Perspectives; Thoughts; Comments; Opinions; Discussions

Posts tagged ‘Natural rights’

Prosecuting Paivi Rasanen for Quoting the Bible Is Making Her an International Star


BY: JOY PULLMANN | AUGUST 15, 2022

Read more at https://thefederalist.com/2022/08/15/prosecuting-paivi-rasanen-for-quoting-the-bible-is-making-her-an-international-star/

Paivi Rasanen speaking at the Issues Etc. conference

Author Joy Pullmann profile

JOY PULLMANN

VISIT ON TWITTER@JOYPULLMANN

MORE ARTICLES

Paivi Rasanen must make God laugh. The 27-year member of Finland’s Parliament on trial for tweeting a Bible verse confounds so many pagan slogans.

She’s a mother of five children and grandmother of 10 who didn’t need abortion to simultaneously pull off two demanding careers: medicine and politics. An empathetic woman who eagerly shows pictures of grandbabies on her phone and expresses concern for strangers’ travel plans, Paivi (pie-EE-vee) also refuses to subjugate her reason to emotional manipulation.

She holds fast to Christian teachings about sex as reserved exclusively for lifelong marriage between one man and one woman, for which she’s been prosecuted and investigated now for three years and will be in court again this November. Her case could affect international law and is a foreboding example of where identity politics policies are quickly heading across the world.

“If we break the gender system and if we break the natural marriage system between one man and one woman, then we have dangerous consequences, especially to children,” Paivi told The Federalist in person this summer in Chicago.

This woman of science also firmly believes in supernatural revelation. In her pamphlet on Christian marriage that Finland’s top prosecutor is seeking to ban as “hate speech,” Paivi writes that “Jesus’s death and resurrection is the core of the entire Christian faith. On this the Bible stands or falls. If one does not believe it, there is nothing left of Christianity. And … if I believe this, it follows logically that I must believe everything else Christ teaches in the Bible through the Apostles and Prophets.”

Paivi speaking to a sold-out audience of Christians in Chicago, Illinois, this summer. (Joy Pullmann / The Federalist)

Persecution Spreads the Gospel

As it has often in history, persecution has created global opportunities for Paivi to spread Christian theology: about sex, its design for lasting human happiness, and Christianity’s warm welcome to those struggling with every kind of sin from the God “who hates nothing He has made.” The 2004 booklet “Male and Female He Created Them,” which prosecutors want to ban entirely and fine Paivi for writing, has gone from a few copies in a few conservative Lutheran churches to translated into half a dozen languages and read all over the world.

Rasanen’s 2004 booklet, printed from the online PDF and in its new second edition distributed worldwide.

Paivi and her husband Niilo (nee-loh) spoke this June in Budapest alongside megastar Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson and his wife. Paivi said she’s seen especially strong support from Eastern European countries because many there still remember the Communists interrogating people about the Bible, as Finnish police did to Paivi three times for a total of 13 hours.

The Rasanens flew to Chicago right after Budapest so Paivi could speak at the sold-out Christian “Issues, Etc.” conference on June 25. In pearls, a flowered dress, and silvered golden hair, the petite 62-year-old asked the American crowd to pray that her case would “allow for more chances to preach the gospel in public.”

Rasanen’s case is on appeal in Finland and may end up in the European Court of Human Rights, developing precedents that could affect the world. If she loses in court, Paivi told a Christian outlet last year, “It will also affect religious freedom in other Western countries. LGBT groups have a very good network across national borders. They will try to achieve the same in other countries in Europe.”

In Q&A after her talk, Paivi said Finnish Prosecutor General Raija Toiviainen is expected to push the case as far as possible because Toiviainen has said identity politics is her top priority. Paivi’s legal help from Alliance Defending Freedom International has told The Federalist they are also prepared to appeal her case as far as possible should she lose.

Paivi Rasanen speaking at the Issues Etc. conference
Image courtesy Issues, Etc.

Persecution Amplifies Word of God’s Mercy for Sinners

Toiviainen claims agreeing with the Bible that sodomy is a sin is a criminal expression of hatred toward homosexuals. Paivi and her legal team have pointed out that if the court interprets the law this way, it will effectively outlaw Christianity and free speech in Finland.

Rather than rejecting homosexuals, as she’s been accused in court, Paivi glows with happiness when relating that gay people have disclosed her “Bible trial” has brought them to faith. In speeches and court testimony, Paivi has emphasized she not only bears no animosity toward homosexuals or transsexuals, she earnestly desires them to join her Christian family by receiving the eternal life that Jesus Christ offers freely to every person.

Paivi has been dragged into European courts and smeared in the press for years as a spewer of “hate speech.” Yet while battling severe jet lag that her husband said often gives her migraines, Paivi expressed not even a flicker of animosity toward her persecutors in Chicago.

Instead, when The Federalist asked if her three-year-and-counting prosecution might be orchestrated by political enemies, she seemed stumped. She conferred with her husband and finally suggested she was simply an easy target as a well-known figure in Finland.

“In all my career I have been known as a Christian and as a biblical Christian who doesn’t accept abortion and homosexual acts and so on,” Paivi told The Federalist. “And that’s why I think that perhaps it is the reason why the prosecutor has targeted just me.”

Family Unites to Fight for Other Families

Acknowledging the Biblical directive that only men serve as pastors has never tied Paivi to the kitchen — although perhaps she’d like to retire there given the suffering her political career has inflicted. Niilo prodded Paivi into running for office nearly three decades ago to try to stop Finland from forcing doctors like her to perform abortions, they told The Federalist.

Niilo Rasanen is a pastor and theology professor at a Lutheran Bible college. Niilo’s widowed mother lived with the couple while their children were young, and Paivi’s parents moved nearby and “helped a lot,” Paivi said. That, with Niilo’s flexibility while earning his doctorate, allowed Paivi to enter public service without sacrificing their children’s needs, they said.

During the five years when Niilo was writing his dissertation, “he was always at home when the children came home” from school, Paivi noted. Paivi and Niilo occasionally pulled out their phones to translate Finnish words into English or check they were using the right words, but Finns learn at least two foreign languages in school, Swedish and English.

Niilo and Paivi Rasanen in Chicago, Illinois, in June 2022. (Joy Pullmann / The Federalist)

In response to a question from the Chicago audience, Paivi revealed threats against her family. When she campaigned against child pornography, she said, a convicted pedophile entered their front yard and threatened their children: “It was quite a difficult time because we had to keep safe our children and they were a little bit afraid many years after that.” The most violent of the recent threats include a rape threat against her son, she said.

These external threats may have helped strengthen family bonds. Paivi and Niilo’s faces light up when they talk about their now-grown children, whom the Rasanens say are a great joy and regularly text their parents Bible verses and prayers.

“The task is communal, we do it together,” Niilo said of their marriage and family. “It has been so busy and hard time in this politic area — very, very busy, very long days. If you are not doing it together, it will not work.”

“I think what has been a great power in our life is that we have felt that these callings and tasks that we have, that they are common,” Paivi added.

From Church Only at Christmas to Global Witness

Born in 1959, Paivi grew up in a remote area near Finland’s border with Sweden, in the village of Konnunsuo. Her father was the agricultural director for a prison there. He oversaw the prisoners raising vegetables and animals to feed and support themselves. Paivi remembers as a girl watching piglets being born.

Her parents went to church only at Christmas, she said, but she learned the Bible from Sunday School and at prison church services. Her family also hosted missionaries to the prison, and they explained Christianity to Paivi and her two younger siblings.

A skilled student, especially in mathematics, young Paivi read all the books in her tiny village library that was open only two hours per week, she said. An adult biography of Nobel Prize-winning Polish scientist Marie Curie particularly inspired Paivi: “I admired her. I thought that I would like to be like her, to do something great.”

At the University of Helsinki, she studied both mathematics and medicine for a half year, but it was too much. So Paivi decided to focus on medicine because “I wanted to work with people.”

Organizing up to 70 Christian students for five years of weekly door-to-door evangelism in university deepened her faith, Paivi told The Federalist: “It was a very important time for me because there were students from different faculties and I had to defend my views, and I had to know [the] Bible because they asked difficult questions.”

She met Niilo doing summer missionary work among immigrants in London, and they married in February 1985, a year after Paivi started working as a doctor. They welcomed their children in 1988, 1990, 1992, 1994, and 1996.

Because Paivi kept organizing debates and speakers about abortion among fellow medical students and doctors, the Christian Democrat political party asked her to run for office. The Christian Democrats are a small party that focuses on faith and family. From 2011 to 2015, Paivi served as Finland’s Minister of the Interior as part of a coalition government.

She Fights Like a Woman

Paivi has fought steadfastly not by disposition, but by compunction. She and Niilo chuckled quietly when noting that in university, she flatly refused all public speaking offers and leadership positions.

In person, the two Finns are true to type and their “Minnesota nice” American cousins: polite, soft-spoken, and deferential. In Chicago, Paivi and Niilo attempted for some 15 minutes to get the Uber app to work on their Finnish cell phones before they could be prevailed upon by this journalist to accept a ride.

She would have walked the mile to the conference, Paivi assured, as they had the day before, but that morning’s rain would bedraggle her hair and dress right before her speech. After a bit of emotional discomfort at allegedly imposing, followed by a quick, rain-unaffected arrival, Paivi laughed softly, expressed thanks, and commented that this would be a good anecdote for The Federalist profile.

Paivi Rasanen during audience Q&A in Chicago. Because English is a second language for Paivi, she was given the written questions in advance.

Although she’s a public figure who regularly appears on TV, including a variety show that dressed her in a bear costume to sing to her grandchildren (she showed photographic evidence), Paivi habitually asks for others’ thoughts rather than discussing her own. It’s yet another contradiction to women’s mag-celebrated attributes: expressing her femininity not only doesn’t abrade Paivi’s character, it complements it.

Paivi doesn’t assert herself as a “girl boss” who assumes masculine prosthetics, despite years of public leadership that could have taught her to do so. Her apparent emotional security in being the woman God made her bestows its own authority and charm.

Only Men and Women Fit Perfectly Together

That acceptance of one’s sex as a gift from God is also a foundation of the theological booklet that helped land Paivi in court indefinitely. Cultural Marxism foments a war between the sexes, but the Bible teaches that love means total self-giving: Husbands sacrifice everything to love their wives, and wives submit to their husbands as they do to God. The true war is not between the sexes, but against them, and in war clear chains of command are necessary to protect everyone.

The 1960s feminist war fomented between the sexes has now expanded into a war on sex itself. Now even recognizing the differences between men and women and the exclusive fertility of natural marriage is heading toward being criminalized across the West, and with it the Christianity that protects and celebrates these natural realities.

When she wrote the booklet, Paivi was already well-known as a Christian member of Parliament representing Hame, a rural Finnish province about an hour north of Helsinki. Pastor Juhana Pohjola, elected bishop of Finland’s non-state Lutheran church in 2021, had asked Rasanen to respond to proposals for government licensing of homosexual relationships. Here was a government endorsement of severing natural biological bonds between parents and children that raised both political and theological concerns.

Rasanen’s resulting 24-page booklet is a succinct summary of Christian sexual ethics. “People who submit themselves to God’s guidance in the Bible are repeatedly amazed at how the very Bible teachings hardest to understand contain God’s deep wisdoms,” Rasanen writes in the English translation.

“No choice of policies is ethically neutral,” she notes. “…In actuality, the acceptance of homosexual partnerships meant a more profound change in values than was willingly acknowledged at the time.” For example, she notes, in Finland, those proposing a homosexual partnerships act promised it would affect adults only. Yet immediately after the act passed, the proponents moved to make taxpayers pay for lesbians to be artificially inseminated and for homosexual couples to adopt children who could never know either a father or mother.

The act’s proponents also promised that Finland’s state church could maintain Christianity’s historic teachings if state recognition of homosexual couples passed. Paivi’s trial today, under a law passed seven years after the booklet was published, directly refutes that claim. It also highlights how impossible it is to reconcile the hard-won natural law framework that protects everyone equally with the identity politics that provides special rights to only government-favored groups.

Seeking an Internet Interdiction

Writing the booklet is one of three charges Toiviainen has filed against Paivi. It forms the sole count against Pohjola, the pastor who published the booklet. The two other counts against Paivi relate to her tweet of a Bible verse at the nominally Lutheran state church for sponsoring a homosexual pride parade and comments in a public radio debate she participated in years ago.

How can the #church ’s doctrinal foundation, the #bible, be compatible with the lifting up of shame and sin as a subject of #pride ?” #lgbt #helsinkipride2019
Finnish Christian MP under hate crime investigation for quoting scripture – Premier

In 2019, several Finns lodged complaints against Paivi’s tweet. Police investigated, interrogating Paivi about her beliefs three times. Although the police ultimately recommended against prosecuting Paivi, prosecutors sifted through her three-decade public record. They dug up the three alleged hate crimes and charged her.

The charges against Paivi fall under the legal category of “war crimes and crimes against humanity.” The prosecutors have asked for Paivi’s writings and audio clips to be completely banned from the internet and for her, Pohjola, and his church to be fined up to a third of their annual incomes, but courts could put Paivi in prison for up to six years if she’s found guilty. Pohjola could be imprisoned for up to two years.

During Paivi and Pohjola’s trial in early 2022, thousands of Finnish supporters gathered in Helsinki outside the court. Free speech supporters in other countries rallied at Finnish embassies. The American Family Research Council sent Pastor Andrew Brunson, whom Turkey detained for two years for preaching Christianity, to give Paivi a pledge of prayers from Christians around the world. U.S. members of Congress, international human rights groups, and coalitions of religious believers have also petitioned the Finnish government to stop prosecuting Rasanen and Pohjola’s human rights to free speech and religious exercise.

“It is important that we have the freedom of speech and freedom of religion,” Paivi told The Federalist in Chicago. “Freedom of speech because it is important for everyone. It is important for every minority and majority. For Christians, it is crucial because we have the commandments of Jesus to tell the good gospel to all people…”

“Also I think that it is important to respect in society also everyone’s right to speak and argue and oppose you,” she continued. “So this is [a] fundamental issue.”

For more on this case, read this profile of Bishop Pohjola, who spoke to The Federalist in person in November 2021.


Joy Pullmann is executive editor of The Federalist, a happy wife, and the mother of six children. Sign up here to get early access to her next ebook, “101 Strategies For Living Well Amid Inflation.” Her bestselling ebook is “Classic Books for Young Children.” Mrs. Pullmann identifies as native American and gender natural. She is also the author of “The Education Invasion: How Common Core Fights Parents for Control of American Kids,” from Encounter Books. In 2013-14 she won a Robert Novak journalism fellowship for in-depth reporting on Common Core national education mandates. Joy is a grateful graduate of the Hillsdale College honors and journalism programs.

Through Our Natural Rights, God Has Empowered Us to Protect Life and Liberty


waving flagBy David Boarman June 8, 2016

I had often wondered, when I read the Declaration of Independence, how to interpret the language. The vernacular is a couple hundred years old and can prove challenging. Even in the 1st and 2nd Amendments to the Constitution, the wording has been argued, interpreted and reinterpreted many times over the past decades. So, I sought to understand exactly what Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion and the right to keep and bear arms really meant.

In a previous article, I reviewed the 2nd paragraph of the Declaration of Independence wherein our inalienable rights are referenced. It had occurred to me that, regardless of vernacular, the Founding Fathers had at least one ideology upon which they agreed: that we are equally created beings. It followed then that they agreed on the fact that a Sovereign Creator had done the work and our design wasn’t simply left to the whims of Mother Nature, rather to Nature’s Creator.

Even Benjamin Franklin, a notorious womanizer and alleged Atheist, was well aware of, and respected, the believer’s need for God (though he did not see the purpose). I may even argue that, given Mr. Franklin’s analysis of God’s characteristics, he had an Agnostic-leaning view. Regardless, Benjamin Franklin agreed with the Declaration of Independence at least on the principles of its existence and certainly with the indictments laid against King George III.

What became obvious to me as I studied the Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights is that if any one of the documents were taken away, the others would lose a great deal of substance.

All three documents were and are necessary to: 1) give hope and purpose, 2) give structure to our nation and form of governance, and 3) ensure life and liberty would be safely guarded within these borders. But, I was still seeking the answer to, “what are our inalienable rights?” Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is simply too vague and I had yet to understand the purpose having rights in the first place.

I began to reconcile the Founding Documents with biblical principal. This was not an easy task either since I was looking for more than surface value. What is found in the Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights is not taken verbatim from the Bible. Nowhere in the Bible are we told, “You are granted these rights…”

It is a foregone conclusion that God would not have endowed different rights to certain individuals. I believe it would not be in His nature to create mankind with varying degrees of inequality. Since mankind is made in His image, I concluded there must be an inherent, created equality. The goal of my journey then was twofold:

  1. Enumerate a list of Natural Rights
  2. Discover the framework of equality

Back in January, 2015, I attended a Tea Party meeting. The agenda that night was a teaching on the Founding Documents with topics covering Separation of Church and State, Freedom of Religion, etc. Specifically, I recall the speaker mention that we could use the Ten Commandments to derive a list of rights. That made sense to some extent but left me with more questions than answers. And if I simply use “Thou shalt not steal” to derive the right to own property, then it becomes too easy for Atheists to call foul.

That said, and by now, the Ten Commandments are all but etched into my psyche. While all of the Commandments don’t directly equate to specific rights, they do provide clues. I went through a series of prayer, reading and research with each of the commandments. Whenever I had questions, the answers were scarce. It was almost as if I had questions that had never been asked, or those who answered tried to fake it. This mission was far too important to me to accept just any answer. Consequently, I often had only one source I could trust. Every time I sought God’s answer He would lead me onto another path of learning and discovery. Through every step, new knowledge built on top of previous knowledge.

In March, 2016, everything seemed to come together. All of the study, all of the research, it all came into focus. I had begun this journey knowing very little about rights, incapable of a definition or explaining what truly makes us equal, to understanding exactly what these Natural Rights are, why we have them and how we are equal. I remember asking in prayer, “What are our rights?” As usual, I was answered with a question, “Why do you have rights?” It was almost as if to say, “You need to know this first.”

So I asked. But before I could even finish uttering the words the answer was given, this time, straightforward and emphatic: “to protect and preserve life.” That’s it? So simple yet profound: We have been equally empowered by God with Natural Rights for the primary function of protecting and preserving life.

As it slowly sunk in, I saw the element of restraint God placed on Himself not to interfere with free will. In all honesty, I began to marvel at the elegance of simplicity as well as the ability to navigate very complex scenarios. There are 7 Natural Rights endowed to us. Within these rights we find the framework of equality and we find Life, Liberty and the ability to pursue Happiness. The Natural Rights empower every individual equally with the right to:

  1. Pursue the worship of God.
  2. A life unharmed by another.
  3. A livelihood.
  4. Own property.
  5. Convey thoughts, beliefs, ideals and motivations.
  6. Know truth.
  7. Choose not to assert any of the above.

After writing the Natural Rights down, it occurred to me that this list is agnostic to those differences that cannot be chosen at birth. This list works for everyone regardless of family, nationality, wealth or status. Instinctively, the biggest hurdle for non-Christians is the first, the right to pursue the worship of God. However, the Natural Rights insist that individuals who choose not to pursue the worship of God can do so without affecting any of the other rights or altering the inherent equality afforded by the framework.

The all important right is the last one. Essentially it is the Right of Free Will. If you choose to assert the 7th to choose not to pursue the worship of God, you are not outside this framework of equality. It is only when individuals take it upon themselves to lay claim to a ‘right’ where none exists that inequality begins creeping in. Equality insists that an equal and identical set of Natural Rights exist for all people.

Because we have been empowered by the Natural Rights to protect and preserve life, it then becomes our duty to do so. And, through the power of the 2nd Amendment, we have equal footing against tyrants, both foreign and domestic, to defend these Rights equally, righteously and justly, for all individuals regardless of religious affiliation. Only one so-called religion exists that, nearly point-for-point, denies the Natural Rights. Because of its doctrine, Islam is at complete odds with the Natural Rights. Fundamentally, this explains why Islamic doctrine is completely incompatible with the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: David Boarman

David Boarman

I am Christian, a husband and a father. Currently, we live in Oceanside, California (which is ironic in so many ways). We moved to San Diego in November, 2011 for a software engineering job. Beginning in November, 2014, I began a journey that has culminated in vast understanding of our natural, inalienable rights. I have converted a Facebook page (formerly for a bid as a presidential candidate). The FB page, Old Guard Federalists, is now about our rights – educate, learn and defend.

 

 

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Our Rights Come From God, Not the Government


waving flagBy David Boarman June 6, 2016

This is the first part in a series of articles where I take you, the reader, with me to reflect on a journey of discovery. I believe it will be just as enlightening for you as it was for me. This adventure became very personal as I dealt with opposition from neighbors, friends and family alike. But I also gained new friends in the process that believed the same as me, thus confirming as truth the foundation that was being laid. The resounding result is this: the truth I now hold is self-evident; that no Civil Right, Liberty or label ever supersedes my Natural Rights.

“What are Natural Rights?”

Natural rights are those rights endowed by our Sovereign Creator. ‘Natural’ meaning that these rights, unmodified, represent the natural equality we are born into – unaffected, unmodified by wealth, status or power – and agnostic of physiological differences which cannot be chosen at birth: gender, skin color or disability.

For all intents and purposes, I use the term Natural Rights synonymously with inalienable, or unalienable, rights. So, without further ado, let’s start with our Declaration of Independence…

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

As Americans we have heard these words on numerous occasions. If one were to ask, “what are your rights?” the answer may often be some form of “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” Some may answer, “the right to vote, to protest, to keep and bear arms.” But when we ask about rights, there are two contexts from which we can draw answers. But there is only one context from which the Declaration of Independence draws from to conclude that we are endowed with rights by our Creator.

Enumerating such things as voting and protest are civil in nature and are not part of the context. No, the Declaration of Independence is referring to our Natural Rights in a divine context. To understand the context, we must find answers to several questions. But if we really want to wrap our heads around the idea of separate contexts and the providence or domain of each – Natural and Civil – then we have to start at the beginning of the statement.

“We hold these truths to be self-evident,”

Truth, in and of itself is not always self evident. It is up to the receiver of information to make the distinction between fact and fiction, truth and deception. What the Founders believed to be self-evident is that truth does exist and, given a foundation in truth, one can find evidence and bring to bear all manner of knowledge and wisdom to reason against falsehoods.

As a matter for consideration, one must understand that the Founders recognized that truth does not change. Albert Einstein once commented on the fact that mathematics enjoys a particular place in the sciences because it is based purely on truth. No other science – biology, astronomy, chemistry, etc. – enjoys such a foundation in truth that math does. The sciences, as we know them, are only as accurate and as good as the knowledge we have today. With some breakthrough tomorrow, everything we know about any given science could change overnight. Mathematics simply does not change. 

“that all men are created equal,”

First, I hope that no one is taking offense to the fact that the masculine is used. Given the vernacular of the day (and throughout biblical writings), this was common and did not necessarily refer only to men. The point of the statement is two-fold: 1) all persons are created beings, and 2) all persons are equal. “Okay,” you say, “I know we are equal. What’s your point?”

The point is, given that we are ‘created equal’, there must be some form or framework by which we can measure that equality. This is where it starts to get interesting, though. If I ask, “what is equality?”, most actually have a difficult time explaining in a few words what it means that ‘all persons are created equal’. We can look at a math equation – e.g. 3 + 4 = 2 + 5 – and see that the ‘=’ is there to state a factual balance between the left and right. In effect the equation states a truth: 3 plus 4 was, is and always will be equal to 2 plus 5.

When it comes to people, though, answers get a lot fuzzier. Ideology of gender, skin color, disability, religion and other characteristics are undoubtedly discussed. In reality, we need to be able to discover a framework that is completely agnostic and independent of those features. This ‘equality framework’ must be able to supply all persons with exactly the same tools regardless of physiological differences – those characteristics that a person cannot choose at birth.

“that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,”

This phrase could be broken up even further to drive home certain points. But we have discussed enough to understand that if people are created, then there is a Creator – One who is above all and exists outside of time, space and matter; a Sovereign source of Wisdom and intelligent design. Aside from that, the truly complex part of the phrase is regarding unalienable rights. What does that mean?

Because these ‘certain rights’ are endowed by a Power higher than man, no man has the power to remove, restrict or modify them. We cannot be separated from these rights. No Civil Right, Liberty or label has the power to restrict or override any of our Natural Rights. And because these rights are endowed by a never-changing Creator, the Natural Rights are never changing.

“that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

When I began studying to find out what our Natural Rights actually are, this phrase gave little help. We say, “of course, I have the right to live.” But then what does it mean to have the right of liberty? And exactly how does this mean I have the right to pursue happiness? Seems somewhat open and ambiguous, especially given the context of what many consider to be ‘happiness’ today.

The Founders hit the nail on the head in one regard with the word ‘Life’. This is what being human is all about – having an abundant, free and happy life. While we are challenged at times with financial issues, physical ailments, difficulty finding work or other hurdles, we can still find happiness through the assertion of our Natural Rights, or liberties. But an ‘equality framework’ could not exist just to provide for happiness and it certainly isn’t there so we can compare ourselves to others.

Our Natural Rights exist for two purposes:

1) to provide a framework within which all persons are equally empowered, and

2) to protect and preserve life.

When any right is claimed, it must measure up to these two principles. For any equality framework to exist, it must do so in such a way that it is unchangeable regardless of physiological differences.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

David Boarman

David Boarman

I am Christian, a husband and a father. Currently, we live in Oceanside, California (which is ironic in so many ways). We moved to San Diego in November, 2011 for a software engineering job. Beginning in November, 2014, I began a journey that has culminated in vast understanding of our natural, inalienable rights. I have converted a Facebook page (formerly for a bid as a presidential candidate). The FB page, Old Guard Federalists, is now about our rights – educate, learn and defend.

Picture1 true battle Picture1 In God We Trust freedom combo 2

Tag Cloud