Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘Terrorist Attack’

BOOM: This Meme PERFECTLY Illustrates How To STOP A Terrorist Attack


waving flagPublished on July 23, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://clashdaily.com/2016/07/boom-meme-perfectly-illustrates-stop-terrorist-attack/

Want to know how you can stop a terrorist attack? Elmer Fudd shows us the perfect way.

Do you think that this would be the most effective method for stopping another Mohammed from blowing himself and others up?

qmeme_1469290229815_272

fight Picture1 true battle In God We Trust freedom combo 2


waving flagGirlsjustwannahaveguns Banner

TOP STORIES FROM GIRLS JUST WANNA HAVE GUNS

girls01 girls02 girls03 girls04 girls05 girls06 girls07 girls08Die true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

 

 

 

Wheel of Misfortune


waving flagPolitical Cartoons » Wheel of Misfortune

Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2015.

Terror Attack Blame

Terror Attack Blame – Obama blames Climate Change or anything else other than Radical Islam for terror attacks.

tyrants muslim-obama Obama Muslim collection cause of death In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Cartoonist Left Islam and Became Advocate for Free Speech


waving flagPosted on May 7, 2015 by

I’ve always admired people who stick up for their principles even under threat of violence or death. Thomas More, the “Man for All Seasons,” is a hero of mine.

After this week, I’ve got a couple of other heroes on my list. There’s Pamela Geller, who now has a fatwah, a death threat, on her head because she stood up for free speech against the world’s Islamo-fascists. And there’s Bosch Fawstin, the cartoonist who won both the judges prize and the People’s Choice prize at last weekend’s contest in Garland, Texas.

The winning drawingFawstin is also under threat of death by the backward forces of Islam, simply for drawing an image of Mohammed. It’s interesting that in all the talk about the failed terrorist attack in Garland, few if any news outlets have actually runFawstin’s winning illustration. It’s pretty nifty line art, and I especially like theHitlerian mustache.The image shows Mohammed threatening the artist, saying, “You can’t draw me!” and the artist responding, “That’s why I draw you.”

It’s clever, and I don’t think there’s anything offensive about it, unless you’re a Muslim who’s embarrassed to have his Prophet’s and fellow Muslims’ attitudes summed up in a sentence.

Many of the entries were offensive on various levels, from the naughty-but-funny to the truly cringe-inducing, but I don’t think any of them were necessarily inaccurate. Speaking as a fellow entrant, I think Fawstin’s piece was the right choice. (Mine was more a study for a painting, rather than a cartoon, but I thought it was important to represent for the First Amendment. I would post a link to all the contest entries, but the page seems to have been removed from Photobucket.)

In an exclusive interview with Breitbart, Fawstin explained that he was raised as a Muslim in the Bronx but left the religion. When 9/11 occurred, he researched his former faith extensively and decided that he had to use his artistic talents to stand up against jihad. From the Breitbart interview:

“I did receive some flack for leaving Islam, but I didn’t feel like I left anything important behind. I wanted to get the hell out. Islam had no hold on me whatsoever. It wasn’t a heartbreak, I just left.

“Right after I left Islam, 9/11 happened. I revisited everything. I reread the Koran. I read countless books on jihad, Islam, and Muhammad. I knew as a cartoonist, as an artist, I had a tool to respond to the atrocities. I made sure I knew Islam very well before making any move. 

“I became a follower of Ayn Rand’s philosophy and remain so to this day. Ironically, I went from the most misogynistic philosophy on earth, to that created by a woman. Without her work, I don’t know where the hell I’d be today.”

Fawstin’s discussion about growing up in a Muslim household underscores some of the things we’ve discussed about Islam here at Godfather Politics, including the sympathy for Nazism and the Left’s myth of the “moderate Muslim.”

“Almost all of the women in my generation were beaten by their husbands. There was strong admiration for Hitler in the household, because he killed more Jews than anyone. That’s why I refer to Hitler as Islam’s favorite infidel. They forgive him because he killed more Jews than anyone. we were ‘moderate Muslims,’ but there was still hardcore misogyny and Jew-hatred in my community.”

As might be expected from that champion of liberals-only speech, Facebook, Fawstin’s Facebook page has been removed, and Fawstin has been requesting that people share his winning cartoon with friends and associates.

The Left is abominable when it comes to protecting the free speech rights of anyone who is not in their PC club. Not only that, but Homeland Security has not even bothered contacting Geller about the Islamic death threat made against her on social media. (For that matter, I don’t think the threat has been taken down as of yet.)

But the Left — and I’m including here the RINO crowd and “moderate” Right — doesn’t get it. If we conservatives lose free speech to Islamic terror, it undercuts all our rights.freedom

While the Left may be fine with that, the rest of us who know the cost must stand up with Geller and Fawstin for free speech against the forces of jihad and totalitarianism.

OARLogo Picture6

United States Becoming Shariah-Compliant


By:  Bryan Fischer, Posted: Thursday, May 7, 2015

“The mere fact they argue Ms. Geller should have known better means they know that Islam is not in fact a religion of peace”

– Bryan Fischer

Let me stipulate up front that drawing caricatures of Muhammad as a form of social commentary is not my style. It’s not something I would do. And it’s not something the American Family Association would be a part of.

That being said, the reaction to Pamela Geller’s “Draw Muhammad” event in Garland, Texas is worrisome and is lurching the U.S. in the direction of becoming an abject, fearful Shariah-compliant nation rather than a proud, bold Christian one.  The issue is simple. Regardless of whether we would enter a contest like the one Ms. Geller sponsored, or even approve of it, the question is this: should somebody be murdered in cold blood for publishing a political cartoon? 

The First Amendment prohibits the federal government and all of its branches from interfering with “the freedom of speech.” By this plank, the Founders intended to protect robust political speech. first-amendment-flag

We as a nation had just emerged from an era in which the Crown sought to suppress and punish any political commentary it didn’t like, and the Founders made a point of ensuring that kind of oppression would not be acceptable in America.

(By the way, the Founders were protecting political speech. They were not protecting pornography, obscenity, vulgarity or even profanity. They would be scandalized at the way in which the First Amendment has been perverted to protect things that would have horrified them.)

The Texas state constitution is equally clear: Every person shall be at liberty to speak, write or publish his opinions on any subject, being responsible for the abuse of that privilege; and no law shall ever be passed curtailing the liberty of speech or of the press. 

This means that, in America, we must all be prepared to listen to political speech that agitates us and offends us. Trust me, this happens to conservatives every day when we read the New York Times and other members of the low-information media. 

Constitutional provisions regarding free speech mean public debate over the nature of Islam is fully protected. The government must protect freedom of robust political debate, and is prohibited from restricting it in any way. The merits of Islam, the truth about Islam, the truth about Muhammad, the question of Muslim immigration, etc. are all proper topics for public discussion.  Such debate includes, as it has since the dawn of the Republic, political cartoons, which were often used to make salient points on a matter of public concern. cropped-different-free-speech-ideologies.jpg

Many voices, on both the left and the right, have condemned Pamela Geller in this circumstance rather than the Muslim shooters. She has been blamed for getting shot at by figures on the right such as Donald Trump and Bill O’Reilly. She has been faulted for going ahead with her event knowing it could possibly trigger Islamic violence.

Such critics do not realize, by the way, what they are saying about the religion of Islam. The mere fact they argue Ms. Geller should have known better means they know that Islam is not in fact a religion of peace no matter how hard they try to convince themselves (and us) otherwise. Liberalism a mental disorder 2

Worse, arguing that no criticism of the prophet should be allowed in America because it might incite violence would in a functional sense place our entire nation under the rule of Shariah law. Christ, the Prophet of Christianity, could freely be criticized, lampooned and cartoon-ized but not Muhammad, the prophet of Islam. America would be turned upside down.

As James Taranto observed in the Wall Street Journal, “In the case at hand, it would effectively make Shariah’s prohibition on images of Muhammad the law of the land. The terrorists really would have won.” 

That’s not the America the Founders bequeathed to us. And it’s not the America we should accept today.OARLogo Picture6

Americans Have a Right to Insult Islam


waving flagBy Rich Lowry — May 5, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/417903/americans-have-right-insult-islam-rich-lowry

geller

My two cents

Below are a few of the less offensive cartoons submitted.

Je-Suis-Charlie-color-1_zpsaamxy8ck-770x550 Mohammad-contest-piece-4-small-1_zpsr4tzeyvq-630x1024 motoon_paul__green-1_zpsx6pjooow-770x1006 Muhamad-copy_zpsnic8t63v Muhammad-Say_zpsfsipoxmf Religion-of-Peace150-jpeg_zpsigfnbedg-758x1024 OARLogo Picture6

 

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon


Don’t Mess With Garland!


URL of the Original Posting Site: http://conservativebyte.com/2015/05/dont-mess-with-garland/

Garland-NRD-600
Liberalism a mental disorder 2 cause of death PUPPET MEDIA

We respect the will of the people as long as they are our people,

We respect the will of the people as long as they are our people,

news media bias Media-Scales-590-LI Liberal Media Bias cartoon-media-blinders-500 OARLogo Picture6

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: