Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘AG Barr’

AG Barr: We Have Evidence Antifa Participating in Violent Activity (VIDEO)


Reported By Cristina Laila | Published June 4, 2020 at 12:36pm

US Attorney General Bill Barr delivered remarks on the protests, looting and rioting taking place across the nation.

A brief tally of just a fraction of the destruction caused by far left radical groups such as Antifa and Black Lives Matter: 21 courthouses damaged, Lincoln Memorial defaced, Korean War Memorial defaced, WWII Monument defaced, buildings burned in Los Angeles, tens of millions of damage in NYC.

Barr said the Justice Department has evidence Antifa and other extremist groups have been involved in violent activity.

But how could this be? The mainstream media said Antifa doesn’t exist!

“We have evidence that Antifa and other similar extremist groups as well as actors of a variety of different political persuasions have been involved in instigating and participating in the violent activity. We are also seeing foreign actors playing all sides to exacerbate the violence,” said Barr.

WATCH:

James O’Keefe and Project Veritas released their investigative report on the domestic terrorist group Antifa on Thursday morning.

Project Veritas’s latest undercover report reveals how the leftist terror group Antifa practice eye gouging, beating their opponents and create an environment of fear and terror.

AG Barr said Antifa had hijacked the protests and warned of federal prosecutions for crossing state lines to riot.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:
Cristina Laila
Cristina began writing for The Gateway Pundit in 2016 and she is currently the Associate Editor.

Category:

Law, Political, Society

Tagged with:

AG Barr Responds to Judge Emmet Sullivan’s Actions in General Flynn Case with Massive Fire Power


Reported By Joe Hoft | Published June 2, 2020 at 8:03am

TOPEKA, KANSAS – OCTOBER 02: Attorney General William P. Barr speaks to Kansas law enforcement officials at the Kansas Bureau of Investigation Forensic Science Center on October 02, 2019 in Topeka, Kansas. Barr was invited to the round table discussion by Senator Jerry Moran (R-KS) where they discussed the state of Kansas law enforcement and ways to curb crime in the state. (Photo by

Not only did the Department of Justice respond to corrupt Judge Emmet Sullivan’s actions in the General Flynn case yesterday, but they did so with massive fire power.

The Barr Justice Department dropped its case against General Mike Flynn last month after bombshell documents were released that proved Flynn was framed by Comey’s FBI.  But the Clinton-appointed Judge Emmet Sullivan made a shocking, political, move to delay justice for General Mike Flynn. Judge Sullivan extended the case by soliciting amicus briefs to allow for public comment on Flynn’s criminal case. Judge Sullivan also appointed retired Clinton appointee judge John Gleeson to argue against the government’s motion to dismiss the charge against Flynn!

This is unheard of!

This came after the US Supreme Court just one week earlier ruled that rogue judges CANNOT do what Judge Sullivan is wanting to do.  The Supreme Court ruled 9-0 to prevent judges like Emmet Sullivan from becoming tyrants on the bench. On Monday Judge Emmet Sullivan claimed he was not required to “rubber stamp” the Justice Department’s bid to dismiss the case.

This is a ridiculous statement by the corrupt judge turned prosecutor.

On Monday afternoon the Department of Justice responded to the rogue judge reminding Sullivan, “We’re the prosecutors here, not you!” But what has gone unreported is that the brief filed by the Justice Department has massive fire power.  The response from the Department of Justice came directly from the office of the United States Solicitor General, Noel Francisco.

Sean Davis at the Federalist reported:

In a sign of how important DOJ views the underlying constitutional issues in the case, the formal brief to the appellate court wasn’t just signed by the line attorney managing the government’s case. Instead, it was signed by Noel J. Francisco, the Solicitor General of the United States who is tasked with representing the U.S. government in the most important appellate cases across the country; Brian A. Benczkowski, the Assistant Attorney General and head of DOJ’s entire criminal division; Deputy Solicitors General Jeffrey B. Wall and Eric J. Feigin; assistants to the Solicitor General Frederick Liu and Vivek Suri; Michael R. Sherwin, the acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia; Kenneth C. Kohl, the acting Principal Assistant United States Attorney for D.C.; and Jocelyn S. Ballantine, the line prosecutor handling the Flynn case at trial.

“The Constitution vests in the Executive Branch the power to decide when—and when not—to prosecute potential crimes,” DOJ argued in its brief. Rules of federal criminal procedure, cited by Sullivan in support of his gambit to appoint himself both judge and prosecutor in the inquisition against Flynn, “do[] not authorize a court to stand in the way of a dismissal the defendant does not oppose, and any other reading of [those rules] would violate both Article II and Article III” of the constitution, DOJ wrote.

“Nor, under the circumstances of this case, may the district court assume the role of prosecutor and initiate criminal charges of its own,” the brief continued. “Instead of inviting further proceedings the court should have granted the government’s motion to dismiss.”

The case is now in the hands of the DC Circuit Court.  Obama’s plans to indict General Flynn are over.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

Joe Hoft
Joe Hoft is the twin brother of TGP’s founder, Jim Hoft. His posts have been retweeted by President Trump and have made the headlines at the Drudge Report. Joe worked as a corporate executive in Hong Kong and traveled the world for his work, which gives him a unique perspective of US and global current events. He has ten degrees or designations and is the author of three books. His new book: ‘In God We Trust: Not in Lying Liberal Lunatics’ comes out soon.

Category:

Political

Tagged with:

New Witnesses: AG Barr to Reveal MASSIVE Democrat Coverup


Written By Kevin Jackson |

#TeamKJ, #kevinJackson

It’s about to get ugly for Democrats. All those butt-munchers who participated in the Russian collusion con job will pay with their careers. Further, all those who helped sell the lie will do the same.

Understand, President Trump will get re-elected in a landslide. And to add insult to the Democrats’ injury, their attempted coup will be their undoing.

Ask yourself why Russian collusion stories have suddenly vanished. The Democrats held House hearings that yielded nothing but embarrassment for them.

And what of the screams of proof from people like Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler?

As Fox News reported,

Key witnesses sought for questioning by Justice Department Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz early in his investigation into alleged government surveillance abuse have come forward at the 11th hour, Fox News has learned.

Sources familiar with the matter said at least one witness outside the Justice Department and FBI started cooperating — a breakthrough that came after Attorney General William Barr ordered U.S. Attorney John Durham to lead a separate investigation into the origins of the bureau’s 2016 Russia case that laid the foundation for Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe.

(…)

Late-breaking information is known to delay such investigations. Horowitz’s office similarly encountered new evidence late in the process of the IG review into law enforcement decisions during the 2016 Hillary Clinton email investigation. In this case, additional FISA information came to light late in the process – including October 2016 contact (first reported by The Hill and confirmed by Fox News) between a senior State Department official and a former British spy Christopher Steele, who authored the infamous and salacious anti-Trump dossier.

I can hardly wait to see what comes of this.

This is Huge, and Here’s Why

These “whistleblowers” feared to come forward earlier. However, with the newly drained swamp, they feel safe to do so. That’s a bad sign for Democrats. These people represent the “weak links” and potential scapegoats. As soon as one of them goes rogue, others will follow.

Anybody think the Democrats really want to get to the bottom of the Mueller Report now? Ask yourself what President Trump will do with the soon to be newly reported information on the coup against him. Trump knows how to market. And during the 22-month investigation, Trump regularly sniped at Mueller from his Twitter account. The president called the investigation a “witch hunt” and accused Mueller’s team of Democratic bias against him. Understand that Republicans will certainly want to know why Mueller stacked the deck.

Later, President Trump called the report and the Democrats’ reaction a “con job”.

And what of what Congress Jim Jordan will ask of Mueller, according to Politico?

“The obvious question is the one that everyone in the country wants to know: When did you first know there was no conspiracy, coordination or collusion? How much longer did it take Bob Mueller to figure that out? Did he intentionally wait until after 2018 midterms, or what?”

Connect the Dots

By now, the bread crumbs are pretty easy to follow, particularly as it pertains to Mueller’s choice of investigators.

Disgraced former FBI Agent Peter Strzok played a key role early in the investigation. He was removed from Mueller’s team in July, 2017. Strzok tainted Mueller’s investigation when anti-Trump text messages between him and former investigator Lisa Page were discovered.

While that is old news, the use of the unverified and now completely discredited Steele dossier will be front and center. How is it possible that Mueller’s Report did not completely destroy any “evidence” based on this fake document?

Understand there is no way around this issue any longer. When AG Barr replaced John Huber with John Durham, the writing was on the wall for the Democrats. Barr, who was heavily criticized by Democrats for his handling of the public release of the slightly redacted Mueller report, has said he believes “spying did occur” on Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. He confirmed that the DOJ is reviewing the origins of the Russia probe.

All we have to do now is wait for the release of the testimony from the witnesses who no longer fear stepping forward.

Category:

Political

Tagged with:

Tag Cloud