Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘CONTRACEPTION’

‘Mistaken Strategy’: Conservative Women Slam Kellyanne Conway’s Push for GOP to Message on Contraception


By: Mary Margaret Olohan @MaryMargOlohan / December 13, 2023

Read more at https://www.dailysignal.com/2023/12/13/mistaken-strategy-conservative-women-slam-kellyanne-conways-push-gop-message-contraception/

Side view of Kellyanne Conway speaking in the White House press briefing room
Conservative women pushed back vehemently on Wednesday against the idea that Republicans must embrace pro-contraception messaging to win back the White House in 2024. Pictured: Kellyanne Conway, then-senior advisor to President Donald Trump, addresses the media in the press briefing room at the White House on Jan. 10, 2020. (Photo: Jahi Chikwendiu, The Washington Post/Getty Images)

Conservative women are pushing back vehemently against the idea that Republicans must embrace pro-contraception messaging to win back the White House in 2024.

POLITICO reported Wednesday morning that “Kellyanne Conway is going to Capitol Hill on Wednesday with a message for Republicans: Promote contraception or risk defeat in 2024.” Conway reportedly believes the Republican Party can persuade voters that they are not anti-woman by pushing pro-contraceptive messaging.

“This is a mistaken strategy,” warned Alexandra DeSanctis Marr, a fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. “Statistics actually suggest that increased access to birth control increases the abortion rate because it leads to more unplanned pregnancies.”

“[Kowtowing] to the Left by promoting abortifacients isn’t a winning GOP strategy,” tweeted Lauren Baldwin, government relations coordinator at the Conservative Policy Institute. “American women deserve better than this.”

‘Women Will Be Caught in the Crossfire’

Pro-life groups have previously argued that to counteract the Left’s messaging on abortion—namely, that Republicans are extremist and are pushing pro-life policy because they want to control women—the GOP should focus on the joy of adoption, the lifesaving work of pro-life pregnancy centers, and the unique strengths of women and mothers.

Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, for example, pushes Republicans not to “ostrich” it by ducking their heads into the sand when they are asked about abortion but instead to highlight their Democratic opponent’s extremism (given that Democrat politicians will often not name a single restriction on abortion that they will support).

Some, like “EWTN Pro-Life Weekly” host Prudence Robertson, fear that Conway’s strategy will only cause more harm to women and further embattle the GOP. Robertson called the idea a “damaging strategy” in a Wednesday tweet.

“Women will be caught in the crossfire for the sake of political wins,” she predicted. “Studies show skyrocketing rates of depression for women on birth control (73%). Not to mention this flies in the face of her [Conway’s] Catholic faith.”

Emma Waters, a research associate in The Heritage Foundation’s DeVos Center for Life, Religion, and Family, pointed to Griswold v. Connecticut, the landmark Supreme Court case that struck down state laws outlawing birth control, even for married couples, pointing out that this case was decided only eight years before Roe v. Wade “wrongly allowed abortion.”

“Casual sex = unplanned pregnancies = more abortion,” she said, above a screenshot of the POLITICO story. “This is NOT the pro-life answer.”

National Review writer Madeleine Kearns warned that “a culture that treats unborn children as disposable begins by treating sexual partners as disposable.”

“You can’t curb the former by encouraging the latter,” she added.

EWTN News contributor Catherine Hadro slammed the strategy in a tweet citing the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute’s numbers on contraception.

“You want to focus in on it?” she asked. “OK. Here’s @Guttmacher’s own numbers, which reveal half of U.S. abortion patients used contraception the month they became pregnant. This is not a pro-life strategy.”

Pro-Contraception Messaging: Behind the Times?

Multiple female conservative professionals also pointed out that public sentiment on birth control is rapidly evolving given the high number of side effects that the drugs have on women’s bodies.

“This makes the GOP look even more out of touch,” tweeted National Review’s Caroline Downey, highlight that there is “a growing Gen-Z [Generation Z] movement” to get off the pill.

“The list of potential risks for the pill is longer than a CVS receipt,” Downey added. “Blood clots, stroke, depression, low libido & more. And, birth control is big business, like abortion.”

NCAA athlete Macy Petty, who advocates for fairness in women’s sports, argued that women deserve better than birth control, saying: “Girls are told the answer to acne, painful periods, unplanned pregnancy is attacking our bodies with birth control chemicals that lead to infertility, mental illness, and more. I could list horror stories, including my own.”

Patricia Patnode, research fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, tweeted a clip of a comedian joking with women about how drastically their lives changed after they got off birth control, building off viral accounts of women breaking up with their boyfriends once they got off the pill.

“Conservatives should feel safe to attack the health impacts & coercive nature of birth control & the emergency contraceptive market like we do with abortion,” she said. “It’s bad. The culture is broadly on the side of science here.”

Carmel Richardson, an editor at The American Conservative, remarked that she finds it “wild” to see “older ‘conservative’ women still pushing birth control.”

“So many young women of my generation, regardless of their politics, have rejected the pill in favor of holistic health and natural cycles,” she said. “Hormonal drugs are not the way.”

And Sarah Wilder, a reporter for The Daily Caller, accused Conway of ignoring the dangers of birth control for political gain.

“Ironic that Republicans seeking to appear more pro-woman would do so by pushing a synthetic hormone that causes gut issues, heart attacks, depression, infertility, and a myriad of other side effects,” Wilder said. “Stop lying to women for political gain, Kellyanne.”

Study Says All Hormonal Birth Control Raises Breast Cancer Risk — But Don’t Expect The FDA To Tell You


BY: GRACE EMILY STARK | APRIL 10, 2023

Read more at https://thefederalist.com/2023/04/10/study-says-all-hormonal-birth-control-raises-breast-cancer-risk-but-dont-expect-the-fda-to-tell-you/

birth control pill pack
Elevating a woman’s risk of breast cancer even a little bit should be a serious consideration for doctors and health-care institutions.

Author Grace Emily Stark profile

GRACE EMILY STARK

MORE ARTICLES

The facade of “safety” around hormonal birth control continues to crumble: Researchers at Oxford Population Health’s Cancer Epidemiology Unit have recently shown that progestin-only hormonal contraceptives, long billed as the “safest” birth control option because of their lack of estrogen, definitively raises one’s risk of breast cancer, similarly to combined hormonal contraceptives (which contain both synthetic estrogen and progestin).

Furthermore, the Oxford researchers found that breast cancer risk, while it declines after discontinuation of hormonal birth control, still remains elevated for ever-users of hormonal birth control (when compared to never-users). Of course, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) still won’t cop to increased risks for breast cancer for ever-users of birth control — just for current users — and they are also currently evaluating whether to make a progestin-only pill the first-ever over-the-counter birth control pill in the United States. 

Unsurprisingly, in another instance of “nothing to see here, folks,” headlines abounded with the results of the Oxford study for a few weeks, carefully emphasizing the “slight” or “small” increase in breast cancer risk. And the experts, of course, were quick to chime in with all the benefits of hormonal contraception, insisting women shouldn’t see this as a reason to go flushing their pills. 

ABC’s Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Jennifer Ashton had this to say, for example: 

So listen, I talk to women about this every single day. You have to talk about risk vs benefit. It is clear that hormonal contraception lowers the risk of ovarian and uterine cancer, but it increases the risk of clotting. When you put that head to head, it’s about individualizing that risk-benefit and option-risk for the woman. If you talk to any OB/GYN, they will say, we have a line, ‘pregnancy is much higher risk than any associated risk with birth control pills or hormonal contraception.’ So you have to have that conversation based on you and your health-care provider.

While I agree that health-care decisions should be made between a woman and her doctor, is it really true, with everything we know about the risks and side effects of birth control (and we know an awful lot), that it’s really that much “safer” than a nine-month pregnancy? Women, after all, tend to be on birth control for years — perhaps even decades — at a time. And the oft-touted benefits of hormonal birth control reducing ovarian and uterine cancers? Well, Dr. Ashton might be surprised to learn that pregnancy has those, too.

It’s also worth mentioning that while ovarian and uterine cancers can undoubtedly be devastating diseases, the average woman’s baseline risk for breast cancer is far greater than her risk for ovarian or uterine cancer; in fact, breast cancer is now the world’s most commonly diagnosed cancer. In other words, elevating the average woman’s risk of breast cancer even a little bit should be a serious consideration for doctors and health-care institutions indeed. In fact, one might argue they have a moral imperative to help women lower their risks for breast cancer.   

Unfortunately, despite increasing, high-quality evidence of the harms of birth control (of which breast cancer is only one among a lengthy list of risks), health-care organizations such as the FDA are loath to give women true informed consent about these drugs. In 2019, the Contraceptive Study Group (CSG) submitted a Citizen Petition to the FDA requesting they add a black box warning to hormonal contraceptives given the mounting evidence for breast cancer risks for ever-users of these drugs (evidence the Oxford study has yet again corroborated).

Yet in a partial response to the CSG’s petition, published a full three years later in 2022, the FDA refused to supply women with this warning. One wonders what leg they have to stand upon now, and if they’ll continue to ignore these significant risks to women — which can be entirely avoided through the use of highly effective, drug- and side-effect-free measures for family planning known as fertility awareness-based methods.

With the publication of the Oxford study, the FDA has once again proven itself at odds with the best scientific evidence on this matter, which even the National Cancer Institute acknowledges. Again, this is largely because of the “benefit” of preventing pregnancy, which evidently trumps all other considerations — even ones that could take the lives of women.


Grace Emily Stark is a freelance writer with published work in multiple outlets, and she is the Editor of Natural Womanhood. Grace is also a current Ramsey Institute Fellow at the Center for Bioethics & Culture, and a former Novak Alumni Fund Journalism fellowship recipient. Follow her writing at GraceEmilyStark.com.

Tag Cloud