have signed up through the private exchanges?

Similarly, where CNN sees “squishiness” because many of the Medicaid and CHIP enrollees are actually re-enrollees, some of the new Medicaid members are there because they were forced off of their own insurance.

 If you add all of this together, the Obamacare “successes” are all self-made. They destroyed 5 million people’s healthcare coverage, forced them into Obamacare and then pretended that they somehow accomplished something. It’s sick. It’s twisted. It’s the Obama Administration handling business as usual.

About the author: Onan Coca

&amp;lt;img alt=” src=’http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/067e140671164d7ce10eea5e42f2e3b6?s=80&amp;amp;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D80&amp;amp;r=G&#8217; class=’avatar avatar-80 photo’ height=’80’ width=’80’ /&gt;

Onan is a graduate of Liberty University (2003) and earned his M.Ed. at Western Governors University in 2012. Onan lives in the Atlanta area with his wife, Leah. They have three children and enjoy the hectic pace of life in a young family. Onan and Leah are members of the Journey Church in Hiram, GA.

Website: http://www.eaglerising.com

Read more at http://eaglerising.com/4136/cnn-calls-obama-administration-liars/#MssWwAbpJfDdb6ET.99

Let Me Get This Straight


Death and Taxes

To insure the uninsured, we must first uninsure the insured, then make them pay more to become insured again, so the uninsured can be insured for free!!!

 Makes sense to me,…I think.  H’m,…

 

GOP-obstructionists

Ben Carson: Next president of the U.S.?


He has my vote and support. JB

 

WND columnist Bob Just interviews famed neurosurgeon as Hannity guest-host

http://www.wnd.com/2014/01/ben-carson-next-president-of-the-u-s/#v5Dy7jbclEDrPDsV.99

Published: 21 hours ago

Dr. Benjamin Carson, the retired neurosurgeon whom many are urging to run for president in 2016, gave a remarkable interview to WND columnist and radio talker Bob Just recently, who was filling in as guest-host on the top-rated “Sean Hannity Show.”

Just interviewed Carson during the second hour of the Dec. 27 program. (During the third hour, Just interviewed WND Managing Editor David Kupelian and historian Ron Rychlak about the influential new book, “Disinformation.”)

With more than 500 affiliates nationwide, Hannity’s radio show, second only to that of Rush Limbaugh, is heard by roughly 13.5 million loyal listeners each week.

Carson, who retired recently as director of pediatric neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins Hospital, became a household name for “speaking truth to power” when he delivered the keynote speech at the National Prayer Breakfast last February and, with President Obama sitting a few feet away, proceeded to brilliantly critique the Obama administration’s deficit spending, health-care takeover and more.

In October, Carson told The Hill, “[Running for president] is not something I have any desire to do whatsoever,” adding “but I certainly listen.”

He continued, “If the circumstances were to evolve in such a way that that seemed to be what God was calling me to do, I would certainly do it. And I would never turn my back on my fellow citizens, if there was a hue and cry for such.”

But on the Hannity show, Just turned aside from all the usual political questions Carson is asked, to get the famed surgeon and possible presidential contender to talk about the person who put him on the path to success – his desperately poor mother.

Read the story about Ben Carson in “Gifted Hands,” see what he believes needs to happen to restore America’s greatness in “America the Beautiful,” and listen to his challenge to have a great adventure in life, in “Take the Risk.”

“She was one of 24 children and got married when she was 13 in a desperate attempt to escape the horrible environment in rural Tennessee,” said Carson. “And she and my father moved to Detroit. He was a factory worker and then she discovered some years later he was a bigamist. So there she was by herself again, trying to raise two young sons in the inner city.”

However, as Carson explained, his mother had one saving grace:

“But the interesting thing about her was, she was never a victim. She never felt sorry for herself, she never made excuses, and that was a good thing.

“The problem was, she didn’t accept excuses from us either (laughter), and that was a problem for us! So we had to learn pretty early on, just forget about making excuses cause it’s just not gonna work. …

“More importantly, we were both poor students, and she was observant, and she noticed in the homes that she cleaned – these were wealthy people – that they didn’t sit around watching TV all day. They did a lot of reading, studying and figuring things out. So she determined that that’s the life we were going to have.

“We were extremely unhappy … but it didn’t matter, we had to do it.

“Interestingly enough, after a while, as I began to read those books, particularly about people of accomplishment, I began to notice something. And that is that the person who has the most to do with what happens to you in life is you. Nobody else gets to determine that except you. And that was an incredible revelation for me and for my brother both. And we realized our terrible situation did not have to continue. We had the power to change it.”

But wait, asked Just: “She had a tough childhood. … How did she overcome that? Where did she find her authority to love you and discipline you the way she did, as a struggling single mom?”

Said Carson: “She found it in God. She became a believer, and a very strong believer …”

And that’s just the beginning. To find out more about how Dr. Ben Carson got started on the path to a remarkable life, listen to Bob Just’s entire interview here:

 Carson one

Carson, winner of the Presidential Medal of Freedom and founder of the Carson Scholar’s Fund, is the author of five bestselling books, including “Gifted Hands: The Ben Carson Story,” “Take the Risk: Learning to Identify, Choose and Live With Acceptable Risk,” and his latest, “America the Beautiful: Rediscovering What Made the Nation Great.”

Bob Just, in addition to being a veteran radio talker and WND columnist is founder and president of several organizations, including Concerned Fathers Against Crime, Concerned Mothers Alliance for Children, and Concerned Youth. He worked with Sean Hannity on the research and development of Hannity’s New York Times bestselling book, “Deliver us from Evil.” His television appearances include Fox News’ “Hannity,” ABC’s “Politically Incorrect,” “Hannity & Colmes,” “Fox & Friends” and “The Coral Ridge Hour.”

’I don’t want to offend anyone’

At the National Prayer Breakfast last February, broadcast live on C-SPAN2, Carson said at the outset that he didn’t want to “offend” anyone. Yet his words nonetheless made at least one distinguished guest in attendance – President Barack Obama – squirm in his seat.

For instance, taking on class-warfare economics by advocating for a 10 percent flat tax, Carson said a person who earns $10 billion should pay $1 billion in tax, while one earning $10 will pay $1 in tax.

“Some people say, ‘Well, that’s not fair because it doesn’t hurt the guy who made $10 billion as much as the guy who made 10,’” Carson said. “[But] where does it say you have to hurt the guy? He just put a billion dollars in the pot!

“We don’t need to hurt him,” Carson continued. “It’s that kind of thinking that has resulted in 602 banks in the Cayman Islands. That money needs to be back here, building our infrastructure and creating jobs.”

Carson further took aim at the swelling national debt, increasing bureaucracy and political correctness, which he called “dangerous” because it “muzzles” people and “keeps people from discussing important issues while the fabric of their society is being changed.”

But it was Carson’s proposal for health-care reform – an approach completely antithetical to the president’s massive and disastrous health-care overhaul program – that likely rankled Obama the most.

“Here’s my solution,” Dr. Carson said of America’s health-care woes. “When a person is born, give him a birth certificate, an electronic medical record and a health savings account [or HSA] to which money can be contributed – pretax – from the time you’re born ’til the time you die. When you die, you can pass it on to your family members, so that when you’re 85 years old and you got six diseases, you’re not trying to spend up everything. You’re happy to pass it on, and there’s nobody talking about death panels.

“And also, for the people who were indigent who don’t have any money,” Carson continued, “we can make contributions to their HSA each month, because we already have this huge pot of money. Instead of sending it to some bureaucracy, let’s put it in their HSAs. Now they have some control over their own health care.”

“Dr. Carson said the one thing that Obama and the Democrats do not want to hear,” Rush Limbaugh later commented. “In this case, we have an ideal replacement for Obamacare that is much better, that promotes the health-care industry, that promotes cost savings, that promotes competition and it gets everybody covered.”

Video of Dr. Carson’s entire National Prayer Breakfast speech can be seen below:

 Carson two

ObamaCare foul-ups lead to chaos at hospitals


http://www.humanevents.com/2014/01/03/obamacare-foul-ups-lead-to-chaos-at-hospitals/

By: John Hayward

ObamaCare foul-ups lead to chaos at hospitalsAs expected, it’s chaos in the hospitals, as the disastrous system Barack Obama inflicted on America leaves medical staff uncertain whether patients have valid insurance.  This is yet another reason why it was important for the chief executive to stay on top of his signature initiative, and order the plug pulled when it became clear the system was not ready for launch on October 1.  But instead, as we all know, the Empty Chair just assumed everything was going great, and later claimed he was the most angry and frustrated person in America when he read the newspapers and discovered Healthcare.gov was a useless mass of bugs and unfinished code.

Judging by a report at the UK Daily Mailthere are people who would hotly dispute the President’s claim of being the most frustrated victim of the Healthcare.gov fiasco:

Hospital staff in Northern Virginia are turning away sick people on a frigid Thursday morning because they can’t determine whether their Obamacare insurance plans are in effect.

Patients in a close-in DC suburb who think they’ve signed up for new insurance plans are struggling to show their December enrollments are in force, and health care administrators aren’t taking their word for it.

In place of quick service and painless billing, these Virginians are now facing the threat of sticker-shock that comes with bills they can’t afford.

‘They had no idea if my insurance was active or not!’ a coughing Maria Galvez told MailOnline outside the Inova Healthplex facility in the town of Springfield.

She was leaving the building without getting a needed chest x-ray.

‘The people in there told me that since I didn’t have an insurance card, I would be billed for the whole cost of the x-ray,’ Galvez said, her young daughter in tow. ‘It’s not fair – you know, I signed up last week like I was supposed to.’

Hey, remember how the Administration was running around and claiming victory because the system was “fixed” after Thanksgiving weekend?  That was funny as hell, wasn’t it?  To this day, Obama’s team of liars claims they have no way of determining how many valid insurance policies have been sold through the ObamaCare exchanges.  They throw out a lot of crazy made-up numbers, which the media dutifully reports as if they were valid facts, but the one and only metric that actually matters for the moment is how many fully-processed policies have seen their first completed payment.  The people described by the Daily Mail are learning that the hard way.  Ms. Galvez said no one has even sent her a bill yet.

The Daily Mail goes on to speculate that Galvez wouldn’t be in much better shape if she did have valid ObamaCare coverage, because it stinks – she’d have to pay a $5,500 deductible before seeing any benefits from her “bronze” plan.  She’s paying a whopping $450 per month in premiums – or, rather, she will, when someone gets around to sending her a bill.

A similar situation frustrated Mary, an African-American woman small businesswoman who asked MailOnline not to publish her last name. She was leaving the Inova Alexandria Hospital in Alexandria, Virginia with two family members.

‘I had chest pains last night, and they took me in the emergency room,’ Mary said. ‘They told me they were going to admit me, but when I told them I hadn’t heard from my insurance company since I signed up, they changed their tune.’

She told MailOnline that a nurse advised her that her bill would go up by at least $3,000 if she were admitted for a day, and her doctor told her the decision was up to her.

‘Should I be in the hospital? Probably,’ she said. ‘Maybe it’s one of those borderline cases. I have to think that if I were really in danger, they wouldn’t give me the choice. But what if I think I’m covered and I’m really not?’

‘The emergency room bill is going to be bad enough.’

Remember, the stated reason Democrats are putting us all through this ordeal was to make insurance coverage available to people who didn’t have it before.  Those people are going to be exceptionally confused when they try to use their expensive new benefits and discover they’re still on the hook for enormous out-of-pocket expenses, to say nothing of getting turned away because the lousy Soviet-surplus computer system can’t even determine if they have coverage.

As for the people who used to have coverage, but ran afoul of Obama’s Big Lie and saw their plans canceled, Democrats are still trying to push back against this disgrace by claiming that “only” half a million people (the Obama Administration), or maybe as few as 10,000 people (congressional Democrats) will end the year without coverage due to ObamaCare.  Even that lowball number from the Democrat caucus is not at all what they promised, over and over again, when they were ramming the Affordable Care Act through Congress.  Also, those who lost their preferred plans and were able to make other arrangements before December 31 still count as betrayed by Obama’s Big Lie.  They were just fortunate enough to work something out with their providers, saving them from the hell of the ObamaCare exchanges… which, incidentally, received a 59 percent negative rating from users according to Gallup, with 29 percent “very negative.”  Let’s see how those numbers look after the hospital and clinic chaos of January.

More vignettes of confusion from the Associated Press:

In Burlington, Vt., the state’s largest hospital had almost two dozen patients seek treatment with new health insurance policies, but more than half of those did not have insurance cards. Minnesota’s health care exchange said 53,000 people had enrolled for coverage through its marketplace, but it was unable to confirm the insurance status of an additional 19,000 people who created accounts but did not appear to have purchased plans.

In Connecticut, officials were pleading for patience as call centers fielded calls from people who are concerned because they had yet to receive a bill for premiums or an insurance identification card.

“This is an unprecedented time, because there are a record number of people who have applied for coverage with an effective date of Jan. 1,” said Donna Tommelleo, a spokeswoman for the Connecticut Department of Insurance.

[…] Julie Cadorette, 63, of Maynard, Mass., said she has spent dozens of hours on the phone trying to find out the status of her application through Massachusetts Health Connect, which she said she sent by certified mail three months ago. Her current plan ends Jan. 31.

“It’s very hard to deal with them, they’re so behind,” she said Thursday. “When you call them, they ask you specific questions. You can’t ask them any questions.”

That’s pretty sad, considering that Massachusetts was already accustomed to the joys of State-controlled health insurance.  Remember how one of Obama’s campaign tactics was claiming Romneycare in Massachusetts was the model for his plan?  Somehow I don’t think you’ll be hearing much of that talking point in the future, now that ObamaCare has plunged even Mitt Romney’s old gubernatorial stomping grounds into chaos.

Just imagine how things must be going in a big state like California!  Oh, wait, we don’t have to imagine.  The Associated Press checked in with them, too:

In California, employees of the state health exchange were still going through some 19,000 paper applications sent in the early days after Covered California launched on Oct. 1, spokesman Dana Howard said. He could not say how many were outstanding.

The entire tracking system was “in a sort of chaos” Thursday as consumers tried to use or confirm their new insurance, said Kelly Fristoe, an insurance agent in Wichita Falls, Texas.

“I’ve got pharmacies that are calling in to verify benefits on these new plans that are getting incorrect information,” he said. “I have people that are calling to make their initial premium payment, and they’ve been on hold for maybe three or four hours at a time and then they get hung up on.”

And we’re only three days into this nightmare.  Depending on how seriously one takes the Administration’s claims of 2.1 million “enrollees,” and the failure rate for information relayed from the ObamaCare exchanges to insurance providers, we could be looking at 700,000 to 1 million people in coverage limbo.  Obviously, most of them haven’t tried seeing a doctor or filling a prescription… yet.  A report at The Hill says everyone in the industry is bracing themselves for a “spike” of activity next week, which is when gale-force winds of wackiness will truly begin howling across the fruited plain.  Wal-Mart and Walgreens are already offering to hand out a free month of prescriptions, with no upfront cost, to ObamaCare victims… er, customers… through the end of January.

And while the private sector he despises has once again saved Obama’s bacon, it doesn’t sound like doctors are going to play along with these seat-of-the-pants fixes for long:

Dr. John Venetos, a Chicago gastroenterologist, said there was “tremendous uncertainty and anxiety” among patients calling his office.

“They’re not sure if they have coverage. It puts the heavy work on the physician,” Venetos said. “At some point, every practice is going to make a decision about how long can they continue to see these patients for free if they are not getting paid.”

Did you enjoy President Obama’s caricature of your profession as a bunch of profiteering tonsil-thieving vampires back in 2009, Dr. Venetos?  Just wait until he tears into you after you start refusing patients due to ObamaCare insurance chaos.

It’s not just ObamaCare policy purchases in turmoil, either.  Both the Daily Mail and Associated Press mention the Medicaid applicants stuck in limbo because the system can’t process them, either.  Yesterday we heard of 16,000 Iowans caught in this Sargasso Sea of incompetence; the AP speaks of another 25,000 in Pennsylvania.

No doubt Democrats will portray all this as a small price to pay for the Great Health Care Leap Forward, having made an ice-cold political calculation that they can live without the votes of the people who spent hours of their valuable time fighting a bug-riddled system to buy insurance they can’t even use.  They’re gambling that general public discontent can be kept under control, while some the people suffering through January (and probably February) chaos can persuaded to forget their tribulations when it’s time to hit the ballot boxes this year.  They’re already trying to make everyone forget about the humiliating launch-pad detonation of the ObamaCare system in October.  But as we can see from today’s chaos, it matters that the system wasn’t ready for prime time when it was launched.  The shock waves from that botched rollout will rumble throughout the year to come.  And for some of the people who showed up at hospitals and clinics to use coverage that doesn’t really exist, the results are a lot more than merely “inconvenient.”

Update: If you think ObamaCare is confusing now, just wait until you try to add a new baby to your health insurance plan.  The statist geniuses who designed this boondoggle forgot to add that capability to the system.  It’s not so great at handling other “life changes affecting a consumer’s taxpayer-subsidized premiums” either, according to the Associated Press… such as “marriage and divorce, a death in the family, a new job or a change in income, even moving to a different community.”

Americans asked to refrain from doing any of those things until President Obama blows another hundred million dollars of your money updating the exchange software to add new features, such as a “Have you died recently?” check box for the subsidy calculator.

Zack Langford: 3 year-old Denied Obamacare


sweepeaOne night before Christmas, a Hawaii-vacation-bound President Barack Obama “encouraged” American families to eschew usual yuletide meanderings around “holiday” trees in favor of donning Swee’Pea footie-pajamas while surfing Healthcare.gov.

Follow Joe For America on Facebook!

Of course, his eponymous Obamacare law, that neither protects patients nor allows affordable acts of care, MANDATES such forays on the government’s insecure website lest one have any refund due from his anti-tea partier-IRS withheld.

The results of one family’s Merry Christmas dialogue appear below:

Dear Mr. Presdient,

I am currently typing this blog post as I sit on hold with the Healthcare.gov marketplace help line. I am doing everything I possibly can to sign up for health insurance (which is required by law) so that my family can have the care that they need next year now that our current plan has been taken away from us.

Despite repeated attempts since October (no less than a dozen, including roughly four alone last week) to submit an application and select a plan, I have run into a myriad of different issues.

While simply signing up has been extremely frustrating and still needs to be resolved, a much more pressing problem that I am having with this process is that according to my recently received eligibility notice from healthcare.gov, my kids (ages 1 and 3) are not eligible to buy health insurance through the exchange. 

What is confusing about this is that my wife and I are eligible. 

Not only is my oldest son not able to receive insurance through the exchange, he is not eligible for ANY other government program according to my official eligibility requirement.

Here is a screenshot of the eligibility notice that I received:

Screenshot 2013-12-23 22.41.51

Notice that my wife and I are eligible. Calls to healthcare.gov confirmed this, but they could not do anything to help me or answer our questions about his eligibility. Why is he not eligible when we meet all of the requirements (income level, no employer provided insurance, etc)?

Here is my problem: 

I have spent many hours on the phone help line with different healthcare representatives and not a single one can give me an answer. Each one of the representatives has said that this eligibility status is “weird” and they have all wondered aloud why my oldest son is not eligible for anything.

One even exclaimed, “That’s not right!” 

Each one told me that I could appeal the decision and that to appeal I should check the page on the healthcare.gov site that gives instructions about how I should go about appealing. However, they also made it clear that because this process takes two weeks, either way, we will not have insurance on January 1 if we don’t sign up by today.

If I do not receive a favorable judgment in my appeal, I will have no choice but to buy health insurance at full price for my boys (one of which desperately needs surgery on his ears).

Again, my question is: Why are they not eligible when we meet all of the requirements?

Having previously purchased private insurance I am completely willing to do this, but after taking an initial look at premiums and deductibles I am going to be paying much more than ever for health insurance, with WORSE COVERAGE. Here is a screenshot of the first quotes that I have received after checking in the last couple of hours.

Screenshot 2013-12-23 13.59.21

Also, this is a quote for only one of my boys; I would have to buy another plan for my other son.

THIS IS NOT DOABLE for us financially. 

What I am asking:

I do not spend a lot of time voicing my political opinion and have been extremely patient (see my detailed experience here) in giving the government time to fix the website and system, but since you have failed to meet the goals that you set for us and for yourself, I am simply holding the government accountable to the promise that was made to not deny anyone affordable healthcare coverage.

At the very least, I feel that it is not unreasonable for me to ask for an explanation about why my son has not been allowed to sign up.

I am not throwing stones or doing this to rebel against the governmental authority that is over me, I am simply writing  to you on behalf of my boys who have been denied what you think they should be required to have.

I am also asking anyone who comes across this letter to send it on and share it to bring awareness to the situation.

Thank you –

Zack Langford and Family

JoeForAmerica encourages Americans to let their voice be heard in the offices of Congressmen that voted for, or subsequently supported, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.  Many on this list have already been discharged from elected office, but for President Obama and the ones that remain, we would like to ask, “Why did you ignore the majority of Americans and make this travesty a law?”

HOUSE

Ackerman Andrews Baca Baird Baldwin Bean Becerra Berkley Berman Bishop (GA) Bishop (NY) Blumenauer Boccieri Boswell Boyd Brady (PA) Braley (IA) Brown, Corrine Butterfield Capps Capuano Cardoza Carnahan Carney Carson (IN) Castor (FL) Chu Clarke Clay Cleaver Clyburn Cohen Connolly (VA) Conyers Cooper Costa Costello Courtney Crowley Cuellar Cummings Dahlkemper Davis (CA) Davis (IL) DeFazio DeGette Delahunt DeLauro Dicks Dingell Doggett Donnelly (IN) Doyle Driehaus Edwards (MD) Ellison Ellsworth Engel Eshoo Etheridge Farr Fattah Filner Foster Frank (MA) Fudge Garamendi Giffords Gonzalez Gordon (TN) Grayson Green, Al Green, Gene Grijalva Gutierrez Hall (NY) Halvorson Hare Harman Hastings (FL) Heinrich Higgins Hill Himes Hinchey Hinojosa Hirono Hodes Holt Honda Hoyer Inslee Israel Jackson (IL) Jackson Lee (TX) Johnson (GA) Johnson, E. B. Kagen Kanjorski Kaptur Kennedy Kildee Kilpatrick (MI) Kilroy Kind Kirkpatrick (AZ) Klein (FL) Kosmas Kucinich Langevin Larsen (WA) Larson (CT) Lee (CA) Levin Lewis (GA) Loebsack Lofgren, Zoe Lowey Luján Maffei Maloney Markey (CO) Markey (MA) Matsui McCarthy (NY) McCollum McDermott McGovern McNerney Meek (FL) Meeks (NY) Michaud Miller (NC) Miller, George Mitchell Mollohan Moore (KS) Moore (WI) Moran (VA) Murphy (CT) Murphy (NY) Murphy, Patrick Nadler (NY) Napolitano Neal (MA) Oberstar Obey Olver Ortiz Owens Pallone Pascrell Pastor (AZ) Payne Pelosi Perlmutter Perriello Peters Pingree (ME) Polis (CO) Pomeroy Price (NC) Quigley Rahall Rangel Reyes Richardson Rodriguez Rothman (NJ) Roybal-Allard Ruppersberger Rush Ryan (OH) Salazar Sánchez, Linda T. Sanchez, Loretta Sarbanes Schakowsky Schauer Schiff Schrader Schwartz Scott (GA) Scott (VA) Serrano Sestak Shea-Porter Sherman Sires Slaughter Smith (WA) Snyder Speier Spratt Stark Stupak Sutton Thompson (CA) Thompson (MS) Tierney Titus Tonko Towns Tsongas Van Hollen Velázquez Visclosky Walz Wasserman Schultz Waters Watson Watt Waxman Weiner Welch Wilson (OH) Woolsey Wu Yarmuth

SENATE

Akaka (D-HI) Baucus (D-MT) Bayh (D-IN) Begich (D-AK) Bennet (D-CO) Bingaman (D-NM) Boxer (D-CA) Brown (D-OH) Burris (D-IL) Byrd (D-WV) Cantwell (D-WA) Cardin (D-MD) Carper (D-DE) Casey (D-PA) Conrad (D-ND) Dodd (D-CT) Dorgan (D-ND) Durbin (D-IL) Feingold (D-WI) Feinstein (D-CA) Franken (D-MN) Gillibrand (D-NY) Hagan (D-NC) Harkin (D-IA) Inouye (D-HI) Johnson (D-SD) Kaufman (D-DE) Kerry (D-MA) Kirk (D-MA) Klobuchar (D-MN) Kohl (D-WI) Landrieu (D-LA) Lautenberg (D-NJ) Leahy (D-VT) Levin (D-MI) Lieberman (ID-CT) Lincoln (D-AR) Manchin (D-WV) McCaskill (D-MO) Menendez (D-NJ) Merkley (D-OR) Mikulski (D-MD) Murray (D-WA) Nelson (D-FL) Nelson (D-NE) Pryor (D-AR) Reed (D-RI) Reid (D-NV) Rockefeller (D-WV) Sanders (I-VT) Schumer (D-NY) Shaheen (D-NH) Specter (D-PA) Stabenow (D-MI) Tester (D-MT) Udall (D-CO) Udall (D-NM) Warner (D-VA) Webb (D-VA) Whitehouse (D-RI) Wyden (D-OR)

Please share this article and let’s help Zack and his family get the answers they need and deserve!

Get a Job


Get-a-job Get-a-job

Eight Ways to Opt Out of Obamacare


http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/12/25/Top-8-Ways-To-Opt-Out-Of-ObamaCare

by  Dr. Susan Berry 25 Dec 2013        

With the deadline to sign up for Obamacare having come and gone, many Americans have decided to “opt out” of President Obama’s signature health care reform law, choosing instead to pay the $95 penalty for sidestepping the individual mandate.

“For many Americans opting out of Obamacare is the best decision they can make, but it’s important that they do it the right way—just refusing to buy health insurance and not having another way to pay for catastrophic medical expenses is a mistake,” Sean Parnell, author of the newly-released The Self-Pay Patient, told Breitbart News. “People who want to opt out should be looking at alternatives to conventional health insurance, such as joining a health care sharing ministry or purchasing a fixed benefits policy.”

Parnell also strongly advises Americans against opting out and simply paying the “list” price for medical visits and prescription drugs without shopping around, or by relying solely on the local hospital emergency room for routine medical care.

“This approach leaves people who opt out vulnerable to sky-high medical expenses at inflated ‘list’ or ‘chargemaster’ rates, and can result in an inability to obtain needed care because of cost,” Parnell writes on his blog, selfpaypatient.com.

Instead, Parnell recommends the following eight options for those who have opted out of ObamaCare:

1. Join a health care sharing ministry, which are voluntary, charitable membership organizations that share medical expenses among the membership.

Parnell states that Samaritan Ministries, Christian Healthcare Ministries, and Christian Care Ministry are open to practicing Christians, while Liberty HealthShare is open to those who are committed to religious liberty.

Healthcare sharing ministries “operate entirely outside of ObamaCare’s regulations, and typically offer benefits for about half the cost of similar health insurance,” says Parnell. “Members are also exempt from having to pay the tax for being uninsured.”

2. Purchase a short-term health insurance policy.

“These policies usually last between one and 11 months and are not regulated under ObamaCare, and, therefore, don’t offer the same high level of benefits that can drive up costs,” writes Parnell.

3. Buy alternative insurance plans such as fixed-benefitcritical illness, or accident insurance.

“These policies pay cash in the event you are diagnosed with cancer, spend a night in the hospital, or need some other medical treatment,” Parnell says. “They cost a fraction of what health insurance costs under ObamaCare, and by giving you cash directly you aren’t locked in to any particular provider network.”

Parnell also recommends maxing out medical and uninsured/underinsured driver coverage amounts under an auto insurance policy, which can help pay for medical bills in the event of injury in an auto accident.

Once major medical insurance is arranged, Parnell suggests shopping around for health care providers and services.

4. Visit cash-only doctors and retail health clinics for primary care. If you usually visit a doctor more than a couple times per year, consider joining a direct primary care practice which will give you access to nearly unlimited primary care for a modest monthly fee.

5. Sign up for a telemedicine service—lower-cost options in which doctors treat relatively simple medical issues via phone calls, email, or a video connection. Telemedicine especially works well, Parnell says, for common injuries, conditions, and illnesses.

6. Use generic prescription drugs whenever possible, and compare prices between pharmacies. Less expensive options are sometimes available at large chain pharmacies such as Walmart and CVS, and online sites such as GoodRx.com and WeRx.org allow patients to view the best deals on medications.

7. For surgery, Parnell recommends going to a facility that offers up-front “package” prices for self-pay patients, such as the Surgery Center of Oklahoma and Regency Healthcare, where prices are typically much less than what is charged at most hospitals. In addition, sites such as MediBid, where doctors bid on providing your surgery or treatment, will often yield substantially less expensive costs coupled with high quality medical care. Yet another option is to become a medical tourist.

8. When a hospital visit becomes necessary, Parnell suggests working with a medical bill negotiation service to get the best price available rather than accept the wildly inflated “chargemaster” prices, usually three to five times more than what insurers pay for the same service or treatment. Patients who wish to negotiate on their own will likely need to put in a significant amount of time and effort, but can use the Healthcare Blue Book or Pricing Healthcare as a starting point to help them find out what insurers are paying for medical services.

“Many Americans say they would prefer free market healthcare, and they don’t have to wait for Congress to repeal, replace, or reform Obamacare to have that,” Parnell told Breitbart News.

“Simply by opting out and doing things like visiting cash-only doctors, becoming a medical tourist, shopping around for the best prices on prescription drugs, and obtaining an alternative type of coverage they can enjoy all the benefits of free market healthcare today including access to affordable, quality care and getting government and insurance company bureaucrats out of the doctor-patient relationship.”

Welcome to Obama’s America…


http://joeforamerica.com/2013/12/welcome-obamas-america/

Posted  by on Dec 19, 2013

WARNING. THIS VIDEO COMES CLOSE TO HOMOSEXUAL PORNOGRAPHY. JB

I was going to say there are no words… but three come to mine… We’re so  screwed…

ALERT! ALERT! Reports of erroneous WA health exchange debits


kgw.com

Posted on December 10, 2013 at 8:28 AM

For the second week in a row, the Washington Healthplanfinder website is down, and it’s causing problems for people who are dealing with billing issues. Some of them say the website is mistakenly debiting their accounts.

Shannon Bruner of Indianola logged on to her checking account Monday morning, and found she was almost 800 dollars in the negative.

“The first thing I thought was, ‘I got screwed,’” she said.

The Bruners enrolled for insurance on the Washington Healthplanfinder website, last October. They say they selected the bill pay date to be December 24th. Instead the Washington Healthplanfinder drafted the 835 dollar premium Monday.

Josh Bruner started his own business this year as an engineering recruiter. They said it’s forced them to pay a lot of attention to their bills and their bank accounts.

“Big knot in my gut because we’re trying to keep it together,” said Shannon Bruner. “It’s important to me that this kind of stuff doesn’t happen.”

They’re not alone.

One viewer emailed KING 5 saying, “They drafted my account this morning for a second time.”

Another woman on Facebook with a similar problem commented, “We are all in the same boat.”

“We’ve got to figure out how to get money to pay the bills for the next week or two until we have another check come through,” said Josh Bruner. “It’s just crazy.”

Washington Healthplanfinder emailed the Bruners a few days ago telling them to log in to view their invoice, something they couldn’t do because the website has been down. The Bruners haven’t been able to get through on the helpline either. They finally contacted Healthplanfinder administrators by posting a message on their Facebook page.

Washington Healthplanfinder tells KING 5 their staff is looking into the problem.

Until it’s resolved, the couple is putting their best face forward.

“We haven’t bought anyone’s Christmas gifts yet,” said Shannon Bruner. “We’re just kind of waiting.”

“We wrote a check to our nanny last week, it isn’t going to work,” said Josh Bruner. “So she can’t get paid.”

Obamacare Shocker


http://conservativevideos.com/2013/12/obamacare-shocker-richest-1-get-best-health-care-99-get-shaft/

Trifeca

Anti-Obamacare Parody Song: ‘You Picked a Fine Time to Leave Me, Blue Shield’


Anti-Obamacare Parody Song: ‘You Picked a Fine Time to Leave Me, Blue Shield’ Anti-Obamacare Parody Song: ‘You Picked a Fine Time to Leave Me, Blue Shield’

South Carolina to Nullify Obamacare


http://eaglerising.com/3528/south-carolina-nullify-obamacare/#ZMBUrsMq0CfbmTo1.99

By / 12 December  2013

The “South Carolina Freedom of Health Care Protection Act,” or South  Carolina’s House Bill 3101, will likely pass through the South Carolina  Senate chamber and could effectively eliminate Obamacare in South Carolina. It  could also serve as a model that other conservative states could look to when  trying to formulate their own plans for eliminating Obamacare in their  states.

In all likelihood South  Carolina will soon be the first state to exempt their populace from any  participation in the Obamacare scheme.

NullifyOcareState Senator Tom Davis, who sponsored the bill,  says, “It will essentially have five components to it, all of which in my  judgment are legal, effective, and within the state’s power to do. What the  Supreme Court said in Printz v. United States is that states are not merely  political subdivisions of the federal government to carry out what the federal  government does; they are sovereign entities. Congress can pass laws, but it  cannot compel the states to utilize either their treasury or personnel to  implement those federal laws.”

South Carolina’s Senate is dominated by Republicans, but even some of the  Democrat members are likely to agree to the bill. Governor Nikki Haley (R-SC)  has been an outspoken opponent of Obamacare and will also very likely jump at  the chance to be the first Governor in the United States to stand up to the  Obama administration by outlawing Obamacare in South Carolina.

Of course, the federal government could enact and handle Obamacare in South  Carolina without the state’s help, but given how badly the Obamacare rollout has  gone thus far, it’s unlikely they’ll be able to do this effectively. Things will  only get worse as other Republican dominated states move forward with similar  plans. There is just no way that the federal government can make Obamacare work  if some states simply refuse to comply with the law.

Nullification

The talking heads and political wonks may not believe that nullification  still exists… but it does. There can be no real balance of power between the  states and the federal government without it. So let’s stand and cheer South  Carolina on as they prove a state still has the right to nullify federal law.  Way to go, Palmetto State!

About the author: Onan Coca

Onan is a graduate of Liberty University (2003) and earned his M.Ed. at  Western Governors University in 2012. Onan lives in the Atlanta area with his  wife, Leah. They have three children and enjoy the hectic pace of life in a  young family. Onan and Leah are members of the Journey Church in Hiram, GA.

Website: http://www.eaglerising.com

Read more at http://eaglerising.com/3528/south-carolina-nullify-obamacare/#ZMBUrsMq0CfbmTo1.99

Harvard: Students turn on Obama, want him recalled, reject Obamacare


http://washingtonexaminer.com/article/2540139

By PAUL BEDARD | DECEMBER 4, 2013 AT 1:12 PM

 The Obama thrill is gone among America’s millennials aged 18-29 just a year after they helped the president win a second term.

A new and shocking poll from Harvard University’s Institute of Politics released Wednesday found that younger Americans are so disgusted with President Obama, Congress and the troubled Obamacare system that 47 percent support recalling the president and just 29 percent are planning to sign up for health insurance.

“A critical factor in the election and reelection of Barack Obama, America’s 18- to 29- year-olds now rate the president’s job performance closer to that of Congress — and at the lowest level since he took office in 2009,” said Harvard Institute of Politics Director Trey Grayson.

How bad is it? Obama’s approval rating among millennials, many with big college loans and no job, is just 41 percent. Even young blacks are tiring of the president, with his approval rating among African-Americans dropping from 84 percent seven months ago to 75 percent today.

Harvard’s poll is especially troubling for Obamacare, which needs millions of younger Americans involved for it to succeed financially. The poll found that 57 disapprove of Obamacare and that there is little interest in signing up.

Worse, by a margin of more than two-to-one, 44 percent of millennials believe that the quality of their care will get worse under the Affordable Care Act and 50 percent believe their cost of care will increase.

“Young Americans aren’t daft, they know a bad deal when they see one and that is why they are abandoning the president and no amount of spin can change the facts that just like MySpace, Millennials are over Obama,” said Raffi Williams, deputy press secretary at the Republican National Committee.

On the issue of recalling the president and Congress, 52 would recall all members of Congress and 47 percent would junk the president, though a nearly-equal 46 percent would not recall him.

Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner’s “Washington Secrets” columnist, can be contacted at pbedard@washingtonexaminer.com.

Author: Paul Bedard
Image

More From the “Thousand Words” File


Obama-care-Table-Talk

President Obama’s heroic new euphemism initiative


President Obama’s presidency is collapsing from accusations of corruption to  incompetence, and White House spokesman Jay Carney is on the hot seat trying to  defend him. The best and brightest minds of the left have been called in to try  and stem the tide of bad news and turn things around. Although it will be an  expensive new government program, the Obama administration finally believes it  has the right approach to get America moving in the right direction.

President Obama is now prepared to “invest” in a “new euphemism” initiative. Millions of dollars will be spent on hiring  marketing consultants to come up with new slogans to change the meaning of  words.

Glitches in Obamacare will now be “prequels to success.”

Benghazi will be explained by pointing out that the  Obama administration has a “99% diplomat survival rate.”

Americans giving up on finding jobs will be praised as “a nation finally  taking time to relax and enjoy time off.”

Obama is also guaranteed a couple of decades from now to remaining “one of  the top 50 American presidents of all time.”

If the consultants fail to come up with real words, the administration will  bring back comedian Rich Hall from the 1980s to reintroduce “Sniglets.” Failing  that, they will borrow Vice President Joe Biden’s Dr. Seuss books for ideas.

In case the new verbiage rollout encounters glitches, Obama administration  officials will roll out the same recycled excuses and euphemisms for failure but  refer to them as new.

“Forward” is the new “forward.”

“Fairness” will be used interchangeably with “fair share.”

“Let me be clear” will be given various spicy but already used adjectives  such as “crystal,” “perfectly” and “totally.” Whether or not these words will be  used in sentences conveying any meaning or truth is “not entirely” clear.

“Make no mistake about it” will be used to convey that President Obama screwed something up royally. So  will “teachable moments.”

The word “investing” will still be a euphemism for spending into bankruptcy,  and every destructive social program will be declared redeemable as long as it  is “for the children.”

“Progressives” who then became “liberals” who then became “progressives” again will again avoid using their actual title of “failures.”

While the Obama Euphemism Initiative is already expected to be a complete  failure, Obama supporters have declared it a success. It did not achieve  anything, but it felt good to say.

ObamaCare = NOT Covered-in-California


“If you like your plan you can keep it. Period.”

Unless the President thinks you need something else. Like the one million  Californians whose plans got cancelled because of ObamaCare.

Calif

“But,” you might say, “President Obama said that we could keep our plans, the  insurance companies could just extend them through next year.”

Bzzzzzzzzzzzt. Wrong. Since the President is not King (yet) that change would  have to be approved by the California insurance commissioner and even then, it’s  up to the individual insurance company to extend the plan. And the insurance commissioner?

Spurning President Obama’s call to let insurers extend canceled health  policies, California won’t allow 1 million policyholders to keep their health  plan for another year.

The board of the Covered California health exchange voted unanimously to  break with the president and keep its requirement that insurers terminate most  individual policies Dec. 31 because the policies don’t meet all the requirements  of the Affordable Care Act.

Bottom line? Obama lied, your policy died. But then, for those of you in  California, that’s exactly what you voted for 13 months ago isn’t it.

Elections have consequences.

HealthCareDotGov fails to meet Nov. 30 targets


http://www.humanevents.com/2013/12/02/healthcaredotgov-fails-to-meet-nov-30-targets-white-house-declares-victory-anyway/

HealthCareDotGov fails to meet Nov. 30 targetsBy: John Hayward  12/2/2013 09:45 AM

Not surprisingly, after moving the goalposts half a dozen times for the November 30 relaunch of Healthcare.gov, the Obama Administration couldn’t get within 30 yards of the end zone, but they declared a touchdown anyway.  It was positively surreal to watch bureaucrats high-five each other for a job well done when it obviously wasn’t.  They’re nowhere near the full functionality that was promised when the November 30 date was set.  Evidence suggests they haven’t even met the lowered expectations of 80 percent functionality.

This is exactly what critics anticipated.  There’s been some progress on the ObamaCare website, but considering what a complete fiasco it was at launch, that’s not much of a metric.  The Washington Post report on the November 30 festivities is packed full of unintentional comedy, including the Post uncritically relaying crisis manager Jeff Zients’ claims that the website is now “working more than 90 percent of the time” – that’s obviously not true, and Zients himself began walking those claims back almost immediately – plus a howler from Zients in which he compares the current performance of the exchange to its condition on Launch Day.  As you may recall, when the Administration’s stonewall of lies and evasions finally cracked, and they released the Day One figures, it turned out that only six people had enrolled in ObamaCare.  It’s a stunning embarrassment for the Administration to boast about having cleared that exceptionally low bar:

“Bottom line, HealthCare.gov on December 1st is night and day from where it was on October 1st,” when the site was launched, Zients said in a teleconference with reporters Sunday morning.

Even with the improved performance, some people are likely to encounter problems on the site. And there is another worry — reports sent to insurance companies about who has enrolled in health plans include errors that could cause problems when people try to use their new insurance plans next year.

Administration officials, in talking to reporters, were careful not to declare a full-fledged victory. In a report issued Sunday, officials with the Department of Health and Human Services said the next few months would require further work to “improve and enhance the website and continue to improve the consumer experience.” Officials have also said repeatedly that consumers might still encounter difficulties and urged them to use the call center and seek help from specially trained personnel.

Still, the announcement is a milestone for the administration, which has struggled to improve the Web site since its botched Oct. 1 launch.

Welcome to the Obama New Normal of lowered expectations, where abject failure is celebrated as a “milestone.”  Even by the incredibly loose and subjective goals they set during the panicky days of mid-October, Team Obama failed.  There’s no achievement here.  It’s like a plumber demanding a bonus because your toilet only explodes half the time when you flush it.  ”We’re doing better” is not an acceptable status report, given the promises made to drag ObamaCare through a couple of brutal news cycles.

Also, part of the spin surge designed to make it look as if great strides have taken involves admitting just how bad HealthCare.gov has been, particularly in October.  That’s something the Administration worked hard to keep hidden, until they decided they could milk a few political points by revealing it, secure in the knowledge that few reporters would respond, “Holy cow, you guys were lying through your teeth about just how bad things were in October!”

No private-sector CEO could get away with such a celebration of inadequacy.  Obama used to love comparing the Healthcare.gov rollout to an iPhone launch.  Not even he has the chutzpah to keep making that comparison.  Imagine a boardroom meeting where the head of the iPhone project brags that the product works more than half the time now, and that’s a huge improvement over the $500 million launch two months ago, when only six people were able to use it successfully.

Here’s more of that unintentional comedy from the Post report, where they relay a couple of “success stories” from the relaunched exchange… and neither of them was a success.

Among those who tried to log on was Sandy Kush, 49, an unemployed medical transcriptionist from Illinois who tried six times in October to use HealthCare.gov, with no success.

She tried again Sunday and, with the help of a call-center representative, was able to enroll in Medicaid — a stopgap measure, she said, until she can find a new job that offers insurance. The whole experience took about an hour and a half but “was pretty smooth,” she said.

Others reported problems getting all the way through the process. Liz Gallops, 33, a North Carolina insurance broker who has tried unsuccessfully to get coverage through the site, said that HealthCare.gov seemed to be working better Sunday but that at one point she got a message stating that the system “cannot finish your application now.”

Whoopee!  Another person signed up for Medicaid!  That’s not an ObamaCare enrollment.  The other person cited by the Post tried to enroll in ObamaCare and failed.  Notably, there was no effort to demonstrate the “new and improved” system for the media during the big “Mission Accomplished” press conference, because the Administration flacks know better than to punch up this bug-ridden disaster and ignite a scandal firestorm by having it crash during the demo.  CNN tried to use the relaunched system live on the air… and it crashed on them:

CNN

Later in the Post report, the walkback of all those rosy 90 percent operation claims begins:

The online system is stable — not crashing — more than 90 percent of the time, officials said. And the report said that the site can handle as many as 50,000 shoppers at the same time and up to 800,000 visits a day.

The report said the administration has yet to meet at least one of its key goals: reducing the site’s average response time to half a second. And government officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss ongoing operations, cautioned last week that they will not know if they have expanded the site’s carrying capacity to 50,000 users at once until they have that many users online.

This is beyond ludicrous.  They’re admitting that they pulled all these wonderful numbers out of their posteriors, and warning people not to push the system anywhere near the capacity they’ve been boasting about!  And that capacity is really nothing to brag about anyway.  50,000 simultaneous connections for the 36 states using the federal exchange system?  They’ve got 82 business days to enroll 7 million people before the end of March, when the individual mandate comes crashing down.  Only 16 business days remain until the revised cutoff date for securing 2014 insurance that would be effective on January 1, and we know at least five million people have been blown out of their existing plans because of ObamaCare.  There’s no way this fabulously expensive but incredibly weak system can process the 300,00 + enrollments per day that would be needed to repair the damage from Obama’s Big Lie, and frankly, there’s little evidence of a surge in demand to buy those overpriced ObamaCare policies.

It’s extremely telling that the Administration continues to prattle on about “visits per day” and “response times” for the web pages to load.  That sounds like happy horse patties designed to reach Low Information Voters who gave up on trying to use the system because they heard it was “slow.”  Clearing up the slow-motion responses and “page not found errors” people were experiencing when they merely tried to log into the system is less than half the battle for improving the front end, and insurance providers are issuing dark reminders about critical back-end systems that are delivering useless garbage data, or not working at all:

The report did not address the “back-end” parts of the systems that consumers do not see, including the error-filled enrollment reports. Insurers have warned that if the problem is not fixed soon, some people may show up for doctor’s appointments in January only to find that the insurance company has no record of their enrollment.

“Insurers are still receiving enrollment files that are duplicative or include missing or inaccurate information,” Robert Zirkelbach, spokesman for America’s Health Insurance Plans, the industry’s main lobbying group, said Sunday. “In some cases they aren’t receiving those enrollment files at all.”

The New York Times has more details about the chaos at insurance companies, as they struggle to cope with the flow of data sewage pouring from the outflow pipes of the worst online system launch in history:

“Until the enrollment process is working from end to end, many consumers will not be able to enroll in coverage,” said Karen M. Ignagni, president of America’s Health Insurance Plans, a trade group.

The issues are vexing and complex. Some insurers say they have been deluged with phone calls from people who believe they have signed up for a particular health plan, only to find that the company has no record of the enrollment. Others say information they received about new enrollees was inaccurate or incomplete, so they had to track down additional data — a laborious task that would not be feasible if data is missing for tens of thousands of consumers.

In still other cases, insurers said, they have not been told how much of a customer’s premium will be subsidized by the government, so they do not know how much to charge the policyholder.

[…] Insurers said they had received calls from consumers requesting insurance cards because they thought they had enrolled in a health plan through the federal website, but the insurers said they had not been notified.

“Somehow people are getting lost in the process,” the insurance executive said. “If they go to a doctor or a hospital and we have no record of them, that will be very upsetting to consumers.”

Imagine how much worse that confusion will become if the almost completely non-functional front end of Healthcare.gov really does start working better, and dumps five or ten times as much junk data in the insurance industry’s lap!

This is, again, beyond ridiculous.  The Administration adamantly refuses to disclose the one and only metric of success that really matters: the number of people who have successfully processed their first payment for an ObamaCare insurance policy.  By law, that’s the condition that must be met to secure valid coverage.  And Team Obama still spews absurd lies about not having the data, every time someone asks for the number of valid policies that have been purchased through the exchange, preferring to babble about how many people have merely visited the website, or how the process of setting up an online account has gotten so much smoother, or how an awful lot of people have briefly fluttered around Healthcare.gov before getting shuffled off to Medicaid.

I have yet to hear a single official number from this Administration that excludes Medicaid applicants and focuses solely on ObamaCare enrollment.  It is entirely possible that the number of valid insurance policies sold through the federal exchange is very nearly zero.  The New York Times report says insurance providers will consider policies valid if the government hasn’t ponied up the taxpayer’s share of the premiums yet – good thing, because the part of Healthcare.gov that handles such payments doesn’t exist yet – but they won’t be able to handle the financial burden of paying claims without receiving subsidies for long.  There were supposed to be over 700,000 fully completed ObamaCare enrollments by now; the heavily cooked number pushed by the Administration is only 100,000, and that includes Medicaid referrals, plus fragmentary online shopping cart data.

The Wall Street Journal isn’t buying any nebulous claims of relative success for an Administration with a proven track record of deception and obfuscation:

If this miracle fix is real, the White House will open the ObamaCare black box to an independent audit, or maybe start by answering questions honestly. But on a conference call with reporters Sunday, HHS refused to say how much progress the team had made on technical problems that are seeding insurance companies with bad information about who is signing up and for what products. It knows the insurers will keep quiet lest they make themselves political targets.

The mission accomplished pose is another attempt to power through a political deadline. Americans who have now discovered the Administration’s other false claims—you can keep your old plan and your doctor, and the new plans are better—can be forgiven for waiting to see the actual results.

No serious journalist would accept the Obama Administration’s report card for its own performance.  Their claims are meaningless.  Absolute transparency and the disclosure of all hard data for independent review should be the non-negotiable demand from the American people.   Reporters should stand as one and walk out of any press conference that doesn’t begin with someone from HHS or CMS demonstrating a completely successful purchase of insurance through Healthcare.gov – because frankly, at this point, there is no hard evidence that anyone has been able to do that yet.

Team Obama is still treating this as a political spin game, while the lives of American citizens are turned upside-down by the foolish Affordable Care Act.  Hard deadlines are fast approaching.  The people and their representatives should have pure, unspun data so they can make solid decisions about how to proceed.  Here’s the bottom line about the big November 30 relaunch: if the system had been launched in the state that exists today, it would still have been a national scandal.

Update: More low comedy from the Administration, as HHS Secretary Kathleeen Sebelius “urges Americans to visit the site during off-peak hours – generally in the morning or at night.”  Enjoy the New Normal of failure, in which incompetent bureaucrats in charge of trillion-dollar agencies bring you a $500 million website that you should only try using at three o’clock in the morning.

Update: Pete Doocy of Fox News tried to use the “new and improved” Healthcare.gov this morning, and this is what he got.  Serves him right for trying to access the Peoples’ Glorious Health Care System during peak hours!

ocare_error

Obama Forces Christians to Violate Faith


http://lastresistance.com/3830/obama-forces-christians-violate-faith/#w2evQGqemsLT2dcg.99

Posted By on Nov 27, 2013

religious freedom matters

Plan B is considered by the Left as birth control—for that matter, so is  late-term abortion–but studies have indicated that many times, Plan B actually  terminates an already fertilized embryo. In that case, the contraceptive is not  in fact birth control, but abortion. Under Obamacare, many Catholic and other  religious businesses are being forced to provide their employees with coverage  for Plan B—something that violates their faith.

According to Fox:

The Supreme Court announced that it will hear  challenges to the mandate from a crafts chain, Hobby Lobby, and a  Mennonite-Owned furniture company, Conestoga Wood. Owners of the companies argue  that by being forced to comply with the federal regulation the feds are  violating their religious beliefs.”

Juan Williams criticizes the argument, saying:

They (Hobby Lobby) are willing to offer  contraceptive services…They object to the morning after pill. This seems to be  Willy Nilly. You’re opening the door to employers saying, well, you know we  don’t like this, but we like that.”

Moreover, this is an obvious violation of religious freedom. That is just  another step in the Leftist agenda against Christianity. Once one religious  freedom is erased, what’s stopping further damage? If religious organizations  are forced to violate their faith even once, or face consequences from the  government, is that not oppression? Is that not a restriction of freedom?

Once the definition of life is blurred even more than it already has been,  and once Christians are forced to obey either the government or their faith,  we’ve lost the moniker of a free society. We have lost our republic.

The following are comments already made about this article:

Juan Williams’ point of view has to be understood.  He sees everything through The Tyrant’s sphincter.  He’s a marxist sycophant.

 Avatar

I will never deny Jesus Christ

 

Avatar

Please people, read HOSANNA-TABOR EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH AND SCHOOL v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION ET AL… U.S. Supreme Court case, 2010, 9 to zero in favor of religious rights for all of us.  While this case was on a specific issue, the other opinions voiced in the decision expanded these religious rights far more than you might believe.  This is a key win for religious beliefs and practices.

 

Avatar

You can bet that Obama would not do something that is against Islam like he does Christians. Obama would  never do something his BFF in the Muslim world don’t like.

 

Avatar

DO NOT compromise your faith at any cost because the ones that are asking you to are not believes and will suffer the results of their foolish failure to stand with faith and God!   NO!  they can go to hell but I am sticking to the foundation of faith and the Bible!  Just ignore all that Obama says and does and when someone asks you why tell them you do to agree and  he is against the freedom of America.  If they hear that enough it will finally get back to O and he will might (?) finally get the message we do not want to trash our nation!
Avatar

 

24 million illegal s ignore our laws, so can the whole country!

Avatar

 

Christians need to stand strong against this mandate being enforced because we know there is only one correct answer to when life begins.

 Avatar

 

Make muslims participate in o-care………wont happen….they are too delicate….

Avatar

 

Thats right! All or none! Let the geniuses figure something else out. What Obama is saying now is Muslims have religious rights, Christians have none. Kind of lets you know what side hes on, doesn’t it. Not only him but his staff and Congress. We Americans are a sad lot indeed!

 

Avatar

It really does not matter what Juan Williams believes, what matters is what the business owners believe.  They have the right to believe that some things are against their religion whether or not you, I or Juan Williams thinks it is logical or otherwise. That’s what the First Amendment is all about.

 

Avatar

We lost the republic when we voted the muslim illegal alien in without vetting him.  Thank the cretins in the democrat party and the traitors in the media.

 Avatar

 

This is a very good point to make. Many liberal arguments use obfuscation and lump things together when they should not be. Either the statement by the left is ignorant, hasn’t thought it out, or it’s an intentional untrue statement.

Avatar

 

But not Muslims.

Avatar

 

“Religious Freedom Matters!” NO! What matters (at least to Yahweh, God of the Bible) is the First Commandment–Thou shalt have no other gods besides Him!

What’s described in this article is occurring because of the religious freedom, outside the bounds of Christianity and the Bible, provided by the framers via Amendment 1. It is inarguable that had the framers not failed to establish government and society upon Yahweh’s immutable morality and everlasting righteousness as reflected in His perfect law (Psalm 19:7-11), none of this would be occurring. Think about it: Obama wouldn’t even be President today, nor would anyone today in Congress be there to accomplish their dastardly deeds.

“…3. Every problem America faces today can be traced  back to the fact that the framers failed to expressly establish a government  upon Yahweh’s immutable morality as codified in His commandments, statutes, and  judgments. (Would infanticide and sodomy be tolerated, let alone financed by  the government, if Yahweh’s perfect law and altogether righteous judgments were  the law of the land? Would Islam be a looming threat to our peace and security if  the First Amendment had been replaced with the First Commandment? Would Americans  be in nearly as much debt if usury had been outlawed as a form of theft? Would  crime be as rampant if “cruel and unusual punishment” had not been outlawed and criminals were instead punished with Yahweh’s altogether righteous judgments?  Would we be on the fiscal cliff if we were taxed with a flat increase tax  rather than a graduated income tax?)….”

For more, see our Featured Blog Article “5 Reasons the Constitution is Our Cutting-Edge Issue.” Click on my name, then our website, and see our Featured Article near the top of the home page. Then take our Constitution Survey in the right-hand sidebar and receive a free copy of an 85-page book that examines the Constitution by the Bible.

 Avatar

 

How about that hope and change?  Well I hope it changes….back to what the framers decided in 1776 !!!

 Avatar

 

Since when did Juan Williams understand anything?

 

Avatar

“What Juan doesn’t seem to understand is that contraception and Plan B are  altogether different animals.” Juan DOES FULLY understand and that is the evil of his statement and position.  Jesus will judge EVERY IDLE WORD.  Did I just judge him?  No, he has judged himself.  The fact is, I didn’t make him state that lie and I didn’t request or coerce him into making that lie.  He did it on his own.  God will judge us both.  Only the blood of Jesus Christ makes a way out of punishment for BOTH of us.

Avatar

 

Are the Muslims having trouble with this also? If not then this is discrimination! As well as religious  persecution! Haven’t we Americans had enough yet? I guess most Americans do not care what this president does. They will care one day but too late!

Avatar

 

I no longer listen to anything Juan Williams has to say.  When he or Obama come on T.V. I change channels.  That goes for Biden, Holder, Pelosi also.  And the list goes on and on.

Avatar

meg Hotnike
JAUAN WILLIAM is a joke ITS LIKE LOOKING AT OVERMIT ON FOX IT is a joke to listen to this person  he is an obsloute idioute like the wel fare reciepts  trying to bring America to her knee s let see if we can change this false gov  lets take it down AS A mericans born in the USA

Have You Seen the New Time Magazine Cover?


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/danieldoherty/2013/11/23/have-you-seen-the-new-time-magazine-cover-n1751216

Daniel Doherty | Nov 23, 2013

Daniel Doherty
Now that the Big Lie has been exposed for everyone to see, it’s going to take some time for it to sufficiently sink in. I imagine most low-information voters who don’t follow politics regularly — the obvious exception being people who’ve already been negatively impacted by the Affordable Care Act — aren’t too familiar with the president’s now-broken “if you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan” pledge. That will all change soon enough.

    Now, of course, when Americans head to the grocery store — or perhaps to their local pharmacy — this cover will be staring them blankly in the face as they wait in the check-out line. Oof:

TIME Cover

Tag Cloud