Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Archive for February, 2017

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


waving flagAmerican Graffiti

Liberals want to change the meaning of the Statue Of Liberty to the Statue of Open Borders and illegal immigration.

Open Border Radical / Political Cartoon By A.F. Branco ©2017.

To see more Legal Insurrection Branco cartoons, click here.

A.F.Branco 2017 Calendar <—- Order Here!

illegalalienvoters-300x300

Planned Parenthood Uses Ultrasounds Only for Abortions


waving flagAuthored by FaithZette Staff | Updated 03 Feb 2017 at 12:29 PM

URL of the original posting site: http://www.lifezette.com/faithzette/planned-parenthood-uses-ultrasounds-only-abortions/
how many body parts

Over the past couple of weeks, Live Action has released new investigative videos — shedding light on the true nature of what goes on at Planned Parenthood.

While the organization attempts to market itself as dedicated to women’s health care, it seems that if a pregnant mom actually wants to keep her baby, then Planned Parenthood is not the place to go. In a new video, undercover journalists are shown calling 68 Planned Parenthoods around the country — and only three of them agree to do an ultrasound to check the health of the unborn baby.

“No, we don’t do any ultrasounds for prenatal care. We do them when we’re doing abortion-monsterabortions, but not for any other reason,” said a Planned Parenthood worker from Council Bluffs, Iowa.

“No. Nope. Not — not something we offer. Well, we do have to do an ultrasound with an abortion, but we don’t offer them for — we can’t do anything to make sure that the pregnancy’s fine,” said an employee at a St. Louis, Missouri, Planned Parenthood.

“We only do ultrasounds if you are terminating,” explained a staff member at a Corning, New York, Planned Parenthood.

Related: Planned Parenthood: Exposed by Its Own Lies

/* */

“I anticipate Planned Parenthood will respond as it usually does by denying the findings of this investigation,” said Lila Rose, the president and founder of Live Action in a statement. “That’s why I encourage media outlets to contact any of the 68 centers that Live Action did — or any others — and ask them if they offer ultrasounds to check the baby’s health if a mother wants to carry her baby to term. The media will find results similar to ours.”

In short: It’s unclear where the lies will end when it comes to the operations of the nation’s largest abortion provider.unborn-lives-matter

Trump delivers for religious right


waving flagAuthored

Religious conservatives’ gamble on President Trump is paying off.

The last several days have brought a slew of victories for evangelicals, many of whom set aside their reservations about Trump to back him during the presidential campaign.

From the nomination of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, to Trump’s affirmation of support for allowing tax-exempt churches to engage in politics, to the appointment of Liberty University President Jerry Falwell Jr. to an education task force, evangelicals are seeing the new president quickly deliver on a number of fronts.

“I never doubted his sincerity or his commitment. There were, obviously, those who did. Not just in the evangelical community or in the faith community, but more broadly,” said Ralph Reed, the chairman of the Faith & Freedom Coalition.

“Certainly even for those doubters, this week has laid any of those concerns to rest.”

Trump, a thrice-married business mogul who once expressed support for abortion rights, hardly fit the mold of a conventional conservative candidate. Some evangelicals were hesitant to fully embrace Trump, particularly after a leaked “Access Hollywood” video showed him bragging about using his celebrity to get away with touching women without their consent. He dismissed the tape as mere “locker room talk.”

Yet Trump won the voting bloc decisively in the election, with 80 percent of white evangelicals supporting him over Hillary Clinton, according to an exit poll conducted by NBC News.

Trump is repaying their support in spades, with promises to repeal the Johnson amendment, which prevents tax-exempt religious organizations from engaging in political activity, and his nomination of a conservative jurist to the Supreme Court.

“I think if you really go back and you look at the campaign, it’s undeniable. He received an astonishing 81 percent of the evangelical vote in no small measure because of ironclad commitments he made that were explicit and unambiguous in areas of policy and personnel,” Reed said.

Religious conservatives in Congress are eager to capitalize on having an ally in the White House. On the same day Trump reaffirmed support for getting rid of the Johnson amendment, Rep. Jody Hice (R-Ga.) and House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) introduced legislation to do just that.  While Trump declared he’d “totally destroy” the law, Hice and Scalise’s bill would allow only political activity by tax-exempt religious organizations in limited circumstances, though they would still be banned from giving to campaigns.  Hice told The Hill he expects his bill to come up for a vote in the House sometime in the near future, though a specific timeline hasn’t been finalized.

“We have great momentum,” Hice, a Southern Baptist pastor, said of Trump’s support. “I think that this is going to send a great, positive message to the evangelical community throughout the country that strongly supported him.”

It hasn’t been entirely smooth sailing, however. Trump this week announced he’d uphold an Obama-era executive order prohibiting federal contractors from discriminating against workers on the basis of sexual orientation.  Former President Obama’s 2014 order stirred fierce debate in the House last year when Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney (D-N.Y.) offered amendments to annual spending bills to ensure the order’s enforcement. Its adoption caused one spending bill to collapse on the floor, in large part because of Republicans who opposed the amendment.

Trump, the first GOP presidential candidate to mention the LGBTQ community at a party nominating convention, made a point of emphasizing his support for gay rights when announcing he’d keep Obama’s order in place.

“President Trump continues to be respectful and supportive of LGBTQ rights, just as he was throughout the election,” the White House said in a statement.

Conservatives expressed disappointment in Trump’s move, though they are still hopeful he will sign an executive order to ban retaliation against religious groups and businesses opposed to gay marriage.

“Trump can and should protect all Americans from violence and oppression, but he should not go along with Obama’s policies of elevating ‘sexual orientation and gender identity’ to a protected class,” Heritage Foundation senior research fellow Ryan Anderson wrote.

But it’s Trump’s selection of Gorsuch for the Supreme Court that has generated the most excitement among religious conservatives.  One of Gorsuch’s most notable rulings was siding with Hobby Lobby and the Little Sisters of the Poor in 2013, when they challenged a provision in the healthcare law requiring them to include contraceptive coverage in their employees’ insurance plans. The Supreme Court eventually ruled in a 5-4 decision a year later that closely held for-profit corporations should be exempted for the contraceptive mandate if its owners have religious objections.

“Things that he promised, he followed through on. The biggest one being this past week with the Supreme Court,” said Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.), another Southern Baptist pastor serving in Congress.

“I mean, when you look at that from all rounds and all sides, especially from the professional conservative point of view, the court pick was the one that I think helped voters come through [for] Trump.”

kick-em-out-of-office

More Political INCORRECTNESS


say-a-prayer-for-me special-kind-of-retard first-american-coil-of-steel unborn-lives-matter

Image

Another Picture Screaming a Thousands Words


american-children-before-refugees

LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Report


waving flagFriday, February 3, 2017

For pro-life news updated throughout the day, visit LifeNews.com.

I AM A PERSON with Poem

Top Stories
• Nancy Pelosi Tells Adopted Woman: Your Mom Should Have Had the “Choice” to Abort You
• Senate Defeats Democrat Filibuster of Pro-Life Trump Education Secretary Nominee Betsy DeVos
• Abortion Activist Katie Couric’s Warped Science: A “Female Fetus” Can “Feel” Male
• Actress Kate Walsh Claims “Women Will Die” if the Planned Parenthood Abortion Biz is Defunded

More Pro-Life News
• Why Aren’t Abortion Activists Calling Beyonce’s Unborn Babies “Fetuses?”
• Liberal Newspaper Claims the Bible is Silent on Abortion. But It’s Wrong
• After 50 Weeks of Prayer, Pro-Life Advocate Believes Neil Gorsuch Will be God’s Champion on SCOTUS
• New York Times Leaves Pro-Life Book on Kermit Gosnell Off Its Best-Seller List
• Abortion Advocate Protesting March for Life Put Down Her Sign and Got a Pro-Life Sign. Here’s Why
• Abortionist Says It’s Time to “Make Abortion Great Again”
• This Catholic University is Hosting the “Vagina Monologues” and Donating Proceeds to Planned Parenthood
• Liberal Sierra Club Believes Abortion Helps Protect the Environment
• False. Vice President Mike Pence Did Not Say Women Would Try to Get Raped to Have Abortions
• Man Charged After Killing Wife in Assisted Suicide, Euthanasia Advocates Raise Money to Defend Him
• German Parliament Honors Nazi Euthanasia Victims
• Abortion Activists Traveling Across Pro-Life Ireland to Hand Out Dangerous Abortion Drugs


Nancy Pelosi Tells Adopted Woman: Your Mom Should Have Had the “Choice” to Abort You
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has made some pretty outrageous statements about abortion in the past.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.


Senate Defeats Democrat Filibuster of Pro-Life Trump Education Secretary Nominee Betsy DeVos
The head of the nation’s biggest abortion businesses is warning her members that Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch is a threat to abortion.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Actress Kate Walsh Claims “Women Will Die” if the Planned Parenthood Abortion Biz is Defunded
Katie Couric sympathizes with the abortion industry and Planned Parenthood. But when it comes to gender, she admits that the unborn can “feel.”

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Abortion Activist Katie Couric’s Warped Science: A “Female Fetus” Can “Feel” Male
Katie Couric sympathizes with the abortion industry and Planned Parenthood. But when it comes to gender, she admits that the unborn can “feel.”

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Why Aren’t Abortion Activists Calling Beyonce’s Unborn Babies “Fetuses?”
For anyone who hasn’t already heard, Beyonce is pregnant with twins.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

 

Liberal Newspaper Claims the Bible is Silent on Abortion. But It’s Wrong
Some claim that because the word “abortion” or some literal statement condemning abortion isn’t in black and white in the Bible, the Bible is silent on the topic and thus abortion must be moral and acceptable.

Cli ck to Read at LifeNews.com.

After 50 Weeks of Prayer, Pro-Life Advocate Believes Neil Gorsuch Will be God’s Champion on SCOTUS
On Tuesday, President Donald Trump named Judge Neil Gorsuch as his Supreme Court nominee to replace Justice Antonin Scalia—a lion-hearted defender of the U.S. Constitution’s original intent.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

New York Times Leaves Pro-Life Book on Kermit Gosnell Off Its Best-Seller List
A new book about abortionist and serial killer Kermit Gosnell debuted as the third bestselling book on Amazon this week and quickly sold out.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Man Charged After Killing Wife in Assisted Suicide, Euthanasia Advocates Raise Money to Defend Him

Daily Pro-Life News Report
Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.

Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright 2003-2017 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.

I knew you life-begins-at-conception deliver-me dead-alive absurdities Would You two victums Saved us all Pro Life how many body parts PP Body Parts Healthcare Choice Andrea Why isit legal Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves so ROE hate God brave enough

SHOCK report: 12 worst nations for CHRISTIAN persecution – look who just made the list


waving flagAuthored

URL of the original posting site: http://www.allenbwest.com/allen/new-report-12-worst-nations-christian-persecution-look-just-made-list

Getty Images

I find it rather humorous that the progressive socialist left is up in arms because Christians from the Middle East are receiving priority entry into the United States. Funny, we heard nothing from the left when these same Christians were being refused entry, and many — Assyrians, Chaldeans, and Copts — had family already established here in America.

Christian Persecution

Image added by WhatDidYouSay.org

It appears that the left has deemed insidious protected status for Muslims, not realizing no foreign national has a right to enter the United States. It is a privilege that we as Americans reserve the right to deny, and our president has the enumerated power to restrict, for concerns of the safety of our citizens. Sadly, folks like the progressive socialist left in America, along with Angela Merkel in Germany, don’t comprehend that.

Muslims — protected. Christians? Not so much. And it appears to be getting much worse very close to home.

The Christian Post reports, The United States has for the first time been named among the top 12 nations where Christians are targeted for their faith by a persecution watchdog group in its “Hall of Shame” report for 2016. www.persecution.org/persecutionnl/2017-01/ICC 2016 Hall of Shame Report.pdf

“We felt it was very important this year that we highlight three countries where religious discrimination and persecution are deemed unusual but have reached a certain threshold of concern. These are Mexico, Russia, and sadly, the United States,” explained in a press release Jeff King, president of International Christian Concern. 

“While conditions in the US are in no way comparable to other countries on the list, a certain segment of the culture and the courts seem to be intent on driving faith out of the public square. There have been too many court cases with bad decisions to miss the clear trend line.” 

The ICC report divides the 12 countries into three categories. Nigeria, Iraq, Syria and North Korea were listed among “the worst of the worst”. India, China, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt were listed as “core” countries of persecution. Finally, the U.S., Mexico, and Russia were identified as “new and noteworthy” nations where Christians are facing increased persecution.”

Another report on Christian persecution doesn’t yet include the U.S., but the list is noteworthy for another reason.

As reported by the Christian Post, Persecution watchdog group Open Doors USA has ranked the top 50 most dangerous places for Christians in the world today in its 2017 World Watch List, with North Korea once again topping the list. 

“For Christians in the West, the Open Doors World Watch List is a clear indicator that we need to advocate on behalf of those who do not have the same religious freedom privileges we do,” said David Curry, president and CEO of Open Doors USA. “We hope the Trump administration will address religious liberties in the first 100 days in office.” 

Open Doors revealed that persecution rose globally for a third year in a row, with countries in South and Southeast Asia rising rapidly in danger levels, almost matching the severe persecution Christians face in the Middle East and Sub-Saharan Africa. The watchdog group estimated that close to 215 million Christians experience “high, very high or extreme persecution” in the countries that made the top 50 ranking.

Researchers with Open Doors used a points-based scale to rank the worst persecutors of Christians around the world, with the top 10 list going as follows:
1. North Korea (92 points)
2. Somalia (91 points)
3. Afghanistan (89 points)
4. Pakistan (88 points)
5. Sudan (87 points)
6. Syria (86 points)
7. Iraq (86 points)
8. Iran (85 points)
9. Yemen (85 points)
10. Eritrea (82 points)

Did you notice? Six of the seven countries listed in President Trump’s (and Barack Obama’s) executive order as “terrorist hot spots” are in the top ten worst countries for persecution of Christians…and the liberal progressive media outrage is, wait for it…crickets.

“As in past years, Islamic extremism remained the top driver of Christian persecution, and was the primary reason for the oppression of Christians in 35 out of the 50 nations listed. North Korea and its secretive government, which outlaws even owning a Bible and carries out imprisonment and executions of Christians, remained in the top spot for the 15th year.”

I tend to believe the Christians residing in these countries would celebrate exuberantly if they were afforded the simple freedom of religion that others enjoy here in America. And these are often historically older communities that have existed long before. I guess we need to ship some “coexist” bumper stickers overseas to these countries. Why is it that we have become so subservient and allowed this to happen while we create false narratives and embrace an absurd level of political correctness? We appear abjectly weak.

Just ask Oregonians Aaron and Melissa Klein who once owned Sweet Cakes by Melissa about state-sponsored persecution of Christians. It never happens quickly, but slowly — almost imperceptibly. And we need to pray the tide is turning.

US sanctions Iran for ballistic missile launch


waving flagAuthored

US sanctions Iran for ballistic missile launch / © Getty

The U.S. slapped new sanctions on Iran on Friday after the Trump administration signaled it wanted to punish Tehran for its latest ballistic missile test.

The Treasury Department announced that 13 people and 12 companies face new restrictions, including several entities that support the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and help the Iranian government procure materials for its missile program.

The individuals and companies — based in Iran, China, Lebanon and the United Arab Emirates — are banned from doing business with U.S. institutions or American citizens. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Foreign nationals who provide support for them could be subject to additional U.S. sanctions, a senior administration official said.President Trump and his top aides have said they won’t tolerate provocative acts like the missile test that occurred Sunday, calling it a violation of a United Nations Security Council resolution. The White House also included Iran on a list of nations whose citizens face a temporary ban on travel to the U.S.  The more aggressive posture is a departure from the approach of former President Barack Obama, who sought closer ties with Tehran.

“Iran is playing with fire — they don’t appreciate how ‘kind’ President Obama was to them. Not me!” Trump tweeted Friday morning.

Two days earlier, national security adviser Michael Flynn made a rare appearance before the White House press corps to announce the administration is putting Iran “on notice.”  The approach has been cheered by national security hawks and congressional Republicans who criticized Obama for taking what they said was too soft of an approach toward Iran.

“This swift and decisive response proves that our new administration is serious about holding the Iranian regime accountable for its illicit behavior,” Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) said in a statement.

Trump’s move also escalated tensions with Iran, which has said the missile tests are within their rights to conduct.

“Iran unmoved by threats as we derive security from our people. We’ll never initiate war, but we can only rely on our own means of defense,” Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif wrote on Twitter before the announcement.

While Trump has taken a tougher rhetorical line against Iran, Friday’s sanctions are similar to penalties imposed by Obama in response to Iran’s previous ballistic missile tests.

The decision to issue sanctions came after a review by the White House and agencies, officials said. While the Treasury Department has long researched new Iranian targets for sanctions, one official said “the launch of the missile was the triggering event.”

But the new punishments come after the Iran nuclear pact took effect last year, in which the U.S. and five nations lifted other sanctions related to the country’s nuclear program.

The Treasury Department said the fresh sanctions are “fully consistent with the United States’ commitments under the” nuclear agreement. 

The U.S. did not reimpose penalties against individuals or entities who had sanctions against them lifted as part of the nuclear deal, a senior administration official said.

This story was updated at 11:35 a.m.

Senate Shoots Down Obama Coal Regulation


waving flagAuthored by Brendan Kirby | Updated 03 Feb 2017 at 7:33 AM

URL of the original posting site: http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/senate-shoots-down-obama-coal-regulation/

The Senate voted Thursday to kill an 11th-hour regulation of the previous administration, stopping new rules restricting coal mining. The 54-45 vote, following House approval Wednesday, sends the resolution to President Donald Trump. Assuming the president signs it, it would be only the second time that lawmakers canceled a regulation under the Congressional Review Act, a 1996 law that gives legislators 60 legislative days to block new regulations from the executive branch.

A veto threat from then-President Obama kept Congress from acting during the past eight years. But there are many regulations adopted in the waning days of the Obama administration that Republicans have in the crosshairs.

“On its way out the door, the Obama administration forced nearly 40 — 40 — major and very costly regulations on the American people,” Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said. “Fortunately, we now have the opportunity to work with the new president to begin bringing relief from those burdensome regulations.”

Trump has made regulatory reform a top priority. Earlier this week, he signed an executive order requiring the repeal of two existing regulations in order to adopt a new one.

/* */

After the vote on the coal cleanup regulation, senators began debating a resolution to kill a regulation by the Securities and Exchange Commission to energy companies to disclose the payments they make to foreign governments for natural resources. The Senate will vote on that Friday morning.

The regulation voted down Thursday, known as the Stream Protection Rule, included more than 400 regulatory changes under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act. The Interior Department finalized the changes in December. Supporters argued the rules would protect 6,000 miles of streams and 52,000 miles of forest by prohibiting mining companies from dumping debris into nearby waters. It narrowed exceptions for a pre-existing 100-foot buffer on coal mining near water.

McConnell called it a “blatant attack on coal miners” and pointed to one study indicating that it would put up to a third of coal-related jobs at risk. He said the Kentucky Coal Association called it a “regulation in search of a problem.”

Killing Obama Energy Rules Will Help the Most VulnerableWhite House, Hill GOP move to overturn regulations that would hike home energy prices

Sen. Susan Collins, of Maine, was the only Republican to join 44 Democrats in voting “no.” Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) argued that the regulation was necessary to protect the environment.

“Regardless of whether you voted for Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton, nobody wants to live in a dirty environment where we don’t have clean water, clean rivers, clean streams or clean air,” she said. “Once again, we’re being told to choose between a clean environment and creating jobs.”Bull

Coal-state Democrats, though, broke with their party.

“There’s no one in West Virginia that wants dirty water or dirty air,” said that state’s Democratic senator, Joe Manchin.

The senator said he urged Obama administration officials to consult with affected states. “They did nothing. They would not reach out to us, whatsoever,” he said.

Manchin said the regulation was “excessive and duplicative,” and that it would cripple his state’s businesses and families.

“Tell me, what four hours of the day do you want your electricity to work? What four hours of the day do you want your refrigerator to stay cold?” he said. “What four hours of the day do you want to heat your home? Tell me what four hours of the day that you take for granted that you want that everything and anything you want works 24 hours a day?”

Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) said regulators devised the rules for the Appalachian Mountains region.

“Yet, the former administration made this rule applicable to the entire nation,” she said.

Chuck Schumer’s Fictitious 60-Vote Tradition


waving flagAuthored by Brendan Kirby | Updated 03 Feb 2017 at 7:46 AM

URL of the original posting site: http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/chuck-schumers-fictitious-60-vote-tradition/

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Thursday cited a supposedly grand tradition of requiring Supreme Court nominees to receive 60 votes in order to win confirmation. The facts don’t back him up.

“It’s nonsense,” said Carrie Severino, chief counsel and policy director at the Judicial Crisis Network, which supports Judge Neil Gorsuch’s nomination to the high court. “Anyone who’s followed the Supreme Court for more than five minutes knows that’s not true.”

Schumer’s comments suggest Democrats are prepared to dig in to fight Gorsuch’s nomination by any means necessary. A filibuster would be close to unprecedented, but Schumer attempted to make it seem par for the course.

“We Democrats will insist on a rigorous but fair process,” he said from the Senate floor. “Part of that process entails 60 votes for confirmation. Any one Democrat can require it. Many already have. It was a bar met by each of [former President] Obama’s nominations. Each received 60 votes. And most importantly, it’s the right thing to do.”DELUSIONAL

Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.) later picked up on Schumer’s assertion.

“I think he should be subject to the same 60-vote margin that the last few Supreme Court nominees were subjected to,” he said.more-leftist-propaganda

/* */

In fact, however, two sitting justices won fewer than 60 votes in their Senate confirmations. Justice Clarence Thomas received 52 votes, and Justice Samuel Alito got 58.

“It’s an arbitrary standard because they just don’t like the nominee,” said Rachel Boyard, an expert at The Heritage Foundation. “It’s wrong for Democrats to say it’s always 60.”

Typically, filibusters have been rare. Democrats tried to launch one against Alito but managed to sustain only 25 votes to keep the delaying tactics going. William Rehnquist also faced filibuster attempts when President Richard Nixon nominated him to the high court in 1971 and then again in 1986 when President Ronald Reagan elevated him to chief justice.

Only once has a Supreme Court nomination been successfully filibustered; President Lyndon Johnson withdrew the nomination of Associate Justice Abe Fortas to become chief justice after a filibuster amid an ethics scandal.

Don’t tell that to Schumer, though. He said a 60-vote threshold ensures a “mainstream” justice.

“Requiring 60 votes has always been the right thing to do on Supreme Court nominations, especially in these polarized times,” he said. “But now in this new era of the court, in this new administration, there is even heavier weight on this tradition.”partyof-deceit-spin-and-lies

Severino said Schumer is conflating the filibuster with ordinary up-or-down votes. Democrats starting employing the tactic against lower-court judges during the George W. Bush administration. But Supreme Court nominations that have been moved to the floor have been granted votes.

“He seems to want a standard of 60 votes for a Republican nominee and 51 votes for a Democratic nominee,” she said. “They’re still throwing a hissy-fit over the election.” 

Schumer argued Thursday that Gorsuch is out of the mainstream and could not be counted on to stand up to business special interests. But Severino and Boyard said it is a hard argument to make with a straight face, given the fact that the Senate confirmed Gorsuch in 2006 for a seat on the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on a voice vote.

It is unclear how unified Democrats will remain as the Gorsuch nomination moves forward. Many Democrats are still seething over the Republican majority’s decision to freeze out Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland to the seat without even holding hearings. But Boyard said she believes some Democrats will want to at least grant Gorsuch a vote, even if they vote against him.

Paul Collins, a professor and director of legal studies at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, said Gorsuch’s credentials are impeccable. But he added that anger of the blocked Garland nomination might trigger a filibuster, nonetheless.Neil Gorsuch: ‘Evangelicals Are Ecstatic’Reactions from the faith world to the Supreme Court nominee

“Historically, filibusters are very rare and nominees have been given an up-or-down vote,” said Collins, who co-wrote a book in 2013 on Supreme Court confirmation. “What you’re filibustering, if that’s what they decide to do, is the idea of this being a stolen seat.”

Severino said former Democratic Senate Leader Harry Reid, who eliminated the filibuster for most appointments, indicated that he would not hesitate to expand that rule to cover Supreme Court nominations if necessary.

“They weren’t wringing their hands and hemming and hawing about institutionalism,” she said.

Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) could decide to employ the so-called “nuclear option,” if Democrats won’t back down. “It will be Chuck Schumer’s fault if it happens,” Severino said.

Boyard said there is a less extreme option open to Republicans — enforcing the “two speech rule.” Under Rule 19, she said, Republicans can hold each Democrat to two speeches during the Gorsuch confirmation debate. That would mean the Democrats could drag out debate but not ultimately prevent a vote. And it would allow the Senate to keep the filibuster rule, Boyard said.

The Clarion Project Newsletter for February 3, 2017


ClarionProject.org Facebook Twitter Youtube issue 384
2.3.2017

TOPSTORIES

5 Things You Need to Know About Linda Sarsour5 Things You Need to Know About Linda Sarsour

Linda Sarsour is a controversial activist now suing President Trump. Here are five things you need to know about her. learn more


The Third Jihad – Part 4


 

MORENEWS

US Agents Tasked With Deradicalization Lack Arabic

U.S. agents hired to combat online radicalization lacked basic skills like Arabic and how to tell the difference between Islamist groups.

learn more

US Agents Tasked With Deradicalization Lack Arabic

UAE Praises Trump’s Immigration Ban

The United Arab Emirates supports President Trump’s executive order banning immigration from seven Middle-Eastern countries.

learn more

UAE Praises Trump’s Immigration Ban

French Town Says ‘Non’ to Islamists

Roubaix was to be the venue for a controversial conference featuring radical speakers until local politicians said enough is enough.

learn more

French Town Says ‘Non’ to Islamists

Pakistan Fears Protests Following Terror Leader Arrest

Pakistan arrested the suspected mastermind behind the 2008 Mumbai attacks on January 30, but fears a backlash from extremists.

learn more

Pakistan Fears Protests Following Terror Leader Arrest

Football’s Coming Home

It was the derby game like no other, as two soccer teams from Aleppo faced off for the first professional game in the Syrian city in five years.

learn more

Football’s Coming Home

Facebook

QUOTABLEQUOTES

Saudi cleric Abdallah Swilam - rape versus prayer

If a guardian rapes his sister or daughter he can be forgiven but if you fail to attend morning prayers it’s a sin that cannot be forgiven.

– Abdallah Swilam
Saudi cleric

READERSWRITE

B.A. [Re ‘ISIS Members Are Being Killed by Iraqis’]: Don’t feel sorry for ISIS – they killed with no pity and proved themselves to be animals. Like an animal once it has tasted blood, killing becomes a part of their everyday life…Iraqis take no pity but guard your heart and mind for after it is over.

B.A.

K.E. [Re ‘ISIS Members Are Being Killed by Iraqis’]: The tides have turned because now they know the U.S. is behind them. ISIS will be gone soon.

K.E.

 

SUPPORT THE CLARION PROJECT’S VITAL WORK

The Clarion Project is a registered 501(c)(3). Donations are tax-deductible.

Donate now!

Clarion Project I 1717 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 1025, Washington DC 20006‏

How Reagan dealt with sniveling left-wing punks disrupting civil order in Berkeley


Ronald Reagan speaking at event.

This CNN anchor’s outrageous comments about your Constitutional rights are a snapshot of liberal ignorance


Carol Costello CNN Trump Prayer Breakfast

I confess that today I was … triggered.

Watching CNN in the office, as is my habit while I work, I heard Carol Costello repeat a common claim made by those on the Left who have zero understanding of the American founding. In this particular segment of “CNN Newsroom,” she asked her guests about something President Trump said while speaking at the National Prayer Breakfast.

The president said that the people in that room were united by their common humanity. “We are not just flesh and bone and blood, we are human beings with souls,” he said. “Our republic was formed on the basis that freedom is not a gift from government, but that freedom is a gift from God.”

And Costello found that strange.

“He said ‘it is God who gave us life and liberty’ … not, of course, the mere men who wrote the Constitution, and came up with the Constitution and our way of government.”More Evidence

As is typical for the Left (and media), Costello fundamentally misunderstands the American founding — the cornerstone principles of the American republic. What exactly were those “mere men” thinking when they put the founding documents of our government together? To understand the philosophy of the United States Constitution, you must first consult the Declaration of Independence.

Thomas Jefferson wrote:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

You see, in the social-compact theory adopted by our Founding Fathers, government does not exist to confer rights upon the people. Those rights preexist government. They are God-given — bestowed upon by the Creator.amen

The role of government, then, is to protect those rights. As the Declaration continues: “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”

A just government acknowledges the natural rights of the people, who have consented to submit themselves to this government’s authority with the understanding that it was instituted to protect their natural rights. When a government fails to protect the natural rights of its people, it is no government at all.

“That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”

As Conservative Review Editor-in-Chief Mark Levin wrote in his book, “Ameritopia”: “The Declaration of Independence represents the most prominent, official, consensus position of the Founders’ rationale for declaring independence and, importantly, the philosophical origin of the new country.”

The philosophy of the Declaration was put into practice in the formation of the “new country” — the United States of America. And the country was formed with the United States Constitution. Hillsdale College President Dr. Larry Arnn beautifully describes the “divine” connection between our founding documents in his book,The Founders’ Key: The Divine and Natural Connection Between the Declaration and the Constitution and What We Risk by Losing It”:

A constitution is not only described in the Declaration of Independence; it is necessary to it. The Declaration claims that the people may not be governed except when they have given their consent. They must agree that some particular offices must be occupied by some particular people who may do some particular things. The Declaration describes what kinds those offices ought to be and how they should be related to one another, but it does not provide the offices themselves or any way for their occupants to be selected. A constitution like the one we have is then a necessary element of the American government.

Carol Costello’s double-plus not good idea about our founding is so commonplace that it ranks right up there with the separation of church and state” misnomer. This is also the same tripe that leads people to think that the court-manufactured positive rights of the 20th century rank up there with the fundamental, negative ones articulated in the Declaration and Bill of Rights. These (leftist) falsehoods and myths are commonplace because they have been endorsed and articulated, fought for at every level of government for more than 100 years by the Progressive movement.

As the Claremont Institute’s Dr. John Marini wrote in an excellent essay, “The Progressive movement … had as its fundamental purpose the destruction of the political and moral authority of the U.S. Constitution.” The moral authority of the Constitution comes from understanding that the rights protected by government are not created by government. These rights are endowed to mankind by a higher moral authority. They are derived from a higher law.amen

The Left rejects this understanding out of necessity. For if rights are manmade, if they have no attachment to a moral force that is beyond mankind, then “rights” can simply be created out of our selfish desires. Such as the right to kill an unborn child … and have the government subsidize the exercise of that “right.” Other rights can be taken away in the name of progress, such as the right of religious conscience objections

In his National Prayer Breakfast speech, President Trump cited Thomas Jefferson:

It was the great Thomas Jefferson who said, “the God who gave us life, gave us liberty.” Jefferson asked, “Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God?”picture2

For all his faults, President Donald Trump has a better understanding of America — and origin of natural rights — than all progressives.

cropped-ignorance.png cropped-jefferson.jpg We have been torn apart Tree of Liberty 03

They lied all along: Republicans plan to ‘repair’ not repeal Obamacare


Green and yellow capsule clamped in a wrench.

Is it possible to repair a house on fire without extinguishing the raging inferno in it? Republicans think we are stupid enough to believe so.

First they promised to repeal Obamacare “root and branch.” Then they promised to “repeal and replace” without explaining its meaning — other than to legitimize the premise of Obamacare as a partial force for good. Now, they are on to “repair.”

The Hill has the relevant quotes from two of the most important committee chairmen (Senator Walden, R-Ore. (F, 36%) and Senator Alexander, R-Tenn. (F, 15%)) drafting the repeal bill … which will not repeal Obamacare:

“I’m trying to be accurate on this that there are some of these provisions in the law that probably will stay, or we may modify them, but we’re going to fix things, we’re going to repair things,” House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Greg Walden (R-Ore.), a key player on healthcare, told reporters Tuesday.

“There are things we can build on and repair, there are things we can completely repeal,” he said.

Senate Health Committee Chairman Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) is sounding a similar note. […]

“I think it is more accurate to say repair ObamaCare because, for example, in the reconciliation procedure that we have in the Senate, we can’t repeal all of ObamaCare,” Alexander said. “ObamaCare wasn’t passed by reconciliation, it can’t be repealed by reconciliation. So we can repair the individual market, which is a good place to start.”

As we noted before, every word of this premise is false because the price-hiking coverage regulations are inextricably linked to the subsidies, as noted by the courts and CBO. Therefore, the regulations can be repealed through budget reconciliation. Moreover, the Senate parliamentarian doesn’t have the final say on addressing Senate precedent.

However, there is a more important point to bring out from this story. These people lied to all of us. They told a bald-faced lie. Absolutely nothing changed structurally about Obamacare from the time they made these promises during the past three elections until now. If anything, premiums went up even more than expected and there are even fewer insurers than previously predicted, making the case for repeal an easier political sell.kick-em-out-of-office

Likewise, nothing changed procedurally from the time they promised to use budget reconciliation to repeal at least most of the main elements of the law. Republicans always knew that they would need to get rid of the actuarially crippling regulations, which would then unfreeze the insurance market, lower costs, bring back choice and competition, and engender much less of a need for subsidies. All the while, everyone always planned to maintain the subsidies and Medicaid expansion for a one to two-year transition period while other free market health care and health insurance reforms were put in place.

Yet, Republicans, particularly those in the Senate, never had any intention of repealing it because they don’t believe or understand free markets, are owned by the big pharma/big government complex, and have no desire or ability to articulate a winning issue to the public without shooting themselves in the foot.

This day was predicted long ago

In 2012 and 2014, conservatives worked against Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. (F, 40%) and his sitting RINO Senators (such as Thad Cochran, R-Miss. (F, 22%), Pat Roberts, R-Kan. (F, 51%) Lisa Murkowski, R-Ala. (F, 20%) and Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn. (F, 15%)) and his chosen challengers in open seats (such as Sens. Tillis, R-N.C. (F, 35%) and Cassidy, R-La. (F, 47%)). Voters were warned that they had no intention of repealing Obamacare. Conservatives cautioned that if Ted Cruz’s, R-Texas (A, 97%) plan to defund Obamacare at its inception was not followed, the law would never be repealed. That if we failed to build a Senate majority upon a solid foundation and stronger leadership, Obamacare would never be repealed even if we were so fortunate to control all three branches. [See my op-ed at Fox News Opinion on October 25, 2013, “Building a GOP Majority on Quicksand”]

Groups like Senate Conservatives Fund were maligned as pursuing “purity for profit” and undermining the creation of a GOP majority that would truly repeal Obamacare. Establishment voices accused the grassroots activists of needlessly creating a civil war over disagreements on strategy. Yet, we knew all along it was a disagreement over beliefs and courage, not strategy. Unfortunately, the establishment used their superior funding (from groups like the Chamber of Commerce that wanted to keep Obamacare all along) to run on repealing the law “root and branch,” as McConnell famously said. Now, some of these very senators are leading the charge to repair the law, which is not feasible.kick-em-out-of-office

Trump must intervene

Obviously, President Trump is having a busy week with his immigration policies and the Supreme Court pick, among many other issues. He can’t address everything in the first month of his presidency. But there is no way to ignore Obamacare. Unless it is FULLY repealed, within a few years no middle-income American will be able to live in freedom and dignity without permanent government support and intervention in healthcare. We will have no freedom in one sixth of our economy. Moreover, the crushing job loss, debt, and diminished wages from the Obamacare regulations are weighing down the economy and will undermine the president’s ability to grow the economy with some of his other plans. It will limit his ability to secure a legacy as a jobs president.

The plan forward

Trump should dispatch Vice President Pence to work with the House Freedom Caucus as well as Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wisc. (F, 52%) and ensure that the House passes the full repeal bill — along with the regulations. They should make it clear that there are no excuses for the Senate to not overrule the parliamentarian, but at the same time they should not wait around for the lords of the Senate to do the right thing. The reconciliation bill should be structured as follows:

  • An 18-month transition for retaining the subsidies and the Medicaid expansion. However, immediately freeze both programs from new registrations.
  • Repeal Obamacare’s taxes immediately and the regulations by mid-year so that insurance companies can have certainty to offer cheaper, competitive plans in 2018
  • On the administrative end, have Tom Price, R-Ga. (D, 62%) get rid of any cost-sharing subsidies and risk corridor bailouts for insurance companies. This will force them to utilize the lifting of regulations to lower prices and actually compete for business rather than relying on subsidies.
  • Meanwhile, individual states should work on reducing their own onerous health care and health insurance regulations in order to maximize the market effect of reducing federal insurance regulations.

At that point, Trump should relentlessly use his bully pulpit to name and shame the Senate into fulfilling their promise. It can be done if we actually got the momentum rolling in the House. As Reps. Mark Meadows, R-N.C. (A 94%) and Jim Jordan, R-Ohio (A, 96%) said in a statement today, “We committed to the American people to repeal every tax, every mandate, the regulations, and to defund Planned Parenthood. That’s what the American people expect us to do — and they expect us to do it quickly.”amen

In the meantime, conservatives should put the pressure on the Senate by launching a new round of primaries. Members like Jeff Flake, R-Ariz. (F, 50%), Bob Corker, R-Tenn. (F, 45%), Roger Wicker, R-Miss. (F, 28%), and Orrin Hatch, R-Utah (F, 33%) could be prime targets in states won by Trump.

As Bobby Jindal said, “Republicans who want to retreat from repeal to repair should be replaced.”

amen kick-em-out-of-office

Congressional Republicans Move to Block Mexican Wall


waving flag

Authored By Mark Swanson   |   Friday, 03 Feb 2017 12:42 PM

URL of the original posting site: http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/donald-trump-border-wall-mexico/2017/02/03/id/771869/

Image: Congressional Republicans Move to Block Mexican Wall / (AP Images)

President Donald Trump is now facing resistance from his own party on his number one campaign pledge — erection of a border wall along Mexico, CNN reported.

When it comes down to the brass tacks, CNN reports congressional Republicans have one major problem with Trump’s wall – dollars and cents.

How, exactly, is Trump planning to pay for the estimated $12 billion to $15 billion it’ll take to build the wall?

“If you’re going to spend that kind of money, you’re going to have to show me where you’re going to get that money,” Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski told CNN. “I don’t see how you can get a bill like that through [Congress] without offsets. I don’t see how that’s possible.”

Trump has pledged that Mexico will pay for the wall one way or another, after the fact if not before. While Mexico has repeatedly said it will not, House Republicans aren’t buying it either.

“It’s not a viable option,” Sen. John McCain told CNN.no-more-rinos-2

So unless Trump’s plan carries with it spending cuts to offset the cost of the wall, Trump’s own party remains skeptical, not only on cost but effectiveness of keeping out bad hombres, too.

“I don’t want to see any spending, additional spending on anything done that is not paid for,” Sen. Bob Corker, a Trump ally and a one-time potential Cabinet nominee, told CNN.

“We have got a huge fiscal problem right now — $20.355 trillion in debt projected to add $9.7 trillion over the next 10 years. ”  

© 2017 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


waving flagThe Tears of a Clown

Schumer and the democrats are now resorting to (phony) crying in an effort to stop the Trump agenda.

Schumer Crying / Political cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2017.

A.F.Branco 2017 Calendar <—- Order Here!

knocking-back-a-bottle

LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Report


waving flagThursday, February 2, 2017

For pro-life news updated throughout the day, visit LifeNews.com.

I AM A PERSON with Poem

Top Stories
• President Trump: “Freedom of Religion is a Sacred Right.” I Will Defend Religious Liberty
• Planned Parenthood CEO Complains “Gorsuch’s Judicial History Shows an Alarming Hostility” to Abortion
• President Trump Considering Executive Order Protecting Conscience Rights of Pro-Life Groups
• Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg Donates $1 Million to Planned Parenthood Abortion Biz

More Pro-Life News
• Former Planned Parenthood Director Abby Johnson: “I Was Ordered to Double the Number of Abortions”
• Planned Parenthood Caught Engaging in False Advertising, Removes “Prenatal” Care from Website
• She Calls Herself the “Abortion Travel Agent” and Her Job is to Help Women Abort Their Babies
• Doctor Cleared After Having Family “Hold Down” Patient While She Was Euthanized
• These Seven States Have Just One Abortion Clinic Left
• American Academy of Pediatrics Says Kids Have a “Right”to Abortion
• Iowa Senate Passes Bill to Defund Planned Parenthood Abortion Business
• Woman Loses Health Insurance for Fourth Time Under Obamacare
• Pregnancy Center Across the Street from Planned Parenthood Helps Women With Abortion Alternatives
• NYC Fashion Designer Posts “Planned Parenthood Saves Lives” Sign on the Runway
• Utah Committee Approves Pro-Life Legislation to Ban Dangerous Webcam Abortions
• Tennessee County Refuses to Fund Planned Parenthood, But the Abortion Business May Sue


President Trump: “Freedom of Religion is a Sacred Right.” I Will Defend Religious Liberty
During his speech at the national prayer breakfast this morning president Donald Trump said the nation should “never ever, ever” stop asking God for wisdom and he promised to continue protecting religious liberty in the United States.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.


Planned Parenthood CEO Complains “Gorsuch’s Judicial History Shows an Alarming Hostility” to Abortion
The head of the nation’s biggest abortion businesses is warning her members that Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch is a threat to abortion.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

President Trump Considering Executive Order Protecting Conscience Rights of Pro-Life Groups
A leaked draft of an executive order from the White House this week could increase religious freedom and conscience protections for individuals and groups that oppose abortion.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg Donates $1 Million to Planned Parenthood Abortion Biz
Another top executive at Facebook recently funneled more money to the nation’s largest abortion business, Planned Parenthood.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Former Planned Parenthood Director Abby Johnson: “I Was Ordered to Double the Number of Abortions”
Recently, Kim Bode, a Huffington Post contributor, posted a piece challenging those who support defunding Planned Parenthood to “educate themselves.”

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

 

Planned Parenthood Caught Engaging in False Advertising, Removes “Prenatal” Care from Website
Despite a boycott by Democrats on the panel of the vote, a Senate committee voted to confirm pro-life Congressman Tom Price as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.

Cli ck to Read at LifeNews.com.

NYC Fashion Designer Posts “Planned Parenthood Saves Lives” Sign on the Runway

Daily Pro-Life News Report
Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.

Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright 2003-2017 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.

I knew you life-begins-at-conception deliver-me dead-alive absurdities Would You two victums Saved us all Pro Life how many body parts PP Body Parts Healthcare Choice Andrea Why isit legal Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves so ROE hate God brave enough

Bill Targets Countries Refusing to Take Back Criminals


waving flagAuthored by Brendan Kirby | Updated 02 Feb 2017 at 9:53 AM

 URL of the original posting site: http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/bill-targets-countries-refusing-take-back-criminals/

President Donald Trump has vowed to go after countries that refuse to accept their citizens under deportation orders in the United States. Legislation by a Texas congressman would give him new tools to deliver on that pledge. In an executive order signed last month, Trump directed the State and Homeland Security departments to “ensure that diplomatic efforts and negotiations with foreign states include as a condition … the acceptance by those foreign states of their nationals who are subject to removal from the United States.”

Legislation by Rep. Brian Babin (R-Texas) includes a provision available but rarely used under existing law — suspension of visas for countries that are deemed non-cooperative in accepting their citizens who have been convicted of crimes and ordered deported. The bill also would:

  • Withhold foreign aid to countries that refuse to take back citizens who have been convicted of crimes and ordered deported.
  • Require the Department of Homeland Security to submit a report to Congress every three months listing the uncooperative countries.
  • Allow victims of crimes by illegal immigrants to sue in federal court.
/* */

“There is absolutely no reason that criminal aliens should be released back onto America’s streets, yet that is exactly what is happening by the thousands each and every year because their countries of origin refuse to take them back,” Babin said in a prepared statement.

Government data suggests it is more than a trivial problem. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials list 23 countries as “recalcitrant” when it comes to deportations. A report released in October by Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) indicates that 242,772 people have final deportation orders but cannot be returned home because they come from one of those 23 countries or 62 others deemed “non-cooperative.” That is a quarter of the 953,806 illegal immigrants who had been ordered deported but remain in America.

Of the non-deportable illegal immigrants, 57,029 had been convicted of criminal offenses. And under a 2001 Supreme Court decision, ICE can hold most deportable immigrants — including those finishing prison sentences — for only six months before turning them loose. Exceptions exist only for national security and public health risks.

“Before my daughter was murdered, I had no idea how many people like me there were,” said Wendy Hartling, a Connecticut woman who lost her daughter to a murderer who had served time for an attempted murder but could not be deported because of resistance from the government in his home country of Haiti.

After Haiti objected on grounds that the citizenship of Jean Jacques could not be proven, U.S. immigration officials had no choice but to free him in January 2015 after he had completed his prison sentence. Five months later, he fatally stabbed 25-year-old Casey Chadwick in a dispute over drugs.

Historically, the federal government has been reluctant to use leverage to force compliance with deportation demands. The George W. Bush administration in 2001 threatened to deny visas allowing government officials and their families from the South American nation of Guyana to travel to the United States. The nation backed down in a deportation dispute and agreed to accept nearly all of the 112 citizens that U.S. immigration authorities wanted to boot.top

But the government did not take similar action again until October when the Department of Homeland Security triggered a law forcing the State Department to revoke visas for government officials and their close relatives in the African nation of the Gambia. The United States was trying to deport nearly 2,000 Gambian citizens.

“This isn’t all on [former President Barack] Obama. It goes back to Bush, too,” said Chris Chmielenski, director of content and activism for advocacy group NumbersUSA. “If Trump follows through with his promise … countries will most likely respond swiftly.”

Chmielenski added that research by his organization indicates that 384,000 people from the 23 “recalcitrant” countries obtained green cards from the United States.

Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies at the Washington-based Center for Immigration Studies, said Babin’s bill is needed. Even if Trump takes strong action, she said, a law passed by Congress would apply to future administrations. And it would have new tools with which to apply pressure, she added.

When Countries Won’t Take Back Their CriminalsFatal stabbing by illegal Haitian made possible by holes in policy, uncooperative nations

Vaughan said the Obama administration should have moved sooner and more aggressively to use the leverage it did have.

“It literally took many murders and pressure from Democrats to, late in the game, invoke it against one tiny country in Africa,” she said. “It looks like it was just a token effort to get Congress off their backs.”

Vaughan said Babin’s bill would make it clear that leverage “wasn’t put there to be window dressing; it was put there to be used.”

The prospects for Babin’s bill are unclear. He introduced it last year, but it did not get a vote in the House of Representatives. This year, 29 representatives — including Democrat Henry Cuellar of Texas — have signed on as co-sponsors.

Hartling, the Connecticut woman whose daughter was murdered by Jacques, said she welcomes any legislative effort to expel dangerous criminals from other countries.

“I’m a Democrat, and I voted for Trump,” he said. “I sincerely feel he’s going to do what he said he’s going to do.”

Democrats plot protest for Trump’s speech to Congress


waving flagAuthored

Democrats plot protest for Trump’s speech to Congress / © Greg Nash

House Democrats are rallying behind a plan to make President Trump’s first speech to Congress as uncomfortable as possible by inviting guests they say will suffer under new White House policies. The strategy means Trump will likely face a crowd including ethnic minorities, LGBT people, undocumented immigrants, the disabled and others when he addresses a joint session on Feb. 28.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s a shift in tactics for Democrats, some of whom skipped Trump’s inauguration last month in protest. Democrats say there are no plans to stage a similar boycott of Trump’s speech, but they want to put him face-to-face with people who feel alienated and targeted by his controversial executive orders.

In a letter circulating on Capitol Hill, a group of liberals is urging fellow Democrats to bring guests who have made “a positive impact” on the community “despite discrimination or marginalization.”

“It is our hope that their presence in the House Gallery will remind President Trump that he is not the arbiter of patriotism,” reads the letter. “This country belongs to all of us, and his rhetoric of intolerance will not stand.”trump-derangement-mental-disorder

The authors of the letter are as diverse as the crowd they’re seeking to assemble. They include Reps. Jim Langevin (R.I.), who was shot accidentally as a teen and became the first quadriplegic to serve in Congress; Michelle Lujan Grisham (N.M.), head of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus; Cedric Richmond (La.), chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus; Judy Chu (Calif.), head of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus; and David Cicilline (R.I.) and Jared Polis (Colo.), the co-chairman of the LGBT Equality Caucus.

“We want to send a strong message to the [president] that he cannot push these communities aside, and he cannot change the fabric of this country,” they wrote.Leftist Propagandist

Some liberals are also eyeing another form of protest during the speech: When Trump walks down the center aisle of the House chamber on the way to the dais, they’re hoping no Democrats scramble to get in the picture for the traditional handshake.

“We have to have a higher standard,” Rep. Luis Gutiérrez (D-Ill.) said.

“For sure I will not be nearby,” Rep. Filemon Vela (D-Texas) echoed. Trump’s campaign rhetoric was combative from the very start, and he’s brought that approach with him to the White House. Most recently, he temporarily banned all refugees from entering the U.S. — and Syrian refugees idefinitely — as well as immigrants from seven Muslim-majority countries. The move sparked an outcry from Democrats and human rights groups, and drew thousands of protestors to airports and streets across the country.liberal-leftist-derangement-syndrom

It’s that spirit of protest the Democrats are hoping to sustain as Trump prepares for his speech to Congress.

“Instead of celebrating the very diversity that makes our country a beacon of inclusion and equality, he has chosen to vilify, bully and alienate women, immigrants, people of color, people with disabilities, and people of differing faiths,” the Democrats wrote in their letter.

“His rhetoric emboldens those who seek a scapegoat for the challenges this country faces.”if-stupid-could-fly

Who Are the Real Bible-Quoting Hypocrites?


Authored By: Dr. Michael Brown | Posted: Thursday, February 2, 2017 1:01 PM

To the Bible-citing Hollywood elites and your ultra-liberal colleagues, are you sure you want to be quoting the words of Jesus?

– Dr. Michael Brown

One of the sharpest criticisms that comes against Bible-quoting, conservative Christians is that we are hypocrites, failing to live by the very book that we so zealously quote. Sadly, that criticism is often true.

To give just one example (and as I’ve said countless times), no-fault, heterosexual divorce in the evangelical church has done more to undermine marriage than all gay activists combined.

But we conservative believers hardly have a monopoly on hypocrisy. To the contrary, the Bible-quoting hypocrisy of the liberal left is far more galling than our conservative Christian hypocrisy. We, for our part, truly believe the Bible to be God’s Word and seek to live by it (even though failingly so at times), whereas the liberal left often despises the authority of Scripture except for a few select passages that it misuses for its purposes.

This has come into glaring clarity in light of the president’s executive order concerning refugees. Suddenly, Hollywood elites and their liberal colleagues are quoting the same book that they openly mock, especially when it comes to moral and spiritual standards. They can’t have it both ways.

Either God’s Word has authority or it does not, and you cannot accept its moral imperative in one place and reject its moral imperative in another place. It simply does not work.

A critic might say, “But you do the exact same thing. You pick and choose what verses you follow.”

Actually, that’s not the case. We have a grid through which we read the Bible – a grid given us by the Bible itself – and we use the Scriptures to interpret the Scriptures. For example, we learn that God gave Israel certain laws to keep them separate from the nations, even though the laws were not based on moral absolutes. A good example would be, “Don’t wear garments with mixed fabric” (Leviticus 19:19; Deuteronomy 22:11), even though there is nothing morally wrong about doing so. It was simply wrong for Israel because God was teaching them to be separate from the other nations.

On the flip side, when the Ten Commandments say, “Do not murder,” it is based on an absolute moral prohibition, one that is binding for all people everywhere.

So, while Christians today are not obligated to keep these specific laws of separation (which include the dietary laws), they are obligated to keep the universal moral prohibitions of the Bible, which include prohibitions against adultery and stealing and murder.

The left-wing, hypocritical Bible-quoters, have no such grid. Instead, they learn a few verses (or, snippets of verses) and quote them with smug self-assurance, not realizing that the book they are selectively quoting actually condemns the lives they are living For a number of years, their favorite verse has been, “Jesus said ‘Don’t judge,’ but you’re guilty of judging me!” – and they say this as they harshly judge us. What they fail to realize is that Jesus was teaching us not to judge superficially or hypocritically and not to condemn so that we could judge righteously rather than by superficial appearances (see Matthew 7:1-6; John 7:24).

And this same Jesus often warned about hell fire, taught that the path to God was narrow and straight, stated that He was the only way to the heavenly Father, and made clear that those who rejected Him would die in their sins – among many other exclusionary and flesh-offending statements. As for the moral standards of the Law – including sexual standards –  He took them to a higher level.

To the Bible-citing Hollywood elites and your ultra-liberal colleagues, are you sure you want to be quoting the words of Jesus?

But the hypocrisy has gotten worse after President Trump’s executive order putting a temporary halt on incoming refugees from 7 Middle Eastern countries. These one-time Bible-mockers are now quoting the words of the Torah in the Old Testament – yes, those supposedly antiquated, misogynist, bigoted words – reminding us of Israel’s calling to care for the refugee and the foreigner in their midst.

Of course, I totally affirm this ethic and call, and since we are a nation of immigrants, it applies all the more to us, just as it applied especially to the people of Israel, who themselves had been mistreated when they lived in Egypt: Don’t do to the foreigners what Egypt did to you!

But let’s put this compassionate command in context. The ancient Israelites were first commanded to exterminate the Canaanites who lived in the land they were about to inherit – including men, women, and children – because the spiritual and moral wickedness of the Canaanites was so great that it would pollute and destroy the Israelites should any survive. That’s what I call extreme, yet it was a one-time command for ancient Israel, only after God waited 400 years until the wickedness of the Canaanites reached horrific proportions (see Genesis 15:16).

So then, the same God who called for compassion on the non-hostile foreigner seeking refuge among the people of Israel also called for the elimination of hostile foreigners (similar to candidate Trump’s call to “bomb the h-ll out of Isis”).

Not only so, but the non-hostile foreigners who took refuge in Israel were required to assimilate into Israel’s culture and were expected to live by Israel’s laws (see, e.g., Numbers 15:29). Is that a standard we’re ready to apply here as well?

More galling still is the liberal left’s quotation of Torah law pertaining to care for the refugee while ignoring the Torah’s strict moral code, which universally forbade homosexual practice and adultery under penalty of death.

For the record, these prohibitions are upheld by the New Testament (both by Jesus and Paul), the difference being that instead of a physical death penalty there is a penalty of spiritual death, which in many ways is far worse.

The bottom line, then, is simple: By all means, keep quoting the Scriptures and calling America to live by the morality of the Bible. Just don’t do it selectively. And the next time conservative Christians do the same, don’t yell back at us, “Separation of church and state!”

Fair enough?

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Dr. Michael Brown Guest Blogger, Distinguished Author, Speaker and Christian Apologist More Articles

Violent riots at UC Berkeley shut down Milo Yiannopoulos event


waving flagPosted by    Wednesday, February 1, 2017 at 10:40pm | 2/1/2017 – 10:40pm

https://twitter.com/GillianNBC/status/826982753879019520
 

Conservative activist and Breitbart editor Milo Yiannopoulos was scheduled to speak at University of California – Berkeley on Wednesday evening.

However, his event was cancelled and massive protests and violent demonstrations broke out on campus instead.

The Breitbart News editor [Milo Yiannopoulos] was set to deliver a speech inside a UC Berkeley campus building but hundreds of protesters began throwing fireworks and pulling down the metal barricades police set up to keep people from rushing into the building. Windows were smashed and fires were set outside the building as masked protesters stormed it.

The Berkeley Police Department said people threw bricks, smoking objects, and fireworks at police officers. University police locked down all buildings and ordered a shelter in place.

“This is what tolerance looks like at UC Berkeley,” said Mike Wright, a Berkeley College Republican member said as smoke bombs went off around him. Someone threw red paint on him.

Yiannopoulous was evacuated, and assured concerned fans he was safe.

https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fmyiannopoulos%2Fposts%2F835263563278207&width=500

free-speechAs of this report, the demonstrations were not under control.

ABC7’s reporter stated earlier that there have not yet been any attempts to put out the fire, and that police had withdrawn from the balcony above the crowd where they had previously been stationed. According to the reporter, police issued a dispersal order to the crowd, declaring it an unlawful assembly, but they have not yet attempted to move the protesters out of the plaza.

The campus may be looking at the Mizzou effect. In the wake of #BlackLivesMatter protests and social justice activism, enrollments to the University of Missouri plummeted and donations from alumni dropped precipitously.

The tweets indicate that Americans are appalled and angry at the tactics of the demonstrators.

My son is slated to begin submitting college applications in about 2 years. UC Berkeley will not be among the schools to which he applies, and I will make point of sending a note the university explaining why that will include a description of this event.

mob-rule-of-law

Image added by WhatDidYouSay.org

UC Berkeley is known as the birthplace of the Free Speech Movement that began on American campuses in 1964. It appears that this is where it has gone to die.

Ann Coulter Letter: Give Me Your Tired Arguments…


waving flagCommentary by  Ann Coulter  | 

URL of the original posting site: http://humanevents.com/2017/02/01/give-me-your-tired-arguments/

Everything said about President Trump’s “Muslim ban” is a lie — including that it’s a Muslim ban.truth-about-so-called-muslim-ban

The New York Times wore out its thesaurus denouncing the order: “cruelty … injury … suffering … bigoted, cowardly, self-defeating … breathtaking … inflammatory … callousness and indifference” — and that’s from a single editorial!

Amid the hysteria over this prudent pause in refugee admissions from seven countries whose principal export is dynamite vests, it has been indignantly claimed that it’s illegal for our immigration policies to discriminate on the basis of religion.

This is often said by journalists who are only in America because of immigration policies that discriminated on the basis of religion.

For much of the last half-century, Soviet Jews were given nearly automatic entry to the U.S. as “refugees.” Entering as a refugee confers all sorts of benefits unavailable to other immigrants, including loads of welfare programs, health insurance, job placement services, English language classes, and the opportunity to apply for U.S. citizenship after only five years.Islam is NOT

Most important, though, Soviet Jews were not required to satisfy the United Nations definition of a “refugee,” to wit: someone fleeing persecution based on race, religion or national origin. They just had to prove they were Jewish. This may have been good policy, but let’s not pretend the Jewish exception was not based on religion.

If a temporary pause on refugee admissions from seven majority-Muslim countries constitutes “targeting” Muslims, then our immigration policy “targeted” Christians for discrimination for about 30 years. Never heard a peep from the ACLU about religious discrimination back then!

According to the considered opinion of the Cato Institute’s David J. Bier, writing in The New York Times, Trump’s executive order is “illegal” because the 1965 immigration act “banned all discrimination against immigrants on the basis of national origin.”pause-comparison

In 1966, one year after the 1965 immigration act, immigrants from Cuba suddenly got special immigration privileges. In 1986, immigrants from Ireland did. People from Vietnam and Indochina got special immigration rights for 20 years after the end of the Vietnam War.

The 1965 law, quite obviously, did not prohibit discrimination based on national origin. (I was wondering why the Times would sully its pages with the legal opinion of a Grove City College B.A., like Bier! Any “expert” in a storm, I guess.)

In fact, ethnic discrimination is practically the hallmark of America’s immigration policy — in addition to our perverse obsession with admitting the entire Third World.

Commenting on these ethnic boondoggles back in 1996, Sen. Orrin Hatch said: “We have made a mockery” of refugee law, “because of politics and pressure.” We let in one ethnic group out of compassion, then they form an ethnic power bloc to demand that all their fellow countrymen be let in, too.

As the former Prime Minister of Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew, described “diversity” in Der Spiegel: “In multiracial societies, you don’t vote in accordance with your economic interests and social interests, you vote in accordance with race and religion.”

That’s our immigration policy — plus a healthy dose of Emma Lazarus’ insane idea that all countries of the world should send their losers to us. (Thanks, Emma!)

Americans are weary of taking in these pricey Third World immigrants, who show their gratitude by periodically erupting in maniacal violence — in, for example, San Bernardino, Orlando, New York City, Fort Hood, Boston, Chattanooga, Bowling Green and St. Cloud.

The Muslim immigrants currently being showcased by the left are not likely to change any minds. The Times could produce only 11 cases of temporarily blocked immigrants that the newspaper would even dare mention. (Imagine what the others are like!)

For purposes of argument, I will accept the Times’ glowing descriptions of these Muslim immigrants as brilliant scientists on the verge of curing cancer. (Two of the Times’ 11 cases actually involved cancer researchers.)

Point one: If the Times thinks that brilliance is a desirable characteristic in an immigrant, why can’t we demand that of all our immigrants? To the contrary! Our immigration policy is more likely to turn away the brilliant scientist — in order to make room for an Afghani goat herder, whose kid runs a coffee stand until deciding to bomb the New York City subway one day. (That was Najibullah Zazi, my featured “Immigrant of the Week,” on May 1, 2012.)

Point two: I happened to notice that even the stellar Muslim immigrants dug up by the Times seem to bring a lot of picture9elderly and sickly relatives with them. Guess who gets to support them?

House Speaker Paul Ryan’s driving obsession (besides being the Koch brothers’ lickspittle) is “entitlement reform,” i.e., cutting benefits or raising the retirement age for Social Security and Medicare. I have another idea. How about we stop bringing in immigrants who immediately access government programs, who bring in elderly parents who immediately access government programs, or who run vast criminal enterprises, stealing millions of dollars from government programs? (I illustrated the popularity of government scams with immigrants in Adios, America! by culling all the news stories about these crimes over a one-month period and listing the perps’ names.)

Point three: Contrary to emotional blather about the horrors refugees are fleeing, a lot are just coming to visit their kids or to get free health care. One of the Times’ baby seals — an Iraqi with diabetes and “a respiratory ailment” — was returning from performing his responsibilities as an elected official in Kirkuk. That’s not exactly fleeing the Holocaust.

While it’s fantastic news that most Muslim refugees aren’t terrorists, the downside is: They’re not refugees, they’re not brilliant, they don’t have a constitutional right to come here and they’re very, very expensive. Until politicians can give us more government services for less money, they need to stop bringing in the poor of the world on our dime.

amen truth-about-pause

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


waving flagBlessings From Above

URL of the original posting site: http://comicallyincorrect.com/2017/02/02/blessings-from-above/

It is believed Antonin Scalia would give his blessing for Donald Trump’s Pick of Judge Neil Gorsuch for Supreme Court Justice.

LifeNews.com Pro-Life News Report


waving flagWednesday, February 1, 2017

For pro-life news updated throughout the day, visit LifeNews.com.

I AM A PERSON with Poem

Top Stories
• Planned Parenthood Slams Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch: He’ll Overturn Roe v. Wade
• Nancy Pelosi Throws a Fit Over Neil Gorsuch: “He’s Hostile to Women” Because He Opposes Abortion
• Senate Committee Approves Pro-Life Attorney General Nominee Jeff Sessions
• Whoopi Goldberg: Defunding Planned Parenthood Makes America “Not Much Different Than the Taliban”

More Pro-Life News
• Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch: “The Intentional Taking of Human Life is Always Wrong”
• Senate Committee Votes to Confirm Pro-Life Rep. Tom Price as HHS Secretary Despite Democrat Boycott
• Texas Governor Greg Abbott: “The Butchering of Unborn Babies” in Abortion is “Barbaric”
• Judge Neil Gorsuch’s Touching Tribute to Justice Antonin Scalia Will Make You Like Him Even More
• Episcopalian Priest: Christians Should Promote the Planned Parenthood Abortion Business
• Woman Writes: “I Had an Abortion Last Week Just Because I Wanted To”
• Pro-Abortion Members of Congress Introduce Bill to Force Americans to Pay For Abortions
• Woman Who Killed Her Newborn Baby Girl Minutes After Birth Won’t Go to Prison
• Totally Paralyzed Patients Use a Computer to Tell Doctors Their Thoughts, They Say They’re Happy
• New Poll: 80% of Americans Wants a SCOTUS Justice Who Interprets the Constitution as Written
• Late-Term Abortionist Resumes Doing Abortions But Does Them in the Middle of the Night
• Iowa Committee Passes Legislation to Defund Planned Parenthood Abortion Biz


Planned Parenthood Slams Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch: He’ll Overturn Roe v. Wade
The Planned Parenthood abortion business was quick to announce its opposition to President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.


Nancy Pelosi Throws a Fit Over Neil Gorsuch: “He’s Hostile to Women” Because He Opposes Abortion
Pro-abortion House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi threw a fit yesterday over President Donald Trump’s nomination of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Senate Committee Approves Pro-Life Attorney General Nominee Jeff Sessions
The Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday approved the nomination of Pro-Life Attorney General nominee Jeff Sessions.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Whoopi Goldberg: Defunding Planned Parenthood Makes America “Not Much Different Than the Taliban”
Tuesday on the View, host Whoopi Goldberg led a segment based off of the ridiculous question, “Is America becoming like the Taliban?”

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Supreme Court Nominee Neil Gorsuch: “The Intentional Taking of Human Life is Always Wrong”
It’s what millions of Americans had been waiting for – collectively holding their breath while joyfully anticipating the outcome.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

 

Senate Committee Votes to Confirm Pro-Life Rep. Tom Price as HHS Secretary Despite Democrat Boycott
Despite a boycott by Democrats on the panel of the vote, a Senate committee voted to confirm pro-life Congressman Tom Price as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.

Cli ck to Read at LifeNews.com.

Texas Governor Greg Abbott: “The Butchering of Unborn Babies” in Abortion is “Barbaric”
Texas is the Lone Star State for a reason. We stand apart as a model for the nation. But we must do more to establish higher standards that reflect respect for the sanctity of life.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

Judge Neil Gorsuch’s Touching Tribute to Justice Antonin Scalia Will Make You Like Him Even More
Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch and the late pro-life Justice Antonin Scalia have much in common.

Click to Read at LifeNews.com.

New Poll: 80% of Americans Wants a SCOTUS Justice Who Interprets the Constitution as Written

Daily Pro-Life News Report
Twice-Weekly Pro-Life
News Report
Receive a free daily email report from LifeNews.com with the latest pro-life news stories on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.
Receive a free twice-weekly email report with the latest pro-life news headlines on abortion, euthanasia and stem cell research. Sign up here.

Comments or questions? Email us at news@lifenews.com.
Copyright 2003-2017 LifeNews.com. All rights reserved.

I knew you life-begins-at-conception deliver-me dead-alive absurdities Would You two victums Saved us all Pro Life how many body parts PP Body Parts Healthcare Choice Andrea Why isit legal Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves so ROE hate God brave enough

Army Corps to Grant Easement Needed to Complete Dakota Access Pipeline


waving flagPosted by    Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 9:02pm | 1/31/2017 – 9:02pm

URL of the original posting site: http://legalinsurrection.com/2017/01/army-corps-to-grant-easement-needed-to-complete-dakota-access-pipeline/

Another campaign promise fulfilled.

http://www.daplpipelinefacts.com/

While everyone is focused on Trump’s Supreme Court nomination of Gorsuch, the Army Corps is pushing ahead with plans to complete the Dakota Access Pipeline.

From local news, KFYRTV:

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Senator John Hoeven issued the following statement after speaking today with Vice President Pence and Acting Secretary of the Army Robert Speer:

“Today, the Acting Secretary of the Army Robert Speer informed us that he has directed the Army Corps of Engineers to proceed with the easement needed to complete the Dakota Access Pipeline. This will enable the company to complete the project, which can and will be built with the necessary safety features to protect the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and others downstream.

“Building new energy infrastructure with the latest safeguards and technology is the safest and most environmentally sound way to move energy from where it is produced to where people need it.

 

“We are also working with the Corps, the Department of Justice, the Department of Interior and the Department of Homeland Security to secure additional federal law enforcement resources to support state and local law enforcement. On Sunday, 20 additional Bureau of Indian Affairs law enforcement officers arrived at Standing Rock to assist local authorities. Also, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribal Council has asked the protesters to leave the campsite on Corps land.

“This has been a difficult issue for all involved, particularly those who live and work in the area of the protest site, and we need to bring it to a peaceful resolution.”

Representative Kevin Cramer released the following statement after Speer’s message:

“I have received word the Department of Defense is granting the easement for the Dakota Access Pipeline and Congressional notification is imminent. It’s time to get to work and finish this important piece of energy infrastructure enhancing America’s energy security and putting North Dakotans and Americans back to work. President Trump has proven to be a man of action and I am grateful for his commitment to this and other critical infrastructure projects so vital to our nation.”

The Hill provides context:

Hoeven’s statement did not say the Army Corps has actually issued the easement, a step that would allow construction to move forward. An agency official did immediately reply to a request for comment on Tuesday.

The easement in question would allow Dakota Access developers to build the pipeline under Lake Oahe in North Dakota, nearing the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s reservation in the state.

The tribe, saying the pipeline threatens its water supply and sacred sites in the area, protested against it and brought a lawsuit to block it last year. The Army Corps approved but never issued the easement under President Obama, and in November administration officials said they would not issue the easement and instead conduct an environmental impact assessment of the line. That process could delay the project for years.

Dakota Access protests cropped up around the country before that announcement, and thousands of demonstrators established protest camps against it in North Dakota.

Follow Kemberlee on Twitter @kemberleekaye

The Clario n Project Newsletter for February 1, 2017


ClarionProject.org Facebook Twitter Youtube issue 383
2.1.2017

TOPSTORIES

U.S. Equips Kurdish Forces With Armored VehiclesU.S. Equips Kurdish Forces With Armored Vehicles

The Kurdish led Syrian Democratic Forces have long requested heavier support from the U.S. and now they’re getting it. learn more


Trump’s ‘Muslim Ban’

It’s not a ban, and it’s not on Muslims. It’s about Region, not Religion. Have your say!

Have your say! http://go.clarionproject.org/ban/


 

MORENEWS

Don’t Let CAIR Take Advantage

In the aftermath of Trump’s executive order, groups like the Council on American Islamic Relations are trying to increase their support.

learn more

Don’t Let CAIR Take Advantage

Why Terrorism?

Terrorism is a specific strategy that’s employed to advance the strategic goals of the groups which use it. Here’s why.

learn more

Why Terrorism?

Islamists Celebrate Presidential Primary Victory in France

As France readies to elect a new president, Islamists are rooting for the Socialist candidate Benoît Hamon, who just won his party’s primary.

learn more

Islamists Celebrate Presidential Primary Victory in France

Germany, Malaysia Make ISIS-Linked Arrests

German police officers also raided a mosque thought to be used as a recruiting ground for Islamic State. One suspect is a guard with a national airline.

learn more

Germany, Malaysia Make ISIS-Linked Arrests

ISIS Members Are Being Killed by Iraqis

Reports are emerging from Iraq that as the group loses ground, locals are taking revenge on Islamic State’s hated fighters.

learn more

ISIS Members Are Being Killed by Iraqis
Facebook

FEATUREDVIDEOS

ISIS' Leader's Sex-Slave Gift for You ISIS’ Leader’s Sex-Slave Gift for You

This first-person testimony tells of the horrors women face under the tyranny of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the ‘caliph’ of ISIS

Watch

READERSWRITE

J.R. [Re ‘Pakistan Fears Protests Following Terror Leader Arrest’]: If they interrogate him with sufficient firmness he should give up plenty of leads to the people who may orchestrate any ‘backlash’. Since Pakistan obviously was behind the 2008 attacks, it should have been Pakistan that received the backlash for the last few years.

J.R.

M.P.E. [Re ‘‘Punish Iran’ for Latest Missile Test’]: They have adhered to no part of the agreement so why would anyone think they would stop if we “punish” them?

M.P.E.

 

SUPPORT THE CLARION PROJECT’S VITAL WORK

The Clarion Project is a registered 501(c)(3). Donations are tax-deductible.

Donate now!

Clarion Project I 1717 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 1025, Washington DC 20006‏

Seen Around the Web


newest-whatdid-yousay-org-logo-january-23-2017 cared-about-homeless-veterans dems-standing-for-refugees-not-americans empty-tent-city-in-suadi-arabia flight-of-woman-rights-activist-to-suadi-arabia hey-starbucks lock-my-doors news-not-nes-anymore people-protesting-at-jfk safe-space seeing-throughfake-news-about-trumps-pause these-are-isis-flags-in-dearborn-mich travel-restriction-comparison trumps-muslim-ban what-sharia-law-will-mean-to-you when-free-men-take-up-swords

 

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


waving flagLie Detector

URL of the original posting site: http://comicallyincorrect.com/2017/02/01/lie-detector/

The Mainstream media easily ignores all of Obama’s lies, but to quick to call out Trump for lying when he speaks the truth.

Obama vs Trump Lying / Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2017.

More A.F. Branco cartoons at Patriot Update here.

A.F.Branco 2017 Calendar <—- Order Here!

propaganda machine

Tag Cloud