Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘Debate’ Pro-Life News Report Monday, September 3, 2019

Top Stories

Autopsy Confirms Abortion Clinic Killed Young Woman in Botched Legal Abortion
Book Confirms Abortion Motivated Christine Ford’s False Attacks on Brett Kavanaugh
Judge Dismisses Father’s Lawsuit Against Abortion Clinic for Aborting His Baby Without His Consent
Pete Buttigieg Claims Mike Pence is a Christian “Hypocrite,” But He Supports Abortions Up to Birth

More Pro-Life News
Planned Parenthood Kills 247 Black Babies Every Day, But the Media Calls White Pro-Lifers Racist
Church’s Sign Claims “A Black Vote for Trump is Mental Illness, White Vote is Racism”
Democrat Presidential Candidates Want to Force You to Fund Abortions on Babies in Other Countries
Doctors Told Parents to Have Abortion Because Their Baby Would Die in the Womb, Now She’s 3
Scroll Down for Several More Pro-Life News Stories

Autopsy Confirms Abortion Clinic Killed Young Woman in Botched Legal Abortion

Tia Archeiva Parks was a 26-year-old mother of a little girl that had just turned four when she walked in to Preterm, a Cleveland abortion facility, on June 7, 2019, for what seemed like a routine abortion in her first trimester of pregnancy. Pro-Life News Report Friday, August 2, 2019

Top Stories

Would Planned Parenthood Stop Abortions to Focus on Women’s Health Care? New CEO Says “Absolutely Not”
Black Activist Says Abortion is the Real Racism: “We’re are Literally Killing Ourselves From the Inside Out”
Texas Town Declares Itself a “Sanctuary for Unborn Children,” Bans Abortion Clinics
Abortion Activists Vandalize Pro-Life Pregnancy Center’s Van, Slash Its Tires

More Pro-Life News
Man Beaten for Wearing “Make America Great Again” Hat
Single Mom Who Rejected Abortion of Twins Graduates With Two Degrees
California Bill Would Mandate Free Abortions at Colleges and Universities
Satanists Challenge Pro-Life Law, Claims it Violates Their Religious Freedoms
Scroll Down for Several More Pro-Life News Stories

Would Planned Parenthood Stop Abortions to Focus on Women’s Health Care? New CEO Says “Absolutely Not”

Since the sudden, forced departure of Dr. Leana Wen from Planned Parenthood, some have been skeptical about the organization’s motives. 

Without a Guaranteed Right to Life, All Other Legal Rights are Fiction

Arkansas Abortions Drop 6% Last Year, 44% Since 2000 as More Babies Saved From Abortions

shirtPro-life t-shirt by Noeclexis. Good everyday t-shirt for prolife supporters . Also good for pro life marches and demonstrations. Get it on Amazon.

Washington State Assisted Suicides Jump 25%, Many Patients Experience Long and Painful Deaths

Abortion Tells Women: We Can’t Help You Raise Your Child, But We Can Kill Your Baby

Australian State Considers New Law legalizing Abortions Up to Birth

Kamala Harris Brags to Joe Biden During Democrat Debate: I’m More Pro-Abortion Than You

Comments or questions? Email us at
Copyright 2003-2019 All rights reserved. Pro-Life News Report Friday, July 19, 2019

Top Stories

Beto O’Rourke Compares Trump Supporters to Nazis, Calls Huge Campaign Event a “Nuremberg Rally”
Leana Wen: Planned Parenthood Fired Me Because “I Did Not Prioritize Abortion Enough”
SHOCK: Investigation Finds Every Single Girl in One India Region Was Killed in a Sex-Selection Abortion
President Trump’s UN Ambassador Nominee Andrew Bremberg is Pro-Life, So Planned Parenthood is Unhinged

More Pro-Life News
Pray for Former Planned Parenthood CEO Leana Wen, That She Becomes Pro-Life and Accepts Jesus
City Adopts Resolution Opposing Abortion, Confirming Human Life Begins at Conception
Pro-Abortion Professor: Babies Can be Killed in Abortions, Infanticide Because They’re Not Fully Conscious
Feminist Writer: Children Shouldn’t “Belong” to Those Whose Genetics They Share
Scroll Down for Several More Pro-Life News Stories

Beto O’Rourke Compares Trump Supporters to Nazis, Calls Huge Campaign Event a “Nuremberg Rally”

Democratic presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke compared President Donald Trump’s political event in North Carolina last week to Nazi Party rallies held in Germany during Adolf Hitler’s reign. 

This ‘People Who Don’t Want A Border Wall’ Meme Needs To Go VIRAL

Written by Wes Walker on January 17, 2019

If you want to see Democrats torn between winning their Shutdown Showdown and saving their skin for 2020, show them this meme.

We can’t take credit for this meme, it was posted on Instagram by the user ‘dc_draino’. But we sure can agree with and promote the hell out of it. (And you can too!)

Do drug cartels want open borders? Yes.

Do sex traffickers want open borders? Yes.

Do smugglers want open borders? Yes.

Does MS-13 want open borders? Yes.

Do rapists that prey upon the vulnerable border-crossers want open borders? Yes.

They even said so in a memo of their own.

The Center for American Progress (CAP) Action Fund memo, which circulated Monday, called on Democrats to “refuse to offer any votes for Republican spending bills that do not offer a fix for Dreamers and instead appropriate funds to deport them.”

The memo from the left-leaning think tank also said that protecting DACA is not only a “moral imperative” but also a “critical component” in winning elections.

“The fight to protect Dreamers is not only a moral imperative, it is also a critical component of the Democratic Party’s future electoral success,” the memo read.

It finished, “If Democrats don’t try to do everything in their power to defend Dreamers, that will jeopardize Democrats’ electoral chances in 2018 and beyond.”
Source: FoxNews

Why would anyone, of any party POSSIBLY be in favor of open borders?

A federal judge in New York has ruled against the Trump administration’s decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census. — Source: NPR

What difference would that make? Oh, nothing much, just a permanent expansion of the Left’s political power base.

One electoral news site gives us an explanation of what counting illegals does to the electoral college numbers, including an interactive map:

Here’s how the electoral map would look, based on 2013 Census estimates, and using 2016 election results, if only citizens were counted. […]

As we found at the time, “11 states would be impacted. The big loser would be California, which would see 4 of its 55 electoral votes trimmed away. No other state was impacted by more than one electoral vote. FL, NY and TX would lose one each, while seven states (LA, MO, MT, NC, OH, OK, VA) would gain one.” In terms of the 2016 election, Donald Trump would have won an additional four electoral votes, giving him a 310-228 victory, vs. the actual 306-232 result.*

“Fundamentally Transforming,” indeed. Into their own perpetual power base, whether we want it or not.

Just like the Big Tech Companies said they would in the article endorsed by their own management:

Leftist Want A ‘New Civil War’ – This Post Is Disturbing

But we’ve got someone in office who’s putting a stop to that plan. Mr. President, America Stands with you … Rock On!

Professors investigated for presenting opposing viewpoints

 waving flagBy Ashe Schow  (@AsheSchow) 6/22/16  Writer, The Washington Examiner

Complaints about professors’ teachings were made to Northern Colorado’s “Bias Response Team

Two professors at the University of Northern Colorado were investigated after students complained that they were forced to hear opposing viewpoints. The complaints were made to Northern Colorado’s “Bias Response Team,” an Orwellian office on campus that asks students to report their peers and professors for anything that upsets or offends them. When the news outlet Heat Street made an open records request for some of the complaints, it discovered that two students had become so upset about having to hear an opinion they disagreed with they filed reports with school administrators.AWWW Poor Baby

And rather than telling the students to buck up because they might hear those opinions outside of college or on the news or in the media, the schools told the professors to stop teaching that there’s an alternate viewpoint.mental illness

One professor instructed his students to read an article from the Atlantic written by Foundation for Individual Rights in Education’s president Greg Lukianoff and social psychologist Jonathan Haidt titled “The Coddling of the American Mind.” The article explains that allowing students to hide from controversial and upsetting ideas (like through the use of “safe spaces” or “trigger warnings”) actually harms those students by not allowing them to confront those opinions.

After reading the article, the professor asked his students to address controversial topics such as abortion, gay marriage, global warming and transgenderism. The professor made no indication as to what his opinion on the matters was, but one student, who identifies as transgender, was upset that the professor even referenced the opinion that “transgender is not a real thing, and no one can truly feel like they are born in the wrong body.”extra bowl of stupid

Instead of learning how to confront this opinion and be able to adequately teach someone how they are wrong to believe that, the student felt they shouldn’t have had to hear it in the first place.

“I would just like the professor to be educated about what trans is and how what he said is not okay because as someone who truly identifies as a transwomen [sic] I was very offended and hurt by this,” the student wrote in their complaint.mental illness

Never mind that the professor wasn’t even expressing his own opinion — this student just wanted the discussion shut down. And the school obliged.Gaged by the Left

A member of the Bias Response Team “advised [the professor] not to revisit transgender issues in his classroom if possible to avoid the students expressed concerns.” He was also told “to avoid stating opinions [his or those of the authors] on the topic as he had previously when working from the Atlantic article.”Assault

This is what America’s colleges are becoming.

Another Northern Colorado professor was also investigated by the BRT (notice how the acronym sounds like “brat”) for assigning controversial reading on homosexuality.

“Specifically there were two topics of debate that triggered them and personally felt like an attack on their identity ( Is this harmful? Is this acceptable? Is this Christianity? And gay marriage: Should it be legal? Is homosexuality immoral as Christians suggest?),” the BRT’s report said.

As with the other complaining student, this one felt the class should not have to hear an opinion counter to what they believe.

“I do not believe that students should be required to listen to their own rights and personhood debated,” the student wrote. “[This professor] should remove these topics from the list of debate topics. Debating the personhood of an entire minority demographic should not be a classroom exercise, as the classroom should not be an actively hostile space for people with underprivileged identities.”Did you just hear what your mouth said

From the questions posed to the class about the topic, it was pretty clear the professor did not agree that homosexuality is immoral. No matter — universities are now expected to be debate- and discussion-free zones.definetly

The professor was not found to have discriminated against anyone, but a member of the BRT met with him to “have a conversation … [and] listen to his perspective, share the impact created for the student and dialogue about options to strengthen his teaching.”mental illness

Because one student in one class was offended, the professor has to change his teaching method. What it means is that our institutions of higher learning are no longer run by adults.Words are suppose to hurt

Ashe Schow is a commentary writer for the Washington Examiner.

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Bernie ACCEPTS Trump’s CHALLENGE to Debate One-on-One, After Hillary Was too Scared

waving flagPosted on May 26, 2016

Screen Shot 2016-05-26 at 9.25.22 AMThis is an interesting turn of events. Trump just made Hillary look like the biggest coward. Who do you think this is going to win this debate?

Bernie Sanders says he’s ready to debate Donald Trump if the billionaire is serious about it. ‘Game on. I look forward to debating Donald Trump in California before the June 7 primary,’ Sanders tweeted early Thursday morning. Trump made the offer Wednesday evening on Jimmy Kimmel,

‘If I debated him, we would have such high ratings,’ said Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee. ‘And I think I should give, take that money and give it to some worthy charity. Okay?’

Sanders said after the show that he’d do it.

The U.S. senator had been hoping for another debate against Hillary Clinton before the California Democratic primary, but her campaign said Monday she wasn’t interested. Sanders is behind Clinton in votes and pledged delegates. He must win seven in 10 Democratic voters in California to elbow Clinton out of the race.

Trump told Kimmel on Wednesday that he’d welcome Sanders as his opponent in the general because he believes he’d be easier to beat than Clinton. And he said he would be happy to debate Sanders in California, the last big primary battleground state before the party conventions.

A reporter covering Trump for CBS News said Thursday morning that Republican was not serious about the debating Sanders, though. In the lengthy interview on the talk show Trump commiserated with Sanders over the ‘rigged’ electoral system.

‘What I like about Bernie, when he loses [it’s] because the system is rigged against him like it was against me. The system is rigged.’

‘And if I didn’t win by massive landslides in every state, there was no chance for me to win. He’s having the same thing, except she has a different kind of deal with superdelegates.’

Trump said, ‘I think it’s unfair what’s happening to Bernie Sanders, actually,’ he said. ‘And it’s a system that’s not a good system.’

Sanders could catch up to Clinton in pledged delegates by winning California. A majority of the superdelegates – the party officials and electeds who also get to vote at the convention – are backing Clinton, however. Because of that, she’s less than 100 delegates away from winning the nomination and is readying herself for November. As part of her pivot Clinton has stopped talking about Sanders on the trail. It’s Trump she has her eye on now.

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

A Debate That MUST Be Shared

waving flagAlthough this debate goes on for over 45 minutes, it is well worth the time to listen. It is a wonderful to help answer New WhatDidYouSay Logoquestions you may have heard about homosexuality and the Bible.

Please watch and share.

Jerry Broussard of



debateBig Gay Hate Machinefreedom combo 2


Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: