Reported by J.M. Phelps (OneNewsNow.com) | Tuesday, December 11, 2018
A pair of experts say the demands of Islam, particularly those in defiance of the laws and customs of the United States, do not have to be accommodated by the government or military.
In opposition to a 200-year tradition, Minnesota Democrat Ilhan Omar desires to wear her Islamic headscarf while serving as an incoming member of Congress. Likewise, the Air Force is appeasing Muslims by granting waivers for wearing beards.
In response to the latter example, Dr. Bill Warner, founder of the Center for the Study of Political Islam, tells OneNewsNow “there is a hadith [a tradition] that says Muslims should wear a beard without a moustache. This is a political demand to the Kafirs (non-Muslims). The out here is that if it were denied, then the sin is on the Kafir and the Muslim is released from the Sharia rule.”
Warner explains that two, often over-looked principles of Islamic law “give direction to Muslims who find themselves in situations where they cannot practice Islam in complete obedience to the totalitarian rules of Sharia – Islamic law.”
The principle of tayseer allows a Muslim to “lighten one’s burden,” according to Warner, which then “leads to the second principle of dararu.” Appointed times of prayer for the Muslim may become lenient, for example, when circumstances to fulfill this duty become difficult or impossible. Missed prayers would simply be accomplished at another time – without doing any harm to their religious beliefs.
Author of Lifting the Veil: The True Faces of Muhammad and Islam, I.Q. al-Rassooli, concurs. The Iraqi-born native Arabic-speaker, living in an undisclosed location in Europe says, “everything Dr. Warner shared is true and correct.”
Al-Rassooli suggests few people in the American government, military, or citizenry have either the knowledge or the backbone to say “although these Sharia-compliant Muslims were elected fairly or may be serving in the U.S. military, they cannot ever be loyal to the American Constitution because Sharia is the nemesis of all known human freedoms.”
He declares “the minute a woman insists she wears a hijab, that means she is Sharia-compliant. Since she is Sharia-compliant, she cannot be loyal among non-Muslims. It’s that simple. It’s not complicated.”
Likewise, al-Rassooli points out “if a Muslim is insisting he needs to have a beard, for so-called religious reasons – which, in fact, means he is Sharia-compliant – then automatically these same reasons would also mandate that he destroy the infidel [the non-Muslim].” He believes “such Muslims are nothing short of a waiting, and ticking, suicide bomber.”
Allowing Muslims to be Sharia-adherent in the U.S. military is “the worst mistake,” according to al-Rassooli. “I have absolutely no doubt that one day soon, such a Muslim will cause horrendous and catastrophic damage, either to planes or to an aircraft carrier.” “The sole purpose in the life of every [Sharia-compliant] Muslim anywhere on Earth is to subjugate all of humanity to Sharia,” al-Rassooli avows. “Therefore, their foremost method is to deceive hundreds of millions of Qur’an-ignorant and Sharia-ignorant people that they [Muslims] mean well.”
According to both Warner and al-Rassooli, Muslims can be released from the demands of Islam while living in America. Sharia offers some leniency, which dismisses any professed necessity for the United States to nix its Constitution to become Sharia-compliant.