Did you see the debate? Did you hear the ‘experts’ tell you who won it? Did ANY OF that line up with the snap polls?
The Media outlets (D) were calling it a crushing victory practically before it started. No surprise there. CNN said she CRUSHED Trump. Hands-down.
Compare that to these:
CNN awarded Hillary Clinton an overwhelming victory in the first presidential debate – but most snap polls show Trump emerged victorious.
The Drudge Report’s poll showed Trump fared better with 81.5 per cent of the vote to Clinton’s 18.5 while others, including Time, CBS New York and the Washington Times, also saw Trump win the vote.
Clinton edged out Trump in the Star Tribune’s poll and one conducted by NBC News. DailyMail
CNBC:
Drudge:
Wikileaks got right to the point… not asking simply who won this particular debate, so much as who they’d specifically vote for:
So Hillary and her Media bodyguard can claim all the ‘victory’ she wants to claim. The people have made up their own minds.
Hillary won the debate on points. You could tell she’s spent a lot of time polishing her lies and deflections. Trump won on not gaffing. He was asked 6 follow-up questions, none for Clinton.
If you listen to Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, you would believe that the American economy is rosy and well. The figures released by the White House also paint a rosy picture of the American economy.
For one thing, one of the key signs of a good economy is a GDP of at least 3.0%, yet Obama is the only White House occupant of recent times that has failed to reach a GDP of 3.0% or higher. He’s had nearly eight years to accomplish this and never has. If you listen to Hillary, she wants to continue many of Obama’s economic policies plus she just made it known that she’ll raise over $1 trillion in taxes by raising the estate tax on the wealthy to 65%.
This estate tax increase may sound great to most Americans but stop and think who owns most of the businesses that employs millions of Americans. It’s the wealthy and their families. Yet, if a wealthy business owner dies and his family is forced to pay 65% of the estate to the federal government in estate taxes, where do you think most of the money will come from? In the majority of cases, it will come from selling off large portions of their businesses or closing the doors and putting millions of Americans out of work. Once that starts to happen, another major recession or even a depression could sweep across America which will also affect most of the rest of the world.
Back to today’s not so rosy economic outlook, several recent reports are indicating that many Americans are struggling to pay their mortgages and turning to alternate solutions.
“The number of New Yorkers applying for emergency grants to stay in their homes is skyrocketing — as the number of people staying in homeless shelters reached an all-time high last weekend, records show.”
“There were 82,306 applications for one-time emergency grants to prevent evictions in fiscal 2016, up 26 percent from 65,138 requests the previous year, according to the Mayor’s Management Report.”
At the same time, the number of people staying in New York homeless shelters have reached an all-time high.
The economic trend is also forcing many Americans to move from their homes to their vehicles. An increasing number of them are living in their cars, trucks, vans, buses and RVs. Some are living in campgrounds and using whatever public facility they have access to for showering, etc.
Circa.com recently reported on the growing number of Americans who have opted or been forced to live in their vehicles because of today’s economy. One man was Stephen Hutchins, a recent graduate from the USC. He is living in his van which cost him $120 at auction. He pays $60 a month for insurance and $60 a month for a storage unit. In comparison, the average rent for a 1-bedroom studio apartment in Los Angeles run around $2,300 a month. By moving into his van, Hutchins says he has cut his cost of living by $800 a month.
Zander Kingsley of Santa Monica, is the owner and founder of Kowasa Clothing Company. He is currently living in an old school bus that he is fixing.
In the Los Angeles general area, at least 4,600 cars, vans, buses, trucks or RVs were used as homes while at the same time there was a 3.1% vacancy rate in the same area. It seems that this is a growing trend throughout the nation as more and more people are being forced into difficult financial decisions.
Obama still has a few more months to further destroy America’s economy. If he doesn’t succeed, a Hillary Clinton presidency definitely will. More Americans will be living in their vehicles or in homeless shelters. The middle class will continue to shrink until there are only two economic classes, the lower class or poverty level and the few ultra-wealthy. Then America will be a true socialist state with the government owning or controlling many of the businesses that the families of wealthy business owners are forced to sell in order to pay Hillary’s exorbitant estate taxes.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Dave Jolly
R.L. David Jolly holds a B.S. in Wildlife Biology and an M.S. in Biology – Population Genetics. He has worked in a number of fields, giving him a broad perspective on life, business, economics and politics. He is a very conservative Christian, husband, father and grandfather who cares deeply for his Savior, family and the future of our troubled nation.
Yes, this one really is perfect. BLM wants us ALL to remember that ‘Black Lives Matter’, and will (violently) ‘protest’ to get their point across. Well, what about THIS…
The left is screaming for Lester Holt to fact check Trump, yet you have Hillary, the biggest lair in the history of running for president, and it’s Lester’s Job to fact check Trump?
>>Secretary Clinton who was reportedly unconscious and “bleeding profusely.”<<
If an unclassified email leaked by WikiLeaks is any indication, it appears that there may be much more to the story of what happened to Hillary Clinton back in 2012. We’ve been told that she suffered a concussion… but was that just diplomatic cover for something else?
Bill Clinton did more today than defend his wife, Hillary Clinton, from recent accusations leveled by GOP strategist Karl Rove that she suffered brain damage after falling in December 2012.
“They went to all this trouble to say she had staged what was a terrible concussion that required six months of very serious work to get over,” he said. “It’s something she never low-balled with the American people, never tried to pretend it didn’t happen.”
The alleged incident claimed in this story overlapped with Hillary’s admitted illness, concussion and time off from office that precipitated her resignation as Secretary of State less than two months later on February 1, 2013.
Wikileaks released this chain of emails forwarded between various ranking military officials, and eventually to State Dept. and top Hillary confidant Jake J. Sullivan who laughed it off when he forwarded it to “H” herself, citing a conspiracy story written by Sorcha Faal – whose reports are widely dismissed as disinfo – claiming that Hillary sustained serious injuries in a crash during a secret diplomatic meeting with the then-president of Iran.
If such a secret meeting did happen, it remains top secret and there is no publicly available information to confirm or deny that such a meeting even took place – let alone that there was a plane crash.
However, Capt Les Horn, USN (Ret), who was in the chain of emails, noted that “The report appears to be credible” in a message he sent to Anthony Milavic, a retired Marine major.
Presumably his assessment is based upon detailed military knowledge of the circumstances under which such a secret diplomatic mission would have taken place, including details about the aircraft and route, and possibly includes first hand knowledge of events. But that remains unclear.
A new Foreign Military Intelligence (GRU) report circulating in the Kremlin today is saying that United States Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was injured, and a top US Navy Seal Commander killed when their C-12 Huron military passenger and transport aircraft crash landed nearly 3 weeks ago in the Iranian city of Ahvaz near the Iraqi border.
[…]
Upon the C-12 Huron landing at Ahwaz, however, this report says it encountered “extreme turbulence” causing it to leave the runway where its main landing gear then collapsed causing it to crash.
Within seconds of the C-12 Huron crashing, this report continues, Iranian emergency and security personal responded freeing the victims, including Secretary Clinton who was reportedly unconscious and “bleeding profusely.”
The death of SEAL Team 4 Commanding Officer Job W. Price adds additional reason to think that a cover story may be at work. Price was reportedly escorting Hillary on the plane, and may have died as a result of injuries in the alleged crash.
The US Navy Seal member reported killed in this bizarre incident, this report says, was indentified as Commander Job W. Price who as a leader of this highly specialized American Special Forces unit protects high-ranking diplomats traveling in Middle Eastern and Asian combat zones.
[…]
This GRU report, however, states that US military flight logs recorded by Russian air and space forces confirm that Commander Price, and other members of US Navy Seal Team 4, left their base in Urozgan Province, Afghanistan on a flight to US Naval Support Activity Bahrain where they met up with Secretary Clinton and all of them transferred to the C-12 Huron that began a flight path to Baghdad, Iraq.
Looking for an inspiring and motivating speaker for your pro-life event? Don’t have much to spend on a high-priced speaker costing several thousand dollars? Contact LifeNews at news@lifenews.com about having LifeNews Editor Steven Ertelt speak at your event.
Daily Pro-Life News Report
Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright 2003-2016 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump talks with rival Ted Cruz during a commercial break in the midst of the Republican presidential candidates debate sponsored by CNN at the University of Miami in Miami, Florida March 10, 2016. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri ∧
Months after their nasty GOP primary fight, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz on Friday officially announced that he will vote Donald Trump for president.
“After many months of careful consideration, of prayer and searching my own conscience, I have decided that on election day, I will vote for the Republican nominee, Donald Trump,” Cruz wrote on Facebook on Friday afternoon.
Trump reacted to the news in a statement, saying: “I am greatly honored by the endorsement of Senator Cruz. We have fought the battle and he was a tough and brilliant opponent. I look forward to working with him for many years to come in order to make America great again.”
Cruz, who it is believed would like to run for president again, was booed in July during the Republican National Convention when he declined to endorse Trump. Instead, he told delegates to “vote your conscience, vote for candidates up and down the ticket whom you trust to defend our freedom and to be faithful to the Constitution.”
The contest between Cruz and Trump got particularly nasty towards the end: Trump routinely referred to his rival as “Lyin’ Ted.” Cruz famously referred to Trump as a “sniveling coward.”
In a lengthy post explaining his decision, Cruz said that “like many other voters, I have struggled to determine the right course of action in this general election.”
“I’ve made this decision for two reasons,”Cruz wrote. “First, last year, I promised to support the Republican nominee. And I intend to keep my word. Second, even though I have had areas of significant disagreement with our nominee, by any measure Hillary Clinton is wholly unacceptable — that’s why I have always been #NeverHillary.”
He added: “A year ago, I pledged to endorse the Republican nominee, and I am honoring that commitment. And if you don’t want to see a Hillary Clinton presidency, I encourage you to vote for him.”
The Tea Party Patriots Citizens Fund, an organization that backed Cruz over Trump in the primary but endorsed Trump this week, said it “commends”Cruz for “listening to the grassroots activists and Republican voters who nominated Donald Trump in order to shake up the Washington Establishment and its stranglehold over our politics.”
“It is clear Ted Cruz has examined his principles, considered the choice at hand and has decided to lead by example in endorsing Donald Trump as the man who will repeal Obamacare, balance our budget, and ensure the Supreme Court protects our most cherished rights over Hillary Clinton, who will represent another four years of the failed Obama Administration,” said the group’s chairwoman, Jenny Beth Martin.
This could be very detrimental to Hillary. But if she wants to be president, she has to learn to handle talks like this. How do you think she will hold up?
If presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton slips into a coughing fit or any other medical crisis during Monday’s high-stakes debate, she will have to power through, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned!
“There are no commercial breaks,” a commission source explains. “Period.”
Debate moderator Lester Holt does not have the authority to cut away from the stage during the epic 90-minute showdown. And microphone audio for either of the candidates is not to be manipulated.
Have you SEEN the list of grievances against our nominee? How can ANYONE support a guy with this many strikes against him? Read to the END and find out!
“He’s nothing but a B-List TV personality. He has no business being in politics.”
“He’s been divorced and remarried. He can’t commit to anything.”
“He’s dangerously ignorant about international affairs. The Russian leaders will walk all over him.”
“He has no filter – doesn’t think before he speaks.”
“Until recently, he was a Democrat. He’s not a real Republican. He hasn’t paid his GOP dues.”
“He used to be Pro Choice. Now, suddenly he’s Pro Life?”
“That can’t be his real hair!”
“He’s a loose cannon. No one wants HIS finger on the nuclear button.”
“His opponent has the experience and political savvy to be president. He does not.”
“He’s just not presidential.”
“His temperament disqualifies him from ever being Commander-In-Chief.”
“He’s proven himself to be mentally unstable.”
“The military will never accept him as Commander-In-Chief. He’s not smart enough.”
“The GOP doesn’t want him to be the head of the party. He could never reach across the aisle to get anything done.”
“Most Republican voters will just stay home rather than go out and vote for him.”
“He’s almost 70. Much too old to be president.”
“Evangelicals will never support him.”
“He says ‘(Let’s) Make America Great Again’. How dare he say we aren’t still great?!?!”
“His intellect is thinner than spit on a slate rock.”
“90 percent of Republican state chairmen judge him guilty of ‘simplistic approaches,’ with ‘no depth in federal government administration’ and ‘no experience in foreign affairs.’”
“His spontaneity with reporters and voters plays well but also gives him plenty of space to disgorge fantasies and factual errors so prolific and often outrageous that he single-handedly makes the word gaffe a permanent fixture in America’s political vernacular. He confuses Pakistan with Afghanistan. He claimed once that trees contributed 93 percent of the atmosphere’s nitrous oxide…”
“After all his gaffs, he doubles down on them instead of admitting he made a mistake.”
“He’s threatening to upend our treaties and relationships with our allies by demanding that they pay for their own defense!”
“Because of his gross factual errors, he might take rash action and needlessly lead this country into open warfare!”
“He’s racist, xenophobic, and fuels the fires of hatred!”
“You shouldn’t take him seriously. He has a penchant for offering simplistic solutions to hideously complex problems and a stubborn insistence that he is always right in every argument.”
“The rising turnout of his voters are not loyal Republicans or Democrats and are alienated from both parties because neither takes a sympathetic view toward their issues.”
“He wears the disdain he draws from the GOP elites as a badge of honor. Henry Kissinger’s championing the other GOP candidate and attacking him are actually helping him!”
“The fact that he could be deemed a serious candidate for president is a shame and embarrassment for the country.”
The New Yorker observed that his appeal “has to do not with competence at governing but with the emotion he evokes…
[He] lets people get out their anger and frustration, their feeling of being misunderstood and mishandled by those who have run our government, their impatience with taxes and with the poor and the weak, their impulse to deal with the world’s troublemakers by employing the stratagem of a punch in the nose.”
“His unpopular opponent presided over the current Iranian crisis… and a reeling economy, yet surely the Democrat will prevail over him.”
“Is he Safe? …he shoots from the hip … he’s over his head … What are his solutions?”
“Voters want to follow some authority figure, — a leader who can take charge with authority; return a sense of discipline to our government; and, manifest the willpower needed to get this country back on track.”
******************************
Sound familiar? You’ve heard this all about Donald Trump, right?.
Try again. Virtually all this was said of Ronald Reagan in 1976 and 1980. Most of it was BY OTHER REPUBLICANS, and Reagan turned out to be one of the greatest presidents of the 20th Century.
We know about the issues of free speech on our colleges and universities. It appears there are those who define free speech as the speech they deem acceptable. If you attempt to speak on issues to which the liberal progressive socialist left does not consent, you should be censored. Or at a minimum, the little cupcakes ask for a “safe space” where they don’t have to hear opposing views — and here we were under the impression that institutions of higher learning were supposed to be places to encourage the free exchange of ideas. Many times we’ve seen on the news and elsewhere stories of conservative speakers being denied the right to speak on college campuses. I’ve watched this and just shaken my head. And then I would ask myself, when will it happen to me?
Well, it has and I’m not happy about it at all. Earlier today, I did a radio interview with former Boston Red Sox baseball superstar pitcher Curt Schilling, and he informed me of something that’s happening at St. Louis University of which I wasn’t aware. I’m to speak on the campus of St. Louis University next week, September 29th, for the Young America’s Foundation (YAF), a student conservative organization. It appears there’s some administrator at St. Louis University who is attempting to limit the free speech of the YAF chapter on campus. I contacted my speakers bureau, Worldwide Speakers Group, who confirmed through YAF Headquarters in Virginia that a very disconcerting and disrespectful action was being taken.
As posted at the YAF website, This week an administrator at Saint Louis University (SLU) informed students organizing a YAF-sponosred lecture by Lt. Col. Allen West they were not allowed to use the words “radical Islam” on any advertisements for the event.
The administrator also claimed West, who is a veteran of both Operation Desert Storm and Operation Iraqi Freedom, does not “have experience with radical Islam.”
These comments were made after students submitted event flyers for approval and campus officials rejected their design due to the inclusion of the words “radical Islam.”
SLU students confirmed these details to Young America’s Foundation this week.
The lecture, scheduled for September 29, is part of Young America’s Foundation’s Fred Allen Lecture Seriesthat is bringing Lt. Col. West to campuses across the country this school year.
YAF activists will not back down in the face of challenges from politically correct campus bureaucrats.
Let me make myself very clear here, whomever this misguided soul is, he or she has picked the wrong fight. This reminds me of the statement by John Kerry that if the media just didn’t talk about Islamic terrorism, it would not be an issue. This “administrator” at St. Louis University represents the most deplorable embodiment of fascism. Here we are less than a week from a weekend of Islamic terrorist attacks and this individual does not want students to have an in-depth discussion about the most serious, savage, and barbaric threat this Nation has faced — well, at least since the Barbary Pirates.
And who is this person who believes they have any right to prescribe to a campus student group what can be advertised for their lecture series? Is this what our country is coming to, and is this what parents who send their kids to St. Louis University are willing to accept? I’m honored YAF has chosen me to be the main speaker of their Fred Allen Lecture Series, and I take this responsibility seriously to educate and inform our young people of the current geopolitical situation — after all, they are our future leaders.
Now, who is this “administrator” who claims I don’t “have the experience with radical Islam” — Whiskey-Tango-Foxtrot! Having served 22 years active service in the United States Army, to include combat tours of duty in the First Persian Gulf conflagration and commanding a Battalion in Operation Iraqi Freedom. And after retiring, I spent two and a half years in Afghanistan as a civilian/military advisor to the Afghan Army, based in Kandahar — the place that was the capitol of the Taliban.
Perhaps having served two years in Congress and sitting on the House Armed Services Committee is just not enough experience to be considered capable of addressing radical Islam. Or maybe, this “administrator” should read the article I was asked to write by Military Review, the official professional journal of the US Army, for their January-February edition that addressed solutions to defeat ISIS — a radical Islamic organization. I wonder if this “administrator” has read, as I have several times, the Muslim Brotherhood’s Strategic Explanatory Memorandum for their engagement in North America — the United States. Many nations, except the United States, have declared the Muslim Brotherhood an Islamic terrorist group.
Bottom line, I want to know who this “administrator” is, and I demand he or she contact me directly. Sir or Ma’am, I’m calling you out, and you tell me what about my service and experiences, in and out of uniform, disqualify me from addressing the issue of radical Islam, or Islamo-fascism, Islamic jihadism, or Islamic terrorism? The better question is, what do you think makes you experienced or qualified to make any judgement on me?
Doggone right, I along with the YAF activists will not back down from this challenge. And if this is just a case of ill-conceived political correctness, we’ll rectify that. But, if this is a case of the influence of stealth jihad radical Islamic campus organizations such as the Muslim Student Association, an affiliate of the Muslim Brotherhood, then you will be exposed. And I recommend to the President of St. Louis University, you do not want it known that a radical Islamic organization is dictating speakers on your campus — that is not the type of PR you really want.
I’m coming to St. Louis University next week, Thursday, September 29th. I’ll be discussing radical Islam and its affects upon freedom in the United States and across the globe. I’ll use my intellect, experiences, and historical reading to share with students so they can be better educated and informed. If someone wants to protest a retired Army officer exercising First Amendment free speech on a university campus — feel free, but I’ll take pleasure in easily defeating you in an intellectual engagement — because I do have experiences and historical knowledge.
Again, I want this administrator to contact me. It’s not that hard — that is, unless you’re truly the coward I sense that you are!
Donald Trump Names Rick Santorum and Other Top Pro-Life Catholics as Key Advisers Fresh from announcing a list of pro-life leaders who are advising him on issues that matter to pro-life voters, Donald Trump has named a group of pro-life Catholic leaders as additional key advisers, including pro-life former presidential candidate Rick Santorum.
Looking for an inspiring and motivating speaker for your pro-life event? Don’t have much to spend on a high-priced speaker costing several thousand dollars? Contact LifeNews at news@lifenews.com about having LifeNews Editor Steven Ertelt speak at your event.
Daily Pro-Life News Report
Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright 2003-2016 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.
In 1961 renowned psychologist Dr. Robert J Lifton published a book on thought reform (brainwashing). Based on observations of brainwashing in China, his book outlines eight elements of thought reform. These thought reform elements are being applied by cultural Marxism to dramatically affect our thinking.
Here are those eight elements. The annotations are mine.
1 — Control or attempting to control communication
The longbow, airplane, and atomic bomb revolutionized warfare.
The current dominant weapon is the media. No shots are fired. We simply acquiesce to the will of our foes.
British journalist Theodore Dalrymple observed that Marxist don’t use logic or data to sway our opinion. They use guilt.
He wrote:
“In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better.”
2 – Mystical manipulation (hidden maneuvers)
The far left uses abstracts to affect our thinking. A glass ceiling is an abstract that evokes the thought of an imposed limitation. A dog whistle suggests an implied and indirect thought. You can’t see glass ceilings and you can’t hear dog whistles.
I mentioned these phantom concepts in last week’s column. Here they are again with a few additions:
Racism • Division • Hostility • Exclusion • Confusion • Ignorance • Triggering • Polarizing • Xenohobe • Dog whistle • Objectifying • Homophobe • Islamophobe • Social justice • Glass ceiling • Empowerment • People of color • White privilege • Disenfranchise • Systemic racism • Disparate impact • Polarized society • White supremacy • Micro aggressions • Critical race theory • Hate (or hate group) • Climate change denier • Spew hate on the Internet • “Don’t you know it’s [current year]?”
3 – Demand for purity
Lifton notes that dangerous cults divide the world into pure good and pure evil.
Cultural Marxism divides the world into the proletariat and bourgeoisie. The proletariat is expressed as “people of color”while the bourgeoisie is expressed as “white privilege”.The proletariat is oppressed. The bourgeoisie is the oppressor.
4 – Ethos of confession
Lifton said:
“If somebody is kept confessing you can achieve control of his or her guilt and shame mechanisms. There is no greater control that one can achieve over another human being.
By convincing us to continually confess our white privilege, cultural Marxism achieves control of our guilt and shame mechanisms. “And there is no greater control that one can achieve over another human being.”
5 – Sacred science
Cultural Marxism attributes natural effects to social causes. Social engineers may then tinker with society; making calibrations based on pseudo-scientific conclusions.
Here are three examples.
Cultural Marxism envelopes natural phenomenon — such as weather patterns and climate changes — into its philosophy by claiming those patterns and changes are harbingers of an environmental apocalypse and can ultimately be attributed to free-market capitalism.
Relating to race, cultural Marxism will defy the overwhelming evidence of forensic sciences to pretend race is a social construct.
Note how cultural Marxism’s “science” exploits women:Men are visually attracted to women. Cultural Marxism exploits this natural phenomenon by evoking the phantom notion of “objectifying” women. Without thought reform women would consider it a compliment to be called “pretty” by a male co-worker. After thought reform women would consider such a comment to be offensive because it objectifies them.
6 – Loading of the language
According to Lifton, loading of a language means:
A rhetoric and a language that only permits the claims of the particular group to be expressed. Alternative claims are blocked out by the very language.
Cultural Marxism considers the term “illegal alien” to be offensively racist, in spite of the fact that illegal aliens are both illegal and alien. “Undocumented guest”is the cultural Marxism placement term, even if the illegal alien possesses a valid drivers license (a document) and was invited into the country by no one.
7 – Doctrine over person
Lifton said:
Any doubts or any critical feelings that one’s accurate perceptions inform one about are attributed to one’s own shortcomings. One has to embrace the doctrine rather than one’s own personal discoveries.
One can be accurate, but will suffer the punishment of social ostracization and stigmatization for his honesty. This is a phenomenon I call “the Galileo syndrome”. Galileo, you’ll recall, was accurate in denying the sun revolved around the earth. Authorities forced him to renounce his accuracy under the threat of death. Today he would be demonized as a “solar rotation denier”.
Likewise, Nobel Laureate James Watson was demonized for noting that sub-Saharan Africans were less intelligent than white people, even though his observation was supported by decades of in-depth research. Specifically he said, “…all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really.”
8 – The dispensing of existence
Lifton said:
Cultic groups so embellish their own claim to absolute truth that they divide the world into those who have a right to exist and those who have no such right. This was observed when Hillary Clinton characterized half of Donald Trump supporters as a “basket of deplorables”.
Clinton later apologized for using the word “half”.
Trump supporters are dehumanized as “Racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic, you name it.”
About the author: Kenn Daily
Kenn Daily is the publisher of DailyKenn.com. Now 63 years old, Kenn formed his conservative views at the age of 14 and was an early member of Young Americans for Freedom. He is a vociferous anti-racist but sets himself apart from most conservatives by refusing to be bullied into silence regarding racial issues. Violent black crime is a signature issue of his website. Kenn is a semi-retired business owner. He lives in Indiana with his wife of 40 years. He has two grown children — a daughter and son — four grandchildren, and two granddogs.
Behold the ‘tolerant’ Left … and their NIMBY policy– exposed!
Since October 1 (the start of the fiscal year), 72 Syrian refugees have been placed in Stone Mountain, State Department data shows. Los Angeles has resettled just 45 Syrian refugees, while NYC has only resettled nine. Syrians aren’t the only refugees placed in Stone Mountain this year. Since October 1, 299 refugees have been resettled in the Georgia town. That’s roughly five percent of Stone Mountain’s July, 2015 population (6,109, according to U.S. Census data). Daily Caller
For context… if they were sending a similar percentage of population to other places that would be:
New York — 420,000 refugees
L.A. — 194,000 refugees
Chicago — 134,780
Portland — 30,472
Hollywood, California — 6,171
Washington DC — 32,944
or… (can you even imagine!) 75 people to Martha’s Vineyard
Right … like any of THOSE things are going to happen. No, we’ll just tuck them away in some part of flyover country where the big proponents of these policies won’t have to pay for it with their property taxes, policing, where they won’t add language complications to their school system.
According to U.S. Census data, the median income in Stone Mountain is $36,444, well below the national average of $53,482. Stone Mountain has a poverty rate of 22.5 percent, which is significantly higher than the national average of 13.5 percent.
..As previously reported by The Daily Caller, the vast majority of Syrian refugees resettled in Virginia have been placed in low-income high-poverty cities, far away from the wealthy D.C. suburbs. —Daily Caller
Do you REALLY need a MORE compelling to vote down Hillary than the fact that she’s being bankrolled by SOROS? You DO remember what his goals are, right?
A new campaign, touted as the “October surprise that will end Trump”, is seeking to mobilise a “secret swing state” of more than 8 million mostly unregistered “global citizens” and “progressive” Americans living abroad to vote in the U.S. election. The initiative was launched in London in the United Kingdom on Wednesday by ‘Avaaz’, a registered U.S. charity and one the world’s largest and most powerful activist groups linked to globalist billionaire George Soros. Campaigners toured from the University College London down to Parliament blasting Bruce Springsteen’s ‘Born in the USA’ while chanting “Don’t Vote Trump” from an open top bus.
..In a press release, Avaaz references a new Oxford University study that found “America’s overseas voters… could decide the US presidency in 2016”. When combined, the potential 8 million voters around the world, “would make up the 13th largest state”, they say.
…Her charity, which has also campaigned for “refugee rights” and against Brexit, claims to have “enlisted over 30 million people around the world to share” a new “super easy” tool enabling left wing American expats to register to vote quickly en mass.
Looking for an inspiring and motivating speaker for your pro-life event? Don’t have much to spend on a high-priced speaker costing several thousand dollars? Contact LifeNews at news@lifenews.com about having LifeNews Editor Steven Ertelt speak at your event.
Daily Pro-Life News Report
Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright 2003-2016 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.
It seems that Colin Kaepernick and his #BlackLivesMatter cronies have no respect for the America’s Flag, no respect for America, no respect for the men and women who have fought and died for America and the American ideal.
They, and their Democrat enablers, will continue to insist that they do respect our nation, but when you hear that, remember, they’re members of the far left and if their lips are moving they’re lying.
It’s good to step back once in a while and remember just what our American Flag is all about, what it stands for, and the amazingly wonderful history that is America.
No other country on earth has done so much to advance individual freedom, liberty, and civil rights.
Today is a great day to be proud to be an American. I am, are you?
A frustrated federal judge ordered the State Department to begin producing within five days hundreds of documents on whether required or recommended security training, briefings or courses were completed by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her top aides.
Judge Richard Leon ruled Tuesday in favor of The Daily Caller News Foundation by rejecting the State Department’s motion to dismiss TheDCNF’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit concerning production of the documents originally sought under the Freedom of Information Act. But he also denied TheDCNF’s request to depose State Department officials.
The State Department has been unable to produce any records confirming that Clinton and her top aides received mandatory annual security briefings about the proper handling of classified materials and the proper methods for conducting secure communications.
In addition to Clinton, TheDCNF seeks the same records for former Clinton Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin and Advisor Jacob Sullivan.
Leon has been impatient with State Department foot-dragging in releasing the documents. He ordered the department to release one third of the 400 documents by Sept. 26 and the rest of them by Oct. 10.
Bradley Moss, one of the attorneys representing TheDCNF, said “Judge Leon’s Order made clear his frustration with the State Department’s continued obstruction of the FOIA process. State will either meet his deadline or face the consequences of failure.”
FBI Director James Comey told reporters in a July 7 news conference he regarded the former secretary of state as a “careless”federal official when she set up a private and unsecured email server in her New York home. Comey did not end up recommending prosecution of the former secretary of state.
National Security Agency officials were aghast to learn early in Clinton’s term that she insisted on using an unsecured personal Blackberry phone within the confines of her State Department office. Unsecured digital devices are banned from the secretary’s office.
State Department officials admitted in a July 29 response to TheDCNF that their failure to produce the requested documents meant the “courses were not completed” by Clinton or her aides.
Department officials balked at searching computer hard drives in Clinton’s executive offices or in security offices where security awareness training is arranged for all of the department’s 45,000 employees and foreign service officers.
In an Aug. 31 hearing, Leon told Justice Department Attorney Jason Lee the documents should be released before the November election.
“I’m sure you can appreciate Mr. Lee, there is a certain time sensitivity on this issue,”Leon said. “We’re looking down the barrel of a presidential election from now in two months.”
The New York Times reports the state of California has come up with a new pension plan called “Save for Retirement or Else!”
Oh wait, that’s just the intent, not the name. The official title is a very reassuring “Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program,”and it’s designed for workers at companies with five or more employees who don’t currently offer a pension program. Only there’s no choice.
Employees are automatically enrolledin a “pension” that will deduct 3 percent from every paycheck and entrust that money to the tender mercies of state bureaucrats. Employees who stubbornly want to keep all their money and not band together with the rest of the workers and stride united toward a glowing future as one . . . wait, I got carried away. That’s what they’ll tell individuals who believe they can manage, or mismanage, their money on their own, without help from the state.
Those non-team players will have to jump through a variety of hoops, fill out an incredible amount of paperwork and justify why they think they should be able to keep their own money. Why, it’s just like the process for applying for a permit to carry a concealed weapon!
Naturally a board of functionaries is already waiting to get their grubby hands on your hard–earned money. A nine–member board has been working on the pick-pocketing scheme since 2012.
So far their most significant accomplishment is getting an exemption from “the federal employee benefits law, known as Erisa, that now covers all nongovernment workers in California and the other 49 states.” That should keep the indictments down and save a lot of money in legal fees.
Yvonne Walker, a board functionary who also happens to be president of a large Service Employees International Union local, assures investors their money will be used “initially to invest workers’ money in safe Treasury securities.” And Walker thought “Secure Force” might “ultimately hire both CalPERS and private firms to handle different investment options.” There’s the tipoff.
CalPERS (California Public Employees’ Retirement System) is the union–dominated government employee pension program whose failures are strangling municipalities all over the state. Asking CalPERS, with its investment record, to manage a pension fund is like asking if it’s too late to invest in sub–prime mortgage bonds. CalPERS started out with safe, conservative investments, too. But once public employee unions took over management of the fund, it has consistently lost money.
City Journal found “Wilshire Consulting reported last year that CalPERS’s returns over the past five years have trailed those of 99 percent of large public pension funds.”
CalPERS lost $11 billion in the real estate crash after jumping on the bubble in late 2005. Board members have also been accused of “awarding contracts to political donors to alleged outright corruption.”
Prospects for the future don’t look any better. The shortfall between what CalPERS must pay out in benefits and the value of the pension fund is $290 billion if the fund can return a growth rate of 4.5 percent. In the just completed fiscal year CalPERS growth rate was a microscopic 0.61 percent, which means the shortfall is closer to a billion dollars.
Letting CalPERS manage more pension money is like asking Obama to be your doctor. Take the advice of someone near and dear to my heart, my step–mother Nancy Reagan, and “just say no.”
Michael Reagan, the eldest son of President Reagan, is a Newsmax TV analyst. A syndicated columnist and author, he chairs The Reagan Legacy Foundation. Michael is an in-demand speaker with Premiere speaker’s bureau. Read more reports from Michael Reagan —Go Here Now.
“We love you, buddy, but what are you here for, if you can’t answer basic questions?”
Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook, was destroyed on Morning Joe Wednesday morning because he tried to tap-dance around the most basic questions about his candidate’s stands on issues. Things started to go downhill about two and a half minutes into the interview when Willie Geist asked Mook if Clinton had regrets about the way Syria was handled. Completely ignoring the question, Mook’s response was that Hillary left the State Dept. with a 70% approval rating.
GEIST: What’s her biggest regret about the way Syria’s been handled?
MOOK: Well, obviously, she’s been out of office for some time now.
GEIST: But she was there when it started.
MOOK: Well, right, but, but, uh, you know, she, I, I think she’s well regarded for her leadership as secretary of state. She came out of that office with a 70 percent approval rating. In contrast to Donald Trump, she has released a clear and decisive plan to defeat ISIS. Donald Trump has said that he thinks he knows more about it than the generals and refuses to tell us what his secret plan is.
GEIST: I understand, Robby. What about in Syria, though? She supported the drawing of the red line. Obviously, she was out of office when Assad used chemical weapons. Was it a mistake to draw the red line if the president was not willing to go — to do something about it when it was crossed?
MOOK: Well, as you pointed out, the decision regarding that was made after she was out of office, so I think you’d have to ask President Obama —
GEIST: Was she disappointed that the president didn’t act when the line was crossed?
MOOK: I think you’d have to ask her about that question, how she would characterize —
GEIST: Well, you’re here to speak for her, Robby, so you haven’t discussed that at all?
MOOK: She — look, what matters is what she’s going to do as president and, as I said, she has a clear plan to defeat ISIS. Donald Trump does not. It’s a secret; he won’t tell anybody what it is, and he says he knows more about it than the generals. I think the choice for voters is clear.
Geist’s question was pretty open ended, he didn’t have to answer by ripping Obama, could have said he regretted the Russian bombing. But he began to rile up the panel by avoiding the question.
Them it was Mike Barnicle’s turn, he asked a question that might very well come up during the Hofstra debate.
BARNICLE: So, Robby, we do realize you are not secretary of state, but in the debate next Monday evening, how would Secretary Clinton respond to somewhat of a version of the following question: We’ve had a relief convoy bombed — potentially a war crime — leading into Aleppo. What would you do, Secretary Clinton, about providing food, water and medicine to the citizens of Eastern Aleppo today, right now, differently than what the Obama administration is doing? What would she do differently?
MOOK: I, I, again, I think you’re going to have to ask her that question. That’s a matter of policy I’m going to leave it to her to determine that.
Now Mook had just finished blasting Trump for not having a plan, but he couldn’t recite a Clinton plan? Joe Scarborough chimed in and he was not happy. He compared Mook’s answer to Gary Johnson’s Aleppo gaffe
SCARBOROUGH: What are you here, what are you — we love you, buddy, but what are you here for, if you can’t answer basic questions? That, I mean, I don’t know if there’s — I mean, we may be tiptoeing into Gary Johnson territory here, if you don’t know the answer to that basic of a question — “What is the response to Aleppo?” — then why do we have you here?
MOOK: I think, I — look, you’re asking new policy questions. You would have to ask the secretary for that. My job is not to set policy.
SCARBOROUGH: No, Aleppo’s been around — Syria’s been around for some time. The red line being drawn has been around for some time. I’m not being difficult here at all. These are basic questions.
Robby Mook’s final tap dance was the most incredible. Later on in the interview, Willie Geist gave him a soft ball. He asked about no-fly zones, an approach that has previously had Hillary Clinton support.
GEIST: One aspect of the Syria policy for Secretary Clinton we do know is she has supported no-fly zones in the country. Is that still her belief, that no-fly zones are a good idea?
MOOK: I’m gonna, I’m gonna let her statements speak for themselves.
GEIST: Robby, Robby, aren’t you here representing her point of view?
MOOK: I am indeed, and I’m going to let her language speak for itself.
GEIST: Well, you’ve been saying that Donald Trump won’t tell us what the policy is, but here you are not telling us what the policy is.
After the interview was over a stunned Joe Scarborough said:
“What’s going on? I mean, like, even — I don’t understand that. I am completely flummoxed by that interview. I mean, first of all, are they pleased with the openness with the press? I had heard after the pneumonia deal they all were chastened, and they were changing their relationship and trying to be more open with the press. Won’t even respond to Aleppo, won’t respond to the no-fly zone. What’s going on here? Better not to come on.”
Heck next time have me on, I will tell him what the answers should have been.
Well THAT’S Weird. If the Birther movement is racist… does that mean that the person who wrote this had it in for Obama? What if that person is … Obama?
Breitbart put this out, taken from the AP, entitled ““Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate”That was June 2004.
“Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.’
“The allegations that horrified fellow Republicans and caused his once-promising candidacy to implode in four short days have given Obama a clear lead as Republicans struggled to fetch an alternative.”
As far as we know, Barack Obama never refuted this article.
It’s still out there on the internet. Here’s a screen capture:
Here’s the bottom half of the same article with AP attribution.
That’s not actually as weird as the one all the way back in 1991. That was Obama’s publicist. Here’s the quote:
Breitbart News has obtained a promotional booklet produced in 1991 by Barack Obama’s then-literary agency, Acton & Dystel, which touts Obama as “born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii.”
The booklet, which was distributed to “business colleagues” in the publishing industry, includes a brief biography of Obama among the biographies of eighty-nine other authors represented by Acton & Dystel.
It also promotes Obama’s anticipated first book, Journeys in Black and White–which Obama abandoned, later publishing Dreams from My Father instead.
If Obama is contradicting himself, the only real question is, which lie do we write of as him cynically manipulating an audience for personal gain?
If his birth in America is valid — as we are led to believe? Why lie about it? Unless playing the ‘foreigner’ card gave him illegitimate access to preferential opportunities or tuition costs. In which case, he is a lying turd who cheated someone more deserving out of … whatever. A Harvard Education, possibly.
Because if That WASN’T a lie… then something else MUST be. That ‘something else’ being his American birth and Citizenship. Which are prerequisites to his presidency.
Hillary’s policies are pretty crazy, and now even her body can’t handle it. Watch as her eyes rebel against her words.
Watch: So, what the hell was that?
What is strabismus (crossed eyes)? Strabismus (crossed eyes) is a condition in which the eyes do not line up with one another. In other words, one eye is turned in a direction that is different from the other eye. Under normal conditions, the six muscles that control eye movement work together and point both eyes at the same spot. Patients with strabismus have problems with the control of eye movement and cannot keep normal ocular alignment (eye position). Strabismus can be categorized by the direction of the turned or misaligned eye:
What causes strabismus? The most common cause of strabismus is heredity; about 30 percent of children with strabismus have a family member with a similar problem. When strabismus is not hereditary, there is usually no specific reason to explain why it occurs. Other conditions associated with strabismus include:
Cerebral palsy (40-60 percent of these patients are affected) Down syndrome (20-60 percent of these patients are affected) Hydrocephalus (a congenital disease that results in a buildup of fluid inside the skull, damaging the brain) Brain tumors Uncorrected farsightedness Stroke (the leading cause of strabismus in adults) Head injuries, which can damage the area of the brain responsible for control of eye movement, the nerves that control eye movement, and the eye muscles Neurological (nervous system) problems Graves’ disease (overproduction of thyroid hormone) Read more:Cleveland Clinic
(Emphasis added)
Hillary has Hypothyroidism, an underproduction of thyroid hormone, so it’s not likely to be Graves’ disease. She doesn’t have Cerebral Palsy or Down Syndrome, nor is she Hydrocephalic. What does that leave?
Lots of things ‘conspiracy theorists’ have been saying: Hillary has real health problems, perhaps she suffered from a stroke or it’s something neurological. This isn’t the first time, either.
Check out these photos:
From September 2015:
This creepy one:
This is from February 2016:
This one was taken in April 2016:
Well, Hillary canceled her California event after the latest weird eye-thing. Her campaign suggests it’s because of her ‘pneumonia’.
Did Belgium Really Just Euthanize a Child? The case in Belgium was announced to the world by Wim Distelmans who is head of the Belgian Euthanasia Evaluation Commission.
Looking for an inspiring and motivating speaker for your pro-life event? Don’t have much to spend on a high-priced speaker costing several thousand dollars? Contact LifeNews at news@lifenews.com about having LifeNews Editor Steven Ertelt speak at your event.
Daily Pro-Life News Report
Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright 2003-2016 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.
Oh, how the worm has turned. From coast to coast, Democrats’ fear that Hillary Clinton may lose to Donald Trump is growing by leaps and bounds. They were panicked at the post-Emmy Awards parties. (And let’s hope all those celebrities now promising to flee the country if Trump wins, actually do so.)
Clinton supporters should be worried. Trump is surging, while Hillary is sinking, as shown by the packed stadiums wanting to see The Donald, and the empty chairs greeting Clinton. (Clint Eastwood must be chuckling.)
The clearest — and most hilarious — sign of the Left’s desperation over Hillary’s fading prospects, though, comes courtesy of the Huffing-and-Puffington Post, which ran an article titled “Why Hillary Lost: a Premature Obit,” in which the writers outline all the people and circumstances Democrats will blame, rather than Clinton, the day after the election, should she lose.
The list is probably pretty accurate, but the most telling thing about the article is it took no less than three — count ’em, three — paid editors to cobble the article together. When the HuffPuff — which skates on the backs of idiot writers willing to fill their site just in exchange for “exposure” — actually pays someone, you know the situation is critical. When it pays three people … start building an ark, cuz the waters they are a-risin’.
As the HuffPuff writers said, “If Donald Trump does sack the fortress, no one who lost the battle will want to admit it was Hillary Clinton’s fault. It will have had nothing to do with, say, ‘transparency’ or calling bearded villagers ‘deplorables’ or the Iraq War vote or the simple fact that middle-of-the-road Clintonism ran out of gas as a public philosophy.”
It wasn’t so many weeks ago that all the major media outlets seemed to be crowning Hillary Clinton the winner of the 2016 presidential election. America was assured that the former secretary of state had it all locked in, that Trump could never win, short of a nuclear apocalypse.
Kaboom. Courtesy of Hillary.
Following ongoing, repeated revelations about Clinton’s emails while at the State Department, supplemented by an avalanche of information hacked, stolen, leaked or embezzled from the Clinton Foundation, the FBI investigation, the Democratic National Committee, and even the Dark Lord of the Sith himself, George Soros, Clinton has been on one long slippery slide down toward the ash heap of history.
As if her shady past political decisions and activities, and money-grubbing for her family’s foundation, weren’t enough to turn off sane voters, her pattern of compulsive lying about her health has come back to bite her as fewer and fewer people still believe that her repeated collapses, coughing fits, brain “short circuits,” confusion in the middle of speeches and inability to climb stairs are simply dehydration, flu or pneumonia — whatever the disability of the day is, according to her camp.
Add in a few dismal performances since her 9/11 collapse, in which she has insulted conservative Americans, and ludicrously accused Donald Trump of treason and giving aid to ISIS — the same ISIS that she and President Obama helped create, armed and funded — and it’s no surprise her poll numbers are going down.
Some of the most sycophantic media are trying to say she and Trump are tied and that she will still pull the election out of the bag, but the more reliable polls have Trump’s lead growing, and even counters of the all-important Electoral College have begun to concede that Trump may have an edge.
There is still more than a month till the actual election, and Hillary’s staff have no doubt shot her up with prescription drugs and vitamins, along with keeping a supply of sharp sticks on hand to poke her with, should she blank out during another campaign event. There is a diminishing possibility she could win.
But the rats are sensing a sinking ship, and frankly, it can’t go under fast enough for the rest of us.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Tad Cronn
Tad Cronn began his journalism career in 1983. While he earned awards for his work as a reporter and editor, his greatest joy is writing news commentary. Providing a conservative and often humorous outlook on current events, he now works as a freelance writer based in California.
The more than 800 immigrants who were mistakenly made citizens were set for deportation!
More than 800 immigrants who came from “counties of concern,” and were supposed to be deported, are instead now citizens of the United States. This bombshell is revealed below at the 2:38 mark.
The U.S. government has mistakenly granted citizenship to at least 858 immigrants from countries of concern to national security or with high rates of immigration fraud who had pending deportation orders, according to an internal Homeland Security audit released Monday.
The Homeland Security Department’s inspector general found that the immigrants used different names or birthdates to apply for citizenship with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and such discrepancies weren’t caught because their fingerprints were missing from government databases.
DHS said in an emailed statement that an initial review of these cases suggest that some of the individuals may have ultimately qualified for citizenship, and that the lack of digital fingerprint records does not necessarily mean they committed fraud.
The report does not identify any of the immigrants by name, but Inspector General John Roth’s auditors said they were all from “special interest countries” — those that present a national security concern for the United States — or neighboring countries with high rates of immigration fraud. The report did not identify those countries.
The report blames reliance on paper records that were never put in digital databases. But that’s obviously because national security has never been a priority. How can we trust a government that fails in such a basic way to properly screen refugees from Syria or anywhere else?
We can’t!
So the Department of Homeland Security spent a massive amount of money to nudie scanners in airports but didn’t bother to give us better immigration security. Of the more than 800 immigrants who are now citizens, how many are sympathetic to ISIS?
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Joe Scudder
Joe Scudder is the “nom de plume” (or “nom de guerre”) of a fifty-ish-year-old writer and stroke survivor. He lives in St Louis with his wife and still-at-home children. He has been a freelance writer and occasional political activist since the early nineties. He describes his politics as Tolkienesque.
This is going to get heated in a hurry. Cruz has been called everything from a Patriot to a Scoundrel.
With the election basically between Trump and Hillary, does Ted need to PUBLICLY support the nominee?
Texas Sen. Ted Cruz could be left “in the rear-view mirror of the Republican Party”if he continues to resist endorsing Donald Trump, Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said Monday on “The Laura Ingraham Show.” Though Patrick was once chair of the Cruz campaign in Texas, he said he always planned to back the GOP nominee.
“It’s time for this to unify, come together, and stop Hillary Clinton from turning over the Supreme Court to liberals and letting hundreds of thousands of people come into this country illegally,”Patrick told LifeZette Editor-in-Chief Laura Ingraham.
[There was a subltle threat in Priebus’s comments.]
“People who agreed to support the nominee, that took part in our process, they used tools from the RNC … Those people need to get on board,” Priebus said Sunday on CBS News’ “Face the Nation.”
“If they’re thinking they’re going to run again someday, I think we’re going to evaluate our process, the nomination process,”Priebus said, “I don’t think it’s going to be that easy for them.”
Do the personal attacks on his family members during the campaign, as well as the onging personal slander of his integrity (i.e. ‘Lying Ted’) provide sufficient justification of his backing down from a PUBLIC endorsement of Trump? Would his same critics call him other names — pussy or sellout for example — if he toes the party line after the attacks on his wife? Those questions are both personal and hypothetical.
This is problem Ted Cruz now faces: his Official Party position is NEITHER Private NOR Hypothetical. Either choice costs him something… and it might be years from now that anyone REALLY knows what that ‘something’ is.
The Obama/Hillary Counter-terrorism policies are a ticking time bomb for the United States. Included in this is their immigration and refugee vetting policies.
“Catholic” Tim Kaine: “I Believe Women Should Be Able to” Have an Abortion Yesterday on Meet the Press, Democratic Vice Presidential pick Tim Kaine, attempted to make his pitch to Millennials by saying that they agree with Hillary Clinton and the Democratic platform on the big issues. One of the big issues is obviously abortion.
Looking for an inspiring and motivating speaker for your pro-life event? Don’t have much to spend on a high-priced speaker costing several thousand dollars? Contact LifeNews at news@lifenews.com about having LifeNews Editor Steven Ertelt speak at your event.
Daily Pro-Life News Report
Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright 2003-2016 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.
Back when the news first broke about the pay-to-play corruption involving then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation – where donors to the foundation were granted political access, including lavish White House State dinners – the Clinton campaign responded by focusing on all the supposed “good” that the foundation has done over the years.
I don’t think anyone was fooled into thinking that the Clinton Foundation was anything other than a money-making machine for the Clinton family and their well-connected friends. The foundation had to at least have the appearance of being a charity, so they had to divert some of their resources to causes. That way, they could always point to those grants as evidence that they’re an organization for good.
Just 5.7 percent of the Clinton Foundation’s massive 2014 budget actually went to charitable grants, according to the tax-exempt organization’s IRS filings. The rest went to salaries and employee benefits, fundraising and “other expenses.”
The Clinton Foundation spent a hair under $91.3 million in 2014, the organization’s IRS filings show. But less than $5.2 million of that went to charitable grants.
That number pales in comparison to the $34.8 million the foundation spent on salaries, compensation and employee benefits.
Another $50.4 million was marked as “other expenses,” while the remaining almost $851K was marked as “professional fundraising expenses.”
Despite taking in an additional $30 million in 2014, the Clinton Foundation spent 40 percent less on charitable grants in 2014 than in 2013. Even as it slashed charitable spending, the foundation increased the amount spent on salaries, employee benefits and compensation by $5 million in 2014. The foundation also spent $5 million more “other expenses” in 2014.
Sometimes, things are exactly as they appear. This was nothing more than a way for the Clintons to make massive amounts of money. And Hillary used her position as Secretary of State to pull money from rich people in exchange for political favors.
The likelihood of more attacks coming in the United States will continue until we get “very, very serious” about having the “right kind of engagement”when it comes to protecting the nation from the threat of radical Islamic terrorism, retired Gen. Michael Flynn said Monday.
“Do we have the right kind of rules of engagement, if you will, within the homeland, within our law enforcement community, to be able to go into these communities?”Flynn, a close adviser of GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump, told Fox News’ “Fox & Friends” show. “This whole notion of Islamophobia, that is absolute nonsense. This is about securing our nation, making the people feel safe on the streets of New York, wherever they are in this country.”
He also called Muslim leaders in this country and internationally to task.
“Where are they to sit on this couch this morning?”said Flynn. “Who are they? What are they saying? I’m going to be very candid here. You don’t have a lot of people yelling ‘Jesus Christ,’ [while they are] putting a knife at somebody’s body or putting a knife in somebody’s head.”
Earlier on Monday, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest told MSNBC that the matter is a “war of narratives,”which Flynn shot down on Fox.
“Our narrative, what I believe right now is we’re losing this war,”said Flynn. “Their narrative is attack where we live. That’s what they just put out a couple of days ago. Attack where we live. Where the enemy lives. That’s us, and it’s whether it’s in Europe or whether it’s in New York City or in Minnesota, they put that word out.”
Fighting back, he continued, isn’t about Islamophobia or racism, but is about “securing our nation in a time where we have a vastly different enemy that we are facing. Globally, globally, this is in many countries right now, so, we have a problem. We have to get serious. I will tell you that I believe that there are components of how we can actually beat these guys. If there’s one thing that’s I know. There’s no enemy that’s unbeatable, none. We can beat them, but we have to decide that this is an enemy, first, and we’re being accused of all sorts of name calling.”
Trump called on Twitter over the weekend to “change the playbook” when it comes to terrorism, and Flynn believes he’s right.
“Political correctness kills,” said Flynn. “These people are pouring in. They are actually being poured in by the White House and by the policies that we have for accepting refugees from places that we don’t really understand, from people that we really can’t vet in a way that we can understand what’s happening and they are not assimilating in these various communities that we are pouring them into.”
The Media (D) is bending over BACKWARDS to not pin criminal acts on Islamic motivation…. even with crystal-clear evidence like THIS! It should have been obvious with inital reports where he asked people if they were Muslim before knifing them.
But now we have this, too:
Authorities are investigating the stabbing of nine people inside a Minnesota mall on Saturday night as a potential act of terrorism after a news agency linked to the Islamic State militant group claimed that the attacker was “a soldier of the Islamic State.”
This is the man said to be responsible for the stabbing of nine people in Minnesota in an attack that ISIS has claimed responsibility for.
Dahir A. Adan, 22, who was identified by his father to the Minnesota Star Tribune, was said to be a ‘soldier of the Islamic state’, according to an ISIS-linked news agency.
A black and white photo from Adan’s Facebook and reported by local media put a face to the name for the first time since Saturday night’s attack.
According to CNN, earlier this year nine Somali-Minnesotans were convicted or pleaded guilty in a plot to travel to Syria and join ISIS. In previous years, a group of men left to join Al-Shabaab, a group which seeks to turn Somali into an Islamist state, CNN reported.
‘We still don’t have anything substantive that would suggest anything more than what we know already, which is this was a lone attacker and right now, we’re trying to get to the bottom of his motivations,’St. Cloud Police Chief William Blair Anderson told CNN.
The FBI has labeled the attack a ‘potential act of terrorism’. …. ‘Potential’
If Saturday’s stabbings are ultimately deemed a terrorist act, it would be the first carried out by a Somali on US soil, said Karen Greenburg, director of the Center on National Security at Fordham University School of Law. -Daily Mail
Republican Donald Trump is warning of a spike in terror attacks after a bomb placed under a dumpster in Chelsea exploded over the weekend, and is placing blame for the attack squarely on immigrants he called a ‘vicious’ threat.
‘They’re here. We’re letting tens of thousands of people flow into this country,’ Trump said Monday morning.
‘They’re bringing in many cases vicious cancer from within. This is something that’s going to be so tough. And you know they stay together so nobody really knows who it is, what’s happening. They’re plotting. This has been going on for so long everybody knows it,’ Trump said.
‘…Well it’s a mess and it’s a shame. We’re going to have to be very tough. I think maybe we’re going to be seeing a big change over the last couple of days,’Trump told ‘Fox and Friends’ in a call-in appearance.
‘I think this is something that maybe will happen perhaps more and more all over the country,’Trump predicted. ‘This is only going to get worse. This isn’t going to get better,’ he warned.
Trump linked the bombing, which authorities continued to pursue with what ABC reported was a police raid in New Jersey Monday morning, with American weakness and with policies that allow migration from the Middle East.
‘Yeah because we’ve been weak. Our country’s been weak. We’re letting people in by the thousands and tens of thousands,’ Trump said. ‘They can’t be properly vetted. There’s no way,’said Trump, who during his campaign has called for a temporary ban on Muslims but in a recent policy speech described a plan that would bar immigration from countries linked to terrorism until they could be properly vetted.
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright 2003-2016 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.
The Governor makes some great points for why they should NOT be made to accept these refugees.
ClashDaily has already reported on the problems associated with assimilation in Amarillo. And there are already suspicions that refugees are being deliberately directed into Red States to influence future voting patterns.
Which one is YOUR favorite? Did you catch the part where Abbott said Obama wrote in a waiver that would accept refugees EVEN IF they had given MATERIAL SUPPORT to TERRORISTS???
Why isn’t THAT tidbit on the nightly news?
So… Back to the quesiton: Can States tell the Feds to pound sand?
One commenter put it this way:
“The Constitution gives the Congress the authority to establish conditions for immigration, but nowhere in the Constitution does it empower the federal government to force States to accept refugees from anywhere.”
Is Federalism still alive and well in America? Or has America actually bought into the Big-State Centralization that puts greater power in fewer hands?
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright 2003-2016 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.
Thousands of Syrian refugees walk to cross into Turkey / AP
The Obama administration plans to spend $4.6 million next year on health promotion and “emotional wellness” for refugees as President Obama plans a 30 percent increase in the number of refugees admitted into the country.
The Department of Health and Human Services issued a grant forecast last month detailing its plans to issue health care grants for refugees on top of government programs that are already available, such as Medicaid.
“The Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) within the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) invites States to submit applications for Refugee Health Promotion (RHP) discretionary grant funds,”the grant forecast says. “The purpose of the RHP grant is to support health and emotional wellness among refugees. The program is designed to coordinate and promote local health and mental health services and education.”
The agency said the funding would be in addition to Medicaid and programs that provide cash and medical assistance for refugees.
“The RHP grant is intended to encourage partnerships with community-based organizations and complement existing care coordination and medical assistance programs such as Medicaid and Refugee Medical Assistance (RMA), which includes refugee medical screenings (RMS), and other ORR-funded social service programs, including Preferred Communities,” according to the grant forecast. Preferred Communities is a job placement program for refugees.
The administration said it would post an official grant announcement on Jan. 6, 2017, less than two weeks before the president leaves office. Funding would be awarded next August.
The call for increased health funding comes as President Obama plans to admit 110,000 refugees in fiscal 2017, a 30 percent increase from this year, the Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday.
The administration has already admitted 10,000 Syrian refugees this year, and is seeking “a significantly higher number”next year. The president’s plan would admit 40,000 refugees from the Near East and South Asia, including Syria.
Each refugee admitted into the United States from the Middle East costs taxpayers an estimated $64,370 to resettle.
The Department of Health and Human Services did not immediately respond to request for comment.
During Donald Trump’s visit to Flint, Michigan on Wednesday, the Republican nominee commented on how the automobile manufacturing industry has moved to Mexico — impacting trade — and how people in Flint can’t drink the water, much like the water in Mexico.
“It used to be cars were made in Flint, and you couldn’t drink the water in Mexico,”Trump stated. “Now, the cars are made in Mexico and you can’t drink the water in Flint.”
“That’s not good,” he added, as people chuckled in response.
Trump visited Flint — a city that has had water trouble since the Spring of 2014 — after the Flint River wasn’t treated with the proper chemicals, which caused lead to get into the drinking water, according to Detroit News.
President Obama, Secretary of State John Kerry, and pretty much anyone paying attention to the chaos in the Middle East tell us that the most persecuted group in the world today are Christians living in the Muslim world (particularly in ISIS dominated Syria).
The media has long been complaining about Donald Trump’s idea that perhaps we should put a temporary halt on importing Muslim refugees until we can properly vet them.
Now let’s analyze one fact that is apparently not common knowledge.
How is this possible? If Christians are the group being most persecuted by the forces of violence in Syria, shouldn’t they be the ones pressing the hardest to leave the war-torn nation? If, as the Obama administration has finally admitted, ISIS is enacting a pogrom of genocide against Christians, shouldn’t they be the people that the administration is most interested in saving from the terror? Instead, it seems that Elliot Abrams is right: the Obama administration has enacted a ban on receiving Christian refugees, and the media has remained silent.
Sure, in that we do not and could not legally ban Christian refugees any more than we could or should bar Muslim refugees. But when you have been running a refugee program for years, and you have accepted 10,612 Sunni refugees and 56 Christians, and it is obvious why and obvious how to fix it, and nothing is done to fix it, well, the results speak more loudly than speeches, laws, intentions, or excuses. In effect we make it almost impossible for Christian refugees to get here.
So I’ll stick with that title. And I agree with Nina Shea: “This is de facto discrimination and a gross injustice.”
Did you know that 10,801 Syrian refugees were admitted to the U.S. in the last year? And reports state that only 56 of them are Christians—yes, 56! “It’s disappointingly disproportional,” attorney Matthew Clark told reporters. He said, “The Obama administration has not prioritized Christians and it appears they have actually deprioritized them, put them back of the line and made them an afterthought.” Tragically, it’s estimated that between 500,000 and 1 million Christians have fled Syria, while many have been targeted and slaughtered by the Islamic State. Join me in praying for the Christians who are trying against all odds to survive in the region of the world where Christianity was born.
We must call on the Obama administration (and the media) to handle the humanitarian disaster in the Muslim world fairly. If they are scandalized by the idea of a temporary ban on Muslim refugees, then they should be even more aggrieved by thereality that Christian refugees have actually been banned by our government.
It is a popular misconception that the left is open to free speech and free ideas. And this is true as long as you agree with them. If you are a leftist, then, by all means, speak as loud and proud as you can. But if you are a conservative, Christian, or believe in limited government, then you have to be silenced.
Employees at a public university in West Virginia told a student to stop promoting his conservative club on campus because he was being “too outgoing.”
Dustin Winsky, a senior at Fairmont State University, was recruiting students to join the school’s Young Americans for Liberty chapter on Aug. 30, when campus police approached him and told him to shut down the operation.
The authorities reportedly said his efforts to talk to students about liberty and limited government were “too outgoing.”
What they actually meant was that they thought that Winsky was doing too well. He was gaining support. People were listening and starting to understand what it was he was saying. He was winning students over. So, the same reason that the left does not want Christians to display or evangelize publicly, they wanted this young conservative silenced.
But, thankfully, this is not where the story ends.
The Times continues
Young Americans for Liberty responded to the affront by spearheading a “Fight for Free Speech” campaign, which will identify and attempt to reform universities with unconstitutional speech codes.
“I’m thrilled to see Young Americans for Liberty leading the national Fight for Free Speech campaign on campuses nationwide,” YAL Executive Director Cliff Maloney Jr. said in a statement.
“Universities should be a place for open dialogue and we will continue this battle to ensure that our First Amendment rights remain protected — not just on college campuses, but everywhere in America,”he said.
Victory here is the only option. If they can silence us, we have no chance of getting our country back on track.
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright 2003-2016 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.
American Family Association
American Family Association (AFA), a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization, was founded in 1977 by Donald E. Wildmon, who was the pastor of First United Methodist Church in Southaven, Mississippi, at the time. Since 1977, AFA has been on the frontlines of Ame
NEWSMAX
News, Opinion, Interviews, Research and discussion
Opinion
American Family Association
American Family Association (AFA), a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization, was founded in 1977 by Donald E. Wildmon, who was the pastor of First United Methodist Church in Southaven, Mississippi, at the time. Since 1977, AFA has been on the frontlines of Ame
American Family Association
American Family Association (AFA), a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization, was founded in 1977 by Donald E. Wildmon, who was the pastor of First United Methodist Church in Southaven, Mississippi, at the time. Since 1977, AFA has been on the frontlines of Ame
You Version
Bible Translations, Devotional Tools and Plans, BLOG, free mobile application; notes and more
Political
American Family Association
American Family Association (AFA), a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization, was founded in 1977 by Donald E. Wildmon, who was the pastor of First United Methodist Church in Southaven, Mississippi, at the time. Since 1977, AFA has been on the frontlines of Ame
NEWSMAX
News, Opinion, Interviews, Research and discussion
Spiritual
American Family Association
American Family Association (AFA), a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization, was founded in 1977 by Donald E. Wildmon, who was the pastor of First United Methodist Church in Southaven, Mississippi, at the time. Since 1977, AFA has been on the frontlines of Ame
Bible Gateway
The Bible Gateway is a tool for reading and researching scripture online — all in the language or translation of your choice! It provides advanced searching capabilities, which allow readers to find and compare particular passages in scripture based on
You must be logged in to post a comment.