Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘United Nations (U.N)’

PURE EVIL: The United Nations Unveils a Statue at its NYC Headquarters that Resembles the Beast from the Book of Revelation

Reported By Joe Hoft | Published December 9, 2021

The United Nations just unveiled a statue of a beast outside its headquarters in New York City. The statue is bizarre and resembles the beast from the book of Revelation.

One of the strangest statues that I have ever seen in my entire life has just been set up right outside UN Headquarters in New York City. When I first heard about this, I could hardly believe that the global elite would be so brazen, and so I checked into this very carefully. Unfortunately, this is not just a bad rumor. This absolutely gigantic statue is called “The Guardian of International Peace and Security”, and it looks like something out of a science fiction movie. It does not resemble any known creature on this planet. Instead, it appears to very closely resemble a “beast” that is described in the Book of Revelation. If you have not seen it yet, you can see video footage of this “beast” right here. Did they really think that they could put this up without anyone noticing?

The Most Important News continues:

Of course when Christians see this monstrosity, they are immediately going to think of the “beast” that is described in Revelation chapter 13…

2 And the beast which I saw was like unto a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion: and the dragon gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority.

Jaguars and leopards have builds that are at least somewhat similar, and so I guess one could make an argument that the body of the statue resembles either one.

As for the feet, they do seem to resemble those of a bear, and it is noteworthy that the feet are a totally different color from the rest of the body.

The UN tweeted a picture of the beast.

What the ‘hell’ is going on here?

Joe Hoft

Joe Hoft is the twin brother of TGP’s founder, Jim Hoft, and a contributing editor at TGP. Joe’s reporting is often months ahead of the Mainstream media as was observed in his reporting on the Mueller sham investigation, the origins of the China coronavirus, and 2020 Election fraud. Joe was a corporate executive in Hong Kong for a decade and has years of experience in finance, IT, operations and auditing around the world. The knowledge gained in his career provide him with a unique perspective of current events in the US and globally. He has ten degrees or designations and is the author of three books. Joe is currently co-host of the morning radio show in St. Louis at 93.3 “Tomorrow’s News Today”. His new book: ‘In God We Trust: Not in Lying Liberal Lunatics’ is out now – please take a look and buy a copy. @joehoft

Category:

International Politics

Tagged with:

Haley Scorches Palestinians, Blocks UN Meddling in Israel, Then Walks Out All in Matter of Minutes

Reported By Joe Saunders | May 16, 2018 at 7:01am

URL of the original posting site: https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/haley-scorches-un-meddling-walk/

Useful Mediots

And Haley was having none of it. In an eight-minute speech, she attacked Palestinian intransigence and blasted the U.N.’s notorious “double standard” when it came to judging the Jewish state.

The thousands of Palestinians who massed at the Israeli border, challenging border guards with slingshots, Molotov cocktails and rocks disregarded clear Israeli warnings beforehand that any attempt to storm the border would be met with deadly force.

“Who among us would accept this type of activity on your border?” Haley asked the other Security Council members. “No country in this chamber would act with more restraint than Israel has.”

Haley then blocked a proposed Security Council resolution to investigate the violence, according to The Daily Caller. When Palestinian Ambassador Riyad H. Mansour began his remarks, Haley simply left the chamber. She couldn’t have missed much, judging by Mansour’s statements to reporters outside the U.N. before the meeting.

Maybe “peaceful” means something different to Palestinian ambassadors to the U.N. than it does to honest people. Or maybe hurling firebombs, launching fire kites and using slingshots to attack armed soldiers qualify as “peaceful” for Palestinians the same way Israeli soldiers firing to protect themselves and their country’s borders qualify as “aggression” to world leaders who aren’t named President Donald J. Trump.

Either way, they’re lies. And Haley proved on Tuesday why Trump’s selection to have her represent the county in the den of vipers known as the U.N. Security Council was right on target.

She’s proven over and over that she’s not afraid to stand up for the country, or walk out when it counts.

Category:

Political

Tagged with:

Alert: Democrat Requests UN Troops Be Deployed to US Soil to Deal With Guns

Reported By V Saxena | December 16, 2017 at 8:20am

URL of the original posting site: https://conservativetribune.com/democrat-requests-un-troops/

Instead of looking to President Donald Trump for assistance with Chicago’s never-ending gun violence, Cook County commissioner Richard Boykin, a Democrat, has reportedly expressed interest in teaming up with the United Nations.

“I’m hoping to appeal to the U.N. to actually come to Chicago and meet with victims of violence, and maybe even possibly help out in terms of peacekeeping efforts, because I think it’s so critical for us to make sure that these neighborhoods are safe,” he said Thursday, according to local station WBBM.

He reportedly made the remarks from Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport en route to New York to meet with Oscar Fernandez-Taranco of Argentina, the U.N. Assistant Secretary-General for Peacekeeping Support. Boykin continued by bemoaning the “quiet genocide taking place in too many of our communities” and rightly noting that most victims of Chicago’s gun violence are blacks who have been “killed at the hands of another African American.”

“So we must protect these population groups, and that’s what the United Nations does,” he added. “They’re a peacekeeping force. They know all about keeping the peace, and so we’re hopeful that they’ll hear our appeal.”

I appreciate his desire to help the black community in Chicago, but why seek help from the U.N. when Trump has already reportedly sent “an additional 20 agents from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives … to Chicago to help in the effort at cracking down on gun crime and the repeat criminals who routinely commit such crimes”? The president has also proposed sending in the National Guard, though the city’s left-wing mayor, Rahm Emmanuel, rudely rejected this offer in January.

“We’re going through a process of reinvigorating community policing, building trust between relationships in the community and law enforcement,” he said, as reported by the Chicago Tribune. “(The National Guard) is antithetical to the spirit of what community policing is.”

But the power-hungry U.N. is not?

Let’s be clear here: The U.N. is an anti-democratic organization that is “hostile to the private ownership of firearms,” as noted five years ago by Ted R. Bromund, Ph.D., a Margaret Thatcher senior research fellow at The Heritage Foundation, in a column for The Daily Signal.

Moreover, the U.N. poses enough of a threat to the U.S. that the National Rifle Association sought to be recognized by it as a Non-Governmental Organization in 1996 just to monitor its activities and stop it from affecting our gun rights.

“NRA has been engaged at the United Nations and elsewhere internationally in response to overreaching small arms initiatives for two decades,” the NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action notes. “During this time, we have been actively opposing transnational efforts that would limit Americans’ Second Amendment freedoms.”

Again, why would Boykin or any other political leader in Chicago be interested in teaming up with this anti-democratic organization when they already have a president ready and willing to help? I don’t know, but I don’t like it. Nor do I like or appreciate the city’s leaders constantly disparaging our president, a man who clearly wants to help.

Speaking on CBS’ “The Late Show” this week, Emanuel proudly declared Chicago a “Trump-free zone” and joked that it’s new motto is “A city he’ll never sleep in.”

Gee, guy, how about making Chicago a violence-free zone with a motto of “A city where little black children can sleep peacefully,” you jerk?

My sincere guess is Emanuel doesn’t really care about Chicago’s gun violence. As for Boykin, I believe he cares but it simply misguided. I just hope somebody warns him about the U.N. before it’s too late.

Category:

Political

Tagged with:

Trump Cuts Budget for Major U.N. Project!

Posted by GirlsJustWannaHaveGuns.com | June 29, 2017

URL of the original posting site: http://girlsjustwannahaveguns.com/trump-cuts-budget-major-u-n-project/

United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley had some great news for the country today. She defended the Trump administration’s plan to drastically cut America’s spending on the UN. She spoke to a House subcommittee, telling them the proposed cuts had sent “shockwaves” through the body, putting the UN “on notice.”

“My job was to go the UN and find value. We want to make sure the U.S. voice is strong, use it for negotiations in every way possible, to push foreign policy… but at the same time the UN has fat around the edges,” she said.

Democrats and some members in the Republican party expressed their concerns over the drastic cuts and how that would affect the UN. The U.S. is more often than not, the top funder of most budgets, even those with a distinctly anti-American bias.

It’s not too hard to believe that some people were upset. Democratic Rep. Nita Lowey from New York called them “far-reaching and catastrophic.”

“Frankly I cannot understand how this administration intends to influence the UN agenda, help those most in need, and advance UN reform if it disengages and severely cuts our contributions.”

She noted the proposed cuts included a 37 percent cut for international peacekeeping, a 27 percent hit to contributions like the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the World Health Organization. Other Democrats pointed to cuts to UNICEF, the World Food Program and the UN Populations Fund (UNFPA).

Haley later noted that $70 million was pulled away from the UNFPA as it was associated with a Chinese company that performed forced sterilization. She said that money was redirected to make sure it accomplished the same goals without those aspects that were against U.S. interests.

Haley also warned that some organizations had become complacent with their budgets, something that was not translating to value for money.

“There are many good organizations that do good work for the U.N. and help people around the world,” she said, before noting that some agencies assume the money will always be there. “Are we giving American taxpayers value for their dollar?”

–Breitbart

Democrats we understand. But there were Republicans who were upset as well. Most were concerned over the impact the cuts would have in the U.S.’ role at the UN.

Rep. Kay Granger of Texas said the cuts were a “shockwave”, asking Haley, “Is the U.S. stepping back?”

“Some of these cuts are massive and they are just devastating. I would beg you to stand firm in that, of course we need to use our American dollars well but our leadership is irreplaceable,” Granger said.

Haley responded, saying American leadership could be shown by forcing the UN to reform its big budgets. She agreed with Granger that, yes, the cuts did send a shockwave, but that was a good thing.

President Trump conveyed his message loud and clear, putting the UN “on notice.”

“The cuts the president and the administration proposed did send shockwaves through the United Nations and it did put everyone on notice, but I do think that wasn’t necessarily a bad thing. I think that if he was intending to send a message he did,” she said.

Now the UN knows the U.S. will not be a rubber stamp for the body, and that we will be watching it “very closely,” according to Haley.

“What we saw in return is they all understand that we won’t be taken for granted any more. They all understand that we expect to find value in the UN. they all and that reforms are needed because it’s been archaic for a while and that they realize they have to support us in that. They do realize we’re now watching the UN very closely so all those things are actually really good.”

Category:

International Politics

Tagged with:

Israel Furious About UN Resolution That Denies Jewish History And Christian Tradition In Jerusalem

Authored by Yochanan Visser October 15, 2016

URL of the original posting site: http://www.westernjournalism.com/israel-furious-about-un-resolution-that-denies-jewish-history-and-christian-tradition-in-Jerusalem/

Israelis were flabbergasted Thursday when the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization adopted the draft version of its second resolution in one year denying any Jewish connection to the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Temple Mount is Judaism’s holiest site, and the site where important events in the life of Jesus took place as recorded in the New Testament.

According to UNESCO, the Western Wall or Wailing Wall — the last remaining wall of the destroyed temple in Jerusalem — doesn’t exist and has been renamed as the Al-Buraq Plaza the Muslim name for the site where Muslims believe Mohammad was carried to Heaven on a tall, white beast called al-Buraq (lightning) that resembled a horse.

The UNESCO resolution also referred to the Temple Mount as Al-Ḥaram Al-Sharif and read as a press release by WAFA the official Palestinian News Agency that is used to release only virulent anti-Israel propaganda.

Israel is called “the occupying power” of the Temple Mount and Israelis and Israeli security forces are constantly “storming the El-Aqsa Mosque” and threatening “to destroy” the Muslim holy place according to UNESCO.

By the “storming of the El-Aksa Mosque,” UNESCO was referring to the daily visits of groups of Jews and Christians to the site where the Temple once stood. Israel also allegedly commits crimes, abuses and aggression against the El-Aqsa mosque and has caused excessive damage to the Muslim shrines on the Temple Mount, claims UNESCO.

The same resolution also deals with Gaza that apparently has become a place of importance for UNESCO’s work as protector of world heritage sites. UNESCO condemns the continuing (legitimate) sea blockade of Gaza by the Israeli navy and blames Israel for the deaths of thousands of civilians in the Gaza Strip.

UNESCO also reaffirmed that Rachel’s Tomb in Bethlehem and the Tomb of the Jewish Patriarchs in Hebron are “Palestinian sites” where Israel is doing all sorts of “illegal things” such as building roads and maintenance work. What did you say 07.jpg

Israel’s supposed transgressions at both Jewish holy sites are linked to the Palestinian Knife Jihad that has killed scores of Israelis since September 2015, while “settlers” and other “Jewish extremists” are blamed for the “ongoing cycle of violence” by the UNESCO resolution.

Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu was one of the Israeli politicians who reacted furiously to the UNESCO resolution.

“The UNESCO theater of the absurd continues,” Netanyahu said in a statement

“Today that organization adopted another delusional decision stating that the Jewish People have no connection to the Temple Mount or the Western Wall,” Netanyahu wrote.

“Even if they do not read the Bible, I would suggest that UNESCO members visit the Arch of Titus in Rome. On it one can see what the Romans brought back to Rome after they destroyed and looted the Second Temple on the Temple Mount 2,000 years ago. There, engraved on the Arch of Titus, is the seven-branched menorah that is the symbol of the Jewish People and, I remind you, is also the symbol of the Jewish state today. Soon, UNESCO will say that the Emperor Titus engaged in Zionist propaganda,” Netanyahu fumed.

“To say that Israel has no connection to the Temple Mount and the Western Wall is like saying that China has no connection to the Great Wall of China or that Egypt has no connection to the pyramids,” he continued.

”By this absurd decision, UNESCO has lost what little legitimacy it had left. But I believe that historical truth is stronger and that truth will prevail. And today we are dealing with the truth,” the Israeli leader, the son of a famous historian, added.

Netanyahu later ridiculed the UNESCO decision to adopt the resolution that was submitted by Algeria, Egypt, Lebanon, Morocco, Oman, Qatar and Sudan.

“What’s next? A UNESCO decision denying the connection between peanut butter and jelly? Batman and Robin?” Netanyahu asked.

The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs also reacted to the new UNESCO resolution and released a short video. The video showed a man reading UNESCO’s version of the Bible where texts such as John 2:13 were “revised.”

On Friday, Israel suspended all cooperation with UNESCO over the resolution that was backed by a large majority of the organization’s members. Only six countries voted against the resolution: The United States, Lithuania, Great Britain, Germany, the Netherlands and Estonia.

France, Sweden, Spain, Greece and Italy were among the countries that abstained from voting while Russia supported the motion.

Even Irina Bolkova the director-general of UNESCO, expressed her dismay and opposition to the resolution on Friday.

“The heritage of Jerusalem is indivisible, and each of its communities has a right to the explicit recognition of their history and relationship with the city,” Bolkova said in a statement.

Category:

International Politics

Tagged with:

Obama: $3B for U.N. Climate Fund ‘A Smart Investment for Us to Make’

By Patrick Goodenough | November 23, 2015

URL of the original posting site: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/patrick-goodenough/obama-3b-un-climate-fund-smart-investment-us-make

Delegates chat ahead of a Green Climate Fund meeting in Berlin, Germany in November 2014. (AP Photo/DPA, Rainer Jensen)

(CNSNews.com) – President Obama had an opportunity Sunday to respond to Republican senators’ threat to withhold the $3 billion he has pledged for the U.N. “Green Climate Fund” (GCF) unless any new climate agreement is presented to the Senate for ratification – but chose not to.

Instead, Obama said simply that critics of his climate agenda lost a major argument when China announced it will join international efforts to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. Speaking in Kuala Lumpur, he also defended climate financing, saying that helping poor countries to adapt to green technologies without having their development efforts impaired was a “smart investment for us to make.” Bull

With the opening of the U.N. climate conference in Paris just days away, a group of 37 GOP senators warned Obama in a letter Thursday that they will not allow taxpayer money to go to the GCF “until the forthcoming international climate agreement is submitted to the Senate for its constitutional advice and consent.”

Republican opposition to the administration’s climate change program appears to be driving the administration’s resistance to calls from Europe and elsewhere for the agreement coming out of Paris to be a treaty – and therefore requiring Senate ratification by a two-thirds vote. The signatories pointed out that Congress had never authorized funding for the GCF, and that Obama’s $3 billion pledge had been made “unilaterally.”

They asked the president to ensure that foreign counterparts in the talks were made aware that “that Congress will not be forthcoming with these funds in the future without a vote in the Senate on any final agreement as required in the U.S. Constitution.”

Speaking to reporters in the Malaysian capital on the final day of a trip to Turkey and South-East Asia, Obama was asked about the issue of raising climate finance, “given especially the Republican opposition back home.”

In his response, he said nothing about the threat to withhold funds or the question of the status of a new climate agreement, which will apply to the post-2020 period.

After outlining the thinking behind climate finance – which will be a central focus in the Paris talks – he turned briefly to criticism of his climate policies.

“Sometimes, back home, critics will argue, there’s no point in us doing something about getting our house in order when it comes to climate change because other countries won’t do anything and it will just mean that we’re in a less competitive position,” he said.

“Well, when I met with President Xi [Jinping] and China signed on to an aggressive commitment, that took a major argument away from those critics,” he said, adding that the world’s two biggest greenhouse gas emitters had now “signed on.”

China announced a year ago that it will aim for its greenhouse gas emissions to peak by 2030, if not earlier. Last September it said it would begin a national cap-and-trade program in 2017.

China has not pledged any contribution to the GCF, saying that must come from “developed nations” – as defined in previous climate change agreements. Instead Beijing says it will set up a separate fund to help developing countries combat climate change. Stop

The GCF is the core of a 2009 agreement by Obama and other leaders to raise – from 2020 onwards – $100 billion each year from public and private sources to help developing countries deal with climate change.

As of early November, 38 countries have pledged a total of $10.2 billion for the GCF, with Obama’s pledge of $3 billion accounting for 29 percent of the total. The next biggest pledges have come from Japan ($1.5 bn), Britain ($1.2 bn) and Germany ($1.003 bn).

Broader climate finance mobilized from public and private sources so far has been estimated at $62 billion, according to a recent OECD study.

The U.N. Environmental Program has argued that $100 billion a year will not be nearly enough to help the world to adapt to global warming.

In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Category:

Political

Tagged with:

Obama Plan May Change Climate Temperature 0.001 Degree

Posted by Tad Cronn

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://godfatherpolitics.com/21421/obama-plan-may-change-climate-temperature-0-001-degree/#ISyObwydF7PQmkim.99

What is there not to like about Emperor Obama’s global warming plan, which he submitted to the United Nations on Tuesday?

It’s going to directly cost hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars, untold billions or trillions more in economic growth.

White House flying monkeys have already announced it’s going to be put into place by a series of executive orders and agency-level rules that His Majesty will pluck out of the executive filing cabinet — you know, the one Obama sits on?

The rules will raise the costs of oil and gasoline; reduce your freedom to travel; keep you colder in winter, hotter in summer; raise the cost and lower the accessibility of electrical power; eliminate jobs, particularly in the energy industry; and have you living like a virtual caveman.

And for all that low, low cost, you will see a potential drop of 0.001 degrees Celsius in annual warming — a potential savings of one-tenth of a degree over a short little century.

Of course, that makes at least two very generous assumptions, the first being that the warmistas are to some extent correct in having observed one or two degrees actual average warming over the past century and that therefore the relationship between carbon dioxide and warming is valid and potentially calculable.

The second big assumption is that, despite the past 15 years of “hiatus,” there actually is a global warming trend going on that will at some point resume, as opposed to the multidecadal cycle of cooling some scientists are predicting.

And realize — this can’t be stressed enough — Obama’s plan would not cool the planet one lick; it just might slow any warming by one-thousandth of a degree per year.

Even that’s pretty generous, because if you crunch the numbers yourself, add up the human contribution to the total amount of CO2 produced naturally by the Earth each year and compare to the actual claims and predictions of warming by the bad-science crowd, one-thousandth to a few thousandths of a degree of warming is about what could actually be attributed to humans over the course of more than 100 years — maybe.

All of which is to say that taxing future generations into extreme poverty and bringing a halt to human progress is totally worth it to save the Earth from having more free water for agriculture and drinking, and to keep rich people’s beachfront properties above sea level.

Category:

Political

Tagged with:

United Nations (U.N)

U.N. Official Admits Goal of Global Warming Scare is to Destroy Capitalism

Rodney Lee Conover — February 15, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://joeforamerica.com/2015/02/u-n-official-admits-goal-global-warming-scare-destroy-capitalism/

The global warming chicken little’s keep crowing their concern about the world heating up and how it’s all about man’s stewardship of the environment. But we know that’s all bull and finally, a United Nations official has now confirmed this.Also known as “the bottom line” for environmental activists, who are malcontents, perpetuating a lie ofHitlerian proportions. They want to control other people. They’re mentally unstable to want to limit freedom. The scam is beginning to fold:

U.N. climate chief Christiana Figueres speaks during an interview at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Jan. 22, 2014.

Investor’s Business Daily reports on a news conference last week in Brussels, where Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism.

“This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution,” she said. Referring to a new international treaty environmentalists hope will be adopted at the Paris climate change conference later this year, she added: “This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history.”

Hmm.. “fundamental transformation“..? Sound familiar?

al-gore-polar-bears Got bad news for you Maoist wannabes – the only economic model that works well is Capitalism. Countries who have embraced free-market capitalism over the past 150 years have enjoyed a system in which output has increased 70-fold, work dayshave been halved and lifespans doubled.

But pesky facts don’t matter to facist control freaks. They want to tell you what to do, where to do it and when to wipe.

About the Author: Rodney Lee Conover

Rodney Lee Conover is a writer, producer and Senior Editor at JoeForAmerica.com

Category:

International Politics

Tagged with:

Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘United Nations (U.N)’

Reported By Joe Hoft | Published December 9, 2021

The United Nations just unveiled a statue of a beast outside its headquarters in New York City. The statue is bizarre and resembles the beast from the book of Revelation.

What the ‘hell’ is going on here?

Share this:

Reported By Joe Saunders | May 16, 2018 at 7:01am

Share this:

Instead of looking to President Donald Trump for assistance with Chicago’s never-ending gun violence, Cook County commissioner Richard Boykin, a Democrat, has reportedly expressed interest in teaming up with the United Nations.

“So we must protect these population groups, and that’s what the United Nations does,” he added. “They’re a peacekeeping force. They know all about keeping the peace, and so we’re hopeful that they’ll hear our appeal.”

“We’re going through a process of reinvigorating community policing, building trust between relationships in the community and law enforcement,” he said, as reported by the Chicago Tribune. “(The National Guard) is antithetical to the spirit of what community policing is.”

Let’s be clear here: The U.N. is an anti-democratic organization that is “hostile to the private ownership of firearms,” as noted five years ago by Ted R. Bromund, Ph.D., a Margaret Thatcher senior research fellow at The Heritage Foundation, in a column for The Daily Signal.

Share this:

Posted by GirlsJustWannaHaveGuns.com | June 29, 2017

“Frankly I cannot understand how this administration intends to influence the UN agenda, help those most in need, and advance UN reform if it disengages and severely cuts our contributions.”

Haley later noted that $70 million was pulled away from the UNFPA as it was associated with a Chinese company that performed forced sterilization. She said that money was redirected to make sure it accomplished the same goals without those aspects that were against U.S. interests.

President Trump conveyed his message loud and clear, putting the UN “on notice.”

“The cuts the president and the administration proposed did send shockwaves through the United Nations and it did put everyone on notice, but I do think that wasn’t necessarily a bad thing. I think that if he was intending to send a message he did,” she said.

Share this:

Authored by Yochanan Visser October 15, 2016

Share this:

By Patrick Goodenough | November 23, 2015

(CNSNews.com) – President Obama had an opportunity Sunday to respond to Republican senators’ threat to withhold the $3 billion he has pledged for the U.N. “Green Climate Fund” (GCF) unless any new climate agreement is presented to the Senate for ratification – but chose not to.

Share this:

Posted by Tad Cronn

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://godfatherpolitics.com/21421/obama-plan-may-change-climate-temperature-0-001-degree/#ISyObwydF7PQmkim.99

Share this:

Rodney Lee Conover — February 15, 2015

URL of the Original Posting Site: http://joeforamerica.com/2015/02/u-n-official-admits-goal-global-warming-scare-destroy-capitalism/

U.N. climate chief Christiana Figueres speaks during an interview at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, on Jan. 22, 2014.

Hmm.. “fundamental transformation“..? Sound familiar?

But pesky facts don’t matter to facist control freaks. They want to tell you what to do, where to do it and when to wipe.

About the Author: Rodney Lee Conover

Share this:

In His Service

Email Subscription

Recent Posts

Family

NEWS

Opinion

Personal

Political

Spiritual

Archives

Spam Blocked

Tag Cloud