National Security Council coordinator John Kirby was peppered with questions Tuesday over how the Biden administration will respond to the Taliban violating the Doha Agreement.
The United States carried out a successful counterterrorism strike against the leader of al Qaeda over the weekend, killing Ayman al-Zawahiri. American operators were successful partly because al-Zawahiri was “hiding” in plain sight in a wealthy Kabul neighborhood, thus underscoring the type of impunity the Taliban have extended to al Qaeda after the fall of Afghanistan last year.
The close relationship between the Taliban and al Qaeda violates the Doha Agreement, a peace treaty negotiated under former President Donald Trump between the U.S. and the Taliban. Specifically, the agreement bars the Taliban from allowing al Qaeda to operate in Afghanistan, a provision the Taliban have clearly violated. With the Taliban in clear violation of the Doha Agreement — a reality Secretary of State Antony Blinken acknowledged — reporters from multiple media outlets grilled Kirby over how exactly the Biden administration will respond.
“What will the repercussions be for the Taliban harboring al-Zawahiri?” ABC News chief White House correspondent Cecilia Vega asked.
“I’m not going to telegraph moves and decisions that we might make,” Kirby responded. “I’m certainly not going to get ahead of anything at this point.”
Kirby, however, disclosed that U.S. leaders have spoken with Taliban leaders for harboring al-Zawahiri, which he admitted is a clear violation of the Doha Agreement. But when NBC News chief White House correspondent Peter Alexander pressed Kirby on whether the Biden administration would hold accountable the Taliban, Kirby obfuscated, saying only that he will not “telegraph punches” and the Taliban know the U.S. is aware they violated the Doha Agreement. Kirby even suggested the Taliban might shape up because they want legitimization from Western powers.
Press Briefing by Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre and John Kirbywww.youtube.com
Then Fox News correspondent Peter Doocy ratcheted up the pressure.
“You guys gave a whole country to a bunch of people that are on the FBI Most Wanted list. What did you think was going to happen?” Doocy pressed.
Kirby responded by saying he takes “issue with the premise that we gave a whole country to terrorist groups.”
“The Taliban was harboring the world’s number-one terrorist. How is that not giving a country to a terrorist-sympathizing group, if not giving them permission to have terrorists just sit on a balcony?” Doocy pressed.
Engaging in circular reasoning, Kirby then told Doocy the strike against al-Zawahiri is proof the U.S. is not idly permitting the Taliban to harbor al Qaeda terrorists. And in the end, Kirby praised Biden.
“I would go so far as to say not only the American people are safer as a result of President Biden’s decision, but the rest of the world is safer,” Kirby said.
Other reporters asked Kirby similar questions about the Taliban and their violations of the Doha Agreement, but he never offered substantive answers.
Kirby said violations of the agreement will “lead to consequences not just from the United States, but from the international community” — but he never said what any of those consequences would be.
Fox News reporter Peter Doocy on Monday pressed White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki about thousands of laid off energy workers thanks to Joe Biden’s executive orders.
Joe Biden killed tens of thousands of jobs his first day in office when he canceled contracts with the Keystone XL pipeline. Biden said there will be high paying “green” jobs available to energy workers and ‘Special Climate Envoy’ John Kerry told the out-of-work oil workers to “go make solar panels.”
Peter Doocy asked Psaki, “When do they get their green jobs?”
Psaki was clearly irritated by the questions.
WATCH:
Advertisement – story continues below
Doocy wouldn’t back down and pointed out that tens of thousands of people are out of jobs who need money now to support their families.
“But there are people living paycheck to paycheck. There are now people out of jobs…It’s been 12 days since Gina McCarthy and John Kerry were here. It’s been 19 days since that EO, so what do those people who need money now — when do they get their green jobs?”
Psaki’s response? Joe Biden has a plan to roll out a plan about his plan.
Advertisement – story continues below
“[Biden] has every plan to share more about his details of that plan in the weeks ahead,” Psaki said.
President Biden’s new “climate czar” John Kerry says laid off workers in the fossil fuels industry should be able to easily transfer their skill set into solar. He specifically said they can “make solar panels” instead of making the Keystone pipeline that Biden canceled on day two of his tenure in the White House.
“What President Biden wants to do is make sure those folks have better choices, that they have alternatives, that they can be the people to go to work to make the solar panels,”Kerry said.
But before anyone says that “they can make solar panels” is the new “learn to code”, just hold your fire for a bit. These really can be union paid jobs, and this is a growth industry, unlike fossil fuels, which for now is the most hated industry in Congress and among the World Economic Forum jet set.
PROMOTED
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries BRANDVOICE | Paid Program
Oil & Gas Outlook – Embracing Change From Now To 2040
Honeywell BRANDVOICE | Paid Program
Why The Future Of Retail Is Frictionless
UNICEF USA BRANDVOICE | Paid Program
In Syria, UNICEF Is Helping Children Survive A Harsh Winter
Solar jobs are manufacturing jobs that don’t require STEM degrees from Stanford and MIT, unlike computer science. I will never learn to code and make a blockchain platform or build the new hologram phone. I can barely get my laptop’s fan to stop spinning and making noise. But I bet I can learn to run the machines that make solar cells and modules.
However, the key word here is “make”. In fact, it is the only word that matters.
If Kerry wants laid off Keystone workers to “make” solar panels then the Administration that he works for will have to do something about protecting the American market from a flood of Chinese solar panels.
MORE FOR YOU
China: Let Us Be Your Green OPEC
Of the top 10 solar panel manufacturers in the world, 8 are Chinese. The only big U.S. player is Ohio-based First Solar FSLR+1.5%. They make the solar cells and modules that are turned into the solar panels you see in the southwest desert, on California hilltops and, increasingly, on American rooftops.
South Korea’s Hanwha Q-Cells manufactures here. As does Chinese firm Jinko Solar, now manufacturing in Jacksonville, Florida. They set up shop primarily due to anti-dumping and countervailing duties imposed on solar panels during the bygone Trump era. That helped Q-Cells and First Solar gain market here. Otherwise, it’s all China imports. And if it is all China imports, then the only jobs on offer will be installer gigs, and the usual white collar professional services jobs of project planners, sales and engineering consultants.
“Make” is the only word that matters in Kerry’s comments.
If the U.S. is going to do what the solar importers want – all of them Chinese – then it’s mainly a job for people drilling solar panels into roofs, or washing them with Windex. (That’s a joke.)
That would be a terrible “green new deal”. But it’s a darn good Red New Deal. (I just trademarked that.)
China is ramping up its solar manufacturing capacity.
An employee works in a factory of solar panel and parts in Jiujiangu in central China’s Jiangxi … [+]
BARCROFT MEDIA VIA GETTY IMAGES
“The recent wave of investment and capacity expansion announcements by China’s largest solar manufacturers threatens the (U.S. solar) recovery with massive overcapacity that will drive producers out of the business, and establish Chinese domination of the entire solar power manufacturing supply chain,” says Jeff Ferry, chief economist with the Coalition for a Prosperous America in a report published on January 28.
China’s big solar multinationals, like Jinko and JA Solar, have announced new expansion projects throughout southeast Asia as part of the Chinese Communist Party’s industrial strategy to dominate key Western supply chains.
The U.S. and European Union have been telling Chinese leadership that they are terrified of ice melt and super storms, and China has responded by saying “let us be your green OPEC.” As a result, China is now key in EV battery supply chains (it controls a lot of the mined materials that go into making battery cells); dominates solar supply chains; and is replacing Europe as the go-to place for wind turbines.
Many of the European brands like Vestas now manufacture in China, though for now that is supposedly staying in China.
Solar industry publication PV Tech called the scale of China’s solar expansions “jaw-dropping.” In 2020, China had the capabilities to produce 90 gigawatts of solar panel power. This year, they will have 180 gigawatts of installed capacity. To put that into perspective, Brazil’s Itaipu dam, the second largest hydroelectric dam in the world, and one that powers more than half of the country, has the capacity to generate 14 gigawatts of electricity. China’s Three Gorges Dam, the world’s largest, has the capacity to generate 22.5 GW. So China’s installed capacity for solar is equal to making the equivalent of 8 Three Gorges Dams if they were to manufacture to their full capabilities.
Massachusetts based 1366 Technologies is building new solar technologies. To grow the solar … [+]
CORBIS VIA GETTY IMAGES
Last year, the U.S. had 12.2 GW of installed capacity, led by First Solar and Q-Cells. This year that is expected to increase to 14.7 GW. We make baby steps. China makes Super Mario triple jumps.
U.S. solar makers have been growing steadily in the last two years thanks to the 2018 Section 201 tariffs that were imposed to restrain solar module imports worldwide, not just from China. There are roughly a dozen smaller firms bringing U.S. innovation to solar again, and that has helped increase capacity by another 5 GW. What usually happens is the innovation happens here and then it is brought to scale in Asia to lower the price. China then commodifies it, and the sector becomes dominated by service providers.
Many U.S. producers are aiming to expand production. But all of that will be upended if China floods the market in hopes to capitalize on Biden’s climate change policies.More demand here is good for China because U.S. firms — at the moment — cannot meet that demand. They could invest in meeting that demand, creating more blue collar jobs, maybe even union jobs, the kind that were lost at Keystone.
The Section 201 tariffs, soon to be dropped to 18%, may not be enough to protect the U.S. suppliers who will easily be outpriced by anything Made in China or southeast Asia.If that happens, the climate friendly “Build Back Better” Biden Administration will face a decision on whether to build their solar future here, or import it and create jobs in China and Malaysia and Vietnam.
A growing bipartisan consensus has emerged on China, and that can be seen even in the segue from Trump to Biden.
Both parties now recognize the U.S. has to address the risk China poses to U.S. economic and national security. Congress and the Trump administration made progress over the past four years in setting the table to correct the profound imbalances in the U.S.-China relationship, Florida Senator Marco Rubio says in a recent Washington Post op-ed.
“The choice facing Biden is simple: support American workers and our national security, or side with Wall Street and the CCP,”Rubio writes.
During the Senate hearings of key Biden cabinet picks, Janet Yellen, Anthony Blinken, Pete Buttigieg and Gina Raimondo all cited climate change as a key part of their mandate in their new roles. China was also talked about, along with domestic manufacturing.
Solar is on the rise in the U.S. But it will be all Made in China unless Washington comes up with something that says – if you want to put solar panels on your house, you can buy them from anywhere. But if you’re the governor of a state that wants to put solar panels on state land to generate electricity, then everything from the polysilicon to the finished product should be made here. If that does not happen, then no, the Keystone Pipeline workers will not be getting jobs making solar panels.
It seems as the growing terror attackson our soil and abroad are taking a toll on the liberal left and President Obama’s war on guns.
During a news briefing at the White House on Friday, President Barack Obama’s mouthpiece, press secretary Josh Earnest, doubled down on calls for stricter gun-control laws, despite knowing by then that the FBI had begun to investigate the San Bernardino shooting as an act of terrorism. This rhetoric from Earnest inspired Fox News reporter Peter Doocy to step up to the plate and ask the question on everybody’s mind.
“The president thinks that if there are potentially two terrorists sitting around planning a mass murder, they may call it off because President Obama has put in place common-sense gun laws?”Doocy asked.
But Earnest, well-trained by Obama at concocting phony narratives, quickly fired back, claiming that all four weapons used by the shooters were obtained legally and that a terrorism motive had not yet been confirmed.
However, the likelihood of the shooting having been motivated by terror seemed very high, given that shooter Tashfeen Malik reportedly pledged allegiance to the Islamic State group as she and her husband opened fire at the Inland Regional Center.
Two of the weapons used by the couple were given to them by someone else, and according to California’s firearms laws, it is “illegal for any person who is not a California licensed firearms dealer (private party) to sell or transfer a firearm to another non-licensed person (private party).”This means that unless the individual who gave them the weapons was a licensed firearms dealer, the couple obtained them illegally.
Obama has been begging Congress for tougher gun control laws during his entire administration. With that being said, the only thing happening is record number of gun sales. This Black Friday produced the highest number of background check in the nation’s history, over 185,000. Barack Obama- criminals don’t abide by the law.
American Family Association
American Family Association (AFA), a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization, was founded in 1977 by Donald E. Wildmon, who was the pastor of First United Methodist Church in Southaven, Mississippi, at the time. Since 1977, AFA has been on the frontlines of Ame
NEWSMAX
News, Opinion, Interviews, Research and discussion
Opinion
American Family Association
American Family Association (AFA), a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization, was founded in 1977 by Donald E. Wildmon, who was the pastor of First United Methodist Church in Southaven, Mississippi, at the time. Since 1977, AFA has been on the frontlines of Ame
American Family Association
American Family Association (AFA), a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization, was founded in 1977 by Donald E. Wildmon, who was the pastor of First United Methodist Church in Southaven, Mississippi, at the time. Since 1977, AFA has been on the frontlines of Ame
You Version
Bible Translations, Devotional Tools and Plans, BLOG, free mobile application; notes and more
Political
American Family Association
American Family Association (AFA), a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization, was founded in 1977 by Donald E. Wildmon, who was the pastor of First United Methodist Church in Southaven, Mississippi, at the time. Since 1977, AFA has been on the frontlines of Ame
NEWSMAX
News, Opinion, Interviews, Research and discussion
Spiritual
American Family Association
American Family Association (AFA), a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization, was founded in 1977 by Donald E. Wildmon, who was the pastor of First United Methodist Church in Southaven, Mississippi, at the time. Since 1977, AFA has been on the frontlines of Ame
Bible Gateway
The Bible Gateway is a tool for reading and researching scripture online — all in the language or translation of your choice! It provides advanced searching capabilities, which allow readers to find and compare particular passages in scripture based on
You must be logged in to post a comment.