Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘LGBT Lobby’

No religious exemption in Obama executive order on discriminating against LGBT workers


http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/07/no_religious_exemption_in_obama_executive_order_on_discriminating_against_lgbt_workers.html

By Rick Moran

Imperial President ObamaPresident Obama will sign an executive order on Monday barring federal contractors from discriminating against LGBT workers. There will be no exemption for companies with religious objections to hiring gays.Shoving

New York Times:

The order will also, for the first time, explicitly protect federal employees from discrimination on the basis of gender identity, officials said. Federal workers are already protected based on their sexual orientation.

Gay groups stepped up their already intense campaign to persuade Mr. Obama to sign the order after the Supreme Court’s decision last month in the Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores case. In that ruling, the court said that family-run corporations with religious objections could be exempted from providing employees with insurance coverage for contraception, and there were fears that the case would have repercussions for gay men, lesbians, bisexuals and transgender people.

“With the strokes of a pen, the president will have a very real and immediate impact on the lives of millions of L.G.B.T. people across the country,” Chad Griffin, the president of the Human Rights Campaign, said in a statement on Friday. “These actions from the president have the potential to be a keystone in the arch of his administration’s progress, and they send a powerful message to future administrations and to Congress that anti-L.G.B.T. discrimination must not be tolerated.”

Religious groups had sought the exemption to ensure that they would not lose federal money or contracts if they could not meet the new guidelines because of their beliefs.

Galen Carey, the vice president of government relations for the National Association of Evangelicals, said he expected the president’s executive order would lead to a lengthy and expensive legal fight.

“It would be better if the president could provide leadership that promotes tolerance all the way around,” Mr. Carey said, “rather than use the force of the state.”

He said the exemption would have protected the groups’ freedom and “social harmony as our nation is working through these issues, on which there’s a lot of disagreement.”

The directive is the latest example of Mr. Obama acting unilaterally after legislation on a domestic priority was stymied by Republican opposition on Capitol Hill. His executive orders have angered Republicans, and Speaker John A. Boehner is preparing a lawsuit to protest the president’s moves.

Mr. Obama warned last month that he was prepared to act on his own to extend the protections because the drive in Congress for a national anti-bias law to cover nearly all employers, a bill known as the Employment Nondiscrimination Act, had stalled.obama- Marxist tyrant

Imperial-PresidentThe “gender identify” crowd will be pleased. You probably haven’t noticed but we’ve gone far beyond simple male-female designations of gender. The gender identity movement is redefining the male-female “binary” gender by creating other genders – or pushing the idea that you can be no gender at all. The president is about to sign an executive order that says biology doesn’t mean anything – that people get to choose their gender based on whatever criteria they see fit to use.

There is a scientific basis for transgenderism – babies born biologically female with the brain of a male and vice versa. But it is incredibly rare – perhaps one Transgenderlive birth for every 50,000 babies born. It may even be rarer than that. Protecting the notion that someone can choose their gender will open a legal can of worms we will be decades sorting out.

Not being able to discriminate against someone so addled and confused they don’t know what gender they are is only the beginning. Next comes the transgender bathrooms – or gender confused people getting the legal right to use whatever bathroom they feel like. Other accommodations to follow.

Social change does not come at the stroke of a pen. All this executive order will do is muddy the waters – both for people of faith and the LGBT community.

 

 

 

 

 

Article collective closing

 

 

Can You Say, “Praise The Lord”?


One more example of how God uses what, and whom He chooses to get His will done. Celebrate with us as you read the following report.

Jerry Broussard

Three Star LineLast-Resistance-Header-5

Effort to Put CA Coed Bathroom Bill on Ballot Thwarted by County Politicians

http://lastresistance.com/4973/effort-put-ca-coed-bathroom-bill-ballot-thwarted-county-politicians/#1MofWDUmSMuJto9z.99

Posted By on Mar 7, 2014

coed bathroom bill

Last year, California passed a controversial bill that has become known as the Bathroom Bill.  The bill states that anyone, especially students, who claim to be transgender, may choose to use the bathroom of whatever sex they identify with regardless of their true anatomical gender.  The bill not only allows for the use of whatever sex bathroom they choose, but also locker rooms and participation in sports.That means that any teenage boy being controlled by his raging hormones can claim to be a transgendered person who thinks he’s a girl and he will have legal access to use the girls’ bathrooms and locker rooms.  He will be legally allowed to gratify his sexual lusts by watching the girls undress, shower and then get redressed.  He’ll also be legally allowed to flaunt his male anatomy in front of all of the girls and no one can stop him.  A month or so later, he can recant his transgender status and go back to being a sex crazed teenaged boy.

The bill was pushed through the California legislature by gay rights activists who insist that the rights of one LGBT person should trump the rights of thousands of normal people.  They have no concern about the rights of all of the other students who find it sinful and repulsive to be exposed to a pervert or the pervert exposing himself to them.

In January I reported about a petition drive that was launched to place the Bathroom Bill on the general ballot in November.  However, two counties, Tulare and Mono, failed to process the petitions within the 90 day time limit.  The Pacific Justice Institute filed a lawsuit against the county registrars and Debra Bowen, California Secretary of State, asking that the signatures be counted and included in the drive to put the measure on the ballot because they were delivered prior to the deadline.

To get the initiative on the ballot, Privacy for All Students needed 504,760 valid signatures.  The Secretary of State’s office invalidated 131,857 signatures that left the initiative a mere 17,276 signatures short of getting it on the November ballot.  Privacy for All Students was granted permission to review the rejected signatures, but some counties in the state are blocking those efforts.

Gena Gleason of Privacy for All Students told OneNewsNow:

“Until now, the process has been done in secret.  We have not had any access to any of the procedures that the counties have used, and so now that the count has been finalized, we have the opportunity to go into each of the counties and take a look at the signatures that were invalidated.”

It seems that gay activists have successfully infiltrated some county governments and are doing everything possible to prevent Privacy from reviewing their invalidating process and the signatures they turned down.  Until the issue of the Privacy for All Students referendum is resolved, California’s Bathroom Bill – AB 1266 – has been put on hold.

Tag Cloud