Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘King George’

U.S. Constitution Acknowledges Jesus, is Unquestionably Uniquely Christian


waving flagWritten by Bethany Blankley

 

decl-locThis year marked the 239th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Not insignificantly, Barack Obama intentionally ignored God in his July 4th “video tribute to America.”However, the signers of the Declaration of Independence—and the majority of America’s 200 Founders—were quite clear: they believed in the God of the Bible. They consistently and publicly acknowledged and thanked God; their speeches, statements, and letters total many tens of thousands of volumes of books.

imgres

George Mason, one founder known as the “Father of the Bill of Rights,” affirmed: “My soul I resign into the hands of my Almighty Creator, Whose tender mercies are all over His works… humbly hoping from His unbounded mercy and benevolence, through the merits of my blessed Savior, a remission of my sins.”Founder James Madison wrote, “I have sometimes thought there could not be a stronger testimony than for men who occupy the most honorable and gainful departments and are rising in reputation and wealth publicly to declare their unsatisfactoriness by becoming fervent advocates in the cause of Christ.”

Unlike the U.S. Supreme Court of the last century, the Constitution communicates the Founder’s intentions by acknowledging both Christianity and Jesus Christ.

When the delegates deliberated over each word when writing the First Amendment, they did so within a specific religious and historical context— influenced by Christianity. In fact, George Mason proposed that the First Amendment include the following terminology:

“[A]ll men have an equal, natural and unalienable right to the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience; and that no particular sect or society of Christians ought to be favored or established by law in preference to others.” (Rowland, 1892, 1:244).

The Annals of Congress, records of their deliberations, evidence the Framers’ discussions about “religion” pertained to Christianity—not Islam, not Hinduism, not Buddhism, and not Judaism (Annals of Congress, 1789, pp. 440ff; Story, 1833, 3.1873:730-731).

Furthermore, Section 7 of Article I, refers to Christianity, not any other religion: “If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it….”

If this exception were made for Jews, Congress would have stated, “Saturdays excepted;” if for Muslims, “Fridays excepted.” If for people practicing no faith, delegates would have specified that the government be closed on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday. Yet the Founders specified: “Sundays excepted,” recognized the importance of the Christian faith to America’s founding.

Amendment1Their Christian worldview primarily explains the Founders’ reasoning to intentionally insert two Religion Clauses to prohibit federal government interference.

This was well understood by John Jay, the original Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. He testified: “Unto Him Who is the author and giver of all good, I render sincere and humble thanks for His manifold and unmerited blessings, and especially for our redemption and salvation by His beloved Son… Blessed be His holy name.”

Significantly, the U.S. Constitution closes with the following words after Article VII: “Done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth …”

Anno-DominiThe Framers intentionally used the “Year of our Lord” (English for the Latin “Anno Domini,”A.D.). Granted, all western Christiansocio-political cultures have recorded time—dates and calendars of events—based on the person of Jesus Christ. Datesprior to Christwere recorded as B.C. (“Before Christ”).The Framers could have used a nominal pluralistic, multi-cultural, or politically correct designation like C.E. (“Common Era”) and B.C.E. (“Before the Common Era”). If they wanted to historically date the Constitution according to the Islamic calendar they would have used “A.H.” (“Anno Hegirae,” “in the Year of the Hijrah”), referring to Muhammad’s escape from Mecca in A.D. 622, officially marking Islam’s beginning.

Jesus is LordThe adjective, “Our Lord,” didn’t refer to a generic deity or to God as father or creator. It explicitly referred to Jesus Christ, who Christians (not anyone else) worship as the Son of God. 

To be clear: the Constitution of the United States explicitly refers to Jesus Christ—not Allah, Buddha, Muhammad, or any Hindu or Native American god known to the Founders, to validate its historical date and importance.

The Founder’s commitment to the Bible is noteworthy. Prior to the Revolutionary War, King George prohibited American colonists from printing the Bible in English. However this changed after the Battle of Yorktown when colonists first became free of British policies. In 1782 Congress, in its entirety, approved printing the Bible in English. On the first page of each newly printed Bible read: “Resolved, that the United States in Congress assembled … recommend this edition of the Bible to the inhabitants of the United States.”

John Adams, one of the most influential Founders, wrote in his diary and to his beloved friend Thomas Jefferson,

“Suppose a nation in some distant region should take the Bible for their only law book and every member should regulate his conduct by the precepts that there exhibited… What a Utopia—what a Paradise would this region be! The Bible is the best book in the world.”

images-8It was no accident that “In God We Trust” and “Annuit Coeptis” (Latin, “God has favored our undertaking”) were first printed on American currency—to be used as the basis for all financial transactions.

IMG_4028Indeed, Alexander Hamilton, the founder of America’s financial system and first Secretary of the Treasury said, “I have a tender reliance on the mercy of the Almighty, through the merits of the Lord Jesus Christ.”

The Declaration of Independence un-mistakenly alludes four times to the God of the Bible. The U.S. Constitution ensures that Christians must be able to practice their faith freely, unimpeded by the government, that the day of Sunday is to be respected and that Jesus Christ is significant to history, time, date, and law. Without question the U.S. Constitution remarkably acknowledges uniquely Christian concepts and was framed by men who openly valued the God of the Bible.

AMEN freedom combo 2

King George VS Obama: Just How Similar are the grievances?


waving flagPublished on July 2nd, 2015 | by Allen West Republic

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://allenwestrepublic.com/2015/07/02/king-george-vs-obama-just-how-similar-are-the-grievances

Obama as King GeorgeIn the Declaration of Independence, forgotten by most of us, is a list of grievances against King George III of England. Most of us remember the basics like “taxation without representation” and forced housing of Royal Troops.  Did you know that the list actually contains 28 charges against King George? Admittedly, some few of them appear to stretch the truth to make their point and satisfy the reasons for the Revolution.
Do you also realize how many of these charges we are still fighting in various forms and formats with our own government.
I have annotated the charges with my thoughts. You are invited to add you own. Read on:

LIST OF GRIEVANCES:

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

Choosing which laws to enforce?

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.  

Choosing which laws to enforce.

king-obama3He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.  

Little by little we are giving up these liberties for security in entitlements.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.  

The progressive agenda is tireless in its efforts to enact their controls over freedom of the individual.

Emperor ObamaHe has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.  

Well, maybe a few veto threats will do.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolution’s, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.  

The inability to pass a Federal budget for over 6 years can have the same effect.

DelusionalHe has endeavored to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.  

We have gone to the other extreme on this with anybody, anytime.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.  

This could also mean choosing which laws to enforce.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.  

Some people will argue that POTUS has bent SCOTUS to his will.

Imperial President ObamaHe has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.  

I think we now have a Czar doe crossing the street!

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

A great argument and justification of the 2nd Amendment.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.  

Not yet.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

Does this smack of the TPP?

kingobamafingerconstitution-300x204For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:  

Jade Helm is NOT one of those kinds of measures.

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

Again, the TPP.

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

Passing laws so we can see what’s in it.

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:  

The IRS come to mind as does the EPA.

muslim-obamaFor transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences  

The CIA is reputed to have this ability, but you must be a terrorist to partake.

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighboring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:  

States are passing laws against Sharia law to forestall this effort.

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

Where have I heard this phrase used lately? burke

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.  

Sort of like the activism of the Supreme Court.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.  

If you are conservative or Christian, you can identify with this.

obama- Marxist tyrantHe has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.  

As in Baltimore and St Louis?

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

Some people think Jade Helm is similar, but I don’t.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.  

Turning race against race and culture against culture could be similar. Civil Race Both

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.  

This makes me think of our open and porous borders.

B2A_FvyCMAE14px The Lower you go Leftist Giant called Tyranny reduced to tears Giant Government Compliance Officer Hate Merchants freedom combo 2

Tag Cloud