Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘ObamaCare’

Video: New Ads Slam Vulnerable Democrats for ‘Parroting’ Obamacare Falsehoods


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/05/28/video-new-ads-slam-vulnerable-democrats-for-parroting-obamacare-lies-n1844379

Guy Benson | May 28, 2014

Guy Benson

 

ad 01The Alaska version is here. Millions of Americans have been unable to keep their existing plans, withaccess shocksevering years-long patient/doctor relationships. And the broken promises are expected to continue to impact vast groups of consumers for years. Obamacare isn’t the only subject on which Senators like Pryor and Begich have done Obama’s bidding. Last year’s Congressional Quarterly analysis revealed that they’ve voted with the White House 90 percent and 97 percent of the time, respectively. Meanwhile, Americans for Prosperity has released an ad critical of Democratic Senate hopeful Rep. Gary Peters in Michigan. You likely remember Peters as the man whose campaign attempted to silence single mother and cancer patient Julie Boonstra, whose plan was canceled under Obamacare. The new spot, conspicuously aimed at female voters, hits Peters for his unrepentant support for a law that is raising many Michiganders’ healthcare costs:

aD 02
In an interesting twist, an NBA player is now claiming that Michigan Democrats “recently” approached him about running for Senate this fall, which Republican Terri Lynn Land’s campaign is touting as a private vote of no confidence against Peters. AFP is also running a positive spot praising Rep. Tom Cotton, Pryor’s opponent in Arkansas. In New Hampshire, Scott Brown’s campaign is up on air with a new radio ad critical of Obamacare’s deleterious impact on jobs and the economy:

ad 03
Earlier in the month, Democrats on Capitol Hill giddily quoted a piece from The Hill positing that Republicans had “gone quiet” on Obamacare, flummoxed by the law’ssuccesses.” In that case, why are GOP ad-makers consistently coming out guns blazing against Obamacare? Perhaps it’s because the law remains deep underwater in the court public opinion, as a new AP poll again confirmed just yesterday. It’s also no mystery why so many of these ads ruthlessly Democrats to President Obama: He’s unpopular, and he’s a significant drag on his party. More results from yesterday’s national survey:

josh tweet

His overall approval rating in the poll is (43/56)…among adults, not likely or even registered voters. By the way, if you’re unacquainted with the significance of the #LikeABoss hashtag, read this to get up to speed.

Complete Message

VOTE 02

 

 

 

Medicaid! It’s FREE!


Webster’s will be soon changing the definition of “free.” The new definition will read: “paid for by US taxpayers.” Medicaid is going to be the picture next to the definition. There are a number of enormous problems with ObamaCare, probably the biggest is its impact on Medicaid.

Medicaid is a program that has historically covered the poor, until ObamaCare it covered children under 6 and pregnant women whose family income was less than 133% of the federal poverty level and children 6-18 for families at 100% of the FPL. ObamaCare changed all that.

States that accepted the Medicaid expansion now have to cover everyone below 133% of the FPL. Everyone.

Complete MessageThe Obama administration offered some cheese to the mouse in order to get the states to accept this suicide pact. The feds are paying (that means you) for 100% of the incremental cost of the new enrollees. Except that they’re going to phase down to 90% of the incremental cost by 2020.

In addition, there’s a group of people known as the “Medicaid woodwork” who aren’t included in the “Fed pays for it” deal. It turns out that the participation rate for people who are eligible for Medicaid is about 62%. As those who are eligible come into Medicaid, thanks to a huge advertising program, those costs are going to add to the state’s burden for health care cost. Right now the states pay for 57% of the Medicaid cost.

Oh, and there’s no “guarantee” that the feds are going to continue to pay up at 90% for the incremental people they are covering.

The Medicaid population is expanding by huge numbers. Just try and get those new medical welfare recipients off the rolls.

GET READY TO STAND IN LINE TO SEE A MEDICAL(?). IT WON’T BE A DOCTOR. IT MAY NOT BE A PHYCISANS ASSISTANCE. IT MAY BE ONLY A NURSE. HOW IS THAT VOTE FOR CHANGE DOING FOR YOU NOW?

Then there’s the “doctor problem” illustrated by, where else, California.

The number of Medi-Cal patients has grown sharply, thanks to Obamacare, but the number of doctors willing to see them has not. In fact, the number of doctors in California willing to take Medi-Cal patients could drop once planned cuts to reimbursement rates kick in next year.

States will be cutting reimbursement rates to doctors in order to balance their budgets. Remember that most states have requirements to balance their state budgets.

Dr. Esteban Lovato is a longtime supporter of the Medi-Cal program. He told the Times that he currently gets about $42 to see each Medi-Cal patient. But next year when rates revert to Medi-Cal rates, including a ten percent cut included in next year’s budget, his reimbursement per patient could drop to $21. That would make it very difficult for him to continue to take Medi-Cal patients. It would also ensure that his colleagues in the medical profession would be less likely to start seeing them.

There’s another problem connected to the new Medi-Cal enrollees. The push to enroll people in Obamacare also brought hundreds of thousands of people who were previously eligible out of the woodwork. But unlike expanded Medicaid where the federal government pays the cost, in the case of people who were previously eligible, the state pays half the cost of their coverage. Governor Jerry Brown just added $1.2 billion to next year’s budget to cover the costs of the additional 800,000 Medi-Cal recipients who fall into this category.

That $1.2 billion is just the start. Just wait until the federal 90% target drops to, oh say, 47%. And, for states like California, if Obama/Boehner get their way on illegal aliens, they’ll get another three or four million Medi-Cal enrollees overnight. Don’t expect the feds to cover those either.

If you’d like to know where all this is going, just look at the VA Hospital scandal.

Either there will be backlogs of patients unable to make appointments because there are not enough doctors to see them, or the state will be forced to increase the amount doctors are reimbursed. In the former case, the patients will experience delayed care. In the latter, the taxpayers will be asked to come up with billions more to cover the cost.

About those Death Panels Democrats said were a lie…..

VOTE 02

Sarah Palin: VA Scandal Future of Obamacare If Democrats Not Voted Out


http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/05/21/Sarah-Palin-VA-Scandal-Future-of-Obamacare-if-Democrats-Not-Voted-Out?utm_source=e_breitbart_com&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Breitbart+News+Roundup%2C+May+22%2C+2014&utm_campaign=20140522_m120570677_Breitbart+News+Roundup%2C+May+22%2C+2014&utm_term=More

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin said President Barack Obama’s Veterans Administration scandal involving 40 veterans who reportedly died after they were put on secret waiting lists represents Obamacare’s future if Democrats are not voted out of office.

“Friends, that’s rationed care. That’s the VA today. That’s what’s got to change,” she wrote Wednesday on Facebook. “That’s why Congress has got to change because until we elect leaders who’ll buck the march to socialized medicine known as Obamacare, America’s health care system will go the way of the VA.”

Palin had previously warned about the perils of socialized medicine and Obamacare before the law was enacted.

“Government health care will not reduce the cost; it will simply refuse to pay the cost,” Palin wrote in 2009 while predicting “death panels.” “And who will suffer the most when they ration care? The sick, the elderly, and the disabled, of course.”

Politifact deemed Palin’s remarks to be its “Lie of the year,” and Palin was mocked years before liberals like Howard Dean, Paul Krugman, and some of President Barack Obama’s former advisers – like Steven Rattner – finally conceded she was right

Palin said Wednesday that “Obama’s Democrat party must be defeated in the ballot box in November” so that America remains the strongest nation on earth. She posted a picture of Abraham Lincoln and referenced Lincoln’s words about Americans having to guard their freedoms: “America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.”

Last week, Palin sounded the alarm about the willingness of Democrats to use Obamacare’s failures to push the country toward a single-payer healthcare system.

“What happens next is the Left will subtly suggest moving America toward a single-payer system, which was their intention all along. Watch for this gradual, but driving, descent into statism,” Palin warned. “So, are you still relying on Obamacare to help and not hurt you? On the Democrats’ watch, health care in the hands of unaccountable bureaucrats proves Reagan’s adage that government is not the solution; government is the problem.”

Complete MessageVOTE 02

 

 

New Poll Spells Absolute Disaster for Democrats


http://www.tpnn.com/2014/05/21/new-poll-spells-absolute-disaster-for-democrats/

That’s like the White Star Line advertising the “success” of Titanic’s maiden voyage.
However, this continued insistence that Obamacare is an achievement on which Democrats should run for reelection is a blessing for Republicans. Despite the mainstream media hustling for the Democrats to try and spin our nation’s sojourn into socialized medicine as anything but a disaster, even they have not been able to conceal the disastrous consequences of Obamacare.
From the failed rollout to the soaring costs to the cancelled insurance policies, Obamacare has received a bad reputation- and rightfully so.
Democrats ought to be worried. A new poll revealed that 9 out of 10 voters intend to consider Obamacare when voting in the midterm elections.
Yes- 90% of those who will be voting will ponder the effects of Obamacare. With no real success stories of note and only failure after failure having piled up, when voters think Obamacare, they are bound to think of government-sponsored disaster.
Worse yet: this poll comes from Politico– a news source that largely caters to the left. If Politico readers have lost that loving feeling for Obamacare, what does that say about American opinions on the subject as a whole?
 
The doom and gloom for Democrats rolls on as the IJ Review reports:
Sixty percent of respondents said the debate on the Affordable Care Act is not over, contrary to the President’s claims. And half of those polled say they favor full repeal of the Obamacare law.
 
The issues currently being used by the Democratic Party to whip up votes – immigration reform and pay equity – don’t even come close as a hot-button issue this year. Only 28 and 16 percent, respectively, said those issues would determine their vote in the midterms.
 
Not only that, when asked which party they would prefer to vote for, voters say they are more likely to vote for a Republican over a Democrat by 7 points, 41 to 34 percent.
 
The poll notes that people are feeling a growing distrust of and hostility towards big government and insiders in Washington, DC.
 
And who can blame them? The Obama administration has “accomplished” nothing of significance except waste trillions of dollars and carry out a disastrous healthcare law that the majority of Americans don’t want. 
As we look on in horror at the VA scandal, one obvious observation goes unmentioned by the mainstream media: this is the face of government-run healthcare. 
Complete MessageVOTE 02

 

Obama Administration just got caught in a massive lie.


http://www.wvoc.com/onair/jonathon-kelly-49688/obama-administration-just-got-caught-in-12378597#ixzz32TS44NO7

Posted Wednesday, May 21st 2014 @ 11am

karikatur für titelseite-barack pinocchioThe LA Times has been as friendly as possible to the Obama administration, but they can’t ignore this. Today they broke the story that another massive lie around Obamacare has been told to the Congress and the American people. As you know “If you like your health plan, you can keep your health plan” was ranked as the biggest lie of the year by the Washington Post.  Well here comes an early contender for this years award. 

The Republicans have been accusing the Obama administration of building into Obamacare an insurance plan for the insurance companies. A bailout if the insurance companies lost money under Obamacare. Their claim was that in the law was something called the temporary risk corridor program. Under that Republicans said the administration had allowed themselves a way to take tax dollars and bailout an insurance company that lost money. But the administration and the Democrats have denied that. Apparently the administration and the Democrats had been telling the truth…and didn’t like it.

The LA Times reports that late last week hundreds of pages of new regulations were added to Obamacare. Their reporters went through it and found a few key paragraphs. The change in regulations essentially provides insurers with another backup: If they keep rate increases modest over the next couple of years but lose money, the administration will tap federal funds as needed to cover shortfalls. This could be hundreds of billions of dollars!

This is a classic bait and switch. The middle class will feel like they’re getting a break on insurance premiums. As long as they don’t look at the governments check book, they’ll believe the Affordable Health Care Law is working. It only unravels if they realize they are paying double for their insurance, because the increase is being charged to their account in the form of more debt.

The Republicans are expected to go nuts over this, and the Democrats will point at the scene they are making and say ‘look how fanatical those people are’. I Complete Messagewould warn Republicans against making a big deal out of this. In the medical field it’s called bedside manner. You’re about to inform the patient (America) that it has a potentially fatal disease (debt). They are going to get a 2nd opinion from the Democrats that will contradict your diagnosis. If you come off as raving lunatics, the patient will believe the diagnosis of the other doctor who is telling them they’re fine. Conservatives don’t have the luxury of showing anger anymore. They have been rightly angry over a number of scandals, but it turns the middle off. It’s vital that the middle hears and comprehends what your message is.

This won’t be classified as a scandal by the media, so we shouldn’t either.

  • Talk calmly about the disappointment you feel in the administration burying new regulations into the law,
  • that Congress didn’t get to vote on,
  • that will cost us potentially hundreds of billions of dollars.
  • Talk about how crony capitialism between this administration and a select few insurance companies has perpetrated a fraud on the American tax payer to make it seem like the Affordable Healthcare Act is helping to keep costs low when in actuality it is forcing prices to skyrocket while making it more difficult for all Americans to receive treatment.
  • Encourage them to read today’s LA Times story.
  • Don’t get into arguments with liberals who support wholeheartedly what is happening out of a blind belief that this is helping. You will not win an Never Argueargument with someone who refuses to look at the facts honestly. And in your rage will potentially dissuade fair minded folks from investigating for themselves.

I don’t believe Obamacare will be the law of the land for long. Sometime around 2017 it will either move to socialized medicine or as the Democrats have branded it “single payer”, or it will turn into some free market based system which probably includes some government subsidies and Health Savings Accounts. There is a lot depending on the way this argument is settled and it’s important that the patients understand what their decision means for their health. 

Watch FOX NEWS Discussion here;

bailout

Leftist Revisionist
VOTE 02

 

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


Heads-UpComplete MessageVOTE 02

Dr. Ben Carson Schools NBC’s David Gregory on Slavery, Obamacare and Marxism


http://www.tpnn.com/2014/05/19/dr-ben-carson-schools-nbcs-david-gregory-on-slavery-obamacare-and-marxism/

Dr.Ben.Carson 
Dr. Ben Carson educated NBC’s David Gregory on  Meet the Press  on Sunday, during a segment where Gregory attempted to smear Carson with a “gotcha” question.

Gregory played a clip from 2013 where Dr. Carson said that Obamacare was “the worst thing that has happened in this nation since slavery. And it is in a way, it is slavery, in a way because it is making all of us subservient to the government and it was never about health care. It was about control.”

Gregory, a mouthpiece for the Obama regime masquerading as a journalist, tried to make that statement stick as Carson’s “legacy,” asking Carson, “People who have health care now that didn’t have it before, I suspect would disagree strongly with you, but I wonder, in addition, is that really how you wanted to be defined, how you wanna put government on trial in effect, in a political way?”

Dr. Carson educated Gregory (see video below) that giving up control of one’s healthcare decisions to government is a loss of freedom and a type of slavery. Dr. Carson said that government takeover of healthcare is a Marxist tactic to take control of the populace and that there is a better way to make sure everyone has access to healthcare:

DR. BEN CARSON:  Well, first of all, recognize what I said — “worst thing since slavery.” I didn’t say that it was slavery. People who are well-read…[Gregory interrupts]

DAVID GREGORY:   [Interrupting Dr. Carson] Well, you said it is slavery in a way because it makes all of us subservient to the government…

CARSON:  Right, and I said, “in a way.” In a way, anything is slavery that robs you of your ability to control your own life, and when you take the most important thing you that you have, which is your health care, and you put that in the hands of government bureaucrats, I think you have done the wrong thing.

And, as I was about to say [before Gregory interrupted], you go back an look at the neo-Marxist literature and look at what they say, you don’t have to listen to what I say, about taking control of healthcare of the populace and making the people dependent.

This is not what America is about.

Do I believe in healthcare for everybody? Absolutely! But, I think they’re much better ways to get there which leaves healthcare in the hands of patients and of doctors.

WATCH BELOW:

ben
Complete MessageVOTE 02

 

First they came for the Veterans . . .


FIRST THEM CAME FOR Graphic #2 homeless vet

 

First they came for the Veterans’ benefits.

They said, “Because you no longer protect or serve, we’re cutting your pensions, your benefits, and closing your commissaries.”

The Veterans asked, “What about the promises you made?”

They were told, “Your country is running out of money.

The Veterans said, “If that is true, why do illegals receive welfare and food stamps?”

They were told. “That’s not your concern. Just trust us. We’ll do the right thing. Your government will take care of you.”

They lied.

Americans (who were not Veterans) didn’t stand up and speak out and so . . .

THEY CAME FOR the medical care of sick and wounded Veterans.

FIRST THEY CAME FOR Graphic #3 hero w one foot in the grave

They said, “Take a number and wait.”

The Veterans asked, “What about the promises you made?”

They were told. “Your country is running out of money.

The Veterans said, “If that is true, why do VA administrators receive bonuses while we wait and die without receiving medical care?”

They were told, “That’s not your concern. Be patient. Fill out the forms. Just trust us. We’ll do the right thing. Your government will take care of you.”

They lied.

Americans (who were not Veterans in need of medical care) didn’t stand up and speak out and so . . .

THEY CAME FOR Social Security benefits.

FIRST THEY CAME FOR Graphic #4 hands off my social security

They said to the Senior Citizens, “Because you no longer contribute to the greater good, you will not receive a cost of living increase.”

The Senior Citizens replied, “But, we worked, followed the rules, and placed our money into the Social Security Fund lockbox. You agreed to guard our contributions. Instead, you “borrowed” our money and never repaid it.”

They were told, “Your country is running out of money.”

The senior citizens asked, “If that is true, why do able-bodied adults, who chose not to work, receive increased entitlements?”

They said. “That’s not your concern. Just trust us. We’ll do the right thing. Your government will take care of you.”

They lied.

Americans (who were not Senior Citizens) didn’t stand up and speak out and so . . .

THEY CAME FOR everyone’s healthcare.

What were the promises made?

The promised broken?

When will we-the-people stand up and speak out against the massive dishonesty

being perpetrated against us by our own government?

Read the rest of this story at TheBlaze.

 

Molli for Joe

P.S. Additional political stories are available in my FREE book download “Uncle SCAM Wants Your Money and Your Country.”Use these stories to help you begin conversations with the less-aware people in your universe. An effective tool of political information sharing is to “entertain first, enlighten second.”
VOTE 02

Today’s Politically INCORRECT, Yet Very Accurate, Cartoon


 

A Growing “Agenda”

“A better title might be, ‘Unfortunately, this is a Horrible Growing Agenda’.” JB

Posted on May 12, 2014

http://conservativebyte.com/2014/05/growing-agenda/#k7bguuolFRDdKqmE.99

A-Growing-Agenda

Complete Message

VOTE 02

 

 

DICTATOR


http://www.tpnn.com/2014/05/04/obama-vows-continued-dictatorial-rule-if-he-doesnt-get-his-way/

Obama Dictator

“Dictator-in-Chief”, Barack Obama

During his Weekly Address, Barack Obama promised to continue his dictatorial style rule of America, vowing to go around Congress and the system of government that our Founders put in place if Republicans don’t give him exactly what he wants. (watch video below)

Apparently forgetting that America is not a dictatorship and the job of Congress is not to be yes-men to him, Obama chastised Republicans, also forgetting that the failure of his jobs bill was due to bi-partisan opposition.

 “[W]e could do a lot more if Republicans in Congress were less interested in stacking the deck in favor of those at the top, and more interested in growing the economy for everybody. They’ve now voted more than 50 times to take apart the Affordable Care Act – imagine if they voted 50 times on serious jobs bills.”

Obama then went full-fledged dictator boldly proclaiming that he will accomplish his Marxist based agenda to fundamentally transform America using whatever means necessary.

“That’s why I’m going to take action on my own wherever I can. To grow our economy from the middle out, not the top down. To give every American who works hard a chance to get ahead.”

While he didn’t use his “I’ve got a pen and I’ve got a phone” mantra, his vow was definitely reminiscent of previous threats he’s made to act unilaterally and unconstitutionally if he doesn’t get his way.

WATCH
weekly
VOTE 02Community Organizer TwoComplete Message

 

Important Obamacare Information You Need to Know.


MEDICARE AT AGE 76, IMPORTANT PLEASE READ – ANYONE WHO DOUBTS THIS IS TRUE CAN DOWNLOAD THE NEW OBAMA CARE AND LOOK UP THE PAGES MENTIONED. THIS IS JUST THE BEGINNING…………………. PLEASE PASS THIS OUTRAGE TO EVERYONE ON YOUR LIST!!!

THIS should be read by everyone, especially important to those over 75……. If you are younger, then it may apply to your parents….

Your hospital Medicare admittance has just changed under Obama Care. You must be admitted by your primary Physician in order for Medicare to pay for it! If you are admitted by an emergency room doctor it is treated as outpatient care where hospital costs are not covered.

This is only the tip of the iceberg for Obama Care. Just wait to see what happens in this year and 2014!

YOU ARE NOT GOING TO LIKE THIS…

At age 76 when you need it most, you are not eligible for cancer treatment * see page 272.

What Nancy Pelosi didn’t want us to know until after the healthcare bill was passed. Remember she said, “We have to pass the Bill so that we can see what’s in it.”

Well, here it is. Obama Care Highlighted by Page Number THE CARE BILL HB 3200, JUDGE KITHIL IS THE 2ND OFFICIAL WHO HAS OUTLINED THESE PARTS OF THE CARE BILL. Judge Kithil of Marble Falls , TX – highlighted the most egregious pages of HB3200 Please read this……. especially the reference to pages 58 & 59 JUDGE KITHIL wrote:

** Page 50/section 152: The bill will provide insurance to all non-U.S. residents, even if they are here illegally.

** Page 58 and 59: The government will have real-time access to an individual’s bank account and will have the authority to make electronic fund transfers from those accounts.

** Page 65/section 164: The plan will be subsidized (by the government) for all union members, union retirees and for community organizations (such as the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now – ACORN)

** Page 203/line 14-15: The tax imposed under this section will not be treated as a tax. (How could anybody in their right mind come up with that?)

** Page 241 and 253: Doctors will all be paid the same regardless of specialty, and the government will set all doctors’ fees. This is what they do in Sweden too.

** Page 272. section 1145: Cancer hospital will ration care according to the patient’s age.

** Page 317 and 321: The government will impose a prohibition on hospital expansion; however, communities may petition for an exception.

Tyranney Alert

** Page 425, line 4-12: The government mandates advance-care planning consultations. Those on Social Security will be required to attend an “end-of-life planning” seminar every five years. (Death counseling..)

** Page 429, line 13-25: The government will specify which doctors can write an end-of-life order.

HAD ENOUGH???? Judge Kithil then goes on to identify: “Finally, it is specifically stated that this bill will not apply to members of Congress. No wonder they did not see the need to read it….doesn’t apply to them!!!

THE AMERICAN PEOPLE NEED TO STAND UP TO WASHINGTON …. I don’t know if we can do anything, but awareness helps.

Complete Message

Judge Andrew Napolitano Natural rights Patriot Act


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Judge

Complete Message

 

The Obamacare Question That Has Democrats Terrified


http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/04/27/The-Obamacare-Question-That-Has-Democrats-Terrified

With just 191 days until the Nov. 4 midterm elections, nervous Democrats are scrambling to find an effective answer to the Obamacare question they may fear the most: “Where is the $2,500 in health insurance savings President Obama and Democrats promised me?”

As the video below demonstrates, President Barack Obama promised numerous times that Obamacare would cut the typical American family’s health insurance premiums by $2,500 per year.

 

 

2500

Indeed, the question has already stumped Democratic lawmakers. During a February town hall in Mankato, Minnesota, one citizen asked Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and Rep. Tim Walz (D-MN) about the $2,500 Obamacare promise.

“I thought the Affordable Care Act would save $2,500 per family. What happened?”

Klobuchar and Walz sat stunned and silent before laughing at the citizen’s question.

stunned

Obamacare has been in effect for over four years but remains deeply unpopular. That means the $2,500 Obamacare question could become the 2014 equivalent of President Ronald Reagan’s famous question: “Are you better off than you were four years ago?”

The overwhelming majority of Americans are facing health insurance premium hikes, not savings. On Thursday, Aetna, America’s third-largest health insurer, announced that customers can expect 2015 premium spikes that in some states will be “over double digits.”

Recent polls show that nearly one in five voters (19%) say a congressional candidate’s position on Obamacare will be the “single most important factor” determining who they will vote for. Worse for Democrats, the all-important Independent voter bloc supports anti-Obamacare candidates by a 25% margin (54% to 29%).

Vulnerable Democrats may worry that last year’s Politifact “Lie of the Year” by President Obama – “If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan” – may come back to haunt them. However, with the sluggish U.S. economy and bleak jobs outlook weighing heavily on voters, the “Where is the $2,500 in savings Democrats and Obama promised me?” question may hit even more voters closer to home

Community Organizer Two

Complete Message

 

 

Members of Congress Urge Court: Rule on Obama’s ‘Stunning Disregard for Law’


http://cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/members-congress-urge-court-rule-obamas-stunning-disregard-law

April 23, 2014 – 7:44 AM

DeSantis

Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) in C-SPAN image.

(CNSNews.com) – Dozens of members of Congress are asking a court to rule on the Obama administration’s attempt to “rewrite the Affordable Care Act on a wholesale basis.”

They say the Office of Personnel Management, which is part of the Executive Branch, showed astunning disregard for the law” when it restored taxpayer-funded health care subsidies for members of Congress and their staffers.

The Affordable Care Act requires congressional employees to sign up for health care through the government-run exchanges, but the law does not provide subsidies for members of Congress and their staffs.

“Well, a lot of people did not like that, so they got the administration to essentially grant unlawful subsidies,” Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) told Fox News on Tuesday. “And so we have tried to challenge that legislatively.”

Ron

The government is now asking a federal court to dismiss the lawsuit filed by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.). But dozens of Republicans, in a legal brief filed Tuesday, urged the court not to do that.

“And I think the point is, is we have been complaining about executive overreach in all of these different instances, as we should be,” DeSantis said.  

“And, look, whatever law you pass, you have got to live under the same terms of it. There are a lot of provisions of Obamacare that harm some of my constituency, but they are not allowed to just go get a bailout from the administration like the members of Congress and the staff did in this situation.”

DeSantis said he and other lawmakers can pay their staffs more money to make up for the lack of tax-preferred health care subsidies. He said only members of Congress will be negatively affected if Johnson’s lawsuit is successful.

“I’m not opposed to there being employment contributions for people’s health care,” DeSantis said. “I just think it has got to actually be in the statute, and you can’t just go making this stuff up willy-nilly.”

DeSantis also disagreed with President Obama’s comment that the debate surrounding Obamacare is over:

“Well, I think that is wishful thinking on his part.” He noted that many of Obamacare’s “most damaging provisions,” including the employer mandate, have been suspended until after the 2014 midterm election.

Eventually, DeSantis said, “You’re going to see more people being moved to 29 hours. You’re going to see businesses not want to go above 50 employees, because of the negative effects that Obamacare will impose upon them, and that is going to create an even bigger drag on our economy.”

The legal brief filed by 38 Republican members on Tuesday says the “unlawful executive action at issue in this case is not an isolated incident. Rather, it is part of an ongoing campaign by the Executive Branch to rewrite the Affordable Care Act on a wholesale basis. If left unchecked, that campaign threatens to subvert the most basic precept of our system of government: The President of the United States is constitutionally obligated to take care that the law be faithfully executed; he does not have the power to modify or ignore laws that have been duly enacted by Congress and that he believes are constitutional…”

In his own response to the government’s motion to dismiss the case, Sen. Ron Johnson noted that he filed suit against the Office of Personnel Management on Jan. 6. 2014, because “it was the one opportunity where I believe I had standing to challenge.”   

Johnson says Congress was clear in its intention: “The misnamed Affordable Care Act required Congress and its staff to get its health coverage through the exchanges and to do it without a tax-preferred employer subsidy, like anyone else who will lose employer-sponsored coverage. The administration’s rule violates this law. It is unfair to the American people and it is an offense against the rule of law.”

Complete Message

Results of This New Poll are Devastating for Democrats


http://www.tpnn.com/2014/04/22/results-of-this-new-poll-are-devastating-for-democrats/

Obama.Reid.Pelosi

THE THREE GENUINE ENEMIES OF THE STATE

 In a shocking new poll, highly coveted “independent” voters, those not affiliated by either major political party, say they would vote for a candidate who opposes Obamacare by a wide margin of 25%.

The new poll released Monday by FOX News  asks voters who they would vote for if the only difference between two congressional candidates is that one promises to fight for Obamacare, while the other candidate promises to fight against it. Independent voters said they’d vote for the anti-Obamacare candidate 54% – 29%.

Both political parties make major efforts to reach the independent vote as they assume most affiliated voters will usually vote for their respective parties.

Additionally, a whopping 72% of independents say that the candidate’s position on Obamacare would be an important factor in their decision who they’d cast their vote for.

Complete Message

HHS Moves to Cancel More Insurance Plans


http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/04/18/HHS-Moves-to-Cancel-More-Insurance-Plans

Tyranney Alert

The Department of Health and Human Services is proposing a rule that would, if implemented, guarantee that even more Americans who like their health insurance plans cannot keep them.

Fixed indemnity plans, which pay insured customers a set amount towards medical expenses and are often cost-effective relative to more comprehensive health insurance, are popular forms of coverage, and potentially becoming more popular in the wake of Obamacare.

Health insurance industry representatives say that fixed indemnity plans have been attracting more interest as many Americans look for a way to mitigate against the high deductibles applicable to many insurance policies available on the Obamacare exchanges (fixed indemnity plans are not Obamacare-compliant, but they are seen by some consumers as pairing nicely with Obamacare-compliant insurance).

But the HHS rule would effectively ban them, overriding regulation that has up until now been the preserve of state governments.  The rule would state that these plans can only be sold to consumers where that consumer also purchases Obamacare-compliant insurance.

It is difficult for fixed indemnity providers to determine definitively whether a given customer carries Obamacare-compliant insurance. The proposed regulation may also conflict with state laws pertaining to fixed indemnity. This uncertainty creates a regulatory nightmare for insurers, threatening to cause insurers to stop offering fixed indemnity coverage altogether, whether consumers like it or not.

“This latest proposed Obamacare regulation, like many before it, isn’t even a remotely plausible interpretation of the statutes that Congress actually passed”, wrote Ed Haislmaier, a senior fellow at Heritage Foundation. “This latest “fix” is worth fighting — both to keep the lifeboats intact during this dangerous voyage and to keep a sound insurance option in place for the long haul.” 

Under the proposal, consumers who can afford only fixed indemnity insurance may wind up carrying no insurance at all and simply paying the Obamacare penalty. Consumers could face higher risks of medical cost-related bankruptcy, while a lower number of consumers- especially younger consumers, who may be able to afford fixed indemnity but not an Obamacare-compliant policy- reject entering the insurance marketplace full stop, thus risking driving up insurance costs for existing insured consumers.

It could also mean that hospitals and other health care providers have a harder time recouping costs for treatment, as more patients go “naked,” lacking even the basic coverage that fixed indemnity plans offer, and cause further inflation in health care costs as providers seek to recoup losses from those who can and will pay.

SEE VIDEO REPORT HERE:

Health

Community Organizer TwoComplete Message

 

 

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


MUST READ AND SHARE!!!!! The Destructiveness of Obamacare in Pictures


http://www.tpnn.com/2014/04/14/the-destructiveness-of-obamacare-in-pictures/

Premiums_Age27

The Heritage Foundation has put together the impact of Obamacare in pictures. This is visual evidence that Obamacare is not only not working, but it is destructive. Above is but one of those pictures which reveals the economic impact of Obamacare on 27 year olds. 
The accompanying full pictures below looks at areas ranging from canceled policies, reduced choices, new taxes and more.

Slide Show

Complete Message

<!–

–>

 

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


Secretary Sebelius “Resigns!?!?!?!?!?!?”

Posted on April 11, 2014

Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2014/04/secretary-sebelius-resigns/#L4JxdMbD3brjdIPI.99

Secretary-Sebelius-Resigns

Complete Message

 

New Yorker Mag Declares Obamacare Victory With Cartoon Cover of Obama Feeding ‘Petulant Children’ of the GOP


http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2014/04/07/new-yorker-mag-declares-obamacare-victory-cartoon-cover-obama-feeding-pe#ixzz2yGDFQUHF

Tim Graham's picture

By Tim Graham | April 7, 2014 | 22:11

Here’s another bizarre “victory lap” for Obamacare, courtesy of the latest cover of The New Yorker magazine. It shows a happy Obama spoon-feeding his medicine to Republican children.

Cover artist Barry Blitt proclaimed “I enjoyed drawing Ted Cruz, John Boehner, and Michele Bachmann as petulant children—and I especially wanted to draw an open-mouthed Mitch McConnell being spoon-fed his meds.”

The cover has no relation to an article inside the magazine. It’s just meant to be topical — and is drawing none of the outrage that Blitt’s “Politics of Fear” cover with terrorist Michelle and Muslim Barack attracted in 2008, even though Blitt was mocking conservatives, then, too. Then announced that it “satirizes the use of scare tactics and misinformation in the Presidential election to derail Barack Obama’s campaign.”

Liberal journalists love mocking Republicans as in serious need of Obama’s wisdom and care.

About the Author

Tim Graham is Director of Media Analysis at the Media Research Center

Complete Message

States Signing Up Prison Inmates for Obamacare


http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/04/06/States-Signing-Up-Prison-Inmates-for-Obamacare

Cash-strapped states like Illinois, Iowa, and Ohio looking to offload costs onto the federal government are signing up prisoners for Obamacare.

As Fox News reports, at least six states are “taking advantage of a little-known provision that lets them shift some of those expenses to the federal government” by “enrolling inmates into a new expanded Medicaid program when they get sick.” Many more states are expected to follow.

States are also enrolling incarcerated criminals in Obamacare before they are released so they will have taxpayer-funded health insurance coverage before re-entering society.

Even former Democratic North Dakota Senator Kent Conrad says the practice raises serious concerns.

“It starts to look a little like a scheme by the states and local jurisdictions to avoid responsibilities that are really theirs,” said Conrad.

States are already making the Obamacare enrollment part of their prison protocols. In President Barack Obama’s state of Illinois, the largest jail complex in the country, Cook County, has processed over 13,000 insurance applications since last April.  Over 2,000 prisoners have already bagged coverage following their release, sheriff’s public policy official Marleza Jentz told Fox News.

Forbes writer and health care expert Avik Roy says the new Obamacare prisoner enrollment strategy stands to alter long-held social values and incentives.

“The political element of Obamacare is that we were helping what we called the deserving poor or what we used to call the deserving poor. A group of people who are just down on their luck…bring them the opportunities they need to get WHAT DID YOU SAYahead and get back on their feet,” said Roy. “And sometimes that’s true of people who served time in prison, and sometimes it’s not.”

Obamacare will cost U.S. taxpayers $2.6 trillion over the next ten years.

Complete Message

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


Titanic “Obamacare”

Posted on April 7, 2014

Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2014/04/titanic-obamacare/#09rcVxZR4PX1dDzW.99

Titanic-ObamaCare

Complete Message

Community Organizer Two

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


A Real “Stinkburger”

Posted on April 4, 2014

Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2014/04/real-stinkburger/#C0AvdTMuW0HruFbi.99

A-Real-Stinkburger

Complete Message

 

You Lie: Obama Lying Through His Teeth Again on Obamacare Sign-Up Numbers


http://clashdaily.com/2014/04/lie-obama-lying-teeth-obamacare-sign-numbers/

By Marc Schenker / 3 April 2014

Back in 2009, the intrepid Joe Wilson—Republican representative for South Carolina’s 2nd congressional district—was way ahead of his time by laudably interrupting President Barack Obama’s address to a joint session of Congress with his awesome “You lie!” exclamation. Since 2009, all that Obama’s done for the most part has been to pathologically lie to the American people, so Wilson was right on the money. The only thing he did wrong was to apologize to Obama for that outburst, of course.

Now, in 2014, we have more outrageously strong suspicions of yet another Obama lie, this time concerning the questionable Obamacare sign-up numbers. Earlier this week, Obama and White House spokesbrat Jay Carney were rubbing it in everyone’s faces that about seven million Americans did sign up for the widely disapproved train wreck called Obamacare.

“See…see!” they shouted. “We told ya that we would meet the enrollment numbers, so shut the hell up.

Republicans and conservatives!” Naturally, they didn’t phrase it quite like that, but you can bet your last bill of Obama money that that’s exactly what they were thinking. The only problem with this insultingly ludicrous claim and Obama’s and Carney’s audacious bragging is that they’re absolutely full of BS.

Only a few days before April 1, the sign-up numbers were destined to fall WAY below the seven million mark, and then, as if by pure magic, the numbers are suddenly met in a way that completely defies all the laws of probability. So what happened? Did Obama and company actually “Galifianakis” (however you pronounce that train wreck of a name) their way to meeting the mark? Did a bunch of millennials suddenly believe that paying for older, unhealthier Americans was a good deal for them?

pinnochioNo one knows for sure, but you can take an educated guess that Obama and company lied yet again as part of a propaganda campaign to shore up desperately needed support for a piece-of-crap law that has widespread condemnation. Here’s what we do know:

–Just a paltry 23% of those who signed up were uninsured before signing up, according to RAND
–Many who signed up already were insured, but had their policies tyrannically canceled due to the insanely oppressive requirements of Obamacare
–Only about half of those newly insured Americans actually paid their premiums for the first month

What this all means is clearly that an absolutely INSIGNIFICANT number of Americans has legitimately signed up for Obamacare if we hold Obama to his own deceptive standards that some 32 million Americans out of 48 million uninsured Americans would be covered because of Obamacare.

Further, Obama has absolutely no credibility to claim victory when we consider that he has a notorious track record of lie after lie after lie that would actually make a carnival barker seem way more credible. Some of the biggest Obama lies up to this point have been:

–Pledging to halve the U.S. deficit by the end of his first term
–Shutting down Gitmo
–Lowering the costs of healthcare premiums
–Refusing to use national security as an excuse to spy on fellow Americans
–Promising not to hire lobbyists at the White House
–Promising Americans can keep their healthcare plans if they like them
–Promising to defend the U.S. Constitution

This is only a partial list; if I were to list all of the president’s lies, I’d get carpal tunnel syndrome from having to endlessly type all of his lies. The gist is, obviously, that Obama has lied more than any politician ever, which is really saying something since politicians are already synonymous with dishonesty!

Community Organizer Two

So when you take the fact that evidence establishes that the seven million sign-up numbers are, at best, untrustworthy, with the fact that Obama has a track record of pathological lying, you can pretty safely conclude that this seven million number is an utter fraud.

Complete Message

Image: Courtesy of: http://ttoes.wordpress.com/2011/09/09/i-think-jimmy-hoffa-is-a-liar

Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2014/04/lie-obama-lying-teeth-obamacare-sign-numbers/#4U7iR8EfCbGIcE9V.99

 

Bobby Jindal’s Blueprint for Health Care Reform


http://blog.heritage.org/2014/04/02/bobby-jindals-blueprint-health-care-reform/

Photo: Stacy Revere/SCG/ZUMAPRESS.com

This morning, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal released a 23-page health reform plan that would repeal the current health law known as Obamacare and replace it with a series of market-based reforms.

“Repealing all of Obamacare is a good and necessary step—but not one sufficient by itself to achieve the real health reform America needs,” said the three-page executive summary of Jindal’s plan.

Jindal, who told The Foundry last week he was thinking about a presidential run in 2016, said his plan would lower health care costs, protect the most vulnerable members of society, and offer more insurance choice and portability—all while avoiding the mandates and requirements that are part of Obamacare.

Among the reforms, Jindal proposes:

  • Changing the tax code to give all individuals the same standard deduction for health insurance;
  • Creating a grant pool of $100 billion over 10 years that would allow states to create insurance exchanges with greater flexibility than the ones available through Obamacare;
  • Guaranteeing people with pre-existing conditions access to the new state exchanges;
  • Strengthening conscience protections for businesses and medical providers as well as restricting federal funding of abortions;
  • Introducing a premium support system into Medicare, the federal health program for seniors and the disabled; and
  • Allowing Americans to buy insurance across state lines.

Nina Owcharenko, director of The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Health Policy Studies, said Jindal’s plan reinforces that conservative lawmakers have a long-established record of providing policy ideas for health reform. Owcharenko notes that:

The plan offers a constructive blueprint for getting health care reform back on track. Of course, while the scope and technical details may vary, the Jindal plan, like other conservative alternative proposals, moves health care toward more patient-centered, market-based health care and away from the government-centered, regulatory approach of Obamacare.

Jindal, in a recent interview with The Foundry, stressed that conservatives must promote pro-growth policy ideas to win in upcoming elections.

“We need to have the courage of our convictions,” he said to Genevieve Wood, a senior contributor to The Foundry. “If we really believe that conservative principles help every son and daughter, every child, every American join and thrive in the middle class, we need to go and fight for that, show that, and prove that. And the reality is our ideas do work.”

Thursday update:  Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.), who has been defending her support for Obamacare ahead of the mid-term elections, hit back at Jindal’s plan last night on Twitter by arguing that the governor had “trotted out the same old tired, ineffective gimmicks.”

“Louisianans are tired of being guinea pigs for Jindal’s vanity run for president,” tweeted Landrieu, who recently co-authored an op-ed in Politico calling for fixes in Obamacare. “He should stay home [and] do the job voters elected him to do.”

Complete Message

This story was produced by The Foundry’s news team. Nothing here should be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of The Heritage Foundation

WE MUST NEVER FORGET

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


What A Sham

Posted on April 3, 2014

Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2014/04/sham/#JJ3ZOPsHrYGGapWV.99

What-A-Sham

Community Organizer Two

Complete Message

Success? Only 1.7% of Previously Uninsured Are Covered Under Obamacare


 http://lastresistance.com/5268/success-1-7-previously-uninsured-covered-obamacare/#35RhOBHDzUJhyYEA.99

Posted By Philip Hodges on Apr 2, 2014

The whole stated purpose of Obamacare was to provide a way for the uninsuredto get insurance through the use of government mandates and fines. When the Democrats were campaigning for Obamacare, they’d drone on about how many uninsured people there were as a way to tug at America’s heartstrings the same way they pretended to care about the kids who died in Sandy Hook, while turning a blind eye to the tens of millions of unborn babies who have been murdered for their own good.

Millions of insurance cancellations and premium hikes later (and how could we forget the website that was put together by a couple 6th graders), all they have to show for is a tiny group of people that has actually enrolled in an Obamacare exchange and paid their first premium.

Breitbart reported:

News of the disastrous numbers comes as nervous Democrats and President Barack Obama, ahead of the November midterm elections, did their best on Monday’s enrollment deadline to put a positive spin on the deeply unpopular Obamacare program. The latest Associated Press poll finds that Obamacare has now hit an all-time low approval rating of just 26 percent.

The White House now claims an Obamacare enrollment figure of six million people. However, according to The New York Times, at least 20% of those never paid their premiums to activate coverage, leaving them uninsured. That drops the number down to 4.8 million.

Next, as Washington Post columnist Ed Rogers notes, “the official HHS numbers still include duplicate enrollments.” No one knows how many duplicate enrollments are in the stack; the White House refuses to say. However, given the disastrous Obamacare website failures, it is reasonable to imagine that the pile is riddled with numerous “false start” applications.

That leaves the most important question: How many people are gaining insurance who were previously uninsured? After all, that was the stated reason for Obamacare in the first place. McKinsey & Co. says that only 27% of those who have picked a plan through Obamacare were previously uninsured. 

Moreover, McKinsey says these individuals have an unusually high rate of failing to pay their first month’s premium. “Only 53 percent of them had paid their first premium, compared with 86 percent of the previously insured,” reports CNBC.

Even conceding the White House its alleged six million enrollment figure (which, again, includes duplicates and incomplete applications), that would mean that just 810,000 of paying Obamacare customers were previously uninsured, a figure that represents 1.7% of America’s 48.6 million uninsured people.

Complete Message1.7%? That sounds like an utter failure, especially considering that several million people’s insurance policies were canceled or had their premiums hiked thanks to the “Affordable” “Care” Act. Liberals keep asking, “You don’t like Obamacare? Do you have a better plan?” Yes. How about repealing the whole thing and replacing it with nothing? We don’t need more government rules, regulations, fines and mandates. Healthcare would be a lot better and more affordable if government got out of the way. Any time they involve themselves in areas they don’t belong, it always drives the cost way up and the quality way down.

 

No, Mr. President. The debate is NOT over.


http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/no-mr-president_786420.html

8:01 AM, Apr 2, 2014 • By WILLIAM KRISTOL

 

President Obama said yesterday:

“The debate over repealing this law is over. The Affordable Care Act is here to stay. … In the end, history is not kind to those who would deny Americans their basic economic security. Nobody remembers well those who stand in the way of America’s progress or our people. And that’s what the Affordable Care Act represents. As messy as it’s been sometimes, as contentious as it’s been sometimes, it is progress.

What Republican will stand up today and say something like this:

“No, Mr. President. No way, Mr. President. We do not accept, we do not acquiesce in, this deplorable piece of legislation. The debate is not over. The debate will continue. It must continue. What is at stake is sound health care policy for America. But what is also at stake is reversing your attempt, Mr. President, to transform a free country committed to limited government into merely another nation burdened with the worst aspects of big-government nanny-statism.’

“Mr. President, you have been elected our 44th president. We of course accept that, and we understand that you will continue to fight for your legislation and threaten to veto attempts to repeal and replace it.

  • But we do not accept that you get to decide that the debate is over.

  • We do not accept that you acquire any moral authority by claiming to enlist “history” on your side.

  • We do not accept that your attempt to expand welfare state at the expense of individual liberty and the rule of law is true “progress.”‘

“President Obama, you might wish the debate were over. You might think you can intimidate us into conceding the debate is over. But you are wrong. The Republican party stands committed, acting through democratic means and as the agent of a self-governing people, to repealing and replacing Obamacare.”

I don’t see anyone standing.

WE MUST NEVER FORGET

Complete Message

 

Three Quarters of Enrollees in Obamacare to See Premiums Rise


http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/03/31/Three-Quarters-of-People-Enrolled-in-Obamacare-To-See-Premiums-Rise

The Affordable Care Act, which the president promised would reduce the typical American family’s health insurance by $2,500 per year, has in fact raised insurance costs for three-quarters of Obamacare policy holders, according to the CEO of the Cleveland Clinic.

In June of 2008, Barack Obama promised, “It’s time to bring down the typical family’s premium by about $2,500. And it’s time to bring down the costs for the entire country.” Moreover, four months later in October he said, “The only thing we’re gonna try to do is lower costs so that those cost savings are passed on to you. And we estimate we can cut the average family’s premium by about $2,500 a year.” Community Organizer Two

Indeed, Obama promised it many times, but Dr. Toby Cosgrove says it’s simply not true. “About three-quarters of them find that their premiums are higher than they had been previously with other insurance,” Cosgrove told Fox News.

Furthermore, Dr. Cosgrove asserted that Obamacare is having a  “major effect” upon health care providers. “We know for example that we’re going to get paid less for what we do,” the doctor explained. “Hospitals are going to be paid less for what they do. We also know that insurers are paying less for what we do.”

Meanwhile, on Monday, the last day of open enrollment for Obamacare and much like the first day of open enrollment, the federal website HealthCare.gov was shut down for several hours.

 

Complete Message

 

Obamacare exchange sends couple voter registration form pre-marked as Democrat


http://libertyunyielding.com/2014/03/30/couple-receives-voter-registration-form-pre-marked-democratic-obamacare-exchange/#tusSJmJcHkdxurQi.99

By Howard Portnoy on March 30, 2014 at 10:04 am

Last October, LU staff reported that Obamacare exchanges offered visitors an option to register to vote. Brian Cook, a spokesman for Medicare and Medicaid Services, was quoted as saying the exchanges were required to include that option under the 1993 National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).

But does that law also empower the exchanges to automatically register enrollees and, if so, as Democrats? That’s what happened to a La Mesa, Calif., couple. ABC News 10 reports that the couple, who asked not to be identified, received an envelope from Covered California, the state’s Obamacare exchange. Inside was a registration card pre-marked with an “x” in the box next to Democratic Party.

The husband told reporters:

I’m an old guy and I never would have noticed it, except I have an accountant that notices every dot and dash on a piece of paper as a wife.

SEE NEWS REPORT BELOW:

Voter

Covered California began mailing out voter registration cards to all enrollees last week after being threatened with a lawsuit by the League of Women Voters, Young Invincibles, other pro-Obamacare voting rights groups, and the ACLU. Their argument, presented in a 6-page letter mailed to Debra Bowen, the California Secretary of State, noted an “obligation on the part of public assistance agencies to provide voter registration services.” Their petition, which cited Section 7 of the NVRA, was based rather loosely on that provision, which reads:

Section 7 of the Act requires states to offer voter registration opportunities at all offices that provide public assistance and all offices that provide state-funded programs primarily engaged in providing services to persons with disabilities. Each applicant for any of these services, renewal of services, or address changes must be provided with a voter registration form of a declination form as well as assistance in completing the form and forwarding the completed application to the appropriate state or local election official. [Emphasis added]

Whether a website can reasonably be called an “office” is open to debate. What is not debatable is the illegality of selecting a party affiliation for private citizens.

There are other problems, noted by the couple:

[T]here’s an awful lot of people who are going to get this that are already registered and they don’t need to. I can see that, but I can’t see putting x on the form before it’s given to me in a little bitty box that nobody’s really going to notice.

Anne Gonzales, a spokeswoman for Covered California, told reporters that the application forms come directly from the Secretary of State’s office, with no fields pre-marked, adding that the couple should contact the Secretary of State, which “takes these violations of election law extremely seriously.” The couple claims they did reach out to the Secretary of State’s office and were unable to get hold of anyone. They then tried contacting the San Diego County Registrar of Voters, which told them to contact Covered California.

Is anybody having fun yet?

Complete Message

 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Howard Portnoy has written for HotAir, NewsBusters, Weasel Zippers, Conservative Firing Line, RedCounty, and New York’s Daily News. He has one published novel, Hot Rain, (G. P. Putnam’s Sons), and has been a guest on Radio Vice Online with Jim Vicevich, The Alana Burke Show, and The George Espenlaub Show.

Obamacare Navigators Helping People Enroll At Mexican Consulates


http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/03/27/Obamacare-Navigators-Help-Enroll-At-Mexican-Consulates#

mexican-flag-us-flag-reutersThe Obama administration has been helping to facilitate a series of events nationwide at Mexican Consulate offices to enroll people in Obamacare – and a key activist says the efforts are “our responsibility” regardless of citizenship.

“Whether they’re Mexican nationals or whether they’re United States citizens or whether they’re in transition– and if they’re there it is our responsibility within all of America to educate on the Affordable Care Act,” Enroll America Field Organizer Jose Medrano told Breitbart News on Wednesday.

Health Care insurance navigator groups hosted an Obamacare enrollment fair on Tuesday in the Mexican Consulate’s Brownsville office, The Rio Grande Guardian reported last Friday, where Mexican nationals among others were counseled about enrolling in the ACA.

“The Mexican consulate is a very reliable source of information to the Latino community. And therefore when they host their events, yesterday being the health fair, there are several hundred people that show up,” Medrano said.

Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), undocumented immigrants aren’t supposed to be receiving government-run health benefits or subsidized coverage. However, President Barack Obama told Latinos in early March that the Healthcare.gov website would not be used to find out about an individual’s immigration status.

“None of the information that is provided in order for you to obtain health insurance is in any way transferred to immigration services,” he said.

According to Medrano, 101 families were represented at the ACA enrollment and education fair at the Brownsville Mexican Consulate on Tuesday and about 60 percent of them spoke to a health care counselor. Medrano says that the consulate’s office is helpful “as part of the transition” to “mainstream… America.”

This is not the first time the Mexican Consulate has been used to enroll individuals into Obamacare. Get Covered Illinois announced in late February that the Erie Family Health Center hoped to increase its enrollment numbers at the Mexican Consulate in Chicago, The Sun Times reported.

According to Vegas Seven, in Nevada, the Latino community is being targeted for ACA enrollment at the Mexican Consulate in downtown Las Vegas. Insurance News says Hispanic National Advocacy groups like National Alliance for Hispanic Health have helped lead the push to get more Latinos enrolled in Obamacare.

“Promoting Obamacare at a Mexican consulate raises three major policy concerns,” Stephen Miller, a spokesman for top immigration hawk Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) told Breitbart News.

“One, the possibility that illegal immigrants could fraudulently access federal subsidies; two, that such promotions provide a financial inducement to unlawfully enter the U.S. (or overstay a visa) by offering households headed by illegal immigrants federal subsidies through their legal relatives or dependents; and three, that these activities widen an existing flaw in our legal admissions process by continuing to subvert the principle that those seeking to lawfully enter the US should be financially self-sufficient,” Miller said.

Mexican Consulates have been used previously to advance USDA assistance programs like food stamps to Mexican nationals, The Daily Caller reported in July of 2012. Mexico promoted the program to 50 of its consular offices in the U.S.

In 2012, ranking members of the Senate Budget, Finance, Judiciary, and Agriculture Committees wrote an oversight letter to Secretaries Napolitano and Clinton that said in part:

The [Immigration and Nationality Act] specifically states: ‘An alien who… is likely at any time to become a public charge is inadmissible.’ … We were thus shocked to discover that both the State Department and DHS exclude reliance on almost all governmental welfare programs when evaluating whether an alien is likely to become a public charge… Under your interpretation, an able-bodied immigrant of working age could receive the bulk of his or her income in the form of federal welfare and still not be deemed a ‘public charge.’”

Medrano, however, said the Mexican Consulate is a trusted source of information for Latinos, who use “those who they relied on for good information” in the past.

“So many of these, of course, while they are U.S. citizens have very strong ties to the consulate in terms of news and information and events and things like that,” he said.

He added, “And also, it was a health fair. The Mexican consulate was providing a community health fair and as part of that, they asked us to come in, because that was the tie in.”

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius has been taking time out of her schedule to push for more ACA enrollment within the Lone Star state. She has made at least four visits to Texas for ACA outreach and enrollment and education related events since December 20, 2013.

“I’m sure [she was aware],” Medrano said when asked if Sebelius knew about the event at the Mexican Consulate. “We put our events in a database that several organizations are connected to at mainly HHS, so they are fully aware of who was here.”

Medrano says that Sebelius has not visited South Texas yet but Obama Small Business Administrator Yolanda Garcia Olivarez did make an appearance at the consulate during the fair and “met with the consul so it was an event that was driven by that presence as well.” Olivarez also made a visit that day to the Brownsville Chamber of Commerce to promote SBA programs.

Olivares told Brownsville’s Action 4 News, “If they don’t meet the deadline they’ve lost the opportunity to have and to have coverage of affordable health care.”

The fair was one of two events (the other was at the McAllen Convention Center) where ACA navigators are scouring the Rio Grande Valley to enroll Latino individuals into the government health care program.

Complete Message

 

Sales Person of the Year


The kids filed into class Monday morning. They were all very excited. Their weekend assignment was to sell something, then give a talk on salesmanship to the class.

Little Sally led off. “I sold Girl Scout Cookies and I made $30” she said proudly. “My sales approach was to appeal to the customer’s civil spirit and I credit that approach for my obvious success.”

“Very good”, said the teacher.

Little Debbie was next. “I sold magazines” she said, “I made $45 and I explained to everyone that magazines would keep them up on current events.”

“That’s excellent, Debbie”, said the teacher.

Eventually, it was Little Johnny’s turn. The teacher held her breath. Little Johnny walked to the front of the classroom and dumped a box full of cash on the teacher’s desk. “$2,467!”, he said.

“$2,467?” cried the teacher. “What in the world were you selling?”

“Toothbrushes”, said Little Johnny.

“Toothbrushes?!?!”, echoed the teacher. “How could you possibly sell enough toothbrushes to make that much money?”

“Well……I found the busiest corner in town”, said Little Johnny. “I set up a “Dip & Chip” stand and I gave everybody who walked by a Free Sample..” They all said the same thing………..”Hey, this tastes like dog poop!”

Then I said, “It is dog poop. Wanna buy a toothbrush?”

“I used the “Obama Method” of giving you some crap, dressing it up so it looks good, telling you it’s free and then making you pay to get the bad taste out of your mouth.”

Little Johnny got five gold stars for his assignment!!!

Bless his heart!!!

Community Organizer TwoComplete Message

Law of the Land? Obama Unconstitutionally Changes March 31st Deadline to ‘sometime in mid-April’


http://www.tpnn.com/2014/03/26/law-of-the-land-obama-unconstitutionally-changes-march-31st-deadline-to-sometime-in-mid-april/

Obama-Depressed
In President Obama’s world, words and promises are meaningless. He has altered the language, mandates, and parameters of his signature legislation Obamacare, otherwise known as the unaffordable ‘Affordable Care Act’, so many times that one would be left to wonder what exactly does ‘law of the land’ mean. After all, when Texas Senator Ted Cruz attempted to filibuster back in October 2013 in order to stop implementation of a law that he believed to not only be unconstitutional, but not ready for primetime if implemented, Obama proclaimed that the train of Obamacare was going forward and there was no way to stop it.

Since that date, the train of Obamacare has become more of a train wreck as we have heard countless stories of people losing the insurance and doctors that Obama told them they could keep. The train wreck became one that you could not stop looking at, as frightening as it was, as Obama began unconstitutionally changing what he previously deemed as ‘settled law’ in hopes of salvaging what was fast becoming a mangled mess.

Community Organizer TwoAs the nation neared Obama’s self-imposed March 31st deadline for enrollment, one thing became clear. The Obama regime was not going to reach its initial goal of 7 million enrolled. In fact, not only did they need 7 million enrolled in order for the government takeover of 1/6 of the American economy to potentially be financially solvent, they needed 40% of those enrolled to be from the key demographic area of 18 – 35 year olds. As of last week, there were only 6 million enrolled in Obamacare and less than 25% were from that key demographic area. Even then, the numbers given by the Obama regime were inflated since they were counting as enrollees individuals who had created a Healthcare.gov profile, perhaps also looked at plans, maybe even placed a potential plan in their shopping cart, but never sealed the deal with a finalized payment.

Critics of Obamacare likened the regime’s counting of such individuals as similar to Amazon.com counting as a sale a book that was left in someone’s shopping cart without the buyer clicking ‘proceed to checkout’ and ‘place your order’. If a private company pulled some of the shenanigans with funny numbers like the Obama regime has, they would likely be hauled before Congress for a hearing.

On Tuesday night, as Obama approached his self-imposed deadline with less than a week left, he quietly came out with a decision in an early evening news dump. Obama has graciously decided to give those who have not yet completed purchase of Obamacare a little more time to finalize their purchase. The real kicker is, similar to people being granted the ability by edict to claim hardship in not being able to afford the so-called ‘Affordable Care Act,’ Obama is going by the honor system with allowing people to check a box that they ‘tried’ to enroll by the 31st, but could not, for whatever reason, complete the purchase.

Community Organizer Two

The newly imposed deadline by Barack Obama isn’t quite a deadline at all. People have until ‘about mid-April’ to finalize their purchase and the government will not try to determine if you’re telling the truth or not.

According to the Washington Post, Obama is graciously offering an extension in preparation for a potential massive surge of individuals onto Healthcare.gov.

Administration officials said the accommodation is an attempt to prepare for a possible surge of people trying to sign up in the final days before the deadline. Such a flood could leave some people unable to get through the system.

“We are ... making sure that we will be ready to help consumers who may be in line by the deadline to complete enrollment — either online or over the phone,” said Julie Bataille, director of the office of communications for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the agency overseeing the federal health-care exchange.

The extra time will not be restricted, though, to people who wait until the last minute to try to sign up. Although no one will be asked why they need an extension, the idea is to help people whose applications have gotten held up because of the Web site’s technical problems — or who haven’t been able to get the system to calculate subsidies to help them pay for coverage.

According to a Health and Human Services official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity about decisions that have not been made public, an exact time frame for this extension has not been set, and depends in part on how many people request it. Nor have officials decided precisely how long people will have to select a health plan after they get the extra time.

Perhaps Obama is recognizing the programming shortcomings of his signature legislation’s website with its tendency to be non-functional. Or, it could be that he’s hoping that the two weeks he’s spent targeting millennials with an embarrassing last-minute push for enrollment will all of a sudden produce the enrollment numbers that he has hoped for.

Even if this extension to a non-deadline deadline bolsters his faux enrollment numbers to 7 million people, Obama himself said over and over again that America had 46 million people uninsured. These people, according to the president, were desperate for coverage. By his analysis, Americans should have been clamoring for coverage and flocking to Obamacare as their savior. Instead, the country has witnessed false figures related to enrollment from Obama and an estimated 5 million people, so far, who have lost the very insurance that they were promised they could keep.

One thing is certain, in Obama’s America, the law of the land is open to activist interpretation and supposedly ‘settled law’ is meaningless if it doesn’t work in favor of Obama’s quest to fundamentally transform America or if it could negatively affect the outcome for his party in the 2014 mid-terms.

Complete Message

Harry Reid Defends Latest Obamacare Delay Because “People Are Not Educated On How To Use The Internet”


http://conservativebyte.com/2014/03/harry-reid-defends-latest-obamacare-delay-people-educated-use-internet/#Et2VcvVetPq6Gcm4.99

Posted on March 26, 2014

Another excuse to serve as a takeover of America. Liberal logic doesn’t have to make sense.

At first I thought this had to be a joke, unbelievably, it is not.

Listen to the news broadcast yourself

(http://youtu.be/AAtgsizDWV0)

Reid

Complete Message

Today’s Political Cartoon


Shoes to Fill

Posted on March 26, 2014

Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2014/03/shoes-fill/#Dt7sGr0oISl6kK0C.99

Two-Shoes

Community Organizer TwoComplete Message

The 15 Dumbest Anti–Hobby Lobby Signs at the Supreme Court


http://www.nationalreview.com/article/374161/15-dumbest-anti-hobby-lobby-signs-supreme-court-andrew-johnson

Donald Trump, Beyoncé, and a crocheted uterus show why Hobby Lobby’s wrong, apparently.

Supporters of an Affordable Care Act mandate that requires religious business people to violate their beliefs were out in full force this morning at the U.S. Supreme Court.

The high court heard arguments in Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores, which pits Obamacare against small businesses seeking to preserve personal and religious freedom.

Complete Message

Here’s a look at some of the most nonsensical and ridiculous signs and participants at Tuesday’s rally.

1. “Hobby Lobby: This Uterus Is For You”

2. “Pro-Life? Eating Raped Murdered Animals Makes U A Hypocrite”

3. “Sex is Beautiful ♥ Reproduction is Optional”

4. Birth control costume in a poncho.

5. “Ho, ho! Hey, hey! Birth control is here to stay!”

​6. “Keep Your Hobbies Off My Ovaries!”

7. “Not My Doctor” (Picture of Donald Trump)

8. “If Men Could Get Pregnant, Birth Control Would Be From Gumball Machines and Bacon Flavored”

9. “I ♥ Birth Control — This is Personal”

10. “My Mom’s Not Ready to be a Grandma”

11. “Thing I want to do before having a baby: graduate college; land my dream job; meet Beyoncé”

​12. “Bigotry disguised as ‘Religious Liberty’ . . . is still BIGOTRY!”

13. “Your Religion Should Never Control My Body”

14. “This Is Not a Healthcare Plan. [Holy Bible]“

 

15. Keep The Boardroom Out of My Bedroom

— Andrew Johnson is an editorial associate at National Review Online.

Religious Freedom on Trial


http://www.tpnn.com/2014/03/25/religious-freedom-on-trial/

Share

religious-freedom
Arguments have begun before the Supreme Court today to determine whether religious freedom in America, under the First Amendment, is guaranteed or not. At the heart of this trial is the mandate by Obamacare requiring businesses that employ 50 employees or more to provide all levels of birth control to its employees and pay for this coverage. This includes not just traditional birth control such as pills and shots to prevent impregnation. It also includes abortifacient drugs, such as the ‘Morning After pill’ that induce abortions after impregnation has occurred.

The suit was brought forth by Hobby Lobby, the arts and crafts store owned by the Green family. The family does not hide their devout Christianity. In fact, service to the Lord by serving others is a part of the identity of Hobby Lobby. In honor of the Lord’s day, every store is closed on Sundays. In addition, their commitment and gratitude to the God is listed on their website.

At Hobby Lobby, we value our customers and employees and are committed to:

  • Honoring the Lord in all we do by operating the company in a manner consistent with biblical principles.
  • Offering our customers exceptional selection and value in the crafts and home decor market.
  • Serving our employees and their families by establishing a work environment and company policies that build character, strengthen individuals and nurture families.
  • Providing a return on the owner’s investment, sharing the Lord’s blessings with our employees, and investing in our community.

We believe that it is by God’s grace and provision that Hobby Lobby has endured. He has been faithful in the past, and we trust Him for our future.

A visit to the ‘Our Company’ section of their website reveals just how ingrained their religious convictions are within all aspects of their business model. Their donations and ministry projects all have one thing in common – a commitment to God and spreading his Word. Organizations such as Oral Roberts University, One Hope, and Every Home for Christ are but some of the organizations to which Hobby Lobby donates and supports.

The company was grown from a $600 start up to a multi-billion dollar corporate entity by David Green who openly gives thanks to God for His blessings and uses Hobby Lobby to spread God’s love and word with a focus on ‘operating the company in a manner consistent with biblical principles.

This strong commitment to God as a company is not something new from Hobby Lobby. They didn’t suddenly shift their business model to be biblically based following the partisan vote by the Democrat party to make Obamacare law. It is, and always has been, a part of who they are.

Complete Message

So, it should come as no surprise that the Green family and the Hobby Lobby corporation would see the Obamacare mandate forcing the company to cover abortion inducing drugs as an attack on their religious freedom. One of their attorneys, Lori Windham with the Becket Fund, had this to say about this case now being argued before the Supreme Court.

This is unquestionably a religious exercise, refusing to pay for something that could take a human life. And so the question here is not whether it’s the Green family or the corporation, both of whom are part of this case. The question is, is this a sincere religious exercise. The answer to that question is yes. So, it ought to be protected.

The left and the leftist media have gone out of their way to distort the reality of Hobby Lobby’s argument framing it as a direct attack on women’s rights in being able to access birth control. However, as previously stated, the objection at the heart of Hobby Lobby’s argument is the company being forced to fund abortions and abortion inducing drugs.

On FOX News with Martha MacCallum this morning, Judge Andrew Napolitano had much to say about this case, including placing blame squarely on the Supreme Court, and Chief Justice John Roberts, for allowing the entire Obamacare plan to go forward based upon the decision that the entire health care plan would levy a tax on you if you did not subscribe to it, rather than a fine. To this, Judge Napolitano said the following:

It really is a bizarre decision in this respect; the government argued it wasn’t a tax and the challengers argued it wasn’t a tax. Yet, the Supreme Court rejected all the arguments before it and found that it was a tax. It’s obvious that this was just a cobbled together compromise by people who otherwise disagree with each other on fundamental jurisprudential views, in order to salvage this legislation. As a result, we have these challenges coming back.

Judge Napolitano also talked about what is at stake with this Supreme Court decision. With government being able to tax whatever it wants, even failure to buy a mandated product or service according to the Supreme Court, can Congress pick and choose to whom or to which entities the constitutionally guaranteed freedom of religious applies.

This is about religious liberty and whether or not Congress can compel corporations to violate religious liberty of the shareholders of those corporations. There are a lot of subsidiary issues. Do corporations have religious liberty or just individuals. Can the owners of the corporation impose their own religious standards on the corporation itself? And, the big picture, can Congress do this to anybody; make you buy a product, contraceptive health care coverage, that goes against the very teaching of your religion from your heart.

This is not just traditional contraception. This is also euthanasia and abortion. It comes in one package in the federal government’s mind that orders the entities that employ 50 or more people to make this available to employees. Now, this is not to say that women are not entitled under the law to choose on their own to have this protection. It’s the flip-side. It’s, are employers free to choose not to pay for this protection if they find it morally and religiously repugnant?

Another favorite argument of the left is that individuals should not be subjected to certain denied coverage simply due to their place of employment. MacCallum played devil’s advocate with this argument. Judge Napolitano had a response to that argument which is, not surprisingly, based on the Constitution.

Martha MacCallum: An employee who exists and works in the United States of America under this law that says that everybody must be covered by a plan that is up to their (government’s) definition of what’s good enough for them should say, “If this is where I want to work, why shouldn’t I be covered by the same description of these plans that everyone else who works in places is covered under?”

Judge Napolitano: And, I’ll give that employee an answer. Because your wish to be covered by contraceptive coverage paid for by your employer is a good that the employer purchases for you. But, the employer’s wish to serve his or her heart and to follow his or her religious beliefs is a right that comes from our humanity and it is expressly given by the First Amendment.

MacCallum: So, you’ve gotta work somewhere else.

Judge: Yes! Or, go out and pay for it yourself or get the federal government, which subsidizes billions in these policies, to pay for it which is probably what will happen if the Supreme Court rules against the federal government. The federal government will offer to subsidize it which means we as taxpayers, you and I and our religious beliefs, with our tax dollars will be subsidizing these policies.

He again placed blame squarely on the Supreme Court for allowing Obamacare, now officially known as the Affordable Care Act, to move forward.

This is an unforeseen consequence of the Supreme Court’s ill-advised decision a year and a half ago, finding all of this constitutional on the grounds that, if you don’t do it, we can tax you and the government can tax anything it wants.

Complete Message

Will religious freedom, constitutionally protected in America by the First Amendment, prevail in America or will the assault on our liberty by an over-bloated big government win? This Supreme Court case will have wide-reaching ramifications on freedom in America if the court once again sides with the federal government and against the Constitution and rights of Americans.

ObamaCare: America’s Kidney Stone


http://clashdaily.com/2014/03/obamacare-americas-kidney-stone/#9mgmPUFSCEXeQUTj.99

By / 21 March 2014

kidney

The connection between the Affordable Care Act and a kidney stone first came to me when Nancy Pelosi, using her best On Golden Pond voice, famously stammered, “We have to pass it to see what’s in it.” While her words replayed on occasion in my recesses somewhere between the cerebellum and the ureter, the analogy didn’t fully dawn on me until I got my projected ACA compliant rates for 2015.

Apparently, by the time I amass all of the coverage this unread 2,000+ page mystery novel mandates, my monthly premiums will increase from $345 a month to $815. So rather than the $2,500 per year savings touted by the President, and despite the MSM’s never ending attempt to revise the numbers and convince us that the law will help, not hurt, my real increase will be over 130%. Not to worry though, my deductibles will only double.

This forever calcified my connection between the ACA and kidney stones: it will now burn when I pay!

Of course as details of this reality continue to emerge for people across the country, stories like mine have been sloughed off as “poppycock” by people like Sen. Harry Reid, a man who clearly has a vivid grasp on fantasies and imagination. I can’t begin to think what his safe word must be.

Sorry Senator, this is all very real to some of us. More real than even the clammy-handed milquetoast who plays your counterpart on House of Cards.

There are a variety of thoughts as to what is but here’s what I think:

The stark reality of adding more sick people of all ages added into the actuarial tables affects rates for everyone. Sure it’s the “right” thing to do, but it makes the increase in costs inevitable. While railing against the man over a cup of free-trade green tea latte, hipsters are quick to relegate this rise in costs to corporate greed.  However, no matter how shaggy your beard is or how many pairs of Clark Kent glasses you own, covering more doctor bills means paying more money.  Math is still math…or at least it will be for a little bit longer.

Also, individuals and families are being forced to pay for programs or coverage they don’t need. Via the ACA the administration has deemed that health insurance policies which don’t have things like birth control and pregnancy coverage are “sub-standard” and “junk.” I for one would like the government to leave my junk alone, as I previously dealt with my own prospective pregnancy concerns over a decade ago: one afternoon of pain, followed by a weekend of frozen peas and martinis. Now, as someone who more closely resembles a Florida orange (full of juice but totally seedless), I resent being forced to pay more for something I don’t need.

What’s the takeaway? First, if your rates haven’t gone up or your policy hasn’t been canceled, they will be. Mandates and delays aside, your day on the chopping block is coming. And if you have already been affected and left between a stone and hard website, tell your story loud and often.  Do your best to influence anyone who will listen.

If we provide so many voices that we can’t all be silenced maybe we can make the upcoming mid-term elections the cranberry juice needed to flush this law once and for all.

Complete Message

About the author: Tim Wilkins

 After years of making various TV appearances, in 2006 Tim became the co-host of the Monday-Friday live morning talk show “Studio 10”, on the CBS station in Tampa, FL. Currently he is the face of MOR TV in Tampa and he also been seen nationally on HBO, ESPN2, Fox Sports, TLC, CW, WE Network, “The Daily Buzz”, “BetterTV”, “Daytime”, Nickelodeon’s “NickMom Night Out”, and CMT’s “Next Big Comic”. He can also be heard regularly on Sirius/XM radio’s comedy channels.

Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2014/03/obamacare-americas-kidney-stone/#9mgmPUFSCEXeQUTj.99

Obama Hijacks Symbol of Liberty and Independence to Sell Tyranny


http://www.tpnn.com/2014/03/20/obama-hijacks-symbol-of-liberty-and-independence-to-sell-tyranny/

March 20, 2014 By Jennifer Burke

Obama-Hijacks-Gadsden-Flag
Obamacare, or as it is officially known the unaffordable “Affordable Care Act”, is a government takeover of 1/6 of America’s economy. It was passed along party lines with 100% of the votes coming from Democrats. It is the first time that the federal government is forcing its citizens to purchase a product or face a penalty. It has resulted in millions losing their insurance coverage and millions more experiencing a massive increase in premiums and/or deductibles. It was sold to the public based upon lies from Barack Obama himself including “If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. Period.” And “If you like your health care plan, you can keep your health care plan. Period.” These lies were told even though the president knew they weren’t true.

Obama has been desperately pushing for enrollment in his signature legislation as he falls massively short of his 7 million-target number. In an effort to bolster enrollment numbers, his administration has even counted as enrollees individuals who created an account, but never formalized a transaction. In addition, there are also stories from people around the country who thought they had coverage, only to find out when they needed it that their enrollment was nowhere in anyone’s system. This series of unfortunate events were magnified when the story was revealed about a man in Las Vegas who is facing $407,000 in medical bills due to no coverage, even though he has paid his Obamacare premium since December.

Despite the reality of Obamacare, especially it being government imposed tyranny with a fine, or tax, on the people for non-compliance, Barack Obama has decided to attempt to hijack the symbol used in the fight for liberty and independence, dating back to when Christopher Gadsden designed It during the American Revolution, to push his massive government intrusion into the lives of every American. Of course, who else would help push such propaganda than Nancy Pelosi’s daughter.

Pelosi

Complete Message

About Jennifer Burke

Jennifer BurkeJennifer Burke became politically active for the first time at the Porkulus Tea Party in Seattle in February 2009. She was a speaker at the Seattle Tax Day Tea Party at Westlake Center on April 15, 2010, was featured in a popular Tea Party video, Proud to be a Teabagger, that has gone viral on YouTube and many top conservative blogs, and was a speaker at the WA 4 WI rally in support of Scott Walker. View all Posts by Jennifer Burke

Put ‘Em Up: America’s Last Chance to Beat Obamacare is Here


Girlsjustwannahaveguns Banner

http://girlsjustwannahaveguns.com/2014/03/put-em-americas-last-chance-beat-obamacare/#U11AYI610HEFEKrR.99

By / 17 March 2014

beat obamacareBy Tim Young–If you haven’t been following the landmark case that Houston’s Dr. Steven Hotze has brought against Obamacare, simply put, now’s the time to listen up.

Of all of the cases that have been brought against the administration, his is THE ONE that has found solid standing in federal court and if experts are correct, this case is the “make or break” for the fight against Obamacare in the court system.

Here’s what you need to know:

Dr. Hotze filed federal suit on May 7, 2013 in Houston Texas. The case is known as Hotze v. Sebelius.

In the case, Dr. Hotze has made 2 significant constitutional claims against Obamacare:

1 – That it violates Article 1, Section 7 of the Constitution known as the Origination Clause. The Origination clause says that any bills for raising revenue must start in the House of Representatives. Guess what? The Affordable Care Act didn’t.

2 – Obamacare violates the Takings Clause in the 5th Amendment of the Constitution. The government can’t force you to buy anything, including Obamacare… which is what this clause is set up to protect us from.

This case seems like a cut and dry win… the end of the tyranny that is Obamacare… but that’s not what a Clinton appointed judge said on January 10, 2014. Federal District Judge Nancy Atlas actually agreed with all of Dr. Hotze’s points… but SOMEHOW STILL FOUND OBAMACARE TO BE CONSTITUTIONAL!

A shocked Dr. Hotze and his legal team immediately appealed to the U.S. 5th Circuit Court in New Orleans. It is by far the most conservative of the 13 federal circuit courts… but with a ruling like what happened in Houston, who knows what will happen.

Here’s the bottom line: This is it. This is our last solid LEGAL and CONSTITUTIONAL chance to stop Obamacare. If this fails, we lose in the courts. Republicans know this. That’s why Sen. John Cornyn and Congressman Pete Sessions are writing and circulating an amicus brief in support of Dr. Hotze’s case.

Battle lines have been drawn, the war has been waged and we are ready to take our final stand with Dr. Hotze. If you want to join the Senators and Congressmen standing with him, please go to www.CitizensAgainstObamacare.com and sign the petition.

Complete Message

He can only win this with your help and support. If you believe in an America that isn’t faced with this horrible tyranny, please go to www.CitizensAgainstObamacare.com and stand against Obamacare right now!

Tim YoungKnown as the Republican John Stewart and the Young Rush Limbaugh, Young has been a guest on Fox News Channel’s ‘Red Eye,’ Huffington Post Live, RT’s The Alyona Show and dozens of syndicated radio shows.

A respected journalist and pundit, sharing his opinion on politics to millions of people every month. His writing has been featured on the cover of HuffingtonPost.com, Washingtonian Magazine, Patch.com, Voice of Baltimore and other major publications. In 2011, he was Young Member Chair of the National Press Club, representing all media under the age of 35.

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


CONSERVATIVE-BYTE-BANNER

Obamacare Has Been a 90 Percent Failure Using the Obama Regime’s Own Numbers


Tea Party News Network Banner

http://www.tpnn.com/2014/03/17/obamacare-has-been-a-90-percent-failure-using-the-obama-regimes-own-numbers/

March 17, 2014 By

Obamacare Failure
According to the Obama government’s own latest numbers, 4.2 million Americans have signed up for Obamacare. And while the Obama regime twists and spins the number as being a great accomplishment, and with the looming deadline to sign up less than two weeks away, just how successful is the number?

Obama said in August of 2009 that there were 46 million uninsured, telling the nation, “I don’t have to explain to you that nearly 46 million Americans don’t have health insurance coverage today. In the wealthiest nation on Earth, 46 million of our fellow citizens have no coverage.”

According to Joseph Curl, writing in The Washington Times, Obama spouted the number as being factual over a dozen times, including in June of 2013, when he tried to guilt the nation into accepting Obamacare by goading, “We are not a nation that accepts nearly 46 million uninsured men, women and children.”

Given that the stated goal of Obamacare is to provide health insurance to the uninsured who were in a state of “crisis,” gauging the success of the operation demands that it be judged based upon that goal. Using Obama’s number of 46 million (he wouldn’t lie about that number, would he?), and using the regime’s latest enrollment number of 4.2 million, it means that less than 10% of the uninsured have actually signed up.

Generously disregarding the fact that the regime doesn’t actually know how many of those enrolled have actually paid for their insurance, or that a reported 5 million have had their policies cancelled because of Obamacare, that’s over a 90% failure. And a 90% failure is a failure by anyone’s yardstick.

Complete Message

About Matthew Burke

Matthew BurkeMatthew Burke is a former Financial Advisor/Planner for 24 years. He was a 2010 Constitutional Conservative candidate for U.S. Congress in Washington State. View all Posts by Matthew Burke

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


CONSERVATIVE-BYTE-BANNER

“Between Two Ferns, who’s the smartest in the room?”

Posted on March 15, 2014

Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2014/03/two-ferns-whos-smartest-room/#yTvo7CDMy5cAq2xf.99

Ferns-and-Clowns

Complete Message

EPIC: What Question Asked by Rep. Trey Gowdy Resulted in Thunderous Applause on the House Floor?


Tea Party News Network Banner

http://www.tpnn.com/2014/03/13/epic-what-question-asked-by-rep-trey-gowdy-resulted-in-thunderous-applause-on-the-house-floor/

March 13, 2014 By

Congressman Trey Gowdy asks, "If a president can change some laws, can he change all laws?"

Congressman Trey Gowdy asks, “If a president can change some laws, can he change all laws?”

Normally speeches given by Congress are a little ho-hum, but not when they’re given by fiery Congressman Trey Gowdy (R-SC).  But along the growing lists of Gowdy’s most powerful moments, this one may turn out to have the greatest impact (watch video below), as his persuasive speech was greeted by massive applause by his colleagues yesterday on the House floor. Gowdy’s speech was made in support of the ENFORCE the Law Act, a bill Gowdy sponsored which would allow legislators to sue agency officials if they refuse to enforce legally-passed laws.

Rep. Gowdy read a series of statements made previously by Obama while a U.S. Senator, asking who made these statements:

  • “These last few years we’ve seen an unacceptable abuse of power, having a president whose priority is expanding his own power.”
  • “No law can give Congress a backbone if it refuses to stand off as the coequal branch the Constitution made it.”
  • “What do we do with a president who can basically change what Congress passed by attaching a letter saying I don’t agree with this part or that part?”
  • “I taught the Constitution for ten years, I believe in the Constitution.”
  • “One of the most important jobs of the Supreme Court is to guard against the encroachment of the executive branch on the power of the other branches. And I think the Chief Justice has been a little too willing and eager to give [sic] the president more power than I think the… Constitution originally intended.”

“How does going from being a senator to a president rewrite the Constitution?” Gowdy asked. “What’s different from when he was a senator? Mr. Speaker, I don’t think there’s an amendment to the Constitution that I’ve missed. I try to keep up with those with regularity.”

But the statement by Congressman Trey Gowdy that brought the House down was this one:

“What are we to do when this president, or any president decides to selectively enforce a portion of the law and ignore other portions of that law?

What are we to do Mr. Speaker, regardless of motivation, when a president nullifies our vote by failing to faithfully execute the law?

How do we explain waivers and exemptions and delays in a bill passed by Congress and affirmed by the United States Supreme Court?

How do we explain away a refusal to enforce mandatory minimums that were passed by Congress and affirmed by the Supreme Court?

And why pursue, Mr. Speaker, immigration reform if presidents can turn off the very provisions that we passed?

The oath that brand new citizens take, it contains six different references to the law.  

If it’s good enough for us to ask brand new citizens to affirm their devotion to the law, is it too much to ask that the president do the same?”

SEE A RECORDING OF HIS SPEECH HERE:

Gawdy

Complete Message

About Matthew Burke

Matthew BurkeMatthew Burke is a former Financial Advisor/Planner for 24 years. He was a 2010 Constitutional Conservative candidate for U.S. Congress in Washington State. View all Posts by Matthew Burke

More Pathetic Propaganda from Obama in Desperate Push to Meet Obamacare Deadline


Tea Party News Network Banner

http://www.tpnn.com/2014/03/13/more-pathetic-propaganda-from-obama-in-desperate-push-to-meet-obamacare-deadline/

March 13, 2014 By

Obama-Worried
Complete Message

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Barack Obama’s desperation in hawking his failed signature legislation Obamacare, otherwise known as the unaffordable Affordable Care Act, is beyond pathetic. It is getting downright embarrassing.  He has sent his wife out to belittle young people by calling them knuckleheads for not enrolling. Remember, these are the same knuckleheads, i.e. uninformed voters, who voted for her inexperienced and inept husband.

He has gone around the country lying about the cost of premiums hoping enough poor dupes will believe him, despite the evidence that the Affordable Care Act is anything but affordable. He has consistently told the young that they should sign up for his government controlled health care system because they are not invincible. In fact, he suggested to one young father to just cancel his phone and cable bill in order to free up money in his budget for the insurance that he claimed would cost everyone less than they were paying.

But, two of his new efforts in a last minute push to get as many people to sign up for Obamacare prior to the March 31st deadline goal of 7 million, a self-imposed goal that he is far from reaching, are ridiculously idiotic.

On Wednesday, Obama’s HHS tweeted his latest propaganda picture push featuring an ‘angry mom’, as reported by Truth Revolt.

Truth Revolt

For Throwback Thursday, he went even more ludicrous. He tweeted an article featured on his propaganda laden Organizing For Action website, also known as BarackObama.com.

Invincible

Refocusing on the ‘you’re not invincible mantra,’ Obama’s Healthcare Campaign Manager Erin Hannigan had this to say on the site.

“I’m going to share a secret with you: Sometimes I wore a cape when I was a kid. It’s true. Putting that cape on made me feel like a real superhero. Invincible!

That’s a feeling I hope some people can relate to—at one point in your life you probably were pretty sure you were invincible. But here’s the truth: we’re not. Things happen—and that’s why it’s so important to have health insurance.

Time is running out to get covered this year, and we’re doing something a little different today. 

For this Throwback Thursday, we’re asking everyone to share a photo of when you felt invincible. Maybe it’s a photo of yourself dressed up like a superhero on Halloween or flexing your kid muscles for the camera. Maybe you’re just wearing a cape.

Tweet it out—and let folks know why it’s important to get covered now that you know you’re no longer invincible. Use the hashtags #TBT and #GetCovered to be part of the conversation.”

Maybe someone should remind the president that begging is not becoming. It makes one look weak and pitiful.

Complete Message

About the Author, Jennifer Burke

Jennifer BurkeJennifer Burke became politically active for the first time at the Porkulus Tea Party in Seattle in February 2009. She was a speaker at the Seattle Tax Day Tea Party at Westlake Center on April 15, 2010, was featured in a popular Tea Party video, Proud to be a Teabagger, that has gone viral on YouTube and many top conservative blogs, and was a speaker at the WA 4 WI rally in support of Scott Walker. View all Posts by Jennifer Burke

A Colorado reporter shows the Washington Press Corpse how to ask about ObamaCare


Joe the Plumber Banner

This clip shows Jay Carney being cornered by a lowly local reporter from Colorado. He’s been in front of Carney before because he notes, at the outset, “the last time I asked you a question you didn’t answer it”. Enjoy the skewering…

Reporter

He prefaces his question by noting that the Democrats passed ObamaCare facing overwhelming poll numbers that said the American people didn’t want it and with a personal shot at Harry Reid when he notes that “the President said you could keep your plan and I know that’s not true because my wife lost hers”.

“We don’t get here very often…” Honestly, you’re not likely to get asked back.

Jay Carney is a dissembling liar. “Do you want quality, affordable health insurance or do you want the insurance company to tell you that you can’t get coverage because of the fine print…” referring to the demon of “pre-existing conditions”.

NEVER FORGET

The pre-existing condition argument made by Democrats is a chain of lies. Forbes deconstructed that argument in just a few words.

According to the latest Census Bureau data, 309 million Americans have health insurance. Of these 4 percent are covered by directly purchased insurance alone. The remaining 96 percent are covered by government or company insurance or some combination. Government health insurance does not allow discrimination based on preexisting conditions. Company insurance typically does not either, insofar as the risk pool is already incorporated in the premiums, and there are portability requirements in moving from company to company.

Thus 12 million people purchased private direct purchased health insurance on the eve of Obama Care. Insurance industry studies show that one in eight applicants for private health insurance have preexisting conditions that affect their eligibility or premiums. This gives a total of 1.5 million Americans who were denied health insurance or paid higher premiums due to pre-existing conditions.

One point-five-million people are impacted because of a pre-existing condition. So the Democrats took over one-sixth of the US economy to “fix” a problem effecting 0.48% of the population. As for the other 99.52% of Americans, our insurance premiums have gone down an average of $2,500 per year increased by an average of 23% according to the Manhattan Institute.

–Average rates will rise in 81% of the 300 age and sex categories, and go down in 19%.

–For all categories in all states, the average increase comes out to 22.8%, with rates going from $268.33 to $329.44 a month, up $61.10. The median increase is just under 32%.

NEVER FORGET

So, on average, consumers with ObamaCare policies saw their insurance cost go up an average of $733.20 vs. the President’s claim of a $2,500 drop. Today, that has only impacted those in the private insurance marketplace because the hit to group plans was delayed until next year by The Imperial President. New pricing on group plans should be out in September/October of this year.

November is a time to exact revenge on the people who’ve been lying to you for the last half-dozen years about this mess called ObamaCare. Republicans need to take back the US Senate and grind this administration to a halt.

Death and Taxes

Today’s “Politically INCORRECT” Cartoon


CONSERVATIVE-BYTE-BANNER

Obama suggests people cancel cable and cell phones to afford Obamacare


Allen B West Banner

http://allenbwest.com/2014/03/obama-suggests-people-cancel-cable-cell-phones-afford-obamacare/#yfYUfi8Y4oKcOkUI.99

Written by Allen West on March 12, 2014

phone
 According to President Obama, low-income families may have trouble affording Obamacare premiums because they simply do not know how to spend their own money. Last week, during a town hall meeting for Spanish language media where Obama was promoting enrollment, a viewer challenged the economics of it for low-income Americans now forced to buy health insurance, according to Hot Air.

The president responded that “if you looked at their cable bill, their telephone, their cell phone bill… it may turn out that, it’s just they haven’t prioritized health care.” He added that if a family member gets sick, the father “will wish he had paid that $300 a month.

nEVER fORGET

Not that the father has any choice in the matter, considering the government is forcing him to buy it.

No Sir, it just means they haven’t prioritized spending on the health care you’re shoving down their throats. The hypocrisy never ceases to amaze. While the “era of austerity is supposedly over,” it’s clearly over for the federal government only.

Once again, President Obama finds someone else to blame for the failures of his own policy — which is so unappealing he keeps delaying it piece be piece. Ironically, cell phones are okay if they’re given away “free” at the expense of the hard-working American taxpayer, but not if you want to buy one yourself.

Daniel Garza, Executive Director of The LIBRE Initiative said of Obama’s remarks, “If the president actually believes that a family earning less than $40,000 per year can afford nearly $4,000 in health insurance premiums, then he truly does not understand middle-income families. Americans do not need the President to tell them how to budget their households. People are already cutting back on things like cable television and cell phones, just to compensate for an awful economy. This president promised he would deliver on affordable health care. Instead, premiums are up, out-of-pocket expenses are up, and overall cost of living is up. The president simply doesn’t get it. And his condescending attitude adds insult to injury.”

nEVER fORGET

Once upon a time, families had the choice of using Healthcare Savings Accounts (HSAs) to spend pre-tax money on routine care and smaller emergencies, while using so-called catastrophic insurance to deal with serious illness requiring hospitalizations. But as part of Obamacare, HSAs are now taxed as well. So much for freedom of choice.

Perhaps we should take away Obama’s cell phone (and pen, while we’re at it) so the politicized executive orders will stop.

Obama is trying to convince Americans that the unaffordability of the Affordable Care Act isn’t his fault. It’s the fault of the states (run by those rascally Republicans) that won’t expand Medicaid. And it’s the fault of those selfish, irresponsible folks who’d rather have cable and cell phones.

If you like your iPhone, you can’t keep it. Period.

Death and Taxes

The Liberal Jihad


eagle-rising-logo3b

http://eaglerising.com/5085/liberal-jihad/#J34elGhg6iRSseQg.99

By / 12 March 2014

It is my experience that liberals are far more than simply gullible or ignorant. Their world view is one of self-deception and self-loathing. They are political and historical masochists. They feel so ashamed at the generosity, wisdom, beauty, and success of Western civilization that they have trained themselves to process everything through the prism of masochism. They are truly Ameriphobic.

I think they view American slavery as the worst of all sins ever committed. While that period of our history is certainly abhorrent, the liberals were never taught that the slave trade was possible mainly because of Islamic conquest and its heavy emphasis on human trafficking.

They don’t look fondly on our Founding Fathers (most of whom were true abolitionists), or our Declaration or Constitution, both of which are true abolitionist documents. They tear down America because of our sins. In contrast, conservatives look fondly at America for her ideals and values, which led to the ending of slavery and eradication of many other historical ills. Americans are not the dictators of the world, but the liberators of humanity from the hands of dictators. That is simply a fact!

Liberals have actually taken on many of the traits of the Islamists they defend.

America is in decline for this very reason: the liberal population of our country no longer defends her, but is, rather, attempting to destroy her. Moderates and middle-of-the-roaders tend to follow like lemmings, because they are incapable of processing reality, and cannot discriminate between the rights and wrongs of history, and give credit where credit is due ~ to the superiority of Western culture, even with all its flaws and blemishes. There is such a thing as better. And I, for one, am proud to be an American, and I will defend her every chance I get. As for our presidents and the current administration, many of them are not worthy of defense, as they are far more anti-American than patriotic.

Liberals live by their own version of Sharia Law.

They say they are inclusive – yet, when asked about including the Tea Party, or a Republican, or a conservative, they recoil in horror. They aren’t inclusive and they aren’t tolerant.

They say they speak for the innocent – yet they refuse to defend the unborn and the elderly from Obamacare.

Only Democrats

They say they are for free speech and the First Amendment, but say anything ill of a liberal, a liberal program, or a liberal idea, and you will be railed for “blasphemy” ~ a crime punishable by a boycott, lost jobs, or character assassination (the next “best” thing to death itself).

They say they are for women, and pretend to defend them against the so-called “War on Women”, yet they allow their men to live lives of shame, permitting the likes of John Edwards and Bill Clinton (who practically had a concubine in Arkansas) to roam free in the hen-house. Never mind the dozens of others who got away with philandering with nary a harsh word from the so-called “women’s groups”. It would be laughable if it weren’t so downright depressing. It seems the liberal men get to enjoy the Islamic paradise of endless women here and now, rather than having to blow themselves up for the cause. Well, I guess they do “blow up” their egos a bit, don’t they? Let’s call it martyrdom “lite”.

antiamericanJust like Islamists, liberals, too, have a dualistic ideology. It’s always okay to destroy the livelihood of a non-liberal, and never okay to speak ill of a fellow progressive, even when the subject or offense is exactly the same.

Liberals are always drooling on themselves about promoting women and minorities, but are simply hypocrites when it comes to putting their money, or political appointments, where their mouth is. Republicans, they may be shocked to learn, were the force behind abolition, desegregation, women’s suffrage, and civil rights. But you won’t hear that in the high schools, colleges, or universities, and you will never see it on network news.

Liberals are all about fairness and equality, except for conservative blacks and conservative women. To those, slander and ad-hominem attacks are delivered on cue. The ugliness echoes almost endlessly, as if fed back through a liberal meme-phone.

Vitriolic talk is to be condemned, if not outlawed, unless it comes from the lips of a liberal. In which case, it is simply the truth, on steroids. All passion from the right is, of course, from the bowels of racism and sexism, and any and every phobia invented in the progressive nomenclature.

Liberals condemn any sort of criticism of those who switch sides – tolerance, acceptance, and open arms are how you welcome those who have turned to the dark side. However, it is much different when leaving the liberal plantation, (an apostate) which leads to marginalization at best, and most-assuredly a fatwa on your head. It never leads to enlightenment and tolerance, and happy good-byes. Giving up the old faith is an apostasy worthy of death, but character assassination will suffice, as it is the most trusted form of liberal abuse to beat former acolytes into submission.

The most hated conservatives are often those who escaped through the underground railroad of critical thinking: Ronald Reagan, Andrew Breitbart, Thomas Sowell, David Horowitz, even Milton Friedman, were all once liberals! Do current liberals have anything good to say about them? No. All we get is “Uncle Tom” to “Bat poop Crazy”. They are only recognized by the verbal filth poured upon their heads.

Show me a young Conservative, and I’ll show you someone with no heart. Show me an old Liberal, and I’ll show you someone with no brains.” – Winston Churchill

This is certainly true of liberals ~ no brains, all emotion; no thought, all feelings.

Leftist Revisionist

Aristotle said “Tolerance and apathy are the last virtues of a dying society.” On that account, where are we today? Near death? The tyrants are not coming, they are already here?

Friends, liberals are very much akin to the Islamists, you either think like them, convert to their side, or face the penalties of their faith system; convert, pay them homage and lip service, or silence yourself before an avalanche of political correctness, lest you die the slow death of a million cuts known as the political vendetta aka character assassination.

Liberalism may be just as deadly as their Jihadist brotherhood. We have many fronts on which to do battle. Let’s mount up and ride…. May we all still be standing when the smoke clears, and may that banner yet wave over the land of the free and the home of the brave!

About the author: David Whitley

David is a deacon at Orange View church of Christ and a perpetual student of religion, politics and American history. David lives in Southern California with his wife and their three children. In 1994 David self published a 300 page compilation of right of center groups and individuals called “The Conservative Directory,” subtitled; The Little Black Book of the Cultural Counter Revolution. It was honored with praise from Charlton Heston, Bay Buchanan, Joseph Farah among many others.

You can follow him on Twitter @cogitarus

Today’s “Politically Incorrect” Cartoon


CONSERVATIVE-BYTE-BANNER

“Chained to It”

Posted on

http://conservativebyte.com/2014/03/chained/

Chained-590-LA

ALWAYS REMEMBER; NEVER FORGET; REMINDER EVERYONE OFTEN

Only Democrats

AND….

Death and Taxes

Tag Cloud