Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘Liberlism’

CULTURAL MARXISM: Brainwashing Everyone Into Progressive GROUP-THINK


waving flagWritten by Kenn Daily on September 22, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://clashdaily.com/2016/09/cultural-marxism-brainwashing-everyone-progressive-group-think/

In 1961 renowned psychologist Dr. Robert J Lifton published a book on thought reform (brainwashing). Based on observations of brainwashing in China, his book outlines eight elements of thought reform. These thought reform elements are being applied by cultural Marxism to dramatically affect our thinking.

Here are those eight elements. The annotations are mine.

1 — Control or attempting to control communication

The longbow, airplane, and atomic bomb revolutionized warfare.

The current dominant weapon is the media. No shots are fired. We simply acquiesce to the will of our foes.

British journalist Theodore Dalrymple observed that Marxist don’t use logic or data to sway our opinion. They use guilt.

He wrote:

“In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better.”

2 – Mystical manipulation (hidden maneuvers)

The far left uses abstracts to affect our thinking. A glass ceiling is an abstract that evokes the thought of an imposed limitation. A dog whistle suggests an implied and indirect thought. You can’t see glass ceilings and you can’t hear dog whistles.

I mentioned these phantom concepts in last week’s column. Here they are again with a few additions:

  • Racism • Division • Hostility • Exclusion • Confusion • Ignorance • Triggering • Polarizing • Xenohobe • Dog whistle • Objectifying • Homophobe • Islamophobe • Social justice • Glass ceiling • Empowerment • People of color • White privilege • Disenfranchise • Systemic racism • Disparate impact • Polarized society • White supremacy • Micro aggressions • Critical race theory • Hate (or hate group) • Climate change denier • Spew hate on the Internet • “Don’t you know it’s [current year]?”

3 – Demand for purity

Lifton notes that dangerous cults divide the world into pure good and pure evil.

Cultural Marxism divides the world into the proletariat and bourgeoisie. The proletariat is expressed as “people of color” while the bourgeoisie is expressed as “white privilege”. The proletariat is oppressed. The bourgeoisie is the oppressor.

All about the vote

4 – Ethos of confession

Lifton said:

“If somebody is kept confessing you can achieve control of his or her guilt and shame mechanisms. There is no greater control that one can achieve over another human being.

By convincing us to continually confess our white privilege, cultural Marxism achieves control of our guilt and shame mechanisms. “And there is no greater control that one can achieve over another human being.”

5 – Sacred science

Cultural Marxism attributes natural effects to social causes. Social engineers may then tinker with society; engineeringmaking calibrations based on pseudo-scientific conclusions.

Here are three examples.

  • Cultural Marxism envelopes natural phenomenon — such as weather patterns and climate changes — Settled-Science-600-LAinto its philosophy by claiming those patterns and changes are harbingers of an environmental apocalypse and can ultimately be attributed to free-market capitalism.
  • Relating to race, cultural Marxism will defy the overwhelming evidence of forensic sciences to pretend race is a social construct.
  • Note how cultural Marxism’s “science” exploits women: Men are visually attracted to women. Cultural Marxism exploits this natural phenomenon by evoking the phantom notion of “objectifying” women. Without thought reform women would consider it a compliment to be called “pretty” by a male co-worker. After thought reform women would consider such a comment to be offensive because it objectifies them.

6 – Loading of the language

According to Lifton, loading of a language means:

A rhetoric and a language that only permits the claims of the particular group to be expressed. Alternative claims are blocked out by the very language.

Cultural Marxism considers the term “illegal alien” to be offensively racist, in spite of the fact that illegal aliens are both illegal and alien. “Undocumented guest” is the cultural Marxism placement term, even if the illegal alien possesses a valid drivers license (a document) and was invited into the country by no one.free speech def

7 – Doctrine over person

Lifton said:

Any doubts or any critical feelings that one’s accurate perceptions inform one about are attributed to one’s own shortcomings. One has to embrace the doctrine rather than one’s own personal discoveries.

One can be accurate, but will suffer the punishment of social ostracization and stigmatization for his honesty. This is a phenomenon I call “the Galileo syndrome”. Galileo, you’ll recall, was accurate in denying the sun revolved around the earth. Authorities forced him to renounce his accuracy under the threat of death. Today he would be demonized as a “solar rotation denier”.

Likewise, Nobel Laureate James Watson was demonized for noting that sub-Saharan Africans were less intelligent than white people, even though his observation was supported by decades of in-depth research. Specifically he said, “…all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really.”

8 – The dispensing of existence

Lifton said:

Cultic groups so embellish their own claim to absolute truth that they divide the world into those who have a right to exist and those who have no such right. This was observed when Hillary Clinton characterized half of Donald Trump supporters as a “basket of deplorables”.

Clinton later apologized for using the word “half”.

Trump supporters are dehumanized as “Racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic, you name it.”

About the author: Kenn Daily

Kenn DailyKenn Daily is the publisher of DailyKenn.com. Now 63 years old, Kenn formed his conservative views at the age of 14 and was an early member of Young Americans for Freedom. He is a vociferous anti-racist but sets himself apart from most conservatives by refusing to be bullied into silence regarding racial issues. Violent black crime is a signature issue of his website. Kenn is a semi-retired business owner. He lives in Indiana with his wife of 40 years. He has two grown children — a daughter and son — four grandchildren, and two granddogs.

Commentary: Mississippi & North Carolina Versus Liberal Totalitarianism


waving flagCommentary By: Dr. David Smith; Posted: Tuesday, April 12, 2016

“Should peaceful non-participation now be made illegal also?”

– Dr. David Smith

Totalitarianism is defined as “a political system where the state recognizes no limits to its authority and strives to regulate every aspect of public and private life wherever feasible. Totalitarian regimes stay in political power through an all-encompassing propaganda campaign, which is disseminated through the state-controlled mass media, a single party that is often marked by political repression, personality cultism, control over the economy, regulation and restriction of speech, mass surveillance, and widespread use of terror.”*  This definition describes the actions desired by those who want to punish Mississippi and North Carolina for wanting to let their citizens be able to decide for themselves what they want to think and do with their own lives. Liberals want a totalitarian government, not a republic, and not a democracy. They seek to force their viewpoint upon everyone.

Most of the companies that are voicing public objections to the laws passed by states, which want to allow religious freedom, are solely acting to protect their bottom line financially and will shift their actions to whichever way they think the wind blows if it will make them money. The same activists who threaten Mississippi and North Carolina also threaten large corporations if they don’t comply with their demands. If it is okay with people to demand adherence in such a totalitarian fashion, then some other questions should also be asked.

Should Teva Pharmaceutical Industries be boycotted because it refuses to allow propofol to be sold for executions? They are discriminating against what their product is used for on the basis of their belief system even though the death penalty and executions are legal. If Christians should be forced to participate in matters that conflict with their belief system and violates their conscience, then how can one argue that these companies should also not be forced to sell their products without “discriminating”? If it is okay to sue Christians who don’t want to perform a service due to religious and moral objections based on their faith, then should not the states who cannot get the medications sold to them for legal executions be able to bring lawsuits against these companies and force them to do what the law states is okay?

Should physicians who have moral objections to participating in abortions be forced to perform them since abortion is legal and physicians who refuse are “discriminating”? How about pharmacists who won’t fill a prescription for an abortifacient drug and are “discriminating”? Should all of these physicians and pharmacists be labeled as bigots and boycotted for their “discriminatory” practices?

What about the pastors who refuse to participate in a same sex “wedding”? Should they also be labeled and treated in the same way? Are these pastors to be listed on a “hate group” registry and hounded for just not wanting to participate?

What about Muslims who will not sell pork, or prepare it for sale, to others based upon their religious beliefs? Should all the pork-loving people get together and bring boycotts and lawsuits to force the discriminatory Muslims to participate in what they deem objectionable based upon their faith practices?

Should Jewish owned businesses who choose to close their doors on Saturday be forced to stay open and not “discriminate” against those who want to shop on Saturday?

It is not people of faith who are bringing lawsuits and attempting to ruin others through tactics of fear and intimidation. These are the actions of the liberal, totalitarian activists who people of faith need to be protected from. Should peaceful non-participation now be made illegal also? That is also what totalitarian governments do. No dissent is allowed without retribution.

People of all faiths should be allowed to follow their conscience and faith practices as their traditions commonly dictate and not have their belief systems trampled by totalitarian demands. The pharmaceutical companies should be allowed to follow their conscience while the states are free to pursue other options without forcing adherence. Physicians and pharmacists should be free to practice in ways that do not violate their faith while those who want something different are always free to seek to have services they legally want elsewhere. Pastors should continue to be free to choose whom they will agree to marry as they always have. Jewish people should be free to practice all aspects of their faith as there are other options for those who live under different practices. Muslims should be free to practice portions of their faith practice as they desire to do so and people who want something different can do business with others. Those who want to label these laws as hateful only reveal their own heart toward those whom they disagree. For people of faith, it is about protecting their own conscience by not participating.  It is not about doing anything to hurt anyone else. It is about having respect for other people’s faith choices in their lives and giving them the freedom to live their lives with their conscience intact, unlike those within totalitarian regimes who have lost any conscience they might have had. 

(Wikipedia, “https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalitarianism”).

About the Author:

Dr. David Smith David Smith, M.D. practices as a Family Doctor in Summit Mississippi and is on staff at Beacham Memorial Hospital. More Articles

Yes I am a Christian Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Tag Cloud