Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘FOX NEWS CHannel’

Tucker Carlson Accuses Fox News of Perpetrating a ‘Dictatorship’ for Censoring White House Press Secretary

Reported by  

After Fox News host Neil Cavuto cut off White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany during an election-related press conference on Monday, ratings giant Tucker Carlson lambasted Cavuto and the network on his titular primetime program.

“In a democracy, you cannot ignore honest questions from citizens. You’re not allowed. You can’t dismiss them out of hand as crazy and immoral for asking. You can’t just cut away from coverage you don’t like. You can’t simply tell people to accept an outcome because force doesn’t work in a democracy. That’s dictatorship,” Carlson said.

“In a free society, you have to convince the public of your legitimacy. You have to win them over with reason. Democracy is always a voluntary arrangement. Telling voters to shut up is never enough,” he concluded.

The entire rant can be seen here:


He is responding to the shameful editorial decision by Cavuto and Fox News earlier in the day to censor McEnany in order to keep up the ruse that Joe Biden is the president-elect:

It is being speculated that Carlson may not be long for Fox News. However, he is a ratings giant who brings in the bacon to a network that is quickly growing reviled to its own core base.

Big League Politics has reported on how consumer boycotts from angry, triggered liberals have been ineffective at stopping the juggernaut freight train that is Carlson:

Fox News host Tucker Carlson has been dogged by ad boycotts from commercial terrorism entities like Sleeping Giants for telling the truth about the marxist Black Lives Matter revolution, but the whining of the snowflakes has not had much of an effect, as Carlson brings in tens of millions to Fox News.

According to MediaPost, ad revenues for prime time cable TV news shows have risen by 31.5 percent over the prior three-month period. Fox News did particularly well during this time period, rising 44.3 percent to $79.7 million, due to Carlson’s dominance as well as the success of Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham.

Standard Media Index’s Accu-TV says that “Tucker Carlson Tonight” raked in $37.2 million, ahead of “The Ingraham Angle” and “Hannity” by a small margin. Other more left-leaning news networks also rose during the period, as the public becomes more tuned into the news with a presidential election coming into focus. CNN rose 28.4 percent to $45.7 million and MSNBC gained 11.8 percent up to $33.3 million.

Big League Politics has reported about Carlson’s ratings dominance amidst his emergence as a lone voice of compassion and sanity for the forgotten man in America…

Carlson is cultivating America’s patriot awakening during a time in which it is being besieged by the enemies of civilization.

If Fox News dumps Carlson, it will probably be the death blow to the beleaguered network that has fallen far since founder Rupert Murdoch’s retirement.


Fmr NV AG Laxalt: ‘No Question’ Trump Would Have Won Nevada ‘Convincingly’ Without Mail-in Voting

Reported by JEFF POOR | 


Wednesday on Fox News Channel’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” former Nevada Attorney General Adam Laxalt decried changes to his state’s mail-in voting laws and subsequent decisions from a court that made it difficult for allies of President Donald Trump to monitor ballot-counting now underway.

According to Laxalt, the rules were changed 90 days out of the election.

“Let me first say we believe we have a path to victory, but the Democrats have absolutely stacked the deck against us in this election,” he said. “They’ve changed this election inside 90 days and as votes are being counted and America thinks that with all these mail-in ballots, that you think you have people watching that counting going on, we are still not allowed to watch the signature-matching. We are not allowed to challenge any of those signatures. So, they switch us to this new system, and they give us no right to be sure that only legal voters count. As America knows, those that stayed up like me all night — they dumped these at 3 a.m. They counted through the middle of the night.”

“They’re counting all day today,” Laxalt continued. “And we’re still having to wait until tomorrow. And we are still right at this second, not in that door. And I warned them about this — that if it came down to Nevada, we’d finally get people to pay attention to the fact that the Democrats didn’t give us this right, and a judge agreed that we weren’t entitled to this right. Of course, we disagreed with that, and we’re still fighting that. But just for your viewers, that has to be quite startling that almost 400,000 votes were cast last night, and there was no observation, no transparency. And you know, we’re supposed to just trust but not be able to verify.”

Laxalt said had the state not chosen a course for mail-in voting, Trump would have won Nevada over former Vice President Joe Biden “convincingly.”

“There is no question that Donald Trump would have won Nevada last night convincingly if we did not move to mail-in ballots,” he added. “And again, we don’t know how bad voters there are in this giant stack. We also know there are likely to be dead voters. There are likely to be people that have moved out of Las Vegas but found their ballots were still cast. So we’re looking into all of this, but it’s just astounding when you watch the news commentary last night about this. They keep acting these systems are foolproof, and there’s no way that any improper voter can get through. And it is just simply not true.”

Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor

Tucker Carlson: NY Times Threatening to Reveal Where I Live — ‘To Hurt Us, to Injure My Wife and Kids’

Reported by JEFF POOR | 

URL of the originating web site:

At the close of his program on Monday night, Fox News Channel’s Tucker Carlson revealed The New York Times had a story in the work that would divulge the location of his home, which could potentially put him and his family in harm’s way.

“Last week, The New York Times began working on a story about where my family and I live,” he said. “As a matter of journalism, there is no conceivable justification for a story like that. The paper is not alleging we’ve done anything wrong, and we haven’t. We pay our taxes. We like our neighbors. We’ve never had a dispute with anyone. So why is The New York Times doing a story on the location of my family’s house? Well, you know why. To hurt us, to injure my wife and kids so that I will shut up and stop disagreeing with them.”

Carlson reminded viewers that nearly two years ago, another such incident occurred when he was residing in Washington, D.C. An angry mob showed up at his home, forcing his wife to hide while the angry mob aligned with Antifa vandalized his home. He said the same could occur if The New York Times followed through with the story.

“Editors there know exactly what will happen to my family when it does run,” Carlson continued. “I called them today, and I told them. But they didn’t care. They hate my politics. They want this show off the air. If one of my children gets hurt because of a story they wrote, they won’t consider it collateral damage. They know it’s the whole point of the exercise: To inflict pain on our family, to terrorize us, to control, we say. That’s the kind of people they are.”

Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor

OUTRAGEOUS! Hidden from the American Public — 74-78% of COVID-19 Patients have At Least One Underlying Health Problem!

Reported By Jim Hoft | Published April 1, 2020 at 9:22am

As we reported earlier — There were 83,780 flu-pneumonia deaths in America this season. The CDC estimated 24,000 to 62,000 flu deaths this year.

We also have Washington DC experts continually changing their “scientific models.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci changed his estimates from 1.7 million deaths to 200,000 possible deaths in a span of 14 days!

TRENDING: In Midst of DC’s Coronavirus Shutdown, Ruth Bader Ginsburg Meets Trainer for Workouts at Supreme Court Gym

This is the same doctor who proposed shutting down the US economy.

The experts continue to promote “models” and “theories” at their press briefings.
Why not facts?

Jordan Schachtel


Birx looks at worst case scenario in Italy and decides we are going to model our response after them. Complete insanity, free from any data-based approach. The cure is not only worse than the disease. The cure is itself a poison pill.

VaPhilla Ice@newmanifest

Ugh. This isn’t rocket surgery. Quarantine the most vulnerable and continue common-sense social distancing and good hygiene, but plan to move back toward a functioning society within weeks, not months, or the economy won’t recover.

View image on Twitter

According to FOX News — 78% of COVID-19 Patients have At Least One Underlying Health Problem!

From this current CDC weekly report 74% had at least one underlying condition present (255/965 total).

When was the last time you heard this at a press conference?

And why do we not know the average age of the coronavirus patient in the US? In Italy the AVERAGE is 80-years-old. What about the US?

Today’s Two Politically INCORRECT Cartoons

French Election 2017 Translated

The French Presidential candidates look a very similar to some candidates here in the United States.

Great American Target

Now that the left has been successful in removing top media personality Bill O’Reilly, they now appear to have their sights on Sean Hannity.

Sean Hannity TargetCartoon by A.F Branco ©2017.

More A.F. Branco Cartoons at Net Right Daily.

A.F.Branco Coffee Table Book <—- Order Here!

Today’s TWO Politically INCORRECT Cartoons

Killing O’Reilly

Killing O’Reilly was a joint effort by the leftist mob, the mainstream media, the Murdoch Brothers, and, yes, Bill himself.

Third Term Wishes

The Obama presidency allowed our enemies to grow stronger as America grew weaker. What could he have done with 4 more years?

Obama Third Term / Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2017.

A.F.Branco Coffee Table Book <—- Order Here!

O’Reilly out at Fox News


Fox News host Bill O’Reilly will not return to the network, 21st Century Fox announced Wednesday. After a thorough and careful review of the allegations, the Company and Bill O’Reilly have agreed that Bill O’Reilly will not be returning to the Fox News Channel, the network said in a statement.

Reports emerged this week that 21st Century Fox was leaning toward ousting O’Reilly in the wake of sexual harassment allegations.

New York Magazine’s Gabriel Sherman reported hours earlier that Fox News had decided to oust O’Reilly and execs were in talks about how to end the relationship “without causing collateral damage to the network.”


O’Reilly’s show lost about 90 advertisers after The New York Times reported earlier this month that five women were paid $13 million to settle sexual harassment suits.

21st Century Fox owner Rupert Murdoch had reportedly said he was reluctant to fire O’Reilly because it would look like The New York Times report forced his hand.Fox also announced Wednesday that Tucker Carlson is moving into O’Reilly’s highly coveted 8 p.m. time slot. “The O’Reilly Factor” has been the top-rated cable news show for the past 15 years, creating big shoes to fill. But Carlson has shown a knack for big ratings at Fox. Originally airing at 7 p.m. when it debuted in September, “Tucker Carlson Tonight” was moved to the 9 p.m. spot after Megyn Kelly left Fox News in November. Kelly had been the second most-watched host on cable, but Carlson bested her ratings in the time slot.

Taking over at 9 p.m. will be “The Five,” a panel show with six co-hosts: Kimberly Guilfoyle, Dana Perino, Bock Beckel, Greg Gutfeld, Jesse Watters and Juan Williams.

And the newly-open 5 p.m. spot will go to a new show hosted by Eric Bolling, a longtime O’Reilly fill-in and former “The Five” co-host. Bolling’s show will debut May 1, with “Special Report with Bret Baier” stretching to two hours to fill the time until then.

A lawyer for O’Reilly said Monday that the host had been subject to a “smear campaign” by far-left groups.

“Bill O’Reilly has been subjected to a brutal campaign of character assassination that is unprecedented in post-McCarthyist America,” Marc E. Kasowitz said in a statement Tuesday, according to CNN.

The script that led to the official announcement of O’Reilly’s departure mirrored that of former Fox News Chairman and CEO Roger Ailes’s ouster.

In July 2016, Ailes was accused of sexual harassment by former host Gretchen Carlson, who filed suit in a New Jersey court. An internal investigation led by the law firm of Paul, Weiss resulted in Ailes’s abrupt departure two weeks later as more claims, including one by star Megyn Kelly, were revealed to investigators. Ailes had been with Fox News since its inception 20 years prior.

Similarly, on April 1, the New York Times report rocked the media world after revealing O’Reilly or 21st Century Fox had paid $13 million to settle harassment claims from five women.

An investigation at Fox by Paul, Weiss followed. Not long after, the company announced the most-watched cable news host of the past 15 years was not returning to the network he has called home since 1996.

All told, Fox News has lost three of its biggest names from its roster in the last year: Ailes, the brains behind the operation that propelled the network to dominance since 2001; Megyn Kelly, who was so coveted by the network she was reportedly offered $100 million to stay; and O’Reilly, who was essentially the face of the network and host of the most popular program at 8 p.m. weeknights.

Despite these losses, Fox News has continued to beat all comers in cable ratings, including non-news networks.

During the week of April 10-16, Fox finished ahead of all other basic cable channels in total viewers for the 15th consecutive week, according to Nielsen Media Research.

– Updated at 3:18 p.m.

Officials announce proposal that would establish California as separate nation

waving flagPublished January 27, 2017 |

URL of the original posting site:

A proposal for California to secede from the United States was submitted to the Secretary of State’s Office Thursday. The proposed “Calexit” initiative – its name borrowed from the UK’s “Brexit” departure from the EU – would ask voters to repeal part of the state constitution that declares California an inseparable part of the U.S.

A recent poll found that one in three California residents would support a possible secession from the U.S. due to their opposition to President Trump. No mention has been made of the president in the proposal. If the proposal qualifies for the ballot and is approved by voters, it could be a step to a future vote on whether the state would break away from the rest of the nation.trump-derangement-mental-disorder

Secretary of State Alex Padilla said the group behind the proposal, Yes California Independence Campaign, was cleared to begin attempting to collect nearly 600,000 voter signatures needed to place the plan on the ballot.

“In our view, the United States of America represents so many things that conflict with Californian values, and our continued statehood means California will continue subsidizing the other states to our own detriment, and to the detriment of our children,” the Yes campaign’s website says.liberal-leftist-derangement-syndrom

Similar attempts to establish California as a nation, or break it into multiple states, have failed.

The proposed constitutional amendment, titled California Nationhood, would also ask voters to repeal language that states the U.S. Constitution is the supreme law. If approved, it calls for scheduling a vote in 2019 to ask voters, “Should California become a free, sovereign and independent country?”

“America already hates California, and America votes on emotions,” Marcus Evans, vice president of Yes California told the Los Angeles Times. “I think we’d have the votes today if we held it.”

The campaign must submit the valid voter signatures by July 25 to qualify for the ballot.picture2

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

SEE VIDEO OF THE TUCKER CARLSON INTERVIEW BELOW:<noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href=""></a></noscript>&#8221; href=”http://<noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href=""></a></noscript>&#8221; rel=”<noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href=""></a></noscript>”&gt;<noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href=""></a></noscript&gt; aligncenter wp-image-27294″ title=”<noscript>Watch the latest video at <a href=""></a></noscript>&#8221; src=”; alt=”calexit” width=”1026″ height=”762″ />

Giuliani: Uniformed Police Officers Not Allowed on Democratic Convention Floor

waving flagby Jeff Poor, 28 Jul 2016

URL of the original posting site:

Thursday on Fox News Channel’s “Fox & Friends,” in an appearance from the site of the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani called the convention “the most anti-police” and “the most anti-law enforcement” he had ever seen.

However, he also said that according to “high-ranking police officers” in Philadelphia, uniformed law enforcement was not allowed on the floor of the convention.

“This is the most anti-police, anti-law enforcement convention I’ve ever seen in my whole life. There was not a uniformed police officer allowed on the convention floor. I was told that by four high-ranking police officers, two of whom I’ve known for a very long time. And then I walked the floor for very long time and I couldn’t find a single officer. Go look at your footage.  You find me a uniform. Hillary Clinton didn’t want uniformed police officers on the convention floor.”

Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor

Judge Jeanine: The Establishment Trying to Take Nomination From Trump Is ‘Un-American’

waving flagby Trent Baker9 Apr 2016

URL of the original posting site:

On the Saturday broadcast of “Justice” on Fox News Channel, host Judge Jeanine Pirro went after the GOP establishment, who she noted is still trying to keep GOP front-runner Donald Trump from getting the nomination. Pirro argued ignoring the people’s votes and choosing someone else as a nominee would be “un-American” of the establishment.

“The Republicans actually take the cake. They are not even hiding what they plan to do. They are about to change the rules, ignore the votes of people who waited in line for hours and invalidate the votes of people who have never voted before, and put in a candidate they think is good for them. Whatever happened to your vote matters? Not only is that infuriating, it is un-American,” said Pirro.AMEN



Follow Trent Baker on Twitter @MagnifiTrent

Help destroy Picture1 true battle freedom combo 2

Ann Coulter Letter; “Fox News Anchored In Stupidity on 14th Amendment

waving flagAnn Coulter  | 

URL of the original posting site:

Fox News Anchored In Stupidity on 14th Amendment

Based on the hysterical flailing at Donald Trump — He’s a buffoon! He’s a clown! He calls people names! He’s too conservative! He’s not conservative enough! He won’t give details! His details won’t work! — I gather certain Republicans are determined to drive him from the race.

These same Republicans never object to other candidates who lack traditional presidential resumes — Carly Fiorina, Ben Carson, Newt Gingrich and Herman Cain, to name a few. I’m beginning to suspect it’s all about Trump’s opposition to mass immigration from the Third World.

Amid the hysteria, Trump is the only one speaking clearly and logically, while his detractors keep making utter asses of themselves.

By my count — so far — Fiorina, Chris Christie, Rick Perry and the entire Fox News commentariat are unfamiliar with a period of the nation’s history known as “the Civil War.” They seem to believe that the post-Civil War amendments were designed to ensure that the children of illegal aliens would be citizens, “anchor babies,” who can then bring in the whole family. (You wouldn’t want to break up families, would you?)

As FNC’s Bill O’Reilly authoritatively informed Donald Trump on Tuesday night: “The 14th Amendment says if you’re born here, you’re an American!”

I cover anchor babies in about five pages of my book, Adios, America, but apparently Bill O’Reilly and the rest of the scholars on Fox News aren’t what we call “readers.”

Still, how could anyone — even a not-very-bright person — imagine that granting citizenship to the children of illegal aliens is actually in our Constitution? I know the country was exuberant after the war, but I really don’t think our plate was so clear that Americans were consumed with passing a constitutional amendment to make illegal aliens’ kids citizens.

Put differently: Give me a scenario — just one scenario — where guaranteeing the citizenship of children born to illegals would be important to Americans in 1868. You can make it up. It doesn’t have to be a true scenario. Any scenario!

You know what’s really bothering me? If someone comes into the country illegally and has a kid, that kid should be an American citizen!

Damn straight they should!

We’ve got to codify that.


No, it isn’t, but that amendment will pass like wildfire!

It’s like being accused of robbing a homeless person. (1) I didn’t; (2) WHY WOULD I DO THAT?

“Luckily,” as FNC’s Shannon Bream put it Monday night, Fox had an “expert” to explain the details: Judge Andrew Napolitano, Fox’s senior judicial analyst.

Napolitano at least got the century right. He mentioned the Civil War — and then went on to inform Bream that the purpose of the 14th Amendment was to — I quote — “make certain that the former slaves and the native Americans would be recognized as American citizens no matter what kind of prejudice there might be against them.”

Huh. In 1884, 16 years after the 14th Amendment was ratified, John Elk, who — as you may have surmised by his name — was an Indian, had to go to the Supreme Court to argue that he was an American citizen because he was born in the United States.

He lost. In Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94, the Supreme Court ruled that the 14th Amendment did not grant Indians citizenship.

The “main object of the opening sentence of the Fourteenth Amendment,” the court explained — and not for the first or last time — “was to settle the question, upon which there had been a difference of opinion throughout the country and in this court, as to the citizenship of free negroes and to put it beyond doubt that all persons, white or black … should be citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside.”

American Indians were not made citizens until 1924. Lo those 56 years after the ratification of the 14th Amendment, Indians were not American citizens, despite the considered opinion of Judge Napolitano.

Of course it’s easy for legal experts to miss the welter of rulings on Indian citizenship inasmuch as they obtained citizenship in a law perplexingly titled: “THE INDIAN CITIZENSHIP ACT OF 1924.”

Yeah, Trump’s the idiot. Or as Bream said to Napolitano after his completely insane analysis, “I feel smarter just having been in your presence.”

The only reason the 14th Amendment doesn’t just come out and say “black people” is that — despite our Constitution being the product of vicious racists, who were dedicated to promoting white privilege and keeping down the black man (Hat tip: Ta-Nehisi Coates) — the Constitution never, ever mentions race.

Nonetheless, until Fox News’ scholars weighed in, there was little confusion about the purpose of the 14th Amendment. It was to “correct” — as Jack Nicholson said in “The Shining” — the Democrats, who refused to acknowledge that they lost the Civil War and had to start treating black people like citizens.

On one hand, we have noted legal expert Bill O’Reilly haranguing Donald Trump: “YOU WANT ME TO QUOTE YOU THE AMENDMENT??? IF YOU’RE BORN HERE YOU’RE AN AMERICAN. PERIOD! PERIOD!” (No, Bill — there’s no period. More like: “comma,” to parents born “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States “and of the state wherein they reside.”)

But on the other hand, we have Justice John Marshall Harlan II, who despite not being a Fox News legal expert, was no slouch. He wrote in the 1967 case, Afroyim v. Rusk, that the sponsors of the 14th Amendment feared that:

“Unless citizenship were defined, freedmen might, under the reasoning of the Dred Scott decision, be excluded by the courts from the scope of the amendment. It was agreed that, since the ‘courts have stumbled on the subject,’ it would be prudent to remove the ‘doubt thrown over’ it. The clause would essentially overrule Dred Scott and place beyond question the freedmen’s right of citizenship because of birth.”

It is true that in a divided 1898 case, U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, the Supreme Court granted citizenship to the children born to legal immigrants, with certain exceptions, such as for diplomats. But that decision was so obviously wrong, even the Yale Law Journal ridiculed it.

The majority opinion relied on feudal law regarding citizenship in a monarchy, rather than the Roman law pertaining to a republic — the illogic of which should be immediately apparent to American history buffs, who will recall an incident in our nation’s history known as “the American Revolution.”

Citizenship in a monarchy was all about geography — as it is in countries bristling with lords and vassals, which should not be confused with this country. Thus, under the majority’s logic in Wong Kim Ark, children born to American parents traveling in England would not be American citizens, but British subjects.

As ridiculous as it was to grant citizenship to the children born to legal immigrants under the 14th Amendment (which was about what again? That’s right: slaves freed by the Civil War), that’s a whole order of business different from allowing illegal aliens to sneak across the border, drop a baby and say, Ha-ha! You didn’t catch me! My kid’s a citizen

– while Americans curse impotently under their breath.

As the Supreme Court said in Elk: “[N]o one can become a citizen of a nation without its consent.”

The anchor baby scam was invented 30 years ago by a liberal zealot, Justice William Brennan, who slipped a footnote into a 1982 Supreme Court opinion announcing that the kids born to illegals on U.S. soil are citizens. Fox News is treating Brennan’s crayon scratchings on the Constitution as part of our precious national inheritance.

Judge Richard Posner of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals is America’s most-cited federal judge — and, by the way, no friend to conservatives. In 2003, he wrote a concurrence simply in order to demand that Congress pass a law to stop “awarding citizenship to everyone born in the United States.”

The purpose of the 14th Amendment, he said, was “to grant citizenship to the recently freed slaves,” adding that “Congress would not be flouting the Constitution” if it passed a law “to put an end to the nonsense.”

In a statement so sane that Posner is NEVER going to be invited on Fox News, he wrote: “We should not be encouraging foreigners to come to the United States solely to enable them to confer U.S. citizenship on their future children. But the way to stop that abuse of hospitality is to remove the incentive by changing the rule on citizenship.”

Forget the intricate jurisprudential dispute between Fox News blowhards and the most-cited federal judge. How about basic common sense? Citizenship in our nation is not a game of Red Rover with the Border Patrol! The Constitution does not say otherwise.

Our history and our Constitution are being perverted for the sole purpose of dumping immigrants on the country to take American jobs. So far, only Donald Trump is defending black history on the issue of the 14th Amendment. Fox News is using black people as a false flag to keep cheap Third World labor flowing.

Today’s Politically INCORRECT Cartoon

waving flagA Serious Enemy

GOP motorcycle ride and pig roast draws seven presidential hopefuls – and major media coverage

Sen. Joni Ernst, shown here on her prized Harley Davidson, will lead a 40-mile motorcyle ride on Saturday - joined by Gov. Scott Walker and Rick Perry. (Image from Sen. Joni Ernst)
Sen. Joni Ernst, shown here on her prized Harley Davidson, will lead a 40-mile motorcyle ride on Saturday – joined by Gov. Scott Walker and Rick Perry. (Image from Sen. Joni Ernst) more >


This pig roast could trump a certain steak fry – and it will certainly go down as a moment in Republican pop culture history. That would be “Joni’s First Annual Roast and Ride,” a bodacious event on Saturday organized by Sen. Joni Ernst. It includes a 40-mile motorcycle ride across the Iowa countryside to honor military veterans – boasting good cheer, thudding bikes and a full police escort – naturally led by the Republican herself, a combat vet and a Harley fan. Next up on the agenda: “a big pig roast,” the lawmaker says, plus a political rally of the old school kind with much speechifying, plenty of good eats and a country rock band.

The event has drawn seven Republican presidential hopefuls and major media as well.

The inaugural Roast and Ride is already being compared to former Sen. Tom Harkin’s annual steak fry, a tradition the Iowa Democrat kept going for four decades. Some locals are whispering that the Ernst party could best the Harkin fete; the barbecue gurus expect to serve 700 pounds of pork alone as the afternoon goes on.

There’s spectacle – and photo ops. Indeed, GOP candidates hopefuls will line up at the podium, including Gov. Scott Walker and Rick Perry. Both plan to make the ride aboard Harley hogs from the excursion’s starting point outside of Des Moines, meandering northwards to Boone. They’ll likely be front and center on the line.

Also on hand: Ben Carson, Carly Fiorina, Mike Huckabee, Sens. Lindsey Graham and Marco Rubio. The quiet word among organizers is that Mrs. Ernst offered Mr. Rubio a spot on the back of her bike – but he turned the offer down, apparently. The candidates have also been encouraged to try their hand at horseshoes, wiffle ball and perhaps some artful pork chop flipping.

Gov. Scott Walker rides his 2003 Harley Davidson Road King (image from Gov. Scott Walker)
Gov. Scott Walker rides his 2003 Harley Davidson Road King (image from … more >

Prominent politicos and conservative stalwarts will also be in the crowd, including Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad, Sens. Chuck Grassley and Tom Cotton of Arkansas, plus Reps. Steve King and David Young.

The press is eager, to say the least. C-SPAN, of course, will be there to bear witness to the big doings from 2 p.m. ET on Saturday, along with the FOX News Channel, which has sent senior correspondent John Roberts to the Hawkeye State. CNN, will feature chief Congressional correspondent Dana Bash who will interview Mrs. Ernst herself, along with Mssrs. Cotton, Graham and Perry. ABC News is also poised for coverage, showcasing their finds on “This Week with George Stephanopoulos.”

freedom combo 2

Emails reportedly show confidant told Clinton Benghazi attack planned by fighters tied to Al Qaeda

Published May 21, 2015,

URL of the Original Posting Site:

A longtime Clinton confidant reportedly advised then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton two days after the 2012 Benghazi terror attack that an Al Qaeda-tied group had planned the deadly assault and used a protest as cover — but despite this warning, Clinton’s U.N. ambassador went on to publicly claim the attack was “spontaneous.”

The guidance from ex-Clinton aide Sidney Blumenthal was contained in a memo sent Sept. 13, according to The New York Times. It is the latest documentation effectively contradicting the administration’s early narrative that the attack was driven by protests over an anti-Islam Internet video — and raising questions over why officials stuck to that story for days.  According to the Times, Blumenthal initially blamed “demonstrators” angry over that video for the attacks. But the next day, he sent Clinton a very different memo. According to the Times, Blumenthal told Clinton the attack was driven by Al Qaeda-tied Ansar al-Shariah members who had planned it for a month and used a protest as cover. He cited “sensitive sources.”

“We should get this around asap,” Clinton reportedly told an adviser in response. Yet, despite this guidance, then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice would go on several television programs Sept. 16 to claim the attacks were “spontaneous,” and not premeditated, and link them to protests over the anti-Islam video.

The State Department would later admit there was no protest on the ground in Benghazi that day. The role of the video continues to be debated to this day, but a mounting body of evidence has emerged showing multiple assessments that the attack was to some degree planned.  Fox News reported earlier this week that a Defense Intelligence Agency report from Sept. 12 also said there were indicators the attack was planned and meant as retaliation for a drone strike that killed an Al Qaeda strategist.

The memo, obtained through a federal lawsuit by conservative watchdog Judicial Watch, said: “The attack was planned ten or more days prior to approximately 01 September 2012. The intention was to attack the consulate and to kill as many Americans as possible to seek revenge for the US killing of Aboyahiye (Alaliby) in Pakistan and in memorial of the 11 September 2001 attacks on the World Trade Center buildings.” Additional memos surfaced last year indicating Rice — now the national security adviser — was prepped before those Sept. 16 Sunday shows. One email from a top administration adviser specifically drew attention to the anti-Islam Internet video, without distinguishing whether the Benghazi attack was different from protests elsewhere in the region which were over the video.

The email listed the following goal, among others: “To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy.” 

A congressional committee is probing the handling of the Benghazi attacks, and the administration’s Internet-video narrative is sure to be just one of many aspects investigated. The emails reported by the Times were part of a batch given to that committee. The Times reported that Blumenthal, who has been subpoenaed by the committee, sent at least 25 memos on Libya to Clinton, including several on the 2012 attacks.

The Times earlier reported that while he was sending memos, Blumenthal also was advising business associates who were hoping to win contracts from Libya’s transitional post-Qaddafi government. The Times report did not make clear what, if anything, Clinton and the State Department knew of Blumenthal’s involvement in any potential business projects in Libya. The Times also reported Thursday that the former secretary of state’s emails reflected she had “sensitive but unclassified” information in her account — operated on a personal email address.

This reportedly included information on travel plans of U.S. officials in Libya.



freedom combo 2

Bill O’Reilly calls allegations he abused ex-wife ‘100 percent false’

Yahoo News

URL of the Original Posting Site:

Bill O'Reilly (Frank Micelotta/Invsion/AP)
Bill O’Reilly (Frank Micelotta/Invsion/AP)

Bill O’Reilly is denying a report that he physically abused his former wife. “All allegations against me in these circumstances are 100 percent false,” the Fox News host said in a statement issued through his attorney to the Hollywood Reporter.

Those allegations surfaced Monday when Gawker reported details leaked from a recently-ended three-year custody battle between O’Reilly and his ex-wife, Maureen McPhilmy. According to Gawker, “a court-appointed forensic examiner testified at a closed hearing that O’Reilly’s daughter claimed to have witnessed her father dragging McPhilmy down a staircase by her neck, apparently unaware that the daughter was watching.”Picture3

The incident allegedly occurred in the couple’s Manhasset, Long Island, home prior to their 2010 separation. They divorced in 2011. Last month, a Nassau County court granted McPhilmy custody of the couple’s two minor children. Documents from the custody dispute are sealed. The website said it learned details from “a source familiar with the facts of the case.”Picture4

“I am going to respect the court-mandated confidentiality put in place to protect my children and will not comment any further,” O’Reilly said.

He did not address the allegation on Monday’s “O’Reilly Factor”. In the past, O’Reilly has frequently used his top-rated cable news show to tackle controversies head-on. In February, he dismissed allegations by former CBS News colleagues who disputed his description of Buenos Aires, Argentina, as a “combat situation” during the 1982 Falklands War.

“I was there on the street with my camera crews,” O’Reilly said on “Factor.” “The violence was horrific, as Argentine soldiers fired into the crowd, who were responding with violent acts of their own.”Picture5

OARLogo Picture6

Ralph Peters: Obama is the reincarnation of Pontius Pilate but Christian blood NOT going to wash off

Posted by The Right Scoop on Feb 25, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site:

Screen Shot 2015-02-25 at 9.39.08 AMRalph Peters was on Fox News this morning and really made the case that Christian civilization is being wiped off the map by the Islamo-Nazis in the Middle East, saying this is indeed a holocaust and our president is doing nothing. He then called Obama a reincarnation of Pontius Pilate washing his hands, but he said this blood is not coming off:

“But what we are seeing now is an Islamist attempt to exterminate the last vestiges of Christian civilization in the Middle East. After the holocaust of World War II the world said never again. But Bill O’Reilly is right, it’s happening again. It is a genuine holocaust against Christians.

  • These Christians are kidnapped. Our president does nothing.
  • Christians are tortured and even crucified publicly. Our president does nothing.
  • The Christian women are kidnapped and raped and raped again. Our president does nothing.
  • Christians are driven from their homes in the Middle East but the hundreds of thousands, slaughtered by the tens of thousands, and our president does nothing!
  • He is the reincarnation of Pontius Pilate washing his hands, but this blood is not coming off.”

Watch the full clip below:

Freedom with Prayer

Bill O’Reilly: The ISIS atrocities continue as a cowardly world does little

 By  Bill O'Reilly, Published February 25, 2015,


Perhaps as many as 90 Christians in Syria have been taken hostage by the ISIS jihadists. We should all pray for those people who may very well be beheaded or burned alive.

Also the United Nations high commissioner for human rights has issued a report that says the following. ISIS atrocities include;

  • rape,
  • slavery,
  • trafficking of women and children,
  • forced recruitment of children,
  • killings of civilians
  • and kidnappings.
  • The U.N. agency says young girls are being forced into marriages;
  • young boys being trained as jihadi fighters. We have seen video of that. And it is appalling.
  • These young boys are being brainwashed,
  • trained to kill.
  • They are powerless to stop ISIS from abusing them.culture of deceit and lies

Meanwhile the world dithers. There is no organized campaign on the ground to stop the atrocities or to defeat the ISIS savages. What a disgrace.

In an excellent bit of reporting from northern Iraq, NBC correspondent Richard Engel interviewed two women who escaped from the ISIS abusers.

RICHARD ENGEL, NBC CHIEF FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT: ISIS is reviving the barbaric tradition of the slave trade, proudly showing its fighters in this ISIS video discussing the Yazidi women they are about to buy.

We showed Farida the video. She instantly recognized the men.

“All of the girls were screaming and crying because they didn’t want to go with them,” she says, “so they beat the girls and dragged them away by force.”

Farida was raped repeatedly for three months.

“They sold me from one man to the next,” she says. The ordeal was even harder for the younger ones.

There is a word we don’t use a lot in the news media but it fits here. This is evil. It was absolute evil by design. This was not a war crime that happened by accident. This is ISIS policy.

O’REILLY: Again, excellent reporting by Richard Engel. And he is right. The news media does not like to use the word “evil” but that’s what the world is witnessing. Once again, Talking Points will remind that you that these ISIS thugs are the same as the Nazis who slaughtered millions of people before and during World War II. There’s no difference in the mentality, none at all. And once again, the world is standing by doing little while the ISIS menace grows spreading all over the Middle East and North Africa.Christian Persecution

President Obama is not taking the lead. His stated 60 nation coalition is invisible. And the other nations of the world are even worse. How long are these atrocities going to continue before the world unites against these savages? How long?muslim-obama Islamapologist Obama Muslim collection

And that’s “The Memo”.

Freedom with Prayer

VIDEO: Dr. Alveda King Calls for Nationwide Prayer to Restore the Dream in 2014

MId Term drawing

October 20, 2014 By

Read More At: (1)
Civil rights leader, Dr. Alveda King, the niece of Martin Luther King, Jr., appeared on FOX & Friends with Steve Doocy to discuss the Restore the Dream in 2014 project.

After discussing how black Americans are far worse off by several different statistical measures, Doocy asks Dr. King what the plan is to get the black community back on track.

“We actually want to educate the community. We want you to look at the facts, not respond to the fear tactics that we’re experiencing,” Dr. King told Doocy. “I really want to say to that soccer mom, to that single mom, to that struggling family, ‘Don’t panic. Don’t let fear overtake you.’”

The “Restore the Dream -2014″ project was started by’s Niger Innis, and includes several high profile black leaders, including successful radio host Wayne Dupree, Rocky Mountain Black Conservatives founder Derrick Wilburn, Conservative Review president Deneen Borelli, FreedomWorks’ the Rev. C.L. Bryant, columnist Star Parker, Conservative Campaign Committee chairman Lloyd Marcus, columnist Star Parker, and former U.N. Civil Rights ambassador Ken Blackwell.

RELATED:  Martin Luther King, Jr. Niece: ‘Moral Bankruptcy’ Ruling Washington D.C. Under Obama

“I really want to call this nation to prayer. I really want to call our president to prayer,” Dr. King urged. “I believe that if we start at that point, as we were, here in 2014 to restore the dream, we’ll have answers,” she asserted.




Article collective closing

Mark Levin: ‘Have You Noticed Nothing Really Works Under This President?’


By Susan Jones / October 2, 2014 – 6:35 AM

( – “[H]ave you noticed really works under this president, from the Secret Service to immigration to the economy?” conservative mark levintalk-radio host Mark Levin asked Fox News’s Sean Hannity Wednesday night.

“Is there anything this president, from your perspective, has done well?” Hannity asked Levin.

“No. There’s not a thing he’s done well,” Levin replied. “And here’s the problem, Sean. People who support big government, centralized government, liberalism — well, congratulations, you have it. And it’s an absolute disaster.’

“And here’s what’s remarkable to me. He doesn’t go back and actually look at something, have some circumspection, say, You know, we’re going to fix Obamacare. Let’s pull back. Maybe we bit off more than we can chew. It’s full speed ahead, the foot on the gas pedal.”


“Now it’s going to be executive imperial fiats for amnesty! He’s looking for all these other areas where he can nationalize what shouldn’t be nationalized, where he’s undermining what shouldn’t be undermined. It’s just like one thing after another after another!’

“This guy does not want to be president. This guy continues to be that community organizer, or disorganizer…sitting in the Oval Office, throwing political mudballs in every direction he possibly can!’

“Have you noticed when he’s happiest?” Levin asked. “He’s happiest when he’s campaigning, trashing Republicans, trashing conservatives, trashing capitalism, trashing the Constitution. That’s right. He’s never really happy doing the job he’s supposed to do!”

Hannity asked Levin about Obama, in a “60 Minutes” interview, blaming his national intelligence director for underestimating the ability of ISIS/ISIL “to reconstitute themselves and take advantage of that chaos” in remote areas of Syria.…

“It is my contention that the president of the United States right now is in a full-blown cover-up. That’s why he went to his favorite ’60 Minutes’ correspondent, Steve Kroft. That’s why he blamed his intelligence agencies for this,” Levin said.

“This has nothing to do with the intelligence agencies. It has to do with the intelligence between his ears! And the fact of the matter is, he’s not paying attention to his job! He’s not attentive to what a president’s supposed to be attentive to because he’s so busy revolutionizing our economy and our government and transforming it, he’s not doing his job!”

Levin wondered if Obama is even reading his intelligence briefings when he reportedly has skipped 60 percent of the face-to-face meetings to discuss those briefings.

“It’s time to hold him to account,” Levin said, noting that some of the information passed along to Obama shows up in newspapers. “The country’s falling apart! It’s unraveling! Everything you look at is a mess! It’s time to pin him down on something! And this is life and death. This is war and peace.’

“And by the way, while we’re at it, Congress declares war! Will John Boehner and Mitch McConnell draw up a declaration of war, or are we going to continue to allow this president to conduct himself — and let me be very clear, and I don’t mean to be provocative about this — he is now fighting a political war! These pinpricks are not stopping ISIS. ISIS is about to conquer Baghdad. It’s on the move on the Turkish border. It’s more powerful this month than it was last month, despite our bombing raids.’

“Obama has the military on a short leash. Now, let’s let them off the leash. Let’s declare war. And let’s defeat them. This is World War III, and we need World War II tactics.”

Article collective closing

Bill O’Reilly: American Mercenary Army Needed to Defeat ISIS


Joe For AmericaSeptember 23, 2014


Whether you love or hate Bill O’Reilly, you have to admit he’s always got his cogs turning. Last night he discussed a concept for defeating terrorist BO1groups by forming an American-controlled elite army of mercenary soldiers, handpicked by U.S. special tactics experts.

Professor Tom Nichols of the U.S. Naval War College.

O’Reilly was challenged on the feasibility of his “Anti-Terror Army” by one such expert–professor Tom Nichols of the U.S. Naval War College.

Despite the logistical obstacles Nichols points out, O’Reilly remains convinced a mercenary army would free the world of terrorists. Worth a try? What do you think of O’Reilly’s plan? Tell Joe For America your opinion, after reading the following coverage by Newsmax.

Fox News Channel’s Bill O’Reilly is calling for a mercenary force to take out the Islamic State (ISIS). 

President Barack Obama has vowed to put no American “boots on the ground” in Iraq or Imperial Islamic President ObamaSyria, fighting ISIS only through airstrikes and ground forces from the Free Syrian Army, Iraq and the Kurdish Peshmerga. 

O’Reilly, on his show Monday night, noted that military experts say the United States has no hope of defeating the terror group without more significant ground forces. But with the American public unwilling to get involved in another Middle East ground war the troops will have to come from somewhere else. 

O’Reilly wants hired mercenaries. 

He suggested a 25,000-member force he would call The Anti-Terror Army, “elite fighters who would be well-paid, well-trained to defeat terrorists all over the world.” 

The fighters would be recruited by the United States and trained on U.S. soil by American special operations forces. U.S. Army rules of engagement and the Geneva Conventions would be followed. 

America would be in charge of who makes the cut and where they are deployed, O’Reilly said. American and NATO officers would lead the mercenary army, and America would provide logistical support. 

The army would be able to take on terrorists worldwide, but the first forces would be places in the Kurdistan region of northern Iraq. 

The coalition that Obama currently is trying to build would pay for them, O’Reilly said, and anyone who wants protection would have to chip in. 

“If they don’t pay, they get no help,” he said. 

Current soldiers in any army would be excluded with the exception of U.S. and NATO commanders. 

Tom Nichols, professor at U.S. Naval War College, told O’Reilly he understands his frustration, but added, “this is a terrible idea” from both moral and practical perspectives. 

America can’t outsource its national security, Nichols said. 

“We’re not talking about ‘Expendibles 8′ here,” O’Reilly protested, adding that Americans have hired mercenaries in every war it has ever fought. 

“Not for the bulk of it,” Nichols replied. 

Gillian Turner, a former National Security Council official under the past two presidents, said O’Reilly’s plan would fail if for no other reason than it would be hard to get a diverse group of nations to agree to finance an army completely controlled by the United States. 

“I think it can be done,” O’Reilly two cents

Article collective closing

Islamic State Vows To Raise Black Jihad Flag In The White House…

Complete Message

Better do it soon while Obama is in office.

flag over white houseWake up America

Article collective closing

Ralph Peters: “Putin Is Not Crazy Or Delusional; Our President And This Administration Are Delusional”

Real Clear Politics Banner


LT. COL. RALPH PETERS: Putin establishes facts on the ground. Look, the vote in the Crimean parliament today, begging to be allowed to join Russia — it’s a done deal. The plebiscite coming up in less than two weeks is a done deal. Crimea now belongs to Russia. As I’ve said on FOX before, the only remaining question is how much more of Ukraine Putin will take and when he will take it.

But the weakness, the lack of unity between the EU and the United States — the greed, the financial cowardice — is absolutely stunning, and Putin isn’t going to stop, and he’s going to do worse.

This administration lives in a dream world that negotiations solve everything. This administration, look, they still indulge in this fantasy that you can talk Putin out of Crimea. It is absolutely insane. Putin is not crazy, he’s not delusional; our president and this administration are delusional.

ALISYN CAMEROTA: But it sounds like, Ralph, what you’re saying is that it would take a military build-up of the kind that you just explained in order to get his attention. That’s not something the U.S. is prepared to do.

PETERS: Well, look at the START treaty. There’s no cost. It doesn’t have to increase our defense budget significantly or anything else. But Obama wants that as part of his legacy even though the U.S. gave up valuable dual-use systems. The Russians gave up junk. Stationing forces, offering to station forces in the Baltic and Poland doesn’t have to be extremely costly, and the EU could pony up for that. It doesn’t have to take a huge Reagan-era military build-up, although, by God, Reagan’s build-up certainly worked against the Soviets and brought them to economic collapse. There are innovative solutions and answers, but you have to be brave, you have to have courage, you have to have vision. You can’t pretend that negotiations will solve all the problems when your enemy — and Putin is our enemy — solves them with military force, establishes facts on the ground you cannot change with blather and visa restrictions. This is shameful.

Related Videos:

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: